---
name: performance-optimizer
description: "Identifies and fixes performance bottlenecks in code, databases, and APIs. Measures before and after to prove improvements."
category: development
risk: safe
source: community
date_added: "2026-03-05"
---
# Performance Optimizer
Find and fix performance bottlenecks. Measure, optimize, verify. Make it fast.
## When to Use This Skill
- App is slow or laggy
- User complains about performance
- Page load times are high
- API responses are slow
- Database queries take too long
- User mentions "slow", "lag", "performance", or "optimize"
## The Optimization Process
### 1. Measure First
Never optimize without measuring:
```javascript
// Measure execution time
console.time('operation');
await slowOperation();
console.timeEnd('operation'); // operation: 2341ms
```
**What to measure:**
- Page load time
- API response time
- Database query time
- Function execution time
- Memory usage
- Network requests
### 2. Find the Bottleneck
Use profiling tools to find the slow parts:
**Browser:**
```
DevTools ā Performance tab ā Record ā Stop
Look for long tasks (red bars)
```
**Node.js:**
```bash
node --prof app.js
node --prof-process isolate-*.log > profile.txt
```
**Database:**
```sql
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = 'test@example.com';
```
### 3. Optimize
Fix the slowest thing first (biggest impact).
## Common Optimizations
### Database Queries
**Problem: N+1 Queries**
```javascript
// Bad: N+1 queries
const users = await db.users.find();
for (const user of users) {
user.posts = await db.posts.find({ userId: user.id }); // N queries
}
// Alternative: batched population; inspect actual generated queries
const users = await db.users.find()
.populate('posts'); // May issue additional batched queries; not necessarily a JOIN
```
**Problem: Missing Index**
```sql
-- Check slow query
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = 'test@example.com';
-- A sequential scan may be optimal for small tables/low-selectivity queries.
-- Add index
CREATE INDEX idx_users_email ON users(email);
-- Check again
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = 'test@example.com';
-- Compare actual cost/latency and write/storage impact.
```
**Problem: SELECT ***
```javascript
// Bad: Fetches all columns
const users = await db.query('SELECT * FROM users');
// Good: Only needed columns
const users = await db.query('SELECT id, name, email FROM users');
```
**Problem: No Pagination**
```javascript
// Bad: Returns all records
const users = await db.users.find();
// Good: Paginated
const users = await db.users.find()
.limit(20)
.skip((page - 1) * 20);
```
### API Performance
**Problem: No Caching**
```javascript
// Bad: Hits database every time
app.get('/api/stats', async (req, res) => {
const stats = await db.stats.calculate(); // Slow
res.json(stats);
});
// Good: Cache for 5 minutes
const cache = new Map();
app.get('/api/stats', async (req, res) => {
const cached = cache.get('stats');
if (cached && Date.now() - cached.time < 300000) {
return res.json(cached.data);
}
const stats = await db.stats.calculate();
cache.set('stats', { data: stats, time: Date.now() });
res.json(stats);
});
```
**Problem: Sequential Operations**
```javascript
// Bad: Sequential (slow)
const user = await getUser(id);
const posts = await getPosts(id);
const comments = await getComments(id);
// Total: 300ms + 200ms + 150ms = 650ms
// Good: Parallel (fast)
const [user, posts, comments] = await Promise.all([
getUser(id),
getPosts(id),
getComments(id)
]);
// Total: max(300ms, 200ms, 150ms) = 300ms
```
**Problem: Large Payloads**
```javascript
// Bad: Returns everything
res.json(users); // 5MB response
// Good: Only needed fields
res.json(users.map(u => ({
id: u.id,
name: u.name,
email: u.email
}))); // 500KB response
```
### Frontend Performance
**Problem: Unnecessary Re-renders**
```javascript
// Bad: Re-renders on every parent update
function UserList({ users }) {
return users.map(user =>
```
### Algorithm Optimization
**Problem: Inefficient Algorithm**
```javascript
// Bad: O(n²) - nested loops
function findDuplicates(arr) {
const duplicates = [];
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
for (let j = i + 1; j < arr.length; j++) {
if (arr[i] === arr[j]) duplicates.push(arr[i]);
}
}
return duplicates;
}
// Good: O(n) - single pass with Set
function findDuplicates(arr) {
const seen = new Set();
const duplicates = new Set();
for (const item of arr) {
if (seen.has(item)) duplicates.add(item);
seen.add(item);
}
return Array.from(duplicates);
}
```
**Problem: Repeated Calculations**
```javascript
// Bad: Calculates every time
function getTotal(items) {
return items.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.price * item.quantity, 0);
}
// Called 100 times in render
// Good: Memoized
const getTotal = useMemo(() => {
return items.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.price * item.quantity, 0);
}, [items]);
```
### Memory Optimization
**Problem: Memory Leak**
```javascript
// Bad: Event listener not cleaned up
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('scroll', handleScroll);
// Memory leak!
