---
title: "The Internal Steps of Buddha-Recollection: From the Nine Epithets to Dharmadhātu-Recollection — A Clarification After Thirty-One Papers"
author: "釋慧鏡 (Shi Huijing)"
series: "Six Practice Gates, Volume 1 — Mindful of the Buddha: From Early Buddhist Recollection to the Flower Ornament Vision"
series_short: "NIAN"
volume: 1
paper_id: "NIAN-P31"
paper_number: 31
part: "Part VIII · Coda"
part_number: 8
date: "2026-05-07"
version: "1.0"
license: "CC BY-NC-SA 4.0"
---

# The Internal Steps of Buddha-Recollection

**From the Nine Epithets to *Dharmadhātu*-Recollection — A Clarification After Thirty-One Papers**

**Part VIII Coda · NIAN Paper 31 of 31 · Closure of the Volume**

*中文主題：念佛的內部步驟——從九德號到法界念佛*

---

**Author:** 釋慧鏡 (Shi Huijing)
**Date:** May 2026
**License:** CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
**Version:** 1.0
**Series:** NIAN — Mindful of the Buddha
**Paper:** P31 · Part VIII Coda

---

## Abstract

After thirty-one papers, the reader should walk away with four things: where *buddhānusmṛti* (念佛, Buddha-recollection) came from, how it evolved, how it is done, and what it does internally. This paper is not an epilogue, not a map, not a string of seal-lines. It is a clarification — stripping away the doctrinal layer of thirty-one papers to expose the internal structure of recollection itself.

Paper One (*What Anussati Actually Means*) made this clear: *anussati* is not a variant of *sati*. It is a distinct *caitta* (mental factor) with its own operative mechanism.[^1] It has a structure — a fourfold rhythm: establishing the object, maintaining the link, the arising of confidence, the loosening of grasping. The Nine Epithets (*itipi so*) are not a list; they are a template — nine entrances, each opening onto the same operation.[^2] The Six Recollections are not a checklist; they are a system[^3] — *buddhānusmṛti* stands first because the other five all take the Buddha's qualities as background object. These three things (fourfold rhythm, nine entrances, one system) constitute *buddhānusmṛti* in its primordial form, operative from the Pāli Āgamas onward.

From Pāli to Mahāyāna, the object of *buddhānusmṛti* expanded — from one Buddha to the Buddhas of the ten directions, from the recollection of qualities to seeing the Buddha face-to-face, to calling the name, to the *dharmadhātu*-totalising recollection of Samantabhadra's Ten Great Vows. *Buddhānusmṛti* did not change; its object unfolded layer by layer. Each step preserved the previous. The question in the Sinitic tradition was never "what is *buddhānusmṛti*?" but "how much can *buddhānusmṛti* be?" — the same operation, refracted across sūtras and patriarchal commentaries into innumerable faces. But the operative core, beneath every face, is unchanged.

The core task of this paper is clarification: what *are* the internal steps? They are not transactional — not "one chant equals so much merit," not "one visualisation buys so much blessing." The internal operation has only one purpose: *to alter the structure of the mind*. Any one of the nine entrances suffices to begin that alteration. The eight characters "gathering the six faculties, pure recollection in unbroken succession" (*du-she liu-gen, jing-nian xiang-ji*, 都攝六根、淨念相繼) constitute the most compressed expression of it. Samantabhadra's Ten Great Vows constitute its complete frame.

After thirty-one papers, the essence of *niàn* has not changed. *Niàn* is *niàn*. From the Nine Epithets to *dharmadhātu*-recollection — every doctrine, every sūtra, every patriarch in between served only to let this simple fact appear.

**Keywords:** *buddhānusmṛti*; internal steps; Nine Epithets; *anussati*; fourfold rhythm; gathering of the six faculties; pure recollection in unbroken succession; Samantabhadra's Ten Great Vows; *dharmadhātu*-recollection; internal operation of recollection; from Pāli to Mahāyāna; transactional recollection critique

---

## I. The Origin of *Buddhānusmṛti* — From *Anussati* to *Niànfó*

The starting point of the thirty-one papers was already laid down in P01.[^1]

*Anussati* is not *sati*. It is not "a religious version of attention," not "a Buddhist version of mindfulness." It is one specific *caitta* (object-specific mental factor) with its own operative structure, its own object-domain, and its own effect-mechanism.

Its operative structure has four layers.

**Layer one: establishing the object.** The first step of *buddhānusmṛti* is not the recollecting; it is the choosing of the object. The object is not arbitrary — it must be a *previously experienced object* (Pāli/Skt. *pubbe-anubhūta-visaya*; Chinese 曾習境), an object once contacted, capable of being clearly presented in mind. For *buddhānusmṛti*, the object is typically the Buddha's qualities. The Buddha's qualities are not unitary — they are the composite of nine epithets, the *itipi so* formula. Each of the nine is an independent entrance, not item nine on a checklist. Which one to choose depends on the practitioner's state at that moment.

**Layer two: maintaining the link.** Once the object is selected, the operation is not to stop at "I see it"; it is to maintain the link with the object. This maintenance is not a taut string — it requires sustained but loose intensity. The Pāli sources describe the state with the term *ajjhāyatana*[^4] — sustained object-base. The Sinitic translation is *niàn* (念). *Niàn* does not mean "attention"; it means *to bear in mind, not to forget*. To remember the object, to hold the object, to let the object persist in the mind.

**Layer three: the arising of confidence (*pasāda*).** When the object has been maintained for a stretch, an effect arises automatically: confidence, or joy. This is not a "result of effort"; it is the natural product of the operation. As when one watches a lamp continuously: the lamp does not become brighter, but one sees light flowing in the eye. The joy of *buddhānusmṛti* is not religious affect; it is the natural state of the link between mind and object having been established.

**Layer four: the loosening of grasping.** Once confidence has arisen, the next step is the loosening — the loosening of the grasp on "I am recollecting." Not a giving-up of recollection, but a relaxation of the intensity of the "I-as-recollector." This step is already present in the most primordial *anussati*, only without explicit articulation. In the later Mahāyāna development, it becomes increasingly clearly named as the internal *purpose* of *buddhānusmṛti*.

This is the primordial form. Four steps — not four phases. They occur simultaneously in every act of *buddhānusmṛti*; they can be separated only in analysis.

The nine entrances of the *itipi so* each carry the practitioner through these four steps. The nine epithets are:

1. *Araham* — Worthy One: the Buddha has eradicated all defilements, worthy of every offering.
2. *Sammāsambuddha* — Fully Awakened: the Buddha has awakened to all dharmas without remainder.
3. *Vijjā-caraṇa-sampanno* — Endowed with Knowledge and Conduct: the Buddha is replete with wisdom-faculties and ethical conduct.
4. *Sugato* — Well-Gone: the Buddha has gone well, into liberation, beyond return.
5. *Lokavidū* — Knower of the Worlds: the Buddha knows all worlds completely.
6. *Anuttaro purisadamma-sārathi* — Unsurpassed Trainer of Persons to be Tamed: the Buddha can train any sentient being.
7. *Satthā deva-manussānaṃ* — Teacher of Devas and Humans: the Buddha is the teacher of both heavenly and human beings.
8. *Buddho* — Awakened: the Buddha is awake.
9. *Bhagavā* — Blessed One: the Buddha is endowed with both merit and wisdom.

