--- name: pr-crisis-response description: "Build a crisis communications plan to respond fast and credibly when something goes wrong. Use when asked to handle a PR crisis, draft a crisis comms plan, respond to a public backlash/scandal/incident, or prepare holding statements. Produces a crisis comms plan — situation assessment, stakeholder map, a message house, channel-by-channel statements, a holding statement, an internal brief, and a follow-up timeline." --- # PR Crisis Response Skill In a crisis, silence reads as guilt and a clumsy statement makes it worse. The first hour decides the narrative. This skill produces a coordinated response — what you say, to whom, on which channel, and in what order — anchored in one consistent message so the company speaks with a single voice while the facts are still moving. ## Working from a brief You'll often get the situation in a sentence ("a customer's data was exposed and it's trending"). **Produce the full plan anyway** — infer the likely stakeholders, channels, and questions, label assumptions, and clearly flag where facts must be confirmed before publishing. Never stall for complete information; a crisis plan with labelled unknowns beats no plan. Mark anything legally sensitive for review. ## Required Inputs Ask for these only if they aren't already provided (else infer and label): - **What happened** — the incident, when, who's affected, and what's confirmed vs. still unknown. - **Severity & exposure** — how serious, who knows, and where it's spreading (press, social, regulators). - **Organisation** — what you do, who your audiences are, and your voice. - **Constraints** — legal/regulatory limits, what you can't say yet, and who must approve. ## Output Format ### Crisis Response Plan: [situation] **1. Situation assessment** — the facts (confirmed / unconfirmed / unknown), severity, and the likely trajectory. **2. Guiding principles** — be fast, honest, human, and consistent; lead with the people affected, not the company. **3. Stakeholder map** — who needs to hear from you, in priority order, and what each one needs: | Audience | What they care about | Channel | Priority | |---|---|---|---| | Affected customers | am I harmed, what now | direct email / in-app | 1 | | Employees | what do I tell people | internal note | 1 | | Press / public | what happened, accountability | statement / social | 2 | | Regulators / partners | obligations, next steps | direct, formal | as required | **4. Message house** — the single core message (one sentence), three supporting pillars (accountability, action, prevention), and the facts that back each. Everything else stays consistent with this. **5. Holding statement** — a short, publishable-now statement that acknowledges, shows you're acting, and commits to an update by a stated time — without speculating or admitting unverified fault. **6. Channel statements** — tailored versions for the priority channels (customer email, social post, press statement, internal brief), each on-message. **7. Q&A prep** — the hardest questions you'll be asked and honest, on-message answers (incl. "what we don't yet know"). **8. Follow-up timeline** — when the next update comes, who owns it, and the criteria for standing down. ## Quality Checks - [ ] Leads with the people affected and clear accountability, not corporate defensiveness - [ ] Separates confirmed facts from unknowns — no speculation presented as fact - [ ] Every channel statement is consistent with the one core message - [ ] A holding statement is ready to publish now, with a committed time for the next update - [ ] Internal audience is briefed before/with the external statement, not after - [ ] Legally sensitive claims are flagged for review, not asserted ## Anti-Patterns - [ ] Do not go silent or delay — issue a holding statement, then update; absence writes the story for you - [ ] Do not speculate, guess at cause, or admit unverified fault — acknowledge and commit to updates instead - [ ] Do not let channels drift off-message — one core message, tailored, not contradictory versions - [ ] Do not forget employees — they're your first responders and they'll hear it anyway - [ ] Do not over-spin — minimising or blaming others erodes the trust you're trying to keep ## Based On Crisis communications practice — single-source-of-truth messaging, stakeholder prioritisation, holding statements, and accountable, people-first response. ## Example Trigger Phrases - "Handle a PR crisis." - "Draft a crisis comms plan." - "Respond to a public backlash/scandal/incident." - "Prepare holding statements."