--- layout: default title: "Expel or Not? That Is the Question" description: "A DNA India report on the expulsion of 14 students from an international school in Bangalore over social media evidence, with quotes from Sunil Abraham on student privacy." categories: [Media mentions] date: 2010-04-02 source: "DNA India" permalink: /media/expel-or-not-that-is-the-question-dna-india/ created: 2026-04-15 --- **Expel or Not? That Is the Question** is a *DNA India* report published on 2 April 2010. The article covers the decision by The International School Bangalore to expel 14 students over alleged behaviour documented on social networking sites, and the debate it triggered among educators about surveillance, privacy, and student discipline. It quotes [Sunil Abraham](/sunil/), then executive director of the [Centre for Internet and Society](/cis/), on the legal grey area around using social media content as institutional evidence. ## Contents 1. [Article Details](#article-details) 2. [Full Text](#full-text) 3. [Context and Background](#context-and-background) 4. [External Link](#external-link) ## Article Details
📰 Published in:
DNA India
📅 Date:
2 April 2010
📄 Type:
News Report
📰 Article Link:
Read Online Online version is shorter than the print edition. Full text preserved above.
## Full Text

The decision of an international school to expel 14 students for their alleged 'promiscuous' behaviour has led to much debate and discussion.

The International School Bangalore (TISB) said the students were caught in 'compromising positions' on several occasions. They did not heed the school's repeated warnings to desist from such behaviour, school authorities said.

The authorities said they had enough 'evidence', collected from social networking sites, to support their claim. The students would not be allowed on the campus anymore. They would, however, be allowed to take the exam in May, the authorities said.

The students have denied the charges. Many boarding institutions said that policing students was not the right approach.

Some of the widely used measures to keep a check on students include monitoring social networking sites, banning laptops on campuses, not allowing students to lock room doors, having security guards patrol campuses and insisting on house masters accompanying students to any part of the campus or hostel after school hours.

"There is no point in expelling students for such an activity," M Srinivasan, principal, GEAR School, said. "If the students had been indulging in such activities often, what were the school authorities doing till now? There is no point making rules if you cannot enforce them. Clearly, there was a lacuna in the system," he said.

Many schools said they keep a tab on the online activities of students. "The IT department at the school tracks the Facebook accounts of students," Bishwajeet Bhattacharya, public relations officer, Trio World School, said. "Trio also has a presence on Facebook. The administration has appointed officials to monitor what is being posted online regarding Trio," he said. The officials also look for objectionable materials.

Authorities, however, admitted that it was difficult to check all the online activities. "It is impossible to monitor all the social networking sites. You can use evidence from online sites, but why go to that extreme? The children are on your campus, their behaviour on campus is what you should be concerned about," Srinivasan said.

"At the hostel, dorm wardens conduct room checks every hour," Chenraj Jain, chairman, Jain Group of Institutions, said. "We don't police the students. Instead, we adopt a more holistic approach," he said.

The grey area

The International School Bangalore (TISB) said it had expelled the 14 students after collecting "enough evidence" from social networking sites about their inappropriate behaviour. The question is: does online content have legal validity?

Experts believe it falls in the grey area. "India does not have any specific law that restricts users from joining social networking sites just because they are below a certain age," Sunil Abraham, executive director of the Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore, said. "Many other countries have such laws," he said.

"If the pictures said to be posted by the students were legal (devoid of vulgarity) and were just posted on a personal profile and not on a college group, then the school was not right in expelling them," he said. "Students are entitled to privacy and schools shouldn't be intruding into their privacy. If the school had used snooping software to monitor the students' online activities, then that is also wrong," he said. "It's a different story if one of their classmates had forwarded the pictures to the teacher," he added.

{% include back-to-top.html %} ## Context and Background The article appeared in April 2010, at a time when Indian schools were beginning to grapple with Facebook and other social networking sites as both a disciplinary challenge and a surveillance tool. The TISB case was unusual in that the school explicitly cited social media content as its primary evidence for expulsion, raising questions about the legal standing of such evidence and the boundaries of institutional oversight over students' personal online activity. Sunil Abraham's comments addressed two distinct issues: the absence of age-restriction laws for social media in India, and the question of whether schools had the right to monitor personal profiles at all. His point that snooping software would itself be wrong drew a clear line between legitimate oversight and privacy violation. ## External Link - [Read on DNA India](https://www.dnaindia.com/bangalore/report-expel-or-not-that-is-the-question-1366490) *(print edition contains additional content not in the online version)*