# Air_Scrubber_v0.md **Purpose** Primary safety module for Lazarus Forge: capture fumes, dust, volatiles, and aerosols generated during salvage processing (grinding, thermal steps, chemical exposure, spin/strat chambers) before they escape into the workspace or environment. Core doctrine: **Capture is production** — captured material is feedstock, not waste. **Design Philosophy** - Negative pressure containment boundary at all times - Forced interaction between gas and capture medium (no passive settling) - Modest energy draw — prioritize low-power fans/compressors over high-throughput - Multi-stage progression: Charge → Cool → Capture - Prefer wet methods for most streams (superior particle adhesion, cooling, and chemical trapping) - Design for easy maintenance and media refresh using salvaged components ### Environmental & Marine Extension Potential While primarily designed for Forge fume/dust hazards (e.g., from Spin_Chamber or Stratification_Chamber exhaust), the bubble-column architecture naturally extends to marine applications via reverse-flow aeration in low-DO ocean zones. This enables: - In-situ oxygenation and volatile capture testing - Validation of scrubber robustness under pressure, corrosion, and biofouling - Feedback loops for orbital volatile handling analogs (Astroid-miner synergies) All extensions remain subordinate to the core negative-pressure safety boundary and modest energy ethos. **Functional Architecture (Baseline)** 1. **Charge Stage** — Ionization or electrostatic preconditioning to charge particles (optional but effective for sub-micron fines) 2. **Cool Stage** — Heat exchanger or mist quench to condense vapors and reduce gas temperature (prevents evaporation loss in wet stage) 3. **Capture Stage** — Bubble-column wet scrubber (preferred) or packed-bed variant - Gas forced upward through liquid pool with fine bubbles - High surface area contact → efficient trapping of particulates, acids, VOCs **Preferred Methods & Variants** **Variant 1 — Baseline Bubble-Column (Aerated Pond Style)** - Simple tank with submerged porous diffuser - Air compressor forces gas through fine bubbles into scrubbing liquid (water + additives) - Overflow or skimmer removes captured sludge **Variant 2 — Packed Column with Recirculation** - Gas rises through packed media (Raschig rings, pall rings, or salvaged plastic scraps) wetted by recirculating liquid - Higher efficiency for soluble gases; higher pressure drop **Variant 3 — Venturi Scrubber (High-Energy Option)** - High-velocity throat atomizes liquid into gas stream - Used only for very fine or sticky aerosols when bubble column insufficient **Variant 4 — High-Pressure / Underwater Bubble-Column Extension (Leviathan-Compatible)** For deep-ocean or high-humidity testing environments (e.g., Leviathan platform deployments in hypoxic/dead zones), adapt the baseline aerated pond-style bubbler into a reverse-flow or in-situ configuration: - Inject compressed air (or oxygen-enriched mix) through submerged diffusers to create rising bubble plumes that enhance gas–liquid exchange. - In "reverse scrubbing" mode, bubbles aerate low-DO water, capturing volatiles (e.g., H₂S, CO₂) into the gas phase for surface off-gassing analysis, or dissolving O₂ to test oxygenation efficiency. - Key adaptations: Pressure-rated diffusers (porous hoses or fine-pore membranes) to match ambient depths (10–100 atm); recirculating loops if needed for closed-system tests; integration with onboard sensors for real-time pH, DO, turbidity, and gas composition. - Rationale: Validates bubble efficiency under pressure/corrosive conditions analogous to salvage fume processing; provides data on residence time, mass transfer rates, and energy per m³ aerated. - Quantitative targets (initial benchmarks from analogs): Achieve 10–30% DO saturation increase in <2 mg/L hypoxic water; bubble sizes 80–500 μm for optimal transfer; energy draw scaled to Leviathan nuclear/battery output (e.g., <100 W per 1–2 m³ plume). - **Bubble Size Optimization**: Target 80–500 μm range for peak mass transfer coefficient (higher interfacial area without