This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.
EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.
EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).
The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.
Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.
Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.
Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.
The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.
Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).
Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.
New Experiments PHYSICO-MECHANICAL, Touching the AIR
The Third Edition.
Whereunto is added A DEFENCE of the Author's EXPLICATION OF THE EXPERIMENTS, Against the OBJECTIONS OF FRANCISCUS LINUS And, THOMAS HOBBS.
NEW EXPERIMENTS PHYSICO-MECHANICAL, Touching The SPRING of the AIR, and its EFFECTS, Made, for the most part, in a New Pnuematical Engine, Written by way of LETTER To the Right Honorable CHARLES Lord Vicount of DUNGARVAN, Eldest Son to the EARL of CORKE.
By the Honorable ROBERT BOYLE
Esq
LONDON, Printed by Miles Flesher for Richard Davis, Bookseller in Oxford, MDCLXXXII.
ALthough the following Treatise being far more prolix than becomes a Letter, and than I at first intended it; I am very unwilling to encrease the already excessive bulk of the Book by a Preface, yet there are some Particulars that I think my self oblig'd to take notice of to the Reader, as things that will either concern him to know, or me to have known.
In the first place then: If it be demanded why I publish to the World a Letter, which by its Style and diverse Passages, appears to have been written as well For, as To a particular Person; I have chiefly these two things to answer: The one, That the Experiments therein related, having been many of them try'd in the presence of Ingenious Men; and by that means having made some noise among the Virtuosi (insomuch that some of them have been sent into Foreign Countries, where they have had the luck not to be desAmanuensis, give out half as many Copies of them as were so earnestly desired, that I could not civilly refuse them. The other, That intelligent Persons in matters of this kind, perswade me, that the publication of what I had observ'd touching the nature of the Air, would not be useless to the World; and that in an Age so taken with Novelties as is ours, these new Experiments would be grate
Of my being somewhat prolix in many of my Experiments, I have these Reasons to render, That some of them being altogether new, seem'd to need the being circumstantially related, to keep the Reader from distrusting them: That divers Circumstances I did
And because sometimes '-tis the Discourse made upon the ExperiAristotle, who somewhere notes, That to seem to know all things certainly, and to speak positively of them, is a trick of bold and young Fellows: whereas those that are indeed intelligent and con
There are divers Reflexions, and other Passages in the following Epistle, and even some Experiments (occasionally mention'd) which may seem either impertinent or superfluous, but are not so: Being purposely written, either to evince some truth oppos'd, or disprove some erroneous conceit maintain'd by some eminent New Philosopher, or by some other Ingenious Men, who, I presum'd, would easily forgive me the having on such occasions purposely omit
Ever since I discern'd the usefulness of speculative Geometry to Natural Philosophy, the unhappy Distempers of my Eyes, have so far kept me from being much conversant in it, that I fear I shall need the pardon of my Mathematical Readers, for some Passages, which, if I had been deeply skill'd in Geometry, I should have treated more accurately.
And indeed, having, for Reasons elsewhere deduc'd, purposely kept my self a stranger to most of the new Hypotheses in Philoso
Besides all this, the distemper in my Eyes forbidding me not only to write my self so much as one Experiment, but even to reade over my self what I dictated to others: I cannot but fear, that besides the Author's mistakes, this Edition may be blemish'd by many, that may be properly imputed to a very unskilfull Writer (whom I was often
I need not, perhaps, represent to the equitable Reader, how much the strange Confusions of this unhappy Nation, in the midst of which I have made and written these Experiments, are apt to disturb that calmness of mind, and undistractedness of Thoughts, that are wont to be requisite to Happy Speculations. But I presume, that by all these things put together, he will readily perceive, That I have been so far from following the Poet's prudent Counsel touching the flow Publication of Books design'd to purchase credit by,
that I suffer this Treatise to come abroad into the World with a mul
But if it be demanded, why then I did not make it fitter for the Press before I sent it thither? my Answer must be, That not at first imagining that this sort of Experiments would prove any thing
I have this farther to add, by way of Excuse, That as it hath been my design in publishing these Experiments to gratifie Ingenious Men; so, if I have not been much flattered, I may hope that the various hints to be met with in the following Letter, will (at least) someFacile Inventis addere: It seems not irrational to expect, that our Engine it self, and divers of our Experiments, will be much promoted by the industry of Inventive and Mathematical Wits, whose Contrivances may easily either correct or supply, and conseSeneca speaks of Nature: Initiatos (saith he) nos credimus, in Vestibulo ejus haeremus: For being now in a place where we are not quite destitute of moderately skil
I Know all Persons that have a publick Spirit for the Advancement of Learning, will think much that this piece came not out in a Language of more gene
But if it be an Honour to a Language to be preferr'd, and this Honour breeds sometimes an Emulation, as anciently it did between the Greeks and Romans, it can
But as to this Particular (give me leave to use words from a Story) Since the Mountain cannot come to Mawill go to the Mountain: I mean thus; Because many witty Men, Persons of Honour and Estate especially, may be suppos'd to be able to make a better account, by employing their Studies and Time on Matter than Words, and so are justly impeded from learning Languages; And because (as I may judge) the Noble Author is willing to oblige all Men, He hath already provided, that this Piece
Having therefore leave so to do, I cannot forbear to give the World the Advertisement of this Latine Editi
This is all the trouble I shall at present give you: Nor shall I need mind you, if you have a true gust for the Book you reade, to have an honour and thankfull regard to the Person that hath favour'd us with the Communication of these his Trials, and is manifestly so great a Patron and Friend to Experimental Learn
I desire to be excused that I do not make Excuses for the slowness of the Publication, hoping that the long expectation you have had of it, will enhance, and not diminish your delight in the enjoyment of a piece like to be, amongst the Students in accurate Philosophy, of so general acceptance. Farewell.
REceiving in your last from Paris, a desire that I would adde some more Experiments to those I formerly sent You over: I could not be so much your SerParis, that seVirtuosi there, were very intent upon the exaVacuum: I thought I could not comply with your Desires in a more fit and seasonable manner, than by prosecuting and endeavouring to promote that noble Experiment of Torricellius: and by presenting Your Lordship an account of my attempts to illustrate a Subject, about which (its being so much discours'd of where you are, together with your inbred Curiosity, and love of Experimental Learning) made me suppose you sufficiently inquisitive.
And though I pretend not to acquaint you, on this occasiknow some things which you did formerly but suppose; and shall present you, if not with new Theories, at least with new Proofs of such as are not yet behopefull Persons of your Quality: who may accomplish mawish, or at most, but design, by being able to imploy the Presents of Fortune in the search of the Mysteries of Nature.
And I am not faintly induc'd to make choice of this Subminutes without it; any considerPhaenomena, in which it hath hitherto scarce been suspected to have any In
And I should immediately proceed to the mention of my Experiments, but that I like too well that worthy saying of In Praefat. lib. 1. the Naturalist Pliny, Benignum est & plenum ingenui
pudoris, fateri per quos profeceris, not to conform to it, by acquainting your Lordship, in the first place, with the Hint I had of the Engine I am to entertain you with. You may be pleas'd to remember, that a while before our separa
But, as few inventions happen to be at first so compleat, as not to be either blemished with some deficiencies needful to be remedi'd, or otherwise capable of improvement: so when the Engine we have been speaking of, comes to be more attentiveWind Pump (as some body not improperly calls it) is so contriv'd, that to evacuate the Vessel, there is requir'd the continual labour of two strong Men for diPhaenomena that have been already observ'd by the Author, and recorded by Schottus. Wherefore to remedy these InconveniG. and R. Hook (who hath also the HoGerman Engine, was in good measure, though not perfectly remedy'd: And to supply the second deDe Vacuo with my own hands; I had, to examine some Conjectures that occurr'd to me about it, caused Glasses to be made with a hole at that end, which uses to be seal'd up, and had nevertheless been able, as occasion requir'd, to make use of such Tubes, as if no such holes had been left in them, by devising stopples for them, made of the common Plaister call'd Diachylon: which I rightly enough guess'd, would, by reason of the exquisite commixtion of its small parts, and closeness of it's texture, deny all access to the exterPhaenomena exhibited by it.
To give your Lordship then, in the first place, some account of the Engine it self: It consists of two principal parts; a glass Vessel, and a Pump to draw the Air out of it.
The former of these (which we, with the Glass-men, shall often call a Receiver, for its affinity to the large Vessels of that name, used by Chymists) consists of a Glass with a wide hole at the top, of a cover to that hole, and of a Stop-cock fastned to the end of the Neck, at the bottom.
The shape of the Glass, you will find express'd in the first Figure of the annexed Scheme. And for the size of it, it con
At the very top of the Vessel, (A) you may observe a round hole, whose Diametre (BC) is of about four Inches; and whereof, the Orifice is incircled with a lip of Glass, almost an Inch high: For the making of which lip, it was requisite (to mention that upon the by, in case your Lordship should have such another Engine made for you) to have a hollow and taper
The use of the lip, is to sustain the cover delineated in the second Figure; where (DE) points out a brass Ring, so cast, as that it doth cover the lip (BC) of the first Figure, and is ce
The last thing belonging to our Receiver, is the Stop-cock, designed in the first Figure by (N,) for the better fastening of which to the neck, and exacter exclusion of the Air, there was soder'd on to the shank of the Cock (X) a Plate of Tin, (MTUW) long enough to cover the neck of the Receiver. But be
The Pump consists of four parts, a hollow Cylinder, a Suc
The Cylinder was (by a pattern) cast of Brass; it is in length about 14 Inches, thick enough to be very strong, notwithstand
To the midst of this former part of the Sucker is strongly faManubrium,
The fourth and last part of this Cylinder, is the Valve, (R) consisting of a hole bored through at the top of the Cylinder, a little tapering towards the cavity; into which hole is ground a tapering Peg of Brass, to be thrust in, and taken out at pleasure.
The Engine being thus describ'd, it will be requisite to add, that something is wont to be done before it be set on work, for the more easie moving of the Sucker, and for the better exclusi
There must then be first pour'd in at the top of the Receiver, a little sallad Oyl, partly to fill up any small intervals that may happen to be betwixt the contiguous surfaces of the internal parts of the Stop-cock: And partly, that it may be the more ea
All things being thus fitted, and the lower shank (O) of the
Your Lordship will, perhaps, think that I have been unneVacuum soon lose that name; by which I here declare once for all, that I under
Now this distinction of Experiments I thought fit to premise to the ensuing Narratives, because, upon trial, we found it so exceeding (and scarce imaginably) difficult a matter, to keep out the Air from getting at all in at any imperceptible hole or flaw whatsoever, (in a Vessel immediately surrounded with the compressed Atmosphere,) that in spight of all our care and diliPhaenomena of Nature.
The Experiments therefore of the first sort, will, I fear, prove the only ones wherewith my Avocations will allow me to entertain Your Lordship in this Letter. For till your fur
TO proceed now to the Phaenomena, exhibited to us by the Engine above described; I hold it not unfit to begin with what doth constantly and regularly offer it self to our observa
First, then, upon the drawing down of the Sucker (the Valve being shut) the Cylindrical space, deserted by the Sucker, is left devoid of Air; and therefore, upon the turning of the Key, the Air contained in the Receiver rusheth into the emptied Cylinder, till the Air in both those Vessels be brought to about an equal measure of dilatation. And therefore, upon shutting the Receiver by re-turning the Key, if you open the Valve, and force up the Sucker again, you will find, that after this first exsuction you will drive out almost a whole Cylinder full of Air: But at the following exsuctions, you will draw less and less of Air out of the Receiver into the Cylinder, because there will still remain less and less Air in the Receiver it self; and consequently, the Particles of the remaining Air, having more room to extend themselves in, will less press out one another. This you will easily perceive, by finding, that you still force less and less Air out of the Cylinder; so that when the Recei
For the more easie understanding of the Experiments triable by our Engine; I thought it not superfluous, nor unseasonable in the recital of this first of them, to insinuate that notion by which it seems likely that most, if not all of them, will prove explicable. Your Lordship will easily suppose, that the No
This Notion may perhaps be somewhat further explain'd, by conceiving the Air near the Earth to be such a heap of little Bo
There is yet another way to explicate the Spring of the Air, namely, by supposing with that most ingenious Gentleman, Monsieur Des Cartes, That the Air is nothing but a Congeries or heap of small and (for the most part) of flexible Particles; of several sizes, and of all kind of Figures which are rais'd by heat (especially that of the Sun) into that fluid and subtle Ethereal Body that surrounds the Earth; and by the restless agitation of that Celestial matter wherein those particles swim, are so whirld round, that each Corpuscle endeavours to beat off all others from coming within the little Sphere requisite to its motion aEther that swiftly flows
By these two differing ways, my Lord, may the Springs of the Air be explicated. But though the former of them be that, which by reason of its seeming somewhat more easie, I shall for the most part make use of in the following Discourse: yet am I not willing to declare peremptorily for either of them, against the other. And indeed, though I have in another Treatise en
I know not whether I need annex that, though either of the a
But lest you should expect my seconding this Reason by ExGerman Experiment, commended at the beginning of this Letter, the ingenious Triers of it found, That their Glass Vessel, of the capacity of 32 measures, was lighter when the Air had been drawn out of it, than before, by no less than one ounce and 3/10 that is, an ounce and very near a third: But of the gravity of the Air, we may elsewhere have occasion to make further mention.
Taking it then for granted that the Air is not devoid of weight, it will not be uneasie to conceive, That that part of the AtmoKepler, and some others, scarce exceeds eight common miles; yet other eminent and laRicciolo makes it probable, that the Atmo
And if it be objected, That in Water, the weight of the upPhaenomena of Wind-Guns would have us believe, that in one of them, by condenPhaenomenon of the Experiment De Vacuo; these things put toPascal (the Son) had the commendable Curiosity to cause the Torricellian Experiment to be tri'd at the foot, about the middle, and at the top of that high Mountain (in Auvergne, if I mistake not) commonly call'd Le Puy de Domme; whereby it was found, That the Mercury in the Tube fell down lower, about three inches, at the top
And if it be yet further Objected against what hath been pro
And, as for the easie yielding of the Air to the Bodies that move in it, if we consider that the Corpuscles whereof it conAEquilibrium: So that the Corpuscles of the Air must be as well sometimes considered under the notion of lit
In verification of which we will, to divert your Lordship a little, mention here a Phaenomenon of our Engine, which even to divers ingenious persons hath at first sight seem'd very wonderfull.
THe thing that is wont to be admired, and which may pass for our second experiment is this, That if, when the RePhaenomenon seems plainly enough to be only this, That the Air in the Receiver, being very much dilated, its Spring must be very much weakn'd, and consequently it can but faintly press up the lower end of the stopple, whereas the Spring of the external Air being no way debilitated, he that a little lifts up the stopple must with his hand support a pressure equal to the disproportion betwixt the force of the internal expanded Air, and that of the Atmosphere in
And, that we have not mis-assign'd the cause of this Phaenomenon, seems evident enough by this, That as Air is suffered by little and little to get into the Receiver, the weight that a man fancieth his hand supports, is manifestly felt to decrease more and more, the internal Air by this recruit approaching more to an
By several other of the Experiments afforded us by our EnPhaenomena are the effects of Natures abhorrency of a Vacuum, which seem to be more fitly ascribable to the weight and spring of the Air.
WE will now proceed to observe, that though, by the help of the handle, the Sucker be easily drawn down to the bottom of the Cylinder; yet, without the help of that LeaTorricellian Experiment, in which, if the inverted Tube of Mercury be but 25 Digits high, or somewhat more, the QuickMercury with so great a force, as doth the incumbent Cylinder of the Air, reaching thence to the top of the Atmosphere: Whereas, if the Cylinder of Mercury were three or four digits longer, it would over-power that of the external Air, and run out into the Vessel'd
HAving thus taken notice of some of the constant Phaenomena of our Engine it self, let us now proceed to the Experiments triable in it.
We took then a Lambs Bladder large, well dry'd, and very lim
And that it may appear that this plumpness of the Bladder pro
This Experiment is much of the same nature with that which was, some years ago, said to be made by that eminent GeometriRoberval, with a Carps Bladder empty'd and conDe Vacuo was after
Now because it hath, by very learned Men, been doubted, whether the swelling of the Bladder may not have proceeded (not from the Dilatation of the included Air,) but from the Texture of the Fibres, which, being wont to keep the Bladder extended when the Animal (to whom it belong'd) was alive, may be suppos'd in our Experiment to have return'd, like so many Springs to their wonted extent, upon the removal of the ambient Air that compress'd and bent them: Because this, I say, hath been doubted, we thought fit to make this further trial.
We let down into the Receiver with the fore-mentioned Blad
We made likewise a strong Ligature about the middle of a long
But a farther and sufficient manifestation whence the intumes
TO try then at once both what it was that expanded the Blad
And of this Experiment these two Phaenomena may be taken notice of: The one, that the Bladder at its breaking gave a great report, almost like a Cracker: And the other, That the Air con
But, to verifie what we say in another Discourse, where we show, That even true Experiments may, by reason of the easie mi
It would not be amiss on this occasion to point at something which may deserve a more deliberate Speculation than we can now afford it; namely that the Elastical Power of the same Quan
HAving thus seen that the Air hath an Elastical Power, we were next desirous to know in some measure how far a par
SInce we wrote the other day the former Experiment, we have met with some Glasses not very unfit for our purpose; by means of which we are now able, with a little more trouble, to
We took then first a Cylindrical Pipe of Glass, whose bore was about a quarter of an Inch in Diameter: This Pipe was so bent and doubled, that, notwithstanding its being about two foot in length, it might have been shut up into a smaller Receiver, not a Foot high: But by misfortune it crack'd in the cooling, whereby we were reduced to make use of one part which was straight and intire, but exceeded not six or seven Inches. This little Tube was open at one end; and at the other, where it was Hermetically seal'd, had a small Glass bubble to receive the Air whose dilatation was to be measur'd.
Along the side of this Tube was pasted a straight narrow piece of Parchment, divided into twenty six equal parts, marked with black Lines and Figures, that by them might be measur'd both the included Air and its dilatation. Afterwards we fill'd the Tube with Water, almost to the top; and stopping the open end with the Finger, and inverting the Tube, the Air was permitted to as
These two Experiments are mention'd to make way for the more easy belief of that which is now to follow. Finding then that our Tube was too short to serve our turn, we took a slender Quill of Glass which happen'd to be at hand, though it were not so fit for our purpose as we could have wished, in regard it was three or four times as big at one end as the other. This Pipe which was thirty Inches long, being Hermetically seal'd at the slender end, was almost filled with water; and after the above-related manner a bubble was convey'd to the top of it, and the open extreme was put into a Viol that had a little fair Water at the bottom: Then the Cover, by means of a small hole purposely made in it for the Glass Pipe to stand out at, was cemented on to the Receiver, and the Pump being set on work, after some exsuctions, not only the Air manifestly appear'd extended below the surface of the subja
These things being thus done we took (to make the Experi
It hath seem'd almost incredible which is related by the IndustriMersennus, That the Air by the violence of heat, though as great as our Vessels can support without fusion, can be so dilated as to take up seventy times as much room as before: Wherefore because we were willing to have a confirmation of so strange a Phaenomenon; we once more convey'd into the Tube a bubble of the bigness of the former, and prosecuting the Experiment as before with the same Water, we observed that the Air did manifestly stretch it self so far, as to appear several times a good way below the surface of the Water in the Viol, and that too with a surface very convex toward the bottom of the Pipe. Nay, the Pump being ply'd a little longer, the Air did manifestly reach to that place where the bottom of the Tube leaned upon the bottom of the Viol, and seemed to knock upon it and rebound from it: Which Circumstances we add, partly that the
TO discover likewise by the means of that pressure of the Air, both the strength of Glass, and how much interest the Figure of a Body may have in its greater or lesser Resistance to the pressure of other Bodies, we made these farther tryals.
We caus'd to be blown with a Lamp, a round Glass bubble, capable of containing, by guess, about five Ounces of Water, with a slender neck about the bigness of a Swan's Quill, and it was purposely blown very thin, as Viols made with Lamps are wont to be, that the thinness of the matter might keep the roundness of the Figure from making the Vessel too strong. Then having moderately emptied the Receiver, and taken it out of the Pump, we speedily applied to the Orifice of the bot
Now that the Figure of the Glass is of great moment in this matter, may be evinced by this other Experiment.
WE took a Glass Helmet or Alembick (delineated by the seventh Figure) such as Chymists use in Distillations, and containing by conjecture between two and three Pints: The Rostrum or Rose of it mark'd with (c) was Hermetically closed; and at the top of it was a hole, into which was fitted and cea b,) and
This will perhaps make it seem strange, that having taken another Glass bubble blown at the same time, and like for ought we discerned for size, thickness and Figure, to that thin one for
WE took a Glass Viol able to hold three or four Ounces of Water, and of the thickness usual in Glasses of that size; into the Neck of this was put a moderately slender Pipe of Glass, which was carefully fastened with a mixture of equal parts of Pitch and Rosin to the Neck of the Viol, and which reached almost to the bottom of it, as the sixth Figure declareth.
This Viol being, upon a particular design, filled with Water, till that came up in it, a pretty deal higher than the lower end of the Pipe, was put into one of our small Receivers, (contain
And this may be presumed sufficient to verify what we deli
And to evince that these Phaenomena were the effects of a liVacuum as that to avoid it, many have been pleased to think that Nature must, upon occasion, exercise an almost boundless power; we afterwards purposely try'd this Experiment with se
And here, My Lord, I hold it not unfit, upon occasion of the mention that hath been made of our having employ'd small Re
First then, besides the great Pneumatical Glass so often mentioned, and the proportionate Stop-cock, we thought fit to provide our selves with some small Receivers blown of Cry
The other thing that we were to advertise, is, That 'tis not every small crack that can make such a Receiver as is of a roun
Jones, we extoll for the mending of crack'd Receivers, and other Chymical Glasses;) and having afterwards thickly overlaid this Plaister with Diachy
The Plaister was made of good quick Lime finely poudred, and nimbly ground with a Pestle in a Mortar, with a quantity (I know not how much precisely, not having those Essays in this place) of scrapings of Cheese and a little fair Water, no more than is just necessary to bring the mixture to a somewhat soft Paste, which when the Ingredients are exquisitely incorporated, will have a strong and stincking smell: Then it must be im
WE took a Tallow-candle of such a size that eight of them make about a pound, and having in a very commodious Candlestick let it down into the Receiver, and so suspended it, that the Flame burnt almost in the middle of the Vessel, we did in some two minutes exactly close it up: and upon pumping ve
But the second time having put in the same Candle into the Receiver, (after it had by the blasts of a pair of Bellows been freed from Fumes) the Flame lasted about two minutes from the time the Pumper began to draw out the Air; upon the first ex
The same Candle being lighted again was shut into the Re
And having an intention to observe particularly what the mo
THere was taken a Wier, which being bent almost in the form of a Screw, constituted such an Instrument, to contain Coals and leave them every way accessible to the Air, as the tenth Figure declareth; the breadth of this Vessel was no less than that it might with ease be convey'd into the Receiver: And having fill'd it to the height of about five Inches with throughly kindled Wood-coals, we let it down into the Glass; and speedily closing it, we caus'd the Pumper to ply his work, and observ'd that upon the very first exsuction of the Air (though perhaps not because of that onely) the Fire in the Coals began to grow very dim, and though the agitation of the Vessel did make them swing up and down (which in the sree Air would have retarded the extinction of the Fire) yet when we could no longer discern any redness at all in any of them, casting our eyes upon a minute Watch we kept by us on this occasion, we found that from the beginning of the Pumping (which might be about two minutes after the Coals had been put in glowing) to the total dis-appearing of the Fire, there had passed but three minutes.
Whereupon, to try the Experiment a little farther, we pre
Lastly, Having taken out the Wier and put other Coals into it, we did, in the same Room where the Engine stood, let it hang quietly by a string in the open Air, to try how long the Fire would last without agitation, when no Air was kept from it, And we found that the Fire began to go out first at the top and outsides of the Coals; but inwards and near the bottom the Fire continu'd visible for above half an hour, a great part of the Coals, especially those next the bottom, being burnt to ashes before the Fire went out.
We caus'd likewise a piece of Iron to be forg'd, of the bigness of a middle siz'd Char-coal, and having made it red-hot through
BEing willing to try after this something that would not che
A While after we let down into the Receiver together with a lighted piece of Match, a great Bladder well tyed at the Neck, but very lank, as not containing actually much (if any thing) above a Pint of Air, but being capable of containing ten or twelve times as much.
Our scope in this Experiment was partly to try whether or no the smoke of the Match, replenishing the Receiver, would be able to hinder the dilatation of the inward Air, upon the ex
The event of our tryal was, That at the beginning of our pumping the Match appear'd well lighted, though it had al
Some Circumstances, besides those already mention'd, oc
First, When the Receiver was full of Smoke, if the Cylinder were emptied, immediately upon the turning of the Stop-cock, the Receiver would appear manifestly darken'd to his eye that look'd upon the light through it: and this darkness was much less when the Receiver was much less fill'd with Fumes: It was also instantaneous, and seem'd to proceed from a sudden change of place and situation in the exhalations, upon the vent sudden
The next thing we observed was, a kind of Halo that ap
And lastly, it is remarkable, That even when the Fumes seemed most to replenish the Receiver, they did not sensibly hinder the Air included in the Bladder from dilating it self after the same manner (for ought we could discern) as it would have otherwise done: So that before the Fire or the Match was quite extinct, the Bladder appear'd swell'd at least to six or seven times its former capacity.
Since the writing of these last Lines, we took a small Recei
TO try diverse things at once, and particularly whether Fire, though we found it would not long last, might not be produced in our evacuated Receiver: We took a Pistol of about a foot in length, and having firmly tyed it to a stick almost as long as the Cavity of the Receiver, we very carefully prim'd it with well dry'd Gunpowder, and then cocking it, we ty'd to the Tricker, one end of a string, whose other end was fasten'd to the Key formerly mention'd to belong to the Cover of our Receiver. This done, we convey'd the Pistol, together with the annexed Staff, into the Vessel which being clos'd up, and empty'd aster the usual manner, we began to turn the Key in the Cover; and thereby shortning the string that reach'd from it to the Pistol, we pull'd aside the Tricker, and observ'd, that according to our expectation the force of the Spring of the Lock was not sensibly abated by the absence of the Air: (from whose impetus yet some Modern Naturalists would derive the cause of the motion of Restitution in solid Bodies) For the Cock falling with its wonted violence upon the Steel, struck out of it as ma
We likewise caus'd a piece of Steel to be made of the form and bigness of the Flint, in whose place we put it, and then the Pistol being cock'd and conveyed into the Receiver, the Tricker was pull'd after the Air was drawn out: And though the place were purposely somewhat darken'd, yet there appear'd not up
But the chief thing we design'd to doe with our Pistol, was, To observe whether Gun-powder would take Fire in our empty'd and closely stop'd Glass? Whether the expansion of the Flame would be considerably varied by the absence of so much of the ambient Air as was drawn out of the Receiver? And whether the Flame would diffuse it self upward, as it is wont, notwith
TO these Experiments concerning Fire we added another, which though it succeeded not, may perhaps without impertinency be recorded: partly, because that (as we have in another Treatise amply declar'd) it is usefull to recite what Experiments miscarry as well as succeed. And partly also, beVertuoso that shall have stancher Tessels than we had, and more Sunny days than the present Winter allows us.
We convey'd then into one of our small Receivers a piece of matter combustible, dry and black (experience declaring things of that colour to be most easily kindled) and carefully closing the Vessel, we brought it to a Window at which the Sun, not very far from the Meridian, shone in very freely: then drawing out the Air with speed we united the Sun beams with a Burning-glass upon the combustible matter, which began immediate
Carneades and Eleutherius have in some Dialogues concerning Heat and Flame, (which were last year seen by some Friends, and may be, when you please, commanded by You,) mention'd divers of my Thoughts and Experiments concerning Fire,
WE designed to try whether or no divers Magnetical ExpePhaenomena, being made in our Evacuated Receiver instead of the open Air: But for want of leasure and conveniency to prosecute such Trials, we were induced to reserve the rest for another time, and to content our selves with making that which follows. We conAEquilibrium it could move freely towards either hand. Then the Air being after the usual manner pumped out, we apply'd a Load-stone moderately vigorous to the outside of the Glass, and found that it attracted or repell'd the ends of the Needle, ac
PRoceed we now to the mention of that Experiment, whereDe Vacuo, the Quick-silver in the Tube is wont to remain elevated, above the surface of that whereon it leans, about 27 digits: I considered, that, if the true and only reaAEquilibrium with the Cylinder of Air, suppos'd to reach from the adjacent Mer
Wherefore (after having surmounted some little difficulties which occurr'd at the beginning) the Experiment was made after this manner. We took a slender and very curiously blown CylinDiachylon, and the round chink, betwixt the Cover and the Recei
Now (to satisfy our selves farther, that the falling of the Quick-silver in the Tube to a determinate height, proceedeth from the AEquilibrium, wherein it is at that height with the external Air, the one gravitating, the other pressing with equal force upon the sub
This Experiment was a few days after repeated in the presence of those excellent and deservedly Famous Mathematick ProfesWallis, Dr. Ward, and Mr. Wren, who were pleased to honour it with their Presence: And whom I name, both as just
And here, for the Illustration of the foregoing Experiment, it will not be amiss to mention some other particulars relating to it.
First then, When we endeavoured to make the Experiment with the Tube closed at one end with Diachylon instead of an HermeDiachylon that stopt the end of the Tube, were so thick and strong, that the external Air could not press it in (as experience taught us that it would have done, if there had been but little of it) yet the subtler parts of it were able (though slowly) to insinuate themselves through the very body of the Plaister, which it seems was not of so close a Texture, as that which we mentioned our selves to have sucDe Vacuo some years ago. So that now we begin to suspect, that perhaps one reason, why we cannot persectly pump out the Air, may be, that when the Vessel is almost empty, some of the subtler parts of the exterDiachylon into the Receiver. But this is only conjecture.
We formerly mention'd, that the Quick-silver did not in its descent fall as much at a time after the two or three first exsuctions of the Air, as at the beginning. For, having marked its several Stages upon the Tube, we found, that at the first suck it descended an Inch and ⅜, and at the second an Inch and ⅜; and when the VesAEquilibrium as both might rest in. But though we could not hitherto make observations accurate enough concerning the measures of the Quick-silver's descent, to reduce them into any Hypothesis, yet would we not dis
And, to illustrate this matter a little more, we will add, That we made a shift to try the Experiment in one of our above-menti
But on this occasion, I hold it not unfit to give your Lordship notice that I hop'd from the descent of the Quick-silver in the Tube upon the first suck, to derive this advantage: that I should thence be enabled to give a near guess at the proportion of force betwixt the pressure of the Air (according to its various states, as to Density and Rarefraction) and the gravity of Quick-silver, than hitherto hath been done. For in our Experiment there are di
For farther confirmation of what hath been delivered, we like
Lastly we also observ'd, That if (when the Mercury in the Tube had been drawn down, and by an Ingress permitted to the
Your Lordship will here perhaps expect, that as those who have treated of the Torricellian Experiment, have for the most part maintained the Affirmative, or the Negative of that faVacuum? so I should on this occasion interpose my Opinion touching that Controversie, or at least declare whether or no, in our Engine, the exsuction of the Air do prove the place de
For on the one side it appears, that notwithstanding the exsuc
By the sixteenth Experiment, it also appears that the close
But on the other side it may be said, That as for the subtle Matter which makes the-Objects enclosed in our evacuated Receiver, visible, and the Magnetical Effluvia of the Earth that may be presum'd to pass thorow it, though we should grant our Vessel not to be quite devoid of them, yet we cannot so reasonably affirm it to be replenish'd with them, as we may suppose, that if they were gather'd together into one place without Intervals between them, they would fill but a small part of the whole Receiver. As in the thirteenth Experiment, a piece of Match was inconsiderable for its bulk, whilst its parts lay close together, that afterwards (when the Fire had scat
And as for the Allegations above mention'd, they seem'd to prove but that the Receiver devoid of Air, may be replenish'd with some Etherial matter, as some Modern Naturalists write of but not that it really is so. And indeed to me it yet seems, that as to those spaces which the Vacuists would have to be empPlenists (if I may so call them) do not prove that such spaces are replenish'd with such a subtle matter as they speak of, by any sensible effects, or operations of it (of which divers new Trials purposely made, have not yet shewn me any) but only conclude that there must be such a Body, because there cannot be a Void. And the reason why there cannot be a Void,
Phaenomena of Nature, that clearly and particularly prove their
But though we are unwilling to examine any farther the InfeTorricellian Experiment, yet we think it not impertinent to present Your Lordship with a couple of Advertisements concerning it.
First, then if in trying the Experiment here or elsewhere, you make use of the English measures that Mathematicians and TraEnglish Air, and that of Italy and France, might keep the Quick-silver from falling quite as low in this colder, as in those warmer Climates; yet we could not beEnglish Inches are somewhat inferiour in length to the digits made use of in Fo
The next thing I desire Your Lordship to take notice of, is, That the height of the Mercurial Cylinder is not wont to be found altogether so great as really it might prove, by reason of the negligence or incogitancy of most that make the Experiment. For oftentimes upon the opening of the inverted Tube into the Vessel'd Mercury, you may observe a bubble of Air to ascend from the bottom of the Tube through the subsiding Quick-silTorricellian Ex
If Your Lordship should now demand what are the best expe
And since we are fallen upon the consideration of the Altitude of the Mercurial Cylinder, I must not conceal from Your LordVertuosi on thinking; and, by disclosing some things about the Air or Atmosphere, that have scarce hitherto been taken notice of, may afford you some hints conducive to a further discovery of the subject of this Epistle.
WE took a Glass Tube, which though it were not much above three Foot long, we made choice of, because it was of a more than ordinarily even thickness. This we fill'd with MerTorricellian Experiment. Then, having according to the manner inverted the Tube, and open'd the mouth of it beneath the surface of some other Quick-silver, that in the Tube fell down to the wonted height, leaving, as is usual, some little Particles of Air in the space it deserted, as we guest by observing, that upon the ApplicaPhaenomena it was to exhibit. For the better disco
During several Weeks that the Tube was kept in that WinWren, who being invited to name any thing he would have us try touching the pressure of the Air, desired us to observe wheCartesian Hypothesis concerning the Ebbing and FlowDes Cartes ascribeth to the greater presNovember and part of December) a good Fire being then in the room, because it was a Snowy day, we found the Quick-silver in the Tube to be above the upper
If Your Lordship should now aske me what are the true causes of this varying altitude of the Mercurial Cylinder; I should not undertake to answer so difficult a question, and should venture to say no more, than that among divers possible causes to which it may be ascribed, it would not be, perhaps, absurd to reckon these that follow.
