# Contributing to the Linera protocol ## Issues We use GitHub issues to track planned improvements, feature requests, and bug reports. * If you plan to contribute a new feature, please discuss the feature in an issue beforehand to ensure that your contributions will be accepted. * If you send a bug report, please ensure that your description is clear and has sufficient instructions to be able to reproduce the issue. ## Pull Requests (PRs) To make a contribution to the code after discussing it in a GitHub issue, 1. Fork the repo and create your branch from `main`. 2. If you've added code that should be tested, add tests. 3. If you've changed APIs, update the documentation. 4. Ensure the test suite passes with `cargo test && cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features`. 5. Run `cargo +nightly fmt` to automatically format your changes (CI will let you know if you missed this). 6. Repeat step 4 and 5 for Wasm examples if needed (see the section on Wasm below for the options to `cargo test`). This repository enforces a linear commit history. To remove merge commits, consider using `git filter-branch` as explained [here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17988099/how-do-i-trivially-linearize-my-git-history). Editing a clean commit history with `git rebase -i` and `git push -f your_PR_branch` is encouraged to help the work of reviewers. Commits that land on the main branch without being squashed should compile correctly and contain the PR number. Only commits in a PR accepted by at least one team member should be pushed to the main branch. Please also be sure to familiarize yourself with the rest of the guidelines below. ## Naming conventions As usual in Rust, type names (struct, enum, traits) are compound words in [camel case](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camel_case), e.g. `GarageDoorOption`. In general, local variables should try to mirror the name of their type except that 1. they are in [snake case](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_case) instead of camel case: `garage_door_option` 2. we make them shorter by keeping the main part (at the end in English) when there is no ambiguity `let option = GarageDoorOption::default()`. Accepted abbreviations in the entire codebase should only concern a very small number of English words (e.g. `database` -> `db`). Abbreviations are never a single letter. However, single letter variables `i`, `x`, `n` are accepted for short-lived integer types (e.g. a for-loop). Prefer plural names for collections of objects: `let values = vec![1, 2, 3];`. ## API coding guidelines Contributions should generally follow the [Rust API guidelines](https://rust-lang.github.io/api-guidelines/checklist.html) whenever possible. ## Documenting public items The library crates enable `#![deny(missing_docs)]`, so every public item needs a `///` doc comment. Prefer writing a real, useful one-line doc over silencing the lint. Adding `#[allow(missing_docs)]` is only acceptable in the following cases: 1. **Generated or macro-produced items that cannot carry doc comments.** For example code from `tonic::include_proto!` / `#[wit_import]`, the `Error` newtype from `thiserror_context::impl_context!`, or generated GraphQL clients. Put a *module-level* `#![allow(missing_docs)]` (or `#![expect(missing_docs)]`, which additionally warns if the macro ever stops generating undocumented items) on the smallest module wrapping the generated code. 2. **`thiserror`-derived error enums** whose variants are already described by their `#[error("…")]` messages. Put a single type-level `#[allow(missing_docs)]` on the enum. 3. **Large, mechanical, self-descriptive message / request / operation enums** — e.g. actor-message enums, the RPC message enum, or wire/ABI operation enums — where per-variant and per-field docs would only restate the obvious. Put a single type-level `#[allow(missing_docs)]` on the type. Everything else (config and data structs, traits, methods, free functions, and any type that is *not* in one of the cases above) should be documented with real `///` comments. Two things to keep in mind: * For a clap subcommand enum whose variants are thin wrappers around documented args structs (e.g. `Command { Add(Add), … }`), giving the *variant* a doc comment shadows the richer `--help` text derived from the inner struct. Use a type-level `#[allow(missing_docs)]` on such an enum rather than duplicating the inner docs. * For `async-graphql` types (`#[derive(SimpleObject)]`, etc.) a doc comment becomes part of the generated GraphQL schema. Documenting them is encouraged, but remember to regenerate the checked-in schema (`cargo run --bin linera-schema-export > …`) in the same change. ## Additional code style guidelines * Type annotations (such as `let x : t = ...;`, `Vec::::new()`) should be present only when required by the compiler. * Re-exports (`pub use foo = bar::foo`) should be limited to definitions that would be private otherwise. * Avoid `let _ = ...