--- name: brag-doc description: "Keep a running brag document of your accomplishments so reviews and promo cases write themselves. Use when asked to start or update a brag doc, log a win, track accomplishments, or prep evidence for a review/promotion. Produces a structured, dated accomplishment log — impact-first entries with metrics, scope, and the evidence link — grouped so it drops straight into a self-review or promo packet." --- # Brag Doc Skill Nobody remembers in December what they shipped in March — so good work goes uncredited at review time. A brag doc is the fix: a running, dated log of what you did and the impact it had, captured while it's fresh. This skill turns a pile of "stuff I did" into impact-first entries you can paste straight into a [`self-review`](../self-review/SKILL.md) or [`promotion-packet`](../promotion-packet/SKILL.md). ## Required Inputs Ask for these only if they aren't already provided: - **The win(s)** — what you did (rough notes are fine; the skill structures them). - **Impact** — the outcome and any metric (before → after, time saved, revenue, users) — even a rough one. - **Scope & role** — your specific contribution vs. the team's, and who it affected. - **Date / period** and any **evidence** (PR, doc, dashboard, kudos, ticket link). ## Output Format ### Brag Doc — [your name], [period] Entries newest-first, grouped by theme (or quarter). Each entry is **impact-first**: > **[Verb-led headline — the outcome, not the task]** · *[date]* > - **What I did:** [the specific action and your role in it] > - **Impact:** [metric / outcome — before → after where possible] > - **Scope:** [who/what it affected — team, org, customers] > - **Evidence:** [link] > - **Maps to:** [the competency / ladder level it demonstrates — e.g. "cross-team influence"] Example: > **Cut onboarding drop-off 18% → 9%, unlocking ~$140k ARR** · *Mar 2026* > - **What I did:** led the redesign of the 3-step signup flow; wrote the PRD, drove eng + design alignment. > - **Impact:** activation 41% → 52%; drop-off halved (measured over 6 wks, 20k users). > - **Scope:** owned end-to-end; affected all new signups. > - **Evidence:** [PRD] · [dashboard] > - **Maps to:** drives measurable product outcomes; cross-functional leadership. End with a **"Themes this period"** summary — the 3–4 narrative threads your wins ladder up to. ## Quality Checks - [ ] Every entry leads with **impact/outcome**, not the activity - [ ] Metrics include the baseline (before → after), not a bare percentage - [ ] Your specific contribution is distinguished from the team's - [ ] Each entry links real evidence - [ ] Entries are tagged to a competency/ladder level, so the doc feeds a review or promo case directly ## Anti-Patterns - [ ] Do not log tasks ("attended planning", "wrote code") — log outcomes ("shipped X, which moved Y") - [ ] Do not wait until review season — capture wins within a week, while the metrics and context are fresh - [ ] Do not inflate or claim team wins as solo — overstated credit is worse than none when a manager checks - [ ] Do not omit the metric because it's imperfect — a rough, labelled estimate beats "improved things" - [ ] Do not bury the evidence — an unlinked claim is one a busy manager can't verify or champion ## Based On Brag-document practice (Julia Evans) and impact-first accomplishment tracking.