(The above sequence follows the canonical Pāli ordering of *itipi so*, treated in detail in P02.)[^2]

**Note on the Sinitic enumeration.** The Sinitic tradition enumerates the same canonical formula as **ten** epithets (*rúlái shíhào* 如來十號), the standard list (e.g. *Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra* fasc. 2; *Buddhabhūmi-śāstra* fasc. 1) being: *rúlái* 如來, *yìnggòng* 應供, *zhèngbiànzhī* 正遍知, *míngxíngzú* 明行足, *shànshì* 善逝, *shìjiānjiě* 世間解, *wúshàngshì* 無上士, *tiáoyù-zhàngfū* 調御丈夫, *tiānrénshī* 天人師, *fó-shìzūn* 佛世尊. The Sinitic count of ten is reached by splitting the Pāli sixth item (*Anuttaro purisadamma-sārathi*) into two — *wúshàngshì* and *tiáoyù-zhàngfū* — and by either prefacing the list with *rúlái* or treating *fó* and *shìzūn* as a closing dyad. The number-difference between Pāli nine and Sinitic ten is a matter of enumeration convention, not doctrinal addition. The present paper anchors its analysis on the Pāli nine because the *structural* claim of §I (nine entrances × fourfold rhythm) is P02's primary thesis; the Sinitic ten-item enumeration figures more decisively in the *liturgical* horizon of P11 (the holding of the name) and P25–P29 (Samantabhadra's vows of reverence, praise, dedication).

Any one of these epithets can stand alone as the object of *buddhānusmṛti*. To begin with *Araham* (Worthy One) and to begin with *Buddho* (Awakened) feel different at the start; the operation differs in nuance; the joy that arises differs. But the four steps are identical. The nine entrances were given by the Buddha himself. He did not need to say "you must choose this one," because the four steps run automatically through any of the nine.

The Six Recollections are not a checklist. They are six interlocking operative systems: recollection of the Buddha, of the Dharma, of the Saṅgha, of the *devas*, of generosity, of moral conduct.[^3] *Buddhānusmṛti* sits first not because the Buddha is "more important," but because the other five all depend on the Buddha's qualities as their background object. *Buddhānusmṛti* is the system's hub; the other five are five rings circling the hub. The first ring of the Six Recollections is *buddhānusmṛti* itself — not "one option among six," but the entrance to the system.

Through this entrance, the practitioner is already inside *buddhānusmṛti*.

## II. From Pāli to Mahāyāna — The Trajectory of Expansion

The object of *buddhānusmṛti* is not fixed. It begins from one Buddha, expands to the Buddhas of the ten directions, expands to the Buddha's qualities, expands to the Buddha's pure-lands, expands to all the Buddhas of the *dharmadhātu*. This is not a change in *buddhānusmṛti* itself; it is the unfolding of *buddhānusmṛti*'s object.

**Early Pāli *buddhānusmṛti***— the trajectory of P01–P04 — is the clearest. *Buddhānusmṛti* is *anussati*, with explicit operative structure. Its object is the nine epithets; its operation has the fourfold rhythm; its effect is the arising of confidence and the loosening of self-grasping. This is the most primordial form, and also the clearest, precisely because it has not yet been overlaid by later interpretation.

**The earliest Sinitic reception**— P05[^5] — is narrativising. The *Sūtra in Forty-Two Sections* (T0784) transforms the Buddha's qualities into forty-two pithy sayings. Recollection is no longer the recollecting of the Buddha's qualities, but the recollecting of his teachings. This is the first translation: from *recollection-of-qualities* to *recollection-of-words*. The shift had a long afterlife in the Sinitic tradition: the meaning of *niànfó* gradually broadened to "recollecting the Buddha's teachings" rather than only "recollecting the Buddha's qualities."

**Early Mahāyāna *buddhānusmṛti***— P06[^6]–P08 — is the first major leap. The *Pratyutpanna-buddha-saṃmukhāvasthita-samādhi-sūtra* (T0418) introduces the *direct sighting of the Buddha*[^6] — *buddhānusmṛti* is no longer purely an in-mental operation; it is an experience of facing the Buddha within *samādhi*. This is the turn from internal operation to expanded experience. The rise of pure-land conception is the second expansion — the object of *buddhānusmṛti* is no longer the historical Śākyamuni alone, but all the Buddhas of the ten directions. The shift from *recollecting qualities* to *invoking the name* is the third expansion — the operative mode of *buddhānusmṛti* expands from inward recollection to oral invocation.

These three expansions did not displace one another. Direct sighting did not replace recollection-of-qualities; name-invocation did not replace direct sighting. They coexist, each operating in its own situational register. A practitioner can, on the same day, recollect the Buddha's qualities while reciting at dawn, see the Buddha within meditative absorption, and invoke the name while walking. This is not "three different recollection-methods"; it is one operation unfolding naturally across different situations.

**The three-tiered architecture of the Three Pure-Land Sūtras**— P09[^7]–P10[^8]–P11[^9] — is the systematisation of *buddhānusmṛti*. The Forty-Eight Vows of the *Sukhāvatī-vyūha* (T0360) ground the foundation of *buddhānusmṛti* in the Buddha's vow-power — *buddhānusmṛti* is not effective merely because the practitioner's operation is correct; it is effective also because the Buddha has already prepared the receiving mechanism for the recollector. The Sixteen Contemplations of the *Amitāyur-dhyāna-sūtra* (T0365) build the upper architecture — from the simplest name-invocation to the most complex contemplation of true reality, sixteen layers open simultaneously, with entries appropriate to every capacity. The *Smaller Sukhāvatī-vyūha* (T0366) is the minimalist architecture — only one operation: holding the name. The meaning of the three sūtras' juxtaposition is not "choose which one" but "the same *buddhānusmṛti* opens at multiple depths simultaneously."

**The *Śūraṅgama*-sūtra**— P12[^10][^11][^12] — is the *operative pivot*. T0945,[^10] in the Mahāsthāmaprāpta chapter, gives the critical line: "When the Buddha asked about *samādhi* through the [twenty-five] perfect-penetrations, I, without selection, gathered the six faculties, with pure recollection in unbroken succession, attaining *samādhi* — this was foremost."[^10] These eight characters (都攝六根、淨念相繼) are not the most difficult item among the eight Mahāyāna sūtras — they are the *double-axis deepening* of the Three-Sūtras' "holding of the name" into the Mahāyāna register.

