--- name: integration-test description: Guide for writing integration tests with Vitest and Testing Library. Use when testing multi-component workflows, database interactions, React components with context providers, or full user flows. Covers the Testing Trophy philosophy (integration > unit), factory patterns for test data, MSW for network mocking, async testing patterns (waitFor, findBy), and custom render with providers. Use this for tests that cross multiple modules or layers of the application. --- # Integration Testing Integration tests verify that multiple parts of the system work together correctly. They provide more confidence than unit tests because they test real interactions with less mocking. ## Testing Trophy Philosophy Integration tests sit at the sweet spot of the Testing Trophy: ``` /\ / \ E2E (slowest, highest confidence) /----\ / INT \ Integration (SWEET SPOT) /--------\ | UNIT | Unit (fastest, lowest confidence) |________| STATIC (lint, types) ``` **Why integration > unit:** - **Less mocking = more confidence** - Test real interactions, not mocked approximations - **Refactoring doesn't break tests** - Testing behavior, not implementation details - **Unit tests can pass while app is broken** - Integration tests catch integration bugs - **Better ROI** - More coverage per test, catches more bug types ## When to Use Integration Tests ✅ **Use integration tests when:** - Testing workflows that span multiple components/modules - Verifying database operations (read → transform → write) - Testing React components that use context providers - Testing full user flows (auth, forms, multi-step processes) - Testing server actions that call multiple services - Verifying API endpoints with real request/response ❌ **Don't use integration tests when:** - Testing pure functions (use unit tests - no mocking needed) - Testing simple utility functions - Testing isolated business logic calculations **Decision heuristic:** If you need >3 mocks, it's probably better as an integration test. ## Core Patterns ### 1. Factory Pattern for Test Data Use factories to create test data with sensible defaults and override support. See `references/factory-patterns.md` for detailed examples. **Quick example:** ```typescript const user = createUser() // defaults const admin = createUser({ role: "admin" }) // override const session = createTestSession({ userId: user.id, permissions: ["edit_workouts"] }) ``` **Benefits:** - Consistent test data across tests - Override only what matters for the test - Self-documenting defaults - Easy to maintain (change defaults in one place) ### 2. Database Testing with Fake DB Use `FakeDatabase` from `@repo/test-utils` to test database operations without hitting a real database: ```typescript import { FakeDatabase } from "@repo/test-utils/fakes/fake-db" import { createUser, createTeam } from "@repo/test-utils/factories" const db = new FakeDatabase<{ users: User; teams: Team }>() // Insert test data const user = db.insert("users", createUser()) const team = db.insert("teams", createTeam({ ownerId: user.id })) // Test your code const result = await yourFunction(db, team.id) // Verify const updated = db.findById("teams", team.id) expect(updated.name).toBe("Updated Name") ``` **FakeDatabase enforces D1's 100 parameter limit** - catches batch query bugs early. ### 3. MSW for Network Mocking Mock at the **network boundary**, not at the function level. Use Mock Service Worker (MSW) to intercept HTTP requests: ```typescript import { http, HttpResponse } from "msw" import { setupServer } from "msw/node" const server = setupServer( http.get("/api/workouts", () => { return HttpResponse.json([ { id: "w1", name: "Fran" }, { id: "w2", name: "Grace" }, ]) }) ) beforeAll(() => server.listen()) afterEach(() => server.resetHandlers()) afterAll(() => server.close()) it("fetches and displays workouts", async () => { render() // Component fetches /api/workouts await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByText("Fran")).toBeInTheDocument() }) }) ``` **Why MSW > function mocks:** - Tests real fetch/axios calls - Catches serialization issues - Tests error handling (network failures, 500s) - Same mock setup works for browser and Node.js ### 4. Async Testing Patterns **NEVER use arbitrary timeouts** (`setTimeout`, `sleep`). Use Testing Library's async utilities: ```typescript // ❌ BAD - flaky, slow it("shows success message", async () => { submitForm() await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000)) expect(screen.getByText("Success")).toBeInTheDocument() }) // ✅ GOOD - fast, reliable it("shows success message", async () => { submitForm() expect(await screen.findByText("Success")).toBeInTheDocument() }) // ✅ GOOD - with custom condition it("updates status", async () => { submitForm() await waitFor(() => { expect(screen.getByTestId("status")).toHaveTextContent("Complete") }) }) ``` **Async query variants:** | Query Type | Returns Immediately | Waits for Element | Use When | |------------|---------------------|-------------------|----------| | `getBy*` | ✅ throws if not found | ❌ No | Element should be there | | `queryBy*` | ✅ returns null | ❌ No | Checking absence | | `findBy*` | ❌ Promise | ✅ Yes (default 1s) | Async rendering | **Prefer `findBy*` for async content:** ```typescript // Automatically waits up to 1s, retries every 50ms const element = await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Submit" }) ``` ### 5. Testing React Components with Providers Use a custom render function to wrap components in necessary providers: ```typescript import { render } from "@testing-library/react" import { SessionProvider } from "@/components/session-provider" import { createTestSession } from "@repo/test-utils/factories" function renderWithSession(ui: React.ReactElement, session = createTestSession()) { return render( {ui} ) } it("shows user name when logged in", () => { const session = createTestSession({ user: { firstName: "Alice" } }) renderWithSession(, session) expect(screen.getByText("Welcome, Alice")).toBeInTheDocument() }) ``` **Common providers to wrap:** - `SessionProvider` - auth state - `QueryClientProvider` - React Query - `ThemeProvider` - styling - Custom context providers ## Multi-Component Testing Example ```typescript import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach } from "vitest" import { render, screen, waitFor } from "@testing-library/react" import userEvent from "@testing-library/user-event" import { FakeDatabase } from "@repo/test-utils/fakes/fake-db" import { createTestSession, createWorkout } from "@repo/test-utils/factories" describe("Workout Subscription Flow", () => { let db: FakeDatabase<{ workouts: Workout; subscriptions: Subscription }> let session: SessionWithMeta beforeEach(() => { db = new FakeDatabase() session = createTestSession({ permissions: ["subscribe_to_workouts"] }) // Seed test data const workout = db.insert("workouts", createWorkout({ name: "CrossFit Open 24.1" })) }) it("allows user to subscribe to a workout", async () => { const user = userEvent.setup() render(, { wrapper: SessionProvider }) // Step 1: Find workout expect(await screen.findByText("CrossFit Open 24.1")).toBeInTheDocument() // Step 2: Click subscribe await user.click(screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Subscribe" })) // Step 3: Verify subscription created await waitFor(() => { const subscriptions = db.findAll("subscriptions") expect(subscriptions).toHaveLength(1) expect(subscriptions[0].workoutId).toBe(workout.id) }) // Step 4: UI updates expect(screen.getByText("Subscribed")).toBeInTheDocument() }) }) ``` ## File Organization ``` test/ ├── integration/ # Multi-component/multi-layer tests │ ├── programming-subscription.test.ts │ ├── auth-flow.test.ts │ └── checkout-flow.test.ts ├── actions/ # Server action tests (mock services) │ └── workout-actions.test.ts ├── server/ # Service tests (mock DB) │ └── workouts.test.ts └── lib/ # Pure function tests (no mocks) └── scoring/ └── validate.test.ts ``` **Integration tests go in `test/integration/`** when they cross boundaries (UI + server + DB). ## Running Tests ```bash pnpm test # all tests pnpm test test/integration/ # integration tests only pnpm test -- programming-subscription.test.ts # single file ``` ## Key Principles 1. **Mock at boundaries, not internals** - Network (MSW), DB (FakeDatabase), external APIs 2. **Test behavior, not implementation** - User actions → expected outcomes 3. **Use factories for consistent data** - Override only what matters 4. **Async utilities over timeouts** - `findBy*`, `waitFor`, never `setTimeout` 5. **Custom render for providers** - Wrap components in necessary context 6. **Enforce real constraints** - FakeDatabase enforces D1's parameter limits ## Additional Resources - **Factory Patterns** - See `references/factory-patterns.md` for detailed factory examples - **Testing Library Docs** - https://testing-library.com/docs/queries/about - **MSW Docs** - https://mswjs.io/docs/ - **Vitest Docs** - https://vitest.dev/