This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.
EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.
EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).
The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.
Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.
Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.
Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.
The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.
Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).
Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site.
A Continuation OF THE EXPOSITION OF THE EPISTLE OF Paul the Apostle TO THE HEBREWS.
Viz. ON THE Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Chapters.
WHEREIN Together with the Explication of the Text and Context.
The Priesthood of Christ as Typed by those of Melchisedek and Aaron, with an Account of their distinct Offices,
The Nature and Efficacy of the Sacrifice of Christ, as Typed by all the Sacrifices of the Law,
The Erection of the Tabernacle according to the Heavenly Pattern; with the Institution of all its Utensils and Services, their especial Signification and End,
The Nature and Differences of the Two Covenants, the Old and the New, with the preference of the latter above the former,
The Reasons and Necessity of the taking away and Abolishing of the Old Legal Worship annexed unto the Covenant of Sinai; & the Means whereby it was removed,
The Glorious Administration of the Mediatory Office of Christ in Heaven; and sundry other Evangelical Truths of the highest Importance,
WITH The Duty of Believers in hearing the Word in Times of Trial and Persecution; the Means and danger of Apostacy from the Profession of the Gospel, Are Declared, Explained and Confirmed.
As also; The Pleas of the Jews for the Continuance and Perpetuity of their Legal Worship; with the DoSocinians about these things, are Examined and Dis
By J. Owen. D. D.
John5. 39.
Search the Scriptures.
LONDON, Printed for Nathaniel Ponder, at the Sign of the Peacock in the Poultry, near the Church, 1680.
I have so fully in my former Discourses on this subject, declared the general design, scope and end of this Epistle, the pro
1. And it may not be amiss in the first place to take notice of an Objection the present endeavour seems liable and obnoxious unto; and this is the Unseasonableness of it. We live in times that are for
They have enough to do, in hearing, telling and reading, real or pretended News of publick affairs, so as to divert them from inga
I shall briefly acquaint the Reader with what Relieved me against this objection, and gave me satisfaction in the publishing of this part of the Exposition, after it was finished. For I could not but re
Besides, in labours and endeavours of this nature, respect is not had meerly unto the present Generation, especially as many are filled with prejudices and causeless enmity against the Author of them. We have our selves more benefit and advantage by the writings of sun
Pascitur in Vivis Livor, post Fata quiescit.
It is therefore the Duty of some in every Age to commit over unto those that shall survive in the Church of God and profession of the Truth, their Knowledge in the Mysteries of the Gospel, whereby spiritual light may be more and more encreased unto the perfect day.
On these and the like Considerations I have wholly left these times and seasons in his hand who hath the sole disposal of them; and will not so far observe the present blustering Wind and Clouds as not to sow this seed, or despair of reaping Fruits thereby.
2. The Reader will find no Exercitations prefixed unto this VoMelchisedek, The nature of the Aaronical Priesthood, and of the Priesthood of Christ as typed thereby, The framing of the Tabernacle with all its Vessels and USinai, with the difference between the two Covenants, the Old and the New; The manner of the Service of the High Priest on the Day of Expiation, with his entrance into the most Ho
3. Concerning the subject matter of these Chapters I desire the Reader to take notice.
1. That the whole substance of the Doctrinal part of the Epistle is contained in them; so as that there is nothing of difficulty in the whole case managed by the Apostle, but is largely treated of in these Chapters.
2. That they do contain a full declaration of that Mystery which from the beginning of the World was hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ; to the intent that even unto the Principali
1. The Wisdom and Grace of God in the Constitution and makSinai; in the Institutions of all the Worship and Divine services thereunto belonging; in the Holy Fabricks, offerIsrael, are declared and manifested therein. For all these things in themselves were car
2. There is therefore in these Chapters an absolute, infallible InExodus and Leviticus, see more of the Wisdom, Holiness and Grace of God in them, and know more of the nature and use of these legal Institutions, not only than all the present Jews, and their Teachers, but than was ever distinctly known in the Church of Israel, of Old.
3. The wisdom, righteousness and faithfulness of God in the Re
4. The work of the Apostle in these Chapters is to shew the Har
5. Herein a glorious account is given of the Representation that was made of the Person and Incarnation of Christ, with the whole Of
6. Directions are given herein unto all unto whom the Gospel is preached, or by whom it is professed, how to behave themselves as unto what God requireth of them, expressed in clear Instructions and pathetical Exhortations, accompanied with glorious Promises on the one hand, and severe Threatnings on the other. Scarcely in the whole book of God such an exact description of the Nature and Work of Faith, the Motives unto it, and Advantages of it; of the deceitful actings of Unbelief, with the ways of its prevalency in the Minds, and over the Souls of men; of the End of true Believers on one hand, and of Hypocrites and Apostates on the other: as is in this discourse of the Apostle. Such a graphical Description and account of these things is given us in the sixth Chapter and the later part of the Tenth, as cannot but greatly affect the minds of all who are spiritually enlight
In the whole there is made a most holy Revelation and Representa
These are the Holy Sayings of God, the Glorious Discoveries of himself and his Grace, the Glass wherein we may behold the Glory of Christ, until we are transformed into the same image from Glory to Glory.
What in the Exposition of these things, and others of an alike nature God hath enabled me to attain unto, is left unto the Use of the Church, and the Judgement of every learned, pious, and candid Reader.
THis whole Chapter is a continuation of the Digression which the Apostle had occasionally entred into, in the Eleventh Verse of the preceding Chapter. For upon the consideration of the Greatness of the Mystery, and Difficulty of the Doctrine which he designed to instruct these Hebrews in, and his fear of their Disability or Unpreparedness (at least of some) to receive it in a due manner unto their Edification, he engageth into a new Discourse, filled up with Reasons and Arguments to excite them unto a diligent Attendance. And this he so doth, as in the very last words of this Chapter, to return by an Artificial connexion of his DisTenth Verse of that foregoing.
There are Four general parts of this Chapter. (1) The Proposition of what he intended to do, or discourse concerning; with an opposition thereunto of what was by him to be omitted: v. 1, 2, 3. (2) An Excitation of the Hebrews unto singular diligence in atperfect Doctrines of Christianity, and making a progress in the Knowledge of Christ. And this he doth from the consideration of the greatness of the Sin, and inevitableness of the Destruction of Apostates. For this sort of Persons do commonly arise from among such, as having received the Truth, and made a Profession thereof, do not diligently endeavour a Progress towards Perfection, according to their Duty. V. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. (3) A Lenifying of the severity of this Commination in respect of its Application unto these Hebrews. For he expresseth his hope that it did not so belong unto them, or that the Sin condemned should be found in them; or the Punishment threatfall on them. But the warning it self contained in the Commination, was, as he shews, Good, Wholsome and Seasonable. And of this his Hope and Judgment conHebrews, he expresseth his Grounds taken from the Righteousness of God, their own Faith and Love, which he prays they may persevere in. V. 9, 10, 11, 12. (4) An Encouragement unto Faith and Perseverance, from the Example of Abraham,
Promises; from the Nature of the Promises themselves; and their Confirmation by the Oath of God, with the Assistance we may have by our Hope in Christ. thereby. V. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. which last Discourse he issueth in the prinEleventh Verse of the foregoing Chapter.
In the first part of the Chapter comprised in the three first Verses, there are three things considerable; (1) A general Proposition of the Apostles Resolution to proceed unto the more perfect Doctrines of the Gospel, as also of his passing over the first Principles of Christianity: v. 1. (2) An Amplication of this Proposition, by an Annumeration of those Doctrines which he thought meet at present to pass by the handling of: v. 1, 2. (3) A Renovation of his Resolution to pursue his Proposition, with a Submission to the Will and good Pleasure of God, as to the Execution of his Purpose; the Expression whereof, the present state of these Hebrews peculiarly called him unto. V. 4.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
ideo; quapropter; propterea: wherefore; intermittentes, Ari. vul. Lat. Rhem.
intermitting; as though the Apostle laid these things aside only for the present, with a Resolution to take them up again in this Epistle. But neither doth the word signifie any such thing, nor doth he so do. Relinquentes, Bez. leaving Syr.
emittamus; or demittamus; dismissing; properly
Wherefore leaving the Doctrine of the Beginning of Christ, let us be carried on to Perfection.Ver. 1.
Wherefore. This Illative manifests that there is a Dependance in what ensues, on what was discoursed of before. That which follows, may be either an Inference from it, or be the Effect of a Resolution occasioned by it. Wherefore; that is, either this Duty will hence follow; or seeing it is so, I am thus resolved to do. And this Connexion is variously apprehended on the account of the Ambiguity of the Expression in the Plural Number and first Person. we leaving, let us go on. For in this kind of Expression there is a Rhetorical Communication. And the Apostle either assumes the Hebrews unto himself, as to his work, or joins himself with them as to their Duty. For if the words be taken the first way, they declare his Resolution in Teaching; if in the latter, their Duty in Learning. And if we take the words in the first way, as expressing the Apostles Resolution as to his own Work, the Inference seems to have an immediate dependance on the Twelfth Verse of the preceding Chapter, passing by the Discourse of the following Verses as a Digression to be as it were included in a Parenthesis. Of whom we have many things to say and hard to be uttered, seeing you are dull in hearing; I shall therefore for your future Instruction, leave the Principles of the Doctrine of Christ, and go on unto more sublime mysteries, or the Wisdom that we speak among them that are Perfect. For although he had blamed them for their
Secondly, If in the latter way the Apostle join himself unto the Hebrews, and it is their Duty which is intended, namely, that they should not always dwell on the first PrinIllative
Time in the first Place, which these Hebrews had enjoyed under the means of growth in the Knowledge of Christ; on the account whereof he affirms that
Therefore, saith he, or on the consideration hereof, it is just and equal that you should go on towards Perfection; which that they would do, he expresseth his Hopes concerning them, v. 9. (2) It respects also that Negligence and Sloth, and backwardness to learn, which he had reproved in them. As if he had said, Seeing therefore you have hitherto been so careless in the Improvement of the means which you have enjoyed, which hath been no small Fault or Evil in you, but that which hath tended greatly to your disad
We need not precisely to determine this Connexion, so as to Exclude either Intention. Yea it may be the Apostle having respect unto the preceding Discourse, and considering thereon both the present condition of the Hebrews, as also the necessity that there was of inAaronical Priesthood and Ceremonies which were yet in Use and Exercise among them, doth intend in this Inference from thence, both his own Duty and theirs; that
Omittentes, relinquentes; we, leaving;
dimitto, to dismiss,
discharge, or let go, sometimes omitto, missum facio, to omit; to pass by; And it is used with respect unto Speech of things that have been already mentioned, Lucian; omitting these Discourses; laying aside farther Speech concerning these things. So is it here used by our Apostle. But the signification of the word is to be limited unto the present occasion. For consider the things here spoken of absolutely, and they are never to be left either by Teachers or Hearers. There is a Necessity that Teachers should often insist on the Rudiments, or first Principles of Religion. And this not only with respect unto them who are continually to be trained up in Knowledge from their Infancy, or unto such as may be newly converted; but also they are occasionally to be inculcated on the minds of those who have made a farther Progress in Knowledge. And this course we find our Apostle to have steered in all his Epistles. Nor are any Hearers so to leave these Principles, as to forget them, or not duely to make use of them. Cast aside a constant regard unto them in their proper Place, and no Progress can be made in Knowledge, no more than a Building can be carried on, when the Foundation is tapresent Occasion. Let us not always dwell upon the Teaching and Learning of these things, but omitting them for a Season, as things that you are, or might be well acquainted withall, let us proceed unto what is farther necessary for you.
It is the Duty of Ministers of the Gospel to take care not only that their Doctrine they Preach
be true, but also that it be seasonable with respect unto the State and Condition of their Hearers. Herein consists no small part of that Wisdom which is required in the Dispensation of the word. Truths unseasonable, are like Showers in Harvest. It is a word spoken in Season, that is Beautiful and Useful.
Again; Some important Doctrines of Truth may in the Preaching of the Gospel, be omitted for a Season; but none must ever be forgotten or neglected. So deals the Apostle in this Place, and Light hath been sufficiently given us hereinto, by what hath already been discoursed.
2. That which is passed over here, he calls, Sermonem de Christo initiantem. Sermo exordij Christi. Sermo quo instituuntur rudes in Christo. We say, the Principles of the Doctrine of Christ; I fear somewhat improperly. For the Principles of the Doctrine of Christ indefinitely, must include all, at least the most principal of those which are so: Cor. 1. 18. And the Name Christ, is not taken here Personally, neither efficiently, as though, of Christ, should be whereof Christ is the Author, nor Objectively concerning Christ; but it is taken Metonymically for the Doctrine of the Gospel, and the Profession of that Religion which was taught by him. So that the word of Christ is no more but the Doctrine of the Gospel as Preached and Taught. Limitation of this Doctrine with respect unto some parts of it. That is, those which men usually and ordinarily were first instructed in; and which from their own Nature it was necessary that so they should be. These are here called the word of the Beginning of Christ. And what these Doctrines are, the Apostle declares particularly in the End of this Verse, and in the next, where we shall enquire into them. They are the same with the first Principles of the Oracles of God, whereof mention was made before. Having
Reinculcation of the things which he would thereomit, they might, he in Teaching, they in Learning, go on to Perfection. And two things must be considered. (1) The End intended; (2) The manner of pressing to
The End is Perfection. That is, such a knowledge of the mysterious and compleatly initiated, and throughly instructed, were partakers of. Of this he says speak wisdom among the Perfect; or declare the deep mysteries of the Gospel, the Wisdom of God in a mystery, unto them that are capable of them. It is then a Perintellectual Perfection, a Perfection of the mind, in Knowledge, that is intended. And this may be where there is not a moral, gracious, sinless Perfection. Yea men may have great Light in their Minds, whilst their Wills and Affections are very much depraved, and their Lives unreformed. (2) It is a Comparative, and not an absolute Perfection. An absolute Perfection in the ComprehenPhil. 3. 12. But such a degree and measure as God is pleased to Communicate to Believers in the ordinary use of means, is that which is intended. See Ephes. 4. 12, 13. Take therefore the Perfection here aimed at, objectively, and it is, the more sublime mysteries of the Gospel which it expresseth; take it subjectively, it is such a clear Perception of them, especially of those which concern the Person and Offices of Christ, and particularly his Priesthood, as grown Believers do usually at
The manner of arriving at this End, he expresseth by Rhetorical Communication mentioned. For either he ascribes that unto himself with them, which belonged only unto them; or that unto them which belonged only unto him; or what belonged unto them both, but in a different way; namely, unto him in Teaching, unto them in Learning. Let us be carried on. The word is emphatical, intiShip makes when it is under Sail. Let us be carried on; that is with the full bent of our Minds and Affections, with the utmost Endeavours of our whole Souls. We have abode long enough by the Shore; let us now hoist our Sails and launch forth into the Deep. And we may hence learn:
(1) That it is a necessary Duty of the Dispensers of the Gospel, to excite their Hearers, by all pressing Considerations, to make a Progress in the Knowledge of the Truth. Thus dealeth our Apostle with these Hebrews. He would not have them always stand at the Porch, but enter into the Sanctuary, and behold the hidden Glories of the House of God. Elsealways Learning, that is in the way of it, under the means of it, but yet by reason of their negligence and carelesness in the Application of their minds unto them, do never come Tim. 3. 4. to a clear Knowledge, and acknowledgment of the Truth. And in the same Spirit he comCorinthians, for their want of Proficiency in spiritual things, so that he was forced in his dealing with them to dwell still on the Rudiments of Religion. 1 Cor. 3. 1, 2. In all his Epistles he is continually as it were pressing this on the Churches, that they should labour to grow in Grace, and in the Knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ; and that they might do so, was the principal matter of his Prayers for them. Ephes. 3. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19. Chap. 1. 16, 17, 18, 19. Col. 2. 1, 2. And they are utter Strangers to his Spirit and Example who are careless in this matter, especially such as perswade and even compel others so to be. Wherefore this Duty is necessary unto Dispensers of the Gospel on sundry Accounts.
1. Because their Hearers do greatly need the Exercise of it. They are apt to be slothful and weary; many begin to run well, but are quickly ready to faint. There is no recNovelties, dislike of that Holiness and Fruitfulness of Life, with which an increase of Knowledge openly tends unto; mispending on the one hand, or Covetousness of time for the Occasions of Life on the other; any prevailing CorrupLion in the Streets, with other
Pleas in the Defence of their own Sloth and Negligence, as that they must be dealt wisely and gently withal in Admonitions concerning them, lest they be provoked, or discouraged. Hence our Apostle having dealt Effectually with these Hebrews about these things, shuts up his DisChap. 13. 22. I beseech you Brethren, suffer the word of Exhortation,
2. The Advantages which Professors have by a Progress in the Knowledge of spiritual things, makes it a necessary Duty, to stir them up, and lead them on therein, unto them who are obliged in all things to watch for the good of their Souls. And these AdvanPapists fill the Rolls of their Converts; or such as having obtained a little superficiary Knowledge, and Confidence therein, without ever laying a firm foundation, or carrying on an orderly superstruction thereon in Wisdom and Obedience; which sort of men fill up the Assemblies of the Quakers. The FounTeaching of the Spirit, the Unction of the Holy One, whereby we know all necessary Truths, that must preserve us in such a Season. 1 Joh. 2. 27. (2) Proportionable unto our growth in Knowledge, will be our encrease in Holiness and Obedience. If this at any time fall out otherwise, it is from the sins and wickedness of the persons in whom it is; in the Nature of the things themselves, they thus depend on one another. See Ephes. 4. 21, 22, 23, 24. Rom. 12. 2. That Ignorance is the Mother of Devotion, is a Maxime that came from Hell to fetch the Souls of men, and carried back multiUsefulness in the Church, unto our Families, and amongst all men depends hereon. This needs no other Confirmation than what the Experience of every man will suggest unto him. And if I should design to go over but the principal Advantages which we attain, or may do so, in the growth of spiritual Light and Knowledge, there is not any thing wherein our Faith or Obedience is concerned, nothing that belongs unto our Graces, Duties, or Communion with God, in them or by them, nothing wherein we are con
Papacy, of a more pernicious Nature and Tendency, than is the Design of keeping the People in Ignorance. So far are they from promoting the KnowProhibition of the People from reading the Scripture in a Language they understand? The most expeditious Course for the rendring of all Streams unuseful, is by stopping of the Fountain. And whereas all means of the increase of Knowledge are but Emanations from the Scripture, the Prohibition of the use thereof doth effectually evacuate them all. Was this spirit in our Apostle? Had he this Design? It is evident to all how openly and frequently he expresseth himself to the conEpistles, is constantly the increase of Light and Knowledge in the Churches, which he knew to be so necessary for them. We may therefore add,
2. The Case of that People is deplorable and dangerous, whose Teachers are not able to carry them on, in the knowledge of the mysteries of the Gospel. The Key of Knowledge may be taken away by Ignorance as well as Malice. And so it is with many. And when KnowHos. 4. 6. Math. 15. 14.
3. In our Progress towards an increase in Knowledge, we ought to go on with Diligence and the full bent of our Wills and Affections. I intend hereby to express the sense of passive signification denoting the Effect; Let us be acied, carried on; but it inactive use of means for the producing that Effect. And the Duties on our part intended may be reduced unto these Heads.
(1) Diligence in an Application unto the use of the best means for this End. Hos. 6. 7. Those that would be carried on towards Perfection, must not be careless, or regardless of opportunities of Instruction, nor be detained from them by Sloth or Vanity, nor diindustry in their pursuit, and choice in the preferring of them before secular Advantages and Avocations, are required hereunto.
(2) Intention of mind in the attending unto them. Such persons are neither to be careof them, nor careless under them. There are who will take no small pains to enjoy the means of Instruction, and will scarce miss an opportunity, that they can reach unto. But when they have so done, there they sit down and rest. It is a shame to consider how little they stir up their minds and understandings, to conceive aright, and apprehend the things wherein they are instructed. So do they continue to hear from day to day, and from year to year, but are not carried on one step towards Perfection. If both heart and head be not set at work, and the utmost Endeavours of our minds improved, in searching, weighing, pondering, learning, treasuring up the Truths that we are taught by any means of Divine Appointment, we shall never make the Progress intended.
(3) There is required hereunto, that our Wills and Affections be sincerely inclined uncarried on in our Voyage. Without this all that we do will amount to nothing, or that which is no better. To love the Truth, the things proposed unto us in the Doctrine of it, to delight in them, to find a goodness, desirableness, excellency, and suitableness unto the condition of our Souls in them, and therefore to adhere and cleave unto them, is that which will make us prosper in our ProWills and Affections do adhere and cleave with Delight unto the things wherein we are instructed, then are we in our right course; then if the Holy Gales of the Spirit of God do breath on us, are we in a blessed tendency towards Perfection. 2 Thes. 2. 10.
(4) The diligent practice of what we know is no less necessary unto the Duty pressed on us. This is the next and immediate End of all Teaching and all Learning. This is that which renders our Knowledge our Happiness. If you know these things, happy are ye if you do them. Doing what we know is the great Key to give us an Entrance into knowing what we do not. If we do the will of Christ, we shall know of his word, Joh. 7. 17.
being carried on in the increase of spiritual Light and Knowledge, and not without them.
In the remainder of the first Verse and the next that follows, the Apostle declares in particular Instances, what were the things and Doctrines, which he called in general beBeginning of the Doctrine of Christ, whose farther handling he thought meet at present to omit.
The Syriack Translation proposeth these words in the way of an Interrogation, Will you again lay another Foundation? And the Aethiopick, omitting the first Clause; in the way of a Precept; Attend therefore again to the Foundation that you dispute not concerning Repentance from dead works, in the Faith of God. But neither the Text nor Scope of the Apo
Syr.
an numquid rursum; or whether again; All others; non rursum, non iterum; Arab: nec amplius, not again; not any more. Syr.
will you lay another Foundation; that term of Another, is both needless because of Again that went before, and corrupts the sense, as though a Foundation different from what was formerly laid, were intended. Besides that is made an Expostulation with the Hebrews, which is indeed expressive of the Apofundamentum jacientes; laying the Foundation.
Syr: unto Repentance from dead works; and so in all the following Instances. There is no difference among Translators about the rest of the words. Only the Aethiopick, reads
Not laying again the foundation of Repentance from dead works ▪ and of Faith towards God, of Baptisms, Doctrine, and the laying on of hands, of the Resurrection of the Dead, and
There are two things in these words added concerning the Doctrine of the Principles of Christ, or the first Doctrines of Christianity. (1) Their general Nature with respect to the whole Truth of the Gospel, metaphorically expressed; They are the Foundation. (2) Their Nature in particular is declared in sundry Instances; not that all of them are mentioned, but these Instances are chosen out to shew of what kind they were. In the first two things are proposed, (1) The expression of the thing it self intended, which is the Foundation. (2) The Apostles design with respect unto it, not laying it again.
Metaphorical; including an allusion unto an Architect, and his Building. First he lays the Foun
There are two properties of a Foundation. (1) That it is that which is first laid in every Building. This the natural order of every Building requires. (2) It is that which bears the whole weight of the superstructure; the whole and all the parts of it being laid
Foundation. But in the latter sense they cannot be so. It is Christ himself, and he only, who is so the Foundation as to bear the weight, and to support the whole Building of the Church of God. Isa. 28. 16. Math. 16. 18. 1 Cor. 3. 10, 11. Ephes. 1. 20, 21, 22. 1 Pet. 2. 4, 5. He is so Personally; the Life and Being of the Church consisting in its spiritual Union unto his person; 1 Cor. 12. 12. and Doctrinally, in that all Truth is resolved into what is taught concerning him. 1 Cor. 3. 10, 11, 12, 13. Wherefore it is in allusion unto a Foundation with respect unfirst Property, namely, that it is first laid in the Building, that these Doctrines are called the Foundation. So the Jews term the general principles of their Profession the Foundations of the Law; or the principal Doctrines taught therein. The first Doctrines which are necessary to be received and professed at mens first entrance into Christianity. And the Apostle intends the same things by the threefold expression which he maketh use of. (1) Chap. 5. 12. The first Principles of the Oracles of God. (2)
Concerning these things he says, not laying it again. His saying that he would not lay it again, doth not infer that he himself had laid it before first Instruction, nor doth he mention any such thing in the whole Epistle. Whereas he frequently pleads it unto those Churches which were planted by himself. 1 Cor. 3. 5, 6, 10. Chap. 4. 15. And it is known from the Story that his Ministry was not used in their first Conversion. But he knew that they had faithful Ininitiated by Baptism, nor admitted into the Church without a Profession of them. Besides they were such, as in general they owned in their former Church State. He might therefore well say, that he would not lay this Foundation again. These things, saith he, you have already been instructed in by others, and therefore I will not, (as also on other considerations) go over them again. Wherefore, Let the Hearers of the Gospel carefully look to it, that they learn those things whereof they have had sufficient Instruction; for if any Evil ensue from their Ignorance of them, they must themselves answer for it. Such Ignorance is their sin, as well as their disadvantage. Preachers may take it for granted, that what they have sedulously and sufficiently instrusinful Negligence if they have not so done. And they are not bound always to wait on some in their Negligences to the disadvantage of others.
Secondly, The Apostle declares in particular what were those Doctrinal Principles which he had in general so described, which were taught unto them who were first initiated into Christianity, and which he will not now again insist upon.
We must first consider the Order of these words, and then their sense, or the things themselves intended. Some here reckon up six Principles, some make them seven, some but four, and by some they are reduced unto three.
The two first are plain and distinct. Repentance from dead works, and Faith towards God. The next that follow are disputed as to their coherence and sense. (1) Genitive Cases being regulated by the Preaching of the word. And this was one of the first things wherein Believers were to be instructed, namely, that they were to abide Acts 2. 42. in a constant attendance unto the Doctrine of the Gospel, when preached unto them. And as I shall not assert this Exposition, so I dare not positively reject it, as not seeing any reason cogent to that purpose. But another sense is more probable.
Take the words in conjunction, so as that one of them should depend on, and be reDeut. 32. 2. Hence the People were said to be Baptized unto Moses, when they were iniCor. 10. 1, 2. The Baptism of John was his Doctrine; Acts 19. 3. And the Baptism of Christ was the Doctrine of Christ, wherewith he was to sprinkle many Nations. Isa. 52. 15. This is the first Baptism of the Gospel, even its Doctrine. The other was the Communication of the Gifts of the Holy Ghost. Acts 1. 5. That this and this alone is intended by the laying on of hands, I shall prove fully afterfoundation of Gospel Baptisms, namely, Preaching and the Gifts of the Holy Ghost. And I know but one Argument against this sense, namely, that it is
There is therefore in these words, nothing peculiar, nor difficult, but only whatconBaptisms, and the Imposition of hands, the Doctrine whereof is specified. Now I cannot discover any just reason hereof, unless it be, that by Baptisms, and the Imposition of hands, the Apostle intendeth none of those Rudiments of Christian Religion wherein men were to be first instructed, but those Rites whereof they were made Partakers who were so instructed. As if the Apostle had said, These Principles of the Doctrine of Christ, namely, Repentance, Faith, the Resurrection and Judgement, are those Doctrines whereBaptized, and to have hands laid on them. According to this sense, the words are to be read as in a Parenthesis. Not laying again the Foundation of Repentance from dead works, and of Faith towards God, (namely, the Doctrine of Baptismes, and of the Imposition of hands) of the Resurrection from the Dead, and Eternal Judgement. When men began to attend unto the Gospel, and thereon to give up their Names to the Church, there were certain Doctrines that they were throughly to be instructed in, before they were admitted unto Baptism; see Gal. 6. 6. These being the Catechetical Rudiments of Christian Religion, are called here
Taking this for the design of the Apostle in the words, as is most probable, there are four Instances given of those principal Rudiments of Christian Religion, wherein all men were to be instructed before they were admitted unto Baptism, who came thereunto in their own personal Right, having not been made Partakers thereof by their Covenant Right through the Profession of their Parents in their Infancy. These were persons to be fully instructed in before their solemn Initiation; the Doctrine concerning them being thence called the Doctrine of Baptisms and of the Imposition of hands, because previously necessary unto the Administration of these Rites. There is a difficulty I confess that this Exposition is pressed with, from the use of the word in the Plural number, of Baptisms; but this equally concerns all other Expositions, and shall be spoken unto in its proper place. And this I take to be the sense of the words, which the design of the place and manner of expression lead us unto. But yet because sundry Learned Men are otherwise minded, I shall so explain the words, as that their meaning may be apprehen
Our next work is to consider the particular Instances in their order. And the first is Repentance from dead works. This was taught in the first place unto all those who would give up themselves to the Discipline of Christ and the
This expression of dead works, is peculiar unto our Apostle, and unto this Epistle. It Chap. 9. 14. And he useth it in Answer unto what he elsewhere declares, concerning mens being dead in Sin by Nature. Ephes. 2. 1, 5.
Col. 2. 13. That which he there ascribes unto their persons, here he attributeth unto their works. These Peter calls mens old Sins; namely, which they lived in before their ConPet. 1. 9. forgetting that he was purged from his old sins. He hath respect unto what is here intended. They were before their Initiation, instructed in the Necessity of forsaking the sins wherein they lived before their Conversion; which he calls their old or former Sins; which he hath also respect unto 1 Epist. Chap. 4. 3. For the Time past of our lives may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in Lasciviousness, Lusts, Excess of Wine, Revellings, Banquettings, and abominable Idolatries. The necessity of Repentance from these and the like sins, was taught them, and which they made Profession of before they were admitpurged from them. And a relapse into these sins, which men had openly professed their Repentance, and Relindangerous, and by some absolutely pernicious, whereon great Contests in the Church did ensue. For the Controversie was not whether men falling into any sin, yea any open or known sin after Baptism, might repent, which none was ever so foolishly proud as to deny: But the Question was about mens open falling again into those sins, suppose Idolatry, which they had made a publick Profession of their Repentance from, before their Baptism. And it came at last to this; not whether such men might savingly Repent, obtain Pardon of their sins and be saved; but whether the Church had Power to admit them a second time to a publick Profession of their RepenBaptism, in them that were adult; the obligaInfancy, Baptism alone was the only Pledge the Church could give of the Remission of such sins; and therefore where men fell again into those sins, seeing
The sins of unregenerate persons whereof Repentance was to be expressed before Bapdead works, in respect of their Nature and their End. For as to their Nature they proceed from a principle under the Power of Spiritual death; they are the works of Persons dead in Trespasses and Sins. All the moral actings of such Persons with respect unto a supernatural End are dead works, being not enlivened by a vital Principle of spiritual Life. And it is necessary that a Person be spiritually living before his works will be so. Our walking in Holy Obedience is called the Life of God. Ephes. 4. 18. That is the Life which God requires, which by his especial Grace he worketh in us, whose Acts have him for their Object and their End. Where this Life is not, persons are dead, and so are their works, even all that they do with respect unto the Living God. And they are called so, 2dly, with respect unto their End; they are mortua because mortifera; dead because deadly; they procure death and end in death.
These were the works which Converts were taught to abandon, and a Profession of Repentance for them was required of all before their Initiation into Christian Religion, or they were received into the Church. For it was not then as now, that any one might be admitted into the Society of the Faithful, and yet continue to live in open sins unre
Secondly, That which is required, and which they were taught with respect unto Repentance. Repentance from dead works is the first thing required of them who take upon them the Profession of the Gospel, and consefirst Principle of the Doctrine of Christ as it is here placed by the Apostle. Without this whatever is attempted or attained therein, is only a Dishonour to Christ, and a Disappointment unto men. This is the method of Preaching, confirmed by the ExamRepent and believe the Gospel, Math. 4. 17. Mark 1. 15. And almost all the Sermons that we find, not only of John the Baptist in a way of preparation for the declaration of the Gospel, as Math. 3. 2. but of the Apostles also in presJews and Gentiles, laid this as their first Principle, namely, the Necessity of Repentance. Acts 2. 38. Chap. 3. 19. Acts 14. 15. Thence in the Preaching of the Gospel it is said, that God Commandeth all men to repent, Acts 17. 30. And when the Gentiles had received the Gospel, the Church at Hierusalem glorified God saying, Then hath Grd also to the Gentiles granted Repentance unto Life, Acts 11. 18. Again this is expressed as the first issue of Grace and Mercy from God towards men by Jesus Christ, which is therefore first to be proposed unto them. God exalted him and made him a Prince and a Saviour to give Repentance unto Israel, Acts 5. 31. And because it is the first, it is put Synecdochically, for the whole work of Gods Grace by Christ. God having raised up his Son Jesus hath sent him to bless you, in turning every one of you from his Iniquities, Acts 3. 26. It is therefore evident that this was the first Doctrinal principle as to their own Duty which was pressed on, and fixed in the minds of men, on their first Instruction in the Gospel.
And in the Testimonies produced, both the Causes of it, and its general Nature are expressed. For (1) Its supream original Cause is the good Will, Grace, and Bounty of God. He grants, and gives it to whom he pleaseth of his own good Pleasure. Acts 11. 18. (2) It is immediately collated on the Souls of men by Jesus Christ, as a fruit of his Death, and an effect of that All Power in Heaven and Earth which was bestowed on Him by the Father. He gives Repentance to Israel; Acts 3. 31. The Soveraign disposal of it is from the Will of the Father, and the actual Collation of it, is an Effect of the Grace of the Son. And (3) the Nature of it is expressed in the Conversion of the Gentiles. It is unto Life, Acts 11. 18. The Repentance required of men in the first Preaching of the Gospel, and the Necessity whereof was pressed on them, was unto Life; that is such as had saving Conversion unto God accompanying of it. This kind of Repentance is required unto our Initiation in the Gospel state. Not an empty Profession of any kind of Repentance, but real Conversion unto God, is required of such persons.
But moreover we must consider this Catechetical Do
1. It respects the Mind and Judgement, according to the Notation of the word, which signifies a Change of Mind, or an after Consideration and Judgement. Men whilst they live in dead works, under the Power of Sin, do never make a right Judgement, conDegrees in this Deceit, but all sinners are actually more or less deceived. No men whilst the Natural Principle of ConRom. 2. 14, 15. That it is the Judgement of God, that those who commit such things are worthy of death. Rom. 1. 32. But yet some there are who so far despise these Convictions, as to give up themselves unto all sin with Delight and Greediness. See Ephes. 4. 17, 18, 19. Practithat Evil in sin which is pretended; or however, that it is better to enjoy the Pleasures of it for a Season, than to relinguish or forego it on other Considerations. Others there are
Dead works. In particular they judge them Evil, but they are so intangled in them, as that they see not the Greatness of that Evil, nor do make such a Judgement concerning it, as whereon a Reliquishment of them should nedespising their Convictions, go on in an unbridled course of Licentiousness, as not judging the Voyce, Language and Mind of them worth enquiring into; Others do in some measure attend unto them, but yet practically they refuse them, and embrace motives unto Sin, turning the Scale on that side, as Occasion, OpportuniDead works. The Mind by the Light and Conviction of saving Truth, determines clearly and steadily, concerSin, that is, all and every Sin, every thing that hath the Nature of Sin, to be universally evil; Evil in its Self, Evil to the Sinner, Evil in its present Effects, and future Consequents, Evil in every kind, shamefully Evil, incompaonly Evil, or all that is Evil in the world. And this Judgement it makes with respect unto the Nature and Law of God, to its own Primitive and present depraved Condition, unto present Duty, and future Judgement. This is the first thing required unto Repentance, and where this is not there is nothing of it.
2. It respects the Will and Affections. It is our Turning unto God; our turning from him being in the bent and inclination of our Wills and Affections unto Sin. The Change of the Will, or the taking away of the Will of sinning, is the principal part of Repentance. It is with respect unto our Wills that we are said to be dead in Sin, and alienated from the Life of God. And by this Change of the Will, do we become dead unto Sin. Rom. 6. 2. That is, whatever remainder of Lust or Corruption there may be in us, yet the Will of sinning is taken away. And for the Affections it works that Change in the Soul, as that quite contrary Affections shall be subwages. With respect unto these, those that live in dead works, both delight in Sin, and have complacency in the Accomplishment of it. These are the Affe
3. It respects the course of Life or Conversation. It is a Repentance from dead works, that is in the Relinquishment of them. Without this no profession of Repentance is of any worth or use. To profess a Repentance of Sin, and to live in Sin, is to mock God, deride his Law, and deceive our own Souls. This is that Change which alone doth or can evidence the other internal Changes of the Mind, Will and Affections to be real and sincere. Prov. 28. 13. Whatever without this is pretended, is false and Hypocritical; like the Repentance of Judah, not with the whole heart but feignedly. Jerem. 3. 10.
(1) A full Purpose of Heart for the Relinquishment of every Sin. This is cleaving unActs 11. 23. Psal. 14. 3. To manifest the stability and stedfastness which is required herein, David confirmed it with an Oath. Psal. 119. 106. Every thing that will either live or thrive must have a Root, on which it grows, and whence it springs. Other things may occasionally bud and put forth, but they wither immediately. And such is a Relinquishment of Sin from occasional Resolutions. Upon some smart of Conviction, from Danger, Sickness, Trouble, Fear, Affliction, there blooms in the minds of many a suddain Resolution to forsake Sin, and as suddainly for the most part it fades again. True Repentance firms a steady and unshaken resolu
(2) Constant Endeavours to actuate and fulfill this purpose. And these Endeavours respect all the Means, Causes, Occasions, Temptations, leading unto Sin, that they may be avoided, opposed, and Deliverance obtained from them; as also all means, adunactive Purpose, is that which many take up withall and ruine their Souls by. Where therefore there is not a sedulous Endead works in all their concerns from their first Rise and Principle to their finishing or Consum
(3) An actual Relinquishment of all sins in the course of our walking before God. And hereunto is required (1) not an absolute freedom from all Sin, for there is no man living who doth good and sinneth not. (2) No absolute and precise deliverance even from great Sins, whereinto the Soul may be surprized by the Power of Temptations. ExamPet. 1. 10. And (2) put him upon the renewing his Repentance, with the same Care, Diligence, Sorrow and Humiliation as at the first. But (1) it is required that this property of Repentance be prevalent against the common sins of the world, mens old Sins which they lived in before their Conversion. Those Sins which are expresly declared in the Gospel to be inconsistent with the Profession, Ends and Glory of it, it wholly exCor. 6. 9, 10. 2 Cor. 6. 16. 1 Joh. 3. 14, 15. And (2) against a course in any Sin or Sins, either spiritual or fleshly, internal or external. 1 Joh. 3. 9. Rom. 6. 2. (3) For the most part against all outward Sins in the course of our Conversation in the world, in which things our Sincerity or Perfection is exercised. And these things were necessary to be touched on, to manifest the Nature of this first Principle wherein men are to be instructed.
There is no Interest in Christ or Christian Religion to be obtained, without Repentance from
Dead works; nor any orderly entrance into a Gospel Church State, without a credible Profession thereof. This was one of the first things that was preached unto Sinners, as was before declared; and without a compliance herewith they were not further to be treated with. For (1) The Lord Christ came not only to save men from their Sins, but to turn them from their Sins; to turn them from their Sins, that they may be saved from them; when he comes out of Sion as a Redeemer, a Deliverer, a Saviour, he turns away ungodliness from Jacob; that is, he turns Jacob from ungodliness, Rom. 11. 26. namely by Repentance. This was one principal End of the Birth, Life, Death, and Exaltation of Christ. His work in all these was to make Peace and Reconciliation between God and Man. Hereunto belongeth the Slaying, Destruction, or removal of the Enmity that was between them. This with respect unto God, was done by the Attonement he made, the Sacrifice he ofCor. 5. 21. But the whole work is not hereby compleated. The Enmity on our part also must be taken away, or Reconciwe were Enemies in our minds by wicked works, Col. 1. 21. and thereby alienated from the Life of God, Ephes. 4. 18. The removal hereof consists in this Repentance. For that is our turning unto God, upon the Terms of Peace tendred unto us. They therefore do but deceive their own Souls, who trust unto Peace with God on the Mediation of Christ, who are not at Peace with God in their own Souls by Rewith God on his own part by Repentance, shall never fail of Peace from God by the Attonement; for he that so lays hold on his Arm and Strength that he may have Peace shall be sure to obtain it, Isa. 27. 3. So without this whatever Notions men may have of Reconciliation with God, they will find him in the issue as devouring Fire, or Everlasting Burnings. All Doctrines, Notions, or Perswasions, that tend to alleviate the necessity of that personal Repentance which was before described, or would substitute any outward Pennance, or Corporeal, pecuniary poenal Satisfaction in the room thereof, are pernicious to the Souls of men. And there is nothing so much to be dreaded or abhorred as a pretence taken unto Sin, unto any Sin without Repentance, from the Grace or Doctrine of the Gospel. Shall we continue in Sin, saith our Apostle, that Grace may abound? God forbid. Those who do so and thereby turn the Grace of God into Lasciviousness, are among the number of them whose Damnation sleepeth not. (2) That any person living in Sin without Repentance, should have an Interest in Christ or Christian Religion, is inconsistent with the Glory of God, the Honour of Jesus Christ, and would render the Gospel, if taught therein, a Doctrine fit to be rejected by all men. For where is the Glory of the Righteimpenitent Sinners may be accepted with him? Besides that it is contrary unto the whole Declaration of himself, that he will not acquit the
Guilty, that he will not justifie the wicked, nor accept the ungodly, it hath an absolute inconsistency with the especial Righteousness of his Nature, and which he exerciseth as the supream Rector and Judge of all, that any such persons should approach before him, or stand in his sight. Psal. 5. 4, 5, 6. Rom. 1. 32. And for the Lord Jesus Christ, it would plainly make him the Minister of Sin, the thought whereof our Apostle so detests. Gal. 2. 17. Nay a supposition hereof would make the coming of Christ, to be the greatest means of letting in, and increasing Sin on the world, that ever was since the fall of Adam. And the Gospel must then be looked on as a Doctrine meet to be abandoned by all wise and sober persons, as that which would tend unavoidably to the debauching of mankind, and the ruine of humane Society. For whereas it doth openly and avowedly propose and declare the Pardon and remission of Sin, of all sorts of Sin, to all sorts of persons that shall believe and obey it, if it did this without annexing unto its Promise, the Condition of Repentance, never was there, nor can there be so great an Encouragement unto all sorts of Sin and Wickedness. There is much to that purpose in the Doctrines of Purgatory, Pennances, and Satisfactions, whereby men are taught that they may come off from their Sins, at a cheaper rate than Eternal Ruine, without that Repentance which is necessary. But this is nothing in comparison to the mischief which the Gospel would produce if it did not require Repentance from dead works. For besides those innumerable AdvanPardon freely without money and without price; and so on this supposition would lay the Reins absolutely free on the Neck of Sin and Wickedness, whereas those other Fancies are burdened and charged with such inconveniencies, as may lay some Curb upon them in easie and carnal minds. Wherefore, I say, on such a false and cursed supposition it would be the Interest of wise and sober men, to oppose and reject the Gospel, as the most effectual means of overflowing the world with Sin and Ungodliness. But it doth not more fully condemn Idolatry, or that the Devil is to be worshipped, than it doth any such Notion or ApprePreachers of Gospel Grace, as those who thereby give Countenance unto this presumption, it is an Accusation that hath more of the hatred of Grace in it, than of the Love of Holiness. For none do, nor can press the Relinquishment of Sin, and Repentance of it, upon such assured grounds and with such cogent arguments, as those by whom the Grace of Jesus Christ in the Gospel is fully opened and de
From what hath been discoursed, we may enquire after our own Interest in this great and necessary Duty; to assist us wherein, I shall yet add some farther Directions. As,
1. Repentance is twofold; (1) Initial, (2) Continued in our whole course; and our Enquiry is to be after our Interest in both of them. The former is that whose general Nature we have before described, which is the door of entrance into a Gospel state, or a Condition of Acceptance with God in and through Christ. And concerning it we may observe sundry things.
1. That as to the Properties of it; it is,
(1) Solemn; a Duty that in all its circumstances is to be fixed and stated. It is not to be mixed only with other Duties, but we are to set our selves on purpose, and engage our selves singularly unto it. I will not say, this is so essential unto it, that he can in no sense be said sincerely to have repented, who hath not separately and distinctly been exerSpirit of Grace is poured out on men, they shall mourn apart, Zach. 12. 12, 13, 14. That is, they shall peculiarly and solemnly separate themselves to the right discharge of this Duty between God and their Souls. And those who have hitherto neglected it, or failed herein, may be advised solemnly to address themselves unto it, whatever hopes they may have, that they have been carried through it already. There is no loss of Time, Grace, nor Comfort, in the so
Universal, as to the object of it. It respects all Sin, and every Sin, every crooked path, and every step therein. It absolutely excludes all reserves for any Sin. To profess Repentance, and yet with an express reserve for any Sin, approacheth very near the great Sin of Lying to the Holy Ghost. It is like Ananias his keeping back part of the Price when the whole was devoted. And these Soul-destroying Reserves which absolutely over
(1) That the Sin reserved is small, and of no great importance. It is a little one. But true Repentance respects the Nature of Sin, which is in every Sin equally, the least as well as the greatest. The least reserve for Vanity, Pride, Conformity to the world, inTruth of Repentance, and all the benefits of it.
(2) That it is so useful as that, at least at present, it cannot be parted withall. So Naaman would reserve his bowing before the King in the House of Rimmon, because his Honours and Preferments depended thereon. So is it with many in their course of Life, or Trading in the world; some advantages by crooked ways seem as useful to them as their right hand, which they cannot as yet cut off and casright Eye, or a right hand, must be content to go with them both into Hell fire.
(3) Secresie. That which is hidden from every Eye, may be left behind. Some sweet morsel of this kind, may yet be rolled under the Tongue. But this is an Evidence of the grossest Hypocrisie, and the highest Contempt of God who seeth in secret.
(4) Uncertainty of some things whether they are Sins or no. It may be some think, such neglects of Duty, such compliances with the World, are not Sins; and whereas themselves have not so full a Gonviction of their being sinful, as they have of other Sins which are notorious and against the Light of Nature, only they have just reason to fear they are Evil, this they will break through, and indulge themselves in them. But this also impeacheth the Truth of Repentance. Where it is sincere, it engageth the Soul against all Appearance of Evil. And one that is truly humbled, hath no more certain Rule in his walking, than not to do what he hath just cause to doubt whether it be lawful or no. True Repentance therefore is universal and inconsistent with all these reserves.
Secondly, Unto the same End, that we may be acquainted with our own Interest in this initiating Repentance, We must consider the Season when it is wrought. And this is,
(1) Upon the first Communication of Gospel Light unto us by the Holy Ghost. Christ sends him to convince us of Sin and Righteousness and Judgement, Joh. 16. 8. And if upon the first participation of Light and Conviction by the Holy Ghost, this Repentance is not wrought in us, it is to be feared that we have missed our Season. And so it falls out with many. They receive Light and Convictions but use them unto other ends. They put them it may be upon a Profession and a Relinquishment of some ways, and parties of men, but farther they use them not. Their first proper end is to work our own Souls unto saving Repentance, and if we miss their first Impressions, their power and efficacy for that end is hardly recoverable.
(2) It never fails on the first saving view of Iesus Christ as crucified, Zech. 12. 10. It is impossible that any one should have a saving view of Christ crucified, and not be saHumiliation and Repentance? Where these ensue not upon what we account our Be
Thirdly, Whereas we call this Repentance initial, we must consider that it differs not in Nature and Kind from that which we ought to be exercised in whilst we are in this world, whereof afterwards. That which we intend thereby is the Use of Repentance in our first admission into an Interest in a Gospel State. And with respect hereunto its duration may be considered; concerning which we may observe,
(1) That with some, especially in extraordinary cases, this Work and Duty may be over in a day as to its initiating use and efficacy. So was it with many Primitive Converts, who at the same time were savingly humbled and comforted by the Promises of the GoActs 2. 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42. Acts 16. 31, 32, 33, 34. Now although in such persons the things we have ascribed unto this Repentance, are not wrought formally and distinctly, yet are they all wrought virtually and radically, and do act themselves on all future oc
initiating. Not only did Paul contithree days and nights under his sore distress without relief, but others are kept days and weeks and months oft-times in the discharge of this Duty, before they have a refreshing entrance given them thereby into an Estate of Spiritual Rest in the Gospel. There is therefore no measure of Time to be allotted unto the solemn attendance unto this Duty, but only this, that none faint under it, wax weary of it, or give it over, before there be thereby administred unto them an entrance into the Kingdom of God.
And these confiderations of the Nature of Repentance from dead works as it is initiating, may give us some direction in that necessary enquiry concerning our own personal In
Now there are several ways whereby men miss their Duty with respect unto this first Principle, and thereby ruine their Souls Eternally.
(1) Some utterly despise it. Such are the presumptuous Sinners mentioned, Deut. 29. 19, 20. As they disregard the Curse of the Law, so they do also the Promise of the Govery first thing which it indispensibly requireth of all that intend any con
(2) Some will repent in their dead works but not from them. That is, upon Convictiabide in their Sins and dead works still. So Pharaoh more than once repented him in his Sins, but never had Repentance from them. And so it was exIsraelites themselves, Psal. 78. 34, 35, 36, 37. And this kind of Repenfew unto whom this kind of Repentance stands in the same stead all their days, as ConPapists, it gives them present ease, that they may re
(3) Some repent from dead works in some sense, but they repent not off them. They will come through the Power of their Convictions to a Relinquishment of many of their old Sins, as Herod did upon the Preaching of John Baptist, but are never truly and sa
Secondly, This Repentance in the Nature and Kind of it, is a Duty to be continued in the whole course of our Lives. It ceaseth as unto those especial Acts which belong unto our Initiation into a Gospel state, but it abides as too our orderly preservation therein. There must be no End of Repentance, until there is a full End of Sin. All Tears will not be wiped from our Eyes, until all Sin is perfectly removed from our Souls. Now Re
(1) As it is a stated constant Duty of the Gospel; (2) As it is Occasional.
1. As it is stated, it is our humble mournful walking with God under a sense of Sin, continually manifesting its self in our Natures and Infirmities. And the Acts of this Repentance in us, are of two sorts: (1) Direct and immediate; (2) Consequential and dependant. The former may be referred unto two Heads. (1) Confession. (2) Humiliation. These a truly penitent Soul will be continually exercised in. He whose Heart is so lifted up on any pretence, as not to abide in the constant exercise of these acts of Repen
2. This continued Repentance is Occasional when it is heightned unto a singular solemnity. And these occasions may be referred unto three heads:
(1) A Personal surprisal into any great actual Sin. Such an occasion is not to be passed over with the ordinary actings of Repentance. David upon his fall, brings his renewed Repentance into that solemnity as if it had been his first Conversion to God. On that account he deduceth his personal Sins from the Sin of his Nature, Psal. 51. 5. besides many other circumstances whereby he gave it an extraordinary Solemnity. So Peter
wept bitterly, which with his following Humiliation and the Renovation of his Faith, our Saviour calls his Conversion, Luke 22. 23. A new Converparticular Instances of Sin, with the general Duties of Repentance.
(2) The Sin or Sins of the Family or Church whereunto we are related, calls unto us to give a Solemnity unto this Duty. 2 Cor. 7. 11. The Church having failed in the buincestuous offender, when they were convinced by the Apostle of their sinful miscarriage therein, most solemnly renew their Repentance towards God.
(3) Afflictions and sore Trials call for this Duty, as we may see in the issue of all things between God and Job, Chap. 42. 6.
And lastly, We may observe that this Repentance is a Grace of the Spirit of Christ, a Gospel Grace, and therefore whatever unpleasantness there may be in its Exercise unto the Flesh, it is sweet, refreshing, satisfactory, and secretly pleasant unto the inner man. Let us not be deterred from abiding and abounding in this Duty. It is not a morose, tetrical, severe self-maceration, but an humble, gracious, mournful walking with God, wherein the Soul finds rest, sweetness, joy and peace, being rendred thereby compliant with the Will of God, benigne, useful, kind, compassionate towards men, as might be declared.
The necessity of a profession of this Repentance from dead works, in order unto an Admission into the Society of the Church, that an evidence be given of the Power and Efficacy of the Doctrine of Christ in the Souls of men, that his Disciples may be visibly separated by their own profession from the world that lies in Evil, and be fitted for Com
The second instance of the Doctrinal Foundation supposed to be laid among the Hebrews,
Wherefore omitting any farther consideration of the order of these things, we must enquire what is here intended by Faith in God. Now this cannot be Faith in the most general notion of it, because it is reckoned as a principle of the Doctrine of Christ. But Faith in God absolutely taken, is a Duty of the Law of Nature. Upon an acknowledgbelieve in him as the first EterAdam's transgression. Wherefore Faith in this sense cannot be called a principle of the Doctrine of Christ, which wholly consists in supernatural Revelations. Nor can it be so termed with respect unto the Jews in particular. For in their Judaisme they were sufficiently taught Faith in God, and needed not to have been instructed therein as a part of the Doctrine of Christ. And there is a distinction put by our Saviour himself, between that Faith in God which they had, and the peculiar Faith in himself which he required, Joh. 14. 1. Ye believe in God, believe also in me. Besides, where these two Repentance and Faith are elsewhere joyned together, as they are frequently, it is an especial sort of Faith in God that is intended. See Luke 24. 46, 47. Acts 19. 4. Chap. 20. 21.
Faith in God as accomplishing the promise unto Abraham in sending Jesus Christ, and granting pardon or remission of Sins by him, that is intended. The whole is exRepent and believe the Gospel, Mark 1. 15. That is the tidings of the AccomHebrews by Peter in his first SerActs 2. 30, 39. Chap. 3. 25, 26. Hence these two principles are exRepentance towards God, and Faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ, Acts 20. 21. As Repentance is here described by the terminus a quo; it is Repentance from dead works; so there it is described by its terminus ad quem; it is Repentance towards God, in our turning unto him. For those who live in their Lusts and Sins, do it not only against the command of God, but also they place them, as to their affections and expectation of satisfaction, in the stead of God. And this Faith in God is there called by way of Explication, Faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ; that is, as he in whose giving and sending the Truth of God was fulfilled, and by whom we believe in God, 1 Pet. 1. 21. This therefore is the Faith in God here intended; namely, that whereby we believe the Accomplishment of his promise, in sending his Son Jesus Christ to dye for us, and to save us from our Sins. And this the Lord Christ testified unto in his own personal Ministry. Hence our Apostle says, that he was the Minister of the Circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the Fathers, Rom. 15. 8. And this he testified unto them,
Faith in God, as to the accomplishing of the great Promise in sending his Son Jesus Christ to
save us from our Sins, is the great fundamental Principle of our Interest in and Profession of the Gospel. Faith in God under this formal consideration, not only that he hath sent and given Jesus Christ his Son, but that he did it in the Accomplishment of his Promise, is rehis Grace in giving him, but also his Truth in sending him according unto his word. And this was that which holy persons of old did glorifie God in an especial manner upon the account of, Luke 1. 54, 55. ver. 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75. And there is nothing in the Gospel that God himself, our Lord Jesus Christ, and the Holy Apostles do more insist upon than this, that God had fulfilled his Promise in sending his Son into the world. On this one thing depends all Religion, the Truth of the Bible, and all our Salvation. If it be not evident that God hath accomplished his Promise, the whole Bible may pass for a Fable; for it is all built on this supposition, that God gave and hath accomplished it; the first being the foundation of the Old Testament, and the latter of the New. And there are sundry things that signalize our Faith in God with respect hereunto. As
1. This promise of sending Jesus Christ was the first express ingagement that God ever made of his Faithfulness and Veracity unto any Creatures. He is Essentially faithful and true; but he had not ingaged himself to act according unto those properties in his dealing with
Gen. 3. 15. This therefore was the spring and measure of all other subsequent promises. They are all of them but new assurances thereof, and acFall.
The first thing proposed unto him, was to believe in God, with respect unto his faith
Besides this Promise hung longest on the File before its Accomplishment. There was not less than four thousand years between its giving and its performance. And many things happened during that season, whereby both its self, and Faith on God thereon, were greatly signalized. For (1) More and greater Objections against the Truth of it, more Temptasuspension of its fulfilling gave such Advantages to Sathan in his opposition unto it, that he prevailed against every expectation, but that of Faith tried and more precious than Gold. And the Saints themselves had a great exercise in the disappointments which many of them fell into, as to the time of its accomplishment. It is not unlikely that most of them looked for it in their own days; great therefore was the Trials of all sorts about it. (2) It was All that the true Church of God had to live upon during that long season, the sole foundation of its Faith, Obedience and Consolation. It is true, in progress of time God added other Promises, Precepts and Institutions, for the direction and instruAdam was indefinitely given to mankind. And it was suited unto the Reparation of their lost condition, yea their investiture into a better state. And this increased the wrath and malice of Sathan. He saw that if they applied themselves to the
It will be said, it may be, that this Promise being now actually accomplished, and that tathat the Son of God is come in the Flesh, but he who believes that he came in the Accomplishment of the Promise of God, unto the Glory of his Truth and Faithfulness. And it is from hence that we know aright both the occasion, original, cause, and end of his coming: which whoso considereth not, his pretended Faith is in vain.
2. This is the greatest Promise that God ever gave to the Children of men, and therenecessary unto us, and greatly tends unto his Glory. Indeed all the concernments of Gods glory in the Church, and our Eternal welfare are wrapped up herein. But I must not enlarge hereon.
Only we must add, that the consideration of the Accomplishment of this Promise is a great incouragement and supportment unto Faith with respect unto all other Promises of God. Never was any kept so long in Abeyance, the state of the Church and design of God requiring it. None ever had such opposition made to its Accomplishment. Never was any more likely to be defeated by the Unbelief of men; all Faith in it being at length renounced by Jews and Gentiles, which if any thing, or had it been suspended on any condition, might have disappointed its event. And shall we think that God will leave any other of his Promises unaccomplished? That he will not in due time ingage his omnipotent Power and infinite Wisdom in the discharge of his Truth and Faithfulness? Hath he sent his Son after
four thousand years expectation, and will he not in due time destroy Antichrist, call again the Jews, set up the Kingdom of Christ gloriously in the world, and finally save the Souls of all that sincerely believe? This great instance of Divine Fidelity, leaves no room for the Objections of Unbelief as unto any other Promises under the same assurance.
Thirdly, The third principle according to the order and sense of the words laid Resurrection of the dead. And this was a fundamental principle of the Judaical Church, indeed of all Religions properly so called in the world. The twelve Articles of the Creed of the present Jews, is, the days of the Messiah; that is, the time will come when God will send the Messiah and restore all things by him. This under the Old Testament respected that Faith in God which we before discoursed concerning. But the present Jews notwithstanding this profession, have no interest herein. For not to believe the Accomplishment of a Promise when it is fulfilled, as also sufficiently revealed and testified unto to be fulfilled, is to reject all Faith in God concerning that Promise. But this they still retain an appearance and profession of. And their thirteenth Article is, Revivisication or Resurrection from the dead. And the Faith hereof being explained and confirmed in the Gospel, as also sealed by the great Seal of the Resurrection of Christ, it was ever esteemed as a chief Prinhow it is a fundamental Principle of all Reliespecial relation unto that taught by Jesus Christ, or declare how it is a fundamental Principle of the Gospel. And, as to the first, it is evident that without its Acknowledgment, all Religion whatever would be abolished. For if it be once supposed or granted that men were made only for a frail mortal life in this world, that they have no other continuance assigned to their Being, but what is common to them with the Beasts that perish; there would be no more Religion amongst them, than there is among the Beasts themselves. For as they would never be able to solve the difficulties of present temporary Dispensations of Providence, which will not be reduced unto any such known visible rule of Righteousness, abstracting from the compleatment of them hereafter, as of themselves to give a firm apprehension of a Divine, Holy, Righteous Power in the government of the Universe; so take away all consideration of future Rewards and Punishments, which are equally asserted in this and the ensuing Principle; and the Lusts of men would quickly obliterate all those notions of a
But it will be asked, whether the belief of the Immortality of the Soul be not sufficient to secure Religion, without the addition of this Article of the Resurrection. This indeed some among the ancient Heathens had faint apprehensions of, without any guess at the Resurrection of the body. And some of them also who were most steady in that perfluctuating and
This Principle therefore both upon the account of its importance in its self, as also of the opposition made unto it among the Jews by the Sadducees, the Apostle took care to settle and establish in the first place, As those truths are in an especial manner to be conpeculiarly opposed. And they had reason thus to do; for all they had to preach unto the world turned on this hinge, that Christ was raised from the dead, whereon our Resurrection doth unavoidably follow, so as that they confessed that without an eviction and acknowledgment hereof, all their preaching was in vain, and all their Faith who believed therein was so also, 1 Cor. 15. 12, 13, 14. This therefirst Principles which our Apostle insisted on in the preaching of the Gospel; a signal instance whereof we have in his discourse at his first coming unto Athens. First he reproves their Sins and Idolatries, declaring that God by him called them to Repentance from those dead works. Then taught them Faith in that God who so called them by Jesus Christ; confirming the necessity of both by the Doctrine of the Resurrection from the dead, and future judgement,
Resurrection of the dead. It is usually expressed by Resurrection only, Mark 12. 18. Luke 20. 27, 33. Joh. 11. 24. Math. 22. 23, 28. For by this single expression, the whole was sufficiently known and apprehended. And so we commonly call it the Resurrection without any addition. Sometimes it is termed Acts 4. 2. The Resurrection from the dead, that is, the state of the dead. Our Apostle hath a peculiar expression, Chap. 11. 35. They received their dead from the Resurrection; that is, by virtue thereof, they being raised to Life again. And sometimes it is distinguished with respect unto its consequents, in different persons, the good and the bad. The Resurrection of the former is called John 5. 29. the Resurrection of Life, that is, which is unto Life Eternal, the means of entrance into it. This is called Resurrection of the Just, Luke 14. 14. And so Life of the dead, or the Resurrection of the dead, was used to express the whole blessed estate which ensued thereon to Believers. If by any means I might attain,
Resurrection of the dead. This is a living again; as it is said of the Lord Christ distinctly, Rom. 14. 9. He rose and lived again, or he arose to life. With respect unto wicked men it is called Resurrection of Judgement, or unto Judgement, Joh. 5. 29. Some shall be raised again to have Judgement pronounced against them, to be sentenced unto punishment. Reserve the unjust against the day of Judgement to be punished, 2 Pet. 2. 9. And both these are put together, Dan. 12. 2. And many of them that sleep in the dust of the Earth shall awake, some to Everlasting Life, and some to shame and Everlasting contempt.
Sathan, denied and opposed by many. And this was done two ways. (1) By an open denial of any such thing, 1 Cor. 15. 12. How say some among you, that there is no Resurrection of the dead. They wholly denied it as a thing improbable and impossible, as is evident from the whole ensuing disputation of the Apostle on that subject. (2) Others there were, who not daring to oppose themselves directly unto a prinAllegorical Exposition upon it, whereby they plainly overthrew the thing intended. They said the Resurrection was past already, 2 Tim. 2. 18. It is generally thought that these men Hymeneus and Philetus placed the Resurrection in Conversion, or Reformation of Life, as the Marcionits did afterwards. What some imagine about the Gnosticks is vain. And that the reviving of a new Light in us, is the Resurrection intended in the Scripture, some begin to mutter among our selves. But, that as Death is a separation or sejunction of the Soul and the Body, so that the Resurrection is a re-union of them in and unto Life, the Scripture is too express for any one to deny, and not virtually to reject it wholly. And it may be observed, that our Apostle in both these cases, doth not only condemn these Errors as false, but declares positively that their admission overthrows the Faith, and renders the preaching of the Gospel vain and useless.
Now this Resurrection of the dead, is the Restauration by the Power of God, of the same numerical body which died, in all the essential and integral parts of it, rendring it, in a re-union of or with the Soul, immortal, or of an Eternal duration in blessedness or misery. And,
The Doctrine of this Resurrection is a fundamental principle of the Gospel, the Faith whereof
is indispensibly necessary unto the Obedience and Consolation of all that profess it. I call it a principle of the Gospel, not because it was absolutely first revealed therein. It was made known under the old Testament, and was virtually included in the first promise. In the Faith of it, the Patriarchs lived and died, and it is testified unto in the Psalms and Prophets. With respect hereunto did the
1. Because it is most clearly, evidently and fully taught and declared therein. It was as sundry other important truths, made known under the Old Testament, sparingly and obbrought to light by the Gospel, 2 Tim. 1. 10. all things concerning them being made plain, clear and evident.
solemn confirmation and pledge of it which was given in the Resurrection of Christ from the dead. This was wanting under the Old Testament, and therefore the Faith of men might oft-times be greatly shaken about it. For whereas death seized on all men, and that penally in the execution of the sentence of the Law, whence they were for fear of it, obnoxious to bondage all their days, Heb. 2. 14, 15. they had not received any pledge or instance of a recovery from its power, or the taking off that sentence and penalty. But Christ dying for us, and that directly under the Sentence and Curse of the Law, yet conquering both Death and Law, being raised again, the pains or bonds of death being loosed, hath given a full confirmation and absolute assurance of our Resurbrought Life and Immortality to light by abolishing of death, 2 Tim. 1. 10. that is, the power of it, that it should not hold us for ever under its dominion, 1 Cor. 15. 54, 55, 56, 57.
3. Because it hath a peculiar influence into our Obedience under the Gospel. Under the Old Testament the Church had sundry motives unto Obedience taken from temporal things, namely, prosperity and peace in the Land of Canaan, with deliverance out of troubles and distresses. Promises hereof made unto them the Scripture abounds withal, and thereon presseth them unto Obedience, and diligence in the Worship of God. But we are now left unto promises of Invisible and Eternal things, which cannot be fully enResurrection from the dead. And therefore these promises are made unspeakably more clear and evident, as also the things promised unto us, than they were unto them, and so our motives and incouragements unto Obedience, are unspeaka
1. It is an animating principle of Gospel Obedience, because we are assured thereby that nothing we do therein shall be lost. In general the Apostle proposeth this as our great encouragement, That God is not unrighteous to forget our work and labour of love, ver. 10. and shews us the especial way whereby it shall be remembred. Nothing is more fatal unto any endeavours, than an apprehension that men do in them spend their strength in vain, and their labour for nought. This makes the Hands of men weak, their Knees feeble, and their Hearts fearful. Nor can any thing deliver us from a slothful desponfruit of our endeavours shall be called over again. And this is given us alone by the Faith of the Resurrection of the dead, when they shall awake again, and sing, who dwell in the dust; and then shall the Righteous be had in everlasting remembrance. Let no man fear the loss of his work, unless it be such as the Fire will consume, when it will be to his advantage to suffer that loss, and to have it so consumed. Not a good thought, word or work, but shall have a new Life given unto it, and have as it were a
2. We are assured hereby that such things shall not only be remembred, but also rewarded. It is unto the Righteous, as we have observed, not only a
2. It hath the same respect unto our Consolation, For if in this Life only we have hope in Christ, then are we of all men most miserable, 1 Cor. 15. 19. that is, if we regard only outward things in this world, Reproaches, Scornings, Revilings, Troubles, Persecutions, have been the Lot of most of them who so hoped in Christ. But is this all which we shall have from him or by him? probably as to outward things it will prove so to most of us in this world, if it come not to greater extremities: Then are we of all men most miserable; But stay awhile. These things will be all called over again, at the Resurrection, (and that is time enough) and all things be put into another posture. See 2
Fourthly, The fourth principle mentioned is outward visible transactions between God and the Souls of men after their departure out of this world, nor any alteration to be made as to their Eternal state and condition, this Judgement is spoken of as that which immediately succeeds death its self, Heb. 9. 27. It is appointed to all men once to dye, and after this the Judgement. This Judgement is sure, and there is nothing between death and it, that it takes notice of. But as to some there may be a very long space of time between the one and the other; neither shall Judgement be administred until after the Resurrecticondemnatory Sentence. Therefore some think that it is only the Judgement of wicked and ungodly men that is intended. day of Judgement is most frequently spoken of in the Scripture with reThes. 1. 7, 8, 9, 10. Jude 14, 15. 2 Pet. 2. 4. And this is partJudgement is general, and all men both good and bad must stand in their lot therein. We shall all stand before the Judgement-seat of Christ; as it is written, As I live saith the Lord every knee shall bow to me, Rom. 14. 10, 11. And this is that which is here intended. As the
This eleventh fundamental Article of the
Two things must be yet farther spoken unto, to clear this great principle of our Faith. First the general nature of this Eternal Judgement, and then the Evidences we have of its truth and certainty.
1. The general concerns of this Eternal Judgement are all of them plainly expressed in the Scripture, which declare the nature of it. (1) As to its time, there is a determined and unalterable day fixed for it; God hath appointed a day wherein he will judge the world in Righteousness, Acts 17. 31. And this time is commonly called the day of Judgement, Matth. 10. 15. Chap. 11. 22, 24. Chap. 12. 32. Mark 6. 11. 2 Pet. 2. 9. 1 Joh. 4. 17. And this day being fixed in the foreknowledge and determinate counsel of God, can no more be either hastened or deferred, than God himself can be changed. Until this apprecise time, the knowledge of it is among the principal secrets of his Soveraignty, which he hath for reasons suited to his infinite Wisdom, laid up in his own Eternal bosom. Hence is that of our Saviour, Of that day and hour knoweth no man, no not the Angels that are in Heaven, neither the Son, (that is in and by the humane nature)
2. There is the Judge, which is Jesus Christ. Originally and absolutely this is the Judgement of God, of him who made the world. And therefore is it often said that God shall judge the world, Deut. 32. 35, 36. Ecclesiast. 12. 14. God the Judge of all, Heb. 12. 23. But the actual Administration of it is committed unto Jesus Christ alone to be exercised visibly in his humane nature, Rom. 14. 11. Dan. 7. 13. Matth. 16. 27. Chap. 19. 28. Joh. 5. 22. 27. Acts 17. 31. 2 Cor. 5. 10. 1 Thes. 4. 16. 2 Thes. 1. 7. and many other places. And herein, in the same individual person, he shall act the properDan. 7. 13. Matth. 24. 30. 1 Thes. 4. 16. Rom. 14. 10. so he shall act the Power and Omniscience of his Deity in upholding the whole state of the Creation in Judgement, and in the discovery of the hearts, and comprehension of the words, thoughts, and actions of all the Children of men from the beginning of the world unto the end thereof. And herein as all the holy Angels shall accompany him, and attend upon him, as Ministers, Assistants, and Witnesses unto his Righteous Judgements, Mark 25. 31. Luke 9. 26. Jude 12. Dan. 7. 10. so also in the Judgement of fallen Angels and the reprobate world, the
3. As to the outward manner of this Judgement it shall be with solemnity and great glory, 2 Thes. 11. 7, 8, 9, 10. Jude 14, 15. Dan. 7. 9. Rev. 20. 4, 5. And this shall be partly for the demonstration of the Glory and Honour of Jesus Christ, who hath been so despised, reproached, persecuted in the world, and partly to fill the hearts of sinners with dread and terror, as
4. The persons to be judged are (1) fallen Angels, 1 Cor. 6. 3. 2 Pet. 2. 4. Jude 6. Matth. 25. 41. (2) All men universally without exception, Isa. 45. 23. Rom. 14. 9, 10. Matth. 25. 31. In especial (1) All the Godly, all such as have believed and obeyed the Gospel shall be judged, Luke 21. 36. Rom. 14. 12. 2 Tim. 4. 8. whether all their Sins shall be then called over and made known unto others, seeing they are known to him who is more in himself and unto us than all the world besides, I question. (2) All the ungodly and impenitent sinners,
5. The Rule whereby all men shall be judged is the Law of their Obedience made known unto them. As (1) The Gentiles before the coming of Christ shall be judged by the Law of Nature, which all of them openly transgressed, Rom. 2. 12, 13, 14. (2) The Jews of the same time by the Law, and the Light into Redemption from Sin, superadded thereLaw and Prophets. (3) The Gospel unto all men unto whom it hath been offered or preached, Rom. 2. 16. The Rule of Judgement at the last day, neither is nor shall be any other, but what is preached every day in the dispensation of the Gospel. No man shall be able to complain of a surprizal, or pretend ignorance of the Law whereby he was to be judged. The sentence of it is proposed unto them continually. In the word of the Gospel is the
Secondly, The Evidence which God hath given concerning this future Judgement, whereon the certainty of it as to us doth depend, may also be considered. And 1. God hath planted a presumption and sense of it on the minds and hearts of men by nature, from whence it is absolutely and eternally inseparable. Conscience is nothing but that judgement which men do make and which they cannot but make of their moral actions with reference unto the supream future Judgement of God. Hence the Apostle treating of this future Judgement,
2. The working of Reason on the consideration of the state of all things in this world, complies with the innate principles and dictates of Conscience in this testimony. We supBeing of God, and his Providence in the government of the world. Others deserve not the least of our consideration. Now those who are under the power of that Acknowledgement and Perswasion, must and do believe that God is infinitely Just and Righteous, infinitely Wise and Holy, and that he cannot otherwise be. But yet when they come to consider how these Divine Properties are exerted in the providential government of the world, which all Ages, Persons and Places must of necessity be subject unto, and disposed by, they are at a loss. The final impunity of flagitious sinners in this world, the unrelieved oppressions, afflictions, and miseries of the best, the prosperity of wicked Devilish designs, the defeating and overPsal. 73. ver. 4. to 17. Jer. 12. 1, 2. Habb. 1. 3, 4, 13. Job 21. 5, 6, 7, 8. &c. And the consideration hereof turned some of the wisest Heathens into Atheisme or outragious Blasphemies at their dying hours. But in this state even Reason rightly exerted will lead men to conclude, that upon the supposition of a Divine Being and Providence, it must needs be, that all these things shall be called over again, and then receive a final decision and determination, whereof in this world they are not capable. And among the Heathens there were proverbial Speeches which they uttered on occasion of great distresses which signified no less. As, Est profecto Deus qui haec videt. For
(1) Upon a due examination it will quickly appear, that the moral actions of men with respect unto God, in the way of Sin and Obedience, are such as that it is utterly imjust recompence of reward. For whereas they have an aspect unto mens utmost end which is Eternal, they cannot be justly or rightly stated but under punishments or rewards Eternal, Rom. 1. 32. 2 Thes. 1. 6. Seeing therefore no full Judgement can possibly pass upon the Sins of men in this world, because all that can befall them is infinitely short of their demerit, even reason it self canall penalties shall be equalled to their Crimes, and
Felix about RighteousJudgement to come, Acts 24. 25. Here Reason may relieve it self in the midst of all cross occurrences of Profinal determination of things is not made here nor is it possible it should so be, on the ground before assigned.
(2) Should God take men off from a respect unto future Eternal Judgement, and conunequal and unrighteous, so it might be an occasion of greater wickedness than the world is yet pestered withall. Unrighteous and unequal it must be unavoidably, because the Judgement supposed must pass according unto what men are able to discern and judge upon, that is, outward actions only. Now this were unrighteous in God, who sees and knows the heart, and knows that actions have their Good and Evil, if not solely yet principally from their respect thereunto. The Lord is a God of knowledge and by him actions are weighed, said Hannah, when Eli judged her drunk, but God saw that she prayed, 1 Sam. 2. 3. There is nothing more evident than that it is inconsistent with, and destructive of all Divine perfections, that God should pass a decretory sentence on the actions of men, according to what appears unto us to be just and equal. This therefore God declines, namely, to judge according to a Rule that we can comprehend, Isa. 11. 3. Rom. 2. 2.
But (3) Suppose that God should in this world distribute Rewards and Punishments constantly according to what he sees in the hearts and inward dispositions of the minds of men, it is no less evident that it would fill all men with unspeakable confusions, and prePsal. 77. 19. Psal. 36. 6.
Wherefore (4) Should God visibly and constantly have dispensed Rewards and Punishworse kind of Atheisme, than any yet the Earth hath been pestered withall. For it could not have been, but that the most would have made the judgement of men the only Rule of all that they did, which God must be obliged to comply withall, or be unrighteous; which is absolutely to dethrone him, and leave him only to be the Executioner of the Wills and Reasons of men. But from all these and the like perplexities, Reason it self may quietly take sanctuary in submission unto Soveraign Wisdom as to present dispensations, in a satisfaction that it is not only suitable unto, but necessary on the account of Divine Justice, that there should be a future Eternal Judgement, to pass according to truth upon all the ways and actions of men. And hereby doth God keep up in the hearts of men a testimony unto this great principle of our pro
3. God hath given Testimony hereunto in all the extraordinary Judgements which he hath executed since the foundation of the world. It is not for nothing that he doth someone day to be called to another account. In great Judgewrath of God is revealed from Heaven against the ungodliness of men, Rom. 1. 18. and an intimation is given of what he will farther do hereafter. For as he leaves not himself without witness in respect of his goodness and patience, in that he doth good and giveth rain from Heaven and fruitful seasons filling mens hearts with food and gladness, Acts 14. 17. so he gives testimony to his Righteousness and Holiness, in the Judgements that he executes, Psal. 9. 16. For whereas goodness and mercy are the works wherein God is
Judgement in severity he calls his strange work, that which he proceeds not unto, but on great provocations, Isa. 28. 21. he satisfieth his holy Wisdom with some extraordinary necessary instances of it. And thus he hath himself singled out some particular instances, which he gave on purpose that they might be as pledges of the future Judgement, and hath given us a rule in them, how we are to judge of all his extraordinary acts of the same kind. Such was the Flood whereby the world was destroyed in the days of Noah, which Peter affirms expresly was a Type to shadow out the severity of God in the last final Judgement, 2 Pet. 2. 5. Chap. 3. 5, 6, 7. Of the like nature was his turning the Cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into Ashes, condemning them with an overthrow, making them an example unto those that after should live ungodly, 2 Pet. 2. 6. He made them a terrifying example, that others should hear and fear and do no more so presumptuously. But now whereas God hath not in the space of four thousand years, brought any such Judgement on any other places or persons, if this Example had respect only unto this world, it must needs have lost all its force and efficacy upon the minds of Sinners. Wherefore it did nearly respect the Judgement to come, God giving therein an instance what obstinate and profligate Sinners are to look for at that great day. Wherefore Jude says expresly, they are set forth for an Example suffering the vengeance of Eternal Fire, ver. 7. And this is the Language of all Gods extraordinary Judgements either on persons or places in the world. Let mens Sins be what they will, God can endure in his long-suffering the Sins of one as well as another, among the Vessels of wrath that are fitted for destruction, and so he doth ordinarily, or for the most part. But yet he will sometimes reach out his hand from Heaven in an extraordinary instance of Vengeance, on purpose that men may know that things shall not for ever be passed over in such a promiscuous manner, but that he hath appointed another day wherein he will judge the world in Righteousness. And for this reason such signal Judgements as are Evidences of the future Eternal Judgement of God, are in the Scripture expressed in words that seem to declare that Judgement it self, rather than the Types of it, Isa. 34. 4. Rev. 6. 13, 14. Dan. 7. 9, 10. Math. 24. 29, 30.
But 4. God hath not absolutely intrusted the evidence and preservation of this iminnate light in the Minds and Consciences of men, which may be variously obscured, until it be alexercise of Reason on the consideration of the present Administration of Providence in this world, which is oft-times corrupted, deextraordinary Judgements may have upon the minds of men, which some fortifie themselves against by their obstiexpress Revelation from the beginning of the world, now recorded in his word, by which all men must be tried whether they will or no. It may not be doubted but that Adam was acquainted with this truth immediately from God himself. He was so indeed in the Commination given against Sin at first, especially as it was explained in the Curse after he had actually sinned. And this was that which was taught him in the threatning, and which his Eyes were open to see clearly after his fall, where he immediately became afraid of God as his Judge, Gen. 3. 10. Nor can it be doubted but that he communicated the knowledge of it unto his posterity. But whereas they quickly in that profligacy in all wickedness which they gave themselves unto, had together with all other sacred Truths, lost the rememwithout excuse, makes a new express Revelation of it unto Enoch, and by him to mankind, Jude 14, 15. For Enoch the seventh from Adam prophesied of these, saying, Behold the Lord cometh with ten thousand of his Saints, to execute Judgement upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them, of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodlily committed, and of all their hard speeches, which ungodly sinners have spoken against him. And this is the second
This principle being thus cleared and confirmed, it may not be amiss to shew what practical improvement it doth require. And it is manifest that there is no Duty in Religion that is not, or ought not to be influenced by the consideration of it. I shall only name some of them whereunto it is in an especial manner applied by the Holy Ghost himself.
First, Ministers of the Gospel ought to dwell greatly on the consideration of it, as it is represented in its terror and glory, that they may be excited and stirred up to deal effectually with the Souls of men, that they fall not under the Vengeance of that day. So our Apostle affirms that it was with himself; for having asserted the truth and certainty hereof, in those words,
2. The consideration of it is peculiarly applied by the Holy Ghost against security in worldly enjoyments, and those Evils wherewith it is usually accompanied. So it is made use of by our blessed Saviour, Luke 21. 34, 35, 36. And so by our Apostle, 1 Thes. 5. 5, 6, 7, 8. And this also is expressed in the Type of it, or the Flood in the days of Noah, noMatth. 24. 38, 39.
3. It is in like manner frequently applied unto the consolation of Believers, under the troubles, difficulties, and persecutions, which in this life they undergo, 2
4. It is in like manner every where applied to the terror of ungodly and impenitent sinners, 1
These therefore (that we may return to the Text) are those fundamental principles of Christian Religion which the Apostle calls the Doctrine of Baptismes and the laying on of hands. This was a summary of that Doctrine wherein they were to be instructed who were to be baptized, and to have Imposition of hands thereon.
But there occurs no small difficulty from the use of the word Baptismes in the plural number. For it is not any where else in the Scripture so used, when the Baptism of the Gospel is intended, and the Jewish washings are often so expressed. The Syriack InterBaptism. But because there is a full agreement in all Original Copies, and the ancient Expositions also concur therein, none have yet adventured to leave the Original, and follow that translation; but all generally who have commented on the place, have considered how the word may be understood and explained. And herein they have fallen into such various conjectures, as I shall not spend time in the consideration and refutation of, but content my self with the naming of them, that the
Wherefore the most general interpretation of the words, and meaning of the Apostle is, that although Baptism be but one and the same, never to be repeated or reiterated on the same subject, nor is there any other Baptism or Washing of the same kind; yet beSubjects of it, or those who were baptized were many, every one of them being made partakers of the same Baptism in special, that of them all is called Baptisms, or the Baptism of the many.
All persons who began to attend unto the Gospel were diligently instructed in the fore-mentioned principles with others of an alike nature, (for they are mentioned only as instances) before they were admitted unto a participation of this Ordinance with impoDoctrine of Baptisms or the Catechetical fundamental truths, wherein those to be baptized were instructed, as being the things whereof they were to make a solemn profession.
But if we shall follow the other interpretation, and suppose that this Doctrine of Baptisms is an epression of a distinct principle by it self, then cannot the word by any means be reBaptism by Water only. For although this be an important head of Christian Doctrine, namely, the declaration, use and end of our Sacramental Initiation into Christ and the Profession of the Gospel, yet no reason can be given why that should be called Baptisms, seeing it hath respect only to the thing it self, and not to the persons who are made partakers of it.
Admit therefore of this sense, that it is the Doctrine concerning Baptisms which is inSign of Baptism, and wrought inwardly by the Spirit and Grace of God, through the efficacy of the Doctrine of the Gospel, in opposition to all the legal and carnal washings among the Jews, is intended hereby. So the Lord Christ loved the Church and gave himself for it, that he might sanctifie and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, Ephes. 5. 26. And indeed the Doctrine hereof is among the Ru
But I yet adhere to the former Eposition, and that also because unto Baptisms, Imposition of hands, whose nature we must netly enquire into, is added.
Some suppose that by this Imposition of hands that Rite in the Church which was afConfirmation, is intended. For whereas there were two sorts of persons adult at their first hearing of the Gospel, and the infant Children of Believers who were admitted to be members of the Church; the first sort were instructed in the principles mentioned before they were admitted unto Baptism, by the profession whereof they laid the foundation of their own personal Right thereunto. But the other being received as a part and branches of a Family whereupon the blessing of Abraham was come, and to whom the Promise of the Covenant was exbaptized in their Infancy, were to be instructed in them, as they grew up unto years of understanding. Afterwards when they were established in the
personal Obedience unto the Gospel, they were offered unto the fellowship of the Faithful. And hereon giving the same account of their Faith and Repentance which others had done before they were bapCommunion of the Church, the Elders thereof laying their hands on them in token of their Acceptation, and praying for their Confirmation in the Faith. Hence the same Doctrines became previously necessary unto both these Rites, before Baptism to them that were adult, and towards them who were baptized in Infancy before the Imposition of hands. And I do acknowledge that this was the state of things in the Apostolical Churches, and that it ought to be so in all others. Persons bapSociety of the Church. But that in those first days of the first Churches, persons were ordinarily after Baptism admitted into their Societies by Imposition of hands, is no where intimated in the Scripture. And the whole business of Confirmation is of a much later date, so that it cannot be here intended. For it must have respect unto, and express somewhat that was then in common use.
Now there is mention in the Scripture of a fourfold Imposition of hands used by the Lord Christ and his Apostles. The first was peculiar unto his own person in the way of Authoritative Benediction. Thus when he owned
Wherefore the Imposition of hands in the last sense mentioned, is that which most proImposition of hands intended, is a description of the persons that were to be instructed in the other fundamental principles, but is no principle its self. And this is not appliable unto any other of the uses of this Rite. For (2) This laying on of hands did commonly if not constantly in those days accompany or immediately follow Baptism, Acts 8. 14, 15, 16, 17. Acts 19. 6. And a thing this was of singular present use, wherein the Glory of the Gospel and its propagation were highly concerned. This was the state of things in the world. When upon the preaching of the Gospel any were converted unto Christ, and upon their profession of Faith and Repentance were baplaid their hands on them, whereon they received the Holy Ghost in a supernatural Communication of Evangelical Gifts. And this, next to the preaching of the word, was the great means which the Lord Christ made use of in the propagation of the Gospel. By the Word he
miraculous gifts he turned the thoughts of men to the consideration of what was preached, by what in an extraordinary manner was objected to their external senses. And this was not conalmost unto all Believers that were baptized, Gal. 3. 2. 1 Cor. 14. (3) In the Verse following mention is made of those who were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, that is, of his miraculous gifts and operations which were communiRite was made use of in other occasions of the Church, in imitation no doubt of this extraordinary action of the Apostles, but there is no mention of it in the Scripture nor was in use in those days, and therefore cannot be here intended. And this is the most genuine interpretation of this place. These mentioned were the principles of the Doctrine of Christ, wherein among others of the same importance they were to be well instructed, who were to be baptized and thereon to have hands laid on them, whereby the extraordinary Gifts of the Holy Ghost were communicated unto them.
But we shall allow a room also for that other Exposition of the words, which is more generally received, and in the exclusion whereof, because it complies with the Analogie of Faith, I dare not be peremptory. And this is, that the Doctrine of laying on of hands maketh one distinct principle of Christianity by its self. But then the thing signified is principally intended, namely, the Communication of the Holy Ghost unto Believers in his Gifts and Graces ordinary and extraordinary, whereof this Rite was the external Sign. And as this was peculiar to the Gospel, so it contained the principal verification of it. And this it did sundry ways: (1) Because the Promises of the Lord Christ for the sending of him were eminently and visibly accomplished. It is known that when he was leaving the world he filled his Disciples with an expectation of his sending the Holy Ghost unto them. And he did not only propose this Promise as their great supportment during his absence, but also suspended on its accomplishment, all the Duty which he required from them in the Office he had called them unto. Therefore he commanded them to abide quietly at Hierusalem without any publick engagement into their work, until they had received the Promise of the Spirit, Acts 1. 4, 8. And when this was done, it gave a full and glorious testimony, not only unto his truth in what he had told them in this world, but also unto his present exaltation and acceptation with God, as Peter declares, Acts 2. 33. (2) His Gifts themselves were such, many of them, as consisted in miraculous operations, whereby God himself gave immediate testimony to the truth of the Gospel, Heb. 2. 3, 4. God himself bearing witness (to the preachers of it) with signs and wonders, and with miracles and gifts of the Holy Ghost. This made the Doctrine concerning them of unconceivable imporjustified in the face of the world. (3) This Dispensation of the Holy Ghost was peculiar to the times of the Gospel, and was in its self a sufficient proof of the cessation of all Legal Ordinances. For it was the principal Prophecy and Promise under the Old Testament, that in the days of the Messiah the Holy Ghost should be so poured out, as I have at large elsewhere declared. And it was to be a consequent of his Glorification, Job. 7. 38, 39. Hence by the argument of their receiving the Spirit, our Apostle proves to the Galatians their freedom from the Law, Gal. 3. 2. Wherefore (4) The Doctrine concerning this Dispensation of the Spirit was peculiar to the Gospel, and so might be esteemed an especial principle of its Doctrine. For although the Church of the Jews beHoly Ghost as one Person in the Trinity, after their obscure manner of appreDispensation of him in his Gifts, though promised under the Old Testament, because not to be accomplished but under the New. Yea John the Baptist who in light into the Mystery of the Gospel, outwent all the Prophets that were before him, yet had not the Knowledge hereof communicated unto him. For those who were only baptized with his Baptism and initiated thereby into the Doctrine of Repentance for the forgiveness of Sins, had not so much as heard whether there were an Holy Ghost, that is, as unto this dispensation of him, Acts 19. 2, 3. Hereupon our Apostle instructing them in the Doctrine of the Gospel he made use of this Rite of the Imposition of hands, whereon the Holy Ghost came on them, and they spake with Tongues and prophesied, ver. 6. This therefore being so great and important a concern of the Gospel, and this being the Rite appointed to represent it by, the Doctrine concerning it, namely, the Promise of Christ to send the Holy Ghost, with the nature, use, and end of the Gifts which he wrought in Believers, is expressed, and reckoned among the first principles of Christian Religion. But the Reader is at liberty to follow whether of these interpretations
1. Persons to be admitted into the Church, and unto a participation of all the holy Ordinances thereof had need be well instructed in the important Principles of the Gospel. We have here the Rule of the Apostle and Example of the Primitive Churches for the ground of this Doctrine. And it is necessary that such persons should be so instructed on their own part, as also on the part of the Church it self. On their
2. It is not the outward Sign but the inward Grace that is principally to be considered in those Ordinances or Observances of the Church which visibly consist in Rites and Ceremonies, or have them accompanying of them. As in the Rite of Imposition of hands, the dispensation of the Holy Ghost was principally to be considered.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
And this will we do, if so be that God permit.Ver. 3.
These words contain two things. (1) The Resolution of the Apostle as to the matter and occasion before him. And this will we do. (2) A limitation of that resolution by an express submission to the will and pleasure of God, if so be that God permit.
As to the sense of the first, it is plain that the Apostle in the foregoing Verses had protwo things of very divers natures. The first hereof is, going on to perfection, ver. 1. and the other, the laying again of the foundation, ver. 2. Hence it is doubted and enquired, whether of these it be that the Apostle hath respect unto in these words, And this we will do.
This we will do, that is, either we will go on to perfection, which was exhorted unto ver. 1. and so is the more remote antecedent; or this will we do, laying again the foundation, which is the next antecedent, whereunto former and more remote antecedent, namely, going on to perfection. And they are, first what the Apostle saith, and then what he doth. In what he saith, his manner of extwice intimates his intention to omit their farther handling. Therefore leaving, or at present omitting the principles of the Doctrine of Christ, and, not laying again the foundation, ver. 1. Hereunto if we reAnd this will we do if God permit, they rather signifie the present leaving of them, than their farther handling. And he not only declares his resolution to omit them, but also gives a sufficient reason why he would do so. And this is expressed in the last Verses of the Chapter foregoing. They had already had both time and means sufficient for their instruction in these principles so that to inculcate them on those by whom they were learned and received was needless; and for those, who had either not received them, or rejected them, it was to no purpose farther to treat with them about these things, which he confirms with a severe reason and dreadful consideration, ver. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. But things are otherwise expressed concerning the other antecedent. He speaks of it positively as that which was in his purpose and design, Let us, saith he, go on to perfection, I in teaching, ye in learning, and this will we do if God permit. (2) His intention is no less evident from what he doth in this Epistle; There is indeed in this Chapter, and the last Chapter of it, mention made about Repentance, Faith, Patience, Obedience, the Worship of God, and the like; but not as principles of Doctrine, to be laid as foundation, but as Graces to be practised in the course of their Edification. But the main business he undertakes, and
carrying on of these Hebrews to perfection by the declaraPriesthood of Christ and the Prefiguration of it by that of Melchisedeck. (3) The whole series of this discourse depends on Chap. 5. ver. 10, 11. Having declared unto them that he had many things to instruct them concerning the Priesthood of Christ, as shadowed out in the Person and Office of Melchisedeck, he lets them know that he had also sundry discouragements in his design, which yet were not such, but that he would break through them and pursue his intention. Only to make his way as smooth and plain as conveniently he could, he deals with them a while about the removal of those hinderances which lay in his way on their part, and then returneth dithe reasons before insisted on, and afterwards to be added, I will proceed unto the declaration of the principal mysteries of the Gospel, especially those which concern the Priesthood of Christ, and thereby raise up the building of your Faith and Profession upon the foundation that hath been laid, whereby through the Grace of God, you may be carried on to perfection, and become skilful in the word of Righteousness.
No discouragements should deter the Ministers of the Gospel from proceeding in the declaration
of the mysteries of Christ, whose dispensation is committed unto them, when they are called thereunto. Among the various discouragements they meet withall, the least is not what ariseth from the
And these things lie plain therein. (1) That they use all means, by warnings, perstir up their people out of their slothful, careHebrews in this Chapter, leaving nothing unsaid that might excite them unto diligence and a due improvement of the means of knowledge which they enjoyed. So will they do with them that watch for their Souls as those who must give an account, and Ministers of another sort have no consome concerning whom they are perswaded of better things, and such as accompany Salvation, as our Apostle speaks
Secondly, The Limitation of this Resolution is expressed in those words, if God permit. There may be a threefold occasion of these words, or a respect unto three things in the Will of God, and consequently a threefold Exposition of them. For,
1. Respect may be had meerly and solely unto the unknown Soveraign will and pleasure of God, and so no more is intended but that general limitation and expression of our abDuty to be continually minded in all we undertake or do, Jam. 4. 13, 14, 15. If this be intended (as it is also, if not only) then it is as if he had said, If he in whose hand is my life and breath and all my ways, whose I am, whom I serve, and to whose disposal I willingly submit my self in all things, see good and be pleased to continue my life, opportunity, his assistance and all other things necessary to this work, I will proceed with my design and purpose to acquaint you with and instruct you in the great mysteries of the Priesthood and Sacrifice of Christ. See 1 Cor. 16. 7.
condition of the Hebrews whose sloth and negligence in hearing the word he hath now under reproof, and the Will or Purpose of God concerning them. For he seems to intimate unto them, that there may be some fear lest God should be so provoked by their former miscarriages, as that he would not afford them the means of farther instruction. For this is a thing which God often threatens, and which falls out oftner than we are aware of, yea most Nations of the Earth are examples of this severity of God. So a word of the same importance is used unto this purpose, as to the turning away of the Gospel from any persons or people,
3. There is a meer naked permission in God that the Apostle inif God let me alone, and as it were wink at what I am doing. But there is a supposition in it of the continuance of Gods gracious assistance and especial presence with him, without which he frequently declared that he could neither undertake nor accomplish any thing that lay before him. God can in the beginning or middle of an Epistle, or a Sermon, take us off when he pleaseth, if he do but withdraw his assistance from us. And all these respects unto the Will of God, are not only con
As it is our Duty to submit our selves in all our undertakings unto the Will of God, so
especially in those wherein his Glory is immediately concerned. In general we have a Rule given us as to the most ordinary occasions of Life, Jam. 4. 13, 14, 15. Not to do it is to disavow our dependance on God; a fruit of carnal wisdom and security, which God greatly abhorreth. Neither is there any thing which will so fill our lives with disdeference unto the Soveraign pleasure of God. This will we do if God permit; namely, the things which concern the instruction and edification of the Church, which regards the Glory of God in an especial manner. For (1) All these things are under the especial care of God, and are ordered by peculiar Wisdom. Not to submit our selves absolutely in these things unto him, is to take his own things out of his hand, and to exalt our wisdom against his, as though we knew better what belonged unto his affairs than himself. (2) We come not to have any concernment in the things of God but upon his call, and hold it at his pleasure. That is the rise and tenour of our Ministry in the Church whatever it be. And is it not just and equal that we should wholly submit in our work unto his Will, and rest in his Pleasure? It may be we have many things in our view that are desirable unto us, many things we would think meet to engage our endeavours in, as supposing them to have a great tendency to the Glory of God, in all which he hath determined contrary to our desires and aymes. All our Satisfaction lies in, and all our Duty is to be bounded by this submission.
Let them who are entrusted with means of Light, Knowledge, and Grace, improve them
with diligence, lest upon their neglect, God suffer not his Ministers farther to instruct them.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Impossibile enim, that is, est, it is impossible, Syr.
But they cannot. This respects the Power of the Persons themselves, and not the Event of things, it may be not improperly as to the sense. Beza and Erasmus, fieri non potest, it cannot be. The same with impossibile. But the use of the word very difficult, not what is absolutely denied, makes it useful to retain the same word, as in our Translation; For it is impossible.
Syr. Those who one time, or once descended unto Baptism; of which interpretation we must speak afterwards. All others, qui semel fuerint Illuminati, who were once Illuminated. Only the Aethiopick follows the Syriack; some read Illustrati to the same purpose.
vul. Lat. Gustaverant etiam donum coeleste; etiam for &. Others express the Article by the Pronoun, by reason of its Reduplication. Et gustaverint donum illud coeleste; and have tasted of that Heavenly Gift. Syr. The Gift that is from Heaven. And this the Emphasis in the Original seems to require. And have tasted of that Heavenly Gift.
Et participes facti sunt spiritus sancti. Vul. Lat. And are made partakers of the Holy Ghost. All others, facti fuerint, have been made partakers of the Holy Ghost; Syr.
Spirit of Holiness.
Vul. Lat. Et gustaverunt nihilominus bonum Dei verbum. Rhem. Have moreover tasted the good word of God. But
Virtutes
Et prolapsi sunt. Rhem. And are fallen. Others, si prolabantur; which the sense requires;
rursus renovari ad poenitentiam, to be renewed again to Repentance, rendring the active verb passively. So Beza also, ut denuo renoventur ad resipiscentiam; that they should again be renewed to Repentance. The word is active as rendered by ours, to renew them again to Repentance.
Rursum crucifigentes sibimetipsis filium Dei.
Et ostentui habentes; Rhem. And making him a mockery. Eras. ludibrio habentes. Beza, ignominiae exponentes. One of late, ad exemplum Judaeorum excruciant; torment him as did the Jews.
For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the Heavenly Gift,
and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, and have tasted the good word of God, and the Powers of the world to come, if they fall away (for' any) to renew them again to Repentance; seeing they crucifie again to themselves the Son of God, and put him unto open shame, (or treat him ignominiously.)
That this passage in our Apostles discourse hath been looked upon as accompanied with great difficulties, is known to all. And many have the Differences been about its InterLatin Church was so backward in receiving the Epistle it self, that it had not absolutely prevailed therein in the days of Hierome, as we have elsewhere declared. Wherefore it is necessary, that we should a little enquire into the occasion of the great contests which have been in the Church almost in all Ages, about the sense of this place.
It is known that the Primitive Church according to its Duty, was carefully watchful about the Holiness and upright walking of all that were admitted into the Society and Fellowship of it. Hence upon every known and visible failing, they required an open Repentance from the Offenders, before they would admit them into a participation of the sacred mysteries. But upon flagitious and scandalous crimes, such as Murder, AdulGentiles in their IdoCyprian in his banishment would not positively determine concerning those of the Church in Carthage, who had so sinned and fallen, but deferr'd his thoughts until his return; when he resolved to advise with the whole Church, and settle all things according to the counsel that should be agreed on amongst them. Yea many of his Epistles are on this subject peculiarly; and in them all, if compared together, it is eviNovatianus, wherein it had been well if his Arguments had answered his Zeal. Before this the Church of Rome was esteemed in particular more remiss in their Discipline, and more than other Churches in their re-admission unto Communion, of notorious Offenders. Hence Tertullian in his Book de Poenitentia, reflects on Zepherinus the Bishop of Rome, that he had admitted Adulterers unto Repentance, and thereby unto the Communion of the Church. But that Church proceeding in her Lenity, and every day enlarging her Charity,
But this controversie is long since buried; the generality of the Churches in the world, being sufficiently remote from that which was truly the mistake of the Novatians, yea the most of them do bear peaceably in their Communion,
But the sense of these words hath been the subject of great contests, on other occareal and true Believers, who are decyphered by the Apostle, and that their Character is given us in and by sundry intotally and finally fall from Grace, and perish Eternally. Yea it is evident that this Hypothesis of the final Apostasie of true Believers, is that which influenceth their Minds and Judgements to suppose that such are here intended. Wherefore others who will not admit that according to the tenor of the Covenant of Grace in Christ Jesus, true Believers can perish Everlastingly, do say, that either they are not here intended, or if they are, the words are only comminatory, wherein although the consequence in them in a way of arguing be true, namely, that on the supposition laid down, the inference is certain, yet the supposition is not asserted in order unto a certain consequent, whence it should follow that true Believers might so really fall away, and absolutely perish. And these things have been the matter of many contests among learned men.
Again, There have been sundry mistakes in the practical Application of the intention of these words unto the Consciences of men, mostly made by themselves who are congreat actual sin, against the Second Table after they have made a Profession of the Gospel, and having their Consciences harrassed with a sense of their Guilt, (as it will fall out where men are not greatly hardned through the deceitfulness of sin) they judge that they are fallen under the sentence denounced in this Scripture against such sinners, as they suppose themselves to be, whereby their state is irrecoverable. Others do make the same Judgement of themselves, because they have fallen from that constant compliance with their Convictions, which formerly led them unto a strict performance of Duties, and this in some course of long continuance. Now whereas it is certain, that the Apostle in this discourse gives no countenance unto the severity of the Novatians, whereby they excluded Offenders everlastingly from the Peace and Communion of the Church, nor to the final Apostasie of true Believers, which he testifieth against in this very Chapter, in compliance with innumerable other Testimonies of Scripture to the same purpose; nor doth he teach any thing whereby the Conscience of any sinner, who desires to return to God and to find acceptance with him, should be discouraged or disheartened; we must attend unto the Exposition of the words in the first place, so as not to break in upon the boundaries of other Truths, nor transgress against the Analogie of Faith. And we shall find that this whole discourse compared with other Scriptures, and freed from the prejudices that men have brought unto it, is both remote from administring any just occasion to the mistakes before-mentioned, and is a needful wholesome commination, duely to be considered by all Professors of the Gospel.
In the words we consider, (1) The connexion of them unto those foregoing, intima
1. The connexion of the word sis included in the causal connexion;
For. It reif God permit. And he doth not herein express his judgement that they to whom he wrote were such as he describes, for he afterwards declares that he hoped better things concerning them, only it was necessary to give them this caution, that they might take due care not to be such. And whereas he had manifested that they were slow as to the making of a progress in knowledge and a suitable practice; he lets them here know the danger that there was in continuing in that slothful condition. For not to proceed in the ways of the Gospel and Obedience thereunto, is an untoward entrance into a total relinquishment of the one and the other. That therefore they might be acquainted with
non-proficiency under it, do end in Apostasie from it. And we may see, That the severest Comminations are not only useful in the Preaching of the Gospel, but exceeding necessary towards persons that are observed to be slothful in their Profession.
2. The description of the Persons that are the subject spoken of, is given in five Instances of the
The first thing in the Description is, that they were once enlightened,
Syriack Translation, as we observed, once baptized; It is very certain that early in the Church, Baptism was called Illumination; and enlighten was used for to
Light or Knowledge by teaching; the same with Greeks. As by Aquila, Exod. 4. 12. Psal. 119. 33. Prov. 4. 4. Isa. 27. 11. as Drustus observes. And it is so by the LXX. Judg. 13. 8. 2 Kings 12. 2. chap. 17. 27. Our Apostle useth it for to make manifest, that is, bring to light, 1 Cor. 4. 5. 2 Tim. 1. 10. And the meaning of it, Joh. 1. 9. where we render it lighteth, is to teach. And Cor. 4. 4. that the Light of the Gospel should not shine into them; that is, the Knowledge of it, so ver. 6. The Light of the Knowledge. Wherefore to be enlightened in this place, is to be instructed in the Doctrine of the Gospel, so as to have a spiritual apprehension thereof. And this is so termed on a double account.
1. Of the Object, or the things known and apprehended. For Life and Immortality are brought to light by the Gospel, 2 Tim. 1. 10. Hence it is called Light. The Inheritance of the Saints in Light. And the state which men are thereby brought into, is so called in opPet. 2. 9. The world withJoh. 5. 19. The whole of the world, and all that belongs unto it, in distinction and opposition unto the new Creation, is under the Power of the wicked one, the Prince of the Power of Darkness, and so is full of Darkness, it is Pet. 1. a dark place, wherein ignorance, folly, error, and superstition do dwell and reign. By the Power and Efficacy of this Darkness are men kept at a distance from God, and know not whither they go. This is called walking in Darkness, 1 Joh. 1. 6. whereunto walking in the Light, that is, the Knowledge of God in Christ by the Gospel, is opposed,
2. On the account of the Subject, or the Mind it self, whereby the Gospel is apprespiritual Light in the minds of men, enabling them to discern what before was utterly hid from them, whilst alienailluminated; that is, freed from the Darkness and Ignorance they once lived in, 2 Pet. 1. 18, 19, 20. This is the first Property whereby the Persons intended are described; they are such as were illuminated by the Instruction they had received in the Doctrine of the Gospel, and the im
1. It is great Mercy, a great Priviledge, to be enlightened with the Doctrine of the Gospel' by the effectual working of the Holy Ghost. But
2. It is such a Priviledge as may be lost, and end in the aggravation of the sin, and condemnation of those who were made partakers of it. And
3. Where there is a total neglect of the due improvement of this Priviledge and Mercy, the condition of such Persons is hazardous, as inclining towards Apostasie.
Apostasie, will afterwards appear. And
1. There is a Knowledge of spiritual things, that is purely Natural and Disciplinary, attainable and attained without any especial Aid or Assistance of the Holy Ghost. As this is evident in common experience, so especially among such, as casting themselves on the study of spiritual things, are yet utter strangers unto all spiritual Gifts. Some Know
2. The Illumination intended, being a Gift of the Holy Ghost, differs from, and is exnatural. For it makes nearer approaches unto the Light of spiritual things in their own nature, than the other doth. Notwithstanding the utmost improvement of scientifical notions that are purely natural, the things of the Gospel in their own nature are not only unsuited to the Wills and Affections of Persons endued with them, but are really foolishness unto their minds. And as unto that goodspiritual Illumination gives the mind some satisfaction with Delight and Joy in the things that are known. By that Beam whereby it shines into Darkness, although it be not fully comprehended, yet it represents the way of the Gospel as a way of Righteousness, 2
Moreover the Knowledge that is meerly natural, hath little or no power upon the Soul, either to keep it from sin or to constrain it unto Obedience. There is not a more secure and profligate Generation of sinners in the world, than those who are under the sole conduct of it. But the Illumination here intended, is attended with efficacy, doth effectually press in the Conscience and whole Soul, unto an abstinence from sin, and the performance of all known Duties. Hence Persons under the Power of it and its Con
3. There is a saving, sanctifying Light and Knowledge, which this spiritual Illumination riseth not up unto. For though it transiently affect the mind with some glances of the Beauty, Glory, and Excellency of spiritual things, yet it doth not give that direct, steady, intuitive insight into them, which is obtained by Grace. See 2
The second thing asserted in the description of them, is, that they have tasted of the
Heavenly Gift;
Article gives Emphasis to the expression. And we must enquire (1) what is meant by the Heavenly Gift. And (2) what by
First, The Gift of God;
donatio, or donum. SomeGrant or giving it self, and sometimes for the thing given. In the first sense it is used, 2 Cor. 9. 15. Thanks be to God,
his Gift that cannot be declared, that is, fully or sufficiently. Now this Gift was his Grant of a free, charitable and bountiful Spirit to the Corinthians, in ministring unto the poor Saints. The Grant hereof is called Gods Gift. So is the Gift of Christ used also, Ephes. 4. 7. according to the measure of the Gift of Christ, that is, according as he is pleased to give and grant of the fruits of the Spirit unto men; see Rom. 5. 15, 17. Ephes. 3. 7. sometimes it is taken for the thing given; properly Jam. 1. 17. so it is used Joh. 4. 10. If thou knewest the Gift of God,
The Gift of God, that is, the thing given by him, or to be given by him. It is, as many judge, the Person of Christ himself in that place, which is intended. But the context makes it
Holy Ghost; For he is the Living water which the Lord Jesus prothe Gift, with respect unto God as denoting the thing given, is no where used but only to signifie the Holy Ghost. And if it be so, the sense of this place is determined, Acts 2. 38. Ye shall receive
the Gift of the Holy Ghost; not that which he gives, but that which he is, Chap. 8. 20. Thou hast thought
that the Gift of God may be purchased with money, that is, the Power of the Holy Ghost in miraculous Opechap. 10. 45. chap. 11. 17. Elsewhere, grant it self. The Holy Spirit is signally the Gift of God under the New Testament.
And he is said to be heavenly, or from Heaven. This may have respect heavenly as opposed to carnal and earthly. But prinMission by Christ after his Ascension into Heaven, Acts 2. 33. Being exalted and having received the Promise of the Father, he sent the Spirit. The Promise of him was, that he should be sent from Heaven, or from above, as God is said to be above, which is the same with Heavenly, Deut. 4. 39. 2 Chron. 5. 23. Job 31. 2, 8. Isa. 2. 2, 15. and chap. 45. 8. When he came upon the Lord Christ to anoint him for his work, the Heavens were opened, and he came from above, Matth. 3. 16. so Acts 2. 2. At his first coming on the Apostles, there came a sound from Heaven. Hence he is said to be sent from Heaven, 1 Pet. 1. 12. Wherefore although he may be said to be Heavenly upon other acsent from Heaven by Christ, after his Ascension thither, and exaltation there, is principally here regarded. He therefore is this heavenly Gift here intended, though not absolutely, but with respect to an especial work.
That which riseth up against this Interpretation, is, that the Holy Ghost is expresly mentioned in the next clause, And were made partakers of the Holy Ghost. It is not there
Answ. (1) It is ordinary to have the same thing twice expressed in various words, to quicken the sense of them; and it is necessary it should be so, when there are divers re
(2) The following clause may be exegetical of this, declaring more fully and plainly what is here intended which is usual also in the Scrptures; so that nothing is cogent from this consideration, to disprove an Interpretation so suited to the sense of the place, and which the constant use of the word makes necessary to be embraced. But,
(3) The Holy Ghost is here mentioned as the great Gift of the Gospel times, as coming down from Heaven, not absolutely, not as unto his Person, but with respect unto an espeChap. 9. 10. The Lord Christ when he ascended into Heaven, left all things standing and continuing in Religious Worship, as they had done from the days of Moses, though he had virtually put an end unto it. And he commanded his Disciples that they should attempt no alteration therein, until the Holy Ghost were sent from Heaven to enable them thereunto, Acts 1. 4, 5. But when he came as the great Gift of God, promised under the New Testament, he removes all the carnal Worship and Ordinances of Moses, and that by the full Revelation of the Accomplishment of all that was signified by them, and appoints the new, holy, spiritual Worship of the Gospel, that was to succeed in their room. The Spirit of God therefore, as bestowed for the introduction of the New Gospel state, in Truth and Worship, is the Heavenly Gift here intended. Thus our Apostle warneth these Hebrews, that they turn not away from him who speaketh from Heaven, chap. 12. 25. that is, Jesus Christ speaking in the Dispensation of the Gospel by the Holy Ghost sent from Heaven. And there is an Antithesis included herein, between the Law and the Gospel; the former being given on Earth, the latter being immediately from Heaven. God in the giving of the Law made use of the Ministry of Angels, and that on the Earth; but he gave the Gospel Church state, by that Spirit which although he worketh on men in Earth, and is said in every Act or Work to be sent from Heaven, yet is he still in Heaven, and always speaketh from thence; as
Joh. 3. 13.
