--- name: "startup-ideation" description: "Generate and evaluate startup ideas: theses table, scorecard, top idea brief, validation plan. See also: startup-pivoting (existing product)." --- # Startup Ideation ## Scope **Covers** - Turning vague "startup ideas" into structured **opportunity theses** - Expanding your **information diet** to find off-the-beaten-path opportunities - Running a **Why Now** analysis based on technology + behavior + distribution shifts - Identifying **tarpits** (ideas that look good but are structurally hard) and pruning early - Scoring ideas and producing a **top-idea 1‑pager** + **2‑week validation plan** **When to use** - "Help me come up with startup ideas in/around ." - "We have 5 ideas — help us pick one and explain why." - "What’s a good *Why Now* for this idea?" - "Pressure to do AI — where are real new opportunities?" - "How do we avoid idea tarpits and pick something differentiated?" **When NOT to use** - You already chose an idea and need a delivery-ready PRD (use `writing-prds` or `working-backwards`) - You need to define the problem space for a specific user pain (use `problem-definition`) - You need to execute research (recruit, interview, synthesize) rather than frame it (use `conducting-user-interviews`) - You need market sizing / pricing / fundraising pitch materials (adjacent work, not covered here) - You already have a product but it is stuck or growth stalled and you are considering a direction change (use `startup-pivoting`) - You have a launched product and need to measure whether you have product-market fit (use `measuring-product-market-fit`) - You want to evaluate trade-offs between a small set of known options, not generate new ideas (use `evaluating-trade-offs`) ## Inputs **Minimum required** - Founder/team context + constraints (time, budget, skills, regulatory constraints) - The decision to make + timeline (e.g., "pick 1 idea to validate in the next 2 weeks") - Target customer type (B2B/B2C; any preferred industries or segments) - Any starting ideas (even rough) + what prompted them **Missing-info strategy** - Ask up to 5 questions from [references/INTAKE.md](references/INTAKE.md). - If still missing, proceed with explicit assumptions and list **Open questions** that could change the recommendation. ## Outputs (deliverables) Produce a **Startup Ideation Pack** in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if the user requests): 1) **Context snapshot** (goal, constraints, decision, timeline) 2) **Unfair advantage + off-the-beaten-path signals** (what you know/see that others might not) 3) **Shift scan + Why Now candidates** (tech/behavior/distribution/regulatory shifts) 4) **Opportunity theses table** (15–30 ideas, each structured + testable) 5) **Tarpit & differentiation check** (prune to a shortlist) 6) **Idea scorecard** (score top 3–5 with evidence) 7) **Top idea brief (1‑pager)** (clear wedge + Why Now + ICP + risks) 8) **2‑week validation plan** (fastest tests for the highest-risk assumptions) 9) **Risks / Open questions / Next steps** (always included) Templates: [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) Expanded guidance: [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) ## Workflow (8 steps) ### 1) Intake + decision framing - **Inputs:** User context; [references/INTAKE.md](references/INTAKE.md). - **Actions:** Clarify decision, time horizon, and constraints. Define success as "pick 1 idea to validate next" (or similar). - **Outputs:** Context snapshot. - **Checks:** You can restate the decision in one sentence ("We are deciding whether to… by "). ### 2) Inventory unfair advantage + off-the-beaten-path signals - **Inputs:** Founder/team background; past work; lived experience; access. - **Actions:** List 5–15 unique signals: personal pain, workflows you’ve seen, niche communities, privileged distribution, proprietary data access, or operator insight. - **Outputs:** Unfair advantage + signals list. - **Checks:** Each signal is specific (who/where/when) and could plausibly lead to a differentiated idea. ### 3) Run a shift scan ("Why now?" raw material) - **Inputs:** Domain + constraints; current trends the user cares about. - **Actions:** Generate 10–20 "shifts" across: technology capability, buyer behavior, regulation, distribution, and cost curves. For each, write: "This enables X that was hard before." - **Outputs:** Shift scan + Why Now candidates. - **Checks:** At least 5 shifts are concrete and