[ { "id": "inr-idempotent-1-timeout", "english": "Task record IDE-100, executor note.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-100 (idempotency key k-100). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-100, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-100 (idempotency key k-100), idempotent.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about INV-100? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-1-verified-none", "english": "Task record IDE-101, executor note.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-101 (idempotency key k-101). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-101, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-101 (idempotency key k-101), idempotent.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about INV-101? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-1-failed-mid", "english": "Task record IDE-102, executor note.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-102 (idempotency key k-102). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-102, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-102 (idempotency key k-102), idempotent.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about INV-102? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-1-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record IDE-103, executor note.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-103 (idempotency key k-103). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-103, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-103 (idempotency key k-103), idempotent.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about INV-103? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-1-timeout-late", "english": "Task record IDE-104, executor note.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-104 (idempotency key k-104). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-104, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-104 (idempotency key k-104), idempotent.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about INV-104? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-2-timeout", "english": "Task record IDE-110, executor note.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-110 (idempotency key k-110). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-110, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-110 (idempotency key k-110), idempotent.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ORD-110? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-2-verified-none", "english": "Task record IDE-111, executor note.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-111 (idempotency key k-111). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-111, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-111 (idempotency key k-111), idempotent.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ORD-111? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-2-failed-mid", "english": "Task record IDE-112, executor note.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-112 (idempotency key k-112). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-112, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-112 (idempotency key k-112), idempotent.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ORD-112? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-2-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record IDE-113, executor note.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-113 (idempotency key k-113). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-113, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-113 (idempotency key k-113), idempotent.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ORD-113? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-2-timeout-late", "english": "Task record IDE-114, executor note.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-114 (idempotency key k-114). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-114, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-114 (idempotency key k-114), idempotent.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ORD-114? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-3-timeout", "english": "Task record IDE-120, executor note.\nSync ledger L-120 to the archive (idempotency key k-120). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-120, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSync ledger L-120 to the archive (idempotency key k-120), idempotent.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about L-120? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-3-verified-none", "english": "Task record IDE-121, executor note.\nSync ledger L-121 to the archive (idempotency key k-121). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-121, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSync ledger L-121 to the archive (idempotency key k-121), idempotent.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about L-121? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-3-failed-mid", "english": "Task record IDE-122, executor note.\nSync ledger L-122 to the archive (idempotency key k-122). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-122, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSync ledger L-122 to the archive (idempotency key k-122), idempotent.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about L-122? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-3-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record IDE-123, executor note.\nSync ledger L-123 to the archive (idempotency key k-123). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-123, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSync ledger L-123 to the archive (idempotency key k-123), idempotent.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about L-123? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-3-timeout-late", "english": "Task record IDE-124, executor note.\nSync ledger L-124 to the archive (idempotency key k-124). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-124, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSync ledger L-124 to the archive (idempotency key k-124), idempotent.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about L-124? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-4-timeout", "english": "Task record IDE-130, executor note.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-130 (idempotency key k-130). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-130, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-130 (idempotency key k-130), idempotent.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about T-130? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-4-verified-none", "english": "Task record IDE-131, executor note.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-131 (idempotency key k-131). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-131, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-131 (idempotency key k-131), idempotent.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about T-131? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-4-failed-mid", "english": "Task record IDE-132, executor note.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-132 (idempotency key k-132). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-132, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-132 (idempotency key k-132), idempotent.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about T-132? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-4-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record IDE-133, executor note.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-133 (idempotency key k-133). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-133, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-133 (idempotency key k-133), idempotent.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about T-133? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-4-timeout-late", "english": "Task record IDE-134, executor note.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-134 (idempotency key k-134). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-134, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-134 (idempotency key k-134), idempotent.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about T-134? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-5-timeout", "english": "Task record IDE-140, executor note.\nSet the DNS record for host h140.example (idempotency key k-140). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-140, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSet the DNS record for host h140.example (idempotency key k-140), idempotent.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about h140.example? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-5-verified-none", "english": "Task record IDE-141, executor note.\nSet the DNS record for host h141.example (idempotency key k-141). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-141, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSet the DNS record for host h141.example (idempotency key k-141), idempotent.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about h141.example? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-5-failed-mid", "english": "Task record IDE-142, executor note.\nSet the DNS record for host h142.example (idempotency key k-142). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-142, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSet the DNS record for host h142.example (idempotency key k-142), idempotent.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about h142.example? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-5-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record IDE-143, executor note.\nSet the DNS record for host h143.example (idempotency key k-143). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-143, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSet the DNS record for host h143.example (idempotency key k-143), idempotent.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about h143.example? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-5-timeout-late", "english": "Task record IDE-144, executor note.\nSet the DNS record for host h144.example (idempotency key k-144). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-144, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nSet the DNS record for host h144.example (idempotency key k-144), idempotent.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about h144.example? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-6-timeout", "english": "Task record IDE-150, executor note.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-150 (idempotency key k-150). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-150, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-150 (idempotency key k-150), idempotent.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ACC-150? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-6-verified-none", "english": "Task record IDE-151, executor note.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-151 (idempotency key k-151). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-151, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-151 (idempotency key k-151), idempotent.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ACC-151? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-6-failed-mid", "english": "Task record IDE-152, executor note.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-152 (idempotency key k-152). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-152, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-152 (idempotency key k-152), idempotent.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ACC-152? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-6-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record IDE-153, executor note.