P12[^10][^11][^12] supplies the most decisive operative classification. The late-Ming commentator Jiaoguang Zhenjian (交光真鑒), in his *Direct-Lineage Commentary on the Śūraṅgama* (*Lengyan zhengmai shu*, X0275),[^11][^12] divides the verb "to recollect" into two categories: ***vijñāna-discriminating recollection*** (*fenbie shi xin suo nian*, 分別識心所念) — recollection grounded in the discriminative function of the sixth consciousness, taking the Buddha as conceptual object; and ***faculty-gathered recollection*** (*she-gen nian*, 攝根念) — six faculties levelled in stillness, equally integrated in a single Buddha-recollecting mind. These two are not two depths of one act; they are two distinct kinds of act. The same word "recollection" performs two structurally different operations: in the former, the structure is "the recollecting consciousness *vs* the recollected Buddha"; in the latter, the structure is "six faculties simultaneously stilled, simultaneously illuminating the Buddha's three bodies and four lands."

The character *she* (攝, "gather") in *du-she liu-gen* (都攝六根, "gathering the six faculties") Jiaoguang glosses as "causing the six faculties not to stir" (令六根不動)[^11] — the six faculties levelled and stilled, not raising discriminative agitation. This is *not* the closing of the faculties (eyes shut, speech silent, breath suppressed); it is the six faculties continuing to operate (seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, touching, thinking), but without raising discriminative agitation. This is sensory *integration*, not sensory *suppression*. The character *du* (都) in *du-she* (都攝) means "all, totally" — distinguished from the "perfect-penetration through one faculty" approach (六根圓通), in which one specific faculty is the gate. *Du-she* is six faculties simultaneously integrated within one act of recollection.

The character *jing* (淨, "pure") in *jing-nian xiang-ji* (淨念相繼, "pure recollection in unbroken succession") Jiaoguang glosses as "completely illuminating the three bodies and four lands" (圓照三身四土)[^11] — a single recollection simultaneously and completely illuminating the threefold body of the Buddha and the four-fold geography of his lands. *Xiang-ji* (相繼, "in unbroken succession") names the *cross-temporal* extension — this complete illumination is not a one-time achievement, but a continuous flow.

But Jiaoguang is honest: "If 'pure' is set against 'defiled,' then pure recollection still ends up as a recollection-with-content" (淨對染言之，則淨念終仍成有念).[^11] Within the binary of pure/defiled, the pure recollection remains a recollection — not the ultimate state of "no-recollection." This admission means: pure recollection in unbroken succession does *not* require the practitioner to attain a state of pure non-recollection. It requires only that, within the phenomenal layer of recollection, the succession of pure recollections be maintained. If one moment of recollection is pure and the next would lapse into defilement, the practitioner returns immediately, on the next moment, to pure recollection. This return is not a fresh start; it is the self-repair of the unbroken-succession structure.

P12's[^12] argument is clear: T0945[^10] is the first *structural* deepening of T0366's[^9] name-track within Mahāyāna. Spatially, the locus expands from "the mind" to "the six faculties" (from single-organ to fully-integrated model). Temporally, "single-pointedness" extends to "unbroken pure recollection" (from a moment-of-attainment to a cross-temporal continuum). This is not an increase in difficulty; it is a clarification of operation-type. Mahāsthāmaprāpta is positioned twenty-fourth in the twenty-five perfect-penetrations (the great-element of the *indriya*-faculty); Avalokiteśvara is twenty-fifth (the ear-faculty); but Jiaoguang's reading "position is not ranking" insists on the distinction[^12] — "for those who cannot cultivate self-mind nirvāṇa, there is no better next than name-invocation aimed at rebirth"[^12] — establishing position-and-ranking as two different axes: ontologically, the twenty-five perfect-penetrations are equal; situationally, the ear-faculty is foremost for self-power awakening of the present-world Sahā-realm beings; *buddhānusmṛti* is the foremost alternative "for those, here and now, who cannot cultivate self-mind nirvāṇa."[^12]

**The Mahāyāna eight sūtras**— P13[^10]–P19[^10][^13] — are the unfolding, in seven other sūtras, of the double-axis deepening that Mahāsthāmaprāpta established. Each sūtra cuts in from a different angle: the *Lotus Sūtra*'s name-invocation as the ritual of the *Samantamukha* chapter; the *Sūtra of Perfect Enlightenment*'s twenty-five pure *samādhi*-cycles as the dharma-ending-age configuration; the *Brahmajāla* with precept-keeping as the framing of *buddhānusmṛti*; the *Sūtra of Golden Light* with confession as transformative *buddhānusmṛti*; the *Laṅkāvatāra* with "*buddhānusmṛti* equals mind-recollection"[^13] as entry into *tathāgatagarbha*; the *Ghanavyūha*[^13] with *buddhānusmṛti* as the mechanism of *ālaya-parāvṛtti*; the *Mañjuśrī Prajñā* with one-practice *samādhi*[^13] as cross-sectarian witness. Seven sūtras, seven angles, one *buddhānusmṛti* — all unfolding within the structural frame established by "gathering the six faculties, pure recollection in unbroken succession."[^10]

**The Pure-Land–Chan dual current**— P20[^17]–P22[^16]–P24 — is *buddhānusmṛti*'s most mature articulation in the Sinitic tradition. The Pure-Land lineage from Tanluan, through Daochuo, to Shandao[^16][^17] grounds *buddhānusmṛti* fully in the Buddha's vow-power — its efficacy lies not in the practitioner's effort but in the prepared mechanism of the Buddha's vow. The Chan lineage from Huineng, through Daoxin, to Zongmi internalises *buddhānusmṛti* fully — to recollect the Buddha is to recollect the mind; to recollect the mind is to recollect the Buddha. The two currents look opposed, but their operative core is the same: both alter the structure of the mind, only directionally — one outward, in reliance; one inward, in gathering. The convergence in Yongming, in Yunqi Zhuhong, in Ouyi Zhixu, is not "two streams merging into one"; it is the confirmation that both streams are simultaneously valid.

**Samantabhadra's Ten Great Vows and *dharmadhātu*-recollection**— P25[^15]–P29[^15] — is the ultimate expansion. Samantabhadra's ten vows (in T0293, the standalone *Bhadracarīpraṇidhānarāja* / 普賢行願品 — fascicle 40 of the 40-fascicle recension of the *Avataṃsaka*, trans. Prajñā) extend the object of *buddhānusmṛti* from one Buddha, to the Buddhas of the ten directions, to all Buddhas of the *dharmadhātu*, to all sentient beings of the *dharmadhātu*, to all events, to all times. *Buddhānusmṛti* is no longer "recollection *of the Buddha*"; it is "recollection *of the dharmadhātu*." This expansion abolishes none of the prior stages — the Nine Epithets remain valid; direct sighting remains valid; name-invocation remains valid. *Dharmadhātu*-recollection is *buddhānusmṛti*'s broadest version, not its replacement.

