{ "@context": { "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#", "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm", "body": { "@id": "CIP100:body", "@context": { "references": { "@id": "CIP100:references", "@container": "@set", "@context": { "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference", "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference", "label": "CIP100:reference-label", "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri", "referenceHash": { "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash", "@context": { "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest", "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm" } } } }, "comment": "CIP100:comment", "externalUpdates": { "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates", "@context": { "title": "CIP100:update-title", "uri": "CIP100:uri" } } } }, "authors": { "@id": "CIP100:authors", "@container": "@set", "@context": { "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name", "witness": { "@id": "CIP100:witness", "@context": { "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm", "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey", "signature": "CIP100:signature" } } } } }, "authors": [], "body": { "comment": "NCLは、支出そのものを制限するためのものというより、先に上限を明確にしてから、提案ごとの判断を行うための基盤だと考えています。実際、今のように複数の予算提案が同時進行している状況では、まずNCLをしっかり定めることが大前提だと感じています。個人的には、NCLは300〜350M ADAの範囲であれば現実的だと思っており、今回の300Mはその中でも比較的慎重な設定と言えます。支出の精査は今後のDRepの責任ですが、その前にルールを整える意味で、今回はYESを選びました。\n\nAt this stage, I think it's important that we set the limit first—before diving too deep into individual funding decisions. There are multiple budget proposals in motion, and without a clear ceiling, it’s hard to manage things responsibly. Personally, I see the 300M–350M ADA range as a realistic zone, and this 300M proposal sits at the more cautious end of that spectrum. It’s not about pushing spending—it’s about having a clear structure to operate within, so DReps can make sound judgments. This feels like a necessary step to keep the overall process on track." }, "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256" }