excessive coalescence); finer pores for deeper ops, coarser for energy savings in shallow tests. - **Residence Time & Height Tuning**: Adjust column/submerged depth (1–3 m typical) to balance transfer efficiency vs. pressure drop; monitor via swarm sensors for real-time refinement. - **Fouling Mitigation**: Periodic back-flush or additive dosing (e.g., low-concentration surfactants) to counter marine biofouling; test divergent variants in parallel. This variant turns the scrubber into a dual-purpose tool: hazard containment in Forge ops and environmental remediation/testing in marine contexts. **Energy Awareness** Conceptual ballpark ranges (Earth surface, standard conditions): - Fan/compressor draw: 50–150 W (baseline bubble column) - Ionization stage: 10–30 W - Recirculation pump (if used): 20–80 W Under high-pressure underwater loads, expect 20–50% uplift in air movement draw due to compression; swarm data will refine these estimates. Goal: Stay well below 500 W total system draw even in worst-case variants. **Testing Extensions & Divergent Validation (Leviathan Integration)** To falsify assumptions and accelerate refinement, incorporate high-throughput, parallel testing via Leviathan swarm proxies: - **Aeration Field Experiments** — Deploy 10–100+ miniaturized scrubber variants in mostly lifeless ocean zones (e.g., oxygen minimum zones). High-pressure air systems create controlled bubble plumes mid-water (avoiding sediment resuspension), churning for vertical mixing while monitoring air off-gassing quality (VOCs, CO₂) and water parameters (DO gradients, pH shifts, turbidity). - **Divergent Setups** — Run simultaneous A/B/n variants: bubble-column vs. packed column; fine vs. coarse diffusers; ionization preconditioning on/off; different electrolytes/additives. Quantify KPIs: DO increase per kWh, mass transfer coefficient, fouling rates, and failure propagation across swarm. - **Value & Metrics** — Generate terabytes of spatial/temporal data for statistical modeling; benchmark against analogs (e.g., 3–100× efficiency gains via optimized bubble size/hydrodynamic effects). Feed results into energy accounting (value recovered per kWh) and upstream triage adjustments. - **Safety & Ethics** — Limit to hypoxic areas with low biodiversity; enforce autonomous shutdown on chemistry drift or unintended byproducts; open-source plume data for community remediation studies. These extensions provide falsifiable, quantitative validation in extreme conditions, bridging Earth-bound salvage to potential orbital/volatile-capture applications. **Cross-Module & Leviathan Tie-ins** - `leviathan_testing.md` — Primary testbed: underwater bubble-column variants, swarm-scale divergent aeration/recovery ops, sensor fusion for plume monitoring. - `Component_Triage_System.md` — Feedback from scrubber chemistry (e.g., captured volatiles/particulates) refines classification heuristics for marine artifacts. - `Trajectories_LF.md` — Updated paths for gas/liquid byproducts during lift-bag assisted recovery or in-situ electrolysis. - `energy_v0.md` — Aggregate swarm data refines modest-draw estimates (50–150 W baseline) under pressure-variable loads. - `Spin_Chamber_v0.md` / `Stratification_Chamber_v0.md` — Exhaust routing tests in wet environments; potential centrifugal pre-separation before scrubbing. - `geck_forge_seed.md` — Bootstrap minimal scrubber seeds for swarm self-deployment in remote tests. - `Ship_of_Theseus_Right_to_Repair.md` — Scrubber as a "preservation enabler" during marine artifact recovery, delaying irreversible corrosion. **Next Steps / Planned** - Prototype pressure-rated diffuser payloads for Leviathan proxies. - Simulate bubble dynamics (e.g., via open-source hydro tools) before lake/ocean drops near Jonesboro-area watersheds. - Open issues for community input on fine-bubble variants or electrolytic preconditioning add-ons. - Field test small-scale bubble-column in controlled tank/lake environment to baseline mass transfer rates. - Explore integration with electrolytic stages for combined gas scrubbing + metal ion capture. Last updated: February 01, 2026