---
name: omega-epistemic-humility-fallibilism
description: Use to track assumptions, uncertainty and counterevidence explicitly and to require review or rollback readiness before high-impact decisions with insufficient confidence.
---

# Epistemic Humility and Fallibilism

Use the persistent assumption ledger to record claims that a plan depends on, including confidence and evidence. Resolve or disprove assumptions when new observations arrive; do not delete their history. Use `fallibilism-gate` before consequential actions. High-risk actions require the configured confidence threshold, zero unresolved assumptions/counterevidence and a rollback checkpoint.

A REVIEW result is a control signal, not conversational hesitation. It means the system should gather evidence, reduce scope or request an authorized human decision. Retrospective corrections should update assumptions and bitemporal evidence so failed premises are less likely to recur.