First then we may consider, that the Air in the upper part of the Tube is much more rarefied, and therefore more weak than the External Air, as may appear by this among other things, That upon the inclining of the Tube, the Quick-silver will readily ascend almost to the very top of it, and so take up eight or nine tenth parts, and perhaps more of that space which it deserted before: which would not happen, if that whole space had been full of unrarefied Air, since that (as tryal may easily satisfie you) would not have suffer'd it self to be thrust into so narrow a room by so weak a pressure. So that although in our Tube when the included Air, was heated, the Quick-silver was somewhat depress'd; yet there is this difference betwixt such a Tube and common Weather-Glasses, that in these the included and the ambient Air are in an AEquilibrium as to pressure, and the weight of the Water that keeps them separate is scarce consider
We may next consider, that this rarefied: Air at the upper part of our Tube being exactly shut up betwixt the Glass and
And we may farther consider, that yet the external Air or Atmosphere is subject to many alterations, besides them that proceed from either of those Qualities.
For the Experiment that occasion'd this Discourse, seems to make it probable enough, that there may be strange Ebbings and Flowings, as it were, in the Atmosphere, or at least, that it may admit great and sudden Mutations, either as to its AltiKircherus, who giving a pertinent admonition concerning the various refractions that may happen in the Air, relateth, That during his stay in Malta, he often saw Mount AEtna, though the next day, notwithstanding its being extremely clear, he could not see it; adding, that Vintemillius, a very Learned Person, did oftentimes, from a Hill he names, behold the whole Island he calls
Nor will it very much import the main scope of our Discourse, whether it be suppos'd that the copious Steams the earth sends into the Air, thicken that part of the Atmosphere that receives them, and make it more heavy: Or that sometimes the Fumes may ascend with such celerity, that though the Air be thickn'd yet they rather diminish than encrease its gravitation, in regard that the quickness of their ascent, not onely keeps them from gravitating themselves, but may hinder the pressing downwards of many Aërial Corpuscles that they meet with in their way up
Your Lordship may also be pleased to remember, That by our seventeenth Experiment it appear'd, that, as when the Air in the Receiver was expanded more than ordinarily, the Quick-silver in the Tube did proportionably subside; so when the Air in the same Receiver was a little more than ordinarily compress'd, it did impell up the Quick-silver in the Tube, above the wonted height of betwixt six and seven and twenty digits.
And if to these things we annex, that for ought we can find by tryals purposely made, the degree of rarity or density of the Air, shut up into our Receiver, doth not sensibly alter its tempermay be able proportionably to alter the height of the Quick-silver. I rather say, that such alterations may be, than that they are the causes of our Phaenomenon: because I think it sufficient, if I have propos'd conjectures not altogether irration
THe same Reason that mov'd us to conclude, that by the drawing of the Air out of the Receiver, the Mercury would descend in a Tube shorter than six and twenty digits, inFrance, by Monsieur Paschal, we are informed that a Tube of no less than about two and thirty Foot; was found requisite to make the Experiment De vacuo succeed with Water instead of Quick-silver: so tall a Cylinder of that lighter Liquor, being it seems, requisite to equal the Weight of a Mercurial Cylinder of six or seven and twenty digits, and surmount the pressure of the Atmosphere.
We took then a Tube of Glass, Hermetically seal'd at one end, of about four foot in length, and not very slender: This,
As much of the event as concerns our present purpose, was this, That till a considerable part of the Air was drawn out of the Receiver, the Tube continu'd top-full of Water as when it was put in, it being requisite that a great part of the Air, formerly contain'd in the Receiver, should be drawn out, to bring the remaining Air to an AEquilibrium, with so short and light a Cy
We will adde no more concerning this Experiment, save that
THat the Air hath a notable Elastical power (whencesoever that proceeds) we have, I suppose, abundantly evinc'd, and it Begins to be acknowledg'd by the eminentest Modern Naturalists. But whether or no there be in Water so much as a languid one, seems hitherto to have been scarce consider'd nor hath been yet, for ought I know, determin'd either way by any Writer, which invited us to make the following Experiment.
There was taken a great Glass bubble, with a long neck; (such as Chymists are wont to call a Philosophical Egge) which being fill'd with common Water till the Liquor reach'd about a span a
Wilkins, doing me the Honour to come himself, and bring some of his inquisitive Friends to my Lodging, we there had in readiness a round and hollow Vessel of Pewter, great enough to contain two pounds of Water, and exactly close every where, but at one little hole where it was to be fill'd, then partly by sucking out the Air, and partly by injecting Water with a Syringe, it was (not withPhaenomena of this Experiment, since they belong not to our present purpose, and are partly mention'd in another of our Papers, we shall, instead of recording them here, give this Advertisement: That as evidently as this Experiment, and that made in our Receiver, seem to prove a power in the Water to expand and restore it self after compression; yet for a reason to be met with ere long, I judged it not safe, to infer that Conclusion from these Premises, till I had made some
TO discover whether the Expansion of the Water really pro
We took then a Glass Viol, containing by ghess a pound and some ounces of Water, this we fill'd top full, and then we put into the Neck of it a Glass Pipe a pretty deal bigger than a Goose Quill, open at both ends, and of divers Inches in length: One end of this Pipe was so put into the Neck of the Viol, as to reach a little below it, and then was carefully cemented there
This done, we began to pump out the Air, and when a pret
Now of this Experiment there are two or three Circumstan
In the first place then, when the greater part of the Air had been pump'd out of the Receiver, the rising bubbles ascended so very slowly in the Pipe, that their Progress was scarce discerna
Another thing we noted in our bubbles was, That whereas in ordinary ones the Air, together with the thin film of Water that invests and detains it, is wont to swell above the surface of the Water it swims on, and commonly to constitute Hemis
We also farther observ'd, that whereas in the bubbles that first appear'd in the Pipe, the ascending Air did, as in other com
All these things laid together seem'd sufficiently to confirm that, which the consideration of the thing it self would easily enough perswade, namely, That the Air, and such like Bodies being under Water, may be press'd upon as well by the Atmo
Hence likewise we may verify what we observ'd at the close of the foregoing Experiment, namely, That from the sole swelHypothesis or Conjectures.
And hence it seems also probable, that in the Pores or invisi
WE recited in our ninteenth Experiment, how by draw
It may indeed, as we lately intimated, be conjectur'd, that these bubbles proceed not so much from any Air pre-existent in the Water, and lurking in the Pores of it, as from the more subtle parts of the Water it self; which by the expansion alPhaenomenon under consideration seem'd manifestly to argue, that the many bubbles that broke at the top of the Water, did contain a real Air, which being collected into one place, and hinder'd by the top of the Glass from receding, was able to with stand the pressure of the outward Air. As we see that if never so little Air remain in the Tube upon the making the ExperiDe Vacuo with Quick-silver, no inclining of the Tube, (though a long one, will enable a Man to impell the Mercury up to the very top, by reason (as we formerly noted) of the resistance of the included Air, which will not be compress'd be
But in order to a farther discovery what our bubbles were, we will, on this occafion, inform Your Lordship, that we try'd the XIXth
Experiment in one of our small Receivers, and found, that upon the drawing down of the Water, so many bubbles disclos'd themselves, and broke into the upper part of the Tube, that having afterwards let in the external Air, the Water was not thereby impell'd to the top of the Tube (three Foot in length) within a little more than half an Inch. And whether or no it were Air that possess'd that space at the top of the Tube which was not fill'd with Water, we took this course to exa
I consider'd also that in case the Bubbles we have been speak
Whence it seems very probable, if not certain, that even in the closest and most ponderous Liquors, and therefore much more in Water, there may lurk undiscernable parcels of Air, capable, upon the removal of the pressure of the ambient Air (though but in part) and that of the liquor wherein it lurks, to produce conspicuous bubbles. And consequently, if it seem inElater of the Water, but of the spring of the many little particles of Air dispers'd through that Water, and acting upon it in their sudden recovering themselves to a greater extent, than that to which a violent compression had reduc'd them to.
But though, from all these particulars, it seems manifest that the Bubbles we have been all this while treating of, were pro
First then, divers Naturalists esteem the Air (as well as other Elements) to be ingenerable and incorruptible. And reasons plausible enough may be drawn to countenance this Opinion from the consideration of that permanency that ought to belong to the corporeal Principles of other Bodies.
Next, Experience may be pleaded to the same purpose, for I have read of some who in vain attempted to turn Air into Water, or Water into Air.
The diligent Schottus tells us, that amongst other rarities to be met with in that great Repository of Part 3. Class. 1.
Musaeum Kercherianum, there is a round Glass with a tapering neck near half full (as one may guess by the Scheme he annexeth) of ordinary Spring-water, which having been hermetically shut up there by Clavius the famous Geometrician, the included Water is to this day preserv'd, not onely clear and pure, as if it were but newly put in: But (as it seems) without (in the least) turn
Nor doth it appear in those Glasses, which for Chymical ExHermes his Seal (as they call it) that the included Air doth, during its long imprisonment, notwithstanding the alteration it receiveth from various degrees of heat, discernably alter its nature. Whereas we plainly per
Besides, since Air is confessedly endow'd with an Elastical power that probably proceeds from its Texture, it appears not, what it is, that in such light alterations of Water, as are by many presum'd capable of turning it into Air, can be reasonably suppos'd so to contrive the Particles of Water, as to give them, (and that permanently,) the structure requisite to a Spring. I add the word permanently, because the newly mention'd ob
Lastly, The Experiment formerly made in our Engine with a piece of Match, seems to evince, that even those light and subtle Fumes (for the most part not aqueous neither) into which the Fire it self shatters dry Bodies, have no such Spring in them as the Air, since they were unable to hinder or repress the expansion of the Air included in the Bladder they surrounded.
I remember indeed that the Learned Josephus Acosta, in his History of the West Indies, tells us, Lib. 3. c. 9.
Varenius
Lib. 1. cap. 19.
Azores,
Sal-Armoniack may sufficiently evince. Not to mention, that I have shewn some Friends a secret kind of saline Substance inSal-Armoniack, which did not onely easily enough ascend it self, but carried up with it (and that in a very great proportion) the solid and ponderous Body even of uncalcin'd Gold in the form of subtle exhalations, which did afterwards fasten themselves to the upper parts of the Vessels, and yet manifest themselves to continue Gold. We remember also, that to try whether Water could be turn'd into Air, we once took an AEolipile, into which we had before convey'd some Water, and placing it upon kindled Coals when the heat forc'd out a vehement stream of aqueous Vapors; we ty'd about the Neck of it, that of a Bladder, which we had before empty'd of Air; and finding the AEolipile after a while to blow up the Bladder, we carefully ty'd it again that the included substance might not get away. Then slipping it off from the AEolipile we convey'd it into our Receiver, to try whether or no that which in part distended the Bladder would appear by its Spring to be true Air: whereby we found that upon the exsuction of the ambient Air, the included substance expanded it self and the Bladder, to a very much greater bulk than it was of before. And for farther satisfaction, having again taken out the BladAEolipile I had imploy'd was a very large one, and that it required much more care than one that hath not try'd it would imagine, to drive out all the Air from a large AEolipile, I easily suspected that the diAEolipile, and had very much wetted the Bladder, but from the rarefied Air which in that sort of Vessels is wont for a good while together to come out with the rarefied Water: and accordingly having reiterated the Experiment, I found it very difficult (by reason of the thrinking of the Bladders (up
Against the other four above-mention'd Considerations, we cannot spend time to frame Objections, but must forthwith proceed to the mention of those things that seem to argue that Air (at least such as produc'd our bubbles) may be generated of Water and other Bodies.
First then we have found by Experience that a vapid Air, or Water rarefied into Vapor, may at least for a while emulate the elastical power of that which is generally acknowledg'd to be true Air. For if you take a good AEolipile, with a moderately strong and slender Neck, and filling it with Water, lay it upon quick Coals, you may after a while observe so great a pressure by some of the parts contain'd in the AEolipile upon others, that the Water will sometimes be thrown up into the Air above three or four Foot high; and if you then take the AEolipile alAEolipile when 'tis taken very hot from the Fire, immersing the Neck of it into cold Water, you will find, that after it begins to suck in some Water, there will be made from time to time store of large bubbles in that Water wherein the Neck was plunged. Which bubbles seem maniAEolipile continues strong enough to rarefy part of the Water that is suck'd in, and expel it in the form of Vapors through the Water incumbent on the Pipe. If also when the AEolipile is almost full of Water, and therefore can contain but little Air; you hold a Coal or Brand in that stream of Vapors that issues out of the narrow mouth of it, you will find this vapid or rorid Air, (if I may so call it) to blow the Fire very strongly, and with a roaring noise. And that it be not said that 'tis by the external Air which the aqueous steams drive before them, and not by the Steams themselves, that the Blast is made and the Flame excited; it hath been observ'd, that by approaching the Coal or Brand almost to the mouth of the AEolipile, the Wind appear'd more vehement, than if the Body to be kindled were held some Inches off.
But in regard the elastical power of the Stream, issuing out of an AEolipile, seems manifestly due to the heat that expands and agitates the aqueous Particles whereof that Stream consists, and that such rapid Winds seem to be but water scatter'd into little parts and set a-moving; since we find, that holding a Knife, or any solid, smooth, and close Body against the Stream that issues out of the AEolipile, the Vapors condensing upon it, will preKircher, of several Musical Engines. And (though it may seem somewhat pro
X mi
mandato organi hydraulici in horto Qui
Erat longitudo sive altitudo camerae AH 5 Pe3 ferè ex lateribus constructa; in CD & EF in moG aquam advehens inserebatur in H eidem epistomiG maximo imA canalem subtiliorémque emittebat: Verum cum poQR in helicem contortum vasi S aliquantulum capaciori in modum Urnae efformato, insertum. Intra Urnam enim plumbeam & canalem tortuosum illisus Aer humidus, ita ab omni aquositate defaecabatur, ut ex furno in Organum derivatus dici potuerit. Urna S canalis tortuosi QR ultimum orificium Z inseritur ane
Debet autem camera illa situari in loco quantum fieri potest sic
Thus far the Ingenious Kircherus, whom I the rather cite, because although I have been informed of divers Ventiducts (as they call them) by very knowing Travellers that have observ'd them: yet this relation of our Author being very punctual, and deliver'd upon his own particular Experience, hath I confess, made me with I had had the good fortune when I was at Rome, to take notice of these Organs; or that I had now the opporAEolian Chamber, (as he calls it.) But in regard the Scheme seems to represent that Chamber as closely shut, and thereby forbids us to suppose that any Air is carried into it, but what is latitant in the Water, it will scarce seem probable (to him who remembers how small a proportion of Air, that appear'd to be when its rarefication ceased, which was conceal'd in the Water we freed from bubbles in our Receiver) that so little Air as is commonly dispers'd through Water, should be able, in so little Water as was requisite for so small a room, to make so vehement a Wind as our Author here tells us of. I have sometime thereLyons and Geneva, I saw, not very far out of the way, a place where the River of Rhone, comeing suddenly to be straiten'd betwixt two Rocks, so near each other, that a Man may, (if my Memory fail me not) stand a stride upon both at once: that rapid Stream dashing with great impetuosity against its Rocky Boundaries, doth break part of its Water into such minute Corpuscles, and put them into such a motion, that PasAEolipiles, how quickly such Vapors are even by a very little cold recondensed into Wa
We took a clear glass Bubble (capable of containing by guess about three Ounces of Water) with a Neck somewhat long and wide, of a Cylindrical form; this we fill'd with Oyl of Vitriol and fair Water, of each almost a like quantity, and casting in half a dozen small Iron Nails, we stopt the mouth of the Glass (which was top full of Liquor) with a flat piece of Diapalma provided for the purpose, that, accommodating it self to the surface of the Water, the Air might be exquisitely excluded: and speedily inverting the Viol, we put the Neck of it into a small wide-mouth'd Glass that stood ready with more of the same Liquor in it, to receive it. As soon as the Neck had reach'd the bottom of the Liquor it was dipp'd into, there appear'd at the upMenstruum upon the Metal, ascending copiously to the
Having also another time try'd the like Experiment with a small Viol, and with Nails dissolv'd in Aquafortis, we found no
Lastly, To the foregoing Arguments from Experience we might easily subjoyn the Authority of Aristotle, and of (his
Leucippus, Democritus, Epicurus and others, follow'd by divers modern Naturalists, have taught, that the difference of Bodies proceeds but from the various Magnitudes, Figures, Motions, and Textures of the small parts they consist of, all the qualities that make them differ, being deducible from thence) there appears no reason why the minute parts of WaCartesian Hypothesis, according to which, as we noted at the beginning of this Letter, the Air may consist of any terrene or aqueous Cor
These, My Lord, are some of the Considerations at present occurring to my thoughts, by which it may be made probable, that Air may be generated anew. And though it be not impos
SInce the writing of the twenty first and twenty second Ex
We chose then, amongst those Glasses which Chymists are wont to call Philosophical Eggs, one that containing about nine Ounces of Water, had a Neck of half an Inch in Diameter at the top, and as we guest, almost an Inch at the bottom; which breadth we pitched upon for a reason that will by and by ap
Being willing likewise to try whether distilled Water were, by having been divided into minute parts, and then re-united, more or less dispos'd to expand it self than Water not distill'd: We took out of our Laboratory some carefully distill'd Rain-wa
But suspecting that either the small quantity of the Water or the figure of the Vessel might have an interest in this odd Phaenomenon, we took the lately mentioned Philosophical Egg, and another not much differing from it; the former we fill'd up with distill'd Rain-water to the old mark, and into the latter we put a long Cylinder or Rod of solid Glass to straiten the cavity of the Neck by almost filling it up; and then pouring some distil
Moreover, having suffered the Glasses to remain above twen
And lastly upon the letting in of the Air, the Water in the straitned Neck soon subsided to the mark above which it had swollen, which whether it ought to be ascrib'd to the same small expansion of the parts of the Water it self, or to the rarifaction of some yet latitant Air broken into such small particles, as to escape our observation, seems not easily determinable, without such farther tryals, as would perhaps prove tedious to be recited as well as to be made; though I was content to set down those already mentioned, that it might appear how requisite it is in nice Experiments to consider variety of Circumstances.
AFter having thus discovered what operation the exsuction of the ambient Air had upon Water, we thought good to try also what changes would happen in other Liquors upon the like taking off the pressure of the external Air. We took then a glass Egg, somewhat bigger than a Turkey Egg, which had a long Neck or Stem of about a ⅓ part of an Inch in diame
After this express'd Oyl, we made tryal of a distill'd one, and for that purpose made choice of the common Oyl or Spirit (for in the Shops where it is sold, the same Liquor is promis
Having likewise a mind to try whether, as strong a solution of Salt of Tartar in fair Water as could be made (we having then no Oyl of Tartar per deliquium at hand) though it be ac
Spirit of Vineger being tried after the same manner, exhibi
Nor could we in Red Wine, try'd in a glass Egg, take no
We likewise conveyed Hens Eggs into the Receiver, but af
We took also some Spirit of Urine, carelesly enough defleg
We took also another Glass egg, and having fill'd it with common Water till it reached to the middle of the Neck, we poured to it of the same Spirit of Wine, till it reached about an Inch higher.
These three Glasses having marks set on them, over against the edges of the contain'd Liquors were put into the Receiver, and that beginning to be evacuated, the bubbles in all the three Liquors began to appear. The mixture of the Spirit of Wine and Water disclos'd a great store of bubbles, especially to
In the Spirit of Wine there did arise a great multitude of bub
The Air being sparingly let into the Receiver, the great bubPhaenomenon could proceed from any mistake in trying the Ex
BEing desirous to discover what difference there might be as to gravity and levity, between Air expanded under Water, and it self before such expansion; we took two very small Viols, such as Chymical Essences (as they call them) are wont to be kept in, and of the size and shape expressed by the eighth Fi
The success was, That having drawn out a pretty quantity of Air, the bubbles began to disclose themselves in the Water, as in the former Experiments; and though for a good while af
But being desirous before we proceed to any new ExperiHydrostaticks, That a Body will swim in the Water, in case it be lighter than as much of the Water as equals it in bulk, will hold likewise when the pressure of the Atmosphere is in very great measure, if not when it is totally taken off from the Liquor and the Body: though it were worth inqui
I know not whether it may be requisite to add, that in this Experiment, as in the former, the outward Air, being let in, did soon precipitate the floating Viol. But I think it will not be amiss to note, that (congruously to what hath been above recorded of the vast expansion of the Air) the Water which in the heavier Viol, succeeded in the room of those forty odd, if not fifty great bubbles of Air, which at several times got out of it, amounted but to a very inconsiderable bigness.
IT having been observ'd by those that have consider'd what belongs to Pendulums (a Speculation that may, in my poor judgment, be highly usefull to the Naturalists) that their ViPendulum would swing faster, or continue swinging longer in our Receiver, in case of exsuction of the Air, than otherwise. Wherefore we took a couple of round and polish'd Pendulums of Iron or Steel, of equal bigness, as near as we could get the Artificer to make them, and weighing each of them twenty Drachmes, wanting as many Grains. One of these we suspended in the cavity of the Receiver by a very slender silken string, of about seven Inches and a half in length from the Cover of the Receiver to which it is fasten'd. Then (by inclining the Engine) we made the Pendulum swing to and fro in it, and describe as long Arches as in the capacity of so brittle a Vessel we thought safe and convenient. And one of the Assistants telling the recursions of the other Pendulum hangPendulum, till it appear'd to keep the same pace in its Vibrations, with that shut up in the Receiver. Then having carefully drawn away the Air, we did again set the Pendulum in the Receiver a vibrating; and giving the other Pendulum such a motion as made it describe an Arch, according to ones ghess, equal to that of the included Pendulum; we reckon'd, one of us, the Recursions of that Pendulum which was swinging within the Receiver; and another of us, that which was moving in (that which one would think a much more resisting medium) the Air. But once, one of us reckon'd near two and twenty Recursions of the included Pendulum, whilst the other reckon'd but twenty of the Pendulum that viPendula was reckon'd to have made one and twenty Recursions, wherein the other made but twenty; Yet this Experiment
Pendulum in the common Air, and in one exPendulum continued its Recursions about fifteen minutes (or a quarter of an hour) before it left off swingPendulum (being fresh put into motion) appear'd not (by a minutes Watch) to last sensibly longer. So that the event of this Experiment being other than we expected, scarce afforded us any other satisfaction, than that of our not having omitted to try it. And whether, in case the trial be made with a Pendulum much less disproportionate to the Air than Steel is, the event will much better answer expectation, experience may be consulted.
THAT the Air is the medium whereby sounds are conKircher, and other Learned Men: who have (as they assure us) observ'd, That if a Bell, with a Steel Clapper, be so fasten'd to the inside of a Tube, that upon the making the Experiment De Vacuo with that Tube, the Bell remain'd suspended in the deferted space at the upper end of the Tube: And if also a vigorous Load-stone be apply'd on the outside of the Tube to the Bell, it will attract the Clapper, which upon the removal of the Load-stone falling back, will strike against the opposite side of the Bell, and thereby produce a very audible sound; Whence divers have concluded, That 'tis not the Air, but some more subtle Body that is the medium of sounds. But because we conceiv'd that, to invaliDe Vacuo (not to mention the usual thinness of the Glass) being seldom made greater than is requisite, a little Air might bear a not inconsiderable proporDe Vacuo, as it is wont to be made, there is generally some little Air that gets in from without; or at least store of bubbles that arise from the Body of the Quick-silver, or other Liquor it self, Observations heedfully made have frequently informed us: And it may also appear, by what hath been formerly deliTorricellian Experiment.
On the occasion of this Experiment concerning sounds, we may add in this place, That when we tried the Experiment for
We thought likewise to convey into the Receiver a long and slender pair of Bellows, made after the fashion of those usually employ'd to blow Organs, and furnished with a small Musical instead of an ordinary Pipe. For we hop'd, that by means of a string fastned to the upper part of the Bellows, and to the moveable stopple that makes a part of the Cover of our ReceiVacuum, must be sup
We had thoughts also of trying whether or no, as Sounds made by the Bodies in our Receiver become much more languid than ordinary, by reason of the want of Air: so they would grow stronger, in case there were an unusual quantity of Air crouded and shut up in the same Vessel. Which may be done (though not without some difficulty) by the help of the Pump, proviPhaenomena it were worth while to try to vary, by means of the compression of the Air.
WE taught, among divers other things, when we dis
We convey'd into the Receiver a new Glass Viol, capable of holding about 6 or 7 ounces of Water, into which we had before put 2 or 3 Spoonfulls of that Liquor, and stopt it close with a fit Cork. The Pneumatical Vessel being emptyed, there ap
From these trials it seem'd deducible enough, that whilst the Viol continued to be well stopt, the included Water did, from the Air, shut up with it, sustain a pressure equal to that of the Atmosphere; since till the Air could get out of the Glass, there appeared no bubbles in the Water, notwithstanding the want of pressure in the ambient Body.
But to be sure to reach the chief end of our Experiment, we made use of this other expedient: We caused a convenient quantity of Water to be put, and Hermetically shut up into a Glass Egg, whose long Neck (which was purposely made of an unequal thickness) was fastened to one end of a string, whose other end was tied to the Cover of our Receiver, after the manner elsewhere mentioned already: Then the Egg being conveyed into the Pneumatical Vessel, and that being evacuPhaenomenon to what I have seen happen in the dissolution of Seed-Pearl in some acid Menstruum, inwhich, if a good quantity of the little Pearls be cast whole, they will at first, if the Menstruum be sharp enough, be carried in swarms from the bottom to the top of the Liquor. We will add, that without sealing up the Glass, this Expe
IT may not a little conduce to the clearer explication of divers Points in the Doctrine of Meteors, and perhaps of some other Physiological difficulties, to discover what the Air doth to the motion of those Steams or Exhalations that ascend into it, namely, Whether they mount upwards by virtue of any such positive levity (as some Peripateticks speak) acquir'd together with their Aërial nature, as inables them to pierce through part of the Atmosphere, and over-come its resistance. Or else, whe
We hop'd to illustrate this matter, by observing the motion of the smoke, proceeding from kindled or flaming Bodies in our exhausted Receiver. But as we formerly noted, upon the exsuction of the Air, the smoking of those Bodies presently ceas'd. We had thoughts also of conveying into our Pneumatical Glass a hot Iron, with some Bodie easie to be dissipated into smoke set upon it, but consider'd, that neither was that way free from inconveniencies; especially this, that the hot Body
Wherefore I bethought my self of another way to satisfie in some measure my curiosity, to wit, by means of a certain Li
This fuming Liquor then I thought would much conduce to the discovery I desir'd to make, since it sav'd me the need of conCarneiades or Eleutherius (for I do not well remember which) in those Dialogues concerning Heat and Flame that have above been mention'd.
More circumstances concerning these Fumes we might have observ'd, had we not been deterr'd by an Indisposition in point
The reflexions that may be made upon this Experiment, we have not now the leasure to prosecute, and therefore shall conen passant) that steams in an ambient Body, or a medium thinner than themselves, may both tend downwards, and otherwise emulate the nature of a Liquor; which I therefore point at, that it may appear the less strange, if we sometimes speak of the At
And though it might perchance suffice to have on this occasion intimated thus much; yet, lest this way of speaking of the At
WE took one of the small Receivers, often mention'd already, and into it we convey'd a piece of well lighted Match; and letting it remain there till it had fill'd the Receiver with smoak, we took it out and hastily clos'd again the Receiver, that the smoak might not get away. Then staying awhile to let these fumes leisurely subside, we found, as we expected, that afSuperficies. If also the Key were turn'd and the Valve unstopp'd, so that there was a free, though but a narrow passage open'd betwixt the external Air and the cavity of the Receiver, then would some of this smoak fall down, as it were, in a stream into the subjacent Cylinder, and a proportionate quantity of the outward Air, would manifestly ascend through it into the incumbent Air, much after the same manner as if you invert a Viol with a long neck, and well fill'd with Red-Wine, into a Glass full of fair Water, you shall see the Water and Wine by degrees mingle with one another; the one falling down as it were in little colour'd streams, and the other assuperficies of our smoak lay smooth and Horizontal, a hot Iron were held near the outside of the Receiver, the neighbousuperficies) being rarified by the heat, would readily ascend in a large Pillar of smoak to the very top of the Receiver, yet without seeming to lose a distinct superficies, or to be confounded with Air; below which, upon the recess of
All which being added to the late Experiment of the smoak
To these things I know not whether it will be requisite to add, That as we lately took notice of conspicuous Waves that appear'd upon the superficies of our agitated smoak: So some such thing may not absurdly be conjectur'd to happen on the superficies of the Atmosphere, by those strange ruggednesses that appear (especially in the Spring and Fall, when Exhalations and Vapours are wont to ascend most plentifully) upon the limb or edge of the Rising and Setting Sun. I speak thus disfidently upon this occasion, because I know, that by the Fluctuation or Boyling of the Suns own
IT hath been admir'd by very ingenious Men, that if the exquisuperficies of that stone being freely expos'd to the Air, is press'd upon by it, whereas the uppermost surface, being contiguous to the superior stone, is thereby defended from the pressure of the Air; which conseParis, put off till a fit
I would gladly have the Experiment try'd with Marble, so well polish'd, as to need no Liquor whatsoever to make them cohere, and in a Vessel out of which the Air may be more persectly drawn than it was out of ours. But in the mean time, though we will not determine whether the spirit of Wine did contriZucchius. Juveni (saith he) lacertorum suorum robur jactanti proposit a
semel est lamina aerea, per ansam in medio extantem
apprehensam elevanda è tabula marmorea, cui optime congruebat: qui primo tanquam rem ludicram puero committendam contempsit: tum instantibus amicis manum utrámque admovens, cum luctatus diu haerentem non removisset, excusavit impotentiam, objecta peregrini & potentissimi glutinis interpositione, quo fortissime copulante nequiret divelli; donec vidit ab alio per tabulam facilimè laminam deduci, & ad extrema productam, & actam in transversum inde deportari. But that we may learn from our, own Engine, that two Bodies, though they touch each other but in a small part of their surfaces, may be made to cohere very strongly, only by this, That the Air presses much more forcibly upon the inferiour superficies of the lowermost Body, than upon the upper surface of the same: We will hereunto annex the following Experiment, though out of the order wherein they were made.
I Remember I have, in a Discourse touching Fluidity and Firm
The Receiver having been exquisitely clos'd as we have of
BUt in regard we have not yet been able to empty so great a Vessel as our Receiver, so well as we can the Cylinder it self; our Pump alone may afford us a nobler instance of the force of the Air we live in, insomuch, that by help of this part of our Engine, we may give a pretty near ghess at the strength of the Atmosphere, computed as a weight. And the way may be this; First, the Sucker being brought to move easily up and down the Cylinder, is to be impelled to the top of it: Then the Receiver must be taken off from the Pump, that the upper Orifice of the Cylinder remaining open, the Air may freely succeed the Suc
According to this method we did, since the writing of the last Experiment, attempt to measure the pressure of the AtManubrium the Sucker moved up and down with so much ease,
Manubrium, its motion in the Cylinder had been before purposely facilitated. This done, the upper Orifice of the Cylinder was very carefully and closely stop
And though (as hath been already acknowledg'd (we can
Est quoddam prodire tenus, si non datur ultra.
Peradventure it will not be impertinent to annex to the other circumstances that have been already set down concerning this
Torricellian Experi
To dwell upon all the several Reflexions, that a speculative Wit might make upon this and the foregoing Experiment, (I mean the thirty third and thirty second) would require almost a Volume; whereas our occasions will scarce allow us time to touch upon three or four of the chief Inferences that seem deducible from them, and therefore we shall content our selves to point at those few.
And first, as many other Phaenomena of our Engine, so espeVacuum, will scarce be satisfactory; unless it can be clearly made out by what little hooks, or other grappling Instruments, the internal Air could take hold of the Sucker; how so little of it obtained the force to lift up so great a weight; and why also, upon the letting in of a little more Air into one of our evacuated Vessels, the attraction is, instead of being strengthened, much weakned; though, if there were danger of a Vacuum before, it would reVacuum within the cavity of the vessel that debilitates the attraPhaenomena of our Experiments, and parVacuum in the cavity of it; but when the Sucker had been already impell'd almost to the top of the Cylinder, and consequently, when the Vacuum that remain'd was become very little in comparison of that which preceded the beginning of the Sucker's ascension.
In the next place, these Experiments may teach us, what to judge of the vulgar Axiom received for so many Ages as an unVacuum, and that to such a degree, that no humane power (to go no higher) is able to make one in the Universe; wherein Heaven and Earth would change places, and all its other Bodies rather act contrary to their own NaVacuum we will understand a place perfectly devoid of all corporeal Substance, it may indeed then, as we formerly noted, be plausibly enough maintained that there is no such thing in the world; but that the generality of the Plenists, (especially till of late years some of them grew more wary) did not take a Vacuum in so strict a sense, may apVacuum, to prove it impossible that there can be any made. For when they alledge (for Instance) that when a man sucks Water through a long Pipe, that heavy LiVacuum, that would be avoided if the hole at the top were open'd. When (I say) they alVacuum, any space here beVacuum, make Bodies act contrary to their own tendency, that a place may be fill'd with Air, if its being so were not necessary to the avoiVacuum.
Taking then a Vacuum in this vulgar and obvious sense, the common opinion about it seems lyable to several Excep
It will not easily then be intelligibly made out, how hatred or aversation, which is a passion of the Soul, can either for a Vacuum, or any other object, be supposed to be in Water, or such like inanimate Body, which cannot be presumed to know when a Vacuum would ensue; if they did not bestir themselves to prevent it: nor to be so generous as to act contrary to what is most conducive to their own particular preservation for the publique good of the Universe. As much then of intelligible and probable Truth, as is contain'd in this Metaphorical ExpresVacuum in it, as if they studiously conspir'd to prevent it. And how far this it self may be granted, deserves to be farther consider'd.
For in the next place, our Experiments seem to teach, that the supposed Aversation of Nature to a Vacuum is but accidental, or in consequence, partly of the Weight and Fluidity, or, at least, Fluxility of the Bodies here below; and partly, and perob fugam Vacui (as the common phrase is) Bodies act without such generosity and consideration, as is wont to be ascrib'd to them, is apparent enough in our 32d Experi
And this minds me to take notice of another deficiency, poinVacuum, seem ra
And as for the care of the publique good of the Universe asth Experiment, upon the Exsuction of the ambient Air, the Water deserted the upper half of the Glass-Tube; and did not ascend to fill it up, till the external Air was let in upon it: whereas by its easie and sudden regaining that upper part of the Tube, it appeared both that there was there much space devoid of Air, and that the Water might with small or no resistance have ascended into it, if it could have done so without the im
Nay, for ought appeareth, even when the excluded Air, as soon as 'twas permitted, rush'd violently into our exhausted Reth Expeth, or a yet smaller part of its ordinary extent) it seems necessary to admit either a notion of condensation and rarefaction that is not intelligible, or that in the capacity of our Receiver when presumed to be full of Air, there yet remain'd as much of space as was taken up by all the Aërial corpuscles, unpossessed by the Air. Which seems plainly, to infer that the Air that rush'd into our empty'd vessel did not doe it precisely to fill up the Vacuities of it, since it left so many un
Vacuum is but Metaphorical and Accidental, being but a consequence or result of the pressure of the Air and of the Gravity, and partly also of the Fluxility of some other Bodies) The power she makes use of to hinder a Vacuum, is not (as we have else-where also noted) any such boundless thing as men have been pleased to imagine. And the reasons why in the former Experiments, mentioned in favour of the Plenists, Bodies seem to forget their own Natures to shun a Vacuum, seems to be but this; That in the alledged cases the weight of that Water that was either kept from falling or impell'd up, was not great enough to surmount the pressure of the contiguous Air; which, if it had been, the Water would have subsided, though no Air could have succeeded. For not to repeat that Experiment of Monsieur Paschal (formerly mention'd to have been tryed in a Glass exceeding 32. Foot) wherein the inverted Pipe being long enough to contain a comVacuum could be made near the confines of the Atmosphere, where the Air is probably but light in comparison of what it is here below. But our present (three and thirtieth) Experiment seems to manifest, not onely that the power, exercis'd by NaVacuum, is limitted, but that it may be determin'd even to Pounds and Ounces: Insomuch that we might say, such a weight Nature will sustain or will lift up to resist a Vacuum in our Engine; but if an Ounce more be added to that weight, it will surmount Her so much magnifi'd detestaNe detur Vacuum, (as they speak) it will follow, that if the Water can be brought to subside in such a case, that deserted space may be deem'd empty, according to their own Doctrine; especially, since Nature (as they would perswade us) bestirs her self so mightily to keep it from being deserted.
