--- name: prompt-pack-matter-budget-template description: Use when preparing a per-matter legal budget for a specific litigation, arbitration, transaction, or regulatory matter. Produces a template with phase/task breakdowns, estimated hours by timekeeper level, disbursements, contingency, key assumptions, and alignment with LEDES/UTBMS billing codes. Applicable to outside counsel preparing client budgets and in-house teams evaluating external counsel proposals. license: MIT metadata: id: prompt-pack.matter-budget-template category: prompt-pack practice_area: legal-ops-billing priority: P2 intent: [operations, matter-budget-template] related: - prompt-pack-legal-budget-forecast - prompt-pack-legal-invoice-review-checklist - prompt-pack-outside-counsel-guidelines - prompt-pack-legal-department-kpi-dashboard - prompt-pack-matter-closing-procedure source: Louis — HAQQ Legal AI (github.com/sboghossian/mini-claude-for-legal) version: "1.0" --- # Matter Budget Template ## When to use this Use this skill when outside counsel needs to provide a client with a matter budget for a specific engagement, or when an in-house team needs to evaluate and document the expected cost of a new matter before instructing external counsel. Triggers: - "Prepare a budget estimate for litigating [matter]." - "Our outside counsel sent a budget — help me review and structure it." - "I need a matter budget template aligned to UTBMS codes." - "Draft a transaction budget for the [acquisition] deal." ## Required inputs | Input | Why it matters | Default | |---|---|---| | Matter name and description | Identifies and scopes the budget | Ask user | | Matter type | Litigation / arbitration / transaction / regulatory / advisory | Ask user | | Phase/task breakdown | Core structure of the budget | Use standard UTBMS phases for the matter type | | Timekeeper levels available | Determines which rate tiers appear in the budget | Ask user or use standard tiers | | Approved rates | Either from OCG rate schedule or quoted rates | Ask user | | Jurisdiction | Affects expected disbursements (court filing fees, expert rates) | Ask user | ## Optional inputs - Billing code standard: LEDES 1998B, LEDES 2000, LEDES Timekeeper, or non-LEDES - Budget format: fixed fee / time-and-materials / phased capped / hybrid - Alternative fee arrangement (AFA): fixed fee per phase, success fee, blended rate - Risk adjustment: probability-weighted scenario analysis - Currency ## Budget template — Litigation / Arbitration ### Matter Information | Field | Details | |---|---| | Matter name | | | Client | | | Counsel / Firm | | | Budget date | | | Budget period | [Phase 1 only / Through first hearing / Full case] | | Governing law | | | Assumed venue | | | Budget type | Time-and-materials (estimated) / Capped / Fixed fee | ### Phase and Task Budget For litigation use UTBMS L-codes; for transactions use UTBMS A/P codes. **Phase L100: Case Assessment, Development, and Administration** | Task | UTBMS Code | Lead Timekeeper | Hours (est.) | Rate (USD/hr) | Estimated Fee | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Initial case assessment | L110 | Partner | | | | | Fact investigation | L120 | Sr. Associate | | | | | Legal research | L120 | Associate | | | | | Case strategy and planning | L120 | Partner | | | | | Document management / organization | L140 | Paralegal | | | | | **Phase L100 subtotal** | | | | | | **Phase L200: Pleadings** | Task | UTBMS Code | Lead Timekeeper | Hours (est.) | Rate | Estimated Fee | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Draft complaint / statement of claim | L210 | Partner / Sr. Associate | | | | | Draft answer / defense | L210 | Sr. Associate | | | | | Preliminary motions / jurisdictional challenges | L210 | Partner | | | | | **Phase L200 subtotal** | | | | | | **Phase L300: Discovery / Disclosure** | Task | UTBMS Code | Lead Timekeeper | Hours (est.) | Rate | Estimated Fee | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Prepare / respond to document requests | L310 | Associate / Paralegal | | | | | Document review | L320 | Associate | | | | | Depositions / witness interviews | L330 | Partner / Sr. Associate | | | | | Expert reports | L340 | Partner (coordination) | | | | | **Phase L300 subtotal** | | | | | | **Phase L400: Trial / Hearing Preparation and Trial** | Task | UTBMS Code | Lead Timekeeper | Hours (est.) | Rate | Estimated Fee | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Pre-hearing