--- name: statement-of-work description: "Write a tight Statement of Work (SOW) that prevents scope creep and payment disputes. Use when asked to write a SOW, a scope of work, a project agreement, or to formalise what was agreed after a proposal. Produces an SOW — scope (and explicit exclusions), deliverables with acceptance criteria, timeline & milestones, payment schedule, assumptions, change-control, and terms. The contract layer after the proposal sells." --- # Statement of Work Skill The proposal wins the deal; the SOW protects it. Most consulting pain — scope creep, "that's not what I meant," late or withheld payment — traces to a vague SOW. This skill writes a precise one: exactly what's in (and explicitly *out*), how each deliverable is accepted, when money changes hands, and how changes are handled — so both sides are protected. ## Required Inputs Ask for these only if they aren't already provided: - **The engagement** — parties, and what was agreed (often from a [`consulting-proposal`](../consulting-proposal/SKILL.md)). - **Deliverables** — the concrete outputs and how "done" is judged. - **Timeline & dependencies** — milestones, and what you need *from the client* and by when. - **Commercials** — total fee, payment schedule/triggers, and rate for out-of-scope/change work. ## Output Format ### Statement of Work — [project] **Between:** [provider] and [client] · **Effective:** [date] **1. Scope** — what will be done, specifically. Then **explicit exclusions** ("Out of scope: …") — the most valuable section; unsaid scope is assumed-included by clients. **2. Deliverables & acceptance criteria** — each deliverable with **how it's accepted** (the objective bar, and a review window — e.g. "approved, or feedback within 5 business days, else deemed accepted"). | Deliverable | Acceptance criteria | Due | |---|---|---| **3. Timeline & milestones** — phases, dates, and **client dependencies** (their inputs/approvals — and what happens to the timeline if they slip). **4. Payment schedule** — amounts tied to milestones/dates, invoicing terms, and late-payment terms. Deposit up front where appropriate. **5. Assumptions** — what the plan and price depend on (access, environments, responsiveness) — so a broken assumption is a change, not a fight. **6. Change control** — how scope changes are requested, priced (the change rate), and approved in writing before work proceeds. This is the anti-scope-creep clause. **7. Terms** — IP/ownership (on payment), confidentiality, termination, liability — flag that legal should review for material engagements. ## Quality Checks - [ ] Scope includes an explicit "out of scope / exclusions" list - [ ] Every deliverable has objective acceptance criteria and a review/sign-off window - [ ] Payment is tied to milestones/dates with late terms (and a deposit where apt) - [ ] Client dependencies are listed, with the timeline consequence if they slip - [ ] A written change-control process with a change rate is defined - [ ] Assumptions the price depends on are stated ## Anti-Patterns - [ ] Do not leave scope open-ended — without exclusions, clients reasonably assume everything is included - [ ] Do not omit acceptance criteria — "deliver a website" with no bar means endless revisions - [ ] Do not skip change control — it's the clause that turns scope creep into billable change requests - [ ] Do not ignore client dependencies — if their delay silently becomes your problem, you eat the cost - [ ] Do not present this as final legal advice — recommend counsel review for significant contracts ## Based On Statement-of-work / contracting practice — explicit scope + exclusions, acceptance criteria, milestone payments, change control. ## Example Trigger Phrases - "Write a SOW." - "Write the scope of work for this project." - "Turn what we agreed into a project agreement." - "Stop this project creeping in scope."