}, []);
// Good: Cleanup
useEffect(() => {
window.addEventListener('scroll', handleScroll);
return () => window.removeEventListener('scroll', handleScroll);
}, []);
```
**Problem: Large Data in Memory**
```javascript
// Bad: Loads entire file into memory
const data = fs.readFileSync('huge-file.txt'); // 1GB
// Good: Stream it
const stream = fs.createReadStream('huge-file.txt');
stream.on('data', chunk => process(chunk));
```
## Correctness and benchmark boundaries
The two `findDuplicates` examples have different output semantics: the nested loop repeats an item per matching pair, while the Set version emits each duplicated value once (and equality differs for NaN). Define the required contract before changing algorithms. The stats cache is suitable only for shared public data; user/tenant-specific results need authorized keys and invalidation. Streaming must handle errors/backpressure and asynchronous processing. `EXPLAIN ANALYZE` executes the query; approve target/load before use. All timings/sizes below are illustrative, not observed results: compare representative repeated runs with workload/environment/sample statistics and regression checks.
## Measuring Impact
Always measure before and after:
```javascript
// Before optimization
console.time('query');
const users = await db.users.find();
console.timeEnd('query');
// query: 2341ms
// After optimization (added index)
console.time('query');
const users = await db.users.find();
console.timeEnd('query');
// query: 23ms
// Improvement: 100x faster!
```
## Performance Budgets
Set targets:
```
Page Load: < 2 seconds
API Response: < 200ms
Database Query: < 50ms
Bundle Size: < 200KB
Time to Interactive: < 3 seconds
```
## Tools
**Browser:**
- Chrome DevTools Performance tab
- Lighthouse (audit)
- Network tab (waterfall)
**Node.js:**
- `node --prof` (profiling)
- `clinic` (diagnostics)
- `autocannon` (load testing)
**Database:**
- `EXPLAIN ANALYZE` (query plans)
- Slow query log
- Database profiler
**Monitoring:**
- New Relic
- Datadog
- Sentry Performance
## Quick Wins
Easy optimizations with big impact:
1. **Add database indexes** on frequently queried columns
2. **Enable gzip compression** on server
3. **Add caching** for expensive operations
4. **Lazy load** images and heavy components
5. **Use CDN** for static assets
6. **Minify and compress** JavaScript/CSS
7. **Remove unused dependencies**
8. **Use pagination** instead of loading all data
9. **Optimize images** (WebP, proper sizing)
10. **Enable HTTP/2** on server
## Optimization Checklist
- [ ] Measured current performance
- [ ] Identified bottleneck
- [ ] Applied optimization
- [ ] Measured improvement
- [ ] Verified functionality still works
- [ ] No new bugs introduced
- [ ] Documented the change
## When NOT to Optimize
- Premature optimization (optimize when it's actually slow)
- Micro-optimizations (save 1ms when page takes 5 seconds)
- Readable code is more important than tiny speed gains
- If it's already fast enough
## Key Principles
- Measure before optimizing
- Fix the biggest bottleneck first
- Measure after to prove improvement
- Don't sacrifice readability for tiny gains
- Profile in production-like environment
- Consider the 80/20 rule (20% of code causes 80% of slowness)
## Related Skills
- `@database-design` - Query optimization
- `@codebase-audit-pre-push` - Code review
- `@bug-hunter` - Debugging
## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.