Secondly, We may enquire what it is to taste of this Heavenly Gift. The expression tasting is metaphorical, and signifies no more but to make a Trial or Experiment; For so we do by tasting, naturally and properly of that which is tendred unto us to eat. We taste such things by the sense given us naturally to discern our food, and then either reeating, much less Digestion and turning into nourishment of what is so tasted. For its nature being only thereby discerned, it may be refused, yea though we like its relish and savour upon some other consideration. Some have observed that to taste is as much as to eat, as 2 Sam. 3. 35. I will not taste bread, or ought else. But the meaning is, I will not so much as taste it, whence it was impossible he should eat it. And when Jonathan says he only tasted a little of the Honey, 1 Sam. 14. 29. it was an excuse and extenuation of what he had done. But it is unquestionably used for some kind of experience of the nature of things, Prov. 31. 18. she tasteth that her merchandize is good, or hath experience of it, from its increase, Psal. 34. 8. O taste and see that the Lord is good; which Peter respects, 1 Epist. 2. 3. If so be that ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious, or found it so by experience. It is therefore properly to make an experiment or trial of any thing, whether it be received or refused; and is sometimes opposed to eating and digestion, as Matth. 27. 34. That therefore which is ascribed unto these Persons, is, that they had an experience of the Power of the Holy Ghost, that Gift of God, in the Dispensation of the Gospel, the Revelation of the Truth, and Institution of the spiritual Worship of it; of this state and of the excellency of it, they had made some trial, and had some experitaste they were convinced, that it was far more excellent than what they had been before accustomed unto, although now they had a mind to leave the finest Wheat for their old Acorns. Wherefore although tasting contain a Diminution in it, if compared with that spiritual eating and drinking, with that Digestion of Gospel Truths, turning them into nourishCharacter given concerning these Apostates is, that they had some experience of the Power and Efficacy of the Holy Spirit from Heaven, in Gospel Administrations and Worship. For what some say of Faith, it hath here no place; and what others affirm of Christ, and his being the Gift of God, comes in the issue unto what we have proposed. And we may observe, farther to clear the Design of the Apostle in this Commination,
1. That all the Gifts of God under the Gospel are peculiarly Heavenly, Joh. 3. 12. Ephes. 1. 3. and that in opposition, (1) To earthly things, Col. 3. 11, 12. (2) To carnal Ordinances, Heb. 9. 23. let them beware by whom they are despised.
2. The Holy Ghost for the Revelation of the mysteries of the Gospel, and the Institution of the Ordinances of spiritual Worship, is the great Gift of God under the New Testament.
3. There is a Goodness and Excellency in this Heavenly Gift, which may be tasted or experienced in some measure by such as never receive him, in their life, power and efficacy. They may
4. A Rejection of the Gospel, its Truth and Worship, after some experience had of their worth and excellency, is an high Aggravation of Sin, and a certain presage of Destruction.
The Third Property whereby these Persons are described is added in those words, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost.
personal Inhabitation, or as unto spiritual Operations. In the first way the world cannot receive him, Joh. 14. 17. where the world is opposed unto true Believers, and therefore these here intended were not in that sense partakers of him. His Operations respect his Gifts. So to partake of him is to have a
All these worketh that one and self-same Spirit, dividing unto every one severally as he will, 1
But whereas the other things mentioned are also Gifts or Operations of the Holy Ghost, on what Ground or for what Reason is this mentioned here in particular, that they were made Partakers of him, which if his Operations only be intended, seems to be expressed in the other Instances?
Answ. (1) It is, as we observed before, no unusual thing in the Scripture, to express the same thing under various notions, the more effectually to impress a conEmphasis in it, as this hath here used; For it is an exceeding Aggravation of the sins of these Apostates, that in these things they were Partakers of the Holy Ghost.
(2) As was before intimated also, this participation of the Holy Ghost, is placed it may be in the midst of the several parts of this Description, as that whereon they do all depend, and they are all but Instances of it. They were partakers of the Holy Ghost, in that they were once enlightened, and so of the rest.
(3) It expresseth their own personal Interest in these things. They had an interest in the things mentioned not only Objectively, as they were proposed and presented to them in the Church, but Subjectively they themselves in their own Persons were made partakers of them. It is one thing for a man to have a share in, and benefit by the Gifts of the Church, another to be personally himself endowed with them.
(4) To mind them in an especial manner of the Priviledges they enjoyed under the Gospel, above what they had in their Judaisme. For, whereas then they had not so much as heard that there was an Holy Ghost, that is, a blessed Dispensation of him in spiritual Gifts, Acts 19. 2. now they themselves in their own persons were made Par
The Holy Ghost is present with many as unto powerful Operations, with whom he is not present as to gracious Inhabitation: Or many are made Partakers of him in his spiritual Gifts, who are never made Partakers of him in his
Fourthly, It is added in the Description, that they had tasted The Good Word of God. And we must enquire, (1) What is meant by the Word of God.
Good; and (3) In what sense they taste of it.
1. verbum dictum, a word spoken; and although it be sometimes used in another sense by our Apostle, and by him alone, chap. 1. 3. chap. 11. 3. where it denotes the effectual active power of God; yet both the signification of the word, and its principal use elsewhere, denotes words spoken, and when applied unto God, his word as preached and declared. See Rom. 10. 17. Joh. 6. 68. The Word of God, that is, the Word of the Gospel as preached, is that which they thus tasted of. But it may be said, that they enjoyed the Word of God in their state of Judaisme; They did so, as to the written word; for unto them were committed the Oracles of God, Rom. 3. 2. But it is the word of God as preached in the Dispensation of the Gospel that is eminently thus called, and concerning which such excellent things are spoken, Rom. 1. 16. Acts 20. 32. Jam. 1. 21.
2. The word is said to be good, desireable, amiable, as the word here used signifieth. Wherein it is so, we shall see immediately. But whereas the Word of God preached under the Dispensation of the Gospel may be considered two ways; (1) In general, as to the whole systeme of Truths contained therein; and (2) In especial, for the Declaration made of the Accomplishment of the Promise in sending Jesus Christ for the Redemption of the Church; it is here especially intended in this latter sense. This is emphatically called Pet. 1. 25. So the Promise of God in particular is called his Good word; Jer. 29. 10. After seventy years I will visit you and perform my good word towards you; as he calls it the Good thing that he had promised, chap. 33. 14. The Gospel is the good tiding of Peace and Salvation by Jesus Christ, Isa. 52. 7.
to taste, as they were before of the Heavenly Gift. The ApoJoh. 6. 35, 49, 50, 51, 54, 55. It is, as if he had said, I speak not of those who have received and digested the spiritual Food of their Souls, and turned it into spiritual nourishment, but of such as have so far tasted of it, as that they ought to have desired it as sincere milk, to have grown thereby; But they had received such an experiment of its Divine Truth and Power, as that it had various effects upon them. And for the further Explication of these words, and therein of the De
1. There is a Goodness and Excellency in the Word of God, able to attract and affect the minds of men, who yet never arrive at sincere Obedience unto it.
2. There is an especial Goodness in the Word of the Promise concerning Jesus Christ, and the Declaration of its Accomplishment.
Lastly, It is added, And the Powers of the world to
come,
Hebrews, hath been declared in our Exposition on chap. 2. 4. whither I shall refer the Reader; and they are known from the Acts of the Apostles, where sundry Instances of them are recorded. I have also proved on that Chapter, that by the world to come, our Apostle in this Epistle intends the days of the Messiah, that being the usual name of it in the Church at that time, as the new world which God had promised to create. Wherefore these Powers of the world to come, were the Gifts whereby those signs, wonJoel 2. compared with Acts 2. These the Persons spoken of, are supposed to have tasted, for the particle Gifts of Tongues, and other miextraordinary Gifts exclusively unPowers of the world to come. So is every thing that belongs to the Erection or Preservation of the New world or the Kingdom of Christ. To the first setting up of a Kingdom, great and mighty Power is required; but being set up, the ordinary Dispensation of Power will preserve it; so is it in this matter. The extraordinary miraculous Gifts of the Spirit were used in the Erection of Christs Kingdom, but it is continued by ordinary Gifts, which therefore also belong unto the Powers of the world to come.
From the consideration of this Description, in all the parts of it, we may understand what sort of Persons it is, that is intended here by the Apostle. And it appears, yea is evident,
1. That the Persons here intended, are not true and sincere Believers in the strict and proper sense of that name, at least they are not described here as such; so that from hence nothing can be concluded concerning them that are so, as to the possibility of their total and final Apostasie. For (1) There is in their full and large Description no mention of Faith or Believing, either expresly, or in terms equivalent. And in no other place in the Scripture are such intended, but they are mentioned by what belongs essentially to their state. And (2) There is not any thing ascribed to these persons, that is peculiar to them as such, or discriminative of them, as taken either from their especial Relation unto God in Christ, or any such Property of their own, as is not communicable unto others. For instance, they are not said to be called according to Gods purpose, to be born again not of the Will of Man, nor of the Will of Flesh, but of God, not to be justified, or sanctified, or united unto Christ, or to be the Sons of God by Adoption, nor have they any other characteristical note of true Believers ascribed to them. (3) They are in the
rain often falls, and beareth nothing but Thorns and Briars. But this is not so with true Believers. For Faith it self is an Herb peculiar to the inclosed Garden of Christ, and meet for him by whom we are dressed. (4) The Apostle afterwards discoursing of
2. Our next enquiry is more particularly whom he doth intend. And (1) They were such who not long before were converted from Judaisme unto Christianity, upon the evicommon sort of them, but such as had obtained especial Priviledges among them. For they had received extraordinary Gifts of the Holy Ghost, as speaking with Tongues or working Miracles. And (3) They had found in themselves and other convincing evidences, that the Kingdom of God and the Messiah, which they called the world to come, was come unto them, and had satischange wrought upon their Affections and in their Conversation, as that they may be of great esteem among Professors; and such these here intended might be. Now it must needs be some horrible frame of spirit, some malitious enmity against the Truth and Holiness of Christ and the Gospel, some violent Love of sin and the world, that could turn off such Persons as these from the Faith, and blot out all that Light and Conviction of Truth, which they had received. But the least Grace is a better security for Heaven, than the greatest Gifts and Priviledges whatever.
These are the Persons concerning whom our Apostle discourseth, and of whom it is supposed by him, that they may fall away,
fall away, do that whereby they do so. I think we have well expressed the word, if they shall fall away. Our old Translations render it only, if they shall fall, which expressed not the sense of the word, and was liable to a sense not at all intended. For he doth not say, if they shall fall into sin, this or that or any sin whatever that can be named, suppose the greatest sin imaginable, namely, the denial of Christ in the time of Danger or Persecution. This was that sin (as we intimated before) about which so many contests were raised of old, and so many Canons were multiplied about the orderPeter fell into this sin, and yet was renewed again to Repentance, and that speerenew him to Repentance. It must therefore (secondly) be a course of sin or sinning that is intended. But there are various degrees herein also, yea there are divers kinds of such courses in sin. A man may so fall into a way of sin, as still to retain in his mind such a Principle of Light and Conviction that may be suitable to his Recovery. To exclude such from all hopes of Repentance, is expresly contrary to Ezek. 18. 21. Isa. 55. 7. yea and the whole sense of the Scripture. Wherefore men after some ConManasseh; consider the nature of his Education under his Father Hezekiah, the greatness of his sins, the length of his continuance in them, with his following Recovery, and he is a great Instance in this case. Whilst
3. Our Apostle makes a distinction between Rom. 11. 11. between stumbling and falling, and would not allow that the unbelieving Jews of those days, were come so far as absolutely,
I say then have they stumbled, that they should fall? God forbid; that is, absolutely and irrecoverably. So therefore doth that word signifie in this place. And
From what hath been discoursed it will appear, what falling away it is that the Apostle here intendeth. And,
(1) It is not a falling into this or that actual sin, be it of what nature it will, which may be, and yet not be a falling away.
(2) It is not a falling upon temptation or surprisal, for concerning such fallings we have rules of another kind given us in sundry places, and those exempli
(3) It is not a falling by a Relinquishment or Renunciation of some though very material Principles of Christian Religion by Error or Seduction, as the Corinthians fell, in denying the Resurrection of the dead, and the Galatians by denying Ju
(4) It must consist in a total Renunciation of all the constitutent Principles and DoJudaisme, as it was then stated, in opposi
(5) For the compleating of this falling away according to the intention of the Apostle, it is required that this Renunciation be avowed and professed; as, when a man forsaketh the Profession of the Gospel, and falls into Judaisme or Mahumatisme, or Gentilisme, in Perswasion and Practice. For the Apostle discourseth concerning Faith and Obedience as professed, and so therefore also of their contraries. And this avowment of a Relinquishment of the Gospel hath many provoking Aggravafalling away is compleat and total in the sight of God; and all they do to cover their Apostasie in an exter
This is the falling away intended by the Apostle; A voluntary resolved Re
Concerning these Persons and their thus falling away, two things are to be conWhat is affirmed of them. (2) The Reason of that Affirmation.
The first is, That it is impossible to renew them again to Repentance. The thing innegative; to renew them again to Repentance, this is denied of them; but the modification of that negation, turns the Proposition into an Affirmation; It is impossible so to do.
absolute,
may be or may not be, as they respect him or his will. And so things that are future may be said to be impossible, or be so, either with respect unto the nature of God, or his Decrees, or his moral Rule, Order and Law. Things are imimpossible, that God should lye; or on some supposition, so it is impossible, that God should forgive sin without satisfaction, on the supposition of his Law, and the Sanction of it. In this sense the Repentance of these Apostates it may be is not impossible. I say, it may be; It may be there is nothing in it contrary to any Essential Properties of the Nature of God, either directly or reductively. But I will not be positive herein. For the things ascribed unto these Apostates are such, namely, their crucifying the Son of God afresh, and putting him unto open shame, as that I know not but that it may be conDevils themselves, or those that are in Hell. But I will not assert this to be the meaning of the place.
Again, Things possible in themselves, and with respect unto the Nature of God, are rendered impossible by Gods Decree and Purpose: He hath absolutely deterSaul and his Posterity should be preserved in the Kingdom of Israel. It was not contrary to the Nature of God, but God had decreed that so it should not be, 1 Sam. 15. 28, 29. But the Decrees of God respecting Persons in particular, and not Qualifications in the first place, they cannot be here intended; because they are free acts of his Will, not revealed neither in particular, nor by virtue of any general Rule, as they are Soveraign, making differences between Persons in the same condition, Rom. 9. 11, 12. What is possible or impossible with respect unto the Nature of God, we may know in some good measure from the certain knowledge we may have of his Being and Essential Properties. But what is so one way or other with respect unto his Decrees or Purposes, which are Soveraign free Acts of his Will, knoweth no man, not the Angels in Heaven, Isa. 40. 13, 14. Rom. 11. 34.
Thirdly, Things are possible or impossible with respect unto the Rule and Order of all things that God hath appointed. When in things of Duty God hath neiimpossible, and then with respect unto us they are so absolutely, and so to be esteemed. And this is the Impossibility here principally in
The Apostle instructs us no farther in the nature of future events, but as our own Duty is concerned in them. It is not for us either to look or hope, or pray for, or endeavour the Renewal of such Persons unto Repentance. God gives Law un
That which is said to be thus impossible with respect unto these Persons, is to renew them again to Repentance,
gracious change of mind on Gospel Principles and Promises, leading the whole Soul into Conversion unto God.
This is the beginning and entrance of our turning unto God, without which, neither the Will nor the Affections will be engaged unto him, nor is it possible for sinners to find acceptance with him.
It is impossible to renew. The construction of the word is dethemselves; it is not possible they should do so, or some should, that any should renew them,
Renewed, and what it is to be Renewed again.
Now our again unto him. For as we had lost the Image of God
First, Real and internal in Regeneration and effectual Sanctification. The washing of Regeneration and the renewing of the Holy Ghost, Tit. 3. 5. 1
Secondly, It is outward in the Profession and Pledge of it. Wherefore RenovaHim who is the Author of it, his Grace which is the Cause of it, and the Ordinance which is the Pledge thereof.
Hence it appears what it is, to renew them again. It is to bring them again into this state of Profession by a second Renovation, and a second Baptism as a Pledge thereof. This is determined impossible, and so unwarrantable for any to attempt. And for the most part such persons do openly fall into such Blasphemies against, and engage (if they have power) into such Persecution of the Truth, as that they give themselves sufficient Direction how others should beJulian. This is the sum concerning what is affirmed of these Apostates, namely, that it is impossible to renew them unto Repentance, that is, so to act towards them as to bring them to that Repentance whereby they may be enstated in their former condition.
Hence sundry things may be observed for the clearing the Apostles Design in this Discourse. As,
(1) Here is nothing said concerning the Acceptance or Refusal of any upon Repentance or the Profession thereof after any sin, to be made by the Church, whose Judgement is to be determined by other rules and circumstances. And this per
(2) Here is nothing that may be brought in bar against such as having fallen ingreat sin, or any course in sinning, and that after Light, Convictions, and Gifts received and exercised, who desire to repent of their sins and endeavour after sincerity therein. Yea such a desire and endeavour exempts any one from the Judgement here threatened.
There is therefore in it that which tends greatly to the encouragement of such sinners. For, whereas it is here declared concerning those who are thus rejected of God, that it is impossible to renew them, or to do any thing towards that which shall have a tendency to Repentance; those who are not satisfied that they do yet savingly repent, but only are sincerely exercised how they may attain thereunto, have no concernment in this Commination, but evidently have the door of mercy
Impossibility intended of what sort soever it be, respects the severity of God, not in refusing or rejecting the greatest sinners which seek after and would be renewed unto Repentance, which is contrary unto innumerable of his Promises; but in the giving up such sinners as these are here mentioned, unto that obdurateness and obstinacy in sinning, that blindness of mind, and hardness of heart, as that they neither can nor shall ever sincerely seek after Repentance, nor may any means according to the mind of God be used to bring them thereunto. And the Righteousness of the exercise of this severity is taken from the nature of this sin or what is contained in it, which the Apostle declares in the ensuing Instances.
What the Apostle had Doctrinally instructed the Hebrews in before, in these Verses he layeth before them under an apposite similitude. For his Design herein is to reunfruitful and Apostatizing Professors, whom here he represents by unprofitable Ground, and Gods dealing with them as men do with such Ground when they have Tilled it in vain. For the Church is a Vine or Vineyard, and God is the Husbandman, Joh. 15. 1. Isa. 5. 1, 2, 3. But here moreover for the greater Illustration of what he affirms concerning such Persons, he compriseth in his similitude the contrary state of sound Believers and fruitful Professors, with the acceptance they have with, and blessing they receive from God. And contraries thus compared do illustrate one another, as also the Design of him who treateth concerning them. We need not therefore engage into a particular Enquiry what it is which the word For, whereby these Verses are annexed and continued unto the precedent, doth peculiarly and immediately respect, concerning which there is some difference among Expositors. Some suppose it is the dealing of God with Apostates before laid down which the Apostle regards, and in these Verses gives an account of the Reason of it, or whence it is they come unto such a woful End. Others observing that in his wholle ensuing Discourse he insists principally if not only on the state of sound Believers and their acceptance with God, suppose he hath immediate respect unto what he hath declared in the beginning of the Chapter, ver. 1, 3. concerning his Design to carry them on unto Perfection. But there is no need that we should restrain his purpose to either of these intentions exclusively unto the other; yea it is contrary to the plain scope of his Discourse so to do. For he compriseth both sorts of Professors and gives a lively representation of their condiexclusively, but extends it self equally to the whole subject treated of.
There is not any thing materially to be observed concerning these words in any Translations ancient or modern; They all agree unless one or two that openly deSyriack rendred propter quos, for whom; all others read per quos, or a quibus, by whom; only ours mark for whom in the Margin, which indeed is the more usual signification of Accusative Case. But that is not inGenitive. And although this be not usual in other Authors, yet unquestionable Instances of it may be given, and amongst them that of Demosten. Olint. 1. is eminent.
For the Earth which drinketh in the Rain, that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth Herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth Blessing from God. But that which beareth Thorns and Briars, is rejected, and is nigh unto Cursing, whose End is to be burned.
Some things must be observed concerning this similitude in general, before we enquire into the particular parts of it. (1) The Application of it, is left included in the proposition of the similitude it self, and is not exEarth by its Culture, Fruit or Barrenness, but nothing is especially added of the things signified hereby, although those are principally intended. And the way of Reasoning herein, as it is compendious, so it is plain and instructive, because the Analogie between the things produced in the similitude, and the things signified, is plain and evident, both in it self and from the whole discourse of the Apostle.
(2) There is a common subject of the whole similitude branched out into distinct parts, with very different Events ascribed unto them. We must therefore consider, both what is that common subject, as also wherein the distinct parts whereinto it is branched, do agree on the one hand, and differ on the other. (1) The common subject is the Earth; of the nature whereof both Branches are equally participant. Originally and naturally they differ not, they are both the Earth. (2) On this common subject in both Branches of it, the Rain equally falls; not upon one more and the other less, not upon one sooner and the other later. (3) It is equally dressed, tilled, or manured by or for the use of some. One part doth not lie neg
In these things there is an Agreement, and all is equal in both Branches of the common subject. But hereon a partition is made or a Distribution of this common subject into two parts or sorts with a double difference between them; and that (1) On their own part, (2) Of Gods dealing with them. For (1) The one part brings forth Herbs which are described by their usefulness, they are meet for them by whom they are dressed. The other bare Thorns and Briars, things not only of no use or advantage, but moreover noxious and hurtful. (2) They differ in the consereceiveth Blessing from God, the other in opposition unto this Blessing from God, (whence we may also learn what is contained therein) is first rejected, then cursed, then burned.
Before I proceed to the particular Explication of the words, Enquiry must be made into the especial Design of the Apostle in them with respect unto these Hebrews. For here is not only a Threatening of what might come to pass, but a particular prediction of what would come to pass, and a Declaration of what was already in part accomplished. For by the Earth he understands in an especial manner the Church and Nation of the Jews. This was Gods Vineyard, Isa. 5. 7, 8. Hereunto he sent all his Ministers and last of all his Son, Matth. 21. 35. Jer. 2. 21. And to them he calls, O Earth, Earth, Earth hear the word of the Lord, Jer. 22. 29. Upon this Earth the Rain often fell in the Ministerial Dispensation of the Word unto that Church and People. With respect hereunto Christ says unto them how often would I have gathered thy Children, Matth. 23. 37. as here the Rain is said to fall often upon it.
This was the Earth wherein were the Plants of Gods especial planting. And these were all now distributed into two parts. (1) Those who Believing and Obeying the Gospel brought forth the fruits of Repentance, Faith and new Obenew Creation, our Apostle compares to the Earth in the old Creation, when it was first made by God and blessed of him. Then in the first place it brought forth Herb meet for him that made and blessed it, Gen. 1. 11. And these were still to be continued the Vineyard of God, a Field which he cared for. This was that Gospel Church gathered of the Hebrews which brought forth fruit to the Glory of God, and was blessed of him.
For (2) the remainder of this People, the residue of this Earth, it was made up of two sorts, which are both of them here cast under the same lot and condition. There were obstinate unbelievers on the one hand, who pertinaciously rejected Christ and the Gospel, with Hypocritical Apostates on the other, who having for a season embraced its Profession, fell off again unto their Judaisme. All these the Apostle compares unto the Earth when the Covenant of God with the Creation was broken by the sin of man and it was put under the Curse. Hereof it is said Gen. 3. 18. it beareth Thorns and Briars. Such was this Church and People now they had broken and rejected the Covenant of God by their Unbelief, Earth that brought forth Thorns and Briars. The best of them was as a Briar and the most upright of them as a Thorn Hedge, then was the Day of their Prophets nigh, the Day of their Visitation foretold by the Prophets their Watchmen, Micah 7. 4. So God threatened that when he rejected his Vineyard it should bring forth Briars and Thorns, Isa. 5. 6.
And of these unbelieving and Apostate Hebrews of this barren Earth, the Apostle affirmeth three things.
(1) That it was rejected, or not approved, that is of God. Hereof they boasted, and herein they continued yet to pride themselves, that God owned them, that they were his People, and preferred them above all others. But although God was pleased yet to exercise patience towards them, yet he had pronounced concerning them in general, that they were not his People, that he owned them not. Thorns and Briars were come upon their Altars, so that both their Persons and Wor
(2) It was nigh unto Cursing. And this Curse which it was now very nigh unto had in it (1) Barrenness; and (2) an unalterable and irrevocable Destination unto Destruction. (1) It had in it Barrenness. For this Church of the Jews made up now of Infidels and Apostates was represented by the Figg-tree cursed by our SaviMatth. 21. 19. He said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever, and presently the Figg-tree withered away. After this time the Gospel having been sufficiently tendred unto them, and rejected by them, there was no more of saving Faith, Repentance, or Obedience, nothing that was acceptable unto God, in HoMany Jews were after this converted, but the Church of the Jews never bare any more Fruits unto God. And (2) they were devoted unto Destruction. The close of the Old Testament, and therein of the immediate solemn Revelation of God unto that Church was, that if they received not the Lord Christ after the coming and Ministry of Elijah, that is, of John the Baptist, that God would come and smite the whole Earth with a Curse, Mal. ult. He would make it a thing anathematized or sacredly devoted unto Destruction,
When God first brought them into his Land, which was to be the seat of his Ordinances and solemn Worship, the first Town that they came unto was Jericho. This therefore God anathematized or devoted to perpetual Destruction, with a Curse upon him that should attempt its Re-edification, Joh. 6. 17. The whole Land thereJerusalem, and consequently the whole Church was now to be made as Jericho; and the Curse denounced was now speedily to be put in Execution, wherein the Land was to be alienated from their Right unto it, and be devoted to Desolation.
(3) The End of all this was that this Earth should be burned. An universal Desolation according to the Prediction of our Saviour by Fire and Sword, repre
This was the especial Design of the Apostle with respect unto these Hebrews; And he adds this Scheme or Dclineation of the present and approaching Condition of that Apostatized Church, to give Terror unto the Commination that he gave unto unprofitable Professors. But whereas all things unto the very last happened
Types, and the Condition of the Churches of the Gospel is repre
1. The Subject of the proposition in the similitude, is the Earth; and that which is represented thereby, is the Hearts and Minds of all those to whom the Gospel Seed, and compares the Hearers of it unto several sorts of Ground whereinto that Seed is cast. And the Allusion is wonderful apposite and instructive.
For (1) Seed is the principle of all things living; of all things that having any kind of natural Life, are capable of natural increase, growth, and furit. And whatever they arrive unto, it is but the actuating of the vital seed from whence they do proceed. So is the Word of the Gospel unto all spiritual Life, 1 Pet. 1. 23. And Believers because of their growth, increase, and fruit, from this vital principle or
(2) The Earth is the only fit and proper subject for seed to be put into, and alone is capable of the Culture or Husbandry that is to be used about it. God hath made no other matter or subject to receive the seeds of things that may bring forth fruit; no man casts Seed into the Air or Water. It was of the Earth alone that God said, Let it bring forth Grass, the Herb yielding Seed, and the Fruit-tree yielding Fruit after its kind, whose Seed is in it self upon the Earth, Gen. 1. 11, 12. The Earth alone hath a passive power to be made fruitful, it hath that matter in it which being cultivated, disposed, excited, sowed, planted, blessed, may bring forth Fruit. So it is with the Souls of men with respect unto the Seed of the Word. Their Minds, and they alone, are a subject capable of receiving of it, and improving it. They are the only meet Object of Divine Care and Culture. The faculties of our Souls, our Minds, Wills and Affections are meet to entertain the Gospel, and to bring forth the Fruits of it, whereof nothing is found in any other Creatures on the Earth. Hence we are Cor. 3. 9. Gods Husbandry, the Ground or Field that he tilleth. As Christ mystical comprising all Professors is the Vine, and his Father is the Husbandmam, Joh. 15. 1. by whom it is dressed and pruned.
(3) The Earth by and of it self, in the state wherein it is, brings forth nothing that is good or useful. Upon its first Creation it was inlaid and impregnated by the Blessing of God with all Seeds of useful Herbs and Fruits. But after the enBarrenness as unto its first usefulness, and brings forth nothing of it self but Thorns, Briars, and noxious Weeds, at least those in such abundance as to choke and corrupt all the Remainders of useful Seeds and Plants in it. It is like the Field of the slothful grown over with Thorns, and Nettles cover the face thereof. Especially it is condemned to utter Barrenness, if the Rain fall not on it; whereof afterwards. And such are the Hearts and Minds of men by nature. They are dark, barren, unprofitable, and which without DiWeeds still; and among the Fruits of unsanctified Minds some may carry a more specious appearance than others; but they are all, spiritually consi
The Minds of all men by Nature are universally and equally barren with respect unto Fruits of Righteousness and Holiness, meet for and acceptable unto God. They are all Intellectual Abilities. Some are of a far more piercing and sagacious UnderGentleness, Sobriety and Modesty; when others from their constitution are Morose, Passionate and Perverse.
immersed in all vitious Abominations. There are therefore on these and the like Accounts great Differences among men, wherein some are incomparaFruits of spiritual Holiness and Righteousness all men by nature are
Of this Earth it is said, that it drinks in the Rain that comes often upon it. SomeBarren Earth to make it fruitful. Rain. And that is described, by (1) its Communication or apfalls upon it; (2) An especial Adjunct thereof in its frequency, it falls often on it. (3) By that Reception which the Earth is naturally fitted and suited to give unto it; it drinketh it in.
The thing it self is Rain. This is that whereby alone the Earth otherwise dry and barren is impregnated and made fruitful. For there is therein a CommunicaRain did fall God caused a vapour to arise which supplied the use of it and watered the Earth, Gen. 2. 6. So the Poet expresseth it,
Tum Pater omnipotens foecundis imbribus Aether, Conjugis in gremium late descendit & omnes Magnus alit, magno commistus corpore, foetus. Georg. 2.
And wetting shower, not a Storm, not a violence of Rain causing an inundation, which tends to Barrenness and Sterility, nor such as is unseasonable and spoils the Fruits of the Earth, but a plentiful shower is intended; for Aristotle observes.
(2) This Rain falls on the Ground. And (3) It is said to fall often or frequeniteratis vicibus. The Land of Canaan is commended that it was not like the Land of Aegypt where the Seed was sowed and watered with the Foot; but that it was a Land of Hills and Valleys and did drink water of the Rain of Heaven, Deut. 11. 10, 11. And they had commonly two seasons of it, the former whereof they called Joreh, and the latter Malcosh, Deut. 11. 14. The former fell about October in the beginning of their year, when their Seed was cast into the Ground, and the Earth as it were taught thereby (as the Word signifies) to apply it self unto the Seed, and to become fruitful. The other fell about March when their Corn was grown up, filling the Straw and Ear for the Harvest, as the word probably signifies. Hence it is said that Jordan overfloweth all his Banks at the time of Harvest, Josh. 3. 15. 1 Chron. 12. 15. which was occasioned by the fallMalcosh or this latter Rain. And that this was in the first Month or March, which was the entrance of their Harvest, it is evident from hence, in that immediately after they had passed over Jordan during the swelling of its waters, they kept the Passeover at Gilgal on the fourteenth of that first Month, chap. 5. 10. Whilst they had these Rains in their proper seasons, the Land was fruitful; and it was by with-holding of them that God punished them with the Barrenness of the Earth, and Famine thereon ensuing. Besides these, in good seasons, they had many other occasional showers; as mention is made of the showers on the mown Grass. Hence it is here supposed that the Rain falls often on this Earth.
Again, The Earth is said to drink in the Rain. The Expression is Metaphorical but common. drinking take in water into their inward parts and bowels. To do thus is peculiar unto the Earth. If the Rain falls upon Rocks or Stones, it runs off from them, it hath no admission into them. But into the Earth it soaks more or less, according as the condition of the Ground is more or less receptive of it. And it is the nature of the Earth as it were to suck in these moistening Rains that fall upon it, until it be even inebriated, Psal. 65. 10. Thou visitest the Earth. and
watereth it, thou waterest the Ridges thereof abundantly, thou setlest the Furrows thereof.
This is the Earth, the Minds and Consciences of men are intended, was before declared; and it is as evident what is meant by the Rain. Yet some suppose that the Gifts of the Holy Ghost before treated of may be designed by the Apostle. For in the communication of them the Holy Spirit is frequently said to be poured out, that is, as Water or Rain. But this Rain is said to fall often on the Earth, (yea upon that Earth which continueth utterly barren) in one shower after another. And this can be no way accommodated unto the Dispensation of the Gifts of the Spirit. For they being once communicated, if they be not exercised and improved, God gives no more showers of them. It is therefore the Administration of the Word that, is inRain and watering, Deut. 32. 2. My Doctrine shall drop as the Rain, my Speech shall distill as the Dew, as the small Rain upon the tender Herb, and as the Showers upon the Grass. And where God denies his Word unto any people, he says, upon them there shall be no Rain, Zech. 14. 17. And hence to drop as the Rain doth is an expression for Prophesying or Preaching, Ezek. 21. 2. Amos 7. 16. the showers whereof are sometimes more soft and gentle, sometimes more earnest and pressing. And those words, Psal. 84. 7. because of the ambiRain also filleth the Pools, and by others, the Teachers shall be filled with Blessings. This is that whereby God watereth and refresheth the barren Souls of men; that whereby he communicates unto them all things that may enable them to be fruitful; in brief, not to enlarge on the Allegory, the Word of the Gospel is every way unto the Souls of men, as the Rain to the barren Earth.
2. This Rain is said to fall often on the Earth. And this may be considered either with respect unto the especial concernment of these Hebrews which was laid open before, or unto the ordinary dispensation of the Gospel. In the first way it reJews in the Ministry of the Word for their healing and recovery from those ways of Ruine wherein they were ingaged. And so it may include the Ministry of the Prophets, with the close put unto it by that of Christ himself, concerning which see our ExChap. 1. 1. And concerning this whole Ministry it is, that our Saviour so expostulates with them, Matth. 23. 37. How often would I have gathered your Children. And this also he at large represents in the Parable of the Housholder and his Vineyard, with the Servants that he sent unto it, from time to time to seek for fruit, and last of all his Son, Matth. 21. 33, 34, 35, 36. Take it in the latter way for the Dispensation of the word in general, and the manner of it with frequency and urgency is included in this expression. Where the Lord Christ sends the Gospel to be preached, it is his will that it should be so, instantly in season and out of season, that it may come as abundant showers of Rain on the Earth.
3. This Rain is said to be drunk in; the Earth drinketh in the Rain. There is no more intended in this expression, but the outward hearing of the Word, a naked assent unto it. For it is ascribed unto them who continue utterly barren and unnatural property of the Earth to receive in the Water that is poured on it; so men do in some sense drink in the Doctrine of the Gospel, when the natural faculties of their Souls do apprehend it and assent unto it, though it works not upon them, though it produce no effects in them. There are indeed in the Earth Rocks and Stones on which the Rain makes no impression, but they are considered in common with the rest of the Earth, and there needs no particular exception on their account. Some there are who when the Word is preached unto them, do obstinately refuse and reject it; but the Hearers in common are said to drink it in; and the other sort shall not escape the judgement which is appointed for them. And thus far things are spoken in general, what is common unto both those sorts of Hearers which he afterwards distinctly insists upon.
The Word of the Gospel in the preaching of it being compared unto Rain we may observe that,
The Dispensation of it unto men is an effect of the Soveraign Power and Pleasure of God, as is the giving of Rain unto the Earth. There is nothing in Nature that God assumeth more into his Prerogative than this of giving Rain. The first menThe Lord God had not caused it to Rain upon the Earth, Gen. 2. 8. All Rain is from the Lord God, who causeth it to Rain or not to Rain at his pleasure. And the giving of it he pleads as a great pledge of his Providence and Goodness. He left not himself of old without witness, in that he did good and gave Rain from Heaven, Acts 14. 17. Our Saviour also makes it an Argument of his Goodness that he causeth his Rain to fall, Matth. 5. 45. And whatever thoughts we have of the commonness of it, and whatever acquaintance men suppose they have with its causes, yet God distinguisheth himself as to his Algive Rain. He calls his People to say in their Hearts, Let us fear the Lord who giveth Rain, Jer. 5. 24. Are there any among the vanities of the Gentiles that can cause Rain, or can the Heavens give showers, Jer. 14 22. And he exerciseth his Soveraignty in the giving of it, Amos 4. 7, 8. I caused it to Rain upon one City, and not to Rain upon another, one piece was rained upon, and the piece whereupon it rained not withered, so two or three Cities wandered unto one City to drink water. And thus is it absolutely unto the Dimatters of his, whereof he giveth no account. Only some things we may consider which give us a prospect into the Glory of his Wis
(1) The principal End which he designeth in his disposal of the Dispensation of the Gospel in that great variety wherein we do behold it, is the Conversion, EdiElect. This is that which he aimeth to accomplish thereby, and therefore his Will and Purpose herein is that which gives Rule and Measure unto the actings of his Providence concerning it. Wherever there are any of his Elect to be called, or in what time soever, there and then will he cause the Gospel to be preached; For the purpose of God which is according to Election must stand, whatever Difficulties lie in the way, Rom. 9. 11. And the Election must obtain, Chap. 11. 5, 6. So the Lord Christ prayed that he would take care of all those that he had given unto him, which were his own by Election (thine they were and thou gavest them unto me) and sanctifie them by his Word, Joh. 17. 17. In pursuit of his own purpose, and in answer unto that prayer of our Lord Jesus, he will send his Word to find them out wherever they are, that so not one grain of his chosen Israel shall be lost or fall to the Ground. So he appointed our Apostle to stay and Preach at Corinth, notwithstanding the difficulties and oppositions he met withall, bemuch people in that City, Acts 19. 9, 10. They were his People by Eternal Designation, antecedently unto their effectual Vocation, and therefore he will have the Word preached unto them. And in the hard work of his Ministry the same Apohe endured all things for the Elects sake, 2 Tim. 2. 10. That they might be called and saved was the work he was sent upon. For whom he doth predestinate, them he also calleth, Rom. 8. 30. Predestination is the Rule of effectual Vocation, all and only they are so called by the Word, who are predestinate. So speaks our Saviour also, I have other Sheep which are not of this Fold, them also I must bring and they shall hear my Voice, Joh. 10. 16. He had some Sheep in that Fold of the Church of the Jews, to them therefore he preached the Word, that they might be gathered unto him. But he had other Sheep also, even all his Elect among the Gentiles, and saith he, them must I gather also. There is a necessity of it upon the account of the purpose of God concerning them, and they are to be gathered by hearing of his Voice, or the preaching of the Word. In that Soveraignty therefore which God useth in the disposal thereof, causing the Rain of the Doctrine of his Word to fall upon one place and not upon another, at one time and not at another, he hath still this certain End before him; and the actings of his Providence are regulated by the purposes of his Grace. In what place or NaElect to be brought forth in the world, he will provide that the Gospel of Peace be preached unto
individual place where the Gospel is preached, there are always some of the Elect to be saved. For the Enjoyments of one place may be occasioned by the Work that is to be done in another, wherewith it is in some kind of conjunction: Or the Word may be preached in a place for the sake of some that are there only accidentally. As when Paul first preached at Philippi, Lydia only was converted, who was a stranger in those parts, belonging to the City of Thyatira in Asia, Acts 16. 14, 15. And an whole Country may fare the better for one City, and an whole City for some part of it, as Micah 5. 7. God concealeth this secret Design under promiscuous outward Dispensations. For he obligeth those by whom the Word is preached to declare his mind therein unto all men indefinitely, leaving the effectual work of his Grace in the pursuit of his purwhence they believe who are ordained to Eternal Life, and those are added to the Church that are to be saved, Acts 2. 47. Acts 13. 48. Besides God hath other Ends also in the sending of his Word, though this be the principal. For by it he puts a Restraint unto Sin in the World, gives a visible control to the Kingfilled with Habitations of Cruelty. And by the Convictions that he brings thereby on the Minds and Consciences of men, he makes way for the manifestation of the Glory of his Justice in their Condemnation. Coming and speaking unto them he leaves them without pretence or excuse, Joh. 15. 22. Yet will I not say that God sends the Word for any continuance for these Ends and Designs only. For a short time he may do so, as our Saviour sending forth his Disciples to Preach, supposeth that in some place their message may be totally rejected; and thereon appointeth them to shake off the dust of their feet as a Testimony against them, or their being left without excuse. But these are but secondary and accidental Ends of the Word where it is constantly preached. Wherefore God doth not so send it for their sakes alone. But on the other side, I dare say, that where God doth not by any means nor in any degree send his Word, there are none of his Flect to be saved; for without the Word they can neither be called nor sanctified. And if any of them are in any such place, as whereunto he will not grant his Word, he will by one providence or other, snatch them like Brands out of the Fire, and convey them under the showers of it. And this we find verified by experience every day. The Gospel therefore doth not pass up and down the world by chance, as we know in how great variety it hath visited and left Nations and People, Ages and Times; nor is the disposal of it regulated by the Wisdom and Contrivance of men, whatfalling of the Rain is regulated by the Soveraign Wisdom and Pleasure of God, wherein he hath respect only unto the Purpose of his own Eternal Grace.
2. He doth according to his Soveraign pleasure call and send persons to the Preaching of it, unto those to whom he will grant the Priviledge thereof. Every man may not upon his own Head, nor can any man upon his own abilities undertake and discharge that work. This is the Eternal Rule and Law of the Gospel. Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved. But how shall men call on him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in him, of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a Preacher? And how shall they Preach except they be sent? Rom. 10. 13, 14, 15. that is, by God himself; for neither doth the Apostle discourse, nor hath he any occasion in that place to discourse concerning the
Secondly, This Communication of Gifts unto men is ordinarily accompanied with a powerful and effectual inclination of the minds of men, to undertake the work and ingage in it against those Objections, Discouragements, Oppositions and DifNiniveh, do consult their own Reputation, Ease and Advantage, and so tack about to Tarshish. And there are not a few who hide and napkin up their Talents, which are given them to Trade withall, though represented unto us under one Instance only. But these must one day answer for their Disobedience unto the Heavenly Call. But ordinaLions that are in the way, or whatever may rise up to deter them from it. So our Apostle affirms that upon the Revelation of Christ unto him, and his Call thereby to Preach the Gospel, immediately he conferred not with Flesh and Blood, but went into Arabia about his Work, Gal. 1. 16, 17. He would not
own Strength, without a supInclination of their Hearts and Minds, they may seem to cast out Water as out of an Engine by violent compression, they will never be like Clouds to pour forth showers of Rain. This therefore also is from the Lord. Again,
2. God ordereth things in his Soveraign unsearchable Providence, so as that the Gospel shall be sent unto, and in the Administration of it, shall find Admittance in what places, and at what times seems good unto himself, even as he orders the Rain to fall on one place and not on another. We have not Wisdom to search into the Causes, Reasons, and Ends of Gods providential Works in the world; and individual persons seldom live to see the issue of those which are on the Wheel in their own days. But we have ground enough in the Scripture to conclude, that the principal works of DiNational Revolutions which have been in the Earth, have been all of them subservient unto the counsel and purpose of God in this matter. And there are Examples also manifesting how small occasions he hath turned unto great and signal use herein. But what hath been spoken may suffice to evince who is the Father and Author of this Rain. And how this consideration may be improved unto the exercise of Faith, Prayer and Thankfulness, is manifest.
This Rain is said to fall often upon the Earth, which respects the actual DispenIt is the Duty of those unto whom the Dispensation of the Word is committed of God, to be diligent, watchful, instant in their Work, that their Doctrine may as it were continually drop and distill upon their Hearers; that the Rain may fall often on the Earth. So hath God provided
The Apostles when this Work was committed unto them, would not be diverted from a constant Attendance unto it, by any other Duty, much less any other occaActs 6. 4. See what a Charge our Apostle gives unto Timothy to this purpose, 2 Tim. 4. 1, 2, 3. And a great Example hereof we have in the account he gives concerning his own Ministry in Asia, Acts 20. (1) He declares when he began his Work and Ministry, the first day he came into Asia, ver. 18. that is, on the first opportunity; he omitted no season that he could possibly lay hold upon, but engaged into his Work, as his manner was in every place, that he came unto. And (2) in what manner did he teach? He did it (1) publickly in all Assemblies of the Church, and others also where he might have a quiet opportunity of speaking. And (2) privately from house to house, ver. 20. All places were alike to him and all Assemblies small or great, so he might have advantage of communicating unto them the knowledge of God in Christ. And (3) what did he so declare unto them, or instruct them in? It was the whole counsel of God, ver. 27. The Gospel of the Grace of God, ver. 24. all things that were profitable unto them, ver. 20. in sum, Repentance towards God and Faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ, ver. 21. And (4) How did he dispense the Word unto them? It was by a Declaration of the Will of God, ver. 27. by testifying the necessity of Gospel Duties, ver. 21. by constant Warnings and Admonitions to stir men up unto diligence in Obedience, and to caution them of their dangers, ver. 31. And (5) When, or at what season did he thus lay out
He did it night and day, ver. 31. that is, continually upon all occasions and advantages. He was one by whom God watered his Vineyard every moment. And (6) in what outward condition was he, and with what frame of Spirit did he attend his work? He was in many Temptations which befell him by the laying in wait of the Jews, ver. 19. or in continual danger of his Life by the Persecutions they stirred up against him. And as unto himself and the frame of his heart in this work, he carried it on with all humility of Mind and with many Tears, ver. 19, 31. He was not lifted up with conceits of the Glory, Greatness and Power of his Office, of the Authority over all the Churches committed unto him by Christ; but with lowliness of mind, and meekness was as the Servant of them all; with that love, tenderness, compassion and fervency as he could not but testifie by many Tears. Here is the great Example for Dispensers of the Gospel. We have not his Grace, we have not his Gifts, we have not his ability or assihaud passibus aequis, and to conform our selves unto him according to our Opportunity and Ability. I confess I cannot but admire to think, what some men conceive concerning him or themselves? Can they say that from the first day of their coming into their Diocesses or Dignities, or Parishes or Places, they have thus behaved themselves? Have they so taught, so preached, so warned, and that with Tears, night and day all sorts of persons, whom they suppose themselves to relate unto? Have they made it their work to declare the Mysteries of the Gospel, and the whole counsel of God, and this both publickly and privately, night and day according to their Opportunities? It will be said indeed that these things belonged unto the Duty and Office of the Apostles, but those that succeed them as ordinary Overseers of the Church, may live in another manner, and have other work to do. If they should carry it with that humility of mind as he did, and use entreaties with Tears as he did, and Preach continually as he did, they should have little joy of their Office, and besides they should be even despised of the People. These things therefore they suppose not to belong unto them. Yea but our Apostle gives this whole Account concerning himself unto the ordinary Bishops of the Church of Ephesus, ver. 17, 28. And in the close of it tells them, that he
Attendance unto the Word preached, hearing of it with some diligence, and giving of
it some kind of Reception, make no great difference among men; for this is common unto them who never become fruitful. This is so plainly exemplified by our SaParable of the several sorts of Ground that receive the Seed of the Word, yet on various occasions lose the power of it, and never come to fruitRain falleth on them it makes no impression into them, they drink it not in at all. It is no otherwise I say with many Hearers, who seem not to have the least sense of what customarily they attend unto. But those are intended in the Text and Proposition who in some measure receive it, and drink it in. They give it an Entrance into their Understandings, where they become Doctrinally acquainted with the Truth of the Gospel. And they give it some entrance into their Affections, whence they are said to receive the Word with joy. And moreover they allow it some inHerod did who heard the preachings of John Baptist gladly and did many things thereon. All these things men may do, and yet at length prove to be that part of the Earth which drinks in the Rain, and yet absolutely is barren, and brings forth Thorns and Briars. There is yet wanting the receiving of it in a good and honest Heart, which what it includes, will afterwards appear. And again, we may observe, that
God is pleased to exercise much patience towards those whom he once grants the Mercy
and the Priviledge of his Word unto. He doth not presently proceed against them for and on their Barrenness, but stays until the Rain hath often fallen upon the Ground. But there is an appointed season and period of time, beyond which he will not wait for them any more, as we shall see.
The Distribution of this Earth into several parts, with the different Lots and Events of them, is nextly to be considered. The first sort the Apostle describes two ways. (1) By its fruitfulness; (2) By its acceptation with God. And this fruitHerb, or Herbs; (2) From the Nature and Use of that Fruit, it is meet for them by whom it is dressed. (3) The manner of it, it brings it forth. These things we must a little open in their Order, as they be in the Text.
1. bringeth forth.
Luke 1. 31. And so it is constantly used in the New Testament, and not otherwise but only in this place, and James 1. 15. Adulterous conception in the Womb of the Adulteress, when at length actual sin is brought forth. The Seeds of it are cast into the Mind and Will by Temptation, where after they are warmed, fomented and cherished, Sin that ugly Monster comes forth in the World. So is this Earth said to bring forth, as a Womb that is naturally and kindly impregnated, in its appointed season. And therefore when the Apostle speaks of the other sort, he changeth his Expression for such a word as may suit a deformed and monstrous Production. But the Native power of the Earth being cherished by the Rain that falls on it, brings forth as from a teeming Womb, the Fruits of those Seeds it is possessed withall.
2. It brings forth Generans herbam; The Rhemists render it Grass, causelesly and amiss. The word signifies such green herbs as are usually produced Gen. 1. 11. All sorts of useful green Herbs, whether Medicinal or for Food, or Beauty and Orna
3. The nature of this Herbal fruit is, that it is opportuna, and some by accommoda; meet answers both. Those that use the former season wherein it brings forth the Fruit. And this is the
Psal 14. The latter word intends the usefulness and profitableness of the Fruit brought forth in what season soever it be. We may comprise both senses, and justly suppose both of them to be intended. The Syriack expresseth it by a general word, which is or may be of use. And the fruits of the Earth, are not profitable unless they are seasonable. So James calls it, the precious Fruit of the Earth, which the Husbandman waiteth for, until the Earth hath received the former and latter Rain, Jam. 1. 7.
Lastly, These Herbs thus brought forth are meet,
unto them by whom it is Tilled, or even by whom; or by whom it is also Tilled. The particle superfluous or insignificant. It declares an Addition of Culture unto the Rain. For besides the falling of Rain on the Earth, there is likewise need of further
Quod nisi & assiduis terram insectabere rastris, Et sonitu terrebis aves, & ruris opaci Falce premes umbras, votis vocaveris Imbrem, que Heu magnum alterius frustra spectabis Acervum.
The Earth must be Tilled from its nature and the Law of its Creation. And thereAdam was to have Tilled and Wrought the Ground in the Garden even before the Fall, Gen. 2. 16. And this is the principal concernment of him that intends to live on the Field. The falling of Rain upon the Earth is common unto the whole. That which gives a Field a peculiar Relation unto any, is, that he dresseth and fenceth and tilleth it. Unto these dressers the Herbs that are brought forth are said to be meet; they belong unto them and are useful for them; for whom, or by whom. In the first way, the chief Owner of the Ground, the Lord of the Field or Vineyard, is signified. The Ground is Tilled or Manured for his use, and he eats of the Fruits of it. In the latter sense, those who immediately work about the Ground in the Tilling of it are intended. But there is no need to distinguish in this place between Owner and Dresser. For God as he is the great Husbandman is both. He is the Lord of the Vineyard, it is his, and he dresseth and pruneth the Vines that they may bring forth Fruit, Joh. 15.
Thirdly, The Ground thus made fruitful receiveth Blessing of God. And the Antecedent, in the communication of Goodness, or fruit-causing virtue unto it. The smell of my Son, is as the smell of a Field which the Lord hath blessed, Gen. 27. 27. A Field that abounds with Blossoms, Flowers and Fruits yielding a sweet Savour, being so made fruitful by the singular blessing of God. But this is not the Blessing here inuseful Herbs, and therefore must be antecedently interested in this kind of Blessing, without which nothing can thrive or prosper. Wherefore (2) Gods Beacceptation, or approbation, with care and watchIsa. 27. 2, 3. And there are three things included in this Blessing of a fruitful Field. (1) The Owning, Acceptation or Approbation of it. Such a Field God owns, and is not ashamed that it should be looked on as his. And this is opposed to the Rejection of the barren Ground afterwards mentioned;
1. The Ground thus dressed, thus bearing Fruit and blessed of God, are true and sound Believers. So our Saviour declares it to be in the interpretation of his own Parable to this purpose, Matth. 13. They are such as receive the Word of God in good and honest Hearts, and bring forth Fruits of it in several Degrees. Such as having been Ministerially planted and watered, have an increase wrought in them by the Grace of God, 1 Cor. 3. 6, 7.
2. There is included herein the manner how they bring forth the Fruits intended. And that is, that they bring forth in their lives what was before conceived and cherished in their Hearts. They have the Root in themselves of what they bring forth. So doth the word here used signifie, namely, to bring forth the Fruit of an inward Conception. The Doctrine of the Gospel as cast into their Hearts, is not only Rain but Seed also. This is cherished by Grace, as precious Seed, and as from a natural Root or Principle in the Heart, brings forth precious Fruit. And herein consists the difference between the Fruit-bearing of true Believers, and the works of Hypocrites or false Professors. These latter bring forth Fruits like Mushromes, they come up suddenly, have oft-times a great bulk and goodly appearance, but they are only a forced Excrescency, they have no natural Seed or Root in the Earth. They do not proceed from a living principle of them in their Hearts. The other sort do first conceive, cherish and foment them in their Hearts and Minds, whence they bring them forth as from a genuine and natural principle. This is on either side fully declared by our Saviour himself, Luke 6. 43, 44, 45.
3. There are the Herbs or Fruits intended. These are they which elsewhere in the Scripture are called the Fruits of the Spirit, the Fruits of Righteousness, of HoliFruits and Herbs intended. When our Hearts are made Holy, and our Lives useful by the Gospel, then are we fruitful.
4. These Herbs are said to be meet for them by whom or for whom the Earth is dressed. As it is neither useful nor safe to press similitudes beyond their principal scope and intention, and to bring in every minute circumstance into the compari
1. That God himself is the great Husbandman, Joh. 15. 1. And all Believers are Gods Husbandry, 1 Cor. 3. 9. He is so the Husbandman as to be the Soveraign Lord and Owner of this Field or Vineyard, and he puts workmen into it to dress it. This our Saviout sets out at large in his Parable, Matth. 21. 33, &c. Hence he calls his people, his Portion, and the Lot of his Inheritance, Deut. 32. 9. He speaks as though he had given up all the world besides into the possession of others, and kept his people only unto himself. And so he hath, as to the especial blessed Relation which he intendeth.
2. It is God himself who taketh care for the watering and dressing of this Field. He dealeth with it as a man doth with a Field that is his own; This he expresseth, Isa. 5. 2. Matth. 21. 33, 34. The Dispensation of the Word, and the CommuniLabourers together with God, 1 Cor. 3. 9. because they are employed by him, do his work, and have the same End with him.
3. This Tilling or Dressing of the Earth which is superadded to the Rain, or the meer Preaching of the Gospel denoted thereby, may be referred unto three Heads. (1) The Ministerial Application of the Word unto the Souls and Consciences of men, in the Dispensation of all the Ordinances of the Gospel. This is the second great
Rain, is the first. (2) The Administration of the Censures and Discipline of the Church. This belongs unto the dressing and purging of Gods Vineyard, and of singular use it is unto that End, where it is rightly and duely attended unto. And those who under pretence hereof instead of purging the Vineyard endeavour to digg up the Vines, will have little thanks from him for their Diligence and Pains. (3) Afflictions and Trials. By these he purgeth his Vine that it may bring forth yet more Fruit; that is, he trieth, exerciseth, and thereby improveth the Faith and Graces of Believers. 1
4. God expecteth Fruit from this Field, which is so his own, and which he so careth for. I looked for Grapes, Isa. 5. 2. He sends his Servants to receive the Fruits of it, Matth. 21. 34. Though he stand in no need of us or our Goodness, it exHerein is my Father glorified that ye bear much Fruit, Joh. 15. 8. Matth. 5. 16.
5. These Fruits when they are brought forth, God approveth of, accepteth, and farther blesseth them that bear them, which is the last thing in the words. Some think there is no use of these Fruits unless they are meritorious of Grace and Glory. But Gods Acceptation of them here, is called his Benediction, his Blessing of them that bring them forth. Now a Blessing cannot be merited; it is an act of Bounty and Authority, and hath the nature of a free Gift, that cannot be deserved. What doth a Field merit of him by whom it is watered and tilled when it bringeth forth Herbs meet for his use; they are all but the Fruits of his own Labour, Cost and Pains. The Field is only the subject that he hath wrought upon, and it is his own. All the Fruits of our Obedience are but the Effects of his Grace in us. We are a subject that he hath graciously pleased to work upon. Only he is pleased in a way of infinite condescension to own in us, what is his own, and to pardon what is ours. Wherefore the Blessing of God on Fruit-bearing Believers, consists in three things. (1) His Approbation and gracious Acceptance of them. So it is said that he had respect unto Abel and his Offering, Gen. 4. 4. He graciously accepted both of his Person and of his Sacrifice, owning and approving of him, when Cain and his were rejected. So he smelt a savour of Rest from the Sacrifice of Noah, Gen. 8. 21. And to testifie his being well pleased therewith, he thence took occasion to renew and establish his Covenant with him and his Seed. (2) It is by increasing their fruitfulness; Every Branch in the Vine that beareth Fruit, he
Where God grants Means, there he expects Fruit. Few men consider what is the state of things with them, whilst the Gospel is preached unto them. Some utterly disregard it any farther than as it is suited unto their carnal Interests and Advanbenefit by a pretence of it or what belongs unworldly interests, and for the most part no otherwise; they are Merchants of Souls, Rev. 18. 11, 12, 13. 2 Pet. 2. 3. Some look upon it as that wherein they are really concerned, and they will both take upon themselves the profession of it, and make use of it in their
Errand that it comes upon, and what the Work is God hath in hand thereby. In brief, he is by it, watering, manuring, cultivating the Souls of men, that they may bring forth Fruit unto his Praise and Glory. His business by it, is to make men holy, humble, self-denying, righteous, useful, upright, pure in heart and life, to abound in good works, or to be like himself in all things. To effect these Ends, is this holy means suited, and therefore God is justly said to expect these Fruits where he grants this Means. And if these be not found in us, all the Ends of Gods Husbandry are lost towards us, which what a doleful issue it will have the next Verse declares. This therefore ought to be always in our minds whilst God is treating with us by the Dispensation of the Gospel. It is Fruit he aims at, it is Fruit he looks for, and if we fail herein, the Advantage of the whole, both as unto our Good and his Glory, is utterly lost, which we must unavoidably account for. For this Fruit God both expecteth, and will require. This is the work and effect of the Gospel, Col. 1. 6. And the Fruit of it is threefold. (1) Of Persons in their Conversion unto God, Rom. 15. 16. (2) Of Real internal Holiness in them or the Fruits of the Spirit, Gal. 5. 22, 23. (3) The outward Fruits of Rigteousness and Charity, 2 Cor. 9. 10. Phil. 1. 11. These God looketh to, Isa. 5. 4. Luke 13. 7. And he will not always bear with a frustration. A good Husbandman will suffer Thorns and other barren Trees to grow in the Field. But if a Vine or Figg-tree be barren in his Garden, he will cut it down and cast it into the Fire. However God will not always continue this Husbandry, Isa. 28. Amos 6. 12.
Duties of Gospel Obedience are Fruits meet for God, things that have a proper and
especial tendency unto his Glory. As the precious Fruits of the Earth which the Husmeet for his use, that is, such as supply his wants, satisfie his occasions, answer his labour and charge, nourish and enrich him; So do these Duties of Gospel Obedience, answer all the Ends of Gods Glory which he hath designed unto it in the world. Hereby, saith our Saviour, is my Father glorified, if ye bring forth much Fruit.
And we must enquire how these Fruits are meet for God. For (1) they are not so, as though he stood in any need of them unto his Glory. Our Goodness extends not unto him, Psal. 16. 2. It doth not so, as though he had need of it, or put any value on it for its own sake. Hence he rejecteth all those multiplied outward SerPsal. 50. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. All thoughts hereof are to be rejected; see Job 22. 2, 3. chap. 35. 7, 8. (2) They are not meet for God, as if they perfectly answered his Law. For with respect thereunto, all our Righteousnesses are as filtby Raggs, most unmeet to be presented unto him, Isa. 64. 6. And if he should mark what is amiss in us or them, who should stand, Psal. 130. 3. Much less (3) are they so meet for him, as that by them we should merit any thing at his hand. This foolish Presumption is contrary to the very nature of God and Man, with that Relation between them which necessarily ensues on their very Beings. For what can a poor worm of the Earth who is nothing, who hath nothing, who doth nothing that is good, but what it receives wholly from Divine Grace, Favour, and Bounty, merit of him who from his Being and Nature can be under no Obligation thereunto, but what is meerly from his own Soveraign pleasure and goodness?
They are therefore no otherwise meet for God but in and through Christ, accordpersons accepted, as was that of Abel through Faith in him, which was the foundation of the Acceptation of his Offering, Gen. 4. 4. Heb. 11. 4. And this is of Grace also; It is to the praise of his glorious Grace wherein he makes us accepted in the Beloved, Ephes. 1. 6. And (2) He bears and takes away the iniquity that cleaves unto them as they proceed from us, which renders them unmeet for God. This was typed out by the plate of God, wherein was inscribed Holiness to the Lord, that was on the forehead of the High Priest. It was that he might bear the Iniquity of the Holy things of the people, Exod. 28. 36, 37, 38. He bare it in the Expiation he made of all sin; and takes it away in the sight of God. And (3) He adds of the Incense of his own Mediation unto
Rev. 8. 3. On this foundation it is that God hath graciously designed them unto sundry Ends of his Glory, and accepts them accordingly.
For (1) The Will of his Command is fulfilled thereby; and this tends to the Glory of his Rule and Government, Matth. 7. 21. We are to pray that the Will of God may be done on Earth, as it is in Heaven. The Glory that God hath in Heaobserve his Commands and do his Will, esteeming their doing so to be their Honour and Blessedness. For hereby is the Rule and AuApostate Angels. In like manner our Fruits of Obedience are the only Acknowledgements that we do or can make to the supream Authority and Rule of God over us, as the one Law-giver, who hath power to kill and keep alive. The Glory of an Earthly King consists principally in the willing Obedience which his Subjects give unto his Laws. For hereby they expresly acknowledge that they esteem his Laws. wise, just, equal, useful to mankind, and also reverence his AuGlory of God, when the Subjects of his Kingdom, do testiholy, righteous, and good, by the Fruits of their Obedience; as also that it is their principal HoJoh. 15. 14. Hereby is our HeaExpression of the nature, power and efficacy of the Grace of God, whereby also he is glorified, for he doth all things to the praise of the Glory of his Grace, Ephes. 1. 6. In all the actings of Lust and Sin, in the drouth and dust of Barrenness, we represent an Enmity against him, and contrariety unto him, acting over the principle of the first Rebellion and Apostasie from him. These things in their own nature tend greatly to his dishonour, Ezek. 36. 20. But these Fruits of Obedience are all effects of his Grace, wherein he worketh in us to will and to do of his own good pleasure. And hereby are both the power and nature of that Grace, manifested and glorified. The power of it in making fruitful the barren Soils of our Hearts, which as under the Curse, would of themselves bring forth nothing but Thorns and Briars. Wherefore to cause our Hearts to abound in the Fruits of Faith, Love, Meekness, and all holy Evangelical Obedience, is that wherein the power of Gods Grace is both manifested and magnified, Isa. 11. 5, 6, 7, 8. And they also declare the nature of God. For they are all of them things good, benigne, beautiful, useful to mankind, such as give Peace, Quietness, and Blessedness unto the Souls of them in whom they are, as tend to the
And indeed this usually is the first thing which affects the minds of any of the Saints of God in any relief that God is pleased to hand out unto them by the means of others. They admire and bless God in and for his Grace towards them by whose Kindness and Compassion they are relieved. So is God glorified by these Fruits. And the second ground of their Praises was, the liberal Distribution unto themselves, as they found by Experience, and unto all men, as they were informed and believed. The Ministration its self testified their Faith and Obedience unto the Gospel, but the Nature of it, that it was liberal and bountiful, evidenced the sincev. 14. they saw hereby that there was not an ordinary or common work only of Grace on these Corinthians engaging them into a Common Profession, and the Duties of it, which yet was a matter of great thankfulness unto God; but that indeed the Grace of God exceedingly abounded in them, which produced these Fruits of it in so plendirect Attribution of Praises unto him. And by their prayer for you, which long after you, for the exceeding Grace of God in you; That is, by both these ways they glorifie God, both in their prayers for a supply of Divine Grace and Bounty to them by whom they were relieved, and in their enflamed love towards them, and longing after them, which was occasioned only by their Relief; but the real Cause, Motive, and Object of it, was the exceeding Grace of God in them, which was evidenced thereby. And by both these Duties, God is greatly Glorified. Hence the Apostle concludes the whole with that Thanks be to God for his unspeakable Gift. This, saith he, is a Gift that cannot be sufficiently declared amongst men, and therefore God is more to be admired in it. And the Apostle presseth the occasion of their joynt thankfulness in a word that may include both the Grace of God given unto the Corinthians enabling them to their Duty, and the Fruit of that Grace in the Bounty conferred on the poor Saints; both of them were the Gift of God, and in both of them was he glorified. And in this regard especially, are the Fruits of our Obedience unto the Gospel, meet for him by whom we are dressed; that is, have an especial tendency unto the Glory of God. Hence is that Caution of the Apostle, Chap. 13. 16. But to do good and communicate, forget not, for with such Sacrifices God is well pleased. Our Prayers and Praises also, as he declares in the Verse foregoing, are Sacrifices unto God, and accepted with him, ver. 15. Our whole Obedience is our reasonable Sacrifice, is a Sacrifice accepRom. 12. 1. yea but in these Fruits of Benignity, Bounty, Cha
And I might here justly take occasion at large to press men unto an abundant fruitfulness in this especial kind of Fruit-bearing, but that the nature of our discourse will not admit it.
(6) They are meet for God, because they are as the first-fruits unto him from the Creation. When God took and rescued the Land of Canaan, which he made his own in a peculiar manner, out of the hands of his Adversaries, and gave it unto his own people to possess and inherit, he required of them that on their first Entrance thereunto, they should come and present him with the first of all the Fruits of the Earth, as an acknowledgement of his right to the Land, and his Bounty unto them, Deut. 26. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. &c. The whole Creation did by sin as it were go out of the possession of God, not of his Right and Power but of his Love and Favour: Sathan became the god of this world, and the whole of it lay under the Power of Evil. By Jesus Christ he rescueth it again from its Slavery and Bondage unto Sathan. But this he will not do all at once, only he will have some first-fruits offered unto him as an acknowledgement of his Right, and as a pledge of his Enthese first-fruits, at the recovery of the Creation unto himself, which is a certain pledge of vindicating the whole from its present Bondage: And it is BeJam. 1. 18. Of his own Will begat he us, with the Word of Truth, that we should be a kind of first-fruits of his Creatures. But we are not so, but in our fruitfulness. Thereby it is that there is a Revenue of Glory and Praise returned unto God from this lower part of the Creation, without which it bears nothing but Thorns and Briars in his sight. In these therefore and the like things consists the meetness of our Fruits of Obedience unto God, or his Glory. Again,
Where ever there are any sincere Fruits of Faith and Obedience found in the Hearts and Lives of Professors, God graciously accepts and blesseth them. Nothing is so small,
sincere he will accept; and nothing so great but he hath an overflowing Reward for it. Nothing shall be lost that is done for God,
This is the first Principle and Foundation of all Religious Worship, which if it be not well and firmly laid in our hearts, all our supplication will be in vain. Now unless we do believe that he doth accept and bless our Duties, we cannot believe that he is such a Rewarder, or as he expressed it in the Covenant with Abraham, an exceeding great reward. But he hath descended to the lowest instances, of a little Goats hair to the Tabernacle, a Mite into the Treasury, a Cup of water to a Disciver. 9. and therefore I shall not here farther con
Some perhaps will say, that their best Fruits are so corrupted, their best Duties so defiled, that they cannot see how they can find Acceptance with so holy a God? Every thing that proceeds from them is so weak and infirm that they fear they shall suffer loss in all. And this very Apprehension deprives them of all that Consolation in the Lord which they might take in a course of holy Obedience. I answer (1) This consideration of the defilements of sin that adhere to the best of our Works or DuMerit whatever, and it is right it should do so. For indeed that cursed Notion of the Merit of good Works, hath been the most pernicious Engine for the ruine of mens Souls, that ever Sathan made use of; for on the one hand many have been so swollen and puffed up with it, as that they would not deign in any thing to be beholding to the Grace of God, but have thought Heaven and Glory as due to them for their Works, as Hell is to other men for their Sin, or the wages of an Hireling to him for his Labour, which cries to Heaven against the Injustice of them that detain it. Hence a total neglect of Christ hath ensued. Others consinful Imperfection of our best Duties: so it is done by the Church, Isa. 64. 6. Rom. 2. 21. (2) This consideration excludes all hopes or expectation of Acceptance with God upon the account of strict Justice. If we consider God only as a Judge pronounLaw, neither we nor any thing we do can either be accepted with him or approved by him. For as the Psalmist says concerning our Persons, If thou Lord mark what is done amiss, O Lord who can stand! and prays, Enter not into Judgement with thy Servant, O Lord, for in thy sight shall no Flesh living be justified. So it is with respect unto all our Works and Duties of Obedience, not any one of them can endure the Trial of God as judging by the Law, but would appear as a filthy thing. Whilst therefore persons are only under the power of their Convictions, and are not able by Faith to take another view of God and his dealings with them, but by the Law, it is impossible that they should have any comfortable Expectation of the Approbation of their Obe
Wherefore that we may be perswaded of the gracious Acceptation of all our Dutwo things in the Eye and View of our Faith: (1) The tenor of the Covenant wherein we walk with God; God hath abolished and taken away the
Covenant of Works by substituting a new one in the room thereof, and the reason why he did so, was because of a double insufficiency in the Law of that Covenant unto his great end of Glorifying himself in the Salvation of sinners. For (1) It could not expiate and take away sin, which must be done indispensably, or that End could not be obtained: this our Apostle asserts as one reason of it, Rom. 8. 3. and proves at large in this Epistle afterwards. (2) Because it neither did nor could approve of such an Obedience, as poor sanctified sinners were able to yield unto God; for it required
But that which beareth Thorns and Briars, is rejected, and is nigh unto Cursing, whose End is to be burned.
In the foregoing Verse the Apostle shewed how it would be and fall out with that part of the Judaical Church which embraced the Gospel, and brought forth the Fruits of Faith and Obedience. God would Accept of them, own them, pregracious Acceptance of them in Christ and the Approbation of their Obedience, ver. 9. (2) In delivering them from that dreadful Curse and Judgement which not long after consumed the whole Remainder of that People. (3) In making use of multitudes of them to be the means of Communicating the Knowledge and Grace of the Gospel unto other Persons and Nations; a greater blessing and honour than which, they could not in this world be made partakers of. (4) In their Eternal Salvation. This being laid down, he proceeds in his Parable to declare the state and condition of the other sort of them, namely, of Unbelievers, Apostates from and Opposers of the Gospel: And this he doth in compliance with the Symbolical Action of our Saviour in cursing the barren Figg-tree, whereby the same thing was represented, Matth. 21. 19. for it was the Apostate, persecuting, unbelieving Church of the Jews, whose Estate, and what would become of them, which our Saviour inFigg-tree. He had now almost finished his Ministry among them; and seeing they brought no Fruit thereon, he intimates that the Curse was coming on them, whose principal Effect would be perpetual barrenness. They would not before bear any Fruit, and they shall not hereafter, being hardened by the just Judgement of God unto their Everlasting Ruine. So was fulfilled what was long before foretold, Isa. 6. 9, 10. as our Apostle declares, Acts 28. 26, 27. In Answer hereunto, our Apostle in this Verse gives this account of their Barrenness, and DeApostates, Unfruitful Professors, Hypocrites and Unbelievers, to whom the Gospel hath been dispens'd, is declared and expressed.
And, as it was necessary unto his Design, the Apostle pursues his former Similitude, making an Application of it unto this sort of men. And (1) He supposeth them to be
First it bringeth forth, Thorns and Briars: See the openall sorts of sins are hereby unfruitful Works of Righteousness, Rom. 6. 21. Ephes. 5. 11. And the principal reason why they are here compared unto Thorns and Briars, is with respect unto the Curse that came on the Earth by Sin. Cursed be the Ground, Thorns and Thistles shall it bring forth unto thee, Gen. 3. 17, 18. whereunto barrenness or unaptGen. 4. 12. from this Curse the Earth of its self and untilled, would bring forth nothing but Thorns and Briars, at least they would be absolutely prevalent in and over all the products of it; so the heart of man by nature is wholly over-run with evil sinful Imaginations, and his Life with vicious sinful Actions, Gen. 6. 5. Rom. 2. 10, 11, 12, 13. (2) Wherefore the bringing
Thorns and Briars, is abounding in such actings and works as proceed from the principle of corrupted Nature under the Curse. In opposition hereunto, all good actions, all acts of Faith and Obedience, are called He rbs and Fruit, beFruits of the Spirit; and such Works are compared to, and called Thorns and Briars from a community of Properties with them. For (1) They are in their kind unprofitable, things of no use, but meet to be cast out, that room may be made for better. When a man hath a Field overgrown with Thorns and Briars, he finds he hath no benefit by them: Wherefore he resolves to digg them up or burn them. Of such and no other use, are the sins of men in the world. All the works of darkness are unfruitful, Ephes. 5. 11. The world is no way benefited by them, never was any man the better for his own or another mans sin. (2) Because, they are hurtful and noxious, choaking and hindering good Fruits, that otherwise would thrive in the Field. So are Thorns and Briars represented in the Scripture as grieving, piercing and hurtful, and things that are so called by their name, Ezck. 28. 24. Mic. 4. 4. Isa. 7. 25. Such are all the sins of men. All the confusion, dissorts of sins, works of darkness, works of the flesh, that are intended by these Thorns and Briars. But yet I presume that the Apostle hath regard unto the sins which the obstinate Jews were then in an especial manner guilty of, and which would be the case of their sudden destruction. Now those as it appeareth from this whole Epistle and matter of Fact in the story, were Unbelief, Impenitency and Apostasie. The Thorns and Briars which were the
Either they would not give their Assent unto its Truth, or would not amend their Lives according to its Doctrine, or would not abide with constancy in its profession. These are the especial sins, which cast those Hebrews, and will cast all that are like unto them, into the condition of Danger and Perdition here described.
Secondly, The manner of bringing forth these Thorns and Briars is expressed by Chrysostome puts a great remark upon the difference of the words used by the Apostle; that which he applieth to the production of good Fruit, is natural conception and production of any thing in due order, time and season. But this barren cursed Ground, denotes a casting of them out in abundance, not only without the use of means, but against it. The Heart of man needs not to be impregnated with any adventitious Seed, to make it thrust forth all sorts of sins, or to make it fruitful in Unbelief and Impenitency: the Womb of sin will on its own accord be continually teeming with these things. Matters being thus stated with this ground, the Apostle affirms three things con
First it is Trial hath been made,
to try, to make an Experiment what any thing is, and of what use; especially it is applied to the trial that is made of Gold and Silver by Fire.
Isocrat. We try Gold in the Fire; that is, whether it be true and pure. Fire is the great trier and discoverer of Metals, of what sort they are, 1 Cor. 3. 13, 14, 15. And hence the Lord Christ in the trial of his Church, is compared to a Refiner with Fire, Matth. 3. 2. so Faith is tried, 1 Pet. 1. 7. And it is the word which our Apostle useth when he enjoyns us to try and search our selves as unto our sincerity in Faith and Obedience, 2 Cor. 13. 5. Gal. 6. 4. as also to make a due enquiry into the true nature of spiritual things, Rom. 12. 2. Ephes. 5. 10. not contenting our selves with a bare notion of them, but endeavouring after an Experience of their power in our own Hearts. an Experience upon trial, Rom. 5. 4. 2 Cor. 2. 9. Phil. 2. 22. as Peter, 1 Epist. 1. 7. Hence is Cor. 11. 19. 2 Cor. 10. 15. 2 Tim. 2. 15. Jam. 1. 12. Rom. 14. 18. Accepted with God, and approved with men. Hence Cor. 9. 27. 2 Cor. 13. 5, 6. Tit. 1. 16. The whole is expressed, Jer. 6. 29, 30. The Bellows are burnt, the Lead is consumed of the Fire, the Founder melteth in vain, Reprobate Silver shall men call them, because the Lord hath rejected them. All means were used to try to the utmost whether they were any
sincere mettal in them. After all they were found refuse Silver, meer dross, which was therefore rejected as of no use. This ground therehad a trial made of it, and all proper means to have been used, for to make it fruitful; but whereas nothing succeeded, it is to be rejected, disapproved, laid aside as to any further endeavours to make it successful; such a piece of Ground the Husband-man leaves caring for, he will lay out no more charge about it, nor take any more pains with it, for he finds in trial that it is incurable.
Secondly, It is said to be, nigh unto a Curse. The Husband-man doth not presently destroy such a piece of Ground, but neglecting of it, lets it lye, resolution to lay it wast, and so to cast it out of the bounds of his possession; and he doth it three ways: (1) By gathering out of it all the good Plants and Herbs that yet remain in it, by transplanting them into a better Soil. (2) By casting down its Fences, and laying it wast, that all the Beasts of the Field shall lodge in it and prey upon it. (3) By with-holding all means of doing it good, by waown'd by him or did ever belong unAddition of good, so Cursing implies the taking off all kindness and all effects thereof, and therewithall the devoting of it unto Destruction.
Lastly, It is added, whose End is unto burning, or to be burned, Fire makes a total and dreadful Destruction of all combustible things Firing or Burning by what means soever they are effected. Things are consumed as if they were burned up with Fire. There is a burning of Ground which is used to make it fruitPoet expresseth it in his Georgicks,
Saepe etiam steriles incendere profuit agros, At levem stipulam crepitantibus urere flammis. que
But it is a burning of another kind that is here intended, and this is an act of positive Indignation. He will not only shew his dissatisfaction in such barren Ground, by a neglect of it, but his Vengeance in its Destruction. And it is thus expressed, to intimate both the temporal destruction of the obstinate Jews, and the External destruction of all Unbelievers, both by Fire of several kinds.
Thus therefore the Apostle declares, that God the great Husbandman and Owner of the Vineyard, would deal with the impenitent and incredulous Hebrews.
First, He tried them, and that for a long season, by the Preaching of the Gospel. The Rain fell oft upon them, and that for the space now of 36 years or thereabouts. God did as it were Essay by outward means to make them fruitful, to bring them to Faith, Repentance and Obedience; but after this long trial, it appeared that they multiplied, as it were, under his hand the Thorns and Briars of their Unbelief, and all sorts of provoking sins. Wherefore God rejects them, declares that his Soul had no pleasure in them, that he would be at no further cost about them. And twice did our Apostle mind his Country-men in other places, that God would speedily so deal with them, Acts 11. 40, 41, 46. chap. 28. 25, 26, 27, 28. as our Saviour had often threatened them, that the Kingdom of God should be taken from them, they should no longer enjoy the means of saving Knowledge or Repentance. God laid them aside as a Field no longer fit to be Till'd. And this he did about the writing of this Epistle; for immediately hereon he began utterly to forsake them who were obstinate in their Judaisme, and all those who Apostatized thereunto from Christiatime after which he casts them out of his Care, will feed them no more; provide no more that they be rained on or dressed; And if they do any more enjoy the Word, it is by accident, for the sake of some who are approved, but they shall receive no Advantage by it, seeing they are no longer
nigh unto Cursing; that is, they were so ordered and disposed of, as that the destroying Curse of Gods Might came upon them; God had now Anathematized them, or devoted them to Destruction; and hereupon he gave them up unto all those ways and means whereby it might be hastened and infallibly overtake them. For (1) He gathered all the good Plants from amongst them; he called out and separated from them, all true Believers, and planted them in the Christian Church; so he deals with all Apostate Churches before their utter Destruction, Rev. 18. 4. (2) He took away their Fences, casting them out of his Protection, insomuch that when they were destroyed, the General of the Roman Army acknowledged that God had infatuated them, that their impregnable Holds and Forts were of no use unto them. (3) He granted them no more use of means for their Conversion. Thenceforwards they fell into all manner of sins, confusions, disorders, tumults, which ocasioned their Ruine. After the same manner will God deal with any other people whom he rejects for their rejection of the Gospel. And the World hath no small reason to tremble at the Apprehension of such a con
Thirdly, In the End, this whole barren Earth was burned up: In the first place, this respects the Destruction of Hierusalem which ensued not long after, when Temple and City, and People and Countrey were all devoured by Fire and Sword, Matth. 4. 1. But yet this, like the Destruction of Sodom, was but an Emblem of the future Judgement. Hypocrites, Unbelievers, Apostates are to have another End, than what they fall into in this World. An End they shall have, wherein their Eternal condition shall be immutably stated. And this End is that they must have, to the Fire, the Fire prepared for the Devil and his Angels, they shall be gathered together and burned with a Fire that shall never be quenched, Joh. 15. 3, 4. And this final Destru
Whilst the Gospel is preached unto men, they are under their great trial for Eternity.
Experiment how they will prove. If they acquit themselves in Faith and Obedience, they receive the Blessing of Eternal Life from God. If they prove barren and unprofitable, they are
1. That we are all made for an Eternal State and Condition in blessedness or wo. Men may live like Beasts, and therefore wish that they might dye like them also; But we are all made with another design, and must all of us stand in our Eternal Lot at the end of the days, Dan. 12. 13.
2. That the unchangeable determination of our Eternal state depends on what we do in this Life. There is neither Wisdom, nor Knowledge, Duty, nor ObeIt is appointed for all men once to dye and after that is the Judgement. Nothing interposeth to alter our state and condition between Death and Judgement. The contrivance of Purgatory when we are gone hence, was an Invention of Sathan to delude the Souls of men with hopes of relief, when all means and ways of it were past and ir
3. The Trial of our future state is made by the Preaching of the Gospel unto us; and our compliance with it, or rejection of it. This is that which the Text declares on the one hand and the other; the barren Ground is rejected on this Trial.
4. It was a Fruit of Infinite Grace, Condescension and Mercy to grant a new Trial unto Sinners, under the Curse we had all cast our selves into. There God
sinning Angels whom he spared not. And had he dealt so with all mankind, who could say unto him, what dost thou? And it is that which we must all answer for, namely, that when we were lost and fallen under the Sentence of the Holy and Righteous Law, God would propose any terms of Peace and Reconciliation unto us and give us a second Trial thereon.
5. That the especial way of this Trial doth most eminently set out this Grace and Mercy. A way it is full of infinite Wisdom, Goodness, Love, Mercy and Grace. Such as wherein all the Divine Perfections will be Eternally glorified, whether it be accepted or refused.
6. When the Gospel is preached unto any, God telleth sinners, that although they have destroyed themselves and are ready every moment to sink into Eternal Misery, yet he will out of infinite Grace and Compassion try them once more, and that by the holy terms of the Gospel. And in the preaching of the Word he doth it accordingly. And although the season of this Trial be determined with God, yet it is unto us uncertain on many Accounts: for (1) the continuance of our Lives, during which alone we are capable of enjoying it, is so; (2) We see that the Preaching of the Gospel is so also. The Lord Christ doth oft-times remove the Candlesticks whilst they continue alive in the world among whom it was once fixed: And (3) there is a time when a Period is put unto the
Barrenness under the Dispensation of the Gospel is always accompanied with an increase of sin. The Ground which brings not forth
(1) When men have rejected the last means of their spiritual healing, and restraint of sin, what can be expected from them but an outrage in sinning? There are three ways whereby God puts a restraint upon sin. The first is by the light of a natural Conscience. This is born with men in the principle of it, and grows into exercise, in the improvement of Reason. And where the natural workings of it are not prevented and suffocated by the horrible example of Parents and Relations living in Cursing, Lying, and all manner of Prophaneness, it is very useful in Youth to reCustom in sinning takes away the Edge of it, and weakens it in its Operation.
Wherefore (2) when this Restraint is broken through, God sets up the Hedge of the Law before the minds of men to deter them from sin. And this also hath a great Efficacy with many unto this End, at least for a season. But neither will meer Conviction from the Law, always give Bounds unto the Lusts of men.
Wherefore (3) the Gospel comes with a different design from them both. The utmost of their Aim and Work is but to restrain sin, but the Gospel comes to Convert the sinner; Their work is to set a damm before the Streams of sin, that of the Gospel is to dry up the Spring. But if this also as it is in this case be rejected and despised, what remains to set any Bounds unto the Lusts of men? They will find themselves at liberty to act their own inclinations to the utmost, as having cast off all regard to God in all the ways whereby he hath revealed himself. Hence you may find more honesty, and uprightness, a more conscientious abstinence from sin, wrongs, and injuries, more effects of Moral Virtue among Heathens and Mahumetans, than among professed Christians; or persons who being unprofitable un
(3) God absolutely and irrecoverably gives them up to extream obstinacy, to final hardness and impenitency, Isa. 6. 8, 9, 10. This is no place to treat of the nature of Divine Induration. It is enough to observe at present, that where provoking sintotally blinded and hardened in sin, unto their Eternal Ruine. Now when God doth thus deal with men who will not, and because they
will not be healed and reformed by the Preaching of the Gospel, can any thing else ensue but that they will give up themselves unto all wickedness and filthiness with delight and greediness? And this wrath seems to be come upon multitudes in the world unto the utmost. So the Apostle describes this condition in the Jews when they were under it, 1 Thes. 2. 15, 16. Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own Prophets, and have persecuted us, and they please not God, and are contrary to all men, forbidding us to speak unto the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway, for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost. And they are even blind them
Ordinarily God proceeds to the rejection and destruction of barren Professors by degrees;
although they are seldom sensible of it until they fall irrecoverably into ruine. This ground here is first disapproved or rejected, then it is nigh to Cursing, the Curse ensues; after which it is burned. And God doth thus proceed with them, (1) In compliance with his own Patience, Goodness, and long-suffering, whereby they ought to be lead unto Repentance. This is the natural tendency of the goodness and patience of God towards sinners though it be often abused,
(2) God will do so to evince the Righteousness of his Judgements, both in the Hearts and Consciences of them who shall be finally destroyed, whose End is to be burned; as also of all others who shall wisely consider of his ways. God endureth all things from the world that he may be justified in his sayings and may overcome when he is judged, Rom. 3. 4. that is, not only that all he doth shall be Righteous and Holy, which is necessary from his own Essential Righteousness, whence he will not, whence he cannot do Evil; but his Works shall be so wrought, so accomeminent and pleadable by his peobarren unprofitable
Churches which he hath formerly owned and blessed. In his dealing with them, he will leave no colour of calling his Goodness and Faithfulness into question, but will as it were refer the Righteousness of his proceedings unto all, even unto themselves. So he doth as to his dealing with the Church of the Jews when it was grown utterly barren, Isa. 5. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. So did our Lord Jesus Christ in his Parable, comwicked Jews to subscribe unto the Righteousness of God in that miserable deMatth. 21. 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40. And this God doth principally by his gradual procedure with them. His pre
(3) Gods dealings with barren Apostates being principally in spiritual Judgebecause others may be yet mixed among them unto whom he will have the means of Grace continued. This Abraham laid down in temporal Judgemaxime of Divine Right, That God would not destroy the Righteous with the wicked, Gen. 18. 23, 25. which Rule yet by the way, is consined unto that kind of destruction which was to be a standing token, and pledge of the last final Judgement, and the Damnation of all ungodly men. For in other cases it will admit of some extraordinary exception, but this is the general way of Gods procedure in all Judgements Spiritual and Temporal. Now if when men openly manifest their barrenness, and daily bring forth Thorns and Briars, if God should immediately remove the Word, whilst there are amongst them a People also that are really fruitful unto his Glory; it cannot be, but that in an ordinary course of his Providence they must suffer with the rest, and that before God hath fulfilled the whole works of his Grace towards them.
This was that wherewith he satisfied and quieted the mind of Elijah when in a transport of Zeal, he complains of the horrible Apostasie of the Church of Israel, making, as the Apostle speaks, intercession against them; and applieth it unto all other seasons of the Church, Rom. 11. 2, 3, 4, 5. And we are taught in that example, that when the Patience of God towards an highly provoking people, seems to inthreatening and the ordinary course of his Providence, to believe that there are yet among them many whose hearts are sincere for God, though for many reasons they are unknown to us. And this should stir us up unto continual prayers for the whole world. When the long-suffering of God is abused by the most, and turned into an increase of their security, yet he hath a blessed End in it, towards his own among them, 1 Pet. 3. 3, 4, 9. And this was the state of Gods present Dispensation towards those Hebrews. The most of them were obstinate Unbebarren Apostates. But yet God continued for a while to exercise Patience towards them, and to tender the Gospel unto them. And this he did because there was a Remnant amongst them according to the Election of Grace, which were to obtain whilst the rest were hardened, as our Apostle declares, Rom. 11. And this Patience of God, the hardened wretches despised and scoffed at. But yet still God went on in his way and method, because of those amongst them, whom through that patience and long-suffering he intended to bring to Repentance and the acknowledgement of the Truth.
Further to clear up this whole matter, it may be enquired what are those Degrees in Spiritual Judgements whereby God doth ordinarily proceed against barren ProInfluence of mens Light upon their own Consciences and AffectiNotions remain with them, but they are not at all affected with what they know, or guided by it as unto their practice. There is a time when Light and Knowledge not imflotes in their Fancies and Memories. And this we see accomplished every day. Men under a barren Apostatizing state, do yet retain some of their Light and Notions of Truth, which they are sensible of no power from, nor have any use of, unless it be to ensin and lusts as the immediate cause of it, yet it is a Spiritual Judgement of God also upon them for their sins. For he with-holdeth all the working of his Spirit in and by that
(2) God deprives them of all the Gifts which formerly they received. Gifts are an Ability for the due Exercise of Gospel Light and Knowledge in the Duties of a publick concern. These they may be made partakers of, who yet prove barren and Apostates. But God will not suffer them to be long retained under a course of Backsiding. As men neglect their Exercise, so God deprives them of them, and makes that very neglect a means of Executing this Judgement on them. The
The next is, that they make Approaches towards the Curse, and this is done two ways: (1) God having evidenced his Rejection of them, he gives them up unto the Temptation of the world, and the Society of ungodly men, whereunto they are engaged by their pleasures or profit. Men gather them, saith our Saviour, Joh. 15. 6. Their Lusts being let loose from under the Power of their Light and Convictions, especially their Love unto the world, they cast themselves into the Society of prophane and wicked men. Among them they wax
Expositors generally agree in giving these Verses as an Instance of the great Wisdom and Prudence used by the Apostle in his dealing with these
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Persuasi sumus, confidimus; Bez. persuasimus nobis, we are perswaded.
My Brethren, Vul. Dilectissimi. Rhem. We confidently trust of you my best beloved.
Meliora, Syr. ea quae sunt bona, pulchra, The things that are good or comely;
and such as draw near to Life, that is, Eternal. Vul. lat. Et viciniora Saluti: Rhem. and nearer to Salvation: others generally, Et cum salute conjuncta: Ours, and such as accompany Salvation; very properly.
But we are perswaded of you, Beloved, better things, and such as accompany Salvation, although we thus speak.
The especial design of the Apostle in this and the following Verses, is to degood-will towards the Hebrews, his Judgement of their state and condition, the Reasons and Grounds of that Judgement, with the proper use and End of the Commination before laid down, that neither that might be neglected, nor themExpression of his Love and goodwill towards them. (2) His
1. His Love and good-will he testifies in his Compellation,
Beloved. It is an Expression of most entire Affection, and is never used in the Gospel but to express the Love of God the Father unto his Son Jesus Christ, Matth. 3. 17. chap.
chap. 17. 5. Mark 1. 11. chap. 9. 7. chap. 12. 16. Luke 3. 22. chap. 9. 35. chap. 20. 13. By the Apostles in their Epistles it is frequently applied unto Believers, especially by Paul, in all those written by him: we might therefore pass it over, as that word which it was usual with him to express his sincere Affections by towards all Saints. But there seems to be a twofold reason of its especial Introduction in this place, both of them respected in the Wisdom of our Apostle. (1) Perhaps, these Hebrews were ready enough to entertain Jealousies concerning him, that he had not that Affection for them which he had for others. For he had now spent a long time with and among the Gentiles for their Conversion and Edification. Among them he had planted very many Churches, and that in one Point contrary to the Judgement of most of these Hebrews, namely, in a Liberty from the Law and the Ceremonies of Moses. In this long converse and work, they might suspect that he had lost his natural Love to his Country-men, as is usual in such cases, and as he was much accused to have done. To root this evil surmise out of their minds, as he useth frequently other affectionate Compellations in this Epistle, so he here calls them his Beloved, than which he had used no Expression of greater EnGentile Converts. And notwithstanding all the Prointense Affection towards them; never opposing them nor reflecting on them with any severity, but only then and wherein they opposed the Gospel, and the Liberty thereof. This Affection was such for them as his Country-men and Kinsmen in the Flesh, as that he could willingly have died that they might be saved, Rom. 9. 2, 3. And for this he prayed continually, chap. 10. 1. And the Addition of Love that was made in him upon their Conversion cannot be expressed. (2) He hath respect unto his preceding severe Expressions, as is plain from the close of this Verse, though we thus speak. As if he had said, Notwithstanding
It is the Duty of the Dispensers of the Gospel to satisfie their Hearers, in and of their Love in Jesus Christ to their Souls and Persons.
2. The Apostle expresseth his Judgement concerning these Hebrews, We are perswaded better things of you, and such as accompany Salvation; wherein we have
It is our Duty to come unto the best satisfaction we may in the Spiritual Condition of
them with whom we are to have Spiritual Communion. There is not any thing of our mutual Duties, that the Gospel more presseth, or more supposeth. And it is necessary both unto Ministers and private Christians. For the former, they are conProv. 27. 23. Be thou diligent to know the state of thy Flock. They are not only to provide good pasture, and feeding for them, but they must know their State and Condition, that what they provide for them may be suitable and seasonable. And unto this End there were at first some in the Church, who had the immediate inspection of the state and walking of the members of it, and were thereby enabled, as Moses said to his Father in Law, Numb. 10. 31. to be instead of Eyes unto the Teachers to look into the condition of all sorts of perperadventure, and to fight uncertainly as men beating the Air, without an Acquaintance with their state, and
Heb. 13. 14. Unless a man have some good satisA workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth, to give unto all their proportion. And the work of the Ministry is not by any means more evacuated and rendered ineffectual, than when men have not a certain design to deal with their Hearers acInstruct, How shall they warn, How shall they comfort any, but on a supat random without a special scope directed by the perswasion mentithis perswasion principally regulates the whole work of the Ministry. He that is a Physician unto the bodies of men, must acquaint himPatients, as also of their distempers, wherein his Skill and Judgement is especially to be exercised. Without that let him be furnished with the greatest store of good Medicines, if he gives them out promiscuously unto all comers, all that he doth will be of little use. It may be his
Four things are required to make the Dispensation of the Word proper and proA good Spring, a safe Rule, a distinct Design, and enlivening Affections. The first is the Dispensers own Light and Experience. He is to see in his work with his own Eyes, and not those of other men. And when he is by own Light as a Scribe unto the Kingdom of God, it is out of the good treasure of his own Heart, that he is to bring forth good things, new, and old. (2) His safe Rule is the infallible word of Truth. This must be the Touchstone of his Light and Experience. And it is suited unto his whole work, unto all the Duties of it, 2 Tim. 3. 16, 17. In nothing but what is regulated hereby are any to be attended unto, Isa. 8. 20. (3) His distinct Design lies in the due consideration of the Spiritual state and condition of them unto whom the Word is to be dispensed. And herein consists the greatest part of the
(2) The Lord Christ hath by his Institution secured us as to a certain rule of this perswasion and love by the disposal of his Disciples into Church Societies upon such grounds as are a sufficient warranty for it. Thus our Apostle in all his Epistles unall to be Saints and called in Christ Jesus. For although some of them might not be so really, and in the sight of God, yet his perswasion, and his Love being directed according to the Rule, were acceptable unto Christ. And whereas our Lord Jesus hath commanded that all his Disciples should joyn themselves unto, and walk in such Societies, were there not great confusion brought into the world in and about Gospel institutions, we should not be at a loss about this perswasion and love; for we should be obliged unto them towards all that are called Christians, until they had openly declared themselves to be Enemies of the Cross of Christ. But we are yet suffering under the confusion of a fatal Apostasie, which God in his good time will deliver his Churches from.
(3) As we cannot direct our Love aright without this perswasion, no more can we exercise any of the Duties or Fruits of it in a due manner. The Fruits of muSpiritual which concern Edification, or in things Temporal which concern outward Relief. Of the first sort, are Admonition, Exhortation, Instructions, and
We may as occasions require publickly testifie that good perswasion which we have concerning
The best perswasion we can arrive unto concerning the Spiritual condition of any, leaves yet room, yea makes way for, Gospel Threatenings, Warnings, Exhortations, and Encouragements.
It followeth hence: (1) That whatever be the state and condition of them unbalk or wave the delivery and pressing of any Evangelical warning, or the severest Threatening contained in the Gospel, much less Encouragements and Motives unto Faith and Obedience, though we are perswaded they both believe and obey. For as it is not impossible but that both they and we may be
(2) That others should not think themselves severely dealt with, when they are pressed on and urged with the severest Threatenings of the Gospel. Let them not say or think in their Hearts, this Preacher looks upon us as persons Unregenerate, or Hypocrites, perhaps out of ill-will unto us. It is certain that on such occasions, men are apt to give place to such surmises. For an Apprehension thereof, is the reason why the Apostle maketh as it were this Apology for the use of the severe foregoing Commination. As if he had said, Do not you entertain any hard thoughts or evil surmises concerning me or my dealing with you in this matter. There are other reasons of my thus dealing with you; for as unto your personal interest in the Grace of Christ, I have as yet a good perswasion, although I thus speak. And let others take heed lest they fall into any such apprehension, which will certainly defeat them of the wholsome Fruit of the Word. Sharp Frosts are needful to make the Ground fruitful, as well as the clearest Sun-shine. And if a Tree be not sometimes pressed on by the Wind, it will never well firm its Roots in the Ground. Sharp Reproofs, and earnestness in pressing Gospel Comminations are sometimes as needful for the
Hos. 10. 11.
Having considered in general the good perswasion of the Apostle concerning those Hebrews, we may consider in especial, his Expression of the things which he was so perswaded to be in them; And this is double, (1) better things; (2) such as accompany Salvation.
(1) He was perswaded concerning them, Better things. There comparison included in this expression, and not only an opposition unto what was spoken. If so, then there is a supposition of some good things granted unto those treated of. This therefore cannot refer unto the Verses immediately beBarrenness and Destruction, but it must relate unto ver. 4, 5, 6. where the Spiritual Gifts collated on them are enumerated. They are Good things in themselves, but yet such Good things as may perish and they also on whom they are bestowed. Those who enjoy them may yet be barren Ground, and so cursed and burned. But the Apostle is perswaded better things of those to whom he speaks, namely, such things as accompany Salvation, such as whosoever is made partaker of shall never perish Eternally. Or Chrysostome supposeth. But yet neither is there any need of supcomparative Degree, although no comparison be included; espe
However here is certainly an opposition unto what was before affirmed concerning others; And that may be reduced unto two Heads. (1) That they were barren and destitute of all saving Grace and Fruits. (2) That they should in the End be destroyed. These better things must be opposed to the one, or other of these, or unto them both. If they are opposed unto the first, then especial saving Grace and Fruit-bearing, such as are peculiar unto Gods Elect proceeding from the real Sanperishing gifted Hypocrites can be partakers of, are intended. If unto this latter, then those better thing respect not their Qualification but their
For of these things it is added, Such as accompany Solvation; literally,
(1) That among Professors of the Gospel some are Partakers of better things than others. They were all Professors concerning whom the Apostle discourseth in this and the preceding Verses. And yet notwithstanding any Good things that some might have had, or might be supposed to have had, others of them had better things than they. And this Difference may be observed, first in the Degrees, and secondly in the Kinds of the things intended. Spiritual Gifts are of one kind. For although there are several sorts of them, yet they have all the same general nature, they are all Gifts and no more. The difference therefore that is amongst them being not to be taken from their own especial nature, but their use and tendency ungradual. For instance, to speak with Tongues and to Prophesie, are two Gifts of different sorts; But whereas they are both Gifts of the Spirit, and are designed unto the furtherance of the GoGifts in the Church, as they have different Gifts, so they have some of them Better Gifts than others, some as to the especial kinds of Gifts, but mostly as to the Degrees of their usefulness unto their proper End. Hence our Apostle having reckoned up the various and manifold Gifts of the Spirit, adds this Advice unto the Corinthians
Cor. 12. 31. Covet earnestly the best Gifts. Those that tend most to the Edification of the Church. Thus ever it was, and ever it will be in the Church of God, some have had, and some have better Gifts than others. And as the whole Church is hence to learn to acquiesce in, and submit to the Soveraignty of the Spirit of God, who divideth unto every man severally as he will; so those who have received these better and differing Gifts either in their especial Nature or Degrees of usefulness, have some Duties singularly incumbent on them, and whose discharge will be required at their hands. As (1) To walk humbly with a constant care, that a sense of their Gifts and Abilities do not in their minds puff them up, fill them with conceits of themsomewhat, and so make them exalt themselves above their Brethren. In the Apostolical and Primitive Church, when there was nothing of that secular Grandeur, Promotion, Preferments, Dignities amongst the Ministers of the Church, as now a days fill the world with Pride and Domination, all the Danger of an hurtful Elation of mind in one above another, was from the eminency of Gifts which some had received above others. And it cannot be denied but that the abuse hereof laid the foundation of all that swelling secular Pride, and cursed Domination or Lordly Rule which afterwards pestered the Church. The two things which the Apostle Peter in one place cautions and chargeth the Elders and Guides of the Church against became their Ruine, namely, filthy Lucre, and Love of Domination over the Lords Heritage, 1 Pet. 5. 2, 3. And indeed it is a very hard and difficult matter for men totally to suppress those insinuations of a good conceit of themselves, and preferring themselves before others, which Gifts singular in their use and kind will suggest. Neither will it be effected without a constant exercise of Grace. For this cause the Apostle would not have a Novice called to the Minipuffed up with Pride and fall into the Condemnation of the Devil, 1 Tim. 3. 6. Afflictions and Temptations for the most part, are a needful Ballance for eminent Gifts. This therefore the Scripture hath provided against, both warning us, that knowledge, which is the matter of all spiritual Gifts, will puff up, and forbidding us to boast in them, befreely bestowed on us, without respect unto any thing of good or worth in our selves, 1 Cor. 4. 7. And if we reckon aright those of us whose Gifts are inferiour unto those of other men, provided we use and improve what we have received unto the best advantage we are able, have no reason to envy them whose Gifts out-shine ours. For if they are gracious, they have work enough cut out for them to keep them watchful over themselves unto Humility, where yet it is to be feared that things do not always so well succeed, but that by sinful sureminently gifted, if he be not eminently humble hath but an unquiet life within doors. And if such a Person be not truly gracious, he is in the ready way to fall into the condemnation of the Devil. Such a Person is a prey to every Temptation, and will also seduce himself into all evil.
(2) It is required of such persons as to be humble, so in an especial manner to be thankful. The things whereof they are partakers are Gifts, and not to be thankGifts, is the most proper ingratitude.
(3) A Fruitfulness proportionable unto the excellency of their Gifts. He who had received five Talents was not only obliged to Trade with them, but to get five Talents more. The increase of one or two Talents would not have served his turn. To whom
Spiritual things which differ in their whole kind and nature from other things, and are better than they as to their Essence and Being. Such is all saving Grace, with all the Fruits of it. I shall not now stay to prove that true saving Grace differs specifically from all common Grace however advanced in its exspecifical difference between things. But this I say plainly, which I can prove assuredly, that true Gospel Faith and sincere Obedience are better things than the most glorious Hypocrite or most reformed unregenerate Person was ever made partaker of. In the visible professing Church all things outwardly seem to be equal. There are the same Ordinances administred unto all, the same Profession of Faith is made by all, the same outward
There are according to the Tenour of the Covenant of Grace, such things bestowed on some persons, as Salvation doth infallibly accompany and ensue upon. Better things and perish and did so. Many excellent things were bestowed on us when we were created in the Image of God. But they were all such things as we might lose, and did lose, and thereby came short of that Glory of God, which we were created for. But in the Covenant of Grace, there is such a disposal and concatenation of Spiritual things, that a real participation of some of them, doth infallibly conclude unto an indefeazable Interest in them all. This did the Apostle assure us in an express annumeration of them, Rom. 8. 29, 30. For instance, there is a saving Faith of this nature. For (1) It is an effect of Gods immutable purpose of Election. If that therefore cannot be changed, this cannot utterly fail and be lost. Whom he predestinates them he calls, that is, to saving Faith by Jesus Christ. Faith is of Gods Elect, and they only believe truly who are orJoh. 17. 8, 11, 15. &c. (3) The Power of God is engaged in the preservation of it, 2 Pet. 1. 3. 1 Pet. 1. 5. Ephes. 1. 19, 20. (4) The Promises of the Covenant are expresly multiplied unto this purpose,
It is the Duty of all Professors strictly to examine themselves concerning their Participation of those better things which accompany Salvation. Their condition is deplora
We may yet farther observe how variously the Apostle treats these Hebrews. SomeHoly Brethren, affirming them to be Partakers of the Heavenly Calling; so also that they had those better things in them which accompany Salvadull and slothful, and had need be taught again what are the Principles of the Oracles of God; and sets before them the final Destruction of Apostates to ingenerate a fear and apprehension of the Terror of the Lord in them. Now this variety in the Apostles treating of them
present Commotions, not from any Rhetorical Artifice, but from a regular and steady Judgement concerning the condition of the whole Church. For (1) There were indeed several sorts of Professors among them answering the several Descriptions he gives of them. He spake therefore to the whole community indefinitely, leaving the especial Application of what he speaks unto themselves in particular, according as their different conditions did require. And this is the only safe and prudent way for Ministers to deal with their Flocks. For when any conceive themselves by other circumstances to be singled out for Reproof and Threatening, they commonly draw forth disadvantage to themselves thereby. (2) The best of the Hearers of the Gospel may have much to be blamed in them, although their sincerity in general ought to be highly approved. (3) Severe Threatenings in the Dispensation of the Gospel, are usually proposed unto them, who yet are not absolutely liable to the Penalty threatened. They do not predict what will come to pass, but warn what is to be avoided.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
The Syriack renders perversus, iniquus, it omitteth vulgar Latine, but expresseth that your Love. Other material differences among Translators there is not.
For God is not unrighteous to forget your work and the labour of that Love which you have (evidently) shewed towards his name, in that you have ministred to the Saints and do minister.
The Expositors of the Roman Church do greatly perplex themselves and others in their Comments on this Text. They generally agree in an endeavour from hence to prove the merit of works against Protestants, because the Council of Trent applies this Text to that purpose. And none are more confident herein than our Rhemists, who after their usual Reproaches of Protestants, affirm, That good works are meritorious and the very cause of Salvation, so that God should be unjust if he rendered not Heaven for the same. But they are greatly divided among themselves about the
How Forraign these Discourses are to the Text and Context is evident to every impartial considerer of it. They are only Chimera's hatched out of the proud
merit of their works that these mens minds are prepossessed withall. For (1) Our Apostle treats of those whom he supposeth and judgeth to be in a present good Spiritual Condition. For with respect thereunto he ascribeth unto them things that accompany Salvation, and prescribeth no other Duty unto them for the actual enjoyment of it, but only those of Faith and Love and Ministration unto the Saints, which at present he commendeth in them. What they did formerly that he affirms them to continue in the performance of, You have ministred and you do minister. (2) The Apostle expresly distinguisheth them concerning whom he now speaks, from those who were now
2ly. Neither is countenance given unto the other Imagination in general conmerit of works in these words. For (1) The Design of the Apostle is only to let them know that their Labour in the work of the Lord, that their Obedience unto the Gospel should not be lost or be in vain. And hereof he gives them assurance from the Nature of God with whom they had to do, with respect unto that Covenant whereinto he takes them that do believe. They had been sedulous in the discharge of the great Duty of
The Apostle in this Verse gives an account of the Grounds of his Perswasion concerning these Hebrews, expressed in the Verse foregoing. And these he declares unto them partly for Encouragement, and partly that they might be satisfied in his Sincerity, and that he did not give them fair words to entice or allure them by. And the reasons he gives to this purpose may be reduced unto two Heads.
Faith and Love, with the Fruits of them.
2. The Faithfulness of God in Covenant, whereon the final preservation of all true Believers doth depend.
These are the Grounds of that perswasion concerning their state and condition which he expressed in the foregoing words. Hence that perswasion of his was of a mixt nature, and had something in it of a Divine Faith, and somewhat only of a moral certainty. As he drew his conclusion from, or built his perswasion on Gods Faithfulness or Righteousness, so there was in it an infallible Assurance of Faith that could not deceive him. For what we believe concerning God as he hath reinfallible. But as his Perswasion had respect unto the Faith, Love and Obedience which he had observed in them, so it was only a moral Assurance, and such as in its own nature might fail. For God only is invisible things may be deceived. The Proposition from Gods Faithfulness is of infallible Truth; the Application of it unto these Hebrews of moral Evidence only. Such a Perswasion we may have in this case, which is prevalent against all Objections, a certain Rule for the performance of all Duties on our parts towards others; and such had the Apostle concerning these Hebrews.
That which in the first place he confirms his Perswasion with is, their work. God is not unrighteous to forget your work. It is not any singular work, but work is, is declared in that parallel place of the same Apostle, 1 Thes. 1. 3. Coincidences of expressions in this and the other Epistles of the same Writer, all peculiar unto himRemembring your Work of Faith and Labour of Love. The Work here intended is the Work of Faith; The whole Work of Obedience to God, whereof Faith is the principle, and that which moves us thereunto. Hence it is called the Obedience of Faith, Rom. 1. 5.