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-153 (idempotency key k-153). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-153, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-153 (idempotency key k-153), idempotent.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ACC-153? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-6-timeout-late", "english": "Task record IDE-154, executor note.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-154 (idempotency key k-154). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-154, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-154 (idempotency key k-154), idempotent.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ACC-154? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-7-timeout", "english": "Task record IDE-160, executor note.\nRestart the tunnel tun-160 (idempotency key k-160). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-160, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRestart the tunnel tun-160 (idempotency key k-160), idempotent.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about tun-160? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-7-verified-none", "english": "Task record IDE-161, executor note.\nRestart the tunnel tun-161 (idempotency key k-161). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-161, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRestart the tunnel tun-161 (idempotency key k-161), idempotent.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about tun-161? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-7-failed-mid", "english": "Task record IDE-162, executor note.\nRestart the tunnel tun-162 (idempotency key k-162). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-162, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRestart the tunnel tun-162 (idempotency key k-162), idempotent.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about tun-162? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-7-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record IDE-163, executor note.\nRestart the tunnel tun-163 (idempotency key k-163). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-163, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRestart the tunnel tun-163 (idempotency key k-163), idempotent.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about tun-163? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-7-timeout-late", "english": "Task record IDE-164, executor note.\nRestart the tunnel tun-164 (idempotency key k-164). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-164, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRestart the tunnel tun-164 (idempotency key k-164), idempotent.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about tun-164? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-8-timeout", "english": "Task record IDE-170, executor note.\nUpload the report file R-170.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-170). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-170, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nUpload the report file R-170.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-170), idempotent.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about R-170.pdf? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-8-verified-none", "english": "Task record IDE-171, executor note.\nUpload the report file R-171.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-171). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-171, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nUpload the report file R-171.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-171), idempotent.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about R-171.pdf? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-8-failed-mid", "english": "Task record IDE-172, executor note.\nUpload the report file R-172.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-172). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-172, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nUpload the report file R-172.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-172), idempotent.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about R-172.pdf? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-8-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record IDE-173, executor note.\nUpload the report file R-173.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-173). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-173, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nUpload the report file R-173.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-173), idempotent.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about R-173.pdf? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-idempotent-8-timeout-late", "english": "Task record IDE-174, executor note.\nUpload the report file R-174.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-174). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record IDE-174, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nUpload the report file R-174.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-174), idempotent.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about R-174.pdf? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "idempotent", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-1-timeout", "english": "Task record NRT-100, executor note.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-100 (idempotency key k-100). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-100, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-100 (idempotency key k-100), no-retry.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about INV-100? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-1-verified-none", "english": "Task record NRT-101, executor note.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-101 (idempotency key k-101). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-101, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-101 (idempotency key k-101), no-retry.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about INV-101? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-1-failed-mid", "english": "Task record NRT-102, executor note.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-102 (idempotency key k-102). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-102, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-102 (idempotency key k-102), no-retry.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about INV-102? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-1-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record NRT-103, executor note.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-103 (idempotency key k-103). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-103, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-103 (idempotency key k-103), no-retry.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about INV-103? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-1-timeout-late", "english": "Task record NRT-104, executor note.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-104 (idempotency key k-104). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-104, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nCharge the card for invoice INV-104 (idempotency key k-104), no-retry.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about INV-104? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-2-timeout", "english": "Task record NRT-110, executor note.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-110 (idempotency key k-110). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-110, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-110 (idempotency key k-110), no-retry.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ORD-110? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-2-verified-none", "english": "Task record NRT-111, executor note.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-111 (idempotency key k-111). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-111, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-111 (idempotency key k-111), no-retry.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ORD-111? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-2-failed-mid", "english": "Task record NRT-112, executor note.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-112 (idempotency key k-112). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-112, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-112 (idempotency key k-112), no-retry.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ORD-112? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-2-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record NRT-113, executor note.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-113 (idempotency key k-113). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-113, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-113 (idempotency key k-113), no-retry.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ORD-113? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-2-timeout-late", "english": "Task record NRT-114, executor note.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-114 (idempotency key k-114). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-114, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSend the dispatch notice for order ORD-114 (idempotency key k-114), no-retry.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ORD-114? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-3-timeout", "english": "Task record NRT-120, executor note.\nSync ledger L-120 to the archive (idempotency key k-120). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-120, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSync ledger L-120 to the archive (idempotency key k-120), no-retry.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about L-120? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-3-verified-none", "english": "Task record NRT-121, executor note.\nSync ledger L-121 to the archive (idempotency key k-121). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-121, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSync ledger L-121 to the archive (idempotency key k-121), no-retry.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about L-121? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-3-failed-mid", "english": "Task record NRT-122, executor note.\nSync ledger L-122 to the archive (idempotency key k-122). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-122, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSync ledger L-122 to the archive (idempotency key k-122), no-retry.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about L-122? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-3-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record NRT-123, executor note.\nSync ledger L-123 to the archive (idempotency key k-123). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-123, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSync ledger L-123 to the archive (idempotency key k-123), no-retry.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about L-123? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-3-timeout-late", "english": "Task record NRT-124, executor note.\nSync ledger L-124 to the archive (idempotency key k-124). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-124, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSync ledger L-124 to the archive (idempotency key k-124), no-retry.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about L-124? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-4-timeout", "english": "Task record NRT-130, executor note.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-130 (idempotency key k-130). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-130, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-130 (idempotency key k-130), no-retry.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about T-130? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-4-verified-none", "english": "Task record NRT-131, executor note.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-131 (idempotency key k-131). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-131, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-131 (idempotency key k-131), no-retry.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about T-131? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-4-failed-mid", "english": "Task record NRT-132, executor note.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-132 (idempotency key k-132). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-132, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-132 (idempotency key k-132), no-retry.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about T-132? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-4-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record NRT-133, executor note.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-133 (idempotency key k-133). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-133, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-133 (idempotency key k-133), no-retry.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about T-133? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-4-timeout-late", "english": "Task record NRT-134, executor note.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-134 (idempotency key k-134). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-134, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRebuild the search index for tenant T-134 (idempotency key k-134), no-retry.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about T-134? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-5-timeout", "english": "Task record NRT-140, executor note.\nSet the DNS record for host h140.example (idempotency key k-140). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-140, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSet the DNS record for host h140.example (idempotency key k-140), no-retry.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about h140.example? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-5-verified-none", "english": "Task record NRT-141, executor note.\nSet the DNS record for host h141.example (idempotency key k-141). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-141, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSet the DNS record for host h141.example (idempotency key k-141), no-retry.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about h141.example? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-5-failed-mid", "english": "Task record NRT-142, executor note.\nSet the DNS record for host h142.example (idempotency key k-142). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-142, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSet the DNS record for host h142.example (idempotency key k-142), no-retry.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about h142.example? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-5-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record NRT-143, executor note.\nSet the DNS record for host h143.example (idempotency key k-143). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-143, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSet the DNS record for host h143.example (idempotency key k-143), no-retry.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about h143.example? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-5-timeout-late", "english": "Task record NRT-144, executor note.\nSet the DNS record for host h144.example (idempotency key k-144). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-144, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nSet the DNS record for host h144.example (idempotency key k-144), no-retry.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about h144.example? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-6-timeout", "english": "Task record NRT-150, executor note.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-150 (idempotency key k-150). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-150, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-150 (idempotency key k-150), no-retry.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ACC-150? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-6-verified-none", "english": "Task record NRT-151, executor note.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-151 (idempotency key k-151). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-151, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-151 (idempotency key k-151), no-retry.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ACC-151? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-6-failed-mid", "english": "Task record NRT-152, executor note.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-152 (idempotency key k-152). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-152, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-152 (idempotency key k-152), no-retry.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ACC-152? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-6-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record NRT-153, executor note.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-153 (idempotency key k-153). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-153, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-153 (idempotency key k-153), no-retry.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ACC-153? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-6-timeout-late", "english": "Task record NRT-154, executor note.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-154 (idempotency key k-154). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-154, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nIssue the credit note for account ACC-154 (idempotency key k-154), no-retry.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about ACC-154? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-7-timeout", "english": "Task record NRT-160, executor note.\nRestart the tunnel tun-160 (idempotency key k-160). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-160, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRestart the tunnel tun-160 (idempotency key k-160), no-retry.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about tun-160? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-7-verified-none", "english": "Task record NRT-161, executor note.\nRestart the tunnel tun-161 (idempotency key k-161). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-161, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRestart the tunnel tun-161 (idempotency key k-161), no-retry.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about tun-161? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-7-failed-mid", "english": "Task record NRT-162, executor note.\nRestart the tunnel tun-162 (idempotency key k-162). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-162, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRestart the tunnel tun-162 (idempotency key k-162), no-retry.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about tun-162? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-7-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record NRT-163, executor note.\nRestart the tunnel tun-163 (idempotency key k-163). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-163, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRestart the tunnel tun-163 (idempotency key k-163), no-retry.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about tun-163? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-7-timeout-late", "english": "Task record NRT-164, executor note.\nRestart the tunnel tun-164 (idempotency key k-164). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-164, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRestart the tunnel tun-164 (idempotency key k-164), no-retry.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about tun-164? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-8-timeout", "english": "Task record NRT-170, executor note.\nUpload the report file R-170.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-170). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-170, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nUpload the report file R-170.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-170), no-retry.\nThe call timed out after the request was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about R-170.pdf? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "scenario": "timeout", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-8-verified-none", "english": "Task record NRT-171, executor note.\nUpload the report file R-171.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-171). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-171, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nUpload the report file R-171.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-171), no-retry.\nThe executor verified with the service: the request never reached it, and nothing was executed.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about R-171.pdf? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "C", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "scenario": "verified-none", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-8-failed-mid", "english": "Task record NRT-172, executor note.\nUpload the report file R-172.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-172). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-172, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nUpload the report file R-172.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-172), no-retry.\nThe call failed mid-execution; the service reports a partial write of unknown extent.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about R-172.pdf? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "scenario": "failed-mid", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-8-confirmed-again", "english": "Task record NRT-173, executor note.\nUpload the report file R-173.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-173). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-173, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nUpload the report file R-173.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-173), no-retry.\nThe executor has confirmed the action completed. A colleague suggests running it once more to be safe.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about R-173.pdf? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "scenario": "confirmed-again", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-no-retry-8-timeout-late", "english": "Task record NRT-174, executor note.\nUpload the report file R-174.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-174). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "ainglish": "Task record NRT-174, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nUpload the report file R-174.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-174), no-retry.\nA completion response arrived late and garbled; the executor cannot tell whether the action took effect.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about R-174.pdf? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "no-retry", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "scenario": "timeout-late", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-1-key-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-300, executor note.\nRequest 1: Charge the card for invoice INV-300 (idempotency key k-300). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Charge the card for invoice INV-300 (idempotency key k-301).