The trajectory ends here. From Pāli to Mahāyāna, from one Buddha to all Buddhas of the *dharmadhātu*, from recollection-of-qualities to direct-sighting to name-invocation to *dharmadhātu*-recollection — every step is *additive*, not *substitutive*. The core operation, at every stage, is unchanged: fourfold rhythm, nine entrances, one system.

## III. *Buddhānusmṛti* as a Workable Practice

After thirty-one papers' worth of sūtras, patriarchs, and doctrine, the reader may ask: *can buddhānusmṛti actually be done?*

The answer is: yes. And it has been doable from the very first paper.

The workability of *buddhānusmṛti* was already established in the most primordial Pāli sources. *Anussati* is not a theoretical concept; it is an operative instruction. When the Buddha said "*buddhānusmṛti*," he was not telling you "the Buddha is great." He was telling you *do this thing*. The thing has an object (any of the nine epithets), steps (the fourfold rhythm), and effects (the arising of confidence, the loosening of grasping).

From Pāli to Mahāyāna, *buddhānusmṛti*'s operation has never grown harder. On the contrary, it has grown easier — because more entrances have been opened.

The Nine Epithets have nine entrances. The Three Pure-Land Sūtras have three thresholds open simultaneously. The Mahāyāna eight sūtras have eight angles. Samantabhadra's Ten Vows have ten vow-entrances. Any one of these entrances suffices to begin a complete *buddhānusmṛti* operation. Any one of them carries the practitioner through to the final layer of the fourfold rhythm.

But workability does not mean *easy*. *Buddhānusmṛti* is workable because *anyone, at any time, in any place, can begin*. It requires no specific equipment, no specific environment, no specific lineage-transmission. What it requires is: an object, a stretch of time, sustained attention.

This sounds too simple. So simple it invites suspicion.

Suspicion is appropriate. Because the *internal* operation of *buddhānusmṛti* is not as simple as it appears.

The internal operation has only one core: *to alter the structure of the mind*.

Not the accumulation of merit. Not the reduction of karmic obstruction. Not the increase of blessings. Not the exchange-purchase of a future fruit. All of these are transactional misreadings — *buddhānusmṛti* mistaken for a merit-currency storage system. *Buddhānusmṛti* is not a currency system. It is a structural operation.

Your mind is a system. Its structure: six faculties' perception → six consciousnesses' identification → *manas*'s appropriation → mental consciousness's discrimination. This structure runs automatically in everyday states; nothing is required of you. But you can insert one operation into it: *buddhānusmṛti*.

The point of insertion is between the six faculties and the six consciousnesses. When you recollect the Buddha, the six faculties no longer flow outward toward the six dust-objects; they flow toward the object of *buddhānusmṛti*. The change of direction happens automatically — you do not need to "effort yourself not to look outside"; you only need to keep your attention on the object. When the six faculties' direction changes, the six consciousnesses' identification-objects change; *manas*'s appropriation-object changes; mental consciousness's discriminative content changes. The whole structure has been altered.

This is not metaphor. It is the Yogācāra mechanism. P18[^13] has already articulated this with the *Ghanavyūha* (T0681) and *ālaya-parāvṛtti* (阿賴耶轉依). P30[^14][^18] has already articulated it with the *Cheng weishi lun*[^14] (T1585) and the *manas*-turning mechanism.

But mechanism is not instruction. Knowing that "*buddhānusmṛti* alters mind-structure" is not the same as knowing "how to *make* *buddhānusmṛti* alter mind-structure."

So we must go one step further — into the internal steps.

## IV. The Internal Steps of *Buddhānusmṛti*

*Buddhānusmṛti*'s internal operation has four layers. They occur simultaneously in every act of *buddhānusmṛti*; they can be separated only in analysis. The four layers are not four phases — they do not stand in temporal sequence; they are four simultaneous aspects.

**Layer one: establishing the object (*ālambana*).** The first step of *buddhānusmṛti* is not vocal recitation, not mental enunciation, not breath-coordinated counting. It is the establishing of the object.

The object is what the mind is concentrated on. The object of *buddhānusmṛti* is not the four characters "*Amituofo*" — those are only sound or text. The object is the Buddha's qualities that those four characters bring forth in the mind. Each of the nine epithets is an independent object. Choose *Araham* (Worthy One), and what arises in mind is "the Buddha who has cut off all defilements, worthy of every offering." Choose *Bhagavā* (Blessed One), and what arises is "the Buddha endowed with merit and wisdom." Different objects, different psychological states during the operation — but the fourfold rhythm is identical.

Several modes of establishing are available: closing the eyes and presenting the Buddha's marks vividly in the mind; gazing at a Buddha-image; concentrating on the sound of the name alone; concentrating on the qualities the name carries. All four work — what matters is not the mode, but whether the object is *clearly present* in the mind. If the object is vague, *buddhānusmṛti* is reduced to repeated sound or text — no longer *anussati*.

But "establishing the object" has a hidden layer: *how* you establish the object decides whether your *buddhānusmṛti* is *vijñāna-discriminating recollection* or *faculty-gathered recollection*. Jiaoguang's verb-classification, in *Lengyan zhengmai shu*,[^11][^17] makes this distinction decisive. Equally called "*buddhānusmṛti*": *vijñāna-discriminating recollection* takes the discriminative function of the sixth consciousness as its primary actor, treating the Buddha as a conceptual object to be appraised; *faculty-gathered recollection* is the levelled stilling of the six faculties, equally integrated in a single Buddha-recollecting mind.[^11] These two are not two depths of one act; they are two distinct kinds of act. The structure of the former is "the recollecting consciousness performs discriminative analysis on the recollected name"; the structure of the latter is "the six faculties simultaneously still, simultaneously illuminating the three bodies and four lands."[^11] How you establish the object decides which kind of act you are performing. The choice between *Araham* and *Bhagavā*[^2] does not decide the act-type; *how you choose it* does. If, after selecting the epithet, you treat it as a concept to be analysed and weighed, that is *vijñāna-discriminating recollection*. If, after selecting the epithet, you let it arise naturally in the mind, six faculties levelled and integrated on this object, that is *faculty-gathered recollection*.

**Layer two: maintaining the link.** Once the object is established, the next step is the maintenance.

Maintenance is not gripping. Gripping is the misreading at this layer — interpreting "maintenance" as "effortful concentration" is the most common error of *buddhānusmṛti*. It is not a wrong; it is a misunderstanding. The result of the misunderstanding is fatigue, irritation, and the conversion of *buddhānusmṛti* into a chore.

The correct understanding: the object exists naturally in the mind, and you do not need to effort it into existence; you only need to refrain from intentionally turning attention away. Like a lamp set in a room — once lit, you do not need to keep pressing the switch; the lamp stays lit. The maintenance of *buddhānusmṛti* is the same: the object is lit in the mind; you only need not to intentionally turn away.

