# Staff Engineer Mode **Staff-level engineering judgment for coding agents, from design to production.** Give Staff Engineer Mode a design, diff, rollout, incident, migration, or maintenance problem. One router selects one of 64 focused specialists. The agent works through relevant failure modes and verification checks before it ships code or changes production. You get concrete decisions, risks, checks, and next steps across architecture, reliability, security, delivery, data, platform, and operations. ## How It Works Ask a normal engineering question. You never need to name a specialist. The router classifies the requested artifact, lifecycle phase, engineering surface, and risk. It chooses one primary specialist and adds a secondary only when the request needs a separate artifact. Supported tools list only the native `staff-engineer-mode` router. The 64 specialist files stay under `specialists/` and load only after routing. For commits and amends, Staff Engineer Mode calls `agent-pr-review` against the exact staged diff. For releases, tags, version bumps, packages, artifacts, and promotions, it calls `release-build-reproducibility` and `production-readiness-review` together. ## Installation Commands labeled "terminal" are run in your shell. Commands labeled "agent chat" are typed inside that tool's interactive agent session. ### Claude Code Terminal: ```bash claude plugin marketplace add https://github.com/sirmarkz/staff-engineer-mode.git claude plugin install staff-engineer-mode@staff-engineer-mode ``` Agent chat: ```text /plugin marketplace add https://github.com/sirmarkz/staff-engineer-mode.git ``` ```text /plugin install staff-engineer-mode@staff-engineer-mode ``` ### Codex Terminal: ```bash codex plugin marketplace add https://github.com/sirmarkz/staff-engineer-mode.git codex plugin add staff-engineer-mode@staff-engineer-mode ``` ### Cursor Terminal: ```bash git clone https://github.com/sirmarkz/staff-engineer-mode.git ~/.cursor/staff-engineer-mode-src mkdir -p ~/.cursor/plugins ln -s ~/.cursor/staff-engineer-mode-src ~/.cursor/plugins/staff-engineer-mode ``` ### OpenCode Terminal: ```bash opencode plugin 'staff-engineer-mode@git+https://github.com/sirmarkz/staff-engineer-mode.git' ``` ### GitHub Copilot CLI Terminal: ```bash copilot plugin marketplace add https://github.com/sirmarkz/staff-engineer-mode.git ``` Install the plugin: ```bash copilot plugin install staff-engineer-mode@staff-engineer-mode ``` ### Gemini CLI Terminal: ```bash gemini extensions install https://github.com/sirmarkz/staff-engineer-mode ``` ## Try It Start a fresh session inside any open repo and try one of these prompts: - "Before implementing partner webhooks, design delivery retries, replay, and dead-letter handling." - "For a new inventory dependency call, decide timeout, retry, and fallback." - "Review my last commit." The agent should load the router, choose one specialist, and respond with concrete decisions, risks, checks, owners, supporting details, and next steps. For more coverage, see the [sample prompts](evals/prompts/expected-routes.md). ## What's Inside Staff Engineer Mode ships one native router skill. It keeps 64 specialist files under `specialists/` and loads them after routing. The concern groups below help you browse. Runtime routing still follows the requested artifact, phase, surface, and risk. | Engineering concern | Specialist files | | --- | --- | | Architecture & interfaces | [`architecture-decisions`](specialists/architecture-decisions.md), [`api-design-and-compatibility`](specialists/api-design-and-compatibility.md), [`data-contracts`](specialists/data-contracts.md), [`event-workflows`](specialists/event-workflows.md), [`resilience-requirements`](specialists/resilience-requirements.md), [`persistent-connection-systems`](specialists/persistent-connection-systems.md) | | Verification & evaluation | [`state-machine-correctness`](specialists/state-machine-correctness.md), [`testing-and-quality-gates`](specialists/testing-and-quality-gates.md), [`test-data-engineering`](specialists/test-data-engineering.md), [`agent-pr-review`](specialists/agent-pr-review.md), [`experimentation-and-metric-guardrails`](specialists/experimentation-and-metric-guardrails.md) | | Reliability & resilience | [`slo-and-error-budgets`](specialists/slo-and-error-budgets.md), [`high-availability-design`](specialists/high-availability-design.md), [`dependency-resilience`](specialists/dependency-resilience.md), [`backup-and-recovery`](specialists/backup-and-recovery.md), [`resilience-experiments`](specialists/resilience-experiments.md), [`performance-and-capacity`](specialists/performance-and-capacity.md), [`cost-aware-reliability`](specialists/cost-aware-reliability.md), [`multi-region-and-data-residency`](specialists/multi-region-and-data-residency.md), [`scheduled-job-reliability`](specialists/scheduled-job-reliability.md) | | Data, storage & privacy | [`distributed-data-and-consistency`](specialists/distributed-data-and-consistency.md), [`database-operations`](specialists/database-operations.md), [`data-pipeline-reliability`](specialists/data-pipeline-reliability.md), [`caching-and-derived-data`](specialists/caching-and-derived-data.md), [`privacy-and-data-lifecycle`](specialists/privacy-and-data-lifecycle.md), [`data-lineage-and-provenance`](specialists/data-lineage-and-provenance.md) | | Delivery & change safety | [`progressive-delivery`](specialists/progressive-delivery.md), [`feature-flag-lifecycle`](specialists/feature-flag-lifecycle.md), [`release-build-reproducibility`](specialists/release-build-reproducibility.md), [`fleet-upgrades`](specialists/fleet-upgrades.md), [`migration-and-deprecation`](specialists/migration-and-deprecation.md), [`configuration-and-automation-safety`](specialists/configuration-and-automation-safety.md), [`dev-environment-parity`](specialists/dev-environment-parity.md), [`service-decommission-and-sunset`](specialists/service-decommission-and-sunset.md) | | Code quality & maintainability | [`code-readability-for-agents`](specialists/code-readability-for-agents.md), [`dependency-and-code-hygiene`](specialists/dependency-and-code-hygiene.md) | | Operations & incident response | [`observability-and-alerting`](specialists/observability-and-alerting.md), [`incident-response-and-postmortems`](specialists/incident-response-and-postmortems.md), [`oncall-health`](specialists/oncall-health.md), [`operational-ownership-transfer`](specialists/operational-ownership-transfer.md) | | Security | [`secure-sdlc-and-threat-modeling`](specialists/secure-sdlc-and-threat-modeling.md), [`identity-and-secrets`](specialists/identity-and-secrets.md), [`cryptography-and-key-lifecycle`](specialists/cryptography-and-key-lifecycle.md), [`software-supply-chain-security`](specialists/software-supply-chain-security.md), [`vulnerability-management`](specialists/vulnerability-management.md), [`tenant-isolation`](specialists/tenant-isolation.md), [`edge-traffic-and-ddos-defense`](specialists/edge-traffic-and-ddos-defense.md), [`llm-application-security`](specialists/llm-application-security.md), [`input-validation-and-injection-defense`](specialists/input-validation-and-injection-defense.md), [`client-application-security`](specialists/client-application-security.md) | | Platform & infrastructure | [`infrastructure-and-policy-as-code`](specialists/infrastructure-and-policy-as-code.md), [`internal-service-networking`](specialists/internal-service-networking.md), [`platform-golden-paths`](specialists/platform-golden-paths.md), [`container-runtime-and-orchestration`](specialists/container-runtime-and-orchestration.md) | | Client applications & accessibility | [`web-release-gates`](specialists/web-release-gates.md), [`mobile-release-engineering`](specialists/mobile-release-engineering.md), [`accessibility-gates`](specialists/accessibility-gates.md) | | AI/ML evaluation & serving | [`llm-evaluation`](specialists/llm-evaluation.md), [`ml-reliability-and-evaluation`](specialists/ml-reliability-and-evaluation.md), [`llm-serving-cost-and-latency`](specialists/llm-serving-cost-and-latency.md) | | Engineering controls & readiness | [`ai-coding-governance`](specialists/ai-coding-governance.md), [`documentation-lifecycle`](specialists/documentation-lifecycle.md), [`engineering-control-evidence`](specialists/engineering-control-evidence.md), [`production-readiness-review`](specialists/production-readiness-review.md) | ## Sources The practice library uses first-party engineering publications from Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Apple, and Netflix. Standards and guidance come from NIST, CISA, OWASP, OpenSSF, IETF, and W3C. The library covers public incident records from AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Google Workspace, Meta, and Netflix. See the [source index](skills/_shared/references/source-index.md) for the full reference set. Staff Engineer Mode is independent and is not endorsed by or affiliated with these organizations. ## Contributing Patches are welcome. New practices should come from authoritative sources: first-party engineering publications, official documentation, standards bodies, peer-reviewed papers, or widely cited practitioner references. Contributors must keep new specialists technology-agnostic. Do not endorse vendors. Maintain authoritative sources in the shared index and read [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md) before opening a PR. Repository checks enforce this voice. ## License MIT