{ "long_indicator_description": { "de": { "baseunit": "Punkte", "text": "In Ex-Post Evaluierungen kann die Wirkung von Gesetzen und deren Nachhaltigkeit ermittelt werden. Sinn und Zweck dieser Evaluierungen ist es, Erfolgs- und Misserfolgsfaktoren zu ermitteln. So kann man durch Ex-Post Evaluierungen Schl\u00fcsse ziehen, die f\u00fcr andere Ma\u00dfnahmen von Interesse sind und aus vorherigen Fehlern lernen. Der Indikator misst, ob Ex-Post Evaluierungen transparent, konsequent, qualitativ hochwertig und mit angemessener Methodik durchgef\u00fchrt werden. Die blo\u00dfe Durchf\u00fchrung einer Ex-Post Evaluierung bedeutet aber nicht, dass diese Schl\u00fcsse auch in der Entwicklung von folgenden Ma\u00dfnahmen ber\u00fccksichtigt werden. Die OECD stellt den Indikator f\u00fcr Gesetze und Verordnungen getrennt bereit, kombiniert beide aber in einigen Visualisierungen. Daran nimmt sich 2030-Watch ein Beispiel und stellt hier den Mittelwert des Indikators f\u00fcr Gesetze und Verordnungen dar. Ex-Post Evaluierung ist einer von drei OECD Indikatoren f\u00fcr die Qualit\u00e4t der Gesetzgebung, die anderen beiden sind Folgenabsch\u00e4tzung und \u00d6ffentlichkeitsbeteiligung. " }, "en": { "baseunit": "points", "text": "In ex-post evaluations, factors that contributed to successes or failures of a policy can be identified. Furthermore, ex-post evaluation can assess the impact of a regulation and its sustainability. Such evaluations are therefore useful to enable systematic learning from previous regulations. The indicator captures whether ex-post evaluation is conducted systematically, transparently, in a high quality and with an adequate methodology. Nevertheless, merely conducting ex-post evaluations does not guarantee that the lessons learned are necessarily incorporated into the next policy-making process. The OECD provides the indicator for primary laws and subordinate laws separately, but combines them in some visualisations. Following the OECD's example, 2030-Watch has calculated the average of the two measures (primary and subordinate laws), which captures Ex-post evaluation of regulations across all national policy areas. Ex-post evaluation is one of three composite indicators developed by the OECD to measure regulatory quality, the other two indicators are stakeholder engagement and regulatory impact assessment." } }, "original_title": "Regulatory Quality of Legislation", "scoring": { "scores": [ { "countries": [ { "name": "Australia", "value": 3.7 }, { "name": "Austria", "value": 1.88 }, { "name": "Belgium", "value": 2.51 }, { "name": "Canada", "value": 2.68 }, { "name": "Chile", "value": 0.72 }, { "name": "Czech Republic", "value": 0.98 }, { "name": "Denmark", "value": 1.6 }, { "name": "Estonia", "value": 1.72 }, { "name": "EU", "value": 2.73 }, { "name": "Finland", "value": 0.54 }, { "name": "France", "value": 0.92 }, { "name": "Germany", "value": 2.77 }, { "name": "Greece", "value": 0.04 }, { "name": "Hungary", "value": 1.28 }, { "name": "Iceland", "value": 1.37 }, { "name": "Ireland", "value": 0.45 }, { "name": "Israel", "value": 1.64 }, { "name": "Italy", "value": 1.45 }, { "name": "Japan", "value": 0.98 }, { "name": "Korea", "value": 1.66 }, { "name": "Luxembourg", "value": 1.57 }, { "name": "Mexico", "value": 2.95 }, { "name": "Netherlands", "value": 1.39 }, { "name": "New Zealand", "value": 1.81 }, { "name": "Norway", "value": 1.19 }, { "name": "Poland", "value": 1.18 }, { "name": "Portugal", "value": 1.17 }, { "name": "Slovakia", "value": 0.56 }, { "name": "Slovenia", "value": 1.18 }, { "name": "Spain", "value": 0.86 }, { "name": "Sweden", "value": 2.0 }, { "name": "Switzerland", "value": 2.01 }, { "name": "Turkey", "value": 0.36 }, { "name": "UK", "value": 3.09 }, { "name": "USA", "value": 1.09 } ], "year": 2014 } ], "timestamp": "2016-12-17", "timestamp_data_host": 2014, "type": "national" }, "sdg": 16, "short_indicator_description": { "de": "Ausma\u00df, in dem Gesetze und politische Ma\u00dfnahmen nach ihrer Durchf\u00fchrung ausgewertet werden", "en": "Extent to which regulations are evaluated after their implementation" }, "source": { "license": "The OECD supports free use and consultation of its data by the public. Information source must be cited. Download is feasible. ", "link": "http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=69796", "note": "Der Indikator wurde in einer OECD-Pilotstudie zur Messbarkeit der SDGs vorgeschlagen (\"Measuring Distance to the SDGs Targets\")", "publisher": "OECD", "type": "unofficial", "value": [ "OKF" ] }, "sponsor": "OKF", "target": { "explanation": { "de": "Die OECD schl\u00e4gt einen Zielwert von 4 vor. Dies ist der Maximalwert des Indikators. ", "en": "The OECD suggests a target value of 4, which is the maximum value of the indicator. " }, "ministerial_responsibility": "BMI", "other_relevant_SDGs": [], "rating": [ 4, 3, 2, 1 ], "tags": "economic, social", "target": 16.6, "target_reference": "http://www.oecd.org/std/OECD-Measuring-Distance-to-the%20SDGs-Target-Pilot-Study-web.pdf", "type": "more", "value": 4 }, "title": "Qualit\u00e4t der Gesetzgebung" }