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-300, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Charge the card for invoice INV-300 (idempotency key k-300), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Charge the card for invoice INV-300 (idempotency key k-301).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, which carries key k-301? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "transfer": "key-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-1-param-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-301, executor note.\nRequest 1: Charge the card for invoice INV-301 (idempotency key k-301). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Charge the card for invoice INV-302 (idempotency key k-301).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-301, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Charge the card for invoice INV-301 (idempotency key k-301), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Charge the card for invoice INV-302 (idempotency key k-301).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, for INV-302? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "transfer": "param-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-1-state-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-302, executor note.\nRequest 1: Charge the card for invoice INV-302 (idempotency key k-302). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Charge the card for invoice INV-302 (idempotency key k-302), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-302, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Charge the card for invoice INV-302 (idempotency key k-302), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Charge the card for invoice INV-302 (idempotency key k-302), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, issued after the reported schema change? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "transfer": "state-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-1-same-idempotent", "english": "Task record TRA-303, executor note.\nRequest 1: Charge the card for invoice INV-303 (idempotency key k-303). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Charge the card for invoice INV-303 (idempotency key k-303).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-303, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Charge the card for invoice INV-303 (idempotency key k-303), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Charge the card for invoice INV-303 (idempotency key k-303).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "transfer": "same-idempotent", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-1-same-no-retry", "english": "Task record TRA-304, executor note.\nRequest 1: Charge the card for invoice INV-304 (idempotency key k-304). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Charge the card for invoice INV-304 (idempotency key k-304).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-304, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Charge the card for invoice INV-304 (idempotency key k-304), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Charge the card for invoice INV-304 (idempotency key k-304).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 0, "transfer": "same-no-retry", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-2-key-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-310, executor note.\nRequest 1: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-310 (idempotency key k-310). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-310 (idempotency key k-311).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-310, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-310 (idempotency key k-310), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-310 (idempotency key k-311).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, which carries key k-311? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "transfer": "key-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-2-param-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-311, executor note.\nRequest 1: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-311 (idempotency key k-311). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-312 (idempotency key k-311).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-311, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-311 (idempotency key k-311), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-312 (idempotency key k-311).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, for ORD-312? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "transfer": "param-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-2-state-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-312, executor note.\nRequest 1: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-312 (idempotency key k-312). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-312 (idempotency key k-312), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-312, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-312 (idempotency key k-312), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-312 (idempotency key k-312), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, issued after the reported schema change? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "transfer": "state-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-2-same-idempotent", "english": "Task record TRA-313, executor note.\nRequest 1: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-313 (idempotency key k-313). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-313 (idempotency key k-313).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-313, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-313 (idempotency key k-313), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-313 (idempotency key k-313).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "transfer": "same-idempotent", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-2-same-no-retry", "english": "Task record TRA-314, executor note.\nRequest 1: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-314 (idempotency key k-314). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-314 (idempotency key k-314).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-314, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-314 (idempotency key k-314), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Send the dispatch notice for order ORD-314 (idempotency key k-314).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 1, "transfer": "same-no-retry", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-3-key-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-320, executor note.\nRequest 1: Sync ledger L-320 to the archive (idempotency key k-320). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Sync ledger L-320 to the archive (idempotency key k-321).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-320, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Sync ledger L-320 to the archive (idempotency key k-320), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Sync ledger L-320 to the archive (idempotency key k-321).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, which carries key k-321? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "transfer": "key-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-3-param-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-321, executor note.\nRequest 1: Sync ledger L-321 to the archive (idempotency key k-321). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Sync ledger L-322 to the archive (idempotency key k-321).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-321, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Sync ledger L-321 to the archive (idempotency key k-321), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Sync ledger L-322 to the archive (idempotency key k-321).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, for L-322? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "transfer": "param-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-3-state-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-322, executor note.\nRequest 1: Sync ledger L-322 to the archive (idempotency key k-322). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Sync ledger L-322 to the archive (idempotency key k-322), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-322, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Sync ledger L-322 to the archive (idempotency key k-322), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Sync ledger L-322 to the archive (idempotency key k-322), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, issued after the reported schema change? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "transfer": "state-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-3-same-idempotent", "english": "Task record TRA-323, executor note.\nRequest 1: Sync ledger L-323 to the archive (idempotency key k-323). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Sync ledger L-323 to the archive (idempotency key k-323).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-323, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Sync ledger L-323 to the archive (idempotency key k-323), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Sync ledger L-323 to the archive (idempotency key k-323).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "transfer": "same-idempotent", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-3-same-no-retry", "english": "Task record TRA-324, executor note.\nRequest 1: Sync ledger L-324 to the archive (idempotency key k-324). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Sync ledger L-324 to the archive (idempotency key k-324).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-324, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Sync ledger L-324 to the archive (idempotency key k-324), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Sync ledger L-324 to the archive (idempotency key k-324).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 2, "transfer": "same-no-retry", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-4-key-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-330, executor note.\nRequest 1: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-330 (idempotency key k-330). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-330 (idempotency key k-331).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-330, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-330 (idempotency key k-330), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-330 (idempotency key k-331).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, which carries key k-331? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "transfer": "key-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-4-param-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-331, executor note.\nRequest 1: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-331 (idempotency key k-331). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-332 (idempotency key k-331).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-331, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-331 (idempotency key k-331), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-332 (idempotency key k-331).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, for T-332? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "transfer": "param-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-4-state-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-332, executor note.\nRequest 1: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-332 (idempotency key k-332). