[ { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-001", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-001", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-111 becomes rev-115. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-111. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-111 becomes rev-115. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-111, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-111.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-115 contents.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-111.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-115 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-111.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-111.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-115 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-111.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-115 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-002", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-002", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-111 becomes rev-115. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-111 becomes rev-115. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-111.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-115 contents.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-111.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-115 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-115 contents.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-111.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-115 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-111.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-115 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-003", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-003", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-112 becomes rev-116. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-112. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-112 becomes rev-116. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-112, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-004", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-004", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-112 becomes rev-116. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-112 becomes rev-116. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-005", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-005", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-113 becomes rev-117. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-113. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-113 becomes rev-117. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-113, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-006", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-006", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-113 becomes rev-117. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is revised: rev-113 becomes rev-117. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-007", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-007", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-121. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-121, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-008", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-008", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-009", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-009", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-122. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-122, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-010", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-010", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-011", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-011", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-123. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-123, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-012", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-012", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the source copy of launch-brief is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-013", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-013", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-131. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-131, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-014", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-014", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-015", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-015", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-132. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-132, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-016", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-016", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-017", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-017", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-133. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-133, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-018", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-018", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of launch-brief is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-019", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-019", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-145, no longer rev-141. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-141. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-145, no longer rev-141. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-141, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-141.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-145.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-141.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-145." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-141.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-141.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-145.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-141.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-145.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-020", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-020", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-145, no longer rev-141. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-145, no longer rev-141. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-141.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-145.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-141.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-145." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-145.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-141.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-145.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-141.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-145.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-021", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-021", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-146, no longer rev-142. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-142. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-146, no longer rev-142. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-142, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-022", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-022", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-146, no longer rev-142. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-146, no longer rev-142. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-023", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-023", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-147, no longer rev-143. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Tamsin an independent fixed representation of exactly launch-brief rev-143. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-147, no longer rev-143. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(launch-brief@rev-143, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-1", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-1-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "design brief", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-024", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-024", "english": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-147, no longer rev-143. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Tamsin a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object launch-brief. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The design brief in question is the canonical launch-brief. When the source copy of launch-brief is next opened, it holds rev-147, no longer rev-143. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(launch-brief, to=Tamsin).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-1", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-1-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "design brief", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-025", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-025", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-211 becomes rev-215. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-211. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-211 becomes rev-215. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-211, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-211.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-215 contents.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-211.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-215 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-211.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-211.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-215 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-211.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-215 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-026", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-026", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-211 becomes rev-215. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-211 becomes rev-215. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-211.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-215 contents.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-211.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-215 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-215 contents.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-211.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-215 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-211.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-215 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-027", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-027", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-212 becomes rev-216. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-212. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-212 becomes rev-216. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-212, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-028", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-028", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-212 becomes rev-216. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-212 becomes rev-216. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-029", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-029", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-213 becomes rev-217. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-213. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-213 becomes rev-217. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-213, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-030", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-030", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-213 becomes rev-217. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is revised: rev-213 becomes rev-217. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-031", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-031", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-221. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-221, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-032", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-032", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-033", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-033", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-222. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-222, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-034", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-034", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-035", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-035", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-223. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-223, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-036", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-036", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the source copy of quarter-ledger is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-037", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-037", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-231. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-231, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-038", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-038", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-039", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-039", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-232. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-232, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-040", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-040", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-041", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-041", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-233. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-233, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-042", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-042", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of quarter-ledger is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-043", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-043", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-245, no longer rev-241. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-241. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-245, no longer rev-241. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-241, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-241.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-245.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-241.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-245." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-241.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-241.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-245.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-241.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-245.