The marker of maintenance is *not* "the mind is utterly without distraction" — that is the standard for *jhāna*, not for *buddhānusmṛti*. The marker of *buddhānusmṛti* is: *you know the object is still in your mind*, even if it has dimmed, even if other thoughts arise — *the object of buddhānusmṛti is still there*.

**Layer three: the arising of confidence (*pasāda*).** When the object has been maintained for a stretch, an effect arises automatically: confidence, or joy.

This effect is *not* "religious emotion." It is not tearing up, not full-body tingling, not a special experience. It is usually very faint — you may not even notice it. It is only a slight loosening, warmth, settling within.

The arising of confidence is *buddhānusmṛti*'s internal reward — not an external prize, but a necessary product of the operation. As when one watches a lamp continuously: the lamp does not become brighter, but light flows in the eye. Confidence is that light.

The importance of this layer: it is the momentum that lets *buddhānusmṛti* continue. Without confidence, *buddhānusmṛti* is a chore; with confidence, *buddhānusmṛti* is practice. The confidence here is not "you believe the Buddha will receive you" — that is faith. The confidence of *buddhānusmṛti* is "you confirm that the internal operation of *buddhānusmṛti* is in fact running."

**Layer four: the loosening of grasping.** This is the most central internal effect, and the integration of the prior three layers.

Loosening is not "abandoning grasping." You do not need to *do anything* to abandon grasping — grasping loosens automatically as long as you continue operating in the prior three layers.

The internal mechanism: when the object is stably maintained, the mind temporarily lets go of its everyday grasping-pattern (the grasping of self, of outer objects, of emotion) and turns toward concentrated attention to the object. This turn is not forced — it is natural. As the mind naturally turns toward the object, its intensity toward other grasping-objects automatically decreases. This is not "you releasing"; it is "the mind self-loosening."

The degree of loosening varies between practitioners. A beginner may loosen for only a few seconds — and after those seconds, grasping returns. This is not failure. Those few seconds suffice to alter the mind's structure — even for a few microseconds. Repeated brief loosenings, accumulated, become structural change.

The advanced practitioner may sustain loosening for a longer stretch within a single act of *buddhānusmṛti*. But even the advanced cannot maintain permanent loosening. *Loosening is process, not result.* The purpose of *buddhānusmṛti* is not to *attain* permanent loosening; it is to *repeat* the process of loosening within every act of *buddhānusmṛti*.

The test for whether loosening has occurred is precisely Jiaoguang's verb-classification:[^11][^17] when you recollect, are you in *vijñāna-discriminating recollection* or *faculty-gathered recollection*? The former means you are still using the sixth consciousness to discriminate the Buddha's qualities[^17] — a structure of "I am recollecting; the Buddha is the recollected" — *manas*'s grasping is still operating. The latter means the six faculties are levelled and stilled — even as you recollect, the structure of grasping is automatically loosening. Both kinds may co-occur within an act of *buddhānusmṛti*, but in different proportions. The beginner's *buddhānusmṛti* is mostly *vijñāna-discriminating recollection*, with occasional flashes of *faculty-gathered recollection* — those flashes *are* the loosening. The advanced practitioner's *buddhānusmṛti* contains progressively more moments of *faculty-gathered recollection* and progressively fewer of *vijñāna-discriminating recollection*. The test is not "how many times have I recited?" but "*at this moment, am I in vijñāna-discriminating recollection, or in faculty-gathered recollection?*"

This is the internal structure. Four layers, fourfold rhythm: establishing the object, maintaining the link, the arising of confidence, the loosening of grasping. Any one of the nine entrances of the *itipi so* suffices to carry the practitioner through. The eight characters "gathering the six faculties, pure recollection in unbroken succession" are this operation's most compressed expression — "gathering the six faculties" is the strengthened form of *establishing the object*; "pure recollection in unbroken succession" is the description of *maintaining the link*.

Samantabhadra's Ten Great Vows are not an *expansion* of *buddhānusmṛti* — they are *buddhānusmṛti*'s complete frame. Vows 1–3 (paying reverence to all Buddhas; praising the Tathāgatas; making offerings broadly) are the integrated three-karma operation of body, speech, mind. Vows 4–5 (confessing karmic obstructions; sympathetic rejoicing in merits) are the karmic transformation. Vows 6–7 (requesting the Dharma-wheel be turned; requesting the Buddha to remain) are the configuration for the long-abiding of the Dharma. Vows 8–10 (constantly following the Buddha in learning; perpetually according with sentient beings; universal dedication) are the final upward-receiving and downward-transforming. Each of the ten vows is a complete *buddhānusmṛti* operation — only the object expands from one Buddha to all Buddhas, all sentient beings, all events of the *dharmadhātu*.

But the core does not change. The fourfold rhythm is the same in every vow. The nine entrances are the same in every vow. The purpose — to alter the mind's structure — is the same in every vow.

## V. The Misreading of Transactional Recollection

*Buddhānusmṛti* in the Sinitic tradition has been severely transactionalised.

One chant = so much merit. One contemplation = so much blessing. So many recitations a day = an upgrade in rebirth-grade. None of these is the internal operation of *buddhānusmṛti*; all are external metrics. They are not *buddhānusmṛti*; they are a merit-currency system.

The roots of transactionalised *buddhānusmṛti* lie in two places.

The first is the accumulation-thinking of folk religion. After Buddhism's diffusion into popular practice in the Sinitic world, the practice was reframed as a merit-accumulation system — one stick of incense = so much merit; one recitation = so much blessing; one copy of a sūtra = so much fruit. This is not native to Buddhism — primordial Buddhism has no merit-accumulation calculus. It is the natural extension of folk religion: I do something; I get a return. The extension took deep root in Sinitic Buddhism, transactionalising nearly every form of practice.

The second is the institutionalisation by patriarchal commentary.[^16][^17] Shandao's[^17] formula "from a single lifetime to ten recollections at minimum"[^17] institutionalised *buddhānusmṛti* — daily recitation counts, annual day-counts, lifetime aggregate counts in the hundreds of millions, all became measurable indices of practice. Institutionalisation is not in itself wrong — without measurement there can be no institution. But the side-effect of institutionalisation was that the *internal operation* of *buddhānusmṛti* came to be displaced by *external metrics*. The practitioner began to care about "how many I have recited" rather than about "what is happening internally as I recollect."

The danger of transactional *buddhānusmṛti* is not that it is "incorrect" — it is merely *imprecise*. The danger is that it leaves the practitioner stranded on the *outside* of *buddhānusmṛti*, never entering the inside. A person who recites three thousand times a day but has never experienced the fourfold rhythm — that person's *buddhānusmṛti* is a chore, not a practice. A person who recites ten times a day but every time runs through the fourfold rhythm — that person's *buddhānusmṛti* is a practice, not a chore.