I hope I shall not need to remind Your Lordship, that I have all this while been speaking of a Vacuum, not in the strict and Philosophical sense, but in that more obvious and familiar one that hath been formerly declar'd.
And therefore I shall now proceed to observe in the last place, that our 33d Experiment affords us a notable proof of the unVarenius Geo: General. lib. 111. Propo: 7. pag. 648.
Vacuum. But I was willing to keep my self to those considerations touching these matters, that might be verified by our engine it self, especially, since, as I said at first, it would take up too much time to insist particularly upon all the Reflexions that may be made even upon our two last Experiments. And therefore passing to the next, I shall leave it to Your Lordship to consider how far these tryals of ours will either confirm or disfavour the new Doctrine of several eminent Naturalists, who teach, That in all motion there is necessarily a Circle of Bodies, as they speak, moving together; and whether the Circles in such motion be an Accidental or Consequential thing or no.
'TIs a known thing to those that are conversant in the HyAEquilibrium upon the change of the ambient Body: so that the Gold will sink lower than the Iron; which, by reason of its greater bulk, hath more Water to lift or displace, that it may sink. By Analogy to this Experiment, it seemed probable, that if two weights did in our Engine ballance each other, when the Glass was full of Air; upon the exsuction of a great part of that Air, so notable a change in the consistence of the ambient Body, would make them lose their
But being desirous at the same time to make a tryal, for a certain Design that needs not here be mention'd, we took for one of our weights a dry Bladder, strongly tyed at the Neck, and about half fill'd with Air (that being a weight both slight, and that would expand it self in the evacuated Glass) and fastnd part of a Grain) we put a Metalline
AEquilibrium, the ballance was convey'd into the Receiver, and suspended from the Cover of it.
But before we proceed farther, we must note, That presently after the laying on of the Cover, the Bladder appear'd to preAEquilibrium, yet so, that a litle advantage remained on that side to which the Metalline weight belonged; they were again let down into the Receiver, which was pre
This done, we very leisurely let in the external Air; and obAEquilibrium with the other, but at length was a little outweighed by it.
But because we suspected there might have interven'd some unheeded Circumstance in this last part of the Experiment we would not presently take out the Scales, nor meddle with the Cover, but leaving things as they were, we perceiv'd, that afAEquilibrium was too far lost to let a small change appear, we determine not.
But to make the Experiment with a Body less apt to be altered by the temperature of the Air, than was the Bladder; we brought the Scales again to an AEquilibrium with two weights, whereof the one was of Lead, the other of Cork. And having evacuated the Receiver, we observed, that both upon the ex
SOme Learned Mathematicians have of late ingeniously endeaSiphons; but still the true cause of the ascension of Water, and other Liquors both in Siphons and in Filtration, needing (for ought we have yet found) a clearer Discovery and Explication, we were desirous to try whether or no the pressure of the Air might reasonably be supposed to have either the principal, or at least a considerable Interest in the raiSiphon of Glass, delineated in the third Figure, consisting of three pieces, two streight, and the third crooked to joyn them together; whose Junctures were diligentSiphon was (as it should be) somewhat longer than the other, and was pervious at the bottom of it onely, by a hole almost as slender as a hair, that the Water might but very leasurely drop out of it, lest it should all run out before the ExSiphon was quite open at the end, and the same wideness with the rest of the Pipe, whose bore was about ¼ of an Inch. The whole Siphon made up of these several pieces put together, was design'd to be about a Foot and a half long; that the remaining Air, when the Vessel was exhausted after the wonted manner, might not be able to impell the Water to the top of the Siphon; which being inverted, was fill'd with Water, and of which the Shorter leg being let down two or three Inches deep into a Glass Vessel full of Water, and the upper parts of it being fasten'd to the inside of the Cover of the Receiver, we proceeded to close first, and then to empty the Vessel.
The effect of the tryal was this, That till a pretty quantity of Air had been drawn out, the Water dropp'd freely out at the lowSiphon, as if the Experiment had been performed in the free Air. But afterwards, the Bubbles (as had been apprehended) began to disclose themselves in the Water, and ascending to the top of the Siphon, imbodyed themSiphon was reduc'd, partly by the extraction of the ambiSiphon, to be but about a Foot high, if so much; whereby it came to pass, that the course of the Water
Siphon was interrupted, and that which remain'd in the longer Leg of it, continu'd suspended there without dropping any longer. But upon the turning of the Stop-cock, the outSiphon, by the little hole at which the Water formerly dropt out; and traSiphon.
To prevent the inconveniences arising from these Bubbles, two Glass Pipes, like the former, were so placed, as to terminate together in the midst of the Belly of a Glass Viol, into whose Neck they were carefully fasten'd with Cement; and then both the Viol and the Pipes being (which was not done without difSiphon describ'd in the fifth Figure, was plac'd with its shorter Leg in the Glass of WaSiphon. But at length the Receiver being very much empty'd, the passage of the Water through the Siphon ceas'd, the upper ends of the Pipes beginning to appear a little above there
And hereby the continuity of the Water, and so the ExperiPhaenomena, which we have not now the leasure to recite. And though upon the whole matter there seem'd little or no cause to doubt, but that, if the Bubbles had not disturb'd the Experiment, it would manifestly enough have appear'd that the course of Water through Siphons depends
This occasion I have had to take notice of Siphons, puts me in mind of an odde kind of Siphon that I caus'd to be made aSiphons: And having immers'd the shorter Leg of one of these into a Glass that held some fair Water, we found, as we expected, that the WaSiphon, though that were high enough, did of it self run down the longer Leg, and continue running like an ordinary Siphon. The cause of this ascension of the WaPhaenomenon under consideration, to the greater pressure made upon the water by the Air without the Pipe, than by that within it, (where so much of the Water (consisting perVacuum: And that 'tis very probable the
Phaenomena, whether, and how far, they may be deduc'd from the Figure of the mercurial Corpuscles, and the Shape of the springy Parti
SEveral ways we have met with propos'd, partly by the exGalileo, and partly by other ingenious Writers, to manifest that the Air is not devoid of weight; some of these reVacuum, we might there weigh a parcel of Air it self, as here we do other Bodies in the Air, because it would there be heavier than that which surrounds it, as are grosser Bodies we commonly weigh, than the medium or ambient Air. Wherefore, though we have above declin'd to affirm, that our Receiver, when emptyed, deVacuum, and though we cannot yet perfectly free it from Air it self, yet we thought fit to try how far the Air would manifest its gravity in so thin a medium, as we could make in our. Receiver, by evacuating it. We caus'd then to be blown at the Flame of a Lamp, a Glass bubble of
Equilibrium, and began to incline to that side on which the Bubble was; which, as the Air was farther and farther drawn out, did manifestly more and more preponderate, till he that pumped began to grow weary of his Imployment: after which the Air being leisurely let in againe, the Scales by degrees returned to their former
We likwise convey'd into the Receiver, the same bubble, open'd at the end of the slender Pipe above-mention'd, but ha
Another thing we must not forget to mention, that happened to us, whilst we were making tryals concerning the weight of the Air; namely, that having once caus'd the Pump to be some
But without examining here the reasonableness of that doubt, we will proceed to recite the Experiment it self, which seems to teach, That though Air, when sufficiently compressed, may perchance get entrance into narrower holes and crannies than Water; yet unless the Air be forc'd in at such very little holes, it will not get in at them, though they may be big enough to let Water pass through them.
The Experiment then was this: I took a fair Glass Siphon, the lower end of whose longest Leg was drawn by degrees to such a slenderness, that the Orifice, at which the Water was to fall out, would hardly admit a very small Pin: This Siphon beSiphon, betwixt the little hole newly mention'd, and the incumbent Water, upon which it came to pass, that the Air being not to be forc'd through so narrow a passage, by so light a Cylinder of Water, (though amounting to the length of divers Inches,) as lean'd upon it, hindered the farther efflux of the Water, as long as I pleased to let it stay in that narrow place: whereas, when by blowing a little at the wider end of the Siphon, that little parcel of Air was forced out with some Water, the remaining Water, that before continu'd suspended, began freely to drop down again as formerSiphon, or no, that being for the most part of the thickness of a Mans Finger, is yet towards one end so slender, as to termi
And on this occasion I remember, that whereas it appears by our fifth Experiment, That the Aërial Corpuscles (except perAlcalizate Salt (we us'd the Calx of Tartar made with Nitre) in a fine Bladder, and dipping the lower end of the Bladder in Water; for if you hold it there for a compe
But I see I am slip'd into a Digression, wherefore I will not examine, whether, the Experiment I have related, proceeded from hence, That the springy Texture of the Corpuscles of the Air, makes them less apt to yield and accommodate themselves easily to the narrow Pores of Bodies, than the more flexible Particles of Water; or whether it may more probably be ascrib'd to some other Cause. Nor will I stay to consider how far we may hence be assisted to ghess at the cause of the ascension of Water in the slender Pipes, and Siphons formerly mention'd, but will return to our Bubble; and take notice, That we thought fit also to endeavor to measure the capacity of the Bubble we had made use of, by filling it with Water, that we might the better know how much Water answer'd in weight to ¾ of a Grain of Air, but notwithstanding all the diligence that was used to preserve so brittle a Vessel, it broke before we could perfect
The haste I was in, My Lord, when I sent away the last Sheet, made me forget to take notice to you of a Problem that occurr'd to my thoughts, upon the occasion of the slow breaking of the Glass Bubble in our evacuated Receiver. For it may seem strange, since by our sixth Experiment it appears, that the Air, when permitted, will by its own internal Spring expand it self twice as much as Mersennus was able to expand it, by the heat even of a candent AEolipile: Yet the Elater of the Air was scarce able to break a very thin Glass Bubble, and utterly unable to break one somewhat thicker, within whose cavity it was impriCabaeus (he that writ of the Load-stone) relates, That he saw a Marble Pillar (so vast, that three men to
I remember I have taken notice that probably the reason why the included Air did not break the hermetically seal'd Bubbles that remain'd intire in our emptyed Receiver, was, That the Air, being somewhat rarefied by the flame imploy'd to close the Glass, its Spring, upon the recess of the heat, grew weaker than before. But though we reject not that ghess, yet it will not in the present case serve the turn, because that much smaller Glass bubbles exactly clos'd, will, by the included Air (though agitated by the heat of a very moderate Fire) be made to fly in pieces. Whether we may be assisted to salve this Problem, by considerCabaeus, notice may be taken of the prodigious power of Rarefaction, which hereby appears capable of performing stranger things than any of our Experiments have hitherto ascrib'd to it.
We should hence, My Lord, immediately proceed to the next Experiment, but that we think it fit, on this occasion, to ac
We took then an AEolipile made of Copper, weighing six ounces, five drachms, and eight and forty grains: this being made as hot as we durst make it, (for fear of melting the mettle, or at least the Sodar) was removed from the fire and immediately stopped with hard Wax that no Air at all might get in at the litAEolipiles for the fumes to issue out at: Then the AEolipile being suffer'd leasurely to cool, was again weighed together with the Wax that stopt it, and was found to weigh (by reason of the additional weight of the Wax) six ounAEolipile and Wax, being again weighed amounted to six ounces, six drachms, and 50 grains. So that the AEolipile freed as far as our fire could free it, from its Air, weighed less than it self when replenished with Air, full eleven grains. That is, the Air containable within the cavity of the
The fore-mentioned way of weighing the Air by the help of an AEolipile, seems somewhat more exact than that which Mersennus used, In that in ours the
As to the proportion of weight betwixt Air and Water, some learned men have attempted it by ways so unaccurate that they seem to have much mistaken it. For (not to mention the imKepler and others.) The learned and diliRicciolus, having purposely endeavoured to investigate this proportion by means of a thin bladder, estimates the weight of the Air to that of the Water to be as one to ten thousand, or there abouts. And indeed I remember that having formerly, on a certain occasion, weighed a large bladder full of Air, and found
Galileo himself using anoAEolipile, seems by great odds more exact; and (as far as we could ghess) seemed to agree well enough with the Experiment made in our Receiver. Wherefore it will be best to trust our AEolipile in the enquiry we are about. And according to our observations the water it contained amounAEolipile with water, so exactly as we would, yet in regard we could not neither as perfectly as we would, drive the Air out of it by heat, we think the proporAEolipile before we set it on the fire, that the copiAEolipile was refrigerated, and the included vapours were by the cold turned again into Water (which could not have happen'd to the Air, that the preceding Steams expelled) the Air, when it was let in, increas'd the weight of the
Mersennus indeed tells us, that by his account Air is in weight to Water, as 1 to 1356. And adds, that we may, without any danger, believe that the gravity of Water to that of Air of a like bulk, is not less than of 1300 to 1. And consequently that the quantity of Air to a quantity of Water equiponderant thereto, is as 1300 to 1. But why we should relinquish our own carefully repeated tryals, I see not. Yet I am unwilling to reject those of so accurate and usefull a Writer: And therefore shall propose a way of reconciling our differing Observations, by presenting, that the discrepance between them may probably aLondon and at Paris: For our Air being more cold and moist, than that which Your Lordship now breaths, may be suppos'd also to be a fourth or fifth part more heavy. I leave it to be consider'd, whether it be of any moment that our Observations were made in the midst of Winter, whereas his were perhaps made in some warmer time of the Year. But I think it were not amiss, that, by the method formerly propos'd, the gravity of the Air were observ'd both in several Countries, and in the same Country, in the several Sea
If Your Lordship should now ask me, if I could not by the help of these, and our other Observations, decide the Contro
London) the proportion of gravity betwixt Water and Air, of equal bulk, is as of a thou
The next thing therefore that we are to enquire after, in order to our present design, is the difference in weight betwixt Water and Quick-silver: And though this hath been defin'd already by the Illustrious Verulam, and some other inquisitive Persons, that have compared the weight of several Bodies, and cast their Ob
We took then a Glass Pipe, of the form of an inverted Siphon, whose shape is delineated in the sixteenth Figure: And pouring into it a quantity of Quick-silver, we held it so, that the superSiphon, till that was almost fill'd, we observ'd the surface of the Quick-silver in that Leg to be, by the weight of the Water, depressed, as from E to B; and in the shorter Leg, to be as much impell'd up
Besides this unusual way of determining the gravity of some things, we measur'd the proportion betwixt Quick-silver and Water, by the help of so exact a ballance, as looseth its AEquilibrium by the hundredth part of a Grain. But because there is wont to be committed an oversight in weighing Quick-silver and Water, especially if the Orifice of the Vessel wherein they are put be any thing wide, in regard that men heed not that the surface of Water in Vessels will be concave, but that of Quick-silver notably convex or protuberant: To avoid this usual oversight (I say) we made use of a Glass bubble, blown very thin at the Flame of a Lamp, that it might not be too heavy for the Ballance, and terminating in a very slender neck wherein the concavity or con
We might here take occasion to admire, that though Water (as appear'd by the Experiment formerly mention'd of the Pewter Vessel) seems not capable of any considerable condensation,
Wherefore, having now given us the proportion of Air to Water, and Water to Quick-silver, it will be very easie to find the proportion betwixt Air and Quick-silver, in case we will suppose the Atmosphere to be uniformly of such a consistence as the Air we weighed here below. For since our Engine hath sufficiently manifested that 'tis the AEquilibrium with the exterTorricellian Experiment keeps the Quick-silver from subsiding; And since, by our accurate Experiment formerly mention'd, it appears that a Cylinder of Mercury, able to ballance a Cylinder of the whole Atmosphere, amounAEquilibrium, with a Mercurial Cylin
But this (as we lately intimated) proceeds upon the supposiSeneca. Omnis Aër (says he) quo propior est terris hoc crassior; quemadmodum in aqua & in omni humore faex
And this conjecture it self may appear very injurious to the height whereunto Exhalations may ascend, if we will allow that there was no mistake in that strange Observation made at Tolouse in a clear Night in August, by the diligent Mathematician Emamuel Magnan, and thus Recorded by
Various Observations made at the feet, tops, and interjacent parts of high Mountains, might perchance somewhat assist us to make an estimate in what proportion, if in any certain one, the higher Air is thicker than the lower, and ghess at the difform conKepler will not the Aër refractivus) and to have rendred a reason why in the mention we made in the Notes upon the first Experiment touching the height of the Atmosphere, we scrupled not to speak of it, as if it might be many Miles high.
WE will now proceed to recite a Phaenomenon, which, though made amongst the first, we thought fit not to mention till after many others, that we might have the opportunity to observe as many Circumstances of it as we could, and so present Your Lordship at once, most of what we at several times have taken notice of concerning so odd a Phaenomenon.
Our Engine had not been long finish'd, when, at the first leiPhaenomenon, as soon as Night
Wherefore the next Morning, hoping to inform our selves better, we went about to repeat the Experiment, but though we could as well as formerly exhaust the Receiver, though the place wherein we made the trial was the very same; and though other Circumstances were resembling, yet we could not discover the least appearance of Light all that Day, nor on divers others on which trial was again fruitlesly made; nor can we to this very time be sure a Day before-hand that these FlaWallis, who express'd a great desire to see this Phaenomenon, though he were not then above a Bow-shoot off, and made haste to fatisfie his Curiosity; yet by that time he was come, the thing he came for was no longer to be seen; so that having vainly endeavourPhaenomenon in his prefence, I began to apprehend what he might think of me, when unexpectedly the Engine presented us a flash, and after that a second, and as maPhaenomenon, though not confidently promise to shew it others.
And this unsuccessfulness whereto our Experiment is liable, being such, that by all our watchfulness and trials, we could neHypothesis to give an account of it: which if the Experiment did con
First then we observ'd, that the Apparition of Light may be made as well by Candle-light, as by Day-light; and in what
Next, we noted that the flash appears immediately upon the turning of the Key, to let the Air out of the Receiver into the emptied Cylinder, in so much that I remember not that when at any time in our great Receiver, the Stop-cock was open'd be
Yet, we farther observ'd, that when instead of the great RePhaenomenon might be exhibit
We noted too, that when we began to empty the Receiver, the appearances of Light were much more conspicuous than to
We observed also, that when the Sucker had not been long before well Oyl'd, and instead of the great Receiver, the smaller Vessel above-mention'd was emptied; We observ'd, I say, that then, upon the opening of the Stop-cock, as the Air descended out of the Glass into the emptied Cylinder, so at the same time there ascended out of the Cylinder into the Vessel a certain steam, which seem'd to consist of very little Bubbles, or other minute Corpuscles thrown up from the Oyl, rarefied by the attrition it suffered in the Cylinder. For at the same time that these Steams ascended into the Glass, some of the same kind manifest
For we likewise sometimes found, by watchfull observation, that when the Flash was great, not only at the very instant the Receiver lost of its transparency, by appearing full of some kind of whitish substance; but that for some short time after the sides of the Glass continued somewhat opacous, and seem'd to be darken'd, as if some whitish Steam adher'd to the inside of them.
He that would render a Reason of the Phaenomenon, whereof all these are not all the Circumstances, must do two things; whereof the one is difficult, and the other little less than im
For our part, we freely confess our selves at a loss about ren
In case then our Phaenomenon had constantly and uniformly appear'd, we should have suspected it to have been produc'd af
First, we observ'd that, thought that which we saw in our Re
Next we consider'd, that our common Air abounds with ParLondon one Night, that the People, upon a very welcome occasion, testified their Joy by numerous Bon-fires; though, by reason of the Interposi
A third thing that we considered, was, That white may be produc'd (without excluding otherways, or denying invisible Pores in the solidest Bodies) when the continuity of a Diaphanous Body happens to be interrupted by a great number of surfaces, which, like so many little Looking-glasses, do confusedly repre
Upon these Considerations, My Lord, and some others, it seem'd not absur'd to imagine, That upon the rushing of the Air out of the Receiver into the empty'd Cylinder, the Air in the Receiver being suddenly and vehemently expanded, the Tex
Several things there were that made this Conjecture seem the less improbable. As first, That the whiteness always appear'd greater when the exsuction began to be made, whilst there was store of Air in the Receiver, than when the Air was in great part drawn out. And next, That, having exhausted the Receiver, and apply'd to the hole in the Stop-cock a large bubble of clear Glass, in such a manner, that we could at pleasure let the Air pass out at the small Glass into the great one, and easily fill the small one with Air again, We observ'd with pleasure, That, upon the opening the passage betwixt the two Glasses, the Air in the smalBenjamin, and some other Resinous Bodies, which being dissolv'd in spirit of Wine, may, by the effusion of fair Water, be turn'd into a seemingly Milky substance. For this whiteness belongs not to the whole Liquor, but to the Corpuscles of the dissolv'd Gum, which after a while subsiding leave the Liquor transparent, themselves only remain
But besides the Conjecture insisted on all this while, we ground
But, My Lord, I foresee You may make some Objections against our proposed ghess, which perhaps I shall scarce be able to answer, especially, if You insist upon having me render a Reason why our Phaenomenon appears not constantly.
I might indeed answer, that probably it would do so, if inPhaenomenon should sometimes be seen, and oftentimes not appear. And though that Conjecture which we last made should not be reJosephus Acosta, among other Judicious Observations he made in America, hath this concerning the effects of some
WE took a Glass Vessel, open at the top, and into it we put a mixture of Snow and common Salt, (such a mixture as we have in another Treatise largely discoursed of) and into the midst of this mixture we set a Glass, of a Cylindrical form, closely stopp'd at the lower end with Plaister, and open at the upper, at which we fill'd it with common Water. These things being let down into the Receiver, and the Pump being set on work, the Snow began to melt somewhat faster than we expect
And on this occasion, My Lord, give me leave to propose a Problem, which shall be this: Whence proceeds that strange force that we may sometimes observe in frozen Water, to break the Bodies that imprison it, though hard and solid? That there is such a force in Water expos'd to Congelation, may be gatherCabaeus's, whereby
WE took an Oval Glass, clear and (lest it should break) pretty strong, with a short Neck at the obtuser end; through this Neck, we thrust almost to the bottom, a Pipe of Glass, which was closely cemented to the newly mention'd Neck, the upper part of which Pipe, was drawn in some places more slender than a Crows Quill, that the changes of the Air in that Glass Egg might be the more conspicuous; Then there was con
The Pump being set a work, upon the exsuction of the Air, the Water in the Pipe descended about a quarter of an Inch, and this upon two or three reiterated trials; which seem'd sufficient
Yet shall not we conclude, that in the cavity of the Receiver
For if it be demanded what then could cause the fore-menVacuum be to be admitted, this Experiment seems to invite us to allow a great disparity, either as to bulk, or as to agitation, or as to both, be
We try'd also what Operation the drawing out of the Air would have upon Camphire, that being a Body, which, though not a
IT may seem well worth trying, whether or no in our exhau
TO satisfie our selves in some measure, about the account upon which Respiration is so necessary to the Animals, that Nature hath furnished with Lungs, we took (being then unable to procure any other lively Bird, small enough to be put into the Receiver) a Lark, one of whose Wings had been broPendulum, and were of late ingeniously invented by the NoHugenius, we found that the whole Tragedy had been concluded within ten Minutes of an hour, part of which time had been imploy'd in cementing the Cover to the Receiver. Soon after we got a Hen-sparrow which being caught with Bird-lime was not at all hurt; when we put her into the Receiver, almost to the top of which she would briskly raise her self, the Experiment being try'd with this Bird, as it was with the former, she seemed to be dead within seven minutes, one of which were imployed in cementing on the Cover: But upon the speedy turning of the Key, the fresh Air flowing in, began slowly to revive her, so that aster some pantings she opened her eyes, and regain'd her feet, and in about a ¼ of an hour after, threatned to make an escape at the top of the Glass,
A while after we put in a Mouse, newly taken, in such a Trap as had rather affrighted than hurt him; whilst he was leaping up very high in the Receiver, we fasten'd the Cover to it, ex
I forgot to mention, that having caus'd these three Creatures to be open'd, I could, in such small Bodies, discover little of what we sought for, and what we might possibly have found in larger Animals; for though the Lungs of the Birds appear'd very red, and as it were inflam'd, yet that colour being usual enough in the Lungs of such winged Creatures, deserves not so much our notice, as it doth, That in almost all the destructive Experiments made in our Engine, the Animals appear'd to die with violent Convulsive motions: From which, whe
Having proceeded thus far, though (as we have partly intimated already) there appear'd not much cause to doubt, but that the death of the fore-mention'd Animals proceeded rather from the want of Air, than that the Air was overVirtuoso of quality, who in the mean while chanc'd to make me a Visit, desir'd to see whether or no the Mouse could be kill'd by the exsuction of the ambient Air whereupon we thought fit to open, for a little while, an intercourse betwixt the Air in the Receiver, and that without it, that the Mouse might thereby (if it were needfull
The Experiment had this event, that after the Mouse had liv'd ten Minutes, (which we ascrib'd to this that the Pump, for want of having been lately Oyled, could move but slowly, and could not by him that manag'd it, be made to work as nimbly as it was wont) at the end of that time he dy'd with Convulsive Fits, wherein he made two or three bounds into the Air, before he fell down dead.
Nor was I content with this, but for Your Lordships far
I Fear Your Lordship will now expect, that to these Experi
And this, My Lord, being all my present Design, I suppose You will not expect that (as if You knew not, or had forgotten what Anatomists are wont to teach) I should entertain You with a needless Discourse of the Organs of Respiration, and the variGalen, that by treating of the Fabricks of living Bodies, I might compose Hymns to the wise Author of Nature, who, in the excellent contrivance of the Lungs, and other parts of (those admirable Engines) Animals, manifests himself to be indeed what the Eloquent Prophet most justly speaks him, Wonderfull in Councel, and excellent in working.
Whether the motion of the Lungs in Respiration be their own, or but consequent to the motion of the Thorax, Diaphragme, and (as some Learned Men would have it) the Abdomen; And, Whence it is that the Air swells the Lungs in Inspiration, any farther than they may reThorax they would not be fill'd with Air. Since as our Learned Friend Dr. Highmore hath well (and congruously, to what our selves have purposely tried) observed, if a live Dog have a great wound made in his Chest, the Lobes of the Lungs on that side of the Mediastinum will subside and lie still; the Thorax and the Lobes on the other side of the Mediastinum, continuing their former motion. And if suddenly at once the Muscles of the Chest be on both sides dissected, up
To which we may add the Observation of the diligent Bartholinus, who affirms the like of the
And hence (by the way) we may derive a new assistance to judge of that famous Controversie disputed among Naturalists and Physicians, ever since Galen's time, some maintaining that the Chest, with the contained Lungs, may be resembled to a pair of Bellows, which comes therefore to be fill'd because it was dilated: And others pleading to have the comparison made to a Bladder, which is therefore dilated because it is fill'd. For as to the Thorax, it seems evident from what hath been lately said, that
Nicolaus Fontanus, a Physician at Amsterdam, who testifieth, That in a Boy of the same Town, four years old, there was found, instead of Lungs, a certain Membra
And thus may the grand Objection of Bartholine, and others, be answered: But I leave to Anatomists to consider what is to be said to some Observations that seem to contradict those AnatomiSennertus (from the obserSchato) of a Melancholy Student, who having stabb'd himself, and pierced the Diaphragme in the thinner or tendonous part (call'd by many the Nervous Circle) lived seven Months after he had wounded himself, though afThorax. And such also was the accident that hapThorax forcibly distended, and hinder'd its wontThorax, as if he exercis'd Respiration) the diligent Wallaeus relates, that he divers times observed, in the dissection of live Bodies, that the Memviz. That Matter collected in the Thorax, hath penetrated into the Lungs, and been discharged by coughHarvey somewhere informs us, That he observ'd them very manifestly to open at their extremities into the Abdomen: And by such perforitions we may well'suppose the passage free betwixt the external Air, and that in the Abdomen: But this Conjecture may be farther consider'd. Besides, to show that the Animals that died in our Glasses, need not be supposed to have been kill'd by the want of Air, we foresee another Argument that we must deal so inVacuum; and hold, that those spaces which are devoid of Air, and other grosser Bodies, are all of them exactly re
But though this be a Difficulty not so easily to be resolved without the assistance of our Engine, yet I suppose we have alth and 39th Experiments; which, though we made partly for other purposes, yet we pre
Another suspicion we should have entertain'd concerning the death of our Animals, namely, That upon the sudden removal of the wonted pressure of the ambient Air, the warm blood of those Animals was brought to an Effervescence or Ebullition, or at least so vehemently expanded, as to disturb the circulation of the Blood, and so disorder the whole Oeconomy of the Body. (This (I say) I should have had some suspicion of) but that AniLarynx, &c. the expulsion of Excrements by Coughing, the conveying in of Odours by Inspiration, and some others, rather convenient for the well being of an Animal, than absolutely necessary to his Life: Whereas (I say) the other uses are such as we have said, The great Hippocrates himself gives this notable Testimony to the use of the Air, as to Animals endow'd with Lungs: Mortalibus (saith he)
But touching the account upon which the Inspiration and Ex
For first, Many there are who think the chief (if not sole) use of Respiration to be the cooling and tempering of that Heat in the Heart and Blood, which otherwise would be immoderate: And this Opinion, not only seems to be most received amongst Scholastick Writers, but divers of the new Philosophers, Cartesians, and others, admitted with some variation; teachth and 39th) that in our exhausted Receiver, where yet Animals die so suddenly for want of Respiration, the ambient Body is sensibly hotter than the common Air.
Other Learned Men there are, who will have the very substance of the Air to get in by the Vessels of the Lungs, to the left VenHippocrates seems manifestly to favour their Opinion; and both Aristotle and Galen do sometimes (for methinks they speak doubtfully eSystole and
Another Opinion there is touching Respiration, which makes the genuine use of it to be Ventilation not of the Heart, but of the Blood, in its passage through the Lungs; in which pasChyle too, which (by those new Conduits of late very happily detected by the FaPecquet) hath been newly mix'd with it in the Heart.) And this Opinion is that of the Industrious Maebius, and is said to have been that of that excellent Philosopher Gassendus; and hath been in part an Opinion almost vulgar: But this Hypothesis may be explicated two ways: For first, The necessity of the Air in Respiration, may be suppos'd to proceed from hence; That as a Flame cannot long burn in a narrow and close place, because the Fuliginous Steams it uncessantly throws out, can
Now of these two ways of Explicating the use of Respira
But if the Hypothesis propos'd, be taken in the other sense, it seems congruous enough to that grand observation, which partly the Phaenomena of our Engine, and partly the relations of Travellers, have suggested to us: namely, That there is a certain consistence of Air requisite to Respiration; so that if it be too thick, and already over-charged with Vapours, it will be unfit to unite with, and carry off those of the Blood, as Wa
Now that Air too much thicken'd (and as it were clogg'd) with Steams, is unfit for Respiration, may appear by what is wont to happen in the Lead-Mines of Devonshire, (and for ought I know, in those too of other Countries, though I have seen Mines where no such thing was complain'd of) for I have been informed by more than one credible Person (and particularly by an Ingenious Man, that hath often, for curiosity, digg'd in those Mines, and been imploy'd about them) that there often riseth Damps, as retaining the Germane Word by which we call them) which doth so thicken the Air, that unless the Work-men speedily make signs to them that are above, they would (which also sometimes happens) be presently stifled for want of Breath, and though their Companions do make haste to draw them up, yet frequently, by that time they
We will add (by way of Confirmation) the following ExSanctorius his Statica Medicina, how much that part of our Aliments, which goeth off by insensible Transpiration, exceeds in weight all the visible and grosser Excrements both solid and liquid.
That (on the other side) an Air too much dilated is not serJosephus Acosta, who tells us, That when he himself past the high Mountains of Peru, (which they call Pariacaca) to which, he says, That the Alps themselves seem'd to them but as ordinary Houses, in regard of high Towers, he and his Companions were surprised with such extreme Pangs of Straining and Vomiting, (not without casting up Blood too) and with so violent a Distemper, that he concludes he should unI therefore (says he)
But (though what hath been hitherto discours'd, incline us to look upon the Ventilation and Depuration of the Blood, as one of the principal and constant uses of Respiration; yet) meSerum of the Blood for a few moments, or the detaining it, du
If to the foregoing Instances of the sudden destruction of AniParacelsus indeed tells us, That as the Stomach concocts Meat, and makes part of it usefull to the Body, rejecting the other part, so the Lungs consume part of the Air, and proscribe the rest. So that according to our Hermetick Philosopher (as his followers would have him stil'd) it seems we may suppose that there is in the Air a little vital Quintessence (if I may so call it) which serves to the re
But yet, on occasion of this Opinion of Paracelsus, perhaps it will not be impertinent, if before I proceed, I acquaint Your Lordship with a Conceit of that deservedly Famous Mechanician and Chymist, Cornelius Drebell, who among other strange things that he perform'd, is affirmed (by more than a few credible PerJames, a Vessel to go under Water; of which, trial was made in the Thames,
Drebell, and especially of an Ingenious Physician that married his Daughter, concerning the grounds upon which he conceived it feasible to make men unaccustomed to continue so long under Water without suffocation, or (as the lately menDrebell conceiv'd, that 'tis not the whole body of the Air, but a certain Quintessence (as ChyDrebell would never disclose the Liquor unto any, nor so much as tell the matter whereof he had made it, to above one Person, who himself assured me what it was.