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-044", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-044", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-245, no longer rev-241. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-245, no longer rev-241. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-241.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-245.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-241.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-245." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-245.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-241.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-245.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-241.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-245.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-045", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-045", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-246, no longer rev-242. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-242. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-246, no longer rev-242. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-242, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-046", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-046", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-246, no longer rev-242. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-246, no longer rev-242. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-047", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-047", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-247, no longer rev-243. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Ulric an independent fixed representation of exactly quarter-ledger rev-243. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-247, no longer rev-243. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(quarter-ledger@rev-243, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-2", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-2-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-048", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-048", "english": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-247, no longer rev-243. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Ulric a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object quarter-ledger. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The ledger export in question is the canonical quarter-ledger. When the source copy of quarter-ledger is next opened, it holds rev-247, no longer rev-243. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(quarter-ledger, to=Ulric).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-2", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-2-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "ledger export", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-049", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-049", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-311 becomes rev-315. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-311. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-311 becomes rev-315. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-311, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-311.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-315 contents.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-311.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-315 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-311.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-311.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-315 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-311.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-315 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-050", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-050", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-311 becomes rev-315. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-311 becomes rev-315. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-311.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-315 contents.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-311.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-315 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-315 contents.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-311.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-315 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-311.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-315 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-051", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-051", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-312 becomes rev-316. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-312. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-312 becomes rev-316. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-312, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-052", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-052", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-312 becomes rev-316. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-312 becomes rev-316. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-053", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-053", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-313 becomes rev-317. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-313. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-313 becomes rev-317. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-313, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-054", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-054", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-313 becomes rev-317. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is revised: rev-313 becomes rev-317. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-055", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-055", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-321. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-321, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-056", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-056", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-057", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-057", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-322. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-322, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-058", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-058", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-059", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-059", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-323. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-323, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-060", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-060", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the source copy of ranker-weights is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-061", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-061", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-331. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-331, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-062", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-062", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-063", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-063", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-332. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-332, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-064", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-064", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-065", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-065", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-333. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-333, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-066", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-066", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of ranker-weights is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-067", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-067", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-345, no longer rev-341. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-341. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-345, no longer rev-341. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-341, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-341.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-345.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-341.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-345." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-341.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-341.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-345.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-341.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-345.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-068", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-068", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-345, no longer rev-341. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-345, no longer rev-341. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-341.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-345.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-341.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-345." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-345.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-341.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-345.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-341.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-345.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-069", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-069", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-346, no longer rev-342. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-342. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-346, no longer rev-342. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-342, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-070", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-070", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-346, no longer rev-342. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-346, no longer rev-342. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-071", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-071", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-347, no longer rev-343. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Vesna an independent fixed representation of exactly ranker-weights rev-343. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-347, no longer rev-343. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(ranker-weights@rev-343, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-3", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-3-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-072", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-072", "english": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-347, no longer rev-343. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Vesna a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object ranker-weights. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The model checkpoint in question is the canonical ranker-weights. When the source copy of ranker-weights is next opened, it holds rev-347, no longer rev-343. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(ranker-weights, to=Vesna).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-3", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-3-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "model checkpoint", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-073", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-073", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-411 becomes rev-415. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-411. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-411 becomes rev-415. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-411, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-411.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-415 contents.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-411.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-415 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-411.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-411.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-415 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-411.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-415 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-074", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-074", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-411 becomes rev-415. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-411 becomes rev-415. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-411.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-415 contents.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-411.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-415 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-415 contents.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-411.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-415 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-411.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-415 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-075", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-075", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-412 becomes rev-416. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-412. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-412 becomes rev-416. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-412, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-076", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-076", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-412 becomes rev-416. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-412 becomes rev-416. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-077", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-077", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-413 becomes rev-417. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-413. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-413 becomes rev-417. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-413, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-078", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-078", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-413 becomes rev-417. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is revised: rev-413 becomes rev-417. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-079", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-079", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-421. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-421, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-080", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-080", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-081", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-081", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-422. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-422, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-082", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-082", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-083", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-083", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-423. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-423, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-084", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-084", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the source copy of release-board is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-085", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-085", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-431. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-431, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-086", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-086", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-087", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-087", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-432. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-432, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-088", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-088", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-089", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-089", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-433. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-433, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-090", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-090", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of release-board is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-091", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-091", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-445, no longer rev-441. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-441. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-445, no longer rev-441. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-441, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-441.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-445.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-441.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-445." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-441.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-441.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-445.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-441.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-445.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-092", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-092", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-445, no longer rev-441. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-445, no longer rev-441. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-441.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-445.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-441.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-445." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-445.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-441.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-445.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-441.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-445.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-093", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-093", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-446, no longer rev-442. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-442. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-446, no longer rev-442. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-442, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-094", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-094", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-446, no longer rev-442. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-446, no longer rev-442. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-095", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-095", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-447, no longer rev-443. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Wendel an independent fixed representation of exactly release-board rev-443. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-447, no longer rev-443. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(release-board@rev-443, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-4", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-4-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "status board", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-096", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-096", "english": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-447, no longer rev-443. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Wendel a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object release-board. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The status board in question is the canonical release-board. When the source copy of release-board is next opened, it holds rev-447, no longer rev-443. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(release-board, to=Wendel).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-4", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-4-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "status board", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-097", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-097", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-511 becomes rev-515. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-511. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-511 becomes rev-515. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-511, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-511.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-515 contents.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-511.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-515 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-511.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-511.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-515 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-511.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-515 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-098", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-098", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-511 becomes rev-515. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-511 becomes rev-515. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-511.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-515 contents.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-511.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-515 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-515 contents.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-511.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-515 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-511.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-515 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-099", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-099", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-512 becomes rev-516. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-512. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-512 becomes rev-516. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-512, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-100", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-100", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-512 becomes rev-516. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-512 becomes rev-516. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-101", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-101", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-513 becomes rev-517. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-513. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-513 becomes rev-517. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-513, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-102", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-102", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-513 becomes rev-517. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is revised: rev-513 becomes rev-517. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-103", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-103", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-521. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-521, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-104", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-104", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-105", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-105", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-522. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-522, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-106", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-106", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-107", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-107", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-523. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-523, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-108", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-108", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the source copy of briefing-audio is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-109", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-109", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-531. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-531, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-110", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-110", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-111", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-111", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-532. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-532, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-112", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-112", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-113", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-113", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-533. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-533, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-114", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-114", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of briefing-audio is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-115", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-115", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-545, no longer rev-541. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-541. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-545, no longer rev-541. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-541, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-541.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-545.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-541.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-545." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-541.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-541.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-545.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-541.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-545.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-116", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-116", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-545, no longer rev-541. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-545, no longer rev-541. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-541.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-545.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-541.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-545." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-545.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-541.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-545.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-541.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-545.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-117", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-117", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-546, no longer rev-542. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-542. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-546, no longer rev-542. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-542, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-118", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-118", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-546, no longer rev-542. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-546, no longer rev-542. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-119", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-119", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-547, no longer rev-543. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Xiomara an independent fixed representation of exactly briefing-audio rev-543. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-547, no longer rev-543. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(briefing-audio@rev-543, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-5", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-5-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-120", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-120", "english": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-547, no longer rev-543. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Xiomara a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object briefing-audio. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The audio recording in question is the canonical briefing-audio. When the source copy of briefing-audio is next opened, it holds rev-547, no longer rev-543. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(briefing-audio, to=Xiomara).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-5", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-5-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "audio recording", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-121", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-121", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-611 becomes rev-615. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-611. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-611 becomes rev-615. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-611, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-611.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-615 contents.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-611.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-615 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-611.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-611.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-615 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-611.