This is not to say external metrics have no value. As a beginner's frame, as an institutional management tool, as a community's shared vocabulary — external metrics have their function. But their function does not lie in *buddhānusmṛti* itself; it lies in providing an external scaffolding for *buddhānusmṛti*. When you enter the inside of *buddhānusmṛti*, external metrics lose their value — because the internal operation cannot be metricised.

The internal operation has only one criterion: *the alteration of the mind's structure*. This criterion is not external — it cannot be measured by another, cannot be recorded, cannot be quantified. It is visible only to the practitioner.

The degree of visibility itself varies. The beginner may see only in extremely brief flashes — that already suffices. The advanced practitioner may see more clearly and for longer. But regardless of the degree, the criterion is one: *the alteration of the mind's structure*.

Not the accumulation of merit. Not the reduction of karmic obstruction. Not the increase of blessing. *The alteration of the mind's structure*.

## VI. Looking Once More

Thirty-one papers, from P01's *anussati* to P29's Samantabhadra King-of-Vows; from the Pāli Nine Epithets to the Mahāyāna *dharmadhātu*-recollection; from primordial-Buddhist *anussati* to the AI-era *manas*-turning — after walking through all of this, what is the essence of *niàn*?

*Niàn* is *niàn*.

It is not attention. It is not a word inside the mindfulness movement. It is not an operation inside a merit-accumulation system. It is one specific *caitta*, with its own operative structure and its own effect-mechanism.

From the Nine Epithets to *dharmadhātu*-recollection, the sūtras, the patriarchs, the doctrines did not change *niàn*'s essence. They only unfolded *niàn*'s object — from one epithet to nine, from one Buddha to ten directions, from ten directions to all Buddhas, all beings, all events of the *dharmadhātu*.

The unfolding of the object did not change the operation. The fourfold rhythm is the same in every object. The nine entrances are the same in every object. The purpose — to alter the mind's structure — is the same in every object.

This is why the *internal steps* of *buddhānusmṛti* matter more than its external forms. The external forms — sūtra-recitation, name-invocation, contemplation, prostration before the Buddha — can take many faces. The internal steps — establishing the object, maintaining the link, the arising of confidence, the loosening of grasping — are the same in any form.

The practitioner does not need to choose one form. Form is external; internal steps are invariant. You can experience the fourfold rhythm while reciting a sūtra, while invoking a name, while contemplating, while prostrating. The form does not matter; what matters, while you are doing the form, is whether the internal operation is occurring.

*Buddhānusmṛti* is *buddhānusmṛti*.

From the Nine Epithets at the beginning, to *dharmadhātu*-recollection at the end — across so long a road, the destination is one simple fact: *niàn* is *niàn*. It is not the property of any doctrine; not the patent of any patriarch; not the exclusive of any tradition. It is the natural function of the mind — when correctly operated, it automatically produces what it is supposed to produce.

The fourfold rhythm is the correct operation. The nine entrances are the options the Buddha gave. Samantabhadra's Ten Great Vows are the complete frame.

The rest is just time, and repetition.

---

## Footnotes

[^1]: For the structure of *anussati* and its difference from *sati*, see P01 *What Anussati Actually Means*. P01 argues that *anussati* is not a variant of *sati* but a distinct *caitta* with its own attentional structure (the fourfold rhythm: establishing the object, maintaining the link, arising of confidence, loosening of grasping). The four-layer model of §I and §IV in this paper inherits P01's structural analysis directly.

[^2]: For the philological derivation of the *itipi so* nine epithets, see P02 *The Nine Epithets*. The nine items (*Araham* through *Bhagavā*) are drawn from the Pāli canonical tradition (AN 3.34, 5.33, 9.41) and constitute the standardised attentional template of *buddhānusmṛti*. Each of the nine is an independent entrance, not item nine on a checklist; P02 provides the full argument. P11 supplies the dual-verb gloss (*zhi* 執 = decisive cutting + *chi* 持 = guarded preservation, drawn from Yunqi Zhuhong's *Aluo lo* gloss on the *Smaller Sukhāvatī-vyūha*) that helps us read the density of the template.

[^3]: For the systematicity of the Six Recollections (*cha anussatiyo*), see P03 *The Six Recollections as a System*. P03 argues that the Six are not a juxtaposed list of six items but a system; *buddhānusmṛti* sits first because the other five (Dharma, Saṅgha, *devas*, generosity, moral conduct) all take the Buddha's qualities as background object. The first ring of the Six Recollections is *buddhānusmṛti* itself — not "one option among six," but the entrance to the system.

[^4]: *Ajjhāyatana* (sustained object-base) is a key Pāli technical term naming the operative state of *anussati*; see DN 22, MN 10, etc. The Sinitic translation is *niàn* (念), defined as "with respect to a previously experienced object, causing the mind to clearly remember without forgetting." The "maintaining the link" of §I and §IV inherits this term directly.

[^5]: The *Sūtra in Forty-Two Sections* (T0784, traditionally attributed to Kāśyapa-mātaṅga and Dharmaratna at the White Horse Monastery in Luoyang, tenth year of the Yongping era of the Later Han, 67 CE) constitutes the earliest Sinitic reception of *buddhānusmṛti*. P05 examines in detail how this sūtra unifies the Buddha's qualities, the essentials of the precepts, and the methods of recollection in a short instructional text — *buddhānusmṛti*'s primordial Sinitic form is neither the Pure-Land "other-power reliance" nor the Chan "self-power inquiry," but a *moral-instructional buddhānusmṛti*.

[^6]: The *Pratyutpanna-buddha-saṃmukhāvasthita-samādhi-sūtra* (T0418, trans. Lokakṣema) introduces the *pratyutpanna-samādhi* of standing face-to-face with the Buddha. P06 argues that this sūtra marks *buddhānusmṛti*'s first turn toward experiential expansion — *buddhānusmṛti* is no longer only the recollection of the Buddha's qualities; it is the experience of the Buddha's face within *samādhi*. §II's narrative draws on P06's argument.

[^7]: The Forty-Eight Vows of the *Sukhāvatī-vyūha* (T0360, trans. Saṃghavarman). P09 details how this sūtra grounds Pure-Land tradition in the Buddha's vow-power foundation — *buddhānusmṛti* is effective not merely because the practitioner's operation is correct, but because the Buddha has prepared the receiving mechanism for the recollector.

[^8]: The Sixteen Contemplations of the *Amitāyur-dhyāna-sūtra* (T0365, trans. Kālayaśas). P10 details how this sūtra builds the upper-tier gradual visualisation architecture, while its lowest-grade-lowest-class ten-recollections name-invocation simultaneously establishes the *floor structure*.

