--- name: lander-audit description: Audit landing page for conversion optimization including headline-ad alignment, promise-delivery consistency, trust signals, and friction points. Use when diagnosing low landing page CTR, optimizing funnels, or reviewing pages before launch. --- # Landing Page Audit Evaluate landing pages for conversion optimization. ## Process ### Step 1: Analyze Headline-Ad Alignment **Scent Trail Check** - Does headline match ad hook? - Is the promise consistent? - Same language/tone as ad? - Visual continuity from ad to page? **Message Match Score** - Strong: Exact phrase/promise carried through - Moderate: Similar theme, different words - Weak: Disconnect between ad and page ### Step 2: Check Promise-Delivery Consistency **Above the Fold** - Is main promise clear immediately? - Does headline address primary pain/desire? - Is there a clear value proposition? - Does subheadline support headline? **Body Content** - Does content deliver on headline promise? - Are claims substantiated with proof? - Is there a logical flow to the argument? - Does unique mechanism get explained? ### Step 3: Evaluate Trust Signals **Social Proof** - Customer testimonials (video > text) - Review counts/ratings - Customer photos - Before/after images - Case studies **Authority Signals** - Expert endorsements - Certifications/credentials - Media mentions (as seen in...) - Scientific backing - Founder credibility **Risk Reversal** - Money-back guarantee - Free trial - No-commitment language - Contact information visible ### Step 4: Identify Friction Points **Visual Friction** - Cluttered layout - Hard to read text - Poor mobile experience - Slow loading elements - Confusing navigation **Cognitive Friction** - Too many choices - Unclear next step - Missing information - Jargon/complexity - Unanswered objections **Form Friction** - Too many fields - Unclear field labels - No progress indicator - Privacy concerns - Submit button unclear ### Step 5: Output Improvement Recommendations ``` ## LANDER AUDIT: [Page URL/Name] ### QUICK SCORES (1-10) | Element | Score | Priority | |---------|-------|----------| | Headline Match | X/10 | [H/M/L] | | Value Prop Clarity | X/10 | [H/M/L] | | Trust Signals | X/10 | [H/M/L] | | Proof Elements | X/10 | [H/M/L] | | CTA Strength | X/10 | [H/M/L] | | Mobile Experience | X/10 | [H/M/L] | | Page Speed | X/10 | [H/M/L] | | **OVERALL** | XX/70 | | ### HEADLINE ANALYSIS **Current:** "[Headline text]" **Issue:** [Problem identified] **Recommendation:** "[Suggested improvement]" ### ABOVE THE FOLD **What's Working:** - [Positive element] **Issues:** - [Problem 1] - [Problem 2] **Recommendations:** 1. [Specific fix] 2. [Specific fix] ### TRUST & PROOF **Current Elements:** - [List what exists] **Missing Elements:** - [What should be added] **Recommendations:** 1. [Specific addition] 2. [Specific addition] ### FRICTION POINTS **High Priority Fixes:** 1. [Issue] → [Solution] 2. [Issue] → [Solution] **Medium Priority:** 1. [Issue] → [Solution] **Nice to Have:** 1. [Issue] → [Solution] ### CTA ANALYSIS **Current CTA:** "[Button text]" **Placement:** [Description] **Issues:** [Problems] **Recommendation:** "[Improved CTA]" ### A/B TEST SUGGESTIONS 1. Test: [Element to test] - Control: [Current] - Variant: [New version] - Hypothesis: [Expected outcome] 2. Test: [Element to test] ... ### PRIORITY ACTION LIST 1. [Highest impact fix] 2. [Second priority] 3. [Third priority] ``` ## Key Metrics to Consider **From Jason K:** - Watch lander CTR closely - Track time on page - Monitor initiate checkout ratio - If ad works but lander doesn't, fix lander **Conversion Killers:** - Generic headlines - Walls of text - No visible social proof - Weak or hidden CTA - Slow load time - Poor mobile experience Source: Jason K, Affiliate Research