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-615 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-122", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-122", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-611 becomes rev-615. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-611 becomes rev-615. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-611.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-615 contents.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-611.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-615 contents." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-615 contents.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-611.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-615 contents.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the recipient-visible content stays at rev-611.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful later read shows the current rev-615 contents.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-123", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-123", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-612 becomes rev-616. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-612. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-612 becomes rev-616. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-612, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-124", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-124", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-612 becomes rev-616. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-612 becomes rev-616. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-125", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-125", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-613 becomes rev-617. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-613. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-613 becomes rev-617. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-613, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-126", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-126", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-613 becomes rev-617. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is revised: rev-613 becomes rev-617. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-source-edit", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-edit", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-127", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-127", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-621. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-621, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-128", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-128", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source deletion.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the source-backed permission cannot retrieve the deleted object.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-129", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-129", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-622. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-622, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-130", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-130", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-131", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-131", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-623. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-623, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-132", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-132", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the source copy of vendor-access-policy is removed from the service that holds it. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-source-deletion", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "source-deletion", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-133", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-133", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-631. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-631, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-134", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-134", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the delivered and retained representation remains available after source access is revoked.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: future access through the revoked permission is denied.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-135", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-135", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-632. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-632, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-136", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-136", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-137", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-137", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-633. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-633, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-138", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-138", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. Afterwards the recipient's access to the source copy of vendor-access-policy is withdrawn. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-grant-revocation", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "grant-revocation", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-139", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-139", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-645, no longer rev-641. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-641. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-645, no longer rev-641. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-641, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-641.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-645.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-641.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-645." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-641.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-641.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-645.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-641.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-645.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-140", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-140", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-645, no longer rev-641. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-645, no longer rev-641. Assume that a fixed transfer, if made, was delivered and retained, and that a live grant, if made, is the recipient's only route to the object, with no separate copy. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-641.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-645.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-641.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-645." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-645.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-641.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-645.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: opening the retained representation shows rev-641.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "snapshot", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: a successful read dereferences the canonical object and shows rev-645.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "live-view", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "later-read", "probe": "core" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-141", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-141", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-646, no longer rev-642. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-642. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-646, no longer rev-642. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-642, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-142", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-142", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-646, no longer rev-642. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-646, no longer rev-642. The recipient separately holds a copy obtained under a different authority; the instruction is silent on editing and redistribution. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: no edit or redistribution right follows, and a separately authorised copy is unaffected.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: edit and redistribution rights follow, and every separately authorised copy is erased.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "later-read", "probe": "authority-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-143", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-143", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-647, no longer rev-643. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send Yusuf an independent fixed representation of exactly vendor-access-policy rev-643. Do not grant continuing access to the source. Later source changes, deletion, or revocation cannot alter or withdraw a delivered and retained representation. Sending does not itself prove receipt.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-647, no longer rev-643. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: send-snapshot(vendor-access-policy@rev-643, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability." ], "answer": "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "send-snapshot-6", "report_cell": "send-snapshot-6-later-read", "strata": { "form": "send-snapshot", "domain": "access policy", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-144", "scenario_id": "rt-snapshot-live-scenario-144", "english": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-647, no longer rev-643. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant Yusuf a revocable read-only capability to the stable canonical object vendor-access-policy. Each successful read shows its then-current contents. Do not intentionally transfer a durable independent copy. This grants no edit or redistribution right and does not prove that the object was opened.", "ainglish": "The access policy in question is the canonical vendor-access-policy. When the source copy of vendor-access-policy is next opened, it holds rev-647, no longer rev-643. There is no delivery receipt, no record of the object being opened, and no reachability check for the service. Instruction: grant-live-view(vendor-access-policy, to=Yusuf).", "question": "Answer both questions by choosing the one option with both answers correct. (1) Which implementation satisfies the instruction? (2) What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?", "questions": [ "Which implementation satisfies the instruction?", "What later consequence or authority/evidence boundary follows?" ], "options": [ "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.", "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event." ], "answer": "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.", "option_components": { "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: transmit an independent representation of the named frozen version. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "snapshot", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": false, "consequence_correct": false }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction alone proves no later receipt, retention, opening, or service-reachability event.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "conservative", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": true }, "Implementation: grant revocable read-only access to the canonical object. Consequence or boundary: the instruction itself proves receipt, retention, opening, and service reachability.": { "implementation": "live-view", "consequence": "overclaim", "implementation_correct": true, "consequence_correct": false } }, "settlement_stratum": "grant-live-view-6", "report_cell": "grant-live-view-6-later-read", "strata": { "form": "grant-live-view", "domain": "access policy", "event": "later-read", "probe": "evidence-boundary" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-cal-01", "english": "Either Bram or Cato owns the failover drill.", "ainglish": "Bram, not Cato, owns the failover drill.", "question": "Who owns the failover drill?", "options": [ "Cato", "cannot tell", "Bram" ], "answer": "Bram", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "strata": { "control": "owner" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-cal-02", "english": "The warm standby is in either Tallinn or Lima.", "ainglish": "The warm standby is in Lima, not Tallinn.", "question": "Where is the warm standby?", "options": [ "Tallinn", "Lima", "cannot tell" ], "answer": "Lima", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "strata": { "control": "region" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-cal-03", "english": "The certificate is either valid or revoked.", "ainglish": "The certificate is revoked, not valid.", "question": "What is the certificate state?", "options": [ "cannot tell", "revoked", "valid" ], "answer": "revoked", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "strata": { "control": "state" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-cal-04", "english": "Either a clock skew or a missing index caused the timeout.", "ainglish": "A clock skew, not a missing index, caused the timeout.", "question": "What caused the timeout?", "options": [ "a missing index", "a clock skew", "cannot tell" ], "answer": "a clock skew", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "strata": { "control": "cause" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-cal-05", "english": "The amber build ran either before or after the teal build.", "ainglish": "The amber build ran before, not after, the teal build.", "question": "When did the amber build run?", "options": [ "before", "cannot tell", "after" ], "answer": "before", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "strata": { "control": "order" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-cal-06", "english": "The manifest lists either nine or fourteen entries.", "ainglish": "The manifest lists nine entries, not fourteen.", "question": "How many entries are listed?", "options": [ "fourteen", "nine", "cannot tell" ], "answer": "nine", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "strata": { "control": "count" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-cal-07", "english": "Either Dov or Ezri approved the rollout.", "ainglish": "Ezri, not Dov, approved the rollout.", "question": "Who approved the rollout?", "options": [ "cannot tell", "Dov", "Ezri" ], "answer": "Ezri", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "strata": { "control": "actor" } }, { "id": "rt-snapshot-live-cal-08", "english": "The badge is either olive or maroon.", "ainglish": "The badge is olive, not maroon.", "question": "What colour is the badge?", "options": [ "olive", "maroon", "cannot tell" ], "answer": "olive", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "strata": { "control": "colour" } } ]