--- namespace: aiwg name: project-health-check platforms: [all] description: Analyze overall project health and metrics commandHint: allowedTools: Bash(git *), Bash(gh *), Bash(npm *) category: project-task-management --- # Project Health Check Analyze overall project health and metrics ## Instructions 1. **Health Check Initialization** - Verify tool connections (Linear, GitHub) - Define evaluation period (default: last 30 days) - Set health check criteria and thresholds - Identify key metrics to evaluate 2. **Multi-Dimensional Analysis** #### Code Health Metrics ```bash # Code churn analysis git log --format=format: --name-only --since="30 days ago" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rg # Contributor activity git shortlog -sn --since="30 days ago" # Branch health git for-each-ref --format='%(refname:short) %(committerdate:relative)' refs/heads/ | grep -E "(months|years) ago" # File complexity (if cloc available) cloc . --json --exclude-dir=node_modules,dist,build # Test coverage trends npm test -- --coverage --json ``` #### Dependency Health ```bash # Check for outdated dependencies npm outdated --json # Security vulnerabilities npm audit --json # License compliance npx license-checker --json ``` #### Linear/Task Management Health ``` 1. Sprint velocity trends 2. Cycle time analysis 3. Blocked task duration 4. Backlog growth rate 5. Bug vs feature ratio 6. Task completion predictability ``` #### Team Health Indicators ``` 1. PR review turnaround time 2. Commit frequency distribution 3. Work distribution balance 4. On-call incident frequency 5. Documentation updates ``` 3. **Health Report Generation** ```markdown # Project Health Report - [Project Name] Generated: [Date] ## Executive Summary Overall Health Score: [Score]/100 [๐ŸŸข Healthy | ๐ŸŸก Needs Attention | ๐Ÿ”ด Critical] ### Key Findings - โœ… Strengths: [Top 3 positive indicators] - โš ๏ธ Concerns: [Top 3 areas needing attention] - ๐Ÿšจ Critical Issues: [Immediate action items] ## Detailed Health Metrics 1. **Delivery Health** (Score: [X]/100) | Metric | Current | Target | Status | |--------|---------|--------|--------| | Sprint Velocity | [X] pts | [Y] pts | ๐ŸŸข | | On-time Delivery | [X]% | 90% | ๐ŸŸก | | Cycle Time | [X] days | [Y] days | ๐ŸŸข | | Defect Rate | [X]% | <5% | ๐Ÿ”ด | 2. **Code Quality** (Score: [X]/100) | Metric | Current | Target | Status | |--------|---------|--------|--------| | Test Coverage | [X]% | 80% | ๐ŸŸก | | Code Duplication | [X]% | <3% | ๐ŸŸข | | Complexity Score | [X] | <10 | ๐ŸŸก | | Security Issues | [X] | 0 | ๐Ÿ”ด | 3. **Technical Debt** (Score: [X]/100) - ๐Ÿ“Š Total Debt Items: [Count] - ๐Ÿ“ˆ Debt Growth Rate: [+/-X% per sprint] - โฑ๏ธ Estimated Debt Work: [X days] - ๐Ÿ’ฐ Debt Impact: [Description] 4. **Team Health** (Score: [X]/100) | Metric | Current | Target | Status | |--------|---------|--------|--------| | PR Review Time | [X] hrs | <4 hrs | ๐ŸŸข | | Knowledge Silos | [X] | 0 | ๐ŸŸก | | Work Balance | [Score] | >0.8 | ๐ŸŸข | | Burnout Risk | [Level] | Low | ๐ŸŸก | 5. **Dependency Health** (Score: [X]/100) - ๐Ÿ”„ Outdated Dependencies: [X]/[Total] - ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Security Vulnerabilities: [Critical: X, High: Y] - ๐Ÿ“œ License Issues: [Count] - ๐Ÿ”— External Service Health: [Status] ## Trend Analysis ### Velocity Trend (Last 6 Sprints) ``` Sprint 1: โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ 40 pts Sprint 2: โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ 45 pts Sprint 3: โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ 50 pts Sprint 4: โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ 45 pts Sprint 5: โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ 38 pts Sprint 6: โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ 35 pts โš ๏ธ Declining ``` ### Bug Discovery Rate ``` Week 1: โ–ˆโ–ˆ 2 bugs Week 2: โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ 4 bugs Week 3: โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ 6 bugs โš ๏ธ Increasing Week 4: โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ 8 bugs ๐Ÿšจ Action needed ``` ## Risk Assessment ### High Priority Risks 1. **Declining Velocity** - Impact: High - Likelihood: Confirmed - Mitigation: Review sprint planning process 2. **Security Vulnerabilities** - Impact: Critical - Count: [X] high, [Y] medium - Action: Immediate patching required 3. **Knowledge Concentration** - Impact: Medium - Bus Factor: 2 - Action: Implement pairing/documentation ## Actionable Recommendations ### Immediate Actions (This Week) 1. ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ **Security**: Update [package] to fix critical vulnerability 2. ๐Ÿ› **Quality**: Address top 3 bug-prone modules 3. ๐Ÿ‘ฅ **Team**: Schedule knowledge transfer for [critical component] ### Short-term Improvements (This Sprint) 1. ๐Ÿ“ˆ **Velocity**: Reduce scope to sustainable level 2. ๐Ÿงช **Testing**: Increase coverage in [module] to 80% 3. ๐Ÿ“š **Documentation**: Update outdated docs for [feature] ### Long-term Initiatives (This Quarter) 1. ๐Ÿ—๏ธ **Architecture**: Refactor [component] to reduce complexity 2. ๐Ÿ”„ **Process**: Implement automated dependency updates 3. ๐Ÿ“Š **Metrics**: Set up continuous health monitoring ## Comparison with Previous Health Check | Category | Last Check | Current | Trend | |----------|------------|---------|-------| | Overall Score | 72/100 | 68/100 | โ†“ -4 | | Delivery | 80/100 | 75/100 | โ†“ -5 | | Code Quality | 70/100 | 72/100 | โ†‘ +2 | | Technical Debt | 65/100 | 60/100 | โ†“ -5 | | Team Health | 75/100 | 70/100 | โ†“ -5 | ``` 4. **Interactive Deep Dives** Offer focused analysis options: ``` "Based on the health check, would you like to: 1. Deep dive into declining velocity trends 2. Generate security vulnerability fix plan 3. Analyze technical debt hotspots 4. Create team workload rebalancing plan 5. Set up automated health monitoring" ``` ## Error Handling ### Missing Linear Connection ``` "Linear MCP not connected. Health check will be limited to: - Git/GitHub metrics only - No sprint velocity or task metrics - Manual input required for team data To enable full health analysis: 1. Install Linear MCP server 2. Configure with API credentials 3. Re-run health check" ``` ### Incomplete Data ``` "Some metrics could not be calculated: - [List missing metrics] - [Explain impact on analysis] Would you like to: 1. Proceed with available data 2. Manually provide missing information 3. Skip incomplete sections" ``` ## Customization Options ### Threshold Configuration ```yaml # health-check-config.yml thresholds: velocity_variance: 20 # Acceptable % variance test_coverage: 80 # Minimum coverage % pr_review_time: 4 # Maximum hours bug_rate: 5 # Maximum % of work dependency_age: 90 # Days before "outdated" ``` ### Custom Health Metrics Allow users to define additional metrics: ``` "Add custom health metric: - Name: Customer Satisfaction - Data Source: [API/Manual/File] - Target Value: [>4.5/5] - Weight: [Impact on overall score]" ``` ## Export Options 1. **Executive Summary** (PDF/Markdown) 2. **Detailed Report** (HTML with charts) 3. **Raw Metrics** (JSON/CSV) 4. **Action Items** (Linear tasks/GitHub issues) 5. **Monitoring Dashboard** (Grafana/Datadog format) ## Automation Suggestions ``` "Would you like me to: 1. Schedule weekly health checks 2. Set up alerts for critical metrics 3. Create Linear tasks for action items 4. Generate PR templates with health criteria 5. Configure CI/CD health gates" ``` ## Best Practices 1. **Regular Cadence**: Run health checks weekly/bi-weekly 2. **Track Trends**: Compare with historical data 3. **Action-Oriented**: Focus on fixable issues 4. **Team Involvement**: Share results transparently 5. **Continuous Improvement**: Refine metrics based on outcomes ## References - @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/addons/aiwg-utils/rules/research-before-decision.md โ€” Collect and analyze actual metrics before scoring; do not estimate health from assumptions - @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/addons/aiwg-utils/rules/vague-discretion.md โ€” Health thresholds must be numeric (e.g., test coverage โ‰ฅ 80%); never "good enough" conditions - @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/addons/aiwg-utils/skills/project-status/SKILL.md โ€” Provides SDLC artifact-based status; this skill provides code and team metrics - @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/security-audit/SKILL.md โ€” Security metrics feed directly into this skill's health score calculation - @$AIWG_ROOT/agentic/code/frameworks/sdlc-complete/skills/codebase-health/SKILL.md โ€” Code structure metrics complement the project-level metrics produced here