# Second-round UX review: host publication

Evidence class: **host documentation and design mockups**. Recorded
2026-10-02. The review was independently checked and landed at
`9d7437b08b1c6429748af29b62b4f8a522ea8dd7`; exact-revision site run
[36967302130](https://github.com/knewter/tdisplay-k230/actions/runs/36967302130)
passed. These drawings are proposals, not newly installed device screens.

The [report](../../research/handheld-ux/review-round-2/README.md),
[baseline and identities](../../research/handheld-ux/review-round-2/baseline.md),
[findings](../../research/handheld-ux/review-round-2/findings.md),
[recommendations](../../research/handheld-ux/review-round-2/recommendations.md),
and [render commands and review corrections](../../research/handheld-ux/review-round-2/visual-review.md)
retain the distinction between current captures, older references and targets.

Annotated comparisons and motion storyboard:

- [Apps comparison](../../research/handheld-ux/review-round-2/visuals/apps.svg)
- [Cards comparison](../../research/handheld-ux/review-round-2/visuals/cards.svg)
- [Keyboard and recovery comparison](../../research/handheld-ux/review-round-2/visuals/keyboard-recovery.svg)
- [Overview to Apps storyboard](../../research/handheld-ux/review-round-2/visuals/overview-to-apps.svg)

Five host tasks are complete. Current-source journey execution and the focused
integrated-candidate recheck remain open. Publication does not close those
gates or archive the analysis. The next three priorities remain owned by
existing theme-motion, card/keyboard and theme-consumer proposals.

## Work-card discovery correction

Build-tested source: `096a66e4a7ab1925b18484d81b697cd076606af8`.

The work board previously discovered cited documents only under evidence and
design folders. The review's research folder was omitted. The discovery fix
adds cited research paths without scanning unrelated research trees. Reviewed
per-file metadata labels all four annotated sheets as design mockups; a
mixed research/capture fixture checks that a captured image keeps its own
provenance. Invalid, duplicate and conflicting metadata are rejected.

Host commands:

```sh
python3 tests/test_work_board.py
python3 scripts/render_work_board.py --working-tree --output "$HOME/tmp/k230-ux-review-publication-snapshot.json"
nix develop --command python3 scripts/build_site.py
```

Results: 22 tests passed; the snapshot exposes all four correctly labeled
sheets; the full site build passed with 503 pages, 15,026,169 bytes and 43.93
seconds, within the existing 16 MiB / 120 second budgets. The kernel auditor
independently approved the citation bounds and per-file labels. This checks
publication integrity, not physical UX acceptance.

## Published browser check

Published revision `c33bae96d7bbff42bb0ef6ef5ed6834b5c55f37b` passed
[site build and deployment run 36968861312](https://github.com/knewter/tdisplay-k230/actions/runs/36968861312).
The coordinator then checked the actual [public work board](https://knewter.github.io/tdisplay-k230/work/)
with Playwright at desktop 1440×1000 and mobile 390×844 viewports, without
mocked network responses. Both checks passed: exact published artifact-index
revision, all four SVGs loaded in the gallery, correct distinct captions and
Design mockup labels, gallery dismissal, and the report opening as rendered
Markdown in the document modal with return to the same card detail. No page
errors occurred. This is host-browser publication proof, not K230 input or
optical acceptance.


## Current candidate checkpoint — 2026-10-09

The [sanitized console and native captures](candidate-2026-10-09/README.md)
identify the later normal runtime and complete candidate/recheck tasks 3.1/3.2.
The actual current journey walkthrough remains open. Historical host/browser
publication above keeps its original evidence class and revision.

## Operator walkthrough — 2026-10-09

The [exact functional reply](candidate-2026-10-09/operator-report.json) confirms
Terminal keyboard, app switching and video journeys requested in this current
candidate session. Task 2.2 is complete as a review with explicit unknowns; this
supersedes the pending walkthrough statement above, without changing historical
evidence or accepting runtime optical/performance/exceptional-state gates.

## Completed report publication — 2026-10-09

The current candidate and operator walkthrough landed at
`817804758cae1801e9b57de3cda6969eccd15529`.
[CI and Pages run 37999119193](https://github.com/knewter/tdisplay-k230/actions/runs/37999119193)
passed build and deployment. The actual [public work board](https://knewter.github.io/tdisplay-k230/work/)
returned HTTP 200 and that exact revision.
[publication.json](candidate-2026-10-09/publication.json) records the check and
its limits. All nine analysis tasks are complete; successor runtime evidence
remains open. This supersedes the incomplete historical checkpoints above.

## Analysis archive — 2026-10-09

The [completed change](../../../openspec/changes/archive/2026-10-09-the-handheld-gets-a-design-and-ux-review/tasks.md)
contains nine completed analysis tasks. OpenSpec synced three new requirements
into `docs/handheld-ux-plan`; all five prior requirements are preserved byte for
byte after surrounding whitespace normalization.
[archive-check.json](candidate-2026-10-09/archive-check.json) records that comparison
and the remaining runtime evidence owners. The archive changes documentation
only and requires no newly installed image or repeat of accepted functional checks.