And this Obedience of Faith according to the Gospel is called there, their work. (1) Because it was their chief employment, their Calling lay in it. They did not attend unto it occasionally, or when they had nothing else to do, as is the manner of some. Religion was their business, and Gospel Obedience their daily work. This was their whole, even to fear God and keep his Commandments, as it is expressed under the Old Testament. (2) Because there is work and labour in it, or great pains to be taken about it. For hereunto our Apostle in the next Verse requires their diligence, ver. 11. as Peter doth all diligence, 2 Epist. 1. 11. And we may observe in our way,
That Faith, if it be a living Faith, will be a working Faith. It is the work
of Faith which the Apostle here commends. This case is so stated by James that it needs no farther confirmation, Chap. 2. 20. Wilt thou know, or knowest thou not, O vain man, that Faith without works is dead? He is a most vain man who thinks otherwise, who hopes for any Benefit by that Faith which doth not work by Love. Sathan hath no greater design in the world than to abuse Gospel Truths. When the Doctrine of free Justification by Faith, through the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ, was first fully revealed and declared, his great Design then was to perlive in sin as they pleased, and neglect all good Works and Duties of Obethis or that Religion, Papists or Protestants, or the like, they shall be saved whatever their ways and works are. So Papists, for Instance, are indeed the greatest Solifidians in the world. For to own the Faith of the Church, is enough with them to secure the Salvation of any. This Abomination having been early started was seasonably suppressed by the writing of James and John. For the former directly and plainly lays open the Vanity of this pretence, declaring, that that Faith which they professed and boasted of, was not the Faith whereby any
living, operative, and fruitful, and evidenceth it self unto all by its Works and Fruits. Whereas that Faith whereof vain men living in their sins did boast, was so far from being a Grace of the Spirit of God, that it was no other but what was in the Devils themselves, and which they could not rid themselves of if they would. The latter without expressing the occasion of it, spends his Epistle in, declaring the necessity of Love and Obedience, or keeping the Commandments of Christ. Wherefore the enemy of our Salvation being defeated in this Attempt, he betook himself unto the other extream; contending that the works of Faith had the same place in our Justification with Faith it self. And why should they not? are not Faith and they equally Acts of Obedience in us? are not Faith and they equally required by the Gospel? why may they not be supposed to have an equal influence into our Justification? at least in the same kind, though Faith on some considerations may have the pre-eminence? I say these things are speciously pleaworks into an Equality with Faith, but to advance them into the room of Christ and his Righteousness. For when we say, we are justified by Faith only, we do not say that Faith is our Righteousness, but as it apprehends the Righteousness of Christ, as he is the End of the Law for Righteousness unto them that do believe. And this is the use that God hath deFaith unto, and which in its own nature it is suited for. But bring in the works of Obedience into the same place, and they are of no use but to be imputed unto us for Righteousness, and so to possess the place of Christ and his Righteouswe are justified freely by Faith through the Redemption that is in the Blood of Christ, and so the Imputation of his Righteousness unto us. (2) That the Faith which hath this effect, which is of this use, is living, operative, fruitful, and will evidence it self by works in Obedience unto the Commands of God. And this is that which here we contend for, namely, that a living Faith will be a working Faith. And he is a vain man that deceives himself with any thing else in the room thereof. And yet this is the course of multitudes. But yet men do not deceive themselves herein notionally but practically. I never yet met with any man in my life who professed it as his Judgement, that so he believed aright, he might live as he pleased, follow his Lusts and neglect all good Works or holy Duties of Obedience. For this implies a contradiction. So to believe, is so far from believing aright, as that it contains in it a total Rejection of the Gospel. But practically we see that the generality of men content themselves with that knowconclusions they draw from any Doctrines which they profess to believe, but from the power of Darkness and the deceitfulthat they are justified by their works. For there is not a race of greater and more flagitious sinners, than (for the most part) are the men of that Perswasion. Only for their Relief, their Leaders have provided them with a Comgood works which shall do the deed for them, as Penances, Pardons, Purgatory, Confessions, Pilgrimages, and the like. But be mens Perswasion what it will, right or wrong, where sin is predominant they will be wicked, and whatever be the Object of their Faith, if it be not living in the subject, it cannot work, nor be fruitful.
We ought to look on Obedience as our work; which will admit neither of sloth nor negligence. Here lies the occasion of the ruine of the Souls of men who profels the Duties of Profession are a thing of course unto them, and that which lies without the compass of their principal work and business in the world. This makes their Profession serve to no other end, but to make them secure in a perishing condition. Now that our Obedience may indeed be our work, it is required, (1) That the carrying of it on, the attendance unto it, and furtherance of it in
principal design in the world. That is a mans proper work which is so. God severely threateneth those which walk with him at peradventures, Levit. 26. 21. if you shall walk with me fortuito, at hap hazard, that is, without making it your principal dethen will even I my self walk with you at all adventures; though I continue with you, as one walking with you in my outno regard unto you, as to do you any good, yea I will sorely punish you notwithstanding the Appearance of our walkAdventures, as unto any especial design of their minds about it. Barnabas exhorted the Disciples at Antioch, that with purpose of Heart they would cleave unto the Lord, Acts 11. 23. firm Resolution to abide in, and pursue the Obedience they were called unto. So Paul tells Timothy, that he knew his Doctrine, manner of life and purpose, 2 Tim. 3. 10. namely, how his principal aim, design and resolution was to abide in and carry on his course of Faith and Obedience. And then is any thing the object of our purpose and prinlive is Christ, or he is the chief end of our life. When men do usually and ordiseason, Obedience is not their principal design. (2) When it possesseth the chiefest place in our valuation and esteem. And this it doth absolutely where we attain that frame, that whilst the work of Faith and Obedience thrives in our Hearts and Lives, we are not much moved with whatever else befalls us in this world. This was the frame of our Apostle, Acts 21. 13. Phil. 3. 7, 8. But because of the weakness, and ingagement of our natural affections unto the lawful comforts of this Life, some are not able to rise unto that height of the undervaluation and contempt of these things whilst the work of our Obedience goes on, which we ought all to aim at; yet we must say, that if there be any sincerity in making our Obedience the principal design of our lives, there will be a constant
The second thing whereon the Apostle grounds his confidence concerning these Hebrews is their
There is in the remaining part of this Verse, which depends on these words;
In the first of these the Apostle observes the Grace it self, and its exercise, their Love and its Labour.
This Grace or Duty being excellent and rare, and its exercise in Labour being highly necessary and greatly neglected, and both in conjunction being a principal Evidence of a good Spiritual condition, of an Interest in those Better things which accompany Salvation, I shall a little divert unto the especial consideration of them.
Love is the second great Duty of the Life of God, which is brought to light by the Gospel. It is Faith that gives Glory to God on high, and Love that Peace on the Earth, wherein the Angels comprised the substance of our Deliverance by Jesus Christ, Luke 2. 14. Neither is there any thing of it in the whole world but what is derived from the Gospel.
All things were at first made in a state of Love. That Rectitude, Order, Peace and Harmony which was in the whole Creation was an Impression from, and an Expression of the Love of God. And our Love towards him was the Bond of that Perfection, and the Stability of that State and Condition. The whole Beauty of the Creation below consisted in this, namely, in mans loving God above all, and all other things in him and for him, according as they did participate of and express his Glory and Properties. This represented that Love which was in God to
When man by sin had broken the first link of this Chain of Love, when thereby we lost the Love of God to us, and renounced our own Love unto him, all things fell into disorder and confusion in the whole Creation; all things were filled with mutual Enmity and Hatred. The first Instance of mutual Love among the Creatures was that between Angels and Men, as those which were in the nearest Alliance, and made for the same End of the Glory of God. For as the Angels rejoiced in the whole Creation of God, when those morning Stars sang together, and all the Sons of God shouted for joy, Job 38. 7. so man being the most capable object of their Love, was their especial Delight. And man being made to love God above all, and all other things in him and for him, his principal Love must be fixed on those who had the most of the Image, and made the most glorious Representation of God. But the Bond of Love being dissolved, mutual Enmity succeeded in the room thereof. And the first Act of Angelical Obedience we read of, was their keeping man from a return into Eden, and eating of the Tree of Life, Gen. 3. 24. and men could look on them only as flaming Swords, ready to execute the wrath of God and the Curse upon him. And this state would have continued unto Eternity, had not God gathered all things again into one, both which are in Heaven and which are in Earth, even in Christ
Jesus, Ephes. 1. to. There could never more have been any Love, nor any Duties of Love between Angels and Men, had not God restored all things by Jesus Christ. This is the only foundation of the whole Ministry of Angels in Love, Heb. 1. 14. For men themselves, mutual Enmity and hatred possessed them. And he who first acted in that frame and spirit which came upon them was a murderer, and slew his Brother. And this the Apostle proposeth as the Instance and Example of that Hatred and Enmity which is among men under the Curse, 1 Joh. 3. 11, 12. And there is no greater Evidence of any persons being uninterested in the Restauration of all things by Christ, than the want of that Love which was again introduced thereby. So the Apostle describing the condition of men in their unregenerate condition, affirms that they live in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another, Tit. 3. 3. There ensued also an Enmity between man and all the Creation here below. The sin of man had brought all things into a Condition of Vanity and Bondage, which they groan to be delivered from, Rom. 8. 20, 21, 22. And the Earth the common Mother of them all, as it were to revenge it self on men, brings forth nothing but Thorns and Thistles, Gen. 3. 18. and yields not her strength to his labour, Gen. 4. 12. Hence is all that vanity, vexation, and sore travail which the life of man is filled withall. After the entrance of this disorder and confusion, there was nothing of true original Love in the world, nor was it by any means attainable. For it all arose from the Love of God, and was animated by our Love unto him. But now all things were filled with Tokens and Evidences of the Anger, DispleaGod was Love, and had a Love for us. For so the Apostle tells us, Herein is Love, not that we loved God but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the Propitiation of our sins, 1 Joh. 4. 10. But if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another, ver. 11. No Love could there be, until a fresh Revelation was made that God is Love; for the first which he had made in the Creation was utterly lost. And this was done by Jesus Christ.
There was some step made unto that confusion which ensued on the loss of this universal Love by the first Promise; without which, the whole lower Creation would have been an Hell, and nothing else. This was the spring of all that Love which was in the Old Testament, because it was a new discovery that there was yet Love in God towards fallen mankind. And whatever in the world may pretend thereunto, yet if it proceed not from the new Revelation and Discovery that God is Love, it is nothing of that Divine Love which is required of us. And this is only in Christ; In him alone the Benignity and Love of God unto mankind appeared, Tit. 3. 4. And here is a foundation laid and a spring opened of a Love far more excellent than that which our Nature was furnished and adorned withall in the first Creation. For the Love of God being the cause and fountain of ours, which is a compliance with the manifestation of it, the more eminently the Love of God is manifested, the more eminent is that Love which is the fruit thereof. And Gods Love is far more gloriously displayed in Christ than it was in all the works of his hands. In him alone we know not only that God hath Love, but that he is Love; that he hath Love for sinners, and that such a Love, as in the spring, means, and effects of it, is every way ineffable and incom
The whole of what I intend is expressed by the Apostle John, 1 Epist. cap. 4. ver. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. Beloved let us love one another, for love is of God, and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God; He that loveth not, knoweth not God, for God is Love. In this was manifested the Love of God towards us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him. Herein is Love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the Propitiation for our sins; Beloved, if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another; No man hath seen God at any time, if we love one another, God dwelleth in us and his Love is perfected in us.
All that we have before affirmed and much more, is here declared by the Apobeing Love himself which is the Eternal Spring of all Love in us. Neither could we have any thing of it, or interest in it, without some glorious effect and manifestation of the Love of God, which he also gave in sending his Son
to be a Propitiation for our sins. And the Love which proceeds from hence, hath all the glorious Properties here ascribed unto it. Wherefore there is no such way and means whereby we may express the distinguishing Light, Grace and Power of the Gospel, no such Evidence of the reality of our Interest in God, as Love, or in the Love of God by Christ, as by and in our own Love to him and his.
The Mystical Body of Christ is the second great mystery of the Gospel. The first is his Person, that great mystery of Godliness God manifest in the Flesh. In this mystical Body we have Communion with the Head, and with all the Members; with the Head by Faith, and with the Members by Love. Neither will the first compleat our Interest in that Body without the latter. Hence are they frequently conjoyned by our Apostle, not only as those which are necessary unto, but as those which EsUnion of the whole mystical Body and Communion therein, Gal. 5. 6. Ephes. 6. 23. 1 Thes. 1. 3. 1 Tim. 1. 14. chap. 1. 11. 2 Tim. 1. 13. chap. 2. 22. Wherefore without Love we do no more belong to the Body of Christ, than without Faith it self. And in one place he so transposeth them in his exPhilem. 5. Hearing of thy Love and Faith which thou hast towards the Lord Jesus, and towards all Saints. Both these Graces are spoken of as if they were exercised in the same manner towards both their Objects,
Whereas therefore this Grace and Duty is the peculiar Effect and Glory of the Gospel, the form and life of the mystical Body of Christ, the pledge and evidence of our Interest in those better things which accompany Salvation, I shall briefly denature of it, and shew the reason of the necessity of its diligent ex
Mutual love among Believers, is a fruit of the Spirit of Holiness, and effect of Faith, whereby being knit together in the Bond of entire Spiritual Affection, on the account of their joynt Interest in Christ, and participation of the same new, divine, spiritual Nature from God, do value, delight, and rejoyce in one another, and are mutually helpful in a constant discharge of all those Duties, whereby their eternal, spiritual and temporal Good may be promoted.
1. It is a fruit of the Spirit of Holiness, of the Spirit of Christ, Gal. 5. 22. It is no more of our selves than Faith is, it is the Gift of God. Natural Affections are in-laid in the constitution of our Beings. Carnal Affections are grown inseparable from our nature as corrupted. Both excited by various Objects, Relations, Occano root in our selves until it be planted in us by the Holy Ghost. And as it is so, it is the principal part of the Renovation of our natures into the Image of God, who is Love. This Love is of God; And every one that loveth is born of God, 1 Joh. 4. 7. You are taught of God to love one another.
2. It is an effect of Faith. Faith worketh by Love, Gal. 5. 6. Hence as we obLove to the Saints is so frequently added unto Faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, as the effect and pledge of it. And although it proceeds in general from Faith as it respects the Commands and Promises of God, yet it derives immediately from Faith as acted on the Lord Jesus Christ. For he being the Head of the whole mystical Body, it is Faith in him that acts it self by Love towards all the Members. Holding him the Head by Faith, the whole Body edifies it self in Love, Ephes. 4.
Faith in Christ is, the more abundant will our Love be towards all his Saints. For Faith in Christ doth first exLove of the Saints, is but the Love of Christ reprePapists tell us that Love or Charity is the form or life of Faith, without which it is dead. It is so far true, that accorJames, where it is not, there Faith is dead. Not that it is the life of Faith, but that Faith wherever it is living will work by Love. Faith thereLove, and not on the conLove which proceedeth not from, which is not the effect of, which is not enlivened by Faith, is not that which the Gospel requireth.
3. Believers are knit together in an entire Affection. This is that Cement whereby the whole mystical Body of Christ is fitly joyned together and compacted, Ephes. 4. 16. This mutual adherence is by the uniting, cementing efflux of Love. It is but an Image of the Body, or a dead carkass that men set up, where they would make a Bond for Professors of Christianity, consisting of outward Order, Rules, and Methods of Duties. A Church without it, is an heap of dead stones, and not living stones fitly compacted and built up a Temple unto God. Break this Bond of Perfection, and all spiritual Church Order ceaseth; for what remains is carnal and worldly. There may be Churches constituted in an outward humane Order, on supposed prudential Principles of Union, and external Duties of Communion, which may continue in their Order, such as it is, where there is no Spiritual Evangelical Love in exercise among the Members of them. But where Churches have no other Order, nor Bond of Communion but what is appointed by Christ, wherever this Love faileth, their whole Order will dissolve.
4. This mutual Love among Believers, springs from and is animated by their mutual Interest in Christ, with their Participation of the same Divine Nature thereby. It is from their
5. This Love in the first place acts it self by valuation, esteem, and delight. So the Psalmist affirms, that all his delight was in the Saints and in the excellent in the Earth, Psal. 16. 3. The Apostle carries this unto the height in that Instance, wherein we ought to lay down our lives for the Brethren, 1 Joh. 3. 16. For whereas Life is comprehensive of all that is dear or useful unto us in this world, what we ought if called thereunto to part with our lives for, we value and esteem above them all. It is true, the cases wherein this is actually required in us, do not frequently occur; And they are such alone wherein the Glory and Interest of Christ are in an especial manner concerned. But such a Love as will always dispose, and when we are called enable us unto this Duty, is required to be in us if we are Disciples of Christ. So are we to prize and value them, as at least to be ready to share with them in all their conditions. For,
6. This Love acts it self by all means, in all ways and Duties whereby the Eternal, Spiritual and Temporal good of others may be promoted. And it would require a long discourse to go over but the principal Heads of those Ways and Duties which are
Description of this Love, as may distinguish it from that cold, formal pretence of it in some outward Duties, which the most sa
This is that Love which the Gospel so earnestly commendeth unto, and so in
And the reason is manifest from what hath been spoken why the Apostle giveth this as a ground of his good Perswasion concerning these Hebrews, as that they had an especial Interest in those Better things from which Salvation is inseparable. For if this Love in general be so a Grace of the Gospel, if it so spring and arise from the Love of God in Christ, as that there neither ever was, nor can be the least of it in the world which is not an Emanation from that Love; and if in its especial nature it so particularly relates unto the Spirit of Christ, and our Union with him, it must needs be among the principal Evidences of a good spiritual condition. And the same will yet farther appear if we consider the grounds whereon it is inforced in the Gospel, which are principally these that follow.
1. As the Head of all other considerations the Lord Christ expresseth it as that which was to be the great Evidence unto the world of the Truth and Power of the Gospel, as also of his own being sent of God, Joh. 17. 21. That they all may be one, as thou Father art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us, that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. It is true there is another especial principle of the Union of Believers as they are
2. Our Right unto, our Priviledge in, and Evidence of our being the Disciples of Christ, depends on our mutual Love, Joh. 14. 34, 35. A new Commandment I give unto you, that you love one another, as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that you are my Disciples if you have love one to another. This especial Commandment of Christ concerning mutual love among his Disciples is here and elsewhere called a
3. This mutual Love is that wherein the Communion of Saints doth consist. How great a thing that Communion is, appears from the place which the acknowledgeancient Creeds of the Church. I do not say this Communion doth consist solely therein. There belongs unto it a common participation of the same sanctifying Spirit, and a common Interest in the same spiritual Head Christ Jesus, as to its principles, and common participation of the same Ordinances as to its exercise. But herein doth this Communion among themselves principally consist. That it hath no concernment in an outward compliance with certain Rites and Ceremonies that are invented not for the life of Unity, but for a shew of Uniformity, I suppose all men are well enough satisfied. But this is the Order of the Communion of Saints. The foundation of it is laid in a joynt par
4. Without this Love we are of no use in the Church of God. Some men seem to be very useful by their Gifts, and I wish that none do pride themselves in them, or bear themselves high upon them. For of themselves they are apt to puff us up. But the very Truth is, that without this Love, and the constant exercise of it, they are of little or no use unto the true spiritual Edification of the Church. This our Apostle doth not only plainly affirm, but also so largely argue, as we need not furCor. 13. For he doth not only compare the most excellent Gifts of the Spirit with it, preferring it above them all; but also declares that witha little sounding Brass, or a tinkling Cymbal, ver. 1, 2, 3. Wherefore we may consider,
5. That whatever Grace any man seem to have, whatever Profession he make, of whatever use he appear to be, if he have not this Love, if he live not in the exercise of it, he hath indeed no Grace in Truth, nor any real Interest in the Benefits of the Gospel. Faith where it is
I cannot pass by this subject wholly without a little farther pressing the necessity of the obtaining and due exercise of this Grace. I know not how it comes to pass, but so it is, that men are harrassed continually about want of Love, with Writings keen and invective, yet little Fruits do we see to come thereof. And the plain reason of it is, because the Love which men so contend for, is confined to that practice in, and of Ecclesiastical Communion, whose measures they have fixed to themselves. If you will do thus and thus, go in such or such ways, so or so far, leave off such ways of Fellowship in the Gospel as you have embraced and think according unto the mind of God, then you have Love, else you have none at all. How little either Unity or Love hath been promoted by such Principles and Prasincere. But that there can be no Love, or no due exercise of it, until that be accomplished, I am not perswaded, I do not believe; yea I judge that if ever it be, it will rather be the effect and fruit of Love; than the cause of it. Let us therefore all lay hold on the present season, and not lose the exercise of Love whilst we contend about it. I know no way wherein I judge that any who fear God in the world do walk at this day, that is in and of it self inconsistent with Gospel Love, or a real ObstruEnvy, Ill-will, and Ignorance. For none of the Institutions of Christ, such as this is, can either directly or by any just consequences, obstruct that Love which he requireth of his Disciples, and which indeed they are all suited to promote. And this of particular Churches is an effect of the Wisdom of Christ providing a way for the con
Let us therefore not wait for other seasons, nor think any outward thing previously necessary unto the due discharge of this great Duty of the Gospel. We are in our way, let us go about our work. And I shall only at present give a few Cauti
1. Take heed of a froward natural temper. Wherever this is predominant, it either weakens Love, or sullies the Glory of its exercise. Some good persons have naturally so much of the Nabal in them, that a man scarce knows how to converse with them. They mingle all the sweet fruits of Love with so much harshness and sowrness, as makes them ungrateful unto those who most need them. I think it is a mistake, that Grace only subdues our sinful corruptions; it will if cared for and used as it ought, cure our natural Dispositions, so far as any evil, or occasion of evil is as it were incorporated with them. If it maketh not the froward, meek, the angry, patient, the peevish and morose, sweet and compliant, how doth it make the Leopard lye down with the Kid, and the Wolf dwell with the Lamb, Isa. 11. 6. And it is not enough considered how great a Lustre is put upon the exercise of Love, when it is accompanied with a natural condescension, compliance and be
2. Watch against the disadvantages of an outward condition. Those of high degree are usually encompassed with so many circumstances of distance, that they know not how to break through them unto that familiarity of Love that ought to be among Believers. But as the Gospel on all civil or secular accounts leaves unto men all their Advantages of Birth, Education, Offices, Power, manner of converse, free and entire, so with respect unto things purely Spiritual it lays all level among Believers. In Jesus Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, Barbarian nor Scythian, bond nor free, but all are one in Christ, and it is the new Creature alone that makes the difference. Hence in all affairs of the Church we are forbid to have any reoutward state and condition of men, Jam. 2. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. We all serve the same common Lord and Master, who when he was rich, for our sakes became poor. And if we for his sake lay not aside the consideration of all our Riches with that distance of mind and conversation from the poorest Saints, his Disciples. I speak not now of the laying out of mens wealth for the use of the poor, but of lowliness of mind in condescending unto a Brotherly Communion in Love with the meanest of them. Let therefore the greatest know, that there is no Duty of Spiritual Love that unbecomes them. And if their state and condition keep them
3. Watch against provocations. Whilst we and others are encompassed with the Body of our Infirmities, we shall meet with what we may be prone so to esteem. Where men are apt to turn every Infirmity, every failing, every neglect, and it may be every mistake, into a provocation and to take offence thereat, never expect any thing of Love from such Persons. For as their frame is a fruit of pride, and self-conceit, so it is diametrically opposite unto all the principal actings of Love deCor. 13. 4, 5, 6, 7.
4. Take heed of resting satisfied in the outward Duties of Love, without the inward workings of it, as also in an apprehension of inward Affections without outward Fruits. Men may have a Conviction that all the outward Duties of Love, in warning, admonishing, comforting, relieving with outward supplies are to be athis Goods to feed the poor, and yet have no Charity, 1 Cor. 13. 2. All Fruit partakes of the nature of the Root. If the good we do in these kinds proceed only from Conviction of Duty, and not from fervent Love, they will prove but Hay and Stubble that will burn in their Trial.
Secondly, With this Love as an eminent Adjunct of it, the Apostle expresseth labour of it, the labour of Love,
laboriosa charitas; laborious Love, saith Beza. Laboris ex charitate suscepti, Eras. the labour undergone on the account of Love, that is, in the exercise of it. painful labour. A lazie Love like that described by the Apostle, Jam. 2. 15, 16. and which most men satisfie themselves withall, is no evidence of a saving Faith. But we are here taught, that Love if it be true is laborious and diligent: or, Great and difficult labour is required unto Love in its due exercise. It is not unto Love it self absolutely but unto its exercise that this labour is required; yet this exercise is such as is inseparable from the Grace it self. And this is necessary upon the account of the Difficulties that lye in its way, and the Oppositions that it meets withall. These make a work laborious and painful. Faith and Love are generally looked on as easie and common things; But it is by them who have them not. As they are the only Springs of all Obedience towards God, and Usefulness towards men, so they meet with the greatest oppositions from within and from without. I shall name some few of those which are most effectual, and least taken notice of. As,
1. Self-love; This is diametrically opposed unto it. Self-love is the making a mans self his own Centre, the beginning and ending of all that he doth. It makes men grudge every drop of good that falls besides themselves; and whoever is under the power of it, will not willingly and chearfully do that for another, which he thinks he can do for himself. This is the measure of self; whatever is added unto it, it doth not satisfie; it would still have more: and whatever goeth from it, on one account or other it is too much, it doth not please. Unless this be in some good measure subdued, mortified, and cast out, there can be no exercise of Love. And hereunto labour is required. For man being turned off from God is wholly turned into himself. And without an holy violence unto all our Affections as naturally deSelf-love, and Love of the Saints, are like two Buckets, proportionably unto the rising of the one, the other goeth down. Look unto what degree soever we arise in self-love, whatever else we do, and whatChristian Love.
2. Evil surmises rise up with no small efficacy against the exercise of Love. And they are apt on various accounts to insinuate themselves into the minds of men when they are called unto the discharge of this Duty. One thing or other from this depraved Affection which our nature is obnoxious unto, shall be sugspiritual labour to cast out all such surmises, and to give up our selves to the conduct of that Charity which suffereth long and is kind, which beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things, 1 Cor. 13.
3. Distrust of Gods Promises as to supplies for our selves. Men are afraid that if they should inlarge themselves in a way of Bounty towards others, which is one Duty of Love, they may in time be brought even to want themselves, at least, as unto that proportion of supplies which they judge necessary. It were endless to recount the sacred Promises which give assurance of the contrary. Nor can any one Instance in the whole world be produced unto this purpose. But these are looked upon as good words by the most, but are not really believed. Yea men are apt to deceive their Souls in supposing they believe the free Promises of God concerning Grace and Mercy, whilst they believe not those which are annexed unto Duty. For he who believeth not any Promises of the Gospel, believeth none. Faith doth as
4. Where the Objects of this exercise of Love are multiplied, Weariness is apt to befall us, and insensibly to take us off from the whole. The Wisdom and Promore acts of Duty; and the corruption of our Hearts with self-love useth the consideration of them, to make us weary of all. Men would be glad to see an end of the trouble and charge of their Love, when that only is true which is endless. Hence our ApoHebrews should not faint in their work, but shew the same diligence unto the full assurance of hope unto the end. See Gal. 6. 9. And if we faint in spiritual Duties because of the increase of their ocproper Root of Faith and Love. What is done in the strength of Nature and Coneven the Youths shall faint and be weary, and the Young men shall utterly fail, Isa. 40. 30. They who seem to be the strongest and most vigorous in the performance of any Duties, yet if they have nothing but their own strength, the Ability of nature under Convictions to trust unto, they will and shall faint and utterly fail. For that such are intended is maBut they that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength, they shall mount up with wings as Eagles, they shall run and not be weary, they shall walk and not faint, ver. 31. If our Strength and Duties be deThe way of the Lord is strength to the upright, Prov. 10. 29. Where we are upright in the way of God, the very way it self will supply us with new strength continually. And we shall go from strength unto strength, Psal. 84. 7. from one strengthening Duty unto another, and not be weary. But hereunto diligence and labour also is required.
From these and the like considerations it is that the Apostle here mentioneth the industrious labour of Love that was in the Hebrews, as an evidence of their saving Faith and Sincerity.
The next thing expressed in these words is the Evidence they gave of this labour of Love, and the means whereby the Apostle came to know it. They shewed it, shewed or manifested it. The same word that James useth in the same case, shew me thy Faith by thy works, declare it, make it manifest. And a man may shew a thing two ways: (1) By the doing of it. (2) By declaring what he hath done. He that works visibly in his calling shews his work by what he doth. And he who works in secret may declare it as he hath occasion. It is in the first sense that the Hebrews shewed their labour of Love,
James requires us to shew our Faith and Works. The things themselves are intended which cannot but be manifest in their due performance. To shew the labour of Love is to labour in the Duties of it, as that it shall be evident. Yet this self-evidencing power of the works of Love, is a peculiar property of those that are some way eminent. When we abound in them, and when the Duties of them are above the ordinary sort and rate, then are we said to shew them, that is, they become conspicuous and eminent. To that purpose is the command of our SaMatth. 5. 16. Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorifie your Father which is in Heaven. Not only let it shine, but let it so shine, which respects the measure and degree of our Obedience; and herein are we required so to abound that our works may be evident unto all. If they will take no notice of them for their good, if they will revile us and reproach us for our good works, as though they were evil works, which is the way of the world tothat it may be seen; but what may be seen is to be done that God may be glorified. Wherefore these Hebrews shewed the work of Faith, and the labour of Love, by a diligent attendance unto, and an abundant performance of the one and the other.
3. The End, or Reason, or Cause of their performance of these Duties, which towards his name. Some would have in his name; which also may bear the sense here intowards his name is more emphatical. And we may observe (1) That in this place it respects not the whole work of these Hebrews, the work of Faith belabour of Love, The labour of Love towards his name. (2) That it was the Saints that were the immediate object of that Love; as is declared in the words ensuing, in that you have ministred to the Saints and do minister. Wherefore it is a Love unto the Saints on the account of the name of God that is intended. And this Love unto the Saints is towards the name of God on three accounts: (1) Objectively: Because the name of God is upon them; They are the Family that is called after his name. Of him the whole Family of them in Heaven and Earth is named, Ephes. 3. 15. They are the Family of God, or Houshold of God, chap. 2. 19. The Saints of the most high, Dan. 7. 27. The Name of God is upon them, and therefore what is done unto them is done towards the Name of God whether it be good or evil. (2) Formally; because their Relation unto God is the Reason why they laboured in Love towards them. This is that which gives this Love its especial nature, when it is exercised towards any, meerly on the account of their Relation unto God, because they are his, beEfficiently; The Name of God is his Auname of God. Hence we may observe; That,
It is a due regard unto the Name of God that gives Life, Spirituality and Acceptance
unto all the Duties of Love which we perform towards others. Great things have been done in the world, with a great appearance of Love, which yet have been all lost as to the Glory of God, and the spiritual Advantage of them by whom they have been done. Some have been lost from a principle of Superstition, some from a delabour of Love is a Duty which hath so many difficulties attending it as we have before declared, it is of the highest conCommand of God, and so be a part of the Obedience of Faith, unless it be influenced with a regard of their Relation unto God, and his
Again, There is the Object of this Love in its exercise, and they are they are Saints; or as unto their particular state and circumstances, they are such as stand in need to be ministred unto.
1. They are Saints. There is nothing more evident than that all true Believers, and all those who upon their Profession are presumed so to be, are in the New Testament stiled Saints. For Rom. 1. 7. Heb. 2. Cor. 1. 2. Saints are the same with called and sanctified in Jesus Christ. Every Believer is sanctified; and every one who is not sanctified, is no true Believer; so that Believers and Saints are the same. But the Atheism of this Age hath made it a Reproach among many once to use the name; and with some this Appellation is restrained unto such as are canonized or deified by themselves. Chrysostome is express to our purpose on this place. Hearing these things, I beseech you let us minister unto the Saints. For every Believer, in as much as he is a Believer, is a Saint. Although he be a secular person (which he mentions in opposition to their Imagination who confined Saintship unto Monks) he is a Saint; which he proves by Testimonies that they are sanctified. These Saints therefore were the Disciples of Christ, Pro
2. They are supposed to be in such an outward condition as to stand in need of being administred unto; they were in some kind of wants or distresses. And such was in an especial manner the condition of the Saints at that time among the Hebrews. Their Poverty was such as that our Apostle in many places, perhaps in all where the Gospel had success, made collations for them. And as he pressed the Gentile Believers unto a contribution unto this purpose, with weighty Arguments, Rom. 15. 25, 26, 27. so he looked on his Duty herein of so great importance that he earnestly requests that his discharge of it might be accepted with God and by the poor Saints themselves, ver. 30, 31. And where any Churches had largely miniCor. 9. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. And this Duty was the Apostle most careful in, as that wherein he gave a Testimony unto the change of the Church Estate of the Old Testament. All the Jews before all the world over did send their Oblations in things dedicated, Silver and Gold, unto the Temple. And if they made any Proselytes among the Gentiles, the first thing they did was to cause them to acknowledge their Obedience by sending Gifts to the Treasury of the Temple; and that this was done from all parts of the Roman Empire was known and complained of. Wherefore our Apostle declares that the Old Church state was now changed, and that the believing Saints were become the only Temple of God. And therefore from all those whom he made Proselytes of, or won to the Faith of Christ, he calleth a Benevolence for that Temple or the poor Saints in
But it may be said, That if this were their state, how could any of them, or how could the Church in general thus labour in Love, by administring unto the wants of others, when they themselves were even overwhelmed with their own? I answer, (1) We do not I fear sufficiently understand what was the frame and spirit of those first Believers; and out of how very little of their own they would admiMacedonia, when they were under Trials, Afflictions, Persecutions, their deep Poverty abounded with the Riches of Liberality, 2
Lastly, The especial manner of the exercise of this labour of Love is called Ministration, and the especial Object thereof is the Saints, of whom we have spowas past, and what they did at present, both which were neYou have ministered and you do minister.
Especial Office. (2) Of Common Love and Charity. The rise, occasion and institution of an especial Office or Ministry towards the poor is at large declared, Acts 6. and mentioned afterwards by our Apostle as an abiding Ordinance, Rom. 12. 7. 1 Tim. 3. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. And this Ministration is comprised herein though not solely intended. For what is done by these Deacons, being done in the name and by the appointment, and out of the Charity of the Church, is to be esteemed the Ministration of the Church it self. And though there be a peculiar Faithfulness and Diligence required in the persons called unto this Ministration, yet the Ministration it self will abound or be straitened according
This is that on the Observation whereof the Apostle grounds his perswasion conHebrews expressed in the Verse foregoing. And herein he gives us the true character of a Church of sound Believers. They are such a Society as being called into the Fellowship and Order of the Gospel do walk in Faith, ex
That it is the Will and Pleasure of God that many of his Saints be in a condition
The great Trial of our Love consists in our regard unto the Saints that are in distress.
Hebrews; they ministred unto them. Either Love or at least an appearance of Love will be easily preserved where we have little or no need of one another. But when the exercise of it proves costly, when it puts us unto charge or trouble, or into danger, as it doth more or less when it is exercised towards them that are in distress, then is it brought unto its trial. And in such a season we have experience that the Love of many is so far from bringing forth more fruit, as that the very leaves of it fall off, and they give over its profession. Wherefore,
It is the Glory and Honour of a Church, the principal Evidence of its spiritual Life,
when it is diligent and abounds in those Duties of Faith and Love which are attended with the greatest difficulties. From hence doth the Apostle commend these Hebrews, and firmly perswades himself that they were endued with those better things which accompany Salvation. For hereby, as we might shew, (1) God is singularly glo
And these things have we spoken concerning the first ground of the Apostles perHebrews, and their future Eternal safety, namely, that work of Faith and labour of Love which he had ob
The other ground of his Perswasion is taken from the Righteousness of God; God is not unrighteous to forget your work. I intimated before that the word used we are perswaded, ver. 9. is applied sometimes to denote the infallible certainty of Faith, and sometimes the moral certainty of Charity. In this place it hath respect unto a double object or reason. (1) What was in the professing Hebrews, their Faith and Love. Hereof he could have no assurance or certainty beyond a moral perswasion, or the satisfaction of a charitable Judgement. But on this supposition his perswaRighteousness of God in the stability of his Promises, whence he had infallible assurance, or did conclude infallibly unto what he was perswaded of.
The Righteousness of God sometimes denotes the absolute Rectitude and perfect Goodness of his Nature; and hereunto all other Acceptations of the Word as apEquity of the holy DispenVindictive Justice whereby he avengeth sin, and punisheth sinners is so expressed. Sometimes, yea frequently, the Fidelity of God in keeping and accomplishing his Promises, is called his Righteousness. For it belongeth unRectitude of his nature so to do. So saith the Apostle, If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, 1
not to forget their work. And this
(1) It is not an unfrequent Temptation unto Believers, that God so far distake care of Graces or Duties in them, to cherish and preIsa. 40. 27, 28. chap. 49. 14. God hath forgotten me. This is here denied; God is not unrighteous to forget us or our work, so as not to cherish and preserve it. So the Apostle expresseth the same Perswasion concerning the Philippians as he doth here of the Hebrews, chap. 1. 6. Being confident of this very thing that he which hath begun a good work in you, will preserve it until the day of Jesus Christ; He is not unrighteous to forget it. God hath in the Covenant of Grace promised to preserve the Faith and Love of his People, that they should not perish nor be lost. Wherefore having begun a good work, and you having made some good progress in compliance with his Grace, he is not unrighteous so as to forget his Covenant Ingagement, but will preserve you and your Graces in you unto the End; which is the sum of that great Prayer of the Apostle for all Believers, 1 Pet. 5. 10.
2. Respect may be had herein to the future and final Reward of the Faith, Love, and Works of Believers. For this also belongs unto Gods Covenant. And it is so of Grace, as that the Righteousness of God wherein it is due unto us, can be no other but that of his Faithfulness in his Promises. For neither we nor our works are capable of an Eternal Reward by the way of merit, i. e. that the Reward should be reckoned unto us not of Grace but of Debt, Rom. 4. 4. And that which utterly overthrows such an Apprehension is, that God himself is our Eternal ReGen. 15. 1. And I leave it unto others to consider how they can deserve that Reward. Whether of these senses he will embrace, the Reader is left to deHebrews that he made another Judgement of them, than of those Apostates whose condition he had be
Our Perseverance in Faith and Obedience though it require our Duty and Constancy therein, yet it depends not on them absolutely, but on the Righteousness of God in his
Promises. Or if we had rather embrace the other sense of the words, then are we sufficiently instructed, That
Nothing shall be lost that is done for God or in Obedience unto him. He is not unjust to forget our labour of Love. And,
The certainty of our future Reward depending on the Righteousness of God, is a great Encouragement unto present Obedience.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
There is not much difficulty as to the signification of these words, and therefore both ancient and modern Translations generally are agreed in the Interpretation of them. The Vul. Lat. renders ostentare sollicitudinem. But ostentare is most frequently used for ostendere gloriandi causa, as Festus saith, though properly it seem to be a frequentative, to shew often, and is improper in this place. Nor doth sollicitudinem well answer Syriack renders by Sedulity, Diligence, Industry. Studium ostendere say most, and most properly. Syr.
ad complementum, to the compleating or perfection of Hope. Vul. Lat. Ad expletionem Spei, which our Rhemists render by, the Accomplishing of Hope; the fulfilling of Hope. Bez. Ad certam spei persuasionem, whereunto answers our Translation, to the full assurance of Hope. Others, ad plenam spei certitudinem, most properly.
earnestly to desire; whence is concupiscence, libido, an earnest,
impetuous desire. So the Philosopher defined Cicero renders, Ira, libido puniendi; both from the Original dedesire that invades the mind, an earnest vehement desire.
and: and we desire; but yet, or moreover. The same with Pet. 1. 5. and besides all this, besides what is past.
manifest, that is, evince it unto all by the same performance of
study, diligence, endeavour. But it is such a Diligence as hath earnestness accompanying it: that is, as it were making haste in pressing towards the End and Accomplishment of any thing or business. And it doth always dePet. 1. 5.
Hesychius,
firmitas, certitudo; stability. It is plena fides, plena persuasio, certa fides. A sure, stable, firm, certain Faith, or perfilling or compleating, taking its signification from the first part in the Composition. But whatever be the native signification of the single words whereof it is compounded, or with respect unto what Allusion soever the signification was first fixed, it is certain that in the best Authors as in the Scripture, it expresseth a full satisfactory perswasion of mind, or the highest assurance in any thing which from the nature of it we are capable of.
And we (earnestly) desire that every one of you do manifest the same diligence, unto the full assurance of Hope unto the End.
Although the Apostle in these words and those ensuing, as is usual with him, taketh a prospect towards his further progress, making way by them and in them unto his discourse concerning Melchisedec, which he hath intermitted, whence some would here begin the third part of the Chapter; yet he plainly pursues his former Argument and gives an express account of his whole design therein. For first he manifests directly what was his intention in proposing unto them that terrible Commination and prediction concerning
Again, He had newly given an account of his real thoughts and Judgement conwith things which accompany Salvation, he had given them assurance of a blessed Issue of their Faith and Profession, from the Faithfulness of God, making therein an Application of the Promises of the Gospel unto them. Hereon he lets them know what by the Appointment of God and the Law of our Obedience, is required of them, that they might answer the Judgement which he had made concerning them, and bring them unto the enjoyment of the Promises proposed unto them. And this was that diligent progress in Faith and Obedience un
And herein the Apostle with great Wisdom acquaints these Hebrews with the proper end and use of Gospel Threatenings and Promises, wherein men are apt to be mistaken and so to abuse the one and the other. For Threatenings have been looked on, as if they had no other end or use but to terrifie the minds of men, and to cause them to despond, as if the things threatened must unavoidably come upon them. Hence some have fancied that they belong not unto the Dispensation of the Gospel as it is to be preached unto Believers; and few have known how to make a due Application of them unto their Consciences. And it is to be feared that the end and use of Gods Promises hath been so far mistaken, as some have sufjoynt end of them both towards Believers or Professors of the Gospel, which is to stir up and encourage them unto their utmost constant persevering diligence in all Duties of Obedience. And it is no small part of the Duty and Wisdom of the Ministers of the Gospel to instruct their Hearers in, and press upon them the proper use and due improvement of the Promises and Threatenings of God.
In this Verse, or the words of it which are an Exhortation unto Duty, we may observe, (1) The connexion of it unto the former discourse; And (2) The Duty exThe same diligence. (3) The manner of its performance; That they would manifest or shew it. (4) The end aimed at in that Duty, The full assurance of Hope. (5) The continuation of it, unto the end. (6) The manner of his Exhortawe desire. But though the words may be thus resolved, I shall open the parts of them in that order wherein they lye in the Text.
1. For the connexion of these words with the foregoing, and therein the occasion of this discourse in the particle adversative but rather illative, as was before declared.
2. The next thing occurring in the words is the manner of the Exhortation, we desire. Chrysostome is large in this place in the consideration of this wisdom of the Apostle in the use of it. From him Oecumenius obintense Affections, and earnest, diligent, actual desire. And that it doth intend an earnest desire, we shewed in the consideration of the word foregoing. And the word is never used in the New Testament, but either in a bad sense, to express the impetuous acting of Lust, as Matth. 5. 28. Gal. 5. 17. Rom. 1. 1. or a most fervent desiring of any thing that is good, Luke 15. 16. Luke 16. 21. chap. 17. 22. chap. 22. 15. And such ought to be the desire of Ministers towards the profiting of their people. There will be a dead, cold, lifeless Ad
I say without this earnest and fervent desire after the profiting and Salvation of our people, we shall have a cold and ineffectual Ministry among them. Neither is it our sedulity or earnestness in Preaching that will relieve us, if that be absent. And this desire proceeds from three Principles, and that which pretends thereto and doth not so, is but an Image and counterfeit of it. And these are, (1) Zeal for the Glory of God in Christ. (2) Real Compassion for the Souls of men. (3) An especial Conscientious regard unto our Duty and Office with respect unto its Nature, Trust, End and Reward. These are the Principles that both kindle and supply fuel unto those servent desires for the good of our people, which oyle the Wheels of all other Duties and speed them in their course. According as these Principles flourish or decay in our minds, so will be the acceptable exercise of our Ministry in the sight of Christ, and the profitable discharge of it towards the Church. And we have as much need to labour for this frame in our Hearts, as for any thing in the outward discharge of our Duty. We must in the first place
3. The Persons exhorted unto the Duty following, are expressed by every one of you. He had so a care of the whole Flock, as to be solicitous for the good of every individual person among them. As our Lord Jesus Christ gives an account unto his Father, that of all those who were committed unto his perhe had not lost any one; only the Son of Perdition, he who was designed to Destruction; so our Apostle laboured that if it were possible not one of those whom he watched over should miscarry. And it is of great advantage when we can so mannage our Ministry that no one of those that are comutmost diligence for their preservation and progress; nor any to have so fallen under decays, but that in the use of diligence they might be recovered. So should the Love and Care of Ministers be extended unto all the Individuals of their Flocks, with an especial regard unto their respective Conditions, that none on the one hand grow secure, nor any on the other hand de
4. The Duty exhorted unto, wherewith we must take,
5. The manner of its performance, is, that they would shew the same diligence.
Ostentare: V. L. that is, to make shew of, ostendere, to shew forth, to manifest. Praestare, Eras. to act, to perform; so the word is sometimes used, Joh. 10. 32. many good things have I shewed you: that is, wrought and performed among you. 2 Tim. 4. 14. Alexander the Copper-smith shewed me many evils: did me much evil. It is so to do any thing as that the doing of it may be evident and manifest. And the Apostle respects not only the Duty it self but the Evidence of its Performance whereon his Judgement and Perswasion of them was grounded. Continue in the performance of these Duties to give the same evidence of your state and condition as formerly.
And the Duty it self he expresseth by idem studium, the same diChrysostome much insists on the Apostles Wisdom in this exsame diligence: for by it he both insinuates his approbation of what they had done already, and manifests that he required nothing of them to secure their future condition, but what they had already experience of. You have used diligence in this matter, continue so to do, which yet is not so to be interpreted as though the Apostle limited them unto their former measures. But warning them to remit in nothing which before they had ingaged into, he encourageth them to proceed and grow therein. That indeed which the Apostle approves in them and exhorts them unto a continuance in, is the work of Faith and labour of Love in ministring unto
the Saints. But here he expresseth the manner wherein they had attended unto those Duties, and which they must continue in unless they intended to desert the Duties themselues; namely, with diligence and alacrity of mind. For such were the Oppositions and Difficulties that they would assuredly meet withall, as we have before declared, that unless they used all diligence and watchfulness, they would more or less faint in their Duty. And we may observe that,
Our Profession will not be preserved, nor the work of Faith and Love carried on unto the Glory of God and our own Salvation, without a constant studious diligence in the preservation
Again, The Apostle exhorts them to shew the same diligence which they had done and which they continued in the exercise of; whence it appears that,
Ministerial Exhortation unto Duty is needful even unto them who are sincere in the practice of it, that they may abide and continue therein. It is not easie to be appreprofoundly ignorant are yet ready to say, that they know as much as the Minister can teach them, and therefore it is to no purpose to attend
negligent and careless in their performance; and unto them indeed they do belong, but not unto them only as the whole Scripture testifieth. And some it may be like well to be exhorted unto what they do, and do find satisfaction therein. But how few are there who look upon it as an Ordinance of God whereby they are enabled for, and kept up unto their Duty, wherein indeed their use and benefit doth con
4. The immediate end of the exercise of this diligence is, that we may attain to the full assurance of Hope. And three things we must consider to come unto the mind of the Apostle in these words. (1) What is that Hope which he intends. (2) What is the full assurance of this Hope. (3) How it is attainable in the exercise of this diligence.
1. The Hope here intended, is a certain assured expectation of good things promised, through the accomplishment of those Promises, accompanied with a love, desire and valuation of them. Faith respects the Promise, Hope the thing promised; where
The great use, benefit and advantage which Believers have by this Grace, is the supporting of their Souls under the troubles and difficulties which they meet withall upon the account of the Profession of what they do believe, Rom. 5. 4, 5. 1 Cor. 15. 19. 1 Thes. 1. 3. Hence in our Christian Armour it is called the Helmet, Ephes. 6. 17. The Helmet of Salvation, that is, the Hope of Salvation, as it is expounded 1 Thes. 5. 8. And for an Helmet the Hope of Salvation. And this is because it bears off and keeps us from being wounded with the sharpness and weight of those stroaks, which do and will befall us in Troubles, Persecutions and Afflictions. And hence it is manifest that a valuation and esteem of the things hoped for, are of the Essence of Hope. For whatever expectation we have of them, if we do not so value them, as to find a satisfactory relief in them in all our Troubles, and that which may outballance our present sufferings, Hope is not genuine and truly Evangelical. And this was now the condition of the
2. There is the of this Hope. The full assurance of it. Hope hath its degrees as Faith hath also. There is a weak, or a little Faith, and a strong or great full assurance is not of the Nature or Essence of it, but an especial degree of it in its improvement. A weak imperfect Hope will give but weak and imperfect Relief under Trouble. But that which riseth up unto the full assurance, will compleat our Relief. WhereTrials do abound. Yet neither is Hope in this degree absolute, or absolutely perfect. Our minds in this world are not capable of such a degree of assurance in spiritual things, as to free us from Assaults to the contrary, and impressions of Fear sometimes from those Assaults. But there is such a degree attainable as is always victorious, which will give the Soul peace at all times, and sometimes fill it with joy. This therefore is the assurance of Hope here intended. Such a fixed, constant, prevailing Perswasion proceeding from Faith in the Promises, concerning the good things promised, our Interest in them, and certain enjoyment of them, as will support us and carry us comfortably through all the difficulties and troubles we have to conflict withall. And with
3. It is to be enquired how the diligence before described tends unto this assurance of Hope. And it doth so three ways. (1) It hath its efficacy unto this purpose from Gods Institution. God hath appointed this as the way and means whereby we shall come to this assurance. So is his Will declared, 2 Pet. 1. 10, 11. Give diligence to make your Calling and Election sure, for if you do these things you shall never fall; For so an entrance shall be administred unto you abundantly into the everlasting Kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. It is the
5. The last thing expressed in the words is the continuance in this Duty, which unto the end. For these words belong not unto them that go immediately before, namely, the assurance of Hope, which some supposing have rendered them harshly and improperly, unto its perfection. The assurance of Hope unto perfection, or until it be perfected. But the words plainly belong unto the precept it self, shewing the same diligence unto the end. There is no time nor season wherein we may be discharged from this Duty; no condition to be attained in this life wherein this diligence will not be necessary for us. We must therefore attend unto it until we are absolutely discharged of this whole warfare. And he who is discouraged because he cannot have a Dispensation
draweth back and his Soul is not upright in him. And we may observe,
Whereas there are degrees in spiritual saving Graces and their Operations, we ought
continually to press towards the most perfect of them. Not only are we to have Hope, but we are to labour for the assurance of Hope. It is one of the best evidences that any Grace is true and saving in its nature and kind, when we labour to thrive and grow in it, or to have it do so in us. This the nature of the new Creature, whereof it is a part, inclineth unto; This is the end of all the Ordinances and Institutions of the Gospel, Ephes. 4. 13. Hereby alone do we bring Glory to God, adorn the Gospel, grow up into conformity with Christ, and secure our own Eter
Hope being improved by the due exercise of Faith and Love, will grow up into such an
assurance of Rest, Life, Immortality and Glory as shall outweigh all the Troubles and Persecutions that in this world may befall us, on the account of our Profession or other ways. There is nothing in the world so vain as that common Hope whereby men living in their sins do make a Reserve of Heaven when they can continue here no longer. The more it thrives in the minds of any, the more desperate is their condition; it being only an endless Spring of Encouragements unto sin. Its beginnings are usually indeed but small and weak; but when it hath been so far cherished as to be able to defeat the power of Convictions, it quickly grows up into Presumption and Security. But this Hope which is the Daughter, Sister and Companion of Faith, the more it grows up, and is strengthened, the more useful is it unto the Soul, as being a living Spring of Encouragements unto stability in Obedience. For it being once fully confirmed it will on every occasion of Trial or Temptation give such a present existence in the mind unto future certain Glories, as shall deliver it from snares and fears, and confirm it in its Duty. But this also must be spoken unto after
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
segnes, slothful, dull;
sitis, efficiamini, be or become, or be made. Syr.
ut non praecidatur, ut non abscindatur; that it be not cut off; which Interpreters refer unto the diligence before mentioned. The Translation in the Polyglott renders it, ne
as following the Translation in the
That you be not slothful, but followers of them,(their Example)who through Faith and patient long-suffering inherit the Promises.
This Verse puts a full close to the former Exhortation built on the description given of unprofitable and Apostate Professors. And here is withall an entrance made into a discourse of somewhat another nature, but intended and applied uncontinuation of the former Exhortation, inforced with a new Argument of great importance. For,
1. The Apostle gives a Caution against an Evil or Vice directly opposite unto the Duty he had been pressing unto, and which if admitted, would obstruct its disyou be not slothful. And therein the series of that discourse hath its connexion with the beginning of ver. 11. We desire, that you be diligent, and that you be not slothful; diligence and sloth being the opposite virtue and vice which are the matter of his Exhortation.
2. He gives a new direction and encouragement unto them for the performance of the Duty exhorted unto, which also guides them in the manner of its perforBut be ye followers.
3. This direction and encouragement consists in the proposal of an Example of others unto them, who performed the Duty which he exhorts them unto. And as for their direction he declares unto them how they did it, even by Faith and PatiEncouragement he minds them of what they obtained thereby, or do so, they inherited the Promises of God.
1. The Apostle cautions the Hebrews against that which would, if admitted, frustrate his Exhortation and effectually keep them off from the Duty exhorted unthat you be not segnes, molles, ignavi, heavy and slothful. He had before charged them that they were chap. 5. 11. dull or slothful in hearing, not absolutely but comparatively, they were not so diligent or industrious therein as they ought to have been; or the Reproof concerned some of them only. Here he warns them not to be slothful in works or working in practical Duties. We are slothful in hearing when we do not learn the Truths of the Gospel with diligence and industry, when we do not take them into our minds and understandings by the diligent use of the means appointed unto that end. And we are slothful in practice when we do not stir up our selves unto the due exercise of those Graces, and discharge of those Duties, which the Truth wherein we are instructed directs unto, and requires of us. And this sloth is opposed diligent and sedulous endeavour in the performance of our Duty. Shew diligence, and be not slothful. And this Vice our Holy Apostle according to his great wisdom and care frequently warns the Hebrews against in this Epistle. For he knew that the utmost intension of our spirits, the utmost dilifaint or grow negligent in our Duty, if careless or slothful, we shall never hold out unto the end; or if we do continue in such a formal course as will consist with this sloth, we shall never come to the blessed end which we expect or look for. The Oppositions and Difficulties which we shall assuredly meet withall from within and without, will not give way unto faint and languid endeavours. Nor will the holy God prostitute Eternal Rewards unto those who have no more regard unto them, but to give up themsloth in their pursuit. Our course of Obedience is called running in a Race, and fighting as in a Battel, and those who are
Spiritual Sloth is ruinous of any Profession though otherwise never so hopeful. The good things and such as accompany Salvation concerning these Hebrews; but yet he lets them know that if they intended to enjoy them, they must not be slothful. Sloth is a vicious Affection, and one of the worst that the mind of man is subject unto. For where it takes place and is prevalent, there is no good Principle or Habit abiding. There is not any thing, any Vice amongst men, that the Heathen who built their Directions on the light of Nature, and the Observation of the ways of men in the world, do more severely give in Cautions against. And indeed it were easie to manifest that nothing more increaseth the degeneracy of mankind than this depraved Affection, as being an in-let unto all sordid Nices, and a perfect obstruction unto all virtuous and laudable Enterprizes. But what shall he say who comes after the King? Solomon hath so graphically deProverbs, that nothing need or can be added thereunto. Besides it is Spiritual Sloth only that we have occasion to speak unto.
Spiritual Sloth is an habitual indisposition of mind unto Spiritual Duties in their proper time and season, arising from unbelief and carnal Affections, producing a neglect of Duties, and Dangers, Remisness, Carelesness or Formality in attendance unto them or the performance of them. The beginning of it is prejudicing negligence, and the end of it is ruining security.
1. It is in general an indisposition and unreadiness of mind, and so opposed unto the entire principle of our spiritual warfare. Fervency in Spirit, Alacrity of mind, Preparation with the whole Armour of God; and therein girding up the Loins of our minds, endeavouring to cast off every weight and the sin that doth so easily beSloth is that which gives us an indisposition of mind in direct opposition unto them all. So it is described, Prov. 26. 15. A Person under the power of this vicious Distemper of mind, is indisposed to every Duty, which makes them grievous unto him.
2. When it comes unto the height of it, it is habitual. There is no man but may be occasionally indisposed unto spiritual Duties. The most healthy and athletick constitution is subject unto the incursion of some distempers. Sometimes bodily Infirmities may indispose us, sometimes present Temptations may do so. Such was the Indisposition which befell the Disciples in the Mount, Matth. 26. 40, 41. which yet was not without their sin, for which they were reproved by our Saviour. But where these things are occasional, when those occasions are endeavoured to be preabsolutely slothful. There may be many
3. But there is this Sloth in a dangerous degree,
1. When this is generally the frame of the mind, when it hath such an unreadiness unto holy Duties as that it either neglects them, or is
2. When Persons are generally uncompliant with such outward means as they canSpouse acknowledgeth, that it was the Voice of her beloved that knocked, saying, Open to me my Spouse, my Love, my Dove, my undefiled, for my Head is filled with with dew, and my Locks with the drops of the night, Can. 5. 2. Both the Voice, and the Love, and the long waiting of Christ were manifest unto her, and she comver. 2, 3. And the sloth of Persons will be reckoned in proportion unto the means of diligence which they do enjoy. Some may not be sleepy, worldly, careless, slothful at as cheap a rate of Guilt as others, though it be great in all.
3. When Persons are as it were glad of such occasions as may justifie and satisfie their minds in the omissions of Duties or opportunities for them. This casts off the Duty prescribed unto us, Heb. 12. 1. which yet is indispensably necessary unto the
embrace occato seek out and invent shifts, whereby they may, as they suppose, be excused from it, which corvicious habit. Especially is this so, when men are apt to approve of such Reasons to this end, which being examined by the Rules of Duty, with the tenders of the Love of Christ, are lighter than vanity. So it is added of the slothful Person, who hides his hand in his bosom; that he is wiser in his own conceit than seven men that can render a reason, Prov. 26 15, 16. He pleaseth himself with his foolish pretences for his sloth, above all the reasons that can be given him to the contrary. And such is the reason pleaded by
4. When there is a great neglect of our own prayers, when at any time we have been enabled to make them. So the Spouse in whom we have an Instance of a surprisal inearnestly for the coming and approach of Christ unto her, chap. 4. 16. in the holy Dispensations of his Spirit. But when he tenders himself unto her desire, she puts off the entertainment of him. So do men pray for Grace and Mercy sometimes. But when the seasons of the communication of them do come, they are wholly regardless in looking after them. They put off things unto another season, and meet oft-times with the success mentioned Cant. 5. 6.
5. When in conflicts about Duties the Scale is often turned on the side of the flesh and unbelief. Sometimes it is so when Duties are considered as future, and sometimes as present. When Duties are considered as future, Difficulties and Objections against them, as for matter or manner, time or season, or degree, one thing or other will be suggested by the Flesh. Grace in Believers will move for an absolute comconsults with flesh and blood, and is under the power of spiritual sloth. And so are men by frivolous pretences and arguings from self and the world, kept off from the most important Duties. And sometimes there is a conflict in the entrance of the Duties of Gods Worship, as praying, hearing the word, and the like. Grace stirs up the Soul to diligence, spirituality, and vigour of spirit. The Flesh in all things is contrary unto it. Usually to give place unto the Flesh so as to be brought under the power of a cold formality is an evidence of a prevalent sloth.
2. Although this sloth may have various causes and occasions, yet the principal of them are those which I have mentioned, namely, Unbelief and Carnal Affe
(1) Unbelief is the principal cause of it, as Faith is of that Diligence and Watchfulness which are opposed unto it. Yea by Faith alone are we excited unto the acting of all other Graces, and the performance of all other Duties. As it is in its nature to quicken us unto them, so it alone takes in all other motives unto vigorous Obedience. Wherefore all Indispositions unto Duty arise from Unbelief. This weakens the efficacy of every thing that should excite us unto it, and increaseth every difficulty that lies in the way of it. As Faith will remove Mountains out of our way or help us to conquer the greatest Oppositions, so Unbelief will make Mountains of Mole-hills, it will make every hindrance like an unconquerable diffislothful by it, cries, there is a Lion in the way, a Lion in the Streets, Prov. 26. 13. And its whole way is as an Hedge of Thorns, chap. 15. 19. that is, so grievous and troublesome that he cares not to take one step in it. Hence is the opposition in these words, that, ye be not slothful, but followers of them who through Faith, &c. If we grow slothful it is an assured Evidence of the decay of Faith.
(2) Carnal Affections do variously promote this evil frame of mind. Love of ease, wealth, profit, pleasure, will quickly make men spiritually slothful. Where these are prevalent, every thing in the way of Holiness and Obedience is difficult and irksome. Strange Representations will be made unto the mind of all Duties, if not in general, yet in all instances that offer themselves. They are difficult, or tediCarnal Affection will be heard in the case, and hath something to offer to deter the mind from its Duty. And the secret aversaslothful, negligent, careless in the Duties of Reli
3. As to the general effects of this spiritual Sloth they may be reduced unto these three Heads.
(1) A neglect of known Duties in matter or manner. Known Duties of Professors are either publick or private; And I call them known because they are both acknowsloth is predominant, clear Duties will be debated. What more clear Duty, than that we should open our hearts unto Christ when he knocketh; or diligently receive those Intimations of his Love and his Mind which he tendersloth, Cant. 5. 2, 3. And it doth so actually when it doth not take diligent heed unto the Dispensation of the word. Wherefore omission of Duties in their seasons and opportunities, whether publick or private, whether of Piety or Charity, of Faith or Love, or the performance of them without life and delight, meerly to comply with custom, or satisfie Convictions, is an evidence of a Soul growing up under a sinful sloth, unto a ruining security.
(2) Regardlesness of Temptations and Dangers by them, is another general effect hereof. These beset us on every hand; especially they do so with reference unto all Duties of Obedience. In watchfulness against them, a conflict with them and prevalency over them, doth our warfare principally consist. And without a due regard unto them we can neither preserve the Life, nor bring forth the fruits of Faith. Herein spiritual sloth will make us careless. When men begin to walk as if they had no Enemies, as if in their course of life, their converse, their callings and occasions, there were no Snares nor Temptations, Spiritual sloth hath possessed their minds.
(3) Weariness and heartless despondencies in a time of Troubles and Difficulties, is another effect hereof. And unto these Heads may all its particular pernicious effects and consequences be reduced.
And this brief Description of Spiritual sloth in its Nature, Causes and Effects, is a sufficient Eviction of our Assertion, so that I need no farther con
Secondly, In the positive Directions given, and the Encouragement adjoyned, Example proposed, and a Duty enjoyned with respect thereunto. The Persons whose Example is prescribed are mentioned here only indefinitely, be followers of them, which in the ensuing Verse, he brings down to the Instance of
The Persons therefore included in the particle Patriarchs of the Old Testament. It is true, it is so expressed as that those who were at present real, sincere, sound Believers might be intended, or those who had fallen asleep in the Faith of the Gospel. But as he deals on all occasions with these Hebrews with Instances and Examples out of the Old Testament, as we have seen and considered it at large in the third Chapter, so his immediate expressing of Abraham as the principal of those which he intended, confines his Design unto those under that Dispensation. Plainly he designs them, whom unto the same purpose he enumerates afterwards in particular with the Instances of their Faith, chap. 11. Nor is there any difficulty in the variety of his expressions concerning them. Of those in the Eleventh Chapter he says, that all died in Faith and obtained
a good report on the account thereof, but received not the Promises, ver. 13, 39. Of those in this place, that through Faith and Patience they inherited the Promises. But it is one thing to receive the Promises, and another to inherit the Promises. By receiving the Prochap. 11. the Apostle respects the actual Accomplishment of the great Promise concerning the exhibition of Christ in the Flesh. This they neither did nor could receive who died before his Incarnation. But the inheriting of the Promises here inActs 15. 10, 11. Heb. 4. 2.
Concerning these Persons he proposeth to them the way that they took, and the end that they attained. The way they took, was by Faith and Patience, or longsuffering.
Some think that here is an constant enduring Faith is constant exercise of it against oppositions is rather proposed unto them under the name of Faith. For that by distinct Grace or Duty is intended, is manifest from ver. 15. where Abrahams carafter he had patiently endured.
What was that Faith, or of what kind which is here ascribed unto the Patriarchs, is evident from the Context. For it was that Faith which had the
The next thing ascribed unto them is Patience, say we, that is, Tim. 3. 10. Faith, Long-suffering, Patience; so plainly Col. 1. 11. unto all patience and long-suffering. And in very many places it is recommended as a special Grace and Duty, 2 Cor. 6. 6. Gal. 5. 22. Ephes. 4. 2. Col. 3. 12. And it is often also ascribed unto God, Rom. 2. 4. chap. 9. 22. to Christ, 1 Tim. 1. 16. longanimis; or as James speaks, chap. 1. 19. slow to anger, ophasty, soon angry, bitter in Spirit. It is a gracious sedate frame of Soul, a tranquillity of mind on holy spiritual grounds of Faith, not subject to take provocations, not to be wearied with opposition. Wherefore although the Apostle saith in like manner in another place, that we have need of Patience, that after we have done the will of God we may receive the Promise, chap. 10. 36. yet the longanimity here intended is distinct from it. For as Patience is a gracious submissive quietness of mind in undergoing present troubles and miseries; so this sedate, gracious disposition of mind to encounter a series of Difficulties and Provocations, without being exasperated by them so as to desert, or cease from the course wherein we are ingaged. So where it is ascribed unto God, it signifies that goodness of his Nature, and purpose of his Will, that notwithstanding their manifold provocations, and as it were, daily new surprisals, yet he will bear with sinners, and not divert from his course of goodmany Difficulties and Opfret themselves to do evil, Psal. 37. 8. So David was Uzza, it is said that the thing which God had done displeased David. But this is that Grace whereby the Soul of a Believer is kept from taking offence, or admitting sinful provocations from cross Accidents, Oppositions, Injuries, Scandals, Disappointments. So is the Duty of it prescribed unto us in particular with respect unto one another, Ephes. 4. 2. Besides (2) There are sundry things in the Promises of God whereof Believers earnestly desire if it were possible, a presick by the deferring of its hopes, the Soul is apt to despond, to give over its expectations, and if it do so, it will quickly also forsake its Duties. The Grace which keeps us up in a quiet waiting upon God for the fulfilling of all that concerns us in his own time and season, that preserves us from fainting and sinful despondencies, is this long-suffering or forbearance.
These were the ways whereby they came to inherit the Promises. The Heathen of old fancied that their Hero's or Patriarchs by great, and as they were called, Heroick Actions, by Valour, Courage, the Slaughter and Conquest of their EneGods Hero's, of the Patriarchs of his Church and People unto their Rest and Glory, unto the enjoyment of the Divine Promises, was by Faith, Patience, Long-suffering, Humility, enduring Persecution, self-denial, and the spiritual Virtues generally reckoned in the world unto pusillanimity, and so de
Faith and patient long-suffering are the only way whereby Professors of the Gospel may attain Rest with God in the Accomplishment of the Promises. It is a sad considewhich way and by what means some men think to come to Heaven, or carry themselves as if they did so. They are but few who think so much as a naked Profession of these things to be necessary thereunto. But living avowedly in all sorts of sins, they yet suppose they shall inherit the Promises of God. But this was not the way of the holy men of old, whose example is proposed to us. Some think Faith at least to be necessary hereunto. But by Faith they understand little more than that they profess the true Religion, about which there are so many contests in the world.
This was not the Faith of Abraham, that is, this alone was not so. Wherein it consisted and how it was acted we shall have occasion afterwards to declare. But what do men think of the long-suffering before described? Their Relief against it, is to trust in such a Faith as stands in no need of it. For that common Faith which most men content themselves withall, seldom or never puts them upon the exerlively Faith that those Oppositions arise which the exercise of that other Grace is needful to conflict with
1. It is necessary with respect unto those Reproaches which the Profession of a saving Faith will expose men unto. It hath done so always, and will do so whilst
accuser of the Brethren. I shall instance only in those of one kind. And they are those which on their Straights, Difficulties and Temptations, the world reflects upon, as if their Profession of Faith in God were vain, false and hypocritical. When men said unto David, Where is now thy God? or what is become of thy Religion and Profession, thy pretended Trust in God? he says, it was a killing Sword in his Bones, it pierced deep and pained greatly, Psal. 42. 10. And it is spoReproaches have broken my heart, and I am full of heaviness, Psal. 69. 20. And this was the Reproach that was cast upon him on the Cross, as the next words manifest, They gave me Gall for my meat, and in my thirst they gave me Vinegar to drink, ver. 21. And this Reproach was that which we InThey shook the Head at him, saying, He trusted on the Lord that he would deliver him, let him deliver him seeing he delighted in him, Psal. 22. 118. Matth. 27. 43. And what befell the Lord Christ on the Cross, teacheth the Church what it is to expect under it. In this condition patient long-suffering is our only Relief. If that be not in exercise, we shall either faint and despond, or fret our selves to do evil, or say in our hearts, we will do unto others what they have done unto us. But hereby is the Soul delivered. It is not made stupid and senseless of the sharpness and evil of them; David was not so, nor was Christ himself; nor is it the Will of God that we should put them off with a careless regardlesness. The Glory and Honour of God and the Gospel are so far concerned in them, and God so designs them for the exercise of our Faith, as that they are not to be despised. But it will give a quietness and evenness of Spirit under them, so that no Duty shall be obstructed, nor that satisfaction which we have in the ways of God be any way impeded. And in this case this patient long-suffering worketh three ways. (1) By committing our whole cause to God; as it did in Christ, 1 Pet. 2. 23. (2) By patient waiting for the pleading of our Cause under a sense of our own sin, and an acknowledgement of the Righteousness of God, Mic. 7. 9, 10. (3) By supporting the Soul with a testimony of its own sincerity, 1 Cor. 4. 3, 4.
2. With respect unto Violence and Persecutions. These also, that Faith which tends to the enjoyment of the Promises, will expose men unto. And they prove great trials, sometimes from their violence and sometimes from their continuance. Some come with the fury of a Storm, as if they would bear down all before them; Such were the Primitive Persecutions, and that at this day in many places under the Papal Power. Others by their long duration in wasting, vexing, consuming Trouto wear out the Saints of the most high, Dan. 7. 25. And what havock hath been made in all Ages by them of the one sort and of the other, is known unto all. The number of Apostates in such seasons hath for the most part exceeded that of Martyrs. And many have insensibly withered and grown utterly weary, under Troubles of a long duration, when they could apprehend no end of them. Here we have need of patient long-suffering, if we intend to inherit the Promises. This is that Grace which calmeth and supporteth the Soul under all these pressures. (1) By keeping and preserving it from darkening, disturbing Affections, and passions of Anger, worldly sorrow, carnal fear, and the inordinate Love of present things. Hereby in patience we possess our Souls, Luke 21. 19. which if discarry out of our power, and possess the conenabling us to take a sedate prospect of Eternal things, of the good things promised, and their glorious excellency in comparison unto what here we suffer in, 2 Cor. 4. 16, 17, 18. (3) By preserving of us from all irregular ways and attempts for deliverance. For without this Grace we shall choose either not to suffer, and so disinherit our selves of the Promises; or shall not suffer in a due manner unto the Glory of God or our own advantage; or shall turn aside unto unlawful Reliefs.
3. It is necessary with respect unto our waiting for the Accomplishment of many great Promises concerning the Kingdom of Christ and Interest of the Gospel in this world. That there are such Promises on record in the Scripture, and as yet unfulfilled, is I suppose generally granted. However I speak of them who are satisfied in their
Fathers under the Old Testament who lived before the coming of Christ in the Flesh. In these Promises and their Accomplishment Believers find themselves greatly concerned; and those who are not so, do disavow an Interest in the spirimade haste and anall expectation of them on the other hand, as though they would never be fulfilled. Herein therefore we have also
4. It is necessary also with respect unto our own personal Obedience and all the principal concerns of it. There are three things which Believers principally aim at in the course of their Obedience. (1) That their corruptions may be throughly subdued. (2) That
But it may be enquired on what Grounds, and for what Reasons the Apostle doth propose unto these Hebrews the Example of their Predecessors in this matter. Wherefore he doth it, or he might do it for these ends: (1) That they might know that he exhorted them unto nothing, but what was found in them who went before them whom they so loved and admired. And this he afterwards unto the same end confirms with many Instances. (2) Unto nothing but what was needful unto all who were to inherit the Promises. For if these things were required of their Progenitors, persons so high in the Love and Favour of God unto that end, how could they imagine that they might be dispensed withall as to their obserpracticable, which others had done, and was therefore possible, yea easie for them through the Grace of Christ to com
Thirdly, The Apostle for their encouragement unto the Duties mentioned, exend which those others attained in the practice of them. who inherit the Promises. It speaks in the present Tense, but principally intends those who lived before, as we have declared. And the Apostle here expresseth the way whereby in the use of the means we come to the enjoyment of the Promises. And this is by Inheritance. We neither merit it, nor purchase it, but inherit it. And how come we to inherit it? By the same way as any other comes to an Inheritance, namely, by being the true Heirs unto it. And how do we become Heirs of this Inheritance? meerly by Gods gratuitous Adoption; so our Apostle declareth fully this whole matter, Rom. 8. 15, 16, 17. Ye have received the Spirit of Adoption whereby we cry Abba Father; The Spirit it self beareth witness with our Spirit that we are the Children of God. And if Children then Heirs of God, and joynt Heirs with Christ. God by free and gratuitous Adoption makes us his Children. All Gods Children are Heirs; he hath an Inheritance for them all. This Inheritance is promised unto them; and therefore their enjoyment of it is called inheriting of the Promises. Wherefore the Grace of Adoption is the Foununrighteous in our Reward, ver. 10. For having freely adopted us and made us Heirs, it belongs unto his Faithfulness and Righteousness to preserve us unto our Inheritance. Only we are such Heirs as have means assigned unto us for the attaining of our Inheritance, which it is our Duty to apply our selves unto.
They inherited the Promises. Camero and Grotius on this Text obPromises are mentioned; But where Believers under the New TestaPromise in the singular number. I shall not give their Reasons why it is so, because they are certainly mistaken in their ObserPromise on the one hand mentioned with respect unto them, as Heb. 11. 39. and the Promises frequently with respect unto us, 2 Cor. 7. 1. 2 Pet. 1. 4. Wherefore those expressions are used promiscuously, as is evident by our Apostle, chap. 11. ver. 13, and 39. Because they all sprang from one Original Promise, and all centred in him, in whom and by whom they were to be accomall yea and Amen in him; and because that one which concerned his Person and Mediation did virtually include all the rest, they are all of them frequently intended and included under the name of the Promise in the singular number. But because God was pleased to let out as it were sundry Rivulets of Grace and Bounty, originally stored in the first great Promise, by several particular grants and instances, partly for the Representation of that
By the Promises here the things promised are intended. To inherit the Promises, is to be made partaker of the things promised. And the matter of these Promises was all Grace and Glory. That which is here especially regarded is their full complement in Everlasting glorious Rest with God by Christ. This is proposed unto the Hebrews, and they are encouraged to expect it by the Ex
Lastly, That they should be imitatores eorum. Imitatores is not used mimicks, or contains some refollowers, that is, in doing what they did, treading and walking in their steps, as our Apostle expresseth it, Rom. 4. 12. as we are to follow the steps of Christ, 1 Pet. 2. 21. It is to think we hear them saying unto us what Abimelech
Judges 9. 48. What you have seen us do make haste and do as we have done.
All Believers, all the Children of God have a right unto an Inheritance. How they came by this right was before declared: It is by that Adoption whereby they are security and value. (1) Let an Inheritance be never so excellent and valuable, yet if it be not secure, if a mans Title unto it be not firm and unquestionable, if he may be defeated of it by fraud or force, which things all Earthly Right and Titles are obnoxious unto, it takes off the worth of it. But this Inheritance is conveyed, settled, and secured by the Promise, Covenant, and Oath of God, 2 Sam. 23. 5. Rom. 4. 16. These secure this Inheritance from all possibility of our being defeated of it. (2) The value of it is inexpressible. It is a Kingdom, Matth. 25. 34. Jam. 2. 5. Salvation. Ileh. 1. 14. The Grace of Life, 1 Pet. 3. 7. Eternal Life. Tit. 3. 7. God himself who hath promised to be our Reward, Rom. 8. 17.
The providing of Examples for us in the Scripture which we ought to imitate and follow, is an effectual way of teaching and a great fruit of the care and kindness of God
towards us. The use of Examples to be avoided in sin and punishment the Apostle declared and insisted on in the third Chapter, which we have also improved as we are able. Here he proposeth those which we are to comply with, and conform our selves unto, which afterwards, chap. 11. he farther presseth in very many particular Instances. And as there is a great efficacy in Examples in general which hath been spoken uoto on chap. 3. so there are many advantages in those which are proposed unto our Imitation in the Wisdom of the holy Spirit. For (1) the things and Duties which we are exhorted unto are represented unto us as possible, and that on terms not uneasie or grievous. Considering all the Difficulties and Oppositions from within and without that we have to conflict withall, we may be ready to think it impossible that we should successfully go through with them, and come off safely at the last. To obviate this despondency is the design of the Apostle in that long series of Examples which he gives us chap. 11. For he undeniably demonstrates by Instances of all sorts, that Faith will infallibly carry men through the greatest difficulties they can possibly meet with in the Profession and Obedience of it. There is no more required of us, than such and such persons by the Testimony of God himself, have successfully passed through. And if we follow them not, it is nostir up and animate the minds of men who have any thing of the same Spirit with them by whom they were performed, to do like them, yea to out-do them if it be possible. So Themistocles said that Miltiades's Victory against the Persians would not let him sleep. Being a person of the same kind of courage with him, it stirred him up in a noble emulation, to equal him in an hazar
But then it is required, that there be the same Spirit in us as was in them, whose Examples are proposed unto us. Let the examples of persons Valiant and Heroical, in their great and noble Actions be set before men of a weak and pusilSpirit and Principle wherewith the Worthies of God, whose ExFaith. In vain should we encourage any unto a following or imitation of them, who hath not the same Spirit and Principle. This the Apostle requireth hereunto, 2 Cor. 4. 13. We having the same Spirit of Faith according as it is written, I believed and therefore have I spoken; we also believe and therefore speak. Had we not the same Spirit of Faith with them, we could not do as they did. And we may take a Trial hereby whether our Faith be genuine or no. For if their Examples move us not, excite us not, unto the like Duties of Obedience with them, it is an evidence that we have not the same Spirit of Faith with them. As the Courage of a Valiant man is enflamed by a noble Example, when a Coward shrinks back and trembles at it. On this supposition there is great force in that direction, Jam. 5. 10. Take my Brethren the Prophets who have spoken in the name of the Lord for an Example of Suffering,
Affliction and Patience. Let a Minister of the Gospel who is made partaker in his measure of the same Spirit, conside how Elijah, Jeremiah, Peter, Paul, and the rest of those Holy Souls who spake in the name of the Lord, carried themselves under their Afflictions and Trials, and it will inflame his Heart to ingage chearfully in the like Conflicts. (3) These Examples are so repreDangers lye on the one hand, and where our Assistance and Relief lye on the other. These two rightly considered and understood in all our Duties, will give us the best directions we can possibly receive. When we know our Dangers and our Reliefs aright, we are half way through our Difficulties. When these are out of mind, when we know them not, on every occasion we fall under surprisals and troubles. Now in the Examples proposed unto us, there is withTemptations which befell those who are so our patterns, the Occasions of them, their Advantages, Power or Prevalency, wherein they missed it, or failed, exposing themselves unto the power of their Spiritual Enemies; and on the other hand what course they took for Relief, what Application they made unto God in their Difficulties and Distresses, and wherein alone they reposed their confidence of success. These things might be confirmed by maInterveniences and Disturbances in our course of Obedience may befall us, which yet ought not to make us utterly despond, and give over our Profession as fruitless and hopeless. I confess great Wisdom and Caution is to be used in the considesins and falls of the Saints under the Old Testament, that they be no way abused to give countenance unto sin, either before or after its Commission. We know not their Circumstances, their Light, their Grace, their Temptations, their Repentance, nor what was the Indulgence of God towards sinabsolutely inconsistent with that course of Obedience which leads unto the Inheritance of the Promises, the Holy Ghost would not without any particular exception as to their persons, have recorded such things in the lives of them whom he proposeth for our
In the close of the foregoing Verse the Apostle expresseth the end of all his Exhortations, what they tended unto, and what would be the advantage of all that complied with them in Faith and Obedience. And this was the
When he promised unto him. V. L. Abrahae nam
Most,
Ad verbum; quoniam per neminem habuit majorem jurare. Seeing by none he had a greater to swear. V. L.
juravit per semet ipsum. Syr. He sware by his Soul; which though it may be an Hebraisme, yet we shall find that God sometimes in his Oath makes mention of his Soul.
Syriack omits the particles
Asseveration in the words. The Vulgar Lat. renders it by nisi; unless, which is retained by Erasmus, the sense whereof we shall afterwards enquire into. Certe, surely; Arab. I have sworn assuredly. Benedicens, or benedicendo benedicam, blessing, I will bless.
he restrained his Spirit; preserved himself by Faith from being hasty, or making haste.
adeptus est, nactus est, assequutus est, obtinuit, consecutus est; all which words are used by Interpreters.
Syr.
the Sons of men; men of all sorts. Per majorem sui. Sui is added if not needlesly, yet barba
Contradictionis, controversiae, litis, contentionis; strife;
finis, rather as Bez. Terminus.
ad confirmationem; Eras. ad confirmandum; juramentum, jusjurandum, adhibitum. Syr.
For when God made Promise to Abraham;(God promising untoAbraham) because he could swear by no greater, he sware by himself, Saying, Surely blessing, I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thee; and so after he had patiently endured he obtained the Promise. For men verily swear by the greater, and an Oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife.
For; Expositors agree that this causal Connexion doth not infer a reason or enforcement of the preceding Exhortation unto Faith and directly: But it gives an Examples of their Fore-fathers, as those who through Faith and Patience inherited the Promises. For that they did so really and truly he proves by an Instance above all exception, producing the Example of one which he knew would be most forcible and prevalent with them. It is evident that they by Faith and Patience obtained the Promise, for so did Abraham, the grounds whereof he particularly declares.
But this in my Judgement compriseth not the whole scope and design of the Apostle in the Introduction of this Example. He hath yet a farther aim in it which we must enquire into. Wherefore (1) having carried on his paraenetical discourse concerning fruitfulness in Profession, with constancy in Faith and Patience, unto a Declaration of the end of all Graces and Duties, which is the enjoyment of the Promise, he takes occasion thence to declare unto them the nature of the Gospel, and the Mediation of Christ therein proposed unto them, unto constancy in the Faith and Profession whereof he had so exhorted them. To this end he lets them know that they were nothing but the
There is in the words, observing as near as we can their order in the Text, in the distribution; (1) The Person unto whom the Promises were made, and who is proposed for the example of the Hebrews, which is Abraham. (2) The Promise made unto him, which is that of Christ himself and the benefits of his Mediation. (3) The confirmation of that Promise by Oath of God; God sware. (4) The especial nature of that Oath, God sware by himself. (5) The reason hereof, because he had none greater by whom he might swear. (6) The end of the whole on the part of Abraham; He obtained the Promise by patient waiting or enduring. (7) The Assurance of the Promise on the part of God as confirmed by his Oath, by a general
1. The Person to whom the Promise was made is Abraham. He was origiAbram;
Pater excelsus, an high or exalted Father. God changed his Name upon the most signal Renovation of the Covenant with him into Abraham, Gen. 17. 5. The reason and added signification whereof is given in the next words; for a Father of many Nations have I made thee.
multitude, and God now declaring that Abraham should not only be the Father of all the Nations that should proceed naturally from his Loyns, but of
Now Abraham was the most meet on many accounts to be proposed as an Example unto this people. For (1)
2. That which is affirmed concerning this Person is, that God made Promise unto
him;
Divine Promises I have treated on Chap. 4. 1, 2. In general they are express Declarations of the Grace, Goodness, Pleasure, and Purpose of God towards men for their good and advantage. That here intended was that for the substance of it God made unto Abraham, Gen. 12. 2, 3. I will bless thee and make thy name great, and thou shalt be a blessing, and I will bless them that bless thee and curse them that curse thee: and in thee shall all the Families of the Earth be blessed. And this same Promise was confirmed unto him by the way of a Covenant, Chap. 15. 3, 4, 5. And more solemnly, chap. 17. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. For chap. 15. it is only promised that he should have a natural Seed of his own, and that a Stranger should not be his Heir. But here his name is changed into Abraham, he is made Heir of the world, and many Nations are given in to be his spiritual Posterity. But because together with the Promise our Apostle designs to give an account and commendation both of the Faith and Obedience of Abraham, he calls not out that grant of this Promise which was preventing, renewing, and calling, antecedent unto all his Faith and Obedience, and communicative of all the Grace whereby he was enabled thereunto, as expressed chap. 12. but he takes it from that place where it was renewed and established unto him after he had given the last and greatest evidence of his Faith, Love, and Obedience, chap. 22. 16, 17, 18. By my self have I sworn saith the Lord, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not with-held thy Son, thine only Son;
That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy Seed. Thus God gave out unto him the fulness of the Promise by degrees. First he mentions only
1. The manner of the expression. 2. The nature and concernments of the Promise it self.
In the manner of the expression there are the Affirmative particles;
certe, truly. They answer only directly unto in the Hebrew; but the Apostle includes In my self have I sworn. And truly; in way of an Asseveration, Job 34. 31. Surely, it is meet to be said unto God I have born, I will not offend, and that properly. And Greek Tongue in Assertory Oaths. So Demosthenes,
He sware
that he would destroy Philip. The Vulgar Latine renders it by nisi, that is, Chrysostome, Oecumenius, and Theophylact, as some of the Expositors of the Roman Church do acknowledge. But yet that manner of expression denotes a sense not unusual in the Scripture. For there is an Intimation in it of a reserved Condition rendring the saying ensuing a most sacred Oath. Unless I bless thee, let
Genesis nor here expressed; only respect is had unto what he affirms, by my self have I sworn. Surely, undoubtedly.
The Promise it self is expressed in those words, Blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thee. Our Apostle renders the words of Moses exactly, Gen. 22. 17. Only where it is said there, I will multiply thy Seed, he expresseth it by I will multiply thee, which is all one, or to the same purpose; for he could be no way multiplied, but in his Seed; and he proceedeth no farther with the words of the Promise, as being not concerned in what followeth. For although his Seed was actually multiplied, yet it was Abraham himself who was blessed therein. The Vulgar Latine in this place reads, Benedicens benedicam, blessing I will bless; but in Genesis hath only benedicam and multiplicabo. Hence divers of the Roman Expositors, as Ribera, Tena and others, give sundry reasons why the Apostle changed the exMoses, where it is only said I will bless thee, into blessing I will bless thee. And which I cannot but observe, Schlictingius who followeth in this place the Exposition of Ribera, complies with him also in that Observation: aliis quidem verbis (saith he) promissionem hanc apud Mosem extulit: But all this is but the mistake of the Vulgar Interpreter on Gen. 22. For the words in the OrigiReduplication rendered by the Apostle, which the Lxx also observe. And this Reduplication is a pure Hebraisme vehemently affirming the thing promised, and hath in it the nature of an Oath. It also intends and extends the matter proBlessing I will bless thee; I will do so without fail, I will do so greatly without measure, and eternally without end. And this kind of Asseveration is comHebrew, Gen. 2. 17. In the day thou eatest thereof dying thou shalt dye; thou shalt assuredly dye; be certainly obGen. 37. 33. 2 Kings 2. 23. 1 Sam. 23. 22. Josh. 24. 10. Jer. 23. 17. Dan. 11. 10.
We have need of every thing that any way evidenceth the stability of Gods Promises to
be represented unto us, for the encouragement and confirmation of our Faith. As God redoubled the word at the first giving out of the Promise unto Abraham for the strengthening of his Faith, so is the same here expressed by the Apostle that it might have the same effect upon us. And two things especially God seems to impress upon our minds in this vehemency of expression. (1) The sincerity of his Intentions without reserve. (2) The
2. For the Promise it self here intended or the matter of it, it may be consiwas personal unto Abraham, or as the Person of Abraham was peculiarly concerned therein. (2) As it regards all the
(1) The greatness of their number; They were to be as the Stars of Heaven or as the Sand by the Sea-shore; that is, innumerable.
(2) Their success and prosperity; that they should possess the Gates of their Enemies; which principally respected the mighty successes which they had and Con
In both these things were they Typical of the more numerous Subjects of the Kingdom of Christ, and of his spiritual Conquest for them and in them of all their spiritual Adversaries. See Luke 1. 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75.
In these two Branches of the Promise the Faith of Abraham was greatly exercised as unto the Accomplishment of them. For as unto the first or multiplication of his Posterity, though he lived after this about 70 years, yet he never saw any more than two persons, Isaac and Jacob that were interested in this Promise; For although he had other Children and Posterity by them, yet in Isaac only was his Seed to be called, as to this Promise. He had therefore during his own days no outward visible pledge or appearance of its Accomplishment; and yet however he lived and died in the Faith thereof. And as unto the latter, of their prosperity and success, he was told before, that they should be in Affliction and Bondage for 400 years. Yet looking by Faith through all these difficulties in its proper season, he inherited the Pro
And he was a great Example herein unto all Believers under the New Testament; For there are many Promises remaining as yet unaccomplished, and which at precalling of the Jews, the coming in of the fulness of the Gentiles, with the
enlargement and establishment of the Kingdom of Christ in this world. Concerning all these things, some are apt to despond, some irregularly to make haste, and some to reject and despise them. But the Faith of Abraham would give us pre
Secondly, The peculiar Interest of Abraham in this Promise as to the spiritual part of it may also be considered; and hereof in like manner there were
1. That the Lord Christ should come of his Seed according to the flesh. And he was the first person in the world, after our first Parents, to whom in the order of nature it was necessary, to whom the Promise of the Messiah to spring from them was confirmed. It was afterwards once more so confirmed unto David, whence in his Genealogy he is said in a peculiar manner to be the Son of David, the Son of Abraham. For unto these two persons alone was the Promise confirmed. And therefore is he said in one place to be the Seed of David according to the Flesh, Rom. 1. 3. and in another, to have taken on him the Seed of Abraham, Heb. 2. 16. Herein lay Abrahams peculiar Interest in the spiritual part of this Promise, He was the first who had this priviledge granted unto him by especial Grace, that the promised Seed should spring from his Loyns. In the Faith hereof he saw the Day of Christ and rejoiced; this made him famous and honourable throughout all Genera
2. As he was thus to be the natural Father of Christ according to the flesh, whence all Nations were to be blessed in him or his Seed; so being the first that received or embraced this Promise, he became the spiritual Father of all that do believe, and in them the Heir of the world in a spiritual Interest, as he was in his carnal Seed the Heir of Canaan, in a political Interest. No men come to be accepted with God but upon the account of their Faith in that Promise which was made unto Abraham, that is, in him who was promised unto him. And we may observe That,
The Grant and Communication of spiritual Priviledges is a meer act or effect of Soveraign Grace. Even this
As it was with Abraham, so is it with all those who in any Age are made parta
Secondly, The Promise here intended as to the spiritual part of it may be conall Believers; of whom Abraham was the Representative. And two things are contained therein.
1. The giving and sending of the Son of God to take on him the Seed of Abraham. This was the life and soul of the Promise; the ancient and first exIn thy Seed shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed; that is, the Seed of the Woman shall break the Serpents head. The Incarnation of the Son of God promised from the Foundation of the world, shall be fulfilled in thy Seed, he shall take on him the Seed of Abraham. So our Apostle argues, Gal. 3. 16. Now to Abraham and his Seed were the Promises made, he saith not unto Seeds as of many, but as of one, and thy Seed which is Christ. For the Proconcerning Christ in one sense, is made unto him in another. As to the benefit and effects of the coming of Christ it was made concerning him unto Abraham and all his Seed, but as unto the first grant, intention and stability of the Promise it is made unto Christ himself, with respect unto that Everlasting Coveundertaker of the Covenant with God, and so the Promise was made unto him; or as the Accomplish
2. The nature of the benefit which is to be received by Christ thus promised; and that in general is a Blessing, in thy Seed shall they be blessed. And two things are comprised in this Blessing, as the Springs of other mercies innumerable. The Promise of Christ himself was the fountain, and all other Promises were particular streams from it, especial Explications and Applications of that Promise. (1) The removal of the Curse of the Law which was come on all men by reason of sin. The Curse could not be removed but by a Blessing; and that which doth it is the greatest of Blessings, as that was the greatest of Curses and Miseries. (2) The bringing in of a blessed Righteousness, on the account whereof we might be accepted with God. See Gal. 3. 13, 14, 15.
Before we proceed we may observe two things in general concerning this ProThat this was the Life of the Church of the Old Testament, the Spring of its continuance unto its appointed season, which could never be dried up. How many times were that whole people, the posterity of Abraham, at the very brink of Destruction? For sometimes they fell generally into such terrible provoking sins, as that their utter casting off might have been justly expected by Angels and men; sometimes they were in the just Judgement of God given up unto such wasting Desolations in their Captivities, as that they were wholly like dry bones on the face of the Earth without hopes of a Resurrection. Yet mercy, patience, and power wrought through all and preserved them in a Church state until this Prohealing and recoveries did proceed. And when this Promise was once fulfilled, it was beyond the power of all the world to keep them unto their former condition. All depended on the issue of this Promise, in whose fulfilling all things were to be cast into a new mold and order. (2) This was that which preserved the Spirits of true Believers among them from ruining Despondencies in the times of the greatest Apostasies, Calamities, and Desolations of the People. They had this Promise still to plead, and rested therein, notwithstanding all the Interveniencies which oft-times seemed to render the case of that people very desperate. See their Faith expressed, Micah 7. 18, 19, 20. Isa. 7. 13, 14, 15. chap. 5. 3. Luke 1. 70,
Abraham according to the Flesh. Who knows but that by virtue of the ingaged Love and Faithfulness of God declared in this Promise, these withered Branches may revive, and these dead bones rise again? Our Apostle placeth the Hopes of it on this ground alone, that as touching the Election they were beloved; they were beloved for the Fathers sake, Rom. 11. 28. As to Profession they were then vsibly falling off; but as to Election, as to Gods purpose concerning them, the Love which he bare to their Fathers, ingaged unto Abraham in this Promise, will one day find them out, and bring them in unto a plentiful share in this Blessing.
Wherefore on all accounts the Instance chosen by the Apostle was of singular use unto the Hebrews, and singularly suited unto their present condition. For as they received many Advantages from his personal Priviledges who was their Father according to the Flesh; so they succeeded unto him in the spiritual part of the Promise; and therefore as the like Duties of Faith and Obedience and Perseverance were required of them as of him, so they in the performance of them had assurance given them in his success, that they also should inherit the Promise. So the Apo
Where the Promise of God is absolutely ingaged, it will break through all Difficulties. and
Oppositions unto a perfect Accomplishment. No Promise of God shall ever fail or be of none effect. We may fail or come short of the Promise by our Unbelief; but the Promises themselves shall never fail. There have been great seasons of Trial in many Ages wherein the Faith of Believers hath been exercised to the utmost about the accomplishment of the Promises; but the Faithfulness of God in them all hath hitherto been ever Victorious, and it will be so for ever. And this Trial hath arose partly from Difficulties and Oppositions, with all Improbabilities of their Accomplishment on rational accounts, or with respect unto visible means; partly from a misunderstanding of the nature of the Promises, or of the season of their Accomplishment. Thus in the first great Promise given unto our Parents after the Fall, how soon was their Faith exercised about it. When they had but two Sons the one of them slew the other, and the survivor was rejected and cursed of God. From whom should now the promised Seed be expected to proceed and spring? Is it not probable that they were oft-times ready to say, where is the Promise of his coming? And yet indeed this which seemed to overthrow and disannul the Promise, was only a means of its farther confirmation. For the death of Abel upon his offering his acceptable Sacrifice, was a Type of Christ and his suffering in his myJoh. 3. 12. When the wickedness of the world was come unto that height and fulness that God would not spare, but destroyed all the Inhabitants of it excepting eight persons, the very destruction of the whole Race of mankind seemed to threaten an Annihilation of the Promise. But this also proved unto its confirNoah, accompanied it with a Covenant and gave a visible Pledge of his Faithfulness therein to abide for ever, Gen. 9. 11, 12. For although that Covenant in the first place respected temporal things, yet as it was annexed unto the first Promise it represented and assured the spiritual things thereof, Isa. 54. 8, 9, 10. This great Promise was after limited unto the person of Abraham, namely, that from him should spring the blessed Seed. Yet after it was given unto him, many and many a year passed over him, before he saw the least hope of its Accomplishment. Yea he lived to see all natural ways and means of fulfilling it utterly to fail; Sarahs Womb being dead and his Body also; so that he was past and beyond all hope of having it fulfilled in the orhope was against hope, Rom. 4. 18, 19. Hence he complained that after all his long and wearisome Pilgrimage he went Childless, Gen. 15. 2. and fell into no small mistakes in the matter of Hagar and
From this state of the Promises three things have fallen out. (1) That in all Ages the Faith of True Believers hath been greatly and peculiarly exercised, which hath been to the singular advantage of the Church. For the exercise of Faith is that whereon the flourishing of all other Graces doth depend. And from hence hath there been a Treasure of fervent Prayers laid up from the beginning, which shall in their proper season have a fruitful return. In that Faith and Patience, in those Supplications and Expectations, wherein in every Age of the Church the Faithful have abounded with respect unto the difficulties that have lain in the way of the Promise, hath God been exceedingly glorified; as also they were the means of drawing forth new encouragements and assurances as the comfort of the Church did require. (2) Hence it was that in most Ages of the Church there have been mockers and scoffers, saying, Where is the Promise of his coming, for since the Fathers fill asleep all things continue as from the beginning of the Creation, 2 Pet. 3. 4. The Fathers were they who received the Promises; especially that of the coming of Christ. These they preached and declared, testifying that they would be accomElect of God should be delivered, and that Judgement should be executed on ungodly men, by the coming of the Lord, Jude 14, 15. But what now is become of these Fathers, with all their great Promises and Preachments upon them? Things go on in the same course as they did in the beginning, and are like to do so to the end of the world; what, we pray, is this Promise of his coming you have so talked of? Such Scoffers have most Ages abounded withall; and I think none more than that wherein our Lot is fallen. Observing that all things are in a most unlikely posture to an eye of carnal reason for the Accomplishment of the great Promises of God that are upon Record in the Word, they scoff at all who dare to own an expectation thereof. (3) Some through haste and precipitation have fallen into manifold mistakes of the Promise on the same account. Some have feigned to themselves other things than God ever promised; as the generality of the Jews looked for a carnal Rule, Glory and DoMessiah which proved their temporal and eternal Ruine. And it is to be feared that some are still sick of the same or like Imaginations. And some have put themselves on irregular courses for the Accomplishment of Promises, walking in the Spirit of Jacob and not of Israel. But whatever of this or any other kind may fall out by the unbelief of men, all the Promises of God are Yea and Amen, and will make their way through all difficulties unto an assured Accom
Thus it is also with respect unto our Faith in the Promises of God as unto our own especial and personal Interest in them. We find so many difficulties, so many oppositions, as that we are continually ready to call in question the AccomplishSion, The Lord hath forsaken us, our way is passed over from him, as for our part we are cut off.
In all these cases it were easie to demonstrate whence it is that the Promise hath its insuperable efficacy, and shall have its infallible Accomplishment, but it must be spoken unto under the particular wherein the confirmation of the Promise by the Oath of God is declared. Again,
Although there may be priviledges attending some Promises, that may be peculiarly appropriated
The next thing considerable in the words, is the especial confirmation of the ProAbraham by the Oath of God. For God—when he could swear by no greater he sware by himself. And sundry things we must enquire into in this pe
1. The Person swearing is said to be God. God sware by himself. And ver. 17. in that God interposed himself by an Oath. But the words here repeated are expresly ascribed unto the
Secondly, It may be enquired when God did thus swear:
promising he sware. He did not first promise, and afterwards confirm it with his Oath. He gave his Promise and Oath together; or gave his Promise in the way of an Oath. Yet are they distinctly considered, nor is it the meer vehemency of the Promise that is intended. For in the next Verse the Apostle calls the Promise and the Oath two things, that is, distinct from one another; two Acts of God. But although he hath respect principally unto that especial Promise which was given with an Oath, yet by the same Oath were all the Promises of this kind given before unto Abraham equally confirmed; whence it may be applied unGen. 22. ver. 15, 16, 17, 18. upon his Obedience in offering up his Son. And this was the last time that God immediately and solemnly made Promise unto him after he had gone through all sorts of Trials and Temptations (whereof the Jews give ten particular Instances) and had acquitted himself by Faith and Obedience in them all. Thus did God in his infinite Goodness and Wisdom see good to give him the utmost assurance of the Accomplishment of the Promise, whereof in this Life he was capable; And although it was an Act of Soveraign Grace, yet had it also the nature of a reward, whence it is so expressed, Because thou hast done this thing, and hast not with-held thy Son, thine only Son. Of the same nature are all those assurances of Divine Love and Grace, with the peace and joy that accompany them, which Believers do re
Thirdly, The Expression of this Oath may be also considered. The Apostle only mentions the Oath it self, with respect unto the ancient Record of it, but expresseth not the formal terms of it. He sware by himself saying; The Expression of it Gen. 22. 16. is By my self have I sworn saith the Lord. And we may consider two things concerning the Oath of God. (1) Why he sware. (2) How he swears.
For the first of these, whereas all the Oaths of God are in the confirmation of his Promises or his Threatenings, the reason and nature of those which respect his Threatenings hath been declared at large on chap. 3. And that which concerns the Promises will return unto us, ver. 17. where it must be spoken unto.
2. How he swears; whrein also two things are comprised; (1) The manner of his swearing, and (2) the Nature of his Oath.
1. The manner of swearing is twofold. (1) That which positively expresseth and ingageth what is sworn by; and (2) That wherein an imprecation or execration is imLatines express by per; per Deum; the Greeks by Hebrews prepose the letter hath Sworn, for he is every way his own witness, 1 Sam. 3. 14. I have sworn unto the House of Eli. So Psal. 132. Isa. 14. 24. Sometimes he expresseth some of the Properties of his Nature, as Psal. 89. 35. Juravi per sanctitatem meam; I have sworn by my Holiness. So Amos 4. 2. By my self; Jer. 22. 5. Isa. 45. 23. chap. 43. 13. By his right hand, and the arm of his strength; Isa. 62. 8. By his great name; Jer. 44. 23. By his Soul; Jer. 51. 14. and by the excellency of Jacob; Amos 8. 7. that is himself only. For all the holy Properties of God are the same with his Nature and Being. For that form of an Oath wherein an Imprecation is used, the expression of it is always Elliptical in the Hebrew Tongue, whereas other Languages abound with cursed and prophane Imprecations. And this Elliptical form of expression by si, is often used by God himself, 1 Sam. 3. 14. I have sworn to the House of Eli;
if the Iniquity of the House of Eli be purged, Psal. 89. 36. I have sworn unto David by my Holiness,
if I lye unto David. So also Psal. 95. 11. Psal. 132. 2, 3. Isa. 14. 24. And this kind of expression is retained by our Apostle; chap. 3. 12. To whom I sware in my wrath,
if they shall enter into my Rest. As also it is made use of by our Saviour, Mark 8. 12. Verily I say unto you, if a sign shall be given unto this Generation. There is herein a Rhetorical
Secondly, For the Nature of this Oath of God it consists in an express engagement of those Holy Properties whereby he is known to be God, unto the accomplishment of what he promiseth or threateneth. By his Being, his Life, his Holiness, his Power, is he known to be God; and therefore by them is he said to swear, when they are all engaged unto the fulfilling of his word.
Fourthly, There is a reason added why God thus sware by himself. It was because he had none greater whereby he might sware. And this reason is built upon this
The end and use of this Oath of God is so fully expressed ver. 17. that I must thither refer the consideration of it.
Ver. 15. The Event of this Promise giving, and Oath of God on the part of Abraham is declared. And so after he had patiently endured he obtained the Promises.
And so; This was the way and manner of Gods dealing with him, He patiently endured; after he had patiently endured, or rather patiently
1. That Abraham was exposed to Trials and Temptations about the Truth and Accomplishment of this Promise. If there be not difficulties, provocations and delays in a business, it cannot be known whether a man be Longanimity.
2. That he was not discomposed or exasperated by them so as to wax weary, or to fall off from a dependance on God. The Apostle explains fully the meaning of this word, Rom. 4. 18, 19, 20, 21. Against Hope he believed in Hope, that he might become the Father of many Nations; according unto that which was spoken, so shall thy Seed be. And being not weak in Faith, he considered not his own Body now dead, when he was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sarahs Womb; He staggered not at the Promise of God through Unbelief, but was strong in Faith giving Glory to God. And being fully perswaded that what he had promised he was able also to perform. Continuing in a way of Believing, as trusting to the Veracity and Power of God against all Difficulties and Oppositions was his
3. That he abode a long season in this state and condition, waiting on God and trusting unto his Power. It is not a thing quickly tried whether a man be patiently endure or no. It is not from his Deportment under one or two Trials, that a man can be so denominated. The whole space of time from his first call to the day of his death, which was just an hundred years, are here included. Wherefore this word expresseth the Life and Spirit of that Faith of Abraham, which is here proposed to the Hebrews as their Example.
(2) The end of the whole was, that compos factus est
Promissionis; obtinuit Promissionem; He obtained or enjoyed the Promise. Sundry Expositors refer this obtaining of the Promise to the Birth of Isaac, a Son by Sarah, which he so long waited for and at length enjoyed; for this was the principal Hinge whereon all other priviledges of the Promises did depend. But Isaac was upwards of 20 years old, at that time when the Promise was confirmed by the Oath of God, which the Apostle hath respect unto. It cannot therefore be that his Birth should be the thing promised. Besides he twice informs us, chap. 11. ver. 13, 19. that the Ancient Patriarchs among whom he reckoneth Abraham as one, received not the Promises. That which he there intends is their full Accomplishment in the actual ex
If therefore we take a view of the Promise as it was before explained, we shall see evidently how Abraham obtained it, that is, how it was every way made good unto him, according as the nature of the thing it self would bear. For as unto his own personal Blessing whether in things Typical or Spiritual, he obtained or enjoyed it. As
blessed and multiplied in that increase of Goods and Children which God gave unto him. Spiritually he was justified in his own person, and therein actually enjoyed all the Mercy and Grace which by the promised Seed, when actually exhibited, we can be made partakers of. He who is freely justified in Christ, and therewithall made partaker of Adoption and SanctiAbraham obtained. For that part of the Promise, that he should be the Heir of the world, and the Father of all that Believe, it could not be actually accomplished in his own days; wherefore therein he obtained the Promise in the assurance he had of it, with the Comfort and Honour which depended thereon. As a pledge of all these things he saw the posterity of Isaac, in whom they were all to be fulfilled. Some things therefore there were in the Promises which could not be actually accomplished in his days; such were the Birth of the Blessing Seed, the numerousness and prosperity of his Children according to the Flesh, the coming in of a multitude of Nations to be his Children by Faith. These things he obtained in that assurance and comfortaIsa. 60. 22. And we may observe that,
1. Whatever difficulty and opposition may lye in the way, patient endurance in Faith and Obedience will infallibly bring us unto the full enjoyment of the Promises.
2. Faith gives such an interest unto Believers in all the Promises of God, as that they obtain even those Promises, that is, the benefit and comfort of them, whose actual Accomplishment in this world they do not behold.
Ver. 16. For men verily swear by the greater, and an Oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife.
The Apostle in these words confirms one part of his Intention, of the stability of a Divine Promise confirmed with an Oath, by a general maxime concerning the Nature and Use of an Oath among men; and withall makes a transition into the second part of his Discourse; or the Application of the whole unto the use of them that Believe. And therefore sundry things, an Observation whereof will give us the sense and explication of them, are to be considered. As,
1. The Reason why God in his gracious Condescension unto our Infirmities is with an Oath, is introduced by the particle For, which gives an account of what was spoken ver. 13. and the reason intended consists herein; That by the Light of Nature witnessed unto by the common conultimate, supream and most satisfactory way of giving assurance unto, or confirming what is spoken, or promised, is by an Oath. And the Apostle argueth not meerly from what men do by common consent as it were among themselves, but what the Law and Order of all things, in subjection unto God, doth require. For whereas men do or ought to acknowledge his suAppeal be made unto God for his Interposition, wherein all must acquiesce. This therefore being amongst men the highest assurance and ultimate determination of their thoughts, the holy God intending the like assurance in Spiritual things confirms his Promise by his Oath, that we may know from what we centre in as to our own occasions, that there can be no accession of security made thereunto.
2. There is in the words the internal manner and form of swearing amongst men, they swear by a greater, a Nature above them, superiour unto them, in whose
3. The use of an Oath among men is declared; and therein (1) The subject matter of it, or what is the occasion and subject which it respects. And this is strife; contradiction between two or more. When one party avers one thing, and another another, and no evidence ariseth from the matter controverted about, nor any of its circumstances, there must of necessity be amongst them endless strife, and mutual
Force and War, if there be no other way of bringing all parties unto an Acquiescency; for he who hath pejust claim as he apprehends, but also of his Reputation, in making an unjust claim thereunto. In such cases an Oath is necessary unto the Gostrifes must be perpetuated, or ended by force and violence. This the Apostle respects when he saith, an Oath amongst men is an end of strife. There is therefore unto a lawful Oath required, (1) A just occasion, or a strife amongst men otherwise undeterminable. (2) A lawful Rule, or Government with power to propose, and to judge about the difference on the Evidence thereof; or a mutual consent of persons concerned. (3) A
4. This brings in the end of an Oath among men, and that is to be
5. The way whereby this is done is by interposing the Oath avowing of the truth, rendering it firm and stable in the minds of men which
If this be the nature, use, and end of an Oath amongst men, if under the conOath of God wherewith his Promise is confirmed, must of necessity be the most effectual means to issue all differences between him and Believers, and to establish their Souls in the Faith of his Promises, against all oppositions, difficulties and temptations whatever, as the Apostle manifests in the next Verses.
As these words are applied unto, or used to illustrate the state of things between God and our Souls, we may observe from them,
(1) That there is, as we are in a state of Nature, a strife and difference between God and us.
(2) The Promises of God are gracious proposals of the only way and means for the ending of that strife.
(3) The Oath of God interposed for the confirmation of these Promises is every way sufficient to secure Believers, against all Objections and Temptations, in all Streights and Trials, about Peace with God through Jesus Christ.
But there is that in the words absolutely considered which requires our further enquiry into, and confirmation of the Truth therein. There is an Assertion in them, that men use to swear by the greater, and thereby put an end unto strife and contentions between them. But it may yet be enquired whether this respects matter of Fact only, and declare what is the common usage among men; or whether it respect
An Oath in the Hebrew is called Niphal a passive Conpassive in swearing, that is, not to do it unless called, at least from circumstances comswears hath taken a burden on himself, or binds himself to the matter of his Oath. And it is derived from seven; because as some think an Oath ought to be before many Witseven being the sacred, compleat or perfect number, the name of an Oath may be derived from it, because it is appointed to put a present end unto difGreek calls it juro and jusjurandum, are plainly derived from
And the nature of an Oath consists in a solemn confirmation of what we affirm or deny by a Religious Invocation of the Name of God, as one that knoweth and owneth the Truth which we affirm. As far as God is thus invocated in an Oath it is part of his Worship, both as required by him and as ascribing Glory to him. For when a man is admitted unto an Oath, he is as it were so far discharged from an earthly Tribunal, and by common consent betakes himself to God, as the sole Judge in the case. By what particular expression this Appeal unto God and Invocation of him is made, is not absolutely necessary unto the nature of an Oath to determine. It sufficeth that such expressions be used as are approved and received signs of such an Invocation and Appeal among them that are concerned in the Oath: only it must be observed that these signs themselves are natural and not Religious unless they are approved of God himself. Where any thing pretends to be of that nalaying the hand on the Book in swearing, and afterwards kissing of it, if it be any more but an outward sign which custom and common consent hath authorised to signifie the real taking of an Oath, it is not to be allowed. But in that sense, though it seem very inconvenient, it may be used until somewhat more proper and suited unto the Nature of the Duty may be agreed upon, which the Scripture would easily suggest unto any who had a mind to learn.
The necessary qualifications of a lawful and a solemn Oath are so expressed by the Prophet as nothing need to be added to them, nothing can be taken from them, Jer. 4. 2. Thou shalt swear the Lord liveth, that is, interpose the name of the living God, when thou swearest, in Truth, in Judgement and in Righteousness. (1) Truth is required in it, in opposition unto falshood and guile. Where this is otherwise, God is called to be a Witness unto a lye; which is to deny his Being. For he whom we serve is the God of Truth, yea Truth it self Essentially. (2) It must be in Judgement also that we swear; not lightly, not rashly, not without a just cause, that which is so in it self, and which appears unto us so to be; or by Judgement the contest it self unto whose determination an Oath is interposed, may be intended. Thou shalt swear in such a case only as wherein something of weight comes to be determined in Judgement. Without this qualification swearing is acRighteousness we must also swear, which respects the matter and end of the Oath, namely, that it be Right and Equity which we intend to confirm; or else we avouch God as giving countenance unto our wickedness and injustice.