This account of Drebell's performance, I mention, not that I any farther assent to his opinion than I have already intimated, but because the Man, and the Invention being extraordinary, I
But not to press this any farther, we will, on this occasion, venture to subjoyn an odd Observation, which may perhaps inDemocritus, Dr. Harvey, proposeth this difficult and noble Problem to Anatomists, Why a foetus, even out of the Womb, if involv'd in the secundines, may live a good while without Respiration; but in case after having once began to breath, its Respiration be stopp'd, it will presently die. We are far from pretending to solve so hard a Problem, but this we try'd in relation to it; We took a Bitch that was said to be almost ready to whelp, and having caused her to be hang'd, we presently open'd her Abdomen, and found four Puppeys in her Womb; one of these we took out, and having freed him from the Teguments that involved him, and from the Liquor he swam in, we observed that he quickly opened his Mouth very wide, moved his Tongue, and exercised Respiration; then we opened both his Abdomen and his Chest, and cut assunDiaphragme, notwithstanding which, he seemed often
Diaphragme, the Mouth and the Tongue: But that which we mention this Puppy for, was this, That being desirous to try whether the other young ones that had not yet breath'd at all, would long survive this or no; we took them also out of the Womb, and having open'd them found none of them so much alive, as to have any perceptible motion in his heart, whereas the heart of that Puppy which had once enjoy'd the benefit of Respiration, continued beating so long, that we our selves observ'd the Auricle to beat, after five or six hours; and a Servant that staid-up and watch'd it after we were gone to Bed, affirm'd, That he saw the PulsaHarvey's Problem.
It is much doubted, whether Fishes breath under Water, and we shall not take upon us, as yet, to determine the Question either way, because we have not yet been able to procure litThat Fishes soon die in Ponds and Glasses quite fill'd with Water; if the one be so frozen over, and the other so closely stopp'd, that the Fishes cannot enjoy the benefit of the Air, if we allow them to be true. But because these Relations are not wont to be deliver'd by Writers upon their own Knowledge; as I shall not reject them, so I dare not build upon them, till I have opportunity to examine them by experience.
We took a large Eel, (being able to procure no other Fish alive) and removing it out of the vessel of Water, wherein it was brought us, into our great Receiver, we caus'd the Air to be pump'd out; and observ'd, That the Eel, after some motion to and fro in the Glass, seem'd somewhat discompos'd; and that when we had prosecuted the exsuction of the Air somewhat obstinately, she turn'd up her belly, as dying Fishes are wont to do, and from thence-forward lay altogether moveless, just as if she were stark dead; and though I did not think her so, yet the continuing in that posture, even after the Cover of the Recei
But that is most strange which we observ'd of a great, gray, House-Snail (as they call it) which being clos'd up in one of our small Receivers, did not only not fall down from the side of the Glass, upon the drawing out of the Air. (For that may be ascrib'd to the tenacity of the Liquor wherewith Snails use to stick themselves, even to the smoothest Bodies) but was not so much as depriv'd of progressive motion by the recess of the Air: Though, except this Snail, we never put any living Creature into our Receiver, whom it did not kill, or at least reduce to seem ready to die. But as we shall not here examine what inter
Nor are we at leisure to examine that Paradox of Hippocrates, which some Learned Physicians have of late reviv'd, namely, That the Foetus respires in the Womb: For on the one side it seems very difficult to conceive, how Air should traverse the Body of the Mother, and the Teguments of the Child: And since Nature hath, in new-born Babes, contriv'd peculiar and Temporary Vessels, that the Blood may circulate thorow other Passages, than it is wont to doe in the same Individuals when they come to have the free use of their Lungs, it seems unlikeFoetus is grown big, he may (especially the upper part of the involving Amnios, being destitute of Liquor, and fill'd only with an halituous substance) exercise some obscure Respiration; espeLarynx produce a Sound, since I find that the Blade of a Knife, held in several postures in
AEolipile, will afford various and very audible Sounds.
I had thoughts of conveying into our Receiver young ones, ripped out of the Womb of their Dams, with their involving Coats intire, but could not procure them And I have also had thoughts of trying whether it be not practicable, to make a Receiver, though not of Glass, yet with little Glass windows, so placed, that one may freely look into it, capacious enough to hold a Man, who may observe several things, both touching Respiration, and divers other matters; and who, in case of fainting, may, by giving a sign of his weakness, be immediWest Indies are said to be able to stay a whole hour under Water. And Cardan tells us of one Colanus a Diver in Sicily, who was able to continue (if Cardan neither mistake nor impose upon us) three or four times as long. Not to mind Your Lordship, that You have Your self oftentimes seen in
I made mention of some Men, and of Accustomance: because there are but very few, who, though they use themselves to it by degrees, are fit to support, for many minutes, the want of Air. Insomuch that an ingenious Man of my acquaintance, who is very famous for the usefull skill of drawing Goods, and even Ordnance, out of sunk Ships, being asked by me how long he was able to continue at the depth of 50 or 60 foot un
But the necessity of Air to the most part of Animals unaccu
We took then an humble Bee, one of those common flyes that are call'd Flesh-flies, and one of those hairy Worms that resemble Caterpillars, and are wont to be call'd Palmer-worms: These three we convey'd into one of our small Receivers, and observ'd, to the great wonder of the Beholders, that not only the Bee, and the Fly fell down, and lay with their Bellies upwards; but the Worm it self seem'd to be suddenly struck dead: All of them being reduc'd to lie without motion, or any other disHippocrates; who saith, That a living Body is throughout perspirable; or to use his expression,
This Circumstance of our Experiment we particularly took no
We may add, That we scarce ever saw any thing that seem'd so much as this Experiment, to manifest, That even living Crea
But it seems, that in these Insects, that fluid Body (whether it be a Juice or Flame) wherein Life chiefly resides, is nothing neaŕ so easily dissipable, as in perfect Animals. For whereas we have above-recited, That the Birds we conveyed into our small Receiver were within two minutes brought to be past re
But, My Lord, I grow troublesome, and therefore shall pass on to other Experiments: Yet without despairing of your parPhaenomena usefull to illuHypothesis, as to lay together divers of the Particulars that occurr'd to me, in orAustin, to one that ask'd him hard Questions: Mallem quidem (says he) eorum quae à me quaesivisti, habere scientiam quam ignorantiam: sed quia id nondum potui, magis eligo cautam ignorantiam confiteri, quam falsam scientiam profiteri.
HAving (partly upon the consideration of some of the fore
I took whole pieces of red Coral, and cast them into as much spirit of Vineger, as sufficed to swim above an Inch over them: These substances I made choice of, that the Ebullition upon the Solution might not be too great, and that the opera
Having then put about half a score sprigs of Coral, together with the Menstruum, into a somewhat long neck'd Viol, whereof
Pneumatical Glasses, containing by ghess about a Quart of Water; and having fastned on the Cover, after the acMenslruum would work upon the Coral otherwise than besore. But sinding there did only arise, as formerly, a pretty number of small Bubbles, that made there no sensible froth upon the surface of the distill'd Vineger, there were made two or three exsuctions of the Air; upon which, there emerg'd from the Coral such a multitude of Bubbles, as made the whole Body of the Menstruum appear white; and soon aster a Froth, as big as all the rest of the Liquor, was seen to swim upon it: And the Menstruum plainly appear'd to boil in the Glass, like a seething Pot. And though, if we desisted but one minute from pumping, the decrement of the Froth and Ebullition, upon the getting in of a little Air, at some leak or other, seem'd to argue, that the removal of the pressure of the external Air was the cause, or, at least, the occasion of this EfMenstruum also working as languidly upon the Coral, as it did before they were put into the Receiver: But when we had again drawn out the Air, first the whiteness re-appear'd, then the Ebullition was reMenstruum upon the Co
Some thing also we try'd in our great Receiver, concerning the solution of Metals in Aqua fortis, and other Corrosive Liquors; but partly the stink, and partly some accidents, kept us from ob
One thing we must not omit, that when the Spirit of Vineger was boiling upon the Coral, we took off the Cover of the Recei
WE will now subjoyn an Experiment, which, if the for
The Experiment was this: We caus'd Water to be boil'd a pretty while, that by the heat it might be freed from the latitant Air, so often already taken notice of in common Water: Then alAEolipile, manifest to be capable of an Elastical Power) were permitted to expand themselves mightily in the evacuated Receiver; and did, in their tumultuous Dilatation, list up (as the Air is wont to do) the uppermost part of the Water, and turning it into Bubbles, made the Water appear boiling. This conjecture was farther confirm'd by these additional
Pater Noster. Now the Experiment having been try'd more than once, and found to succeed as to the main, seems much to countenance the ConjecPhaenomena than Men have hitherto thought. For as we had not then made this Experiment, so now we have made it, it seems to teach, That the Air, by its stronger or weaker pres
To conclude, This Experiment might have been farther pro
BEing come thus far, My dear Lord, not without thoughts of proceeding farther: The unwelcome Importunity of my ocCorke: Who being at length arriv'd in England, after I have for
Lord of Dungarvan. But I suffer my self to be transported too far with these delightfull thoughts; To return therefore to our Engine. Though I find this Letter is beyond my expectation swell'd, not only into a Book, but almost into a Vo
But, My Lord, though to invite and encourage You and Your learned Friends at Paris, to make a farther use of this Engine, than I have yet been able to doe, I am thus free to acknowledge the ImDungarvan, by the same way which I indeavour to express my Self
A DEFENCE OF THE DOCTRINE Touching the Spring and Weight Of the AIR, Propos'd by Mr. R. BOYLE in his New PhyFRANCISCVS LINVS.
Wherewith the Objector's FUNICULAR HYPOTHESIS is also Examin'd.
By the Author of those Experiments.
LONDON, Printed by M. Flesher, for Richard Davis Bookseller in Oxford, 1682.
Yov may possibly in this Volume have expected the Appendix which the Author heretofore proFranciscus Linus and Mr. Hobbs are presented in compensation of the delay, and for your forbearance of that Appendix, which ere long you may expect in kind. For the Author having hinted the ProAnswers, and publishing the Sceptical Chymist, and some other Discourses, have been the principal hindrances to that Piece; which is really so near a readiness, that part of it has lain at the Press these six Months: But yet it being not all perfected, the Stationer was loth to delay any longer the Publication
Latine Edition is intended) appear now the rather in English, that they may accompany the Second Edition of the Original Experiments, which were printed first in that Language in Octavo; and that inAppendix they may complete the bulk of the Quarto Volume.
As for that part of this Piece that concerns Mr. Hobbs, it might have been larger: but the information that the Author had that the Learned Dr. Wallis was writing aHobbs his Dialogues (as well that concerning the Air as the rest) was the occaErrata of the Press I hope they will not be many: However the Author as to these is to be excused, who never (in regard to his Eyes and ImpediCorrections and Revises; neither could the Publisher much attend the Press, it being printed in a distant place from his usual Adobe. If, as I wish, you shall find this jea
THEY that know how indispos'd I naturally am to Contentiousness, will, I presume, wonder to see me publickly engaged in two Controversies at once. But that I am still as averse as ever from entering into Disputes that may handsomly be declin'd, the way wherein I have managed the following Controversies will, I hope, evince. And the Inducements I now have to appear in publick are such, that it would be hard for me to resist the being prevail'd on by them.
For, in the first place, I was (by Name, as it were) challengHypothesis and Arguments, and his Book being soon after follow'd by another written by Mr. Hobbs, a man of Name in the World; there seem'd to be some danger that so early an Opposition might op
But I scarce doubt but that intelligent Readers, especially those that are imbued with the Principles of the Corpuscularian Philosophy, will be much more apt to think that I had reason to write the following Discourses, than to think that I had any to make them so prolix: And especially ingenious men, that are accustomed to admit nothing that either is not intelligible, or is precarious, will think divers of the Objections I reply to have needed no Answers, or at least no solemn ones. But to these I have four things to represent.
And First, That which not a little swells the bulk of the fol
Next, I was the more willing to prosecute some of Franciscus Linus his Objections, because the fear of being reduc'd to grant a Vacuum has so prevail'd with many eminent persons bred up in the received Philosophy of the Schools, that though they disagree both with him and among themselves about the partiPhaenomena of the Torricellian Ex
Thirdly, though the Examiners Hypothesis have but few,
Hypothesis, yet they may chance puzzle such Readers as do not, and these possibly will prove more than a few
And, Lastly, because that sometimes when the Argument objected did not perhaps deserve to be much insisted on, the Argument treated of deserv'd to be considered; I thought it not amiss to make use now and then of some such opportuni
First, because I find that, except by some able MathematiHydrostaticks, that I can scarce impute it to any thing, but to their not throughly underHypothesis they would confute.
And, Next, because I was willing to lay down in my Answer to the Objections I examin'd, the grounds of answering such other Arguments as may be built upon the same or the like Principles. And perhaps I may truly enough say, that in the following Treatise I have already in effect answered several disTorricellian and other new Experiments relating to a Vacuum, though I forbore to mention the names or words of the Authors, because I found not that my Writings or ExperiLinus the fitter to be insisted on, because he seems to have more diligently than some others, (who yet venture to dispute against it) enquired into our DoVacuum, because (as I acknowledge in the first Chapter following) I cannot yet procure the Books of divers learned men, especial
But there is another sort of Persons besides those I mention'd at the beginning of this Preface, to whom I must address the remaining part of it; namely, to those who seem troubled, that I suffer my self to be diverted either by Linus or Mr. Hobbs from perfecting those ExEssays; and from prosecuting those wayes of enquiry into the Nature of things,
Hypotheses, and thereby to shew in some measure that I am not altogether unacquainted with the way of defending oppos'd Truths, I have laid aside the thoughts of writing any more distinct or entire Polemical Trea
For first, as I elsewhere declare, it was not my cheif Design to establish Theories and Principles, but to devise Experiments, and to enrich the History of Nature with Observations faithHypotheses and Theories on. And though in my Physico-Mechanical Epistle and my Specimens I have ventur'd some Conjectures also at the Causes of the
Next, though I have adventur'd to improve the Doctrine of the Spring and Weight of the Air by some Supplements where I found it deficient, and to recommend it by some new IllustraHypotheses themselves (for the main) being the Opinions also of
Mathematicians, and others Eminent
Thirdly, nor do I see much cause to doubt that the things I have deliver'd will notwithstanding my silence be left undefended: The forwardness I have already observ'd in divers Vertuosi to VinHobbs and Linus have examin'd my Writings upon PrinciPhaenomena. So that usually without objecting any Incongruity to my particular ExHypotheses themselves: in whose Defence I think I may with the more Reason expect to be seconded, because not onely I have endeavour'd, as I formerly noted, to lay the grounds of answering such Objections as I foreLinus, without being oblig'd to do so for the Vindicating of my Explications, which are particularly maintain'd in the third Part.
I know not whether I may venture to adde on this occasion,
Bacon's or Mersennus's to be met with, and those who have either made themselves, or at least seen others make Experiments, even such as those I have publish'd, with the care I am wont to think my self oblig'd to employ on such Occasions; will perhaps not onely believe that they cost me far more time and pains than they that have not made nor seen such tryals are apt to imagine, but will possibly think it enough for a Person that is not by Profession a Scholar, to make them carefully, and set them down faithfully, and will allow him to let others Vindicate the Truths he may have the good fortune to discover, especially, when there are so many fitter for it than he, who have (as well as his Adversaries) more leisure to write Disputations than opportunity to prose
To be short, though if any thing very worthy to be taken noVacuum, or about the Air. Which Declaration I make, not that I think it will or ought to hinder any man from making use of his liberty to express a dis
The one, That my silence might not injure either the Truth or my self, by tempting men to think, that whatever I do not another, That I may not hinder those who would reply to such Adversaries by leave
A Newly-published Treatise, De Corporum inseparabilitate, being brought to my Hands, I find several Chapters of it employ'd to oppose the Explications I ventur'd to give of some of my
'Tis true indeed, and it somewhat troubles me that it is so, that I can scarce promise my self to make my Adversary a ProAristotelean Rarefaction, and who will as well as I be back
Now though I be not in strictness oblig'd to defend any more than such of my own Explications as the Examiner has thought
Hypotheses of the Spring and Weight of the Air; yet that I may the more effectually proseHypothesis he would substitute in their stead; and the third shall contain particular Replyes to what he alledges against some of my particular Explications.
ALthough our Author confesses in his second Chapter, that the Air has a Spring as well as a Weight, yet he resolutely denies that Spring to be near great enough to perform those things which his Adversaries (whom for brevities sake we will venture to call Elaterists) ascribe to it. And his whole fourth Chapter, as the Title declares, is imploy'd to prove that the Spring of the Air is unable in a close place to keep the Mercury suspended in the Torrecellian Experiment. The proof of this Assertion he sayes is easie: But alledges two or three Arguments for it, which I think will be more easily answer'd than his Asser
In the First he sayes that those Experiments concerning the Adhesion of ones finger, &c. which he had mentioned in the foregoing Chapter, eodem modo se habent in loco clauso ac in aperto. But the answering of this we shall suspend till anon; partly, because it may then be more conveniently examin'd, and partly, because our Author seems not to build much upon it, his chief Ar
Hinc, inquam, contra hanc sententiam formatur argumentum: nam st externus ille aër nequeat vel hos viginti digitos argenti à lapsu sustentare, uti jam vidimus, quomodo quaeso sustentabit 29½? Certè haec nullatenus reconciliari possunt.
But to this Argument, which he thinks so irreconcilable with his Adversaries Hypothesis he has himself furnisht them with an Answer in these words, Dices forte ideo argentum in hoc casu descendere, quia deorsum truditur ab aëre illo sese per suum Elaterium dilatante. Which Anfwer I think sufficient for the Objection, notwithstanding the two exceptions he takes at it.
For first, whereas he sayes, that sic deberet digitus potius à tubo repelli, quam eidem affigi, cum non minus sursum quam deorsum fiat bujusmodi dilatatio: He considers not, that though the endeaAtmosphere upon it; and consequently cannot be thrust away
Mercurial Cylinder to assist the Spring of the Air, to surAtmosphere that gravitates upon the restagnant Mercury. So that the Air included and endeavouring to expand it self, finding no assistance to expand it self upward, and a considerable one to expand it self downward, it is very natural that it should expand it self that way whence it finds less resistance. As accordingly it will happen, till the Spring of the Air be so far debilitated by its Expansion, that its pressure, together with the weight of the Mercury that remains suspended, will but counter-balance, not overcome, the pressure of the outMercury. And this explication may be confirm'd by this trial that I have purposely made, namely, that if in stead of Quicksilver you employ Water, and leave as before in the Tube an Inch of Air, and then inverting it, open it under Water, you will perceive the included Inch of Air not to dilate it self any thing near (for I need not here define the Proportion) half so far as it did when the Tube was almost fill'd with Mercury; because the Weight of so short a
And having said thus much to our Authors first exception against the solution he foresaw we would give of his third ArConcipi non posse quomodo aër ille sic se dilatet, argentumque deorsum trudat, nisi occupando
majorem locum: Quod tamen hi Authores quam maxime refugiunt, asserentes rarefactionem non aliter fieri, quam per corpuscula aut vacuitates: I wish he had more clearly express'd himself, since as his words are couch'd I cannot easily guess what he means, and much less easily discern how they make an Argument aMercury, without in some sense taking up more room than it did before: For the very word Dilatation, and the effect they ascribe to the included Air, clearly imply as much; so that I see not why he should say that they are so averse from granting the Air to take up more Place than before, especially since he takes notice in the former Chapter, that we compare the Expansion of the Air to that of compress'd Wooll; and since he here also annexes that we explicate Rarefaction either by Corpuscles or Vacuities. But this later Clause makes me suspect his meaning to be, that the Elaterists do not admit that the same Air may adequately fill more of Place at one time than at another; which I believe to be as true as that the self-same lock of compress'd Wooll has no more Hairs in it, nor does adequately fill more Place with them, when it is permitted to expand it self, than whilst it remain'd compress'd. But against this way of RareConcipi non potest: Which if it be,
Aristotelean way of Rarefaction conceivable; and he acknowledges (as we shall see anon) that it is not clear; what the ablest of his Party (the moPlenists) are wont to object against the way of Rarefaction he dislikes, is, that it is not true, not that it is not intelligible.
OUR Authors Second Objection (for so I reckon it) is thus propos'd by him. Si sumatur tubus utrinque apert us sed longior, puta digitorum 40. Argentoque impleatur, eique
digitus supernè applicatur ut prius, videbimus subtracto inferiore digito, argentum quidem descendere usque ad consuetam suam stationem; Digitum autem superiorem fortiter intra tubum trahi, eique firmissime, ut prius, adhaerere. Ex quo rursum evidenter concluditur, argentum, in sua statione constitutum, non ibidem sustentari ab externo aëre, sed à funiculo quodam interno suspendi, cujus superior extremitas, digito affixa, eum sic intra tubum trahit, eique affigit. But this Argument being much of the same nature with that drawn from his third Experiment, the Answer made to that and to his first may be easily apply'd, and will be suffi
BY what we have already said against our Examiners Third Argument, we may be assisted to answer his first, though he propose it as a very clear Demonstration; and though it be indeed the principal thing in his Book. Sumatur (sayes he) tubus brevior digitis 29½ puta digitorum 20. non tamen clausus altero extremo, (ut hactenus) sed utrinque apertus:
Hic Tubus, immerso ejus orificio Argento restagnanti, suppositoque digito, ne effluat Argentum Tubo infundendum, impleatur Argento vivo: alius
Ex quo sane experimento clarissimè refellitur haec sententia: Cum enim, juxta eam, Argentum in tubo hujusmodi 20. tantum digitorum, sursum trudatur à praeponderante aëre externo: nunquam profecto per eam explicabitur, quomodo digitus ille sic trahatur deorsum, tubo
Thus far our Authors objection, in answer whereunto I have divers things to represent, to shew, that a good account may be given of this Experiment in the Hypothesis of the Elaterists, which is sufficient to manifest how far the argument is from being so un
I deny then that the Finger is drawn downward, or made by suction to adhere to the Tube; but I explicate that which he calls the suction of the Finger, as I lately did in answer to his third Argument, as we shall more particularly see anon.
He sayes indeed, that the Air which thrust up the Quicksilver
Phaenomenon thus:
When the Tube is fill'd with Quicksilver, the Finger that stops the upper Orifice is almost equally press'd above and at the sides by the contiguous Air; but when the lower Finger is reMercury, which before gravitated upon the Finger, comes to gravitate upon the restagnant Mercury, and by its intervention to press against the outward Air: so that against those parts of the Finger that are contiguous to the Air there is all the wonted pressure of the outward Air; whereas against that Pulp that is contiguous to the
I know the Examiner affirms, That no thrusting or pressure from without can ever effect such an adhesion of the Finger to the Tube. But this should be as well prov'd as said. But, first,
Mercurial Experiments; it is to be consider'd, that the Air being a fluid as well as a heavy body, it does not (as grosser Weights would) press only a
By this it may appear that we need not borrow the ObjectiQuod vel inde confirmatur, Quia cum praeponderans ille aër succedat (uti asseritur) loco sublati inferioris
THe Examiners Fourth and last Experiment is thus propos'd. Quarto denique (says he) impugnatur: Quia ex eo sequeretur, Argentum vivum per similem Tubum è vasculo exugi posse eâdem prorsus facilitate quâ ex eodem exugeretur
Pecquettus in dissertatione Anatomica pag. 63.) manifestum est, eadem planè facilitate exugendum sic Ar
This Experiment I remember I made some years ago, accorVacuum spontaneously ascend, which I presume will be so far allow'd of by our Author, who would have Liquors suppos'd to be rais'd by Suction violently drawn up by the contraction of his Funiculus. But to examine this Experiment, as it concerns the present Controversie, we may recal to mind that we formerly shew'd in the Answer to our Author's Third Argument, That when the Mercurial Cylinder that leans upon the restagnant
We may consider also that there is against the Thorax and those Muscles of the Abdomen that are subservient to RespiraThorax at pleasure; because, as fast as they open the Chest, and by dilating it weaken the Spring of that Air which is then
Thorax in an AEquilibrium of force with that without. These things premised, 'tis not Difficult in our Hypothesis to give an Answer to our Examiner's Experiment. For we say when a Cylinder of Mercury is rais'd in the Tube to any considerable height, the Pressure of the Air in the Thorax is lessen'd by the whole weight of that Mercurial Cylinder, and consequently the Respiratory Muscles are thereby disabled to dilate the Chest as freely as they were wont, by reason of the prevalency of the undiminish'd Pressure of the external Air against the weakned Pressure of the internal: But if instead of Mercury you substitute Water, so short a Cylinder of that comparatively light Liquor takes off so little of the Pressure of the included Air, that it comes into the Lungs with almost its usual strength, and consequently with almost as much force as the outward Air presses with against the Thorax.
And on this occasion there occurs to my thoughts a noble Experiment of the most Ingenious Monsieur Paschal, which clearly shews, that if we could free the upper part of such a Tube as we are now considering from the Pressure of all interAtmosphere. The Experiment it self beGassendus. Neque hoc verò solum, sed insuper vitreo
And thus we have examin'd our Author's four Arguments, to prove that in the Torricellian Experiment the Quicksilver canSpecimen is, that from his Adversaries
HIs fourth Chapter, wherein the Title promises that he will prove, Argentum in loco occluso non sustentari à lapsu per ipsum aëris Elaterium, is very short, and does not require that we should dwell long upon it. For the proof he brings of his Assertion being this, Cumtota vis hujus Elaterii pendeat à refutato jam aëris aequipondio cum digitis 29½ Argenti
To his second Argument our Author adds not a third, unless we take that for an Argument which he immediately annexes to his last recited words: Et profectò (says he) si secum expenderent hi Authores, quanta sit difficultas explicandi
hujusmodi aëris elaterium, nisi idem aër se solo occupet majorem locum (ut paulo ante) credo eos sententiam facilè mutaturos. But this being said gratis, does not exact an Answer; and he must make it more intelligible than any man that I know of has yet done, how the same Air can adequately fill more space at one time than at another, before he perswade me to change my opinion about the Spring of the Air: Especially since he himself allows that the Air has a Spring, Hypothesis, or ours, be the more intelligible, will be more properly considered in the second part of our Discourse, to which we will therefore now proceed.
THE Hypothesis that the Examiner would, as a better, substitute in the place of ours, is, if I mistake it not, briefly this; That the things we ascribe to the weight or spring of the Air are really perform'd by neither, but by a certain Funiculus, or extremely thin substance, provided in such cases by Nature, ne detur vacuum, which being exceeding
But this Hypothesis of our Authors does to me, I confess, appear liable to such Exceptions, that though I dislik'd that of his Adversaries yet I should not imbrace his, but rather wait till time and further Speculations or tryals should suggest some other Theory, fitter to be acquiesc'd in than this; which seems to be partly precarious, partly unintelligible, and partly insufficient, and besides
First, then, the Arguments by which our Author endeaFuniculus, are incompetent for that end.
The first he sets down in these words, Constat hoc primò exjam dict is Capite praecedente: nequit enim argentum descendens sic digitum deorsum trahere, tubo
In the next place therefore I consider that according to the Examiner, there can be no Vacuum; and that he makes to be the main reason why Nature in the Torricellian and our ExperiFuniculus. For in the 47th. Page, having in his Adversaries name demanded what need there is at the descent of the Quicksilver, that before it falls a superficies should be separated from it, and extended; Respondeo (sayes he) ideo hoc fieri, ne detur vacuum; cum nihil aliud ibi adsit quod loco argenti descendentis possit succedere. To which he immeAt
And though he seem to make his
To which I might adde, that the Torricellian Experiment being made in a dark night, or in a Room perfectly darkn'd, if it succeed (as there is little cause to suspect it will not) it may well be doubted whether our Authors Argument will there take place. For if he endeavour to prove that the place in question was full in the dark, because upon the letting in of the Day, or the bringing in of a Candle, the light appears within it; the Vacuists may reply according to their Hypothesis, That that light is a new one, flowing from the lucid body that darts its corporeal beams quite through the Glass and Space we dispute about, which for want of such Corpuscles were not just before visible.
And supposing light not to be made by a trajection of Atoms through Diaphanous bodies, but a propagation of the impulse of lucid bodies through them; yet it will not thence necessacoacervate Vacuity in the space so often mention'd, but absolutely that there is none. For 'tis in this last sense, as well as the other, that the Schools and our Author, who defends their Opinion, deny a V
But notwithstanding what we have now discours'd, as in our 17. Experiment we declin'd determining whether there be a Vacuum or no; so now what we have said to the Examiners Argument, has not been to declare our whole sense of the ConHypothesis supVacuum, yet his Arguments do not sufficiently prove it: which may help to shew his Doctrine to be precariCartesians, though Plenists, may plauVacuum in the deserted space of the Tube, by supposing it fill'd with their second and first Element, whose Particles they imagine to be minute enough freely to pass in and out through the Pores of Glass. But then they must allow the pressure of the outward Air to be the cause of the suspension of the Quicksilver: for though the materia caelestis may readily fill the spaces the Mercury deserts; yet that within the Tube cannot hinder so ponderous a liquor from subsiding as low as the restagnant Mercury; since all the parts of the Tube, as well the lowermost as the uppermost, being pervious to that subtile matter, it may with like facility succeed in whatever part of the Tube shall be forsaken by the Quicksilver.
The Examiners second Argument in the same place is, That since the Mercurial Cylinder is not sustain'd by the outward Air it must necessarily be, that it be kept suspended by his
Mercurial Cylinder, resting in its wonted station, does not gravitate: as may appear by applying the Finger to the imMercury, (which circumstance must not be neglected, though our Author have omitted it) that so you may shut up no more Quicksilver than the Mercurial Cylinder is wont to consist of, you will find the Experiment to succeed well enough: (Which makes me somewhat wonder to find it affirm'd, that the learned Maignan denies it) not but that you will feel upon your Finger a gravitation or pressure of the Glass-Tube, and the contained Mercury as of one body; but that you will not feel any sensible pressure of the Mercury aHypothesis; for according to that, the
And if some inquisitive person shall here object, That cerMaignan did purposely try, that his hand being thrust three or four Palmes deep into Quicksilver, his fingers were not sensible, either of any weight from the in
To these three Arguments the Examiner addes not a fourth, unless he design to present it us in this concluding passage: Huc etiam faciunt insignes librationes quibus argentum subito descendens agitatur: Idem enim hic fit quod in aliis Pendulis
And on this occasion I shall adde this Experiment: I took a Glass Pipe, whose two legs (very unequal in length) were parSyphon is describ'd in our 36. ExMercury and Water) into this Quicksilver was pour'd till 'twas some Inches high, and equally high in both legs: then the Pipe being inclin'd till the most part of the Quicksilver was fallen into one of the legs, I stopt the Orifice of the other leg with my Finger, and eMercury in this unstopt leg, make divers unaequilibrium. Of which the Reason may be easily deduc'd from what has been newly deliver'd; and yet in this case there is no pretence to be made of a Funiculus of violently distended Air to effect the Vibrations of the Mercury.
THirdly, But though our Examiner have not sufficiently proved his Hypothesis, yet perhaps it may be in its own nature so like to be true, as to deserve to be imbrac'd as such. Wherefore we will now take notice of some of those many things that to our apprehension render it very improbable.
And first, whereas our Author acknowledges that QuicksilPaschall's, and other Experiments, induc'd to admit this; it cannot but seem strange that, whatever the liquor be, there should be just the same weight or strength to extend them into a Funiculus: though Water, for instance, and Quicksilver be near fourteen times as heavy one as the other, and be otherwise of very distant natures; and though divers other liquors, as Oyle and Water, be likewise of Textures very differing. And this may somewhat the more be wondred at, because our AuFuniculus, that he will not allow any humane force to be able to produce one, by the divulsion of two flat Marbles, in case the contact of their Surfaces were so exquisite as quite to exclude all Air; though in the same place his Ratiocination plainly enough teaches (which Experience however does) that adhering Marbles, though with extraordinary difficulty, may be forcibly sever'd, and according to him the superficial parts may be distended into a Funiculus, that prevents a Vacuum.
But now the Hypothesis of his Adversaries is not at all inaequilibrium, whether what be put in the other be Gold, or Quicksilver, or Wooll, or Feathers, provided its weight be just a pound.
In the next place we may take notice, That the account our Examiner gives us of his Funiculus in the tenth Chapter, (where he takes upon him to Explicate it) is much more strange than satisfactory, and not made out by any such parallel opeweight and Spring of the Air may be inferr'd from such unquestion'd ExFuniculus, he would have us note two things: First, Argentum dum replet totum tubum, non mere tangere ejus summitatem (ut primo aspectu videtur)
sed eidem quo
(subjoyns he)
For I farther demand how the Funiculus comes by such hooks or graple-irons, or parts of the like shape, to take fast hold of all contiguous bodies, and even the smoothest, such as Glass, and the calm surface of Quicksilver, Water, Oyle, and other fluids: And how these slender and invisible hooks cannot onely in the tersest bodies find an innumerable company of ears or loops to take hold on, but hold so strongly that they are able not alone to lift up a tall Cylinder of that very ponderous meFuniculus once layes hold on the superficial Corpuscles, presently emulate the nature of consis
It seems also very difficult to conceive how this extenuated substance should require so strong a spring inward as the ExFuniculus, he seems plainly to intimate that it has its spring inward, upon the same account that Lute-strings and Ropes forcibly stretch'd have theirs. But there is no small disCartesian Notion of the cause of Springiness be admitted, then our extenuated substance having no Pores to be pervaded by the materia subtilis (to which besides our Author also makes Glass impervi
BUt this is not all that renders the Examiner's Hypothesis improbable: For, besides those already mentioned particulars, upon whose score it is very
For the better discernment of the force of this Objection we must briefly premise, That a Body is commonly said to be rarefi'd or dilated, (for I take the word in a larger sense than, I know, many others do, for a reason that will quickly apPhaenomena of Nature, there are three (and for ought we know but three) ways of explicating it: For, either we must say with the Atomists and Vacuists, that the Corpuscles whereof the rarefied Body consists do so depart from each other, that no other substance comes in between them to fill up the de
Now 'tis to this last (and, as some call it, rigorous) way of RaHypothesis: Though this, I confess, appear to me so difficult to be conceiPhaenomenon can be explained by it; since to explain a thing is to deduce it from something or other in Nature more known than it self.
He that would meet with full Discussions of this Aristotelean Rarefaction, may resort to the learned writings of Gassendus, Cartesius and Maignan, who have accused it of divers great ab
Let us then suppose, that in the Magdeburg Experiment he
Hypothesis; let us (I say) for easier considerations sake suppose, that the undilated Air, which (as he tells us) possessed about half an inch of space, consisted of a hundred CorCorpore occupante locum verbi gratia duplo majorem, necesse est ut
quaelibet ejus pars locum quo
prompts us to subjoyn, that in the whole capacity of the Globe (which according to him was two thousand times as great as the room possessed by the unexpanded Air) there must likewise be two hundred thousand parts of space commensurate each of them to one of the fore-mentioned hundredth parts of Air; and conse
And indeed when I considered these difficulties and others, that attend the Rarefaction our Examiner throughout his whole Book supposes, and when I found that ever and anon he remits us to what he teaches concerning Rarefaction; I could not but with some greediness resort to the Chapters he addressed me to.
such still, and that 'twas very hard even for a witty man to make more of a subject than the nature of it does bear. Which I say, that by professing my self unsatisfied with what he writes, I may not be thought to find fault with a man for not doing what perplain, as are scarcely (if at all) so much as intelligible. And in
The things he alledges in favour of the Rarefaction he would persuade are two: The one, That the Phaenomena of Rarefaction cannot be explicated either by Vacuities or the subingression of an AEthereal substance; and the other, That there are two ways of explicating the rigorous Rarefaction he contends for.