` to discard values, because it can hide important information like unawaited futures or unhandled errors. `let _x =` should only be used for RAII guards. ## Hash-consed types and `linera_cache::Arc` Any content-addressed immutable data (also known as hash-consed data) — for example `Block`, `Blob`, `ConfirmedBlockCertificate` — should be cached and passed around as `linera_cache::Arc` (re-exported as `linera_storage::Arc`). `linera_cache::Arc` is a newtype over `std::sync::Arc` with **no public constructor**: the only way to obtain one is through `ValueCache::insert`, `ValueCache::insert_hashed`, or `ValueCache::get`. This makes the "one allocation per content" invariant a compile-time guarantee rather than a convention. Concretely: - For freshly-constructed `ConfirmedBlockCertificate`s (e.g. from network or proposal flows), call `Storage::cache_certificate`. - For freshly-constructed `ConfirmedBlock`s, call `Storage::cache_confirmed_block`. - For freshly-constructed `Blob`s, call `Storage::cache_blob`. - For values being re-inserted from a borrowed reference, use `ValueCache::insert_hashed`. `std::sync::Arc::new` for a hash-consed value bypasses the dedup index and creates a duplicate allocation; the type system prevents this by design. See the [`linera-cache` README](linera-cache/README.md) for details. ## Formatting and linting Make sure to fix the lint errors reported by ``` cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features ``` and format the code with ``` cargo +nightly fmt ``` (The nightly build is required notably for [rust-lang/rustfmt#4991](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/4991).) ## Command-line tools and services * All executables should use `clap_derive`. When tools call each other, the `--version` is checked and must match the package version of the caller. This means that all executables should include a `command(version = linera_version::VersionInfo::default_clap_str())` annotation. * Only structured data should be printed to the standard output, preferably as newline-separated JSON values. * The preferred way to output to the standard error is to use the logging crate `tracing`. See existing `main` functions for the necessary boilerplate. ## Managing cargo features and dependencies between crates * Crates `xxx` which define the `test` feature must include `linera-xxx = { path = ".", features = ["test"] }` in the section `[dev-dependencies]` instead of repeating the dependencies already declared by the feature `test`. * A few crates define the features `wasmtime` and `wasmer`. For convenience, these crates also define a `default` feature. As a consequence, these crates must always be included with the flag `no-default-features = true`. (This also applies to the self-dependencies of the previous rule.) Besides the verification above with clippy, the following steps will verify that most combinations of features compile for each crate: ``` cargo install --git https://github.com/ma2bd/cargo-all-features --branch workspace_metadata cargo check-all-features --all-targets ``` ## Snapshot tests Several crates (`linera-rpc`, `linera-views-derive`, and others) use [`insta`](https://insta.rs/) to manage snapshot tests and ensure output or RPC formats don't unintentionally change. If you've deliberately changed the output of one of these crates, and the test fails, you can use `cargo insta review` to update the staged snapshot, or manually move the `.snap.new` file into place. See the [`insta` documentation](https://insta.rs/docs/quickstart/) for more information. ## Wasm support The support of Wasm is controlled by the features `wasmer` and the `wasmtime`, and currently defaults to `wasmer` only. Wasm tests can be executed with: ``` cd examples cargo test ``` Some tests require the application examples from `examples` to be compiled. If needed, this can be done manually with ``` cd examples cargo build --release --target wasm32-unknown-unknown ``` The Rust flags are suggested to reduce the size of the Wasm bytecode files. ## Platform-specific features Features that compile only on specific platforms are currently addressed using a variant of the [`winit` convention](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67373380/can-i-set-cargo-projects-default-features-depending-on-the-platform). Let's look at an example: imagine our crate has a feature `metrics` that only works on UNIX platforms. We use `cfg_aliases` in `build.rs` for our crate to define an alias `with_metrics` that also includes the supported platform(s): ``` rust fn main() { cfg_aliases::cfg_aliases! { with_metrics: { all(feature = "metrics", target_family = "unix") }, } } ``` Now, when we conditionally compile the feature in our code, we use `cfg(with_metrics)` instead of `cfg(feature = "metrics")`. This has the effect that the feature is disabled both if it isn't requested _and_ if it is unsupported on the