falsifiable (not vague hype). ### 4) Generate opportunity theses (structured ideas) - **Inputs:** Signals + shifts. - **Actions:** Produce 15–30 opportunity theses using the template: *Customer → Job → Pain → Why now → Wedge → First test*. - **Outputs:** Opportunity theses table. - **Checks:** Every idea includes a Why Now statement and a proposed first validation test. ### 5) Tarpit & differentiation check (prune) - **Inputs:** Opportunity theses table. - **Actions:** Flag tarpits and thinly differentiated ideas. Apply "off-the-beaten-path" pressure: if an idea is widely discussed, require a strong wedge or discard. - **Outputs:** Pruned list + notes on tarpits/differentiation. - **Checks:** The remaining shortlist has at least one concrete advantage (distribution, insight, data, speed, regulatory, workflow depth). ### 6) Score + shortlist top 3–5 - **Inputs:** Pruned list; [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md). - **Actions:** Score each shortlisted idea with evidence and assumptions. Highlight the 1–2 criteria that dominate the outcome (sensitivity). - **Outputs:** Idea scorecard + top 3–5 recommendation. - **Checks:** Scores cite specific evidence or clearly labeled assumptions (no hand-wavy numbers). ### 7) Draft the top idea 1‑pager + 2‑week validation plan - **Inputs:** Top idea; [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md). - **Actions:** Write a crisp 1‑pager (ICP, problem, Why Now, wedge, GTM motion hypothesis). Then design the fastest validation plan focused on the riskiest assumptions. - **Outputs:** Top idea brief + validation plan. - **Checks:** The plan includes: who to talk to, what to build (if anything), success criteria, and a stop/pivot rule. ### 8) Quality gate + finalize pack - **Inputs:** Full draft pack. - **Actions:** Run [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and score with [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md). Add **Risks / Open questions / Next steps**. - **Outputs:** Final Startup Ideation Pack. - **Checks:** A stakeholder can review async and decide "validate / park / discard" without a meeting. ## Anti-patterns (common failure modes) 1. **Idea brainstorm without structure:** Generating a long list of ideas with no Why-Now analysis, no tarpit check, and no scoring. Volume without evaluation is noise, not ideation. 2. **Tarpit blindness:** Falling in love with ideas that sound exciting but have well-known structural traps (marketplace cold-start, consumer social network effects, hardware-dependent plays). Always run the tarpit check before shortlisting. 3. **Missing founder-market fit:** Evaluating ideas purely on market attractiveness without considering the team’s unfair advantages, domain expertise, or distribution access. An objectively good idea is bad if this team cannot win it. 4. **Vague Why-Now claims:** Citing broad trends ("AI is hot", "remote work is growing") without connecting them to a specific enabling shift that makes this idea possible or necessary now vs. two years ago. 5. **Skipping validation design:** Producing a polished top-idea brief but no concrete 2-week validation plan, leaving the founder with a thesis but no next action to test it. ## Quality gate (required) - Use [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md). - Always include: **Risks**, **Open questions**, **Next steps**. ## Examples **Example 1 (B2B):** "We’re ex-operators in logistics. Generate and score startup ideas; pick 1 to validate in 2 weeks." Expected: opportunity theses rooted in real workflows + a shortlist + a top idea 1-pager with a concrete validation plan. **Example 2 (AI shift):** "We think new LLM capabilities enable something new in customer support; help us find a differentiated idea and Why Now." Expected: shift scan -> structured theses -> tarpit check -> top idea brief with a tight wedge and clear risks. **Boundary example 1:** "Give me 100 startup ideas with no context." Response: ask intake questions first; if the user won’t provide any, produce a small set of generic theses with explicit assumptions and advise on how to ground them in real signals. **Boundary example 2:** "Our SaaS product has stalled at 50 customers and we are thinking about changing direction. Help us figure out what to do." Response: this is a pivot decision, not greenfield ideation. Use `startup-pivoting` to diagnose what is stuck, run an exhaustion check, and evaluate pivot options before generating new ideas.