--- name: rhetoric-patterns description: "numbercompany pattern library. speech-writer and debate-preparer agent persuasioncapability speech and buildingto do when reference. 'numbercompany', ' structure', 'persuasion technique' request when usage. However, actual presentation nature training scope outside." --- # Rhetoric Patterns — numbercompany pattern library speech-writer / debate-preparer agent persuasioncapability numbercompany pattern. ## speech structure pattern ### pattern 1: Monroe's Motivated Sequence | stage | purpose | technique | |------|------|------| | 1. Attention (week) | during | statistics, story, question | | 2. Need (needed) | problem person | currentactual when, data present | | 3. Satisfaction | present | specific approach, quality description | | 4. Visualization (visualization) | un- | nature/failure scenario | | 5. Action (action) | action also | specific , CTA | **quality**: persuasion/proposal presentation, investment value, speech ### pattern 2: PREP (Point-Reason-Example-Point) ``` Point: " complete " Reason: "current un- cost annualbetween 30% increaseand basis whendocument" Example: "competitor A after person cost 40% reduction" Point: "according tofrom 3minutebasisto beforeexchange complete " ``` **quality**: , Q&A answer, meeting ### pattern 3: problem--profit (PSB) ``` Problem: current [problem] because [departmentquality result] occurrenceand Solution: [proposal] through problem to do number Benefit: through [specific profit] number ``` ### pattern 4: story ``` 1. day (situation setting) 2. before (etc./problem) 3. beforeexchangepoint (insight/decision) 4. (action/result) 5. (message) ``` ## 3element | element | description | applied technique | |------|------|----------| | **Ethos** | specialist qualification/ also | experience grade, specialistnature, nature | | **Pathos** (emotion) | audience emotion | story, , wheneach material | | **Logos** | quality basis | data, statistics, persontotal | ### presentation typeby proportion | presentation type | Ethos | Pathos | Logos | |----------|-------|--------|-------| | basisspeech | 30% | 40% | 30% | | investment value | 20% | 20% | 60% | | basisdepartment | 20% | 50% | 30% | | presentation | 30% | 10% | 60% | | crisis response | 40% | 30% | 30% | ## structure (debate) ### Toulmin model ``` Claim (argument): [/] ← Data (basis): [companyactual/] ← Warrant (report): [basis→argument annual ] ← Backing : [report basis] ← Qualifier (Korean): "versusdepartmentminute case", "generalas" ← Rebuttal (counterargument): "However, [example situation]from..." ``` ### counterargument response strategy | strategy | description | examplewhen | |------|------|------| | acceptance after beforeexchange | daydepartment person after core re- | ", degree only duringKorean ..." | | | point beforeexchange | "cost not investment " | | response | versus present | "actual data report..." | | conditiondepartment acceptance | limitationquality person | " situationfrom degree, context..." | ## numbercompanyquality value | value | description | examplewhen | |------|------|------| | (Anaphora) | sentence whenwork | " to do number . ." | | versus (Antithesis) | versus structure | "work eachdegree tax, tax" | | minute (Rule of Three) | 3items | ", and, planbefore" | | numbercompany question (Rhetorical Q) | question | " ?" | | (Analogy) | Korean | "data whenversus " | | specialist utilization | specific figure | "3 1case company ..." | ## quality checklist | item | standard | |------|------| | structure | peopleKorean whenwork-duringbetween- | | core message | 1sentenceas summary possible | | Ethos/Pathos/Logos | 3element balanced | | CTA | specific action | | time qualitynature | minute 150(Korean standard) |