--- title: "My first blog post was a guest post" layout: default category: Etc tags: [PVA, publications, Hungary] published: true disqus: petersolymos promote: false --- The title says it all. I wrote [this](http://okologiablog.hu/node/219) piece about *Publication Viability Analysis* pondering about a pattern that I observed while looking at Hungarian ecologists publication output through time using the [Web of Science](https://webofknowledge.com/) database (the original post is in Hungarian). I fit Ricker growth model to observed publication numbers and a non-stationary 2-phase model was the best fit. An intrinsic growth rate of 0.39 with carrying capacity *K* = 14 publications per year was characteristic to the pre-democracy (Soviet occupation era) phase (1978--1997). The democratic era (1998--2012) showed growth rate of 0.21 with a much higher *K* = 100 (variance went from 0.44 to 0.03). The motivation for the analysis and post was that the number of publications has been persistently around *K* = 100 for 5 years. So I looked at the correlation between the number of PhD students and the number of publications, using different lag times between 0 and 10 years. The correlation was highest for a 7-year lag. This more or less indicates a cohort of PhD students (myself included) who started PhD around 2000. This cohort represents the grandchildren of the post-WWII boom, births have declined after this cohort -- therefore less PhD students to produce papers. If this is true, it also means that it takes considerable time for PhD students to reach peak publication productivity. So I proposed to shorten the lag to 3--5 years to boost publication numbers. Win for the students and win for Hungary. Why am I bringing this old post up 3 years later? Because I wanted to see how well my estimates have held up from a short-term forecasting standpoint. Well, here are the results of a recent query with identical settings (`ADDRESS=HUNGARY; CATEGORIES=ECOLOGY`) for the years 2013--2015: Year | Count ---- | ------ 2013 | 87 2014 | 114 2015 | 108 PVA The figure shows the two phases used in modeling (grey and gold), and the forecast (tomato) with horizontal lines for carrying capacity. I wish these numbers have improved, but it is what it is. [You can't argue with science](http://comicvine.gamespot.com/images/1300-1819415). In case you want to argue, just leave a comment!