Comments on: Zumix Proposal and MOU process https://codesign.mit.edu/2013/10/zumix-proposal-and-mou-process/ civic media: collaborative design studio Mon, 28 Oct 2013 22:38:11 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2.7 By: beckyh https://codesign.mit.edu/2013/10/zumix-proposal-and-mou-process/#comment-236 Mon, 28 Oct 2013 22:38:11 +0000 http://codesign.mit.edu/?p=749#comment-236 Hey ZUMIX Team!
I’ve enjoyed reading about your processes and considerations of how to include more ZUMIX folks in the codesign process! I’m sharing some comments below following the URBANO feedback methodology. Let me know if I can clarify anything.
Cheers,
Bex

Clarify
You say that you are moving forward with the Old Time Radio idea and also looking for more design ideas. What will you be seeking to design? Are you still planning to build radio receivers, just not necessarily styled as “Old Time”?

Value
This project could be a great way to engage more folks already involved with ZUMIX. I can imagine running workshops with people to build small personal radios.

Concern
Are you considering designing the interactions with the radio as well as the radio device? Thinking about how this will be engaging for people and how people can engage with ZUMIX after listening will help you to guide your design so it answers to the goals you’ve identified together.

Suggestions
This could be a fun way to invite people to listen to ZUMIX Radio programs. You might also consider designing take-away components for people after they have listened or spoken with you — stickers, pamphlets, SD cards with radio programming… etc.

]]>
By: schock https://codesign.mit.edu/2013/10/zumix-proposal-and-mou-process/#comment-229 Sat, 26 Oct 2013 18:27:13 +0000 http://codesign.mit.edu/?p=749#comment-229 This is great 🙂 Feedback below!

Clarify:

*Who is the unnamed ‘youth representative?’

* Did you consider building micropower radio transmitters?

* Will the Radio also be able to play the Zumix Radio station live,
either via the livestream, FM transmission (if they get their
license), or both?

* Does everyone on your project team have the skills needed to build
the Zumix Radio? Please clarify who will be leading this component,
and what aspects of the project others will be responsible for (for
example, documentation, graphic/visual design, outreach, event
planning, and so on).

Value

* The central project idea, designing and building a Zumix Mobile
Radio, is clear, concrete, and fits directly with Zumix’ goals on
multiple levels.

* Doing design/build workshops together w/Zumix youth adds a lot of
value to the project, above and beyond the object that you’ll create
together, very nice.

* It’s a fun, interesting, creative approach.

* The project proposal document is very clear and well organized, glad
to see the inclusion of clear roles and that your team is
considering both product and process ownership.

Concern:

* Your project proposal leaves case study work until the very end.
Please Rethink this so that you are doing process documentation and
write-ups as you go.

* Clarify roles and responsibilities for all project team members, not
just hardware design/build

* It’s not clear how or whether the project will meet the goal of
increasing listenership of Zumix Radio live stream, think more about
this

* The features of the actual Mobile Radio you’ve proposed to build
need additional workshopping, for example: what if people want to
swap out the music? If it goes outside, will battery, amplifier, and
speakers be powerful enough to be heard? Can it be used to play the
live stream from Zumix radio, and if so, how? Is it a standalone
object, or is it designed to connect to other devices like a mobile
phone or mp3 player? Etc.

* This isn’t really a concern, more of a clarification: In your
project proposal post, you state ﻗ°ﻸWho gets to decide which project
we choose? ﻗ°ﺄ Ultimately, the choice is ours. This seems like a
central lesson that this course is trying to convey. Weﻗ°ﻷre in the
position to choose who participates and who doesnﻗ°ﻷt. This gives us
power.ﻗ°ﻻ However, this doesn’t have to be the case. For example, your
MOU lays out decisionmaking power; if you’d prefer ZuMix staff to
choose between projects, you could simply state that in your MOU. If
you’d like to come to formal consensus together, you might specify
that instead.

Suggestions:

* Create an ‘Instructable,’ or clear, well-documented how-to guide,
for your Zumix Radio build. This will help others do similar
projects in the future, and also provide more visibility for Zumix
Radio.

* Plan how to do a good job with process documentation as you go, and
who will do this. Think about how process documentation might also
be part of a social media strategy to get people listening to the
station’s stream.

* Consider a stop-motion video of your build, as a fun part of
documentation that might also be shared on social media and bring
more listeners to Zumix radio stream.

* The best commercial implementation of a ‘Mobile Radio’ like the one
you’re describing is probably the Logitech Squeezebox. Suggest
taking a look at its design & features.

* If you’re able to get the build cost way down, consider whether you
can offer youth workshop participants the option to take their Zumix
Mobile Radio home with them once they’ve built it?

* Suggest including a mini input and male to male cable with the
Radio, so that people can connect their mobile phone headphone
output and use the device as an external speaker (a nice feature of
the Logitech Squeezebox).

* Suggest a design that allows people to easily modify the music
that’ll be played. A built in drive preloaded with music seems like
a poor design choice? Consider setting it up so that the music it
plays is stored on a USB flash drive, a cheap & widely available
memory option.

* If it’s going to be brought outside, it needs powerful battery,
amplifier, and speakers.

* Please specify your open license for process documentation (CC
attribution sharealike would be good).

]]>