These things being premised I do affirm, That where matters are in strife or controversie among men, the peace and tranquillity of humane Society in general, or particular, depending on the right determination of them, it is lawful for a Christian or a Believer being lawfully called to confirm the truth which he knows by the interposition or invocation of the Name of God in an Oath, with this design to put an end unto strife. For our Apostle in this place doth not only urge the common usage of mankind, but he layeth down a certain
2. In compliance herewith, holy men and such as walked with God before the giving of the Law, did solemnly swear when occasion did require it, and they were lawfully called. So Abraham sware to Abimelek, Gen. 21. 15. and gave an Oath unto his Servant, Gen. 24. 3. 9. So Jacob sware with Laban, Gen. 31. 52. And Joseph sware unto his Father, Gen. 47. 31. And these had no respect unto any legal Institution, so that their practice should be thought to be reproved in those passages of the Gospel which shall be mentioned afterwards.
3. That Oaths were in use and approved of under the Law and the Administration thereof, is not by any denied, and they are commended who did solemnly practice according to the Command. Isa. 65. 16. Psal. 63. 12. which of it self doth suffino evil in the nature of it; for God did never permit much less approve any thing of that kind. And those who judge an Oath to be unlawful under the New Testament, do suppose that the Lord Christ hath taken away the principal Instrument of humane Society, the great means of preserving Peace, Tranquillity and Right, though in its own Nature good and every way suited to the Nature of God and man.
4. There is in the New Testament nothing against this practice, yea there is much to confirm it, although considering the foundations whereon it is built, it is sufficient that there is not any thing in the Gospel contrary unto it, as it was a positive Institution, nor can be any thing in the Gospel contrary unto it as it is a dictate of the Light of Nature. But (1) That Prophecy Isa. 45. 23. doth belong and is expresly applied unto Believers under the New Testament. I have sworn by my self, the word is gone out of my mouth in Righteousness, and shall not return, that unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear. See Rom. 14. 11. This hath respect unto what God had of old prescribed, Deut. 6. 13. Thou shalt fear the Lord thy God and serve him, and shalt swear by his Name. This now saith the Prophet shall in the days of the Gospel be observed throughout the world, which it could not be in case it were not lawful for Christians in any case to swear by that holy Name. And that in like manner is a promise concerning the Calling and ConGentiles under the New Testament, Jer. 12. 16. And it shall come to pass if they will diligently learn the ways of my people to swear by my Name, the Lord liveth (as they caused my people to swear by Baal) then shall they be built in the midst of my people; Now this can be no direction, no encouragement unto the Converts of the Gentiles, if it be not lawful for them so to swear, if it be not their Duty when lawfully called thereunto. Yea if God promiseth that they shall swear by his Name, and the Gospel should forbid them so to do, where should they find rest and assurance unto their Obedience.
2. The Apostle Paul doth solemnly swear unto the truth of his own AffirmaRom. 9. 1. 2 Cor. 1. 23. It was not concerning any Doctrines he taught that he did swear. They needed no confirmation by his Oath; as deriving all their Authority and Assurance from Diown heart and purpose, whereof there might be much doubt and hesitation, yea presumption contrary to the truth; when yet it was of great concernment to the Church to have them truly known and stated. And in this case he confirms his Assertion by an Oath, which wholly takes off all pretence of a general Rule, that an Oath is unlawful under the New Testa
Oath been unlawful under the New Testament God would not have continued the use of it in any kind, lest Christians should thereby be drawn to act against the Rule and his Command. But this he did in that of the Angel, who lifted up his hand unto Heaven and sware by him who liveth for ever and ever, Rev 10. 5, 6. To give a great and an approved example of that which in no case we may imitate, doth not become the Wisdom of God, and his Care towards his Church.
Add unto all these considerations the express Approbation given in this place by our Apostle unto the practice of solemn swearing among men to confirm the truth, and to put an end unto strife, and the lawfulness of an Oath will be found suffi
There are two places in the New Testament which are usually pleaded in opposiMatth. 5. 33, 34, 35, 36, 37. Ye have heard that it hath been said of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thy self, but thou shalt perform unto the Lord thine Oath. But I say unto you, Swear not at all, neither by Heaven for it is Gods Throne, nor by by Earth for it is his Foot-stool, neither by Hierusalem for it is the City of the great King, neither shalt thou swear by thy Head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black: but let your Communication be yea, yea, nay, nay, for whatsoever is more than these, cometh of evil. And unto these words of our Saviour the Apostle James hath respect chap. 5. 12. But above all things, my Brethren, swear not, neither by Heaven, neither by Earth, neither by any other Oath, but let your yea be yea, and your nay be nay, lest you fall into Condemnation.
Answ. It is evident that this place of James is derived from, and hath respect unto the words of our Saviour; it being an express Inculcation of his Precept and Direction on the same reason. The same Answer therefore will serve both places, which will not be difficult from the observation of the Reasons and Circumstances of our Saviours discourse. And to this end we may observe,
(1) That all things prohibited by our Saviour in that Sermon to the Jews, were in themselves and by virtue of the Law of God antecedently unlawful. Only whereas the Pharisees by their Traditions and false Interpretations of the Scripture in a compliance with their own wickedness and covetousness, had perswaded the body of the Church, and brought them into the practice of much lewdness and many sins; and by their Ignorance of the true spiritual nature of the Law, had led men unto an Indulgence unto their internal Lusts and Corruptions, so they break not forth into open practice; our Saviour rends the veil of their Hypocrisie, discovers the corruption of their Traditions and Interpretations of the Law, dewhereby he restored the Law, as the Jews speak, unto its pristine Crown. Let any of the particulars mentioned by our Saviour be considered, and it will be found that it was before unlawful in it self, or declared so in the positive Law of God. Was it not evil, to be angry with a Brother without a cause, and to call him Racha and Fool, ver. 22. was it not so to look on a woman to Lust after her, or were such unSwear not at all, was somewhat that was even then unlawful, but practised on the false glosses of the Pharisees upon the Law. Now this was not solemn swearing in Judgement and Righteousness, which we have proved before not only to have been lawful, but appointed expresly by God himself.
(2) Our Saviour expresly limiteth his Precept unto our Communication, Let your Communication be yea, yea, nay, nay, ver. 37. There was then amongst men, and that countenanced by the Pharisees, a cursed way of mixing Oaths with mens orCommunication. This blasphemous wickedness, as it was a direct vioThird Commandment, so it was frequently rebuked by the Prophets. But as other publick sins, it grew and increased among the people until their corOaths in common Communication were lawful, and what were unlawful, what were obligatory and what were not. To eradicate this cursed practice our Saviour gives this general Prohibition unto all that would be his Disciples, Swear not at all, that is, in Communication, which is the first design of the
(3) The Direction and Precept of our Saviour, is given in direct opposition unto the corrupt Glosses and Interpretations of the Law introduced by Tradition, and made Authentick by the Authority of the Pharisees. This is evident from the express Antithesis in the words, You have heard what hath been said of old time, but I say unto you: Now these were two, (1) That there was no evil in an Oath at any time, but only in swearing falsly. This they gathered, (as they fathered their most absurd apprehensions on some pretext of Scripture) from Deut. 19. 12. Ye shall not swear by my Name falsly, neither shalt thou prophane the Name of thy God. From hence they concluded that Gods Name was not prophaned in swearing, unless a man sware falsly, that is, forsware himself. And this also they restrained printheir Advantage who had the disposal of things sacred and devoted. This they judged to comprise the whole of the Prohibition in the Third Commandment, but most falsly, and unto the hazard of the Souls of men. For not only the using or interposition of the Name of God in a false matter which is Perjury, but also the using of it in vain, that is, without just cause, or reason, or call, lightly and vainly, is expresly forbidden. Herein our Saviour interposeth his Divine Interpretation, and in opposition unto the corrupt exposition of the Pharisees, declares that not only false swearing by the Name of God in Judgement or otherwise is forbidden in the Command; but also that vain interposition of the Name of God in our Communication is utterly prohibited. And it is hence evident unto me, that no man ought voluntarily to take an Oath unless the matter in controversie be undetermiswear, and swear on without the guilt of Perjury, did they swear never so falsly; And this was not to swear by the Name of God himself, which if they did and sware falsly, they were perjured, but by the Heavens, or by the Earth, or Hierusalem, or the Temple, or the Altar, or their own Heads; for such kind of Oaths and Execrations were then, as also now in use in the ordinary Communication of men. But herein also the filthy Hypocrites had a further reach, and had insinuated another pestilent Opinion into the minds of men, tending to their own advantage. For they had instructed them, that they might freely swear by the Temple, but not by the Gold of it, and by the Altar, but not by the Gift that was upon it, Matth. 23. 16, 17, 18, 19. For from the Gold offered in the Temple, and the Gift brought unto the Altar, did advantage arise unto these covetous Hypocrites, who would therefore beget a greater veneration in the minds of men towards them, than to the express InstituInterposition of the Name of God in our ordinary Communication, without cause, call, warrant, or Authority, when no necessity requireth us thereunto; where there is no strife otherwise not to be determined, or which by consent is to be ended; And the usage of the names of Creatures Sacred or Common in our Oaths without mentioning of the Name of God. And there are two Rules in the Interpretation of the Scripture which we must in such cases always carry along with us. (1) That universal Affirmations and Negations are not always to be universally understood, but are to be limited by their occasions, circumstances and subject matter treated of. So where our Apostle affirms, that he became
(1) That the custom of using Oathes, Swearing, Cursing or Imprecation in common Communication, is not only an open transgression of the Third Commandment which God hath threatened to revenge, but it is a practical Renunciation also of all the Authority of Jesus Christ who hath so expresly interdicted it.
(2) Whereas swearing by the Name of God in Truth, Righteousness and Judgement is an Ordinance of God for the end of Strife amongst men; Perjury is justly reckoned among the worst and highest of sins, and is that which reflects the greatest dishonour on God, and tendeth to the ruine of Humane Society.
(3) Readiness in some to swear on sleight occasions, and the ordinary Impositions of Oaths on all sorts of persons, without a due consideration on either hand of the Nature, Ends and Properties of lawful swearing, are Evils greatly to be lamented, and in Gods good time among Christians will be reformed.
In this last part of the Chapter two things are further designed by the Apostle. (1) An Explication of the purpose and end of God in his Promise, as it was conApplication of the whole unto all Believers, seeing the mind and will of God was the same towards them all, as they were towards Abraham to whom the Promise so confirmed was made in particular. (2) A confirmation of the whole priviledge intended by the Introduction of the Interposition of Christ in this matter; and this is expressed in a Transition and return unto his former discourse concerning the Priesthood of Christ.
17.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 18.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 19.
, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 20.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
in quo, qua in re, Syr. propter hoc, quapropter. Some have rething it self spoken of, some unto the reasons of things spoken.
Abundantius volens; volens ex abundanti, Syr. maxime voluit, abunde voluit, would abundantly.
ostendere, manifestly to set forth.
Immutabilitatem consilii, Bez. Immobilitatem, An. V. Lat. Rhem. The stability; which answers neither of the words used, which are more emphatical. Syr.
That his Promise should not be changed.
intervenit Juramento, An. fide jussit jurejurando, Bez. Interpositionem fecit jurejurando, interposuit jusjurandum. Vul. Lat.
ut per duas res immutabiles, or immobiles: Rhem. that by two things unmoveable. Syr. which are not changed, or ought not to be; by two immutable things,
fortem consolationem habeamus; fortissimum solatium; validam consolationem habeamus, haberemus.
confugientes, qui confugimus, qui cursum eo corripimus; Bez. who have hastened our course or flight. Qui huc confugimus; Ours, who have fled for refuge. And indeed for to fly to a shelter, refuge or protection. Hence refugium, a refuge that any one be
ad tenendum propositam spem, to hold the proposed hope. Obtinere, to obtain; Syr. that we may hold. Ut spem propositam retineamus; Bez.
safe and firm, firm and stable. Syr. which holds our Soul that it be not moved, expressing the effect and not the nature or adjuncts of the means spo
Et incedentem, ingredientem, introeuntem, us
Vul.
Ubi praecursor pro nobis introivit. But quo is better, not where but whither, Rhem. The precursor for us: Syr. where before Iesus is entered for us, which determines the ambiguity of our forerunner is entered, but the forerunner is entered for us.
Wherein God willing more abundantly to manifest unto the Heirs of Promise the Immutability of his Counsel, interposed himself by an Oath; That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to deceive, we might have strong (prevailing) consola tion, who have fled for refuge to lay hold on the hope set before us; Which we have as an Anchor of the Soul both safe and stedfast, and which entereth into that within the Veil, Whither the forerunner is for us entred, Jesus made an High Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.
Sundry things are observable in these words. (1) The Introduction unto the ApWherein, (2) The design of God in the confirmation of his Promise by his Oath, which was to manifest the Immutability of his Counsel. And this is amplified, (1) By the frame, pur
for which cause, respect may be had unto the An Oath among men is unto them an end of strife; so a reason is thence inferred why God should interpose himself by an Oath in this matter. And the words are rendered by some as we have seen; propter quod, or propterea, in for propter is not unusual. And this then is the coherence, Whereas mankind doth consent herein, that an Oath in things capable of no other proof or demonstration, shall end controversies, satisfie doubts, and put an issue to contraHeirs of Promise. For what could they require further? Will they not rest in the Oath of God, who in doubtful cases do and will acquiesce in the Oaths of men? what way could be more suited unto their Peace and Consolation? And such is Gods Love and Grace that he would omit nothing that might tend thereunto, though in such way of condescension as no Creature would or could, or ought to have expected, before inwhole subject matter treated of; and so the words are rendered in quo or in qua re, in which case or matter. And this our Translation seems to respect, rendering it wherein. Then the words direct unto the Introduction of the end of Gods Oath, expressed in the words following, In this matter God sware by himself, that thereby the Heirs of Promise, might not only be setled in Faith, but more
God willing. Hereunto all that follows is resolved, It is all Will of God. And two things may be denoted hereby, (1) The Inclination and disposition of the mind of God, he was
The Soveraign Will of God is the sole spring and cause of all the Grace, Mercy and Consolation, that Believers are made partakers of in this world. So is it here proJustice, Promise or Covenant, to give any Grace unto, to bestow any Mercy or Favour upon Apostatized sinners; wherefore those things could have no rise, spring or cause, but in a free gracious Act of the Soveraign Will and Pleasure of God. And thereunto in the Scripture are they constantly assigned, whether absolutely, that Grace is bestowed on any, or comparatively, on one and not another, it is all from the Will of God.
So is it also with respect unto Grace and Mercy considered comparatively as collated on one and not another, Rom. 9. 15, 16. 1 Cor. 4. 7. there is no other Spring or Fountain of any Grace or Mercy. It may be some may hope to educe Grace out of their own wills and endeavours, and to obtain mercy by their own Duties and Obedience: But the Scripture knows no such thing, nor do Believers find it in their experience.
Let them who have received the least of Grace and Mercy know from whence they have received it, and whereunto they are beholding for it. A due considerathankfulness to God,
Let those who stand in need of Grace and Mercy, (as who doth not) expect them wholly from the Soveraign Will and Pleasure of God, who is gracious unto whom he will be gracious, Jam. 1. 5. our own Endeavours are means in this kind for obtaining Grace in the measures and degrees of it; but it is the Will of God alone that is the cause of it all, 2 Tim. 1. 9.
2. What God was thus willing unto is expressed, and that was more abundantly to declare the Immutability of his Counsel. And we may enquire concerning it, (1) What is meant by the Counsel of God; (2) How that Counsel of God was, and is Immutable. (3) How it was declared so to be. (4) How it was abundantly so declared.
(1) The Counsel of God is the Eternal purpose of his Will, called his Counsel because of the infinite Wisdom wherewith it is always accompanied. So that good pleasure which he had purposed in himself, Ephes. 1. 9. is termed the Counsel of his Will, ver. 11. Counsel among men, is a rational deliberation about causes, means, effects, and ends according to the Nature of things ad
In particular the Counsel of God in this place, is the holy, wise Purpose of his Will, to give his Son Jesus Christ to be of the Seed of Abraham, for the Salvation of all the Elect, or Heirs of Promise; And that in such a way, and accompanied with all such good things, as might secure their Faith and Consolation. This is the Coun
(2) Of this Counsel, it is affirmed that it was immutable, not subject unto change. quod
nequit, that cannot be altered. But the design of God here was not to make his Counsel unchangeable, but to declare it so to be. For all the Purposes of God, all the Eternal Acts of his Will considered in themselves are Immutable. See Isa. 46. 10. Psal. 33. 11. Prov. 19. 21. chap. 21. 30. and their Immutability is a necessary consequent of the Immutability of the Nature of God, with whom is no variableness nor shadow of turning, Jam. 1. 17. The strength of Israel is not a man that he should repent, 1 Sam. 15. 29. And in opposiPsal. 102. 27. which the Apostle renders by thou art He always, in all respect one and the same. Hence among the Jews
He is a Name of God, expressing his immutable self-subsistence. But it will be said that there are in the Scriptures many Declarations of Gods altering his Purpose and Counsels, and repenting him of what he had before determined, being grieved at what he had done, Gen. 6. 6. 1 Sam. 2. 30.
It is agreed by all, that those expressions of repenting, grieving, and the like, are figurative, wherein no such Affections are intended as those words signifie in created Natures, but only an event of things like that, which proceedeth from such Affections.
And as to the changes themselves expressed, the School-men say not amiss, Vult Deus mutationem, non mutat voluntatem, He willeth a change, he changeth not his Will.
But fully to remove these Difficulties; the Purpose of God and the Counsels of his Will, may be considered either in themselves, or in the Declaration that is made concerning their Execution. In themselves they are absolutely immutable, no more subject unto change than is the Divine Nature it self. The Declarations which God makes concerning their Execution or Accomplishments are of two sorts.
(1) There are some of them wherein there is necessarily included a respect unto some antecedent moral Rule, which puts an express condition into the Declarations, although it be not expressed, and is always in like cases to be understood. Thus God Commands the Prophet to declare, that yet forty days and Niniveh should perish, Jonah 3. 4. Here seems to be an absolute Declaration of the Purpose of God without any condition annexed; a positive prediction of what he would do, and should come to pass. Either God must change his Purpose or Niniveh must be overthrown. But whereas this destruction was foretold for fin, and impenitency therein, there was an antecedent moral Rule in the case, which gives it as compleat a condition as if it had been expressed in words. And that is, that Repentance from sin, will free from the punishment of sin; so that the prediction had this limitation by an antecedent Rule, unless they Repent; And God declares that this Rule puts a condition into all his Threatenings, Jerem. 18. 7, 8. And this was the course of Gods dealing with the House of Eli, 1 Sam. 2. 30. God doth neither suspend his Purpose on what men will do, nor take up conditional resolutions with respect thereunto; He doth not purpose one thing, and then change his Resolutions upon contingent emergencies; for he is of one mind and who can turn him, Job 23. 13. nor doth he determine, that if men do so on the one hand, that he will do so; and if otherwise, that he will do otherwise. For instance, there was no such Decree or Purpose of God, that if Niniveh did Repent it should not be destroyed; and if it did not Repent it should perish. For he could not so purpose unless he
Niniveh would do; which to affirm, is to deny his very Being and Godhead. But in order to accomplish his Purpose that Niniveh should not perish at that time, he threatens it with Destruction in a way of prediction, which turned the minds of the Inhabitants to attend unto that antecedent moral Rule which put a condition into the prediction, whereby they were saved.
(2) In the Declaration of some of Gods Counsels and Purposes as to the Exeantecedent moral Rule, as should give them either Limitation or Condition. God takes the whole in such cases absolutely on himself, both as to the ordering and disposing of all things and means unto the end intended. Such was the Counsel of God concerning the sending of his Son to be of the Seed of Abraham, and the blessing that should ensue thereon. No alteration could possibly on any account be made herein, neither by the sin nor unbelief of them concerned, nor by any thing that might befall them in this world. Such was the Counsel of God, and such the Immutability of it here intended, as it was absolutely unchangeable in it self, so as to mans concerns and interest in it, it was attended with no condition or reserve.
3. This Immutability, God was willing shew, manifest, declare,
make known; It is not his Counsel absolutely, but the Immutability of his Counsel, that God designed to evidence. His Counsel he made known in his Promise. All the gracious actings of God towards us, are the executing of his holy Immutable Purposes, Ephes. 1. 11. And all the Promises of God are the Declarations of those Purposes. And they also in themselves are Immutable, for they depend on the EsTit. 1. 2. In hope of Eternal Life which God that cannot lye promised before the world began. Gods Essential Veracity is engaged in his Promises. And they are so expresly the Declaration of his Purposes, that when God had only purposed to give us Eternal Life in Christ, he is said to have promised it; namely, before the world began. And this declareth the Nature of Unbelief, He that believeth not God, hath made him a Liar, 1
4. He would do it more abundantly, that is, beyond what was abPromise of God who is the God of Truth, is sufficient to give us Security. Nor could it be by us discovered how the Goodness of God himself should require a further procedure. Yet because someCondescension are evidently manifested, so it likewise appears what weight God lays upon the assuring of our Faith and Confidence. For in this Case he swears by himself, who hath taught us not so to use his Name but in things of great conAssurance given, which is more abundant than it could be in or by a single Promise. But God himself, who gives this Assurance; and then it is as much as ex abundanti, when God who is Truth it self, might justly have reex abundanti, from a superabounding love and care he would confirm it by his Oath; Either sense suits the Apostles design.
3. It is declared who they were to whom God intended to give this Evidence the Heirs of Promise, that is, Believers, all Believers, both under the Old and New Testament. It may be indeed that those of the Hebrews were in the first place intended. For unto them did the Promise belong in the first place, as they were the natural Seed of Abraham, and unto them was it first to be declared and proposed upon its Accomplishment, Acts 2. 29. Acts 3. 25. Acts 13. 46. But it is not they alone who are intended. All the Children of the Faith of Abraham are
Gal. 4. 27, 28. It is therefore with respect unto all Believers absolutely, that God confirmed his Promise with his Oath, though the natural Seed of Abraham was respected in the first place, until they cut off themselves by their Unbelief. See Luke 1. 72. Micah 7. 20.
Believers are called Heirs of the Promise on a double account; (1) With respect unto the Promise it self. (2) With respect unto the matter of the Promise or the thing promised. This distinction is evidently founded on Chap. 11. ver. 13, 17, 39. compared. For look in what sense they are said to be Heirs of the Promise, therein they are not actually possessed of it. For an Heir is only in expectancy of that whereof he is an Heir. Wherefore take the Promise in the first sense formally, and it is the
4. What God did in this matter for the ends mentioned is summarily expressed, interposed himself by an Oath, fidejussit jurejurando. He that fidejussor, one that gives security to Faith. And fidejussor in the Law is Interventor, one who interposeth or cometh between, and ingageth himself to give Security. This state of things is therefore here supAbraham unto whom the Promise was first made, with respect unto that signal Pledge of its Accomplishment in the birth of Isaac. In this case though God was no way obliged to give them further Caution or Seinterposeth himself by an Oath; he mediated by an Oath, he interposed himself between the Promise and the Faith of Behimself he takes it on his Life, his Holiness, his Being, his Truth, to make it good. The Truths which from these words thus opened we are instructed in, are these that follow.
The Purpose of God for the saving of the Elect by Jesus Christ, is an Act of Infinite Wisdom as well as of Soveraign Grace. Hence it is called the Counsel of his Will, Wisdom. And it is declared,
(1) As that which no created understanding of Men or Angels is able perfectly to comprehend, neither in the Counsel, nor in the Effects of it. Hence our Apostle shut
(2) As that wherein God hath expresly designed to Glorifie himself unto Eternity. This is the end of all the free Acts, and Purposes of the Will of God, neither can they have any other, though all other things may be subordinate thereunto. Now no Property of the Divine Nature is so conspicuous in the disposal of things unto their proper end, as that of Wisdom, whose peculiar work and effect it is. WhereWisdom whereby it was contrived must needs be Eminent and Glorious. So the Apostle tells us, Then is the End when Christ shall have delivered up the Kingdom unto God, even the Father, and he also in his humane Nature subjects himself unto him, that God may be all in all, 1 Cor. 15. 24, 28. that is, when the Lord Christ hath finished the whole work of his Mediashall God be all in all; or therein, or thereby he will be for ever exalted and glorified; when it shall be manifest how all this great work came forth from him, and is issued in him, Jude 25. 1 Tim. 1. 17.
(3) The whole work is therefore expresly called the Wisdom of God, because of those Characters and Impressions thereof that are upon it, and because it is a peculiar effect thereof. So our Apostle tells us, that Christ crucified is the Power of God and Wisdom of God, 1 Cor. 1. 24. and that the Gospel whereby it is declared, is
(4) On this account are all the Treasures of Wisdom and Knowledge said to be hid in Jesus Christ, Col. 2. 3. There is not only in him, and the work of his MeTreasures of it; that is, God will not produce any effects out of the stores of his infinite Wisdom, but what is suitable and subservient unto what he hath designed in and by Jesus Christ. And may we not,
(1) Hence see the horrible depravation of Nature which by sin is befallen the minds, reasons, and understandings of men. For from hence alone it is that this Purpose of God which was an Act of Infinite Wisdom, that the work which he hath wrought pursuant thereof, whereon are impressed the Characters of his manifold Wisdom, are esteemed folly, or foolish things unto them. So far are men by NaDivine Wisdom in them, that they cannot sufCor. 1. Had the mind of man fixed on any other Reason for the rejection of this Counsel of God, some excuse might be pretended for it, but to reject that as folly which God sets forth and declares as the principal Instance of his Infinite Wisdom, this discovereth the horrour of its depravation. And those in whom this blindness is prevalent may be referred unto three sorts.
(1) Such as by whom the Gospel is absolutely rejected as a foolish thing unbecoming the Wisdom of God to propose, and their own Wisdom to receive. As this was the state of the
(2) Such as own the Gospel in the Letter of it, but look on the Mystery of it, or the Counsel of God therein as foolishness. Hence all the principal parts of it, as the Incarnation of Christ, the Hypostatical Union of his Person, his Sacrifice and Oblation, the Attonement and Satisfaction made by his Death, the Imputation of his Righteousness, the Election of Grace, with the Power and Efficacy of it in our Conversion, are all of them either directly exploded as
(3) There are multitudes whose choice of their outward Conditions being prevented by the Providence of God, so that they are brought forth and fixed where the Gospel passeth currant in the world without any open controul, who do see no reason why, with the first sort, they should openly reject it, nor will be at the pains with the second sort to corrupt it, but yet practically esteem it a foolish thing to give place unto its power on their hearts, and do really esteem them foolish who labour so to do. And this is openly the condition of the generality of those, who live under the Dispensation of the Gospel in the world.
I have named these things only to reflect thereby on that horrible depravation which by corruption of Nature is come upon the minds and reason of mankind. And it is in none more evident than in those who most boast of the contrary. And,
(2) We may learn from hence, that there is no greater Evidence of thriving in spiritual Light and Understanding, than when we find our Souls affected with, and raised unto an holy Admiration of the Wisdom and Counsel of God which are declared in the Gospel.
The Life and Assurance of our present Comforts and future Glory depend on the
Immutability of Gods Counsel. To secure those things unto us, God shews us that Immutability. Our own endeavours are to be used to the same End, for we are to give all diligence to make our Calling and Election sure. But all depends on the unchangeable Purpose of the Will of God, which alone is able to bear the Charge of so great a work. But this must be further spoken unto on the next Verse.
The Purpose of God concerning the Salvation of the Elect by Jesus Christ, became
Immutable from hence, that the Determination of his Will was accompanied with infinite Wisdom; It was his Counsel. All the certainty that is amongst men as to the Acexercise of Wisdom in finding out and applying suitable means thereunto. And because their Wisdom is weak in all things, and in most no better than folly, whence generally they fix first on ends unprofitable, and then make use of means weak and unsuited unto their purpose, it is, that all their affairs are wrapped up in uncertainties, and most of them end in disappointments and confusion. But as God fixeth on those Ends which perfectly comply with his own infinite Holiness and Soveraignty, whence they
various means that proffer themselves unto those Ends. But in his infinite Wisdom Ends and Means lye before him in one Vein; and fall together under his unalterWisdom of God giving Immutability to his Counsel concerning the Salvation of the Elect by Jesus Christ.
(1) Thereby he saw at once not only whatever was needful for the Accomplishing of it, but that which would infallibly effect it. He chose not probable and likely means for it, and such as might do it, unless some great obstruction did arise, such as whose efficacy might be suspended on any conditions and emergencies; but such as should infallibly and inevitably reach the End intended. In the first Covenant wherein God had not immutably decreed to preserve mankind absomight effect it, in case they were not wanting unto themselves, or that Obedience which they were enabled to perform. This man neglecting, the means appointed of God as to their success depending thereon by Gods own Appointment, that End which in their own Nature they tended unto was not attained, and that because God had not immutably determined it. But now whereas God engaged himself in an unchangeable-Purpose, in his infinite Wisdom he fixeth on those means for its Accomplishment, as shall not depend on any thing, whereby their efficacy might be frustrated. Such was his sending of his Son to be Incarnate, and the Dispensation of Grace of the New Covenant, which is in its Nature infallibly effectual unto the End whereunto it is designed.
(2) God in his infinite Wisdom foresaw all the Interveniencies on our part that might obstruct the certain Accomplishment of the Promise. The Promise was first given indefinitely unto all mankind in our first Parents. But soon after the wickedness of the whole world, with their absolute contempt of the Grace of the Promise was such, as that any Creature would conceive that it would be of none effect, being so visibly, so universally rejected and despised. But a perfect View hereof lying under the Wisdom of God, he provided against it for the Immutaone, then another, and at last the whole Posterity of Abraham, towards whom the Promise should be accomplished. But yet after a long season, there came the last and uttermost trial of the whole matter. For the generality of the Seed of Abraham rejected the Promise also, whereby it appeared really to have been fruRom. 9. 6. But instead of changing his Purpose, God then more fully discovered wherein the Immutability of his Counsel did consist, and whereon it did depend, as Gal. 3. 8. And this was, that all along, and under all those ApostaElect people chosen by him before the foundation of the world, in and towards whom his Purpose was ImInterveniency can possibly shake or alter what hath been settled by infinite Wisdom. There is not a particular Believer but is made so sensible of his own unworthiness, that at one time or another he cannot but be almost brought to a loss, how it should be, that such a one as he should ever inherit the Promise. But God foresaw all that hath befallen us, or will do so; and hath in his infinite Wisdom provided against all Interveniencies that his Purpose might not be changed, nor his Promise frustrated.
Infinite Goodness, as acting it self in Christ, was not satisfied in providing and preparing good things for Believers, but it would also shew and declare it unto them for their present
For (1) It was herein the peculiar Design of God to glorifie his Goodness, Love, Grace, and Mercy by Jesus Christ, and he will do it in an abundant manner. He had before glorified his Eternal Power and infinite Wisdom in the Creation of the World and all things therein contained, Psal. 19. 1, 2, 3. Rom. 1. 21. And he had glorified his Holiness and Righteousness in giving of the Law accompanied with Eternal Rewards and Punishments. But Grace and Truth (in the provision of it, and the Accomplishment of the Promise) came by Jesus Christ, Joh. 1. 18. And therefore that the Lord Christ in all this may have the preheminence, he will do it in an abundant and unconceiveable manner, above the former Declarations of his Glory in any other of his Attributes. Hence in the Scripture the CommuRom. 5. 20. more than abound. To abound expresseth the largest comprehensible Meamore than abound, who can conceive? 1 Tim. 1. 14. The Grace of our Lord did more than abound; it exceeded all comprehension. So that Glory which is the Effect of this Grace, is said to be given, Cor. 4. 17. that is, in an excellency and exceeding greatness no way to be conceived. So plainly the Apostle calls the Grace of God in Christ, Ephes. 2. 7. excelling Riches. That we may know his meaning, he calls it again, chap. 3. 8. Riches whereof there is no Investigation. In the pursuit of this design to exercise and manifest the infinite fulness of his Love and Goodness, he will not satisfie himself with a meer declaration of his Will, but he will have those concerned in it, to know it, to understand it, to have the present Comfort of it; and because they could not do that without satisfaction in the Immutability of his Counsel, he evidenceth that unto them by all means possible. And thereby he sufficiently manifests how willing he is, how well pleasing it is unto him that our Faith in him should be firm and stedfast.
(2) Man is now fallen into a condition of Sin and Misery. And herein is he filled with so many Fears, Discouragements, and Despondencies, that it is the diffiprepose his Mind and Will unto us, as unto Grace and Glory, but useth all ways possible to ingenerate in us a Confidence of his willingness to bring us unto a participation of them. He doth every thing that may direct and encoustedfast view of the Excellency and Immutability of his Counsel in this matter. Hence a great part of the Scripture, the Revelation of Gods Will, is taken
Promises, Exhortations, Invitations, Discourses and Expressions of Love, Kindness, and Compassion. And in particular, although the
1. The unspeakable encouragement unto Believing, which is given unto all unto whom this Counsel of God and its Immutability is proposed. The EsUnbelief shall keep off any from the enjoyment of the Promise. (2) That all Believers, whatever difficulties they may meet withall in themselves, or objections against themselves, shall certainly and infallibly enjoy the Promise and be saved. And the Immutability of Gods Counsel herein he hath made so evident, that there is no room for any Obcannot have; God will not, God cannot give. All persons not yet come up unto Believing, unto whom this Peace with God is preached, are distinguished into two sorts; Them that are nigh, and them that are far off, Ephes. 2. 17. This, in the first place exJews and Gentiles; but in a parity of Reason must be extended unto others. Some are comparatively nigh; such as have been affected with the Word, and brought into enquiries whether they should believe or no; And there are some afar off, who as yet have taken little notice of these things. Herein is both a Call and Encouragement unto both. To the first to determine their Wills in the choice of Christ in the Promise; unto the other
2. It discovers the hainous Nature of Unbelief. The Gospel which is a mesDamnation unto it. He that believeth not shall be damned. And although they shall also perish unto whom the Gospel is not preached, Rom. 2. 12. yet the Gospel though it speaks not exclusively unto others, yet prinDamnation of them who believe not when the Promise is declared to them, 2 Thes. 1. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. however, it declares that they shall fall under a sorer death and destructiCor. 2. 16. And the reason of this Severity is taken partly from the Nature of Unbelief, and partly from the Aggravation of it. The Nature of Unbelief consists in a refusal of the Testimony of God, so making him a Liar, 1 Joh. 5. 10. and in esteeming that which he proposeth as his Power and Wisdom to be weakness and folly. Hence there is no way of Sin or Rebellion against God whatever, that casts such Scorn and IndigHow shall we escape if we neglect so great Salvation? Heb. 2. 3. We may look only on that which lies before us; namely, the
It is not all mankind universally, but a certain number of persons under certain Qualifications, to whom God designs to manifest the Immutability of his Counsel,
and to communicate the Effects thereof. It is only the Heirs of Promise whom God intendeth. But herein two things are to be considered. (1) The outward Revelation or Administration of these things; and (2) Gods
Let us always remember that in these things we have to do with him who is greater than we, and who giveth no Account of his matters. What if God will take this way of procedure, and give no reason of it? who are we that we should dispute against God? Wherefore our Apostle having at large discoursed this whole matter, and pleaded the absolute freedom of God to do whatdeep Admiration of his unsearchable Wisdom, wherein it is our Duty to acquiesce, Rom. 11. 33, 34, 35. But yet I may add,
That the Nature of the thing it self doth require this Dispensation of the Promise indefinitely to all, though the
God alone knows the due measures of Divine Condescension, or what becomes the Divine Nature therein. Who could have once apprehended, who durst swear by himself to confirm his Word
Incarnation of the Son of God, the Glory whereof will be the Object of the Admiration of Men and Angels unto Eternity. For alas! what created Understanding could ever have raised it self unto a thought, that the Eternal Word should be made Flesh? God alone who is infinitely Wise, only Wise, knew what became the Holiness of his Being, and his Goodness therein. And so is it in its measure in this of his Oath. And as we are with holy Confidence to make use of what he hath done in this kind, seeing not to do so, is to despise the highest expression of his GoodDivine Condescension beyond Divine Expressions.
So unspeakable is the weakness of our Faith, that we stand in need of unconceivable
That by two Immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lye, we might have a strong Consolation, who have fled for Refuge to lay hold upon the Hope set before us.
Two things in general the Apostle further designs in this Verse. (1) That the Declaration which God had made of the Immutability of his Counsel in this matter was every way sufficient and satisfactory. (2) What was the especial End and Design which he had therein, towards the Heirs of Pro
For the first, He doth it by declaring the Evidence given and the Nature Act or Deed, such as we make and deliver when we convey any thing from one to another. An Instrument of an Assurance. This is the Promise and the Oath of God. Security is given by them; both from their own Nature, and also because they are two; two Witnesses whereby the thing intended is established. But what need was there of two such things? Is it because one of these was weak, infirm, alterable, such as may be justly challenged, or excepted against; that the other is added to strengthen and confirm it? No, saith the Apostle, both of them are equally Immutable. Wherefore we must still carry along with us, the infinite and unconceiveex Abundanti; not only beyond what he was any way obliged unto, but whatever we could desire or expect.
For (2) this makes the Evidence absolute, and uncontroulable, that as they are two things which are produced to make it good, so they are both of them equally Immutable; such as neither in their own Nature, nor in their ExecuAlteration. For the Promise it self was absolute, and the thing promised depended on no Condition in us, on nothing without God himself. For there was in the Promise it self, all the Springs of all that is good, and of Deliverance from all that is Evil, so that on every side it brings along with it the Condition of its own Accomplishment. But whereas God in the Covenant of Works did give no Promise unto ManConditional, and suspended on such things on our part, as might or might not be, whence it came to pass that we sinned and came
Oath.
Moreover the Apostle confirmeth this Testimony yet further from the NaIn
by which it was impossible that God should lye or deceive. to lye, but by any means to deceive him who hath cause to trust what we say or do. The highest Security among men consists in a Promise confirmed with an Oath; and this is, and must be unto them an End of Strife; for higher they cannot go. But yet it is possible there may be a lye and deceit in their Testimony, and he who trusts unto them may be deceived, as it often falls out in the world. For although the things themchangeable, yea liars. But it is God who makes use of them in our Case, and therefore is it Impossible that he should lye. God having made this double engagement of his Truth and Faithfulness, it is utterly impossi
But why doth the Apostle put an Emphasis upon this, that by these things it was impossible that God should lye, or deceive? For it is necessary unto God from his own Being, that it should in all things be impossible for him to lye. He cannot lye, He cannot deceive, He cannot deny himself, or his Word, these things are repugnant unto his Being. I Answer; That the Apostle speaks not of the Nature of the things themselves, but of their manifestation with respect unto us. Nothing was added to the Promise of God to render it more certain, firm, and stable; but an Addition was made unto it to give our minds greater security. Gods Immutability in promising, and im
Fallen sinful man stands in need of the utmost Encouragement that Divine Condescension can extend unto, to prevail with him to receive and lay hold of the Promise of Grace
There is nothing that we are so prone unto, as to distrust the Promises of God. Nothing that we are with more difficulty won over unto, than to mix them with Faith. To evidence this we may consider,
1. That the first entrance of Sin into the world, was by a disbelief of the Truth of God; yea that very sin formally consisted in an Apprehension, that God in his Promises and Threatenings had a mind to deceive us, Gen. 3. 4, 5, 6. And as sin thus laid its foundation by the Craft of Sathan, so it en
For (1) Secret thoughts there are in the Hearts of men (which are detrue, in the terms and sense wherein they are probad with any as he threateneth, nor so well as he promiseth. Did men believe the ThreatenThe Lord will not do good, neither will he do evil, Zeph. 1. 12. namely, as he hath either promised or threatened.
(2) Men think that there are still some reserves and latent Conditions in the Promises and Threatenings of God, and that God knows it shall be otherSathan deceived our first Parents as to the Truth of God in his Threatening. He perswaded them that there was a reserve therein, that was directly contrary unto what the
not dye, but be Wise and like himself. And still men suppose that the Promises propose a fair ground indeed; but that if they should go to build upon it, there is a Mine under it, which would be sprung at one time or another unto their Ruine. They cannot apprehend that it shall be with them according unto, and as the Promise doth declare. If they should atlatent condition or other would defeat them of obFaith alone.
(3) Whatever may be the Truth of the Promise, yet they cannot conceive that God intends them therein; whereas yet there is no Declaration or Inten
On these and the like grounds, the great contest in the world between God and Man, is whether God be True or a Liar in his Promise. It is not thus directly stated in the minds of Men; for they have many other prehe that receives not the Testimony of God, maketh him a Liar. So was it with the People in the Wilderness, whose Carkasses fell therein because of their Unbelief. The Reasons they pretended and pleaded why they would not atCanaan, were that the People were strong, and the Cities walled, and Giants among them, Numb. 13. 28, 32, 33. But the true reason was their Unbelief of Gods Promise; wherefore God expresseth the sense of his Indignation against them, with that Scheme of Reproach; Ye shall bear your Iniquities, and you shall know my breach of Promise, chap. 14. 34. or see what your Unbelief hath brought you unto. And no otherwise is it with all Unbelievers at pre
2. The Curse of the Law having by the guilt of Sin been admitted unto a Dominion over the whole Soul, it is a great thing to receive and admit of a Testimony to the contrary, such as the Promise is. What the Law speaks, it speaks unto them that are under it, as all men are by Nature. And it speaks in the Heart of every man, that the sinner must dye. Conscience complies also, and adds its suffrage thereunto. This fixeth a conclusion in the mind, that so it will be, whatever may be offered unto the contrary. But so is the Testimony of God in the Promise, namely, that there is a way of Life and Salvation for sinners, and that God offereth this way and an Interest therein unto us. Nothing but the exceeding greatness of the power of Grace, can enable a guilty sinner in this case to set his Seal that God is true.
3. When the Promise comes, and is proposed unto us, for the most part it finds us deeply engaged into, and as to our selves, Immutably fixed on other things that are inconsistent with Faith in the Promises. Some are interested in divers Lusts and Pleasures; Some are filled with inveterate prejudices through a vain Conversation received by Tradition from their Fathers; and some have some good hopes in themselves, that in the way wherein they are, by the RePromise of Grace, so it excludes every thing but Grace. Wherefore when it is proposed unto any, it doth not only require that it be believed, or God be believed therein, but also that in order thereunto, we part with and utterly renounce all hopes and confidences in our selves from what we are or expect to be, and betake our selves for Life and Salvation unto the Promise alone. Some imagine that it is a very easie thing to believe; and that the Souls of men are but deceived when they are called off from the Duties that Light and Conviction put them upon, to the way of Faith in the Promise.
4. The guilt of sin hath filled the mind of every sinner with innumerable fears, doubts and Confusions that are very difficultly satisfied or removed. Yea the remainders of them do abide in Believers themselves, and oft-times fill them with great perplexities. And these when the Promise is proposed unJames 1. 6. No sooner is one of them answered or waved, but immediately ano
And on these grounds it is that poor sinners have such need of the Reduplication of Divine Assurances, that notwithstanding all pretences unto the contrary, the Promise of Grace in Christ shall be made good and be accomplished unto them.
5. The especial Design of God in this Dispensation and Condescension, is That we might have a strong Consolation. Being engaged in the Application of his Instance in the Promise and Faith of God given unto Abraham, the Apostle here plainly dismisseth the consideraTypical of things spiritual; and applies the whole unto present Believers, and therein unto all those of future Ages. That we might have. And herein he builds on this Principle; That whatever God promised, designed, sware unto Abraham, that he did so promise unto all Believers whatWhat God designs unto them; (2) Such a Description of them as contains the Qualifications necessary unto a Participation of what is so designed.
The first is Exhortation, an encouraging perswasive Exhortation. And in that sense it is here taken by some ExposiTheophylact, and Oecumenius. That we might have thereby a prevalent Exhortation unto Faith and Patience in Believing. But Comfort or Consolation is the most usual signification of the Word in the New Testament, as I have shewed elsewhere; and that sense of the Word alone can be here intended. A ConAssurance of Faith, and of our Interest thereobviates and prevents them, or it outballanceth them, and bears up our Souls against them. For
And this Consolation which God intends and designs Believers, is solamen fortissimum, forte, validum, potens. Strong, powerful, prevalent. Strong so as to be prevalent against Opposition, is that which is intended. There are Comforts to be taken, or are often taken from earthly things. But they are weak, languid, and such as fade and dye upon the first appearance of a vigorous opStrong; that is, such as will abide against all Opposition. A strong Tower; an impregnable Fortress, Munition of Rocks. For it is not the abounding of Consolation in us, but the prevalency of the Causes of it against Opposition that is intended.
6. There is the Description of the Persons unto whom God designs this Confly for Refuge. (2) The Relief it self which they seek after, which is the Hope set before them. (3) The way whereby they are made Parlay hold upon it.
that fly for Refuge; Qui cursum corripiunt. It is the Judgement of many that here is an Allusion unto him who had slain a man unawares under the Law, whose safety and life depenCities of Refuge, Numb. 35. 11, 12. And hereunto our Translators had undoubtedly respect, whereon they rendered the word, flying for Refuge. And indeed the word it self signifies such an Action as is there ascribed unto the man-slayer. For cursum corripere, hath respect unto two things. (1) An apprehension of Danger, or a real surprisal with it, whereon a man takes his flight for Deliverance. And so it was with the man-slayer; his apprehension of the approach of the Avenger of Blood, to take away his Life, stirred him up Speed and Diligence in an endeavour to attain that place or company, or End which a man proposeth unto himself, as the means of his Deliverance; and whereby he hopes to find safety. He that doth so fly, casts off all Tergiversation, stirs up himself, gives no place to sloth or vain hopes, and useth his utmost diligence in the pursuit of his safety. And hereby doth the Holy Ghost lively express the state and condition of all the Heirs of Promise in this matChildren of the first Adam, they are all exposed upon the Guilt of Sin Original and Actual unto the SenDanger wherein they are, the Execution of that Curse which they are obnoxious unto being impendent over them. In this Condition they see a necessity of seeking out for Relief, as knowing that if it be not obtained they must perish, and that Eternally. Love of Sin, compliance with the World, hopes of Righteousness of their own, do all endeavour variously to retard and hinder them in their Design. But when God proceeds to shut them up, to sharpen their Convictions, and continually to represent their Condition unto them, giving them to conclude that there is no hope in their present Condition, at length they stir up themselves unto a speedy flight to the Hope set before them in the Promise. And,
That is the second thing to be enquired into, namely, what is this Hope that is set before us, and how it is so. (1) Most Expositors take Hope here Metonymy of the Subject for the thing hoped for; that is, Grace and Glory, Justification and Salvation by Jesus Christ. These things are the subject matter of the Promises, which we desire and hope after. And unto these we may be said to fly for Relief or Refuge, when in our expectation of them we are supported and comforted. (2) Some take Hope subjectively for the Grace of Hope it self. And this we are said to fly unto, that is, speedily to betake our selves unto the exercise of it, as founded in the Promises of God, foregoing all other expectations, wherein we shall find assured Consolation. (3) Hope, by a metonymy of the effect for the Cause, may express the Promise it self, which is the cause and means of ingenerating Hope in us. And this I take to be the proper meaning of the place, and which is not exclusive of the other senses mentioned. The Promise being proposed unto us is the Cause and Object of our Faith on the account of the Faithfulness of God therein. Faith brings forth Hope, whose Object is the same Promise, or the good things thereof, as proposed from the same Faithfulness. Thence is it self called the Hope, as that without which we could have none, there being neither Cause of it, nor Object for it. And this Hope is said to be set before us, or to be proposed unto us, which it is in the Declaration of the Promise, or the Dispensation of the Gospel. Therein it is proposed as the Object of our Faith and Hope, as the means of the strong ConMetaphor plain and easie. For it is evident how the Promise and all that we hope for thereby is set before us and proposed unto us in the Gospel, as also how we fly or betake our selves thereunto in all distresses for Relief. And it is more natural to allow of this metonymical expression in the word Hope, than to admit of so rough a Catachresis in the other part of the words, wherein the Grace of Hope within us, should be said to be set before us.
to lay hold on, fortiter apprehendere, constanter retinere. The signification injecta manu, totis viribus retinere; to hold fast what we lay hold on, with all our might and power. There will be many endeavours to strike off the hand of Faith from laying hold on the Promise; and many more to loosen its hold when it hath taken it. But it is in its Nature, and it is a part of our Duty strongly to lay hold upon, and firmly to retain the Promise when we have reached unto it. And there seems in the whole Metaphor to be an Allusion unto those who run in a Race. For whereas they have a Prize or mark, which when they have attained they both lay fast hold on, and bear it away with them as their own. So is it with Believers as to the Promise proposed unto them or set before them. They reach out after it, lay hold upon it, reserve it as to their Interest in it, as the only means of their Deliverance and Salvation, and of that Consolation which in every condition they stand in need of. And from the words so opened we may observe that,
Sense of Danger and Ruine from sin, is the first thing which occasions a Soul to look
out after Christ in the Promise. It is implied in the word fly for Refuge. As the Lord Christ came to seek and save that which was lost, to call not the Righteous but sinners to Repentance, to be a Physician to the sick and not to the whole; so if men are not sensible of their lost condition, of the sin and sickness of their Souls, they will never in good earnest look out after him. And therefore as those by whom Conviction of Sin, and Humiliation for it are despised, as they are by many, Christ himself also, who is the End of the Law and all its Convictions for Righteousness, is despised; so the Profession of Christ and hopes of Salvation by him is in vain in all those who were never truly made sensible of Sin and the danger of Eternal Ruine thereby.
A full Conviction of Sin is a great and shaking surprisal unto a guilty Soul. Hence is such an one here tacitely compared unto him who had killed a man
at unawares. He was just before in a condition of Peace and Safety, fearing no man, but with quietness and assurance attending his own occasions. But having now slain a man at unawares, he finds all things on a suddain changed round about him. Fear within, and danger from without, do beset him on every hand. If he seeth any man, he supposeth him the Avenger of Blood; and if he seeth no man, solitude is dreadful unto him. No otherwise is it with them who are throughly convinced of Sin. They were alive, as the Apostle speaks Rom. 7. and at peace, fearing no more Evil than they felt; perhaps perCommandment comes and discovers their guilt and danger thereon, and unveils the Curse which until now was hidden from them, as the Avenger of Blood ready to execute the Sentence of the Law. This being a thing which they never expected nor feared, fills them with great surprisals. Hence are those cries of such Persons; what shall we do to be saved? that argue a great distress and no small amaze
The Revelation or Discovery of the Promise, or of Christ in the Promise, is that alone which directs convinced sinners into their proper course and way. This is the setting of
an Hope before them, wherein they are called to look unto their strong Tower as Prisoners of Hope, that they may be brought out of the Pit through the Blood of the Everlasting Covenant. The man slayer probably might have many contrivances sug
Where there is the least of saving Faith, upon the first Discovery of Christ in the
Promise, it will stir up the whole Soul to make out towards him, and a Participation of him. As Faith is begotten in the Soul by the Promise, so the first na
It is the Duty and Wisdom of all those unto whom Christ in the Promise is once discovered, by any Gospel-means or Ordinance once set before them, to admit
of no delay, of a through closing with him. Many things, yea things innu
There is a spiritual strength and vigour required unto the securing of our Interest in
the Promise,
to lay fast and firm hold upon it. The greatness of our concern therein, the opposition that will be made thereunto, the Love where
The Promise is an assured Refuge unto all sin-distressed Souls who betake themselves
thereunto.
Where any Souls convinced of Sin by the charge of the Law, and their own
lost condition thereon, do betake themselves unto the Promise for Relief, God is abundantly willing that they should receive strong Consolation. For herein doth the Na
Which(Hope)we have as an Anchor of the Soul, both sure and stedfast, and which entereth into that within the Vail.
Having made mention of our Hope with respect unto the Promise of God, He adds an account of the use of that Hope in the course of our Faith and Obedience. And he leaves herein the metonymical signification of the word, returning unto that which is proper, namely, the Grace of Hope in us. But this he doth not absoObject or the Promise laid hold upon by Faith. For he doth not expresly mention Hope it self, but includes it in the relative Article, and so respects not its self alone but its object also, which he had mentioned beHope as arising from, or caused by and fixed on the Promise of God. WhereHope as fixed on, and mixed with that Promise, securing our InNature of this Hope. (2) Its Use and Properties. (3) Its Operation and Effects. The first is included, the second expressed under a Natural, and the third under a Typical similitude.
1. The Grace of Hope being not expresly mentioned but only included in the words, and that not with respect unto its Essence and Nature, but its Use and Operation, here is no occasion given to insist upon it. Only whereas it is supposed as the principal subject of the Proposition, it may briefly be spoken unto.
This Hope elsewhere He calls our confidence, and ascribes a chap. 3. 6. and a full assurance; chap. 6. 1. Wherefore it is that Grace whereon our Assurance, or that full perswasion of Faith which gives confidence and Glory, doth depend. And there is nothing more adHope. For it is generally conceived as a dubious, uncertain, fluctuating expectation of that which may be, or may not be for the future. Now although such expectations of all sorts may be included in the general notion of Hope, yet are they excluded from the Nature and Use of that Grace of Hope which is recommended unto us in the Scripture. For this is a firm Trust in God for the enjoyment of the good things contained in his Promises, at the appointed season, raising in the Soul an earnest desire after them, and expectation of them. And for want of the knowledge of the Nature of this Grace, many live without any benefit of its exercise. Let two things concerning it be observed and they will give Light into its Nature and Use. (1) That it springs from Faith, in that it fixeth all its expectation on the good things in the Promise, and that as promised. But it is Faith alone that receives the Promise and giveth an Interest therein. (2) That its Nature and Essence consists in Trust in God, which if it be not the Foundation of all its exercise, whatever may be so called is but a deceiving prePsal. 33. 18. 42. 5. Psal. 130. 5. &c. Wherefore it is the fiduciary Act of Faith on God in the Promises, as it respects the good things of it, as yet absent, future, unenjoyed.
2. The Use and Operation of this Hope, the Apostle expresseth by a double metaphor, the one taken from things Natural, the other from things instituted and Typical. Its Use he sets forth by a Metaphor taken from things natural; it is the Anchor of the Soul, firm and stable; and its Operation by a Metaphor taken from things Typical, it entereth into that within the Vail.
1. In it self and as unto its Use He compareth it unto an Anchor; It is the Anchor of the Soul. For the Souls of Believers it seems have need of an Anchor. And there is much instructive efficacy in such similitudes They are the only lawful Images in things sacred. For that which in its self is
2. The Allusion respects the Properties of an Anchor, which as here expressed are two, the one respecting its Nature, the other its Use. (1) It is sure;
substance of it is firm, the proportion of it is suited unto the Burden of the Ship; and it is no fair promising and yet deceitful Engine. (2) In its Use it is firm and stedfast, which no sure, and not a deceiving ImaIt maketh not ashamed, Rom. 5. 5. by any failure or disappointment. Groundless Presumptions are the deceitful Engines, whereby the Souls of multiMariners should cast out a Logg, or a burden of Straw, to stay their Vessel in a Storm. But Hope proceeding on and built on Faith, is infallible and will not deceive. (2) In its Use it is firm and invincible, against all oppositions, not indeed from its self, but from the ground which it fixeth upon, namely, Christ in the Promise, as the next words declare. For,
Secondly, The way or means whereby this spiritual Anchor secures our Souls is and which entereth into that within the Vail. And herein there is a dissimilitude in the comparates. For an Anchor is cast downwards and fixeth it self in the Earth at the bottom of the Sea; but Hope ascendeth upwards, and fixeth it self in Heaven, or in that which is therein. And we must enquire, (1) What is this Vail. (2) How Hope entreth it. (3.) What is that within it, that Hope entreth into. (1) For the Vail it self, the Apostle unto that
The Vail therefore here alluded unto, was that which parted the most holy place from the Sanctuary or Body of the Temple. This our Apostle calls the second Vail, chap. 9. 3. and here the Vail absolutely. For the Body of the Temple whereinto the Priests only entred to offer Incense, was separated from the People by the first Vail, as the most Holy place was from that, by the second Vail. Through the foraspectable Heavens through which he passed in his Ascension into the glorious Presence of God. See our Exchap. 4. ver. 14. Within the Vail therefore, is within and above these visible Heavens, the place of Gods glorious Residence, the Holy Tabernacle not made with hands, where the Lord Christ continueth to administer for his Church. (2) This Hope entreth into, or passeth through. The Heavens are as a Vail unto the sense and reason of man; there, their sight and their thoughts are bounded; they can neither discern nor judge of any thing that is above or within that Vail. But Faith with Hope pierceth through it; no created thing can keep them at a diAnchor stays not in the Waves of the Sea, as it cannot fix it self in the Waters, but pierceth through them until it come unto solid Earth in the bottom; no more doth or can the Hope of a Believer fix it self on any thing under these Heavens, but it pierceth through all till it come within the Vail. And this it doth (1) under the conduct of Faith, which goes before it, and presents unto it the things hoped for, Heb. 11. 1. (2) By the Rule and Line of the Word which on no occasion it will vary from.
And (3) this it doth to that which is within. And what is it that is within this Vail? not an Ark and a mercy-seat, not TaSoul stedfast in all the Storms and Tempests that may befall it. Wherefore that which Hope fixeth on within the Vail; is (1) The Father as the Author. (2) The
That all true Believers are exposed to Storms and Tempests in this world. This makes Anchors so necessary for them. The wise God would not have proAnchor for them and enjoyned its use, if he had not known they would be exposed unto Storms. He that dwells at peace in his House, of all things thinks least of an Anchor. But we are to look for Storms. Sup
These Storms would prove ruinous unto the Souls of Believers, were they not indefeasibly
No distance of place, no Interposition of difficulties can hinder the Hope of Believers,
from entring into the Presence of, and fixing it self on God in Christ. It pierceth through the Clouds, passeth through the Heavens, stops not at their glorious Vail, until it comes unto the Eternal Fountain and Spring of all Grace and Mercy. And therefore,
The strength and assurance of the Faith and Hope of Believers is invisible unto
the world. They enter in within the Vail where no Eye of Reason can pur
Hope firmly fixed on God in Christ by the Promise will hold steady and preserve the Soul in all the Storms and Trials that may befall it. It is an Anchor both sure
It is our Wisdom at all times, but especially in times of Trial, to be sure that our Anchor
Whither the forerunner is for us entred, Jesus made an High Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.
The Apostle issueth this long digression as he doth all his other Discourses, in the Person of Christ; who being the Author and Finisher of our Faith, with him he begins, and in him he ends continually. And three things he aims at in this Verse.
1. To give new Assurance unto the efficacy and prevalency of Hope fixed on the Promise as it enters in unto that within the Vail; namely, because Christ our High Priest is there. It enters there, whither Christ is gone. Even HeaThrone of Grace in Heaven, as there could have been no Typical Throne in the Sanctuary, without the Mercy-seat. And this contains the relation between the two Verses; wherein we see that,
After the most sincere performance of the best of our Duties, our Comforts and Securities
2. The Apostle in these words by an Artificial Transition, lands us on that Priesthood of Christ as represented in that of Melchisedec. This he had asserted chap. 5. 12. But upon the consideration of the depth of this Mystery, the Importance of the subject matter of it, with the present state of the most of these Hebrews, he engageth into that long digression for their due preparation unto the hear
As the minds of men are greatly to be prepared for the Communication of spiritual mysteries unto them, so the best preparation is by the cure of their sinful and corrupt Affections, with the removal of their Barrenness under what they have before learned and been instructed in. It is to no purpose, yea it is but the putting of New Wine into Old Bottles to the loss of all, to be daily leading men into the knowledge of
3. He gives an account of the Lord Christ unto whom he hath now reduced his Discourse, in sundry particulars; As,
1. He expresseth him by his Name Jesus. And by the Interposition of
(1) To mind us of the signification of it, whence the reason of his AsJesus signifies a Saviour; And he was called Jesus, because he was to save his People from their sins, Matth. 1. 21. He therefore concerning whom all these things are affirmed, is to be considered as our Saviour; who had the name of a Saviour given him by God himself, with respect unto the work which he was to do, 1 Thes. 1. 10. and he is Jesus still, able to save to the uttermost them that come unto God by him.
(2) To reflect on the common use of that name in the world. This was the Name under which he was reproached, reviled, crucified and slain as a Malefactor, They crucified
This same Jesus is our Saviour in every state and condition, the same on the Cross and the same at the right hand of the Majesty on high. Hence he is still represented in Heaven as a Lamb slain, Rev. 5. 6. And all apprehensions unto the contrary are destructive unto the whole Foundation of the Gospel.
2. He describes him by that Office and Action whence our Hope receives its Forerunner for us, and as such is entred in thither.
In this place alone is this Title assigned unto the Lord Christ, though the things intended in it are elsewhere expressed. And so it must be said concerning the name of a surety, which our Apostle makes use of in the next Chapter, ver. 22. Great mysterious Truths may often be comprised in one word, used and employed by the Holy Ghost for our Instruction; and therefore every word of the Scripture is diligently to be searched into.
It is indifferent whether we render the words, the Forerunner for us, that is, our Forerunner is entred; or the Forerunner is entred for us. In the first
Forerunner acting for us, is intended. Both come to the same purpose; and our Translators so place the words as if they enclined unto the latter sense. Two things we are to enquire into.
(1) What is a Forerunner. (2) What the Holy Ghost would instruct us in by this Ascription unto Christ, or he is a Forerunner entring within the Vail for us.
(1) Praecursor; is one who in an affair of publick concern, makes speed by himself unto the place whereunto the Affair belongs, to give an Account of it, and to dispose of all things needful and suited unto the disposal of the Affair that he reports. Commonly indeed such a publick Harbinger is inferiour unto those who come after, under whose conduct the main of the affair doth abide. But this is only where he who is the
(1) He is in his entrance into Heaven, or the Holy place, Forerunner. This the High Priest of Old when he entred once a year into the Holy place was not. He entred thereinto himself, but he made no way for any to follow after. He did not go before the People to give them an entrance into the Holy place; but both by his entrance and his return signified their exclusion for ever. We have then herein another Instance of the excellency of our High Priest and his Office. When he entred into the Holy place, he did it not meerly for himself, but to go before, to lead and conduct the whole Church into the same Glory.
(2) He is a Forerunner for us; that is, for all Believers, for the whole Church in all Times, Ages and Places. And this he is three ways.
1. By way of Declaration. It belongs unto a Forerunner to carry Tidings, and to declare what is the success that hath been obtained in the Affair which he giveth an account of. The Lord Christ entring into Heaven makes an open declaration, that he hath led Captivity Captive, spoiled Principalities and Powers, triumphed over them, that he hath obtained his Portion, and divided the spoil with the strong, Isa. 53. 12. that he hath rescued his Church from the Power of Sin, Sathan, Death and Law. And there were two parts of the Triumphant Declaration made by this Forerunner of the Church. (1) That he had discharged his Original Engagement for the Salvation of Believers under the Old Testament, on the Faith whereof they were accepted with God, and saved. Hence upon his entrance within the Vail, they also joyn in that doxologie, Rev. 5. 9, 10, 11, 12. And he was their Forerunner also. For although I have no apprehension of the Limbus Patrum fancied by the Panearer Admission into the Presence of God, upon the Ascension of Christ, than what they enjoyed before. They were in Heaven before, the Sanctuary of God; but were not admitted within the Vail, into the most holy place, where all the Counsels of God in Christ are displayed and represented. There was no entrance before either as to Grace or Glory within the Vail, Heb. 9. 8. For as I said, within the Vail are all the Counsels of God in Christ laid open, as they were typed in the Holy place. This none could or were to behold, before his own entrance thither. Wherefore he was their Forerunner also. (2) To declare the Redemption of all the Elect that were to follow him in their several Generations. This is Triumphantly declared in Heaven, Psal. 47. 5, 6, 7. Psal. 68. 18, 24, 25, 26.
2. By way of Preparation. And this is twofold.
(1) With respect unto our present gracious entrance into the Holiest, by Faith and Prayer. This way was not made for us whilst the Old Taberchap. 9. 8. But this way is now prepared for us by our
(2) As unto our future entrance into Glory. Under this capacity as a Foreprepare Mansions for us in his Fathers House, whither he is gone, and which he hath promised to do, Joh. 14. 23. He prepares Mansions for us, and he prepares us for those Mansions, suiting Grace and Glory unto each other. Heaven indeed is ready for us, whenever we are meet and ready for Heaven.
3. By the way of Possession. He had now obtained for the Church EterActs 26. 18. This he went, for them and in their Name to take possession of, and to reserve it in the Heavens for them, 1 Pet. 1. 4. Hereon being by Adoption made Heirs of God, they become to be Coheirs with Christ, Rom. 8. 17. and are at last admitted into the same Glory with him. So is he a Forerunner for us.
3. As a Forerunner he is entred within the Vail; that is, into Heaven it self, the place of the glorious Presence of God. And this also may be considered two ways.
1. With respect unto what he hath already done for us; and two things are included therein. (1) That he had compleatly finished the work he had to do upon the Earth. He had absolutely won the Victory, and secured the Church from all its spiritual Adversaries. Without this a Triumphant Entrance into Heaven had not been granted unto him. (2) Gods blessed Approbation of all that he had done here below, Isa. 53. 11, 12. Phil. 2. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.
2. With respect unto what he hath yet to do for us. Hence it is that he is not said absolutely to enter into his Glory; but to enter as a Priest, as through a Vail, as into the Holy place; where he continues as our Forerunmade an High Priest after the order of Melchisedec, whereof we must treat in the next Chapter.
Now the Lord Jesus being thus entred into Heaven as our Forerunner, gives us manifold security of our entrance thither also, in the appointed seaJoh. 14. 3, 19. For (1) He passed through all the Storms of Trials, Temptations, Persecutions, and Death it self, that we are exposed unto; and yet is landed safely in Eternal Glory. His Anchor was Trust and Hope in all his Storms, chap. 2. 13. Isa. 50. 7, 8, 9. And it was tried to the utmost, Psal. 22. 8, 9, 10. It preserved him in them all, and will be no less Faithful unto the whole Church. As he hath thus gone before us, he is able to succour us, and hath given us in himself a Pledge of success. (2) He is now where our Hope is fixed, namely, within the Vail, where he takes care of it and will preserve it unto the end.
Again, If the Lord Christ be entred in Heaven as our Forerunner, it is our Duty to be following of him with all the speed we can. And it is required hereunto. (1) That we be willing to follow him, in the way wherein he went, as well as unto the place whither he is gone. And the way he went was, (1) The way of Obedience, chap. 5. 8, 9. (2) The way of suffering, chap. 12. 2. Holiness and the Cross are the two Essential parts of the way whereby our Foreburden not our selves with any thing that will retard us, chap. 12. 1.
And we may see whereon the security of the Church doth depend as to the Trials and Storms which it undergoes in this world. He that can consider the Oppo
There is no proportion between its visible defence and the visible opposition that is made unto it. It is Jesus our Forerunner who is within the Vail, taking care of all our concerns, that is alone our security.
And what will he not do for us, who in the height of his Glory is not ashamed to be esteemed our Forerunner? What Love, what Grace, what Mercy may we not ex
When our Hope and Trust enter within the Vail, it is Christ as our Forerunner that in opeculiar manner they are to fix and fasten themselves upon.
Analyses given of this Chapter, as there are Commentators upon it. And sometimes the same Person proposeth sundry of them, without a Determination of what he principally adheres unto. All of them endeavour to reduce the whole Discourse of the Apostle unto such a Method as they judge most Artificial and Argumentative. But, as I have else-where Observed, the Force of the Apostles Reasonings doth not absolutely depend on any such Method of Arguing as we have framed unto our selves. There is something in it more
The Design of the Apostle in this Chapter is not to declare the Nature, or the Exercise of the
Herein was the Authority and Infinite Wisdom of God made manifest in his dealing with the Church of Old: By his Authority he obliged them unto a Religious ObservMal. 4. 4, 5, 6. But in his Infinite Wisdom, he had
And with Respect unto both of these, did that Church greatly miscarry: For first, in many Ages it could not be brought with any Constancy to submit unto the Authority of God in Obedience unto his Ordinances and Institutions, as the whole story of the Old Testament doth declare. And now, when the time was come, wherein they were all to cease, under a pretence of adhering to the Authority of God, they Rebelled aWisdom, and refused to consider the Instructions which he had inlaid from first to last concerning their Ceasing and Alteration; whereon the Generality of the Church fell and utterly perished. This therefore the Apostle Designs here to enlighten them in.
And this should teach us with what Diligence, with what Reverence, with what Subjection of Soul, and Resignation of our Understandings unto the Will and Wisdom of God, all Divine Revelations are to be enquired into. So dealt in this Matter the Holy men and Prophets of Old, 1 Pet. 1. 10, 11. And as for Want hereof, the whole Church of the Jews perished at this Season; So in all Ages sundry particular Persons did wofully miscarry; see Lev. 10. 1, 2, 3. 2 Sam. 6. 6, 7. 1 Chron. 14. 11. And the Want hereof is the Bane of most Churches in the World at this day.
In Order unto the End mentioned, the Apostle in the first place declares, that Antecedently unto the giving of the Law, and the Institution of the Levitical Priesthood thereby, God had, without any Respect thereunto, given a
He in whom this praefiguration of the Priesthood of Christ was made, is Melchisedec, concerning whom and his Priesthood an Account is given in the first part of the Chapter unto
The Second Part of it, from ver. 10. unto ver. 24. consisteth in a double Inference, with their Improvements taken from that Discourse, as respecting Christ in his Of
(1.) Unto the Removal, Abolition, or taking away out of the Church, the whole Aaronical Priesthood, with all the Worship of the Tabernacle and Temple, which deMelchisedec, whereof he had given an Acver. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17.
(2.) Unto the Excellency of the Priesthood of Christ in it self above that of the Taver. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24.
(3.) Having laid this Foundation in his Demonstration of the Necessary removal of the Aaronical Priesthood, and the preeminence of that of Christ above it, even whilst it did continue, he further declares the Nature of it, from the Dignity and Qualifications of his Person, with the manner of the discharge of his Office on this Ac
This may suffice as a plain View and Prospect of the general scope of the Apostle in these Discourses. The especial coherence of one thing with another, the Nature of his Instances, the Accuracy and Force of his Arguings, the Perspicuity of his Deducti
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
THere is little variety in the Translation of these Verses, Dei Summi, for altissimi, the most High God of all; but adds in a new way of Exposition, every thing that was with him; that is, of the Spoyls, as it is afterwards Expounded. divisit; properly Syr. Separated, laid aside, Bez. impartitus est, Imparted, gave, sine Genealogiâ; Bez. sine genere, without stock; sine serie generis, without
For this Melchisedec, King of Salem, Priest of the most High God, who met Abrareturning from the slaughter of the Kings, and Blessed him; to whom also Abraham divided out a tenth part of all: First, being by Interpretation King of Righteousness; and after that also King of Salem, which is King of Peace: Without Father, without Mother, without Pedigree; having neither beginning of days, nor end of life, but made like unto the Son of God, abideth a Priest continually.
The words are an entire Proposition, consisting of a Subject, and a Predicate, or what is affirmed of it. Unto the Subject spoken of, which is Melchisedec, there is adjoynlarge Description, by its Properties and Adjuncts in sundry particulars. That which is affirmed of him, as so described, which is the predicate of the Proposition, is contained in the last words, or the Close of the third Verse; but being made like unto the Son of God, abideth a Priest for ever.
The Introduction of the whole Discourse, and therein its Connexion unto what went before, is contained in the casual Particle For; and this may respect the
Reason why the Apostle affirmed, and insisted so much on it, that the Lord Christ was a Priest after the Order of Melchisedec: For, both the Truth (saith he) of my Asserthis Melchisedec was, how he is Represented in the Scripture, and what is affirmed of him. Or Respect may be had in this word unto the whole preceChap. 5. ver. 11. There he lays the Foundation of it, affirmMelchisedec; and those such, as they would not easily understand, unless they diligently applyed their minds unto the knowledge of Divine Mysteries; hereof he now designs to give them an Account. For this MelchiConnexion is most Natural unto the words immediately preceding; and a Reason is given of what was affirmed in them, Namely, That Jesus was made an High Priest for ever, after the Order of Melchisedec, Chap. 6. 20. for it was thus with this Melchisedec.
When Truths in themselves Mysterious, and of great Importance unto the Church, are asserted or declared, it is very necessary that clear Evidence and Demonstration be given unto them; that the minds of men be left neither in the dark about their Meaning, nor in suspense about their Truth. So dealeth our Apostle in the large ensuing confirma
The mention of Melchisedec is introduced with the Demonstrative Pronoune this: It always hath an Emphasis, and denotes somewhat eminent in the Subject spoken of, mostly in a way of Commendation, so ver. 4. Consider how
great a man this was. This man of whom is our Discourse.
The Person spoken of is variously Described: (1.) By his Name, Melchisedec. (2.) By his Original Office, he was a King. (3.) The place of his Rule or DomiSalem; King of Salem. (4.) By another Office added to the forNature of it, the Priesthood; a Priest. (2.) By its Object and Author; of the most High God. (3.) By his Actings as a Priest; he Blessed Abraham: Illumet him. (2.) By the time of it, and its Cirwhen he returned from the slaughter of the Kings. (6.) By the acknowledgment of his Office made by
For the Person spoken of, and Described by his Name, Melchisedec, I shall in this place say no more of him but what is Necessary for the Understanding of the Text. For I shall not here Examine those Opinions and Disputes concerning him, which for the most part have been raised by needless Curiosity: the fond and impious imagination of them who would have him, some of them, to be the Holy Ghost, and some of them God, even the Father himself, have been long since exploded. That he was an Angel in Humane Appearance, is so contrary to the Design of the Apostle, that not ma
But that he was the Son of God himself, in a prelibation of his Incarnation, taking upon him the Form of a man, as he did afterwards the internal Form and Being in the Personal Union, some Learned Men have conjectured and contended. Howbeit, this also is directly contrary to the Text, wherein he is said to be made like unto the Son of God. And indeed all such Opinions as make him more than Man, are wholly inconamong men, there was a Priest and Priesthood representative of Christ, and his Priesthood Superiour to that of the Law; which hath nothing of Argument in it, if he were more than a Man. Besides he lays it down for a certain Principle, That every High Priest is taken from among men, Chap. 5. 1. And therefore if
Among these who grant him a meer man, very many, following the Opinion of the Jews, contend he was Shem the Son of Noah, who was certainly then alive, and of great Authority in the World by virtue of his Primogeniture. But this also riseth up in Contradiction unto our Apostle, beyond all possibility of Reconciliation. The
Jews who are no further concerned in him but as to what is declared by Moses, may safely, as to their own Principles, though not truly, conjecture him to be Shem. But whereas our Apostle affirms that he was without Father, without Mother, without Genealogy, having neither beginning of Days, nor end of Life, we are not allowed to In
These things therefore are certain, and belong unto Faith in this Matter. First, That he was a meer Man, and no more but so; for (1.) Every High Priest was to be taken from among Men, Chap. 5. 1. So that the Son of God himself could not have been a Priest had he not assumed our Nature. (2.) That if he were more than a man, there were no Mystery in it, that he is introduced in the Scripture, without Father, without Mother, without Pedigree, for none but Men have so. (3.) Without this Conception of him there is no force in the Apostles Argument against the Jews. SePrimogeniture (which includes a Genealogy) or any other Successive way, but was raised up and immediately called of God thereunto. For in that respect Christ is said to be a Priest after his Order. Thirdly, That he had no Successor on the Earth, nor could have; for there was no Law to constitute an Order of Succession, and he was a Priest onely after an extraordinary Call. These things belong unto Faith in this Matter, and no more.
Two things every way consistent with the scope and purpose of the Apostle, yea, Eminently subservient thereunto, I shall take leave to add; the one as my Judgment, the other as a probable Conjecture onely. And the first is, that although he Lived and Dwelt in Canaan, then and afterwards principally possessed by the Posterity of the Son of Cham so called, yet he was none of the Seven Nations or People therein that were in the Curse of Noah devoted unto Bondage and Destruction. For whereas they were therein by a Spirit of Prophecy Anathematized and cast out of the Church, as also devoted unto Destruction, God would not raise up among them, that is of their Accursed Seed, the most glorious Ministry that ever was in the World, with respect unto Typical Signification, which was all that could be in the World until the Son of God came in his own Person. This I take to be true, and do somewhat wonder that no Expositors did ever take any Notice of it, seeing it is necessary to be granted from the Analogy of Sacred Truth.
My Conjecture is, that he was a Person of the Posterity of Japhet, who was prinGentiles that were to be called. Noah had Prophesied, that God should enlarge the Heart of Japhet, or perswade him so, as that he should return to dwell in the Tents of Shem, Gen. 9. 27. Unto Shem he had before granted the present Blessing of the Covenant, in those words, Blessed be the Lord God of Shem, ver. 26. and thereby the bringing forth of the Promised Seed was confined unShilo came, unto whom the gathering of the Gentiles was to be, in the enlargement of Japhet, and his Return to dwell in the Tents of Shem. And whereas the Land of Canaan was designed of God for the seat of the Church in his Posterity, he suffered it to be possessed first by the Seed of Cursed Canaan that in their dispossessing and destruction he might give a Representation and Security of the Victory and final Success of the Lord Christ and his Church over all their Adversaries. Before this came to pass, God, as I suppose, brought this Melchisedec and some others of the Posterity of Japhet into the Land of Canaan, even before Abraham himself, in pursuit of the Promise made unto Shem, had possession of it, and placed him there in a Condition of Office Superiour unto Abraham himself. And this might be done for two ends. (1.) That a claim might be put in on the behalf of Japhet unto an Interest in the Tents of Shem in the Type of the Priviledge, for a while confined unto his Family. This Right and Rule of Melchisedec in those places which were to be the Seat of the Church enjoying the Promise made to Shem; took, as it were, Livery and Seisin for the Gentile Posterity of Japhet, which was in due time to be brought into the full posGentile Converts in the Promise and Spiritual Priviledges of the Church, should be far more Excellent and better than was the state and Privileges of the Posterity of Shem whilst in their separate condition, God having provided some better things for us that they without us should not be made perfect. But these things are submitted to the judgment of every Candid Reader.
I shall onely add what is certain and indubitable, namely, that we have herein a sigSovereignty and Wisdome of God. All the World was at that time generally fallen into Idolatry and false Worship. The Progenitors of Abraham, though a principal Branch of the Posterity of Shem (as it is like, in the line of Primogeniture) dwelt beyond the River, and Served other gods, Josh. 24. 2. Probably Abraham himCanaan was InhabiAmorit
with the rest of the
1. That God can raise the greatest Light in the midst of the greatest Darkness; as, Mat. 4. 16.
2. He can raise up Instruments for his Service and unto his Glory, when, where, and how he pleaseth.
3. This Signal Praefiguration of Christ in the Nations of the World, at the same time when Abraham received the Promises for himself and his Posterity, gave a Pledge and Assurance of the certain future Call of the Gentiles
2. This is the Person spoken of; and the first thing in the Description of him is his Office, that he was a King. So he is Reported in the first mention of him, Gen. 14. 18. Melchisedec King of Salem. Now whereas this doth not belong unto that wherein he was a King after the Order of Melchisedec, nor doth the Apostle make any Use of the consideration of this Office in him. We may enquire wherefore God placed him in that state and con
1. To make his Typical Ministry the more eminent and conspicuous. For, placing him in the condition of Regal Power and Authority, what he was and did, would necesprivate man. And moreover by those Possessions and Wealth which he had as a King, he was enaOffice of Priesthood in Sacrifices and other Solemnities. God therefore made him a King, that he might be known and oba Priest, and be able to bear the Burden of that Office. And these things were then not onely consistent, but some Preparation seems to be made for the Conjunction of these Offices, by the Priviledge and Rights of Primogeniture, whereof I have Discoursed else-where. Now although nothing can be concluded from hence conPriestly Office among men above the Regal, which the Romanists plead for, from more vain and empty pretences; yet it doth follow, that the greatest Temporal Dignities and Enjoyments, ought to be subservient unto Spiritual things, and the Concerns of Christ.
2. Although he was not in his Kingly Office directly Typical of Christ, yet he was by
King the more meet to represent him as a Priest, seeing he was to be the onely King & Priest of the Church also. And it may be observed, that although Moses in Genesis makes mention of the Acts of both his Offices, yet our Apostle takes notice of those of one sort onely. For Moses informs us in the first place, that when he went to meet Abraham, he brought forth Bread and Wine, that is, for the Refreshment of him and his Army. Now this was an Act of Regal Power and Munificence. This the Apostle takes no Notice of, but only of his receiving Tythes, and Blessing Abraham, which were both of them Acts of Sacerdotal Power. Wherefore although it was conveniKing, yet as a King, and in what he did as a King, he was no Type of Christ, though there might be a Moral Resemblance between them. For as Melchisedec Refreshed
1. The Lord Christ as King of the Church is plentifully stored with all Spiritual Provisions for the Relief, Supportment, and Refreshment of all Believers in and under their Duties, and will give it out unto them as their Occasions do require. For as
2. Those who go to Christ meerly on the Account of his Priestly Office and the Benefits thereof, shall also receive the Blessings of his Kingly Power, in abundant Supplies of Mercy and Grace. Abraham designed nothing with
III. This Kingly Office of Melchisedec is farther asserted by the Specification of the Place where he was King and Reigned. He was King of Salem. There hath been great enquiry about, and much uncertainty there is concerning this place or City. Two Salem is Hierusalem that is above, the Mother of us all, he hath thought meet to give other Instances also, how little he understands the things he undertakes to treat about. But some think it was that City, and no other, which was afterwards called
Of this latter Opinion Hierome is the Principal Author and Maintainer in his Epistle to Cuagrius. And there are three Reasons for it, whereon he much insists: (1.) That there was a City near Sychem that was called Salem and no otherwise. And this is plainly affirmed in the Scripture, Gen. 33. 18. And Jacob came to Shalem a City of Shechem which is in the Land of Canaan. For those who render the words, —Et venit Jacob pacificus or incolumis ad Urbem Shechem, so making the word appellative, and not the Name of a place, are undoubtedly mistaJohn 3. 23. John was Baptizing in Aenon near to Salim. For, that Salim and Salem are the same Hierome well thews, with the Reason of the variation. (2.) He affirms, that at that time were seen at Sychem the Ruines of the Palace of Melchisedec, which manifested it to have been a munificent Structure. (3.) It is pleaded that the circumstances of the story make it necessary to judge that it was this Salem. For Abraham was passing by the place where
On the other side it is pleaded with more probability, that Hicrusalem was the Seat of his Kingdom. For (1.) It was Anciently called Salem, which Name is afterwards occasionally applyed unto it, as that whereby it was known, Psal. 76. 2. In Salem is Gods Tabernacle, and his dwelling-place in Sion, where Hierusalem only can be inJebusites, it began at first to be called Jebus-Salem, that is, Salem of the Jebusites, which by Custom was transformed into Hierusalem. But the approved Etymology from Sight or Vision of Peace, is certainly true, and proJoshua, the King of Hierusalem was called Adonizedec, a Name of the same signification with Melchisedec, which possibly from him was the Name of the Kings who afterwards Reigned in that City. And that man as it should seem was in some Reputation for Righteousness among the Canaanites, whence he managed their common Cause in their Danger, Josh. 10. 1, 2, 3, 4. (3.) Abraham dwelt at this time at
And these Reasons do prevail with me to judge that Hierusalem was the place of the Habitation and Reign of Melchisedec. As for what is affirmed by Hierome concernRuines of his Palace at Sychem, it is notoriously known, how little Credit such Traditions do deserve. Besides, Josephus who lived 400 Years before him, makes no mention of any such thing. And it is probable that the Ruines which Hierome saw were those of the Palace of Jeroboam, who there fixed the Seat of the Kingdom of Israel, 1 Kings 12. 25. as King of the place where he obtained the Crown, ver. 1. But Credulous and Superstitious Posterity chose to ascribe it unto the Memorial of Melchisedec rather than of him, who being the Bane and Ruine of the Nation, his Memo
God in his Sovereign Pleasure gives various Intervals unto places, as to the enjoyment of his Worship and Ordinances. This Hierusalem which was at first enobled by the PriestMelchisedec, was afterwards left for a long Season unto the Idolatrous Jebusites. In process of time it was visited again, and made the fixed station of all Solemn Divine Worship, as it is now left unto
By the way we must here give an Account of somewhat that the Apostle doth not say, as well as what he doth. After the mention of Melchisedec and his being King of Salem, in the Story, Gen. 14. it is added, That he met Abraham, and brought forth Bread and Wine, ver. 17. 18. Of his meeting Abraham the Apostle takes Notice, but of his bringing forth Bread and Wine, not at all. Hereof undoubtedly no Reason can be given, but only that That particular Action or Passage belonged not at all unto his Purpose. For he who takes Notice of all other Circumstances, Arguing as well from what was not said of him, as from what was, would not have omitted any thing which is so expressely affirmed, as this is, had it any way belonged unto his Purpose.
Papists, who with a strange kind of Considence do hence seek Countenance unto their Missatical Sacrifice, makes it necessary that we should en
Melchisedec, they tell us, as a Priest and Type of Christ did offer this Bread and Wine in Sacrifice to God. Herein, they add, alone was he Typical of Christ, who offered himself unto God under the Appearance of Bread and Wine. And he also Instituted the Sacrifice of the Mass, wherein he should be so Offered continually unto the end of the World. And on that Account alone (they say) he continueth a Priest for ever. For if he had not appointed Priests here in his room to Offer him unto God, that Office of his would have ceased, as Bellarmine
It were easie to make naked the fondness of these Imaginations, would our present Design permit. Some few things may be Remarked on their Assertions. As, (1.) The Apostle in this whole Discourse wherein Melchisedec is introduced and concerned, treateth not at all of the Sacrifice of Christ, nor intimates any Resemblance between the Offering of Melchisedec and that of Christ; but it is the Office alone and its DigniSacrifice. And when he doth so, he doth not in the least compare it with the Sacrifice of Melchisedec, but with those of
1. The Process of the Story directs unto another sence of words. Abraham was now Returned with his Forces unto the Valley of Shaveh, which is the Kings Dale, ver. 17. a place not far from Hierusalem, called, as it is likely, the Kings Dale, from Melchisedec, unto whom it belonged; where afterwards
2. This Act of Melchisedec is immediately subjoyned unto the mention of him as King, being an Instance of Kingly Power and Munificence. Melchisedec, King of Sabrought forth Bread and Wine. After this, is added, And he was a Priest of the most High God; which is a plain Introduction of, and Preparation for the Expression of his Exercise of that Office in his Blessing of Abraham, which ensues in the next words. The Romanists contend that Vau in He brought forth Bread and Wine, because he was the Priest of the High God. But as this offers force to the Universal usage of that ParMelchisedec only Offered this Sacrifice of Bread and Wine; whereas if the Reason why he did so, was because he was the Priest of the High God, then every one who was so, was in like manner to Offer the same Sacrifice. And whereas they place the whole especial Nature of the Melchisedecian Priesthood in this his Sacrifice; if this were common to him with all others, then was he not a Priest of a particular Order; and so the whole Discourse of the Apostle is vain and impertinent. But it is plain that he having nothing to do with, nor Inference to make from his Royal Office or Acts, doth therefore omit this which evidently was an Act of Kingly Bounty.
3. The word here used brought forth, or caused to be brought forth, Bread and Wine, is no Sacred word, nor is ever used in the Scripture to express the Sacred Action of Oblation or Offering in Sacrifice. It is always a common Action that is denoted thereby.
4. The Apostle's silence in this matter casteth this Pretence out of all consideration. His Design was to evince the Excellency of the Priesthood of Christ above that of Levi, from this particular consideration, That he was a Priest after the Order of Melchisedec. To prove that he was so indeed, and withal to shew how great and Excel
Acts of Munificence & Bounty are memorable & Praise-worthy, though they no way belong unto things Sacred by Virtue of Divine Institution. So was this Bringing forth of Bread & Wine by Melchisedec to Refresh Abraham and his People, though there was nothing of Sacrifice therein. In former Ages either Men were more inclined to such Acts than now they are, or there were more efficacious means of engaging them thereunto, than are judged meet now to be made Use of, because perhaps discovered to have something of deceit in them. But this went along with all their Bounty, that they would make the Acts of it Sacred and Religious, all should be peculiarly devoted and dedicated unto
Sacred which God had not made so. But such Acts as those we speak of towards Men, need no more of Religion in them; but that they be done in Obedience to the Will of God, who requires of us to do good to all, and to exercise loving kindness in the Earth. They are so good and Praise-worthy, provided, (1.) They are of real Use, and not in things that serve only for Ostentation and show. (2.) That they enterfere with no other especial Duty, nor cause an Omission of what is Necessary, &c. Again,
It is acceptable with God that those who have Laboured in any Work or Service of his, should receive Refreshments and Encouragements from men. For as such an acceptable Service is the Relief given to Abraham and his People, by Melchisedec Celebrated. God is himself a sufficient Reward unto his People in and for all their Services. He needs not call in the help of Men to give them a Recompence. However it is well-pleasing unto him, that he, or his Work which they do, in any thing, be owned by Men.
IV. The Apostle proceeds with his Description of the Subject of his Proposition, with Respect unto that Office which he principally regards: Priest of
the most High God. Two things are here asserted. (1.) That in general he was a Priest. (2.) The Limitation of that Office with Respect unto the Author and Obmost High God.
First, he was a Priest, and he was the first that was so by especial Institution; How the Rite of Sacrificing was common to all Worshippers of Old, and what was the peFirst-born therein, I have at large before declared. I have also proved that Melchisedec was the first who was Authoritatively separated unto this Office by Gods Approbation. And as it was a new, so it was a great and Remarkable thing in the World. For although we know not how far it was received or understood by the Men of that Age, who I believe were not stupidly Ignorant and Carnal as some would have them to be; yet certain it is, that the Institution of this Office, and the Representation of it in the Person of Melchisedec, gave great Light and Instruction infirst Promise, and the work of the Blessing Seed which was to be exhibited. For the Faith of the Church in all Ages was so directed, as to believe that God had respect unto Christ and his Work, in all his Institutions of Worship. WhereMelchisedec, must needs lead them into an Acquaintance with the Nature of his work in some measure, both he and it being so conspicuously represented unto them.
In this general Assertion that he was a Priest, two things are included. (1.) That he was truly and really a man, and not an Angel or an Appearance of the Son of God praelusory unto his Incarnation. For every Priest is taken from among men, Chap. 5. 1. of the same common Nature with other Men, and in the same state untill he be sepaMelchisedec, a Man called out from amongst Men, or he was not a Priest. (2.) That he had an Extraordinary Call into his Office. For he falleth likewise under that other Rule of our Apostle; No man taketh this Honour unto himself unless he be Called of God, Heb. 5. 4. But of what Nature this Call was, and how he received it, cannot positively be determined in particular. Two things are certain concerning him negatively. (1.) That he came not to this Office in the Church by Succession unto any that went before him, as did all the Levitical Priests after Aaron. There was none went before him in this Office, as none Succeeded unto him, as we shall see immediately. And when the Lord Christ is said to be a Priest after the Order of Melchisedec, it doth not suppose that he was of any certain
1. Every one is that in the Church and nothing else which God is pleased to make him so to be. Wherefore for us to rest in Gods Vocation is our Honour and our Safety as well as our Duty. For,
2. Where God Calleth any one unto a singular Honour and Office in his Church, it is in him a meer Act of his Sovereign Grace. So he took this Melchisedec who had nothing of Stock, Race, Descent, or Succession to recommend him, but as one as it were newly sprang out of the Earth, and raised him to the highest Dignity that any Man in those Days was capable of. Let us not therefore repine or murmure at any of Gods Dealings with others, nor envy because of his Gifts bestowed on them, may he not do what he will with his own, seeing he is greater than Man, and giveth no account of his matters?
3. A Divine Call is a sufficient Warranty for the acting of them according unto it, who are so Called, and the Obedience of others unto them in their Work or Office. By Virtue hereof this Melchisedec arose in the midst of the Nations of the World, took on him a new Office and Power, being owned and submitted unto therein, by Abraham and all that Believed.
4. The first Personal Instituted Type of Christ was a Priest: This was Melchisedec. There were before real Instituted Types of his Work, as Sacrifices. And there were Moral Types of his Person, as Adam, Abel, and Noah, which Represented him in sundry things. But the first Person who was Solemnly designed to teach and repreFoundation of all that the Lord Christ had to do in and for the Church was laid in his Priestly Office, whereby he made Attonement and Reconciliation for Sin. Every thing else that he doth is Built on the supposition hereof. And we must begin in the Application where God begins in the Exhibition. An Interest in the Effects of the Priestly Office of Christ, is that which in the first place we ought to look after. This being attained, we shall be willing to be Taught and Ruled by him, and not else.
Secondly, The Apostle adds the Limitation of this his Office of Priesthood, as to its Author and especial Object, and that is, the most High God. For so by Moses. (1.) He was Priest to God. This determines the sence of the word Cohen to the Office of the Priesthood; contrary to the Pretensions of some Modern Jews, and the Targum on Psal. 110. For whereas they cannot understand how the Messiah should be a Priest, and perceive well enough the inconsistency of the Legal Priesthood with such a supposition, they would have the word Cohen in the Psalms to signifie a Prince or a Ruler. But although the word used absolutely may be applyed sometimes to such a Purpose, yet where God is proposed as its object, a Priest of God, or unto God, none can be signified but one in the Priestly Office. (2.) He was a Priest unto the most High God. This is the first time that this Title is ascribed unto God in the Scripture, which afterwards is frequently repeated,
God above, God over all, the God of Heaven, and absolutely the most High. And it is either Descriptive or Distinctive, as all such
1. As it is Descriptive; the Majesty, Power, and Authority of God over all are intended therein. The most High God is the Glorious God with whom is terThrone is High and lifted up, Isa. 6. 1. And he is called the High and Lofty one that Inhabiteth Eternity, Isa. 57. 17. Thus is he styled to fill our Hearts with a Reverence of him, as one infinitely above us, and whose Glorious Majesty is absolutely unconceivable. So when the Holy Ghost would express the Glory of Christ as exalted, he says, he is made Higher than the Heavens, and he is sate down at the Right hand of the Majesty on High. The most High God therefore is first, God as inconceiveably ex
2. As it is Distinctive it respects other gods, not in Truth and Reality, but in Reputation. For so there were then Lords many, and Gods many in the World. So they were esteemed by them that made them, and Worshipped them: called gods, 1 Cor. 8. 5. but by Nature were not gods, Gal. 4. 8. They were all Earthly, and though some of them had their Being above, as the Sun, Moon, and Host of Heaven, yet they had all their Deity from beneath; nor ever had it any Existence but in the deluded Imaginations of the Sons of Men. In Opposition unto them, with Distinction from them, God is called the most High God. The World was at that time fallen into all manner of Idolatry. Every Countrey, every City, every Family almost had made new gods unto themselves. The most general Veneration, as I have elsewhere shewed, was then given unto the Sun, and that because he appeared to them on High, or the Highest Being they could apprehend. Hence had he the Name of Greeks, from High one. In Opposition unto all these gods, and Renunciation of them, Melchisedec professed himself the Priest of the most High God; as Paul Preached at Athens the unknown God in Opposition unto all their known Idols whom they supposed themselves acquainted withespecial Name, as he did afterwards on sundry occasions; (the first he made of that kind being El Shaddai, or God Almighty,
The Socinians in all their Disputes against the Deity of Christ do always make Use of this Name, and continually repeat it; Christ, they say, is not the most High God; a God they will allow him to be, but not the most High God. But whereas this Name is used in Distinction only from all false gods, if their Christ be a God but not on any Account the most High God, he is a false god, and as such to be reJer. 10. 11. And from this Name or Title of God as it is Descriptive of his Majesty and Authority, we may observe,
1. To keep up and preserve a due Reverence of God in our Minds and Words, we should think of, and Use those Holy Titles which are given unto him, and whereby he
is described in the Scripture. This was the constant manner of the Holy Men of Old, and which God himself in sundry places directs unto. Thus Abraham imGen. 14. 22. I have lift up my Hand unto Jethe most High God, the Possessor of Heaven and Earth. So are we taught to fear that Dreadful and Glorious Name, The Lord thy God, Deut. 28. 58. See Isa. 30. 15. Chap. 57. 15. And there is nothing that Argues a greater contempt of God among Men, than the common slight irreverend mention of his Name, whose highest degree is that horrible Profanation of Swearing and Cursing by it, with wicked and Diabolical Spirits. Let us not therefore think of God, nor mention him, but as the most High and Holy one that Inhabiteth Eternity. Not that on all Occasions of mentioning him we should constantly make Use of these Glorious Ti
2. It is good at all times to fix our Faith on that in God, which is meet to encourage our Obedience and dependence upon him in our present Circumstances. The Believers in those Days did in a very particular manner confess themselves to be Strangers and Pilgrims in the Earth, Heb. 11. 13. The Church was not as yet fixed unto any certain place, and they being Separated from the Apostate World, not mixInheritance nor abiding place, but expothe most High God; as he that was over all, and had the Disposal of all things in his own Sove
3. In particular it is a matter of inestimable Satisfaction that he whom we Serve is the most High God, the Sovereign Possessor of Heaven and Earth. It is in sence, the same with that Name which God gave himself when he entred into Covenant with Abraham, encouraging thereby unto an adherence to him in Faith and Obedience, Gen. 17. 1. I am God Almighty. And it were easie to Demonstrate what Relief in all Troubles, Dangers, Persecutions, Distresses inward and outward, in Life and Death, we may thence receive. As this Name is Distinctive we may observe, That,
4. Publick Profession in all Ages is to be suited and pointed against the Opposition that is made unto the Truth, or Apostacy from it. The World being now generally falIdolatry and the Worship of new Earthly gods, Believers made this the principal part of their Profession, that they Served the most High God, which ought to be observed on all alike Occasions.
V. The Apostle Describes this Melchisedec from that Action of his with its Circumstances, which gave occasion unto the whole Account of him. Who met Abraham returning from the Slaughter of the Kings. On this Occasion onely is he introduced in the Scripture-story, as a new Person never heard of before, nor ever afterwards to be made mention of, as unto any of his own Concerns. Abraham did not only overthrow the whole Army of the Kings, and Recovered the Spoyls, but he
But it may be enquired whether this were a just Occasion for the Introduction of
King of Peace, Priest of the High God, and Type of Christ, to Bless him who returned from War with the Spoyls of a bloody Victory. Answ. (1.) The Apostacy and Rebellion of the whole World against God have made it necessary that Spiritual Victory be the Foundation of all the actings of Christ, in the setting up of his Kingdom. The first Promise of him was, that he should break the Serpents Head, wound the Head over the large Earth,
3. The Land of Canaan was now given unto Abraham and his Seed for a PosForeign Kings to set up any Dominion there
4. Abraham was obliged in Justice and Affection, both, to Rescue his Brother Lot, whom they were carrying away Captive. And this is expressed as the next cause of his Engagement against them; ver. 14. On all Accounts therefore this VVar was just, and the Victory of God. And because there was a RepresentaMelchisedec, blessing him in the ex
5. This Congress of Melchisedec and Abraham, after Abraham had gotten the Victory over all his Adversaries, was a Type and Representation of the Glorious Congress and Meeting of Christ and the Church at the last day, when the whole Church shall have finished its warfare, and be Victorious over the VVorld, Sin, the Law, Death and Hell. Then will the Lord Christ bring out the Stores of Heahim that overcometh. And we we may observe, That,
1. All the Commotions and Concussions that are among the Nations of the World, do lye in or shall be brought into a subserviency unto the Interest of Christ and his Church. I intend those places where either the Seat of the Church is, or is to be. A great VVar and Tumult there was between these Eastern Kings and those of Canaan, and many Nations were smitten and destroyed in the Expedition, Gen. 14. 5, 6, 7. And what is the final Issue whereinto all these things do come? VVhy, two things fell out hereon that neither side of the Combatants either looked for, or had any Interest in. (1.) The Victory of Abraham or the Church over them all. (2.) A Glorious Type and Representation of Christ brought forth visibly acting in his Church. Yea I may add, that in Abraham's Glorious Victory, and Royal Munificence on the one hand, and in the Sacerdotal Blessing of Melchisedec on the other, there was such a Representation of Christ in his Principal Offices as Priest and King, as had never been made in the VVorld before. This Issue did God
2. There have been and are to be such Seasons wherein God will dispose of Nations and their Interest according as the Condition of the Church doth require; as he did here with all these Nations, Isa. 43. 3, 4. Chap. 60. 6, 7.
3. The Blessing of God may be expected on a Just and Lawful War. This VVar and Victory of Abraham, which he received the Blessing upon, is Celebrated, Isa. 41. 2, 3. And our Apostle mentions that Circumstance of the Slaughter of the Kings as that which was a Token of Gods kindness unto Abraham, and of his own Greatness. And where these things occur, (1.) A Lawful necessary immediate Cause of War, as Abraham had for the Rescue of Lot. (2.) A Lawful Call unto the War, as Abraham had being a Sovereign Prince and raising his Army of his own People meerly, and that to the securing of the Possessions of a Countrey granted unto him by God himself; and (3.) A Subserviency unto the Glory of Christ and the Good of the Church, the Presence of God in it, and the Blessing of God upon it, may be justly expected.
VI. Melchisedec is farther Described by two Acts of his Sacerdotal Power, or Office which he exercised on this occasion of meeting Abraham. (1.) He Blessed him, and then (2.) He received Tithes of him.
He met Abraham and Blessed him. This Solemn Benediction is fully expressed, Gen. 14. 19, 20. And he Blessed him and said, Blessed be Abraham of the most High God Possessor of Heaven and Earth; and Blessed be the most High God who hath delivered thine Enemies into thy hand. There are two parts of this Blessing; (1.) That which hath Abraham for its Object, a Blessing of Prayer. (2.) That which hath God for its Object, a Blessing of Praise. Our Apostle seems to take Notice only of the first, or that part of the Blessing whereof Abraham was the imBlessed God, being on the Account of Abraham and as it were in his Name, it belongs also to the Bles
As to this Blessing we may consider, (1.) The Nature. (2.) The Form of it. As to the Nature of it, Blessings in general are the means of Communicating Good Things, according unto the Power and Interest in them of them that Bless, Gen. 33. 11. So also are Curses of Evil. Hence it is God alone that absolutely can eiBless or Curse, for he onely hath Sovereign Power of all Good and Evil. He doth therefore so express his Blessing; In Blessing I will Bless thee, Gen. 22. 17. Do it assuredly and effectually as having all the Subject-matter of Blessings in my hand. And therefore he says to Abraham, I will Bless them that Bless thee, and Curse them that Curse thee, Gen. 12. 3. Because he is over them and all their BlesBalak therefore was not a little mistaken when he tells Balaam, I know that he whom thou Blessest is Blessed, and he whom thou Cursest is Cursed, Numb. 22. 6. For however he might Divine concerning them that should be so, absoBlessings are Instituted means of the conveyance and Communication of Good unto others, according unAuthoritative. (2.) Such as are
Authoritative Benediction among Men is two-fold. (1.) Paternal. (2.) Sacerdotal, or with Respect unto any other Office in the Church.
Paternal Benedictions were of old of two sorts. (1.) Such as were of Common Right. (2.) Such as had an especial
Secondly, There was of old a Paternal Benediction that had its Rise in an espePraediction and Declaration of future Events, whereby those so Blessed were Infallibly and Indispensibly stated in a Right unto them. So Noah blessed Shem and Japhet; Isaac blessed Jacob, Jacob all his Sons. Herein God gave unto some Parents the Honour of a Power to bequeath unto their Posterity, those Good things which he Graciously intended to bestow on them. This kind of blessing is now absolutely ceased, for it wholly respected the coming of Christ in the Flesh with those other things which conduced thereunto.
It were well if instead of all these several ways of Blessing, many Parents did not Curse their Children. Some upon their provocations have desperately and ProfaneOppressions and Falshood, in getting their Estates, or in a Flagitious course of Life, which God will Revenge to the third Generation. But most do Curse them with the Cursed Example of their Conver
It is true, many of those Parents who do use conscientiously the ways appointed of God whereby they may Bless their Children, do oft-times not see the effect of their Endeavours. They Bless them, but they are not Blessed. But (1.) They have Peace and Comfort in the Discharge of their Duty (2.) Their Blessing may have Success and oftentimes hath, when they are gone out of the World, yea, in their Childrens Children for many Generations. (3.) If all fail, they shall be Witnesses for God at the last day against their own profligate Posterity. But I return.
Sacerdotal Blessings were Authoritative also; and that on a double Ground. (1.) Of Common Right and Equity. (2.) Of Especial Institution. (1.) There was a common Right and Equity that he who was called to be a Priest should bless the People Authoritatively. For as he was appointed to Act for Men with God, so it is reasonable, that he should pronounce Blessings unto them in the Name of God; that as he Ministerially carried their Gifts, Offerings, and Services unto God, so in like manner he should return his Acceptance and blessing unto them. Whereas
Priest, two things ensue thereon. (1.) That this Blessing was an Act of Authority, for every Act of Office is so. (2.) That he who thus blesseth another is greater than he who is blessed by him, as our Apostle disputes, and we shall see afterwards. And we may take Notice in our passage, That whatever be the Interest, Duty and Office of any to act in the Name of others towards God, in any Sacred Administrations, the same proportionably is their Interest, Power and Duty to act towards them in the Name of God in the Blessing of them. And therefore Ministers may Authoritatively bless their Congregations. It is true, they can do it onely Declaratively, but withAuthoritatively, because they do it by Virtue of the Authority comMinisterial Blessing is someEuctical or a meer Prayer. Neither is it meerly Doctrinal and Declaratory, but that which is built on a particular especial warranty proceeding from the Nature of the Ministerial Office. But whereas it hath respect in all things unto other Ministerial Administrations, it is not to be used but with refe
Secondly, There was an especial Institution of a Sacerdotal Benediction under the Old Testament, Recorded, Numb. 6. 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27. And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, speak unto Aaron and his Sons, saying, On this wise shall ye Bless the Children of Israel, saying; The Lord Bless thee and keep thee, the Lord make his Face to shine upon thee, and be Gracious unto thee, the Lord lift up the light of his Countenance upon thee and give thee Peace; and they shall put my Name on the Children of Israel, and I will Bless them. Their putting the Name of God upon the People, was their praying for and pronouncing Blessings on them in his Name, by virtue of this Institution. For it is an Institution whereby the Name of God is put on any thing or Person. Hereon God would effectually bless them. This especial Institution I acknowledge was after the Days of Melchisedec, and the cesSysteme unto Moses, were singly and gradually given out by Inspiration and Prophecy unto the Church before the giving of the Law; onely at Sinai their Number was increased, and the Severity of their Sanction heightned. Thus this Sacerdotal Benediction was but a Transcript from, and expressive of that Power and Form of Blessing, which Melchisedec as a Priest enjoyed and used before. And from what hath been spoken we may gather the Nature of this Blessing of Melchisedec wherewith he
1. That he who hath received the greatest Mercies and Priviledges in this World, may yet need their Ministerial confirmation. Abraham had before received the BlesMelchisedec. And inAbraham in this World, that what through the weakness of their Faith, what through the greatness of their Temptations and Trials, they stand in need of all Ministerial Renovations of the Pledges of Gods good will towards them. We are apt to think that if God should speak once unto us as he did to Abraham, and assure us of the Blessing, we should never need farther confirmation whilst we live. But the Truth is, he doth so speak unto all that believe in the Word, and yet we find, how much we want the Ministerial Renovation of it unto us. Bless God for the Ministry, for the Word and Sacraments; Ordinarily our Faith would not be kept up without them.
2. In the Blessing of Abraham by Melchisedec all Believers are Virtually Blessed by Jesus Christ. Melchisedec was a Type of Christ and represented him in what he
Abraham in all these things bare the Person of, or Represented all his Posterity according to the Faith. Therefore doth our Apostle in the foregoing Chapter Entitle all Believers, unto the Promises made unto him, and the Inheritance of them. There is therefore more than a bare story in this matter. A blessing is in it conveyed unto all Believers in the way of an Ordinance for ever.
3. It is Gods Institution that makes all our Administrations Effectual. So did SaAuthoritative and Efficacious. Innumerable ways and means of blessing things and persons have been found out in the Papacy. They will bless Bells, Steeples, and Churches, Church-yards, Utensils, Fonts, Candles, Salt; and Children by Confirmation. There is in Truth in them all a want of that wisDivine Institution.
The Second Sacerdotal Act, or Exercise of Priestly Power ascribed unto Melchisedec is that
This receiving of Tithes by Melchisedec was a Sacerdotal Act. For, (1.) The Tenth thus given was firstly given unto God; and he who received them received them as Gods Officer in his Name. Where there was none in Office so to reJacob vowed the Tenth unto God, Gen. 28. 22. which he was himself to Offer, there being no other Priest to receive it at his hand, and no doubt but he did it accordingly, when God minded him to pay his Vow at Bethel, Gen. 35. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. And (2.) The things that were fit of this sort, were
There is great Enquiry usually made on this place, whether Tithes be due by the Light of Nature, or at least by such a Moral positive Command of God, as should be perpetually Obligatory unto all Worshippers unto the end of the World. This many contend for, and the principal Reasons which they plead from the Scripture are these. (1.) That Tithes were paid before the Law as well as under the Law; and what was so observed in the Worship of God, Namely, that being in Usage before the Law and confirmed by the Law, is Originally of the Law of Nature, and could have no other Fountain. (2.) Our Lord Jesus Christ himself speaking of Tithing Mint and Cummin, approveth of it, affirming that those things ought not to be omitted though the most Inferiour Instance that could be given of the Duty. (3.) He seems in like manner to have respect thereunto, when he commands to give unto Caesar the things that are Caesars, and unto God the things that are Gods, which were the Tithes, the Law concerning them being thereby confirmed, which proves it not to be Ceremonial. And this some Men judge to be a certain Argubefore the Law, under the Law, and under the Gospel after the Expiration of the Law of Ceremonies, or the Law of Commandments contained in Ordinances. And it seems so to be, if there be the same Reason of the Law or Command in all these Seasons, for otherwise it is not so. For instance it is supposed that the eating of Blood was forbidden before the Law, and assuredly it was so under the Law, and is so in the New Testament,
I shall not enter into any long Digression about this controverted Subject. It is such as wherein the various Interests of Men have engaged their utmost diligence on the one hand and on the other. But this I am sure enough of, that unless they were paid by them that give them with more Conscience and regard unto Duty than geneCivil Law of the Land; and unless they turned unto a better Account with them by whom they are received, than generally they do, it is to no great purpose to dispute upon what Grounds, or by what Right they are due unto any. And without sollicitousness concerning Offence, I shall take leave to say, that it is no safe Plea for many to insist on, that Tithes are due and Divine, as they speak, that is, by a binding Law of God now under the Gospel. For be the Law and Institution what it will, nothing is more certain than that there is nothing due under the Gospel by virtue of Gods Command or Institution with respect unto his Worship unto any who do not wholly give up themselves unto the Ministry and Labour in the Word and Doctrine, unless they be such as are disenabled by Age and Infirmities, who are not to be forsaken all the days of their lives. For Men to live in Pleasure and Idleness, according to the Pomp, Vanities and Grandeur of the World, neither rising early, nor going to bed late, nor spending their time or strength in the Service of the Church, according to the Duties required of all the Ministers thereof in the Gospel, to sing unto themselves that Tithes are due to them by the Appointment and Law of God, is a fond Imagination, a Dream that will fill them with Perplexity when they shall awake. But as unto the Question in hand, I shall briefly give my thoughts about it in the ensuing Observations and Pro
1. By Tithes is understood either the express Law of Tithing, or paying the Tenth of all our Substance and of the whole Increase of the Earth; or only the dedicating of a certain Portion of what we have unto the Uses of the Worship and Service of God. If this latter be intended, it is with me past all Doubt and Quebountiful part of our Enjoyments is to be separated unto the Use and Service of the Worship of God, particularly unto the comfortable and honouraby Civil Laws unto some or other whether they will or no, are either discouraged, or disenabled, or think themselves discharged from doing that which God certainly requireth at their hands in a way of Duty. However this will be no Excuse for any, for generally they have yet left unto them that whereby they may discharge their Duty in an acceptable manner. And I cannot but won
2. If the strict Legal course of Tithing be intended, it cannot be proved from this Text, nor from any other Instance before the Law. For Abraham gave only the Tenth of the Spoils which were not Tithable by Law. For if the places taken or destroyed in War, were Anathematized, as Jericho was and also Amalek, no Portion was to be reserved under a pretence of Sacrifice or any other Sacred Use, as Saul found to his Cost. And if they were not Anathematized, all the Spoils were left entirely unto the People that went to War, without any Sacred Decimation. So the Reubenites and the Gadites at their Return over Jordan into their own Land
their Rich Spoils and Cattel with them, no Tithe being mentioned, Josh. 22. 8. Although there is no Question but many of them Offered their Free-will Offerings at the Tabernacle. And when God would have a Sacred Portion out of the Spoils, as he would have in the Wilderness, out of those that were taken from the Midianites, to manifest that they fell not under the Law of Tithes, he took not the Tenth part, but one Portion of 500 from the Souldiers, and one of 50 from the People, Numb. 31. 28, 29, 30. Wherefore the giving of the Tenth of the Spoils, was not from the Obligation of any Law, but was an Act of Free-will and Choice in the Offerer. But yet there was so great an Equity herein also, Namely, that God should have an acknowledgment in the Fruits of those Successes which he gave in VVar, that out of the Spoils of his and his Peoples Enemies David made his Provision for the Building of the Temple. And the Captains of the Host that went against Midian, after a Tribute was raised for the Lord out of the Spoyls according unto the Proportions mentioned, when they found the Goodness of God in the Preservation of their Souldiers, whereof there was not one lost, they made a new voluntary Oblation unto God out of their Spoils, Numb. 31. 48, 49, 50. And as for the Instance of Jacob, who Vowed unto God the Tenth of all, it is so far from proving that the Tenth was due by virtue of any Law, that it proves the conExtraordinary Vow, whereby he could express his Obedience unto God.
