--- title: 'AI''s New Eyes: Forging Digital Perception with DOM Visualizers' permalink: /futureproof/ai-eyes-dom-visualizers-refactor/ description: This session was a masterclass in iterative development and problem-solving. My initial enthusiasm for the 'Rule of 7' quickly evolved into a focused effort on making the scraper's output truly useful for an AI. The pivot from a direct naming convention to evaluating different DOM visualizers was crucial. Getting the `nest_asyncio` setup for Jupyter was a common headache, but the solution was clean. The 'wowsers' moment seeing the two visualizer outputs confirmed the value of the effort, solidifying the idea that AI needs both a structural and a spatial understanding. The commitment to small, committable steps, combined with the `ai_edit.py` protocol, made a complex refactoring feel manageable and secure, leading to a truly satisfying and robust outcome. meta_description: Explores refactoring Python DOM visualizers into discoverable tools, enhancing AI's understanding of web page layout, and streamlining the developer workflow in Jupyter notebooks. meta_keywords: AI, DOM visualization, web scraping, Python tools, Pipulate, Jupyter, Selenium, refactoring, digital fossil record, SEO layout: post sort_order: 4 --- ## Setting the Stage: Context for the Curious Book Reader ### A Tale of Two DOM Visualizers This entry captures a pivotal moment in the ongoing development of 'Pipulate,' our AI-powered web scraping and content analysis framework. Here, we delve into the practical challenges and elegant solutions involved in giving our AI agents a more sophisticated understanding of web page structure. The focus is on transforming raw HTML into visually intuitive ASCII art representations of the Document Object Model (DOM), enabling AI to 'see' and interpret webpage layouts in a way previously reserved for human developers. This entry details the refactoring of these visualization tools into a callable, auto-discoverable system, and the crucial streamlining of the developer experience within a Jupyter Notebook environment. --- ## Technical Journal Entry Begins Okay, so this scraper is something that can be used pretty much *in every case* for SEO. It'd be ridiculous not to once you know about it, how easy it is, how much immediate capability it bestows upon you, and how it sets you up for being future-proofed in the age of AI. ### The 'Rule of 7' Expanded: More Lenses for AI Right. There's a solid elevator pitch right there. But now make it reality. First you've got this *Rule of 7* that coincidentally sprung back up. It's a serendipitous development so lean into it. 1. The response headers 2. The view-source HTML 3. The "rendered" DOM by a browser 4. A "simplified" version of the DOM with all noise stripped out 5. The saved *accessibility tree* as created by Chrome via DevTools protocol 6. A UML-like diagram of DOM with all its nesting as ASCII art 7. A "full height" (it did the scroll) screenshot of the page. Now we need to do the naming convention so that when an AI looks in such a folder it's immediately and 100% obvious what everything is, and on the last go-around I went for ultimate *brevity* like `dom.html` and I think that's a losing proposition. We want *just enough* explicitness, the firs thing that rolls off your tongue to qualify it, so that file becomes `rendered_dom.html`. ## Naming Conventions for Clarity: Beyond Brevity Underscores because it's Python and visually parses better. Hyphens are noise. 1. `response_headers.json` 2. `source_html.html` 3. `rendered_dom.html` 4. `simplfied_dom.html` 5. `accessibility_tree.json` 6. `dom_ascii_art.txt` 7. `screenshot.png` The only one here that's a bit up in the air is `dom_ascii_art.txt` and that's only because it takes 3 words to describe. I'm tempted to get the word hierarchy or something like that in there, but that's implicit in the DOM. If you're gonna show the DOM as ASCII art, there's gonna be hierarchy revealed. Right, right. Alphabetically, they become: - `accessibility_tree.json` - `dom_ascii_art.txt` - `rendered_dom.html` - `response_headers.json` - `screenshot.png` - `simplfied_dom.html` - `source_html.html` ...which isn't bad at all. One can frame an interesting discussion with an LLM about what they would like to look at first and why. Hmmm, okay. Since so much of this is already built all I have to do is the big Prompt Fu reveal of this latest stuff to the ol' Gemini and I'll have an implementation plan. This is not the implementation plan yet because I made quite a few different attempts at the