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-332 (idempotency key k-332), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-332, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-332 (idempotency key k-332), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-332 (idempotency key k-332), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, issued after the reported schema change? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "transfer": "state-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-4-same-idempotent", "english": "Task record TRA-333, executor note.\nRequest 1: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-333 (idempotency key k-333). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-333 (idempotency key k-333).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-333, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-333 (idempotency key k-333), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-333 (idempotency key k-333).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "transfer": "same-idempotent", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-4-same-no-retry", "english": "Task record TRA-334, executor note.\nRequest 1: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-334 (idempotency key k-334). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-334 (idempotency key k-334).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-334, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-334 (idempotency key k-334), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Rebuild the search index for tenant T-334 (idempotency key k-334).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 3, "transfer": "same-no-retry", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-5-key-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-340, executor note.\nRequest 1: Set the DNS record for host h340.example (idempotency key k-340). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Set the DNS record for host h340.example (idempotency key k-341).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-340, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Set the DNS record for host h340.example (idempotency key k-340), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Set the DNS record for host h340.example (idempotency key k-341).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, which carries key k-341? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "transfer": "key-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-5-param-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-341, executor note.\nRequest 1: Set the DNS record for host h341.example (idempotency key k-341). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Set the DNS record for host h342.example (idempotency key k-341).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-341, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Set the DNS record for host h341.example (idempotency key k-341), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Set the DNS record for host h342.example (idempotency key k-341).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, for h342.example? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "transfer": "param-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-5-state-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-342, executor note.\nRequest 1: Set the DNS record for host h342.example (idempotency key k-342). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Set the DNS record for host h342.example (idempotency key k-342), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-342, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Set the DNS record for host h342.example (idempotency key k-342), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Set the DNS record for host h342.example (idempotency key k-342), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, issued after the reported schema change? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "transfer": "state-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-5-same-idempotent", "english": "Task record TRA-343, executor note.\nRequest 1: Set the DNS record for host h343.example (idempotency key k-343). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Set the DNS record for host h343.example (idempotency key k-343).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-343, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Set the DNS record for host h343.example (idempotency key k-343), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Set the DNS record for host h343.example (idempotency key k-343).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "transfer": "same-idempotent", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-5-same-no-retry", "english": "Task record TRA-344, executor note.\nRequest 1: Set the DNS record for host h344.example (idempotency key k-344). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Set the DNS record for host h344.example (idempotency key k-344).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-344, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Set the DNS record for host h344.example (idempotency key k-344), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Set the DNS record for host h344.example (idempotency key k-344).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 4, "transfer": "same-no-retry", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-6-key-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-350, executor note.\nRequest 1: Issue the credit note for account ACC-350 (idempotency key k-350). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Issue the credit note for account ACC-350 (idempotency key k-351).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-350, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Issue the credit note for account ACC-350 (idempotency key k-350), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Issue the credit note for account ACC-350 (idempotency key k-351).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, which carries key k-351? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "transfer": "key-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-6-param-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-351, executor note.\nRequest 1: Issue the credit note for account ACC-351 (idempotency key k-351). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Issue the credit note for account ACC-352 (idempotency key k-351).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-351, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Issue the credit note for account ACC-351 (idempotency key k-351), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Issue the credit note for account ACC-352 (idempotency key k-351).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, for ACC-352? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "transfer": "param-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-6-state-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-352, executor note.\nRequest 1: Issue the credit note for account ACC-352 (idempotency key k-352). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Issue the credit note for account ACC-352 (idempotency key k-352), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-352, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Issue the credit note for account ACC-352 (idempotency key k-352), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Issue the credit note for account ACC-352 (idempotency key k-352), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, issued after the reported schema change? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "transfer": "state-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-6-same-idempotent", "english": "Task record TRA-353, executor note.\nRequest 1: Issue the credit note for account ACC-353 (idempotency key k-353). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Issue the credit note for account ACC-353 (idempotency key k-353).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-353, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Issue the credit note for account ACC-353 (idempotency key k-353), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Issue the credit note for account ACC-353 (idempotency key k-353).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "transfer": "same-idempotent", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-6-same-no-retry", "english": "Task record TRA-354, executor note.\nRequest 1: Issue the credit note for account ACC-354 (idempotency key k-354). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Issue the credit note for account ACC-354 (idempotency key k-354).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-354, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Issue the credit note for account ACC-354 (idempotency key k-354), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Issue the credit note for account ACC-354 (idempotency key k-354).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 5, "transfer": "same-no-retry", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-7-key-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-360, executor note.\nRequest 1: Restart the tunnel tun-360 (idempotency key k-360). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Restart the tunnel tun-360 (idempotency key k-361).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-360, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Restart the tunnel tun-360 (idempotency key k-360), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Restart the tunnel tun-360 (idempotency key k-361).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, which carries key k-361? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "transfer": "key-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-7-param-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-361, executor note.\nRequest 1: Restart the tunnel tun-361 (idempotency key k-361). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Restart the tunnel tun-362 (idempotency key k-361).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-361, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Restart the tunnel tun-361 (idempotency key k-361), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Restart the tunnel tun-362 (idempotency key k-361).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, for tun-362? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "transfer": "param-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-7-state-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-362, executor note.\nRequest 1: Restart the tunnel tun-362 (idempotency key k-362). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Restart the tunnel tun-362 (idempotency key k-362), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-362, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Restart the tunnel tun-362 (idempotency key k-362), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Restart the tunnel tun-362 (idempotency key k-362), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, issued after the reported schema change? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "transfer": "state-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-7-same-idempotent", "english": "Task record TRA-363, executor note.\nRequest 1: Restart the tunnel tun-363 (idempotency key k-363). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Restart the tunnel tun-363 (idempotency key k-363).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-363, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Restart the tunnel tun-363 (idempotency key k-363), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Restart the tunnel tun-363 (idempotency key k-363).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "transfer": "same-idempotent", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-7-same-no-retry", "english": "Task record TRA-364, executor note.\nRequest 1: Restart the tunnel tun-364 (idempotency key k-364). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Restart the tunnel tun-364 (idempotency key k-364).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-364, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Restart the tunnel tun-364 (idempotency key k-364), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Restart the tunnel tun-364 (idempotency key k-364).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 6, "transfer": "same-no-retry", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-8-key-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-370, executor note.\nRequest 1: Upload the report file R-370.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-370). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Upload the report file R-370.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-371).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-370, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Upload the report file R-370.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-370), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Upload the report file R-370.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-371).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, which carries key k-371? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 0, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "transfer": "key-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-8-param-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-371, executor note.\nRequest 1: Upload the report file R-371.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-371). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Upload the report file R-372.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-371).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-371, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Upload the report file R-371.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-371), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Upload the report file R-372.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-371).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, for R-372.pdf? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 1, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "transfer": "param-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-8-state-shift", "english": "Task record TRA-372, executor note.\nRequest 1: Upload the report file R-372.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-372). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Upload the report file R-372.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-372), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-372, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Upload the report file R-372.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-372), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Upload the report file R-372.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-372), issued after the service reported a schema change on this target.\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, issued after the reported schema change? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Cannot determine from this record.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "E", "gold_position": 2, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "transfer": "state-shift", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-8-same-idempotent", "english": "Task record TRA-373, executor note.\nRequest 1: Upload the report file R-373.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-373). Re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 2: Upload the report file R-373.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-373).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-373, executor note.\nLegend — , idempotent: re-executing it cannot change the outcome beyond the first run's effect; on ambiguous timeout, re-running is safe.\nRequest 1: Upload the report file R-373.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-373), idempotent.\nRequest 2: Upload the report file R-373.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-373).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows." ], "answer": "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "A", "gold_position": 3, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "transfer": "same-idempotent", "tag_on_request_1": "idempotent", "legend_tag": "idempotent" }, { "id": "inr-transfer-8-same-no-retry", "english": "Task record TRA-374, executor note.\nRequest 1: Upload the report file R-374.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-374). A repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 2: Upload the report file R-374.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-374).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "ainglish": "Task record TRA-374, executor note.\nLegend — , no-retry: a repeated execution would materially change the outcome (double charge, duplicate message, corrupted state); on ambiguous completion, verify state or escalate instead of re-running.\nRequest 1: Upload the report file R-374.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-374), no-retry.\nRequest 2: Upload the report file R-374.pdf to the vault (idempotency key k-374).\nThe second request timed out after it was sent; whether it completed is unknown.", "question": "What does the record license the executor to do now about the second request, identical to the first? Choose the reading the instruction supports.", "options": [ "Cannot determine from this record.", "Execute it once now; the earlier attempt never happened, so this is the single run the instruction calls for.", "Run it again right now without checking; a repeat leaves the end result exactly as the first run left it.", "Never execute it again under any circumstances, whatever verification shows.", "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first." ], "answer": "Hold off on any repeat; a second run would alter the result, so if the fate of the first is unclear, check with the service or hand it up first.", "settlement_stratum": "transfer", "gold_key": "B", "gold_position": 4, "status": "LEGEND_ARM_FROZEN_BEFORE_MINT", "action": 7, "transfer": "same-no-retry", "tag_on_request_1": "no-retry", "legend_tag": "no-retry" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-01", "calibration": true, "english": "Manifest-record-801: either Store-Moss-41 or Store-Ivory-41 is the responsible store; this has not been settled. Either Clerk-Ivory-61 or Clerk-Ochre-61 is the destination clerk; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Manifest-record-801: Store-Moss-41, not Store-Ivory-41, is the responsible store. Clerk-Ivory-61, not Clerk-Ochre-61, is the destination clerk.", "question": "Which complete store/clerk assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Store-Moss-41 / Clerk-Ochre-61", "Store-Ivory-41 / Clerk-Ivory-61", "The record contradicts itself.", "Neither store nor clerk established.", "Store-Moss-41 / Clerk-Ivory-61", "Store-Ivory-41 / Clerk-Ochre-61", "Store established; clerk not established.", "Store not established; clerk established." ], "answer": "Store-Moss-41 / Clerk-Ivory-61" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-02", "calibration": true, "english": "Manifest-record-802: either Bay-Sable-42 or Bay-Umber-42 is the responsible bay; this has not been settled. Either Shelf-Sable-62 or Shelf-Ochre-62 is the destination shelf; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Manifest-record-802: Bay-Sable-42, not Bay-Umber-42, is the responsible bay. Shelf-Sable-62, not Shelf-Ochre-62, is the destination shelf.", "question": "Which complete bay/shelf assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "The record contradicts itself.", "Bay-Sable-42 / Shelf-Ochre-62", "Bay-Sable-42 / Shelf-Sable-62", "Bay not established; shelf established.", "Bay-Umber-42 / Shelf-Sable-62", "Bay established; shelf not established.", "Bay-Umber-42 / Shelf-Ochre-62", "Neither bay nor shelf established." ], "answer": "Bay-Sable-42 / Shelf-Sable-62" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-03", "calibration": true, "english": "Roster-record-803: either Auditor-Ochre-43 or Auditor-Moss-43 is the responsible auditor; this has not been settled. Either Archive-Moss-63 or Archive-Umber-63 is the destination archive; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Roster-record-803: Auditor-Ochre-43, not Auditor-Moss-43, is the responsible auditor. Archive-Moss-63, not Archive-Umber-63, is the destination archive.", "question": "Which complete auditor/archive assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Auditor established; archive not established.", "Auditor-Ochre-43 / Archive-Umber-63", "Auditor-Ochre-43 / Archive-Moss-63", "Auditor-Moss-43 / Archive-Moss-63", "Neither auditor nor archive established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Auditor-Moss-43 / Archive-Umber-63", "Auditor not established; archive established." ], "answer": "Auditor-Ochre-43 / Archive-Moss-63" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-04", "calibration": true, "english": "Manifest-record-804: either Auditor-Ochre-44 or Auditor-Ivory-44 is the responsible auditor; this has not been settled. Either Desk-Sable-64 or Desk-Umber-64 is the destination desk; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Manifest-record-804: Auditor-Ochre-44, not Auditor-Ivory-44, is the responsible auditor. Desk-Sable-64, not Desk-Umber-64, is the destination desk.", "question": "Which complete auditor/desk assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Auditor not established; desk established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Auditor established; desk not established.", "Auditor-Ivory-44 / Desk-Sable-64", "Auditor-Ochre-44 / Desk-Sable-64", "Auditor-Ivory-44 / Desk-Umber-64", "Neither auditor nor desk established.", "Auditor-Ochre-44 / Desk-Umber-64" ], "answer": "Auditor-Ochre-44 / Desk-Sable-64" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-05", "calibration": true, "english": "Manifest-record-805: either Auditor-Ivory-45 or Auditor-Plum-45 is the responsible auditor; this has not been settled. Either Bay-Plum-65 or Bay-Sable-65 is the destination bay; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Manifest-record-805: Auditor-Ivory-45, not Auditor-Plum-45, is the responsible auditor. Bay-Plum-65, not Bay-Sable-65, is the destination bay.", "question": "Which complete auditor/bay assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "The record contradicts itself.", "Auditor-Ivory-45 / Bay-Plum-65", "Neither auditor nor bay established.", "Auditor-Plum-45 / Bay-Sable-65", "Auditor-Ivory-45 / Bay-Sable-65", "Auditor established; bay not established.", "Auditor-Plum-45 / Bay-Plum-65", "Auditor not established; bay established." ], "answer": "Auditor-Ivory-45 / Bay-Plum-65" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-06", "calibration": true, "english": "Folio-record-806: either Courier-Sable-46 or Courier-Teal-46 is the responsible courier; this has not been settled. Either Desk-Plum-66 or Desk-Ochre-66 is the destination desk; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Folio-record-806: Courier-Sable-46, not Courier-Teal-46, is the responsible courier. Desk-Plum-66, not Desk-Ochre-66, is the destination desk.", "question": "Which complete courier/desk assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Courier not established; desk established.", "Courier-Teal-46 / Desk-Plum-66", "Courier-Sable-46 / Desk-Ochre-66", "Courier-Teal-46 / Desk-Ochre-66", "Courier established; desk not established.", "Neither courier nor desk established.", "Courier-Sable-46 / Desk-Plum-66", "The record contradicts itself." ], "answer": "Courier-Sable-46 / Desk-Plum-66" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-07", "calibration": true, "english": "Docket-record-807: either Courier-Umber-47 or Courier-Sable-47 is the responsible courier; this has not been settled. Either Bay-Moss-67 or Bay-Ivory-67 is the destination bay; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Docket-record-807: Courier-Umber-47, not Courier-Sable-47, is the responsible courier. Bay-Moss-67, not Bay-Ivory-67, is the destination bay.", "question": "Which complete courier/bay assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Neither courier nor bay established.", "Courier not established; bay established.", "Courier-Sable-47 / Bay-Ivory-67", "Courier established; bay not established.", "Courier-Umber-47 / Bay-Moss-67", "Courier-Umber-47 / Bay-Ivory-67", "Courier-Sable-47 / Bay-Moss-67", "The record contradicts itself." ], "answer": "Courier-Umber-47 / Bay-Moss-67" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-08", "calibration": true, "english": "Roster-record-808: either Bay-Teal-48 or Bay-Umber-48 is the responsible bay; this has not been settled. Either Desk-Ivory-68 or Desk-Rust-68 is the destination desk; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Roster-record-808: Bay-Teal-48, not Bay-Umber-48, is the responsible bay. Desk-Ivory-68, not Desk-Rust-68, is the destination desk.", "question": "Which complete bay/desk assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Bay-Umber-48 / Desk-Rust-68", "The record contradicts itself.", "Bay-Teal-48 / Desk-Ivory-68", "Bay-Teal-48 / Desk-Rust-68", "Bay established; desk not established.", "Bay-Umber-48 / Desk-Ivory-68", "Bay not established; desk established.", "Neither bay nor desk established." ], "answer": "Bay-Teal-48 / Desk-Ivory-68" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-09", "calibration": true, "english": "Manifest-record-809: either Auditor-Umber-49 or Auditor-Moss-49 is the responsible auditor; this has not been settled. Either Bay-Sable-69 or Bay-Moss-69 is the destination bay; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Manifest-record-809: Auditor-Umber-49, not Auditor-Moss-49, is the responsible auditor. Bay-Sable-69, not Bay-Moss-69, is the destination bay.", "question": "Which complete auditor/bay assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Neither auditor nor bay established.", "Auditor-Umber-49 / Bay-Sable-69", "Auditor-Moss-49 / Bay-Sable-69", "The record contradicts itself.", "Auditor-Umber-49 / Bay-Moss-69", "Auditor established; bay not established.", "Auditor not established; bay established.", "Auditor-Moss-49 / Bay-Moss-69" ], "answer": "Auditor-Umber-49 / Bay-Sable-69" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-10", "calibration": true, "english": "Ledger-record-810: either Bay-Ivory-50 or Bay-Umber-50 is the responsible bay; this has not been settled. Either Auditor-Ochre-70 or Auditor-Sable-70 is the destination auditor; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Ledger-record-810: Bay-Ivory-50, not Bay-Umber-50, is the responsible bay. Auditor-Ochre-70, not Auditor-Sable-70, is the destination auditor.", "question": "Which complete bay/auditor assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Bay-Ivory-50 / Auditor-Ochre-70", "Bay-Umber-50 / Auditor-Sable-70", "The record contradicts itself.", "Bay-Ivory-50 / Auditor-Sable-70", "Bay-Umber-50 / Auditor-Ochre-70", "Neither bay nor auditor established.", "Bay established; auditor not established.", "Bay not established; auditor established." ], "answer": "Bay-Ivory-50 / Auditor-Ochre-70" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-11", "calibration": true, "english": "Docket-record-811: either Clerk-Ochre-51 or Clerk-Sable-51 is the responsible clerk; this has not been settled. Either Auditor-Sable-71 or Auditor-Ochre-71 is the destination auditor; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Docket-record-811: Clerk-Ochre-51, not Clerk-Sable-51, is the responsible clerk. Auditor-Sable-71, not Auditor-Ochre-71, is the destination auditor.", "question": "Which complete clerk/auditor assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Clerk-Sable-51 / Auditor-Sable-71", "Clerk-Ochre-51 / Auditor-Ochre-71", "The record contradicts itself.", "Clerk not established; auditor established.", "Neither clerk nor auditor established.", "Clerk established; auditor not established.", "Clerk-Ochre-51 / Auditor-Sable-71", "Clerk-Sable-51 / Auditor-Ochre-71" ], "answer": "Clerk-Ochre-51 / Auditor-Sable-71" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-12", "calibration": true, "english": "Register-record-812: either Archive-Ochre-52 or Archive-Rust-52 is the responsible archive; this has not been settled. Either Auditor-Ochre-72 or Auditor-Teal-72 is the destination auditor; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Register-record-812: Archive-Ochre-52, not Archive-Rust-52, is the responsible archive. Auditor-Ochre-72, not Auditor-Teal-72, is the destination auditor.", "question": "Which complete archive/auditor assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Archive-Rust-52 / Auditor-Ochre-72", "Archive-Rust-52 / Auditor-Teal-72", "Neither archive nor auditor established.", "Archive-Ochre-52 / Auditor-Ochre-72", "Archive established; auditor not established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Archive not established; auditor established.", "Archive-Ochre-52 / Auditor-Teal-72" ], "answer": "Archive-Ochre-52 / Auditor-Ochre-72" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-13", "calibration": true, "english": "Folio-record-813: either Auditor-Teal-53 or Auditor-Plum-53 is the responsible auditor; this has not been settled. Either Courier-Umber-73 or Courier-Teal-73 is the destination courier; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Folio-record-813: Auditor-Teal-53, not Auditor-Plum-53, is the responsible auditor. Courier-Umber-73, not Courier-Teal-73, is the destination courier.", "question": "Which complete auditor/courier assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Auditor-Plum-53 / Courier-Teal-73", "Auditor established; courier not established.", "Auditor-Teal-53 / Courier-Umber-73", "The record contradicts itself.", "Auditor not established; courier established.", "Auditor-Teal-53 / Courier-Teal-73", "Neither auditor nor courier established.", "Auditor-Plum-53 / Courier-Umber-73" ], "answer": "Auditor-Teal-53 / Courier-Umber-73" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-14", "calibration": true, "english": "Roster-record-814: either Bay-Ivory-54 or Bay-Teal-54 is the responsible bay; this has not been settled. Either Courier-Teal-74 or Courier-Ivory-74 is the destination courier; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Roster-record-814: Bay-Ivory-54, not Bay-Teal-54, is the responsible bay. Courier-Teal-74, not Courier-Ivory-74, is the destination courier.", "question": "Which complete bay/courier assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Bay established; courier not established.", "Bay not established; courier established.", "Bay-Teal-54 / Courier-Ivory-74", "Bay-Ivory-54 / Courier-Teal-74", "Bay-Teal-54 / Courier-Teal-74", "Neither bay nor courier established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Bay-Ivory-54 / Courier-Ivory-74" ], "answer": "Bay-Ivory-54 / Courier-Teal-74" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-15", "calibration": true, "english": "Manifest-record-815: either Shelf-Moss-55 or Shelf-Sable-55 is the responsible shelf; this has not been settled. Either Store-Rust-75 or Store-Teal-75 is the destination store; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Manifest-record-815: Shelf-Moss-55, not Shelf-Sable-55, is the responsible shelf. Store-Rust-75, not Store-Teal-75, is the destination store.", "question": "Which complete shelf/store assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Shelf-Moss-55 / Store-Teal-75", "The record contradicts itself.", "Shelf established; store not established.", "Shelf-Sable-55 / Store-Teal-75", "Shelf-Moss-55 / Store-Rust-75", "Neither shelf nor store established.", "Shelf not established; store established.", "Shelf-Sable-55 / Store-Rust-75" ], "answer": "Shelf-Moss-55 / Store-Rust-75" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-16", "calibration": true, "english": "Register-record-816: either Store-Ochre-56 or Store-Ivory-56 is the responsible store; this has not been settled. Either Desk-Teal-76 or Desk-Ivory-76 is the destination desk; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Register-record-816: Store-Ochre-56, not Store-Ivory-56, is the responsible store. Desk-Teal-76, not Desk-Ivory-76, is the destination desk.", "question": "Which complete store/desk assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Neither store nor desk established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Store-Ochre-56 / Desk-Teal-76", "Store-Ivory-56 / Desk-Ivory-76", "Store-Ivory-56 / Desk-Teal-76", "Store not established; desk established.", "Store-Ochre-56 / Desk-Ivory-76", "Store established; desk not established." ], "answer": "Store-Ochre-56 / Desk-Teal-76" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-17", "calibration": true, "english": "Roster-record-817: either Bay-Ivory-57 or Bay-Umber-57 is the responsible bay; this has not been settled. Either Courier-Plum-77 or Courier-Rust-77 is the destination courier; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Roster-record-817: Bay-Ivory-57, not Bay-Umber-57, is the responsible bay. Courier-Plum-77, not Courier-Rust-77, is the destination courier.", "question": "Which complete bay/courier assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Neither bay nor courier established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Bay not established; courier established.", "Bay-Ivory-57 / Courier-Rust-77", "Bay-Umber-57 / Courier-Plum-77", "Bay-Umber-57 / Courier-Rust-77", "Bay-Ivory-57 / Courier-Plum-77", "Bay established; courier not established." ], "answer": "Bay-Ivory-57 / Courier-Plum-77" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-18", "calibration": true, "english": "Docket-record-818: either Desk-Sable-58 or Desk-Rust-58 is the responsible desk; this has not been settled. Either Courier-Umber-78 or Courier-Rust-78 is the destination courier; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Docket-record-818: Desk-Sable-58, not Desk-Rust-58, is the responsible desk. Courier-Umber-78, not Courier-Rust-78, is the destination courier.", "question": "Which complete desk/courier assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Desk-Sable-58 / Courier-Umber-78", "Neither desk nor courier established.", "Desk established; courier not established.", "Desk-Rust-58 / Courier-Umber-78", "The record contradicts itself.", "Desk-Sable-58 / Courier-Rust-78", "Desk not established; courier established.", "Desk-Rust-58 / Courier-Rust-78" ], "answer": "Desk-Sable-58 / Courier-Umber-78" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-19", "calibration": true, "english": "Ledger-record-819: either Clerk-Umber-59 or Clerk-Sable-59 is the responsible clerk; this has not been settled. Either Archive-Moss-79 or Archive-Ochre-79 is the destination archive; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Ledger-record-819: Clerk-Umber-59, not Clerk-Sable-59, is the responsible clerk. Archive-Moss-79, not Archive-Ochre-79, is the destination archive.", "question": "Which complete clerk/archive assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Clerk-Sable-59 / Archive-Moss-79", "The record contradicts itself.", "Clerk-Sable-59 / Archive-Ochre-79", "Clerk not established; archive established.", "Neither clerk nor archive established.", "Clerk-Umber-59 / Archive-Moss-79", "Clerk-Umber-59 / Archive-Ochre-79", "Clerk established; archive not established." ], "answer": "Clerk-Umber-59 / Archive-Moss-79" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-20", "calibration": true, "english": "Roster-record-820: either Courier-Moss-60 or Courier-Umber-60 is the responsible courier; this has not been settled. Either Store-Ochre-80 or Store-Rust-80 is the destination store; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Roster-record-820: Courier-Moss-60, not Courier-Umber-60, is the responsible courier. Store-Ochre-80, not Store-Rust-80, is the destination store.", "question": "Which complete courier/store assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Neither courier nor store established.", "Courier-Moss-60 / Store-Ochre-80", "The record contradicts itself.", "Courier-Moss-60 / Store-Rust-80", "Courier-Umber-60 / Store-Ochre-80", "Courier not established; store established.", "Courier established; store not established.", "Courier-Umber-60 / Store-Rust-80" ], "answer": "Courier-Moss-60 / Store-Ochre-80" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-21", "calibration": true, "english": "Register-record-821: either Courier-Ivory-61 or Courier-Sable-61 is the responsible courier; this has not been settled. Either Shelf-Plum-81 or Shelf-Ochre-81 is the destination shelf; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Register-record-821: Courier-Ivory-61, not Courier-Sable-61, is the responsible courier. Shelf-Plum-81, not Shelf-Ochre-81, is the destination shelf.", "question": "Which complete courier/shelf assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Courier established; shelf not established.", "Courier-Ivory-61 / Shelf-Plum-81", "Courier-Sable-61 / Shelf-Plum-81", "Courier-Sable-61 / Shelf-Ochre-81", "Neither courier nor shelf established.", "Courier-Ivory-61 / Shelf-Ochre-81", "The record contradicts itself.", "Courier not established; shelf established." ], "answer": "Courier-Ivory-61 / Shelf-Plum-81" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-22", "calibration": true, "english": "Roster-record-822: either Archive-Umber-62 or Archive-Rust-62 is the responsible archive; this has not been settled. Either Clerk-Umber-82 or Clerk-Teal-82 is the destination clerk; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Roster-record-822: Archive-Umber-62, not Archive-Rust-62, is the responsible archive. Clerk-Umber-82, not Clerk-Teal-82, is the destination clerk.", "question": "Which complete archive/clerk assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Archive-Rust-62 / Clerk-Teal-82", "The record contradicts itself.", "Neither archive nor clerk established.", "Archive-Rust-62 / Clerk-Umber-82", "Archive-Umber-62 / Clerk-Teal-82", "Archive not established; clerk established.", "Archive established; clerk not established.", "Archive-Umber-62 / Clerk-Umber-82" ], "answer": "Archive-Umber-62 / Clerk-Umber-82" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-23", "calibration": true, "english": "Manifest-record-823: either Shelf-Plum-63 or Shelf-Umber-63 is the responsible shelf; this has not been settled. Either Bay-Ochre-83 or Bay-Umber-83 is the destination bay; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Manifest-record-823: Shelf-Plum-63, not Shelf-Umber-63, is the responsible shelf. Bay-Ochre-83, not Bay-Umber-83, is the destination bay.", "question": "Which complete shelf/bay assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Neither shelf nor bay established.", "Shelf-Umber-63 / Bay-Umber-83", "Shelf-Umber-63 / Bay-Ochre-83", "Shelf-Plum-63 / Bay-Umber-83", "Shelf established; bay not established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Shelf-Plum-63 / Bay-Ochre-83", "Shelf not established; bay established." ], "answer": "Shelf-Plum-63 / Bay-Ochre-83" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-24", "calibration": true, "english": "Folio-record-824: either Desk-Sable-64 or Desk-Ivory-64 is the responsible desk; this has not been settled. Either Archive-Moss-84 or Archive-Rust-84 is the destination archive; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Folio-record-824: Desk-Sable-64, not Desk-Ivory-64, is the responsible desk. Archive-Moss-84, not Archive-Rust-84, is the destination archive.", "question": "Which complete desk/archive assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Neither desk nor archive established.", "Desk-Ivory-64 / Archive-Rust-84", "Desk-Sable-64 / Archive-Moss-84", "Desk established; archive not established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Desk not established; archive established.", "Desk-Sable-64 / Archive-Rust-84", "Desk-Ivory-64 / Archive-Moss-84" ], "answer": "Desk-Sable-64 / Archive-Moss-84" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-25", "calibration": true, "english": "Folio-record-825: either Store-Sable-65 or Store-Ivory-65 is the responsible store; this has not been settled. Either Auditor-Ochre-85 or Auditor-Teal-85 is the destination auditor; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Folio-record-825: Store-Sable-65, not Store-Ivory-65, is the responsible store. Auditor-Ochre-85, not Auditor-Teal-85, is the destination auditor.", "question": "Which complete store/auditor assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Neither store nor auditor established.", "Store-Sable-65 / Auditor-Ochre-85", "Store-Sable-65 / Auditor-Teal-85", "Store not established; auditor established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Store-Ivory-65 / Auditor-Ochre-85", "Store-Ivory-65 / Auditor-Teal-85", "Store established; auditor not established." ], "answer": "Store-Sable-65 / Auditor-Ochre-85" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-26", "calibration": true, "english": "Docket-record-826: either Store-Ivory-66 or Store-Teal-66 is the responsible store; this has not been settled. Either Auditor-Ochre-86 or Auditor-Teal-86 is the destination auditor; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Docket-record-826: Store-Ivory-66, not Store-Teal-66, is the responsible store. Auditor-Ochre-86, not Auditor-Teal-86, is the destination auditor.", "question": "Which complete store/auditor assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Store-Teal-66 / Auditor-Teal-86", "Neither store nor auditor established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Store-Ivory-66 / Auditor-Teal-86", "Store-Ivory-66 / Auditor-Ochre-86", "Store-Teal-66 / Auditor-Ochre-86", "Store not established; auditor established.", "Store established; auditor not established." ], "answer": "Store-Ivory-66 / Auditor-Ochre-86" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-27", "calibration": true, "english": "Roster-record-827: either Shelf-Ivory-67 or Shelf-Plum-67 is the responsible shelf; this has not been settled. Either Auditor-Sable-87 or Auditor-Moss-87 is the destination auditor; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Roster-record-827: Shelf-Ivory-67, not Shelf-Plum-67, is the responsible shelf. Auditor-Sable-87, not Auditor-Moss-87, is the destination auditor.", "question": "Which complete shelf/auditor assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Shelf established; auditor not established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Shelf-Plum-67 / Auditor-Sable-87", "Neither shelf nor auditor established.", "Shelf-Plum-67 / Auditor-Moss-87", "Shelf-Ivory-67 / Auditor-Sable-87", "Shelf-Ivory-67 / Auditor-Moss-87", "Shelf not established; auditor established." ], "answer": "Shelf-Ivory-67 / Auditor-Sable-87" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-28", "calibration": true, "english": "Ledger-record-828: either Auditor-Sable-68 or Auditor-Plum-68 is the responsible auditor; this has not been settled. Either Bay-Ochre-88 or Bay-Rust-88 is the destination bay; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Ledger-record-828: Auditor-Sable-68, not Auditor-Plum-68, is the responsible auditor. Bay-Ochre-88, not Bay-Rust-88, is the destination bay.", "question": "Which complete auditor/bay assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Auditor-Plum-68 / Bay-Ochre-88", "The record contradicts itself.", "Auditor not established; bay established.", "Neither auditor nor bay established.", "Auditor-Sable-68 / Bay-Ochre-88", "Auditor-Sable-68 / Bay-Rust-88", "Auditor-Plum-68 / Bay-Rust-88", "Auditor established; bay not established." ], "answer": "Auditor-Sable-68 / Bay-Ochre-88" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-29", "calibration": true, "english": "Manifest-record-829: either Courier-Rust-69 or Courier-Teal-69 is the responsible courier; this has not been settled. Either Clerk-Umber-89 or Clerk-Moss-89 is the destination clerk; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Manifest-record-829: Courier-Rust-69, not Courier-Teal-69, is the responsible courier. Clerk-Umber-89, not Clerk-Moss-89, is the destination clerk.", "question": "Which complete courier/clerk assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Courier-Rust-69 / Clerk-Umber-89", "Courier established; clerk not established.", "Courier not established; clerk established.", "Courier-Teal-69 / Clerk-Moss-89", "Courier-Teal-69 / Clerk-Umber-89", "Courier-Rust-69 / Clerk-Moss-89", "The record contradicts itself.", "Neither courier nor clerk established." ], "answer": "Courier-Rust-69 / Clerk-Umber-89" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-30", "calibration": true, "english": "Roster-record-830: either Bay-Teal-70 or Bay-Moss-70 is the responsible bay; this has not been settled. Either Archive-Plum-90 or Archive-Umber-90 is the destination archive; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Roster-record-830: Bay-Teal-70, not Bay-Moss-70, is the responsible bay. Archive-Plum-90, not Archive-Umber-90, is the destination archive.", "question": "Which complete bay/archive assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Bay-Moss-70 / Archive-Umber-90", "Bay-Teal-70 / Archive-Plum-90", "Bay-Teal-70 / Archive-Umber-90", "The record contradicts itself.", "Neither bay nor archive established.", "Bay established; archive not established.", "Bay not established; archive established.", "Bay-Moss-70 / Archive-Plum-90" ], "answer": "Bay-Teal-70 / Archive-Plum-90" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-31", "calibration": true, "english": "Docket-record-831: either Courier-Umber-71 or Courier-Rust-71 is the responsible courier; this has not been settled. Either Auditor-Rust-91 or Auditor-Umber-91 is the destination auditor; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Docket-record-831: Courier-Umber-71, not Courier-Rust-71, is the responsible courier. Auditor-Rust-91, not Auditor-Umber-91, is the destination auditor.", "question": "Which complete courier/auditor assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Courier-Umber-71 / Auditor-Rust-91", "Courier established; auditor not established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Neither courier nor auditor established.", "Courier not established; auditor established.", "Courier-Umber-71 / Auditor-Umber-91", "Courier-Rust-71 / Auditor-Rust-91", "Courier-Rust-71 / Auditor-Umber-91" ], "answer": "Courier-Umber-71 / Auditor-Rust-91" }, { "id": "inr-legend-calibration-32", "calibration": true, "english": "Manifest-record-832: either Bay-Plum-72 or Bay-Umber-72 is the responsible bay; this has not been settled. Either Archive-Umber-92 or Archive-Sable-92 is the destination archive; this also has not been settled.", "ainglish": "Manifest-record-832: Bay-Plum-72, not Bay-Umber-72, is the responsible bay. Archive-Umber-92, not Archive-Sable-92, is the destination archive.", "question": "Which complete bay/archive assignment is established by this record?", "options": [ "Bay-Umber-72 / Archive-Umber-92", "Neither bay nor archive established.", "The record contradicts itself.", "Bay-Umber-72 / Archive-Sable-92", "Bay-Plum-72 / Archive-Umber-92", "Bay-Plum-72 / Archive-Sable-92", "Bay not established; archive established.", "Bay established; archive not established." ], "answer": "Bay-Plum-72 / Archive-Umber-92" } ]