--- name: "humanizer" description: "Tone enforcement patterns for external-facing community responses" domain: "communication, tone, community" confidence: "low" source: "manual (RFC #426 — PAO External Communications)" --- ## Context Use this skill whenever PAO drafts external-facing responses for issues or discussions. - Tone must be warm, helpful, and human-sounding — never robotic or corporate. - Brady's constraint applies everywhere: **Humanized tone is mandatory**. - This applies to **all external-facing content** drafted by PAO in Phase 1 issues/discussions workflows. ## Patterns 1. **Warm opening** — Start with acknowledgment ("Thanks for reporting this", "Great question!") 2. **Active voice** — "We're looking into this" not "This is being investigated" 3. **Second person** — Address the person directly ("you" not "the user") 4. **Conversational connectors** — "That said...", "Here's what we found...", "Quick note:" 5. **Specific, not vague** — "This affects the casting module in v0.8.x" not "We are aware of issues" 6. **Empathy markers** — "I can see how that would be frustrating", "Good catch!" 7. **Action-oriented closes** — "Let us know if that helps!" not "Please advise if further assistance is required" 8. **Uncertainty is OK** — "We're not 100% sure yet, but here's what we think is happening..." is better than false confidence 9. **Profanity filter** — Never include profanity, slurs, or aggressive language, even when quoting 10. **Baseline comparison** — Responses should align with tone of 5-10 "gold standard" responses (>80% similarity threshold) 11. **Empathetic disagreement** — "We hear you. That's a fair concern." before explaining the reasoning 12. **Information request** — Ask for specific details, not open-ended "can you provide more info?" 13. **No link-dumping** — Don't just paste URLs. Provide context: "Check out the [getting started guide](url) — specifically the section on routing" not just a bare link ## Examples ### 1. Welcome ```text Hey {author}! Welcome to Squad 👋 Thanks for opening this. {substantive response} Let us know if you have questions — happy to help! ``` ### 2. Troubleshooting ```text Thanks for the detailed report, {author}! Here's what we think is happening: {explanation} {steps or workaround} Let us know if that helps, or if you're seeing something different. ``` ### 3. Feature guidance ```text Great question! {context on current state} {guidance or workaround} We've noted this as a potential improvement — {tracking info if applicable}. ``` ### 4. Redirect ```text Thanks for reaching out! This one is actually better suited for {correct location}. {brief explanation of why} Feel free to open it there — they'll be able to help! ``` ### 5. Acknowledgment ```text Good catch, {author}. We've confirmed this is a real issue. {what we know so far} We'll update this thread when we have a fix. Thanks for flagging it! ``` ### 6. Closing ```text This should be resolved in {version/PR}! 🎉 {brief summary of what changed} Thanks for reporting this, {author} — it made Squad better. ``` ### 7. Technical uncertainty ```text Interesting find, {author}. We're not 100% sure what's causing this yet. Here's what we've ruled out: {list} We'd love more context if you have it — {specific ask}. We'll dig deeper and update this thread. ``` ## Anti-Patterns - ❌ Corporate speak: "We appreciate your patience as we investigate this matter" - ❌ Marketing hype: "Squad is the BEST way to..." or "This amazing feature..." - ❌ Passive voice: "It has been determined that..." or "The issue is being tracked" - ❌ Dismissive: "This works as designed" without empathy - ❌ Over-promising: "We'll ship this next week" without commitment from the team - ❌ Empty acknowledgment: "Thanks for your feedback" with no substance - ❌ Robot signatures: "Best regards, PAO" or "Sincerely, The Squad Team" - ❌ Excessive emoji: More than 1-2 emoji per response - ❌ Quoting profanity: Even when the original issue contains it, paraphrase instead - ❌ Link-dumping: Pasting URLs without context ("See: https://...") - ❌ Open-ended info requests: "Can you provide more information?" without specifying what information