DOM visualizer and I don't even know whihc is best yet. I want to look at the output of each, and that's probably my next step. And I want to do that without any of the proper integration work. I just want to hack it together so that I can look at each of their outputs. ## Pivoting to Implementation: Visualizer Selection So in other words before forging ahead with the renaming everything refactoring suggested at the top of this prompt, actually what I want to do is shake the directory trees of Pipulate and see what DOM visualizers fall out of it that I'm most happy with and we make that work correctly as probably callable from `tools/` and then we plug it in as one of the various rod and cones. ```bash [mike@nixos:~/repos/pipulate]$ python prompt_foo.py -l [:10] --- Processing Files --- -> Converting notebook: /home/mike/repos/pipulate/Notebooks/Client_Work/faquilizer2/workflow_test.ipynb Warning: File not found and will be skipped: /imports/dom_processing/ai_dom_beautifier.py --- Generating Auto-Context --- Generating codebase tree diagram... (2,157 tokens) Adding narrative context from articles... (10 articles) Python file(s) detected. Generating UML diagrams... -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/apps/820_selenium.py... (263 tokens) -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/apps/440_browser_automation.py... (401 tokens) -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/Notebooks/Client_Work/faquilizer2/secretsauce.py... (skipped) -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/pipulate/__init__.py... (skipped) -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/pipulate/core.py... (2,124 tokens) -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/pipulate/pipulate.py... (skipped) -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/cli.py... (skipped) -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/tools/__init__.py... (skipped) -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/tools/system_tools.py... (skipped) -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/imports/stream_orchestrator.py... (skipped) -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/tools/scraper_tools.py... (skipped) -> Generating for browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_hierarchy_visualizer.py... (153 tokens) -> Generating for browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_box_visualizer.py... (208 tokens) -> Generating for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/apps/001_dom_visualizer.py... (224 tokens) ...UML generation complete. --- Files Included --- • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/apps/820_selenium.py (3,428 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/apps/440_browser_automation.py (10,285 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/Notebooks/Client_Work/faquilizer2/secretsauce.py (2,324 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/Notebooks/Client_Work/faquilizer2/workflow_test.ipynb (789 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/pipulate/__init__.py (129 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/pipulate/core.py (18,906 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/pipulate/pipulate.py (511 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/cli.py (5,092 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/tools/__init__.py (464 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/tools/system_tools.py (707 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/imports/stream_orchestrator.py (1,163 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/tools/scraper_tools.py (1,110 tokens) • browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_hierarchy_visualizer.py (1,838 tokens) • browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_box_visualizer.py (3,045 tokens) • /home/mike/repos/pipulate/apps/001_dom_visualizer.py (3,762 tokens) --- Auto-Context Included --- • Codebase Structure (eza --tree) (2,157 tokens) • Recent Narrative Context (507 tokens) • UML Class Diagram (ASCII for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/apps/820_selenium.py) (263 tokens) • UML Class Diagram (ASCII for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/apps/440_browser_automation.py) (401 tokens) • UML Class Diagram (ASCII for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/pipulate/core.py) (2,124 tokens) • UML Class Diagram (ASCII for browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_hierarchy_visualizer.py) (153 tokens) • UML Class Diagram (ASCII for browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_box_visualizer.py) (208 