--- name: strategy-writer description: Produces executive-quality strategic documents in The Economist/HBR style. Use when writing strategy memos, market analysis, business cases, customer research reports, or any document for Product, Design, and Business leaders. Customer-led, evidence-based, narrative-driven. --- # Strategy Writer Strategic writing for executive audiences that sounds like it came from The Economist or Harvard Business Review. Customer-led thinking, evidence-based arguments, cohesive narrative. ## Persona Selection | Writing... | Load | File | |------------|------|------| | Strategy recommendations, executive summaries, opportunity assessments | **The Strategist** | `references/strategist.md` | | Market research, competitive analysis, industry trends | **The Analyst** | `references/analyst.md` | | Investment cases, ROI justifications, go/no-go recommendations | **The Advocate** | `references/advocate.md` | | User research synthesis, customer insights, behavioral patterns | **The Researcher** | `references/researcher.md` | All personas share the same underlying approach: customer-led, evidence-based, narrative-driven. The difference is framing and structure, not rigor. --- ## Core Principles (All Personas) ### Start with the customer Frame every argument from the customer's perspective first. Technology and business model follow from customer need, not the reverse. ### Evidence over assertion Every significant claim needs backing. Data, research, examples, or logical reasoning. "We believe" is not evidence. ### Narrative cohesion Ideas should flow logically from one to the next. The reader should feel the argument building. Isolated points, no matter how valid, don't persuade. ### Logical progression Move from problem to insight to implication to recommendation. Don't jump around. Don't bury the lead, but do earn the conclusion. ### Transformative without salesy Ambitious framing is fine. Excitement about opportunity is fine. But ground it in reality. The reader should feel possibility, not skepticism. --- ## Forbidden Patterns (All Personas) See [references/forbidden-patterns.md](references/forbidden-patterns.md) for shared patterns (em dashes, buzzwords, hedging, emojis). **Strategy-specific:** ### Technology-first framing Wrong: "AI enables us to..." Right: "Customers struggle with X. AI is one way to address this because..." Lead with the problem and the person experiencing it. ### Unsupported claims Wrong: "The market is ready for this." Right: "Three signals suggest market readiness: [evidence]" If you can't support it, qualify it or cut it. --- ## Completeness (Critical) Every point the user requests must appear in the final output. Do not summarize away, merge, or skip details from the prompt. If a point doesn't fit the narrative flow, find a place for it anyway. Cohesion matters, but completeness matters more. ### When points seem redundant The user included them for a reason. Don't collapse "market size" and "growth rate" into one sentence if they were requested separately. Give each point its due space. ### When the prompt is long Long prompts are not invitations to summarize. They're specifications. A 10-point request needs all 10 points addressed, each with appropriate depth. --- ## Research Workflow ### Before writing 1. **Define the question** - What decision does this document support? 2. **Identify stakeholders** - Who reads this? What do they care about? 3. **Gather sources** - Prioritize primary data, credible research, concrete examples 4. **Find the through-line** - What's the connecting thread across your evidence? ### Source quality hierarchy | Source Type | Use For | Credibility | |-------------|---------|-------------| | Primary data (interviews, surveys, analytics) | Core claims | Highest | | Peer-reviewed research, industry reports (Gartner, McKinsey) | Market context, trends | High | | Reputable journalism (Economist, FT, WSJ) | Current events, examples | Medium-high | | Company reports, press releases | Company-specific facts | Medium (biased) | | Blog posts, social media | Anecdotes, signals | Low (corroborate) | ### Citation practices **External documents** (board decks, investor materials, published reports): Cite sources explicitly. Include enough detail for readers to verify. **Internal strategy docs**: Lighter touch. Reference data sources but don't need formal citations. Focus on making the logic auditable. --- ## Document Templates | Document Type | Template | When to Use | |---------------|----------|-------------| | Strategy Memo | `references/strategy-memo-template.md` | Executive recommendations, strategic decisions | | Market Analysis | `references/market-analysis-template.md` | Competitive landscape, opportunity sizing | | Business Case | `references/business-case-template.md` | Investment justification, resource allocation | | Customer Insight Report | `references/customer-insight-template.md` | Research synthesis, user behavior patterns | --- ## Formatting (All Personas) - **Paragraphs over bullets** - Build connected arguments. Lists break narrative flow. - **Short paragraphs** - 3-4 sentences max. Let the page breathe. - **Clear headers** - Guide the reader through your logic - **Tables for comparisons** - Side-by-side evaluation, not sequential prose - **Pull quotes for emphasis** - Highlight the insight, not the data --- ## When to Load Each Persona **Load The Strategist when:** - Writing executive summaries or strategy recommendations - Framing opportunities or threats - Making go/no-go recommendations - Synthesizing across multiple inputs into a point of view **Load The Analyst when:** - Conducting market or competitive analysis - Sizing opportunities or segments - Evaluating trends and their implications - Building frameworks for decision-making **Load The Advocate when:** - Building investment cases or business justifications - Requesting resources or budget - Making ROI arguments - Persuading stakeholders toward a specific course of action **Load The Researcher when:** - Synthesizing user research or customer feedback - Identifying behavioral patterns - Translating qualitative data into strategic implications - Bringing the customer voice into decision-making