His Objections against the Epicurean and Cartesian ways of making out Rarefaction are some of them more plausible than most of those that are wont to be urged against them; yet not such as are not capable enough of Answers. But whilst some of the passages appeared easie to be replyed to by the FavouHypothesis they oppose, before I had fully examined the rest, chancing to mention these Chapters to an ingenious Man, hereafter to be further mentioned in this Treatise; he told me he had so far considered them more than the rest of the book, that he had thought upon some Hypotheses, whereby the Phaenomena of Rarefaction might be made out either according to the Vacuists, or according to the Cartesians, adding, that he had also examined the Instance our Adversary pretends to be afRota Aristotelica. Wherefore being sufficiently distressed by Avocations of several sorts, and being willing to reserve the Declaration of my own thoughts concerning the manner of Rarefaction and Condensation for another Treatise, I shall refer the Reader to
After our Author's Objections against the two ways of RareVacuists, and the other by the Cartesians and others, that admit the solidest Bodies, and even Glass it self, to be pervious to an AEthereal or subtile matter; he attempts to explicate the manner by which that rigorous RaAristotelean Rarefaction according to those two
And, first, having told us how Rarefaction may be exin infinitum, he does himself make such an Objection against the infinity of parts in a continuum, as he is fain to give so obscure an Answer to,
obscure, and endeaHypothesis it can scarce be otherwise.
Wherefore I shall only add on this occasion, that 'tis not clear to me, that even such a divisibility of a continuum as is here supposed would make out the Rarefaction he contends for. For, let the integrant parts of a continuum be more or less finite or infinite in number, yet still each part, being a corporeal substance, must have some Particle of space com
The second Argument alledged to recommend the hitherAquinas and Suarez, have taught that the same corporeal thing may naturally be, and
But to conclude at length this tedious Enquiry into the Aristotelean way of Rarefaction, (which is of so obscure a nature that it can scarce be either proposed or examined in few words) I will not take upon me resolutely to affirm which of the two ways of explicating it (by Atomes or by Parts infinitely divisible) our Author declares himself for. But which of them soever it be, I think I have shown that he has not intelligibly made it out: And I make the less scruple to do so, because he himself is so inge
As for the other way of explicating Rarefaction, namely, by supposing that a body is made up of parts indivisible; he will not I presume, deny, but that the Objections we formerHypothesis (which one would think he prefers, since he makes use of it in the three or four last Chapters of his Book)
Two Arguments indeed there are which our Adversary offers as proofs of what he teaches. The first is, That they commonly teach in the Schools, that at least divinitus (as he speaks) such a thing as is pleaded for may be done, and that consequently it is not repugnant to the nature of a body. But, though they that either know me, or have read what I have written about matacknowledge and venerate Divine Omnipotence; yet in some famous Schools they teach, that it is contrary to the naimpiety be of a differing mind from him about the possibility of such a Rarefaction as he would here have, our Author may perchance think fit to grant, if he remember that he himself says a few Pages after, Cum tempus sit Ens essentialiter successivum, it a ut ne divinitus
But though our Author's way of explicating Rarefaction be thus improbable, yet I must not here omit to take notice, that his Funiculus supposes a Condensation that to me appears incumpenetration of dimensions. A thing that Philosophers of all Ages have looked upon as by no means to be admitted in Nature. And our Author himself speaks somewhere at the same rate, where to the Question, Why the walls that inclose fired Gun-powder must be blown asunder? Respondeo (says he) haec omnia inde accidere, quod pulvis ille sic accensus & in flammam conversus,
THere remain then yet a couple of Considerations to be oppos'd against the Examiners Hypothesis, which, though the past Discourse may make them be look'd upon as needless, we must not pretermit, because they contain such Arguments as may not only be imployed against our Adversaries Doctrine, but will very much tend to the confirmation of ours.
I consider then further, that the Hypothesis I am opposing, bePhaenomena would be plausibly enough explicable by it: the same motions in an intermediate body being in many cases producible alike, whether we suppose it to be thrust or drawn; provided both the endeavours tend the same way. But then we may be satisfied whether the effect be to be ascribed to Pulsion or to Traction, (as they commonly speak, though indeed the later seems reducible to the former) if we can find out an Experi
It need therefore be no great wonder, if his Adversaries do, as he observes, make a great account of this Experiment, to prove that the Mercury is kept up in the Tube by the resi
And, First, he questions the truth of the Observation it self; because having made trial in a low Hill, the event did no ways answer his expectation. But though, in stead of disapproving, I am willing to commend his Curiosity, to make the ExperiPaschal's. For besides the comGassendus, who relates the ExperiPaschal) by whose direction he supposes it to have been try'd: the same Gassendus relates, that the like Observation was five times repeated,
But because that though Experiments made in very elevated places are noble ones, and of great importance in the ControAtmosphere, in a far less height than that of an ordinary Hill. But in stead of a common Tube we made use of a kind of Weather-glass, that the included Air might help to make the event notable, for a reason to be mentioned ere long; and in stead of Quicksilver we employ'd common Water in the Pipe belonging to the Weather-glass, that small changes in the Weight or resistance of the Atmosphere in opposition of the inWestminster, and there blew in a little Air to raise the Water to the upper part of the Pipe, that being above the Vessel (AB) we might more precisely mark the several stations of the Water than otherwise we could. Afterward having suffered the Glass to rest a pretty while upon the Lead, that the Air (II) within might be reduc'd to the same state, both as to coldness and as to pressure, with (KK) that without, having marked the station of the Water (F), we gently let down the Vessel by a long string to the foot of the Wall, where one attended to receive it; who having suffer'd it to rest upon the ground, cry'd to us that it was subsided about an Inch becaeteris paribus, colder than that below, which would rather check the greater expansion of the included Air at the top of the Leads than promote it. But the better to avoid mistakes and prevent Objections, we thought fit to try the Experiment within the Church, and got into a Galery of the same height with the Leads: but the upper part of the Pipe being casually broken off, we thought fit to order the matter so, that the surface (G) of the remaining Water in the Pipe should be about
Atmosphere should make no change in it, as in another whose included Air was at the top, (whereTorricellian Experiment upon the above-mentioned Leads, and then let down the Tube together with the restagnant Mercury to the ground, to observe the increasing altitude of the QuickAppendix to the Epistle we have been defending. And it shall suffice us in the mean time that the Tryals already mentioned seem to make it evident enough that the Atmosphere gravitates more, caeteris paribus, near the surface of the Earth, than in the more elevated parts of the Air. For the Leads on which we made our Tryals were found by measure to be in perpendicular height but threescore and fifteen Foot from the ground. To which we shall onely add this at present, that once being desirous to observe what we could touching the proportions of the subsidence of the Water to the
The other Particular I shall mention for confirmation of our Hypothesis, is that Experiment (which, though it be needless, seems yet more cogent and proper to prevent Evasions) made by the same Mousieur Paschal, of carrying a weakly-blown Foot-ball from the bottom to the top of an high Mountain. For that Foot-ball swell'd more and more, the higher it was carried, so that it appeared as if it were full blown at the top of the Mountain, and gradually growing lank again, as it was carried downwards; so that at the foot of the Hill it was flaccid as before. This, I say, having thus happened, we have here an Experiment to prove our Hypothesis, wherein recourse cannot be had to any forcibly and preternaturally distended Body, such as that is pretended to be which remains in the deTorricellian Experiment.
The other thing which the Examiner alledges against our Argument from Monsieur Paschal's Tryals, is, that supposing it to be true, yet it cannot thence be inferr'd, that the subsidence of the Mercury at the top of the Hill proceeded from the Atmospherical Cylinder's being there lighter and less able to sustain the Quicksilver.
I was going to proceed to what remains of this second Part of our Treatise, But that since I begun this Chapter casually meeting with an Experiment lately sent in a Letter to a very Ingenious Croon one of the learned ProGresham College.Hen. Power.Westminster, and to be of such a nature as we have not in this part of England the opportunity to try the like, for want of Hills high enough, I shall (according to the perTorricellian Experiment, afforded us a noble proof of the weight of the Air; so they may afford us one of its Spring:
Phaenomenon of the Waters descent will not be ascribed to any attraction made of the Water by the violentlyThis fifteenth of October 1661. we took a Weather glass A B, of about two
foot in length, and carrying it to the bottom of Hallifax Hill, the Water stood in the shank at thirteen Inches above the Water in the Vessel: Thence carrying it thus fill'd, with the whole frame, immediately to the top of the said Hill, the Water fell down to the point D, viz. an Inch and a quarter lower than it was at the bottom of the said Hill; which (as he rightly inferrs) proves the Elasticity of the Air: for the internal Air A C, which was of the same power and extension with the external at the bottom of the Hill, did manifest a greater Elasticity than the Mountain-Air there
The like Experiment, I hear, the same Ingenious Doctor has very lately repeaVirtuosi have thought it strange, that in an Hill far inferiAlps and Appennines, so short a Cylinder of so light a liquor as Water should fall so much; yet I see not any reaWestminster;) but raTorricellian Experiment made without purposely leaving any Air in the Tube, would not, at the top of the mention'd Hill, have subsided above an Inch, if so much, the Water, that is near fourteen times lighter, should not fall above a sourteenth part of that space; whereas in the Torricellian Experiment, the upper and deserted space of the Tube has little or no Air left in it, but the Correspondent part of the Weather-glass was furnish'd with Air, whose
Atmosphere at the bottom of the Hill; and consequently must be much greater than the pressure of the Atmosphere at the top of the Hill, where the Atmospherical Cylinder's gravity (upon whose account it presses) must be much diminish'd by its being made much shorter, and by its consisting of an Air less comprest. And thus much for the first of the two Considerations wherewith I promised to conclude this second part of the present Tract. Onely before I proceed I must in a word desire the Reader to take notice, that though I have here singled out but one of the nine ExPhaenomena, but onely leave both them and some other things he delivers about Siphons and the Magdeburg Experiments, to be discours'd by those that are more concerned to examine them, contentFuniculus which his Expositions suppose, and cleared the grounds of explicat
THE other thing that I would have considered touching our Adversaries Hypothesis is, That it is needless. For whereas he denies not that the Air has some Weight and Spring, but affirms that it is very insufficient to perform Phaenomena of the Torricellian Experiment.
We took then a long Glass-Tube, which by a dexterous hand and the help of a Lamp was in such a manner crooked at the bottom, that the part turned up was almost parallel to the rest
Mercury standing in a level might reach in the one leg to the bottom of the divided paper, and just to the same height or Horizontal line in the oMercury, (we took (I say) care) that the Air at last included in the shorter Cylinder should be of the same laxity with the rest of the Air about it. This done, we began to pour Quicksilver into the longer leg of the Siphon, which by its weight pressing up that in the shorter leg, did by degrees streighten the included Air: and continuing this pouring in of Quicksilver till the Air in the shorter leg was by condensation reduced to take up but half the space it possess'd (I say, possess'd, not fill'd) before; we cast our eyes upon the longer leg of the Glass, on which was likewise pasted a list of paper carefully divided into Inches and parts, and we observed, not without delight and satisfaction, that the Quicksilver in that longer part of the Tube was 29. Inches higher than the other. Now that this Observation does both very well agree with and confirm our Hypothesis, will be easily discerned by him that takes notice what we teach, and Monsieur Paschal and our English friends Experiments prove, that the greater the weight is that leans upHypothesis, that as according to it the Air in that degree of density and corresponTorricellian Experiment; so here the same Air being brought to a degree of density about twice as great as that it had before, obtains a Spring twice as strong as formerly. As may appear by its being able to sustain or resist a Cylinder of 29 Inches in the longer Tube, together with the weight of the Atmospherical Cylinder, that lean'd upon those 29 Inches of Mercury; and, as we just now inferr'd from the Torricellian Experiment, was equiva
We were hindered from prosecuting the trial at that time by the casual breaking of the Tube. But because an accurate Experiment of this nature would be of great importance to the Doctrine of the Spring of the Air, and has not yet been made (that I know) by any man; and because also it is more uneasie to be made than one would think, in regard of the difficulty as well of procuring crooked Tubes fit for the purMercury's surface; I suppose it will not be unwelcome to the Reader, to be informed that after some other trials, one of which we made in a Tube whose longer leg was perMercury was risen in that longer Tube, when it appeared to have ascended to any of the divi
AA. The number of equal spaces in the shorter leg, that contained the same parcel of Air diversly extended.
B. The height of the Mercurial Cylin
C. The height of a Mercurial Cylinder that counterbalanc'd the pressure of the Atmosphere.
D. The Aggregate of the two last CoB and C, exhibiting the pressure sustained by the included Air.
E. What that pressure should be accorHypothesis, that supposes the pressures and expansions to be in reciprocal proportion.
For the better understanding of this Experiment it may not be amiss to take notice of the following particulars:
1. That the Tube being so tall that we could not conveni
2. The lower and crooked part of the Pipe was placed in a square wooden Box, of a good largness and depth, to prevent
3. That we were two to make the Observation together, the one to take notice at the bottom how the Quicksilver rose in the shorter Cylinder, and the other to pour in at the top of the longer, it being very hard and troublesome for one man alone to do both accurately.
4. That the Quicksilver was poured in but by little and lit
5. That at the beginning of the Operation, that we might the more truly discern where the Quicksilver rested from time to time, we made use of a small Looking-glass, held in a convenient posture to reflect to the eye what we desired to discern.
6. That when the Air was so compress'd, as to be crouded into less than a quarter of the space it possess'd before, we try
Now although we deny not but that in our Table some parHypothesis might perchance invite the Reader to expect; yet the Variations are not so considerable, but that they may probably enough be ascribed to some such want of exactness as in such nice Experiments is scarce avoidable. But for all
Mercury. For no man perhaps yet knows how near to an infinite compression the Air may be capable of, if the compressing force be comFuniculus, which in our present case has nothing to do. And to let you see that we did not (a little above) inconsiderately mention the weight of the inMercury in the Tube did notably ascend. Which considerable
Now, if to what we have thus delivered concerning the comPhaenomena of these Mercurial Experiments depend upon the differing measures of strength to be met with in the Air's Spring, according to its various degrees of compression and Laxity. But, before I enter upon this subject, I shall readily acknowledge that I had not reduc'd the trials I had made about measuring the Expansion of the Air to any certain Hypothesis, when that ingenious Gentleman Mr. Richard Townley was pleaPhysico-Mechanical Experiments been satisfied that the Spring of the Air was the cause of it, he had endeavoured (and I wish in such attempts other ingenious men would follow his example) to supply what I had omitted concerning the reducing to a preAppendix, or to publish it by it self, or at all; and because he hath not yet, for ought I know, met with fit Glasses to make an any-thing-acTownley's suppositions about the proportion wherePneumatical Treatise) made Observations to the same purpose, which he acknowledged to agree well enough with Mr.
A. The number of equal spaces at the top of the Tube, that contained the same parcel of Air.
B. The height of the Mercurial Cylinder, that together with the Spring of the included Air counterbalanced the pressure of the At
C. The pressure of the Atmosphere.
D. The Complement of B to C, exhibiting the pressure sustained by the included Air.
E. What that pressure should be according to the Hypothesis.
To make the Experiment of the debilitated force of expanMercury that might be spilt. And in regard it would require a vast and in few places procurable quantity of QuickTorricellian Experiment, we made use of a Glass-Tube of about six foot long, for that being Hermetically sealed at one end, serv'd out turn as well as if we could have made the Experi
Secondly, We also provided a slender Glass-Pipe of about the bigness of a Swans Quill, and open at both ends: All along which was pasted a narrow list of Paper divided into Inches and half quarters.
Thirdly, This slender Pipe being thrust down into the greaMercury inMercury in the Tube.
Fourthly, there being, as near as we could guess, little more than an Inch of the slender Pipe left above the surface of the reMercury, and consequently unfill'd therewith, the prominent orifice was carefully clos'd with sealing Wax melted; after which the Pipe was let alone for a while, that the Air di
Fifthly, Having thus included a just Inch of Air, we lifted up the slender Pipe by degrees, till the Air was dilated to an Inch, an Inch and an half, two Inches, &c. and observed in Inches and Eighths, the length of the Mercurial Cylinder,
Mercury in the Tube.
Sixthly, The Observations being ended, we presently made the Torricellian Experiment with the above-mention'd great Tube of six foot long, that we might know the height of the Mercurial Cylinder, for that particular day and hour; which height we found to be 29¾ Inches.
Seventhly, Our Observations made after this manner furAtmosphere should be look'd upon (as it usually is) as a limited and bounded Portion of the Air; or whether we should in a stricter sense than we did before, use the Atmosphere and Aëreal part of the World for almost equiAtmosphere some other notion in relation to its Extent and Li
Phaenomena there is not of our Adversaries Hypothesis any need: the evincing of which will appear to be of no small moment in our present Controversie, to him that considers, that the two main things that induced the Learned Examiner to reject our Hypothesis are, that Nature abhors a Vacuum, and that though the Air have some Weight and Spring, yet these are insufficient to make out the known Phaenomena; for which we must therefore have reFuniculus. Now as we have formerly seen, that he has not so satisfactorily disproved as resolutely rejected a Vacuum, so we have now manifested that the Spring of the Air may suffice to perform greater things than what our ExpliTorricellian Experiments and those of our Engine obliges us to ascribe to it. Wherefore since besides the seveHypothesis we oppose, and especially its being scarce, if at all, intelligible, we can add that it is unnecessary; we dare expect that such Readers as are not byass'd by their reverence for Aristotle or the Peripatetick Schools, will hardly reject an Hypothesis which, besides that it is very intelligible, is now prov'd to be sufficient, only to imbrace a Doctrine that supposes such a rarefaction and condenPhaenomena wont to be expli
AND now we are come to the third and last Part of our Defence; wherein we are to consider what our ExamiPhysico-Mechanical Treatise. But though this may seem the only part wherein I am particularly concern'd; yet perhaps we shall find it, if not the shortest, at least the easiest, part of our Task.
And to proceed now to his 18 Chapter, which he intitles De Experimentis Boylianis, we shall find according to what we lately noted, that against the first Experiment he objects noPhaenomenon of the intrusion of the Finger into a Cavity, where it finds no resistance, having been formerly accounted for according to our Hypothesis, we shall not need to repeat our Explication of it; though this mistaPhaenomenon supplies our Adversary with divers of his folHoc esse discrimen manifestum inter pressionem & suctionem, quod suctio efficiat hujusmodi adhaesionem, pressio autem minimè; since to say so is but to affirm, not to prove.
What our Author would except against the 3. Experiment he ought to have more intelligibly exprest: For whereas of a DisNullatenus satisfacit, ut legenti constabit; I would not do the Reader the injury to suspect him of taking this proofless AsserHypothesis, however it may disagree with the ExaHoc quo
que
Experimentum principiis nostris optimè convenit: Cum enim per illam Emboli depressionem aër in cavitate brachii inclusus separetur ab eodem brachio, descendat
que
simul cum Embolo (uti de aqua simul cum argento vivo descendente capite decimo tertio vidimus) fit ut in tota illa depressione, novae semper ab aëre illo descendente superficies deripiantur simul & extendantur, ut ibidem de aqua est explicatum: cum ita
que
aeque facile diripiantur & extendantur hujusmodi superficies in fine depressionis ac initio, mirum non est quod eadem utrobi
que
sentiatur deprimendi difficultas.
By which though he seems to intend an Opposition to that part of the third Experiment which I oppos'd not against his Opinion, but that of some learned Vacuists: Yet (not to menHypothesis, and is either unsatisfactory even according to that, or else disagrees with what himself hath taught us but a little before. For 'tis evident that the more the Sucker is depress'd, the more the Cylinder is exhausted of Air. And in his third Corollary (which we lately desired the Reader to observe) speaking of the Air in the Receiver (and the case is the same with the Air in the Cylinder) he affirms more than once, Eo magis extendi ac rarefieri aërem relictum, quo plus inde exhauritur, majoremque proinde acquirere vim sese contrahendi. Whereas here he would have us believe, that the little internal Air that was in the Cavity of the shank of the Stop-cock, does as strongly retract the Sucker, or, which in our case is all one, resist its depression, when the Sucker is yet near the top of the Cylinder, (and con
In the Fourth Experiment, touching the swelling of a BladFuniculus, and the Re
As for the reason likewise he adds, why a perforated BladFuniculus) to shew us what kind of strings they are; which though, according to him, strongly fastned to the inside of the Receiver and the superficies of the Bladder, must draw just as forcibly one as another, how long soever they be without the Bladder in comparison of those that within the Bladder draw so as to hinder the diduction of its sides. For Experience shews, that in a perforated Bladder the wrinkles continue as if there were no drawing at all.
Funiculus to have any other than an imaginary existence; and whereas he acknowFuniculus, to draw asunder the sides of the Bladder, we can confirm our Explication by the formerlyPaschal, who carryFuniculus of vio
Against the cause we assign of the fifth Experiment he like
This is that wherein we mention our having broke a GlassAt profect non videtur credibile, mollissimum hunc aërem tam vehementer
vitrum (tantae praesertim crassitudinis quantae ibidem dicitur) undi
as if it were more credible that the little Air within (which, according to him, is so much thinner than common Air) should be able to act more powerfully upon the Glass than the Air without, which himself confesses to be a heavy body, and which not only reaches from the surface of the Earth to the top of the highest Mountains, but which (as may not improbably be argued from what we have elsewhere delivered) may, for ought we know to the contrary, be heaped upon the Receiver to the height of some
As for the Explication he substitutes in these words, Verius ita
By what we have already discour
Our Explication of the ninth Experiment he handles very seSed profecto nimis longè videtur hoc à veritate recedere: potest
But, I do confess, I do for all this think our Explication more true, than well considered by our Author. For the putting of water into the Vial that was broken, was done (as is clearly intimated in the beginning of our Narrative) upon a particular design (as indeed we tryed divers other things with our Engine, not so much with immediate reference to the Spring of the Air, as to make use of such Tryals in some other of our Writings.) And accordingly in the second Tryal mentioned in the same Experiment the water was omitted. But, notwithstanding this water, the sides of the Glass being exposed to the pressure of the Atmosphere, had that whole pressure against them before the exhaustion of the Receiver; so that there needed no such blowing in of the Air afresh as our Author imagines, to effect the breaking of the Vial, it being sufficient for that purpose, that the pressure against the convex superficies of it was taken off by the exhaustion of the Receiver, the pressure against the concave superficies remaining as great as ever. And therefore we need not altogether deny what the Examiner sayes that Licet clausus superne fuisset tubulus ille, eodem tamen modo fract a sine dubio fuisset phiala. For, since in such cases the Air (as we have often taught) is shut up with the whole pressure of the Atmosphere upon it, it may almost as easily break the Glass as if it were unstopt. And accordingly we mention in the 36. Experiment the breaking of a thin Glass Hermetically seal'd upon the recess of the ambient Air. But, how confidently soever our Author speaks, I thought fit to adde the word almost, because we observed in the 39 Experiment, that such thin Vials (and thick ones will not break) are subject upon the withdrawing of the ambient, Air to retch a little, whereby the Spring of the Air within the Vial might in some cases (I say, in some) be so far weakned as not to be able to break it, unless
All the Experiments from the 9. to the 17. exclusively our Examiner leaving uncensured, we may with him advance to the consideration of the 17.
In this we relate how, when we made the Torricellian ExMercury together with the Tube and the suspended Mercurial Cylinder (of about 29. Inches) in our Receiver, that by drawing off and letting in the Air at pleasure upon the restagnant Mercury, and consequently weakning and increasing its pressure, we might make it more clearly appear than hitherto had been done by Experiment, that the suspension of the Mercurial Cylinder, and the height of it, depended upon the greater or lesser pressure of the Air. But against our Explication of this Experiment (which has had the good fortune to convince and satisfie many ingenious men) the Examiner objects nothing in particular, contenting himself to have recourse here also to his Funiculus. Yet two obser
The first is, that though the Quicksilver were exactly shut up into our Receiver after the manner newly declared, yet the suspended Quicksilver did not descend: whence having said that I argue, that it is now sustained not by the Counterpoise of the Atmosphere, but by the Spring of the Air shut up in the Receiver, he subjoyns onely this, Sed rectius sane infertur, Cylindrum illum nihil ibidem antea praestitisse. But whether this be not gratis dictum we leave the Reader to collect from what we have formerly discourst in the second Part of this De
Mercury in the Tube, by the debilitated and strengthned Spring of the Air. But without finding fault with our application of that principle to the Phaenomena, he sayes that he has sufficiently refuted the principle it self in the fourth Chapter, (which how well he has done we have already seen) and therefore expliDico igitur (sayes he) argentum per illam exhaustionem sic in tubo descendere, quod deorsum trahatur ab aëre qui incumbit argento restagnanti: siquidem incumbens ille aër jam per exhaustionem valde rarefact us & extensus, sese vehementer contrahit, & contrahendo conatur etiam subjectum sibi argentum restagnans è suo vasculo elevare, unde fit ut (argento illo restagnante minus. jam gravitante in fundum sui vasculi) argentum quod est in tubo descendat; ut per se patet. Adeo
But this Explication supposing such a
I know not whether I may not adde (to express an unwilPhaenomena in question by saying, that the Air in the Receiver
Our Examiner in his Animadversion upon the 18 ExperiMercury did in Winter rise and fall in the Tube, someHypothesis of the Atmospherical Cylinder, and clearly shew that the Quicksilver is not sustained by it: Nam (sayes he) si hic ab eo sustentatum fuisset, debuisset potius frigidiore tempore ascendere quam descendere, eo quod aër tunc multo densior esset & gravior. Ita
And by the same Argument he con
First, That it doth not conclude: because that as sometimes the Quicksilver in the Tube did rise in warmer, and fall in colder, weather; so at other times it did rather emulate the ascent and descent of water in a Weather-glass.
And, thirdly, this Objection does as little agree with his Doctrine as with my Conjecture: For in the 50. page, where he gives us an account according to his principles of the rising and falling of water in a Weather-glass, and compares it with the suspension of Quicksilver, he tells us, Hinc fit quod, contracto hoc funiculo per frigus, aqua illa tempore frigido ascendat, descendat autem tempore calido, eo quod per calorem funiculus ille dilatetur. So that, according to the Examiner himself, the Quicksilver ought to have ascended in colder, and descended in warmer, weather. Now, although I proposed my thoughts of the difficult
Upon this the Examiner has onely this short AnimadverIn decimo nono ostendit aquam eodem modo per exhaustionem Recipientis descendere, quo in praecedente descendere ostenderat argentum vivum; cujus cum eadem sit ratio, non est cur amplius ei insistamus. In which words since he offers nothing new or peculiar to shew any incongruity in our Explication to our principles, which agree very well with the new
In his Examen of this Experiment our Author makes me inPhaenomena he repeats, that not onely the Air, but the Water also has a Spring. But though I suspect not that he does wilfully mistake my sense, yet by what I write in this and the following Experiments the Reader may well enough
But whereas I ascribe the appearance of the Bubbles in the water to this, that upon the exhaustion of some of the Air inNam
si ita fieret, deberent profecto hujusmodi bullulae non è fundo vasis sic ascendere, (uti tam in hoc quam in sequentibus experimentis in quibus de istis bullis agitur semper asseritur) sed è superiore parte aquae, ubi minus premuntur, ut per se est manifestum. But why he should be here so peremptory I confess I do not, for all this Objection, yet see: For in the bottom of the next page he sayes, he will not deny but that Aërial Particles latitant in the other parts of the water (he had before spoken of the bottom of it) may be extended into bubAnd this Effervescence was so great in the upper part of the water, &c. As also, —
Our Author making no particular Objection against the 10 following Experiments, we also shall pass them by, and fall with him upon the consideration of the 31 Experiment.
Upon this our Author having recited our Conjecture as the cause why two very flat and smooth Marbles stick so closely together, that by lifting up the uppermost you may take up also the lowermost, approves my way of examining that ConCertum esse, sententiam illam vel hoc solo Experimento satis refelli. But possibly he would have spoken less resolutely, if he had made all the trials about the adhesion of Maibles that we relate our selves to have made in the short History we have publish'd of
As for the account the Examiner substitutes of our Phaenomenon, I know not whether many Readers will acquiesce in it: For, not to insist upon the Objection which himself takes no
Against our Explication of these two, which our Author examines together, he objects nothing peculiar, but contents himself to explicate them by his Funiculus: Wherefore neither shall we need to frame any peculiar defence for it, especially if the Reader will be pleased to refer hither as much of what we oppos'd to his Animadversion on the third Experiment as is justly applicable to our present Controversie. Our Author indeed endeavours to prove his Explication by saying, that the distended Air in the exhausted Cylinder draws up the Sucker with the annexed weight, Eodem fere modo quo videmus in cueurbitulis dorso aegrotantis applicatis, in quibus, extincta jam flamma, rarefact us aër se contrahens carnem tam vehementer, uti videmus, elevat attrahit
But that
To these our Author saying nothing but this, In his tribus nihil peculiariter occurrit hic explicandum, cujus ratio ex jam dictis non facile pateat; we also may be allow'd to pretermit them, and pass on to
Of the appearance of Light or Whiteness, mentioned in this Experiment, the Examiner confesses that we have assigned a cause probable enough, by referring it to the vehement and sudPhaenomenon but as mere Conjectures, and though he annexes his Explication of it; yet I see not but that it is coincident with ours, or not better than it. For, to what I had said of the Commotion of the parts of the Air, he adds only in two or three several places their being violentPhaenomenon I do not readily see. And whereas he subjoyns, Existimo autem dicendum potius candorem illum esse lumen quoddam reflexum, quam innatum, eo quòd (ut testatur Author) in tenebris non appareat, sed solum de die aut accensa candela: I presume the attentive Reader will easily discern that his Opi
Against these our Author makes no peculiar Objections.
But in his Animadversions upon these, having told the Reader that I seem to ascribe the sudden extinction of the inVerum impossible videtur, ut hujusmodi animalcula ob solum defectum crassioris aëris tam cito moriantur: But gives no other reason than that they dye so soon, which is no more than what he said in the newly-cited words, and besides is grounded upon some
For my part, as in the 41 Experiment I tender'd my thoughts concerning Respiration but doubtingly, so I am yet unwilling to determine resolvedly in a matter of that difficulty.
In his Examen of these two last of our Physico-Mechanical Experiments, the Author contents himself to endeavour to exPhaenomena recited in them by the contraction of the rarefi'd Air; which, according to him, endeavours to draw up the subjacent water out of the Vial, whereby it vehemently distends the parts of that water, as he taught in the like case upon the 20 Experiment. But since we have already consiFuniculus should in that case also distend it; we are so afraid of tiring out the Readers patience by the frequent repetition of the same things, that we will leave it to him to judge which of the two Explications, the Examiner's or ours, is to be prefer
And thus have we by God's assistance considered what the Examiner hath been pleased to oppose either against our partiHypotheses that divers of them suppose: Wherein I have been the more particular and prolix, because I would willingly excuse my self and others from the trouble of any more Disputes of this kind. I hope there is not in my Answers any thing of Asperity to be met with; for I have no quarrel to the Person of the Author, or his just repuPerhaps, or some such expression of diffidence, as others do what they deliver far more resolutely. And though being very far from being wedded to my Opinions, I am still ready to exHypothesis he would substitute in the room of ours (besides that it is partly precarious) supposes things which divers of the eminentest Wits of our Age (otherVirtuosi speak of his Attempts, and particularly of his Funiculus, to fear that some of those he has needlesly oppos'd, will be apt to apply to him that of St. Austin against some of his AdversaIn mala causa non possunt aliter, at malam causam quis eos coegit habere? But this notwithstanding I am, as I was going to say, content my Adversary should be thought to have said for his Principles as much as the Subject will bear; nor would I have it made his Disparagement, that I have declared that his whole Book has not made me depart from any of my Opinions or Explications, since his Hypothesis and mine being inconsistent, it may be looked upon as a sign rather that each of us have, than that either of us have not, reason'd closely to his own Principles, that the things we infer from our contrary Suppositions do so generally disagree.
THE chief Arguments of the Author of a certain TreaDe Corporum inseparabilitate, whereby he endeaHypothesis of the Weight and Spring of the Air, and to set up and establish instead thereof an unintelHypothesis of Attraction, performed by I know not what strange imaginary Funiculus, are only Five, two against the former, and three for the later. The first of which is, That the Weight and Spring of the Air are not sufficient to perform the Effects ascribed to them: The second, that could they be performed by that Hypothesis granted, yet the way of this strange Spring it self is not intelligibly explained or ex
First therefore, we will examine his Negative, and next his Affirmative, Arguments for this strange Hypothesis.
His Negative I find in the 20 Chapter, where he endeaVacuists and that of the Plenists.
Concerning the first of these we find him conclude it imposVacuum, which being done by a Circle (viz. There is no Vacuum in the Tube because Nature abhors a
Next, as for Rarefaction by heat, that will as naturally folHypothesis. For the Atoms of fire flowing in in great numbers, and passing through with a very rapid motion, must needs accelerate the motion of these ParEpicurus permedium will be less impeded by the ra
As for his third Objection drawn from his supposed attractive virtue of the thus-rarefi'd Air, that is quickly answered, by de
And, lastly, the Phaenomena of my Lord Bacon's Experi
So then, by granting Epicurus his Principles, that the Atoms or Particles of bodies have an innate motion; and granting our Supposition of the determinate motion and figure of the Aërial Particles, all the Phaenomena of Rarefaction and Condensation, of Light, Sound, Heat, &c. will naturally and necessarily fol
As to the second way of Rarefactiore by the intrusion or inAEther into the spaces dePlenum, this also is by the Author condemned, and branded with Impossibility. And why? First, because 'tis (he says) impossible that the above-mentioned Phaenomena of the Carp's Bladder can be explained by it. Second
And the way that I shall take, shall be that of the most aDes Cartes, published in his Philosophical Works: Which is this, That the Air is a Body consisting of long, slender, flexible Particles, agitated or whirl'd round by the rapid motion of the Globuli Caelestes, and the subtile Matter of his first Element, whereby they are each of them enabled to drive or force out of their Vortice all such other agitated Particles. Now the swifter these Bodies are whirl'd round, the more do their flexible parts flie asunder and stretch themselves out, and the more forcibly do they resist the ingress of any other so agitated particles into their Vortice, and consequently the slower their motion is, the less will be their resistance. And because there is a vast number of these whirHypothesis an effect of Heat) more swiftly and strongly whirled round, they presently begin to expand themselves, and maintain a bigger Vortice than before. Now to perform what I just now promised, I shall endeavour to give a possible, if not a proPhaenomena. And, First, for that of the Carp's Bladder, where the Air is rarefi'd (says the AuMercury in the Torricellian Experiment freed from the pressure of the Air, and their motion continuing the same (by reason that the TransMagdeburgick Experiment. Now, whereas these Particles will by the same pressure of the Air be reduc'd to the same state they were in at first, that is, to be thronged into a very little room, and thereby be able to maintain a very small VorTorricellian Experiment reduces the Air in the Bladder to its former inconspicuousness, as the adMagdeburg Experiment does that Receiver full of rarefi'd Air into the bigness of a Hazel Nut. Now the Water in this last-mention'd Experiment enters with a great impetuosity, because driven on with the whole pressure of the Atmosphere, and resisted only by the small force of the so-far. rarefi'd Air.
