First Performed at the Theatre Royal, Haymarket, on Thursday, March 16, 1854.
An Original, Pathetic, and Heart-rending Tragedy, very Mirthful to behold, in which is disclosed the Doleful Life and Dismal Death of a Pair of True Lovers—as also the Melancholy Wooing and Sad Undoing of a Gay and Galliant Lord, entitled
From an unique MS. lately discovered amongst the waste papers of a retired Cheesemonger, and now given for the delight of the Public and the profit—it is hoped—of the Lessee.
By J. STIRLING COYNE.
With entirely New Scenery, by Messrs. W. CALLCOTT and Morris.
The Medley Overture and Music (introducing several Ancient “ Ryghte Merrie Ditties,” and the “ Willikind Polka”), composed, selected, and arranged by Edward Fitzwilliam. *
Scene 1—THE FRONT GARDING—Callcott.
Scene 2—INTERIOR OF THE Stern PARIENT’S DWELLING—Morris.
Scene, 3—THE BACK GARDING—Callcott.
Costume—Period of the Reign of James I.
In presenting this Doleful Tragedy for the first time on the Stage of any Theatre, it is believed that a few particulars relative to its literary history will neither prove unimportant nor uninteresting. The play itself, which has been recently discovered amongst the papers of a retired Cheesemonger, belongs apparently to the Elizabethan period ; a supposition rendered more probable by a Latin inscription on the fly-leaf, which, though nearly obliterated by time, may be decyphered thus:—"Mihi et Betti Martini," signifying, doubtless, the names of the joint Authors as Myself and Elizabeth Martin names which, though not familiar, perhaps, to the students of our early dramatic history, are yet of no rare occurrence in popular literature. As the most indefatigable researches in the British Museum have failed to bring to light any quarto or folio edition of “Ye Tragicalle Hystorie of Willikind and his Dinah, with ye manner of theyre love-makynge, ye cruelle Parent’s enmitie, and theyre most pittiful ends,” there is reason to believe that it was never printed, and, consequently, it is fair to assume that it was never published. The original story on which the plot was based seems equally to have baffled the investigation of those who sought to trace the legend to its primitive source. An anonymous writer in a work dated 1583, and entitled “A Paradise of Curious Conceits and Daintie Devices,” alludes to a similar story, in which a Parent refuses consent to a Daughter’s Marriage. The name of Willikind, however, seems unknown in the Parish Registers before 1602, when it figures in an entry, which would seem to show that a person of that name then existed; but whether it was the same individual—there is now no possible method of ascertaining.—Dinah, or Dian-ah—the interjection “ah!” having been palpably appended to the first syllable to express the melancholy nature of her career,—has been often made the subject of reference by the lyrists of Ethiopia, but there is no reason for supposing that they could throw any light on the present history. Under these circumstances, as it appears that no information can be gained by pursuing the inquiry any further, it seems to be most advisable to desist from the attempt, and the curious in these etymological, genealogical, and archaeological researches are, therefore, confidently referred to the Tragedy itself, which will be found to embrace all the particulars hitherto unknown and unrecorded.
In representation omit the first verse of the Finale.