---
id: ins_interviewing-information-gathering-exercise-how
operator: Varun Anand
operator_role: 'Co-Founder @ Clay'
source_url: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7406238203810078720/
source_type: thread
source_title: 'I want to give every startup founder permission to hire candidates based off vibes'
source_date: 2026-04-10
captured_date: 2026-05-02
domain: [growth, customer-success, hiring]
lifecycle: [retention, hiring-team-design]
maturity: applied
artifact_class: framework
score: { originality: 3, specificity: 4, evidence: 2, transferability: 4, source: 4 }
tier: B
related: []
raw_ref: raw/linkedin/reactions/linkedin-reactions-2026-04-10.md
---

# Interviewing is an information gathering exercise, and how a candidate makes you feel (
## Claim
I want to give every startup founder permission to hire candidates based off vibes. But I'm going to give you the vocabulary to feel better about it. Leaders resist "vibes hiring" because it sounds lazy. Like you're not doing due diligence.

## Mechanism
Leaders resist "vibes hiring" because it sounds lazy. Like you're not doing due diligence. People don't love feelings-based decisions and revert to only what the evidence says. But recruiting is a human game and humans have feelings. That's why you must incorporate how someone makes you feel in the decision.

## Conditions
Holds when: the operating context matches the post's stated frame (team shape, stage, tooling, buyer type).
Fails when: the practice is lifted into a different stage or buyer context without reworking the underlying mechanism.

## Evidence
> "Interviewing is an information gathering exercise, and how a candidate makes you feel (The Vibes) is as important as their take home assessment, behavioral interview and specific competencies."

· Varun Anand, LinkedIn, 2026-04-10

## Signals
- The team observes the pattern repeating across multiple cycles before naming it.
- Practitioners stop questioning the discipline once results compound.
- Skipping the step shows up as friction within one or two iterations.

## Counter-evidence
No opposing view in current corpus.

## Cross-references
- (none in current corpus)