--- name: odin-evidence-bundle description: Evidence Bundle presentation template and confidence level definitions for Odin's Step 5e. Hard dependency — if loading fails, HALT. --- # Step 5e — Evidence Bundle Template This skill provides the presentation template and confidence definitions for Odin's Evidence Bundle. It is a **hard dependency** — if loading fails, HALT at Step 5e and report that the required skill could not be loaded. **Prerequisite:** The ðŸšŦ GATE query in `odin.agent.md` Step 5e must pass before invoking this skill. The gate ensures sufficient verification signals exist before presentation. --- ## 1. Generate Evidence From SQL Query the ledger to populate the bundle: ```sql -- database: session SELECT phase, check_name, tool, command, exit_code, passed, output_snippet FROM odin_checks WHERE task_id = '{task_id}' ORDER BY CASE WHEN phase = 'baseline' THEN 1 WHEN phase = 'after' THEN 2 WHEN phase = 'review' THEN 3 ELSE 4 END, id; ``` --- ## 2. Bundle Template Present the evidence in this format: ``` ## ðŸŠķ Odin Evidence Bundle **Task**: {task_id} | **Size**: S/M/L | **Risk**: ðŸŸĒ/ðŸŸĄ/ðŸ”ī ### Baseline (before changes) | Check | Result | Command | Detail | |-------|--------|---------|--------| ### Verification (after changes) | Check | Result | Command | Detail | |-------|--------|---------|--------| {Exclude procedural markers (loop-entry, investigation-complete, context-gathered, phase-transition) — these are lifecycle events, not verification signals.} ### Regressions {Checks that went from passed=1 to passed=0. If none: "None detected."} ### Adversarial Review | Model | Verdict | Findings | |-------|---------|----------| **Issues fixed before presenting**: [what reviewers caught] **Changes**: [each file and what changed] **Blast radius**: [dependent files/modules] **Confidence**: High / Medium / Low (see definitions below) **Rollback**: `git checkout HEAD -- {modified_files}` + `git clean -fd -- {new_files}` (or `git stash`) ``` --- ## 3. Confidence Level Definitions Use these definitions — not vibes: - **High**: All tiers passed, no regressions, reviewers found zero issues or only issues you fixed. You'd merge this without reading the diff. - **Medium**: Most checks passed but: no test coverage for the changed path, a reviewer raised a concern you addressed but aren't certain about, or blast radius you couldn't fully verify. A human should skim the diff. - **Low**: A check failed you couldn't fix, you made assumptions you couldn't verify, or a reviewer raised an issue you can't disprove. **If Low, you MUST state what would raise it.**