current target platform, allowing us to test `--all-targets` with impunity. ## Debugging techniques The debugging of tests can be complicated and some tools can help this. ### Runtime limitation A test that goes into an infinite loop will never finish which besides being difficult to resolve makes it impossible to see the print statements of your code. A useful tool for that is to use the crates [ntest](https://crates.io/crates/ntest) with the following command added just before the line declaring the test ``` #[ntest::timeout(600000)] ``` If the test lasts longer than the fixed time then it fails. The unit of time is a millisecond, so the `600000` corresponds to `600` seconds and so to `10` minutes. ### Tracking simultaneous threads in `tokio` The running of what is going on in `tokio` based programs can be difficult. The [tokio-console](https://crates.io/crates/tokio-console) crates allows to see the different threads going on. See [documentation of the user interface of tokio-console](https://docs.rs/tokio-console/0.1.9/tokio_console/) for more details. A simple way to use this on a laptop is the following: 1. First of all install the program `tokio-console` via `cargo install --locked tokio-console`. 2. Replace `tokio = "1.25.0"` by `tokio = { version = "1.25.0", features = ["full", "tracing"] }` in `Cargo.toml` 3. Add `tokio-console = "0.1.9"` and `console-subscriber = "0.1.10"` to `Cargo.toml` 4. Add `console-subscriber.workspace = true` to the relevant `Cargo.toml` subspace 5. For the asynchronous tests in question, they have to be of the form `#[tokio::test]`. Tests of the form `#[test_log::test(tokio::test)]` are using a different instrumentation and we can use only one instrumentation at a time. The error is at runtime. 6. For the test in question add the line `console_subscriber::init();` at the first line of the test. 7. Run the test in question as usual. 8. Then on a separate terminal, run the program tokio-console (which will listen to `http://127.0.0.1:6669/`). For example if the test blocks, it will show the line in question with `block_on`. See the documentation of `tokio-console` for more details. ### Tracking metrics The prometheus system is used for keeping track of the validators in a Kubernetes setting. However, this can also be used locally to run test case and then get metrics to work on. This is a little bit more indirect than having runtimes in log file, but works fine. The steps are the following: 1. The list of the metric service ports can be seen in the validator logs with the entries "Starting to serve metrics". 2. The list of nodes served if 4 validators are used `is 0.0.0.0:XXXXX` with `XXXXX` being 11000, 11001, 11100, 11101, 11200, 11201, 11300, 11301. 3. Create a `prometheus.yml` file that contains the source of data. Each one of the ports has to be present. One example for querying every second is ``` global: scrape_interval: 1s evaluation_interval: 1s rule_files: # - "first.rules" # - "second.rules" scrape_configs: - job_name: linera_test_11000 static_configs: - targets: ['0.0.0.0:11000'] . . - job_name: prometheus static_configs: - targets: ['localhost:9090'] ``` 4. The Web app on `http://localhost:9090` provides a way to access to the metrics. Another way is to use the API as indicated below and process the results. 5. The list of available metrics is available by looking at `http://localhost:9090/api/v1/label/__name__/values` 6. The instantaneous value of a metric over all sources is accessed via `http://localhost:9090/api/v1/query?query=up` with `up` the metric sought. 7. The values of metrics over an interval over all sources is accessed via `http://localhost:9090/api/v1/query_range?query=up&start=2023-01-04T12:00:00Z&end=2023-01-04T16:00:00Z&step=1s`. ## Adding dependencies to third-party crates Given the nature of the project, every dependency will be eventually tracked and audited. Please be mindful about adding new dependencies to crates that are large and/or unlikely to be already vetted by the Rust community. ## License and copyright By contributing to `linera-protocol`, you agree that your contributions will be licensed under the terms of the [`LICENSE`](LICENSE) file in the root directory of this source tree. New files should be copyrighted by "Zefchain Labs, Inc" (the legal entity behind the Linera project) using this header: ``` // Copyright (c) Zefchain Labs, Inc. // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 ``` ## Reviewer Checklist - The title and the summary of the PR are short and descriptive. - The proposed solution achieves the goals stated in the PR. - The test plan is reproducible and provides sufficient coverage. - The release plan is adequate. - The commits correspond to distinct logical changes. - The code follows the [coding guidelines](https://github.com/linera-io/linera-protocol/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md). - The proposed changes look correct. - The CI is passing.