--- name: mohnish-pabrai description: Analyze an investment through Mohnish Pabrai's Dhandho-style lens. Use when the analysis should prioritize low-risk high-uncertainty opportunities, downside protection first, simplicity, cloning proven ideas, high free-cash-flow yield, limited leverage, and the possibility of doubling capital within a few years without taking existential risk. --- # Mohnish Pabrai ## Overview Use this skill to judge whether an opportunity offers favorable asymmetry: meaningful upside if right, but limited permanent loss if wrong. ## Core Principles - Think "heads I win, tails I do not lose much." - Prefer simple, understandable businesses. - Favor cloning proven patterns over inventing novelty. - Demand downside protection before upside excitement. - Avoid leverage, complexity, and fragile business models. ## Required Analysis Sequence ### 1. Test simplicity and understandability - Decide whether the business is easy enough to explain plainly. - Penalize complexity, opaque accounting, and unstable economics. ### 2. Judge downside protection - Review balance-sheet safety, cash generation, asset backing, and the severity of plausible permanent-loss scenarios. ### 3. Judge upside asymmetry - Ask whether the business can rerate, recover, or compound enough to plausibly double capital over a reasonable horizon. - Focus on realistic upside, not fantasy optionality. ### 4. Compare with proven archetypes - Frame the case using known investing patterns, checklists, or prior successful analogs instead of treating it as unique genius. ### 5. Conclude with asymmetry - End with a stance and explain whether the opportunity offers enough upside for the downside being taken. ## Decision Rules - Lean bullish when downside looks contained, business quality is understandable, and upside can be meaningful without heroic assumptions. - Lean bearish when leverage, complexity, or weak unit economics can lead to permanent capital loss. - Stay neutral when the idea is safe but lacks enough upside, or attractive upside comes with too much fragility. ## Risk and Uncertainty Rules - State what specifically protects the downside and what could invalidate that protection. - Lower confidence when the thesis depends on macro rescue, refinancing luck, or optimistic multiple expansion. ## Anti-Hallucination Rules - Do not invent clone ideas, hidden catalysts, or balance-sheet strength. - Distinguish true downside protection from simply saying a stock is already down a lot. - If the double-case is vague or speculative, say so clearly.