3. The precise Law of Tithing is not confirmed in the Gospel. For that sayTithing of Mint and Cummin, evidently respects that Legal Institution which was then in force, and could not be violated without sin. And by his Approbation of that Law, and of the Duty in observance of it, he did no more confirm it, or ascribe an Obligatory Power unto it under the Gospel, than he did so unto all other those Ceremonial Institutions which both he himself observed as a Man made under the Law, and enjoyned others so to do. They all continued in full force unto the Time of Reformation, which gave them their Bounds and LiHeb. 9. 10. and ended with his Resurrection. His other saying, of giving unto Caesar the things that are Caesars, and unto God the things that are Gods, respects our whole Moral Obedience unto God, and not this or that particular Institution. The meaning of it is, that we are to pay or perform unto God all whatever he requireth of us in a way of Obedience, but what that is in particular, is not here determined. And other mention of Tithes in the Gospel there is none.
4. VVhereas by the Light of Nature, all Rules of Reason, and positive Institua Portion of what God is pleased to give unto every Man is to be returned unto him in the way of his Worship and Service, wherein it may be used according unto his Appointment; And whereas before the giving of the Law sundry Holy Men fixed on the Tenth part, as that which was meetest to be so Dedicated unto God, and that as is probable not without some especial Conduct of the Holy Spirit, if not upon express Revelations; and whereas this was afterwards expressely confirmed under the Law by positive Institution, the Equity whereof is urged in the Gospel; it is the best direction that can be given unto any what proportion of their Estate should be set apart unto this Purpose. Herein, I confess, so many Circumstances are in particular cases to be considered, as that it is impossible any one certain Rule should be prescribed unto all Persons. But whereas withal there is no need in the least to furnish Men with Pleas and Excuses for the non-performance of their Duty, at least as unto the necessary degrees of it, that I shall not suggest any thing unto them, which may be used to that purpose. I shall therefore leave this Rule in its full Latitude, as the best Direction of Practice in this Matter.
5. On these Suppositions it is that the Apostle treating of this Matter makes no Use of the Right or Law of Tithing, though directly unto his purpose, if it had not been abrogated. For intending to prove that the Ministers of the Gospel ought to be Liberally supported in their works with the Earthly things of them unto whom they do Administer the things of God, he Argueth from the Light of Nature, the general Equity of other Cases, the Analogy of Legal Institutions, the Rules of Justice with the especial Institution of Christ in the Gospel, but makes no mention of the Natural or Legal Right of Tithing, 1
Whatsoever we receive signally from God in a way of Mercy, we ought to return a
Portion of it unto him in a way of Duty. That this was the Practice of the Saints of old, might easily be proved by an Induction of Instances, from this Act of Abraham, (yea, from the Sacrifice of
And we may do well to consider, (1.) That no Man hath any great or signal Success in any Affair or Occasion, more than others, or more than at other time, but there will be in his Mind an ascription of it unto one cause or another. This the Nature of things makes Necessary, nor can it be avoided, Hab. 1. 11. (2.) That whatever a Man doth secretly ascribe such Successes unto, That he makes in some sence his God. They Sacrifice unto their Net, and burn Incense unto their Drag, because by them their Portion is fat, and their Meat plenteous, Hab. 1. 16. They as
VI. The Apostle pursues his Design and Argument from the Name and Title of the Person spoken of with their Interpretation. First, being by Interpretation King of Rightcousness, and after that also King of Salem, that is, King of Peace. And we shall consider herein,
First,
1. He respecteth his Proper Name, that is, Melchisedec. For the Fancy of Sedec was a place or City where first he Reigned, as he did afterwards at Salem, is very fond. For then he must be utterly without a Name belonging unto his Person, which the Apostle doth not observe, as he would have done one way or other, had any such unusual thing offered it self unto him. Besides had it been so, he would not have been called Melchisedec, but said to be Melch Sedec, as he is said to be Melec Salem.
King, and by the Interposition of Yod to smooth the Composition, the former Saegol is turned into Patha, and the latter into Schevah, whence Melchi ariseth. Some would have this Yod to be a Pronoun
Affix, and then the meaning of the word is my King; and on this Supposition, taSedek for Saddik; they would render it, my Righteous King. But there is nothing more Ordinary in the Composition of Names than the InterYod paragoricum, to soften the Sound and Pronunciation of them. So is it in Adonisedek, Adonibezek, Abimelech, Achitob, Abishua, Abishag, Abishalom, and sundry others. Wherefore
2. His Title is, the King of Salem, of which place we have spoKing
of Peace. Some think that herein occurs a greater Difficulty, than did in the InSalem, say they, doth not signifie Peace, but Shalom. Salem is only as much as Pacificus, Peaceable, not Pax, or Peace it self. But yet neither ought this to give us any trouble. For Instances may be given in this Language wherein the same word is used sometimes Substantively, sometimes Adjectively; as for Instance Rex pacificus and Rex pacis do both denote him that is the Maker and Author of Peace. So God on that Account is called the God of Peace, Rom. 15. 13. Chap. 16. 20. 1 Thes. 5. 23. 2 Thes. 3. 16. Heb. 13. 20. Wherefore as we ought to acquiesce in the Authority of the Apostle who knew better than us all, the signification of these Names, so that he gives, is proper according unto our best conception of these things.
Secondly, It may be enquired what Ground the Apostle had to Argue from the Signification of these Names, which seems to be but a Curious and infirm kind of Argumentation. And we find by Experience, that whilst some have followed and imitated as they suppose this Example, they have fallen into woful Mistakes.
Answ. 1. The Apostle takes it for granted in general that every thing in the story of Melchisedec was Mystical and Figurative. This he did on good Grounds, because the only Reason of its Introduction was to give a Representation of the Per
2. It was usual under the Old Testament to have Names given unto Children by a Spirit of Prophecy, as to Noah, Peleg, and others, yea, it may be most of the Patriarchs. It was so also to have Mens Names changed upon some great and Solemn Occasions, as Abram was called Abraham, Sarai, Sarah, Jacob was called Israel, and Solomon, Jedediah. And whereas this was sometimes done by Divine Authority, as in the Instances mentioned, whence it was highly significant; so the People in imitation thereof, did often give other Names to themselves, or others, on some Occasion wherewith they were affected. Hence it is that we find the same Persons so frequently called by divers Names, which gives no little Difficulty in Genealogies. But where this was done by
3. As for the Name of the place where he Reigned, or Salem, it was also giSalem by Sychem we have before declared. And I am perswaded that God himself by some Providence of his, or other intimation of his mind, gave that Name of Peace first unto that City, because there he designed not only to Rest in his Typical Worship for a season, but also in the fulness of Time there to accomplish the great work of Peace-making
Jerusalem or a Vision of Peace, because of the many Visions and Prophecies concerning the Spiritual and Eternal Peace which was to be wrought and Publish
Thirdly, The Interpretation of the Names being proper, and the Argument from thence in this case Useful, as to the Signification of them, it must be enquiKing of Righteousness and Peace. Most suppose that no more is intended but that he was a Righteous and Peaceable King, one that Ruled Righteously, and Lived Peaceably. And it is true that absolutely in himself and as unto his own Personal Qualifications he was so and no more, nor could be more. But these Names have Respect to his Relative state, and were given him as a Type of Christ. He was a King of Righteousness and Peace, as he was without Father and without Mother, that is, to Represent Christ in his Office. Really he was a RighTypically he was the King of Righteousness and Peace. Now the King of Righteousness is he who is the Author, Cause, and Dispenser of Righteousness unto others. As God is said to be the Lord our Righteousness. And so is the King of Peace also; in which sence God is called the God of Peace. Thus was it with Melchisedec as he was the Representative of Jesus Christ.
4. The last thing that the Apostle Observes from these Names and Titles in their Order, wherein it is Natural that the Name of a Man should precede the TiFirst, King of Righteousness, and afterwards King of Peace. Righthe Righteous shall flourish and abundance of Peace, so long as the Moon endureth, Psal. 72. 7. First they are made Righteous, and then they have Peace. And Isa. 32. 17. The work of Righteousness shall be Peace, and the effect of Righteousness Quietness and Peace for ever. This is the Order of these things. There is no Peace but what proceedeth from and is the Effect of Righteousness. So these things with respect unto Christ are declared by the Psalmist, Psal. 85. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. What we are taught hence is,
1. That the Lord Jesus Christ is the only King of Righteousness and Peace unto the Church. See Isa. 32. 1, 21. Chap. 9. 6. He is not only a Righteous and Peaceable King as were his Types Melchisedec and Solomon, but he is the Author, Cause, Procurer and Dispenser of Righteousness and Peace to the Church. So is it deJer. 23. 5, 6. Behold the Days come saith the Lord that I will raise unto David a Righteous Branch, and a King shall Reign and Prosper, and shall Execute Judgment and Justice in the Earth. In his Days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely, and this is his Name whereby he shall be called, The Lord our Righteousness. He is Righteous and Reigneth Righteously, but this is not all, he is the
VII. The Apostle proceeds yet unto other Instances in the Description of Melchisedec wherein he was made like unto the Son of God,
1. It is said of him in the first place, that he was without Father, without Mother,
without beginning of Days, doth deFather or Mother? Man that is Born of a Woman is the Description of every Man; what there
2. On the same Account is he said to be without beginning of Days or end of Life. For as he was a Mortal Man he had both. He was assuredly Born, and did no less Recorded concerning him. We have no more to do with him, to learn from him, nor are concerned in him, but only as he is Described in the Scripture, and there is no mention therein of the Beginning of his Days, or the end of his Life. Whatever therefore he might have in himself, he had none to us. Consider all the other Patriarchs mentioned in the Writings of Moses, and you shall find their Descent Recorded, who was their Father, and so upwards unto the first man; and not only so, but the time of their Birth and Death, the Beginning of their Days, and the End of their Lives is exLived so long, and begat such a Son, which fixed the time of Birth. Then of him so begotten it is said he lived so many Years, which determines the end of his Days. These things are expressely Recorded. But concerning Melchisedec none of these things are spoken. No mention is made of Father or Mother, no Genealogy is Recorded of what Stock or Progeny he was, nor is there any Account of his Birth or Death. So that all these things are wanting unto him in this Historical Narration wherein our Faith and Knowledge is alone concerned. Some few things may yet farther be enquired into for the clearing of the sence of these words.
(1.) Whereas the Observation of the Apostle is built upon the silence of Moses in the History, which was sufficient for him, whatever was the Cause and Reason of that silence, we may enquire whence it was? Whence it was, I say, that Moses should introduce so great and excellent a Person as
Answ. 1. Some of the Jews absurdly imagine that it was because his Parents were not only Obscure, but that he was Born of Fornication, and so he had no Right of Genealogy. But this is both a foolish and wicked Imagination. For it is not to be supposed God would have Advanced a Person known to be of such an Extract and Original, into the Honour of the Priesthood, and that of the most Excellent kind that ever was under the Old Testament. For being low and mean in the World it is neither Disadvantage nor Disparagement. The best of Men were so, and
Patriarchs were but Shepherds. But Bastardy is a Mark of Infamy in the World, and God would not raise such an one to Administer peculiarly unto him, and that as a Type of his own Son, who was to be Incarnate.
2. Some say that there is no singular thing herein, but that it is done according to the Custom of Scripture, which relates only the Genealogies of the Patriarchs, who were of that Linage from whence Christ did come. But when it makes mention of any others, though they be never so eminent, it reckoneth not up their Genealogy. Thus it dealeth with Jethro the Father-in-law of Moses, and with Job, so great and Holy a Person, concerning whom it says no more, but that there was a Man in the Land of Uz Named Job. And some things may be allowed herein. But the Instances are no way parallel. For Jethro, he was a stranger unto the Church, and there is a full Account concerning him, so far as it is either Necessary or Useful, that we should in point of story know any thing of him. And the story of Job, is a seonly and Family was concerned; and we have thereMelchisedec, so he is introduced as one in whom the Church of God was Pub
3. The true Cause of the Omission of all these things, was the same with that of the Institution of his Priesthood, and the Introduction of his Person in the Story. And this was that he might be the more express and signal Representative of the Lord Christ in his Priesthood. For to this End it was not only needful that he should be declared to be a Priest, as the Messiah was to be, but also in that DeclaGenealogy and Pedigree both by Father and Mother,
And we may herein consider the Sovereign wisdom of the Holy Ghost in bringTruth unto Light according as the state and condition of the Church doth require. And first he proposeth only a naked Story of a Person that was a Type of Christ, and that obscurely and sparingly. Something the Men of the Age wherein he lived might learn by his Ministrations, but not much. For that which was principally Instructive in him for the Use of the Church was not of Force unParents, Birth and Death had been conStory in Moses was lost, and the Church was fully satisfied in a Priesthood quite of another Nature, the Holy Ghost in one word of Prophecy Instructs the Church, not only that the thing spoken concerning Melchisedec were not so Recorded for his sake, or on his own account, but with respect unto another Priest which was afterwards to arise, by him Represented; which gave a new Consideration, Sence and DePriesthood which it then enjoyed was not alwas to continue, but that another of another Nature was
Psal. 110. 4. And as this was sufficient for the Use and EdiJews had utterly lost all knowledge and Understanding of the Mystery of it, and the Promise renewed in the Psalm. For they thought it strange that there should be a Priest that had no Genealogy, no Solemn Consecration nor Investiture, with his Office. VVherefore our Apostle entring upon the unfolding of this Mystery doth not only Preface it with an Assertion of its Difficulty, or how hard it was to be understood aright, but also by a long
1. That the Church never did in any Age, nor ever shall want that Instruction by Divine Revelation which is needful unto its Edification in Faith and Obedience. This it had in all Ages according unto that gradual progression which God gave unto Light and Truth in the Explication of the great Mystery of his Grace, which was hid in him from the Foundation of the World. An Instance hereof we have in the things which concern this Melchisedec, as we have observed. The Church had never need to look after the Traditions of their Fathers, or to betake themselves unto their own Inventions, their Instruction by Revelation was always sufficient for the State and Condition wherein they were. Much more therefore is it so now, when the Sum and Perfection of all Divine Revelations is given in unto us by Jesus Christ.
2. It is a great Honour to Serve in the Church by doing or suffering for the Use and Service of future Generations. This was the Honour of Melchisedec, that he was employed in a Service, the true Use and Advantage whereof was not given in unto the Church, until many Generations after. And I add Suffering unto Doing, because it is well known what Glories have sprang up in future Ages, upon the past Sufferings of others.
3. The Scripture is so absolutely the Rule, Measure, and Boundary of our Faith and Knowledge in Spiritual things, as that what it conceals is Instructive, as well as what it expresseth. This the Apostle Manifests in many of his Observations concerning Melchisedec, and his Inferences from thence. But I have (as I remember) Discoursed somewhat hereof before.
Secondly, Our next Enquiry is, Wherein Melchisedec was Typical of Christ, or what of all this belongeth unto the following Assertion that he was made like unto the Son of God; that is, so described as that he might have a great Resemblance of him.
Answ. It is generally thought that he was so in the whole, and in every particular mentioned distinctly. Thus he is said to be without Father, and without Mother, (no mention is made of them) because the Lord Christ was in some sence so also. He was without Father on Earth as to his Humane Nature, with respect whereunto God says that he will create a New thing in the Earth, That a Woman should compass a Man, Jer. 31. 22. or Conceive a Man without Natural Generation. And he was without
Again, He is said to be without Beginning of Days and end of Life. And this also is spoken by our Apostle with respect unto the Narration of Moses wherein mention is made neither of the one, nor of the other. And it belongs unto his Conformity unto the Son of God, or that wherein he Represented him; for as unDivine Person, the Lord Christ had neither the one nor the other, as the Apostle proves, Chap. 1. 10, 11, 12. from Psal. 102. 25, 26, 27. But on the other side, as to his Humane Nature he had both, he had both beginning of Days and End of Life, both which are upon Solemn Record. Wherefore it should seem that if there be a likeness in these things on the one account, there is none on the other, and so no Advantage in the Comparison.
Considering these Difficulties in the Application of these particulars, some do judge that these Instances do not belong unto the Analogy and Resemblance between Christ and Melchisedec, but are introduced only in Order unto what ensues, namely, He abides a Priest for ever, wherein alone the similitude between him and Christ doth consist. And so they say we find things quoted in the Scripture at large, when onone passage in it, may be used directly unto the business in hand. But although this will be difficultly proved, namely, that any Testimony is cited in the Scripwas not spoken at all, which in an Ordinary way ought to have been mentioned, if the whole of what he so Ob
Wherefore it must be granted, as that which the plain Design of the Apostle exacteth of us, that Melchisedec even in these things, that in the Story he was without Father, without Mother, without Genealogy, having neither beginning of Days nor End of Life, was a Type and Representative of Christ. But it is not of the Per
In these things was Melchisedec made like unto Christ, whom the Apostle here
Son of God; made like unto the Son of God. I have formerly observed in this Epistle, that the Apostle makes mention of the Lord Christ under various
Appellations, on various Occasions; so that in one place or another he makes Use of all the Names whereby he is signified in the Scripture. Here he calls him the Son of God, and that, (1.) To intimate that although Melchisedec were an ExcelSon of God. He was not the Son of God, but he had the Honour in so many things to be made like unto him. (2.) To declare how all these things which were any way Represented in Melchisedec or couched in the Story, or left unto Enquiry by the vail of silence drawn over them, could be fulfilled in our High Priest. And it was from hence, namely, that he was the Son of God. By virtue hereof was he caalways-living, abiding, uninterrupted Priesthood, although as to his Hu
This Description being given of the Person treated of, which makes up the Subject of the Proposition, it is affirmed concerning him that he abideth a Priest for ever. For any thing we find in the Story of his Death, or the Resignation of his he abideth a Priest for ever. Some I find have been venturing at some obscure Conjectures of the perpetuity of the Priesthood of Melchisedec in Heaven. But I cannot perceive that they well unMelchisedec, is as inconsistent with the Priesthood of Christ, as the continuance of the same Office in the Line of Aaron. But things are so related concerning him in the Scripture, as that there is no mention of the ending of the Priesthood of his Order, nor of his own Persoto abide a Priest for ever. This was that which our Apostle principally designed to confirm from hence, namely, that there was in the Scripture before the Institution of the Aaronical Priesthood a Representation of an Eternal, unchangeable Priesthood to be introduced in the Church, which he demonstrates to be that of Jesus Christ.
It may not be amiss in the close of this Exposition of these Verses summarily to represent the several particulars wherein the Apostle would have us to observe the likeness between Melchisedec and Christ, or rather the especial Excellencies and Properties of Christ that were Represented in the Account given of the Name, Reign, Person and Office of Melchisedec. As,
1. He was said to be, and he really was, and he only, first the King of Righteousness, and then the King of Peace; seeing he alone brought in Everlasting Righteousness and made Peace with God for Sinners. And in his Kingdom alone are these things to be found.
2. He was really and truly the Priest of the High God, and properly he was so alone. He offered that Sacrifice, and made that Attonement which was signi
3. He Blesseth all the Faithful, as Abraham the Father of the Faithful was Blessed by Melchisedec. In him were they to be Blessed, by him are they Blessed, through him delivered from the Curse and all the Fruits of it, nor are they Partakers of any Blessing but from him.
4. He receiveth all the Homage of his People, all their grateful AcknowledgMelchisedec received the Tenth of the Spoils from Abraham.
5. He was really without Progenitors or Predecessors unto his Office, nor would I exclude that Mystical sence from the intention of the place, that he was without Father as to his Humane Nature, and without Mother as to his Divine.
6. He was a Priest without Genealogy, or Derivation of his Pedigree from the Loyns of Aaron, or any other that ever was a Priest in the World, and moreover Mysteriously was of a Generation which none can declare.
7. He had in his Divine Person, as the High Priest of the Church, neither Beginning of Days nor End of Life, as no such thing is reported of
8. He was really the Son of God, as Melchisedec in many Circumstances was made like to the Son of God.
9. He alone abideth a Priest for ever; whereof we must particularly treat af
The Doctrinal Observations that may be taken from these Verses, are,
1. When any were of Old designed to be Types of Christ, there was a Necessity that things more Excellent and Glorious should be spoken or intimated of them, than did properly belong unto them. So many things are here observed of
2. All that might be spoken so as to have any probable Application in any sence unto Things and Persons Typically, coming short of what was to be fulfilled in Christ, the Holy Ghost in his Infinite Wisdom supplied that defect by Ordering the Account which he gives of them so, as more might be apprehended and learned from them than could be expressed. And where the Glory of his Person as vested with his Office could not be Represented by positive Applications, it is done by a Mystical Silence, as in this Story of Melchisedec. And the most Eminent and Glorious things assigned unTypes as such, have a more Glorious signification in Christ than they have in them. See to this purpose our Exposition on Chap. 1. ver. 5.
3. That Christ abiding a Priest for ever hath no more a Vicar or Successor or Substitute in his Office, or any deriving a real Priesthood from him, than had Melchise
4. The whole Mystery of Divine Wisdom effecting all unconceivable Perfections centred in the Person of Christ, to make him a meet, Glorious, and most Excellent Priest unto God in the behalf of the Church. This it is the principal Design of the whole Gospel to demonstrate, namely, to declare that all
THE Proceed of these Verses is unto the Application of what was before DisMessiah was to be a Priest after the Order of Melchisedec from Psal. 110. and given a Description both of the Person and Office of this Melchisedec from the Historical Narration of them as laid down by Moses, he makes Application of the whole unto his present purpose. And from the consideration of sundry particulars in his Description, confirms in general the Argument which he had in hand. For that which princia more Excellent Priesthood than that of Aaron being introduced according to the Purpose and Promise of God, it followed necesPriesthood with all the Worship, Rites and Ceremonies which bePromised Priesthood was inconsistent with it, and could not be Established without the Abolition of it, so it brought a far greater Benefit and Spiritual Advantage unto the Church than it before enjoyed. And we are not to wonder that the Apostle insists so much hereon, and that with all
That the Old Priesthood was to be removed, and the New one mentioned to be introduced. He proves in the first place, by the Greatness of the Person who was first chosen of God to praefigure and Represent the Lord Christ in his Office of Priesthood. For if he were so Excellent in his Person and Office, as deservedAaron and all his Successors, then he who was praefigured and represented by him, must be so also; yea, be so much more as that which is Typed out and Signified, is, and always must be more Excellent than the Type and Sign, which are of no Use but with respect thereunto.
In these Verses he choseth out his first Instance in what he had observed before out of the Narrative of Moses concerning the Greatness and Excellency of Melchisedec, in that he received
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Considerate, Spectate, Syr. —Videte; Vul. Lat. intuemini. Consider, Behold, Contemplate; serious Consideration with Diligent Intuition is in
Consider then how great this man was, unto whom even the PatriarchAbrahamgave the Tenth of the Spoils.
The Duty of the Hebrews upon the Proposition of the state of Melchisedec beRespect unDuty prescribed, the Object of that Duty, and the Reason of a Qualification therein expressed, amplified by the Title, State and Conone Person concerned.
1. The Note of Respect unto the preceding Discourse is in the Particle now, consider now, then, or therefore; but do you consider. The things before
2. The Especial Duty which he prescribes unto them with Respect unto the things proposed by him concerning the Excellency of Melchisedec and his Office, would consider it.
He doth four times in this Epistle call the Hebrews unto this especial Duty of an Inteuse Consideration of the things proposed unto them, as we have translated his words, and that not unduly,
1. It will be fruitless and to no Advantage to propose or declare the most Important Truths of the Gospel, if those unto whom they are proposed do not diligently enquire into them. And here those unto whom the Dispensation of the Gospel is committed, are pressed with no small difficulty, as our Apostle professeth that he was in this very case. For whereas it is incumbent on them in that Declaration of the whole Counsel of God which is enjoyned them, to insist upon sundry things that are Deep, Mysterious, and hard to be understood, when their Hearers for want of a good Founperception and understandown Labours and others Profit disapgive the hearing unto such as endeavour to carry them to perfection, they will lose all the advantage of their Ministry. This Duty therefore is here prescribed by the Apostle with respect unto this Truth, to obviate this slothful frame. And we may on this Occasion briefly name the things that are required thereunto. As, (1.) Sense of a concernment in them. Unless this be well fixed on the mind, Men will never diligently attend unto them, nor duly consider them. If upon the prohard to be understood, they begin to think that this belongs not unto them, it is for others who are more exercised than they, it is not likely they should ever endeavour to apprehend them aright. And this very frame keeps many in a low form of knowledge all their days; possibly also this Neglect is increased in many, by the spreading of a late foolish apprehension, that we are upon the matter to look after nothing but the Doctrines and Precepts of Morality that are in the Scripture; but as for the more Spiritual Mysteries of Grace we are not concerned in them. Where this Principle is once imbibed, Men will rest and satisfie themselves in the most
That which the Apostle proposeth in the first place and in general as the Object of this Enquiry and consideration, is Quantus iste erat; the word Greatness and Excellency in any kind. Nunc quantus Achilles, Quantus erat Julius Caesar, and the like. And this Greatness of Melchisedec respected neiJob, Barzillai, and others; but it regards alone his Dignity with respect unto his Office, and his Nearness unto God on that account. That which these Hebrews insisted on as their Chief and Fundamental Priviledge in Judaism, and which they were most unwilling to forgo, was the Greatness of their Predecessors, with their nearness unto God in Favour and Office. In the first way as to Divine Love and Favour, they Gloried in Abraham, and opposed the Priviledge of being his Children on all Occasions unto the Person and Doctrine of Christ,
The Proof of the Apostle's Assertion, included in that Interrogation, How Great this Man was, follows in an Instance of what he had before observed and proposed unto them; Unto whom even the Patriarch Abraham gave the Tenth of the Spoils.
Tenth part. The Conjunction Emphatical; and although in the Original it is joyned with Abraham; not, unto whom Abraham gave even the Tenth; but unto whom even Abraham gave the Tenth, as it is in our Tran
The Proof of the Greatness of Melchisedec from hence consists in three things. (1.) In the Nomination of the Person that was Subject unto him, or Abraham. (2.) In the Qualification of his Person, He was the Patriarch. (3.) In what he did, He gave him the Tenth part of the Spoils.
As to the Person himself he was the Stock and Root of the whole People, their Common Father in whom they were first separated from other Nations to be a Peofirst Founders of their Political State, who among the Idolatrous Heathens were commonly Deified, and made the Objects of their Rereceived the Promise and the Covenant with the Token of it, and by whom alone they put in their Claim unto all the Priviledges and Advantages which they Gloried in above all Nations in the VVorld. This Abraham therefore they esteemed next unto God himself. And their Fosterity do now place him in Heaven above the Angels, hardly allowing that the Messiah himself should be exalted above him, and tell a Foolish story how he took it ill, that the Messiah should be on the Right Hand, and he on the Left Hand of God. But it is sufficiently evident from the Gospel, how much in those days they boasted of him, and trusted in him. Hence it is that our Apostle expresseth it so emphatically, even Abraham.
The Qualification of his Person, and his Title thereon is added in like manner: Patriarch is a Father, that is, a Prince or Ruler of a FaRuling Father; and these Patriarchs were of three sorts among the Jews. Of the first sort was he alone who was the first separated Progenitor of the whole Nation. He was their first Father of all that great Family. Secondly, there were such as Succeeded him, from whom the whole Nation in like manner Descended, as Isaac and Jacob, who were Heirs with him of the same ProHeb. 11. 4. Thirdly, Such as were the first Heads of their Twelve Tribes into which the Nation was divided, that is, the Twelve Sons of Jacob, are called PaActs 7. 8, 9. Others that followed them, as David, who is also called a Patriarch, Acts 2. 29. were termed so, in allusion unto them, and being signalAbraham alone. VVherefore if any one were greater than Abraham, and that in his own time, it must be acknowledged it was upon the acAbraham were made partakers of. But that this was so the ApoMelchisedec, &c.
he gave them; yet not arbitrarily, but in the way of a Necessary Duty, not as an Honorary respect, but as a Religious Office. And he gave thus Tithe-portion, delivering it up unto his Use and Disposal as the Priest of the most High God. And this Tenth was Moses, of the Spoils of War.
acervus,
top of the Heap, the best of it, from whence the First-fruits were taken for Sacred Services. And because it was the Custom of all Nations afterwards to dedicate or devote some Portion of what they got in War unto Religious Services, the word it self came to signifie the Spoils of War. At first it was the portion that was taken out of the whole, and afterwards the whole it self was signified by it. Now although Abraham had reKing of Sodom and his Companions, yet the Army and King which he had newly slain and destroyed haGen. 14. 5, 6, 7. and dealt with them as they did with Sodom and the other Towns, took all their Goods and Provision, ver. 11. being now in their return home and laden with Prey, it fell all into the hand of the Conquerour; The Tenth part of the Spoils in every kind, might probably be a very great Offering both for Sacrifice and Sacred Dedication in the place where Melchisedec Ministred in his Office. What farther concerns the
But how came Melchisedec to be thus Great? Is it because he was Originally in himself, more Wise and Honourable than any of the Sons of Men? We Read no such thing concerning him, which the Apostle declares to be the Rule and Measure of all our Conceptions in this matter. Is it that he attained this Dignity and Greatness, by his own Industry and Endeavours? as the Prophet says of some, that their
The Sovereign Will, Pleasure, and Grace of God is that alone which puts a difference among Men, especially in the Church. He makes Men Great or Small, High or Low, Eminent or Obscure, as it seemeth Good unto him.
Secondly, Whereas even Abraham himself gave the Tenth of all to Melchisedec, we may Observe, that
The Highest Priviledge exempts not any from the Obligation unto and Performance of the meanest Duty. Notwithstanding all these Advantages and Priviledges which Abraham was possessed of, on the account whereof he was Mighty in his own Days & almost Adored by his Posterity, yet when the meanest Duty was presented unto him, he readily complyed with it. Nor ought it to be otherwise with any. For, (1.) Priviledge is less than Duty. A Man may have the Greatest Priviledges and yet be rejected, but the least sincere Duty shall not be unrewarded. For Duty inOrdinary Labour of the Ministry, is horrid Pride and Ingratitude. But when Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Priviledges are pretended to countenance Men in a Life or Course of Idleness, Sloth, Pleasure, Sensuality, or Worldliness in any kind, it is a Crime that it may be we as yet want a Name to express. Wherefore, (2.) Whatever is pretended, that is no Priviledge, which either exempts a Man, or hinders him in and unto the performance of any Duty whatever. It is such a Priviledge as being well improved will send Men to Hell. It will prove no otherPriviledges whereof in this World we may be made Partakers; whereof the first is to enable us unto Duty, and the other is to encourage us thereunto. HereExample unto others in the Performance of their Duties, when these Ends are not pursued, all Priviledges, Promotions, Dignities, Exaltations, are snares and tend unto the Ruine of Mens Souls. There are things still of this Nature both as unto whole Churches and as unto particular Persons. Some Churches are like Capernaum as to the outward means of Grace, as it were lifted up to Heaven; Let them take heed of Capernaum's Judgment in being brought down as low as Hell for their Abuse of them, or Negligence in their Improvement. Some Persons have Eminent Endowments, and if they are not Eminent in Service, they will prove their disadvantage. Yea, the Highest Priviledges should make Men ready to condescend unto the
3. Opportunities for Duty which render it beautiful, ought diligently to be embraced. So did Abraham as unto this Duty upon his meeting of Melchisedec. Hence the Performance of this Duty became so Renowned, and was of the Use whereunto it is here applyed by our Apostle. It is Season that gives every thing its Beauty. And Omission of Seasons or Tergiversations under them, are Evidences of an Heart much under the power of Corrupt Lusts or Unbelief.
4. When the Instituted Use of Consecrated things ceaseth, the things themselves cease to be Sacred, or of Esteem. For what became of all these Dedicated things after the death of Melchisedec? They were no more Sacred, the Actual AdminiBrazen Serpent after it was taken from the Pole whereon it was lifted up by Gods appointment; or of what Use would the lifting of it up be, when it was not under an express Coma Snare, a means of Idolatry, and that was all. Gods Institution is the Foundation and VVarranty of all Consecration. All the Men in the world cannot really Consecrate or Dedicate any thing, but by virtue of Divine Appointment. And this Appointment of God respected always a limited Use, beManna so kept, it breeds VVorms and stinketh. These things are maniSacred which never had warMonasteries, Abbies, Persons and Lands, Altars, Bells, Utensils, with other things of the like Nature very many, which whatever Use they are of, yet all the Men in the world cannot make them
And verily they that are the Sons ofLevi,who receive the Office of the Priesthood, have a Commandment to take Tithes of the People according to the Law, that is of their Brethren though they come out of the Loins of Abraham.
Melchisedec above Abraham, from his giving the Tithe or Tenth of all unto him, and consequently receiving the Blessing from him. And this is taken from what was determined in the Law and acknowledged among the Hebrews, with which kind of Arguments the Apostle doth principally press them in the whole Epistle, as we have shewed on many Occasions. Now this is, that the Priests who received Tithes by the Law were Superiour in Dignity and Honour unto the People from whom they did receive them. And this was only declared in the Law, for the Foundation of it was in the
There are considerable in the words, (1.) The Introduction of this new conDescription of the Persons in whom he Instanceth. (3.) The Action ascribed unto them with its Limitation. And (4.) The Qualification of the Persons to whom their Power was exercised.
The Introduction of his Reasoning herein is in these words, Continuation of the same Argument with farther Proof is intended. And he adds the Note of Observation, verily; as if he had said, as to this matDignity and Preemi
The Description of the Persons in whom he Instanceth is in those words, The Sons of Levi who receive the Office of the Priesthood. It was the Priests directly Aaron; and he might have so expressed it, the Priests according to the Law. But he varieth his expression for sundry Rea
1. Because all the Levites did receive Tithes by the Law, yea, Tithes in the first place was paid unto them in common. But because their Dignity among the People was less conspicuous than that of the Priests; and the design of the Apostle is not meerly to argue from the giving of Tithes unto any, but the giving of them unto them as Priests, as Abraham gave Tithes of all to Melchisedec as Priest of the High God, he thus expresseth it, The Sons of Levi, who receive the Office of the Priesthood. For though all the Sons of Levi received Tithes, yet all of them did not receive the Priesthood, with which sort of Persons alone he was concerned.
2. He doth thus express it to introduce the mention of Levi, whom he was afterwards to mention on the same Occasion, and to lay the weight of him and the whole Tribe under the same Argument.
3. He minds them by the way of another Dignity of the Priesthood, in that not all the Posterity of Abraham, no, nor yet of Levi were partakers thereof, but it was a Priviledge granted only to one part of them, even the Family of Aaron. And these are the Persons in whom he makes his Instance. Thus God distributes Dignity and Preeminence in the Church as he pleaseth. Not all the posterity of
Thirdly, What is ascribed unto these Persons ensues in the words, have a Commandment
Rule, Institution, and Command, without regard unto unrequired Humility, or Pleas of greater Zeal and Self-denial, unless in evident and cogent Circumstances, are the best Preservatives of Order and Duty in the Church. They are so in every kind, especially in the disposal of Earthly things, such as the Maintenance of the OffiPoverty, nor the Ministers pretence of Humility will regulate this Matter as it ought to be. But as it is the Peoples Duty to provide for them, wherein they exercise Grace and OReceive what is their Due by the appointment of Christ, for they have a Command so to do. But whereas they are not many who are apt to Transgress on this hand, we shall not need farther to press this Consideration. But add,
2. As it is the Duty of those who are employed in Sacred Ministrations to receive what the Lord Christ hath appointed for their Supportment, and in the way of his Appointment, so it is likewise without Trouble, Solicitousness or Complaint to acquiesce therein. So was it with the Priests of old, they were to receive their portion, and to acquiesce in their portion; the Neglect of which Duty was the sin of the
1. The Change made in the way of Maintenance pretended so disadvantagious unto Ministers of the Gospel, is no other but a part of that Universal Alteration, wherein Carnal things are turned into those that are more Spiritual, which was made by the bringing in of the Kingdom of Christ. And if Ministers may comTithes, the People may as well complain that they have no Inheritances in the Land of Canaan. But he is unworthy the Name of a Minister of the Gospel, who is not satisfied with what our Lord hath Ordained in every kind. And as for those who indeed think better of what was of Use in Judaism or Heathenism, than what is warranted by the Gospel, I shall not debate the matter with them. Whereperfective Alteration, becoming the Spirituality and Glory of the Kingdom of Christ. For,
2. This way is the most Honourable way, and that which casts the greatest Respect upon them. Even the Princes and Rulers of the World have their Revenue and Supportment from the Substance of the People. Now I would only ask, whether it would not be more Honourable that the People should willingly and of their own accord bring in their Contribution, than meerly pay it under the Compulsion of a Law. For in this latter way, no Man knoweth whether they have the least true Honour for their Ruler or Regard unto his Office. But if it might be done in the former, all the World must take Notice what Reverence, Regard, and Honour they have for the Person and Dignity of their Prince. It is true generally the Men of the World are such lovers of themselves, and so little concerned in Publick Good, that if they were left absolutely at Liberty in this matter, their Go
Thirdly, It must be acknowledged that this way of Voluntary Contribution is not like to afford matter for that Grandeur and Secular Greatness, those ample Revethe Clergy got them by Force of Arms, or Fraud, nor were they their Patrimonial Inheritance. But yet I fear, there were some undue Artifices used to induce men unto such Donations and Ecclesiastical Endowments, and somewhat more of Merit fixed thereon than Truth will allow, besides a Compensation therePurgatory when men were gone out of the world. However the thing it self in its whole kind, that men out of their SubMischievous and Fatal, when those who received what was so given, being unmeasurably Covetous and Worldly, fixed no Bounds unto the Charity or Superstition of men in this kind, until they had over-run the World with their Gains. And not only so, but whereas there was no pretence of Use of such great Revenues in any way pretended to be of Divine Appointment, they were forced to invent and find out ways innumerable, in Abbies, Monasteries, Cloysters, to be Repositories of their overflowing Treasure and Revenues. But when God had appointed to Build his Tabernacle of the Free-will Offerings of the People, a Type of the Gospel-Church, when there was Provision enough of Materials brought in, the Liberality of the People was restrained by Proclamation, and some perhaps grieved that their Offerings were not received,
4. It is indeed supposed unto the Disadvantage of this way, that by means thereMinisters do become obnoxious unto the, People do depend upon them, and so cannot deal so uprightly and sincerely with their Consciences as they ought to do, left they incur their Displeasure, wherein they are too much concerned. It were easie to manifest with how many more and greater Inconveniencies the other way is atOrder and Disposal of these things, as should administer no Occasion for the VVisdom and Graces of them concerned, nor would such a way be at all Useful. I say therefore, that God hath Established mutual Duty to be the Rule and Measure of all things between Ministers and People. Hereunto it is their wisdom and Grace to attend, leaving the Success unto God. And a Minister may easily conclude that seeing his whole Supportment in Earthly things with respect unto his Ministry, depends on the Command of God on the Account of the DisDuty, if he have respect thereunto in his work, or so far as it is Lawsincere and upright he is therein, the more asMinistry in a due manner, considering the Nature of that work, and what he shall assuredly meet withal in its Discharge, is not in much danger of being
displeasing this or that man in the Discharge of his Duty.
5. It is farther pleaded, That these things were tolerable at the first entrance and Beginnings of Christianity, when the Zeal, Love, and Liberality of its Prodegenerate from their pristine Faith and Love, Coldness and Indifferency in the things of their Eternal concernment, with Love of Self and this present evil World, do so prevail in them all, as that if things were left unto their Wills and sence of Duty, there would quickly be an end of all Ministry for want of Maintenance. This is of all others the most cogent ArguMinisters Maintenance by a Voluntary Contribution. I shall briefly give my thoughts concerning it, and so return from this Digression. And I say, (1.) I do not condemn any Provision that is made by Good, Wholsom, and Righteous Laws among men for this end and purpose, provided it be such as is accommodate unto the furtherance of the Work it self. Such Provision as in its own Nature is a Snare and Temptation, inclining men unto Pride, Ambition, Luxury, distance from, and elation above the meanest of the Sheep or Lambs of Christ, or as it were requiring a Worldly
Secondly, These Sons of Levi who obtained the Priesthood received Tithes according to the Law; That is, as the
But there is an Objection that this Assertion of the Apostle seems liable unto, which we must take Notice of in our passage. For whereas he affirms that the Levites who received the Office of the Priesthood took Tithes of their Brethren, it is evi
Answ. 1. By Tithes the whole Consecrated portion according unto the Law is intended, as we said before. Hereof the Portion allotted unto the Priests out of various Offerings or Sacrifices was no small part, wherein the Levites had no InLevites themselves were given unto the Priests for their Service in and about Holy things, Numb. 3. 9. Whatever afterwards was given unto the Levites, it was so with reference unto the Supportment of the Priesthood in due Order. The Tithes therefore that were paid to the Levites were in the Original Grant of all to the Priests. (3.) The Priests Tithed the whole People in that Tenth of all which they received of the Levites; and that being given unto them, what remained in the possession of the Levites themselves, became as all other clean things, to be used promiscuously, Num. 18. 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32.
Fourthly, The Priviledge of the Priests in taking the Tenth of all is amplified own Brethren. And these also were so their Brethren as that they had a right unto, and were partakers of the same Original Priviledge with themselves, which did not exempt them from the Duty of paytook Tithes of their Brethren, though they came out of the Loins of Abraham. Abraham first received the Promises, and was an equal common Spring of Priviledges to his whole Posterity. The Priests were not more Children of Abraham than the People were. The whole People therefore being so, and thereby equally interested in all the Priviledges of Abraham or the Church of Believers, it is manifest how great the Honour and preeminence of the Priests were in that they took Tithes of them all. And this the Apostle declares to strengthen his Argument for the Greatness and Excellency of Melchisedec in that he received Tithes of Abraham himself. And we may learn, (1.) That it is Gods Prerogative to give Dignity and Preeminence in the Church among them which are otherwise equal, which is to be acquiesced in. Our common Vocation by the word, states us all equally in the same Priviledge, as all the Children of Abraham were in that respect in the same Condition. But in this common state, God makes by his Prerogative a three-fold difference among Believers; as to Grace, as to Gifts, as to Office. For, (1.) Although all true Believers have the same Grace in the kind thereof, yet some much excel others in the degrees and exercise of it. As one Star differeth from another, that is, excelleth another in Glory, so here one Saint excelleth another in Grace. This both the Examples of the Scripture, and the Experience of all Ages of the Church doth testifie. And this dependeth on the Soveraign Pleasure of God. As he is Gracious unto whom he will be Gracious, so when, and how, and in what measure he pleaseth. Some shall have Grace sooner than others, and some that which is more eminent than others have. Only he that hath least, shall have no lack, as to making of him meet for the Inheritance of the Saints in Light; and he that hath most, hath no more than he shall find need of and exercise for. But so it is, some God will have as Pillars in his House, and some are but as bruised Reeds. And every ones Duty it is for himself, in his place and
feeble of the Flock, those who either really are so, or in their own apprehensions, complain or faint. For (1.) There is no Man in the world that hath so little Grace, who hath any, but he hath more than he ever deserved; as none hath so much, as that any Dram of it is of his own earning. And as he who hath nothing but what he hath freely received, hath nothing to boast of; so he who hath that which he never deserved, hath no Reason to complain. (2.) It is the Pleasure of God it should be so. If it be his will to keep us Spiritually Poor, so we are thereby kept Humble, we shall be no losers. I say not this, as though any one who hath but a little Grace, or apprehends himself to have so, should on the Presuch is the will of God concerning him and his Condition, neglect the most earnest Endeavour after more, which would be a shrewd Evidence that he hath none at all; but that those who in a diligent Use of means for Growth and Improveaddition of one Grace unto another, as their profiting may be manifest, which falls out on several Occasions, may find Relief in the Sovereign pleasure of God to keep them in their low Cona great deal of Glory in the least of true Grace. Though there be not so much as in more Grace, yet there is more than in all things under the Sun besides. No Man hath so little Grace, who hath any, as that he is ever able to set a sufficient price upon it, or to be thankful enough for it. (4.) There is indeed so much spoken in the Scripture concerning the Love, Care, Compassion, and Tenderness of our Lord Jesus Christ, towards the Weak, the Sick, the Diseased of his Flock, that on some Accounts the state of those Humble Souls who have yet received but little Grace seems to be most safe and desirable, Isa. 40. 11. Let not such therefore complain, it is God alone who is the Author of this difference between them and others. And on the same Grounds, (Secondly) Those who are strong, who have much Grace, ought not, (1.) To boast, or be lifted up. For as we observed before, they have nothing but what they have freely received. Yea, it is very suspitious that what any one boasteth of, is not Grace. For it is the Nature of all true Grace to exclude all boasting. He that by comparing himself with others, finds any other Issue in his thoughts, but either to admire Sovereign Grace, or to judge himself beneath them, is in an ill Condition, or at least in an ill frame. (2.) Nor to trust unto what they have received. There is none hath so much Grace, as not every moment to need Supplies with more. And he who like Peter trusteth unto that wherein he is above others, will one way or other be brought down beneath them all. (3.) Let such be greatly Fruitful, or this appearance of much Grace will issue in much darkness.
Secondly, God dealeth thus with Men as to Spiritual Gifts. Among those who are called, the Spirit divideth unto every one even as he will. Unto one he giveth five Talents, unto another two, and to a third but one. And this diversity dependSoveraignty is visible in all Churches. And as this tends in it self unto their Beauty and Edification, so there may be an abuse of it unto their disadvantage. For besides those disorders which the Apostle declares to have enChurch of Corinth upon the undue Use and Exercise of Spithese Spiritual Gifts in any Eminent manner, may be apt to be lifted up with good Conceits of themselves, and even to despise their Brethren who come behind them therein. This Evil was openly prevalent in the Church of Corinth. (2.) Among those who have received them in some
3. God distinguisheth Persons with Respect unto Office. He makes, and so accounts whom he will Faithful, and puts them into Ministry. This of Old Korah repiMinistry by endeavouring to bring it down into contempt. But the
No Priviledge can exempt Persons from Subjection unto any of Gods Institutions. Though they were of the Loyns of Abraham. Yet,
IN the five following Verses the Apostle pursues and Concludes that part of his Argument from the Consideration of Melchisedec, which concerned the Greatness and Glory of him who was Represented by him, and his Preeminence above the
Upon the Supposition that the Levitical Priests did receive Tithes, as well as Melchisedec, wherein they were equal; and that they received Tithes of their
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
The Aethiopick Translation omits those words, Abraham in the fore-going Verse, who came forth out of the Loyns of Abraham; and adds unto them what follows in this, who received the Promise; possibly deceived by a maimed transcript of the Original.
—He who is not written in their Genealogies; properly enough; for the Apostle speaks of the GeWritten and on Record in the Book of Genesis, wherein there is none of Melchisedec. And it is the Writing by Divine Inspiration that his ArAnsw. Genealogisatus, Genealogised. Is cujus genus non recensetur ex illis; Whose Stock is not reckoned from them; or as Beza, Ad illos non refertur. Vul. Lat. Cujus Generatio non annumeratur in eis; That is as the Rhemists, He whose Generation is not Numbred among them. Nor
from them, from among them; Vul. Lat. in eis, for, inter eos, among them, whose Generation is not Numbred among them. The meaning is, he was not of their Stock or Race; he sprang not of them, nor arose from among them.
decimas tulit, sumpsit, exegit, accepit, decimavit;
decimo, or
But he whose Descent is not reckoned from them, received Tithes fromAbraham, and Blessed him that had the Promises.
A Description there is in these words of Melchisedec, by a Negation of a cerDescent, Pedigre, Nativity, Traduction of Stock and Linage, was not
2. Having thus described Melchisedec, and manifested on what Account the things mentioned were ascribed or did belong unto him, he mentions the things themselves, which were two. (1.) That he received Tithes of Abraham. (2.) That he Blessed him. In both which he demonstrates his Greatness and Dignity. (1.) By the Consideration of the Person of whom he received Tithes, it was Abraham himself. (2.) By an especial Circumstance of Abraham; it was he who received the Promises, from whence the whole Church of Israel claimed their Priviledges.
(1.) He received Tithes of Abraham. The Levitical Priests received Tithes of those who came out of the Loyns of Abraham, which was an Evidence of their Abraham himself, which Evidently declares his Superiority above them, as also herein above Abraham himdispossess the minds of Men of those things which they have long trusted unto and boasted of. It is plain from the Gospel throughout, that all the Jews looked on this as their great Priviledge and Advantage, that they were the Posterity of Abraham, whom they conceived on all accounts the greatest and most Honourable Person that ever was in the VVorld. Now although there was much herein, yet when they began to abuse it, and trust unto it, it was NeArgument unto it, that hath a real force and evidence in it, especially such things as they had not before considered, as it is plain they were utterly Ignorant in the Instructive part of this story of Melchisedec. And we see in like manner, when Men are possessed with an inveterate conceit of their being the Church, and having all the Priviledges of it enevery Particle of Divine Truth is Instructive and Argumentative when it is rightly used and improved. Hence the Apostle presseth all the Circumstances of this Story, from every one of them, giving light and evidence unto the great Truth which he sought to Confirm.
2. That it might yet farther appear how great Melchisedec was, who received Tithes of Abraham, he declares who Abraham was in an instance of his great and received the Promises. This he singles out as the greatest Priviledge and Honour of Abraham, as it was indeed the Foundation of all the other Mercies which he enjoyed, or Advantages that he was entrusted withal. The Nature of this Promise, with the Solemn manner of its giving unto Abraham, and the Benefits included in it, he had at large declared, Chap. 6. ver.
Abraham became the Father of the Faithful, the Heir of the World, and the Friend of God; so that it exceedingly Illustrates the GreatMelchisedec, in that this Abraham paid Tithes unto him.
The Medium of the Argument in this instance is lyable only unto one ExcepAbraham was not the first that received the Promises, so that although he were not, yet there might be others greater than Melchisedec, who never made any acknowledgment of his Preeminence. For the Promise was giAdam himself immediately after the Fall, as also unto Noah in the CoAbraham died in the Faith. Answ. It is true, they had the Promise and the Benefit of it; but yet so as in sunAbraham was preferred above them all. For, (1.) He had the ProHe saw the Day of Christ and Rejoiced, as having a clearer view of his Coming and of Salvation by him, than any that went before him. (2.) The Promise was confirmed unto him by an Oath, which it had not been unto any before. (3.) The Promised Seed was in it peculiarly confined unto his Family or Posterity; See Heb. 2. 17. (4.) His receiving of the Promise was that which was the Foundation of the Church in his Po
But it may yet be said, that Abraham had not received the Promises then when he was Blessed of Melchisedec, so that it was no Argument of his Preeminence at that time. But (1.) He had before received the same Promise for the Substance of it, which was afterwards more Solemnly confirmed unto him, on the trial of his Faith in Offering his only Son, Gen. 12. 2, 3. Chap. 13. 15, 16. (2.) He was then actually instated in a Right unto all that farther Confirmation of the Promises which he received on various Occasions, and what followed added not unto the Dignity of his Person, but served only unto the Confirmation of his Faith. So Melchisedec Blessed him who had the Promises. And we may Observe,
1. We can be made partakers of no such Grace, Mercy, or Priviledge in this World, but that God can when he pleaseth make an addition thereunto. He who had received the Promises was afterwards Blessed. VVe depend upon an infinite Founwhole of what he hath provided for us, in the enjoyment whereof our final Blessedness doth consist. VVherefore as it is required of us to be thankful for what we have, or to walk worthy of the Grace we have received: Yet we may live in constant expectation of more from him, and it is the great Comfort and Relief of our Souls that we may so do.
2. It is the Blessing of Christ, Typed in and by Melchisedec, that makes Promises and Mercies effectual unto us. He is himself the great Subject of the Promises, and the whole Blessing of them cometh forth from him alone. All besides him, all with
3. Free and Soveraign Grace is the only Foundation of all Priviledges. All that is spoken of the Dignity of Abraham is resolved into this, That he received the Promises.
But what if Abraham was thus Blessed by Melchisedec, doth this prove that he was less than he by whom he was Blessed? It doth so, saith the Apostle, and that by virtue of an unquestionable general Rule.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
The words less and greater, are in the Neuter Gender, and so rendred in most Translations; illud quod minus est, à majore; only the Syriack reduceth them to the
Porro nemo negat; absque ulla, omni contradictione; and without all
And without all Contradiction the Less is Blessed of the Greater.
The words prevent an Objection, which is supposed, not expressed. And thereManner of the Assertion; and, (2.) The Proposition it self.
(1.) The Manner of it is in these words, without, bereasonable Contradiction. A Truth this is that cannot, that will not be gain-said, which none will deny or oppose; as that which is evident in the Light of Nature, and which the Order of the things spoken of, doth require. All Truths, especially Divine Truths, are such as ought not to be Contradicted, and which no Contradiction can evert or change their Natures, that they should not so be. But against some of them, not for want of Truth, but either from want of EviContradictions may arise, and they may be called into Dispute or Question. Thus it hath fallen out with all Truths which we receive by meer Supernatural Revelation. The Darkness of the minds of Men, unable clearly to discern them, and perfectEvidence in themselves, and such a Suitableness unto the Principles of Reason and Light Natural, that no colour of Opposition can be made unto them. And if any out of brutish Affectithere are some Principles of Truth that are so Secured in their own Evidence and Light, as that being unquestionable in themselves, they may be used and improved as concessions, whereon other less evident Truths may be Confirmed and Established. The due consiUse in the Method of Teaching, or in the Vindication of any unquestioned Truths from Opposition. In all Teaching, especially in MatControverted, it is of great Advantage to fix some unquestionable Principles, whence those which are
2. The Proposition thus Modified, is, That the Less is Blessed of the Greater; that is, wherein one is orderly Blessed by another; he that is Blessed is therein less whom he is Blessed, as it is expressed in the Syriack Translation. Expositors generally on this place distinguish the several sorts of Benedictions that are in Use and warrantable among Men, that so they may fix on that concerning which the Rule here mentioned by the Apostle, will hold unquestionably. But as unto the especial design of the Apostle this Labour may be spared: For he treats only of Sacerdotal Benedictions, and with Respect to them, the Rule is not only certainly true, but openly evident. But to Illustrate the whole, and to shew how far the Rule mentioned may be extended, we may reduce all sorts of Blessings unto four Heads.
(1.) There is Benedictio Potestativa; that is, such a Blessing as consists in an actual Efficacious Collation on, or Communication of the matter of the Blessing unto the Person Blessed. Thus God alone can Bless absolutely. He is the only Fountain of all Goodness, Spiritual, Temporal, Eternal, and so of the whole enmatter of Blessing, containing it all eminently and virtually in himself. And he alone can efficiently communicate it unto, or collate it on any others, which he doth as seemeth Good unto him, according to the Counsel of his own will. All will grant, that with Respect hereunto, the Apostle's Maxime is unquestionable, God is greater than Man. Yea, this kind of Blessing ariseth from, or dependeth solely on that Infinite Distance that is between the Being or Nature of God, and the Being
Addition of Good as the Jews call it; a real communication of Grace, Mercy, Priviledges, or whatmatter of the Blessing be.
2. There is Benedictio Authoritativa. This is when Men in the Name, that is, by the Appointment and Warranty, of God, do declare any to be Blessed, proExtraordinary by virtue of especial immediate Inspiration, or a Spirit of Prophecy: Secondly, Ordinary by virtue of Office and Institution. In the first way Jacob Blessed his Sons, which he calls a Declaration of what should befall them in the last days, Gen. 49. 1. And such were all the Solemn Patriarchal Benedictions; as that of Isaac, when he had Infallible direction, as to the Blessing, but not in his own mind as to the Person to be Blessed, Gen. 27. 27, 28, 29. So Moses Blessed the Children of Israel in their respective Tribes, Deut. 33. 1. In the latter, the Priests by virtue of Gods OrdiBless the People with this Authoritative Blessing. And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, speak unto Aaron and his Sons, saying, On this wise shall ye Bless the Children of Israel saying unto them; The Lord Bless thee and keep thee, the Lord make his Face shine upon thee, and be Gracious unto thee; the Lord lift up the light of his Countenance upon thee, and give thee Peace; and they shall put my Name on the Children of Israel, and I will Bless them, Numb. 6. The whole Nature of this kind of Blessing is here exemplified. It is founded in Gods Express Institution and Command. And the Nature of it consists in putting the Name of God upon the People; that is, declaring Blessings unto them in the Name of God, praying BlesBless is used in a two-fold sence in this Institution; ver. 23. Ye shall Bless the Children of Israel is spoken of the Priests; ver. 27. I will Bless them is spoken of God. The Blessing is the same, declared by the Priests, effected by God: They blessed declaratively, He efficiently. And the blessing of Melchisedec in this place seems to have a mixture in it of both these. For as it is plain that he blessed Abraham by virtue of his Sacerdotal Office, which our Apostle principally considereth; so I make no Question but he was peApostolical Maxime maintains its Evidence in the Light of Nature.
3. There is Benedictio Charitativa: This is, when one is said to bless another, by praying for a Blessing on him, or using the means whereby he may obtain a BlesSuperiours, Equals, Inferiours, any or all Persons muKings 8. 14, 55, 56. 2 Chron 6. 3. Prov. 30. 11. This kind of Blessing, it being only improperly so, wherein the Act or Duty is demonstrated by its Object, doth not belong unto this Rule of the Apostle.
4. There is Benedictio Reverentialis; Hereof God is the Object. So Men are said often to Bless God, and to Bless his Holy Name, which is mentioned in the Scripture as a signal Duty of all that Fear and Love the Lord. Now this Blessing of God is a Declaration of his praises with an Holy Reverential Thankful admiration of his Excellencies. But this belongs not at all unto the design of the Apostle, nor is regulated by this general Maxime, but is a particular Instance of the direct conwithout Controversie the Greater is Blessed of the Less. It is the seBlessings that is alone here intended; and that is mentioned as an EviMelchisedec, and his Preeminence above Abraham.
It is a great Mercy and Priviledge when God will make Use of any in the Blessing of others with Spiritual Mercies. It is God alone who Originally and Efficiently can do so, who can actually and infallibly Collate a Blessing on any one. Therefore is he said to Bless us with all Spiritual Blessings in Heavenly things, Ephes. 1. 3. There is no one Blessing but he is the sole Author and worker of it. But yet also he maCollation of Good things, yea, the best things on others. For what greater Priviledge can any one be made Partaker of, than to be an Instrument in the Hand of God, in the Communication of his Grace and Goodness? And a Priviledge it is whose Exercise and Improvement
Benedictions are Euctical and Charitative only, in their mutual Prayers; but of such as are in some sence Authoritative. Now a Man Blesseth by the way of Authority when he doth it as an especial Ordinance, as he is called and appointed of God thereunto. Peculiar Institution gives peculiar Authority. So
Secondly, Ministers Bless the Church. It is part of their Ministerial Duty, and belongs unto their Office so to do. (1.) They do it by putting the Name of God upon the Church. This was the way whereby the Priests Blessed the People of Old, Numb. 6. last. And this putting the Name of God upon the Church is, by the right and orderly Celebration of all the Holy Ordinances of Worship
of his appointment. For the Name of God and of Christ is upon them all; whereis put upon the Church, and is brought under the Promise of the Meeting and Blessing of God; as he hath spoken concerning every thing whereon he hath placed his Name. This is an espeAuthoritative Blessing, which can no way be discharged but by virtue of Ministerial Office. Only let Ministers take heed that they put not the Name of a false god upon the Church, by the introduction of any thing in Religious WorDispensation and Preaching of the Word unto the Conversion and Edification of the Souls of Men. So speak the Apostles concerning their Preaching of the VVord, Acts 3. 26. Unto you first God having raised up his Son Jesus sent him to Bless you, in turning every one of you from his Iniquities. This sending of Christ after his ResurMinistry of the Apostles and others, by the Preaching of the Gospel. And the End hereof is to Bless them unto whom it is Preached. And it is known that all the Principal Spiritual Blessings of God in this World are Communicated unto the Souls of Men by the Ministry of the VVord, and Ministerial Administration of the Sacraments, as the only outward Causes and Means thereof. Herein do Ministers Bless the People in the Name and Authority of God. (3.) They do it by the particular Ministerial applications of the Word unVVhose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them, and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained, John 20. 23. I know what Use hath been made of these words, that is, how they have been abused to give Countenance unto the neprivate Confession of all Sins unto the Priests, and of their Power of Abwaved or over-looked. It is not therefore the meer Preaching of the VVord and therein a Doctrinal Declaration of whose Sins are remitted, and whose Sins are retained, according to the Gospel, which Men are respectively interested in by their Faith or Unbelief, that is here intended; the Commission giving Power whereunto, is of a more general Nature. But an especial Application of the word unto the Consciences of Men with respect unto their Sins is included therein. And this is done two ways. (1.) VVith respect unto the Judgment of the Church. (2.) VVith respect unto the Judgment of God. The first is that binding or loosing which the Lord Christ hath given Power for unto the MiMat. 18. 18. For by the Ministerial Application of the Word unto the Sins and Consciences of Men, are they to be continued in, or excluded from the Communion of the Church, which is called the binding or loosing of them. The other respects God himself; and the sense which the Conscience of a Sinner hath of the guilt of Sin before him. In this case the Ministers of the Gospel are Authorized in the Name of Christ, to remit their Sins; that is, so to apply the Promises of Mercy and Grace unto their Souls and Consciences, as that being received by Faith, they may have Peace with God. So are they Authorized to remit or retain Sins according to the tenor and terms of the Gospel. Not that the Remission of Sins absolutely doth depend on an Act of Office, but the Release of the Conscience of a Sinner from the sense of guilt, doth sometimes much depend upon it, rightly performed; that is, by due Application of the Promises of the Gospel unto such as Believe and Repent. (4.) How they Bless the Church by Prayer and Example, may be understood from what hath been spoken concerning those things with respect unto Parents. The Authority that is in them depends on Gods especial Institution, which exempts them from and exalts them above the common Order of mutual Charitative Benedictions. (5.) They Bless the People Declaratively; as a Pledge whereof it hath been almention of the Blessing of God, which they pray for upon them. But yet because the same thing is done in the Administration of all other Ordinances, and this BeEuctical or by the way of Prayer, I shall not plead for the Neces
And we may yet infer two things from hence. (1.) That those who are thus appointed to Bless others in the Name of God, and thereby exalted into a Preeminence above those that are Blessed, by his appointment, ought to be accordingly regarded
The Eighth Verse carrieth on the same Argument, by a particular Application unto the Matter in hand, of the things which he had in general observed before in Melchisedec. For whereas the Apostle had before declared, that he was without Father, without Mother, without Beginning of Days or End of Life, he now shews how all this conduced unto his purpose.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Idiotisme of that Language, the Sons of Man.
qui moriuntur, who dye. Vul. Lat. Homines morientes, dying men; of which difference we must speak afterwards; de quo testatum est, quod vivat. Vul. Lat. Ibi autem contestatur quia vivit; which the
And here men verily that dye receive Tithes, but there he of whom it is witnessed that he Liveth.
There is in the words a Comparison and Opposition between the Levitical Priests and Melchisedec in this matter of receiving Tithes, which in general was common to them both. And we may consider in them, (1.) The Circumstances of the Comparison. (2.)
The Circumstances of the Comparison are two. (1.) The manner of its Introduction, in the earnestness of the Assertion, in the Particle
Secondly, The Determination of the Time or Place, or Manner of the Opposition in those Adverbs here and there;
place. And some think that the Apostle hath respect unto Hierusalem the Seat of the Levitical
Priesthood, and the Land of Canaan which alone was Tithable according to the Law. For the Jews do Judge, and that rightly, that the Law of Legal Tithing extended not it self beyond the Bounds of the Land of Canaan; a sufficient Evidence that it was Positive and Ceremonial. In Opposition hereunto, there, must signifie some other places or any place where the Priesthood of Melchisedec hath its signiChristian Religion. But the Truth is, if there, must be Salem, where Melchisedec dwelt, which was not only afterwards Tithable as within the Bounds of Canaan, but most probably was Hierusalem it self, as we have declared. This Conjecture therefore is too Curious; nor do we need to tye up our selves unto the precise signification of the word time as well as place. VVherefore these words here and there, do
Here, is in the case of the Levitical Priesthood; and There respects the case of Melchisedec, as stated, Gen. 14.
Secondly, The Foundation of the Comparison, that wherein both agreed, is in this, that they received Tithes. It is expressed of the one sort only, namely, the Levitical Priests, they received Tithes; but it is understood of the other also, whereon the word is repeated and inserted in our Translation; but there he receiveth
The Opposition and Difference lyes in the Qualification and Properties of them Levitical Priesthood were Homines qui moriuntur, or homines morientes; Men that dye, dying men; that is, Men subject unto Death,
In Opposition unto this state of the Levitical Priests, it is affirmed that Melchisedec,
Witnessed that he Liveth. How he Liveth, and how it is Witnessed unto that he Liveth we must Enquire. For it is apparently of Melchisedec, of whom in the first place as the Type these things are spoken; and yet we know that really and in his own Person he was Dead long before. But there are several things on the Account whereof, it is said, that it is witnessed that he Liveth. For (1.) Whatever the Scripture is silent in as to Melchisedec, which it usually relates of others in the like state, our Apostle takes for a
1. In the outward Administration of his worship God is pleased to make Use of poor, frail, mortal, dying men. So he did of old, and so he continues still to do. Our Fathers where are they? and the Prophets do they Live for ever? Zech. 1. 5. The Prophets of old, the most Eminent Administrators under the Old Testament they were all mortal dying men, and whilst they lived in this World they were Subject, unto like Passions with other Men, James 5. 17. And the same account the Apostle giveth us of the Principal Administrators of the New Testament, 2 Cor. 4. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. Chap. 6. 8, 9. And we know it is so with all those into whose hands the same work is transmitted. Yea, oft-times as to the Infirmities of Body and outall Infirmities and Temptations with all other BeAdministrators. He could have employed his Holy Angels in the Declaration and Dispensation of the Gospel; or he could have raised up Men so signalized with Wisdom and all endowments of Mind and Body, as should have eminently distinguished them from the whole Race of Mankind besides. But waPoor, Infirm, Frail, Tempted, Sinning, Dying men. And sundry Reasons of this his Holy Councel are expressed in the Scripture.
1. He doth it to make it Evident that it is his own Power and nothing else which gives Efficacy and Success unto all Gospel-Administrations. 2 Cor. 4. 7. VVe have
this Treasure in Earthen Vessels that the Excellency of the Power may be of God and not of us. There is an Excellency of Power accompanieth the Dispensation of the VVord. Mighty Spiritual Effects are produced by it, such as wherein the Glory of God doth consist, and whereon the Eternal welfare of the Souls of Men doth depend. This Glory in subduing the Adverse Power of Sin, Satan, and the World, in the Quickening, Sanctifying, Saving the Souls of the Elect, God will be seen and owned in, he will not give it unto another. Whereas therefore those by whom these Treasures are communicated unto others, are frail, perishing, Earthen Vessels, or those by whom the Gospel is dispensed are poor, frail, weak men, seen and known so to be, there is no veil by their Ministry cast over the Glory of God. There is not a Soul Convinced, Converted, or Comforted by their Word, but they may truly say of it as the Apostles did of the Miracle which they wrought, Acts 3. 12. Why look ye so on us, as though by our own Power and Holiness we made this man walk? This Blind Man to see, this Dead Man to live. By the ConsideExcellency of this Power is of God, and not of us. Yea, for this very End our Apostle refused to make Use of such a perswasiveness of words and exercise of VVisdom, as might give any AppearCor. 2. 4, 5. My Speech and my Preachings was not with enticing words of mans wisdom, but in demonstration of Spirit and of Power; that your Faith should not stand in the wisdom of Man, but in the Power of God. And herein ought he to be an Example unto us all. But it is come to that with many, that being destiDemonstration of the Spirit and of Power, do wholly betake themselves unto what he re
(2.) God hath so Ordered things in VVisdom and Grace, that the Administramight have Experience in themselves of their State and Condition so as to be moved with Compassion towards them, Care about them, and Zeal for them. VVithout these Graces and this constant Exercise Men will be but very useless Instruments in this work. And they will not grow any where but in Mens own Experience. For how shall he be Tender Compassionate, Careful towards the Souls of others, who knows no Reason why he should be so towards his own? The High Priest of Old was such an one as could have Compassion on the Ignorant and them that are out of the way, for that he himself was encompassed with Infirmity, Heb. 5. 2. And therein was he a Type of Christ, who was in all points Tempted as we are, that he might be ready to Succour them that are Tempted. This gave him the Experience of Compassion in the Exercise of it. VVherefore when a Minister of the Gospel knows his own VVeakness, Infirmities, and Temptations, his need of Mercy and Grace, the ways of his obtaining Supplies of them, the dan
3. That the Power of Gospel-Grace and Truth may be exemplified unto the Eyes of them unto whom they are dispensed, in the Persons of them by whom it is Administred according unto Gods Appointment. It is known unto all who know ought in this matTemptations and Objections will arise in the minds of poor Sinners against their obtaining any Interest in the Grace and Mercy that is dispensed in the Gospel. Some, they judge, may be made Partakers of them, but for them, and such as
Encouragement unMen Subject unto alike Passions with themselves, and who if they had not freely obtained Grace, would have been as vile and unworPaul to the Ministry, who had been a Blasphemer, a Persecutor and Injurious, that he might in him shew forth all Long-suffering for a Pattern unto them who should hereafter believe on him to Everlasting Life, that is for the Encouragement even of such high Criminal Offenders to Believe, 1
4. In particular God maketh Use of Persons that dye in this matter, that their Testimony unto the Truth of Gospel-Grace and Mercy may be Compleat and unquestionable. Death is the great Touch-stone and Trial of all things of this Nature, as to their Efficacy and Sincerity. Many things will yield Relief in Life, and various Re
I cannot but Observe for a Close of this Discourse, that as the unavoidable InMinisters of the Gospel managed and passed through in a course of Faith, Holiness, and Sincere Obedience, are on many Accounts of singular Use and Advantage unto the Edification and Consolation of the Church; so the Evil Examples of any of them in Life and Death, with the want of those Graces which should be excited unto Exercise by their Infirmities, is pernicious thereunto.
The Life of the Church depends on the Everlasting Life of Jesus Christ. It is said of Melchisedec, as he was a Type of him, It is witnessed that he Liveth. Christ doth so, and that for ever; and hereon under the Failings, Infirmities, and Death of all other Administrators, depends the Preservation, Life, Continuance, and Salvation of the Church. But this must be spoken peculiarly on ver. 27. whi
It may be Objected unto the whole precedent Argument of the Apostle, That although Abraham himself paid Tithes unto Melchisedec, yet it followeth not that Melchisedec was Superiour unto the Levitical Priests, concerning whom alone the Question was between him and the Jews. For although Abraham might be a Priest in some sence also, by virtue of common Right, as were all the Patriarchs, yet was he not so by virtue of any especial Office, Instituted of God to abide in the Church. But when God afterwards by peculiar Law and Ordinance Erected an Order and Office of Priesthood in the Family of Levi, it might be Superiour unto or Exalted above that of Melchisedec, although Abraham paid Tithes unto him. This Objection therefore the Apostle obviates in these verses, and thereTransition according unto his usual Custom (as it hath been often Observed that it is his MeExcellency of the Priesthood of Christ, above that of the Law, which is the main scope of this whole Discourse.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Ut verbum dicere, as to speak a word. Vul. Lat. Ut ita dictum sit, be it so said. Syr. As any one may say. Arab. And it is said that this Discourse, or
There are three things Observable in these words. (1.) The manner of the Introduction of the Apostle's new Assertion. (2.) The Assertion it self, which hath the force of a new Argument unto his Purpose, ver. 9. And (3.) The Proof of his Assertion in ver. 10.
The manner of the Introduction of his Assertion is in these words, as I may so
say. This Qualification of the Assertion makes an abatement of it one way or other. Now this is not, as to the Truth of the Proposition, but as to the Proactually so; namely, that
2. His Assertion is, That Levi who received Tithes was Tithed in Abraham,
Abraham gave the Tithes of all to Melchisedec. By Levi he inLevi absolutely, the Third Son of Jacob, but his Powhole Tribe proceeding from him, so far as they were Interested in the Priesthood. For Levi himself never received Tithes of any, the Priesthood being erected in his Family long after his Death in the Person of his Great GrandAaron. So then Levi who received Tithes is the same with the Sons of Lewho received the Priesthood, ver. 5. Namely, in their several Generations unto that Day.
Of this Levi it is affirmed that He was Tithed or paid
Tithes in Abraham, or through him, and by him, as the word is. When Abraham himself gave Tithes to
For he was yet in the Loyns of his Father whenMelchisedecmet him.
The force of this Proof seems to depend on a double Principle. (1.) That are in his Loyns before they are Born. And this Principle is sure in the Light of Nature and common Reason; they are in them as the Effect in its Cause; nor have they any future existence but with Relation unProgenitors even the remotest of them. (2.) That what any one doth,
all his Posterity are esteemed to do in and by him. But it is certain that this Rule will not generally hold, nor indeed will it ever do so absolutely without some other cogent Circumstances. By Humane Laws, the Crimes of Men reflect dishoHonour which by their worth they have acquired on their Posterities. What a Man also gives away of his Estate unto Publick Uses, as in the Foundation of Schools or Hospitals, his Children may be said to do it in him, because so much is decreased from their Inheritance. As here what
1. That Abraham was now called of God, and separated unto his Service, so as to be the Foundation of a new Church in the World. And there is a Relation unto such an Original Stock in all the Branches, beyond what they have unto any other intermediate Progenitors. Hence all the Idolatrous Nations in the World, constantly made the first Persons from whom they derived their Original, of whose Off-spring they would be their gods whom they Worshipped. These were their Joves indigites, their Home-born Deities, whom they Honoured, and whose Honours they thought descended unto them by Inheritance.
2. He had now received the Promise that God would be a God unto him and his Seed after him; whereby all his Posterity were taken into Covenant with him, and hereon Abraham Covenanted with God in the Name of, and as the great RepreOrder and Rule in this World. For after Persons, or a People have Covenanted into such Agreements in Government, and as to the Administration of Common Right among themselves, provided the terms whereon they have agreed be good and suitable unto the light of Nature, their Posterity are not at Liberty to alter and change them at their Pleasure. For whereas they derive all their Right and InheProgenitors, they are supposed in them to have consented unto all that was done by them.
3. Hereon what God said and did unto Abraham, he said it and did it unto all his Seed in him. The Promises were theirs, and the Inheritance was theirs; yea, what God is said to give unto Abraham so often, namely, the whole Land of Canaan, was never actually made good unto him in his own Person, no, not a
4. What Abraham did Solemnly in Obedience unto God by virtue of the Covenant as a Publick Condition thereof, he did undertake in it for his Posterity, and performed it in their Name. And therefore God enjoyned him to bring all his Po
5. Abraham in this Solemn Address unto God by Melchisedec the Type of Christ, wherein he expressed his Covenant-Obedience unto him, was the Representative of all his Posterity, and in particular of
as intricate and more remote from cogency than any else-where used by him. And therefore by some Profane Persons hath it been cavilled at. But all things of that Nature arise meerly from want of a due Reverence unto the Word of God. When we come unto it with those Satisfactions in our Minds, that there is Truth, and Divine Wisdom in every Expression of it, that all its Reasonings are cogent and effectual, though we understand them not, we shall not fail upon an
And the fore-going Observation will expedite two difficult Questions which Expositors raise unto themselves on this Verse. The first whereof is, whether
For the first of these, Austin and others have well Laboured in the solution of it: The Sum of what they say is, That the Lord Christ was not in Abraham as Levi was, not in his Nature as it was Corrupted; nor did he educe or derive his Nature from him by Carnal Generation or the Common way of the Propagation of Mankind. And these things do constitute a sufficient Difference and distance between them in this Matter. But yet with these Considerations and on the Supposition of them, there is another which contains the true and proper Reason of this Diffe
And this makes way for the Solution of the general Question, How one may be said to do any thing in another which shall be reckoned unto him as his own act? And this may be by virtue of a Covenant and no otherwise. Hence Divines do usually Illustrate the imputation of the Sin of Adam unto his Posterity by this Example of Levi, though I have not met with any who truly understand the Ground of the CompariAbraham acting as a Covenanter in the Name of his Posterity. But whereas this is opposed with some vehemency by Schlictingius in his Comment on this place, I shall Transcribe his words, and consider his Discourse. Haec sententia non ad omnes actiones transferenda est; sed ad eas tantum quae propriè versantur vel in auctione vel in diminutione rerum quae à Parentibus in liberos devolvi & haereditario jure transferri solent, qualis actio est decimarum solutio. Persolvuntur enim de bonis & facultatibus, quae hactenus cùm sunt liberorum, quatenus jus haereditatis ad eos spectat, praesertim si certum sit, fore liberos, qui in bona succedant, quemadmodum Abrahamo
I have Transcribed these words at large, because their Design is to defeat that Article of our Faith concerning the Imputation of the Sin of Adam unto all his Posterity, which there is no doubt but they will make Use of, who are gone over among our selves unto the Negative of it: and that it might appear whose
But we may take some Observations from these words: As,
1. They who receive Tithes of others for their work in Holy Administrations, are thereby proved to be Superiour unto them of whom they do receive them. They are
Dignity. So it was when they were paid of Old by Gods Institution; and so it would be still, if they might be paid or received in a due manner with respect unto the Labour of any in Gospel Administrations. But whereas not one among thousands doth give or pay them on any other Ground but because they must do so whether they will or no; nor would do so any more were it not for the coercive enforcing Power of Humane Laws: If they on the other side that do receive them, do look on them not as a free Pledge of the Peoples Respect and the Honour that they bear unto them, but as their own Right and due by Law, they are a Testimony neither of the Peoples Obeextream Disorder of all things in Religion.
2. It is of great Concernment unto us, what Covenant we do belong unto, as being esteemed to do therein what is done by our Representatives in our Name. There were never absolutely any more than two Covenants. Wherein all Persons indefinitely are concerned. The first was the Covenant of Works made with Adam and with all in him. And what he did as the Head of that Covenant, as our Representative thereRom. 5. 12. The other is that of Grace made Originally with Christ, and through him with all the Elect. And here lieth the life and hope of our Souls, That what Christ did as the Head of that Covenant as our Representative, it is all imputed unto us for Righteousness and Salvation. And certainly there is nothing of more Importance unto us than to know whether of these Covenants we belong unto; we are also some way concerned in them, by whom that one or the other of these Covenant-states is conveyed unto us. For before we make our own Personal voluntary Choice, we are by the Law of our NaProgenitors as to their Covenant-state. And thence it is that in the severest Temporal Judgments Children not Guilty of the actual Transgression of their Parents, not having sinned after the similitude of them, by
IN this Verse, after so long a Preparation and Introduction, whereby he cleared his way from Objections, and secured his future Building, the Apostle enters on his Principal Argument concerning the Priesthood of Christ, and all the ConsePerson of Christ as vested with his Blessed Offices. And from hence unto the didactical part of the Epistle, he proceeds in a Retrograde Order unto what he had before insisted on. For whereas he had first declared the Glory of the Person of Christ in his Kingly Office, Chap. 1. then in his Prophetical, Chap. 2, 3. And having now entred on his Sacerdotal, he goes on to enlarge upon this last Function, then he returns unto his Prophetical, and shuts up the whole with a reKingly Power, as we shall see in their Order and proper places.
consummatio, perfectio, A Sacred Perfection, or com
Syr.
By the Hand of the Priesthood of Levi himself; Because
Nam sub hoc, populo sancita est Lex, Beza. For under it the Law was established to the People. Sub ipso populus legem accepit, acceperat; Syr.
quid adhuc, quid amplius opus erat, esset; necessarium fuit. What need was there yet, or moreover; Syr.
wherefore, ad quid, to what pur
oriri; Beza. Exoriri, Surgere; vul. Lat. Syr.
should arise. Oriri, properly, Syr.
in or after the likeness of MelchiSecundum ordinem.
Et non secundum ordinem Aaron dici, Syr.
Polyglot: Sed dixit, but he said, it shall be, or he shall be in the likeness of Aaron; Dixisset antem, which regulated by the precedent Interrogation, gives us the true sence of the place. Suppose there must another Priest arise, yet if Perfection had been by the Levitical Priesthood, he would have said that he should be of the Order of Aaron.
If therefore Perfection were by theLeviticalPriesthood, (for under it the PeoMelchisedec,ple Received the Law) what farther need was there that another Priest should rise after the Order of and not be called after the OrAaron.der of
The first thing in the words is the Introduction of the ensuing Discourse and Argument, in those particles of Inference, if therefore. If things be Melchisedec, he will now make an Application of unto the great cause he had in hand. He hath proved by all sorts of Arguments that the Priesthood of Melchisedec was Superiour unto that of Aaron. Before he had evinced that there was to be another Priest after his Orgreater than all those who went before him of the Tribe of Levi, in as much as he was so, by whom he was represented before the Institution of that Priesthood. Now he will let the Hebrews know whiif therefore. And to comprehend the meaning of these words in general, with the Design of the Apostle in them, we may observe,
1. That his Reasoning in this case is built upon a Supposition which the Hebrews
Perfection or Consummation is the end aimed at in the Priesthood of the Church. That Priesthood which perfects or consummates the People in order unto their acceptance with God, and future enjoyment of him, their present Righteousness and future Blessedness, is that which the Church stands in need of, and cannot rest till it comes unto. That Priesthood which doth not do so, but leaves Men in an
2. Look unto the Levitical Priesthood in the days of David and Solomon. Then was that Order in its height and at its best; then was the Tabernacle first, and afTemple in their greatest Glory, and the Worship of God performed with the greatest Solemnity. The Hebrews would grant, that the Priesthood of Levi could never arise to a higher pitch of Glory, nor be more Useful than it was in those days. Yet, saith he, it did not then consummate the Church: Perfection was not then attainable by it. This the Jews might deny, and Plead that they dePerfection than what was in those days attained unto. Wherefore our Apostle proves the contrary; namely, that God designed a Perfection or Consummation for his Church by a Priesthood that was not then attained. This he doth by the Testimony of
3. The Apostle obviates an Objection that might be raised against the sence of the Testimony produced by him and his Application of it. For it might be said, that after the Institution of the Levitical Priesthood there was yet mention of another Priest to rise, it might be some
4. He hath yet a farther Design, which is not only to prove the Necessity of another Priest and Priesthood, but thereon also a Change and an Abrogation of the whole Law of Worship under the Old Testament. Hence he here introduceth the mention of the Law, as that which was given at the same time with the Priesthood, and had such a Relation thereunto, as that of Necessity it must stand and fall with it. And this may suffice for a view of the Scope of this Verse, and the force of the Argument contained in it. We shall now consider the particulars of it.
1. A Supposition is included that Perfection, is the adaequate and compleat end of the Office of the Priesthood in the Church. This at one time or another, in one Order or another, it must attain, or the whole Office is Useless. And the Apostle denies that this could be obtained by the Levitical Priesthood. And he calls the Priesthood of the Law Levitical, not only because Levi was their Progenitor, the Patriarch of their Tribe, from whom they were Genealogized; but also because he would comprise in his Assertion not only the House of Aaron, unto whom the Right and Exercise of the Priesthood was limiLevitical Service which was subservient unto the Office of the Priesthood, and without which
Levitical Priesthood is that Priesthood in the Family of Aaron, which was assisted in all their Sacerdotal Actings and DuLevites, who were Consecrated of God unto that End. That Perfection was of this Priesthood, is denyed in a restrictive Interrogation. If it had been so, it would have been otherwise with respect unto another Priest, than as it is declared by the Holy Ghost.
2. Our principal Enquiry on this Verse will be, what this Perfectio, Consummatio, Consecratio,
First, That it is the Effect or End, or Necessary consequent of a Priesthood. This Supposition is the Foundation of the whole Argument of the Apostle. Now the Office and Work may be considered two ways. (1.) With respect unto God, who is the first immediate Object of all the proper Acts of that Office. (2.) With respect unto the Church, which is the Subject of all the Fruits and Be
If we take it in the first way, then the Expiation of Sin is intended in this word. For this was the great Act and Duty of the Priesthood towards God, namely, to make Expiation of Sin, or Attonement for it by Sacrifice. And if we take the word in this sence, the Apostle's Assertion is most true. For this Perfection was never attainable by the Levitical Priesthood. It could Expiate sin, and make AtTypically, and by way of Representation, really and effectually as to all the Ends of Spiritual Reconciliation unto God, and the Pardon of sin they could not do it. For it was not possible, as our Apostle observes, that the Blood of Bulls and Goats should take away sins, Chap. 10. 4. which he also proves in his enSacerdotal Energy whereby sin is Expiated, it is the Church that is here said to be Perfected; so that Expiation of sin cannot be intendLevitical Priesthood whatever.
The Socinians would have Expiation of Sin here intended; and I shall therefore examine briefly what they speak to this purpose, in their Comment on this place. Perfectionis
nomine hoc loco nihil aliud intelligit Autor, quàm veram & perfectam Expiationem peccatorum, qua non tantum quorundam sed omnium etiam gravissimorum criminum reatus, isque non tantum poenae alicujus temporariae & ad hanc vitam spectantis, sed ipsius aeternae mortis aufertur, jusque homini vitae sempiternae conceditur; qua denique non tantum reatus omnis omnium peccatorum, sed & ipsa peccata in hominibus tolluntur. Namque his in rebus vera hominum perfectio coram deo consistit. Si ergo haec perfectio hominibus contingere potuisset per Sacerdotium Leviticum, certè nullus fuisset usus novi Sacerdotis Melchisedeciani. Sacerdotium enim propter peccatorum
1. What in general is suited unto the Apostle's Argument, whatever be the sence of the Expiation of Sin be here intended, what is the Nature of that Expiation, and what was the Use of the Sacrifices under the Law? All which on this Occasion are spoken unto, and the mind of the Holy Ghost in them all perverted. For (1.) That Expiation of Sin properly so called by an Act of the Priestly Office towards God, is not here intended, hath been before declared, both from the signification of the word, and the Design of the Apostle. What these Men intend by the Expiation of Sin, and how remote it is from that which the Scripture teacheth, and the NaExercitations about the Priesthood of Christ. And take Expiation in the sence of the Scripture, with the common sence and usage of Mankind, and in their Judgment, it was by the Levitical Priesthood, and was not by the Priesthood of Christ. For it cannot be denied, but that the Levitical Priests acted towards God, in their Offering of Sacrifices to make Attonement for Sin. But that the Lord Christ did so is by these Men denyed. For that which unLevitical Priesthood, on two grounds. (1.) Because they did Expiate only some lesser Sins, as of Ignorance and Infirmity; and so it cannot be said to be by them, because they were only some few sins that they could Expiate. (2.) Because their Expiation concerned only deliverance from Temporal Punishment. That Expiation in the Scripture-sence could not be really effected by the Levitical Priesthood is granted, and shall afterwards be proved. But both these pretended Reasons of it are false. For (1.) There was an Attonement made in general for all the sins of the People. For when Aaron made an Attonement by the Scape Goat, Lev. 16. 10. he Confessed over him all the Iniquities of the Children of Israel, and all their Transgression in all their Sin, ver. 21. And herein the
Secondly, This that perfect state of the Church in this World, which God from the beginning designed unto it. He entred upon its Erection in the first Promise, with respect unto his Worship, and the blessed Condition of the Church it self. Hereon, and with respect hereunto, is the Church-state of the Old Testament said to be weak and imperfect like that of a Child under GoGod having Ordained better things for us, or the Church under the New Testament, Heb. 11. 40, That they without us should not be consummate, or made perfect in their Church-state. And this state of the Church is expressed by this word in other places, as we shall see. The FoundaJohn 19. 30. It is finished or compleated; that is, all things belonging unProphets had fore-told; all that he was to do in this World, and the consummation of the Church was to ensue thereon, when by one Offering he for ever perfected them that are Sanctified. And those who were throughly instructed in the Priviledges of this Church-state, and had a sense of the Benefits thereof, are called perfect, 1 Cor. 2. 6. We speak WisHeb. 5. 14. This our Saviour Prayed for in the behalf of his Church immediately before he procured it by his Sacrifice, John 17. 23. that they may be perfected. And the End of the Institution of the Ministry of the Gospel, to make his Mediation effectual unto the Souls of Men by the Application of it in the Word unto them, was to bring the Church Ephes. 4. 13. to a perfect Man; or that perwarning every Man, and teaching them in all Wisdom, was that he might present Col. 1. 28. every Man, that is, all Believers perfect in Christ Jesus. For in him we are compleat, Chap. 2. 10. Where though another word be used, (perfect compleat state of the Church which God designed to bring it unto in Christ. And that our Apostle useth the same word in the same sence in sundry places in this Epistle we shall see in our Progress.
Thirdly, This Perfection, may be considered two ways. (1.) As to its absolute compleatness in its final Issue. This the Apostle denies that he himself had as yet attained, Phil. 3. 12. Not as though I had already attained, or received,
or were already made perfect, which could not be without attaining the Resurrection of the Dead, ver. 11. though the substance be so already in the Saints departed; whence he calls them the Spirits of Just Men, Heb. 12. 23. made perfect. And this he calls absolutely Cor. 13. 10. That which is perfect; or that state of absolute Perfection which we shall enjoy in Heaven
(2.) It may be considered as to its initial state in this World, expressed in the Testimonies before recited: and this is that which we enquire after. And the Lord Christ, as the sole procurer of this state, is said to be Consummator, the Perfecter, the
This is that, whatever it be, (which we shall immediately enquire into) that
Levitical Priesthood, and afterwards unto the Law, as that which they could not effect. They could not by their utmost Efficacy, nor by the strictest Attendance unto them, bring the Church into that state of Perfection, which God had designed for it in this World, and without which the Glory of his Grace had not been demonstrated.
4. The Chief thing before us therefore is to enquire, What this state of Perfection is, wherein it doth consist, and what is required unto the Constitution of it; and in the whole to shew that it could not be by the
1. The first thing constituting this Gospel-state of Perfection, is Righteousness. The Introduction of all Imperfection and weakness in the Church was by sin. This made the Law weak, Rom. 8. 3. and Sinners to be without strength, Rom. 5. 7. VVherefore the Reduction of Perfection must in the first place be by Righteousness. This was the great Fundamental Promise of the times of the New Testament, Isa. 60. 21. Psal. 72. 7. Psal. 85. 10, 11. And this was to be brought in by Christ alone. VVherefore one Name whereby he was Promised unto the Church, was, The Lord our Righteousness, Jer. 23 6. Righteousness of our own we had none, nor could any thing in the whole Creation supply us with the least of its Concerns, with any thing that belongs thereunto: Yet without it must we perish for ever. VVherefore Jehovah himself becomes our Righteousness, that we might say, In Jehovah have we Righteousness and Strength, and that in him all the Seed of Israel might be Justified and Glory, Isa. 45. 25. For by him are all that Believe Justified from all things, from which they could not be Justified by the Law of Moses, Acts 13 39. To this end he brought in Everlasting Righteousness, Dan. 9. 24. Temporary Righteousness suited unto the Age of the Church under the Old Covenant, which is often said to be Everlasting in a limited sence; but that which was for all Ages to make the Church Blessed unto Eternity. So is he made unto us of God Righteousness, 1 Cor. 1. 30.
This is the Foundation of the Gospel Perfection; and it was prohave Redemption through his Blood, even the Forgiveness of Sins, Ephes. 1. 7. God having set him forth to be a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood to declare his Righteousness for the forgiveness of sins. And this he is in Opposition unto whatever the Law could effect, taking away that Condemnation which issued from a Conjunction of Sin and the Law. For what the Law could not do in that it was weak through the Flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful Flesh, and for sin, Condemned sin in the Flesh, that the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us, Rom. 8. 3, 4. The end of the Law in the first place, was to be a means and Instrument of Righteousness unto those to whom it was given. But after the entrance of sin it became
It may be said that Believers had this Righteousness under the Levitical Priesthood, or they could not have had a good Report through Faith, namely, this Testimony, That they pleased God.
Answ. 1. Our Apostle doth not deny it, yea, he proves it at large by maniChap. 11. that they had it. Only he denies that they had it by virLevitical Priesthood, or any Duties of the Law. He speaks not of the thing it self, with respect unto the Persons of Believers under the Old Testament, but of the cause and means of it. What they had of this kind was by virtue of another Priesthood, which therefore was to be introduced; and the other, which could not effect it, was therefore to be removed. He denies not Persection unto Persons under the Levitical Priesthood, but denies that they were made Partakers of it thereby.
2. They had this Righteousness really and as to the Benefits of it, but had it not in that Clearness and Evidence of its Nature, Cause, and Effects, as it is now reperfect state of the Gospel, consists in a clear Apprehension, that Christ is, and how he is our Righteousness, whereon the main of our present Comforts do depend. The great Enquiry of the Souls of Men is how they may have a Righteousness before God. And the clear discovery of the causes of it, of the way and manner how we are made partakers of it, is a great part of the Perfection of the Gospel
3. It was so obscurely represented unto them, as that the Law arose up in a comlooked for Righteousness as it were by the works of the Law, Rom. 9. 32. and on this Rock of Offence, this stumbling-stone, they Shipwracked their Eternal Conver. 32, 33. For whilst they went about to establish their own Righteousness, they submitted not unto the Righteousness of God, Rom. 10. 3. And we may easily apprehend how great a snare this proved unto them. For there is in corrupted Nature such an Opposition and Enmity unto this Righteousness of God in Christ, and the dictates of the Law are so riveted in the Minds of Men by Nature, that now after the full and clear Declaration of it in the Gospel, Men are shifting a thousand ways to set up a Righteousness of their own in the room of it. How strong then must the same Inclination be in them, who had nothing but the Law to Guide them, wherein this Righteousness was wrapt up under many Veils and Coverings. Here therefore at the last, the Body of the People lost themselves, and continue unto this day under the Curse of that Law, which they hoped would Justifie and Save them.
2. Peace is the next thing that belongs unto this Gospel-state of Perfection. The Kingdom of God is Peace, Rom. 14. 17. To lay the Foundation of this Kingdom, the Lord Christ both made peace, and Preached peace, or declared the Nature of the Peace he had made, tendring and communicating of it unto us, Ephes 2. 14, 17. And this Peace of Evangelical Consummation is three-fold. (1.) With God. (2) Between Jews and Gentiles. (3.
1. It is Peace with God. This is the first Effect and Fruit of the Righteousness before mentioned, Isa. 32. 17. For being Justified by Faith we have Peace with God, Rom. 5. 1. And hereon depends our Peace in the whole Creation above and bePeace with God and the whole Creation. All things in the Creation were at odds, jarring and interfering continually, upon the entrance of sin. For an Enmity thereby being introduced between God and Man, it extended it self unto all other Creatures that
Vanity and Bondage which they groan under, and as it were, look out for a Deliverance from, Rom. 8. 20, 21, 22, 23. But in this Gospel-state God designs a Reconciliation of all things, or a reduction of them into their proper Order. For he purposed in himself that in the Dispensation of the fulness of times, he would gather together in One all things in Christ, both which are in Heaven, and which are on Earth, even in him, Ephes. 1. 9, 10. The Seasons, with respect unto his own Works and the Revelation of his mind and will unto Men. See Our Exposition on Chap. 1. ver. 1. Every one of these Parts or Seasons had its particular Dispensation. But there was a a certain time or season, wherein all the rest that were past before, should have their Complement and Perfection. And this Season had its especial Dispensation also. And this was the Peace-making and Reconciliation of all things, by gathering up the scattered, divided, jar
Answ. (1.) Peace is made for all that Believe. (2.) The way of attaining it is laid open unto them, Isa. 27. 5. (3.) Patient abiding in Faith will in due time bring them into this Peace. (4.) It is one thing to have Peace with God, which all Beconstant sense and comfort of it in their own Souls, which they may want for a Season. Secondly, some say, they are so far from finding Peace with the whole Creation, that on all accounts they meet with great Enmities in the World. Answ. (1.) It is not said that Peace is made for us with Satan or the World, the Serpent and his Seed. This belongs not unto this Perfection. (2.) Whatever troubles we may have with other things, yet in the Issue, they shall all work together for our Good, which is sufficient to constitute a state of Peace.
This part of the Perfection of the Church could not be attained by the Levitical Priesthood. For two things belonged thereunto. (1.) That Peace be actually made. (2.) That it be fully declared. So the Apostle expresseth it as it was effected by Christ, Ephes. 2. 14. He is our Peace; and that (1.) By making Peace, he made Peace, ver. 15, 16. (2.) By declaring it, ver. 17. He came and Preached Peace. Neither of these could be done by the Levitical Priesthood. Not the first, it could not make Peace, because it could not bring in Righteousness, which is the Cause and FounIsa. 32. 17. Rom. 5. 1. Not the second, it could not declare or preach this Peace. For the giving of the Law, with all Tokens of Dread and Severity, with the Curse annexed unto it, was directly contrary hereunto. This therefore was brought in by this better Priesthood alone.
Jews and Gentiles belongs unto this state. For God designed not the erecting of his Kingdom amongst one Party or sort of Mankind. That it should be otherwise, that the Gentiles should become the Children of Abraham, and be made Heirs of the Promise, was a great Mystery under the Old Testament, Ephes. 3. 4, 5, 6. And we know how slow the Disciples of Christ himself were in the receiving and understanding hereof. But evident it is, that this was God's design from the giving of the first Promise, and we see now in the light of the Gospel that he gave many intimations of it unto the Church of Old, with respect whereunto the Veil abideth on the minds of the Jews unto this day. Wherefore without this Peace also, the perfect state of the Church aimed at could not be atLivitical Priesthood and Law. For they were indeed the principal Occasion of the Distance between them, and the means of the continuance of their Disagreement. And that which the Jews thought to have been the principal Advantage and Priviledge of Abraham in his Posterity, was that which whilst it continued, kept him from the actual Possession of his greatest Glory in
It will be said that we yet see a variance between Jews and Gentiles continued all the World over; and they are in all places mutually an Abomination unto each other. And it is true it is so, and is likely so to continue. For there is no Remedy that can be so effectual to heal a Distemper, or make up a Fracture, as that it will work its Cure without Use or Application.
The Gospel is not at all concerned in what state and condition Men are who reject it, and
3. Peace among our selves, that is, among Believers, doth also belong hereunto. There was Peace and Brotherly Love required under the Law. But no Duty rePurchase of it by the Blood of Christ, his Prayer for it, the new Motives added unto it, the communication of it as the Legacy of Christ among his Disciples, with the especial Ends and Duties of it, do constitute it a part of the perfect state of the Church under the Gospel.
is Spiritual Light and Knowledge, with respect unto the Mysteries of the Wisdome and Grace of God. God had designed for the Church a Measure of Spiritual light and knowJer. 31. 34. whose Accomplishment is declared, 1 John 2. 27. And there are three things which concur unto the Constitution of this Priviledge.
1. The Principal Revealer of the mind and will of God. Under the Law God made use of the Ministry of Men unto this purpose, as of Moses, and the Prophets. And he employed also, both in the Erection of the Church-state, and in sundry particulars afterwards the Ministry of Angels, as our Apostle declares, Chap. 2. 2. And in some sence that state was thereby put in Subjection unto Angels, ver. 5. But this Ministry, the Dispensation of light and knowledge thereby, could not render it compleat; yea, it was an Argument of the Darkness and Bondage under which it was. For there was yet one greater than they all, and above them all, one more intimately acquainted with God and all the Counsels of his will, by whom he would speak forth his mind, Deut. 18. 18, 19. This was the Son of God himself, withimmediate Ministry the consummation of the Church-state could not be attained. This consideration our Apostle insists upon at large in the first Chapter and the beginning of the second, concluding from thence the Preeminence of the Evangelioutward Priviledge that the Church is capable of, and eminently concurs unto its PerArguments unto the necessity of our Obedience, above what they were urged withal. See Chap. 2. 2, 3. Chap. 12. 25. And this full Revelation of his Counsels by the Ministry of his Son, God did reserve partly that he might have a Preeminence in all things, and partly because none other either did or could comprehend the Mysteries of it as it was now to be Revealed. See John 1. 18.
2. The matter or things themselves revealed. There was under the Levitical Priesthood a shadow of good things to come, but no perfect Image or compleat deliChap. 10. 1. They had the first Promise, and the enlargements of it unto Abraham and David. Sundry Expositions were also added unto them, relating unto the manner of their Accomplishment. And many Intimations were given of the Grace of God thereby. But all this was done so darkly, so obscurely, so wrapped up in Types, Shadows, Figures, and Allegories, as that no Perfection of light or knowledge was to be obtained. The Mystery of them continued still hid in God, Ephes. 3. 9. Hence are the Doctrines concerning them called Parables and dark Sayings, Psal. 78. 2. Neither did the Prophets themselves see into the depth of their own Predictions, 1 Pet. 1. 11, 12. Hence the Believing Church waited with earnest expectation, until the day should break, and the shadows should flee away, Cant. 2. 17. Chap. 4. 6. They longed for the breaking forth of that gloWord of Prophecy, which was as the light of a Candle unto them shining in a dark place. They lived on that great Promise, Mal. 4. 2. They expected Righto see the things of the Gospel, and saw them not, Mat. 13. 17. Luke 10. 24. And therefore John the Baptist, who was greater than any of the Prophets because he saw and owned the Son of God as come in the Flesh, which they desired to see, and saw not; yet living and dying under the Levitical Priesthood, not seeing Life and Immortality brought to light by the the Gospel, the least in the Kingdom of God is greater than he in Spiritual knowperfect state of the Church, that there should be a full and plain Revelation and Declaration made of the whole Counsel of God, of the Mystery of his Will and Grace, as the end of those things which were to be done away. And this is done in the Gospel under that New Priesthood which was to be introduced. Nor without this Priesthood could it be so made. For the principal part of the Mystery of God depends on, consists in the
Gospel-perfection. This the Apostle disputes at large, 2 Cor. 3. from ver. 7. to the end of the Chapter.
3. The inward Spiritual Light of the minds of Believers enabling them to discern the mind of God, and the Mysteries of his Will as revealed, doth also belong unto this part of the Perfection of the Gospel Church-state. This was promised under the Old Testament, Isa. 11. 9. Chap. 54. 13. Jer. 31. 34. And although it was enjoyed by the Saints of Old, yet was it so in a very small measure and low degree, in comparison of what it is now after the plentiful Effusion of the Spirit. See 1 Cor. 2. 11, 12. This is that which is prayed for, Ephes. 1. 17, 18, 19. Chap 3. 18, 19. VVherefore this Head of the Perfection intended consists in three things. (1.) The Personal Ministry of Christ in the Preaching of the GosDispensation or Mission of the Holy Ghost to reveal and fully make known the same Mystery by the Apostles and Prophets of the New Testament, Ephes. 3. 5. (3.) In the Effectual Illumination of the Minds of them that do Believe, enaPet. 2. 9. Ephes. 3. 17, 18, 19. Chap. 5. 8.
Fourthly, There belongs unto this Perfection that Liberty and Boldness which Believers have in their Approaches unto God. This is frequently men
1. From the Dreadful manner of giving the Law. This filled the whole PeoAbba Father, Rom. 8. 16. Gal 4 6. They have the Liberty and Boldness to draw nigh unto God, and to call him Father. But there was such an Administration of a Spirit of Dread and Terror in the giving of the Law, as that the People were not able to bear the Approaches of God unto them, nor the thought of an Access unto him. And therefore they desired that all things for the future might be Transacted by an Internuncius, one that might go between God and them whilst they kept at their distance, Deut. 5. 23, 24, 25, 26, 27. VVhen any first hear the Law, they are afraid of God, and desire nothing more than not to come near him. They would be saved by a distance from him. VVhen any first hear the Gospel, that is, so as to believe it, their Hearts are opened with Love to God, and all their desire is, to be near unto him, to draw nigh unto his Throne. Hence it is called the Joyful sound. Nothing can be more opSpirit of Fear and Dread thus first given out in the giving of the Law, was communicated unto them in all their GeneraLevitical Priesthood continued. For as there was nothing to reChap. 12. 18, 19, 20, 21.
2. It arose from the Revelation of the Sanction of the Law in the Curse. Hereby principally the Law gendered unto Bondage, Gal. 4. 25. For all the People were in some sence put under the Curse; namely, so far as they would seek for Righteousness by the Works of the Law. So saith our Apostle,
3. Under the Levitical Priesthood, even their Holy Worship was so appointed and Ordered, as to keep them partly in Fear, and partly at a Distance from the PreMultiplication of their Sacrifices, one day after anoChap. 10. 1. The Law, saith he, could never by those Sacrifices which they Offered, Year by Year continually,
4. God had designed the whole Dispensation of the Law under that Priesthood unto this very End, that it should give the People neither Rest nor Liberty, but press and urge them to be looking after their full Relief in the Promised Seed, Gal. 4. 1, 2. Chap. 3. 24. It pressed them with a sense of sin, with a Yoke of Ceremonious ObHand-writing of Ordinances which was against them, Col. 2. 14. It urged their Consciences not to seek after Rest in or by that state. Here could be no Perfection, because there could be no Liberty. The Boldness we speak of, is opposed unto all these causes of Bondage and Fear. It was not the Design of God always to keep the Church in a state of Non-age, and under School-Masiers; he had appointed to set it at Liberty in the fulness of time, to take his Children nearer unto him, to give them greater Evidences of his Love, greater Assurances of the Eternal Inheritance, and the use of more Liberty and Boldness in his Presence. But what this freedom of Spirit, what liberty of Speech, what Right of Access, and Boldness of Approach unto God, Built upon the removal of the Law, the communication of the Spirit, the way made into the Holyest by the Blood of Christ, with other concernments of it, Constitutive of Gospel-perfection, I have already in part declared in Our Exposition on Chap. 3. ver. 5. and must, if God please, yet more largely insist upon it, on Chap. 10th. so that I shall not here further speak un
5. A clear fore-sight into a Blessed estate of Immortality and Glory, with unquestiConsummation. Death was Originally threatned as the final End and Issue of sin. And the Evidence hereof was received under the
1. He himself died as our High Priest. He entred into the devouring Jaws of Death, and that as it was threatned in the Curse. And now is the Trial to be made. If he who thus ventured on Death as threatned in the Curse, and that for us, be swallowed up by it, or detained by its Power and Pains, there is a certain end of all our Hopes. Whatever we may arrive unto in this World, Death will convey us over into eternal Ruine. But if he brake through its Power, have the pains of it removed from him, do swallow it up into Victory, and rise Triumphantly into Immortality and Glory, then is our entrance into them also even by and after Death secured. And in the Resurrection of Christ the Church had the first unqueLevitical Priesthood. But hereby was the Veil rent from top to bottom, and the most Holy place not made with hands laid open unto Believers. See Isa. 25. 7, 8.
2. As by his Death, Resurrection, and entrance into Glory He gave a Pledge, Example, and Evidence unto the Church of that in his own Person, which he had designed for it; so the Grounds of it were laid in the Expiatory Sacrifice which he Offered, whereby he took away the Curse from Death: There was such a close Conjunction between Death and the Curse, such a Combination between Sin, the Law, and Death, that the breaking of that Conjunction, and the dissolving of that Combination was the greatest Effect of Divine Wisdom and Grace, which our ACor. 15. 54, 55, 56, 57. This could no otherwise be brought about, but by his being made a Curse in Death, or bearing the Curse which was in Death, in our stead, Gal. 3. 13.
3. He hath clearly declared unto the utmost of our Capacities in this World that future state of Blessedness and Glory, which he will lead all his Disciples into. All the concernments hereof under the Levitical Priesthood, were represented onEarthly things. But he hath abolished Death, and brought Life and Immortality to light through the Gospel, 2 Tim. 1. 10. He destroyed and abolished him who had the Power of Death, in taking away the Curse from it, Chap. 2. 14. And he abolished Death it self in the removal of those dark shades which it cast on Immortality and Eternal Life; and hath opened an abundant entrance into the Kingdom of God and Glory. He hath unveiled the unconsummate state of the Church which God designed, and which the Levitical Priesthood could no way effect.
6 There is also an especial Joy belonging unto this state. For this Kingdom of God is Righteousness, and Peace, and Joy in the Holy Ghost. Neither was this atLevitical Priesthood. Indeed many of the Saints of the Old TestaRejoyce in the Lord, and had the Joy of his Salvation abiding with
them. See Psal. 51. 12. Isa. 25. 9. Hab. 3. 17, 18. But they had it not by virtue of the Levitical Priesthood. Isaiah tells us that the ground of it was the swallowing up of Death in Victory, ver. 8. which was no otherwise to be done, but by the Death and Resurrection of Christ. It was by an Influence of Efficacy from the Priesthood that was to be introduced, that they had their Joy: Whence Abraham saw the Day of Christ, and Rejoyced to see it. The Prospect of the Day of Christ was the sole Foundation of all their Spiritual Joy, that was purely so. But as unto their own present state, they were allowed and called to Rejoyce in the abundance of Temporal things; though the Psalmist in a Spirit of Prophecy, prefers the Joy arising from the light of God's Countenance in Christ, above all of that sort, Psal. 4 6, 7. But ordinarily their Joy was mixed and allayed with a respect unto Temporal things. See
7. Confidence and Glorying in the Lord is also a part of this Perfection. This is the Flowring, or the Effect and Fruit of Joy; a readiness unto, and the way whereall Boasting, all Glorying in any thing of self in Religion, Rom. 3. 27. It is by the Gospel and the Law of Faith therein that Men are taught not to boast or glory, neither in outPhil. 3. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Rom. 3. 27, 28. Chap. 4. 2. What then, is there no Glorying left us in the Profession of the Gospel, no Triumph, no Exultation of Spirit, but we must always be sad and cast down, at best stand but on even terms with our Oppositions, and never reGlorying introduced, than the Heart of Man on any other Account is capable of. But God hath so Ordered all things now, that no Flesh should Glory in his Presence, but that he who gloryeth, should glory in the Lord, 1 Cor. 1. 29, 31. And what is the Reason or Foundation hereof? It is this alone, That we are in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us Wisdom, and Righteousness, and Sanctification, and Redemption, ver. 30. So it was promised of Old; that in the Lord, that is, the Lord our Righteousness, all the Seed of Israel should be Justified and Glory, Isa. 45. 25. This is that Chap. 3. 6, 14. whither the Reader is referIt is that Triumphant Exultation of Spirit which ariseth in Believers, from their absolute proferring their Interest in Heavenly things above things present, so as to contemn and despise whatever is contrary thereunto, however tendred in a way of Allurement or Rage.