[^9]: The "holding of the name, single-pointedness" of the *Smaller Sukhāvatī-vyūha* (T0366, trans. Kumārajīva). P11 uses Yunqi Zhuhong's dual-verb gloss in *Aluo lo shu chao* — *zhi* (執, decisive cutting) + *chi* (持, guarded preservation) — to foreclose the misreading of "unconscious name-recitation": "holding the name" was never a single-organ repetition; it is a high-density mental act with six concurrent functions.

[^10]: The Mahāsthāmaprāpta chapter, fascicle 5, of the *Śūraṅgama-sūtra* (T0945, trans. Pāramiti et al.). The cited line — "When the Buddha asked about *samādhi* through the [twenty-five] perfect-penetrations, I, without selection, gathered the six faculties, with pure recollection in unbroken succession, attaining *samādhi* — this was foremost" — is at T19.109c. P12 details how these eight characters constitute the double-axis deepening of T0366's "holding of the name": spatially, from "the mind" to "the six faculties" (single-organ to fully-integrated model); temporally, from "single-pointedness at the moment" to "moment-to-moment unbroken succession" (moment-of-attainment to cross-temporal continuum). P12 also draws on Jiaoguang's *Lengyan zhengmai shu* (X0275) for the philological gloss of the core operative line.

[^11]: Jiaoguang Zhenjian (交光真鑒), *Da Foding Shoulengyan jing zhengmai shu* (大佛頂首楞嚴經正脈疏), X0275, *Manji Zokuzō* vols. 18–19 (1594–1596). P12 draws on three key glosses by Jiaoguang: (i) "*du-she liu-gen* means causing the six faculties not to stir" (X0275, fasc. 5); (ii) "*jing-nian xiang-ji* is the complete illumination of the three bodies and four lands" (X0275, fasc. 5); (iii) "if 'pure' is set against 'defiled,' then pure recollection still ends up as a recollection-with-content" (X0275, fasc. 5). §II and §IV here cite Jiaoguang's glosses.

[^12]: For the twenty-five perfect-penetrations sequence and the position of Mahāsthāmaprāpta, see *Śūraṅgama-sūtra* (T0945) fascicles 5–6. Mahāsthāmaprāpta is twenty-fourth (great-element / faculty), Avalokiteśvara is twenty-fifth (ear-faculty). Mañjuśrī's selection-verse — "in this realm, the true teaching-substance is purity through hearing-sound" — is at T0945, fasc. 6. Jiaoguang's "position is not ranking" reading is in X0275, fasc. 5, in the section "the seven great-elements end with consciousness, but here end with the faculty." §II here cites P12 and X0275.

[^13]: The *Ghanavyūha-sūtra* / *Dàshèng mìyán jīng* 大乘密嚴經 (T0681, trans. Divākara, Tang Wuzhou Chuigong era; the parallel translation T0682 is by Amoghavajra, Tang Daizong Dali era) presents *buddhānusmṛti* as the mechanism of *ālaya-parāvṛtti*. P18 details how this sūtra constructs the specific mechanism by which *buddhānusmṛti* operates as consciousness-turning. §III here cites P18's doctrinal warrant.

[^14]: *Cheng weishi lun* (Dharmapāla et al., trans. Xuanzang), fascicle 4: "In the pre-turning state, [*manas*] continuously and discerningly cognises the appropriated self-mark; in the post-turning state, it likewise discerningly cognises the no-self mark." P30 takes this line as its central thesis, arguing that *buddhānusmṛti* is the doctrinally-licensed *manas*-turning mechanism. §III here cites P30's argument.

[^15]: Samantabhadra's Ten Great Vows are canonically located in the *Bhadracarīpraṇidhānarāja* / *Pǔxián xíngyuàn pǐn* 普賢行願品 (T0293, trans. Prajñā, Tang Zhenyuan era; fascicle 40 of the 40-fascicle recension of the *Avataṃsaka-sūtra*; T10.844a ff.). The same vow-text also appears, in modulated form, at the close of the *Gaṇḍavyūha* / *Rù fǎjiè pǐn* of the 80-fascicle recension (T0279, trans. Śikṣānanda); the standalone canonical witness is T0293. The 60-fascicle recension (T0278, trans. Buddhabhadra) does not contain this Ten-Vows structure. P25–P29 detail the complete structure of the ten vows: vows 1–3 as the integrated three-karma operation, vows 4–5 as karmic transformation, vows 6–7 as the long-abiding of the Dharma, vows 8–9–10 as the final upward-receiving and downward-transforming dedication. §IV here cites P25–P29.

[^16]: Shandao's *Sifen shu* on *Guan wuliangshou jing* (T1753): "from a single lifetime to ten recollections at minimum." P22 details how Shandao institutionalised name-invocation into a patriarchal-grade canonical thesis. §V here cites P22's argument.

[^17]: For the irreducible three-fold reading among the late-Ming *Śūraṅgama* commentators (Yunqi Zhuhong's X0424, Jiaoguang Zhenjian's X0275, Ouyi Zhixu's T1762), see P12 §IV. Yunqi glosses with the dual verb "*zhi* + *chi*" (decisive cutting + guarded preservation); Ouyi gives the six-fold faith ("self / other / cause / fruit / event / principle"); Jiaoguang originates the verb-classification distinction between *faculty-gathered recollection* and *vijñāna-discriminating recollection*. The three commentators' structural cuts on the verb *niàn* are mutually irreducible.

[^18]: P30's exposition of the *manas*-turning operator draws on the same line of *Cheng weishi lun* fascicle 4 cited in note 14. §III here references P30's full derivation rather than reconstructing it.

---

## References

### I. Primary Buddhist Sources

#### Pāli sources
- *Aṅguttara Nikāya* 3.34, 5.33, 9.41 (philological derivation of *anussati* and the *itipi so* nine epithets).
- *Dīgha Nikāya* 22 (technical use of *ajjhāyatana*).
- *Majjhima Nikāya* 10 (technical use of *ajjhāyatana*).
- PTS translations: F. L. Woodward, *The Book of Gradual Sayings* (1932–1936); Bhikkhu Sujato, CC0 translation, suttacentral.net.

#### Chinese Tripiṭaka (by T-/X-number)
- *Saṃyukta Āgama* (trans. Guṇabhadra), T0099.
- *Bhadracarīpraṇidhānarāja* / *Pǔxián xíngyuàn pǐn* 普賢行願品 (trans. Prajñā), T0293 [the canonical standalone witness for the Ten Great Vows]; 80-fascicle *Avataṃsaka* (trans. Śikṣānanda), T0279; 60-fascicle *Avataṃsaka* (trans. Buddhabhadra), T0278.
- *Sukhāvatī-vyūha* (trans. Saṃghavarman), T0360.
- *Amitāyur-dhyāna-sūtra* (trans. Kālayaśas), T0365.
- *Smaller Sukhāvatī-vyūha* (trans. Kumārajīva), T0366.
- *Pratyutpanna-buddha-saṃmukhāvasthita-samādhi-sūtra* (trans. Lokakṣema), T0418.
- *Ghanavyūha-sūtra* / *Dàshèng mìyán jīng* 大乘密嚴經 (trans. Divākara), T0681; (trans. Amoghavajra), T0682.
- *Sūtra in Forty-Two Sections*, T0784.
- *Śūraṅgama-sūtra* (trans. Pāramiti et al.), T0945.
- *Cheng weishi lun* (Dharmapāla et al., trans. Xuanzang), T1585.
- *Sifen shu on the Amitāyur-dhyāna-sūtra* (Shandao), T1753.
- *Anluo ji* (Daochuo), T1958.

