--- name: osint description: Comprehensive company intelligence gathering using distributed OSINT system with parallel specialized agents disable-model-invocation: true --- ## Configuration Read `.jobops/config.json`. If missing, stop with: > JOBOPS NOT CONFIGURED > Run /jobops:setup to initialize your workspace. Use `config.directories.` for all file paths in this skill. Use `config.preferences.cultural_profile` if this skill generates resume-style content. Use `config.preferences.default_jurisdiction` if this skill has jurisdiction-sensitive logic (crisis/legal skills accept `--jurisdiction=` to override). ## Company-Intelligence Path Resolution This skill writes to a per-company folder under `{config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/`. Before dispatching any sub-agent: 1. Extract `{Company}` from the job-posting frontmatter or from the explicit argument (e.g., `/jobops:osint Google`). 2. Compose the target folder: `{config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/`. 3. If the folder already exists, prompt the user: - **refresh** — overwrite all per-agent files. - **append** — keep existing files, write a new `summary_{YYYYMMDD}.md` alongside them (do not modify per-agent files in place). - **skip** — exit without running. 4. Sub-agents write to fixed filenames: `corporate.md`, `legal.md`, `leadership.md`, `compensation.md`, `culture.md`, `market.md`. 5. Person-level reports from `osint-person` land under `{Company}/people/{interviewer_name}.md`. 6. The aggregated synthesis lands at `{Company}/summary.md` on refresh or `{Company}/summary_{YYYYMMDD}.md` on append. ## Mission Overview Deploy 6 specialized OSINT agents simultaneously to conduct parallel intelligence gathering on {{ARG1}}: 1. **osint-corporate** - Corporate structure, financials, strategic positioning 2. **osint-legal** - Litigation history, regulatory compliance, legal risks 3. **osint-leadership** - Executive backgrounds, leadership analysis 4. **osint-compensation** - Salary benchmarking, benefits, total rewards 5. **osint-culture** - Employee sentiment, workplace culture analysis 6. **osint-market** - Industry analysis, competitive landscape ## Operational Protocol ### Phase 1: Parallel Agent Deployment ✓ Deploying 6 specialized intelligence agents for target analysis Launch all 6 specialized OSINT agents simultaneously to maximize intelligence gathering efficiency. Each agent will conduct focused research in their specialized domain and produce standardized intelligence reports saved to the resolved per-company folder `{config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/`. **CRITICAL**: You must deploy all agents in parallel using a single message with multiple Task tool calls. This ensures simultaneous execution rather than sequential processing. **FILE STORAGE REQUIREMENTS**: Each specialized agent MUST save their complete intelligence report to `{config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/` using the fixed filenames (the folder path encodes company identity; the calling skill handles refresh vs. append dating): - `corporate.md` - `legal.md` - `leadership.md` - `compensation.md` - `culture.md` - `market.md` When dispatching each sub-agent, pass the fully resolved target path explicitly in the Task instruction so the sub-agent writes to the correct location. **YAML FRONT MATTER**: Prepend each specialized report with: ```yaml --- company: {{ARG1}} report_type: corporate|legal|leadership|compensation|culture|market generated_by: /osint generated_on: output_type: intelligence_report status: final version: 1.0 --- ``` Set `report_type` to the appropriate domain. Update timestamps and versioning on reruns. Example deployment pattern: ``` Deploy all 6 OSINT agents simultaneously to research [COMPANY]: - Corporate intelligence (structure, finances, strategy) - Legal intelligence (litigation, regulatory, compliance) - Leadership intelligence (executives, personnel, governance) - Compensation intelligence (salaries, benefits, equity) - Culture intelligence (employee sentiment, workplace environment) - Market intelligence (industry analysis, competitive positioning) ``` ### Phase 2: Intelligence Synthesis & Integration After receiving all 6 specialized intelligence reports, synthesize findings into a comprehensive Master Intelligence Report following the structure below. The Master Intelligence Report MUST be saved to `{config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/summary.md` on **refresh**, or `{config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/summary_{YYYYMMDD}.md` on **append**. Prepend the master report with: ```yaml --- company: {{ARG1}} generated_by: /osint master generated_on: sources: - corporate - legal - leadership - compensation - culture - market output_type: intelligence_report_master status: final version: 1.0 --- ``` ## Master Intelligence Report Format ```markdown # Master Intelligence Report: {{ARG1}} **Report Date:** [Date] **Intelligence Sources:** 6 Specialized OSINT Agents **Classification:** Strategic Intelligence / Company Assessment ## Executive Intelligence Summary ### Critical Findings - **Overall Risk Assessment**: [High/Medium/Low] - **Investment/Employment Recommendation**: [Strong Positive/Positive/Neutral/Negative/Strong Negative] - **Key Opportunities**: [Top 3 strategic opportunities] - **Key Risks**: [Top 3 critical risk factors] ### Intelligence Confidence Level - **Overall Confidence**: [High/Medium/Low] based on source quality and verification - **Information Gaps**: [Areas requiring additional intelligence] ## Corporate Intelligence Summary *[Synthesized from osint-corporate report]* ### Financial Health Assessment - **Revenue Trend**: [Growth/Stable/Declining] - **Financial Stability**: [Strong/Adequate/Concerning] - **Strategic Position**: [Market leader/Strong competitor/Follower/Struggling] ### Key Corporate Findings - [Top 3 corporate intelligence findings] - [Critical business developments] - [Strategic partnerships and positioning] ## Legal Intelligence Summary *[Synthesized from osint-legal report]* ### Legal Risk Profile - **Litigation Risk**: [High/Medium/Low] - **Regulatory Compliance**: [Strong/Adequate/Concerning] - **Active Legal Issues**: [Number and materiality of active cases] ### Key Legal Findings - [Significant litigation or regulatory issues] - [Compliance track record] - [Legal risk factors for employment/business] ## Leadership Intelligence Summary *[Synthesized from osint-leadership report]* ### Leadership Assessment - **Executive Quality**: [Exceptional/Strong/Adequate/Concerning] - **Leadership Stability**: [Stable/Some turnover/High turnover] - **Governance Quality**: [Strong/Adequate/Weak] ### Key Leadership Findings - [Executive backgrounds and track record] - [Leadership effectiveness and red flags] - [Succession planning and key person risks] ## Compensation Intelligence Summary *[Synthesized from osint-compensation report]* ### Compensation Profile - **Market Position**: [Above market/Competitive/Below market] - **Total Rewards**: [Comprehensive/Standard/Limited] - **Equity Upside**: [High/Medium/Low potential] ### Key Compensation Findings - [Salary ranges and competitiveness] - [Benefits and perks highlights] - [Equity and bonus structures] - [Negotiation leverage assessment] ## Culture Intelligence Summary *[Synthesized from osint-culture report]* ### Culture Assessment - **Employee Satisfaction**: [High/Medium/Low] - **Culture Rating**: [X.X/5.0 across platforms] - **Work Environment**: [Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor] ### Key Culture Findings - [Employee satisfaction themes] - [Management quality feedback] - [Work-life balance and flexibility] - [Diversity and inclusion practices] ## Market Intelligence Summary *[Synthesized from osint-market report]* ### Market Position - **Industry Health**: [Growing/Stable/Declining] - **Competitive Position**: [Market leader/Strong/Follower/Weak] - **Growth Prospects**: [High/Medium/Low] ### Key Market Findings - [Industry trends and opportunities] - [Competitive advantages and threats] - [Market position and differentiation] ## Integrated Risk Analysis ### High Priority Risks 1. **[Risk Category]**: [Specific risk description and potential impact] 2. **[Risk Category]**: [Specific risk description and potential impact] 3. **[Risk Category]**: [Specific risk description and potential impact] ### Medium Priority Risks - [List of secondary risks with brief descriptions] ### Low Priority Risks - [List of minor risks for completeness] ## Strategic Opportunities Assessment ### High Value Opportunities 1. **[Opportunity Category]**: [Specific opportunity and strategic value] 2. **[Opportunity Category]**: [Specific opportunity and strategic value] 3. **[Opportunity Category]**: [Specific opportunity and strategic value] ### Secondary Opportunities - [Additional opportunities worth considering] ## Intelligence-Based Recommendations ### For Job Candidates - **Employment Recommendation**: [Accept/Consider Carefully/Decline] - **Negotiation Strategy**: [Areas of leverage and approach] - **Red Flags to Explore**: [Issues requiring clarification in interviews] - **Questions to Ask**: [Specific questions based on intelligence gathered] ### For Investors/Business Partners - **Partnership