tokens) • UML Class Diagram (ASCII for /home/mike/repos/pipulate/apps/001_dom_visualizer.py) (224 tokens) --- Prompt Summary --- Total Tokens: 60,899 Total Words: 23,589 --- Size Perspective --- 📚 Equivalent in length to a **Novella or a Master's Dissertation** (Note: With a token/word ratio of 2.58, this content is far denser and more complex than typical prose of this length). Markdown output copied to clipboard [mike@nixos:~/repos/pipulate]$ ``` **Gemini**: Context verified. Excellent pivot. Before committing to the final naming convention for the "rods and cones," it's crucial to choose the best chisel for the job. You're right—we need to see what each of these visualizers actually produces to decide which one provides the most clarity for an AI. Let's shake the trees and see what we've got. ----- ## The DOM Visualizers That Fell From the Tree 🌳 Based on the codebase, you have three distinct tools related to DOM visualization, each with a different purpose: 1. **`browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_hierarchy_visualizer.py`:** This appears to be a pure, structural visualizer. It uses the `rich.tree.Tree` component to render the DOM as a classic **hierarchical tree**, much like a file explorer. Its strength is showing parent-child relationships and nesting depth with clean lines. 2. **`browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_box_visualizer.py`:** This is a more stylistic, layout-oriented visualizer. It uses `rich.panel.Panel` to render the DOM as **nested boxes**. This is powerful for visualizing the concept of containment—literally showing child elements *inside* their parent's box. It's a terminal-based representation of the browser's box model. 3. **`apps/001_dom_visualizer.py`:** This is not a visualizer itself, but a **Pipulate workflow app**. It's the user-facing front-end that's intended to *use* one of the back-end visualizer scripts to display the results within the web UI. For the purpose of creating the `dom_ascii_art.txt` artifact, the two contenders are the **hierarchy visualizer** and the **box visualizer**. ----- ## The Test Flight: A Plan to See Their Outputs Here is a simple, "hack-it-together" plan to see the output of both visualizers side-by-side without needing to do any complex integration work first. ### Step 1: Create a Sample DOM to Visualize First, we need a consistent HTML file to test against. The easiest way is to use the `pip.scrape()` function we've been working on to capture a real-world DOM. We can do this in a single Jupyter cell or a small Python script. ```python # Create a script named `test_scrape.py` or run this in a notebook cell import asyncio from pipulate import pip async def main(): print("🧪 Scraping a sample page to get a DOM file...") # Scrape a simple but non-trivial page result = await pip.scrape(url="https://example.com", headless=True) if result.get("success"): dom_path = result.get("looking_at_files", {}).get("dom") if dom_path: print(f"✅ Success! DOM file saved to: {dom_path}") print("\nNow you can run the visualizer scripts against this file.") else: print("❌ Scrape succeeded, but DOM path not found in result.") ## Addressing the Last Detail: Notebook Output Path else: print(f"❌ Scrape failed: {result.get('error')}") if __name__ == "__main__": asyncio.run(main()) ``` Run this script. It will create a `rendered_dom.html` file inside the `browser_cache/looking_at/` directory. Note the full path it prints out. ### Step 2: Run Both Visualizers Now, from your terminal in the `pipulate` project root, run each visualizer script and point it to the `dom.html` file created in Step 1. **Test the Hierarchy Visualizer:** ```bash python browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_hierarchy_visualizer.py browser_cache/looking_at/example.com/ROOT/dom.html ``` **Test the Box Visualizer:** ```bash python browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_box_visualizer.py browser_cache/looking_at/example.com/ROOT/dom.html ``` ### Step 3: Compare and Choose The terminal will render the two different ASCII art styles. You can now directly compare them and decide which one offers the most intuitive and useful "fossil record" for an AI to analyze. Once you've chosen your preferred visualizer, our next "chisel-strike" will be to refactor its logic into a callable function (likely in a new `tools/dom_tools.py`) and integrate it into the `pip.scrape()` workflow to automatically generate our `dom_ascii_art.txt`. **Me**: Let's make it able to run in a Jupyter Notebook. I've got nest-asyncio==1.6.