Phaenomena of Gun-powder, I shall enCartesian Hypothesis. For supposing those Terrestrial parts of the Gun-powder to be first at rest, and afterwards agitated by the rapid motion of his first Element, there will be sufficient differMateria subtilis, so soon as an in
So then let us suppose a Barrel of Gun-powder placed in some close room, to some grains of which we will suppose some actual fire to be applied, by which actual fire (the TexMateria subtilis: into which posture they are no sooner put, than agitated and whirled sufficiently by it; whence folMateria subtilis. Which subtile Matter being every where present,
Materia subtilis must needs be hurried away with so great an impetuosity on all sides, as not only to break in pieces its slight wooden prison, and remove the lighter Particles of the ambient Air, but huge Beams, nay, vast accumulated Masses of the most compacted Structures of Stone, and even shake the very Earth it self, or whatGlobuli secundi Elementi (as he calls them) are expell'd out of the room, and the Materia primi Elementi succeeds in the place of it. Nor do I see, secondly, what great reason he had for his grand Conclusion,
Having thus examined the Author's first Arguments, that Rarefaction cannot be made out by any other way than his; we shall find his other, which he brings to establish his own Hypothesis, much of the same kind. As, First, that his way of Rarefaction implies no Contradiction: For if the affirming a body to be really and totally in this place, and at the same time to be really and wholly in another, that is, to be in this place, and not to be in this place, be not a Contradiction, I know not what is. Next, that some learned School-men have thought so; to which I answer, more learned men have thought otherwise. And, lastly, that there are very plain Examples of the like nature to be found in other things; of which he only brings one, viz. that of the Rota Aristotelica, which upon
THe great Problem of the Rota Aristotelica, by his explicaquae Philosophorum ingenia bactenus valde exercuerunt, but to give an instance for the confir
CHap. 2. Pag. 3. Cum tota vis, &c. Being the whole power of the Spring of the Air depends upon the AEquilibrium of its weight with twenty nine Inches and an half of Quicksilver, so that this Spring doth neither more nor less in a shut place, than is done by that AEquilibrium in an open place: It is manifest, seeing we have shewed the
P. 4. Nam si Tubus, &c. For if a Tube but twenty Inches long (such as we used in our first Argument) be not quite filled with Quicksilver, as before, but a little space be left betwixt the Mercury and the Finger on the top of the Tube, in which Air only may abide: We shall find that the Finger below being removed, the Finger on the top will not only be drawn downwards, as before, but the Quicksilver shall descend also, and that notably, viz. as much as so small a parcel of Air can be extended by such a descending weight. So that if instead of Air, Water or any other Liquor which is not so easily extended be put in its place, there will be no descent at all.
Hence, I say, against this Opinion an Argument is framed: For if the external Air cannot keep up those twenty Inches of Quicksilver from de
Ibid. Dices fortè, &c. You will perchance say, that the Quicksilver therefore doth in the alledged case descend, because it is thrust down by that parcel of Air which dilates its self by its own Spring.
Ibid. Sic deberet, &c. So should the Finger be rather thrust from the top of the Tube, than thereby fastned to it; because this Dilatation must be made as well upwards as downwards.
P. 6. Concipi, &c. It cannot be conceived how that Air should dilate it self, or thrust down the Mercury, unless by taking up a greater place; which thing these Authors are much against, asserting that Rarefaction can be made no otherways than by Corpuscles or Vacuities.
Chap. 3. p. 7. Si, &c. If you take a Tube open at both ends of a good length, suppose forty Inches long, and fill it with Mercury, and place your Finger on the top as before, taking away your lower Finger you will find the Mercury to descend even to its wonted station, and your Finger on the top to be strongly drawn within the Tube, and to stick close unMercury placed
Cord, whose upper end being fastned to the Finger draws and fastens it after this manner into the Tube.
Chap. 4. p. 8. Sumatur, &c. Take a Tube shorter than twenty nine InMercury, and one Finger being plac'd underneath, that the Mercury to be poured in run not through, be filled with Mercury; and then another Finger be applied to its Orifice, to close it well: Which being done, if you draw away your lower Finger, the upper will be found to be strongly drawn and suck'd into the Tube, and so stifly to adhere to it, (or rather to the Quicksilver, as I shall hereafter shew) that it will elevate the Tube it self with all the Quicksilver, and make it con
From which Experiment this Opinion is most clearly refuted: For, seeing according to it the Quicksilver in such a Tube but twenty Inches long must be thrust upwards by the preponderating Air; it will never by it be explained how this Finger is so drawn downwards, and made so strongly to stick to the Tube. For it cannot by the Air thrusting up
p. 10, 11. Quod vel, &c. Which is thence confirmed, Because if that preponderating Air succeeds, as is asserted, in the place of the lower Fin
Chap. 5. p. 11, 12. Quarto, &c. In the fourth place it is impugn'd, Be
The sequel I thus manifest: Because seeing, according to this Opinion, that the Liquor underneath, whether it be Water or Mercury, may so asPecquet declares in his Anatomical Discourse, p. 63.) It is
Mercury may be suck'd out with the same easiness that Water is suck'd out with. Which being so evidently against Experience, the Opinion from whence it is deduced must needs be false.
p. 13. Ne
And not only this, but over and above, if a Glass
p. 15. Maneat igitur, &c. Be it therefore confirm'd by so many Argu
Cap. 6. Ibid. Argentum, &c. That Quicksilver in a close place is not upheld from falling by the Elater or Spring of the Air.
Ibid. Cum tota, &c. Seeing the whole power of this Spring depends upon the already-confuted AEquilibrium of the Air with 29 Inches and an half of Quicksilver, so that this Spring does neither more nor less in a close place than is done by that AEquilibrium in an open place; it is maAEquilibrium is already shewn to be plainly fictitious and imaginary, that the Spring of the Air is so likewise.
p. 16. Nec plus, &c. And that this Spring doth neither more nor less in a close place, than is done by that AEquilibrium in an open place.
Ibid. Adde, &c. Add, that seeing the Experiments brought in the Chapter above of the adhesion of the Finger, &c. are alike in a close and an open place: it is necessary and certain that the same Arguments made against the AEquilibrium have force against the Spring of the Air.
p. 17. Et profecto, &c. And really if these Authors would consider how great a difficulty there is in explaining this Spring of the Air, unless the same Air by it self alone may take up a greater place, I believe they would readily alter their Opinion.
Part 2. Chap. 1. p. 19. Constet hoc, &c. This appears from what has been already spoken in the preceding Chapter: For the Quicksilver descend
Ibid. Respondeo, &c. I answer, That this comes to pass that there may be no Vaculty, seeing there is nothing else there that can succeed into the place of the descending Quicksilver.
Nature doth abhor a Vacuum.
Ibid. Nam licet, &c. For though the immediate cause why Water (for instance) doth not descend from a Gardener's Watering-pot (for that Example they use) stopt on the top, is not the fear of a Vacuum, but the reason now mentioned, namely, That there is not weight sufficient to loose that conjuncture by which the Water doth adhere to the top of the closed Water-pot: Nevertheless in the end we must of necessity come to that Cause.
p. 20. Quae quidem, &c. Which traction and adhesion when it cannot proceed but from some real Body placed between the Finger and the Mercury, it is manifest that that space is not empty, but filled with some true substance.
Ibid. Eo quod, &e. Because no visual species's could proceed either from it, or through it, unto the eye.
Ibid. Vera, &c. To be filled with any true substance.
p. 24. Huc etiam, &c. And to this purpose make those considerable ViPendula in their fall from on high.
p. 27. Argenium dum, &c. Quicksilver while it fills the whole Tube doth not only touch its top, (as you would think at the first sight) but doth firmly stick unto it also; as it is manifest from the Experiment men
Ibid. Licet illud, &c. Though that Orifice of the Tube be anointed with Oyl, or any other matter that will hinder adhesion, nevertheless the Finger will no less firmly stick than before.
p. 28. Partes, &c. That the parts of Air it self so shut up in the Tube (which otherwise are so easily severed) are now so firmly glued to one another, that they make (as we see) a strong Chain, by which not only Water but even weighty Quicksilver is drawn on high.
Ibid. Rarefactionem, &c. That the Rarefaction or Extension of a Bodisjoyning power; as on the contrary Condensation is not only made by Cold, but also by Compression, as infinite Exam
p. 29. Cum per, &c. Seeing by the first Note 'tis manifest that the Quicksuperficies fixed unto the top of the Tube, and by its weight doth so stretch
p. 30. These Surfaces seem to be separated from the Quicksilver, and to be extended into a most slender string by the weight that falls down, after the same manner that in a lighted Candle surfaces of like sort are seMercury, from whence it arose, did before take up. As also it doubtless hap
p. 36. Corpore, &c. A body taking up a place, for instance, twice as big as it self; it is of necessity that every part of it must likewise take up a place twice as big as it self.
p. 41. Juxta, &c. According to the more probable Opinion such a virtual extension of a corporeal Being is not to be granted, as being only proper to such as are Spiritual.
Ibid. Praestat, &c. It is better to continue in the common Opinion, which hath been hitherto received in the Schools: which although it doth not clearly resolve all difficulties, yet it doth not openly lie un
Ibid. Necessario, &c. We must needs confess that one and the same part must be in two places adequately. For seeing it is indivisible, and takes up a greater place than before, it must of necessity be all in every point of that place, or that be virtually extended through all that space.
p. 43. Cumtempus, &c. Seeing Time is a Being esfentially successive, so that neither by divine power can two of its parts exist together.
p. 44. Respondeo, &c. I answer, that all these things happen because the Gun powder so kindled and turned into flame takes up a much grea
p. 48. Partim, &c. Sometimes within the Chapel, sometimes in the open Air; the wind sometimes blowing, and sometimes being still.
Sed dici, &c. But it may be said, that on the top of the Mountain it therefore descended after that manner, because the Air was more cold there, or of some other temperature, such as might cause this descent.
p. 68. Hoc esse, &c. That this is the difference between Pression and Suction, that Suction makes such an adhesion, and Pression doth not.
p. 69. Hoc quo
And even this Experiment doth very well agree with our Principles: For seeing by this depression of the Sucker, the Air shut up in the cavity of the Cylinder is separated from the Cylinder, and doth descend together with the Sucket, (as we have,
Ibid. Eo magis, &c. That the Air is so much the more extended and rarefied, by how much the more is thence exhausted, and so doth acquire a greater force of contracting it self.
p. 71. At profecto, &c. But truly it seems not credible that this most soft Air should so vehemently compress a Glass on all sides (especially one of that thickness there mention'd) as to break it.
p. 72. Verius, &c. It is therefore more truly answered, that the Glass is therefore so broken, because by that exsuction its sides are more vehe
Ibid. Sed profecto, &c. But truly this seems too far remov'd from Truth, and may be by this alone sufficiently refuted. Because if the pres
p. 73. Licet, &c. Though the Tube had been shut at the top, the Vial had doubtless been broken after the same manner.
p. 74. Sed rectius, &c. But it is more rightly thence inferr'd that that Cylinder did nothing there before.
p. 75. Dice, &c. I say then that the Quicksilver doth by that exhaustiMercury out of its Vessel; whence it comes to pass that (the restagMercury now less gravitating upon the bottom of its Vessel) the Quicksilver in the Tube must descend, as is manifest in it self: So that it is no wonder that, the external Air afterwards entring, the Quicksilver again ascends, seeing by that ingress the force which elevates the restag
Ibid. At
And hence is a reason also given of another thing which is there noted, namely, that by the violent intrusion of the external Air into the Receiver the Quicksilver ascended considerably above 29 Inches and an half. For as by the extraction of the Air the Quicksilver is deprest below its station, so by the intrusion of new Air it is elevated above it.
p. 77. Nam si, &c. For if it were kept up by that, it ought rather to ascend than descend in colder weather, because the Air then would be more dense and heavy. Therefore the Quicksilver is not upheld by the AEquilibrium of Air, as is asserted.
p. 78. Hinc fit, &c. Hence it comes to pass, that this Funicle being contracted by the cold, the water doth ascend in cold weather; but doth descend in hot, because by heat the Funicle is dilated.
Ibid. Ego certè, &c. I truly do not doubt but there are some such occult causes, by which the slender Funicle that suspends (as we mentio
p. 79. In decimo nono, &c. In the 19. he shews that water doth in the same manner descend upon the exhausting the Receiver, as he had shewn Quicksilver in the foregoing Chapter to descend. Of both which seeing there is the same cause, there is no reason we should any longer insist on this.
p. 80. Nam fi, &c. For if it were done so, these bubbles ought not so to have ascended from the bottom of the Vessel, (as it is asserted they did, both in this and the following Experiments that treat of bubbles) but from the upper part of the water, where they are less comprest; as it is apparently manifest.
p. 81. Respondeo, &c. I answer that the water, upon that exhaustion of the Air, doth not so ascend of its own accord, but is violently drawn or lifted upwards by that rarefied Air contracting it self. For as water doth
p. 82. Certum esse, &c. It is certain that that Opinion is sufficiently refuted by this single Experiment.
p. 83. Necesse, &c. It must needs be that that stone could not other
Ibid. Vnde, &c. Whence I plainly conceive that if two perfectly
Ibid. Vti etiam, &c. Which also is confirmed by the Example the Author there brings of a Brass Plate sticking so close to a Marble Table, that by a lusty Youth, who boasted of his own strength, it could not be lifted off by a Ring fixed to its Centre.
p. 84. Eodem, &c. Almost the same manner as we see in Cupping-glasses applied to a Patients back, in which the flame being extinct, the rarefied Air contracting it self doth so vehemently (as we see) lift up, and draw the flesh within the Glass.
p. 85. In his, &c. In these three there is nothing occurs to be peculiar
Ibid. Existimo, &c. But I think that Whiteness should be rather called a reflex than an innate light, because, as the Author bears witness, it ap
p. 86. Verum, &c. But it seems impossible that such Animals should dye so soon only for want of a thicker Air.
p. 87. Quia per, &c. Because by the self-contraction of the rarefied Air their breath is drawn out of their bodies.
Ibid. At
And thence also arose those vehement Convulsions, which the Author there mentions certain small Birds to have endured before their death.
p. 89. In mala, &c. In a bad Cause they can do no other; but who compell'd them to undertake a bad Cause?
WHerein the Adversaries Objections against the Elaterists are exa
The occasion of this Writing, pag. 1. Franciscus Linus his civility in writing obliges the Author to the like, p. 2. Books concerning the Torricellian Experiment wherewith the Author was formerly unacquainted,
A repetition of the Adversary's Opinion and Arguments. His Argup. 4. An Experiment of his to prove that the external Air cannot keep up twenty Inches of Quick-silibid. The Author's answer and reconciliation of the Experiment to his Hypothesis, p. 5. and the relation of an Experiment of the Author's, wherein only water being employed instead of Quick silver, without other alteration of the Adversaries Experiment, it agrees well with and confirms the Author's Hypothesis, and his Explication of the mentioned Experiments, ibid. That Water hath no Spring at all, or a very weak one, p. 6. The second Argument examined, ib. Whether the same quantity of Air can adequately fill a greater space, p. 7. The conceivableness of both Hypotheses compared, ibid.
Another Argument of the Adversaries, from an Experiment wherein the Mercury sinking draws the Finger into the Tube, examined. Q. Whether the Mercury placed in its own station is upheld by the external Air, or susp. 7, 8.
A repetition of Franciscus Linus his principal Experiment, wherein in a Tube of twenty Inches long the Finger on the top is supposed to be strongly drawn and suck'd into the Tube, p. 8. The Experiment explicated without the assistance of Suction, by the pressure of the external Air upon the outside of the Finger, thrust, not suck'd in, p. 9. Franciscus Linus his argumenp. 10.
The Eximiners last Experiment considered, in which he argues against the Author's Hypothesis, because Mercury is not suck'd out of a Vessel through a Tube so easily as Water is, p. 11, 12. An Experiment of Monsieur Paschall shewing, that if the upper part of a Tube could be freed from the pressure of all internal Air, the Mercury would by the pressure of the outward Air be carried up into the Tube as well as Water, till it had attained a height great enough to make its weight equal to that of the Atmosphere, p. 13. Why in a more forcible respiration the Mercurial Cylinder is raised higher than in a more languid, p. 14. A Remark by the bie, That the contraction of the AdFuniculus is not felt upon the Lungs, p. 15.
The examination of the Adversaries 4th Chapter, p. 15. That the Spring of the Air may have some advantage in point of force above the Weight of it, p. 16. That it is unintelligible how the same Air can adequately fill more space at one time than at another, p. 17.
Wherein the Adversaries Funicular Hypothesis is examined.
Wherein what is alledged to prove the Funiculus is considered; and some Difficulties are proposed against the Hypothesis.
The nature of this supposed Funiculus described, p. 18. That according to the Adversaries Opinion this Funiculus is produced by Nature only to binder a Vacuum, p. 19, 20. The Adversaries proofs that there is no Vacuum examined,
Wherein divers other Difficulties are objected against the Funicular Hypothesis. As that in Liquors of divers weights and natures, as Water, Wine and Quick-silver, there should be just the same weight or strength to extend them into a
The Aristotelean Rarefaction proposed by the Adversary examined. What Rarefaction and Condensation is, p. 34. Three ways of explicating how Rap. 34, 35. Absurdities in resolving the Magdeburg ExAristotelean way of Rarefaction, p. 36. The inconveniences of the several Hypotheses compared, p. 37. The difficulties in the Adversaibid. The difficulp. 39, 40. The difficulties wherewith his Condensation is incumbred, as that it inp. 41.
A Consideration pertinent to the present Controversie, of what happens in trying the Torricellian and other Experiments at the top and feet of Hills. That the Funicular Hypothesis is but an Inversion of the Elastical, one supp. 46. That these trials on the tops and feet of Hills determine the case for the Author's Hypothesis, p. 47. The truth of the Observation of Monsieur Paschall confirmed, p. 48. and the several triibid. A trial of the Author's from the Leads of the Abbey-Church at Westminster, p. 50, 51, 52. That the subsidence of the Mercury at the top of a Hill proceeds from the lightness of the Atmospherical Cylinder there, p. 53. The relation of an Experiment lateHallifax Hill in confirmation of the former, p. 54.
Two new Experiments touching the measure of the force of the Spring of the Air compress'd and dilated. That it is capable of doing far more than the necessity of the Author's Hypothesis requires, p. 55. The first ExperiMercury into a crooked Tube, related, ibid. Wherein the same Air being brought to a degree of density twice as
p. 57. A Table of the Conp. 58. Particular Ciribid. How far the Spring of the Air may be increased, p. 60. Of the decrement of the force of dilated Air, p. 61. A Table of the Rarefaction of the Air, p. 62. Parp. 63, &c. That the free Air here below appears to be near as strongp. 65.
Wherein what is objected against Mr. Boyle's Explications of particular Experiments is answered.
The entrance into this Part of the Discourse, with an advertisement how far only it will be requisite to examine the Adversaries assertions and explicaHypothesis on both sides being before considered, p. 67.
A defence of the first and second Experiments, concerning the intrusion of the Finger into the Orifice of the Valve of the evacuated Receiver, p. 68.
A defence of the third Experiment, why the Sucker being drawn down there is no greater difficulty in the end than in the beginning of the depression, ibid.
Of the fourth Experiment, touching the swelling of a Bladder upon the exhaustion of the ambient Air, and proportionably to that exhaustion, p. 70, 71. The Author's and the Funicular Hypothesis in the explication of this Phaenomenon compared, ibid.
Of the fifth Experiment, ibid.
Of the eighth Experiment, about the breaking of a Glass-Receiver which was not globular upon the exhaustion of the inward Air, p. 71. Whether it were more likely to be broken by the pressure of the Atmosphere without, or a contraction of a string of Air witbin, p. 72.
Of the ninth Experiment, ibid. Whether the breaking of the Vial outp. 73.
Of the 17. Experiment, p. 74, 75, 76. The Torricellian Experiment being made within the Receiver, whether the descent and ascent of the Mercury in the Tube, under and above its wonted station, be caused by the debiliibid.
Of the 18. Experiment, p. 77, 78. Whether the Authors or the Funicular Hypothesis assign the more probable cause why a Cylinder of
Of the 19. Experiment, p. 79.
Of the 20. Experiment, p. 79, 80. Some mistakes in the Adversary of the Author's meaning about the Spring of the Water, and the places whence the bubbles arose, ibid. The Hypotheses compared, ibid.
Of the 31. Experiment, p. 81, 82, 83. Of the cause why the Marbles fell not asunder in the exhausted Receiver, though a weight of four Ounces were hung at the lower stone, ibid. Whether the account of the Author or Adversary be more satisfactory, ibid.
Of the 32. and 33. Experiments, of the re-ascent of the Sucker and its carrying up a great weight with it upon the exhaustion of the Receiver, p. 84. How the flesh and neighbouring blood of a Patient is thrust up into a Cupibid.
Of the 37. Experiment, and the cause of the appearance of light or whitep. 85.
Of the 40. and 41. Experiments, concerning the cause of the sudden death of Animals in the exhausted Receiver, p. 85, 86.
Of the 42. and 43. Experiments, p. 87.
The Conclusion, p. 91, 92.
AN EXAMEN OF Mr. T. HOBBS his Dialogus Physicus De Naturâ Aëris.
As far as it concerns Mr. BOYLE's Book of New Experiments touching the Spring of the Air, &c.
With an APPENDIX touching Mr. Hobbs's Doctrine of Fluidity and Firmness.
By the Author of those Experiments.
LONDON, Printed by M. Flesher, for Richard Davis Bookseller in Oxford, 1682.
HAVING, soon after I had begun the following Examen of Mr. Hobbs's Dialogue, been diverted for a good while by divers urgent Avocations from pursuVirtuosi abroad) that my publishing any thing against his Objections would not be necessary, nor was much expected: Whereupon I should perhaps have declined resuming an Employment, that to a perThe Weight and Spring of the Air, which (if I mistake not) we have firmly established, we have added an Examen, that otherwise we should scarce have made, of the greatest part of the Physiological passages in Mr. Hobbs's book, most of which I thought might be rationally question'd, and many of them clearly disprov'd. And in pursuance of this, though I did not perhaps alwayes think my self oblig'd to proboth that 'tis easie even for a great Wit frequently enough to mistake, and much more frequently to miss of clearly demonstrating what he preand that Mr. Hobbs's Adversaries need not be much ashamed of the Name he is pleased to give them of Experimentarian Philosophers. It was also suggested to me, that the dangerous Opinions about some important, if not fundamental, Articles of Religion I had met within his
I doubt not but Critical Readers will think I might have excepted against many more particulars in Mr. Hobbs's Book than I have Examin'd; and indeed about this I dare not conNam conveniant (sayes he, speaking of the Virtuosi that meet at Gresham College) Studia conferant, Experimenta faciant quantum volunt, nisi & principiis utantur meis, nihil proficient; and again, Nae illi quae dicerent non videntur cogitasse, sed sortitos esse; and elsewhere,
And having said thus much as to the Reasons of my penning the following Discourse, I must adde something, though but little, touching the Manner of it; Wherein I hope I have not much, if at all, swerv'd from what I propos'd to my self, namely, to give an Example of Disputing in Print against a Provoking, though unprovoked, Adversary, without BitterGresham College, will be look'd upon onely as an effect of my judging it fit to leave them the full Liberty to right themselves, if they think it worth while, by some better Pen than mine. And if Mr. Hobbs think fit to say any thing to the following Discourse, it will not be amiss that his Reply be as inoffensive as I have endeavour'd to make my Examen. For having dispatch'd as much as I think requisite to say of this Controversie my self, and having other (and I hope better) Employments for my leasure hours, if I can get any; I must leave the further Disputes, if any shall arise, to be manag'd by others, who, if Mr. Hobbs refuse to imitate my way of writing, will possibly make no seruple to imitate his, and put him in mind of that Law of Vespasian, upon which himself would be thought to ground that heap
MEeting the other day with a Treatise then newly publisht by Mr. Hobbs, and intituled Dialogus Physicus De Natura Aeris; The Name of the AuGresham College; yet the Arguments are for the most part levelled at some Writings of mine, puHobbs, whom if my Books have at all mentioned, it has been with respect, should fall upon a person that had not provoked him, whilst such Mathematicians as Dr. Wallis, Dr. Ward, Tacquet, and Moranus (Men much too famous to be despicable Adversaries) having a good while since professedly and unchalleng'd writ
Examen of the Argumentative part of his Discourse; My ReHobbs's Name may with some Rea
ANd first, whereas Mr. Hobbs is pleas'd to write as if the Explications and Experiments to be met with in the Physico-Mechanical Treatise he censures, were those of the whole Society at Gresham College; I must do them that Right to declare, that this way of Proceeding is manifestly grounded upon a Mistake. I will not affirm that the Mistake was wilsull, that Mr Hobbs might give himself a pretence to Quarrel with them, (who have hitherto suspended the DeclarHobbs might very easily have avoided this mistake: since the Book he censures was publishVirtuosi here)
Monarch of the Virtuost, as well as of Great Britain, for a Spectator. And though possibly divers of the Learned MemExamen of the several OpiHobbs has thought fit to impute to the Society those Opinions which (how Erroneous soever he is pleas'd to think them,) I must own to be mine. And this Justice I the rather do It, because 'tis all that I am to do in this Treatise on their Behalf, not onely for the ReaHobbs deserves a better Pen than mine, though it doth not need it.
Secondly, undertaking then the Defence of my own Cause, without Interessing them in my Quarrel, I must next admonHobbs writes, as if the new Experiments were devised or at least employ'd, to prove a Vacuum; he is in this likewise mistaken. For neither has the Society declared either for or against a Vacuum, nor have I: Nay I have not only forborn to profess my self a Vacuist, or a
Hobbs either injures or mistakes those, whom he will needs make his Adversaries, when he represents the new Experiments as Demonstrations alledg'd by profess'd Vacuists to disprove the Fulness of the World. And though I shall be oblig'd in the following Discourse to reject Mr. Hobbs's Supposition of a
As for the Assertion Non dari vacuum, though, as I said, I need not in this place declare my self either for or against it, yet I confess I do not find that Mr. Hobbs, though all along this Discourse he argues from this Principle against those he thinks Vacuists, has demonstrated it. For in his Book De Corpore (though a main part of it depend That if a Gardeners Watering-Pot be fill'd with Water, the hole at the top being stopt, the Water will not flow out at any of
the holes in the bottom: But if the finger be removed to let in the Air above, it will run out at them all; and, as soon as the finger is applied to it again, the Water will suddenly and totallay be stayed again srom running out. The cause whereof (sub
But this Experiment, as an obvious one, and without dreaming that Mr. Hobbs had laid such stress upon it, I have incidentally answer'd in what I say in two or three passages on the thirty third Experiment of my Epistle. But after found that it had been more fully answer'd (but upon Grounds some of which I do not need) by my Learned Friend Dr. Ward, with whom I thus take Mr. Hobbs his Argument to pieces. The Cause, according to Mr. Hobbs, of the Suspension of the Water in the Vessel is, that the Water cannot thrust away the Air. 2. And it cannot thrust that away unless Air succeed in its place. 3. But Air cannot succeed in its place, unless either by getting in at the upper Orifice, or at the Holes that perforate the bottom. By which view of the Argument it appears that the main force of it lies in the second PropositiMonsieur Paschall's Experiment mentioned in my Epistle manifests; That though in a Glass-Tube HermetiAtmospherical Cylinder that opposes its DesAEquilibrium: so on the other side if instead of increasing the length of the Cylinder of the Water, you lessen the pressure and resistance of the Air, the Water will likewise descend, though the Pillar be very short, as I have shown in the nineHobbs his Argumentation requires it should be, may be prov'd by what is there added, That by letting in the outward Air when the Water was sunk so low it was immediately impell'd up again to the higher parts of the Tube.
And indeed (as I elsewhere discourse) it seems Hobbs justly does, that Conceit of Natures Abhorring a Vacuum, and making it, as it were, her business to hinder it, to prove there can be no Vacuum at all by any particular Experiment. For if the Fulness of the World be not made necessary either by the Nature of Body in general, or by the Design of the Author of the Universe, it can scarce be easie to prove by a particular Experiment, that no Humane Force or Art can contrive a way of overcoming at least for some time, and as to some space, either the Gravity of fluid Bodies or whatever other Quality of the Air or Water it is by which the Contiguity of the neighbouring Parts of the World is wont to be maintain'd. As we see the Water that will not descendeven in a Tube of thirty foot, (and thereby has made
of Flame and Heat: That whilst onely particular Experiments are brought to assert the Impossibility of a Vacuum, perhaps the Vacuists will have the Advantage on their side. For a thousand Experiments are not of that force to prove universally that a thing cannot be efHypothesis, accordPhaenomena. And the Vacuists will have this Advantage, that if Mr. Hobbs shall say that it it as lawfull for him to assume a Plenum as for others to assume a Vacuum; not onely it may be answer'd, 'tis also as lawfull for them to assume the contrary; and he but Barely Assuming, not Proving a Plenum, his Doctrine will still remain questionPhaenomena of the Torrecellian Experiment, and in many of those of our EnHobbs proves the space deserted by the Quicksilver or the Air to have no Vacuity, because according to his SupPhaenomena that prove the Space in Question to be perfectly full:) For no less Fulness is requisite to the truth of his
From all which it seems probably deducible, That 'tis a very hard thing, by. Mr Hobbs's way of managing the ConVacuum, But as for the Cartesian's more subtile and plausible way of asserting a Plenum, it concerns me not here to Dispute against it, or De
I will add this, and but this, on the occasion of Mr. Hobbs's Building a great part of his Philosophy upon no surer a ground, That we may hence learn how little Reason there is to blame me as he is pleas'd to do, for making elaborate Experiments; and that though (as I have elsewhere purposely and amply disPhaenomenon they exhibit may proceed from more Causes than one, and to expect that a more Artificial Trial may determine which of them is the true.
Thirdly, whereas Mr. Hobbs is pleas'd to find much sault with the Society, and me, for not assigning the Case of Springs in general; that Omission seeming to him very unworthy of Philosophers: I answer, that the Society having hitherto, for weighty Reasons, forborn to determine the particular Causes of Things, there was no Reason they should alter their Method, for Experiments that were not made or published by Them or by their Order And as for me, the Title of my
Experiments touching the Spring of the Air and its Effects, not Speculations of the Causes of Springs in general. My avow'd Intention was candidly to communiHobbs would more prejudice the Commonwealth of Learning by his severity, than he has yet Advantag'd it by any other way, if he could obtain, that none should publish an Experiment or Observation that canHobbs has done, Elements of Philosophy, then perhaps I shall be able to give an Account of Springs, not much more unsatisfactory than others think his. For though he referre us to his Explication given of the Motion of Restitution in his Book De Corpore; yet in the 22 Chapthe (removing of Impediments not having the Efficacy of a Cause) that which follows to the end of the SeThe Cause therefore of their Restitution is some Motion either of the Parts of the Ambient, or of the Parts of the Body compress'd or extended. But the Parts of the Ambient have no endeavour which contributes to their Compression or Extention, nor to the setting them at Liberty or Restitution. It remains therefore, that from the time of their Compression or Extension, there be left some endeavour (or Motion) by which the Impediment being remov'd, every Part resumes its former place; that is to say, the Whole restores it self. Now this not
Quanquam vis illius motus in Recipiente (ut loquimini)
evacuato diminuta sit, oppressa ab Aëris intus commoti consistentia, non tamen extinguitur; & propterealevata oppressione, satis habebit virium ad excitandum phantasiam lucis quanquan debiliorem. But I shall rather subjoyn, That yet, Thirdly, I do not think it improbable what the Learned
Fourthly, Mr Hobbs in divers passages wherein he disputes against me, seems to have misapprehended my Notion of the Air. For when I say, that the Air has Gravity and an Elastical Power, or that the Air is, in great part, pump'd out of the Receiver, 'tis plain enough that I take the Air in the obvious Acception of the word, for part of the Atmosphere which we breath, and wherein we move. Nor do I find that any other of my Readers do otherwise understand me. But Mr. Hobbs seems to think he has sufficiently confuted me, if in some cases he have prov'd (which whether he have done well or no is not here to be examin'd) that there is a subtile substance, which he calls AEther (but which I wish he had better explain'd) in some places which I take not to be fill'd with Air; and that the AEther has or has not some Accidents which I deny or asAtmosphere or fluid Body that surrounds the terraqueous Globe, may, besides the grosser and more solid Corpuscles wherewith it aAtomical or the Cartesian Hypothests touching the Nature of the Air, yet I propos'd the later too as probable (which as it excludes a Vacuum, so it makes the Air consist in great part of a Celestial Matter.) And my incidental Explications of the Rarefaction and Condensation of the Air, together with my comparing it to a Fleece of Wooll, sufficiently declare that I take it not to be a Homogeneous Body; and though there be Air intercepted betwixt the Hairs of Wooll, yet in case I should prove that a Box were not so full of Wooll as before, because the most part of the Hairs had been taken out, I should
Hobbs has in divers passages, wherein he supposes he disCartestan Hypothests, ascribing that to the Air which Des Cartes does to Water; If the Reader think it worth while to compare the Summary Account I give of that
HAving thus dispatch'd those general Considerations I thought expedient to premise, my proposed Method leads me in the next place to consider that Mr. Hobbs does not, that I remember, deny the truth of any of the matters of fact I have deliver'd. Nor does he, if my memory fail me not, labor to prove that the Explications I have given of my Experiments, are not agreeable to the Doctrine I propos'd: But rather thinks fit to reject our two grand Hypotheses them
And first, that the Air (in the sense wherein we take the word) is not devoid of Weight, we have prov'd by divers Experiments: which having more fully deliver'd in the Book it self, it may in this place suffice now to name them.
One then of these Experiments that prove the Air's Gra
Next it has been observ'd in our 36. Experiment, that an AEolipile, being well heated, and the little hole left at the top of the Pipe being stopt, when it was thus hot; upon the opening of that hole, when the AEolipile was grown cold again, the external Air rushing in with a wistling noise at
AEolipile weigh so much more than it did just before the external Air got in, that it a
Thirdly, in the Magdeburgick Experiment, (mention'd at the beginning of our Epistle) the ingenious makers of it found, that, having before weighed the great Receiver they were to exhaust, and having done the like after the extractipag. 446.
quod sane (saies the learned Publisher, though a Peripatetick) luculentissimum est argumentum gravitatis aëris.
Fourthly, in our 36. Experiment we relate our having weighed the Air, and that shut up in Bodies in our exhausted Receiver, wherein of two Bodies of differing Natures (the one a blown Bladder, and the other a Glass Bubble) that were aequiponderant each to a more solid Weight before the Air was pumpt out, that which included a good quantity of Air did manifestly preponderate after the exhaustion.
And to these four we might adde other proofs to the same purpose; But that these contain in them such a variety of Cases, that I think it would be superfluous.
