# Introduction Buttercup is a behavior-driven development framework for testing Emacs Lisp code. It does not depend on any other Emacs Lisp libraries. It has a clean, obvious syntax so that you can easily write tests. It is heavily inspired by [Jasmine](https://jasmine.github.io/). So heavily inspired, in fact, that most of this page is more or less a verbatim copy of the [Jasmine introduction](https://jasmine.github.io/edge/introduction.html). All code in this file can be run by Buttercup’s built-in markdown test runner. Just use `make test` in the project directory to see the output. ## Suites: `describe` Your Tests A test suite begins with a call to the Buttercup macro `describe` with the first parameter describing the suite and the rest being the body of code that implements the suite. Note that `lexical-binding: t` is **required** in files defining buttercup tests. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A suite" (it "contains a spec with an expectation" (expect t :to-be t))) ``` ## Specs Specs are defined by calling the Buttercup macro `it`, which, like `describe` takes a string and code. The string is the title of the spec and the code is the spec, or test. A spec contains one or more expectations that test the state of the code. An expectation in Buttercup is an assertion that is either true or false. A spec with all true expectations is a passing spec. A spec with one or more false expectations is a failing spec. ### It’s Just Functions The code arguments to `describe` and `it` is just turned into functions internally, so they can contain any executable code necessary to implement the rules. Emacs Lisp scoping rules apply, so make sure to define your spec file to be lexically scoped. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A suite is just a function" :var (a) (it "and so is a spec" (setq a t) (expect a :to-be t))) ``` ## Expectations Expectations are expressed with the `expect` function. Its first argument is the actual value. The second argument is a test, followed by expected values for the test to compare the actual value against. If there is no test, the argument is simply tested for being non-nil. This can be used by people who dislike the matcher syntax. ### Matchers Each matcher implements a boolean comparison between the actual value and the expected value. It is responsible for reporting to Buttercup if the expectation is true or false. Buttercup will then pass or fail the spec. Any matcher can evaluate to a negative assertion by prepending it with the `:not` matcher. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "The :to-be matcher compares with `eq'" (it "and has a positive case" (expect t :to-be t)) (it "and can have a negative case" (expect nil :not :to-be t))) ``` ### Included Matchers Buttercup has a rich set of matchers included. Each is used here — all expectations and specs pass. There is also the ability to write custom matchers (see the `buttercup-define-matcher` macro for further information) for when a project’s domain calls for specific assertions that are not included below. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "Included matchers:" (it "The :to-be matcher compares with `eq'" (let* ((a 12) (b a)) (expect a :to-be b) (expect a :not :to-be nil))) (describe "The :to-equal matcher" (it "works for simple literals and variables" (let ((a 12)) (expect a :to-equal 12))) (it "should work for compound objects" (let ((foo '((a . 12) (b . 34))) (bar '((a . 12) (b . 34)))) (expect foo :to-equal bar)))) (it "The :to-have-same-items-as matcher compares two lists as sets" (let ((first (list "a" "b" "c")) (second (list "c" "a" "b")) (third (list "a" "c" "d")) (fourth (list "a" "b"))) (expect first :to-have-same-items-as second) (expect second :to-have-same-items-as first) (expect first :not :to-have-same-items-as third) (expect third :not :to-have-same-items-as second) (expect first :not :to-have-same-items-as fourth) (expect fourth :not :to-have-same-items-as first))) (it "The :to-match matcher is for regular expressions" (let ((message "foo bar baz")) (expect message :to-match "bar") (expect message :to-match (rx "bar")) (expect message :not :to-match "quux"))) (it "The :to-be-truthy matcher is for boolean casting testing" (let (a (foo "foo")) (expect foo :to-be-truthy) (expect a :not :to-be-truthy))) (it "The :to-contain matcher is for finding an item in a list" (let ((a '("foo" "bar" "baz"))) (expect