motions / briefs | L420 | Partner | | | | | Witness preparation | L450 | Partner / Sr. Associate | | | | | Hearing attendance (days × daily rate) | L450 | Partner + Associate | | | | | Post-hearing brief | L460 | Partner / Sr. Associate | | | | | **Phase L400 subtotal** | | | | | | **Phase L500: Appeal** (if applicable) | Task | UTBMS Code | Lead Timekeeper | Hours (est.) | Rate | Estimated Fee | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Notice of appeal | L510 | Partner | | | | | Appellate brief | L510 | Partner / Sr. Associate | | | | | Oral argument | L520 | Partner | | | | | **Phase L500 subtotal** | | | | | | ### Disbursements / Expenses | Expense category | UTBMS Code | Estimated amount | Notes | |---|---|---|---| | Court / tribunal filing fees | E112 | | Confirm current fee schedule | | Expert witness fees | E119 | | Estimate from expert | | Travel and accommodation | E110 / E111 | | Economy class per OCG | | Document production / e-discovery platform | E101 / E106 | | Per-GB pricing estimate | | Interpreters / translation | | | If applicable | | Process server / enforcement fees | E112 | | | | Other | | | | | **Disbursements subtotal** | | | | ### Budget Summary | Category | Estimated amount | Notes | |---|---|---| | Phase L100 | | | | Phase L200 | | | | Phase L300 | | | | Phase L400 | | | | Phase L500 (if applicable) | | | | Disbursements | | | | **Fees + Disbursements subtotal** | | | | Contingency (typically 10–15%) | | | | **Total estimated budget** | | | ### Key Assumptions State all material assumptions on which the budget is based. The budget is only as reliable as these assumptions; if they change, the budget should be revised. 1. This budget covers Phase [X] only / the full case through [award/judgment]. 2. No third-party disclosure order is required. 3. Number of witnesses to be deposed/heard: [X]. 4. Document volume estimate: [X documents / GB of data]. 5. Expert witnesses: [X experts in [X fields]; budget does not include expert fees unless separately stated]. 6. Settlement discussions: this budget does not include costs of mediation or settlement negotiation. 7. Regulatory or parallel proceedings: not included unless specified. 8. The other side does not bring a counterclaim of material complexity. 9. Rates are per the approved rate schedule as at [date]; rate adjustments will be addressed by amendment. ### Budget Update Triggers Outside counsel undertakes to notify the client promptly if: - Actual costs in any phase approach 80% of the phase budget - An event occurs that materially changes the scope or complexity of the matter - The matter proceeds to a phase not originally budgeted Budget revisions require written agreement from the client before the new budget ceiling is exceeded. ## MENA considerations - **Expert witnesses in UAE / KSA courts**: court-appointed experts are common and can significantly affect the budget; include a line for responding to court expert reports. - **Arabic translation costs**: all documents submitted to UAE or KSA courts must be in Arabic or translated with a certified translator; translation costs can be substantial for document-heavy cases. - **DIAC / ADCCAC arbitration fees**: arbitration institution fees in MENA are calculated as a percentage of the claim amount; include institutional fees as a separate line item. - **Travel costs for MENA-based hearings**: regional hearings in Dubai, Riyadh, or Beirut involve international travel for international counsel teams; estimate realistically. ## Common mistakes - **Omitting the assumptions section**: a budget without stated assumptions is meaningless; counsel will always find a reason why costs exceeded budget if assumptions are not pinned down. - **Not including disbursements**: attorney fees are always presented; disbursements (expert fees, filing fees, translation) can add 20–40% to the total cost. - **No contingency**: all litigation budgets should carry a contingency; absent one, the first complication produces a budget overrun. - **Not updating the budget when scope changes**: a budget issued at case inception should be revised at each phase gate; use budget update triggers to formalize this. ## Related skills - [[prompt-pack-legal-budget-forecast]] - [[prompt-pack-legal-invoice-review-checklist]] - [[prompt-pack-outside-counsel-guidelines]] - [[prompt-pack-legal-department-kpi-dashboard]] - [[prompt-pack-matter-closing-procedure]]