But now let us see what Mr. Hobbs objects against the newlyQuod quidem lanx (saith he) in qua est vesica, magis deprimitur
But to return to our Experiment. The Account he gives why the Bladder does propend (for so he loves to speak) is this, Quod vesica sive follibus sive flatu oris
distenta sit, gravior sit quam eadem vesica non distenta, negarenolo, propter majorem quantitatem Atomorum follibus, vel Corpusculorum fuligineorum ab halitu inflatorum. Ab experimento autem quod fit à vesica inflata nihil colligunt quod sit satis certum. Oportuit lancibus imponere duo vasa pondere aequalia, quorum alterum esset accuratè clausum, alterum apertum: Sic enim non inflatus sed inclusus tantum aër ponderatus esset. Quando igitur aërem sic ponderatum videbis, meditabimur postea quid dicendum sit de Phaenomeno quod retuleris. But, as to the First part of this passage, it does not deny the gravity of what we call the Air; but onely endeavours
But how little this comes short of granting as much Spring to the Air as the Cartesians do, and as I need require, may easily be judg'd by divers passages in our Book; and partiCartesian way of explicating the Spring of the Air; according to which the Corpuscles that swim in the AEther, being each hindred by the neighbouring ones from the freedom of its motion, they beat off one another (which Mr. Hobbs would have them do:) whence it comes to pass that, in any assign'd portion of Air here below, the Corpuscles that compose that portion, beaten off by one another, do make the whole portion tend to ob
We may enforce this by another passage of Mr. Hobbs's, that speaks expresly enough to our present purpose, where he gives this Reason of one of the Phaenomena of our Engine, Quoniam per suctoris retractionem aër purus impulsus
erat, partes autem terreae impulsae non erant; major erat ratio particularum terrearum quae extra Cylindrum suctori contiguae erant, ad aërem purum, in quo motum suum exercebant, post revulsionem
Elem. Chap. 30. Sect. 9.
quam ante: quare particulae illae motae minus habentes loci ad motum suum naturalem exercendum, aliae aliis impingebant, & propellebant: necesse ergo erat, ut particulae quae suctoris superficiei contiguae erant suctorem propellerent. To which we may adde, that Mr.
But besides Mr. Hobbs's Concessions in the passages newly recited, and some others; we can prove the Spring of the Air
Phaenomena of our Engine, which we have deduc'd from it, and of which he does not offer any other way of Explication. Wherefore we shall now content our selves to prove the Spring of the Air by two Experiments: The one not mention'd in our Epistle, and the other much oppos'd by Mr. Hobbs.
And first, if you make the Torrecellian Experiment in a Tube of between two foot and half and three foot in length, and if, when the Mercury rests at its wonted Station, you dexterously stop the Orifice of the Tube with your Finger (that Orifice being lifted up as near the surface of the restagMercury as it can be, without giving admission to the external Air) and if then you quite lift up the Tube thus stopt into the free Air you shall feel upon your Finger little or no gravitation or pressure from the Weight of the Mercurial Cylinder, distinct from the Weight of the Tube: because (as we have more fully explicated this Phaenomenon elsewhere) the gravity of the Quicksilver
The other Experiment I shall mention is the Fourth in our Epistle; namely, that of the swelling and shrinking of a BladHypothesis, that 'tis generally acquiesc'd in by those Ingenious men that have hitherto seen it; yet Mr.
For first, how unlike is it to be true what he affirms, and what his Reply supposes, namely, that such Bladders as we us'd are readily pervious to the Air; when easie Experience shewes us, that by leasurely compressing such blown bladders
ex abundanti we will adde, that in our 36. ExperiPhaenomenon to prove that the Receiver is full of any such aër per vim incussus as he would have, we see plainly that when the Air does manifestHobbs) the Bladder is pervious to the Air, and the Air within the Receiver is universally comprest, as well that which is within the Bladder as that which is without it; how comes it to pass, that the Air that bears against the Convex Surface of the Bladder does not resist that which is contiguous to the Concave Superficies of the same; And at least how comes the Bladder to be broken by the Air, which, accordHobbs, can get in and out at pleasure? And lastly, to shew that to the swelling of the Bladder there needs nothHobbs supposes to be made in our Engine; It appears by the elsewhere-mention'd Experiment of Monsieur Paschal, that in the free and ordinary Air a Foot-ball half blown up will swell more and more the nearer it is carried to the top of an high Mountain; where the incumbent Cylinder of the Atmosphere is shorter, and its Weight lighter: and will, for the contrary Reason, grow more and more flag'd, the nearer it approaches again to the foot of the Mountain.
Though I doubt not but the Arguments employ'd in this Chapter will be sufficient to convince impartial Readers; yet
Hobbs ascribes the Weight of the Air in Bladders to the earthy CorPhaenomena of our Engine, to the violent Motion the Air is put into by the vehement impulses of the Rammer or Sucker: our Doctrine may be evinc'd by Experiment, wherein the Air in its natural and wonted state operates without being forcibly comprest or put into motion by us. This may appear by the two sorts of Experiments to be made upon high Mountains, which we have mention'd and urg'd in the Second Part of our Defence against the Learned Linus. Wherefore referring the Reader thither, we shall now onely in very few words mention the substance of them.
The First Experiment is, That it has been found upon Tryal, both formerly in France and since in England, that the QuickTorricellian Experiment falls notably lower at the top of a Mountain than at the foot, (by Monsieur Paschal's observation upon a Hill (far higher than those the Experi
The other of the two mentioned Experiments is briefly this, That a Termoscope being carried from the bottom to the top of a Hill, the included Air, instead of shrinking in that colder Region, manifestly dilated it self, and notably de
And this may suffice for our third Chapter, wherein havHobbs our grand Hypothesis of the weight and Spring of the Air, I hope we have dispatched the chief part of our work; since as for the particular ExplicatiHypotheses, there are but very few, if any, that he endeavours to prove incongruous to them. Yet after we shall have (in the following Chapter) consider'd upon what grounds he prefers his Doctrine before ours, we shall (God permitting) in two or three other Chapters gather up the things that he objects against some particular Opinions and Explications by us delivered, and examine them.
OF the Hypotheses that Mr. Hobbs assumes to explicate the Phaenomena of our Engine, himself gives us a summary in this passage, (pag. 10.) intellêxtiergo Hypotheses meas, 1. Quod aëri interspersae sunt particulae multae terreae praeditae motu circulari simplice, naturae congenito. 2. Quod major est quantitas earum particularum in aëre propè adterram quàm in aëre à terra remotiore.
other things which he takes for granted. As, first, Non dari Vacuum, which as we have already seen he has not well evinced, nor I think easily will upon the grounds he proceeds on. Next, that our common Air is chiefly composed of an AEthereal substance, which methinks he should have proved; since for the most part the Vacuists (and such he will needs have his Adversaries to be) admit not that pure Air of his. Thirdly, that the Air, at least the pure Air, is easily divisible into parts always fluid and always Air. Indeed he sayes of this Assumption, Nec suppono tantùm, sed credo; but neither to suppose nor to believe, is to prove. And what he adds, Ne
if it were true, would conclude little, since many things have not been, and perhaps cannot be, proved to be true; of whose not being possible no proof has been given. We might, I say, mention and examine these
And as for the second of them, bateing the peculiar motion he is pleas'd to ascribe to the earthy Particles, I shall not conHypothesis; and therefore shall now onely consider the other. The Motus circularis simplex it self, which he imagines in the Sun and the terrestrial Globe, I shall not need to examine, since Dr. Ward (a person whom, wthout disparagement to a famous man, I may affirm to be ati least as esteemed for Astronomy as Mr. Hobbs) has expresly endeavoured to confute it, and that not without some derision, (which yet I willingly forbear to imitate) by Arguments that I cannot learn Mr. Hobbs has yet answered. And I am inWallis, and others intend, some Animadversions on this Motion. But restraining our present consideration to what this Dialogue suggests to me, This Assumption to me seems very precarious, since I know not any unquestionable Example or Experiment whereby it can
motus circularis simplex as he ascribes to each of these innumerable earthy and (as himself adds in the same page) aqueous ParHobbs as well as we makes the terrene Atoms in the Air to have gravity, which yet is a quality that does not properly belong to the whole Globe of the Earth; nor is it manifest why, because the Terrestrial Globe moves in a vast Circle about the Sun, each particular Atom of it must describe a small Circle in the Air about I know not what CenHypothesis, and a few lines before it, That the Air, near the Earth abounds with such Terrene Corpuscles, 'tis not likely they should be perDes Cartes ascribes to his Terrestrial Particles swimming in the Atmosphere. That which some will, I doubt not, peHobbs's Hypothesis is, that he makes this regular motion of each Atom naturae suae congenitus: For Philosophers that are known to wish very well to ReliPhaenomena. And the Cartesians will think it at least as allowable for them to suppose the Motion he will not grant in their Materia subtilis, as for Mr. Hobbs to assume it in his Particulae terreae: especially since he seems to make each such Atom put into and kept in a regular motion; whereas they assume but the having of one general impulse given to the whole mass of Matter. Those likewise that fancie a Spring properly so called in particular Aerial Cormotus circularis simplex. How well like wise this Hypothesis will agree with his Fundamental Doctrine, That Nihil movetur nisi à corpore contiguo & moto, I leave to him to consider. As also whether or no Gassendus, and those other Atomists that admit Creation, may not hence counteHobbs's Philosophy. But whatever becomes of this motus circularis simplex, I need not be much solicitous, having formerly shewn, that the admission of it would not disprove what I have delivered concerning the Spring of the Air: and therefore leaving Mr. Hobbs to dispute it out, if he think fit, with his other Adversaries, I will proceed to the main ExHobbs endeavours to prefer his Doctrine about the Phaenomena of our Engine before ours. And these I find to be the four that ensue.
The first and principal of these is that wherein he strives to prove, That by the Exhaustion of our Cylinder no Vacuum is produced, and to give of the Experiment it self a very difverbatim: Dum Suctor (sayes he) retrahitur, quanto relict us locus major fit, tanto minus loci relinquitur aëri externo, qui retrusus
If he do speak of such Air, I can plainly prove by several Experiments, that our Engine is in great part devoid of it.
For, first, if there be a contrivance made, whereby the whole Pump may be covered with Water, one may, as we have tryed, plainly see the Air that is drawn out of the Re
Next, it appears by the Magdeburg Experiment formerly mentioned, that by reason of the recess of the Air, the Globe of Glass, whence it went out, was diminish'd in weight aHobbs's very improbable ExpliHypothesis the reason is clear, but not in Mr Hobbs's. But, fifthly, (not to multiply Instances, though that were easie for me) what I contend for may be sufficiently provPhaenomenon, That though, if the Receiver being full of common Air the Key be turned under water, the water will not at all be spurted up at the open Orifice: yet the like being done after the Exhaustion of the Receiver, we have had divers Gallons of water violently impell'd into
Penetration of Dimensions; or else common Air, to which Glass is impervious, must pass through the water, which we conclude it does not, because no such bubbles are made in the external water as would appear if common Air past through it: Nay, so little of this common Air was sometimes left in the Globe us'd at Magdeburg, that when the water was suffered to rush in, it reduced the Air into less by the beholders estimate than the thousandth part of the capacity of the Globe: And even if our Receiver be unstopt, not under water, but in the open Air, the ambient Air will vio
And thus we may argue against Mr. Hobbs, if he would have the Engine, when we call it exhausted, fill'd with common Air, as his words in the recited passage (where he talks of the external Air, and that impell'd into the Cylinder, withHobbs take the Air in this Second Notion, he opHobbs's will be lyable to the two first Inconveniences lately objected against the other in favour of the Vacuists; and to divers of those things besides, that are objected in the following parts of that Discourse. Next I observe again, that though the Pump be all the while kept under water, yet the Exhaustion of the Cylinder and Receiver will be made as well as in the open Air: I demand then of Mr. Hobbs, how the pure Air gets in by the sides of the Sucker that is immers'd in water? I presume that for want of a more plausible Answer he will here say, (as he elsewhere does in an almost parallel case) That the Air passes through the body of the water to fill up that deHobbs's bare affirmation. If I be, I must almost despair to prove things by Experiments; and if he will allow me to expect from him as much as he seems to do from me, I shall scarce despair to maintain almost any Hypothesis I please: For, besides that he does not so much as pretend by any Phaenomenon to countenance this bold asPhaenomena that make against it. For I know not how many Experiments shew us, that when Air passes through Water, it makes bubbles there, which in our case do not appear. And besides, I see not why the outHobbs's behalf, and it seems the most that can be said, that either his Explication or a Vacuum must be admitted. To which I reply, First, that he
Vacuum; having endeavourVacuum than this does for it. Next that we have lately made it probable, that by his ExVacuum. And thirdly, that a Plenist without having recourse to Mr. Hobbs's precarious diving of the Air, may more probably decline the necessity of yielding a Vacuum by saying, according to the Principles of the Cartesians, (the subtilest and wariest ChamPlenum I have yet met with) that the AEther is by the impulse of the depressed Sucker and the resistance of the ambient Bodies squeez'd in at the pores of the Glass or Cylinder into the cavity of the vessel, as fast as room is there made for it. And I confess, I somewhat wonder at Mr. Hobbs's being averse to this way of salving the objected DifHobbs's AECartesians Celestial matter; the violent rushing in of the water, when the vessel is unstopt under that Liquor, and divers other Phaenomena which will not be ascriHobbs's so often mentioned passage, where he would have the Air that he supposes to be impell'd into the Sucker, to move very swiftAppendix, promised by the Translator of the newly-mentioned Treatise. But if you let in the Common external Air at the Stop-cock, that indeed will rush in with Noise and Violence, and whirle about the Bladder that hung quietly enough before.
Having thus examined Mr. Hobbs's First solemn ExplicatiHypothesis of the Reason, Why in our Engine, if the Manubrium of the deprest Sucker happens to slip out of the Pumpers hand, the Sucker is carryed up again towards the top of the Cylinder. But since this Explication is such, that though he mentions it as his first, presently after the Recital of his two Hypotheses, he himself is pleas'd to confess in the last page of his Book, that 'tis Erronious; I shall forbear to vex it, thinking such acknowledgments more fit to be imitated whenever there is the like occasion, than to be discouraged. But as for the Explication which at the end of his Dialogues he substitutes for his Retracted one, I confess to me 'tis so obscure, that I know not well what to make of it. But, as far as upon consideration I can understand it, it is coincident with that, which in our Method will be call'd his Fourth Explication; with which that it may the better agree, seems one of the chief Reasons of his altering it from what we had proposed at first. Wherefore we should preTorricellian Experiment.
And here he spends many words to prove the Opinion he had whether proposed or adopted in his Elements of Philosophy; namely, that the place deserted by the suspenMercury is not empty, but full of Air. But because this Exposition assumes what he has not yet Demonstrated, viz. Non dari Vacuum, and because the Torricellian ExperiPhaenomena of our Engine; I shall refer you to what those Learned men DocWard and Moranus have prosessedly, and the first of them largely enough, written against Mr. Hobbs's ExplicatiPhaenomena as these. That if the Experiment be very well made, we may by inclining the Tube impell the Mercury from its wonted station to the top of the Tube; which will not happen in case the Air were before Inclination let into that deserted space.
If any friend of Mr. Hobbs's seeing the manifest inconveniHobbs's expressions look so much another way, that his Readers (for ought I have found) do generally understand him of such common Air as is displac'd by the descent of the Mercury. And therefore I had reason enough to argue against what he wrote, as I have newly done; and however, this assertion is clearly precarious, and lyable to the Objections formerly alledg'd against the passing of the Air through the water. To which we may adde this circumstance, that in our present case it must descend into a far heavier and closer Liquor than water. But perhaps it will be thought, I have already said more than needed aHobbs asserted it as afterwards, has been thought so unlikely, as not to have been (that I know of) approv'd by any man, even before the discovery of the Phaenomena of our Engine. Which last words I adde, because that Mr. Hobbs not pretending that any attraction intervenes in the case, I see not how he can possibly make out, to omit other Phaenomena, the descent of the Mercury in the Tube further and further beneath its wonted station,
Mercury in the same Tube, as we please to let in more or less of the outward Air; without admitting as much of Spring or Pressure in the Air as I need contend to have here allowed me. The weight of the Terrene Particles, by which, at the end of the third Exposition, he is reduc'd to endeavour the Solution of the Quicksilvers falling lower at the top than at the bottom of a Hill, (for I am willing to think that is his meaning, and that 'tis by the Transcribers fault rather than his, that resolutely affirms the quite contrary) will by no means serve his turn: It being utterly improbable to imagine, that the contain'd in so little a vessell as one of our Receivers can by its weight counter-balance so pon
The Fourth and last of Mr. Hobbs's principal Expositions is of that Experiment of ours, wherein 100. and odde pound weight being hung at the depressed Sucker, the SuckPhaenomenon (which has not hitherto prov'd unwellcome to the Vertuous) Mr Hobbs gives us the following account.
Haerent hic nostri: (which why he sayes I know not) quomodo haec expedies tu?
A. Expedivi ante. Aër enim à retractione Suctoris retrò pulsus, nec locum in mundo (ut supponimus pleno) quò se recipiat inveniens, nisi quem ipse, corpora contigua suis locis pellens, sibi faceret, perpetuâ pulsione in Cylindrum tandem cogitur, tantâ velocitate inter Cylindri concavam & Suctoris convexam superficiem, quant a respondere solet viribus illis magnis quas ad Suctorem revellendum necessarias expertt estis. Aër autem ille, quâ velocitate ingreditur, eandem ingressus retinet,
Thus far our Authors passage: a
I know indeed that after the Exposition last recited out of Mr. Hobbs, he makes the Academian Dialogist confess, that the rest of the Phaenomena of our Engine may also not uneasily be reduc'd to his principles. But perhaps they that take notice of the variety of those Phaenomena we have set down in our Treatise, will scarce be of his mind; and those that have considered what has been discours'd in this Chapter against his four principal Explications, and what I am about to subjoyn in the following part of this Treatise, concerning divers other Solutions that he gives, Will perhaps be inclined to think that others may be like these, without being there
I Proceed then to the Fifth Chapter, in which and the next I glean up and examine divers scatter'd passages, whereArgument; for as to those passages that do but either praise himself or disparage his Adversaries, I have almost as little leisure as inclination to take notice of them, and do not much apprehend that the Virtuosi (e
To skip then what Mr. Hobbs is pleased to say in the first Page of his Dialogue, concerning some disputable discoverAppendix to be subjoyned to this Discourse to examine what I find in this Dialogue dispersed touching Fluidity, I shall now onely say, that he does very much mistake and mis-represent my Doc
To take up then the particulars we are to examine, in the order (as far as conveniently may be) wherein I find them lye in the Authors Dialogue, and passing by at present those things which either we have considered already, or are not to consider in this place; The first particular that offers it self to be taken notice of, is this passage at the bot
B. In vas apertum infudimus aquam, in aqua fistulam
statuimus erectam, longam, exilissimam; observavimus autem aquam è vase subjecto in erectam fistulam ascendisse.
A. Nec mirum; nam superficiem aquae, particulae aëri interspersae
aquae
To this I say, that 'tis manifest by what I write in my Epistle, that I did not then take upon me, nor do I underPhaenomenon. An Attempt of this kind has been since adHobbs's Exposition: For, to say nothing of the motion he ascribes to the particles disPhaenomenon to bethink themselves also of a reason why, if the Experiment be tryed with Quicksilver instead of Water, the Surface of the LiHobbs's Explication be suffi
The next passage I have to consider is in the 13. page thus set down; Siquis post impulsionem revulsionem
A. Ab aëris qui est in Recipiente fortissimo conatu circulari facto à violento ingressu aëris inter superficiem Suctoris convexam
& Cylindri concavam, generato per iteratam illam impulsionem revulsionem
B. Verisimile est: Nam ut aër novus in Recipiens paulatim admittitur, etiam apparentem illam gravitatem paulatim perdit.
But, I do not much fear that this Explication will keep the Experiment from continuing to be thought by ingenious men, a notable Confirmation of our Hypothesis. For, to pass by something that, though I am no way satisfied with, cannot well be examined in few words; I answer, First, that if there be such a vehement circular endeavour as he imagiHobbs's reason necessarily be extracted with the stopple in one case, I see not why the like should not happen in another. But since Mr. Hobbs is pleased to call us Experimentarian Philosophers, let us shew that such ExplicatiFortissimus conatus circularis in the exhausted Receiver as he pretends; but that there is indeed an endeavour of the AmHobbs here supposes. To which I shall now adde, that neither were a pair of Scales suspended within the same Cavity; nor was a long Magnetical Needle that rested upon the point of another Needle, at all whirled about by this imaginary motion of the Air. Besides, if you leisurely loosen the Brass stopple, so that it may be very near, but not contiguous, to the sides of the Socket, you shall manifestly perceive a strong current of Air to flow into the Receiver at that passage: And more than once, when instead of that piece of Brass we stopt the hole in the Cover with our Cement, one might observe sometimes whilst we were pumping, sometimes after we had done pumping, that the outward Air by degrees desuperficies of the Cement expos'd to it, and made it concave, and now and then would break through it, thrusting it inward with great violence and noise.
In the same page our Author rectifies, after his way, anVidimus item aquam demissam in Recipiens post Suctoris aliquot
reciprocationes ita bullire, ac st supposito igne fervesceret.
A. Id quo
B. Imo certi sumus quod non calescit sensibiliter.
A. Quid ergo tali aquae motui conferre posse putas majorem vel minorem Atmosphaerae gravitatem?
B. Ne
But, I confess, I see not how the circular motion of the
As for what he sayes about the gravity of the Atmosphere, 'tis plain enough that my conjecture ascribes the Phaenomenon to the taking off, not the gravity of the external Air, but of the pressure of the Air within the Receiver; though I see not why the removal of the weight of the Atmosphere, if it could be out of the Engine effected, should not have a like operation.
And (to answer Mr. Hobbs's Question as it should have been put) that which I think the greater or lesser pressure of the Air confers to this Phaenomenon is this, That whereas common Experience shews us, that water by being heated is expanPhaenomenon that pressure being by the exhaustion of the Receiver taken off, the Aerial particles and agitated Vapours that abound in the hot water are allowed to expand themselves, as before they could not, and to make such numerous and great bubbles, that thereby a good part of the water is carried out of the Vial. So that I somewhat wonder what makes Mr. Hobbs speak as if there were no sensible heat of the water under considerPhaenomenon, the Experimentarian Philosophers need not the Objection lately made against it; For I have alPhaenomenon to; nay, when there is manifestly a whirlHobbs might not have let alone my Conjecture, (for I pro
As for what he-adds in these words, Ab hoc experimenta manifestum est, quod Recipiens per exuctionem hanc quam vocatis Aeris, non sit vacuum. Nam moveri
aqua non potuit nisi à movente aliquo moto & contiguo.
Phaenomenum hoc demonstrationem suppositionis meae continere videtur non infirmam. I am not obliged to answer it, but leave that to those that are profest Vacuists; against whom I must doubt whether his Ratiocination will conclude, though the consequence be not manifest to me. For himself allows his Terrestrial Atoms an innate circular motion, which consequently needs not depend upon some body contiguous and moved; and the Vacuists will say, that the particles of the water being strongly agitated when it was put into the Receiver, (whether by fiery Corpuscles swarming in it, or otherwise) and the resistance of the incumbent Air being taken off, the Phaenomenon would be produced just as it is, though we should suppose no other body to succeed in the room of the exhausted Air. And besides, though some subfill up exactly all the little spaces deserted by the
Phaenomenon at all prove, much less manifestly prove, that they were quite full. And since an actual heat, that is, a brisk and various Agitation of its small parts, is requisite to the boyling of the water in this ExperiHobbs must allow, that in Air comprest by Quicksilver, or some other weight, the removal of that pressure is sufficient to make that Air expand it self by the flying abroad of its parts.
And whereas Mr. Hobbs urges this other Argument against the Vacuists, Praeterea dic mihi, bullientem aquam potuistin' conspicere?
B. Quidni?
A. Nonne visionem fieri concedunt vestri per actionem continuam ab objecto ad oculum? Nonne etiam putant actionem esse motum, & omnem motum esse corporis? Quomodo ergo potuit ab objecto, nempe aqua, ad oculos tuos motus per vacuum (id est, per non corpus) derivare?
B. Non affirmant nostri it a vacuum esse Recipiens, ut nullus omnino aër relict us sit.
A. Nil refert an totum Recipiens vacuum sit, an magna ejus pars; nam utrumvis supponatur, derivatio motus ab objecto ad oculum intercipietur.
B. Ita videtur, nec habeo quod respondeam. The Vacuists will perhaps answer him as I answered Franciseus Linus to an almost like Objection. And those of them (which make far the greatest number) who plead but for an interspersed Vacuum, will perhaps tell him, that they take Vision to be made not by such a Propagation of Impulse as he does, but by a Trajection of Effluvia, that issuing out of the Sun, and traHobbs, why a motion may not be made through a Vacuum or non corpus? nay, how it can naturally be stopt in vacuo where there is nothing to resist it? But Con
In the 14. page Mr. Hobbs having recited that ExperiCredin'tu animalia istatam cito interempta esse eo quod carerent aëre? Quomodo
And as for the Explication that Mr. Hobbs would recoma motus vehementissimus as he pretends: besides that he shews not how this motion comes to kill the included Animals which I was wont to keep, not near the Centre of the Receiver, where he seems to think this moti
In the same page our Author makes a digression from the Engine, and discourses of another Experiment which I have long since often made: but though his Explication be lyable enough to just Exceptions, (as I can make good if it be rePlacet mihi tua magis Hypothesis quam illa de vi aëris elastica: nam
video quod à veritate illius veritas dependet vel vacui vel pleni; sed à veritate hujus nihil sequitur in neutram partem quaestionis. Aëris, inquit, structura similis est compressae lanae. Bene est. Lana fit ex filis. Recte. Sed cujus figurae? Si Parallelopipedi, nulla potestesse compressio partium: si non Parallelopipedi, erunt inter fila illa spatia quaedam relicta; quae si vacua sunt, supponunt Vacuum, ad probandum quod Vacuum est possibile; si plena, plenum dicunt quod vacuum putant. To this passage, I say, I cannot but represent, that the Question is not, whether from the
To examine then onely the first of the above mentioned particulars, I shall begin with observing that his story of the damp to be met with in Mines is more largely set down by Mr. Hobbs in that Chapter of his Elements of Philosophy, where he treats of Gravity; in which place he seems to menHobbs into a suspicion of relating things untrue as matters of fact, his enemies themHobbs would have it: for that, he here tells us, is of a consistence betwixt Air and Water; and in the above cited place of his Elements he sayes, that 'tis not much lighter than Water. But by the Magdeburgick ExAEolipiles, that grow lighter when the Air is expell'd. BeHobbs would have it; how chance a Pendulum should not move very sensibly slower in it, when in Water the Diadromes are so exceedingly much more slow? And the breaking of an Hermetically-seal'd bubHobbs's discourse upon our Experiment. But
Hobbs, that because a Candle or a live Coal may a great way under ground be extinguisht by a thick Damp, therefore the effect must proceed from the like cause in our Receiver, where there is no sign of any Damp or unusual thickness of the Air, but of the contrary.
But let us follow Mr. Hobbs to the next passage, wherein he seems fond enough of playing the Censor. For, speaking of our 11. Experiment, wherein the Coals that seemed alFuere eorum aliqui qui remansisse dixerunt in carbonibus illis (quanquam extincti videbantur) particulas quasdam igneas, quae admisso aëre ventilate caeteram
As for the reason Mr. Hobbs assigns of our Experiment in the lately mentioned passage of his Dialogue, being grounded upon such a thickness of the Air in the Quando autem est quod de homine vere pronunciare possumus quod est mortuus, sive (quod idem
A. De puncto temporis quo anima à corpore separatur difficile est statuere. Perge igitur ad experimenta alia.
I confess I see not why that needless Question might not have been well spared, if he designed to give it no better Answer.
WHat our Author has in the 19. page concerning a Bladder has been already examined, wherefore I proB. Si acus magnete excitus libere pendeat intra Recipiens, sequetur tamen ille motum ferri quod circumducitur extra Recipiens. Item object a intus posita ab iis qui extra sunt videbuntur, & soni intus facti audientur, omnia haec aeque post at
A. Manifestissima haec sunt signa Recipientis semper pleni, nec posse inde exugi aërem. Quod autem soni inde sentiantur debiliores, signum est consistentiae aëris. Consistentia autem aëris à motu ejus est per lineas diametraliter oppositas. But I meet with few of the Vacuists, who, even in the Torricellian Experiment, think the place relinquished by the Quicksilver to be perfectly void, most of them allowing, that though it be not quite full of body, yet it may contain some of the Earth's magnetical steams, or of those igneous Corpuscles that flow from the Sun, or both of them. Now against these who would from our Experiments deduce but onely an interspersed Vacuum, I see not that the Phaenomena mentionHobbs do conclude half so manifestly as he preEffluvia, that issuing out of the Load10th. part of the Receiver. I know inHobbs has another Hypothesis of the Phaenomena
Phaenomena here mentioned by Mr.
In the same 19. and some following pages Mr. Hobbs, has a long Discourse against my Conjecture at the reason I proThat the lower superficies of that (unstone being freely exposed to the Air, is prest
upon by it; whereas the uppermost surface being contiguous to
the superiour stone, is thereby defended from the pressure of the Air, which consequently pressing the lower stone against the upper hinders it from falling, as we have elsewhere more fully declared. Which last words I therefore omit not, because they shew that I handle this matter in this place but inciden
His whole Discourse concerning my Conjecture, and his Scheme, would be too prolix to be entirely inserted. But the thing his Discourse drives at is to shew, that neither the Spring nor Weight of the Air have any thing to do with this Phaenomenon: and therefore when he had made his Academian relate, that two coherent Marbles suspended in our Receiver did not fall asunder upon the exhaustion of it, he subjoyns that it was, Quia nihil istic erat quod ageret Atmosphaerae pondus; and annexes,
But Mr. Hobbs tells us, that the cause I assign of the coheConfitentur (sayes he)
AEolipile being by heat freed from Air as much as you can, if the little hole at the extremity of the neck, by which the Air gets in and out, be presently and carefully stopt with Wax, and afterwards suffer'd to cool, there will not be in the Cavity of the AEolipile a resistance any thing near equal to the pressure of the outward Air. And thereAEolipile be unstopt under water.
Next, I relate in the mentioned History, that having drawn some of the Air out of a large Glass with a narrow mouth, and thereby destroyed the equality of force betwixt the weight of the outward Air, and the now weakned spring of the inward; I found that by immediately applying a flat body to the Orifice of the Vessel, that body was readily lif
Thirdly, I lately met with the relation of an Experiment which does abundantly make out the power of the ambient Atmosphere to press bodies against each other, when it canMagdeburgick Experiment writes to the indusSchottus, that having caused two Copper Plates to be made almost in the form of Scales a little above half an Ell in Diameter, and exactly congruous if laid upon one another; Has (sayes our Jesuite) si mutuo sibi imponit, & aërem extrahit, adeo ab externi aëris gravitate Schot. Mech. Hyd. Pneumat. pag. 461. compressae at
But let us follow Mr. Hobbs a little further. Having ask'd this Question, Sed vis illa elastica quam in aëre esse dicunt, nihilne ad marmor sustinendum conferre potest? he answers, Nihil omnino; non enim conatus in aëre est Pag. 20, 21. ullus ad centrum terrae magis quam ad aliud quodvis punctum Universi. Quoniam enim gravia omnia tendunt à circumferentia Atmosphaerae ad centrum terrae, & inde rursus ad circumferentiam Atmosphaerae per easdem lineas reflexas, conatus sursum conatui deorsum aequalis erit, & proinde mutuo se perimentes neutrâ conabuntur viâ. But that the Spring of the Air may perform somewhat in the case proposed, I hope the newly-mention'd Experiments have evinc'd. And the reason he annexes to his Negative, as also the difficult Example he sub
As for the Scheme he annexes, I confess I do not well see what he drives at in it; at least if it be intended for a ConfutaNon potest ergo pars, BC. (which in the ExPars Atmosphaerae intra totam posita ubicun
his No
And as for what he adds, Si possibile esse negarem, ut diligentiâ & arte humanâ duae superficies corporum
duorum inter se per omnia puncta ita accurate congruae fiant, ut ne minimo quidem corpusculo creabili transitus permittatur, non video quomodo illi aut suam Hypothesim tueri, aut negationem nostram improbitatis arguere jure possent: I confess I do not see how this Argumentation proves any thing against the Interest, either of the Weight, or so much as of the Spring of the Air in the cohesion of our Marbles. For, provided that the Corpuscles of the Air get not in between the two stones, the pressure of the Air may well suffice to keep them together. And, lastly, as for that modest passage (that im
But after having so long dwelt upon the consideration of our Marbles, it is high time to proceed to what remains.
In the 24. page Mr. Hobbs has that passage I formerly reVincenzo Vincenti of
B. Cur non potest aqua, quae cum injiceretur particulas aëris comprimebat, ab iisdem particulis se explicantibus
A. Quia locum explicatae majorem non requirunt quam compressae. Quemadmodum in vase aqua pleno, in qua esset multitudo anguillarum, anguillas sive in se volutas sive explicatas idem semper capit locum. Propellere ergo aquam per vim Elasticam, quae alia non est quam motus corporum se explicantium, non possunt.
B. Comparatio illa aëris cum aqua anguillis plena, nostris, credo, non displicebit.
But the Elaterists will answer, that neither can his earthly Atoms, to whom he ascribes the Rejection of the water forc'd in, truly fill up more parts of space at one time than at anoHobbs knows well, are not wont to compare the Air to Eels, but to Wooll: and though each hair that makes up a compress'd lock of wooll, do not really fill more space with wooll when extended than when crumpl'd; yet when there is a congeries of these hairs
congeries does by its spring endeavour to thrust away those contiguous bodies by which it is penn'd up, as I have more fully explained in my Epistle; so that these Aerial Corpuscles, being pent up by the water forc'd into the Glas, still endeavour to expand themselves by throwing it out.
What our Author addes in the same page, as if they were mistaken that think the Experiments of the Plenists tended (especially till of late) to prove that the generality of them did not always mean by a Vacuum a space perfectly devoid of all corporeal substance, but any space here below that is not fill'd with a visible body, or at least with Air, (for these are my words to which I suppose Mr. Hobbs alludes) To this, I say, it is scarce worth while to make answer, the Controversie being of such small moment, (though I think I could easily enough do it) especially since he rather excuses those that may have negligently exprest themselves, than disproves what I said. And since I spoke chiefly and by name of the Peripatetick Schools, he may well allow that their Expressions concerning this matter were not alwayes so accurate, whilst in this very passage he concludes with these words, Vides quam ineptum sit ad explicationem effectuum talium advocare verba Metaphorica, ut fugam vacui, horrorem naturae, &c.
quibus olim ad existimationem suam tuendam usae sunt Scholae. Nor is what he adds concerning the Vacuum to be attributed to Democritus and Epicurus either clear enough, or of con
But there are in this page two particulars, which, though they make little or nothing against what I said of the Plenists, may deserve to be taken notice of.