In these things and others of the like Nature and Kind, consists that Consummation of the state of the Church as to the Persons of the Worshippers, which the Apostle denies to have been attainable by or under the Levitical Priesthood. The Arguments wherewith he confirms his Assertion ensue in the Verses follow
Observ. 1. An Interest in the Gospel consisteth not in an outward Profession of it, but in a real participation of those things wherein the Perfection of its state doth consist. Men may have a form of Godliness, and be utter strangers to the Power of it. MulExperience in themselves of the real Benefits and Advantages wherewith it is accompanied. All that they obtain hereby is but to deceive their Souls into eteranother World they shall obtain Rest and Blessedness and Glory by it. But the Gospel will do nothing for them hereafter in things Eternal, who are not here Partakers of its Power and Fruits in things Spiritual.
Observ. 2. The Preeminence of the Gospel-state above the Legal is Spiritual and undiscernable unto a Carnal Eye. For (1.) It is evident that the Principal Design of the Apostle in all these Discourses is, to prove the Excellency of the state of the Church under the New Testament, in its Faith, Liberty, and Worship, above that of the Church under the Old. And (2.) That he doth not in any of them produce instances of outward Pomp, Ceremonies, or visible Glory, in the conCor. 3. He expressely compares those two Administrations of the Law and the Gospel as unto their Excellency and Glory. And first, he acknowledgeth that the Administration of the law, in the Institution and Celebration of it, was glorious, v. 9, 10, 11. But withal he adds, that it had no Glory in comparison with that under the New Testament, which doth far excel it. Wherein then doth this Glory consist? He tells us it doth so in this, in that it is the Administration of the Spirit, ver. 8. How shall not the Administration of the Spirit be rather Glorious? He doth not resolve it into outward Order, the Beauty and Pomp of Ceremonies and OrdiPerfection we have treated of was effected by the Gospel, and could not be so by the Levitical Priesthood and the whole Law of Commandments contained in Ordinances. In these Spiritual things therefore are we to seek after the glory of the Gospel, and its Preeminence above the Law. And those who suppose they render the Dispensa
Secondly, This Worship of the Gospel as well as the Persons of the Worshippers, and the Grace whereof they are made Partakers. God had designed the Church unto a more perfect state in point of Worship, than it was capable of under the Levitical Priesthood. Nor indeed could any Man reacompleat ultimate Worship and Service that he would require or appoint in this VVorld, seeing our Natures, as renewed by Grace, are capable of that which is more Spiritual and Sublime. For,
1. They were in their Nature Carnal, as our Apostle declares, ver. 16. and Chap. 9. 10. The Subject of them all, the means of their Celebration were Carnal things, beneath those pure Spiritual Acts of the Mind and Soul, which are of a more Noble Nature. They consisted in
2. What by their Number, and what by their Nature, and the manner of exa Yoke which the People were never able to bear with any Joy or Satisfaction, Acts 15. 10. And this Yoke lay partly in the first place on their Consciences or the inner Man. And it consisted principally in two things. (1.) The multitude of Ceremonies and Institutions did perplex them, and gave them no rest. Seeing which way soever they turned themselves one Precept or other, positive or negative, touch not, taste not, handle not, was upon them. (2.) The Veil that was on them, as to their Use, Meaning, and End, increased the trouble of this Yoke. They could not see unto the End of the things that were to be done away, because of the veil, nor could apprehend fully the Reason of what they did. And it may be easily conceived how great a Yoke it was to be bound unto the strict Observation of such Rites and Ceremonies in Worship; yea, that the whole of their VVorship should consist in such things, as those who made use of them did not understand the End and Meaning of them. And (2.) It lay on their Persons from the manner of their Imposition; as they were tyed up unto Days, Times, and Hours, so their Transgression or Disobedience made them obevery Transgression and Disobedience received a just Recompence of Reward, Chap. 2. 2. For he that despised Moses Law died without Mercy, Chap. 10. 28. which they complained of,
3. Their Instructive Efficacy, which is the Principal End of the Ordinances of Divine VVorship was weak, and no way answered the Power and Evidence of Gospel-Institutions, Chap. 10. 1. Therefore was the way of Teaching by them intricate, and the way of Learning difficult. Hence is that difference which is put between the Teachings under the Old Testament and the New. For now it is Proshall not teach every Man his Brother, and every Man his Neighbour, saying, know the Lord, as it was of Old. The means of Instruction were so dark and cloudy, and having only a shadow of the things themselves that were to be taught, and not the very Image of them, that it was needful that they should be continually incalcated to keep up the knowledge of the very Rudiments of Religion. Besides, they had many Ordinances, Rites, and Ceremonies imposed on them to increase their Yoke, whereof they understood nothing but only that it was the Soveraign pleasure and will of God, that they should Observe them, though they understood not of what Use they were: And they were Obliged unto no less an exact Obser
The best Direction they had from them and by them was, that indeed there was nothing in them, that is, in their Nature or proper Efficacy, to produce or procure those good things which they looked for through them, but only pointed unto what was to come. VVherefore they knew that although they Exercised themselves in them with Diligence all their Days, yet by virtue of them they could never attain what they aimed at; only there was something signified by them, and
increased their Bondage. God indeed by his Grace did influence the Minds of true Belie
Nor could any Relief be given in this state unto the Minds or Consciences of Men by the Levitical Priesthood. For it was it self the principal cause of all these Burdens and Grievances, in that the Administration of all Sacred things was com
The Apostle takes it here for granted, that God designed a state of Perfection unto the Church; and that as unto its Worship as well as unto its Faith and Obedience. We find by the Event that it answered not the Divine VVisdom and Goodness to bind up the Church during its whole Sojourning in this VVorld, unto a VVorship so Carnal, Burdensome, so imperfect, so unsuited to express his Grace and Kindness towards it, or its sense thereof. And who can but pity the woeful condition of the present Jews, who can conceive of no greater Blessedness than the Restauration of this burdensome Service. So true is it what the Apostle says, the Vail is upon them unto this present day, yea, Blindness is on their minds that they can see no Beauty but only in things Carnal, and like their fore-fathers who preferred the Bondage of Egypt because of their Flesh-pots, before all the LiCanaan; so do they their old Bondage-state, because of some Temporal Advantages it was attended withal, before the glorious Liberty of the Sons of God.
In Opposition hereunto there is a worship under the Gospel which hath such ProPerfection. By Gospel-worship, I underInternal Glory and Dignity of this Worship must be reChap. 10. 19, 20, 21, 22. Here I shall only mention some few things, wherein its Excellency consists in opposition unto the defects of that under the Law, on the account whereof it is Constitutive of that Evangelical Perfection whereof we treat.
1. It is Spiritual, which is the Subject of the Apostle's Discourse, 2 Cor. 3. 6, 7, 8, 9, &c. And it is so on a two-fold Account. (1.) In that it is suited unto the Nature of God, so as that thereby he is glorified as God. For God is a Spirit, and will be Worshipped in Spirit, which our Saviour asserts to belong unto the GosJohn 4. 21, 22, 23. So is it opposed unto the old Worship as it was Carnal. It was that which in and by it self, answered not the Nature of God, though Commanded for a Season. See Psal. 50. ver. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14. (2.) Because it is performed meerly by the Aids, Supplies, and Assistances of the Spirit, as it hath been at large proved elsewhere.
2. It is easie and gentle in opposition unto the Burden and insupportable Yoke of the Old Institutions and Ordinances. That so are all the Commands of Christ unTake my Yoke upon you, saith he, and learn of me, for I am meek and lowly in Heart, and ye shall find Rest unto your Souls; for my Yoke is easie, and my Burden is light, Mat. 11. 29, 30. So the Apostle tells us, that his Commandments are not grievous, 1 John 5. 3. But yet concerning this Ease of Gospel-worship, some things must be observed.
1. As to the Persons unto whom it is so easie and pleasant; and it is so only unto them, who being weary and heavy laden do come unto Christ, that they may have Rest, and do learn of him; that is, unto convinced, humbled, converted Sinners that do Believe in him. Unto all other who on meer Convictions, or by other means do take it upon them, it proves an insupportable Burden, and that which
Professing the Christian Religion, are quickly weary of Evangelical worship, and do find out endless Inventions of their own, wherewith they are better satisfied in their Divine Services. Therefore have they multiplyed Ceremonies, fond SuperChurch of Rome. And the Reason hereof is, that Enmity which is in their Minds against the Spiritual things represented and exhibited in that VVorship. For there being so near an Alliance between those things and this VVorship, they that hate the one, cannot but despise the other. Men of unspiritual Minds cannot delight in Spiritual VVorship. It is therefore
2. Easie unto Believers, on the Account of that Principle wherewith they are acted in all Divine things. This is the New Nature, or New Creature in them, wheredelight in all Spiritual things in the inner Man, because they are cognate and suitable thereunto. Weariness may be upon the Flesh, but the Spirit will be willing. For as the Principle of Corrupted Nature goeth out with delight and vehemency unto Objects that are unto its Satisfaction, and unto all the means of its Conjunction unto them and Union with them; so the PrinDelight and Fervency un
3. The constant Aid they have in and for its performance if they be not wantIsa. 59. 21. and he helpeth and assisteth in all the worship of it, as was intimated before.
4. The Benefit which they receive by it renders it easie and pleasant unto them. For all the Ordinances of Evangelical-worship are of that Nature, and appointed of God unto that End, so as to excite, increase, and strengthen Grace in the worshipWorship they thrive in both parts of their Interest, it cannot but be pleasant unto them.
5. The Outward Rites of it are few, lightsome, easie to be observed, without scrupulous tormenting fears, nor such as by attendance unto Bodily Services do divert the Mind from that Communion with God which they are a means of.
Thirdly, It is Instructive, and that with clearness and evidence of the things which we are to know and learn. This was a great part of the Imperfection of Legal Institutions, that they taught the things which they signified and represented Obscurely, and the Mind of God in them was not learned but with much difficulty, no small part of their Obedience consisting in a resignation of their Understandings unto God's Soveraignty, as to the Use and the End of the things wherein they were exercised in his Worship. But all the Ordinances and Institutions of the Gospel do give light into, and exhibit the things themselves unto the Minds and Faith of Believers. Hereon they discern the Reasons and Grounds of their Use and Benefit; whence our whole Worship is called our Reasonable Service, Rom. 12. 1. Thus in the Preaching of the Word, Jesus Christ is evidently set forth Crucified among us, Gal. 3. 1. not darkly represented in Types and Shadows. And in the Sacrament of the Supper we do plainly shew forth his Death untill he comes, 1 Cor. 11. 26. And the like may be said of all other Evangelical Institutions. And the principal Reason hereof is, because they do not represent or shadow things to come, no, nor yet things absent, as did those of Old; but they really present and exhibit Spiritual things, Christ and the Benefits of his Mediation unto our Souls. And in the observance of them we are not kept at a distance, but have an Admission unto the Holy place not made with hands, because Christ, who is the Minister of
in them and by them really present unto the Souls of BeRelation unto Christ as our High Priest, and our Access in it unto the Holy place the Throne of Grace, must be spoken unto at large elsewhere.
This is a brief Declaration of that Perfection, which the Apostle denies to have been attainable by the Levitical Priesthood. And the grounds of his Denial he gives us in the remaining words of the Text, which we shall also consi
To look for Glory in Evangelical Worship from outward Ceremonies and Carnal Ordinances, is to prefer the Levitical
Having denyed Perfection unto the Levitical Priesthood, which he lays down in a Supposition including a Negation, so as to make way for the Proof of what he denyed; for the further Explication of it, and Application unto his present purLaw, intending thereby to bring the Law it self under the same censure of disability and insufficiency.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
1. The Subject spoken of is People, that is in the Wilderness, the Moses. But after this the whole Posterity of Abraham in their successive Generations were one People, with them, and are so esteemed. For a People is still the same, and as a People never dies till all Individuals that belong unto it are cut off. So by this People the whole Church of all Ages under the Old Testament is intended.
2. Of this People he says, they were Legalized. They were also Evangelized, as our Apostle speaks, Chap. 4. 2. They were so in the Promise
Abraham, and in the many Types of Christ and his Offices and Sacrifice that were instituted among them. Yet were they at the same time so brought unPower of the Law, as that they had not the Light, Liberty, and Comfort of the Gospel, which we enjoy. legem ferre, legem sancire, legem imponere; to
This is said to be done, under it; that is Priesthood.
The Introduction of this clause by the Particle Interpretation of the words. (1.) It may be used in a way of
There yet remains one Difficulty in the words. For the People are said to receive the Law under the Levitical
Obs. Put all Advantages and Priviledges whatever together, and they will bring nothing to Perfection without Jesus Christ. God manifested this in all his Revelations and
The last thing considerable in these words is the Reason whereby the Apostle proves, That in the Judgment of the Holy Ghost himself Perfection was not attainable by the Levitical
The Reason in these words is plain and obvious. For after the Institution of that Priesthood, and after the Execution of it in its greatest Glory, Splendour, and EffiDavid, of another Priest, of another OrPerfection was not attainable by that which was already instituted and executed. For it was a Perfection that God aimed to bring his Church unto, or the most Perfect state in Righ
That another Priest,
A Priest of another sort. Not only a Priest who individually was not yet exhibited, but one of another Stock, and Order. A the Tribe of Levi, nor of the Order of Aaron, as is af
to arise; that is, to be called, exalted; to stand up in the Execution of that Office. To rise up, or to be raised up, is used indefinitely concerning any one to raise up Pharaoh to shew his Power in him, that he might Magnifie his Glorious Power in his Punishment and Destruction, Exod. 9. 16. Rom. 9. 17. In a good sence with respect unto the Call of God, it is used by Deborah, Judg. 5. 7.
And this Priest was thus to arise after the Order of Melchisedec. So it is exPsalms. And here the Apostle takes in the consideration of what he had before Discoursed, concerning the Greatness of Melchisedec. For he designed not only to prove the thing it self, which is sufficiently done in the TestiPsalmist; but also to Evidence the Advantage and Benefit of the Church by this change. And hereunto the consideration of the Greatness of Melchisedec was singularly subservient, as manifesting the Excellency of that Priesthood by whom the Righteousness of the Church and its VVorship was to be consum
Lastly, The Apostle adds negatively of this other Priest who was to rise by ReaLevitical Priesthood which could not Perfect the state of the Church, that he was not to be Called after the Order of Aaron.
Aaron, that is in the Psalm where the rising of this Priest is declared and fore-told; there denominated a Priest after the Order of Melchisedec, and noAaron.
external denomination, not an internal Call. It is not the same with
And this is the first Argument whereby the Apostle confirms his principal De
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Mutato Sacerdotio; Vul. Lat. Translato. Beza. Hoc Sacerdotio; expressing the Article. Syr. Yea, even as a change was made in the Priesthood, so a change was made also in the Law, not to the mind of the Apostle; Aethiop. If their Law so passed away, their Priesthood shall pass away; more out of the way than the other.
For the Priesthood being changed, there is made of Necessity a change of the Law.
IN this Verse the Apostle Evidently Declares what he intended by the Law in that foregoing, which the People received under the Levitical Priesthood. It was the whole Law of Commandments contained in Ordinances, or the whole Law of Moses so far as it was the Rule of Worship and Obedience unto the Church. For that Law it is, that followeth the Fates of the Priesthood.
And herein lyeth the stress and moment of the Controversie which the Apostle then had with the Jews, and which we have at this day with their Unbelieving PoLaw of Moses was to be eternal absoPreaching of the Gospel, that which most proJews, was that there was inferred thereby a cessation and taking away of Mosaical Institutions. This was that which enraged them, unto the Blood of
Stephen under pretence he had said that Jesus of Nazareth should destroy the Customs which Moses delivered, Acts 6. 14. And this also provoked their Rage against our Apostle, Acts 21. 28. Yea, the most of them who were Conobstinate in this Perswasion, That the Law of Moses was yet to continue in force, Acts 20. 21. And with this OpiGentiles, as hath been at large elsewhere declared. This matter therefore which the Apostle now entreth upon, was to be managed with care and diligence.
This he enters upon in this Verse, being a Transition from one point unto anoExcellency of the Priesthood of Christ, above that of the Law, manifested in the Representation made of it by Melchisedec. In the pursuit of his Argument unto that purpose, he proves that the
Herein therefore lay the Principal Design of the Apostle in this whole Epistle. For the Law may be looked on under a double consideration. (1.) As unto what the Jews in that degenerate state of the Church obstinately looked for from it. (2.) As unto what it did really require of them, whilst it stood in force and power. And under both these Considerations it was utterly inconsistent with the Gospel. The Jews at that time expected no less from it, than Expiation of Sin by its Sacrifices, and Justification by the works of it. It is true, they looked for these things by it unjustly, seeing it promised no such thing, nor was ever ordained unto any such purpose; but yet these things they looked for, and were resolved so to do, until the Law should be removed out of the way. And it is evident how inconsistent this is with the whole work of the Mediation of Christ, which is the sum and substance of the Gospel. But suppose they looked not absolutely for Attonement and Justification by the Sacrifices and VVorks of the Law, yet the continuance of their observance was repugnant unto the Gospel. For the Lord Christ by the One Offering of himself, had made perfect Attonement for Sin; so that the Sacrifices of the Law could be of no more Use or Signification. And the continuance of them, wherein there was
Again, VVhereas the Lord Christ by his Obedience and Righteousness had fulfilled the Law, and was become the End of it, for Righteousness, unto them that do Believe, the seeking after Justification
And in the next place the Law may be considered as it prescribed a way of Worship in its Ordinances and Institutions, which God doth accept. This the People were indispensably obliged unto whilst the Law stood in force. But in the Gospel our Lord Jesus Christ had now appointed
VVherefore the whole Law of Moses, as given unto the Jews, whether as used or abused by them, was repugnant unto and inconsistent with the Gospel, and the Mediafor Christ and his Priesthood in the Church, nor indeed for the Discharge of his other Offices. And this opposition between the Law and the Gospel, VVorks and Grace, our own Righteousness and that of Christ, our Apostle doth not only grant, but vehemently urge in all his Epistles, allowing none to suppose that they may have both these strings unto their
One of them he is peremptory that all Mankind must betake themselves unto. Here the Jews were entangled, and knew not what to do. The greatest part of them adhered unto the Law with an utter rejection of the Gospel and the Author of it, perishing in their Unbelief. Others of them endeavoured to make a composition of these things, and retaining of Moses, they would admit of Christ and the Gospel also. And this the Holy Ghost in the Apostles did for a while bear withal. But now whereas the whole Service of the Tabernacle was of it self fallen down, and become, as Useless, so of no Force, its Obliging Power ceasing in its Accomplishment by Christ; and whereas the Time was drawing near whereinconsistency of it with the Gospel-state of the Church was now fully to be declared.
This therefore our Apostle grants, that there was such a Repugnancy between the Law and the Gospel, as unto the Ends of Righteousness and Divine Worship, as that one of them must of Necessity be parted withal. Wherefore the whole Controversie turning on this hinge, it was highly incumbent on him to manifest and prove that the Law did now cease, according unto the Appointment of God; and that God had of old designed, fore-told, and promised, that so it should do, and be abolished upon the Introduction of that which was the End and Substance of it. And this I look upon as the greatest Trial the Faith of Men ever had in the contake away, abolish, and leave as dead and useless, that whole System of Solemn Worship which he had aponly for a time, and served to introduce a more Glorious Dispensation of Divine Wisdom and Grace.
The Proof therefore of the utter Cessation of the Law the Apostle enters upon by the Invincible Argument, whose Foundation or Proposition is laid in this verse, and the especial parts of it are explained, confirmed, and vindicated in those that follow. And in his ensuing Discourse his Principal Design is to prove, That the Church is so far from being a loser or disadvantaged by this Change, as that she receiveth thereby the highest Priviledge, and greatest Blessing that in this World she is capable of.
In the words of this verse there is a Supposition of the Change of the Priesthood, as that which was proved before, and an Inference from thence unto a Necessity of the change of the Law.
The Priesthood being changed; that is, the Priesthood of Levi appointed and extranslato, mutato; so some read, transferred,
translated, some changed. The former do not reach the whole sence intended. For the Office of the Priesthood may be transferred from one Person to another, one Family unto another, yea, one Tribe unto another; and yet the Priesthood, as to the kind and nature of it, continue the same. This our Apostle afterwards menver. 13, 14. as a part of his Argument to prove the Priesthood it self to be changed. But this it doth not absolutely; seeing it is possible that the Office may be transferred from one Tribe unto another, and yet not be changed, as unto its Nature. But the Proof lies in this, That Moses in the Institution of the Priesthood made no mention of the Tribe of Judah, and therefore if that Office be transferred unto that Tribe, it must be of another kind than that before Instituted. And on this Supposition that which he intends to prove follows evidently upon the Translation of the Priesthood. For all the Sacred Services and Worship which the Law required, were so confined, or at least had that respect unto the
But yet it is not a meer transferring of the Priesthood from one Tribe unto anodisanulling or abolishing, as is affirmed, ver. 18. Such therefore must the change of the Priesthood be, and so it was. The Priesthood was changed, in that one kind of it was utterly abolished, and another introduced. So was the Levitical Priesthood changed, as that the other Priest which came with his Office in the room thereof, could not be called or said to be after the
It may therefore be enquired on what Grounds this Priesthood was to be so abolished, or how it appears that so it is, and by what means it was actually taken away.
That it was so to be abolished the Apostle proves, (1.) Because before the InMelchisedec. (2.) That the Holy Ghost had declared that the Introduction of that more Excellent Priesthood for a Season, was to prefigure and represent another Priesthood that was afterwards to be established. And this could not be that of Levi, seeing God doth not make use of that which is more Excellent, to figure or represent that which is Inferiour thereunto. Another Priesthood therefore must arise and be granted unto the Church in answer unto that Type. (3.) That it was imOrder of Melchisedec, should be consistent with that of Levi, or that it shoudl be continued after that was brought in. For (1.) He was to be of another Tribe, as he immediately proves. (2.) Because his Priesthood and Sacrifice were to be of another kind than that of Levi, which he demonstrates at large in the ensuing Chapters. (3.) Because on the other hand the Priesthood of Aaron, (1.) Could never Accomplish and Effect the true and proConsummate: And (2.) Was in its own Nature, Offices, Works, and Duties, inconsistent with any Priesthood, that was not of its own Order. It must therefore be abolished.
It may therefore be enquired, how the Priesthood was changed, or that of the House of Levi taken away. And I say as the Apostle directs, it was done by the Appointment of God. For his Introduction of another Priest when it was actually accomplished, had the force of a Repealing law. The Institution of the former was abrogated thereby, without any other Constitution. For as unto its Use, it did hence cease of it self. It had no more to do, its work was at an end, and its Services of no Advantage to the Church: For the Sign of what is to come, is set aside when the thing signified is brought in; and ceaseth to be a Sign. Yea, the continuance of it would give a Testimony against it self. And as to its Right, this new Institution of God, applyed by his own Authority unto it in its proper Season, took it away. (2.) The Application of the Authority of God in the InstiHoly Ghost, in the Revelation of the will of God by the Gospel, wherein the ceasing of it was de
1. Notwithstanding the great and many provocations of them by whom it was exercised and discharged, yet God took it not away until it had accomplished the End whereunto it was designed. Neither the wickedness of the People, nor of the Priests themselves, could provoke the Lord to revoke his Institution, until the appointed End of it was come. And it is no small part of the Blindness of the
2. That the Efficacy of all Ordinances or Institutions of Worship depends on the will of God alone. Whilst it was his will that the Priesthood should abide in the Family of Levi, it was Useful and Effectual unto all the Ends whereunto it was designed. But when he would make an Alteration therein, it was in vain for any to look for either Benefit or Advantage by it. And although we are not now to expect any change in the Institutions of Divine Worship, yet all our Expectations from them, are to be resolved into the will of God.
3. Divine Institutions cease not without an express Divine Abrogation. Where they are once granted and erected by the Authority of God, they can never cease without an express Act of the same Authority taking of them away. So was it with the Institutions of the Aaronical Priesthood, as the Apostle declares. And this one consideration is enough to confirm the grant of the initial Seal of the Copresent Seed of Believers, which was once given by God himself, in the way of an Institution, and never by him revoked.
4. God will never abrogate or take away any Institution or Ordinance of Worship unto the loss or disadvantage of the Church. He would not remove or abolish the
5. God in his Wisdom so Ordered all things, that the taking away of the Priesthood of the Law, gave it its greatest Glory. For it ceased not before it had fully and absolutely accomplished the End whereunto it was designed, which is the Glory and Perfection of any Ordinance: even the Mediation of Christ himself shall cease, when all the Ends of it are fulfilled. And this End of the Priesthood was most Glorious; namely, the bringing in that of Christ, and therein of the Eternal SalJews by their pretended Adherence unto it, are they which cast the highest dishonour upon it; for they own that it is laid aside, at least that it hath been so for 1600 Years, and yet neither the End of it effected, nor any thing brought in by it, un
The next thing considerable in these words, is the Inference which the Apostle makes from his Assertion and the Proof of it: There is made of Necessity a change also of the Law,
Of Necessity. It is not a note of the necessity of the Inference
Wherefore there is also change of the Law; that is, an Abolition of it. For it is a change of the same Nature with the change of the Priest
But moreover the Law in its Institutions was an Instructive Revelation, and taught many things concerning the Nature of Sin, its expiation and cleansing, repreRevealed will of God. And the light of the Gospel being brought unto it, we may learn things far more clearly out of it, than ever the Jews of Old could do.
And the force of the Argument here insisted on by the Apostle against the absolute perpetuity of the Law, which was of Old, and yet continueth to be the Head of the Controversie between the
1. How it is a fruit of the manifold Wisdom of God, that it was a great Mercy to give the Law, and a greater to take it away. And
2. If under the Law the whole worship of God did so depend on the Priesthood, that that failing or being taken away, the whole worship of it self was to cease, as being no more acceptable before God; how much more is all worship under the New Testament rejected by him, if there be not a due regard therein unto the Lord Christ as the only High Priest of the Church, and the Efficacy of his Discharge of that Office.
3. It is the highest Vanity to pretend Use or Continuance in the Church, from possession or prescription, or pretended Benefit, Beauty, Order, or Advantage, when once the mind of God is declared against it. The Pleas for the
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
in quem, in quo; Vul. Lat. For he concerning whom these things are spoken. For he on whom these things are said, Rhem. improperly. de alia tribu est, Rhem. is of another Tribe, omitting the especial force of the word
For He of whom these things are spoken, pertaineth unto another Tribe, of which no man gave Attendance at the Altar.
The Causal Conjunction
Application of the whole precedent Discourse unto the Person of Jesus Christ the true and only High Priest of the Church.
In the words there is, (1.) The Subject to be further treated on, described, de quo; He concerning whom, quem designaverunt haec, ad quem haec pertinent; He who is designed in all these things, He un
That it is our Duty in studying of the Scripture to enquire diligently after the things which are spoken concerning Jesus Christ, and what is taught of him in them. This doth our Apostle find out in all that was spoken concerning Melchisedec and the Levitical Priesthood. This he gives himself in Charge,
It is added He pertained unto another Tribe. To confirm his Argument concerning the Changing or Abolition of the Priesthood, the Apostle supTribes according unto the Number of the Sons of Jacob. And as these Tribes had a common Interest in the Church, so some of them had peculiar Priviledges granted and confirmed unto them by Law. So the Priesthood was granted, confined, and confirmed unto the Tribe of Levi, and unto the Family of Aaron in that Tribe. And it was so confined thereunto, as that all the rest of the Tribes were for ever excluded from any Interest therein, and all that belonged unto them incapacitated thereof. But unto one of the Tribes so excluded from an Interest in the
3. He Describes in general this other Tribe whereof he was, by its Legal exOf which no man gave attendance at the Altar. VVhat Tribe that was in particular he declares in the next Verse, shewing not only of what Tribe he was, but also what it was necessary he should be. Another Tribe,
That Expression, attended, waited on the Altar, may be a Synechdochical Description of the whole Priestly Office from the principal Work include the Priests, unto whom the immediate work of Sacrificing at the Altar did belong; but all those who attended the Services of it, though they could Offer neither burnt Incense nor Sacrifice; that is, all the Levites in their courses. For He so excludes the Tribe, whereof he speaks, from the least Relation unto the Sacerdotal VVork or Office. None of them ever did or might draw near nor Minister unto the AlCor. 9. 13.
This Entrance doth the Apostle make into the confirmation of his Assertion, that the Priesthood was changed, and therewithal the Law. For it appears that there was to be a Priest who had no Right by the Law so to be; seeing he was of that Tribe which the Law utterly excluded from any Interest in the Sacred Services of the Altar; and much more those which were peculiar unto the Aaronical Priests. Thus,
1. All mens Rights, Duties, and Priviledges in Sacred things are fixed and limited by Divine Institution. And,
2. Seeing Christ himself had no Right to Minister at the Material Altar, the Reintroduction of such Altars is inconsistent with the perpetual continuance of his Priesthood.
THIS Apostle confirms his Assertion by a particular Application of it unto the Person of our Lord Jesus Christ.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
de Sacerdotibus, without countenance from any Copies of the Original or Ancient Translation.
The words contain a double Assertion. (1.) That our Lord sprang of the Tribe of Judah. (2.) That of that Tribe Moses spake nothing concerning the Priesthood. There wants nothing to compleat the Proof of his Argument but that our Lord was a Priest, which he therefore proves in the ensuing Verses.
For it is Evident(or Manifest)that our Lord sprang out ofJudah,of which TribeMosesspake nothing concerning the Priesthood.
In the first part of the words there are two things considerable. The manner of the Proposition, or the Modification of the Assertion, palam est, manifestum, it is manifest, open, a thing confessed; Evident, as we say, in it self. A thing easie to be proved, but that it is by no Man denyed. Only whereas manifest or evident,
manifest before-hand; as Messiah should be of the Tribe of Judah. But we may consider in general how this is said to be a thing Evident or Manifest in its application unto our Lord Jesus Christ. And
1. This was included in the Faith of Believers, who granted him to be the Messiah. For nothing was more plainly promised under the Old Testament, nor more firmly believed by the Church, than that the
2. It was in those days manifest by his known Genealogy. For by the Providence of God his Parents were Publickly enrolled of that Tribe and of the Family of David in the Tax and Recognition of the people appointed by
Sundry of the Ancients had an apprehension that the Lord Christ derived his Genealogy from both the Tribes of Judah and Levi, in the Regal and Sacerdotal Offices, as he who was to be both King and Priest. And there is a Story inserted in Suidas, how in the days of Justinian the Emperour, one Theodosius, a principal Patriarch of the Jews, acquainted his Friend, one Philip, a Christian, how he was enrolled by the Priests in their Order, as of the Linage of the Priests, by the Name of Jesus the Son of Mary and of God; and that the Records thereof were kept by the Jews at Tiberias to that very time. But the whole Story is filled with gross effects of Ignorance and incredible Fables, being only a Dream of some SuperMonastick. But the Ancients grounded their imagination on the Kindred that was between his Mother and Elizabeth the Wife of Zechariah the Priest, who was the Daughter of Aaron, Luke 1. 5. But this whole conceit is not only false, but directly contradictory to the Scope and Argument of the Apostle in this place. For the Authors of it would have the Lord Christ so to derive his GeneaTribe of Levi, as thence to be entitled unto the Priesthood, which yet it could not be, unless he was also proved to be of the Family of Aaron. And to assign a Priesthood unto him as derived from Aaron, is openly contradictory unAlliance and Kindred that was between the Blessed Virgin and Elizabeth was doubtless by an Antecedent intermarriage of those Tribes, as Elizabeth's Mother might be Sister unto the Father or Grand-father of the Holy Vir
It pleaseth God to give sufficient Evidence unto the accomplishment of his Promise.
He sprang;
cause to rise, Mat. 5. 45. causeth his Sun to rise. And sometimes it is used Neutrally, for to rise; and so as some think it peculiarly denotes the rising of the Sun, in distinction from the other Planets. Hence is the East, from the rising of the Sun. So the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ is called the rising of the Sun of Righteousness with healing in his wings, Mal. 4. 2. Luke 1. 78. The day-spring from on high. Thus did the Lord Christ arise in the light and glory of the Sun, a light to lighten the Gentiles, and the Glory of his People Israel. But the word is used also to exspringings; as of Water from a Fountain, or a Branch from the Stock. And so it is said of our Lord Jesus, that he should grow up as a tender Plant, and as a Root out of a dry Ground, Isa. 53. 2. A Rod out of the Stem, and a Branch out of the Roots of Jesse, Chap. 11. 1. Hence he is frequently called the Branch, and the Branch of the Lord, Isa. 4. 2. Jer. 23. 5. Chap. 33. 15. Zech. 3. 8. Chap 6. 12. But the first, which is the most proper sense of the words, is to be regarded; he arose eminently and illustriously from the Tribe of Judah.
Having laid down this Matter of Fact, as that which was evident, and on all hands confessed, he observes upon it, that of that Tribe Moses spake nothing concerning the Priesthood.
with reference unto which Tribe,
de qua Tribu. Being to prove that the Priesthood did no way belong to the Tribe of Judah: So that the Inthat Tribe must necessarily exclude those of the House of Aaron from that Office, he appeals unto the Law-giver, or rather the Law it self. For by Moses, not the Person of Moses absolutely is intended; as though these Ministry in giving of the Law; or his Person only as Ministerially employed in the Declaration of it, that our Apostle respects. And it is the Law of Worship that is under consideration. Moses did reBlessing of Judah, as given him by Jacob, wherein the Promise was made unto him, that the Shilo should come from him, Gen. 49. 10. And this same Shilo was also to be a Priest. But this was a Promise before the Law, and not to be acMoses. Wherefore Moses as the Law-giver, when the Office of the Priesthood was Instituted in the Church, and confirmed by especial Law or Ordinance, spake nothing of it with respect unto the Tribe of Judah. For as in the Law, the first Institution of it was directly confined unto the Tribe of Levi, and House of Aaron, so there is not in all the Law of Moses the least intimation, that on any Occasion in any future Generations, it should be translated unto that Tribe. Nor was it possible without the alteration and abolition of the whole Law, that any one of that Tribe should once be put into the Office of the Priesthood: The whole worTribe of Judah should Officiate in the Office of the Priesthood. And this silence of Moses in this matTribe of Judah. And the Grounds hereof are resolved into this general Maxime, that whatever is not revealed and appointed in the Worship of God by God himself, is to be considered as nothing, yea, as that which is to be rejected. And such he conceived to be the Evidence of this
Divine Revelation gives Bounds positively and negatively unto the Worship of God.
THat the Aaronical Priesthood was to be Changed, and consequently the whole Law of Ordinances that depended thereon, and that the Time, wherein this Change was to be made, was now come, is that which is designed unto ConfirmaAcceptance of Evangelical Worship is resolved. For without the removal of the
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
And it is yet far more evident for that after the Similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another Priest, who is made not after the Law of a carnal Commandement, but after the power of an Endless Life. For he Testifieth, thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedec.
There are four things to be considered in these words. 1. The manner of the Introduction of this new Argument, declaring its especial force with the weight that the Apostle lays upon it; And it is yet far more Evident.
2. The Medium or Argument it self which he insists upon, which is, that from what he had already proved, there was another Priest to arise after the Similitude of Melchisedec.
3. The Illustration of this Argument in an Explication of the wayes and means whereby this Priest arose, declared both negatively and positively: Who is made not after the Law of a carnal Commandement, but after the Power of an Endless Life.
4. The Confirmation of the whole with the Testimony of David. For he Testifieth, thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedec.
The manner of the Introduction of this Argument is Emphatical:
And it is yet far more Evident.
The Conjunctive Particle
The thing spoken of is said to be ver. 14. namely, that our Lord sprang of Judah; Evident, Manifest, Demonstrable: but this he adds is intends the signification, arguing yet a more open and convincing Evidence.
Hence he adds, that it is magis patet: abundantius manifestum,
Evidence in arguing unto his End. There is more immediate force in this Consideration to prove the Cessation of the Levitical Priesthood, that
And therefore he adds yet; that is, above all that hath been collected from Melchisedec, there is yet this uncontroulable Evidence unto our purpose remaining.
The Apostle we see lays great weight on this Argument, and withal proceeds gradually and distinctly from one thing to another in the whole Discourse. It may be we see not why he should insist so much upon, and so narrowly Scan all particulars in this matter. For being freed by the Gospel from the power of Temptations about it, and being of the Gentiles, who were never concerned in it, we cannot be sensible of the just importance of what is under Confirmation. The Truth is, He hath the greatest Argument in hand that was ever controverted in the Church of God and upon the Determination whereof the Salvation or Ruine of the Church did depend. The Worship he treated of, was immediately instituted by God
certain Rule of Gods Acceptance of the People or his Anger towards them; For whilst they complyed with it, his Blessing was continually upon them; and the neglect of it was still punished with Severity. And the last Caution that God had given them by the Ministry of the last Prophet he sent unto them, was, that they should abide in the Observance of the Law of Moses, lest he came and smote the whole Earth with a Curse. Mal. 4. last. Besides these and sundry other things that were real and pleadable in the behalf of the Mosaical Worship, the Hebrews esteemed it always their great and Singular Priviledge above all other Nati
It was therefore very necessary that the Apostle should proceed Warily, Distinctly and
1. That Present Truths are earnestly to be Pleaded and Contended for. So the APeter would have Believers established in the present Truth. All Truth is Eternal, and in it self equally subsistent and present unto all Ages. But it is especially so either from the great use of it in some seasons, or the great Opposition that is made unto it. So this Doctrine about the
2. Important Truths, should be strongly Confirmed. Such is that here pleaded by the Apostle, and therefore doth he so labour in the Confirmation of it. He had undertaken to convince the Hebrews of the Cessation of their Legal Worship, out of their own acknowledged Principles. He deals not with them meerly by his Apostolical
3. Arguments that are equally true, may yet on the Account of Evidence not be equally Cogent; yet
4. In the Confirmation of the Truth we may use every help that is true and seasonable, though some of them may be more effectual unto our End, than others.
This we are instructed in by the Apostle, affirming in this place, that what he now affirms is yet far more Evident. And this Evidence, as we observed before, may respect either the things themselves, or the Efficacy in point of Argument. For in themselves all things under the old Testament were Typical and Significant of what was afterwards to be introduced. So our Apostle tells us that the Ministry of Moses consisted in giving Testimony to those things which were to be spoken or declared afterwards, chap. 3. 5. But among them some were far more Clear and Evident as to their signification than others were. In the latter sense the things which he had discoursed about Melchisedec and his Priesthood, were more effectudemonstrative of the Change of the Levitical Priesthood, than what he had newly observed concerning the Rising of our Lord Jesus Christ not of the Tribe of Levi but of Judah, although that had life and evidence also in it self, which is prin
The Argument it self is nextly expressed whereunto this full Evidence is ascribif another Priest do arise after the Similitude of Melchisedec. And in the words there is (1) the
if, is generally taken here not to be a Conditional but a Causal Conjunction. Ei.
Rom. 8. 31. 2 Cor. 5. 15. 1 Thess. 3. 8. 1 Pet. 1. 17. And it is rendered in our Translation by For, For that another Priest; as Beza rendreth it by quod, because. Others by ex eo quòd, and siquidem. Syr. and again this is more known, by that which he said. All take it to be an intimation of a Reason proving what is affirmed; and so it doth if with the Vulgar we retain si, or siquidem, if so be. And it is yet far more Evident, if so be that another Priest.
As to the Argument in general, we must observe (1) That the Design of the Apostle in this place is not to demonstrate the Dignity and Eminency of the Priesthood of Christ from that of
2. The Subject spoken of is alius: as the Syriack understood it, who renders it by alienus,
3. His Introduction into his Office is expressed by there ariseth. Oritur,
4. The Nature of his Priesthood is declared in its Resemblance unto that of Melchisedec,
according unto the Order; but he respects the whole Conformity that was between Melchisedec and our Lord Jesus Christ, in the instances which he had before insisted on. For whereMelchisedec, that he might be ver. 3. made like unto the Son of God, he is said to arise according to the likeness or similitude of Melchisedec. For every Similitude is mutual; one thing is as like unto another, as that is unto it. This therefore is evident, that there was to be another Priest; another, but one of another Stock and Race; and a Priest he was to be after the Similitude of Melchisedec, and not so much as after the Similitude of Aaron. The arising of Christ in his Offices puts an end unto all other things that pretend an usefulness unto the same end with them. When he arose as a King he did not put an end unto the Office and Power of Kings in the World; but he did so unto the Typical Kingdoms over the Church, as he did to the Priesthood by arising as a Priest. And when he ariseth spiritually in the Hearts and Consci
This Verse containeth an Illustration and Confirmation of the foregoing Asserway and manner how this other Priest, who was not of the Seed of Aaron, should come unto that Office. And this was necessary also for the prevention of an Objection, which the whole Discourse was obnoxious unto. For it might be said, that whatever was affirmed concerning another Priest, yet there was no way possible, whereby any one might come so to be, unless he were of the Family of Aaron. All others were expressely excluded by the Law. Nor was there any way or means ordained of God, any especial Sacrifice institusuch a Priest might be dedicated, and initiated into his Office. In prevention of this Objection, and Confirmation of what was before declared, the Apostle adds,
Who was made, not after the Law of a Carnal Commandment, but after the Power of an Endless Life.
The words declare, (1.) That this Priest was made so; and (2.) How he was made so, both negatively and positively.
1. He was made so; was made; or who was made a Priest. The force of this Expression hath been explained on Chap. 3. 2. and Chap. 5. 5. take this Office upon himself. He became so, he was made so by the Appointment and DesignaAuthority of God alone which is the Foundation of all Office, Duty, and Power in the Church. Even what Christ himself is and was unto the Church, he is and was so by the Grace and Authority of God even the Father. By him was he sent, his will did he perform, through his Grace did he die, by his Power was he exalted, and with him doth he intercede. What Acts of God in particular do concur unto the constitution of this Office of Christ, and to the making him a Priest, have been declared before.
2. The manner of his being made a Priest is expressed Negatively,
not after; or not according unto the Law of a Carnal Commandment. Syr.
1. For the first, we may observe that the whole Law of Worship among the Jews is called by our Apostle, Ephes. 2. 15. The Law of Commandments in Ordinances. And it is so called for two Reasons.
(1.) Because Commands were so multiplyed therein, that the whole Law was deYoke hardly to be born, if not altogether intolerable, Acts 15. 10. (2.) Because of that Severity whereAuthority, and the multiplication of them
2. Why doth the Apostle call this Commandment Carnal or Fleshly. Answ. It
(1.) With respect unto the Sacrifices which were the principal part of the conAaron unto his Office. And these may be called Fleshly on two AcSubject-matter, they were Flesh, or the Bodies of Beasts; as the Syriack reads these words, the Commandment of Bodies, that is, of Beasts to be Sacrificed. 2. In themselves and their Relation unto the Jewish State they reached no further than the purifying of the Flesh. They Sanctified unto the Purifying of the Flesh, as the Apostle speaks,
(2.) It may be called Carnal, because a Priesthood was Instituted thereby, which was to be continued by Carnal Propagation only; the Priesthood appointed by that Law was confined unto the Carnal Seed and Posterity of Aaron, wherein this other Priest had no Interest.
(3.) Respect may be had unto the whole System of those Laws and Institutions of Worship, which our Apostle, as was also before observed, calls Carnal Ordinances,
None of these ways was the Lord Christ made a Priest. He was not dedicaSacrifice of Beasts, but Sanctified himself thereunto, when he Offered himself through the Eternal Spirit unto God, and was consumCarnal Seed of Aaron, nor did, nor could claim any Succession unto the Priesthood by virtue of an Extraction from his Race. And no constitution of the Law in general, no Ordinance of it, did conRight or Title unto the Priesthood.
It is therefore Evident, that he was in no sense made a Priest according to the Law of a Carnal Commandment; neither had he either Right, Power, or Authority to exercise the Sacerdotal Function in the observation of any Carnal Rites or Ordinan
That what seemed to be wanting unto Christ in his entrance into any of his Offices, or in the Discharge of them, was on the account of a greater Glory. Aaron was made a Priest with a great outward Solemnity. The Sacrifices which were Offered, and the Garments he put on, with his visible separation from the rest of the People, had a great Ceremonial Glory in them. There was nothing of all this, nor any thing like unto it, in the Consecration of the Lord Christ unto his Office. But yet indeed these things had no Glory, in comparison of that excelling Glory, which accompainvisible Acts of Divine Authority, VVisdom, and Grace which comSpirit, all outward Ceremony is a diminution and debasement of it. Hence were Ceremonies for Beauty and Glory multiplyed under the Old Testament, but yet as the Apostle shews, were all but Carnal. But as the sending of Christ himself and his Investiture with all his Offices were by Secret and Invisible Acts of God and his Spirit, so all Evangelical VVorship, as to the Glory of it, is Spiritual and InVeil, which hindred from an insight and entrance into the Holy place.
2. The way and manner whereby the Lord Christ was made a Priest is exprespositively:
But according unto the Power of an
How is Christ then made a Priest according to the Power of an endless Life? That installed into the Priesthood after his Resurrection. VVhat is meant by installed, I well know not. It should seem to be the same with Consecrated, Dedicated, Initiated. And if so, this Exposition diverts wholly from the Truth. For Christ was installed into his Office of Priesthood before his Resurrection, or he did not Offer himself as a Sacrifice unto God in his Death and Blood-shedding. And to suppose that the Lord Christ discharged and per
Some think that the endless life intended is that of Believers, which the Lord Christ by virtue of his Priestly Office confers upon them. The Priests under the Law proceeded no further but to discharge Carnal Rites, which could not confer Eternal life on them, for whom they Ministred. But the Lord Christ in the DisEternal Redemption and Everlasting life for Bebe made a Priest according to the Power of that Eternal Life, which he confers on others. For the comparison and opposition that is made between the Law of a Carnal Commandment, whereby Aaron was constiPower of an endless Life, whereby Christ was made so, do Evidence, that the making of Christ a Priest, not absolutely, which the Apostle treats not of, but such a Priest as he is, was the Effect of this endless Life.
VVherefore the indissoluble Life here intended, is the life of Christ himself. Hereunto belonged, or from hence did proceed that Power, whereby he was made a Priest. And both the Office it self and the ExEternal or endless life of Christ, is his life as the Son of God. Hereon depends his own Mediatory life for ever, and his conferring of Eternal life on us, John 5. 26, 27. And to be a Priest by virtue of, or according unto this Power, stands in direct opposition unto the Law of a Carnal Commandment.
It must therefore be enquired, how the Lord Christ was made a Priest according unto this power. And I say it was, because thereby alone he was rendred meet to discharge that Office, wherein God was to redeem his Church with his own Blood, Acts 20. 28. By Power therefore here, both meetness and ability are intended. And both these the Lord Christ had from his Divine Nature and his endless life therein.
Or it may be the Life of Christ in his Humane Nature is intended, in opposiCarnal Commandment, did not continue in the Discharge of their Office by reason of Death, as our ApoNatural life of Christ, the life of the Humane Nature was not Endless, but had an End put unto it in the Dissolution of his Soul and Body on the Cross.
I say therefore this life of Christ was not absolutely the life of the Humane NaPerson of the Son of God, of Christ as God and Man in one Person. And so his life was endless. For first, in the Death which he underwent in his Humane Nature, there was no Interruption given unto his Discharge of his Sacerdotal Office, no, not for a moPerson still lived, and both Soul and Body were therein inseparably United unto the Son of God. Although he was truly and really dead in his Humane Nature, he was still alive in his indissoluble Person. And this the ApoLevitical Priests. But Christ is made a Priest according to the Power of an endless life; that is, through the Power and Efficacy of that Eternal life which is in his Divine Person, both his Humane Nature is preserved always in the Disother Priest from those of the Order of Aaron, not only from the Tribe wherein he was to be, and from his Type Melchisedec, but also from the way and means, whereby the one and the other were enabled to discharge their Office.
The Proof of all before asserted is given in the Testimony of the Psalmist so ofFor he testifieth, thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedec.
The Introduction of this Testimony is by or he Witnesseth or TeDavid doth in the Psalm, or rather the Holy Ghost speaking in and by David, doth so testifie. He doth not absolutely say that so he speaks, but testifies; because he used his words in a way of Testimony unto what he had deone thing be now principally intended by him, yet there is in these words a Testimony given unto all the especial Heads of his Discourse. As (1.) That there was to be another Priest, a Priest that was not of the Stock Aaron, nor Tribe of Levi. For he says unto the Messiah Prophesied of, who was to be of the Seed of David, Thou art a Priest, although a stranger from the Aaronical Line. (2.) That this other Priest was to be after the Order of Melchisedec,
And the Apostle had sufficient Reason to affirm that what he proposed was emimanifest, namely, from the Testimony which he produceth thereof. For what can be more evident than that the Aaronical Priesthood was to be abolished, if so be that God had designed and promised to raise up another Priest in the Church, who was neither of the Stock nor Order of Aaron, nor called the same way to his Office, as he was, and who when he was so raised and called, was to continue a Priest for ever, leaving no room for the continuance of that Priesthood in the Church, nor place for its return when it was once laid aside? And we may ob
1. The Eternal continuance of Christs Person gives Eternal continuance and efficacy unto his Office. Because he lives for ever, he is a Priest for ever. His
2. To make new Priests in the Church, is virtually to renounce the Faith of his living for ever as our Priest, or to suppose that he is not sufficient to the Discharge of his Office.
3. The Alteration that God made in the Church by the Introduction of the Priesthood of Christ was progressive towards its perfection. To return therefore unto or look after legal Ceremonies in the Worship of God, is to go back unto poor beggarly Elements and Rudiments of the World.
IN the Twelfth Verse of this Chapter the Apostle affirms, that the Priesthood being changed, there was of Necessity a change made of the Law also. Having proved the former, he now proceeds to confirm his Inference from it, by declaring that the Priest and Priesthood that were promised to be introduced, were in all things inconsistent with the Law. In that place he mentions only a Alteration to be made in it, so as that being changed and mended, it might be restored unto its former Use. But it was such a change of it, as was an Abrogation of it, as in these Verses he doth de
Now this was a matter of the highest concernment unto the Hebrews, and of great Importance in it self. For it included and carried along with it an Alteration of the
whole state of the Church, and of all the Solemn Worship of God therein. This therefore was not to be done but on Cogent Reasons and Grounds indispensable. And no doubt but the Apostle foresaw, what a surprisal it would be unto the GeneHebrews, to hear that they must quit all their concern and special InteMoses. For he had three sorts of Persons to deal withal in this great cause.
1. Such as adhered unto and maintained the Mosaical Institutions in Opposition unto Christ and the whole way of our coming unto God by him. These esteemBlasphemy imaginable for any to affirm, that the Law was to be changed or abrogated. And this was the occasion of the death of the first Martyr of Jesus Christ under the accusation of Blasphemy, which by the Law was to be punished with Death. For this they made their charge against Stephen, that he spake Blasphemous words against Moses, (whom they put in the first place) and against God. Act. 6. 11. And the proof of this Blasphemy they lay on those words, that Jesus should change the Customs which Moses had delivered to them. Accordingly on this very account they stirred up Persecution with rage and madness against the Holy Apostles all the World over. The mouths of these Cursed Unbelievers were to be stopped; and therefore Cogent Reasons and Unanswerable were in this Case to be urged by the Apostle; and they are so accordingly. And they were now to know that notwithstanding all their Rage and Bluster, those that believed were not ashamed of the Gospel, and they must be told that the Law was to be abrogated, whether they would hear or forbear, however they were provoked or enraged thereby.
2. There were others of them who, although they received the Gospel and believLaw was still in force, and the Worship prescribed in it still to be observed. And of these there were very great MultiActs 21. 20. This Error was in the Patience of God for a while tolerated among them, because the time of their full Conviction was not yet come. But those who were possessed with it, began after a while to be very troublesome unto the Church, and would not be content to observe the Law themselves, but would impose the Observation of it on all the Gentile Converts on the pain of Eternal Damnation. Acts 15. 1. They said and contended, that unless they were Circumcised after the manner of Moses, they could not be saved. These also were to be restrained and convinced. And those of them who were obstinate in this Perswasion, not long after apostatized from the whole of Christianity. And
3. There were sincere Believers, whose Faith was to be strengthned and confirmed. With respect unto them all the Apostle laboureth with great Diligence in this Arguwill and purpose of God that the Adcease and be abrogated. This therefore he proceeds withal in these Verses.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Reprobatio; Rhem. Reprobation, most improperly; Syr. Mutatio, a Change; which reacheth not the force of the word, Ar. Abrogatio; Bez.
quidem, equidem, enim Syr. autem, but; For verily.
praecedentis mandati. The Syriack thus renders the verse, The Change, which was made in the first Commandement, was made for its weakness and because there was no profit in it.
propter ipsius imbecillitatem; infirmitatem; propter illud quod in eo erat infirmum aut imbecille.
& inutilitatem,
and because there was no profit in it.
The Arab. changeth the sense of the place; reading to this purpose. For there is a Transgression where the Commandement went before, because that was weak and of little Advantage.
perfecit lex. Bez. consummavit, ad perfectum adduxit; Vul. Lat. Rhem. brought nothing to Perfection. Syr. For the Law did not perfect any thing.
introductio verò melioris spei. Beza, sed superintroducta spes potior. Others, Sed erat Introductio ad spem potiorem. Syr, But there entered in the room thereof, an hope more excellent than it.
appropinquamus; accedimus; Vul. proximamus. Rhem. we approach.
Our own Translation fully expresseth the Original in all the parts of it, only it determines the sense of verse the 19, by the insertion of that word (did.)
For there is verily a disanulling of the Commandement going before, for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof. For the Law made nothing perfect; but the bringing in of a better hope, by which we draw nigh unto God.
(1) The Subject spoken of is the Command; (2) Described by the Time of its giving, it went before; (3) Hereof it is affirmed, that it is disannulled; and (4) The Reason thereof is adjoyned from a twofold property or adjunct of it in particular; For 1. It was Weak. 2. It was Unprofitable. (5) As unto its deficiit made nothing perfect; (6) Illustrated by that which took its work upon it self, and effected it throughly; the Hope brought in, by which we draw nigh unto God.
1. The ver. 18. as Law in ver. 19. For the same thing is intended in both the words. It is not therepeculiar command for the institution of the Legal Priesthood that is intended, but the whole System of Mosaical Institutions. For the Apostle having already proved, that the Priesthood was to be abolished, he proceeds on that Ground and from thence to prove, that the whole Law was also to be in like manner abolished and removed. And indeed it was of such a nature and constitution, that pull one pin out of the Fabrick and the whole must fall unto the Ground. For the Sanction of it being, that he was cursed who continued not in all things written in the Law to do them, the change of any one thing must needs overthrow the whole Law. How much more must it do so, if that be changed, removed, or taken away, which was not only a material part of it, but the very hinge, whereon the whole observance of it did depend and turn.
And the whole of this System of Laws, is called Command, because it consisted arbitrary Commands and Precepts, regulated by that Maxim; The man that doth these things shall live by them. Rom. 10. 5. And therefore the Law, as a Command, is opposed unto the Gospel, as a Promise of Righteousness by Jesus Christ. Gal. 3. 11, 12. Nor is it the whole Ceremonial Law only that is intended by the Command in this place; but the Moral Law also, so far as it was compacted with the other into one Body of Precepts for the same End. For with rewhole Law of Moses as unto our drawing nigh unto God, it is here considered.
2. This Commandement is described by the Time of its giving; it is before the Gospel as now preached and dispensed. It did Promise, whereby the Grace of the New Covenant was exhibited, and which contained the Substance and Essence of the Gospel, it was given 430 years before the giving of the Law, Gal. 3. 17. Wherefore the Precedency of the Law here expressed may respect the Testimony produced out of David, whereby the Apostle proves the Cessation of the Priesthood and consequently of the Law it self. For the Command was given before that Testimony, and so went before it. But it rather respects the actual Introduction of a New Priest in the Accomplishment of this Promise. For hereon the whole change and alteration in the Law and Worship pleaded for by our Apostle, did ensue.
The Commandement going before, is the Law whereby the Worship of God and Obedience unto him was regulated before the coming of Christ, and the Introduction of the Gospel.
3. Of this Command or Law, it is affirmed that there is an truly, verily, certainly. This what
Lawgiver, him that hath power over it, or of those unto whom it is given as a Law, and who are under the Power of it. In the latter sense Transgress a Law, to make it void what lies in us, by contemning the Authority of him by whom it is given; that use of the word was before observed in
It is therefore plainly declared, that the Law is abrogated, abolished, disanulled; but we must yet farther enquire, (1) How this could be done; (2) By what means it was done; and (3), which himself adds expresly, for what Reason it was done.
The first of these seemes not to be without its difficulties. For it was a Law originally given unto the Church by God himself, and continued therein with his Approbation for many Generations. And there are multiplyed instances in the Sacame not
Math. 5. 17. to dissolve or destroy the Law, which upon the matter is the same with totally dissolved as to its obligatory power. And our Apostle removes the suspicion of any such thing from the Doctrine of the Gospel, Rom. 3. 31. Do we then make void the Law through Faith? God forbid: yea we establish the Law.
Ans. There are two ways whereby any Law may be disanulled or abrogated. First, By taking away all Authority and use from it as unto its proper end, whilst it is in its pretended force. For suppose it to be made for ever or for a time only, its Abrogation is its deprivation of all Authority and Use as a Law. And this cannot regularly be done, but on one of these accounts. (1) That the Authority giving the Law was not valued from the Beginning, but men have been obliged unto it on a false presumption thereof. (2) That the matter of it was never Good, or usefull, or meet to be made the matter of Law. On neither of these accounts could this Law be abolished, nor ever was so by the Lord Christ or the Gospel, nor is so to this day. For God himself was the immediate Author of it, whose Authority is Soveraign and over all; and thence also it follows, that the matter of it was Good. For the Commandement, as our Apostle speaks, was Holy, Just, and Good, Rom.
Morally Good in it self and its own Nature, and that which is so only by Divine Institution; yet the Revealed Will of God is the adequate Rule of Good and Evil unto us, as unto our Obedience. On these Accounts therefore, it never was, nor ever could be abo
Secondly, A Law may be abrogated, when on any consideration whatever, its Obligation unto practice doth cease or is taken away. Thus was it with this Law; for, as every other Law, it may be considered two ways.
1. With respect unto its main End, and directive power to guide Men therein. This, in all Humane Laws, is the Publick Good of the Community or Society unto whom it is given. When this ceaseth, and the Law becomes not directive or Useful unto the Publick Good any more, all Rational Obligations unto its Observance do cease also. But yet this Law differed also from all others. All that any other Law aimeth at, is
2. The Law may be considered with respect unto the particular Duties, that it required and prescribed. And because the whole Law had its End, these were apEnd might be or was attained. So saith our Apostle, They were imposed untill the Time of Reformation, Chap. 9. 10. VVherefore two things did accompany this Law in its first Institution. (1.) That an Obedience unto its Commands would not produce the Good which it directed unto, as formally reDuties it required had a limited time for their Performance and Acceptance allotted unto them. VVherefore without the least Disparagement unto it, as unto the Authority whereby it was given, or as unto its own Holiness and Goodness, it might be disanulled as unto its actual ObEstablished, than if the observance of it had been continued unto the end of the world. It was therefore Established by Christ and the Gospel as unto its End, Use, and Scope; it was disanulled as unto its ObligaLaw, as unto all its Ends, should be fulfilled, and yet stand in force in its Obligatory Power unto Obedience.
Secondly, VVe must enquire how this was done, or how this Law was AbroObligatory Power and Efficacy. And this was done two ways.
1. Really and virtually. This was done by Christ himself in his own Person. For the fulfilling and accomplishing of it was that which really and virtually took away all its Obligatory Power. For what should it oblige Men unto? An Answer is ready unto all its Demands, namely, that they are fulfilled: and as unto what was Significative in its Duties, it is all really exhibited; so that on no Account it can any more
2. It was so abrogated Declaratively; or the Will of God concerning its Abro
1. In general by the Promulgation and Preaching of the Gospel, where the AcMessiah was come, that he had finished his work in the VVorld, and thereby made an End of Sin, bringing in Everlasting Righteousness, whereby the Law was fulfilled, did sufficiently manifest its Abrogation. The Apostles, I confess, in their first Preaching to the Jews spake not of it expresly, but left it to discover it self as an undeniable consequent of what they taught, concerning the Lord Christ and the Righteousness of God in him. This for some while many of them, that BeZealous of the Law, which God in his Patience and Forbearance did Graciously tolerate so, as not to impute it unto them. It was indeed great Darkness and manifold Prejudices that hindred the Believing Jews from seeing the necessary consequence unto the Abolition of the Law from the Promulgation of the Gospel: Yet this was God pleased to bear with them in, that we might not be too fierce, nor reflect with too much Severity on such as are not able in all things to receive the whole Truth as we desire they should.
2. It was so by the Institution and Introduction of new Ordinances of Worship. This was wholly inconsistent with the Law, wherein it was expresly enacted; that nothing should be added unto the Worship of God therein prescribed. And if any such Addition was made by the Authority of God himself, as was inconsistent with any thing before appointed, it is evident that the whole Law was disanulled. But a new Order, a new
3. There was a Determination made in the case by the Holy Ghost upon an occasion administred thereunto. Those of the Apostles, who Preached the Gospel unto the Gentiles, had made no mention unto them of the Law of Moses, as knowing, that it was nailed unto the Cross of Christ, and taken out of the way. So were they brought unto the Faith and Obedience of the Gospel without any respect unto the Law, as that wherein they were not concerned, now it had received its Accomplishment. But some of the Jews who Believed, being yet perswaded that the Law was to be continued in force, and its Observation imposed on all that were Proselyted by the Gospel, occasion was given unto that Solemn Determination which was made by the Apostles through the Guidance of the Holy Ghost, Acts 15. And the Substance of that Determination was this; that the Gospel, as Preached unto the Gentiles, was not a way or means of Proselyting them unto Judaism, but the bringing them
new Church-state by an Interest in the Promise and Covenant of Abraham, given and made 430 Years before the giving of the Law. VVhilst the Law stood in its force, whoever was Proselyted unto the Truth, he was so unto the Law, and every Gentile that was Converted unto the true God, was bound to be Circumcised, and became obliged unto the whole Law. But that being now
4. As unto those of the Hebrews, who yet would not understand these express Declarations of the ceasing of the Obligatory Power of the Law, to put an end unto all Disputes about his will in this Matter, God gave a dreadful Abolition unto it, in the total, final, irrevocable Destruction of the City and Temple, with all the Instruments and Vessels of its VVorship, especially of the Priesthood, and all that belonged thereunto. Thus was the Law disanulled, and thus was it declared so to be.
Obs. 1. It is a matter of the highest Nature and Importance to set up or take away, to remove any thing from, or change any thing in the Worship of God. Unless the Autho
2. The Revelation of the Will of God, in things relating unto his Worship, is very difficultly received, where the minds of Men are prepossessed with Prejudices and Traditions. Notwithstanding all those ways whereby God had revealed his mind concern
3. The only Securing Principle in all things of this Nature, is to preserve our Souls in an entire Subjection unto the Authority of Christ, and unto his alone.
The Close of the Verse gives an especial Reason of the disanulling or abrogation of the Command, taken from its own Nature and Efficacy. For there is verily a disanulling of the Commandment going before;
Adjective in the Neuter Gender put for Substantive, which is Emphatical; as on the contrary it is so, when the Substantive is put for the Adjective; as 1 John 2. 27. is true, and is not a lye; that is, mendax, false or lying. And its own, is added to shew that the principal cause of disanulling the Law was taken from the Law it self.
I have proved before that the Commandment in this verse is of equal extent and signification with the Law in the next. And the Law there doth evidently intend the whole Law, in both the parts of it, Moral and Ceremonial, as it was given by Moses unto the Church of Israel. And this whole Law is here charged by our Apoweakness and unprofitableness, both which make a Law fit to be disanulled. But it must be acknowledged that there is a Difficulty of no small Importance in the assignation of these Imperfections unto the Law: For this Law was given by God himself. And how can it be supposed that the Good and Holy God should preweak and unprofitable. From this and the like considerations the Blasphemous Manichees denyed that the Good God was the Author of the Old Testament, and the Jews continue still upon it to reject the Gospel, as not allowing the least Imperfection in the law, but equalling it al
1. Some seek for a Solution of this Difficulty from Ezek. 20. ver. 11. compared with ver. 25. Ver. 11. God saith, That I gave them my Statutes, and shewed them my Judgments, which if a Man do, he shall live in them. But ver. 25. I gave them also Statutes that were not Good, and Judgments whereby they should not live. The first sort of Laws, they say, were the Decalogue, with those other Judgments that accompanied it, which were given unto the People as Gods Covenant before they broke it by making the Golden Calf. These were Good in themselves, and Good unto the People, so as if
But as the Application of this Exposition unto this passage in the Apostle's DisExposition it self is not defensible. For it is plain, that by the Laws and Statutes mentioned,
Secondly, I Answer, That the whole Law may be considered two ways. (1.) Absolutely in it self. (2.) With
In it self, no Reflection can be made upon it, because it was an effect of the Wisdom, Holiness, and Truth of God. But in the Respects mentioned it maniweakness and unprofitableness. For they were Sinners unto whom it was given, and both defiled and guilty antecedently unto the giving of this Law, being so by Nature, and thereon Children of Wrath: Two things they stood in need of in this Condition.
1. Sanctification by an Inherent Purity and Holiness, with a Compleat Righteousness from thence. This the Moral Law was at first the Rule and Measure of; and would have always effected it by its Observance. It could never indeed
(2.) Sinners do stand in need of the Expiation of Sin: For being actually guilty already, it is to no purpose to think of a Righteousness for the future, unless their present Guilt be first expiated. Hereof there is not the least Intimation in the Moral Law. It hath nothing in it, nor accompanying of it, that respects the
But it may be yet farther enquired, Why God did give this Law unto the People, which although it were Good in it self, yet because of the condition of the People it could not attain the End which was intended. The Apostle gives so full an answer unto this enquiry, as that we need not farther to insist upon it. For he giveth two Reasons why God gave this Law. First he saith it was added because of Transgression till the seed should come to whom the Promise was made. Gal. 3. 19. It had a manifold necessary respect unto Transgression. As (1) to discover the nature of Sin, that the Consciences of men might be made sensible thereof. (2) To Coerce and Restrain it by its Prohibition and Threatnings that it might not run out into such an excess as to deluge the whole Church. (3) To
This brief Account of the weakness and unprofitableness of the Law, whereon it was disanulled and taken away, may at present suffice. The Consideration of some other things in particular will afterwards occur unto us. Only in our passage we may a little examine, or reflect on the senses that some others have given unto these words.
Schlictingius in his Comment on the next verse gives this Account of the state of the Law. Lex expiationem concedebat leviorum delictorum, idque ratione poenae alicujus arbitrariae tantum: gravioribus autem peccatis quibus mortis poenam fixerat, nullam reliquer at veniam, maledictionis fulmen vibrans in omnes qui graviùs peccássent. But these things are neither accommodate unto the Purpose of the Apostle, nor true in themselves. For (1) The Law denounced the Curse
And Grotius on the place. Non perduxit homines ad justitiam illam veram & internam, sed intra ritus & facta externa constitit: Promissa terrestria non operantur mortis contemptum, sed eum operatur melior spes vitae aeternae & caelestis. Which is thus enlarged by another;
Thus then was the Law disanulled; and it was so actually by the means before mentioned. But that the Church might not be surprized, there were many warnings given of it before it came to pass. As (1) A
1. The Introduction into the Church of what is better and more full of Grace in the same kind with what went before, doth disanul what so preceded; but the bringing in of that which is not better, which doth not communicate more Grace, doth not do so. Thus our Apostle expresly disputes that the bringing in of the Law 400 years after the giving of the Promise, did not evacuate or any way enervate the Promise.
And the Sole Reason hereof was, because the Promise had more Grace and PriviLaw had. But here the bringing in of another Priesthood, beeffectual Grace and mercy, utterly disanulled that which was instituted before. And as we may hence learn the care and kindness of God unto the Church; so also our own Duty in adhering with constant Obedience unto the Institutions of Christ. For this must be so, untill something else more full
of Grace and Wisedom then they are, be appointed of God in the Church. And indeed this is that which is pretended by those by whom they are rejected. For they tell us that the Ordinances of the Gospel are weak and unprofitable, and are disDispensation of the Spirit which hath ensued after them. But the Truth is, to fancy a Dispensation of the Spirit without, against, or above the Ordi
2. If God would disanul every thing that was weak and unprofitable in his Service, though originally of his own Appointment, because it was not exhibitive of the Grace he intended, he will much more condemn any thing of the same kind that is invented by men. I could never yet understand why God should abolish those Ordinances of worship which himself had appointed because they were weak, and approve of such as men should find out of themselves, which cannot have the least Efficacy or signification towards Spiritual Ends; Such as are multiplyed in the Papacy.
3. It is in vain for any men to look for that from the Law now it is abolished, which it could not effect in its best estate; and what that is the Apostle declares in the next Verse.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
non enim aliquid; that is, Nihil.
perfecit; finished, perfected. Vul. Lat. ad perfectum adduxit; Rhem.
Syr.
but for it (or in its stead) there entred an Hope which is better than it. Beza, Superintroducta spes potior.
Supraintroductio, or Postintroductio; the bringing in of one thing after another. Some supply erat here, and read the words; sed erat Introductio ad spem potiorem; or
proximamus ad Deum. Vul. Lat. Appropinquamus Deo.
For the Law made nothing Perfect, but the bringing in of a better Hope, whereby we draw nigh unto God.
The Disanulling or Abolition of the Law was laid down in the precedent verse, as a necessary consequent of its being weak and unprofitable. For when a Law hath been tried, and it is found liable unto this Charge, it is equal and even necessary that it should be disanulled; if the End aimed at, be necessary to be attained, and there be any thing else to be substituted in its Room, whereby it may so be. This thereCausal Connexion For, doth inti
1. He gives an especial Instance, wherein it was evident that the Law was weak and unprofitable.
2. He declares what was to be introduced in the Room thereof which would attain and effect the end, which the Law could not reach unto, by Reason of its weakness.
3. He expresseth what that End was.
The first he doth in those words: For the Law made
nothing perfect. The subject spoken of is Law; that is, the whole System of Mosaical Ordinances, as it was the Covenant which God made with the Peo
Of this Law, Commandement, or Covenant, it is said that it
made nothing perfect.
nothing, for no man say expositors generally; Neuter is put for the Masculine. So it is in those words of our Saviour, Joh. 6. 37. All that the Father giveth me, cometh unto me; that is every one. So is ver. 63. The Flesh profiteth nothing, that is, say some, no man. But I am not satisfyed with this Exposition, but rather judge that the Apostle did properly express his Intention. It made nothing, that is, none of the things which we treat about, perfect. It did not make the Church state perfect, it did not make the worship of God perfect, it did not perfect the Promises given unto Abraham in their Accomplishment, it did not make a perfect Covenant between God and man; it had a shaddow, an obscure Representation of all these things, but it made nothing perfect.
What the Apostle intends by ver. 11. So that we shall not here a
But it may be enquired, why, if the Law made nothing perfect, it was institustate of Perfection unto the Church, and seeing the Law could not effect it, nay seeing it could not be introduced whilst the Law was in force, unto what end served the giving of this Law?
Ans. This doubt was in part solved before, when we shewed the Ends for which the Law was given, although it was weak and unprofitable, as unto some other. But yet there are some other Reasons to be pleaded to represent the Beauty and Order of this Dispensation. For
1. In all these things the Soveraignty of God is to be submitted unto. And unto humble Souls there is beauty in divine Soveraignty. When the Lord Jesus rejoyced in Spirit, and thanked his heavenly Father that he had revealed the Mysteries of the Gospel unto Babes, and hid them from the Wise and Prndent, he assigns no other Reason but his Soveraignty and Pleasure, wherein he rejoyced; even so Father, for so it seemed Good in thy Sight, Luke 10. 21. And if we cannot see an ex
2. Mankind having wofully prevaricated and apostatized from God, it was just and equal that they should not be at once enstated in their Reparation. The suddainness of it might have taken off from its
3. That People unto whom the Law was peculiarly to be given, and by whom God would accomplish his further Design, were a stubborn, earthy, hard-hearted
Yoke to burden and subdue them unto the will of God. So obstinate they were in what they had once received, and so proud of any Priviledge they enjoyed, that whereas their Priviledges were very many, and very great, they would never have had any thought of looking out after another state, but have forgone the Promise, had they not been pinched, and burdened, and disappointed in their Expectation of Perfection by this Law, and the Yoke of it.
4. God had designed that the Lord Christ should in all things have the Preheminence. This was due unto him on the Account of the Glory of his Person, and the Greatness of his Work. But if the Law could have made any thing
Perfection being thus denied unto the Law, it is added elliptical, and without a Supplement give no certain sense. And this may be made two ways. First, by the Verb Substantive
it was the bringing in of a better Hope, or an Introduction unto a better Hope, as some render the words. It served as Gods Way and Method unto the bringing in of our Lord Jesus Christ; unto this End it was variously Serviceable in the Church. For as its Institutions, Promises, Instructions, and Types did represent him unto the Faith of Believers; so it prepared their Minds unto an Expectation of him, and longing after him. And the Conjunction Adversative, seems to intimate an Opposition in what the Law did, unto what it is said before that it did not. It did not make any thing Perfect, but it did bring in a better Hope; and we know in how many things it was a preparatory Introduction of the Gospel. VVherefore this sence is true, though not, as I judge, directly intended in these words.
Beza first Observed, that contrary effect unto the Law unto what was before denyed, is intended; but the designation and expresanother Cause of the effecting of that which the Law could not effect. And the defective Speech is to be supplyed by made perfect; as we do it by did, that is, did make all things perfect. To the same purpose the Apostle expresRom. 8. 3. For what the Law could not do, in that it was weak through the Flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh. For the words are so to be supplyed, what the Law could not do, that God did; which what it was, and how God did it, the folunto a better state, a state of Comparative Perfection in this World. This the Law was not a means or Instrument suited unto: wherefore another way is fixed on to that End, which being compleatly effective of it, the Law was laid aside and disanulled as un
This the word Postintroductio,
Superintroductio; the Introduction of one thing after, or upon another. This was the Priesthood and Sacrifice of Christ, which were brought in after the Law, upon it, in the room of it, to effect that which the Law could not do. This our Apostle further Argues and confirms, Chap. 10. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.
This therefore is the sense of the words; The Introduction of the Better Hope, after, and upon the Law, when a sufficient Discovery had been made of its weakness and insufficiency, as unto this End, did make all things perfect, or bring the Church unto that state of consummation, which was designed unto it.
It remaineth only therefore that we shew what this Better Hope is, whereunto this effect is ascribed. Whatever it be, it is called better, with respect unto the Law, with all things that the Law contained or could effect, somewhat of more Power and Efficacy to perfect the Church-state. This neither was, nor could be any thing but Christ himself and his Priesthood: For in him we are compleat, Col. 2. 10. and by one Offering he hath for ever perfected them that are Sanctified; the Heavenly things themselves being purified thereby.
Hope therefore is used here Metonymically, to design the thing hoped for. From the giving of the first Promise, and throughout under the Dispensation of the Hope of all Believers, the
the Desire of all Nations, Hag. 2. that which the Secret desires of the whole Race of Mankind worked towards. And in the Church, which enjoyed the Promises, they rejoyced in the fore-sight of it, as did Abraham; and desired to see its Day, as did the Prophets, diligently enquiring into the time and season of the Accomplishment of those Revelations, which they had received concerning him, 1 Pet. 1. 11, 12. It is not therefore the Doctrine of the Gospel, with its Precepts and Promises (as some suppose) which is here intended; any other ways but as it is a Declaration of the coming of Christ, and the Discharge of his Office: For without a respect hereunto, without Virtue and Efficacy thence alone dirived, the outward Precepts and Promises of the Gospel would no more perfect the Church-state than the Law could do.
Obs. 1. When God hath designed any Gracious End towards the Church, it shall not fail, nor his work cease for want of effectual means to accomplish it. All means inWisdom makes them
VVherefore the Promise of God concerning the Church, and to it, must be the Rule and Measure of our Faith. Three things do deeply Exercise the Church, as unto their Accomplishment. (1.) Difficulties rendring it wholly improbable. (2.) Long unexpected Procrastination. (3.) Disappointment of appearing means of it. But in this Instance of the Introduction of a perfect Church-state in and by the Person of Jesus Christ, God hath provided a Security for our Faith, against all Objections, which these considerations might suggest. For,
(1.) VVhat greater Difficulties can possibly lye in the way of the AccomplishJews, the Distruction of Antichrist, the Peace of the Church, and Prosperity of it in the plentiful Effusion of the SpiAbraham; all the Calamities and Desolating Judgments that over-took them, the cutting down of the House of David, untill there was only a Root of it left in the Earth; the Unbelief of the whole Body of the People, the Enmity of the world, Acted by all the Crafts and Powers of Satan, were as Mountains in the way of the Accomplishment of this Promise. But yet they all of them became at length a Plain before the Spirit of God. And if we should compare the Difficulties and Oppositions that at this Day lye against the fulfilling of some Divine Promises, with those that rose up against this one of perfecting the Church-state in Christ, it would, it may be, abate our forwardness in condemning the Jews of Incredulity, unless we found our selves more established in the Faith of what is to come, than for the most part we are. (2.) Long and unexpected Procrastinations are Trials of Faith also. Now this Promise was given at the Beginning of the world, nor was there any time allotted for its Accomplishment. Hence it is generally supposed from the words there used in the imposition of the Name of Cain on her First-Born, that Eve apprehended that the Promise was actually fulfilled. The like Expectations had the
rising of this bright morning Star. Many a time did God renew the Promise, and sometimes confirmhis Oath, as unto Abraham and David; and yet still were their expectVeracity in the Accomplishment of his Promises, which they attained not unto, shall we think it much, if they are exercised some part of that season, (as yet but a small time) in looking after the Accomplishment of other Promises? (3) Disappointment of appearing means is of the same nature. Long after the Promise given and renewed, the Law is in a solemn and glorious manner delivered unto the Church, as the Rule of their worship and the means of their Acceptance with God. Hence the Generality of the People did alwayes suppose, that this was it, which would make all things perfect. Something indeed they thought might be adMessiah: but the Law was still to be that which was to make all things perfect. And we may easily apprehend what a surprizal it was unto them, when it was made manifest that the Law was so far from effecting this promised state, that there was a necessity of taking it out of the way as a thing weak and unprofitable, that the better Hope perfecting the state of the Church might be introduced. Such Appearances are sometimes represented unto us of means highly probable for the Delivery of the Church, which after a while do utterly disappear, and things are rolled into a posture quite conAppearance of what God hath promised, of what Believers have prayed for, it is no wonder if some do earnestly embrace it. But where God hath laid aside any means, and sufficient
Obs. 2. Believers of Old who lived under the Law, did not live upon the Law, but upon the Hope of Christ, or Christ hoped for. Christ is the same (that is, unto the Church) yesterday to day and for ever. If Justification, if Salvation could be had any other way, or by any other means, then was his coming needless, and his death in vain. It was the Promise of him, and not of the Law which he had broken, which was the Relief and Salvation of Adam. This being the first thing that was proposed unto fallen man, as the only means of his Restauration, Justification and Salvation, if any thing were afterwards added unto the same purpose, it would desame promise of Christ, which virtually contained and exhibited unto Believers all the Benefits of his mediation, as it was frequently renewed and variously explained, did all the Saints live under the Old Testament. And the obdegrees, but not the essence of their Faith.
Obs. 3. The Lord Christ by his Priesthood and Sacrifice makes perfect the Church and all things belonging thereunto, Col. 2. 10.
In the last place the Apostle illustrates the work wrought through the Introduction of the better Hope, by the effect of it in them that do believe. By which we draw nigh unto God.
Introduction or bringing in, or unto the next, which is Hope; being both of the same Gender. By the Introduction of the better Hope we draw nigh to God; or by which Hope we draw nigh to God. Both come to the same for the substance of the sense; but the Application is more natural to the next Antecedent, by which Hope we draw nigh unto God. It re
Sacerdotal Office, denoting the approach of the Priests unto God in his worship. So the LXX for the most part render all Access unto God with Sacrifices and Offerings. And this doth the Apostle intend. Under the Levitical Priesthood, the Priests in their Sacrifices and Solemn Services did draw nigh unto God. The same now is done by all Believers under
Sacerdotal Ministration of Jesus Christ. They now all of them draw nigh unto God. And in all their worship, especially in their prayers and supplications, they have by him an Access unto God, Ephes. 2. 18. There is a similitude in these things, and an Allusion in the one unto the other; yet so as that the one doth far excell the other, as to Grace and Priviledge. For, (1.) under the Law it was the Priests alone who had this Priviledge of drawing nigh unto God, in the solemn worship of the Temple and Tabernacle. The People were kept at a Distance, and might never come near the Sacred Services of the Holy place. But all Believers being made a Royal Priesthood, every one of them hath an equal Right and Priviledge by Christ, of drawing nigh unto God. (2.) The Priests themselves did draw nigh only unto outward pledges, Tokens, and Symbols of Gods Presence. Their highest Attainmade with hands, only instituted to represent his Glory. But Believers do draw nigh to God himself, unto the throne of his Grace, as the Apostle declares, Chap. 10. 19, 20, 21, 22.
It may therefore be granted that there is this Intention in the words. For as by the Law of Old the Priests in the solemn worship of the Church did draw nigh to God in those visible pledges of his Presence which he had appointed; and this they did by vertue of the Aaronical Priesthood and the Law of its Institution, which was the utmost that could be attained in their imperfect state; so now upon the Introduction of the better Hope, and by vertue thereof, Believers in all their sodraw nigh unto God himself, and find Acceptance with him.
And there are two Reasons for the Admission of this Interpretation. For, (1.) one part of the Apostles Design is to manifest the Glory and Preheminence of Gospel-worship above that of the Law. And the excellency hereof consists, not in outward forms and pompous Ceremonies, but in this, that all Believers do therein draw nigh unto God himself with boldness. (2.) Whereas it is peculiarly the Priesthood of Christ and his Discharge of that office in his Oblation and Interbetter Hope, as he fully declares himself toEntrance unto the Throne of Grace is through the veil of his flesh as offered. Our Admission is only by vertue of his Oblation, and our Acceptance depends on his Intercession. Herein therefore in a peculiar manner, by this better Hope, we draw nigh unto God.
But yet there is a more extensive signification of this Expression in the Scripture, which must not be here excluded. By nature all men are gone far off from God. The first general Apostacy carried mankind into a most unconceiveable Distance from him. Though our Distance from him by nature, as we are Creatures, be infinite, yet this hinders not but that in his infinite Goodness and Condescension we may have intercourse with him, and find Acceptance before him. But the Distance which came between us by sin cuts off all Communion of that kind. Wherefore our Moral Distance from God as our nature is corrupted, is greater, with respect unto our Relation unto him, than our essential Distance from him, as our nature is created. Hence, being afar off, is the expression of this state of nature, Ephes. 2. 13. You were sometimes afar off. And whatever accompanieth that state in wrath and curse upon men in fear, bondage, the power of sin and enmity against God within them; in obnoxiousness unto misery in this world and eternal Defar from the Love and Favour of God, from the knowledge of him, and obedience unto him. Wherefore our drawing nigh unto God, denotes our delivery and recovery from this estate. So it is expressed in the place named: But now in Christ Jesus, ye who were sometimes afar off, are made nigh by the blood of Christ. To represent this all the Acts of solemn worship, which respected the Sacrifice of Christ, were called Approximations.
And hereunto, unto this drawing nigh to God, or that we may so do, two things are required.
1. A Removal of whatever kept us at a Distance from God. And the things of this nature were of two sorts. (1.) What was upon us from God for our sin and Apostacy. This was his wrath and curse; And these were declared in the pubSinai with the terrible appearances and dreadful voices that accompanied. This made the People stand afar off; Exod. 20. 21; as an Emblem of their condition with respect unto the Law. (2) Guilt within, with its consequences of fear, shame, and Alienation from the life of God. Unless these things of the one sort and the other, those upon us and those within us, be tadraw nigh unto God. And to secure our Distance, they were enrolled in an hand-writing as a Record against us, that we should never on our own account so much as endeavour any Access unto him, Ephes. 2. 14. Col. 2. 14. How they were removed by the bringing in of the better Hope, that is, by the Priesthood of Christ, the Apostle declares in this Epistle, as we shall see God willing in our Progress. This neither was nor could be done by the Law or its Ordinances, neither the Moral preceptive part of it, nor the Ceremonial, in all its Rites and Sacrifices, could of themselves expiate sins, make Attonement for our Apostacy, turn away the wrath of God, nor take away Guilt, fear, bondage, and Alienation out of the minds of men.
2. There is moreover required hereunto, that upon the Justification and Acceptation of our Persons, we have Faith, Liberty, Boldness, Confidence and Assurance given unto us in our coming unto God. And this cannot be without the Renovation of our natures into his Image, the quickning of our souls with a new Principle of Spiritual life, and Ability unto all Duties of acceptable Obedience. All these things are required unto our drawing nigh unto God, or unto a state of Re
1. Out of Christ, or without him all Mankind are at an unconceivable Distance from God. And a Distance it is of the worst kind; even that which is an effect of mutual Enmity. The cause of it was on our part voluntary, and the effect of it the height of misery. And however any may flatter and deceive themselves, it is the present condition of all who have not an Interest in Christ by Faith. They are far off from God, as he is the Fountain of all Goodness and Blessedness; inhabiting, as the Prophet speaks, the parched places of the wilderness, and shall not see when Good cometh, Jerem. 17. 6. far from the dews and showers of grace or mercy, far from di
2. It is an effect of infinite condescension and Grace, that God would appoint a way of Recovery for those who had willfully cast themselves into this wofull Distance from him. Why should God look after such Fugitives any more? He had no need of us or our services in our best condition, much less in that useless, depraved state wherePunishment. By our sins we our selves come short of the Glory of God, but he could lose none by us, whilst it was absoAdam in the bushes, wherein he thought foolishly to hide himself, who could expect (Adam did not) but that his only design was to appreGrace and Love of God, which are beyond expression or conception, Joh. 3. 16. And it hath
Angels that sindesire again unto the works of his hands, to bring poor mankind near unto him. And whereas he might have recalled us unto himself, yet so as to leave some marks of his displeasure upon us, to keep us at a greater Distance from him than that we stood at before; as David brought back his wicked Absalom to Jerusalem, but would not suffer him to come into his Presence; He chose to act like himself in infinite wisdom and grace, to bring us yet nearer unto him, than ever we could have approached by the Law of our Creation. And as the Foundation, means and Pledge hereof he contrived and brought forth that most glorious and unparallel'd effect of divine wisdom, in taking our nature into that unconceivebringing of us nigh to God who were afar off, are exmore nigh to God in our nature, than we were upon our first Creation, or than Angels shall ever be; so by vertue thereof, are we in our Persons brought in many things much nearer to God, then ever we could have been brought by the Law of Creation. O Lord our God, how excellent is thy name in all the earth! who hast set thy Glory above the Heavens. Psal. 8. 1. It is in the Admiration of this unspeakable Grace, that the Psalmist is so ravished in the contemplation of God, as hath been declared in our Exposition on the second Chapter of this Epistle.
3. All our Approximation unto God in any kind, all our Approaches unto him in holy worship is by him alone, who was the blessed Hope of the Saints under the Old Testament and is the life of them under the New. These things must be afterwards spoken unto.
THE Apostle had warned the Hebrews before, that he had many things to say, and those not easie to be understood concerning Melchisedec. And herein he insignifyed thereby in the Person and Office of Christ. And therefore he omits nothing which may from thence be any way re
1. That the Lord Christ was to be a Priest, which included in it the cessation of the Levitical Priesthood, seeing he was of the Tribe of Judah, and not of the Tribe of Levi.
2. That he was to be Another Priest, that is, a Priest of another Order, namely, that of Melchisedec. And this he variously demonstrates to prove his Preheminence above the Aaronical Priesthood: as also thereon, that upon his In
3. He observes from the same Testimony unto the same purpose, that he was to be a Priest for ever, so as that there should never more upon his death or otheranother Priest, nor any possibility of the return of the former Priesthood into the Church.
4. Neither yet doth he rest here, but observes moreover the manner how God in the Testimony insisted on, declared his purpose of making the Lord Christ a Priest which was constitutive of his Office; and that was by his Oath. And thence takes occasion to manifest how far his Priesthood is exalted above that under the Law. This is that which now lyes before us in these verses. And we have in these things an Instance given of what unsearchable stores of Wisdom and Truth are laid up in every parcel of the word of God, if we have a spiritual light in their Investigation.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
The words of the 20th. verse being Elliptical, the sense of them is variously supplyed. Most Translators carry on the sense unto that which is the middest of
Others were made Priests without an Oath. The Syriack refers the words unto them foregoing; and confirmed it, (that is the better Hope) with an Oath. And Beza, etiam quatenus non sine jurejurando superintroducta est; in as much as (that Hope)
Etiam quatenus; & quatenus; and in as much.
Syriack; Vul. in quantum est, in as much; hereunto answereth, eatenus.
jusjurandum; an Oath. But it is here principally applyed unto those Oaths whereby Conventions, compacts, or Covenants were confirmed. Hence sacrifices that were offered in the confirmation of sworn Covenants. It is three times used here by our Apostle on this occasion, ver. 20, 21, 28. and no where else in the new Testament.
Alii quidem, which the Rhemists mend by rendring it, and the other; Beza. nam illi quidem; and so the Syriack and they; ours; for those Priests; rather, and truly those Priests, though
were, but the manner of their being made Priests is intended; and so the words are to be expressed fully; facti sunt, were made.
by the hand of David; It is not the giving of the Oath, but the recording of it in the Psalm that he in
non poenitebit; Syr. will not lye; will not repent, or change his mind.
Vul. in tantum; to answer in quantum before; Tantò, eatenùs; tanto; by so much; Syr.
Of the signification of the word
And in as much as not without an Oath. For they truely were made without an Oath; But this with an Oath, by him that said unto him, the Lord sware, and will not repent, thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedec. By so much was Jesus made surety of a better Covenant.
The same Argument is pursued as in the foregoing verses, only with a new Medium, and that such as leads on towards the conclusion of the whole Disputa
There are three things in these three verses.
1. A Proposition of a New Medium for the confirmation of the principal Argument before insisted on, ver. 20.
2. An Illustration and Proof of what is asserted in that Proposition, ver. 21.
3. An Inference from its being so established and proved, ver. 22.
In the Proposition three things may be considered.
1. The Connexion of it unto the preceding Discourse, by the conjunction
2. The Modification of the Proposition in the manner of its Introduction; quanto, quatenus, in quantum; in as much.
3. The Proposition it self expressed negatively; not without, &c.
The Note of Connexion
ver. 17; where the same Testimony now insisted upon, is introduced, and so may intimate a farther pursuit of the same Parenthesis, comprizing an inference of what the Apostle had before proved, with the Reasons of it. For whereas before he had only made use of the words of the Father unto Christ, thou art a Priest for ever, and thereon shewed what would thence follow; he now proceeds to declare the manner how those words were spoken, namely, with an Oath. Or it may respect the words immediately foregoing, namely, the bringing in of a better hope; for it was brought in by an Oath: and this sense is folTranslators, who supply the Defect in these words by the repetibetter Hope. But although neither of those suppositions concerning the connexion of the words, doth prejudice the sense or Design of them, yet as we have observed before, For, oftentimes is as much as moreover, as it is rendred, etiam, by Beza; and then it denotes not an immediate connexion with, or dependance on what went before in particular, but only a Processe in the same general ArguIntroduction, of a new special consideration for the confirmation of the same Design. Thence our Translators supply the words, not with any thing that went before, but with what follows after, which the Apohe was made a Priest.
The Modification of the Proposition is in those words eatenus quantum,
in quantum, inasmuch, so much. Hereunto answers ver. 22. in tantum: quanto, tanto. The excellency of the Covenant whereof Christ was made MediaAaron, in that he was made a Priest by an Oath, but they were not so. And we may observe in general, that
Obs. The Faith, Comfort, Honour, and Safety of the Church, depends much on every particular remark that God hath put upon any of the Offices of Christ, or whatever belongs thereunto
We have lived to see Men endeavouring their utmost to render Christ himself, and all his offices of as little use in Religion as they can possibly admit, and yet reminute considerations, as some would think were little to be regarded. But all things concerning him are full of Divine Mysteries, and eve
The Proposition it self is in those words; not without an Oath. Two things the Apostle supposeth in this Negative Proposition.
1. That there were two ways whereby men either were or might be made Priests, namely, they might be so either with, or without an Oath. And he expresseth the latter way applying it negatively unto Christ, that he might include a Negation of the former way with respect unto the Priests under the Law; both which he after
2. That the Dignity of the Priesthood depends on, and is declared by the way whereby God was pleased to initiate men into that Office.
These two things being in general laid down, as those which could not be deniFriests of the Law on the one hand, and Christ on the other, in a comparison be
Nothing was wanting on the part of God that might give eminency, stability, glory, and efficacy unto the Priesthood of Christ. Not without an Oath. For,
1. This was due unto the Glory of his Person. The Son of God in infinite Grace condescending unto the susception of this Office, and the discharge of all the Duties of it, it was meet that all things which might contribute any thing unto the Glory, or efficacy of it should accompany his undertakings. For being in himself the Image
of the invisible God, by whom all things were created, it was meet that in his whole work, he should in all things have the preheminence, as our Apostle speaks Col. 1. 15, 16, 18. He was in every thing that he undertook, to be preferred and exalted above all others, who ever were employed in the Church, or ever should be; and therefore was he made a Priest not without an Oath.
2. God saw that this was needful to encourage and secure the Faith of the Church. There were many things defective in the Priesthood under the Law, as we have partly seen already, and shall yet see more fully in our progress. And it suited the design and wisdom of God that it should be so. For he never intended that the Faith of the Church should rest and be terminated in those Priests or their Office. What he granted unto them was sufficient unto the end and use whereunto he had designed it; so as that the Church might have all that respect for it, which was needIntroduction of the Priesthood of Christ, God really and actually proposeth and exhibiteth unto the Church, all that they were to trust unto, all that he would do or was any way needful to be done for their Peace and Sal
In the Application of this assertion the Apostle affirms, that those Priests, the were made without an Oath. No such thing is mentioned in all that is recorded concerning their Call and Consecration. For where they are expressExod. 28, 29. there is mention made of no such thing. But their dedication consisted in three things.
1. A Call from God expressed, chap. 28. ver. 1. VVe have shewed how nefirst erection of any Priesthood, though it was to be contichap. 5, 4. It is therefore granted that in this general Foundation of the Office, Aaron had it, even as Christ had, though not in the same way or manner. For the Call of Christ was far more eminent and gloriAaron; as hath been shewed.
2. It consisted in the Appointment and Preparation of those peculiar Garments, and Mystical Ornaments wherein they were to administer their Office, and their Unction with the holy Annointing Oyle, when cloathed with those Garments.
3. In the Sacrifices wherewith they were consecrated and actually set apart unto that Office whereunto they were called. And these two were peculiar unto them, there being no use of them in the consecration of Christ, for both of them did deexternal and carnal, and therefore could nemake any thing perfect, nor were capable of a confirmation unto perpetuity.
But the Promise made unto Phineas seems to be expresse for an eternity in this Priesthood. Behold, saith God, I give unto him my Covenant of Peace, and he shall have it, and his seed after him, even the Covenant of an Everlasting Priesthood. Num. 25. 12, 13. But this proves not a certain absolute perpetuity of this Priesthood of Phineas. For,
1. The Covenant intended, was not a compleat solemn Covenant confirmed either by Oath or Sacrifice, but only a naked Promise or Declaration of the VVill of God. And that Jews themselves.
2. All the special Covenants or Promises that God made unto, or which any unCommensurate unto the Duration and Continuance of the Law it self. VVhilst the Covenant of the Law it self was in force, they also continued; and when that ceased, then also
But neither with respect unto him or any other, is there any mention of the Oath of God. For indeed God did never solemnly interpose himself with an Oath in a way of Priviledge or Mercy, but with direct respect unto Jesus Christ. So he sware by himself unto Abraham, that in his seed all the Nations of the Earth should be blessed, whereby he declared the immutability of his Counsel, in sending his Son to take his seed upon him. So he sware unto David by his Holinesse, that his seed, namely Christ, should sit on the Throne for ever. Wherefore although God never changeth any real internal Acts of his Will, or his Purposes, for with him there is neither variableness nor shadow of turning; yet he often works an Alteration in some things, which on some conditions, or for some time he hath proposed and enOath. For this declares them to be absolutely immutable.
This is the Account the Apostle gives of the Aaronical Priests,
and they
truly, that is, Aaron and all his Posterity that exercised the Priests Office in a due manner, they were all made Priests, that is, by God himself. They did not oritake this Honour unto themselves, but were called of God. For he hath no regard unto them who in those days invaded the Priests Office with violence, deCovenant of Levi. Those that entred into and executed their Office according to the Law, are here intended by him. These were all made Priests in the way of Gods appointment; but neither all of them nor any of them were made Priests by an Oath. God, into whose Soveraign Will and Pleasure all these things are resolved, granted unto them what he saw convenient, and withheld what seemed good unto him; what he did was sufficient to oblige the People unto Obedience during that Dispensation of his Will: and what he did not adde, but reserved for a further dispensation of His Grace, intimated that liberty which he reserved unto himself of making an Altera
Although the Decrees and Purposes of God were always firm and immutable, yet there was no fixed state of outward Dispensations, none confirmed with an Oath, untill Christ came. Nor shall we find any rest in any thing, until we come to Christ.
The Apostle in the next words declares in particular, and positively, what he had in general and negatively before laid down; but this with an Oath,
but He,
this Man, he who was to be a Priest after the order of Melchisedec. He was made with an Oath. This is first asserted and then proved by the Psalmist; and the Assertion may have a double signification. (1) That this Oath was constituent of his Office. Therein his Call and Consecration did consist. (2.) That his Call, Constitution, or Consecration was confirmed and ratiAntithesis require. Those legal Priests had a Divine Constitution and Call, but they had no Confirmation by the Addition of an Oath; God used not an Oath in or about any thing that belonged unto them. Wherefore this Man was also to have another Call unto, and Constitution of his Office, but he was to be confirmed therein by an Oath. Wherein this call of Christ unto his Office did consist, what were the Acts of the Divine Will thereabout, and what was the manifestation of them, I have declared at large in the Exercitations about the Priesthood of Christ. Two things are to be considered in this Oath. (1.) The form. And (2.) the matter of it.
the Lord sware and will not repent. And the Mathe in his own Person should be a Priest for ever.
The Person swearing is God the Father, who speaks unto the Son in the Psalm 110. 1. The Lord said unto my Lord: and the Oath of God is nothing but the solemn Eternal Unchangeable Decree and Purpose of his Will, under an especial way of Declaration. So the same Act and Counsel of Gods Will is called his
If then it be demanded, When God thus sware unto Christ? I answer, we must consiDecree it self unto this purpose, and the peculiar Revelation or Declaratifoederal Transactions between the Father and the Son, which were the original of the Priesthood of Christ, which I have at large explainExercitations. And as for the latter, it was when he gave out that RePsalm by David.
It is therefore not only a mistake but an Error of danger in some Expositors, who suppose that this Oath was made unto Christ upon his Ascension into Heaven. For this Apprehension being pursued, will fall in with the Socinians in this whole Cause, namely, that the
Wherefore this Oath of God, though not in it self solely the constituent cause of the Priesthood of Christ, yet it was, and it was necessarily to be antecedent unto his Actual entrance upon, or discharge of any solemn Duty of his Office.
That additional expression, and he will not repent, declares the nature of the Oath of God and of the Purpose confirmed thereby. When God makes an Alterepent. This God by this word declares shall never be; no Alteration or Change, no Removal or Substitution shall ever be made in this matter.
2. The matter of this Oath, is, that Christ is and should be a Priest for ever. He was not only made a Priest with an Oath, which they were not, but a Priest for
And this, for ever, answers unto the for ever under the Law; each of them beabsolute Eternity belongs not unto these things. The Ever of the Old Testathis, for ever, respects the New Covenant, which is to continue unto the consummation of all things, no change therein being any way intimated or promised, or consistent with the Wisdome and Faithfulness of God, all which were otherwise under the Law. But at the end of the world, together with the Dispensation of the New Covenant, an end will be put unto all the Mediatory Offices of Christ, and all their Exercise. And there are four things which the Apostle declareth and evinceth in this observation.
1. That our High Priest was peculiarly designed unto and initiated into his Office by the Oath of God, which none other ever was before him.
2. That the Person of the High Priest is hereby so absolutely determined, as that the Church may continually draw nigh unto God in the full Assurance of Faith.
3. That this Priesthood is liable to no Alteration, Succession, or Substitution.
4. That from hence ariseth the principal Advantage of the New Testament above the
Old, as is declared in the next verse, and we may observe,
1. That although God granted great Priviledges unto the Church under the Old Testament, yet still in every instance he withheld that which was the principal, and should have given perfection unto what he did grant. He made them Priests, but without an Oath. In all things there was a reserve for Christ, that he in all might have the Preeminence.
2. God by his Oath declares the Determination if his Soveraign pleasure unto the Object of it. What he proposeth and prescribeth unto us, he declares no more of his mind and his will about, but that he requireth and approveth of our Obedience unto it, but still reserves the liberty unto himself of making those Alterations in it and about it, that seem good unto him. Nothing therefore in the whole legal AdOath of God, it was always ready for a remo
3. Christ his being made a Priest by the Oath of God for ever, is a solid Foundation of Peace and Consolation to the Church. For,
4. All the Transactions between the Father and the Son, concerning his Offices, undertakings, and the work of our Redemption, have respect unto the Faith of the Church, and are declared for our Consolation. Such were his
1. The things which God proposeth unto our Faith through Christ, are exinnate Apprehensions, do need the highest confirmation. Things they are, which
frame of our Hearts with respect unto them, is such from first to last, as stands in need of all the Evidence that can be given unto them. For there is in us by nature an aversation unto them, and a dislike of them. In the wisdom of our carnal minds we look on them as foolish and useless. And when this woful enmity is conquered by the Mighty Power of God, and the Souls of Sinners wrought over to approve of these effects of Divine Wisdom and Grace, yet no man can recount how many doubts, fears, jealous suspicions we are, as to our closing with them by Faith, obnoxious unto. Every ones own Heart, if he have any acquaintance with it, if he be diligent in the examination of it, will sufficiently satisfie him what objections Faith in this mat
By so much wasJesusmade a Surety of a better Testament.
By so much answers directly to ver. 20. in as much. There is therefore an immediate connexion of these words unto that verse. Hence ver. 21. wherein a confirmation is interserted of the principal Assertion, is justly placed in a Parenthesis in our Translation.
So the sense of the Words is to this purpose: And in as much as he was not made a Priest without an Oath, he is by so much made the Surety of a better Testament.
And there may be a twofold Design in the Words. (1.) That his being made a Priest by an Oath made him meet to be the Surety of a better Testament; or (2.) That the Testament whereof he was the Surety must needs be better than the other; because he who was the Surety of it was made a Priest by an Oath. In the one way, he proves the Dignity of the Priesthood of Christ from the New Testament; and in the other the Dignity of the New Testament from the Priesthood of Christ. And we may reconcile both these senses by affirming, that really and efficiently the Priesthood gives Dignity unto the New Testament, and declaratively the New Testament sets forth the Dignity of the Priesthood of Christ.
It is owned tacitely, that the Priesthood of Levi, and the Old Testament were good, or these could not be said to be better in way of comparison. And Good they were because appointed of God, and of singular use unto the Church during their continuance. But this Priesthood and Testament are better, by so much as that which is confirmed with an Oath, is better than that which is not so, which aPriesthood of Christ, and of the New Testament in comparison unto those of old, all which encrease the proportion of Difference; but at present the Apostle considers only what depends on the Oath of God. Wherefore the DeMelchisedec, was designed to be the Surety of another Testament, he was confirmed in his office by the Oath of God, which gives a Prcheminence both unto his Office and the Testament whereof he was to be a Surety.
In the Assertion it self that Jesus was made a Surety of a better Testament, we may consider, (1.) what is included or supposed in it, and (2.) what is literally expressed.
included and supposed in this Assertion. (1.) That there was another Testament that God had made with his People. (2.) That this was a good Testament. (3) That this Testament had in some sense a Surety.
As unto what is expressed in these words, there are four things in them. (1.) The Name of him who was the subject discoursed of, it is Jesus. (2.) What is affirmed of him, he was a Surety. (3.) How he became so, He was made so. (4.) Whereof he was a Surety, and that is of a Testament of God. Which, (5.) is described by its respect unto the other before mentioned, and its preference above it, it is a better Testament.
1. It is supposed that there was another Testament which God had made with his People. This the Apostle supposeth in this whole context, and at length brings his discourse unto its Head and issue in the eighth Chapter, where he expresly compareth the Two Testaments the one with the other. Now this was the CoveHebrews on Mount Sinai when he brought them out of Egypt, as is expresly declared in the ensuing Chapters, whereof we must treat in its proper place.
2. It is supposed, that this was a Good Testament. It was so in it self, as an effect of the Wisdom and Righteousness of God. For all that he doth is good in it self, both naturally and morally, nor can it otherwise be. And it was of Good Use unto the Church, namely, unto them who looked unto the end of it, and uBody of the People indeed, as far as they were carnal, and looked only on the one hand for temporal Benefits by it, or on the other for Life and Salvation, it was an heavy yoke, yea the Ministration of Death. With respect unto such Persons and Ends it contained Statutes that were not Good, Commandments that could not give Life; and was every way unprofitable. But yet in it self it was on many Accounts Good, Just and Holy. (1.) As it had an Impression upon it of the Wisdom and Goodnesse of God. (2) As it was instructive in the nature and demerit of Sin. (3.) As it directed unto and
3. It is supposed that this Testament had a Mediator. For this New TestaSurety, the other must have so also. But who this was must be in
1. Some would have our Lord Jesus Christ to be the Surety of that Testament alThere is one God, and one Mediator between God and Man, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave himself a ransome for all to be Testified in due time; 1 Tim. 2. 5, 6. Be the Covenant or Testament what or which it will, there is but one Mediator between God and Man. Hence our Apostle says of him, that Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, to day, and for ever, Chap. 13. 8. If therefore he be the only Mediator to day under the New Testament, he was so alyesterday under the Old.
Answ. 1. There is some difference between a Mediator at large, and such a Mediator as is withal a Surety. And however on any Account Christ may be said to be the Mediator of that Covenant, he cannot be said to be the Surety of it.
2. The place in Timothy cannot intend the Old Covenant but is exclusive of it. For the Lord Christ is there called a Mediator with respect unto the Ransome that he paid in his death and bloodshedding. This respected not the confirmation of the Old Covenant, but was the Abolition of it; and the Old was confirmed with the Blood of Beasts, as the Apostle expresly declares, Chap. 9. 18. 19.
3. The Lord Christ was indeed in his Divine Person the immediate Administrator of that Covenant, the
4. The Lord Christ was a Mediator under that Covenant, as to the original ProMediator and Surety of it as it was a Covenant: For had he been so, he beyesterday, to day, and for ever, that Covenant could have never been dis
Moses to have been the Surety of the Old Testament. For so it is said, that the Law was given by the Disposition of Angels in the hand of a Mediator. Gal. 3. 19. That is, of
Answ. (1.) Moses may be said to be the Mediator of the Old Covenant in a gewent between God and the People, to declare the Will of God unto them, and to return the profession of Obedience from them unto God; But he was in no sense the Surety thereof. For on the one side God did not appoint him in his stead to give Assurance of his fidelity unto the People. This he took absolutI am the Lord thy God. Nor did he, nor could he on the other side undertake unto God for the People; and so could not be esteemed in any sense the Surety of the Covenant. (2.) The Apostle hath no such argument in hand, as to compare Christ with Moses, nor is he treating of that Office wherein he compares him with him, and pre
3. It was the High Priest alone who was the Surety of that Covenant. It was made and confirmed by sacrifices, Psal. 50. 5. as we shall see more at large afterChap. 9. 19, 20. And if Moses were concerned herein, it was as he exePriest in an extraordinary manner. Therefore the High-Priest offering solemn sacrifices in the name and on the behalf of the People, makAttonement for them according to the terms of that Covenant, supplyed the place of the Surety thereof. And we may observe, That
How good and glorious soever any thing may appcar to be, or really be in the Worship of God, or as a way of our coming to him, or walking before him; if it be not ratified in and by the immediate Suretiship of Christ, it must give way unto that which is better; it could be neither durable in it self, nor make any thing perfect in them that made use of it.
2. In what is positively asserted in the words we may observe,
1. The Person who is the subject spoken of, and that is, Jesus. He had in geMelchisedec. But he had not yet in this whole chapter, that is, from the beginning of this discourse, mentioned who that Person was, or named him. But here he makes application of the whole unto him; it is Jesus who in all these things was intended. And this he doth suitably unto his design and occasion. For two things were in question among the Hebrews. (1.) What was the Nature of the Office of the Messiah. (2.) Who was the Person. For the first of these, he proves unto them from their own acknowledged Principles, that he was to be a Priest, as also what was the nature of that Priesthood, and what would be the necessary consequents of the setting up that office in the Church, and the exercise of it: this his whole precedent discourse is designed unto. Now he asserts the second part of the difference, namely, that it was Jesus who is this Priest, because in him alone do all things concurre that were to be in that Priest, and he had now discharged the principal part and Duty of that Office.
It was sufficient for the Church of the Jews to believe in the Messiah, and to own the work of Redemption which he was to accomplish. Nor did the meer actual coming of Christ make it absolutely necessary that they should all immediately be obliged to believe him to be the Person. Many, I doubt not, died after his IncarHe who was their ReDeclaration that was made of him, and the Evidences given to prove him to be the Son of God, the Saviour of the world. So he tells those unto whom he preachif ye believe not that I am he, ye shall dye in your sins, John 8. 24. It would not now suffice them to believe in the Messiah in general, but they were also to believe, that Jesus was He, or they must perish for their unbelief. Howbeit they only were intended who hearing his words and seeing his Miracles, had sufficient Evidence of his being the Son God. Of others in the same Church, this was not as yet required. Nor, it may be, doth our Saviour oblige them immeMessiah, should continue in their unbelief. Hereon and not before, the Belief in his individual Person, in Jesus the Son of God, became the Foundation of the Church; so that whoever beleived not in him did die in their sins. Wherefore the Apostles immediately upon the coming of the Holy Ghost, made this the first and principal subject of their Preaching, namely, that Jesus was the Christ. See Acts 2, 3, 4, 5. so our Apostle in this place, having asserted the Nature of the Office of the promised Messiah, makes an application of it unto his Person, as he also had done, Chap. 2. 9. And we may observe that,
All the Priviledges, Benefits and Advantages of the Offices and Mediation of Christ, will not avail us, unless we reduce them all unto Faith in his Person. Indeed it is not so much what is done, though that be unconceivably great, as by whom it is done, namely, Jesus the Son of God, God and Man in One Person.
It is a matter of somewhat a surprizing Nature, that divers in these days do endeavour to divert the minds and Faith of men from a Respect unto the Person of Christ. But that the crafts of Satan have made nothing, be it never so foolish or impious in Religion, to seem strange, a man could not but admire how such an Atfervently love, nor more
2. That which is affirmed of this Person is, that he was made a Surety.
1. The way whereby he became so, is expressed by He was made so. So Chap. 1. 4. of the same importance with another translated appointed, Chap. 3. 2. and it signifies what is expressed, Chap. 5. 5. The places may be consulted with our exposition of them. Respect is had hereActs of God the Father in this matter. What are those Acts of God, whether Eternal or Temporal that did concurre unto or any way belong unChap. 1. 1, 2, 3. And more particularly for what concerns his Priesthood, it hath been handled apart in our Exercitations on that subject. But we may here also observe, that
The whole undertaking of Christ and the whole efficacy of the discharge of his Office depends on the Appointment of God even the Father.