Recommendation**: [Proceed/Proceed with Caution/Avoid] - **Due Diligence Focus**: [Areas requiring additional investigation] - **Risk Mitigation**: [Strategies to address identified risks] ### For Competitors/Market Analysis - **Competitive Threat Level**: [High/Medium/Low] - **Competitive Advantages**: [Company's key strengths to monitor] - **Competitive Vulnerabilities**: [Areas where company may be attacked] ## Cross-Domain Intelligence Correlations ### Corroborating Evidence - [Where multiple intelligence domains confirm same findings] ### Contradictory Intelligence - [Where different domains show conflicting information] ### Intelligence Gaps - [Areas where additional research is needed] ## Follow-Up Intelligence Collection ### Immediate Priorities - [High-priority areas needing additional research] ### Medium-term Monitoring - [Areas requiring ongoing intelligence updates] ### Long-term Surveillance - [Factors to monitor over extended period] ## Intelligence Sources & Reliability ### High Reliability Sources - [Sources with strong track record and verification] ### Medium Reliability Sources - [Sources with adequate verification] ### Lower Reliability Sources - [Sources requiring additional verification] ## Appendices ### Appendix A: Individual Agent Reports - Links to full detailed reports from each specialized agent ### Appendix B: Source Bibliography - Complete list of all intelligence sources consulted ### Appendix C: Intelligence Collection Timeline - Dates and sequence of intelligence gathering activities ``` ## Quality Standards ### Intelligence Integration Requirements 1. **Cross-Reference Verification**: Corroborate findings across multiple intelligence domains with source citations 2. **Contradiction Resolution**: Address any conflicting intelligence between agents with source attribution 3. **Gap Identification**: Clearly identify areas where intelligence is insufficient with explicit labeling 4. **Risk Prioritization**: Rank risks by severity and probability with supporting evidence and sources 5. **Actionable Insights**: Provide specific, actionable recommendations based on intelligence with clear source attribution ### Report Quality Criteria - **Comprehensiveness**: Cover all critical aspects of company assessment with complete source documentation - **Objectivity**: Present balanced analysis without bias, clearly distinguishing facts from analysis - **Evidence-Based**: Support all conclusions with specific intelligence sources including URLs where available - **Strategic Focus**: Emphasize insights most relevant for decision-making with clear source provenance - **Professional Standards**: Meet intelligence community standards for analysis with rigorous citation practices ### MANDATORY SOURCE ATTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS 1. **Direct Citations**: All factual claims MUST include inline citations with source URLs where available 2. **Footnotes**: Use numbered footnotes for detailed source information and methodology 3. **Inference Labels**: Clearly mark inferred, calculated, or derived information as [INFERRED], [CALCULATED], or [DERIVED] 4. **Assumption Flags**: Mark assumptions as [ASSUMPTION] with reasoning provided 5. **Confidence Indicators**: Include confidence levels (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) for all major findings 6. **Source Quality Ratings**: Rate each source as (HIGH RELIABILITY), (MEDIUM RELIABILITY), or (LOW RELIABILITY) 7. **Date Attribution**: Include access/publication dates for all sources 8. **Missing Source Disclosure**: Explicitly state when sources are unavailable or information is based on industry standards ## Operational Security ### Ethical Guidelines - Use only publicly available information sources - Respect privacy and legal boundaries - Maintain objectivity and avoid speculation - Provide source attribution for verification - Flag limitations and confidence levels ### Information Handling - Classify intelligence appropriately - Protect sources and methods - Ensure accurate attribution - Maintain audit trail of intelligence gathering ## Mission Success Criteria 1. **Complete Coverage**: All 6 intelligence domains researched thoroughly 2. **Parallel Execution**: All agents deployed simultaneously for efficiency 3. **Quality Integration**: Findings properly synthesized and cross-referenced 4. **Actionable Intelligence**: Clear recommendations for decision-making 5. **Professional Standards**: Report meets intelligence community quality standards Execute this comprehensive intelligence operation with the thoroughness and professionalism of an elite intelligence organization.