--- layout: default title: "A Torrent of Illegal Activities" description: "A Deccan Herald report examining film piracy through torrents in Bangalore, featuring perspectives from filmmakers, cyber cafe operators, and Sunil Abraham of the Centre for Internet and Society on copyright enforcement challenges and potential solutions." categories: [Media mentions] date: 2014-06-10 source: "Deccan Herald" permalink: /media/torrent-illegal-activities-deccan-herald/ created: 2025-12-27 --- **A Torrent of Illegal Activities** is a *Deccan Herald* report published on 10 June 2014. The article investigates the prevalence of film piracy through torrent downloads in Bangalore, exploring motivations ranging from multiplex ticket costs to access for lower-income audiences. It includes commentary from Sunil Abraham, then Executive Director of the Centre for Internet and Society, on updating copyright laws to address technological change. ## Contents 1. [Article Details](#article-details) 2. [Full Text](#full-text) 3. [Context and Background](#context-and-background) 4. [External Link](#external-link) ## Article Details
đź“° Published in:
Deccan Herald
đź“… Date:
10 June 2014
đź“„ Type:
News Report
đź“° Newspaper Link:
Read Online
## Full Text

It is the era of downloading. Movies, music and software are downloaded the most with the help of torrents.

Even though the owners of websites have come together to combat illegal downloads, they have failed to stop the menace as hackers and software developers have always created sites that can host illegal content. The government has introduced strong infringement policies to curb this menace. However, it's all in vain.

In a City like Bangalore where very few single screen theatres exist and multiplexes are becoming popular, movie buffs resort to illegal downloads to not just save money but also watch their favourite movie without any ads or breaks. Says a student who downloads and watches movies, "Watching movies in multiplexes is costly. We can't afford to watch all the movies there. We can probably just watch one or two a month, that too on weekdays! The only way out is to download them on torrents." However, for filmmakers who put in a lot of creativity, time and money in a movie, it's a big loss when someone downloads their work.

Says Saakshi Agarwal, an actress, "Piracy is a crime and can have severe effects. Sales deplete and creative content does not get the boost and revenues it deserves. Even the most acclaimed movies in the world are not receiving enough income to recover the initial investment." This is a worry that all filmmakers in the country have. She adds, "The people who are into piracy and are releasing movies before the set date will not have a free ride for long. There will be more stringent laws coming into place."

"These days, we convert movies into 3GP files for our customers and put it on their phones for Rs 20 or 30. The people who come here are from the lower class of society and can't afford to pay Rs 100-Rs 150 to watch movies. So even though this is illegal, it's giving every individual the chance to watch a movie," says the owner of a cyber cafe. He adds, "People come here these days to get movies in bulk for a less price. The idea of a cyber cafe has changed because everyone has smartphones with an internet access. So movies and songs are most sought after and people come in everyday to take the latest collection that we have downloaded."

In India, movies release on torrent sites one month before the actual day of release, causing a huge loss for the movie-makers and producers. "Development in technology means upgrading the laws that we have. However, privacy laws are not upgraded along with technology. Just like how we got a flat fee when radio became independent, there should be a fee every time someone downloads a film. This will keep things in balance and also work in favour of both the owners and the ones downloading information or movies," says Sunil Abraham, executive director, Centre for Internet and Society. Though there are many organisations along with the crime branch that study and monitor illegal downloads, the issue is far from over.

{% include back-to-top.html %} ## Context and Background This report appeared during a period when BitTorrent-based piracy dominated discussions about digital copyright enforcement in India. Torrent sites allowed peer-to-peer file sharing, making it difficult for authorities to shut down distribution networks since content was hosted across multiple users rather than centralised servers. The Copyright Act of 1957, as amended, provided both civil and criminal remedies for infringement, including imprisonment up to three years and fines ranging from ₹50,000 to ₹200,000. Despite these provisions, enforcement remained challenging. Government agencies periodically blocked torrent websites, but new domains appeared rapidly, and users employed virtual private networks to bypass restrictions. The economics of cinema distribution contributed to piracy patterns. Single-screen theatres had declined sharply in urban centres like Bangalore, replaced by multiplexes with higher ticket prices. This pricing structure, combined with pre-release leaks—often originating from compromised screening copies or unauthorised recordings in theatres—created substantial revenue losses for the film industry. Sunil Abraham's suggestion of statutory licensing mechanisms reflected debates within copyright policy circles about balancing creator compensation with public access. Radio broadcasting in India operated under compulsory licensing provisions that allowed stations to play music by paying standardised royalties, avoiding individual negotiations with rights holders. Extending similar frameworks to digital downloads would have required legislative changes that never materialised. By 2014, legal streaming platforms were beginning to emerge in India, though their catalogues and regional content remained limited. Subsequent years would see growth in services like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and domestic platforms offering affordable subscription models, which gradually reduced—though did not eliminate—incentives for piracy. ## External Link - Read on Deccan Herald