--- name: repo-maintainer description: Championship-grade repository maintenance. Audits for test artifacts, dependency issues, CI/CD health, documentation sync, and FAF alignment. Generates prioritized cleanup plans. Use when repos need deep cleaning or ongoing maintenance. risk: unknown source: https://github.com/Wolfe-Jam/faf-skills/tree/main/skills/repo-maintainer source_repo: Wolfe-Jam/faf-skills source_type: community date_added: 2026-07-01 license: MIT license_source: https://github.com/Wolfe-Jam/faf-skills/blob/main/LICENSE --- # Repo Maintainer - Championship Repository Hygiene **"When brakes must work flawlessly, so must our repos."** --- ## When to Use This Skill Activate when: - User types `/repo-maintainer` or `/maintain` - User says "clean up this repo" or "audit the repo" - Starting maintenance on a repository - After major refactoring or before releases - Monthly/quarterly repo health checks - Onboarding to a new codebase ## What This Skill Does ### ๐Ÿ” **Phase 1: Comprehensive Audit** Systematically checks 7 critical areas: #### 1. **Artifact Detection** ```bash # Find test artifacts *.test.js leftovers *.spec.ts.snap orphans .DS_Store files tmp/, temp/, cache/ directories coverage/ not in .gitignore dist/, build/ committed by accident node_modules/ somehow in git ``` **Detection Strategy:** - Check `git status` for untracked patterns - Scan for common artifact extensions - Compare against .gitignore - Find large files (>1MB) in working directory #### 2. **Dependency Health** ```bash # Check package health npm outdated npm audit npx depcheck (find unused deps) Check for pinned versions (inquirer@8.2.5 pattern) Verify Dependabot config ``` **Red Flags:** - Packages with security vulnerabilities - EOL runtime versions (Node 16, Python 3.7) - Duplicate dependencies (lodash + lodash.merge) - Unused dependencies (installed but never imported) #### 3. **CI/CD Alignment** ```bash # Workflow consistency check Node versions across all workflows Test matrices (should match across ci.yml, release.yml) Action versions (@v6 vs @v5) Failed/skipped workflow runs Secrets/tokens properly configured ``` **Common Fixes:** - Remove EOL runtimes (e.g. Node 16) from release workflows - Align Node versions across all workflows (e.g. 18/20/22) - Pin packages that break under ESM resolution #### 4. **Documentation Sync** ```bash # Context alignment check README.md โ†” CLAUDE.md โ†” project.faf CHANGELOG up to date with git tags package.json version matches latest tag Examples in README still work Links not broken (404 checks) ``` **FAF-Specific:** - project.faf reflects current state - CLAUDE.md bi-sync active - .faf-dna not churning unnecessarily #### 5. **Git Hygiene** ```bash # .gitignore audit Untracked files that should be ignored *.config.mjs *.faf test artifacts .env.local, .env.development Large files in git history (use git-filter-repo) Binary files that don't belong ``` **Pattern Recognition:** ```gitignore # Add to .gitignore based on artifacts found *.config.mjs *.faf.backup .faf-dna.tmp test-*.faf ``` #### 6. **Code Quality Signals** ```bash # Quick health indicators Dead code (unused exports via ts-prune or depcheck) TODO/FIXME comments (track count, prioritize) Commented code blocks (remove or document) Console.log statements in production code Hardcoded secrets/tokens ``` #### 7. **FAF Ecosystem Health** For FAF projects specifically: ```yaml # Check FAF alignment .faf score accuracy (run faf score) Bi-sync alignment โ€” CLAUDE.md โ†” .faf (run `faf sync`; mtime auto-direction) MCP server compliance (if applicable) WJTTC test coverage (for faf-cli, MCP servers) ``` For MCP servers: ```bash # MCP-specific checks package.json has "mcp" field Server implements required tools Tests cover all tool endpoints README has MCP installation instructions Registry listing accurate (npm + MCP registry) ``` --- ### ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ **Phase 2: Cleanup Plan Generation** After audit, generate prioritized task list: ```markdown # ๐ŸŽ๏ธ REPO HEALTH REPORT: faf-cli **Overall Score:** 85% โ—‡ Bronze **Status:** Production-ready with minor cleanup needed --- ## ๐Ÿšจ CRITICAL (Fix Now) ### 1. Security: `open@10` breaking CI/CD - **Impact:** Release pipeline failing - **Fix:** Pin to `open@8.4.2` โœ… FIXED - **Effort:** 5 minutes - **Auto-fix:** Available --- ## โš ๏ธ MEDIUM (This Week) ### 3. .gitignore Gaps - **Issue:** `*.config.mjs`, `*.faf` test files not ignored - **Fix:** Add patterns to .gitignore - **Effort:** 1 minute - **Auto-fix:** Available ```gitignore *.config.mjs test-*.faf ``` --- ## โ„น๏ธ LOW (Nice to Have) ### 6. README Links - **Issue:** 2 broken links to old docs - **Fix:** Update URLs - **Effort:** 5 minutes ### 7. Unused Dependencies - **Issue:** `depcheck` found unused packages - **Fix:** Remove or document why needed --- ## โœ… EXCELLENT - Test coverage: 799/799 passing - TypeScript strict mode: enabled - FAF score: 83% (good) - CI/CD: All workflows aligned - Security: No critical vulnerabilities - Documentation: CLAUDE.md in sync --- ## ๐ŸŽฏ RECOMMENDED ACTIONS **Quick wins:** .gitignore + CHANGELOG entry + README links + safe `npm update`. **This week:** triage TODOs, remove unused deps, bump patch. **Monthly:** full dependency audit, large-file scan, perf baseline. --- ## ๐Ÿ”ง AUTO-FIX AVAILABLE I can automatically fix: - โœ… .gitignore additions - โœ… CHANGELOG draft - โœ… Safe dependency updates - โœ… Workflow alignment **Run auto-fix?** (yes/no) ``` --- ### ๐Ÿค– **Phase 3: Auto-Fix (Optional)** For safe, non-breaking fixes: ```bash # 1. Update .gitignore cat >> .gitignore <> CHANGELOG.draft.md # 3. Safe dependency updates (non-breaking) npm update --save # 4. Create cleanup branch git checkout -b repo-maintenance/$(date +%Y-%m-%d) git add .gitignore CHANGELOG.md package.json package-lock.json git commit -m "chore: repo maintenance - cleanup artifacts and update deps - Add missing .gitignore patterns - Update CHANGELOG with v4.4.0 - Safe dependency updates (patch/minor only) Generated by /repo-maintainer skill" ``` --- ## Workflow ### Step 1: Initial Assessment ```bash # Quick health check pwd git status git log --oneline -5 ls -la | head -20 ``` ### Step 2: Systematic Audit Run checks in order of priority: 1. **Critical first** - CI/CD failures, security issues 2. **Medium next** - Dependencies, documentation gaps 3. **Low priority** - Code quality signals, nice-to-haves ### Step 3: Generate Report Create structured report with: - Overall health score (0-100%) - Critical/Medium/Low sections - Effort estimates - Auto-fix availability - Recommended action plan ### Step 4: Execute (with approval) Ask user: - "Run auto-fix for safe items?" - "Create cleanup branch?" - "Open issues for manual items?" Never make changes without explicit approval. --- ## MCP Server Maintenance ### Additional MCP Checks: ```bash # 1. MCP-specific structure package.json has "mcp" field Server exports via index.ts Tools properly registered # 2. Registry compliance Registry listing accurate (npm + MCP registry) README has MCP install instructions Works with Claude Desktop config # 3. Tool coverage Each tool has tests Each tool has description Error handling implemented # 4. Version alignment package.json version git tag version MCP registry version