--- name: dealflow-sourcing-to-memo description: "End-to-end associate workflow with time-boxed gates: thesis -> sourcing -> meetings -> diligence -> memo, ending with either IC-ready memo or explicit kill decision. Use when you need to run the full pipeline for a sector or a specific deal." license: Proprietary compatibility: Requires web access for research + Salesforce logging is mandatory; can be run without scripts. metadata: author: evalops version: "0.2" --- # Dealflow: sourcing to memo ## When to use Use this compound skill when you need to simulate a full associate workflow: - Build a sector view and generate targets - Source and qualify companies - Move a specific deal from first meeting to memo/IC - Keep Salesforce current so the team can route work ## Inputs you should request (only if missing) - Thesis area (or a company to start from) - Stage focus and decision timeline - CRM conventions (Salesforce stages/fields) if known - Sprint length: 3-day, 5-day, or 10-day ## Outputs you must produce **Every workflow ends with one of two outcomes:** 1. **Partner-ready memo + scheduled IC** - deal advances 2. **Explicit kill decision** with logged reason, "what would change our mind", and a follow-up reminder (e.g., "recheck in 6 months") No deals in limbo. No "watching" without a recheck date. ## Time-boxed workflow (default: 10-day sprint) ### Phase 0: Set thesis (Day 0-1, max 8 hours) **Deliverables:** - Wedge + buyer + why now (1 page) - Initial market map (50-150 companies in CSV) - Top 10 force-ranked targets with "must be true" + fastest test - Kill criteria for the thesis **Gate:** Do you have a clear buyer, budget source, and trigger event? If no, iterate or kill the thesis. Log: create Campaign `Thesis: (YYYY-MM)` in Salesforce ### Phase 1: Source (Days 1-3) **Deliverables:** - Top 50 humans list (network cultivation) - Weekly pipeline update with 10 new names (all in Salesforce) - 5 outreach targets sent - 3 meetings scheduled **Gate:** Did you generate 3 qualified meeting candidates? If no, the thesis is too narrow or your signals are wrong. Iterate or kill. Log: all Leads/Accounts created with next-step Tasks ### Phase 2: First meetings (Days 3-5) For each qualified company: 1) Write meeting brief (kill questions + wedge hypothesis + "must be true") 2) Run the meeting with structure and note-taking rules 3) Same-day follow-up (value + next steps) within 2 hours 4) 5-bullet recap logged to Salesforce within 2 hours **Gate (per company):** Advance to diligence OR pass with reasons. **Pass requirements:** - Tagged reason in Salesforce - "What would change our mind" documented - Recheck date set (3/6/12 months) Log: Event + Notes + Opportunity stage update ### Phase 3: Diligence sprint (Days 5-8, max 3 days per deal) **Deliverables:** - Ranked risk register (MAX 4 risks) - Fastest test per risk (time-boxed) - Customer diligence (3 buyers, 2 users, 1 churned/lost - REQUIRED) - Anti-confirmation evidence (competitor/alternative user) - Evidence pack **Gate:** For each risk, did the test produce decision-changing evidence? If a critical risk remains untestable, consider killing the deal. Log: Tasks per workstream + Activity logs for calls ### Phase 4: Memo + decision (Days 8-10) **Deliverables:** - Memo with clear recommendation in first line (no hedging) - Steelman "best argument against" - Decision log (what changed since first call) - IC date scheduled OR explicit kill with recheck date **Final gate:** One of two outcomes only: 1. **ADVANCE:** Partner-ready memo + IC scheduled 2. **KILL:** Pass logged with reason + "what would change our mind" + recheck date Log: attach memo to Opportunity + update stage to "IC Scheduled" or "Passed" ## Sprint variants ### 3-day sprint (urgent deal) - Day 0: Thesis alignment + risk register (2 hours) - Day 1: Customer diligence (3-5 calls) - Day 2: Product/GTM validation - Day 3: Memo draft + decision Gate at end of Day 2: Kill or continue? No "need more time." ### 5-day sprint (standard deal) - Days 0-1: Risk register + diligence plan - Days 2-3: Customer + product + GTM diligence - Day 4: Evidence synthesis - Day 5: Memo + decision Gate at end of Day 3: All top 4 risks tested? If not, why? ### 10-day sprint (new thesis + deal) - Days 0-1: Thesis + market map - Days 1-3: Sourcing - Days 3-5: First meetings - Days 5-8: Diligence - Days 8-10: Memo + decision Gate at each phase transition. ## Decision gates (mandatory checkpoints) At each gate, you must answer: 1. **Kill?** Is there a clear reason to stop? If yes, log it and set recheck date. 2. **Continue?** Is there enough signal to invest more time? What's the next deliverable? 3. **Escalate?** Does a partner need to weigh in before proceeding? No "let's keep watching" without a concrete recheck date and trigger. ## Guardrails - Do not "diligence everything." Diligence the top 4 risks. - Always write "must be true" claims early; update with evidence. - **Salesforce is the source of truth.** If it's not logged, it didn't happen. - Every active opportunity must have a dated next step task. - Every meeting must have a 5-bullet recap within 2 hours. - Every pass must have a tagged reason + "what would change our mind" + recheck date. ## References Use atomic skills as needed: - thesis-market-mapping - signal-sourcing-engine - founder-meeting-runbook - diligence-risk-burndown - investment-memo-writing - salesforce-crm-ops