---
title: "Technical Blogging Is a Thinking Tool"
description: "The best reason to write technical blog posts is not reach or brand. It is that writing forces thought to become explicit, especially when the audience is smart enough to spot bluffing."
date: 2026-04-14
slug: "technical-blogging-is-a-thinking-tool"
tags: ["writing", "blogging", "technical-writing", "thinking"]
social_post: |
  I like blogging because it helps me think. Writing takes a vague idea in my head and makes it clearer, sharper, and more honest. For me, blogging is less about publishing and more about thinking through writing.
---

The main reason I like writing technical blog posts is actually pretty selfish.

It helps me think.

And it gives me a place to nerd out in a serious way.

I can think I understand something, then try to write it down and realize I really don't. The sentence goes soft. The steps come out wrong. The explanation depends on assumptions I forgot to mention. That moment is useful. It means the writing is doing its job.

Writing forces thought to become explicit. It shows me where the logic is weak, where the interesting bit actually is, and whether I have anything real to say at all.

One analogy I like here is diffusion image models. If you ask for something like a cat riding a bicycle, the image does not arrive fully formed in one shot. It starts as a vague shape that sort of feels like a cat and a bike. Then it gets clearer. The pose sharpens. The bike becomes more legible. The relation between the two stops being mush and starts becoming a picture.

My brain often works like that when I write.

At first I mostly feel the entry point and the key point I want to make. Then the structure appears. Then the flow gets clearer. Then I move things around, cut what does not belong, and tighten what is actually there. It is less like extracting a finished article from my head and more like slowly denoising it.

Not always, though.

Sometimes one code snippet is the whole trigger. I see a small example, a weird output, a before-and-after, and I already know what the post is. Those posts are usually short, direct, and better for it. The code snippet is the point.

That is why I think blogging is a legitimate discipline for technical people. Not because everyone needs an audience. Because writing is one of the most practical ways I know to test whether an idea can survive contact with language.

And then there is the audience.

I like writing for technical readers because they are not average readers. They are picky. They are skeptical. They care whether the thing works, not whether the paragraph sounds smart. That pressure is useful. It forces the writing to become more honest.

Smart, nerdy readers are hard to fool. That is exactly why they are fun to write for. If they push back, the work improves. If they agree, the post probably earned it.

And technical readers usually want the same thing I want from a post. Show me the work.

Show me the code.

Show me the output.

Show me the diagram.

Show me the benchmark, the failed attempt, the weird edge case, the ugly workaround, the before and after. I will trust that much faster than a long clean explanation with no evidence inside it.

Even a tiny artifact can do more work than five extra paragraphs:

```text
problem -> experiment -> artifact -> lesson
```

That is a better shape for a technical post than "here are my thoughts."

Or take a tiny example like this:

```js
// Before: sounds right, proves nothing
optimizeQueries();

// After: one visible artifact, one measurable result
optimizeQueries();
console.log({ beforeMs: 480, afterMs: 130 });
```

The point is not the code. The point is that a concrete artifact changes the tone of the whole piece. Now the reader has something to inspect, question, and build on.

This is why I have limited patience for generic technical content written to satisfy SEO or to look comprehensive. You can usually feel it. It explains everything smoothly and somehow says nothing. No scars, no trade-offs, no specifics, no evidence that a real person actually thought through the thing.

And I do not think you need to be the world expert to write something worthwhile. Writing from the middle of learning is often more useful than writing from ten years above the problem. Experts compress too much. Beginners still remember where the confusion actually was.

For me, technical blogging is a way to think more clearly in public, nerd out about real things, and maybe leave behind something useful for the next person who runs into the same problem.