npm published version ``` ### MCP Cleanup Checklist: - [ ] Remove test artifacts - [ ] Update dependencies - [ ] Align workflows (Node 18/20/22) - [ ] Verify MCP tools still work - [ ] Update README examples - [ ] Check CHANGELOG current - [ ] Verify published to npm - [ ] Confirm registry listing accurate --- ## โœช Tier System (Aligned with FAF) **CRITICAL: Use Official FAF Tiers for All Scoring** | Score | Tier | Symbol | Status | |-------|------|--------|--------| | 100% | Trophy | โœช | Perfect โ€” Gold Code | | 99% | Gold | โ˜… | Exceptional | | 95% | Silver | โ—† | Top tier | | 85% | Bronze | โ—‡ | Production ready | | 70% | Green | โ— | Solid foundation | | 55% | Yellow | โ— | Needs improvement | | 1% | Red | โ—‹ | Major work needed | | 0% | White | โ™ก | Empty | The score is **deterministic** โ€” same input โ†’ same score, every time. **FAF doesn't lie.** **Note:** ๐ŸŠ **Big Orange** is an **HONOR**, not a score or a badge. It recognizes sustained excellence across multiple criteria; it is never calculated from a single score. **Apply These Tiers to:** - Overall repo health score - Individual category scores (CI/CD, Dependencies, etc.) - Summary reports - Cleanup recommendations **Examples:** ``` 95% Security โ†’ โ—† Silver 88% Overall โ†’ โ—‡ Bronze 78% Dependencies โ†’ โ— Green 70% Git Hygiene โ†’ โ— Green 40% CI/CD โ†’ โ—‹ Red 100% Tests โ†’ โœช Trophy ``` --- ## Related Skills - `/wjttc-builder` ยท `/wjttc-tester` - generate + run championship-grade tests before a release - `/faf-expert` - master the `.faf` format + score the repo's AI-readiness --- ## Best Practices ### 1. **Run Regularly** - After major refactors - Before releases - Monthly maintenance - When onboarding new devs ### 2. **Prioritize Impact** - Fix breaking issues first (CI/CD, security) - Document before cleaning (understand why artifacts exist) - Test after cleanup (ensure nothing broke) ### 3. **Track Progress** - Use TodoWrite for multi-step cleanups - Create issues for manual items - Document decisions in CLAUDE.md ### 4. **Automate Where Safe** - .gitignore additions โœ… - CHANGELOG drafts โœ… - Workflow alignment โœ… - Breaking changes โŒ (need review) --- ## Example Session ``` User: /repo-maintainer Claude: ๐ŸŽ๏ธ Starting championship repo maintenance audit... [Runs git status] [Checks workflows] [Scans for artifacts] [Runs npm outdated] [Checks .gitignore] ๐Ÿ“Š AUDIT COMPLETE Overall Health: 85% โ—‡ Bronze Critical Issues: 2 Medium Issues: 3 Low Priority: 5 Top Issues: 1. ๐Ÿšจ open@10 breaking CI/CD (auto-fixable) 2. ๐Ÿšจ Node 16 in workflows (EOL) 3. โš ๏ธ .gitignore missing *.config.mjs 4. โš ๏ธ 15 outdated dependencies 5. โš ๏ธ CHANGELOG missing v4.4.0 I can auto-fix items 1, 2, 3, and draft 5. Would you like me to proceed? (yes/no) User: yes Claude: โœ… Fixing... [Pins open@8.4.2] [Updates workflows to Node 20] [Adds .gitignore patterns] [Drafts CHANGELOG entry] โœ… Auto-fixes complete! Remaining manual items: - Review 15 dependency updates - 3 TODO comments need review Create cleanup branch? (yes/no) ``` --- ## The Championship Promise > "Pit crews service the car between every race. > Your repos deserve the same attention." --- *Repo Maintainer - Championship Repository Hygiene* *"When brakes must work flawlessly, so must our repos."* ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches its upstream source and local project context. - Verify commands, generated code, dependencies, credentials, and external service behavior before applying changes. - Do not treat examples as a substitute for environment-specific tests, security review, or user approval for destructive or costly actions.