--- name: press-kit-epk description: "Build an electronic press kit that bookers and blogs actually read โ€” the three-sentence bio that isn't 'genre-defying', a one-page layout with streaming numbers presented honestly, the photo and live-video requirements, and pitch emails tuned per target (venue, blog, radio, festival). Use when a musician says 'I need an EPK', 'venues keep ignoring my emails', 'write my band bio', or 'what do I send festivals'. Produces the EPK content, the one-page layout spec, and four pitch email templates." homepage: https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/skill/press-kit-epk.html metadata: { "openclaw": { "emoji": "๐Ÿง " } } --- # Press Kit EPK Skill The people an EPK is for โ€” bookers, blog editors, festival programmers โ€” give it fifteen seconds. In those seconds they're answering three questions: what does this sound like, can they draw/play live, and are they professional enough to not be a problem. Most EPKs fail all three with a 400-word bio about the artist's journey, no comparable artists (the one thing every booker wants), and links that need three clicks. This skill builds the fifteen-second version: sounds-like up front, honest numbers presented right, one live video that proves the show, and pitch emails that do the target's job for them. ## What This Skill Produces - The **bio, three sizes**: one sentence (the sounds-like line), one paragraph (the pitch version), one page (the print/program version) โ€” all specific, zero "genre-defying journeys" - The **one-page EPK layout spec**: what goes where and why, ordered for the fifteen-second skim (works as a PDF or a simple page โ€” see [[portfolio-page]] for the web version) - **The numbers, presented honestly**: which stats help at the artist's actual size, which to omit (silence beats small numbers presented apologetically), and the local-draw line bookers actually care about - **Four pitch emails**: venue, blog/playlist, radio, festival โ€” each two paragraphs, each leading with what the *target* needs - The **asset list**: photo requirements (live + press, print-res), the one live video that matters, streaming links that work in one click ## Required Inputs Ask for (if not already provided): - The music: genre as the artist says it, and โ€” pushed for explicitly โ€” three "for fans of" artists (two familiar, one cooler; this line does more work than the whole bio) - The true story: where based, what's released, one genuinely interesting true thing (the odd venue, the day job, the recording story โ€” real beats grand) - The honest numbers: streams, followers, typical local draw, notable supports/rooms played - What exists already: photos, live footage, past press quotes - The current target: who is this EPK trying to convince first? ## Framework 1. **Lead with sounds-like.** Sentence one of everything: "[Artist] makes [plain description] โ€” for fans of X, Y, and Z." Bookers route by comparison, not by adjectives. "Genre-defying" tells them nothing; "shoegaze with country bones โ€” for fans of A, B" books shows. 2. **Bio truth over bio myth.** The paragraph version: sounds-like line โ†’ one true specific thing โ†’ the current release/tour fact โ†’ the live-show sentence. Cut every "embarking on a musical journey"; keep every checkable fact. Press quotes only if real and attributed โ€” never invented, never "critics say." 3. **Numbers strategy by honest size.** Strong numbers (real draw, notable supports, a genuine playlist add): state plainly with dates. Small numbers: omit rather than apologize โ€” "consistently draws 60+ in [city]" is a booker's language; "1,200 monthly listeners" argues against you. The local-draw line is the venue email's load-bearing sentence. 4. **One live video beats six.** Bookers book the live act: one well-shot, well-mixed live performance (even single-camera, great audio) linked prominently. The asset list is ruthless: 2 photos (one live, one press, print-res), the video, one-click streaming links, contact that's a person. 5. **Pitch emails do the target's job.** Venue: date-flexible ask + draw + the sounds-like + one link. Blog: the story angle + the sounds-like + "premiere available" if true. Radio: the single, the clean edit exists, the local angle. Festival: the live video first, the fit with their past lineups named. Two paragraphs each; the EPK link carries the rest. Subject lines included โ€” they're half the open rate. ## Output Format ``` ## The bio, three sizes [One sentence ยท one paragraph ยท one page โ€” sounds-like first in all] ## One-page EPK layout (top to bottom) [Photo strip โ†’ sounds-like + bio paragraph โ†’ the numbers that help โ†’ live video link โ†’ releases โ†’ quotes if real โ†’ contact] ## Your numbers, deployed [Use these: โ€ฆ ยท Omit these (and why omission beats apology): โ€ฆ] ## Pitch emails [Venue ยท Blog ยท Radio ยท Festival โ€” each with subject line] ## Asset punch-list [What exists โœ“ ยท what to produce, cheapest-first] ``` ## Quality Checks - [ ] The for-fans-of line exists and contains real artists the user confirmed - [ ] Every bio fact is checkable; zero journey-language survived - [ ] Numbers section explicitly omits weak stats rather than dressing them - [ ] Each pitch email leads with the target's need, fits two paragraphs, and has a subject line - [ ] No invented press quotes, playlist claims, or draw figures โ€” gaps are filled with the punch-list, not fiction ## Anti-Patterns - [ ] Do not write the mythology bio โ€” specific and true beats grand and vague in every inbox that matters - [ ] Do not present small numbers apologetically or pad them โ€” omission is a strategy, inflation is a reputation risk - [ ] Do not bury the live video below the fold of the layout - [ ] Do not send one generic pitch to four target types โ€” the four templates exist because the targets want different things - [ ] Do not gate the music behind sign-ups or three clicks โ€” one click or they're gone ## Related [[release-day-countdown]] โ€” the EPK's busiest fortnight; [[band-agreement]] before the bookings bring money; [[media-pitch]] for the general-press cousin; [[personal-bio]] for the human behind the act.