--- id: ins_seasons-not-roadmaps operator: Asha Sharma operator_role: CVP, Microsoft AI Platform source_url: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/how-80000-companies-build-with-ai-asha-sharma source_type: podcast source_title: Asha Sharma — Product as organism, post-training, agentic society — Lenny's Podcast source_date: 2026-04-28 captured_date: 2026-05-01 domain: [product, ai-native, leadership] lifecycle: [strategy-bets, process-cadence] maturity: frontier artifact_class: framework score: { originality: 4, specificity: 4, evidence: 3, transferability: 5, source: 5 } tier: B related: [ins_product-as-organism] raw_ref: raw/podcasts/asha-sharma--product-as-organism--2026-04-28.md --- # Plan in seasons keyed to secular changes, not 6-month roadmaps ## Claim Six-month roadmaps die on contact with model launches. Replace them with seasons, periods defined by a set of secular changes (e.g., "season of agents," "season of reasoning models"). Seasons can last 3 to 12 months depending on capability waves. Within a season, set 4–6 week goals that ladder up; reserve slack for the slope. ## Mechanism A traditional roadmap commits the team to a fixed plan for a fixed duration. AI capability shifts invalidate that plan mid-quarter. Seasons commit instead to a *thesis* about the current wave, what's changing, what customer problems matter now, what winning looks like. Tactics underneath are revisable; the thesis is the stable artifact. The team gets shared orientation without locked-in deliverables. ## Conditions Holds when: - Leadership is comfortable with looser commitment language at the top of the planning hierarchy. - The team can articulate the season thesis clearly enough that 4-6 week goals roll up to it. Fails when: - The org is scaled and dependencies (legal, finance, sales) require firm dates. Seasons feel like cop-outs to those audiences. - The thesis is vacuous ("season of growth"). Without a substantive secular-change identification, seasons devolve into theatre. ## Evidence > "How does anyone plan a roadmap when GPT-5 just came out? We think about it as: what season are we in? Season one was prototyping. Then models and reasoning. Now agents. A season is denoted by a set of secular changes. Can last 6 months, 3 months, a year. We ground everyone on: what changes are we in? What customer problems? What's winning look like? That shared sense is north star." · Asha Sharma on Lenny's Podcast, 2026-04-28 ## Signals - Quarterly OKRs are loose; 4–6 week goals are sharp. - Annual planning produces a thesis paragraph, not a Gantt chart. - The team can answer "what season are we in?" in one sentence. ## Counter-evidence Brian Halligan and other large-public-company operators argue the Gantt chart is irreducible past a certain scale because the org cannot coordinate without firm dates. Seasons are a small/mid-cap pattern. Hybrid approach: seasons at the top, traditional roadmap underneath for deliverables that need them. ## Cross-references - `ins_product-as-organism`, the underlying frame that requires this planning shift