a :to-contain "bar") (expect a :not :to-contain "quux"))) (it "The :to-be-less-than matcher is for mathematical comparisons" (let ((pi 3.1415926) (e 2.78)) (expect e :to-be-less-than pi) (expect pi :not :to-be-less-than e))) (it "The :to-be-greater-than matcher is for mathematical comparisons" (let ((pi 3.1415926) (e 2.78)) (expect pi :to-be-greater-than e) (expect e :not :to-be-greater-than pi))) (it "The :to-be-close-to matcher is for precision math comparison" (let ((pi 3.1415926) (e 2.78)) (expect pi :not :to-be-close-to e 2) (expect pi :to-be-close-to e 0))) (describe "The :to-throw matcher" (it "is for testing if an expression throws an exception" (expect (+ 1 2) :not :to-throw) (expect (+ a 1) :to-throw)) (it "accepts a symbol to check for the signal thrown" (expect (/ 1 0) :not :to-throw 'void-variable) (expect (+ a 1) :to-throw 'void-variable)) (it "optionally matches arguments to signals" (expect (+ a 1) :not :to-throw 'void-variable '(b)) (expect (+ a 1) :to-throw 'void-variable '(a))) (it "matches inherited signals" (expect (signal 'overflow-error nil) :to-throw 'overflow-error) (expect (signal 'overflow-error nil) :to-throw 'arith-error) (expect (signal 'overflow-error nil) :to-throw 'error) (expect (signal 'arith-error nil) :not :to-throw 'overflow-error) (expect (signal 'arith-error nil) :to-throw 'arith-error) (expect (signal 'arith-error nil) :to-throw 'error)))) ``` If you are migrating from ERT, you can also use `should` and similar macros inside a buttercup test just like you would inside an `ert-deftest` form. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (require 'ert) (describe "ERT support" (it "allows you to use ERT macros in tests" (let* ((a 12) (b a)) (should (= a b)) (should-not (eq a nil)) (should-error (error "Throws an error"))))) ``` ## Grouping Related Specs with `describe` The `describe` macro is for grouping related specs. The string parameter is for naming the collection of specs, and will be concatenated with specs to make a spec’s full name. This aids in finding specs in a large suite. If you name them well, your specs read as full sentences in traditional [BDD](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavior-driven_development) style. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spec" (it "is just a function, so it can contain any code" (let ((foo 0)) (setq foo (1+ foo)) (expect foo :to-equal 1))) (it "can have more than one expectation" (let ((foo 0)) (setq foo (1+ foo)) (expect foo :to-equal 1) (expect t :to-equal t)))) ``` ### Declaring Variables The `describe` macro supports the optional `:var` and `:var*` args. These bind variables for the suite by passing them as a varlist to the `let` and `let*` form respectively. Only one instance of `:var` or `:var*` is allowed, and it must come first in the `describe` form. It can not be interspersed between `it` statements. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spec using :VAR" :var ((foo 1)) (it "has access to the variables bound in :VAR" (expect foo :to-be 1))) (describe "A spec using :VAR*" :var* ((foo 1) (bar (1+ foo))) (it "has access to the variables bound in :VAR* which can refer \ to symbols already bound" (expect bar :to-be 2))) ``` It's important to note that `lexical-binding` must be `non-nil` for `:var` and `:var*` to work properly. Within a test file this is usually set using a local file variable. Using `:var` and `:var*` works just like the `let` equivalents, but it's recommended to use the `:var` format to be future proof. Future internal changes in `buttercup` could break suites using `let`. ### Setup and Teardown To help a test suite DRY up any duplicated setup and teardown code, Buttercup provides the `before-each`, `after-each`, `before-all` and `after-all` special forms. As the name implies, code blocks defined with `before-each` are called once before each spec in the `describe` is run, and the `after-each` code blocks are called once after each spec. Here is the same set of specs written a little differently. The variable under test is defined at the top-level scope — the `describe` block — and initialization code is moved into a `before-each` block. The `after-each` block resets the variable before continuing. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spec using `before-each' and `after-each'" :var (foo) (before-each (when (not foo) (setq foo 0)) (setq foo (1+ foo))) (after-each (setq foo 0)) (it "is just a function, so it can contain any code" (expect foo :to-equal 1)) (it "can have more than one expectation" (expect foo :to-equal 1) (expect t :to-equal t))) ``` The `before-all` form is called only once before all the specs in `describe` are run, and the `after-all` form is called after all specs finish. These functions can be used to speed up test suites with expensive setup and teardown. However, be careful using `before-all` and `after-all`! Since they are not reset between specs, it is easy to accidentally leak state between your specs so that they erroneously pass or fail. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spec using `before-all' and `after-all'" :var (foo) (before-all (setq foo 1)) (after-all (setq foo 0)) (it "sets the initial value of foo before specs run" (expect foo :to-equal 1) (setq foo (1+ foo))) (it "does not reset foo between specs" (expect foo :to-equal 2))) ``` ### Nesting `describe` Blocks Calls to `describe` can be nested, with specs defined at any level. This allows a suite to be composed as a tree of functions. Before a spec is executed, Buttercup walks down the tree executing each `before-each` function in order. After the spec is executed, Buttercup walks through the `after-each` functions similarly. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spec" :var (foo) (before-each (setq foo 0) (setq foo (1+ foo))) (after-each (setq foo 0)) (it "is just a function, so it can contain any code" (expect foo :to-equal 1)) (it "can have more than one expectation" (expect foo :to-equal 1) (expect t :to-equal t)) (describe "nested inside a second describe" (let (bar) (before-each (setq bar 1)) (it "can reference both scopes as needed" (expect foo :to-equal bar))))) ``` ## Disabling Suites Suites and specs can be disabled by marking them as pending with the `xdescribe` and `xit` macros, respectively. Any suites or specs inside a `xdescribe' suite is also pending. Pending suites and specs will be listed as pending in the results, but the containing code will not be run. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (xdescribe "A spec" :var (foo) (before-each (setq foo 0) (setq foo (1+ foo))) (it "is just a function, so it can contain any code" (expect foo :to-equal 1))) ``` ## Pending Specs Pending specs do not run, but will be listed in the results. Any spec declared with `xit` is marked as pending. Any spec declared without a function body will also be marked as pending in results. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "Pending specs" (xit "can be declared using `xit'" (expect t :to-be nil)) (it "can be declared with `it' but without a body")) ``` ## Conditionally Skipping Specs Use the `assume` macro to conditionally skip a spec. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "Conditionally skip specs" (it "with the `assume' macro" (assume (fboundp 'new-function) "`new-function' not availeble") (expect (new-function)))) ``` If the first argument to `assume` evals to nil, the spec will be marked as pending, and the second arg `message` will be added to the output. ## Spies Buttercup has test double functions called spies. While other frameworks call these mocks and similar, we call them spies, because their main job is to spy in on function calls. Also, Jasmine calls them spies, and so do we. A spy can stub any function - whether it already exists or not - and tracks calls to it and all arguments. Spies may only be created in `before-each` or `it` blocks. Spies are removed and all counters reset after each spec and its `after-each` blocks have completed. There are special matchers for interacting with spies. The `:to-have-been-called` matcher will return true if the spy was called at all. The `:to-have-been-called-with` matcher will return true if the argument list matches any of the recorded calls to the spy. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spy" :var (foo bar) (before-each (setf (symbol-function 'foo) (lambda (value) (setq bar value))) (spy-on 'foo) (foo 123) (foo 456 "another param")) (it "tracks that the spy was called" (expect 'foo :to-have-been-called) (foo 789)) (it "resets tracking after each spec" (expect 'foo :not :to-have-been-called-with 789)) (describe "that is defined in a nested `describe'" (before-each (spy-on 'foo :and-return-value 1)) (it "will override any outer spy" (expect (foo 789) :to-equal 1) (expect 'foo :not :to-have-been-called-with 123))) (it "will not be active outside it's scope" (expect (foo 789) :to-equal nil)) (it "tracks all arguments of its calls" (expect 'foo :to-have-been-called-with 123) (expect 'foo :to-have-been-called-with 456 "another param")) (it "stops all execution on a function" (expect bar :to-be nil))) ``` The `:to-have-been-called-times` matcher will return true if the spy was called a certain number of times. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spy" :var (foo bar) (before-each (setf (symbol-function 'foo) (lambda (value) (setq bar value))) (spy-on 'foo) (foo 123) (foo 456 "another param")) (it "tracks that the spy was called twice" (expect 'foo :to-have-been-called-times 2))) ``` ### Spies: `:and-call-through` The keyword argument `:and-call-through` to `spy-on` will make the spy call the original function instead of returning `nil`. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spy, when configured to call through" :var (bar set-bar get-bar fetched-bar) (before-each (fset 'set-bar (lambda (val) (setq bar val))) (fset 'get-bar (lambda () bar)) (spy-on 'get-bar :and-call-through) (set-bar 123) (setq fetched-bar (get-bar))) (it "tracks that the spy was called" (expect 'get-bar :to-have-been-called)) (it "should not affect other functions" (expect bar :to-equal 123)) (it "when called returns the requested value" (expect fetched-bar :to-equal 123))) ``` ### Spies: `:and-return-value` The keyword argument `:and-return-value` specifies the value the spied-on function should return. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spy, when configured to fake a return value" :var (bar set-bar get-bar fetched-bar) (before-each (fset 'set-bar (lambda (val) (setq bar val))) (fset 'get-bar (lambda () bar)) (spy-on 'get-bar :and-return-value 745) (set-bar 123) (setq fetched-bar (get-bar))) (it "tracks that the spy was called" (expect 'get-bar :to-have-been-called)) (it "should not affect other functions" (expect bar :to-equal 123)) (it "when called returns the requested value" (expect fetched-bar :to-equal 745))) ``` ### Spies: `:and-call-fake` The keyword argument `:and-call-fake` delegates calls to a supplied function. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spy, when configured with an alternate implementation" :var (bar set-bar get-bar fetched-bar) (before-each (fset 'set-bar (lambda (val) (setq bar val))) (fset 'get-bar (lambda () bar)) (spy-on 'get-bar :and-call-fake (lambda () 1001)) (set-bar 123) (setq fetched-bar (get-bar))) (it "tracks that the spy was called" (expect 'get-bar :to-have-been-called)) (it "should not affect other functions" (expect bar :to-equal 123)) (it "when called returns the requested value" (expect fetched-bar :to-equal 1001))) ``` ### Spies: `:and-throw-error` With the keyword argument `:and-throw-error`, all calls to the spy will `signal` the specified value as an error. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spy, when configured to throw an error" :var (bar set-bar get-bar fetched-bar) (before-each (fset 'set-bar (lambda (val) (setq bar val))) (fset 'get-bar (lambda () bar)) (spy-on 'get-bar :and-throw-error 'error)) (it "throws the error" (expect (get-bar) :to-throw 'error))) ``` ### Other tracking properties Every call to a spy is tracked and exposed using the `spy-calls` accessor. This tracks both successful calls and calls that throw errors. `spy-calls-any` returns `nil` if the spy has not been called at all, and then `t` once at least one call happens. `spy-calls-count` returns the number of times the spy was called. `spy-calls-args-for` returns the arguments passed to a given call (by index). `spy-calls-all-args` returns the arguments to all calls. `spy-calls-all` returns the context (current buffer, arguments passed and return status) of all calls. `spy-calls-most-recent` returns the context of the most recent call. `spy-calls-first` returns the context for the first call. Contexts are represented by instances of the `spy-context` struct with the slots `args`, `current-buffer`, `return-value` and `thrown-signal`. The `return-value` and `thrown-signal` slots represent the return status. Calling `spy-context-return-value` for a context representing a raised signal (or vice versa) will raise an error. Test the context type with `spy-context-return-p` and `spy-context-thrown-p`. Finally, `spy-calls-reset` clears all tracking for a spy. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A spy" :var (set-foo foo) (before-each (fset 'set-foo (lambda (val &rest ignored) (setq foo val))) (spy-on 'set-foo)) (it "tracks if it was called at all" (expect (spy-calls-any 'set-foo) :to-equal nil) (set-foo 5) (expect (spy-calls-any 'set-foo) :to-equal t)) (it "tracks the number of times it was called" (expect (spy-calls-count 'set-foo) :to-equal 0) (set-foo 2) (set-foo 3) (expect (spy-calls-count 'set-foo) :to-equal 2)) (it "tracks the arguments of each call" (set-foo 123) (set-foo 456 "baz") (expect (spy-calls-args-for 'set-foo 0) :to-equal '(123)) (expect (spy-calls-args-for 'set-foo 1) :to-equal '(456 "baz"))) (it "tracks the arguments of all calls" (set-foo 123) (set-foo 456 "baz") (expect (spy-calls-all-args 'set-foo) :to-equal '((123) (456 "baz")))) (it "can provide the context and arguments to all calls" (set-foo 123) (expect (spy-calls-all 'set-foo) :to-equal `(,(make-spy-context :current-buffer (current-buffer) :args '(123))))) (it "has a shortcut to the most recent call" (set-foo 123) (set-foo 456 "baz") (expect (spy-calls-most-recent 'set-foo) :to-equal (make-spy-context :current-buffer (current-buffer) :args '(456 "baz")))) (it "has a shortcut to the first call" (set-foo 123) (set-foo 456 "baz") (expect (spy-calls-first 'set-foo) :to-equal (make-spy-context :current-buffer (current-buffer) :args '(123)))) (it "tracks the return values and error signals of each call" ;; Set up `set-foo' so that it can either return a value or throw ;; an error (spy-on 'set-foo :and-call-fake (lambda (val &rest ignored) (if (>= val 0) val (error "Value must not be negative")))) (expect (set-foo 1) :to-be 1) (expect (set-foo -1) :to-throw 'error) (expect (spy-context-return-p (spy-calls-first 'set-foo))) (expect (spy-context-return-value (spy-calls-first 'set-foo)) :to-be 1) ;; Trying to get the thrown signal from a call that didn't throw a ;; signal is an error (expect (spy-context-thrown-signal (spy-calls-first 'set-foo)) :to-throw) (expect (spy-context-thrown-p (spy-calls-most-recent 'set-foo))) (expect (spy-context-thrown-signal (spy-calls-most-recent 'set-foo)) :to-equal '(error "Value must not be negative")) ;; Trying to get the return value from a call that threw a signal ;; raises an error (expect (spy-context-return-value (spy-calls-most-recent 'set-foo)) :to-throw) ;; Use :return-value and :thrown-signal to create matching spy-contexts (expect (spy-calls-all 'set-foo) :to-equal (list (make-spy-context :args '(1) :current-buffer (current-buffer) :return-value 1) (make-spy-context :args '(-1) :current-buffer (current-buffer) :thrown-signal '(error "Value must not be negative"))))) (it "counts the number of successful and failed calls" ;; Set up `set-foo' so that it can either return a value or throw ;; an error (spy-on 'set-foo :and-call-fake (lambda (val &rest ignored) (if (>= val 0) val (error "Value must not be negative")))) (expect (set-foo 1) :to-be 1) (expect (set-foo 2) :to-be 2) (expect (set-foo 3) :to-be 3) (expect (set-foo -1) :to-throw 'error) (expect (set-foo -2) :to-throw 'error) (expect (set-foo -3) :to-throw 'error) (expect (set-foo -4) :to-throw 'error) (expect (spy-calls-count 'set-foo) :to-be 7) (expect (spy-calls-count-returned 'set-foo) :to-be 3) (expect (spy-calls-count-errors 'set-foo) :to-be 4)) (it "can be reset" (set-foo 123) (set-foo 456 "baz") (expect (spy-calls-any 'set-foo) :to-be t) (spy-calls-reset 'set-foo) (expect (spy-calls-any 'set-foo) :to-be nil))) ``` ## Warnings in tests By default, Buttercup captures any warning emitted during a test and displays them all after the test completes in order to keep the output readable. If you need to suppress this (for example if your test deals with the warnings itself), you can use the macro `buttercup-suppress-warning-capture`, which works like `progn` but suppresses Buttercup's warning capturing within the body. ```Emacs-Lisp ;;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*- (describe "A test" (it "can issue warnings while running" (display-warning 'buttercup "This warning should be visible after the test report.") (expect (+ 2 2) :to-equal 4)) (it "can capture its own warnings as part of the test" (buttercup-suppress-warning-capture (let ((warning-text (format "This warning, issued at %s should be sent to the *Warnings* buffer as normal." (current-time-string)))) (display-warning 'buttercup warning-text) (expect (with-current-buffer "*Warnings*" (buffer-string)) :to-match (regexp-quote warning-text)))))) ```