3. It is affirmed that he was thus made, appointed or constituted, that is, by God himself a Surety, which is farther declared by the Addition of that whereunto his Suretiship had a respect, namely, a better Covenant;
Of the proper signification of the word Hebrews. As,
1. That there was to be another Covenant or Testament of God with and towards the Church, besides that which he made with Israel when he brought them out of Egypt. The Promises hereof are so frequently repeated in the Prophets especial
New Covenant or Testament should be better than the former, which was to be disanulled thereby. This carried along with it, its own Evidence. For after God in his Wisdom and Goodness had made one Covenant with his Peothat other were better than it; especially declaring so often as he doth, that he granted them this New Covenant, as the highest effect of his Grace and Kindness towards them. And that indeed it was expressely promised to be a better Covenant than the former, we shall see in the next chapter, if we live and God Will.
3. It is supposed that this better Covenant must have a Surety. The original CoAdam had none, and therefore was it quickly broIsrael had no Surety, proSurety.
Of the word and its signification we have spoken before. And in our enquiry Suretiship of Christ, the whole will be resolved into this one Question, namely, Whether the Lord Christ was made a Surety only on the part of God unto us, to assure us that the Promise of the Covenant on his part should be accomplished, or also an Undertaker on our part for the performance of what is required, if not of us, yet with respect unto us, that the Promise may be accomplished. The first of these is vehemently asserted by the Socinians, who are followed by Grotius and Hammond in their Annotations on this place.
The words of Schlictingius are. Sponsor foederis appellatur Jesus, quod nomine Dci nobis spoponderit, id est, fidem fecerit Deum foederis promissiones servaturum esse. Non verò quasi pro nobis spoponderit Deo, nostrorumve debitorum solutionem in se receperit. Nec enim nos misimus Christum sed Deus, cujus nomine Christus ad nos venit, foedus nobiscum panxit, ejusque promissiones ratas fore spopondit & in se recepit, ideoque nec sponsor simpliciter sed foederis sponsor nominatur. Spopondit auiem Christus pro foederis divini veritate, non tantùm quatenùs id firmum ratumque fore verbis perpetuo testatus est, sed etiam quatenus muneris sui fidem maximis rerum ipsarum comprobavit Documentis, tum perfectâ vit ae innocentia & sanctitate, tum divinis plané quae patravit operibus, tum mortis adeò truculentae, quam pro doctrin ae suae veritate subiit, perpessione. After which he subjoyns a long Discourse about the Evidences which we have of the
On the other hand the generality of Expositors antient and modern, of the Roman and Protestant Churches, affirm that the Lord Christ as the Surety of the CoveSurety or undertaker unto God for us, and not a Surety or un
And first, we may consider the Argument that is produced to prove, that Christ was only a Surety for God unto us. Now this is taken neither from the Name nor Nature of the Office or work of a Surety, nor from the Nature of the Covenant whereof he was a Surety, nor of the Office wherein he was so. But the sole Arguthat we do not give Christ as a Surety of the Covenant unto God, but he gives him unto us, and therefore he is a Surety for God and the Accomplishment of his Promises, and not for us to pay our debts, or to answer what is required of us.
But there is no force in this Argument. For it belongs not unto the nature of a Surety, by whom he is or may be designed unto his Office and work therein. His own voluntary susception of the Office and work, is all that is required thereunto, however he may be designed or induced to undertake it. He who of his own AcSurety. And this the Lord Christ did in the besacrifice and burnt Offerings and whole burnt-offerings for sin God would not have, or accept as sufficient to make the AttoneLo I come to do thy will O God, Heb. 10. 5, 6. He willingAttonement for us, wherein he was our Surety. And accordingly this underLove which he exercised herein, Gal. 2. 12. 1 John 3. 16. Rev. 1. 5. And there was this in it moreover that he took upon him our Nature or the Seed of Abraham, wherein he was our Surety. So that although we neither did nor could appoint him so to be, yet he took from us that wherein and whereby he was so: which was as much as if we had designed him unto his work, as to the true Reason of his being our Surety. Wherefore notwithstanding those antecedent Transactions that were between the Father and him in this matter, it was the voluntary engagement of himself to be our Surety, and his
2. We may consider the Arguments, whence it is evident that he neither was nor could be a Surety unto us for God, but was so for us unto God. For,
1. Surety, is one that undertaketh for another wherein he is defective really or in Reputation. Whatever that undertaking be, whether in Words of Promise, or in depositing of real security in the hands of an Arbitrator, or by any other Personal engagement of Life and Body, it respects the
2. God can therefore have no Surety properly, because there can be no ImagiWord or Promise of God. To assure us hereof, it is not the work of a Surety, but only any one or any means that may give evidence that so it is. But upon a supposition that what is proposed, is his Word or Promise, there can be no Imagination or Fear of any defect on his part, so as that there should be any need of a Surety for the performance of it. He doth indeed make use of Witnesses to confirm his Word, that is, to testifie that such Promises he hath made and so he will do. So the Lord Christ was his
3. The Apostle had before at large declared who and what was Gods Surety in this matter of the Covenant, and how impossible it was that he should have any ohimself alone interposing himself by his Oath. For in this cause, because he had none greater to swear by, he sware by himself, Chap. 6. 13, 14. VVhereSurety besides himself, it must be one greater then He. This being every way impossible, he swears by himself only. Many ways he may and doth use for the declaring and testifying of his Truth unto us, that we may know and believe it to be his word; and so the Lord Christ in his Ministry was the principal Witnesse of the Truth of God. But other Surety than himself he can have none. And therefore,
strong Consolation, he resolves it wholly into the immutability of his counsel, as declared by his Promise and Oath, Chap. 6. 18, 19. So that neither is God capable of having any Surety properly so called, neither do we stand in need of any on his part for the confirmation of our Faith in the highest degree.
5. VVe on all Accounts stand in need of a Surety for us, or on our behalf. NeiSurety could any Covenant between God and us be firm and stable, or an Everlasting Covenant ordered in all things and sure. In the first Covenant made with Adam there was no Surety, but God and Man were the immediate Covenanters. And although we were then in a state and condition able to perform and answer all the Terms of the Covenant, yet was it broken and disanulled. If this came to pass by the failure of the Promise of God, it was nesurety to undertake for him, that the Covenant might be stable and Everlasting. But this is false and blasphemous to imagine. It was man alone who failed and brake that Covenant. VVherefore it was necessary that upon the making of the New Covenant, and that with a design and purpose that it should never be disanulled, as the former was, that we should have a Surety and undertaker for us. For if that first Covenant was not firm and stable because there was no Surety to undertake for us, notwithstanding all that Ability which we had to answer the Terms of it, how much less can any other be so, now our natures are become depraved and sinful? wherefore we alone are capable of a Surety properly so called for us, we alone stood in need of him, and without him the Covenant could not be firm and inviolable on our parts: The Surety therefore of this Covenant is so with God for us.
6. It is the Priesthood of Christ that the Apostle treats of in this place, and that alone. VVherefore he is a Surety as he is a Priest and in the Discharge of that ofGod on our behalf. This Schlictingius observes and is aware what will ensue thereon against his pretensions, which he endeavours to obviate. Mirum (saith he) porrò alicui videri posset, cur D. Auctor de Christi sacerdotio in superioribus & in sequentibus agens, derepente eum sponsorem foederis, non verò sacerdotem vocet. Cur non dixerit, tantò praestantioris foederis factus est sacerdos Jesus? hoc enim planè requirere videtur totus orationis contextus. Credibile est in voce sponsoris sacerdotium quoque Christi intelligi. Sponsoris enim non est solùm alieno nomine quippiam promittere, & fidem suam pro alio interponere; sed etiam, si ita res ferat, alterius nomine id quod spopondit, praestare. In rebus quidem humanis, si id non praestet is pro quo sponsor fide jussit; hic verò propter contrariam causam (nam prior hic locum habere non potest) nempe quatenus ille, pro quo spopondit Christus, per ipsum Christum promissa sua nobis exhibet, quâ in re praecipuè Christi sacerdotium continetur.
Answ. (1.) It may indeed seem strange unto any one who imagineth Christ to be such a Surety as he doth, why the Apostle should so call him and so introduce him in the Description of his Priestly Office, as that which belongeth thereunto. But grant what is the proper work and duty of a Surety, and who the Lord Jesus was a Surety for, and it is evident that nothing more proper or pertinent could be mentiSuretiship of Christ, as making a Surety for God, he contradicteth the nature and only notion of a Surety among men. For such a one he acknowledgeth doth nothing but in the defect and inability of them for whom he is ingaged and doth undertake. He is to pay that which they owe, and to do what is to be done by them, which they cannot perform. And if this be not the notion of a Surety in this place, the Apostle makes use of a word no where else used in the whole Scripture, to teach us that which it doth never signifie among men, which is improbable and absurd. For the sole Reason why he did make use of it was, that from the Nature and Notion of it among men in other Cases, we may understand the signification of it, what he intends by it, and what under that name he ascribes unto the Lord Jesus. (3.) He hath no way to solve the Apostles mention of Christs being a Surety in the Description of his Priestly Office, but by overthrowing the nature of that Office also. For to confirm this absurd notion that Christ as a Priest was a Surety for God, he would have us believe that the Priesthood of Christ coneffectual Communicating
It remaineth that we enquire positively, how the Lord Christ was the Surety of the New Covenant, and what is the benefit we receive thereby. And unto this purprocure the New Covenant; although at first view it be irreconcileable unto the nature and notion of a Surety. For a Surety is not the ProSurety, but only the undertaker for its Accomplishprocure the New Covenant by his Death and Mediation. And to this end we must observe that the New Covenant may be considered divers ways in various respects.
1. In the Designation and Preparation of its Terms and Benefits in the Counsel of God. And this although it have the nature of an Eternal Decree, yet is it distinguishDecree of Election, which first and properly respects the Subjects or PerPreparation only of that Grace and Glory, as to the way and manner of their Communication. It is true, this Purpose or Counsel of Gods Will, is not
2. It may be considered with respect unto the Federal Transactions between the Father and Son, concerning the Accomplishment of this counsel of his Will. What these were, wherein they did consist, I have declared at large in my Exercitations. Neither do I call this the Covenant of Grace absolutely, nor is it so called in the Scripture. But it is that wherein it had its establishment, as unto all the ways, means and ends of its Accomplishment; and all things so disposed, as that it might be effectual unto the Glory of the Wisdom, Grace, Righteousness and Power of God. Wherefore the Covenant of Grace could not be procured by any means or cause, but that which was the cause of this Covenant of the Mediator, or of God the Father with the Son as undertaking the work of Mediation. And as this is no where ascribed unto the Death of Christ in the Scripture, so to assert it, is contraAgreement between God and him, that he should dye?
3. With respect unto the Declaration of it: this you may call Gods making or establishing of it with us, if you please, though making of the Covenant in the Scripture is applyed only unto its
1. In the way of a singular and absolute Promise, as it was first declared unto, and thereby established with Adam and afterwards with Abraham. This is the DeclaPurpose of God, or the free Determination of his VVill as to his dealonly Cause: Heb. 8. 8.
substance of that Promise wherein this DeCovenant of Grace which was introduced and established in the room of that which was broken and disanulled as unto the ends and benefits of a Covenant. The substance of the first Promise, wherein the whole Covenant of Grace was virtually comprized, directly respected and expressed the giving of him, for the Recovery of mankind from sin and miseGen. 3. 15. VVherefore if he, and all the benefits of his Mediain the Promise of the Covenant, that is, in the Covenant it self; then was not his Death the procuring Cause of that Covenant, nor do we owe it thereunto.
2. In the additional prescription of the way and means whereby it is the will of God that we shall enter into a Covenant state with him, or be interested in the bevirtually comprized in the absolute Promise, is expressed in other places by the way of the Conditions required on our part. This is not the Covenant but the Constitution of the Terms on our part, whereon we are made parConstitution of these Terms an effect of the Death of Christ, or procured thereby. It is a meer effect of the Soveraign Wisdom and Grace of God. The things themselves as bestowed on us, communicated unto us, wrought in us by Grace, are all of them effects of the Death of Christ; but the Constitution of them to be the Terms and Conditions of the Covenant, is an Act of meer Soveraign Wisdom and Grace. God so loved the VVorld as to send his only Begotten Son to dye, not that Faith and Repentance might be the means of Salvation, but that all his Emight believe, and all that believe might not perish, but have Life Everlasting. But yet it is granted that the Constitution of these Terms of the Covenant doth refederal Transactions between the Father and the Son, wherein they were ordered to the Praise of the Glory of Gods Grace; and so although their Constitutirespect unto it, it had not been. VVherefore the sole cause of making the New Covenant in any sense, was the same with that of giving Christ himself to be our Mediator, namely, the Purpose, Counsel, Goodnesse, Grace and Love of God, as it is every where expressed in the Scripture.
It may be therefore enquired what respect the Covenant of Grace hath unto the Death of Christ or what Influence it hath thereunto.
I Answer, it hath a threefold respect thereunto.
1. In that it was confirmed, ratified, and made irrevocable thereby. This our AChap. 9. ver. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. And he compares his Blood in his Death and sacrifice of himself, unto the sacrifices and their Blood whereby the old Covenant was confirmed, purified, dedicated or established, ver. 18, 19. Now these sacrifices did not procure that Covenant, or prevail with God to enter into it, but only ratified and confirmed it; and this was done in the New Covenant by the Blood of Christ, in the way that shall be afterwards declared.
2. He thereby underwent, and performed all that which in the Righteousnesse and VVisdome of God required that the Effects, Fruits, Benefits and Grace inonly Cause and Means whereby the whole Grace of the Covenant is made effectual unto us. For,
3. All the Benefits of it were procured by him; that is, all the Grace, Mercy, Priviledges and Glory that God had prepared in the Counsel of his VVill, and proposed in the Covenant or promises of it, are purchased, merited, and procuMediatory Acts. And this is much more an eminent procuring of the New Covenant, than what is pretended about the procurement of its Terms and Conditions. For if he should have procured no more but this, if we owe this only unto his Mediation, that God would thereon, and did grant and establish this Rule, Law, and Promise, that Whosoever believed should be saved, it was possible that no one should be saved thereby; yea if he did no more, considering our state and condition, it was impossible that any one should so be.
Surety of the Covenant, as he is here called.
A Surety, Sponsor, Vas, Praes, Fidejussor, for us the Lord Christ was, by his voluntary undertaking out of his rich Grace and Love, to do, answer, and perform all that is required on our Parts, that we may enjoy the Benefits of the Covenant, the Grace and Glory prepared, proposed and promised in it, in the way and manner determined on by Divine wisdom. And this may be reduced unto two Heads.
1. He undertook as the Surety of the Covenant to answer for all the sins of those who are to be, and are made Partakers of the Benefits of it. That is, to underpunishment due unto their sins; to make Attonement for them, by offering himself a propitiatory Sacrifice for their Expiation, redeeming them by the price of his Blood from their state of misery and bondage under the Law and the Curse of it, Isa. 53, 4, 5, 6, 10. Matth. 20. 28. 1 Tim. 2. 6. 1 Cor. 6. 20. Rom. 3. 25, 26. Heb. 10. 5, 6, 7, 8. Rom. 8. 2, 3. 2 Cor. 5. 19, 20, 21. Gal. 3. 13. And this was absocommunicated unto us. VVithout this undertaking of his, and performance of it, the Righteousness and Faithfulness of God would not permit, that sinners, such as had Apostatized from him, despised his Authority, and rebelled against him, falling thereby under the sentence and curse of the Law, should again be received into his favour, and be made partakers of Grace and Glory. This therefore the Lord Christ took upon himself, as the Surety of the Covenant.
2. That those who were to be taken into this Covenant should receive Grace enabling them to comply with the Terms of it, fulfil its conditions, and yield the obedi
Obs. The stability of the New Covenant depends on the Suretiship of Christ and is secured unto Believers thereby. The Introduction of a Surety in any case is to give Stability and Security. For it is never done but on a supposition of some weakness, or defect on one Account or other. If in any Contract, Bargain, or Agreement, a man be esteemed every way responsible both for Ability and Fidelity, there is no need of a Surety, nor is it required. But yet whereas there is a defect or weakthat they are all mortal and subject unto death, in which case neither Ability nor FideliImportance need Sureties. These give the utmost confirmation that affairs among men are capable of. So doth the Suretiship of Christ on our behalf in this Covenant. For the evidencing whereof, we may consider,
1. The first Covenant as made with Adam, had no Surety. As unto that which in the New Covenant the Suretiship of Christ doth principally respect, it had no need of any. For there was no sin, Transgression or Rebellion against God to be satisfied for, so that it was absolutely incapable of a Surety unto that end. But as to the second part of it, or his undertaking for us, that through supplies of strength from him, we shall abide faithful in the Covenant, according to the Terms and Tenure of it; this had no inconsistency with that first state. As the Lord Christ upon his undertaking the work of Mediation, became an immediate Head unto the Angels that sinned not, whereby they received their establishment and security from any future defection; so might he have been such an Head unto, and such an undertaker for man in Innocency. No created nature was or could have been unchangeable in its condition and state, meerly on its root of Creation. As some of the Angels fell at first, forsaking their habitation, falling from the principle of obedience which had no other Root but in themselves; so the Rest of them, all of them, might afterwards have in like manner Apostatized and fallen from their own innate stability, had they not been gathered up into the new head of the Creation, the Son of God as Mediator; receiving a New Relation from thence, and establishment thereby. So it might have been with man in Innocency: But God in his infinite Soveraign wisdom saw it not meet that so it should be. Man shall be left to the Exercise of that Ability of living unto God, which
2. When God made a Covenant with the People in the wilderness, to manifest that there could be no stability in it without respect unto a Surety, that it could not continue, no not for a day, he caused it to be dedicated or confirmed with the blood of Sacrifices. This the Apostle declares, and withal its Typicalness with respect unto the new Covenant and the confirmation of it with the blood of Christ, Chap 9. 18, 19, 20, 21. And afterwards, as we have declared, the high Priest in the Sacrifices that he offered, was the Typical Mediator and Surety of that Covestability. And we need a Surety unto this pur
1. Because in the state and condition of sin, we are not capable of immediate dealing or Covenanting with God. There can be no Covenanting between God and sinners, unless there be some one to stand forth in our name, to receive the Terms of God, and to undertake for us. So when God began to treat immediately from Heaven with the people of old, they all jointly professed, that such was the
2. The changeableness of our Condition in this World, requires a Surety for us, to render the Covenant firm, stable and unalterable. So the Psalmist complaining of our frail and mutable Condition shews, that it is in Christ alone that we have all our establishment, Psal. 102. 25, 26, 27, 28. Of old thou hast laid the Foundations of the Earth, &c. That it is the Lord Christ the Son of God that in an especial manner is intended, I have shewed and proved at large on Chap. 1. 10. where this passage in the Psalm is applyed unto him. And the conclusion that the Psalmist makes from the consideration of his
3. VVho is it among the whole society of Believers, that is not sensible of such actual dispositions unto change, yea such actual changes, as that it is not evident unto him, that his final stability depends on the undertaking of a Surety? No man can give an Account from himself whence it is, that he hath not already utterly broSuretiship of Christ, which discovers how we have been kept hitherto, and which gives us any comfortable prospect of our future Preservation. And the same is evident from the Consideration of all the Adversaries of our Covenant interest.
Here we might stay a while to contemplate the glory of Divine wisdom and grace, in providing this Surety of the Covenant, and to adore the infinite Love and condescension of him, who undertook the discharge of this Office for us. But we must proceed, only observing
2. That the Lord Christs undertaking to be our Surety gives the highest Obligation unto all Duties of Obedience according to the Covenant. For he hath undertaken for us, that we shall yield unto God this Covenant Obedience, and said, surely they are Children that will not lye. He is no Believer who understands not some
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Et alij quidem plures facti sunt sacerdotes; And many others truly were made Priests, or, and others truly were made many Priests.
Et illi quidem plures sunt facti sacerdotes. And they truly were many Priests. So the Syr.
and they were many Priests, omitting the note of Asseveration, Truely.
were made: not only the event and matter of fact, but Gods Insti
Idcirco quòd morte prohiberentur permanere, Rhem. because that by death they were prohibited to continue. Ours, Because they were not suffered to continue by Reason of Death; quoniam per mortem non sine bantur permanere; which is the true meaning of the words. Syr. Because they died and were not left to continue.
hic autem, at iste; But this Man,
quòd maneat in aeternum; quoniam ipse in aeternum maneat, propterea quòd in aeternum manet; all to the same purpose.
sempiternum, perpetuum habet sacerdotium. Syriack,
His Priesthood passeth not away:
transgressed, and so not altered, as Sacred Law which none ought to transgresse, which cannot in any thing be dispensed withal: And by conpasseth not away. That Priesthood, (
Syr.
and he can quicken, or enliven, or give Eternal Life;
Syr.
for ever, respecting duration of time, in perpetuum, Vul. Lat. Others, perfectè, perfectly, compleatly; Ours, to the utmost.
accedentes per semetipsum ad Deum. Rhemists, he is able to save for ever going by himself unto God; strangely darkening the sense. For going seems to respect his own going to God, which the Vulg. accedentes, will not bear, eos qui per ipsum accedunt ad Deum. Those who by him draw nigh to God.
semper vivens ad interpellandum pro nobis, always living to make infor us, instead of for them,
Syr.
Causing to ascend, or offering prayers for them.
And they truly were many Priests, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of Death. But this Man, because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable Priesthood. Wherefore he is able to save them also to the uttermost, that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make Intercession for them.
THe Apostle in these words proceedeth unto his last Argument, from the consiMelchisedec. And his intention is still to prove the excellency of it above the Levitical, and of his Person above theirs. And in particular he makes it manifest that the
That he hath in these verses a respect unto Melchisedec as a Type of Christ and what we are taught thereby, is evident from the matter treated of in them. He had observed that as to the Description given of him in the Scripture, that he abideth a Priest continually, ver. 3. and that it is
Moreover as what the Apostle affirms here of Christ hath respect unto what he had before observed concerning Melchisedec, so what he affirms of the Levitical Priests depends on what he had before declared concerning them, namely, that they were all mortal dying men and no more, and who actually died in their Sucver. 8.
The words therefore have three things in them in General.
1. The state and Condition of the Levitical Priests by reason of their mortality, ver. 23. This he observes because he is not declaring the Dignity of Christ and his Priesthood absolutely, but with respect unto them; whose state therefore was the Antithesis in the Comparison.
2. The state and Condition of the Priesthood of Christ on the account of his glover. 24.
3. The blessed effects and consequents of the Priesthood of Christ, in as much by vertue of his Immortality, he was a Priest for ever, v. 25.
In the first (ver. 23.) there is (1.) The Introduction of his Assertion and Observaand they truly.
(2.) What he affirms of those Priests, they were many.
(3.) Whence that came to pass; namely, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death: which is not alledged only as the cause and Reason of their being many, but also as a proof of their weakness and Infirmity.
In the Introduction of his Assertion, there is a note of connexion and another of Asseveration.
The first is the copulative Conjunction; And,
2dly. There is a vehemency in his Assertion or a note of Asseveration; and they
truly. He had used the same note before in the same manner, ver. 21. where we omit the Emphasis of it without cause. And in other places the same Translators render this Particle by, truly, as they do here, 1 Joh. 1. 3. But he doth not so much assert a thing by it that was dubious, as positively declare that which was well known, and could no way be gainsaid by them with whom he had to do. And an Argument pressed ex concessis is forceible. This is a known Truth.
2. That which he affirms of them is, that they were many Priests; or there many made Priests; or they who were made Priests were many. The sense is the same. By the Appointment of God himself, there were many made Priests, or executed the office of the Priesthood. It is of the High Priests only, Aaron and his Successors of whom he speaks: And it is with respect unto their Succession one to another, that he affirms they were many. This both the reason of it which he subjoynes, and what he afterwards adds concerning the Priestno Succession, do evidently declare. For there neither was nor could be by the Law any more than one at a time. Perhaps in the disorder and confusion of that Church there might be more that were so called and esteemed, as were Annas and Caiphas: but that confusion he takes no notice of, but attends unto what alwayes was or ought to have been, according to the Law.
By Succession these High Priests were many. For from Aaron the first of them unto Phineas, who was destroyed with the Temple, there were inclusively four-score and three High Priests. Of these, thirteen lived under the Tabernacle, before the building of the Temple by Solomon; Eighteen under the first Temple unto its Destruction by the Babylonians; and all the rest lived under the second Temple, which yet stood no longer than the first. And the Multiplication of High Priests unJews look upon as a Punishment and token of Gods displeasure: for because of the sins of a Nation, their Rulers are many, and fre
Whatever Advantages there may be in an orderly Succession, yet is it absoImperfection. And by the Appointment of this Order God signified an Imperfection and Mutability in that Church state. Succession indeed was a Relief against death; but it was but a Relief, and so supposed a want and weak
God will not fail to provide Instruments for his work that he hath to accomplish. If ma
3 The Reason of this Multiplication of Priests, was because they were not suffered
1. There is such a necessity of the continual Administration of the Sacerdotal Office in behalf of the Church, that the interruption of it by the death of the Priests was an Argument of the weakness of that Priesthood.
The High Priest is the Sponsor and Mediator of the Covenant. Those of old were so Typically and by way of Representation. VVherefore all Covenant Transactions between God and the Church must be through him. He is to offer up all Sacrifices, and therein represent all our prayers. And it is evident from thence what a Ruin it would be unto the Church to be without an High Priest one moment. Who would venture a suprizal unto his own soul in such a condition? Could any man enjoy a moments peace, if he supposed that in his extremity the High Priest might dye? This now is provided against, as we shall see in the next verse.
But this man, because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable Priesthood.
IN opposition unto what was observed in the Levitical Priests, the contrary is here affirmed of the Lord Christ. And the Design of the Apostle is still the same, namely, to evince by all sorts of Instances his Preeminence as a Priest above them as such also.
1. The Person spoken of is expressed by Exceptive Conjunction,
but,
Antithesis.
2. It is affirmed of this Person, that he hath an unchangeable Priesthood; the Ground and Reason whereof is assigned, namely, because he continueth ever, which must be first considered.
The sole Reason here insisted on by the Apostle, why the Levitical Priests were
many, is because they were forbidden by death to continue. It is sufficient thereperpetual uninterrupted Administration of it.
This was the Faith of the Jews concerning the Messiah, and his office. We have heard, say they, out of the Law, Joh. 12. 34. That Christ abideth for ever; whereon they could not understand what he told them about his being lifted up by Death. And so the word abide, to continue in any state or condition, Joh. 21. 22, 23. And this was that which prinMelchisedec, concerning whom there is no Record, as to the Beginning of Days or End of Life, but as unto the Scripture Descriptito abide a Priest for ever.
It may be said in opposition hereunto, that the Lord Christ dyed also, and that no less truely and really than did Aaron or any Priest of his Order. Wherefore it will not hence follow that he had any more an uninterrupted Priesthood than they had.
Some say the Apostle here considers the Priesthood of Christ only after his Resurrection and
I say therefore that although Christ dyed, yet he was not forbid by death to abide in his Office as they were. He died as a Priest, they died from being Priests. He died as a Priest, because he was also to be a Sacrifice. But he abode and continued not only vested with his Office, but in the execution of it in the state of death. Through the indissolubleness of his Person, his soul and body still subsisting in the Person of the Son of God, he was a capable subject of his Office. And his bestate of the dead belonged unto the Administration of his Office, no less than his Death it self. So that from the first moment of his being a Priest he abode so alwaies without interruption or intermission. This is the meaning of in his own Person abideth. Nor doth the Apostle say, that he did not dye, but only that he abideth alwaies.
3. It followeth from hence, that he hath an unchangeable Priesthood. A Priestsacerdotium successivum, per successionem ab uno alteri traditum. Such a Priestabideth not with him but he delivereth over unto another, as Aaron did his unto Eleazar his Son, or it falls unto another by some Right or Law of Succession: A Priesthood that goes from hand to hand.
Priesthood that doth not passe from one unto another. And this the Apostle seems directly to intend, as is evident from the Antithesis. The Priests after the Order of Aaron were many, and that by reason of death. Wherefore it was necessary that their Priesthood should pass from one to another by Succession. So that when one received it, he that went before him ceased to be a Priest. And so it was, either the Predecessors were taken off by death, or on any other just occasion as it was in the case of Abiathar, who was put from the Priests Office by Solomon, 1 King. 2. 27. How beit our Apostle mentions their going off by death only; beordinary way, and which was provided for in the Law. With the Lord Christ it was otherwise. He received his Priesthood from none. AlTypes, yet he had no Predecessor. And he hath none to sucfollow him than went before him.
The Expositors of the Roman Church are greatly perplexed in the reconciling of this Passage of the Apostle unto the present Priesthood of their Church. And they may well be so, seeing they are undoubtedly irreconcileable. Some of them say that Peter succeeded unto Christ in his Priesthood, as Eleazar did unto Aaron; So Ribera: some of them deny that he hath any Successor properly so called. Successorem non habet, nec it a quisquam Catholicus loquitur, si bene & circumspectè loqui
That which they generally fix upon is, that their Priests have not another Priesthood or offer
1. This is directly contrary unto the words and design of the Apostle. For the Reason he assigns why the Priesthood of Christ doth not passe from him unto any other, is because he abides himself for ever to discharge the Office of it. Now this excludes all subordination and conjunction; all Vicars as well as Successors, unless we shall suppose that although he doth thus abide, yet is he one way or other dis
2. The Successors of Aaron had no more another Priesthood but what he had, than it is pretended that the Roman Priests have no other Priesthood but what Christ had. Nor did they offer any other Sacrifice than what he offered, as these Priests presame Sacrifice that Christ did. So that still the case is the same beAaron and his Successors, and Christ and his Substitutes.
3. They say that Christ may have Substitutes in his Office though he abide a Priest still, and although the office still continue the same unchangeable. So God in the Government of the world makes use of Judges and Magistrates, yet is himSacerdotal Office of Christ consisted in his Oblation, or his offering himself a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God. This he did once, and ceaseth for ever from doing so any more. But these Priests are assigned to offer him in Sacrifice every day, as partakers of the same Priesthood with him, which is indeed not to be his Substitutes but his
The Argument of the Apostle as it is exclusive of this Imagination, so it is cogent unto his purpose. For so he proceedeth. That Priesthood which changJews grant that the frequency of their change under the second Temple was a Token of Gods displeasure. But thus it was with the Priesthood of Christ which never changeth, and that of Aaron which was alwaies in a transient Succession. And the Reasons he gives of this contrary state of these two Priesthoods do greatly enforce the Argument. For the first Priesthood was so Successive, because the Priests themselves were obnoxious unto death the sum and issue of all weaknesses and infirmities. But as to the Lord Christ, his Priestbeing made a Priest according to the Power of an endless Life, which is the sum of all Perfections, that our nature is capable of. And we may observe,
1. The perpetuity of the Priesthood of Christ depends on his own perpetual Life. He did not undertake any Office for the Church to lay it aside whilst he lives, until the whole Design and work of it be accomplished. And therefore he tells his Disthat because he liveth they shall live also, John 14. 19. For whilst he lives, he will take care of them. But this must be spoken unto on the next verse.
2. The perpetuity of the Priesthood of Christ, as unchangeably exercised in his own Person, is a principal part of the Glory of that Office. His discharge of this Office for the Church in his own Person throughout all Generations is the glory of it. (1.) Hereon depends the Churches preservation and stability. There is neither a ceasing nor any the least intermission of that Care and Providence, of such interposition with God on its behalf which are required thereunto. Our High Priest is continuabiding for ever, manifests the continuance of the same Care and Love for us, that he ever had. The same Love wherewith as our High Priest he laid down his Life for us, doth still continue in him. And every one may with the same confidence go unto him with all their concerns, as poor diseased and distempered Persons went unto him when he was upon Earth; when he never shewed greater displeasure than unto those who forbad any to come unto him whatever their pretences were. (2.) Hereon depends the Union and Communion of the Church with it self in all successive Generations. For whereas he who is their Head and High Priest, in whom they all center as unto their Union and Communion, and who hath all their Graces and Duties in his hand to present them unto God, they have a Relation unto each other and a concernment in one another. VVe that are alive in this generation have CommuChap. 12. ver. 22, 23, 24. And they were concerned in us, as we are also in the generations that are to come. For all the Prayers of the Church from first to last are lodged in the hand of the same High Priest who abides for ever. And he returns the prayers of one Generation unto another. VVe enjoy the fruits of the Prayers, Obedience, and Blood of those that went before us; and if we are faithful in our generation, serving the VVill of God, those shall enjoy the fruits of ours, who shall come after us. Our joynt interest in this our abiding Priest gives a line of Communication unto all Believers in all Generations. And, (3.) the Consolation of the Church also depends hereon. Do we meet with Troubles, Trials, Difficulthe Blood of the Lamb, or the efficacy of his Sacrifice, that they overcame their Adversaries, Revel. 12. 11. By the same blood were their Robes washed and made white, Chap. 7. 14. From thence had they their Righteousness in all their Sufferings. And by him had the Church its triumphant issue out of all its Trials. Now is he not the same that he ever was, vested with the same Office, and hath he not the same Qua
3. The Addition of sacrificing Priests as Vicars of, or Substitutes unto Christ in the discharge of his Office, destroys his Priesthood as to the principal eminency of it above that of the Levitical Priesthood.
Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make Intercession for them.
IN this verse the Apostle brings his whole preceding Mysterious discourse unto an Issue, in the Application of it unto the Faith and Comfort of the Church. It was not his Design meerly to open Mysterious Truths in the notion of them; Nor only to prove the Glory and preeminence of the Gospel Church state, above that of the same Church, under Mosaical Institutions, on the Account of the Priesthood of Christ: But his principal Design was, to demonstrate the Spiritual and Eternal Advantages of all true Believers by these things. The sum of what he intends, he proposeth in this verse, and afterwards enlargeth on unto the end of the Chapter. What Believers ought to seek in, and what they may expect from this
There are in the words, (1.) The Illative Conjunction or note of Inference; Wherefore.
(2.) An Ascription of Power unto this High Priest; He is able.
(3.) The end of that Power, or the effect of it; it is to save, which is farther dethe extent of it, it is unto the uttermost. (2.) The especial Object of it; Those that come to God by him.
4. The Reasons of the whole; which are, (1.) His perpetual life; (2.) His perpetual work. He ever liveth to make Intercession for them. The note of InfeArgumentative DisChap. 2. 17. 3. 1. 8. 3. 9 18. 11. 19. and in this place, ideo, quapropter.
Considerations of the Person and Offices of Christ ought to be improved unto the strengthening of the Faith, and encrease of the Consolation of the Church. So they are here by the Apostle. After the great and ample Declaration that he hath made of the Excellency of his Priestly Office with respect unto his Person, he applies all that he hath spoken unto the incouragement of the Faith and Hope of them that endeavour to go to God by him. And all those who explode such considerations and such improvements of them, are no otherwise to be looked on but as persons ut
2. That which is inferred to be in this Priest, is Power and Ability.
He is able; He can. This is the second time the Apostle ascribeth Power or Ability
Chap. 2. ver. 18. and the Exposition thereof. And it is, not an Ability of nature, but of Office that is intended. An Ability of nature in Christ he had proved sufficiently in the first Chapter of the Epistle, and that accompaSupreme Power or Authority over all; But whereas, as our Mediator, he hath undertaken such Offices for us, he is, as such, able to do no more, than he is so by vertue of them or in the discharge of those Offices. If therefore there be any thing needfull for us, which although it may be supposed within the compasse of the Divine Power of the Son of God, is yet not to be effected in a way of Office, that as our Mediator he, is not able for. Hence doth our Apostle presse his Ability not
absolutely, but as the High Priest of the Church: As if a man who is mighty in Wealth, Riches, and Power be also made a Judge. It is one thing what he can do by his Might and Power, another what he is able for, and can do as a Judge. And he who hath to deal with him as a Judge, is to consider only what he is able for in the Discharge of that Office. And he doth this partly to evince his preeminence apersonal Infirmities and the limited nature of their Office, they were really unable to effect many things which the Church stood in need of from those that discharged that Office, suppoready, Willing, diligent and
The Consideration of the Office Power of Christ is of great use unto the Faith of the Church. To this end we may observe,
1. That the Foundation of all the Benefits which are received by Christ, that is, of the Spiritual and Eternal Salvation of the Church, is laid in his condescension to undertake the Office of a Mediator between God and Man. And as this was the greatest effect of Divine Wisdom and Grace, so it is the first Cause, the Root and Spring of all Spiritual Blessings unto us. This the whole Scripture beareth TestiHeb. 10. 7. 1 John 3. 16. This is the fundamental Article of Faith Evangelical. And the want of laying this Foundation aright, as it occasioneth ma
2. Having undertaken that Office, all the Actings of it for us and towards us or towards God in our behalf, are circumscribed and limited by that Office. We have no Ground of Faith to expect any thing from him or by him, but what belongs unthe Office that he hath undertaken. Neither are we in our Addresses unto him, and expectations from him, to consider him absolutely as God, the Eternal Son of God only, but as the Mediator between God and Man. VVe can look for no more from a King but what he can justly do as a King, nor any other Person in Office; no more are we to look for from Christ himself.
3. This Office of Christ in general as the Mediator and Sponsor of the New Cothree especial Offices, of a King, a Prophet, and a Priest. Whatever therefore we receive from Christ, or by him, we do it as he acts in that threefold capacity, or in one of those Offices, a King, a Priest, or a Prophet. VVhatever he hath done for us, or continueth to do, whatever he doth
4. All these Offices, whether vested jointly in any one other Person, or severally and distinctly in several Persons, as they were under the Old Testament, could neunto all the occasions and necessities of the Church. The business of our Apostle, in this chapter, is to prove, that the Office of the Priesthood as vested in Aaron and his Successors, made nothing perfect, did not consummate the Church state, nor could effect its Salvation. The Kingly Office as it was Typically managed by David and others, was remote from answering that Rule and Safety which the Church stood in need of. Neither did nor could
Prophet, no nor yet all the Prophets together, reveal and declare the whole Counsel of God. But,
5. These Offices as they were in Christ did perfectly answer, and yet do, all that belongs to the Redemption, Sanctification, Protection and Salvation of the Church. And this they do on two Accounts,
1. Because they were Committed unto him in a more full, ample and unlimited manner, than either they were, or could be unto others, on Purpose that they might answer all the ends of Gods Grace towards the Church. So as he was made a King; not this or that degree or enlargement of Power was committed unto him, but all Power in Heaven and in Earth, over all the Creation of God, in all things Spiritual, Temporal and Eternal. See our Description and Delineation of this Power, on Chap. 1. ver. 2, 3. As a Prophet he did not receive this or that particular Revelation from God, but all the Treasures of Wisdom and Knowledge were laid up in him, and he knew the whole mind and Counsel of God, as coming forth from his Divine Bosom. And as unto his
2. The principal Reason of the All-sufficiency of the Office-Power, and Ability of Christ, is taken from his own Person, which alone was capable of a Trust of such a Power, and able to execute it unto all the Ends of it. He alone who was God and Man in one Person, was capable of being such a King, Priest, and Prophet, as was able to save the Church unto the uttermost. Wherefore in the consideration of this Office-Power of Christ wherein all our Salvation doth depend, we have two things to attend unto. First, his Person who bears these Offices, and who alone was fit and able so to do; and secondly, the especial Nature of the Office as committed unto him. On these grounds he was Able to do infinitely more as a Priest, than all the Priests of the Order of Aaron could do. So the Apostle expresseth it in the next words.
3. He is able to save,
even to save, to save also; not for this or that even to save. The general sense of this word is litemporal Deliverances, but that which is supernatural, spiritual and eternal is intended thereby.
And, (1.) The Notion of the word includeth in it a supposition of some Evil or Danger that we are delivered from. This is sin with its consequents of Misery, in the Curse of the Law and the VVrath to come: VVherefore it is said of Christ that he saves his People from their sins, Math. 1. 21. from the Curse, Gal. 3. 13. and from the Wrath to Come, 1 Thess. 1. 10. In these things all that is or can be Evil un
(2.) The bringing of us into an estate of present Grace and Right unto future Blessedness, with the enjoyment of it in its appointed season, is intended in it. For although this be not included in the first notion of the VVord, yet it belongs unto the Nature of the thing intended. This Salvation, called therefore great and Eternal Salvation, doth not meerly respect the
1. That there is Power and Ability required unto this work. He is able to save. It was no easie thing to take away sin, to subdue Satan, to fulfil the Law, to make Peace with God, to procure Pardon, to purchase Grace and Glory, with all ois able to accomplish it, and that by the means he hath designed to use, and the way wherein he will proceed. We are apt to pass this over without any enquiry into it, and to take it for granted that God is able to do whatever he pleaseth: But it is not of the absolute Power of God whereof we speak, but of the Power of God or of Christ put forth in such a peculiar way. And the want of Faith herein, is the first and most proper part of Unbelief. VVherefore as God ingageth his Omnipotency or All-sufficiency as the Foundation of all his Covenant Actings toGen. 17. 1. So he often pleadeth the same Power to assure us of the AcIsa. 40. 28, 29. And it is expresly asserted as
principal ground of Faith, Rom. 4. 21. Chap. 11. 23. 1 Cor. 10. 10. 13. Ephes. 3. 20. 2. Tim. 1. 12. Jude 24. and often in this Epistle.
2. It is here supposed that the discharge of Christs Priestly Office, is the Way deto save us by, or to effect this great work of Salvation. No other way or means is appointed of God unto this End. Here we must look for it, or go withsons of Belial, who said of Saul when God had anointed him King, how shall this man save us, and despised him, 1 Sam. 10. 21. They understand not how Christ is able to save them by his Priesthood, and therevarious Pretences they trust to themselves and despise him. All false Religion is but a choice of other things for men to place their trust in with a neglect of Christ. And all Superstition grows on the same Root, in all effects or instances of it, be they great or small. VVherefore I say we are to consider whether this Office and the Acts of it, be suited and meet for the effecting all things that belong to this Salvation. For if we find them not so, we cannot believe that he is a Priest able to save us. But they evidence themselves to be otherwise, unless our minds are darkned by the Power of Unbelief, as we shall see in the particulars after
It is good to secure this first Ground of Evangelical Faith, that the Lord Christ as vested with his Offices and in the exercise of them, is able to save us. Salvation is that which all sinners, who have fallen under any Convictions, do seek after. And it is from God they look for it; he alone they know can save them; and unless he do so, they cannot be saved. And that he can do so they seem for a while to make no Question, although they greatly doubt whether he will or no. Here under these general apprehensions of the Power of God, they cannot long abide, but must proceed to enquire into the Way whereby he will save them, if every they be saved. And this the whole Scripture testifieth to be no otherwise but by Jesus Christ. For there is no salvation in any other; neither is there any other Name under Heaven given among men whereby they must be saved; Act. 4. 12. When their thoughts are thus limited unto Christ alone, their next enquiry is, how shall this man save us? And hereon are they directed unto his Offices, especially his Priesthood whereby he undertakes to deliver them from the Guilt of their sins, and to bring them into favour with God. Is it not therefore highly incumbent on them, to satisfie themselves herein that Christ is able to save them in the exercise of this Office? For if he be not, there is no salvation to be obtained. And when men are come thus far, as that they will not Question in general but that the Lord Christ in the discharge of his Sacerable to save sinners in general, yet unbelief will keep them off from acquiescing in this Power of his as so limited, for their own salvation. As Naaman had thoughts in general that Elisha could cure men of their Leprosie, yet he would not believe that he could cure them in the way and by the means he preKing. 5. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14. When Peronly by Christ, and do apprehend in general that he can save sinners, yet oft-times when they come to inquire into the way and manner of it by the Exercise of his Priestly Office, they cannot close with it. Away they turn again into themselves, from which if they are not reChrist as a Priest is able to save us, or is able to do so in the discharge of his Sacerdotal Office, we shall never make one firm step in our Progress. To this end we must consider,
That the Lord Christas Mediator, and in the Discharge of his Office, is the wisedom of God and the Power of God. So saith our Apostle;
3. He is able to save also Perfection of the work, or its Duration; and so it is variously rendred; to the utmost, that is, compleatly; or evermore, that is, alwaies or for ever. So the Syriack Translation carries it.
Take the word in the first sense, and the meaning is; that he will not effect or work out this or that part of our salvation; do one thing or another that belongs unto it, and leave what remains unto our selves or others; but he is our Rock and his work is perfect. Whatever belongs unto our entire compleat Salvation he is able to effect it. The general notion of the most that are called Christians, lies directly against this Truth.
In the latter sense two things may be intended. (1.) That after an entrance is made into this work, and men begin to be made partakers of deliverance thereby, there may great oppositions be made against it in Temptations, Trials, Sins and Death, before it be brought unto Perfection. But our Lord Christ, as our Faithful High Priest, fainteth not in his work, but is able to carry us through all these difficulties, and will do so until it be finished for ever in heaven. (2.) That this Salvation is durable, perpetual, eternal, Isa. 45. 17. Salvare in aeternum; to prosalutem aeternam. But favores sunt ampliandi, and there is nothing hinders but that we may take the words in such a comprehensive sense, asto include the meaning of both these Interpretations. He is able to save compleately as to all Parts, fully as to all causes, and for ever in Duration. And we may observe,
Whatever hindrances and difficulties lye in the way of the salvation of Believers, whatever oppositions do rise against it, the Lord Christ is able by vertue of his Sacerdotal Office, and in the exercise of it, to carry the work through them all unto eternal perfection.
In the Assertion of the Ability of Christ in this matter, there is a Supposition of a work whereunto great Power and efficacy is required; and whereas it is emaffirmed, that he is able to save unto the uttermost, it is supposed that great Oppositions and difficulties do lye in the way of its accomplishment. But these things are commonly spoken unto by our Practical Divines, and I shall not therefore in
The whole is farther declared by instancing in those who are to be saved or made Partakers of this Salvation. He is able to save to the uttermost, but yet all are not to be saved by him; Yea, they are but few that are so. Of the most it may be said, They will not come unto him that they may have life. Wherefore those whom he is thus able to save and doth save accordingly, are all those and only those, who come unto God by him.
To Come to God hath a double sense in the Scripture, for it is sometimes expresMatth. 11. 28. And Unbelief is a refusal to come to
You will not come to me that you may have Life. Faith in God through him, is coming to the Father by him, Joh. 14. 6. so to come to God by Christ, is through him to believe in God, 1 Pet. 1. 21.
2. Our Accesse unto God in his Worship, is our coming unto him. So is it most frequently expressed in the old Testament, Drawing nigh unto God. And the expression is taken from the Approach that was made unto the Tabernacle in and with all holy services. Worship is an Approximation unto God, Psal. 73. 28. Heb. 10. 1. The Comers, the worshippers; not those that come to the Worship, but those who by that Worship come to God. In anAccesse, an ApproximaEphes. 1. 18. Heb. 10. 22.
The latter sense is principally here intended; for the discourse of the Apostle is concerning the slate of the Church under the New Testament, with the Advantage of it above that of Old, by its Relation unto the Priesthood of Christ. They came of old to God with their worship by the High Priest of the Law; But those High Priests could not save them in any sense; But the High Priest of the New TeGospel worshippers, all that come to God by him.
But the former sense of the word is also included and supposed herein. They that come unto God by Christ, are such, as believing in him, do give up themselves in holy Obedience to worship God in and by him.
So is the way expressed of this coming unto God, by him as an Chap. 10. 19, 20, 21, 22.
Now to come unto God by Jesus Christ in all holy worship, so as thereon to be interested in his saving Power as the High Priest of the Church, is so to come, (1.) In Obedience unto his Authority as to the way and manner of it; (2.) With Affiance in his Mediation, as to the Acceptance of it; (3.) VVith
1. It is to come in Obedience unto his Authority, and that on a double account. (1.) Of the way of coming. It is not by legal Institutions, it is not by our own InAppointment. Matth. 28. 20. To come to God any other way, gives us no interest in the care or saving Power of Christ, John 15. 7, 8. (2.) Of that especial respect which we have in our Souls and Consciences un
2. With Affiance in his Mediation. And therein Faith hath respect unto two things, (1.) The Sacrifice he hath offered, the Attonement and Reconciliation he hath made for us, whereon our whole liberty of Accesse unto God doth depend, Chap. 10. 19, 20, 21, 22. (2.) To his Intercession whereby he procures actual Acceptance for our Persons and our Duties, Heb. 4. 16. 1 John 2. 2.
3. The Foundation of the whole is Faith in his Person as vested with his holy Office, and in the discharge of it. It is so to believe in him, as to believe that he is able to save to the utmost all that come unto God by him. This is the ground whereon in our holy worship we assemble in his name, Matth. 18. 20. And make all our Supplications unto God in his name, John 16. 26. That is, by an exercise of Faith and Trust in him, that by and through him we shall be accepted with God. And we may hence observe,
1. The Salvation of all sincere Gospel worshippers is secured by the Actings of the Lord Christ in the Discharge of his Priestly Office.
2. Attendance unto the Service, the worship of God in the Gospel, is required to interest us in the saving Care and Power of our High Priest. Men deceive themselves who look to be saved by him, but take no care to come to God in Holy Worship by him: Nor is it an easie or common thing so to do. All men pretend unto
3. Those who endeavour to come unto God any other way, but by Christ; as, by Saints and Angels, may do well to consider, whether they have any such Office in Heaven as by vertue whereof they are able to save them to the uttermost. That this is done by those of the Roman Church, cannot with any modesty be denied, yea, it is avowed by them. For when they are charged with the wickedness of their Doctrine and Practice in this matter, evacuating the Mediation of Christ, they reply that they admit of no Mediators of Reconciliation with God, but only of intercession. Be it so, Ability to save to the utmost is here ascribed unto our High Priest upon the Account of his interFor being reconciled by his Death, we are saved by his Life, Rom. 5. 10. He therefore alone is the Mediator of Intercession, who is able by vertue of his Office to
Those whom they choose to go to God by, are able to save them, or they are not. If they are not, is it not the greatest folly and madness imaginable, whilst we seek after Salvation, to set him aside on any occasion, in any one instance, who can save us to the utmost, and betake our selves unto them who cannot save us at all? If they are able to save us in any sense, it is either by vertue of some Office, and Office-Power that they are invested withal in Heaven, (as Ministers are in the Discharge of their Office said to save them that hear them, 1 Tim. 4. 16. That is, ministerially and inany Office, they can do more than Jesus Christ can do; for he is able to do it by vertue of his Office only. And if it might have been otherwise, what need was there that Christ should undertake and discharge this Office of the Priesthood, and that our Apostle should so labour to prove the Excellency of this his Office, only to satisfie us that he is able to save them that come to God by him? If they do it by vertue of any Office committed to them, let it be named what it is. Are they
And what is the Reason, why men should so readily close with other means, oMediators of Intercession to go to God by them? For when they pray to Saints, although they should only pray unto them to intercede for them, as some of them pretend, (however openly and manifestly against their expresse and avowed Prago to God by them. For to speak of any Religious Prayer, and yet not to look on it in general as a going or coming to God, is a fond and sensepray to Saints, as most of them do more than to Jesus Christ, their design is to go to God by them. But what is it that should enduce them hereunto? Our Lord Christ hath told us, that he is the way; and that no man cometh unto the Father but by him, John 14. 6. What reathat no man cometh unto the Father but by him; should yet attempt to go another way? Have others more Power in these things than he, so as it is adviseable on that Acare able to save to the utmost all that come to God by them? Or where is any one word spoken of their Power or Interest in HeaPower only, but of Love, Pity and Compassion: And although the Saints have less Ability than Christ, yet they may have more of Love and CompasKindred, or Progenitors, or CounBlessed Virgin,
female Saints are by their natural constitution as well as their Grace, (who would not think so?) mightily enclined unto pity and compassion. And indeed they are marvellous things, which some of them tell us concerning the Blessed Virgin in this case, and her condescension in the pursuit of her Love and Pity. But yet this Imagination is the highest pitch of Folly and Ingratitude. Certainly nothing can more stir up the Indignation of God, than to have any Creatures in Heaven or Earth, or all together equalled in Love and Compassion with Jesus Christ. He that doth not know that there is an unparellel'd Eminency of these in him, who is not in some measure instructed in the cause and effect of them, knows no more of the Gospel than a Jew. There is more Love, Pity and Compassion in Christ Jesus towards every poor sinner, that comes unto God by him, than all the Saints in Heato comprehend. And if Kindred or Alliance may be of consideration in this matter, he is more nearly related unto us, than Father or Mother, or wife or children, or all together, we being not only bone of his bone, and flesh of his flesh, but so joyned to him, as to be one spirit with him.
But it will yet be said, that it is on none of these considerations that men choose to go unto God by other Mediators of Intercession, only whereas the Lord Christ is so great and so gloriously exalted at the right hand of the Majesty on high, they dare not alwaies presumptuously intrude into his glorious presence: and therefore they make use of the Saints, who are more cognate unto us, and not cloathed with such terrible Majesty. And in going unto God by the friends of Christ, they please him as well as if they went immediately by himself. Answ. (1) He is an Unbeliever, unto whom the
The close of this verse gives us the special Reason and Confirmation of all the efficacy that the Apostle hath assigned unto the Priesthood of Christ. alwaies living to make Intercession for them. And three things must be considered in these words.
1 The state and Condition of Christ as an High Priest. He liveth alwayes, or for ever.
2. What he doth as an High Priest in that state and Condition: He maketh Inter
3. The Connexion of these things, their mutual regard, or the Relation of the work of Christ unto his state and condition; the one is the end of the other; He lives for ever to make intercession for us.
1. As to his state and condition, He lives for ever. He is alwayes living. The Divine Person hath a threesold life in Heaven. The one he lives in himself: the other for himself: and the last for us.
1. The Eternal life of God in his Divine Nature; This he liveth in himself. As the Father hath life in himself, so hath he given unto the son to have life in himself, Joh. 5 26. He hath given it him by eternal Generation, in a communication unto him of all the divine Properties. And he that hath life in himself, a life indepenliving one, the living God. No creature can have life in himself. For in God we live, move, and have our being. He is hereby Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, the Begining and end of all, Revel. 1. 11. because he is living one, ver. 18. And this Life of Christ is the foundation of the efficacy of all his Mediatory Actings, namely, that he was in his own divine Person the Living God, Act. 20. 28. 1 Cor. 2. 8. 1 Joh. 3. 16. But this is not the immediate cause of his Mediatory Effects, nor is it here intended.
2. There is a Life which he liveth for himself; namely, a Life of unconceivable Glory in his Humane Nature. He lead a mortal life in this world, a life obnoxious unto misery and death, and died accordingly. This life is now changed into that
Hence forth he dyeth no more, death hath no more Power over him. And not only so, but this Life of his is unto him the cause of, and is attendineffable Glory which he now enjoyes in Heaven. This Life he lives for himself, it is his reward, the Glory and Honour that he is crowned withal. All the endowments, all the enjoyments and the whole eternal exaltation of the Humane Nature in the Person of Christ belong unto this Life of Glory. And the glorious exaltation of that individual humane nature, which the son of God as
3. The Lord Christ lives a Mediatory Life in Heaven, a Life for us. So saith our Apostle, he was made a Priest after the Power of an endless Life; whereof we have treated before. He lives as King, Prophet and Priest of the Church. So he describes himself, Revel. 1. 18. I am he that liveth and was dead, and behold I am alive for evermore, and have the keys of Hell and Death. As he died for us, so he liveth for us, and is entrusted with all Power over the Churches adbecause he liveth we shall live also, Joh. 14. 19. Now this life differeth not essentially from that life of Glory in the Humane Nature which he livone especial end of it, and that only for a season. The Lord Christ will have the life in himself, the divine life unto all Eternity; and so also will be the Life of Glory in the Humane Nature. But he shall cease to live this Mediatory Life for us, when the work of his Mediation is accomplished, 1 Cor. 15. 28. But he shall lead this life alwaies for us, until the whole work committed unto him be accomplished, and shall lead it as a Life of Glory in himself unto Eternity.
Obs. It is a matter of strong consolation unto the Church, that Christ lives in Heaven for us. It is a spring of unspeakable Joy unto all true Believers, that he lives a Life of Immortality and Glory in and for himself in Heaven. Who can call to mind all the miseries which he underwent in this world, all the reproach and scorn that was cast upon him by his enemies of all sorts, all the wrath that the whole world is yet filled withal against him, but is refreshed, rejoyced, transported, with a spiritual view by Faith of all that Majesty and Glory, which he is now in the Eternal PossesStephen; Act. 7. 56. And therefore in all the AppearanAct. 26. 13. Revel. 1. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. And the due consideration hereof cannot but be a matter of unspeakable Refreshment unto all that love him in sincerity.
But herein lyeth the Life of the Churches Consolation, that he continues to live a Mediatory Life in Heaven for us also. It is not I fear so considered, nor so imdyed for us, all who own the Gospel profess in words: though some so explain their Faith or rather their Infidelity as to deny its proper use, and to evacuate its proper ends. That so he lived for us here in this world, so as that his Life was some way or other unto our Advantage, at least thus far that he could not have died if he had not lived before, all men will grant, even those by whom the principal end of this Life, namely, to fulfil the Law for us, is peremptorily denyed. But that Christ now lives a life of Glory in Heafor himself alone. But the Text speaks to the contraHe lives for ever to make Intercession for us. Neither is this the only end of his present Mediatory Life in Heaven, though this only be here expressed. Should I undertake to shew the ends of the present Mediatory Life of Christ for the Church, it would be too great and long a decursion from the Text. However the whole of the work of this Life of his may be reduced into these three heads.
1. His immediate Actings towards the Church it self, which respects his Prophe
2. His Actings for the Church in the world, by Vertue and Power of his Kingly Office.
3. His Actings with God the Father in their behalf, in the dischage of his sacer
Holy Ghost unto the Church. He lives for ever to send the Holy Spirit unto his Disciples. Without this conBeing of the Church would fail, it could not subsist one moment. For hereon depends; (1.) All saving Light to understand the word of God, or spiritual things in a spiritual manner, wherein he continueth the exercise of his Prophetical Office. (2.) All Habitual Grace whereby the souls of the Elect are quickned and regenerated. (3) All supplyes of actual Grace, which the whole Church hath from him every moment, and without which it could yield no Obedience unto God. (4.) All spiritual Gifts, the sole foundation and means of the Churches edification, and without which it can have no real benefit by any Gospel Ordinances or Administrations. (5.) All Comfort and all Consolation, which in all variety of occurrences the Church doth stand in need of; which things I have elsewhere spoken unto at large.
2. His Actings by vertue of his Mediatory Life for the Church in the world, are also various, wherein he exerciseth his Kingly Power; that Power which is given unto him as he is Head over all things unto the Church. Ephes. 1. 22. Hence is the whole preservation of the Church in this world, by glorious effects of divine wisraign until all his Enemies be made his footstool. In the exercise of this Life, wherein the Keys of Hell and Death are committed unto him, doth he put forth his Mighty poWorld, Sathan, Death, the Grave, and Hell, for the Eternal securiLife for us in Heaven, nei
3. By vertue of this Life he Acts with God on the behalf of the Church. And He lives for ever to make intercession for them. Now this expression containing the whole of what the Lord Christ as the High Priest of the Church doth now with God for them, and whereon the certainty of our Salvasome diligence be enquired into.
Expositors, especially those of the Roman Church, enquire with many Disputes into the External form of the Intercession of Christ, as namely, whether it be oral and vocal, or no. And they produce many Testimonies out of the Antients upon the one side and the other. And great weight is laid by some on the Difference and Determination of it. For whereas Ribera grants that the Dispute is more about words and the manner of Expression, than the matter it self; Tena affirms that what he says is most false. And it is evident that the Testimonies produced by themChrysostome, Theophylact, Ambrose, Austin, and so to Ruperu
and
1. The Socinian Figment about the Nature of the Intercession of Christ is of no consideration. For by a strange violence offered unto the nature of things, and the signification of words, they contend that this Intercession is nothing but the Power of Christ to communicate actually all good things, the whole effect of his Mediati
2. The Intercession of Christ was under the Old Testament Typed out three ways. (1.) By the Living fire that was continually on the Altar. Herewith were all sacrifices to be kindled and burned, which thence were called Firings. But this principally Typified his Prayers, when he offered himself unto God through the Eternal Spirit, which he did with strong cryes and Supplications or Intercessions, Heb. 5. 7. Hereby, and the Actings of the Eternal Spirit therein, he kindled and
fired in himself a sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God, Eph. 5. 2. (2.) By the dayly sacrifice of morning and evening for the whole People. See the Institution of it, Exod. 29. ver. 38, 39, 40, 41, 42. For although that sacriexpiatory Oblation, because it was by blood; yet the principal end of it was to make continual Application of the great solemn annual expiation unto the Consciences of the People. (3.) By the Incense that was burnonce a year into the most holy place on the Day of Expiation. For he might not enter in, yea he was to dye if he did, unless in his entrance he filled the place and covered the Ark and Mercy-Seat with a cloud of Incense, Levit. 16. 12, 13. Which Incense was to be fired with burning coals from the Altar of burntHe filled Heaven at his entrance with the sweet savour of his Intercession, kindled with the Coals of that Eternal Fire, whereIncense that was burned every day in the Sanctuary by the Priests in their courses. This represented Prayer, Psal. 141. 2. and was always accompanied with it, Luke 1. 9, 10. This also was a Type of the continual efficacy of the Intercession of Christ, Revel 8. 4. But this was the most solemn representation of it. In that anniversary Sacrifice, whereof we must treat afterwards at large, there was Attonement made for all the Sins and Transgressions of the People; Levit. 16. 21. And it was consummated by carsome of the Blood as a representation of it into the most holy place, sprinkling it before the Ark of the Covenant and the Mercy-Seat. This was done but once in the year. To keep this in Remembrance and to make Application of the Benefits of it unto the Consciences of the Worshippers, the dayly sacrifice was appointed: So doth the intercession of Christ make continual Application of his great sacrifice and Attonement, whence it derives its efficacy. And as the Fire on the Altar kindled all the renewed sacrifices, which were to be repeated and multiplyed because of their weakness and imperfection; so doth the Intercession of Christ make effectual the one perfect sacrifice which he offered once for all in the varions applications of it unto the Consciences of Believers, Heb. 10. 2.
3. The actual Intercession of Christ in Heaven, as the second Act of his sacerdotal Office, is a fundamental Article of our Faith, and a principal Foundation of the Churches consolation. So is it asserted to be, 1 John 2. 1, 2. And it is expressed by our Apostle, as that whereby the Death of Christ is made effectual unto us, Rom. 8. 3, 4. For it comprizeth the whole care, and all the Actings of Christ as our High Priest with God, in the behalf of the Church. This therefore is the immeencouragement to make our Application unto God, to come with boldness of Faith unto the Throne of Grace, Chap. 4. 15, 16. Chap. 10. 21, 22. Wherefore whatever Apprehensions we may attain of the manner of it, the thing it self is the center of our Faith, Hope, and Consolation.
4. It is no way unworthy or unbecoming the humane nature of Christ in its glorious Exaltation to pray unto God. It was in and by the humane Nature that the Lord Christ exercised and executed all the Duties of his Offices whilst he was on Earth. And he continueth to discharge what remains of them in the same Nature still. And however that Nature be glorified, it is the same essentially that it was, when he was in this world. To ascribe another kind of Nature unto him, under pretence of a more divine Glory, is to deny his Being; and to substitute a fancy of our own in his Room. So then the Humane Nature of Christ however exalted and glorifyhumane Nature still, subsisting in dependance on God and subjection unto him. Hence God gives him new Revelations now in his glorified condition, Revel. 1. 1. With respect hereunto he acted of old as the Angel of the Covenant with exZech. 1. 12, 13. So the Command given him to intercede by the way of Petition, Request or Prayer, Psal. 2. 8. Ask of me; respects his state of Exaltation at the Right hand of God, when he was declared to be the Son of God with Power by the Resurrection from the dead, v. 7, 8. And the Incense which he offereth with the Prayers of the Saints, Rev. 8. 3, 4. is no other but his own Intercession, whereby their Prayers are made acceptable unto God.
Praying of Christ at present is no other but such as may become him who sits down at the Right hand of the Majesty on High There must therefore needs be a great difference as to the outward manner between his present Intercession in HeaTemptations and Difficulties he cast himself at the foot of God with strong cryes, tears and supplications, Chap. 5. 7. This would not becauses or occasions of that kind of treating with God. And yet at an another time whilst he was in this world, he gave us the best estimate and Representation of his present Intercession that we are able to comprehend. And this was in his Prayer recorded,
6. It must be granted that there is no need of the use of Words in the immediate Presence of God. God needs not our words whilst we are here on Earth, as it were absent from him. For he is present with us, and all things are open and naked beneed the use of them for many reasons, which I have elsewhere declared. But in the glorious presence of God, when we shall behold him as the Lord Christ doth in the most eminent manner Face to Face, it cannot be underneed or use we can have of words to express our selves unto God, in Prayers or Praises. And the souls of men in their separate state and condition, can have no use of Voice or VVords; yet are they said to cry and pray with a loud voice, because they do so virtually and effectually, Rev. 6. 9, 10. However I will not determine what outward Transactions are necessary unto the glory of God in this matter before the Angels and Saints that are about his Throne. For there is yet a Church state in Heaven wherein we have Communion, Chap. 12. 22, 23, 24. What solemn outward and as it were visible Transactions of worship are required thereunto, we know not. And, it may be, the Representation of Gods Throne, and his worship, Revel. 4, 5. wherein the Lamb in the midst of the Throne hath the principal part, may not belong only unto what is done in the Church here becease, and not be any more after the Day of Judgment, 1 Cor. 15. 26, 28.
7. It must be granted that the vertue, efficacy and Prevalency of the Intercession of the Lord Christ depends upon and flows from his Oblation and Sacrifice. This we are plainly taught from the Types of it of Old. For the Incense and carrying of Blood into the Holy place after the Expiatory Sacrifice, the great Type of his Oblation of himself, did both of them receive their efficacy, and had respect unto the Saby the one Offering of himself obtained for us eternal Redemption, and for ever perfected them that are sanctified. Wherefore nothing remains for his Intercession, but the Appli
8. The safest Conception and Apprehension that we can have of the Intercession of Christ as to the manner of it, is his continual Appearance for us in the Presence of God by vertue of his Office as the High Priest over the house of God, representing the efficacy
of his Oblation, accompanied with tender Care, Love and Desires, for the welfare, supply, deliverance and Salvation of the Church. Three things therefore concurre hereunto. (1.) The Presentation of his Person before the Throne of God on our behalf, chap. 9. 24. This renders it sacerdotal. His Appearance in Person for us is required thereunto. (2.) The Representation of his Death, Oblation and Sacrifice for us, which gives Power, Life and Efficacy unto his Intercession. Thence he appears in the
Thus far then may we proceed. (1.) It is a part of his Sacerdotal Office; He intercedes for us as the High Priest over the House of God. (2.) It is the first and principal way whereby he Acts and exerciseth his Love, compassion and care towards the Church. (3.) That he hath respect therein unto every Individual Believer, and all their especial occasions; if any man sin we have an Advocate. (4.) That there is in his intercession, an effectual signification of his will and desire unto his Father; For it hath the nature of Prayer in it, and by it he expresseth his DeApplication of all the Fruits, Effects and Benefits of his whole Mediation unto the Church. For this is the formal nacontinual Application of all the Benefits of the Death of Christ, and all effects of the Promises of the Covenant, shall be communicated unto us, unto his Praise and Glory. (6) The efficacy of this intercession as it is Sacerdotal depends wholly on the antecedent Oblation and sa
The third thing observed was the connexion of the two things mentioned, or their Relation, one unto another; namely, the perpetual life of Christ and his inHe lives for ever to make intercession. His intercession is the end of his Mediatory Life; not absolutely, nor only, but principally. He lives to Rule his Church, he lives to subdue his Enemies, for he must raign until they are all made his footstool; He lives to give the Holy Spirit in all his blessed effects unto Believers. But because all these things proceed originally by an emanation of Power and Grace from God, and are given out into the hand of Christ upon his intercession, that may well be esteemed the principal end of his Mediatory Life. So he speaks expresly concerning that great fruit and effect of this Life of him, in sending of the Spirit, I will pray the Father, I will intercede with him for it, and he shall send you another Comforter, John 14. 16. And the Power which he exerts in the subduing and destruction of the Enemies of his Kingdom, is expresly promised unto him upon his
1. So great and glorious is the work of saving Believers unto the utmost, that it is necessary that the Lord Christ should lead a Mediatory Life in Heaven, for the perfecting and accomplishment of it. He lives for ever to make intercession for us. It is generally acknowledged that sinners could not be saved without the Death of Christ; but that Believers could not be saved without the life of Christ following it, is not so much considered. See
The sure Foundations of our eternal Salvation were laid in his Death and Resurrection. So it is said, that
Neither could the Remainder of this work be committed unto any other hand. He employeth others under him in his work to act Ministerially in his name and Authority. So he useth the Ministery of Angels and Men. But did not he himself continue to act in them, by them, with them, and without them, the whole work would fail and be disappointed. In one instance of the Revelation of the will of God concerning the state of the Church by the opening of the Book, wherein it was recorded, there was
Who can expresse the opposition that continues to be made unto this work of compleating the Salvation of Believers? what Power is able to conflict and conSin, the opposition of Sathan and the World? How innumerable are the Temptations which every individual Believer is exposed unto, each of them in its own nature ruinous and pernitious?
God alone knoweth all things perfectly in infinite wisdom, and as they are. He alone knows how great a work it is to save Believers unto the utmost; what Wisdom, what Power, what Grace and Mercy is requisite thereunto. He alone knows what is meet unto the way and manner of it, so as it may be perfected unto his own Gloinfinite wisdom alone hath found out and determined the glorious and mysterious ways of the Emanation of Divine Power and Grace unto this End. Up
2. The most glorious Prospect that we can take into the things that are within the vail, into the remaining Transactions of the work of our Salvation in the most Holy place, is in the Representation that is made unto us of the intercession of Christ. Of old when Moses went into the Tabernacle, all the People looked after him, until he enPillar of the Cloud stood at the door of it, that none might see into the Holy place, Exod. 33. 8, 9. And when the Lord Christ was taken into Heaven the Disciples looked after him, until a cloud interposed at the Tabernacle door, and took him out of their sight, Act. 1. 9. And when the High Priest was to enter into the Tabernacle to carry the Blood of the sacrifice of Expiation into the most Holy place, no man, be he Priest or not, was suffered to enter into, or abide in the Tabernacle, Levit. 16. 17. Our High Priest is now likewise entred into the most Holy place, within the second vail, where no eye can pierce unto him. Yet is he there as an High Priest, which makes Heaven it self to be a glorious Temple, and a place as yet for the exercise of an instituted Ordinance, such as the Priesthood of Christ is. But who can look into, who can comprehend the Glories of those Heavenly Administrations? Some have pretended a view into the orders and serChore of Angels, but have given us only a Report of their own imaginations. What is the Glory of the Throne of God, what the Order and Ministry of his Saints and Holy ones, what is the
3. The intercession of Christ is the great evidence of the continuance of his Love and Care, his Pity and Compassion towards his Church. Had he only continued to Rule the Church as its King and Lord, he had manifested his glorious Power, his Righteousness and Faithfulness. The Scepter of his Kingdom is a Scepter of Righteour High Priest. See Chap. 4. 15. Chap. 5. 1, 2. So the great exercise of his sacerdotal Office in laying down his Life for us, and expiating our sins by his Blood, is still peculiarly ascribed unto his Love, Gal. 2. 20 Ephes. 5. 2. Revel. 1. 5. Wherefore these properties of Love and Compassion belong pecuthese things, and how all their Consolation in this World depends upunspeakable Love, Tenderness, and Compassion of Jesus Christ, is a stranger unto the Life of Faith, and unto all true spiritual Consolation.
But how shall we know that the Lord Christs is thus tender, Loving and Compasnature it self, by its investiture with glory; nor how inconsistent these affections, which in us cannot be separated from some weakness and sorrow, are with his present state and dignity. Nor can any solid satisfaction be received by curious contemplations of the nature of glorifyed Affections. But herein we have an infallible Demonstration of it, that he yet continueth in the exercise of that Office, with respect whereunto all these Affections of Love, Pity and Compassion are ascribis able to suffer, to condole with, to have compassion on his poor tempted ones, Chap. 4. 15. All these affecticontinually intercedes for them. For he doth so, that their sins may be pardoned, their TempLove, Care, Pity and Compassion.
In this Verse the Apostle renders a Reason of his whole preceding Discourse, and why he laid so great weight upon the Description of our High Priest. And he hath probably in it a respect unto what he had last asserted in particular concerning his Ability to save them to the utmost that come to God by him.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Syr.
For yet also this High Priest was just to us: that is, it was just, right or meet that we should have this High Priest. All others, talis nos decebat.
Syr.
pure; Sanctus; Holy.
Syr.
without malice. Beza, ab omni malo alienus. Innocens. Free from all evil.
without spot. Vul. impollutus. Beza, sine labe; unpolluted, without spot.
separate from sins; all others, from sinners.
The words will be farther explained in our enquiry into the things signified by them.
For such an High Priest became us, who is Holy, Harmless, Undefiled, Separate from sinners and made higher than the Heavens.
There is something supposed and included in this Assertion; namely, that if we intend to come unto God, we had need of an High Priest to encourage and enable us thereunto. For if in particular we need such an High Priest, it is supposed that without an High Priest in general, we can do nothing in this matter. This theresinners, as we are all, can have no Access unto God, but by an High Priest. And there was no need for him much to labour with those Hebrews in the confirLegal Prohibitions fortified with severe Penalties, he had forbidden all men, the highest, the greatest, the best and most holy, to come unto him any other way. Hereby were they taught the everHigh Priest, and the discharge of his Office, whatever End or Issue their Typical Priests came unto. And herein lyes a great Aggravation of the present misery of the Jews. High Priest of their own they have none, nor have had for many Ages. Hereon all their solemn worship of God utterly ceaseth. They are the only Persons in the world, who, if all mankind would give them leave and assist them in it, cannot worship God as they judge they ought to do. For if Hierusalem were restored into their Possession, and a Temple reedified in it more glorious than that of Solomon, yet could they not offer one Lamb in Sacrifice to God. For they know that this cannot be done without an High Priest, and Priests inAaron, of whom they have amongst them not one in all the world. And so must they abide under a sense of being judicially excluded and cast out from all solemn worship of God, until the vail shall be taken from their Hearts, and leaving Aaron, they return unto him who was Typed by Melchisedec, unto whom even
Whence this necessity of an High Priest for sinners arose, I have so largely enExercitations on the original and causes of the Priesthood of Christ, as that there is no need again to make mention of it. Every ones duty it is to consider it, and rightly improve it for himself: The want
Upon this supposition of the necessity of an High Priest in General, the Apostle declares what sort of High Priest was needfull for us. And this he shews,
1. In his Personal Qualifications.
2. In his outward State and Condition, ver. 26.
3. In the nature of his Office and the manner of its Discharge, ver. 27. And he confirmeth the whole by the consideration of the Person who was this Priest, and of the way and manner how he became so, compared with them, and their consePriests according unto the Law, ver. 28.
The two first are contained in this verse; namely (1.) The Personal Qualifications of him who was meet to be a Priest for us, by whom we might come unto God; and (2.)
And in the first place the necessity of such an High Priest as is here described, is Became us. Decuit, decebat. It was meet, it was just for us, as the Syriack renders it. And respect may be had therein either unto the wisdom of God, or unto our state and condition, or unto both; such an High Priest it was meet for God to give, and such an High Priest it was needful that we should have. If the condecency of the matter, which lies in a contrivance of proper means unto an end, be intended, then it is God who is respected in this word; If the necessity of the kind of Relief mentioned be so, then it is we who are respected.
The word is applyed unto God in this very case, Chap. 2. ver. 10. It became him for whom are all things, and by whom are all things. Consider God as the Subecame, was necessary unto his infinite Wisdom and Holiness that having demake the Captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings. So the Condecency here intended may respect, (1.) The Wisdom, Grace and Goodness of God. It became him to give us such an High Priest as we stood in need of; namely, one that was able in the Discharge of that Office to save all to the uttermost that come unto God by him. For to design our salvation by an High Priest, and not to provide such an one, as was every way able to effect it, became not the Wisdom and Grace of God.
(2.) Respect may be had herein unto our state and condition. Such this was as such an High Priest could relieve us in or save us from. For we stand in need of such an one as our Apostle declares, as (1.) could make Attonement for our sins, or perfectly expiate them. (2.) Purge our Consciences from dead works, that we might serve the living God; or sanctifie us throughout by his Blood. (3.) Procure Acceptance with God for us, or purchase eternal Redemption. (4.) Administer supplies of the spirit of Grace unto us to enable us to live unto God in all Duties of Faith, Worship, and Obedience. (5.) Give us assistance and consolation in our Trials, Temptations and Sufferings, with pity and compassion. (6.) Preserve us by Power from all ruining Sins and Dangers. (7.) Be in a continual Readiness to receive us in all our Addresses to him. (8.) To
God in infinite wisdom, Love and Grace, gave us such an High Priest, as in the Qualifications of his Person, the Glory of his Condition, and the Discharge of his Office, was every way suited to deliver us from the state of Apostacy, sin and misery, and to bring us unto himself through a Perfect salvation. This the ensuing particu
The Qualifications of this High Priest are expressed first indefinitely in the word Difference from other High Priests is included herein. He must not Ordinary sort, but one so singularly qualified unto his work, so exalted after his work, and so discharging his work unto such Ends. In all these things we stood in need of such an High Priest, as was quite of another sort, order and kind, than any the Church had enjoyed under the Law, as the Apostle expresly conver. 28.
His Personal inherent Qualifications are first expressed; and we shall consider first some things in general that are common unto them all, and then declare the especial intendment of every one of them in particular.
Such an High Priest became us, as is Holy, Harmless, Undefiled, Separate from sinners.And,
1. There is some Allusion in all these things unto what was Typically represented in the Institution of the Office of the Priesthood under the Law. For the High Priest was to be a Person without blemish, not maimed in any part of his body. He was not to marry any one that was defiled, nor to defile himself among the People. On his forehead in his ministrations he ware a Plate of Gold with that Inscription, Holiness to the Lord. And no doubt but Personal Holiness was required of him in an especial manner; for want whereof, God cast out the Posterity of Eli from the Priesthood.
But all those things were only outward Representations of what was really resuch an High Priest as the Church stood in need of. For they were mostly external, giving a Denomination unto the Subject, but working no real change in it. And where they were internal, they were encompassed with such a mixture of sins, weaknesses, infirmities, and the Intercision of Death, as that they had no Glory in comparison of what was required. All these things the Apostle observes, reducing them unto two Heads, namely, that they were obnoxious unto Sin and Death; and therefore as they died, so they offered sacrifices for their own sins. But the Church was taught by them from the Beginning, that it stood in need of an High Priest whose real Qualifications should answer all these Types and Represen
2. It is possible that our Apostle in this Description of our High Priest, designed to obviate the prejudicate opinion of some of the Hebrews concerning their Messiah. For generally they looked on him as one that was to be a great earthly Prince and warriour, that should conquer many Nations, and subdue all their enemies with the sword, shedding the blood of men in Abundance. In opposition unto this vain and pernicious Imagination, our Saviour testifies unto them, that he came not to kill, but to save and keep alive. And our Apostle here gives such a Description of him in these holy gracious Qualifications, as might attest his Person and work to be quite of another nature than what they desired and expected; And their frustraunbelief. See Mal. 3. 1, 2, 3.
3. I am sorry that it hath fallen from the Pen of an able Expositor of our own on this place; that the Time when the Lord Christ was thus made an High Priest for ever, and that by an Oath, was after he had offered one sacrifice, not many; for the People, not for himself; once, not often; of everlasting vertue, and not effectual for some petty Expiations for a time; and after he was risen, ascended and set at the right hand of God.
If by being made an High Priest, only a Solemn Declaration of being made so, is intended, these things may passe well enough. For we allow that in the Scripture, then a thing is oft-times said to be, when it is first manifested or declared. So was the Lord Christ determined to be the son of God with Power by the Resurrection from the dead. But if it be intended, as the words will scarce admit of any other Interpretation, that then the Lord Christ was
4. We may observe that all these Qualifications of our High Priest were pecuaccount of the Sacrifice which he had to offer. They were not only necessary for him, as he was to be the Sacrificer, but also as he was to be the Sacrifice; not only as he was to be the Priest, but as he was to be the Lamb. For the Sacrifices were to be without blemish, as well as the Sacrificers. So were we redeemed with the precious blood of Christ, as of a Lamb without blemish and without spot, 1 Pet. 1. 19. But however the Sacrifices were chosen under the Law without blemish, yet were they still in their own nature, but Calves, and Goats, and Lambs. And therefore Priests who had weaknesses and infirmities and sins of their own, might be meet enough to offer them. But here both Priest and Sacrifice were to be equally pure and holy.
5. We must not pass by the wresting of this Text by the Socinians; nor omit its due Vindication. For they contend that this whole Description of our High Priest doth not respect his internal Qualifications in this world before and in the offering of himself by his Blood; but his glorious state and condition in Heaven. For they fear (as well they may) that if the
The Paraphrase of one of our own seems to comply herewith; which is as folAnd this was a sort of High Priests which we sinful weak creatures had need of, (which by the way I do not understand, for we stood not in need of a new sort of High Priests, but of one single individual High Priest,) One that being mercifully disposed, is also incapable of suffering any hurt, of being defiled or corrupted, and consequently of dying, and to that end is exalted unto a pitch above our sinful corruptible condition here. So
Three things seem to be aymed at in this Exposition.
1. To make way for another corrupt notion on the next verse, wherein these men with Grotius would have Christ in some sense offer for his own sins also; which there can be no pretence for, if these things be asscribed unto him, as he was a Priest in this world.
2. To take care that the Innocency, Holinesse and absolute Purity of our High Priest be not supposed to be necessary unto our Justification, neither as the material, nor formal cause of it. For if the Lord Christ in the Sacrifice of himself died for our Justification, and that he might do so, it was necessary that he should anteceholy, harmless, undefiled and separate from sinners; then was his being so necessary unto our Justification, as a cause thereof.
3. To obviate an Apprehension of his being an High Priest before his death, and to have offered his one Sacrifice therein. For if he had not the Qualifications ne
1. This Exposition is contrary to the concurrent sense of all sober, antient and modern Expositors. And which is more, it is contrary to the common sense of all Christians. Not one of them who knoweth ought of these things, unless their
first and last consideration of these words, they respect Jesus Christ as to his personal Holiness in this World. And that Exposition had need be well confirmed, which is not only contrary to the Judgement of all learned men, but also destructive of the common Faith of Christians. But as yet we have nothing beyond crude Assertions offered in the proof of it.
2. It is contrary unto, or inconsistent with the sense and use of the Words in all good Authors, sacred and prophane; and contrary unto the Application of them unto the Lord Christ in other places of the Scripture, as we shall see immedi
3. It is contrary to the order of the Apostles words; For he placeth all these Proqualifications of this Person antecedently unto his Exaltation. He was first Holy, Harmless, Undefiled, and then made Higher than the Heavens. But according unto this Exposition his being made higher than the Heavens, is the antecedent cause of his being made Holy, &c.
4. It is highly false that the blessed state pretended to be here set forth, was antecedently unto his
5. Schlictingius pleads that although all these things were true with respect unto the life and manners of Christ, yet it was no way unto the purpose of the Apostle to mention them unto the end designed. But, (1) If that be the sense of the words which he contends for, not one of them is true with respect unto the life and manners of Christ in this world, for they all belong unto his blessed estate in the other. (2) We shall see on the next verse, how far he will allow them to be true of the life and manners of Christ in any sense, seeing in some sense he affirms him to have offered sacrifice for his own sins. And this he doth with an expresse contradiction unto his own main Hypothesis. For by sins he understands weakness and infirmities; and whereas he will not allow Christ to have offered himself before his entrance infreed from all weaknesses and Infirmities, it is the highest contradiction to affirm that he offered for them: seeing he could not offer himself until he was delivered from them. (2.) We have only his bare word for it, that the Asscription of those things unto our High Priest as inherent Qualifications, was not unto the purpose of the Apostle. And his Assertion is built on a false supposition, namely, that the Lord Christ was not an High Priest on the Earth, nor did offer himself unto God in his Death, which overthrows the Foundation of the Gospel.
6. The Vanity and Falshood of this novel Exposition, will yet farther and fully be evinced, in an enquiry into the proper signification of these words as here used by the Apostle; every one whereof is wrested to give countenance unto it.
1. He is, or was to be, Sanctus, Holy, that is Acts 2. 22. thy Holy one: from Psal. 16. 10. And the Lord Christ is there said to be antecedently unto his Resurrection: which must be with respect unto his internal Holiness, Thou shalt not suffer thine Holy One to see Corrupton. And in the New Testament the word is every where used for him, that is
It is therefore the holy purity of the nature of Christ that is intended in this expresEpithets. His nature was pure and holy, absolutly free from any spot or taint of our original Defilement.
holy thing of God; Luke 1. 35. All others since the fall have a polluted nature and are originally unholy. But his conception being miraculous, by the immediate operation of the Holy Ghost, and his nature not derived unto him by natural Generation, the only means of the Propagation of original Defilement, and in the first instant of its being, filled with all habitual seeds of Grace; He was Holy. And such an High Priest became us, as was so. Had he had a nature touched with sin, he had not been meet either to be a Priest or Sacrifice. This Holiness of nature was needful unto him, who was to answer for the unholiness of our nature, and to take it away. Unholy Sinners, do stand in need of an Holy Priest and an Holy Sacrifice. What we have not in our selves we must have in him, or we shall not be accepted with the Holy God, who is of purer eyes than to be
2. He was to be Schlictingius, omnis mali expers, nullis amplius
Holy is his Epithet with respect unto his Nature;
Harmless respects his Life. The first includes all positive Holiness; the other an Abnegation of all unholiness. As he was sin present, as we have with us, Rom. 7. 18, 21. or sin easily besetting, Heb. 12. 1. As he was effect of such a Principle.
And we had need of such an High Priest. Had he not been innocent and every way blameless himself, he would have had other work to do, than always to take care of our Salvation, as the Apostle observes in the next verse. He must first have offered for his own sins, as the High Priest did of old, before he had offered for us or ours. And this added unto the merit of his Obedience. For whereas he was absolutely Innocent, Harmlesse, and free from all evil and Guile, he was reproached and charged with every thing that is evil; A Seducer, a Blasphemer, a Seditious Person, the worst of Malefactors. For herein also, as to the suffering part, he was made sin for us, who knew no sin, that we might become the Righteousness of God in him. And a great encouragement this is unto those who suffer in the like kind according to their measure.
3. He was to be cujus felicitas & beatitas nulla vel minima adversitate
quasi labe pollui inficique possit, saith, Schlictingius; than which a more vain Imaobscurity and expressing of his Mind in such uncouth terms, never used by any others, nor by himself in any other place in such a sense or signification; Unpolluted, undefiled, that is, every way happy and blessed, not touched with the defilement of any Adversity. But the use of Adversity, is to purge and purifie. And as that word doth properly signifie, undefiled, unpolluted, that is, morally with any sin or evil, so it is not used in the New Testament in any oHeb. 13. 4. Jam. 1. 27. 1 Pet. 1. 4. The enquiry therefore is how this differs from negation of all Moral evil. Answ. The one is, he did no evil in himself; the other, that he contracted none from any thing else, nor from any Persons with whom he conversed. This may fall out
he was undone, not only because of his own sinfull defilements, but because of the
And besides, many things might befall the High Priests of old, whereby they might be legally defiled, and so rendred uncapable for the discharge of the Office. And for this cause, they always had a second Priest in Readiness, at the great Solemn Festivals, especially at the Anniversary Expiation, that in case any such Pollution should befall the High Priest, the other might for that time take his place, and discharge his Office. So it was with them principally with respect unto Ceremonials, though
4. He was Schlictingius, Loco & conditione,
Separate from sinners: From sins, saith the Syriack. But that was sufficiently seSinners as Sinners, and in their sins. He was like unto us in all things, sin only excepted. We must therefore consider wherein he was, and wherein he was not separate from sinners.
1. He was not separate from them as unto community of nature. For God sent his own son in the likeness of sinful flesh; Rom. 8. 3. He sent him in the flesh, for he sent him made of a woman, made under the Law, Gal. 4. 4. wherein the word was made flesh; Joh. 1. 14. but he sent him only in the likeness of sinful flesh. And that because he made him sin, who knew no sin; 2 Cor. 5. 21. He took our flesh, that is, our nature upon him without sin, yet so as that by Reason of the charge of sin with the consequences thereof that was upon him, he was in the likeness of sinful flesh. He was not therefore really separate from sinners as they were flesh, but as they were sinful flesh. He took upon him the seed of Abraham, and because the Children were partakers of flesh and blood he himself partook also of the same. Without this Relation unto us, and Union with us, in one common nature, wherehe that sanctifyeth and they that are sanctifyed, are of one, he could not have been an High Priest or sacrifice for us. He was not therefore thus separated from sinanother nature from them. He took not on him the nature of Angels, nor was a meer
2. He was not separated from sinners as to the Duties of outward Conversation. He lived not in a wilderness, nor said unto the children of men, stand off, I am holyer than you. He conversed freely with all sorts of Persons, even Publicans and Harlots, for which he was reproached by the proud hypocritical Pharisees. His work was to call sinners to Repentance, and to set before their eyes an example of Holiness. This he could not have done, had he withdrawn himself from all communication with them. Yea, he condescended unto them beyond the legal Austerities of the Baptist. Matth. 11. 18, 19. Hence those who of old pretending more than ordinary
Holiness and Devotion did withdraw themselves into wildernesses from the converse of men, did quite forget the Example and work of their Master: Yea they did avowedly prefer the Example of the Baptist as they supposed, before that of our Saviour, which sufficiently reflects on his Wisdom and Holiness. Nor indeed did they in the least express the Pattern which they proposed unto themselves for Imitation. For although John lived in the wilderness of Judaea for the most part, yet was he the voice of one crying in the wilderness. He lived there where it was most convenient for him to discharge his Ministry, and preach the word of God. And his Austerities in Food and Raiment, were but to express outwardly the Doctrine of Repentance enforced by threats which he preached. But as these Persons forsook the Example of Christ and the Gospel to go back unto John and his Ministry, so they utterly mistook their pattern, and instead of making their Retirement a means and help to discharge the Ministry in calling others unto Faith and Repentance, they made it a Covert for their own Ignorance and Superstition. And for those Votaries of the Roman Church who pretend in the foolish Imitation of them to fancy a Wilderness in the middest of
3. He is not said to be separate from Sinners, so in state and condition, as Kings and Potentates are from Persons poor and mean: and who therefore out of a sense of their own meanness, and the others State and Greatness of mind, dare not approach unto them. No, but as he was meek and lowly, and took up his whole converse with the lower sort of the People, the poor of this world; so he did by all ways and means, invite and encourage all sorts of sinners to come unto him.
4. He is not said to be separate from sinners, as though he had been ever in any communion with them, in any thing wherein he was afterwads separated from them. The Participle
Adjective, declaring what is, and not how he came so to be. He was always in such a state and condition, so Holy, so Harmless, and Undefiled, as never to have a concern in any thing, from which he was to be separated.
It appeareth hence plainly wherein it was that he was separate from sinners; namely, in Sin, in its Nature, causes and effects. Whatever of that sort he underperfect Holiness of his Nature and his Life, distinguished from all sinners; not only from the greatest, but from those who ever had the least taint of Sin, and who othermiddle Person between God and Sinners, was to be separate from those sinners, in that thing, on the Account whereof he undertook to stand in their stead.
And these are the Properties of the Humane Nature of our High Priest, and which were necessary antecedently unto the discharge of any Part or Duty of his Office.
His present state and condition is in the next place expressed; and made higher than the Heavens.
Made higher. God is called the most high God; God above. And Glory is to be asscribed unto him in the Highest, Luk. 2. 14. And the Lord Christ in his Exaltation is said to sit down at
He was for a season made lower than the Angels, made on the Earth, and descendthe lower parts of the Earth; and that for the Discharge of the principal Part of his Priestly Office, namely, the offering of himself for a Sacrifice unto God. But he abode not in that state nor could he discharge his whole Office and all the Duties of it therein; and therefore was made higher than the Heavens. He was not made higher than the Heavens that he might be a Priest: but being our High Priest and as our High Priest, He was so made, for the discharge of that part of his Office which yet remained to be performed; for he was to live for ever to make Intercession for us.
double signification; (1) Of Place. (2) Of state and condition.
1. If it be Place that is meant, then by the Heavens which he is made above, those aspectable Heavens with all their Glory are intended. He is no longer on the Earth,
passed through these Heavens when he went into the Presence of God, chap. 4. 14, 15. And there he abides. For although the Heaven of Heavens cannot conHeavens must receive him, until the time of the Restitution of all things, Act. 3. 21. He is in this sense no more on the Earth, nor Subject unchap. 8. 4.
2. Glorious state on the right hand of the Majesty on high which he is exalted unto. And in this sense by the Heavens, than which Christ is made higher, exalted above, the Angels the sacred Inhabitants of those Heavenly Places are intended. And this our Apostle in other places often insists upon, as a great manifestation of the Glory of Christ: See Ephes. 1. 21, 22. Phil. 2. 10, 11. Heb. 1. 4. chap. 2. 7, 8. I see no Reason but that both these may be included in this expression. He was so exalted as to the place of his Residence from the Earth, above those aspectable Heavens, as withal to be placed in Honour, Dignity and Power above all the Inhabitants of Heaven, he only excepted who puts all things under him.
And so we have finished the Exposition of these words, with the vindication of the proper meaning of them.
Two ends there are why the Apostle gives us such a Description of the High Priest that became us, or which we stood in need of.
1. To manifest that the Levitical Priests were no way qualifyed for this Office, no way meet or able to bring us unto God. Something they did represent, but nothing of themselves they did effect. They all of them came short in every Qua
2. To encourage the Faith of Believers, by evidencing unto them, that what
1. Although these Properties of our High Priest are principally to be considered as rendring him meet to be our High Priest, yet are they also to be considered as an Exemplar and Idea of that Holiness, and Innocency which we ought to be conformable unto. If we will give up our selves to the conduct of this High Priest, if by him alone we design to approach unto God; conformity unto him in Holiness of nature and Life according unto our Measure is indispensably required of us. None can more dis
2. Seeing all these Properties were required unto Christ and in him, that he might be our High Priest; he was all that he is here said to be for us, and for our sakes; and benefit from them doth redound unto us. For seeing he was a Priest for us, all that he was that he might be a Priest, was for us also. Such an High Priest became us, and such an High Priest we have.
3. The infinite Grace and Wisdom of God are always to be admired by us in providing such an High Priest as was every way meet for us, with respect unto the Great End of his Office, namely, the bringing of us unto himself.
4. The Dignity, Duty, and Safety of the Gospel Church depend solely on the Nature, Qualifications, and the Exaltation of our High Priest. Or
5. If such an High Priest became us, was needful unto us, for the establishment of the New Covenant and the Communication of the Grace thereof unto the Church, then
all Persons, Christ alone excepted, are absolutely excluded from all Interest in this Priesthood. He that takes upon himself to be a Priest undere the Gospel, must be
6. If therefore we consider aright what it is that we stand in need of, and what God hath provided for us, that we may be brought unto him in his Glory, we shall find it our wisdom to forego all other Expectations, and to betake our selves unto Christ alone.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
The words used in this context have been opened in several places before. And in one thing only is there any material Difference among the Translators of them. And this is in those words Syriack reads them, Article in the masculine Gender, who was after the Law; and so doth the Vulgar Latine also, qui post legem est, referring unto Erasmus renders supra legem, above the Law. But others think and that rightly, that Accusative case, is never to be rendred by
Who needeth not dayly, as those High Priests, to offer up Sacrifices, first for their own sins, and then for the Peoples, for this he did once, when he offered up himself. For the Law maketh men High Priests which have Infirmity, but the word of the Oath, which was since the Law, the Son who is perfected for evermore.
As these verses contain other instances of the Preeminence of our High Priest above those of the order of Aaron: so all those mentioned in the former of them, do depend directly on, and flow from the qualifications and endowments of his Persuch an one as is there described, Holy, Harmless, Undefiled, Separate from sinners, and made higher than the Heavens, for such an one alone became us, he was above and freed from all those things and services which the
VVho needeth not dayly, &c.
The words are a Negation as they respect our High Priest, and include an Affirmation with respect unto the
1. The manner of the negation, He needeth not; it is not necesmight do, or omit as they saw occasion; but they were necessarily obliged unto them. And the necessity the Apostle intends, was not only that which arose from Gods Institution, who appointed them to offer dayly, first for themselves and then for the People, but that also which arose from their own state and condition, and from the nature of the sacrifices that they offered. For themselves being weak, infirm, and sinful, and their offerings being only of earthly things that could never perfectly expiate sin, these things were necessary for them, and so God had ordained. Wherefore there
necessity here asscribed unto these Priests.
1. God had appointed them so to do. This comes first to view although there be another Reason even of this Appointment. And God taught hereby both them and the Church, their utter incapacity to effect the work committed unto them, at once, whereon they were to multiply their Oblations.
2. The Nature of the Offerings and Sacrifices which they offered did make the manner of it here expressed, necessary unto them. For they were such as could not attain the end of expiating sin: but only could represent that which did so; and therefore the Repetition of them was needful, because their principal use was to be instructive only. Things that are really efficient themselves, may at once produce and perfect their effects: But those which are instructive only must be reite
3. This Necessity arose from their own state before God, and the state of the People. For they themselves often sinned, and having no other to offer for them, it was necessary that they should often offer for themselves. And so it was with the People also. They sinned still, and still must be offered for. After one offering, their sins again encreased on them, and made another necessary.
From all these considerations our High Priest was absolutely exempted; and that on a twofold Account, (1.) Of his Person, which being Holy, Harmless, Undefiled, and Separate from sinners, he needed not offer for himself. (2.) Of his Offering, which being at once perfectly expiatory of the sins of the People, needed not to be repeated. And on these Grounds God also had appointed that he should offer himself only once for all.
2. The second thing in these words is the Declaration of them that lay under this necessity which our High Priest was not liable unto, As the High Priests, that is, those High Priests of the Law concerning whom he had treated. So as those High Priests, in like manner as they were, or as they had need. For the Apostle with respect unto the Levitical Priesthood carriHigh Priests and the Discharge of their Office; For they were the Head of the Priesthood, and the Glory of the Church of Israel. Howbeit all other priests emAll these priests had need to offer in the manner here ex
3. A threefold Difference is intimated between our High Priest and them. As,
1. In the frequency of their Offerings, they were to offer dayly, which also infirst for themselves, and then for the People: Whereas he offered once only.
2. It is supposed they offered the sacrifices appointed by the Law which were of brute Creatures only, whence their insufficiency and frequent Repetition did proChap. 10. 1, 2, 3. He offered himself.
3. In the cause of their offering; they offered for their own sins, but he had none of his own to offer for.
Now all the things here asscribed unto the Levitical priests, are weaknesses and imperfections in their Office. And hereby the main position of the Apostle, and which was destructive of the whole Fabrick of Mosaical worship, namely, that the Law whereby they were constituted made nothing perfect, was abundantly confirmed. For the greatest effect of that Law was the constitution of this Priesthood. And what perfection can be expected by such a Priesthood where the Priests were obliged continually to offer for their own sins? No sooner was one offering past, but they were providing matter, making another necessary. And so it was with respect unRotation of sins and sacrifices? Is it not manifest that this Priesthood and these sainstructive use was excellent: They both directed Faith to look unto the great future Priest and Sacrifice, and established it, in that they were Pledges given of God in Assurance thereof. The eye of them all was a conperfect ease and Peace unto them that were exercised in them. Some relief they found in them, but compleat Peace they did not afford. Nor can any thing do so, that is often to be repeated. The frequent Repetitions of the sacrifices of the masse in the Church of Rome, doth sufficiently manifest that there is no solid abiding Peace with God in that Church. For this is not to be attained by any thing that must be frequently repeated. So our Apostle affirms expresly, that if the
It was therefore unbelief heightned unto Obstinacy, which caused the Hebrews to refuse this High Priest and Sacrifice when exhibited of God, whereas before they could never attain unto Peace firm and stable. But Love of carnal Worship, and adherence unto self Righteousnesse, are inseparable companions.
Obs. God requireth our Faith and Obedience in and unto nothing, but what is as absolutly needful for us, so highly reasonable unto the minds of them that are enlightned. Such was this Priesthood of Christ, now proposed unto the Faith of the Church, in comparison of what was before enjoyed.
4. There is in the words the Time and Season of the performance of what is here asscribed unto these High Priests, as necessary for them. They were to do it, Dayly: that is, so often as occasion required according unto the Law. For there is no Reason to confine the Apostles intention unto the annual expiatory sacrifice only; as though
5. What they were thus obliged unto, is declared; to offer sacrifices for sins. All Propitiatory and expiatory sacrifices are intended. But possibly a principal regard is had unto the great Anniversary sacrifice in the feast of Expiation, Levit. 16. For although the Apostle mentions plural number, and that was but one; yet because of the Repetition of it, it being offered year by year continually, as he speaks, Chap. 10. 1. it may be signifyed hereby. And those sacrifices were offered himself a sacrifice for sin. And this is expressed by for sin only, without the mention of sacrifice. Rom. 8. 3 For because sin, and in another to expiate sin, the sacrifices it self is expressed by For sin.
6. The order of these sacrifices is expressed by first and then. First for his own sins, and then for those of the People. Either the whole DisFeast of Expiation. For he was in general to take care in the first place about offering for his own sins according to the Law, Levit. 4 For if that were not done in due order, if their own legal Guilt were not expiated in its proper season according to the Law, they were no way meet to offer for the sins of the Congregation; yea, they exposed themselves unto the penalty of Excision.
infirmities of their own, as is expressed in the next verse. Or the order intended may respect in an especial manner the form and process prescribed in the solemn Anniversary sacrifice at the least of Expiation. Levit. 16. First he was to offer a Sin-offering for himself and his house, and then for the People, both on the same day.
1. for his own sins: And this upon a double Account. really a sinner as the rest of the People were. If he do sin according to the sin of the People, Levit. 4. 3. Secondly, That upon the
2. For the sins of the People; whole congregation of
Levit. 16. 21.
This was the Duty, the order and method of the High Priests of old in their offerings and sacred services. This their weaknesses, Infirmities and Sins, as also the Sacrifices which they offered, did require. All that could be learned from it was, that some more excellent Priest and Sacrifice was to be introduced. For no Perfection, no Consummation in divine Favour, no settled Peace of Conscience could in this way be obtained; all things openly declared that so they could not be. And hence have we an Evidence of what is affirmed, Joh. 1. 17. The Law was given by Moses, but Grace and Truth came by Jesus Christ. And the Priviledge or Ad
These are the things that are here denied of our High Priest: He had no need to offer Sacrifice in this way, order, and method. The offering of Sacrifice is not denied, that is, Sacrifice for the sins of the People; yea, it is positively asserted in the next words; but that he offered dayly, many sacrifices, or any for himself, or had need so to do, this is denied by the Apostle. That alone which he did, is asserted in the remaining words of the verse; For this he did once when he offered himself.
And two things are in the words; (1) What he did in general; (2) In particular, how he did it.
For the first, it is said, This he did;
Antecedent, namely, offering for the sins of the People. This he did
once, when he offered himself; for himself he did not offer.
But contrary unto the sense of the whole Church of God, contrary to the Analogie of Faith, and with no small Danger in the expression, Socinus first affirmed that the Lord Christ offered also for himself or his own sins. And he is followed herein by those of his own Sect, as Schlinctingius on this Place, and so he is also by Grotius and Hammond, which is the Chanel whereby many of his Notions and Conceptino sins of his own properly so called; that is, Transgressions of the Law; but his Infirmities, say some of them, whereby he was exposed unto Death, his sufferings, say others, are called his sins.
But nothing can be more abhorrent from Truth and Piety than this Assertion. For,
1. If this be so, then the Apostle expresly in terms affirms that Christ offered for his own sins, and that distinctly from the sins of the People. And from this Blasphemy we are left to relieve our selves by an
2 The sole Reason pretended to give countenance unto this absurd Assertion is, that, This, must answer to the whole preceding proposition which is its Antecedent. Now therein is mention of the Priests offering
3. This Insinuation not only enervates, but is contradictory unto the principal Design of the Apostle in the verse foregoing and in that which follows. For, ver. 26. He, on purpose describes our High Priest by such Properties and Qualifications as might evidence him to have no need to offer for his own sins, as those other Priests had. For from this consideration that he was holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, the Apostle makes this Inference, that he needed not to offer for himself as those High Priests did. But according unto this interpretation, no such thing ensues thereon; but notwithstanding all those
4. When those priests offered for their own sins, their sins were of the same nature with the sins of the People.
5. If the Lord Christ offered for himself or his own Infirmities, then those InfirObstructions and hinderances unto his offering for others; for that is the only Reason why he should offer for their removal or taking away. But this is so far otherwise as that indeed he was obnoxious unto no Infirmity, but what was necessary that he might be a meet High Priest and Sacrifice for us. For so was every thing that is inseparable from humane nature; which is utterly de
6. This Imagination will admit of no tolerable sense in its Exposition or Applioffered for his own infirmities, that is, his sorrows, sufferings, and obnoxiousness unto death? It must be by his suf
7. It is contradictory unto the principal Maxim of the Socinians with respect unto the Priesthood of Christ. For they maintain, that his one perfect offering or Expiatory Sacrifice was in Heaven only, and not on the earth. But he could not at his Appearance in the Holy place offer for his own infirmities and miseries, for
These things are sufficient to repress the vanity of this Figment. But because there is no small danger in the proposal that hath been made of it, I shall briefly examine what Reasons its Authors and Promoters do produce to give countenance unto it.
Thus proceeds and argues Crellius or Schlictingius on the place. Peccata preprie dicta, id est, divinar am legnm transgressiones, cum in Christo locum non habeant ullum, (1)
I have transcribed his words at large, because what is offered by others unto the same Purpose, is all included in them. But the whole of it will be easily re
1. The Impropriety of speech pretended, that sins should be put for Infirmities, is that which the use of the Scripture will give no countenance unto. It is only feigned by these men at their pleasure. Let them, if they can, produce any one place, where by sins not moral evils, but natural infirmities are intended. But by feigning Improprieties of speech at our pleasure we may wrest and pervert the Scripture, even also as we please.
2. Of the Infirmities of the Humane Nature of Christ, which were necessary that he might be a Sacrifice, and usefull unto his being a Priest, we have also treated in the place quoted; chap. 5. 2, 3. Whereunto the Reader is referred.
3. Not the contrary unto these Infirmities, but the contrary unto sin Original and Actual, is intended by Holiness and Innocency in the verse foregoing, as hath been proved in the Exposition of that verse, whereunto the Reader is referred.
4. The Lord Christ offered up prayers and supplications unto God, when he offered himself: not to expiate his own infirmities by his offering, but that he might be carried through and supported in his Oblation which he offered for the sins of the People; and had success therein. See the exposition on chap. 5. 7.
5. He is more kind than ordinary in extending the Oblation of Christ unto his death also. But he recalls his grant, affirming that he did only prepare himself for his offering thereby. And this also casts his whole Exposition into much confusion. Christ offered himself once, saith the Apostle; once, and at one time. This I suppose is agreed. Then he offered for himself and his own sins, or not at all. For he offered but once, and at one time; Where then did he thus offer himself and when? In Heaven upon his Ascension, say the Socinians with one accord. Where then and when did he offer for himself? On the earth. Then he offered himself twice? No, by no means, he offered not himself on the Earth; how then did he offer for himself on the earth? He did not indeed offer himself on the Earth, but he prepared himself for his offering on the Earth, and therein he offered for himself; that is, he did, and he did not offer himself upon the earth. For they cannot evade by saying that he did it when he offered up prayers on the Earth: For the Apostle says expresly in this place, that what he did, he did it when he offered himself. And it must be by such an of
6. The close of his Discourse, whereby he would prove the Truth of his Exposifalsehood, from what is more evidently so.
Grotius adds little unto what Schlictingius offers in this case. Only he tells us that those griefs which are commonly the punishment of sin; Rom. 6. 10. But it is a mistake: died once for sin, that is, he suffered once for sin. He says moreover, that profluvium mulierum is called Levit. 12. 8. 15. 13. as also is the leprosie; chap. 14. 13. But herein also he is mistaken; both the one and the other subject unto those defiling Distempers, were appointed to offer a sin-offering for those sins, which those Defilements were tokens of, and the sin of Nature which they proceed from. Again he says, that Christ in his offering was freed from those infirmities and miseries, per mortem acceleratam. But his death was not hasted one moment until all was finished; nor did he offer for the hastening of his Death. And his ensuing words are most ambiguous; Christ offered, pro doloribus istis qui solent peccatorum poenae esse, & quos Christus occasione etiam peccatorum humani generis toleravit. If the sorrows intended were not true punishments of sin, they could not be offered for. And what sorrows Christ underpenal, he offered for them when he offered for the sins of the People, and not otherwise. But those which are called his own sins, must be every way distinct from the sins of the People, and have no Relation unto them; as the sins of the High Priests of old had not. Wherefore if by the occasion of the sins of men, he intend, that his Sufferings and Griefs were for the sins of men, then he offered for them when he offered for the sins of the People, when he bare our sins and sorrows, and had no need to offer distinctly for them as his own. And if it were a sorrow that was not for sin, it cannot be called Sin. Christs sufferings on the occasion of the sins of mankind, is well understood by those who are any way skilled in the Socinian Mysteries.
Hammond says the same. He both (saith he) offered for himself, that is, made expiation as it were (not to deliver himself from sin, for he was never guilty of any) but from the infirmities assumed by him, but especially from death it self; and so is now never likely to dye, and to determine his Melchisedecian Priesthood. Ans. (1) To make expiation as it were from the infirmities assumed by him, or to be delivered from them, is hard to be understood. (2) Much more is it, how by death wherein he offered himself, he should make expiation to be delivered from death it self. (3) And it is as hard to say, that Christ offered for himself once by death, that he might dye no more; seeing it is appointed unto all men only once to dye.
I have digressed thus far to crush this novel Invention, which as it is untrue and alien from the sense of the Apostle, so it hath in the expression of it an ungrateful sound of Impiety. But I expect not so much Sobriety, as that considering the means of its conveyance unto the minds of men at present, it should not be vented again, until what hath been here pleaded in its confutation be answered. At pre
How, and what Christ offered for the sins of the People is declared in the words remaining.
1. For the way or manner of it. He did it Once only. This is directly opposed unto the frequency of the legal Sacrifices repeated daily as there was occadaily, on all occasions; He Once only.
And I cannot but observe by the way that this Assertion of the Apostle is no less absolutely exclusive of the Missatical Sacrifices of the Priests of the Roman Church, than it is of the Levitical Sacrifices of the High Priest of the Church of the Jews. Their Expositors on this place do generally affirm in plea for their Church, that they offer it not to make expiation of sins, but only to represent and make application of the one Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross. But in their Mass it self they speak otherwise, and expresly offer it to God a Sacrifice for the sins of the living and the dead. Neither yet do we enquire unto what End they do what they do: and this is all they say, that they offer the same sacrifice that Christ did, that is, himself. And this they do a thousand times more frequently, than the ExpiatoJews. Neither were their Sacrifices offered promake Attonement for Sin by their own vertue and Efficacy; but only to be a Representation and Application of the Sacrifice of Christ to come. Whatever ends they therefore fancy unto themselves, by pretending to
same sacrifice that Christ did, they contradict the words of the Apostle, and wholly evert the force of his Argument. For if the same sacrifice which the Lord Christ offered be often offered and had need so to be, the whole Argument to prove the excellency of his Priesthood in that he offered himself but once, above them who often offered the same sacrifices, falls to the ground.
And hence also the Foundation of this fiction is rased. For it is, that the Lord Christ offered himself at the supper the night before he was hetraied, as the Trent Council affirms, Sess. 22. Cap. 1. For if he did so, he offered himself more than once, twice at least; which being a matter of Fact, is to give the Apostle the lye.
What he offered is expressed in the last place, and therein the Reason is contained why he offered but once, and needed not to do so daily, as those Priests did. And this is taken from the excellency of his offering, he offered himself.