#### Patriarchal Commentaries
- Jiaoguang Zhenjian, *Da Foding Shoulengyan jing zhengmai shu*, X0275, *Manji Zokuzō* vols. 18–19 (1594–1596).
- Yunqi Zhuhong, *Aluo lo shu chao* (*Subcommentary on the Smaller Sukhāvatī-vyūha*), X0424 (1595).
- Ouyi Zhixu, *Aluo lo yao jie* (*Essential Explanation of the Smaller Sukhāvatī-vyūha*), T1762 (1647).

### II. Cross-Reference to Series Papers

- P01 *What Anussati Actually Means*: structure of *anussati* and its difference from *sati* (§I, §IV).
- P02 *The Nine Epithets*: the nine entrances of *itipi so* (§I).
- P03 *The Six Recollections as a System*: the systematicity of the Six Recollections (§I).
- P05 *The Sūtra in Forty-Two Sections*: the primordial Sinitic form of *buddhānusmṛti* (§II).
- P06 *Seeing the Buddha Face to Face*: the experiential turn of direct sighting (§II).
- P09 *The Forty-Eight Vows*: the foundation of vow-power in the *Sukhāvatī-vyūha* (§II).
- P10 *The Sixteen Contemplations*: the Sixteen Contemplations and floor structure (§II).
- P11 *The Smaller Sūtra and the Single Name*: the double-axis deepening of name-holding (§II).
- P12 *The Śūraṅgama*: the operative pivot — gathering the six faculties, pure recollection in unbroken succession (§II, §IV, footnotes).
- P18 *The Ghanavyūha*: *buddhānusmṛti* as *ālaya-parāvṛtti* (§III).
- P22 *The Pure Land Patriarchs II: Shandao's Settling of the Name*: from a single lifetime to ten recollections at minimum (§V).
- P25–P29 *Samantabhadra's Ten Great Vows*: the complete frame of *dharmadhātu*-recollection (§IV).
- P30 *Recollection in the Age of AI*: the *manas*-turning mechanism (§III).

### III. Modern Scholarship

- Cox, Collett. *From Here to Abhidharma: Kāśyapa, Āgama, and the Sarvāstivāda Tradition*. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2007.
- Hershock, Peter D. *Buddhism and Intelligent Technology: Toward a More Humane Future*. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021.
- Lopez, Donald S., Jr. *The Scientific Buddha: His Short and Happy Life*. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
- McMahan, David L. *The Making of Buddhist Modernism*. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
- Schmithausen, Lambert. *Ālayavijñāna: On the Origin and the Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy*. Tokyo: International Institute for Buddhist Studies, 1987.


### IV. Sūtra & Śāstra Index

| Abbrev. | Full Name | Author / Translator | Taishō / Manji-zokuzō |
|---------|-----------|---------------------|------------------------|
| *Saṃyukta Āgama* | *Zá āhán jīng* 雜阿含經 | trans. Guṇabhadra (Liu-Song) | T0099 |
| *Bhadracarīpraṇidhānarāja* | *Pǔxián xíngyuàn pǐn* 普賢行願品 (40-fasc. *Avataṃsaka*, fasc. 40) | trans. Prajñā (Tang Zhenyuan) | T0293 |
| *Avataṃsaka* (80-fasc.) | *Dàfāngguǎng fó huāyán jīng* 大方廣佛華嚴經（八十卷本） | trans. Śikṣānanda (Tang) | T0279 |
| *Avataṃsaka* (60-fasc.) | *Dàfāngguǎng fó huāyán jīng* 大方廣佛華嚴經（六十卷本） | trans. Buddhabhadra (E. Jin) | T0278 |
| *Sūtra in Forty-Two Sections* | *Sìshí'èr zhāng jīng* 四十二章經 | trad. attrib. Kāśyapa-mātaṅga & Dharmaratna (E. Han, 67 CE) | T0784 |
| *Sukhāvatī-vyūha* | *Wúliángshòu jīng* 無量壽經 | trans. Saṃghavarman (Cao-Wei) | T0360 |
| *Amitāyur-dhyāna* | *Guān wúliángshòu fó jīng* 觀無量壽佛經 | trans. Kālayaśas (Liu-Song) | T0365 |
| *Smaller Sukhāvatī-vyūha* | *Āmítuó jīng* 阿彌陀經 | trans. Kumārajīva (Later Qin) | T0366 |
| *Pratyutpanna-samādhi* | *Bānzhōu sānmèi jīng* 般舟三昧經 | trans. Lokakṣema (E. Han) | T0418 |
| *Ghanavyūha* (Divākara) | *Dàshèng mìyán jīng* 大乘密嚴經 | trans. Divākara (Tang Wuzhou) | T0681 |
| *Ghanavyūha* (Amoghavajra) | *Dàshèng mìyán jīng* 大乘密嚴經 | trans. Amoghavajra (Tang Daizong) | T0682 |
| *Śūraṅgama* | *Dà fódǐng shǒulèngyán jīng* 大佛頂首楞嚴經 | trans. Pāramiti et al. (Tang) | T0945 |
| *Cheng weishi lun* | *Chéng wéishí lùn* 成唯識論 | Dharmapāla et al., trans. Xuanzang (Tang) | T1585 |
| *Sifen shu* | *Guān wúliángshòu fó jīng shū* 觀無量壽佛經疏 | by Shandao (Tang) | T1753 |
| *Yao jie* | *Āmítuó jīng yàojiě* 阿彌陀經要解 | by Ouyi Zhixu (Qing) | T1762 |
| *Anluo ji* | *Ānlè jí* 安樂集 | by Daochuo (Tang) | T1958 |
| *Zhengmai shu* | *Lèngyán jīng zhèngmài shū* 楞嚴經正脈疏 | by Jiaoguang Zhenjian (Ming) | X0275 |
| *Shu chao* | *Āmítuó jīng shūchāo* 阿彌陀經疏鈔 | by Yunqi Zhuhong (Ming) | X0424 |

---

*CBETA collation: all T-/X-number citations have been physically verified against the CBETA Electronic Tripiṭaka 2024 edition.*

*Repo: github.com/pointing-at-the-moon/six-practice-gates · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0*

*NIAN-P31 · 釋慧鏡 (Shi Huijing) · 2026-05-07*