The second (for I think it expedient to dispatch that first) is couch'd in these words, In Hydriis perforatis ideo haeret aqua, quia quae per tantillum foramen exiturit, adeo exigua est, Page 25. ut non posset ita in longitudinem se diffundere,
ut descendendo aditum aëri faciat per foraminum circumferentias; ne
But this Experiment I have already examined as 'tis proPaschall's Ex
But the other particular here mentioned by Mr. Hobbs, who thus proposes it, Qui per fistulam ore aquam sugit, aerem medium prius sugit, quo distentum aerem externum removet; qui remotus locum (in pleno) habere nisi
proximum removendo non potest, & sic continua pulsione aqua tandem pellitur in fistulam, succedit
de
But in the same 25. page our Author tells us, that the
Id vero impossibile est. Nam in Siphone nisi ambo crura aquâ impleantur, aqua è pelvi non ascendet. Ascensionis causa in pannum est motus ille terrearum atomorum quae aquae contiguae sunt, motus (inquam) circularis simplex, aëri in quo moventur communicatus; quae atomi aquam ferientes in materiam laneam incutiunt, incussae autem magis magis
Thus far he; but the passage in my Epistle, upon which he seems to have grounded his Opposition, is but this (wherewith I begin my 35. Experiment)
But to draw at length towards a Conclusion of our trouExamen; it remains onely that I take some notice of the general Corollary that Mr. Hobbs is pleased to deduce from his whole Discourse, of the Experiments exhibited in our Engine.
A. Fateris ergo (says he) nihil hactenus à Collegis tuis promotam esse scientiam causarum naturalium,
B. Nec fateri pudet; nam, Est aliquid prodire tenus, si non datur ultra.
A. Quid tenus; Quorsum autem tantus apparatus & sumptus machinarum factu difficilium, ut eatenus tantum prodiretis quantum ante prodierat Hobbius? cur non inde potius incepistis ubi ille desiit? cur principiis ab eo positis non estis usi? Cum
Aristoteles
As to what he sayes to the disparagement of the AssemHobbs, if he means here, as he elsewhere teaches (pag. 13. and 19.) that the Motion he speaks of is produc'd by that of the Air impell'd betwixt the sides of the Sucker and the Cylinder; perhaps it will be thought I have sufficiently provany of its uses, so far is it from being its chief or onely use. But I consess I somewhat wonder Mr. Hobbs should quarrel with me, (for 'tis I that in my Epistle em
Est aliquid prodire tenus, si non datur ultra.
And this not, as some would perhaps suspect, because I do not imitate him, in speaking of my self, as he does of himself, but because he thinks the expression too arrogant. For since he here confesses that his Hypotheses are by this Engine rendered more probable, some will perchance think that to be enough to entitle my Experiment to some degree of usefulness, unless Mr. Hobbs's Doctrine of the Air had found more embracers than before these seasonable, though despised, Experiments it was observed to have. But, since either of us may be partial in his own case, I am very well content to leave others to judge both whether my Expression have been guilty of Arrogance, and how much he has done more than prodire tenus in all the past long Discourse against me, when they have considered what new Experiment or matter of fact Mr. Hobbs has therein added to enrich the History of Nature, what new Truths he has discovered, or what Errors (except one of his own in the last page) he has well confuted. These things, I say, I am very well content to leave to be judged of by all dis-interessed persons, withHobbs thinks fit to speak of his own performances and mine, or invited to imitate him in that way of writing, my Endeavours (such as they are) having hitherto been favoured
Virtuosi, that possibly I may have almost as little need as reason to commend them.
But 'tis somewhat trouble some work to argue long with a man that's angry with an Expression, which perhaps none but he would have found fault with for want of modesty; and therefore as I have lest un-recited several provoking and very undeserved Expressions he emploies in the same page, and even that passage, where to prove our Naturalists and Mathematicians professed they would not receive Truth comOwen, who, besides that his proAristotle, whom on other occasions he is wont to use with as little respect as if he were a MemGalilaeo, Mersennus, Verulam, Des-Cartes, Gassendus, Balianus, Foannes Marcus Marci, Honoratus Fabris, (not to mention other Moderns, nor those of our own as
There remain yet some other pages of Mr. Hobbs's. Diapartly, because I am too much tired already to be fond of engaging in Controversies that I am not tyed to meddle with, (except what concerns Fluidity and Firmness, which I shall, God willing, examine by it self;) partly, because divers passages relate to Persons, not Things: partly, because I do not much fear that Mr. Hobbs will find ecomplaisant as he makes his Academian, who in many passages of the Dialogue speaks not un
ALthough Mr. Hobbs do not name me for the Maintainer of the Opinions which I have proposed in the History of Fluidity and Firmness, and which he censures: yet since that History, after having been mentioned in the Book I have hitherto been defending, was published a good while before Mr. Hobbs's Dialogue; and since some of the chief particulars he censures or takes notice of, are delivered there, and some of them perchance no where else; I think it may concern me to examine what he sayes either against my Opini
But, before I go further, I must at the very entrance of this Discourse take notice, that in the fifth page, where Mr. Hobbs begins to dispute against our Notion of Fluidity, he very much mistakes my Opinion, as may appear by these words, which he puts into the mouth of his Academian, Sed pleri
For I have shewn in the History of Firmness, that this DiHobbs here anDivisio quidem infinita concipi non potest, Divisibilitas autem facile. For since in this very passage and within a very few lines he has recourse in this matter to God's Omnipotence, I see not why an infinite division cannot be as well conceived as an infinite divisibility, since sure an Omnipotent Agent is able to do what is possible to be done; and why else should a body be called infinitely divisible? Besides, when Mr. Hobbs has recourse to what God can do, (whose Omnipotence we have both great reason to acknowledge) it imports not to the Controversie about Fluidity to determine what the Alcan do, but what he actually has done. And, lastly, whereas my Adversary requires to have the magnitude defined which a part of a falling Wall ought to have to deserve the name of fluid; first, he should have clearly proved that FluHobbs in his Definition above-revery weak enHobbs's Ratiocination, yet as to the Opinion it self, for whose sake he speaks so severely and so despairingly of our Society, if it be conmay become parts of a fluid body. And against this Mr. Hobbs's indignation seems stronger than his Argument: For that which he objects being as we have lately seen, that at this rate all bodies must be fluid; 'tis evident by what I have already argued, that he infers this Absurdity not from my Opinion, but his own mistake of it: nor did I content my self with the proofless proposal of my Conjeccoagulum of pure spirits of Urine and Wine may by bare digestion be turned into a permanent liquor; and that the fluid body of Quicksilver may without any sensible addition be turned into a permanent dry Powder, and may again in a trice by bare heat be turned into a lastingly fluid body. Whereto I added other Experiments, which together with these Mr. Hobbs would possibly have thought fit to answer, if he had found it easie for him to do so.
After this passage extant in Mr. Hobbs's fifth page that I have all this while been examining, I remember nothing in his DiaHobbs so far agrees as to say, Quin corpuscula (qualia sunt atomi quas supponit
at
Hobbius)
Mr. Hobbs's Theory of Fluidity and Firmness is thus deliver
B. Quaenam duri & fluidi sunt principia?
A. Quid aliud nisi fluidi quidem, Quies, duri autem,
Motus quidam ad illum effectum producendum idoneus? Per Quietem intelligo duar am partium inter se quietem cum se mutuo tangunt quidem, sed non premunt: Nam & fluida moveri tota possunt retenta fluiditate, & dura quiescere, ut tamen partes eorum moveantur.
I doubt not but this will to most Readers seem a Paradox. And as for his Ratiocination contain'd in the two last lines, I shall readiFluida moveri tota possunt retent a fluiditate, since that I think agrees at least as well with my Hypothesis as his: but whereas he adds that hard bodies may rest, and yet their parts be moved, that may in one case be conceived, and in another not. For indeed the implicated parts of a firm body may be made to tremble or a little vibrate as it were to and fro, as those of a sounding Bell do, or as in a Hedge the branches and twigs may be shaken by the wind, whilst the trees and bushes themselves conti
But Mr. Hobbs contents himself to alledge in favour of his strange Notion touching Fluidity and Firmness three particulars, which, I confess, afford me not the least satisfaction.
The first is drawn from what he formerly taught touching the
At
But, I confess, I do not see how the Motus circularis simplex he talks of should give such a hardness to the fluid Air: nor is it manifest to me how the Air that perfectly fills the Cylinder can be by motion compress'd, especially so far as to obtain thereby a degree of consistence fit to be mentioned, as he speaks of it, when (without adding the word much, or any other equivalent term) he sayes that yet 'tis less than the consistence of water. For the Cylinder being, according to him, perfectly full of Air, I see not how the Pumping can make the Cavity (to use his own exfuller than full; nor consequently can comex abundanti, for the violent motion it self of the Air in the Cylinder (which motion the Argument supposes) has been already, in the Examen of one of the former passages of his Dialogue, sufficiently manifested to be contrary to Experience.
The second thing Mr. Hobbs alledges is his Conceit of the GeAt
The third thing that Mr. Hobbs alledges is not so much a confirmation of his own Doctrine, as an Objection, as he seems to think, against that of his Adversaries. For, Si supponamus (sayes he presently after his last-recited words)
But in exchange of these few & unconcluding arguments, which are all that Mr. Hobbs alledges to countenance his Paradox, how many Experiments and Reasons mightwe transcribe out of our His
And as Critical as Mr. Hobbs appears in laying down the reHypothesis, I must make bold to the two conVt sit conceptibilis (idest, non absurda) (which whether it be enough I now dispute not)
But since the want of more to say would not in haste put a PeHobbs teaches concerning Fluidity and Firmness, either here, or in that Section of his Elements where he pretends to define them, I think I need not fear that a Doctrine which I have perhaps with some care endeavoured to establish, for the main, upon Experiments, should be overthrown by Opinions whose grounds are but such as we have already seen; and in pleading for which the Author is pleaPhaenomena of Fluidity and Firm
And now leaving Mr. Hobbs to apply my self to the Reader, I have to the things hitherto discourst but this one thing to adde concerning them, That as little cause as Mr. Hobbs has hitherto given me to distrust what I have written of Fluidity and Firmgreat distrust even of things whereof my Adversaries Objections give me not any.
PAg. 12. Quanquam vis, &c. Although the force of that motion in the evacuated Receiver be diminished, being opprest by the con
p. 13, 14. Sine, &c. Without which Hypothesis let never so much labour, art, cost be bestowed for the finding out of the invisible causes of natural things, all will be in vain.
p. 15. Cum ejus, &c. Seeing almost all its parts are flexil, like little soft feathers to fine threds.
Ibid. Sed quisquis, &c. But it matters not who was the Author of that Supposition. For the very Hypothesis it self, wherein is supposed a motion of subtil matter, which is swift without any cause assigned, and hath moreover divers innumerable circulations of Corpuscles generated from the single motion of that matter, is not the conceipt of a man of wit or sense.
p. 16. Nempe hoc, &c. This is the thing that the great Des-Cartes somewhere admired, that he, whether his Positions are true or false, doth never in argumentation make any right inference from his Suppositions.
p. 17. Quod sane, &c. Which is indeed a most evident argument of the weight of the Air.
Ibid. Quod quidem lanx, &c. That the Scale in which the Bladder is, is more deprest than the other, they may be certain, their eyes bear
p. 18. Quod vesica, &c. That the Bladder, whether it be blown up with a pair of Bellows, or with the breath of ones mouth, is heavier than when it is not blown up, I will not deny, because of the greater quantity of Atoms from the Bellows, or of fuliginous Corpuseles that are blown in from the breath. But notwithstanding they gather nothing of sufficient certainty from this Experiment of a blown Bladder. They ought to have put into the Scales two Vessels of equal weight, whereof one should be shut and the other open: For by this means Air not blown in, but onely inclosed, had been weighed. When therefore you shall see Air so weighed, we will afterwards consider what may be said conPhaenomenon you bring.
Quod Atmosphaerae, &c. That many Particles both of Earth and Water mingled with the AEthereal body are in the Atmosphere, I am easily persuaded: but that in the middle of the AEther they should move upwards, downwards, every way, and that one leaning on the back of another they should not gravitate, is a thing utterly unconceivable.
p. 20. Aer quo, &c. The Air, with which in the beginning the Sphe
p. 21. Quoniam, per, &c. Because by the drawing back of the Sucker the pure Air was thrust in, but the earthy parts were not thrust in; there was a greater proportion of earthy Particles, which without the Cylin
Ibid. Vidisti, &c. You see now that the Spring of the Air, which they fuppose, is either an impossible thing: or they must (for its defence) have recourse to the Hypothesis of Mr. Hobbs.
p. 23. Quia cuticula omnis, &c. Because every skin is made up of small threds or filaments, which by reason of their figures cannot accurately touch in all points. The Bladder therefore, being a skin must be persuperficies of the Bladder. Wherefore it is of necessity that it must swell every way, and the vehemency of the endeavour increasing, be torn at last.
p. 26. Intellexti, &c. Have you understood my Hypotheses? 1. That there are with the Air intersperst many earthy Particles, endued with a simple circular motion, congenite to its nature. 2. That there is a greater quantity of these Particles in the Air that is near the Earth, than in that which is more remote from it.
Ne
nor is there any one that hitherto has brought any reason why it may not be so.
p. 29. Nihil, &c. Nothing is moved but by a contiguous Body that is in motion.
Ibid. Dum Suctor, &c. While the Sucker is drawn back, by how much a greater place is left (within,) by so much a lesser place is left to the external Air, which being thrust backwards by the motion of the Sucker towards the outmost parts, doth move in like manner the Air that is next it self, and that Air the next, and so forwards; so that it is of necessity at last that the Air must be compell'd into the space deserted by the Sucker, and to enter between the convex and surface of the Sucker, and the concave of the Cylinder. For it being supposed that the parts of the Air are infinitely subtil, it is impossible but they should insinuate themselves that way by which the Sucker is drawn down. For first, the contact of those surfaces cannot be perfect in all points, because the surfaces themselves cannot be made infinitely smooth. Then, that force which is applied to draw back the Sucker, doth distend in some measure the cavity of the Cylinder. Lastly, if in the confines of (that is, betwixt) the two surfaces any one single hard Atom should enter, pure Air will enter at the same way, although with a weak endeavour. I might also have accounted that Air which for the same cause insinuates it self through the Valve of the Cylinder. You see therefore the conseEmpty place is taken away. It will follow also that the Air which is driven up into the place deserted by the Sucker, because it is driven up thither by a great force, is moved with a very swift and circular motion betwixt the top and the bottom in the Cylinder, because there is nothing there that can weaken its motion: and you know that there is nothing that can give motion to its own self, or diminish it.
p. 39. Haerent hic, &c. Here our men are at a stand: How will you expedite this difficulty?
A. I have don't already: For the Air being beaten back by the reof it self) Elastical. Therefore the Air in the Cylinder being vehemently moved, endeavours or thrusts against all parts of the concave surface of the Cylinder; but in vain, untill the Sucker, is drawn back: But as soon as the Sucker having slipt the hand, ceases to make its impulse upon the Air, that Air which was before driven in, by reason of its endeavour against every point of the internal superficies of the Cylinder and of the Elastical force of the Air, will insinuate it self between the same surfaces with the same swiftness as that by which it was impell'd, that is, with that velocity which answers the strength of the impulsion. If therefore so great a power of Weight be hung upon the Sucker as may answer the power of the hands by which it was impulss'd; the swiftness with which the same Air goes out of the Cylinder, finding no place in the world (which is full) where to dispose it self, will again impell the Sucker to the top of the Cylinder, for the same reason that the Sucker a little before made an impulse upon the Air.
p. 44. In vas, &c. B. We poured water into an open Vessel, we pla
A. No wonder: For the small Particles that are interspers'd in the Air near the Water, did by their motion beat upon the surface of the Water, so that the Water must of necessity ascend into the Pipe, and that sensibly into a Pipe that was so exceeding slender.
p. 45. Siquis, &c. If any one after the frequently-repeated impulse and retraction of the Sucker, endeavour to draw out the Stopple of the upper Orifice of the Receiver, he shall find it gravitates very much, as if a weight of many pounds hung upon it. Whence comes this?
A. From a strong circular endeavour of the Air within the Receiver, made by the violent ingress of the Air between the convex surface of the Sucker and the concave of the Cylinder, procured by the repeated impulse and revulsion of the Sucker, which you improperly call the Exsuction of the Air. For by reason of the fullness of Nature the Stopple cannot be drawn out, but the Air that is in the Receiver (contiguous to the Stopple) must be drawn out too: which Air, if it were settled and at rest, the Stopple would easily be drawn out; but whiles that doesmost swiftly circulate, it comes out very hardly, that is, it seems to be very heavy.
B. Very likely: For as soon as fresh Air is by degrees let into the Re
p. 47. Vidimus, &c. We saw also water, being let down into the Re
A. This likewise happens, as we spake, by reason of the swiftness of the circulating Air: unless perhaps you find the water hot too whiles it bubbles. For if we were sure it was hot, we must find out some other cause of the Phaenomenon.
B. We are certain it is not sensibly hot.
A. In what therefore can the greater or lesser motion of the Atmo
B. I suppose they do not attribute this motion to the Atmosphere.
p. 49. A. It is manifest from this Experiment, that the Receiver is not made empty by this exsuction of Air, as you call it: For the water could not be moved but by some contiguous mover, that was it self in motion. Therefore this Phaenomenon seems to contain no weak demonHypothesis.
p. 50. Besides, tell me, could you see the water bubbling in that manner?
B. What else?
A. Do not your Associates grant that Vision is made by a continued action from the object unto the eye? Do they not also think action to be motion, and all motion to be of some body? How therefore could the motion be derived from the object, the water, unto your eyes through a Vacuum, that is somewhat that is not a body?
B. Our friends do not affirm the Recipient to be so empty that no Air at all is left.
A. No matter whether the Receiver be wholly, or for the greater part empty; for which ever you suppose, the derivation of the motion from the object to the eye will be intercepted.
B. It may be so; I can't tell what to answer.
p. 51. Credin' tu, &c. Do you think these Animals were therefore so quickly killed because they wanted Air? How then do they who make a trade of Diving live under water, of whom there be some who being accustomed from their childhood have wanted Air a whole hour? No. Thatmost vehement motion by which Bladders shut therein are distended and broken, kills these Animals shut up in the Receiver.
Ibid. Ego contra, &c. I on the contrary think that neither the Air can be suck'd out, nor that the Animal would so soon dye if it were suck'd out. The action indeed to which this death is a consequent may seem either a certain suction (and so, that the Animal is kill'd by the exsuction of the included Air, its Respiration being taken away) or a compulsion of the Air from all parts towards the Centre of the spherical Glass in which the Animal is inclosed, and so may be seen to dye stifled by the
p. 53. Placet, &c. Your Hypothesis pleases me better than that of the Spring of the Air: For from its truth depends the truth of a Vacuum or a Plenum; but from the truth of that nothing follows on either part of the Question. The make of the Air (sayes he) is like that of comprest wooll. Well; wooll is made of hairs or threds. Right; but of what figure? if of a Parallelopipedon, there can be no compression of parts: if not of a Parallelopipedon, there will be betwixt the hairs certain spaces left, which if they be empty they suppose some place empty, to prove that a Vacuum is possible; if full, they say that is full which they sup
p. 56. Fuere, &c. There were some of them that said there remained in those coals (though they seem'd extinguish'd) some fiery Particles, which being blow'd up by the Air upon its admission did re-kindle the rest of the mass.
Ibid. Nae, &c. In good faith they seem not so much as to have consi
p. 58. When is it that we may truly say of a man that he is dead, or (which is the same) hath expired his Soul? For it has been known that some men who have been taken for dead, being brought out the next day revived.
A. It is hard to determine the point of time in which the soul is sepa
p. 59. Si acus, &c. If a Needle excited by a Loadstone hang freely within the Receiver, it will nevertheless follow the motion of the Iron which is drawn about without the Receiver. So objects put within will be seen by those that are without, and sounds made within will be heard
B. These are most manifest signs that the Receiver is alwayes full, and that the Air cannot thence be suck'd out. That the sounds thence are more weak to ones hearing is a sign of the consistence of the Air; for the consistence of the Air is diametrically opposite from its motion.
p. 61. Quia nihil &c. Because there was nothing there that the weight of the Atmosphere should do; no more strong or evident Argument could be made against a Vacuum than this Experiment. For if of two coherent Marbles either of them should be thrust forward that way that their surfaces lye contiguous, they would easily be sever'd; the neigh
p. 62. Confitentur, &c. They themselves and all others confess, that all Ponderation is an endeavour every way by right lines unto the Centre of the Earth; and so that it is made not by the figure of a Cylinder or Column, but by a Pyramide, whose top is the Centre of the Earth, and whose Basis is part of the surface of the Atmosphere.
Ibid. Conatus, &c. Therefore the endeavour of all the points that ponderate will be propagated to the surface of the upper Marble, before it can be propagated further (suppose) to the Earth.
p. 64. Has, &c. These Scales he puts one upon another and draws out the Air, and then are they kept so comprest and united by the gravity of the external Air, that six strong men cannot pull them asunder. But if at length by the use of utmost endeavour they are pluckt in sunder, they make a noise equal to the report of a Musquet; but as soon as ever by the Stop-cock open'd there is the least entrance given to the Air, they are severed of their own accord.
p. 65. Sed vis, &c. But can the Spring, which they say is in the Air, confer nothing to the holding up the Marble? — Nothing at all: For there is no endeavour of the Air to the Centre of the Earth, more than to any other point in the Universe. For seeing that heavy things tend from the circumference of the Atmosphere unto the Centre of the Earth, and thence again to the circumference of the Atmosphere by the same reflected lines, the endeavour upwards will be equal to the endea
Non potest ergo pars BC, &c. Therefore the part BC (that is a part of the Atmosphere placed any where within the whole) cannot (by reason of its greatness) descend, although it be heavy, and there
Ibid. Si possibile, &c. If I should deny it possible, that by the art of man two furfaces of two bodies could be made so accurately fit that they should touch in all points, so that there could no creable Corpuscle pass between them; I do not see how they could defend their own Hypothesis, or disprove our Negative assertion.
Ibid. Vtraque, &c. Both these Fancies, as well that of the Weight as of the Spring or Antitupy of the Air, are Dreams. But if it be granted that there is a kind of Recoyling in those small hairs or slender Corpus
p. 67. Cur non, &c. Why cannot the water, which when it was in
A. Because when explicated they require no greater place than when comprest: As in a vessel full of water, wherein are many Eeles, the same proportion of place receives them, whether they are folded round or at length. Therefore they cannot drive up the water by their Spring, which is nothing else but the motion of bodies explicating themselves.
B. The comparison of Air to Eeles in water I suppose will be well received by our Academians.
p. 68. Vides, &c. You see how foolish a thing it is to bring for the explication of such effects Metaphorical words, as the shunning of a Vacuum, the ahhorrence of Nature, &c. which heretofore the Schools used to defend their reputation.
Ibid. In the Gardeners Watering-pots therefore is the water suspended, because that which issues out at so small a hole is so little, that it cannot diffuse it self to such a length, that by its descent it may give passage to the Air through the circumferences of the holes. Nor can the Air driven off by the water going out find any other place besides that which the water leaves.
p. 69. Qui per, &c. He that sucks water into his mouth by a Pipe, first sucks up the Air between, whereby he removes the distended external Air, which being removed (the world being full) it can have no place but by removing the next, and so by continual pulsion the
p. 72. Id vero, &c. But that is impossible: For in a Siphon, unless both legs are filled with water, the water will not ascend out of the Bason. The cause of its ascent into that cloth is the motion of the earthy Atoms which are near the water, I say the simple circular motion com
p. 73. A. Fateris, &c. You confess then that your Collegiates have as yet in nothing advanced the knowledge of natural causes, but that one of them hath found out an Engine, in which there may be such a motion of the Air excited, that the parts of the Sphere may together every way tend unto the Centre, and that the Hypotheses of Mr. Hobbs, before pro
B. Right; I am not ashamed to confess it; for it is somewhat to arrive so far, if we can make no further progress.
A. Why so far? To what end such preparation and charge for Engines difficult to be made, to make no further discovery than Mr. Hobbs had made before you? Why did you not rather begin where he ended? Why did you not use the Principles he had laid; and when Aristotle had rightly said, That without the knowledge of Motion there is no knowledge of Nature, how durst you take such a task upon your selves?
Ibid. Est, &c.
p. 75. But most of us distinguish the nature of fluid from that which is not fluid, by the greatness of the parts of which any body consists and is made up with. Wherefore we do not onely look upon Air, Water, and all Liquors, but upon Ashes also and Dust, as fluid bodies. And we deny not that fluid things may be made of things not fluid; for we do not digest the Notion of infinite Divisibility.
A. Infinite Division cannot be conceived, but (infinite) Divisibility may easily. I on the contrary do not understand the distinction of Fluids and not Fluids, which you take from the greatness of the parts: could I digest this, I must say, the ruines of shattered rubbish stones that lye in Pauls were fluid. But if those ruines cannot be called fluid because the stones are too big, define me the bigness that the parts of a ruin'd wall must have that they may be called fluid. But you that cannot underfluids consist of Non-fluids; as if a wall that began to fall and be ruinous were called by them a fluid body. If they may speak so, every thing is fluid, for even Marble it self may be broken into parts less than any Atom imagin'd by Epicurus.
p. 79. Ruina, &c. The ruines that lye in Pauls Church might be called fluid.
Ibid. Si sic, &c. If they may so speak, there is nothing but is fluid, for even Marble may be beaten into parts less than any Epicurean Atom.
p. 80. Divisio, &c. Division that is infinite cannot be conceived, Divisibility may easily.
p. 81, 82. Quia corpuscula, &c. But the Corpuscles (such as are the Atoms supposed by Lucretius and also by Mr. Hobbs) being hard before might be easily compacted by any of the mention'd causes, so that it is not to be doubted but that the whole to be made of those Corpuscles will be hard.
Ibid. Si dura, &c. If hard bodies are made out of parts originally hard, why are not fluid bodies made of parts originally fluid? Could great fluids, as the AEther, be created; and could not small ones? He that first made a body hard or fluid, could if he would have made it greater or less than any other proposed body. Now if a fluid body be made of parts not fluid, (as you speak) and hard bodies onely from hard parts; doth it not follow that nothing neither fluid nor hard is made of original fluids?
p. 84. B. Quaenam, &c. What are the principles of Fluidity and Firmness.
A. Of Fluidity nothing but Rest, of Firmness Motion, such as is fit to produce that effect. By Rest I understand the rest of two parts one with another, when they each touch, but neither press one another. For entire bodies of fluids may be in motion their fluidity abiding, and hard bodies be at rest although their parts be in motion.
p. 85. At
And hence it is manifest that there is a great compression in the Air so moved and shut up, namely, so great as that force by which it was driven in was able to make; and also that from so great compression some degree of consistence must be made, though less than that of the consistence of water. Now if in all the same Particles of Air, besides the motion by which one presses another, there was also
p. 86. At
And such indeed may be the cause of the
Ibid. Si supponamus, &c. If we suppose with them that the cause of hardness is the greatness or thickness of the parts, what reason can we give why congealed water should be harder or firmer than the same water is before such congelation?
p. 87. Ut sit, &c. That it be conceivable, that is, not absurd; and that from its being granted the necessity of the Phaenomenon may be inferr'd.
p. 88. Qui, &c. They which putting bodies to bodies shew the new and admirable works of Nature do wonderfully inflame the minds of men with the love of Philosophy, and do not a little instigate them unto the search of Causes, and on that account are worthy of commendation.
True; for they enrich Natural History, without which Natural Science is in vain sought for.
THe occasion and scope of the present Treatise. Reasons why Mr. Hobbs might have employed himself otherwise, and have spared this Disp. 2. Why the Author would have been contented he had done so, ibid. Why he now undertakes the Reply, p. 3.
Of some mistakes of Mr. Hobbs touching matters of Fact and the Authors Doctrine. That he mistakes in ascribing the Explications and Experiments in the Physico-Mechanical Treatise of the Society at Gresham College, p. 3. the Experiments having been seen done long, and the book published, before the Society began, &c. p. 4. That the Experiments were not devised nor employed to prove a Vacuum, Ibid. Whether Mr. Hobbs by the ExperiVacuum, p. 5. That if the Watering-pot were tall enough, the water would run out with unstopping the upper Orifice, prov'd by M. Paschal's Experip. 6. The way of Argument on both sides compared, p. 7, 8. Why the Author did not assign the cause of Springs, p. 9. That Mr. Hobbs his account of Springs is imperfect, and that he has not solved the Phaenomena of them, p. 10, 11, 12, 13. That he mistook the Authors notion of the Air, p. 14. 15.
Wherein the Weight and Spring of the Air are asserted against Mr. Hobbs. Several Experiments recited that prove the real Weight of the Air, p. 16, 17. Mr. Hobbs's Objections against the Experiment of the heaviness of a blown Bladder, p. 17, 18. answered, p. 19. The Spring of the Air asserted from Mr. Hobbs's concessions, p. 20, 21, The same asserted by particular Experiments, p. 22, 23. Mr. Hobbs his answer to that of the Bladder considered, p. 23, 24. Experiments of the Spring of the Air not comprest, p. 25.
Wherein Mr. Hobbs his principal Explications of the Authors Phaenomena are examined. What things Mr.
In which divers scatter'd Explications and other passages in Mr. Hobbs's Dialogue are examined: His Explications why water without visible force ascends in a slender Pipe considered, p. 44, 45. Why the stopple of the Cover of the exhausted Receiver so much gravitates, considered, p. 46. His Explication and the Authors, why in the exhausting of the Receiver water let down into it boyles as it were or bubbles there, viewed and compared, p. 47, 48 Whether the Phaenomenon of this water bubbling in the Receiver be an evidence that there is no vacuity in the Receiver, p. 49, 50. Whether Animals in the exhausted Receiver dye for want of Air, or for the causes assigned by Mr. Hobbs, p. 51, 52. That the Author asserts not the proof of a Vacuum or Plenum to depend on the Hypothesis of the Spring of the Air, p. 53. That the Air in the exhausted Receiver is not thicker but thinner, not heavier but lighter, proved by Experiments, p. 54 55. The Epicurean Hypothesis of fire, and the effects of the Sun-beams through Burningp. 57. Whether he deserves a censure that calls kindled coals fire, p. 58.
Wherein other passages of Mr. Hobbs's Dialogue that concern the Author are examined. That the Experiments of the Needle's motion in the exhausted Receiver, and of sounds being audible, and objects visible there, are reconp. 59. Whether from the cohesion of two Marbles the non: existence of a Vacuum follows, p. 60, 61. How the lower Marble is upheld, p. 62, 63. The power of the oblique pressure of the Air to these effects illustrated by Experiments, p. 64. Whether the throwing up of water in the Glass fountains, invented by Vincenzo Vincenti of Urbin, can be explicated by the Spring of the Air, p. 67, 68. Mr Hobbs's Explication of the cause of waters being suspended in a Gardeners Wateringp. 69. An Experiment purposely devised to shew that both
Vacuists and Plenists should admit an Elastical power in the Air, p. 70, 71. Mr. Hobbs's correction of the Authors discourse about the ascension of water in Siphons and Filtres animadverted, p. 72. Some unhandsom passages, and such as shew the unequal estimation Mr. Hobbs has of his own and others preformances in Philosophy, p. 73, 74. What parts of Mr. Hobbs's Treatise, and why, past by without censure by the Author, p. 75.
Wherein is examined what Mr. Hobbs teaches concerning Fluidity and Firmness. Mr. Hobbs mistakes, and so misreports, the Authors Doctrine of the cause of Fluidity, p. 77. His Animadversions on the Doctrine considered, p. 78, 79. Whether fluid bodies are made from parts originally fluid, or from small Solids in motion, &c. p. 79, 80, 81. Mr. Hobbs's Theory of Fluidity and Firmness examined, p. 81, 82, &c. What influence therein his simple circular motion may have, considered, p. 82, 83. That there is a third requisite of a good Hypothesis, viz. That it be not inconsistent with any Truth or Phaenomenon of Nature, p. 84. That Mr Hobbs his Hypothesis wants this requisite, proved by references,
*NEW Physico-mechanical Experiments concerning the Weight and Spring of the Air; published in English, Anno Dom. 1660.
* A Continuation of them, Part I. 1669.
* The Defence of the New Experiments, &c. against Franciscus Linus.
The Examen of the Physical Dialogues of Thomas Hobbs, concerning the Air. These two were published, A. D. 1661.
* The Sceptical Chymist. 1661.
* Physiological Essays, together with the History of Fluidity and Firmness, and some other Tracts, Printed 1662.
* The Experimental History of Colours begun, A. 1663.
Concerning the usefulness of Experimental Philosophy; the first Tome: A. 1664.
The second Tome was Printed, 1669.
* A Tract concerning the Origin of Forms and Qualities, 1666.
Though this Tract was turned into Latine divers years before the Genevlan Collection was published, yet was omitted therein whence it appears, that the Publisher was not very cautious, who affirms in his Preface, That all Mr. Boyle's Works are contained in that Volume.
The Experimental History of Cold begun, to which is subjoined a Dissertation concerning Antiperistasis, together with an Examen of Mr. Hobbs's Doctrine about Cold; 1665.
* Hydrostatical Paradoxes; 1666.
* Tracts concerning the Cosmical Qualities of things; Cosmical Suspicions; the Temper of the Marine Regions; the Temper of the Subterranean Regions, and of the Bottom of the Sea: 1671.
* An Essay concerning the Origin and Vertues of Gems; 1672.
A Tract containing New Experiments between Flame and Air; together with an Hydrostatical Dissertation; 1672.
* Some Essays concerning the wonderfull Subtilty and Efficacy of Effluviums, and their determinate Nature; 1673.
Some Tracts consisting of Observations concerning the Saltness of the Sea; with a Sceptical Dialogue concerning the Nature of Cold both positive and privative; 1674.
Tracts containing some Suspicions concerning some Occult Qualities of the Air; with an Appendix touching Celestial Magnets, &c. 1674.
An Introduction to the History of particular Qualities in the PhyloN. 63. p. 2057.
* Of the Excellency of the Mechanical Hypothesis; N. 103. p. 53.
Experiments and Observations concerning the Mechanical Production and Origin of several particular Qualities; together with some Reflexi
The Sceptical Chymist, or Chymico-physical Doubts and Paradoxes about those Experiments, whereby vulgar Spagyrists do labour to evince, that Sal; Sulphur and Mercury are the genuine Principles of things; to which, viz. in this 2d. Edition, sundry Experiments and Considerations are subjoined concerning the Producibleness of Chymical Principles; 1680.
* A Continuation of new Physico-mechanical Experiments; the second Part; 1680.
The Aerial Noctiluca, or some New Phaenomena and a Process of a Factitious self-shining Substance; 1680.
New Experiments and Observations made upon the Icy Noctiluca, to which is annexed a Chymical Paradox; 168½.
These are the Philosophical Works of our Author hitherto published; what he hath wrote in Divinity belongs not properly to this place; not to mention several Dissertations of his which you may find here and there intersporsed among the Philosophical Transactions published in Print.