--- layout: default title: "Consent, the Final Layer in India's Ambitious Data Regime, Falling in Place" description: "A FactorDaily report on the consent architecture being developed as the fourth layer of India Stack, enabling user-controlled digital data sharing for credit assessment, examining its applications in SME lending, healthcare, and the regulatory challenges around consent brokers." categories: [Media mentions] date: 2017-09-05 authors: ["Jayadevan PK"] source: "FactorDaily" permalink: /media/consent-architecture-indiastack-factordaily/ created: 2026-01-12 --- **Consent, the Final Layer in India's Ambitious Data Regime, Falling in Place** is a *FactorDaily* report published on 5 September 2017. The article examines the development of a consent architecture as the fourth and final component of India Stack, designed to enable user-controlled sharing of digitally signed, machine-readable data with service providers. It explores early implementation plans for SME lending integrated with the Goods and Services Tax Network, alongside concerns about consent revocation mechanisms and the regulation of consent brokers. ## Contents 1. [Article Details](#article-details) 2. [Full Text](#full-text) 3. [Context and Background](#context-and-background) 4. [External Link](#external-link) ## Article Details
📰 Published in:
FactorDaily
📅 Date:
5 September 2017
👤 Authors:
Jayadevan PK
📄 Type:
News Report
📰 Article Link:
Read Online
## Full Text

India is gearing up to put in place what it calls a "consent architecture," a system which allows users to digitally share their data with service providers in exchange for easier access to credit, insurance and other services. When fully operational, this could bring a big change in the way businesses, individuals, services providers and others use digital data in their day-to-day operations.

While the consent architecture can take several months to be fully implemented, we will see its application in areas such as small business lending before the turn of the year, say top officials who have worked on the project.

"In 3-4 months, you should see it in SME lending. There's a lot of action in healthcare as well," a top source who is working closely with the government told FactorDaily. The source requested anonymity because he is not authorised to speak to the media. For a complete roll out to take place, many things, including India's data protection law and sector specific regulations need to fall in place and will take over a year.

The consent architecture is also likely to find use in the agriculture sector.

The architecture gives the control of data to the end user. Take, for instance, small business lending. Currently, when a small business applies for a loan, it has to provide reams of documents including KYC documents, audited financials for three years, tax returns and bank documents. The consent architecture allows sharing of the business's data with a lender. With this machine readable data, the bank can perform credit evaluation in seconds. If the system works as proposed, India could even have real-time data on the economy.

Lending and Consent Architecture

In the case of lending to small and medium businesses, it's going to be tied to the data captured by the Goods and Services Tax Network or GSTN. The idea is for the end user (in this case the applicant) to be able to share digitally signed, machine readable data with a lender to easily prove creditworthiness.

"It's like how you can use your Twitter ID to log into some other application but even better. With this, you can give fine grain control over how the data is viewed… whether it is at the aggregate level or more granular," Thiyagarajan M, a fellow at iSPIRT, told FactorDaily. iSPIRIT, a software products think tank, has been building and championing the cause of India Stack, a set of code that helps developers build products and services riding on the country's digital infrastructure.

The consent architecture is the fourth and final piece in the India Stack. The other three layers relate to identity management, a digital records repository, and cashless payments.

"The regulators, say in banking or telecom, may allow this to happen faster. But the broader use cases will take longer," said Sanjay Jain, the Chief Innovation Officer at the Centre for Innovation Incubation and Entrepreneurship, IIM Ahmedabad. Jain was one of the core team members who built India's biometric identity system, Aadhaar.

The committee on data protection, headed by former Supreme Court judge B M Srikrishna, said Jain, will play a crucial role in protecting citizen data and also empowering them to use their data.

Also see: India's top tech architect talks about the tech behind GST, data empowerment

There are over 51 million small and medium businesses in India and most of them struggle to access credit because banks have a tough time ascertaining their creditworthiness. Which is why only about 1.2 million companies in the country have availed bank loans.

The consent architecture, applied on top of the GSTN, is likely to change this for the better. Nearly 8 million companies have registered to be part of the GSTN. This could even help grow bank lending to industries, which has been slowing.

Some Fixes

"It's not perfect yet but this is the part of the India Stack that I like," Sunil Abraham, the Executive Director of Bengaluru-based research organisation, the Centre for Internet and Society, said. But he has a short wish list of fixes. "I'd want revocation of consent to be easy. A one button 'do not dial' for the information society," said Abraham.

But in some cases, entities are required to retain data. For example, Abraham points out, banks may have to retain records as a legal requirement. The anti money laundering guidelines issued by India's central bank in 2009, require financial institutions to retain data for 10 years. "The user can choose to revoke consent in other cases," said Jain.

Secondly, Abraham points out, there can be many people who can act as your "consent brokers," ranging from an insurance or loan aggregator to an education service provider. There should be just one consent broker and that category should ideally be regulated, Abraham insisted. "The last piece is, that consent brokers can only get paid by the data subjects…if I mess up consent, I will lose revenues. In the current environment, it isn't very clear how economic incentives will encourage good behaviour," he said.

If done right, India could have one of the most advanced data regimes in the world. The European Union, recently came out with the General Data Protection Regulation, to strengthen data protection of individuals in the EU. It will be enforced in May 2018. But they are yet to come up with a technology layer to handle user consent.

{% include back-to-top.html %} ## Context and Background This article was published three months after the Goods and Services Tax was implemented in India in July 2017, and during the period when the Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee was formulating what would become the Personal Data Protection Bill. The consent architecture represented an attempt to operationalise data portability and user control principles before comprehensive privacy legislation existed. India Stack's consent layer aimed to address persistent credit access barriers faced by small and medium enterprises, which constituted over 95 per cent of registered businesses but accessed disproportionately limited formal lending. Traditional creditworthiness assessment relied on lengthy documentation processes that disadvantaged smaller firms lacking audited financial statements or established banking relationships. The integration with GSTN data promised real-time verification of business transactions, potentially democratising credit access. The technical architecture drew conceptual influence from the EU's General Data Protection Regulation, particularly Articles 20 (data portability) and 7 (consent conditions), though the European framework lacked comparable technological infrastructure at the time. Concerns raised by digital rights organisations centred on three issues: the ease of consent revocation, the potential proliferation of unregulated consent brokers acting as intermediaries, and misaligned economic incentives that might encourage brokers to prioritise data maximisation over user privacy. These debates presaged ongoing tensions in India's data governance framework between innovation imperatives and individual autonomy protections. ## External Link - Read on FactorDaily (Archive)