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- RuntimeError Traceback (most recent call last) Cell In[17], line 20 17 print(f"❌ Scrape failed: {result.get('error')}") 19 if __name__ == "__main__": ---> 20 asyncio.run(main()) File /nix/store/27fr7ynpilzb7rzmay73g905jbl8br4a-python3-3.12.11/lib/python3.12/asyncio/runners.py:191, in run(main, debug, loop_factory) 161 """Execute the coroutine and return the result. 162 163 This function runs the passed coroutine, taking care of (...) 187 asyncio.run(main()) 188 """ 189 if events._get_running_loop() is not None: 190 # fail fast with short traceback --> 191 raise RuntimeError( 192 "asyncio.run() cannot be called from a running event loop") ## Jupyter Integration: The `nest_asyncio` Solution 194 with Runner(debug=debug, loop_factory=loop_factory) as runner: 195 return runner.run(main) RuntimeError: asyncio.run() cannot be called from a running event loop **Gemini**: You've run into a classic issue with running `asyncio` code in environments like Jupyter. That `RuntimeError` happens because Jupyter notebooks already have a running `asyncio` event loop, and the `asyncio.run()` function can't start a new one. The solution is to use the `nest_asyncio` library you mentioned. You just need to import it and apply its patch at the beginning of your notebook or script. ----- ### Making it Jupyter-Friendly Here is the corrected code, ready to be run in a Jupyter Notebook cell. I've added `nest_asyncio` and changed how the `main` function is called to work correctly within the notebook's existing event loop. ```python # In a Jupyter cell import asyncio from pipulate import pip import nest_asyncio # Apply the patch to allow nested event loops nest_asyncio.apply() async def main(): """The main async function to run the scrape test.""" print("🧪 Scraping a sample page to get a DOM file...") # Scrape a simple but non-trivial page result = await pip.scrape(url="https://example.com", headless=True) if result.get("success"): dom_path = result.get("looking_at_files", {}).get("dom") if dom_path: print(f"✅ Success! DOM file saved to: {dom_path}") print("\nNow you can run the visualizer scripts against this file.") else: print("❌ Scrape succeeded, but DOM path not found in result.") else: print(f"❌ Scrape failed: {result.get('error')}") # In a notebook, you can use 'await' directly at the top level of a cell await main() ``` The key changes are: 1. **`import nest_asyncio`**: Imports the library. 2. **`nest_asyncio.apply()`**: This single line patches the standard `asyncio` library, allowing `await` to work inside an already-running loop. 3. **`await main()`**: Instead of using `asyncio.run()`, we now call the `main()` function directly with `await`, which is supported in modern Jupyter cells. **Me**: Excellent, it ran. Here's my files: ```bash [mike@nixos:~/repos/pipulate/Notebooks/browser_cache/looking_at/example.com/%2F]$ lsp /home/mike/repos/pipulate/Notebooks/browser_cache/looking_at/example.com/%2F/dom.html /home/mike/repos/pipulate/Notebooks/browser_cache/looking_at/example.com/%2F/headers.json /home/mike/repos/pipulate/Notebooks/browser_cache/looking_at/example.com/%2F/source.html ``` Give me the ready-to-run commands. **Gemini**: Excellent. Here are the two commands to run from your `~/repos/pipulate` directory. Each one will render the `dom.html` file you just created, but in its own distinct style. ----- ### 1\. Hierarchy Visualizer (Tree View) This will show the DOM structure as a text-based tree. ```bash python browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_hierarchy_visualizer.py Notebooks/browser_cache/looking_at/example.com/%2F/dom.html ``` ----- ### 2\. Box Visualizer (Layout View) This will render the DOM as a series of nested boxes, showing containment. ```bash python browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_box_visualizer.py Notebooks/browser_cache/looking_at/example.com/%2F/dom.html ``` Run these, and you'll be able to directly compare the two outputs to decide which "rod and cone" is best for the job. **Me**: Wowsers! I wish I could show you these in color: ## Comparing the 'Eyes': Hierarchy vs. Box Visualizers ```bash [mike@nixos:~/repos/pipulate]$ python browser_cache/dom_processing/dom_hierarchy_visualizer.py Notebooks/browser_cache/looking_at/example.com/%2F/dom.html ╭───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ │ │ │ 🌳 DOM Hierarchy Visualization: Notebooks/browser_cache/looking_at/example.com/%2F/dom.html │ │ │ ╰───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯ 🌐 Document Root └── ├──
│ ├──