1. That no sinful man was meet to offer the great Expiatory sacrifice for the Church; much less is any sinful man fit to offer Christ himself. As the first part of this AsserJews, so doth the latter the vain pretence of the Priests of the Church of Rome. The former the Apostle proves and confirms expresly. For no other high Priest but such a one as was in himself perfectly sinless, did become us, or our state and condition. He that was otherwise could neither have any thing of his own to offer, and must in the first place offer for himself, and this he must be doing day by day. And the latter on many accounts is a vile presumptuous Imagination. For a poor sinful worm of the Earth, to interpose himself between God and Christ, and offer the one in sacrifice unto the other, what an issue is it of Pride and Folly?
2. The Excellency of Christs Person and Priesthood freed him in his offering from many things that the Levitical Priesthood was obliged unto. And the due ApprehenTypes. For many things we shall meet withal which we cannot see how they had a particular AccomCall and Consecration which they had by the Law, in the sacrifice of beasts, with certain washings and unctions, their sacrificing often, and for themselves, their Succession one to another, their Purifications or legal Pollutions. These and sundry things of like nature were made necessary unto them from their own sins and infir
3. No Sacrifice could bring us unto God and save the Church to the utmost, but that wherein the Son of God himself was both Priest and Offering. Such an High Priest became us who offered himself once for all. And we may consider, (1.) That this was one of the greatest effects of infinite divine Wisdom and Grace. His Incarnation wherein he had a body prepared for him for this purpose, his call to his Office by the Oath of the Father and Unction of the Spirit, his sanctifying himself to be a sacrifice, and his offering up himself through the eternal Spirit unto God, are all full of Mysterious Wisdom and Grace. All these wonders of wisTransaction, all that belongs unto this sacrifice, is filled up with Perfection, that no more could be required on the part of God, nor is any thing
Behold the Lamb of God that takes away the sins of the World.
4. It was burdensom and heavy work to attain relief against sin and settled Peace of Conscience under the old Priesthood, attended with so many weaknesses and infirmities. Herein lyes the greatest part of that Yoke which the Apostle Peter affirms that neither they nor their Fathers were able to bear, Act. 15. 10. Which the Lord Christ gives us deliverance from,
For the Law maketh men High Priests which have Infirmity; but the Word of the Oath which was since the Law, maketh the Son, who is consecrated for evermore.
The Apostle in this verse summeth up the whole of his precedent Discourse, so as to evidence the true and proper Foundation, which all along he hath built and proceeded on. (1.) One Principle there was agreed upon between him and the Hebrews who adhered unto Mosaical Institutions; and this was, that an High Priest over the Church there must be; and without such an one there is no approach unto God. So it was under the Law, and if the same order be not continued, the Church must needs fall under a great disadvantage. To lose the High Priest out of our Religion, is to lose the Sun out of the firmament of the Church. This was a common Principle agreed on between them, whereon the Apostle doth proceed.
(2.) He Grants unto them that the High Priests who officiated in the TaberLaw.
(3.) Hereon ensued the main Difference between him and them. They were perswaded and hoped that these Priests should continue for ever in the Church withanother order to be introduced in their room; which would be so far from being any disadvantage unto the Church, as that the whole safety, glory, and blessedness thereof did depend thereon. And this he proves by many cogent and irrefragable Arguments unto them. As,
1. That before the erection of the Levitical Priesthood by the Law, there was another priest of the High God, who was far greater and more excellent than those Priests, yea, than Abraham himself from whom they derived all their Privi
2. Because after the giving of the Law and the setting up of the Levitical Priestanother Priest, in another kind, afprefigured before the Law, and promised after the Law, so that his Introduction could not be prejudiced by the Law.
3. That this High Priest thus promised, neither was to be nor could be, of the same stock, Nature, or Order with the Levitical priests, but one that was not only distinct from them, but really inconsistent with them. He manifests that there was no possibility they should be priests together, or that the Church should be under the conduct of them both.
4. Whereas hereon it may be said, who knows whether this change and AlteAdvantage of the Church or no, whether it were not better to adhere unto these priests which we have already, than relinquishing them and all Benew High Priest; the Apostle in anexcellency of this other Priest above them. And not only so, but he proves undeniably that by all which those other Priests did perform in divine service, and by all that the Law could effect, whereby they were constituted and made Priests, there was no Access unto God, no Perfection, nor Consummation in peace of Conscience to be obtained. For there were so many defects and weaknesses that accompanied them and their sersingle High Priest now introduced, and his one sacrifice offered once for all, by reason of the perfection of the one and the other, all those blessed Ends were compleatly accomplished.
This being the Design of the Apostles Discourse in this Chapter, he giveth us a summary of the whole, and of the principal Grounds which he proceeds upon, with wonderful Brevity in this last verse. For upon an acknowledgement of the different Principles mentioned, he shews us in an elegant Antithesis,
1. The different means of the constitution of these different Priests; on the one hand, the Law; and on the other, the Word of the Oath.
2. The different times of their constitution; the one in the giving of the Law; the other after the Law.
3. The difference of their Persons; those of the first sort were Men, and no more; the other was the Son.
4. The Difference in their state and condition; the former had infirmities, the later is consecrated for ever.
5. This also is included in the words, that those of the first sort were many, men that had infirmities; he of the later was one only. And in these things, as we shall briefly see, be the springs of all the Arguments which the Apostle hath used in this case, and a plain Representation is given us of the Truth he contended for.
1. The first Difference is in the constituting Principles of these distinct Offices: That on the part of the Levitical Priesthood was the Law, that is, the ceremonial Law, as we call it; the Law given in Horeb, concerning Religious Rites, the way and manner of the Solemn worship of God in the Tabernacle. It was not the Moral Law, not immediatly the commands of the Decalogue, but the especial Law of divine Service and Worship that is intended.
And what doth the Law do? It appointeth. It did so Morally, God appointed them in and by the Law. And he speaks in the Present Tense. So long as the Law continueth in force and Efficacy it appointeth such Priests. None other are to be looked for in, or expected from the Law. Now a Moral Rule or Institution is sufficient to convey power and Authority of office unto men. So is it under the
Hereunto is opposed the word of the Oath, as the constitutword as that was also. The Law was The word spoken by Angels. chap. 2. 2. The word of God, though spoword in this sense is either a meer word of command, or a word of Promise; either of which is sufficient to constitute an office, being Dechap. 5. ver. 5, 6. But herein especially did this Word excel the Word of the Law, in that it was confirmed by the Oath of God. It was the Word, the Will, the Promise of God declared in and by his Oath. And herein hath it many Advantages above the Law, which was not so. As,
1. An high federal Solemnity. Things confirmed by an Oath are peculiarly SaInterposition of an Oath was originally (it may be, solely) used in the confirmation of Covenants about things of moment, and wherein several Parties were highly con
2. An Oath declares the immutability of that Counsel whence the matter sworn unto doth proceed. In the giving of the Law, God declared his will, so far as to what he would have the People at present obliged unto. But he did not by any
unchangeable counsel determined, that the kind of worship, and state of the Church then erected, should continue for ever. Yea, he did many ways intimate that he did reserve unto himself the power of altering the whole. But now the Immutability of Gods Counsel is declared by his Oath. What was this Oath of God, and how the Lord Christ was made a Priest thereby, hath been before at large declared. The Apostle takes notice of it here only as it was given out in prophecy by David which was but a Solemn Declaration of the Eter
2. The Difference of the Time wherein these Priesthoods were ordained, is inwhen the Law was given, whereby they were made Priests: the latter was after the Law, or the giving of it. This, I confess, doth not appear at first view to be to the advantage of the Apostles Design, namely, that this Oath was after the Law. For in another place he expresly argues on the other hand, that what is first in such cases hath the Preeminence; and cannot be disanulled by what doth ensue. Gal. 3. 17. And this I say, that the Covenant that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the Law which was four hundred and thirty years after cannot disanul, that it should make the Promise of none effect. May it not be as well said that this Oath, which was declared about four hundred years after the giving of the Law, could not disanul it, or make it of none effect? The Objection being not without its difficulty, I shall spend a litfolloweth after cannot Disanul what went before,
1. If that which is afterwards introduced be consistent with what was before established. For in that case there is no intimation of the Pleasure of God that it should be
2. Especially it cannot do so, if it be inferior unto that which went before, either in Dignity or use and benefit, and so be made subservient unto it.
3. And it must be invalid unto any such Purpose, if it had no other antecedent foundation, that did indeed precede the former Grant: for if it have so, it may ra
Now thus it was with the Law in respect unto the Promise, which (as the Apobefore it, could not be disanulled by it. For,
1. The Law as it was then ordained of God, was consistent with the Promise; Yea, and given in the pursuit of it; so as that there was no need that any should forsake the Promise to comply with the Will of God in giving the Law.
2. The Law as it was inferior in Dignity and Use unto the Promise, so it was made subordinate and subservient unto it. For the man end of giving the Law, was to guide and direct the Church unto the right use and benefit of the Promise.
3. The Promise had an absolute priority above the Law. There was no Ground or Foundation laid for the Law, no intimation of its future introduction, before the giving of the Promise: And therefore the Promise could not be disannulled by it.
But in the present case all things are otherwise. For,
1. The Priesthood confirmed by an Oath, and introduced after the Law, was utterly inconsistent with the Law and the Priesthood thereof. This the Apostle hath fully proved before. Wherefore of necessity either the Law and the Priestdisannulled, or the Oath of God must be of none effect; For what he had sworn unto was inconsistent with the continuance of what was before appointed for a time.
2. This new Priesthood could no way be made subordinate or subservient unto the other, so as to leave it a place in the Church. But as it was eminently above it in Dig
3. This Priesthood had its Reasons, Grounds, Foundation and Representation long before the giving of the Law. For besides that it had a virtual constitution in the first Promise 2000 years before the giving of the Law, it had also a Typical ReMelchisedek; and it received only a Declaration and Confirmation in the Account given of the
Wherefore the direct contrary is here the matter in hand, unto what is spoken
Promise was confirmed by an Oath, the latter was not. But here the latter which was after the Law, was confirmed by the Oath of God, which the Law was not. And hereon its being after the Law is a sufficient Evidence of its preeminence above the Law, and all the Institutions of it. For hereby was that introduced which was to supply all the defects and weaknesses of the Law and its Priesthood, and so to disanul them and take them out of the way.
3. The third Difference is, that the Law made Men to be High Priests;
meer men and no more. And therefore notwithstanding the Office and Dignity which they were called and exalted unto, they were all but servants in the House of God, nor could they be any other as the Apostle proves, Chap. 3. 5. In opposition hereunto, the Word of the Oath makes Son an High Priest; that Son who is Lord over the whole House, and whose the House is, ver. 5, 6. And in this word the Apostle openeth the necessity and Dignity of the Priesthood of the New Testament. For it consists in the Dignity of the Person designed unto that Office. This was no other, nor could be other, but the Son, the Eternal Son of God. Filium, nempe Dei, non hominem caeteris parem, nascendi sorte, saith
4. It is added in the last place that the Law made men Priests, that had infirmity: subject to infirmities. And these were of two sorts, Moral and Natural; neither could they be freed from either of them during the whole time of their Priesthood. The first were their Sins, hence they were obliged continually to offer sacrifice for their own sins, and that to the very last day of their Lives. The summe and issue of their natural weaknesse was death it self. This seized on every one of them, so as to put an Everlasting end unto their sacerdotal Administrations.
But wherefore did the Law make such Priests, men, meer men, that had infirmity, subject to sin and death, so as to put an end unto their Office? The Reason is, befind any better, nor make them any better whom it found in that condition. The Law must be content with such as were to be had, and in it self it had no power to make them better.
In opposition hereunto it is said the Word of the Oath made the Son
consecrated for ever. What was the consecration of the Lord Christ unto the infirmities which those other Priests were obnoxious unto, namely, such Infirmities in the first place as with respect whereunto, sacrifice was to be offered unto God, that is, their own sins. And the Apostle here opposing the
1. There never was, nor never can be any more than two sorts of Priests in the Church, the one made by the Law, the other by the Oath of God. Wherefore,
As the bringing in of the Priesthood of Christ after the Law and the Priesthood constituted thereby, did abrogate and disanul it; so the bringing in of another Priesthood after his, will abrogate and disanul that also. And therefore,
3. Plurality of Priests under the Gospel overthrows the whole Argument of the Apostle in this place, and if we have yet Priests that have infirmities, they are made by the Law, and not by the Gospel.
4. The summe of the Difference between the Law and the Gospel, is issued in the Difference between the Priests of the one and the other state, which is inconceivable.
5. The great Foundation of our Faith, and the hinge whereon all our consolation depends, is this, that our High Priest is the Son of God.
6. The Everlasting continuance of the Lord Christ in his Office, is secured by the Oath of God.
〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
There are Two General Parts of this Chapter.
I. A Father Explication of the Excellency of the Priesthood of Christ, or of Christ himself, as vested with that Office; that is, both in his Personal GloAaron.
II. A further confirmation hereof; wherein is introduced the consideration of the two Covenants; the Old and the New. For unto the former was the whole Administration of the Levitical Priests confined. Of the latter Christ as our High Priest was the Mediator and Surety. And therefore the Apostle fully proves the excellency of this New Covenant above the Old, which redounds unto the Glory of its Mediator.
The First part is contained in the first five verses: the latter extends from thence to the end of the Chapter.
In the first Part two things are designed. (1.) A Recapitulation of some things before delivered. (2.) The Addition of some farther Arguments in the confirmation of the same Truth, so long before insisted on.
Both of them he comprizeth in three instances of the excellency of Christ in his Priest
1. In his Exaltation and the Place of his present Residence: ver. 1.
2. In the Sanctuary whereof he is a Minister, and the Tabernacle wherein at present he doth administer, ver. 2.
3. In the Sacrifice he had to offer, or which he offered before his entrance into that Sanctuary, ver. 3. which he illustrates by two especial considerations, ver. 4, 5.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
caput; vul. Capitulum, Summa; Beza. Caeterum eorum quae diximus haec summa est. Moreover this is the Sum of what we speak. Summatim autem dicendo: to speak briefly,
We have an High Priest, he who sitteth; omitting this word, or inis, ille.
magnitudinis; which the Rhemists render by Majesty, and retain Sedis for Majestatis illius; or, Throni, virtutis, magnificandi.
Now of the things that are spoken, this is the sum: We have such an High Priest, who is set on the right hand of the Throne of the majesty in the Heavens.
This first Verse contains two things. (1) A Preface unto that Part of the ensuing Discourse which immediately concerns the Priesthood of Christ, unto the end of ver. 5. (2) A Declaration of the first Preheminence of our High Priest, which the Apostle would have us in an especial manner to consider.
The Preface is in these words;
I. The Design of the Apostle in this Interlocution, (which is not unusual with him) is to stir up the Hebrews unto a diligent consideration of what he insisted on, and to leave an impression of it on their minds. And this he doth for two Reasons.
1. Least the Length and Difficulty of his preceding Discourse should have any way discomposed their minds, or wearied them in their Attention, so as that they could not well retain the substance of what he pleaded. In such cases it was always usual with them who pleaded important Causes before the wisest Judges, to recapitulate what had been spoken at length before, and to shew what hath been evinced by the Arguments they had used in their Plea. To this purpose speaks Quintilian, lib. 6. cap. 1. Perorationis duplex ratio est posita, aut in rebus, aut in affectibus. Rerum repetitio aut congregatio, quae Graece dicitur
2. Because of the Importance of the matter in hand. He is treating of the very Head of all the Differences between the Law and the Gospel, between those who adhered unto Mosaical Institutions, and those who embraced the Faith. Hence he calleth them unto a renewed Attention unto what he delivered. For herein he set Life and Death before them, and was zealous for them, and earnest with them, that they would chuse Life, and not die in their Unbelief.
II. The Sense of the words is to be considered. Capitulum, Caput, proHead of any living Creature. But the most frequent use of it is in a sense metaphorical, as it is here used by the Apostle. And so it hath a double sense and use whereunto it is principally applied, for it hath also other significations; For (1) It is taken for that which is chief and principal in any matter, business or cause. Isoc. The Head of the whole Business.
Plato, de Legib. lib. 1. The principal thing in Education or InCaput used among the Latines. Caput est in omni procuratione negotii & muneris publici, ut avaritiae pellatur etiam minima suspicio. This is the chief or
principal thing in the management of all publick Affairs, that all suspicion of Covetousness be far away. (2) It is taken for the sum and substance of what hath been spoken or declared, reduced into a short Scheme.
ut summatim dicam, Demosthenes. And so some render these words summatim dicendo. And Isocrates hath an expression directly answering that of the Apostle in this place, ad Nicoc.
the sum of what hath been spoken; so Caput, the Head, is used in he Hebrew,
When thou takest the Head (the Sum) of the Children of Israel: So also Numb. 4. 2. And in this sense is Ephes. 1. 10. but it may have another sense in that place.
In whether of these two significations it is here used by our Apostle, will best appear, from the consideration of what it is applied unto,
1. in or among; and then the things themselves treated the chief and principal thing or matter. Among all the things treated of, this is the principal; as indeed it is, and that which all other things in debate did depend upon.
2. If redundant, and no more is intended but of the things spoken, then Recapitulation of them. This is that which my Arguments amount unto, the Sum of what I have pleaded.
Both these Senses are consistent. For the Apostle in this and the ensuing Verses doth both briefly Recapitulate, what he had evinced by his preceding Arguments, and also deprincipal thing that he had contended for and proved. I incline unto the latter signification of the word, respected in our Translation; yet so as that the former also is true, and safely applicable unto the Text.
And some Directions we may take from the wisdom of the Apostle in this managepresent Subject, in our preaching or teaching of spiritual things. For,
1. When the nature and weight of the matter treated of, or the variety of Arguments wherein it is concerned, do require that our Discourse of it should be drawn forth unto a length more than ordinary, it is useful to refresh the minds, and relieve the memories of our Hearers, by a brief Recapitulation of the things insisted on. It is so, I say, someonce, and but once by our Apostle. When it is necessary, is left unto the wisdom and choice of those who are called unto this work. I mean of such who labouring diligently and conscientiously in the discharge of it, do really consider at all times what is for the benefit and edification of their Hearers. But this is to be done onely on great and importent occasions; the usual way of the Repetition of the Heads of Sermons before preached, is in my judgment useless and unprofitable.
2. When Doctrines are important, and such as the eternal welfare of the Souls of men are immediately concerned in, we are by all means to endeavor an impression of them on the minds of our Hearers. Be they never so precious and worthy of all Acceptation, oft-times they will not obtain an Entrance into mens minds, unless they have an edge ministerially put upon them. Wherefore they are by all sutable means, with gravity and zeal to be called unto a diligent Attendance unto them. Weight is to be laid doctrinally in their delivery, on things that are of weight
II. The second Part of it in the following words, contains the first general Prehemipresent and eternal state or condition.
And there are three things considerable in the words. (1.) Our Relation unto this High Priest. (2.) The general Denotation of him. (3.) His Eminency and Dignity in particular above all others.
I. Our Relation unto him is expressed in the word We have. For the Apoour Interest therein, or our ReSuch an High Priest became us, Chap. 7. 26. We have not an High Priest that cannot, &c. Chap. 4. 15. The High Priest of our Profession, Chap. 3. 1. And here, we have such un High Priest. And to the same purpose we have an Altar, Chap. 13. 10. And two things the Apostle seems to design herein.
Dignity of the Christian Church, as now separated from the Church of the Jews. In all their confidence in their Worship, that which they principally boasted of was their High Friest and his Office. He was anointed with the Holy Oil. He wore the Garments that were made for Beauty and Glory. He had on his Forehead a Plate of Gold, with that glorious Inscription, Holiness unto Jehovah. And He alone entred into the Holy Place, having made Expiation of the Sins of the People. The Christians who were now separated from them, they despised, as those who had no lot nor portion in all this Glory; no such visible High Priest as they had. So the same Persons were afterwards reproached by the Pagans, that they had neither Temples, nor Altars, nor Images or visible Deities. So hard was it to call off the carnal minds of Men, from things viRoman Church, that whereas the Gospel in asserting the pure, heavenly, spiritual Worship of God, had prevailed against the World, and triumphed over all that is carnal, invented to please the senses, and satisfie the superstitious minds of Men; they have made themselves the scorn and spoil of their conquered Enemies, by returning to the same kind of Worship in vaby building up what was before destroyed. But the Primitive Christians did still oppose the spiritual Worship of sanctified Souls, in the observation of the Institutions of Christ, unto all the pretences of Glory and Beauty pleaded to be in their outward force. So the Apostle here, to evince the Dignity of the Christian Church against the Unbelief of the Jews, pleads their Relation unto an invisible spiritual High Priest, exalted in GloWe have an High Priest; and that such an one, as he immediately declares.
2. He would teach us, that whatever be the Glory and Dignity of this High Priest, without an Interest in him, without an especial Relation unto him, unless we have an High Priest, we are not concerned therein. Many do give their assent unto this Truth, That Christ is an High Priest, but how or wherein he is so to them they know not, nor yet do they make any use of him as such. Yea, unto many, the principal mysteries of the Gospel are but meer Notions, and barren Speculations; what it is to be practically influenced by them, and to live in the power of them, they know not. That there is an High Priest they believe, but what it is for them to have an High Priest, they cannot understand. But this is that we are to look after, if we intend any benefit by it. And we may know whether we have an High Priest or no, really and substantially, by the use which we make of him as such in all our approaches unto God. For he presides over the whole House of God, and all the Sacred Services thereof. None can come unto the Father but by him. Through him have we Boldness, through him have we Ability, through him have we Access unto, and Acceptance with God. He presents both our Persons and Duties unto him. Without a daily improvement by Faith of the Office of Christ unto these ends, it cannot be said that we have an High Priest.
3. That the Office of the Priesthood of Christ is confined unto the Church, unto Believers. Theirs he is, and for them alone doth he administer before God in this Office.
II. There is a general Denotation of this Priest, as to his Qualifications, in the word we have an High Priest only, nor another High
Priest, not according to the Ordinances of the Law, which he had proved before, from the Type of Melchisedec, and the Testimony of the Psalmist; but moreover such an one as hath that Dignity and those Excellencies which he now ascribes unto him. The Salvation of the Church doth not depend meerly on its having an High Priest, which yet in it self is absolutely necessary thereunto, but on his Dignity and Excellency, his Exalta
Wherefore it is affirmed of him, That he is such an High Priest as is set on the right hand of the Throne of the glorious Majesty in the Heavens. And two things we must consider in these words: (1.) The Design of the Apostle in them: And (2) Their particular Interpretation.
Design of the Apostle as we observed before, was not to prove the Reality of his Priesthood, that he was truly a Priest; nor yet absolutely the Qualifications of his Person, but his Dignity and Excellency. For our Lord Jesus Christ when he was on the earth, and whil'st he offer'd up to God his great propitiatory Sacrifice, was as unto his outward state and condition inferior unto the Levitical High Priests, who were in great honour and veneration among the People. But the state and condition of any in the bearing and discharge of an Office, is not to be esteemed and reckoned from what he condescends unto with respect unto any action or duty belonging unto that Office. For a King may condescend unto very mean Services, when the condition of his Subjects and good of the Kingdom require it of him. But it is to be reckoned from his durable estate, and perpetual abode therein. Now although our Lord Christ was for a season in a condition of deep humiliation, taking on him the form of a servant, and being esteemeven as a worm and no man, which was necessary unto the Sacrifice he had to offer; yet as unto his durable state wherein he continues in the discharge of his Office, he is inHigh Priest do, after he had offerAnniversary Sacrifice of Expiation unto God? He entred indeed into the Holy Place, with the blood of the Sacrifice, presenting it there before the august Pledges of the presence of God. But all the while he was there, he stood before the Typical Throne or Ark and Mercy-seat, with Holy Awe and Reverence. And immediately on the disSanctuary. But what is this unto the Glory of our High Priest? For after he had offered his great Sacrifice unhe entred not into the Holy Place made with hands, but into Heaven it self. And he entred not to stand with humble Reverence before the Throne, but to sit on the Throne of God at his right hand. Nor did he do so to abide there for a season, but for ever
2. As to the words themselves, we may observe that the Apostle three times in this Epistle maketh use of them with some little variety. Chap. 1. 3. Chap. 12. 2. And in this place. Chap. 1. 3. He sate down at the right hand of the Majesty on High: where there is no mention of the Throne. Chap. 12. 2. He is sate down at the right hand of the Throne of God: where Majesty is not added. Here we have both; the right hand of the Throne of the Majesty. In the first place, the Glory of his Kingly Power is intendPriestly Office. The same Glory and Advance
The manner of his enjoyment of this Dignity and Glory is expressed in the word He sate down. Hereof there was nothing Typical in the Legal High Priest,
sate down in the Holy Place. But as he was in many things typed by the Levitical Priests, so in what they could not reach unto, he was represented in Melchisedec, who was both a King and a Priest. And hence he is prophesi'd of as a Priest upon his Throne, Zech. 6. 13. And the immutable stability of his state and condition is also in
2. The Dignity it self consists in the place of his Residence, where he sate down; and this was, at the right hand. See the Exposition hereof, Chap. 1. 3.
3. This right hand is said to be Thorne of God. A Throne is Insigne Regium, an Ensign of Royal Power. That intended by it, is the manifestation of the Glory and Power of God in his Authority and Sovereign Rule over all.
4. This Throne is here said to be, Majesty, or Glorious Greatness and
Power, that is, of God himself, for his essential Glory and Power is intended. The Right hand of the Throne of Majesty, is the same with the Right hand of God. Only God is represented in all his Glory, as on his Throne. Christ is sate down at the Right hand of God, as considered in all his glorious Power and Rule. Higher expression there cannot be used to lead us into an holy Adoration of the tremendous invisible Glory which is intended. And this is the eternal stable condition of the Lord Christ our High Priest. A state of inconceivable Power and Glory. Herein he dischargeth the remaining Duties of his Mediation, according as the nature of his especial Offices do require. In this state doth he take care and provide for the application of the benefits of his Oblation or Sacrifice unto Believers; and that by
in the Heavens; as in the other place in the Highest, that is, Heavens. And by the Heavens here, not these visible aspectable
Heavens are intended; for with respect unto them he is said to be exalted above all Heavens, and to have passed through them. But it is that which the Scripture calls the Heaven of Heavens, 1 Kings 8. 27. wherein is the especial residence and manifestation of the glorious presence of God. With respect hereunto our Saviour hath taught us to call on our Father which is in Heaven. And from the words we may observe that
The principal Glory of the Priestly Office of Christ depends on the glorious Exaltation of his Person. To this end is it here pleaded by the Apostle, and thereby he evinceth his glorious Excellency above all the High Priests under the Law. To evidence and make useful this Observation, the things ensuing are to be observed.
1. The Divine Nature of Christ is capable of no real Exaltation by an addition of Glory, but only by the way of manifestation. So God absolutely is often in the Scriexalted, that is, he is so, when he himself by any Acts of Grace or Providence makes the eternal Glory of his Power, his Holiness, or any other properties of his Nature manifest and conspicuous; or when others
2. The Person of Christ as to his Divine Nature, was always on the Throne, and is unhe came down from Heaven, though he descended into the lower parts of the Earth, although he was exposed unto all miseries, was obedient unto death, the death of the Cross, wherein God redeemed his Church with his own blood, yet did he all this in the humane nature that he assumed; his Divine Person can no more really leave the Throne of Majesty, than cease to be. So he saith of himself, No man hath ascended up to Heaven, but he that came down from Heaven, even the Son of man which is in Heaven, John 3. 13. His Ascension into Heaven in this place, which preceded the actual Ascension of his humane Nature, is nothing but his admission into the knowledge of heavenly things, of all the secrets of the counsel of God, see
3. It is the Humane Nature of Christ, or Christ in his Humane Nature, or with recapable of this real Exaltation, by a real addition of Glory. It is not the manifestation of his Glary with respect unto his Humane Nature, but the real Collaa real communication of Glory unto Christ by the Father after his Ascension which he had not before. See Luke 24. 16. John 17. 24. Acts 2. 33. Acts 5. 31. Rom. 14. 9. Ephes. 1. 20, 21, 22, 23. Phil. 2. 9, 10, 11. Hebr. 1. 3. Chap. 12. 2. 1 Pet. 1. 21. Rev. 5. 9. And concerning this Glory given him of God, we may observe
1. That it is not absolutely infinite and essentially divine Glory, This cannot be communicated unto any. A Creature, as was the Humane Nature of Christ, cannot be made God, by an essential communication of Divine Properties unto it. Neither are
communicable, nor is that a capable Subject of their inhesion. Wherefore they speak dangerously who assert a real communication of the Properties of the one Nature of Christ unto the other, so as that the Humane Nature of Christ shall be Omnipresent, Omnipotent and Omniscient: neither doth the Union of the two Natures in the Person of Christ, require any more the Transfusion of the Divine Properties into the Humane, than those of the Humane into the Divine. If therefore by that Union, the Humane Nature should be thought to be rendred subjectively omnipotent and omnipresent, the Dilimited and finite. But whatever belongs unto Christ with respect unto either Nature, belongs unto the Person of Christ, and therein he is all that he is in either Nature, and in both hath done and doth, what in either of them he hath done and doth, they yet continuing distinct in their essential Proper
2. Yet this Exaltation and Glory of Christ in his Humane Nature is not only absolutecreated Being eiUnion of his Person, a Priviledge which no other Creature can ever preHebr. 2. 16. This renders his Glory in his Exaltation of another kind than that of the most glorious Creatures in their best condition. Again, it consists greatly in that Power and Authority over the whole CreChap. 1. ver. 3.
4. This Exaltation of the Person of Christ gives Glory unto his Office, as the Apostle here declares. It is the Person of Christ which is vested with the office of the Priestredeemed his Church with his own blood; although he exHumane Nature only. And this gives Glory unto his Office. For
1. This is a manifest Pledge and Evidence of the absolute Perfection of his Oblation, and that by one offering he hath for ever perfected them that are sanctified. When the High Priest of old appeared for awhile in the Holy Place, he returned again unto his former station, that he might be in a condition to offer
2. By his Glorious Power he makes all things subservient unto the ends of his medigiven to be Head over all things to the Church. All things are in his Power and at his Disposal, as he is exalted at the right hand of God, and he will assu
3. He is able to render the Persons and Duties of Believers accepted in the sight of God. To present them unto God is the great remaining Duty of his Office. That they be so, is their only real concern in this world, and that alone which their minds are prinInterest and Glory which this their
THE second Preeminence of our Lord Christ as our High Priest, which the ApoSummary of his Discourse, is contained in this second Verse.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Minister;
Sanctorum. Rhem. of the Holies. Syr. of the Holy House, or Domus Sanctuarii, of the House of the Sanctuary. Sanctuarii, of the Sanctuary; as we shall see. quod fixit Deus; which God hath fixed or pitched, Rhem. which our Lord pight; following the Original as to the word God.
not a Son of man. Some Copies of the Vulgar Latine, Dominus.
A Minister of the Sanctuary, and of the true Tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.
There are two Parts of these words, expressing,
1. What is affirmed of our High Priest, namely, That he was a Minister of the Sanctuary, and the true Tabernacle.
2. An Amplification of what is so affirmed, by the Description and Distinction of this Tabernacle; which the Lord fixed, and not man.
In the first also there are two things.
1. It is affirmed that he is a Minister. Having declar'd the Glory and sitting down at the right hand of the Throne of the Majesty in Heaven; what can be farther expected from him? There he lives, eternally happy in the enjoyment of his own Blessedness and Glory. Is it not reasonable it should be so, after all the hardships and miseries which he, being the Son of God, underwent in this world? Who can expect that he should any longer condescend unto Office and Duty? Neither generally have men any other thoughts concerning him. But where then would lie the advantage of the Church in his Exaltation, which the Apostle designs in an especial manner to demonstrate? Wherefore unto the mention of it he immediatecontinuation of his Office. He is still Publick Minister for the Church.
minister; either with God, or before God, as a Priest for others, or for God, in the Name of God towards others, as do Magistrates and Ministers of the Gospel. And therefore all these sorts are called Priest; it is a name of his Priestly Office wherein he acts towards God. Nor is he any where called or said to be Rom. 15. 8. that is, he was so in the days of his flesh, but that name now no way belongeth unto him. He is not therefore styled a Minister, because he executeth the Purposes of God towards us, as Schlictingius fancieth; but he acts towards God and before God on our behalf, accordbefore God on our behalf. And it is granted also, that by vertue thereof he doth also communicate all good things from God unto us. For the whole administration of things Sacred between God and the Church, is committed unto him. And we must observe, that
The Lord Christ in the Height of his Glory, condescends to discharge the Office of a publick minister in the behalf of the Church. We are not to bound our Faith on Christ, as unto what he did for us on the Earth. The Life and Efficacy of the whole of his Me
2dly. There is a Limitation of this ministration of our High Priest, with respect unto its proper Object, and that in a double expression. For he is a Minister (1.)
1. He is so, Masculine or of the Neuter
Gender, and so respect either Persons or Things. If it be taken in the former way, it is of the Saints. And this is the ordinary sense of
Neuter Gender may have a double signification. (1.) Of Holy things in general. (2.) Of Holy Places. (1.) Of things, So the Uul. Lat. renders the word, Sanctorum, which the Rhemists translate Holies; that is, of Holy Persons or Holy things. And ours place Holy things in the Margen. And the sense is true, if the signification of the word be extended unto all Holy Things. For the ministration of them all is committed unto Jesus Christ. But the word hath yet a more peculiar significa
The inmost part of the Tabernacle, our Apostle calls Chap. 9. 3. That is Holy of Holies, the most Holy Place. And absolutely he calls it Holyes. Chap 9. 8, 12, 24, 25. Chap. 13. 11. And in answer thereunto he calleth our Spiritual Presence before God, whereunto we have an Access by the Blood of Christ, by the same name; Chap. 10. 19. And hence the word is rendred by most Interpreters, the Sanctuary, as by the Syr. The House of the Sanctuary. Particular
Take this Sanctuary properly and literally, and Christ was not the minister of it. He never entred into it, nor could, nor had any Right so to do, because it belonged and was apver. 4.
Wherefore we must take our Direction herein from the words following. For mentiTabernacle, as he doth here one part of it, namely, the Sanctuary, he gives it a note of Distinction from the Old Tabernacle of Moses, the true Tabernacle. So must the Sanctuary be distinguished from that of Old. It is that which answers thereunto. And this is nothing but Heaven it self. Heaven not as considered absolutely, but as the Place of Gods glorious Presence, the Temple of the living God, where the worship of the Church is represented, and all its Affairs transacted. This is called Gods Sanctuary, Psal. 102. 19. He looked down from the height of his Sanctuary, from Heaven did the Lord behold the Earth. And so the Apostle himself plainly interprets this place,
And this is called the Sanctuary, because there doth really dwell and abide all that was typically represented in the Sanctuary below. And therein doth the Lord Christ disHigh Priest entred into the Holy Place. For he carried with him the Blood wherewith Attonement was made for all their sins. Yet he was quickly
Sanctuary, in the Holy Place for ever, alwaies representing the efficacy of the Blood whereby atonement was made for all our sins. As no Interposition between Heaven and us should discourage us, while Christ is there ministring for us; so his being there will draw our hearts and minds thither continually, if so be we are really interested in his Holy ministrations. These things are to some in darkness and obscurity if not wholly out of their sight, yet out of their Practice. In their Faith, Worship, and Obedience, they find no concernment in the Heavenly ministrations of this High Priest. Things
The second Part of the Limitation of the ministration of our High Priest is in these and of that true Tabernacle, which is farther described by its efficient cause expressed both positively and negatively; which God pitched and not man.
Expositors generally agree, that by True in this Place, that which is Substantial, Solid and abiding is intended. For it is opposed unto that which is Umbratile, Transitory and Pigurative. The Old Tabernacle could in no sense be said to be false or deceiving, for it was an Ordinance of God, set up and used by his Appointment, and gave true directions unto its proper end. But it was Figurative and Typical, denoting somewhat that was to be the true and substantial Tabernacle of God. So is the expression interpreted, John 6. 23. Moses gave you not the Bread from Heaven, but my Father giveth you the true Bread from Heaven; that is, Spiritually substantial and abiding, nourishing the soul un
But what is the Tabernacle here intended, deserves our diligent enquiry. And I find a fourfold sense to be given of these words; The true Tabernacle.
1. Some (as Grotius) take it for this whole Universe, the Fabrick of Heaven and Earth. This some, even among the Heathen, have called the Tabernacle and Temple of God. This he hath made as it were to dwell in, as a certain fixed Place for the manifestation of his Glory. And whereas the ministry of Christ, at least as unto the effects of it, is not conficertain Place, above or below, to no material Tabernacle or Temple; The whole universe is called his Tabernacle, as being that which is true, substantial, and abiding. And thus it may answer what is affirmed of all Power being given unto him in Heaven and Earth, and his being given to be the Head over all things unto the Church.
I see nothing absurd in this Opinion, nor contradictory unto the Analogy of Faith. But the Design of the Apostle in using these words and expressions, will not allow this to be his especial meaning. For somewhat he doth intend that the Old Tabernacle did typify and represent, which it did not the Fabrick of the Universe, but that especial pattern which was shewed unto Moses in the Mount.
2. Some with more probability do judge, that by the true Tabernacle, the Universal Spiritual, Catholick Church, is intended. For this is compared expressly unto a Tabernacle, Isa. 33. 20.
But yet all this doth not suffice to have the Lord Christ called the Minister of this Tabernacle. This indeed is that which he
3. Most Expositors take the Tabernacle, as they do the Sanctuary, for Heaven it self. And they would have the word true by a Zeugma to belong unto the Sanctuary, as well as unto the Tabernacle, which we have also before allowed. But yet this proveth not, that the Sanctuary and the Tabernacle must be the same, though both be equally true in the same sense. This way go the Greek Expositors, as Chrysostome, Theophylact and Oecumenius on the Place. And because this Tabernacle is said to be fixed of God, Chrysostome reproachHeavens do move and are Spherical, though he never had a prophetical dream of the Copernican Hypothesis. But yet as Beza well observes, they forChap. 9. 11, 12. where the Tabernacle is spoken of in the same sense that here it is.
But besides the Reasons that shall be given immediately for another interpretation, two things will not comply with this. For (1.) There is no reason why the Apostle should express the same thing, first under the name of the Sanctuary, and then of a Tabernacle. (2.) There is no especial Reason why it should be added peculiarly concern
4. I say therefore that by this true Tabernacle, the Humane Nature of the Lord Christ himself is intended. Hereof he is the Minister, herein doth he minister before God above. For
1. Hereof the Old Tabernacle was a Type. Thence is the expression taken, and thereunto is opposition made in the Epithete, True. This therefore is our best direction and rule in the interpretation of this expression. For look what that Type did signifie, what was to be the substantial Antitype of it, that is the true Tabernacle whereof the Lord Christ is the Minister. For all agree that it is called true, in opposition and anumbratile and figurative. Now that Tabernacle was not erected to be a Type of Heaven, nor is any such thing intimated in the Scripture. A token, pledge, and means it was of Gods presence with his People here on earth, of his nearness unto them, whence also he is said to dwell among them. But this he doth really and substantially only through Christ. He therefore alone is this true Tabernacle. For
2. In answer hereunto when he was incarnate, and came into the world, it is said that He fixed his Tabernacle among us, John 1. 14. that is the signification of the word which we have translated to dwell, because the Tabernacle of old was the way and means of Gods dwelling among the People, in the pledges of his gracious presence. All that old curious Structure for an Habitation for God, did only represent his taking our nature upon him, fixing his Tent thereby among men. What was the pattern of this Tabernacle shewed unto Moses on the Mount we must enquire, on ver. 5.
3. He himself calleth his own Body his Temple, with respect unto the Temple at Jerusalem, which was of the same nature and use with the Tabernacle,
4. That is the true Tabernacle which God truly and really inhabiteth, and on the acTabernacle of old. God dwelt therein in the signs and pledges of his presence, and was on the acGod of that People, according to the terms of the Covenant between them, Exod. 25. 8. Rev. 21. 3. That therefore wherein God dwells really and substantially, and on the account whereof he is our God in the Covenant of Grace, that and no other is the
5. He is the only way and means of our approach unto God in holy Worship, as the Tabernacle was of old; which we have elsewhere declared.
That alone which seems to be of any force against this Interpretation, is, that the Humane Nature of Christ is that wherein he is the Minister of this Tabernacle; it canTabernacle it self wherein he doth administer, and therefore the place of his abode must be intended by the Tabernacle whereof he is the Minister.
Answ. By the same Rule it would follow, That because Christ is the High Priest, he is not the Sacrifice, for the Priest and the Sacrifice among men cannot be the same. Howoffered himself only. And the reason of these things is, that he was in his own Person and what he did therein, to answer all those Types of Priest, Sacrifice, Altar, Tabernacle, and what belonged thereunto. He was the body and substance of them all, Col. 2. 17. No one of them was able to represent the fulness of Grace that was to be in Christ. Therefore were there many of them ordained, and those of various sorts. And therefore his being eminently intended in one of them, no way hinders his being so in another. He was all in himself, Priest, Tabernacle, Altar and Sacrifice.
Lastly, The efficient cause of this true Tabernacle is declared both positively and which God hath pitched, and not man.
Tabernacle, and extends not unto the Sanctuary mentioned beOf the true Tabernacle which the Lord pitched. And hereby this Tabernacle is distinguished from both the Sanctuaries, the Typical here below, and the Real above,
same Building with either of them, as the Apostle declares, Chap. 9. 11.
pitched, fixed. It is a word proper unto the erection and establishment of a Tabernacle. The fixing of Stakes and Pillars, with the fastening of Cords thereunto, setting up a Tabernacle, Isa. 54. 2. The preparation of the Humane Nature or Body of Christ is that which is intended. A Body hast thou prepared me, Chap. 10. 5. And this
Author of this work was the Lord: This is the word or Name whereJehovah. And whereas in the revelation of that name, God declared that self-subsisting firmitude and unchangeablePromises of God became Yea and Amen. How this Tabernacle was prepared and fixed immediately by the Holy Ghost acting the infinite power of God alone there
It is added negatively and not man. Some suppose a Pleonasm in the words, and that redundant. For to say it was pitched by God, sufficiently includes that it was not done by man. But the expression is emphatical, and the Apostle hath an especial design in it. For
1. The Old Tabernacle itself may in some sense be said to be pitched by God. It was done by his command, order and direction, as were all other Ordinances of his appointGod pitched it, and not man, which excludes the whole Service and Ministry of Man. For the Ministry of Men was used in the prepatrue Tabernacle was the work of God alone, without any Ministry or Service of men; A Body hast thou prepared me.
2. The Apostle hath an especial respect unto the Incarnation of Christ, without the concurrence of man in natural Generation. This is expressed in answer unto that enquiry of the blessed Virgin, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man? Luke 1. 34, 35.
This was the true Tabernacle which the Lord pitched, and whereof Christ is the Mi
1. That all spiritually sacred and holy things are laid up in Christ. All the utensils of Holy Worship of old, all means of Sacred Light and Purification, were all placed and laid up in the Tabernacle. And these were all Patterns of the heavenly things themselves, which are all laid up in Christ the true Tabernacle. They are all inclosed in him, and it will be in vain to seek for them elsewhere. For
2. He hath the Ministration of all these holy things committed unto him. He is the Minister both of the Sanctuary and Tabernacle, and of all things contained in them. Herein he stands in no need of help or assistance, nor can any take his work out of his hand.
3. The Humane Nature of Christ is the onely true Tabernacle wherein God would dwell personally and substantially. The dwelling of God with men, was ever looked on as an infinite condescension. So Solomon expressed it in his Prayer at the dedication of the Temple, But will God indeed dwell on the earth? Behold, the heaven, and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee, 1 Kings 8. 27. But there are various degrees of this conArk and Mercy-seat; whence that which was done before the Ark, is said to be done before the Lord, Exod. 30. 5, 8. This was as Solomon expresseth it, a great condescension in the infinite, incomprehensible God, and there was a great Glory accompanying this his presence. Under the New Testament God dwelleth in his Saints by his Spirit, whereby they become an holy Temple unto him. And of this inhabitation of God, I have treated elsewhere. But his dwelling in the Hu
Hence is that expression of our Apostle, In him dwelt the fulness of the Godhead bodily, Col. 2. 9. It is not any sign or token, it is not any effect of the Divine Power, Goodness and Grace that dwells in him, but the
4. The Church hath lost nothing by the removal of the Old Tabernacle and Temple, all being supplied by this Sanctuary, true Tabernacle, and Minister thereof. The Glory and Worship of the Temple was that which the Jews would by no means part withall. They chose rather to reject Christ and the Gospel, than to part with the Temple, and its outward pompous worship. And it is almost increadible how the vain mind of man is addicted unto an outward beauty and splendor in Religious worship. Take it away, and with the most you destroy all Religion itself; as if there were no beauty but in painting, no evidence of health, or vigor of body, but in warts and wens. The ChriJews and Gentiles, than in this, that they had a Religion, without Temples, Altars, Images, or any Solemnity of worship. And in latter Ages men ceased not, until they had brought into Christianity itself a worship vying for external Order, Ceremony, Pomp and Painting, with whatever was in the Tabernacle or Temple of old, coming short of it principally in this, that, that was of Gods institution for a time, this of the invention of weak, superRome. And an hard thing it is to raise the minds of Men unto a satisfaction in things meerly spiritual and heavenly. They suppose they cannot make a worse change, nor more to their disadvantage, than to part with what is a present object and entertainment unto their Senses, Fancies, carnal AfTabernacles, and Temples, Modes of Worship and Ceremonies, which Men have found out in the room of them, which they cannot deny but God would have removed; For so they judge that he will be satisfied with their carnal Ordinances in the Church, when the time is come that he would bear his own no longer. But unto them that believe Christ is precious. And this true Tabernacle with his Ministration is more unto them, than all the old pompous Cere
5. We are to look for the gracious presence of God in Christ only. Of old all the ToTabernacle. There were they to be found and nowhere else. Many Altars the People of old did erect elsewhere, many high places they found out and prepared, but they were all sin and misery unto them; God granted his presence unto none of them all. Hos. 8. 11. Chap. 12. 11. And many ways there are whereby Men may and do seek after the presence of God, after his favour and acceptance with him, not in and by this true Tabernacle. But they labour in vain, and spend their strength for that which doth not profit. Neither the Love, nor Grace, nor Goodness, nor Mercy of God are elsewhere to be found, nor can we by any other way be made partakers of them.
6. It is by Christ alone that we can make our approach unto God in his Worship. All Sacrifices of old were to be brought unto the door of the Tabernacle. What was offered elsewhere was an Abomination to the Lord. With the Instruments, with the Fire, with the Incense that belonged unto the Tabernacle, were they to be offered and no otheran access in one Spirit unto the Father, Ephes. 2. 18. He is the only way of going to him, John 14. 6. And it is in and by his blood that he hath consecrated a new and living way unto the holy place, Chap. 10. 19, 20.
7. It was an Institution of God that the People in all their Distresses should look unto, and make their Supplications towards the Tabernacle or holy Temple. 1 Kings 8. 29, 30. And it is unto the Lord Christ alone who is both the true Tabernacle and the Minister thereof, that we are to look in all our spiritual Distresses.
8. If any one else can offer the Body of Christ, he also is the Minister of the true Tabernacle. For the Lord Christ did no more. He did but offer himself; and they that can offer him, do put themselves in his place.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Description of our High Priest designed, is carried on in this Verse, And the Apostle manifests, that as he wanted nothing, which any other High Priest had, that was necessary unto the discharge of his Office; so he had it all in a more eminent manner than any other had.
Qui stat ut offerat, Who standeth (that is at the Altar) that he may offer; rendering neutrally, the whole sense is imperfect, For every High Priest who standeth (at the Altar) that he may offer gifts and sacrifices; therefore
Oblationem, vul. Munera. Some rather use dona, and some donaria, sacred Gifts.
Sacrifices, vul. Hostias; and the Rhemists, Hosts, it may be to countenance their name of the Host in the Mass.
justum erat, aequum erat; it was just and equal. vul. necesse est, in the present tense, it is necessary.
habere, hunc habere; Syr. huic ut esset ei; To this Man that there should be to him, or with him.
aliquid quod offerat; something that he may offer. Syr.
Something that he should offer. The Arabick adds for himself, corruptly.
For every High Priest is ordained(appointed)to offer Gifts and Sacri(it was necessary)fices: wherefore it is of necessity that this man(should)have somewhat also to offer.
The Connexion of these words unto what was before asserted, which giveth us the causal Conjunction,
For. He both giveth a confirmation of what he had before affirmed, namely, that Christ was the Minister of the true Tabernacle, that is, of his Body, and rendereth a reason why it should so be; and this he farther confirms in the
The Reason he insists on, is taken from the general nature of the Office of every High Priest. That the Lord Christ is our High Priest, he had sufficiently demonstrated and confirmed before; this therefore he now assumes as granted. And hereon what beas such, he farther manifests, by shewing what the nature of that Office required, and what did necessarily belong unto every one that was Partaker thereof.
There are therefore two things in the words.
I. A general Assertion of the Nature, Duty, and Office of every High Priest.
II. A particular Inference from thence, of what did necessarily belong unto the Lord Christ in the susception and discharge of this Office.
In the first, the Universality of the expression is to be observed. Every
2. ordained; that is, appointed of God by the Law. Of the sense of this Chap. 5. 12.
Gods Ordination or Appointment gives Rules, Measures and ends unto all sacred Offices and Employments. Whoever undertakes any thing in Religion or Divine Worship, withGod doth not ordain in his service, is an Intruder; and that which he doth not appoint is an usurpation. Nor will he accept of any Dutys, but what he himself hath made so.
3. The principal end why the High Priests were ordained of God is expressed; it was
to offer Gifts and Sacrifices. This appears in their Original Institution, Exod. Chap. 28. 29.
1. They were to offer. God appointed Aaron and his successors, on purpose to offer Gifts and Sacrifices for the whole People.
2. None but they were to offer, that is, none but the Priests were so; none but they might approach unto God, to offer any thing sacredly unto him. The People might bring their Offerings unto God, but they could not offer them on the Altar. And some Offerings, as those at the Feast of Expiation were appropriated unto the High Priests only. So is the case stated by Azariah the High Priest, 2 Chrom. 26. 18. Not unto thee Uzziah to burn Incense unto the Lord, but to the Priests the Sons of Aaron who are consecrated, from Exod. 30. 7. Numb. 18. 7.
And God hereby taught the People that nothing should ever be accepted from them, but in and by the hand of the great High Priest who was to come. And this is that which we are yet taught thereby. And whoever he be, if as great and prosperous as King Uzziah who shall think to approach unto God immediately without the Interposition of this High Priest, he is smitten with the plague of
4. What they were to offer is also declared. Gifts and Sacrifices.
Munera, donaria, dona. Sometimes all
There is no Approach unto God without continual respect unto Sacrifice and Attonement. The principal end of Sacrifices was to make Attonement for sin. And so necessary was this to be done, that the Office of the Priesthood was appointed for it. Men do but dream of the Pardon of sin or acceptance with God without Attonement.
This the Apostle layeth down as that which was necessary for every High Priest by Gods Institution. There never was any High Priest, but his Office and Duty it was to Offer Gifts and Sacrifices, for unto that end was he ordained of God.
Hence he infers that it was necessary that This Man should have somewhat to Offer. For being a Minister of the Heavenly Sanctuary, and the true Tabernacle, an High Priest he was. But this he could not be, unless he had somewhat to offer unto God. A Priest that had nothing to offer, that was not ordained unto that end, is indeed no Priest at all.
And in this Assumption of the Apostle, we may observe. (1.) The note of inference; Wherefore; (2.) The Designation of the Person spoken of, This man. (3.) The Manner of the Asscription made unto him; He
1. The note of Inference is, Wherefore, It is frequently used by the Apostle, in Old Institutions of the Law and their signification. Chap. 2. 17. 3. 1. 25. 9, 18. And the whole force of this InOld Typical
Institutions did represent what was really to be accomplished in Christ; whence it was necessary, that he should be what they did signify and represent. Hence it is often observed in the Gospel, that he did or suffered such things or in such a manner, because things were so ordered under the Law.
2. The Designation of the Person is expressed. This Man. He of whom we speak, Jesus, and by his Dignity, the Son of God. That this Man, this Jesus the High Priest of the New Testament.
3. The subject being stated, that which he affirmes thereof, is that He, this Priest, have somewhat to offer. And this was of necessity, that so it should be. For what ever otherwise this Glorious Person were or might be, yet an High Priest he could not be, unless he had somewhat to offer; for to offer Gifts and Sacrifices is the sole end of that office.
This necessity then was absolute. For without this no Office of Priesthood could be discharged, and consequently no Attonement be made, nor could we be brought unto God.
And it is said, that it was thus necessary have. And it is not Possession only that is intended; but Possession with respect unto use. He was so to have somewhat to offer, as to offer it accordingly. For it would not avail the Church to have an high Priest that should have somewhat to offer, if it were not actually offered. Wherefore respect is had both unto the meetness of Christ unto his Office, and his FaithHe had what to offer, and he did offer it.
3. The matter of his offering is expressed. what this was that he had to offer, what was the matter of his Sacrifice, and what it was necessary that it should be. And this was himself, His whole Humane Nature Soul and Body.
It may be it will be said, that it doth not necessarily follow, that if he have somewhat to offer, it must be himself. For he might offer somewhat else out of the Flocks and Herds, as they did of old. Nor indeed doth the Apostle intend directly to prove it in this place, namely, that it must be himself which he must offer. But it doth necessarily follow from the Arguments before insisted on; Chap. 7. For whatever else God had appointed or apLevitical Priesthood to offer, and appropriated the offering of it unto them, so as no such Sacrifice could ever be offered by any who was not of the seed of Aaron. Whereas therefore our High Priest was not of the Tribe of Levi, but of Judah, it is evident that he could not offer any of the things which were appropriated unto their ministry and service. And hence our Apostle in the next verse, affirmes directly, that if he was on the Earth, that is, to officiate in his Office with the things of the Earth after the manner of other Priests, he could not be so much as a Priest at all, seeing all such services were appropriated unto and performed by the Priests of another Order. Again; if he might have done so, and accordingly had done so, our Apostle manifests that his Priesthood must have been ineffectual as unto the proInfirmity and
Something must yet be added as unto the reading of the words themselves which influnecessary, of necessity must have the verb substantive added to determine its signification. Erasmus adds, est; it is necessary; and we render it, it is of necessity. Beza supplies, fuit, as doth the Syriack Interpreter
fuit, erat, it was necessary. And so he renders quod offerret, which he should offer, in both respecting the time past. Others render it by quod offerat, which he may offer, with respect unto the time present or to come. And Beza gives this account of his Translatipast, affirms, that it was necessary that he should have somewhat that he might offer; and not that it is necessary, that he should have somewhat to offer. And although I will not deny, but that the Lord by reason of the perpetual efficacy of his Oblation and the
offer himself, yet his Sacrifice and Oblation of himself were properly on the Earth, as I have fully proved else
This Text being urged by Grotius with respect unto the Offering and Sacrifice of Christ, Crellius replies, Concludit Scriptor Divinus ex eo quod Christus sit Sacerdos, necesse esse ut habeat quod offerat; non ut loquitur Grotius
1. That there was no salvation to be had for us, no not by Jesus Christ himself, without his Sacrifice and Oblation. It was of necessity that he should have somewhat to offir, as well as those Priests had of old according to the Law. Some would have it that the Lord Christ is our Saviour, because he declared unto us the way of salvation, and gave us an example of the way whereby we may attain it, in his own personal obedience. But whence then was it
2. As God designed unto the Lord Christ the work which he had to do, so he provided for him, and furnished him with whatever was necessary thereunto. Somebody did God preChap. 10. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, &c.
3. The Lord Christ being to save the Church in the way of Office, he was not to be spared in any thing necessary thereunto. And in conformity unto him
4. Whatever state or condition we are called unto, what is necessary unto that state is indispensibly required of us. So is Holiness and Obedience required unto a state of Reconciliation and Peace with God.
〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
VUl. Lat. si esset super terram; all others, in terra, to the same purpose. Syr. in the Earth.
even also he should not be a Priest.
cum essent qui offerrent. Rhem. Whereas there were who did offer. The
In the preceding Discourses the Apostle hath fully proved, that the Introduction of this new Priesthood under the Gospel had put an end unto the old; and that it was necessary so it should do, because as he had abundantly discovered in many instannew Priesthood. In parHigh Priest offered his great expiatory Sacrifice once for all, yet the consummation of this Sacrifice, and the derivation of the Benefits of it unto the Church, depended on the following discharge of his Office, with his personal state and condition therein. For so was it with the High Priest under the Law, as unto his great
Having fully manifested these things, unfolding the mystery of them, he proceeds in this Verse to shew how necessary it was that so it should be, namely that he should neither offer the things appointed in the Law, nor yet abide in the state and condition of a Priest here on earth, as those other Priests did. In brief he proves that he was not in any thing to take on him the Administration of holy things in the Church, according as they were then established by Law. For whereas it might be objected, If the Lord Christ was an High Priest as he pleaded, why then did he not administer the holy things of the Church according to the duty of a Priest? To which he replies, That so he was not to do; yea a supposition that he might do so, was inconsistent with his Office, and destructive both of the Law and the Gospel. For it would utterly overthrow the Law, for one that was not of the Line of Aaron to officiate in the holy place; and God had by the Law made proGospel also would have been of no use thereby, seeing the Sacrifice which it is built upon, would have been of the same nature with those under the Law. This the Apostle confirms in this Verse.
For indeed if he were on earth, he should not be a Priest, seeing that there are Priests that offer Gifts according to the Law.
The words are an Hypothetical Proposition, with the Reason or Confirmation of it. The Proposition is in the former part of the Verse; For if indeed he were on the earth, he should not be a Priest. Hereof the remainder of the words is the Reason or Confirmation, Seeing that there are Priests that offer Gifts according unto the Law.
And we may consider first the Causal Connexion, For, which relates unto what he had discoursed immediately before, as introducing a Reason why things ought to be, as he had declared. He had in sundry instances manifested his present state and condition, with the way and manner of the discharge of his Office. A Priest he was, and therefore he must have somewhat to offer, which must be somewhat of his own, seeing the Law would not accommodate him with a Sacrifice, nor yet the whole Creation; the Law having prepossessed unto its own use, all that was clean
A Sanctuary he must also have wherein to offiexalted into Heaven, and set down at the right hand of God. And of all this there was yet ano
If indeed he were on earth. The Emphasis of the Particle Per is not to be omitreally it were so; or therein is Force granted unto the Concession that the Apostle here makes; truly it must be so.
If he were on Earth, includes two things.
1. His continuance and abode on the Earth. If he were not exalted into Heaven in the discharge of his Office, if he were not at the right hand of God, if he were not entred into the heavenly Sanctuary, but could have discharged his whole Office here on the Earth without any of these things. If he were thus on the Earth, or thus to have been on the Earth.
2. The state and condition of his Priesthood. If he were on the Earth, or had a Priesthood of the same order and constitution with that of the Law, if he were to have offered the same Sacrifices, or of the same kind with them, which were to be perfected on the Earth; if he were not to have offered himself, wherein his Sacri
These two things the Apostle was treating of; (1) His present state and condition as to the Sanctuary wherein he administred, which was heavenly. (2) His
This therefore is the full sense of this Supposition, which is well to be observed to clear the meaning of the whole Verse, which the Socinians endeavor with all their skill and force, to wrest unto their Heresie. If we did aver him to have such a Priesthood, as in the discharge thereof he were always to continue on the Earth, and to administer in the Sanctuary of the Tabernacle or Temple with the blood of legal Sacrifices.
On this Supposition the Apostle grants that he could not be a Priest. He had not been, or could not be so much as a Priest, or a Priest at all in any sense. That a been a Priest.
It will be said, that he was a Priest on the Earth, and that therein he offered his great Expiatory Sacrifice in and by his own blood. And it is true. But (1) This was not on the Earth in the sense of the Law, which alone appointed the Sacrifices on the Earth; it was not in the way, nor after the manner of the Sacrifices of the Law, which are expressed by that Phrase on the Earth. (2) Although his Obon the Earth, yet the whole Service beon the Earth. Had he not entred into Heaven to make a representation of his Sacrifice in the holy place, he could not have been the High Priest of the Church, from that offering of himself, because the Church could have enjoyed no benefit thereby. Nor would he ever have offered that Sacrifice, if he had been to abide on the Earth, and not afterwards to have entred the heavenly Sanctuary to make it effectual.
The High Priest on the great day of Expiation perfected his Sacrifice for his own sin, and the sins of the people without the Tabernacle. But yet he neither could nor would, nor ought to have attempted the offering of it, had it not been with a design to carry the blood into the holy place, to sprinkle it before the Ark and Mercy-seat, the Throne of Grace. So was Christ to enter into the holy place not made with hands, or he could not have been a Priest.
The reason of this Assertion and Concession is added in the latter part of the Verse, Seeing there are Priests that offer Gifts according to the Law.
Sacerdotibus existentibus, cum sint Sacerdotes, whereas there are Priests. The Apostle doth not grant that at that time when he wrote this Epistle, there were legal Priests de jure, offering Sacrifices according to the Law. De facto indeed there were yet such Priests ministring in the Temple which was yet standwhole Epistle, as to right and acceptance with God, he proves that their Office was ceased, and their administrations useless. Wherefore legal Institution of the Priests, and their right to officiate then when the Lord Christ offered his Sacrifice. Then there were Priests who had a right to officiate in their Office, and to offer Gifts according to the Law.
Two things are to be inquired into, to give us the sense of these words, and the force of the Reason in them.
1. Why might not the Lord Christ be a Priest, and offer his Sacrifice, continuing on the Earth, to consummate it, notwithstanding the continuance of these Priests according unto the Law.
2. Why did he not in the first place take away and abolish this order of Priests, and so make way for the Introduction of his own Priesthood.
I answer unto the first, That if he had been a Priest on the Earth to have dissame order with them, or of another; and have offered Sacrifices of the same kind as they did, or Sacrifices of another kind. But neither of these could be. For he could not be of the same order with them. This the Apostle proves because he was of the Tribe of Judah, which was excluded from the Priesthood, in that it was appropriated unto the Tribe of Levi, and Family of Aaron. And therefore also he could not offer the
2. Unto the second Inquiry, I say the Lord Christ could not by any means take away that other Priesthood, until he himself had accomplished all that ever was sigde jure before the whole of what was prefigured by its Being, Duties and Offices was fulfilled. And thereIntercision of its administrations for Seventy years, during the Babylonish Captivity, yet was the Office itself continued in its right and digniascended into the heavenly Sanctuary, to administer in the presence of God for the Church. For until then, the High Priests entering into the holy place in the Tabernacle once a year, had not an accomplishment in what was prefigured thereby. Wherefore there was not an end put unto their Office and Ministration by the oblation of Christ on the Cross, but they still continued to offer Sacrifices according to the Law. For there yet remained unto the fulfilling of what was designed in their whole Office, his entring into the holy place above. Wherefore they were still to continue Priests, until he had compleated the whole Service prefi
This therefore is the sense of the Apostles reasoning in this place. The Priests of the Order of Aaron continued de jure their administrations of holy things, or were so to do, until all was accomplished that was signified thereby. This was not done until the Ascension of Christ into Heaven. For the first Tabernacle was to stand until the way was made open into the Holiest of all, as we shall see aftercould not have been a Priest, had he been to continue in the Earth, and to administer on the Earth, for so their Priesthood with which his was inconsistent, could never have had an end. For this could not be without his entrance as a Priest into the heavenly Sanctuary.
Socinians is from this place to prove that the Lord Christ did not offer his expiatory Sacrifice here on the Earth. For the Apostle speaks nothing of his Oblation, which he had before declared to have been once for all, before he entred into Heaven to make intercession for us. But he speaks only of the Order of his Priesthood, and the state and condition wherein the present administration of it was to be continued.
Ob. 1. Gods Institutions rightly stated do never interfere. So we see those of the ancient Priesthood and that of Christ did not. They had both of them their proper bounds and seasons; nor could the latter compleatly commence and take place, until the former was expired. The entrance of Christ into the Holy Place, which stated him in that condition wherein he was to continue the exercise of his Priesthood unto the consummation of all things, put an absolute period unto the former Priesthood by accomplishing all that was signified thereby, with a due and seasonable end unto all legal worship, as to right and efficacy. When he had done all that was figured by them, he took the whole work into his own hand.
2. The discharge of all the Parts and Duties of the Priestly Office of Christ in their proper order were needful unto the salvation of the Church. His Oblation was to be on the Earth, but the continuation of the discharge of his Office was to be in Heainfinite wisdom of God, ordering and disposing all things that concern the discharge of this Office unto their proper times and seasons; so (2) Believers do find in their own experience, how all things are suited unto their conditions and wants. Unless the founda
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Qúi, ut qui; as those who, deserviunt, inserviunt, Syr. ministred, (as in a sacred Office) properly. Exemplari, Rhem. that serve the exemplar and shadow, every way imperfectly, Syr. unto the similitude.
Coelestium; others, Rerum Coelestium, of heavenly things, Syr.
Who serve(in Sacred Worship)unto the example and shadow of heaMosesvenly things, even as was admonished of God, when he was about to make the Tabernacle; For see (saith he) that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.
WE must first consider the reading of these words by reason of the testimony which the Apostle quotes out of the Law, and his rendring thereof. The words in the original, Ex. 25. 40. are And look (or take heed) and make after their pattern which was shewed thee in the mount. The Apostle adds all things, which is not in the original, nor in the Version of the LXX. But (1) he might take it from ver. 9. of the Chapter, where the word is expressed according unto all that I shall shew thee. (2) Things indefinitely expressed are to be expounded universally. 1 Kings 8. 39. and to give to every man according to his ways, that is, 2 Chron. 6. 30. and render to every man according to all his ways. Deut. 19. 15. At the mouth of two or three witnesses shall the matter be established, that is, 2 Cor. 13. 1. shall every word be established. Psal. 110. 1. Until I make thine enemies thy footstool, that is, 1 Cor. 15, 25. all thine enemies. Wherefore the Apostle by the addition of all things, says no more but what is expressed in one place, and necessarily understood in the other.
2. —According to their Pattern, or the Pattern of them; the Apostle renders by according to the Pattern, which comes all to one.
to bind; and it is used for a prepared Pattern or similitude that any thing is to be framed unto. So whereas the Apostle renders it by Type or Pattern as other things are to be framed by, and not that which is the effigies or Representation of somewhat else.
2. The Connexion of these words with the preceding Discourse which gives us the general Design of the Apostle, is nextly to be considered. He had before intimaThat the High Priests according to the Law did not Minister the Heavenly things. (2.) That the Lord Christ alone did so: whence he concludes his Dignity and Preeminence above them, which is the Argument he hath in hand. Both these he confirmes in these words. For he confines their Ministry unto the Types of Heavenly things, exclusively unto the Heavenly things themselves. And by shewing, as in the verse preceding, that if Christ had been to continue on the Earth, he could not have been a Priest, he manifests that he alone was to administer those Heavenly things.
served unto the example and shaddow of Heavenly things, that is, only so and no more, is taken from the words of God to Moses. And the force of the Argument is evident. For God in those words declares that there was something above and beyond that maOriginal or an Exemplar in the Top of the Mount, which what he was to do below did but shaddow and represent. And therefore they who ministred in what he was to make, could serve only therein to be the example and shadow of Heavenly things. This therefore is the Apostles Argument from this Testimony; If God shewed unto Moses on the Top of the Mount that which was Heavenly, and he was to make an example or shaddow of it, then they that ministred therein served only unto the example and shaddow of Heavenly things.
In the words may be observed; (1.) The Persons spoken of; who, (2.) What is ascribed unto them; they serve. (3.) The Limitation of that service; wherein there is. (1.) The present immediate Object of it; an example and shadow. (2.) The ultimate things intended; Heavenly things. (4.) The Proof of the whole Assertion; from the words of God to Moses; wherein there is (1.) The manner of the instructihe was warned of God. (2.) The instruction or warning it self; see that thou make, &c.
1. There is the Persons spoken of, Who; It refers unto the Priests menver. 4. Seeing there are Priests that offer Gifts; who. But although that exLevitical Priests, yet it refers in particular unto the High Priests, verse 3. every High Priest; Which High Priests.
2. What is ascribed unto them;
do serve. The general signification of the English word to serve is not intended, as any thing doth serve for an end, or the Ordinances of Divine Service which were appointed under the first Tabernacle Chap. 9. 1. They do serve: They do according unto the Law officiate in sacred things; That is, they did so de jure, in their first Institution, and continued de facto so to do still. And the word Matth. 4. 10. Act. 7. 7. Rom. 1. 9. It respects therefore all that the High Priests did, or had to do in the worship of God, in the Tabernacle or Temple.
3. The Limitation of their sacred service, is, that it was to an example and shadow.
Specimen of any thing: that whereby any Part or Instance. It is used in the New Testament only Jude 7. are set forth for an example, (speaking of Sodom and Gomorrah) or a particular Instance of what would be Gods dealing with provoking sinners at the last day.
Col. 2. 15. where we render it to make a shew; that is a Representation of what was done; example shewing or declaring any thing in a way of instance. Joh. 13. 15. I have given you an example, saith our Saviour, when he had washed his Disciples feet; that is, shewed you in what I have done, what you ought to do also. So Jam. 5. 10. Take, my Brethren, the Prophets for an example. But whereas principally and commonly examples are Patterns of other things that which they are to be conformed unto, as in the places cited,
shaddow. Some suppose a shaddow is taken artificially and opexpress Image or compleat delineation of any thing, by a similitude lines and shaddows of any thing that is afterwards to be drawn
Chap. 10. 1. The Law had only a shadow of good things to come, and not the express Image of the things themselves. But proBody or Substance; Col. 2. 17. Which things have a shadow of things to come; but the Body is Christ.
It is indifferent in whether sense we here take the word, for what is affirmed is true in both. If we take it in the first way, it intends that obscure delineation of Heaobscurely that none could see their beauty and excellency therein. If it be used in the latter way, then it declares that the substance of what God intended in all his worship was not contained nor comprized in the services of those Priests. There were some lines and shadows to represent the body, but the body it self was not there. There was something above them and beyond them, which they reached not unto.
4. The things themselves whence they are restrained by this Limitation is exof Heavenly things. The things intended in these words are no other, than what God shewed unto Moses in the Mount; and therefore we shall defer our en
1. God alone limits the signification and use of all his own Institutions. We ought not to derogate from them nor to take any thing out of them, which God hath put into them; nor can we put any thing into them, that God hath not furnished them withal. And we are apt to err in both extremes. The Jews to this day believe, that the ministration of their Priests contained the Heavenly things themselves. They do so, contrary to the nature and end of them, which the Scripture so often speaks unto. This is one occasion of their Obstinacy and unbelief. They will imagine that there was nothing above or beyond their legal Institutions; no other Heavenly Mysteries of Grace and Truth, but what is comprized in them. They put more in them, then ever God furnished them withal, and perish in their vain confidence.
It hath so fallen out also under the New Testament. God hath instituted his holy Sacraments, and hath put this vertue into them that they should represent and exhibit unto the Faith of Believers, the Grace which he intendeth and designBaptisme to be Regeneration it self, and that there is no other Evangelical Regeneration but that alone, with the profession which is made thereon. Every one who is baptized is thereby regenerate. The
Some suppose it to be such a distinguishing or rather separating Ordinance that the Administration of it in such a way or such a season, is the fundamental Rule of all Church fellowship and Communion; whereas God never designed it un
In the Supper of the Lord, the Church of Rome in particular is not contented that we have a Representation and instituted Memorial of the Death of our Lord Jesus Christ in the signes of his Body as broken, and his Blood as shed for us, with an exhibition of Grace in the word of Promise or the Gospel; but they will have the
Some on the other side do derogate from them, and will nor allow them that staDignity. They do so by joyning their own Appointments unto them, as of equal worth and Dignity with them. (2.) Some do so from their Necessity, practically setting light or by disregarding the Participation of them. (3.) Some do so from their use, openly denying their continuance in the Church of God.
The Reasons why men are so prone to deviate from the Will of God in his InWant of Faith in its principal Power and Act, which is submission and Resignation of soul unto the Sovereignty of God. Faith alone renders that an alsufficient reason of Obedience. (2.) Want of Spiritual Wisdom and understanding to discern the mystery of the Wis
2. It is an Honour to be employed in any sacred service that belongs unto the worship of God, though it be of an inferior nature unto other parts of it. It is so I say if we are called of God thereunto. This was the greatest Honour that any were made Partakers of under the Old Testament, that they served unto the example and shadow of Heavenly things only. And if now God call any of us unto his service, wherein yet by the meaness of our gifts, or want of opportunities, we cannot serve him in so eminent a manner, as some others do; yet if we abide in our station and Duty, there is great Honour in the meanest Divine Service.
3. So great was the Glory of Heavenly ministration in the mediation of Jesus Christ, as God would not at once bring it forth in the Church, untill he had prepared the minds of men by Types, Shadows, Examples, and Representations of it. This was the end of all legal Institutions of Divine Worship and Service. And herein the Wisdom of God, provided in these to cases, that were necessary. First he filled them with Glory and Beauty that they might affect the mindes of men, with an admiration and expectation of that greater Glory which they represented and pointed unto. And this they did among all them who truly believed, so that they continually looked and longed after the coming of him, the glory of whose miniPet. 1. 10, 11. (2.) In earnest desires after the enjoyment of what they saw afar off, and which was obscurely repreCant. 2. 18. Chap. 4. 6.
From both these arose that fervent love unto, zeal for, and delight in those Ordiglorious, that they might be shadows of heavenly things, and the People unto whom they were given were carnal, and given to rest themselves in present outward Apborn, and many Laws with Penalties severe and dreadful. This Provision was laid in by Divine Wisdom, that they might not rest in what he designed only to prepare their minds for the introduction of that which was far more glorious. And well is it for us, if we have a due apprehension of the glory of the heavenly Ministration of Christ, now it is introduced. It is too evident that with many, yea with most that are called Christians, it is far otherwise. For they are still seeking after the outward glory of a carnal Worship, as though they had no view of the spiritual Glory of the heavenly Ministration of the Gospel in the hand of Jesus Christ our High Priest. Nor will it be otherwise with any of us, unless we are enabled by Faith to look within the vail, and see the beauty of the appearance of Christ at the right hand of God. The Apostle tells us, that the Ministration of the Law was glorious; yet had it no Glory in comparison of that which doth excel. But if we are not able to discern this more excellent Glory, and satisfie our selves therein, it is a great sign that we our selves are carnal, and therefore are delighted with those things that are so. But we must proceed with our Exposition.
5. The proof of the foregoing Assertion is added by the Apostle, in the words which God spake unto Moses with respect unto his building the Tabernacle, which was the Seat of all the Divine Service they were to administer. And there are two things to be considered in this Testimony. (1) The manner of its Introduction. (2) The words of the Testimony itself.
1. The words of the Introduction are, Admonished
of God.
Answer of God, Rom. 11. 4. But what saith unto him
the Divine Oracle; A Responsum, a Word or Answer from God, giving Caution or Direction. And it is used principally for such an Oracle of God, as hath a warning or caution in it, for the avoiding somewhat on the one hand, as well as doing what is given in charge on the other. So Joseph was divinely warned to avoid the danger that was designed unto the Child Jesus, Matth. 2. 22. as the Wisemen were to avoid going unto Herod, ver. 12. so Hebr. 11. 7. Noah being
divinely warned, was moved with fear. Yet sometimes it is used for any immediate private Revelation, Luke 2. 26. Acts 10. 22. Wherefore two things are intended in this expression. (1) That Moses had an immediate Word, Command or Oracle from God to the purpose intended. And (2) That he was to use great caution and heed about what was enjoined him, that there might be no miscarriage or mistake. Admonished of God.
And the manner of the Expression in the Original carrieth Admonition in it and look to it and do, Exod. 25. 40. take diligent care about it. The same is the sense of take heed, look well to it. When John upon surprisal would have fallen down before the Angel to worship him, he replied, see thou do it not, avoid it with care, Rev. 22. 9. The matter was of the greatest importance, and the utmost diligence was to be used about it, whence the Divine Oracle was given out in a way of charge and admonition, as we have well rendred the word. And we may observe,
That our utmost care and diligence in the consideration of the mind of God, is required in all that we do about his Worship. There is nothing wherein men for the most part are more careless. Some suppose it belongs unto their own wisdom to
First, From the aptness and proneness of the minds of men unto pernicious ex
(1) The Generality of Men have been stupidly negligent herein, as if it were a matter wherein they were not at all concerned. What is provided for them, what is proposed unto them, what comes in the ordinary way whereunto they have been accustomed, whatever it be, that they follow. And as they take it upon light grounds, so they observe it with slight spirits. And this hath been the true cause of that inundation of Prophaness which is come on the Christian world. For when once Men come unto such an inconcernment in the Worship of God, as to ingage in it they know not well why, and to perform it they know not how, all manner of Im
(2) Many in all Ages have been prone to indulge unto their own Imaginations and
Secondly, The concernment of the Glory of God calls for the same care in like manner. It were no hard thing to demonstrate that the principal way and means whereby God expects that we should give glory unto him in this world, is by a due observation of the Divine Worship that he hath appointed. For herein do we in an especial manner ascribe unto him the glory of his Sovereignty, of his Wisdom, of his Grace and Holiness; when in his Worship we bow down our Souls under his Authority alone; when we see such an impress of Divine Wisdom on all his Institutions, as to judge all other ways folly in comparison of them, when we have experience of the grace represented and exhibited in them, then do we glorifie God aright. And without these things, whatever we pretend, we honour him not in the Solemnities of our Worship. But we return.
In the charge given to Moses two things are observable. (1) The time when it was given him. (2) The charge itself.
1. The time when it was given. when he was about to make the Tabernacle.
in procinctu, in readiness for that work; just as it were taking it in hand, and going about it. This made the divine warning seasonable. It was given him upon the entrance of his work, that it might make an effectual impresto charge our Consciences with a divine admonition. What immediate Revelation was to Moses, that the written Word is to us. To charge our ConRule from it, and its Authority will preserve us in whatever may fall out in the way of our duty, and nothing else will do it.
perficere, to accomplish, to perfect, to finish. But it includes here Acts 7. 44. where this whole passage is somewhat otherwise expresas he appointed who spake unto Moses (which was God himself, as our Apostle here declares, in the second Person the great Angel of the Covenant) that he should make it according to the pattern which he saw. Wherefore Moses, in making, framing, and finishing the Tabernacle.
The warning and charge itself is, That he should make all things according to the Pattern shewed him in the Mount. What this Pattern was, how it was shewed unto Moses, and how he was to make all things according unto it, are all of them things not easie to be explained.
In general it is certain that God intended to declare hereby, that the work which
Moses had to do, the Tabernacle he was to erect, and the Worship thereof, was not either in the whole, or in any part of it, or any thing that belonged unto it, a mateight times repeated in one Chapter, that all things were done as God commanded Moses. And herein was that Truth fully consecrated unto the perpetual use of the Church in all Ages, That the Will and Command of God is the sole Reason, Rule and Measure of all Religious Worship.
For the Pattern itself, Expositors generally agree, That on the Top of the Mount God caused to appear unto Moses, the form, fashion, dimensions and utensils of that Tabernacle which he was to erect. Whether this representation were made to Moses by the way of internal Vision, as the Temple was represented unto Ezekiel, or whether there were an
But supposing such an aetherial Tabernacle represented unto Moses, yet it cannot be said, that it was the substance of the heavenly things themselves, but only a shadow or representation of them. The heavenly things themselves, in the mind of God, were of another nature, and this Pattern on the Mount was but an external representation of them. So that here must be three things intended.
Wherefore this TaLevitical Priests administred their Office, was so far from being the substance of the heavenly things themselves, as that they were but a shadow of that shadow of them which was represented in the Mount.
I know not that there is any thing in this Exposition of the words that is contrary unto the Analogy of Faith, or inconsistent with the design of the Apostle. But withall I must acknowledge, that these things seem to me exceeding difficult, and such as I know not how fully to embrace, and that for the Reasons follow
1. If such a representation were made unto Moses in the Mount, and that be the Pattern intended, then the Tabernacle with all its Ministry was a shadow thereof. But this is contrary unto our Apostle in another place, who tells us that indeed all legal Institutions were only a shadow, but withall that the substance or body was of Christ, Col. 2. 17. And it is the body that the shadow doth immediately depend upon and represent. But according unto this Exposition, this Figure or Appearance made in the Mount, must be the body or substance which those legal Institutions did represent. But this Figure was not Christ. And it is hard to say, that this Figure was the body which the Tabernacle below was the shadow of, and that body was the shadow of Christ. But that Christ himself, his Mediation and his Church, that is, his Mystical Body, were not immediately represented by the Tabernacle, and the Service of it, but somewhat else that was a Figure of them, is contrary unto the whole dispute of the Apostle in this place, and the Analogy of Faith.
2. I do not see how the Priests could minister in the earthly Tabernacle as an exaetherial Tabernacle. For if there were any such thing, it immediately vanished after its appearance; It ceased to be any thing, and therefore could not be any longer an heavenly thing. Wherefore with respect thereexample of heavenly things, which were not.
3. No tolerable account can be given of the reason or use of such a represensuch Tabernacle in Heaven, that it should
Moses, confirming the remembrance and knowledge of them in his mind by the Holy Spirit, by whom he was acted and guided, as that he needed no help from his imagination, in the view of the representation of such a Fabrick.
4. Whatever Moses did, it was for a Testimony unto the things which were to be spoken afterwards, Chap. 3. 5. But these were the things of Christ and the Gos
5. The sense of the words must be determined from the Apostle himself. And it is evident,
(1) That the heavenly things unto whose resemblance the legal Priests did minister, and the Pattern shewed unto Moses in the Mount, were the same. Hereon depends the whole force of his Proof from this Testimony.
(2) These heavenly things, he expresly tells us, were those which were consecrated, dedicated unto God, and purified by the
(3) That Christ by his Sacrifice did dedicate both himself, the whole Church and its Worship unto God. From these things it follows,
(4) That God did spiritually and mystically represent unto Moses, the Incarnation and Mediation of Christ with the
For the Tabernacle that Moses made was a sign and figure of the Body of Christ. This we have proved in the Exposition of the second verse of this Chapter, and it is positively affirmed by the Apostle, Col. 2. 17. For therein would God dwell really and substantially, Col. 2. 9. In him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And the Tabernacle was but to represent this Inhabitation of God in Christ. Therefore did he dwell therein typically by sundry pledges of his presence, that he might represent the real substantial Inhabitation of the Godhead in the Body, or Humane Nature of Christ. This therefore was the Moses on the top of the Mount.
These were the heavenly things, which they served unto the resemblance and shadow of. It is therefore most prodable, and most agreeable unto the mystery of the wisdom of God in these things, that before the building of the Tabernacle below, God did shew unto Moses what was to be signified and represented theretrue Tabernacle, then appointed a Figure of it, which was to abide and serve the Worship of the Church, until that true one was to be introduced, when this was to be taken down and removed out of the way, which is the substance of what the Apostle designeth to prove.
It will be said that what was shewed unto Moses in the Mount, was only likeness, similitude and type of other things. This therefore could not be Christ himself and his Mediation, which are the substance of heavenly things, and not a resemblance of them.
I answer (1) All Representations of Christ himself, antecedent unto his actual exhibition in the flesh, (as his appearances in humane shape of old) were but Resemblances and Types of what should be afterwards.
(2) His manifestation unto Moses is so called, not that it was a Type of any other things above, but because it was the Prototype of all that was to be done be
1. This was the Foundation of the Faith of the Church of Israel in all Geneoutward things they enlost the Faith of, they lost all acceptance with God in their Worship. The relation of their Ordinances unto him, their expression of him, as their Prototype and Substance, was the line of life, wisdom, beauty, glory and usefulness that ran through them all. This being now taken away, they are all as a dead thing. When Christ was in
delight of God, and the joy of the Souls of his Saints. Now he hath uncloathed himself of them, and left them to be rolled up as a vesture, as a monument of the Garments he thought meet to wear in the immature Age of the Church, they are of no more use at all. Who now can see any beauty, any glory in the Old Temple Administrations should they be revived? Where Christ is, there is glory, if we have the light of Faith to discern it; and we may say of every thing wherein he is not, be it never so pompous unto the eyes of flesh, Ichabod; where is the glory of it, or it hath no glory.
Jude tells us of a Contest between Michael and the Devil about the Body of Moses, ver. 9. It is generally thought that the Devil would have hindred the Burial of it, that in process of time it might have been an occasion of Idolatry among that People. But that which was signified hereby, was the Contest he made to keep the Body of Moses, the whole System of Mosaical Worship and Ceremonies, from being buried, when the life and soul of it was departed. And this hath proved the ruine of the Jews unto this day.
2. Consider the progress of these heavenly things; that is, of Jesus Christ, and all the effects of his Mediation in Grace and Glory.
(1) The Idea, the original Pattern or Exemplar of them was in the mind, the counsel, the wisdom and will of God, Ephes. 1. 5, 8, 9.
(2) Hereof God made various accidental Representations, preparatory for the full expression of the glorious eternal Idea of his mind. So he did in the appeaAbraham, Jacob, and others; so he did in the Pattern that he shewed unto Moses in the Mount, which infused a spirit of life into all that was made unto a resemblance of it. So he did in the Tabernacle and Temple, as will be more fully declared afterwards.
(3) He gave a substantial Representation of the eternal Idea of his Wisdom and Grace, in the Incarnation of the Son, in whom the fulness of the Godhead dwelt substantially, and in the discharge of his work of Mediation.
(4) An Exposition of the whole is given us in the Gospel, which is Gods means of instructing us in the eternal counsels of his Wisdom, Love and Grace, as reCor. 3. 18.
The actings of Faith with respect unto these heavenly things, do begin where the Divine Progress of them doth end, and end where it begins. Faith in the first place respects and receives the Revelation of the Gospel, which is the means of its receiving and resting in Christ himself. And through Christ our Faith is in God, 1 Pet. 1. 20. as the eternal Spring and Fountain of all Grace and Glory.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
There is no material difference in any Translators ancient or modern in the ren
But now he hath obtained a more excellent Ministry, by how much also he is the Mediator of a better Covenant, which was established on better Promises.
IN this Verse beginneth the Second Part of the Chapter, concerning the differtwo Covenants, the Old and the New, with the Preheminence of the latter above the former; and of the Ministry of Christ above the High Priests on that account. The whole Church state of the Jews, with all the OrdiCovenant that God made with them at Sinai. But the introduction of this new Priesthood whereof the Apostle is discoursing, did necessarily abolish that Covenant, and put an end unto all sacred Ministrations that belonged unto it. And this could not well be offered unto them, without the supply of
Two things unto this purpose he proves by express Testimonies out of the ProJeremiah.
1. That besides the Covenant made with their Fathers in Sinai, God had proanother Covenant with the Church, in his appointed time and sea
2. That this other promised Covenant should be of another nature than the former, and much more excellent as unto spiritual Advantages, unto them who were taken into it.
From both these fully proved, the Apostle infers the necessity of the Abrogation of that first Covenant, wherein they trusted, and unto which they adhered, when the appointed time was come. And hereon he takes occasion to declare the Nature of the two Covenants in sundry instances, and wherein the differences between them did consist. This is the substance of the remainder of this
This Verse is a Transition from one Subject unto another, namely, from the Excellency of the Priesthood of Christ above that of the Law, unto the Excellency of the New Covenant above the Old. And herein also the Apostle artificially comNature and Excellency of that Covenant whereof he was the Mediator in the discharge of his Office.
There are two Parts of the words.
1. An Assertion of the Excellency of the Ministry of Christ. And this he exHe hath obtained a more excellent Ministry: and after declareth the degree of that comparison; By how much also.
Proof of this Assertion, in that he is the Mediator of a better Covenant, established on better or more excellent Promises.
In the first of these there occur these five things.
1. The Introduction of the Assertion is by the Particles But now;
now, is a note of time, of the present time. But there are Instances where these Adverbial Particles thus conjoyned, do not seem to denote any time or season, but are meerly adversative, Rom. 7. 17. 1 Cor. 5. 11. Chap. 7. 14. But even in those places there seems a respect unto time also, and therefore I know not why it should be here excluded. As therefore there is an Opposition intended unto the Old Covenant, and the Levitical Priesthood; so the season is intimated of the Introduction of that Covenant, and the better Ministry wherewith it was accomNow, at this time, which is the season that God hath appointed for the Introduction of the New Covenant and Ministry. To the same purpose the Apostle expresseth himself, treating of the same subject, Rom. 3. 26. to declare at this instant season, now the Gospel is preached, his Righteousness; at. For
Ob. God in his infinite wisdom gives proper times and seasons unto all his Dispensations unto and towards the Church. So the accomplishment of these things was in the fulness of times, Ephes. 1. 10. that is, when all things rendred it seasohasteneth all his works of grace in their own appointed time, Isa. 60. 22. And our duty it is, to leave the ordering of all the Concerns of the Church in the accomplishment of promises, unto God in his own time, Acts 1. 7.
2. That which is ascribed unto the Lord Christ is Ministry. The Priests of old had a Ministry, they ministred at the Altar, as in the foregoing verse.
Minister also; so the Apostle had said before, he was A Minister of the holy things. Wherefore he had a Liturgy, a Ministry, a Service committed unto him. And two things are included herein.
1. That it was an office of Ministry that the Lord Christ undertook. He is not called a Minister with respect unto one particular Act of Ministration; so are we said to minister unto the necessity of the Saints, which yet denotes no office in them that do so. But he had a standing Office committed unto him, as the word imports. In that sense also he is called Minister in office, Rom. 15. 8.
2. Subordination unto God is included herein. With respect unto the Church his Office is supreme, accompanied with Sovereign Power and Authority; He is Lord over his own house. But he holds his Office in subordination unto God, being faithful unto him that appointed him. So the Angels are said to
1. That the whole Office of Christ was designed unto the Accomplishment of the Will and Dispensation of the Grace of God. For these ends was his Ministry committed unto him. We can never sufficiently admire the Love and Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ in undertaking this Office for us. The greatness and glory of the duties which he performed in the discharge thereof, with the benefits we reOffice was committed unto him of God, even the Father, and his Will did he do in the dis
2. The Condescension of the Son of God to undertake the Office of the Ministry on our behalf, is unspeakable, and for ever to be admired. Especially will it appear so to be, when we consider who it was who undertook it, what it cost him, what he did and underwent in the pursuance and discharge of it, as it is all expressed, Phil. 2. 6, 7, 8. Not only what he continueth to do in Heaven at the right hand of God belongeth unto this Ministry, but all that he suffered also upon the Earth. His MiMatth. 20. 28. It is true, it is issued in glory, but not until he had undergone all the evils that humane nature is capable of undergoing. And we ought to undergo any thing chearfully for him, who underwent this Ministry for us.
3. The Lord Christ by undertaking this Office of the Ministry, hath consecrated and made honourable that Office unto all, that are rightly called unto it, and do rightly discharge it. It is true, his
3. The general way whereby our Lord Christ came unto this Ministry, is exHe obtained it.
sorte contingo, to have a lot or
portion, or to have any thing befall a Man, as it were by accident; or assequor, obtineo, to
There were two things that concurred unto his obtaining this Ministry. (1) The eternal purpose and counsel of God, designing him thereunto; an Act of the Divine Will accompanied with infinite Wisdom, Love and Power. (2) The actual call of God, whereunto many things did concur, especially his Unction with the Spirit above measure for the holy discharge of his whole Office. Thus did he obtain this Ministry, and not by any legal Constitution, Succession, or carnal Rite, as did the Priests of old. And we may see that
Ob. The Exaltation of the Humane Nature of Christ into the Office of this glorious Ministry, depended solely on the Sovereign Wisdom, Grace and Love of God. When the Humane Nature of Christ was united unto the Divine, it became in the Person of the Son of God meet and capable to make satisfaction for the sins of the Church, and to procure Righteousness and Life Eternal for all that do believe. But it did not merit that Union, nor could do so. For as it was utterly impossible that any created Nature, by any Act of its own should merit the Hypostatical Union; so it was granted unto the Humane Nature of Christ antecedently unto any Act of its own in way of obedience unto God. For it was united unto the Person of the Son, by virtue of that Union. Wherefore antecedently unto it, it could merit no
Quality of this Ministry thus obtained as unto a comparative excellency,
more excellent. The word is used only in this Epistle in this sense, Chap. 1. 4. and in this place. The original word denotes only a difference from other things; but in the comparative degree as here used, it signifies a Difference with a Preference, or a comparative excellency. The Ministry of the Levitical Priests was good and useful in its time and season. This of our Lord Jediffered from it, as to be better than it, and more excellent,
5. There is added hereunto the Degree of this Preheminence so far as it is intendby how much. So much more excellent by how much. The excellency of his Ministry above that of the Levitical Priests, bears proportion with the excellency of the Covenant whereof he was the Mediator, above the Old Covenant wherein they administred, whereof afterwards.
So have we explained the Apostles Assertion, concerning the excellency of the Ministry of Christ. And herewith he closeth his Discourse which he had so long engaged in, about the Preheminence of Christ in his Office above the High Priests of old. And indeed this being the very hinge whereon his whole Controversie with the Jews did depend, he could not give it too much evidence, nor too full a confir
Ob. It is our Duty and our Safety to acquiesce universally and obsolutely in the Ministry of Jesus Christ. That which he was so designed unto in the infinite wisfurnished for the discharge of, by the communication of the Spirit unto him in all fulness, that which all other Priesthoods were removed to make way for, must needs be sufficient and effectual for all the ends unto which it is designed. It may be said, this is that which all men do; all that are called Christians do fully acquiesce in the Ministry of Jesus Christ. But if it be so, why do we hear the bleating of another sort of Cattel? What mean those other Priests and reiterated Sacrifices which make up the Worship of the Church of Rome? If they rest in the Ministry of Christ, why do they appoint one of their own to do the same things that he hath done, namely, to offer Sacrifice unto God?
The Proof of this Assertion lies in the latter part of these words. By how much he was the Mediator of a better Covenant, established on better Promises. The words are so disposed, that some think the Apostle intends not to prove the excellency of the Covenant, from the excellency of his Ministry therein. But the other sense is more suited unto the scope of the place, and the nature of the Argument which the AHebrews withal. For on supposition that there was indeed anobetter Covenant to be introduced and established, than that which the Levitical Priests served in, which they could not deny; it plainly follows, that he on whose Ministry the dispensation of that Covenant did depend, must of necessimore excellent in that Ministry, than they who appertained unto that CovePriest is, such is the Covenant, such as the Covenant is in dignity, such is the Priest also.
In the words there are three things observable.
1. What is in general ascribed unto Christ, declaring the nature of his Ministry, He was a Mediator.
2. The Determination of his Mediatory Office, unto the New Covenant, Of a better Covenant.
3. The Proof or Demonstration of the nature of his Covenant as unto its excellency, It was established on better Promises.
1. His Office is that of a Mediator,
Covenant might be establishSchlictingius on the place gives this descriMediatorem faederis esse nihil aliud est, quam Dei esse interpretem, & internuntium in faedere cum hominibus pangendo; per quem scilicet & Deus
But this Description of a Mediator is wholly applicable unto Moses, and suited unto his Office in giving of the Law, see Exod. 20. 19. Deut. 15. 27, 28. What is said by them doth indeed immediately belong unto the Mediatory Office of Christ, but it is not confined thereunto; yea, it is exclusive of the principal parts of his Mediation. And whereas there is nothing in it, but what belongs unto the Prophetical Office of Christ, which the Apostle here doth not principally intend, it is most improperly applied as a Description of
The Lord Christ then in his Ministry is called Mediator of the CoveSurety, whereof see the Exposition on
Whereas this is the first general Notion of the Office of Christ, that which comprizeth the whole Ministry committed unto him, and containeth in itself the especial Offices of King, Priest, and Prophet, whereby he dischargeth his Mediation, some things must be mentioned that are declarative of its nature and use. And we may unto this purpose observe,
1. That unto the Office of a Mediator, it is required that there be different Persons concerned in the Covenant, and that by their own wills, as it must be in every compact of what sort soever. So saith our Apostle,
2. That the Persons entering into Covenant be in such a state and condition, as that it is no way convenient or morally possible, that they should treat immediately with each other as to the ends of the Covenant. For if they are so, a Mediator to go between, is altogether needless. So was it in the original Covenant with Adam, which had no Mediator. But in the giving of the Law, which was to be a Covenant between God and the People, they found themselves utterly insufficient for an immediate Treaty with God, and therefore desired that they might have an Internuntius to go between God and them, to bring his Proposals, and carry back their consent, Deut. 5. 23, 24, 25, 26, 27. And this is the voice of all men really convinced of the Holiness of God, and their own condition; such is the state between God and sinners. The Law and the Curse of it did so interpose between them, that they could not enter into any immediate Treaty with God, Psal. 5. 3, 4, 5. This made a Mediator necessary, that the New Covenant might be established, whereof we shall speak afterwards.
3. That he who is this Mediator, be accepted, trusted, and rested in on both sides or the Parties mutually entering into Covenant. An absolute Trust must be repoterms, can have no benefit by no intrust of all the concernments of the Covenant in him, and absolutely rested therein. Behold, saith he of him, my servant whom I
uphold, mine Elect in whom my Soul delighteth, or is well pleased,
Matth. 3. 17. When he undertook this Office, and said, Lo I come to do thy Will, O God, the Soul of God rested in him, Exod. 23. 21. Joh. 5. 20, 21, 22. And to him he gives an account at last of his discharge of this thing, Joh. 17. 4. And on our part, unless we resign our selves absolutely unto an uni
4. A Mediator must be a middle Person between both Parties entering into Covenant, and if they be of different natures, a perfect compleat Mediator ought to partake of each of their natures in the same Person. The necessity hereof, and the glorious wisdom of God herein, I have elsewhere at large demonstrated, and shall not therefore here again insist upon it.
5. A Mediator must be one who voluntarily and of his own accord undertamediate between any Persons at variance to bring them unto an agreement on equal terms. So it was required that the will and consent of Christ should concur in his susception of this Office; and that they did so, himself expresly testifieth, Chap. 10. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. It is true, he was designed and appointed by the Father unto this Office, whence he is called his Servant, and constantly witnesseth of himself, that he came to do the Will and Commandment of him that sent him. But he had that to do in the discharge of this Office, which could not according unto any Rules of Divine Righteousness be imposed on him without his own voluntary conWill, Grace and Love in the susception of this Office, is a principal motive unto that Faith and Trust which the Church placeth in him, as the Mediator between God and them. Upon this his voluntary undertaIsa. 53. 10, 11, 12. And the Faith of the Church whereon Salvation doth depend, must have love unto his Person inseparably accompanying of it. Love unto Christ is no less necessary unto Salvation, than Faith in him. And as Faith is resolved into the sovereign Wisdom and Grace of God in sending him, and his own ability to save to the uttermost those that come to God by him; so Love ariLove and Grace in his voluntary undertaking of this Office, and the discharge of it.
6. In this voluntary undertaking to be a Mediator, two things were re
1. That he should remove and take out of the way whatever kept the Coveenmity between them. For it is supposed that such an enmity there was, or there had been no need of a Mediator. ThereAdam, there having been no variance between God and man, nor any distance but what necessarily ensued from the distinct natures of the Creator and a Creature, there was no Mediator. But the design of this Covenant was to make Reconciliation and Peace. Hereon therefore depended the necessity of Satisfaction, Redemption, and the making of atonement by Sacrifice. For man having sinned and apostatized from the Rule of God, making himself thereby obnoxious unto his wrath, according unto the eternal Rule of RighteousCurse of the Law, there could be no new Peace and Agreement made with God, unless due satisfaction were made for these things. For although God was willing in infinite Love, Grace and Mercy, to enter into a new Covenant with fallen man, yet would he not do it unto the prejudice of his RighMediator of this Covenant, but he that was able to satisfie the Justice of God, glorifie his Government, and fulfill the Law. And this could be done by none but him, concerning whom it might be said that God pur
2. That he should procure and purchase in a way suited unto the glory of God, the actual communication of all the good things prepared and proposed in this
Surety he was. And this is the foundation of the merit of Christ, and of the Grant of all good things unto us for his sake.
7. It is required of this Mediator as such, that he give assurance and undertake unto the Parties mutually concerned, of the accomplishment of the terms of the Covenant, undertaking on each hand for them.
(1) On the part of God towards men, that they shall have peace and acceptance with him in the sure accomplishment of all the Promises of the Covenant. This he doth only
(2) On our part, he undertakes unto God, for our acceptance of the terms of the Covenant, and our accomplishment of them, by his enabling us there
These things, among others, were necessary unto a full and compleat Mediator of the New Covenant, such as Christ was. And
The provision of this Mediator between God and Man, was an effect of infinite Wisdom and Grace: Yea, it was the greatest and most glorious external effect of them, that ever they did produce, or ever will do in this world. The Creation of all things at first out of nothing, was a glorious effect of infinite Wisdom and Powprovision of a Mediator, one whereby all things were restored and retrieved into a condition of bringing more glory unto God, and securing for ever the blessed estate of them whose Mediator he is, is accompanied with more evidences of the divine exEphes. 1. 10.
Two things are added in the description of this Mediator.
1. He was the Mediator of a Covenant. And two things are supposed herein.
First, That there was a Covenant made or prepared between God and man; that is, it was so far made, as that God who made it, had prepared the terms of it in a sovereign Act of Wisdom and Grace. The preparation of the Covenant consisting in the will and purpose of God graciously to bestow on all men the good things which are contained in it, all things belonging unto grace and glory, as also to make way for the obedience which he required herein, are supposed unto the constitution of this Covenant.
Secondly, That there was need of a Mediator that this Covenant might be efnature of a Covenant in general; for a Covenant may be made and entred into between different Parties without any Mediator, meerly on the equity of the terms of it. Nor was it so from the nature of a Covenant between God and man, as man was first created of God. For the first Covenant between them was immediate without the interpoRom. 8. 3. For what the Law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh. The Law was the moral Instrument or Rule of the Covenant that was made immediately between God and man: But it could not continue to be so after the entrance of sin, that is, so as that God might be glorified thereby, in the obedience and reward of men. Wherefore he sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, that is, provided a Mediator for a New Covenant. The persons with whom this Covenant was to be made, being all of them sinners, and apostatized from God, it became not the Holiness or Righteousness of God to treat immediately with them any more. Nor would it have answered his holy ends so to have done. For if when they were in a condition of uprightness and indepraved condition of Apostasie from God, and Enmity against him? It therefore became not the wisdom of God to enter anew into Covenant with Mankind, without secuthat every imagination of the thoughts of mans heart was only evil continually, Gen. 6. 5. Wherefore it was necessary there should be a Mediator to be the Surety of this Covenant. Again, the Covenant itself was so prepared in the counsel, wisdom, and grace of God, as that the principal, yea insatisfaction for sin, and the bringing in of everlasting Righteousness, which are the foundation of this ove
2. To proceed with the Text, this Covenant whereof the Lord Christ is the better Covenant. Wherefore it is supposed that there was another Covenant, whereof the Lord Christ was not the Mediator. And in the following Verses there are two Covenants, a first and a latter, an old and a new compared together. We must therefore consider what was that other Covenant, then which this is said to be better: for upon the determination thereof depends the right understanding of the whole ensuing Discourse of the Apostle. And because this is a Subject wrapt up in much obscurity, and attended with many difficulties, it will be necessary that we use the best of our diligence both in the investigation of the truth, and in the declaration of it, so as that it may be distinctly apprehend
1. There was an original Covenant made with Adam and all Mankind in him. The Rule of Obedience and Reward that was between God and him, was not exCovenant, but it contained the express nature of a Covenant. For it was the agreement of God and Man concerning Obedience, and Disobedience, Rewards, and Punishments. Where there is a Law concerning these things, and an agreement upon it, by all Parties concerned, there is a formal Covenant. Where
(1) As it was a Law only, so it proceeded from and was a consequent of the nature of God and man, with their mutual Relation unto one another. God being considered as the Creator, Governor and Benefactor of man; and man as an intel
(2) As it was a Covenant; and this depended on the will and pleasure of God. I will not dispute whether God might have given a Law unto men, that should have had nothing in it of a Covenant properly so called, as is the Law of Creation unto all other Creatures which hath no Rewards nor Punishments annexJer. 33. 20, 21. But that this Law of our Obedience should be a formal compleat Covenant, there was moreover some things required on the part of God, and some also on the part of man. Two things were required on the part of God to compleat this Covenant, or he did so com
First, By annexing unto it Promises and Threatnings of Reward and Punish
Secondly, The expression of these Promises and Threatnings in external signs; the first in the Tree of Life, the latter in that of the knowledge of good and evil. By these did God establish the original Law of Creation as a Covenant, gave it the nature of a Covenant. On the part of man, it was required that he accept of this Law as the Rule of the Covenant which God made with him. And this he did two ways.
(1) By the innate Principles of Light and Obedience concreated with his Na
Commands concerning the Tree of Life, and that of the knowledge of good and evil, as the signs and pledges of this Covenant. So was it established as a Covenant between God and man, without the interpositiCovenant of Works, absolutely the old or first Covenant that God made with men. But this is not the Covenant here intended. For
1. The Covenant called afterwards the first, was Testament. So it is here called. It was such a Covenant as was a Testament also. Now there can be no Testament, but there must be death for the confirmation of it, Chap. 9. 16. But in the making of the Covenant with Adam, there was not the death of any thing whence it might be called a Testament. But there was the death of Beasts in Sacrifice in the confirmation of the Covenant at Sinai, as we shall see afterwards. And it must be observed, that although I use the name of a Covenant, as we have rendred the word Covenant properly and strictly so called, but such an one as hath the nature of a
2. That first Covenant made with Adam, was, as unto any benefit to be expectceased long before, even at the entrance of sin. It was not abolished or abrogated by any Act of God, as a Law, but only was made weak and insufficient unto its first end, as a Covenant. God had provided a way for the salvation of sinners, declared in the first Promise. When this is actually embraced, that first Covenant ceaseth tosinless obedience, as the condition of life, because both of them are answered by the Mediator of the New Covenant. But as unto all those who receive not the grace tendered in the Promise, it doth remain in full force and efficacy not as a Covenant, but as a Law, and that because neither the Obedience it requires, nor the Curse which it threatens are answered. Thence if any man believeth not, the wrath of God abideth on him. For its Commands and Curse depending on the necessary renever abrogated formally: But as all Unbelievers are still obliged by it, and unto it must stand or fall, so it is perfectly fulfilled in all Believers, not in their own persons, but in the person of their Surety. God sending forth his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and condemning sin in the flesh, that the righieousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us, Rom. 8. 3, 4. But as a Covenant obliging unto personal, perfect, sin
3. The Church of Israel was never absolutely under the power of that CoveAbraham, the Promise was given unto them and their Seed. And the Apostle proves that no Law could afterGal. 3. 17. But had they been brought under the Old Covenant of Works, it would have disandiametrically opposite. And moreover, if they were under that Covenant, they were all under the Curse, and so perished eternally, which is openly false. For it is testified of them that they pleased God by Faith, and so were saved. But it is evident that the Covenant intended, was a Covenant wherein the Church of Israel walked with God, until such time as this better Covenant was solemnly introduced. This is plainly declared in the ensuing Context, especially in the close of the Chapter, where speaking of this former Covenant, he says, it was become old, and so ready to disappear. Wherefore it is not the Covenant of Works made with Adam that is intended, when this other is said to be a better Covenant.
faederal Transactions between God and the Church before the giving of the Law on Mount Sinai. Two of them there were into which all the rest were resolved.
1. The first Promise given unto our first Parents immediately after the Fall. This had in it the nature of a Covenant, grounded on a Promise of Grace, and re
2. The Promise given and sworn unto Abraham, which is expresly called the Covenant of God, and had the whole nature of a Covenant in it, with a solemn outward Seal appointed for its confirmation and establishment. Hereof we have treated at large on the Sixth Chapter.
Neither of these, nor any Transaction between God and man that may be refirst Covenant here intended. For they are not only consistent with the New Covenant, so as that there was no necessity to remove them out of the way for its Introduction, but did indeed contain in them the
3. The other Covenant or Testament here supposed, whereunto that whereof the Lord Christ was the Mediator is preferred, is none other but that which God made with the People of Israel on Mount Sinai. So it is expresly affirmed, ver. 9. The Covenant which I made with your Fathers in the day I took them by the hand, to lead them out of the Land of Egypt. This was that Covenant which had all the Institutions of Worship annexed unto it, Chap. 9. 1, 2, 3. whereof we must treat afterwards more at large. With respect hereunto it is, that the Lord Christ is said to be the Mediator of a better Covenant, that is, of another distinct from it, and more excellent.
It remains unto the Exposition of the words; that we enquire what was this Covenant, whereof our Lord Christ was the Mediator, and what is here affirmed of it.
This can be no other in general but that which we call the Covenant of Grace. And it is so called in opposition unto that of Works, which was made with us in Adam. For these two, Grace and Works, do divide the ways of our Relation unto God, being diametrically opposite, and every way inconsistent, Rom. 11. 6. Of this Covenant the Lord Christ was the Mediator from the foundation of the world, namely, from the giving of the first Promise, Rev. 13. 8. For it was given on his Interposition, and all the benefits of it depended on his future actual Me
But here ariseth the first difficulty of the Context, and that in two things. For
(1) If this Covenant of Grace was made from the Beginning, and that the Lord Christ was the Mediator of it from the first, then where is the priviledge of the Gospel state in opposition unto the Law, by vertue of this Covenant? seeing that under the Law also the Lord Christ was the Mediator of that Covenant which was from the Beginning.
(2) If it be the Covenant of Grace which is intended, and that be opposed unto the Covenant of Works made with Adam, then the other Covenant must be that Covenant of Works so made with Adam, which we have before disproved.
The Answer hereunto is in the word here used by the Apostle concerning this New Coxenant, New Covenant absolutely, and as it was virtually administred from the foundation of the world, in the way of a Promise. For as such it was consistent with that Covenant made with the people in Sinai. And the Apostle proves expresly, that the renovation of it made unto Abraham, was no way abrogated by the giving of the Law, Gal. 3. 17. There was no interruption of its administration made by the introduction of the Law. But he treats of such an establishment of the New Covenant, as wherewith the old Covenant made at Sinai was absolutely inconsistent, and which was therefore to be
actually compleated, so as to bring along with it all the Ordinances of Worship which are pro
This is the meaning of the word established, say we. But it is reduced into a fixed state of a Law or Ordinance. All the Obedience required in it, all the Worship appointed by it, all the Priviledges exhibited in it, and the Grace administred with them, are all given for a Statute, Law and Ordinance unto the Church. That which before lay hid in Promises, in many things obscure, the principal Mysteries of it being a Secret hid in God himself, was now brought to light; and that Covenant which had invisibly in the way of a Promise put forth its efficacy under Types and Shadows, was now solemnly sealed, ratified and convisible outward Worship, proper and peculiar unto it, is now made the only Rule and Instrument of Worship unto the whole Church, nothing being to be admitted therein, but what belongs unto it, and is aplegal establishment of the New Covenant with all the Ordinances of its Worship. Hereon the other Covenant was disannulled and removed, and not only the Covenant itself, but all that System of Sacred Worship whereby it was administred. This was not done by the making of the Covenant at first. Yeal all this was superinduced into the Covenant as given out in a Promise, and was consistent therewith. When the New Covenant was given out only in the way of a Promise, it did not introduce a Worship and Priviledges expressive of it. Wherefore it was consistent with a form of Worship, Rites and Ceremonies, and those composed into a yoke of Bondage which belonged not unto it. And as these being added after its giving, did not overthrow its nature as a Promise, so they were inconsistent with it, when it was compleated as a Covenant. For then all the Worship of the Church was to proceed from it, and to be conformed unto it. Then it was established. Hence it follows, in answer unto the second difficulty, that as a Promise, it was opposed unto the Covenant of Works; as a Covenant, it was opposed unto that in Sinai. This Legalizing, or authoritative establishment of the New Covenant, and the Worship thereunto belonging did effect this alteration.
In the last place the Apostle tells us whereon this establishment was made, and that is on better Promises. For the better understanding Divine Promises in our Relation unto God. And we may observe,
1. That every Covenant between God and man, must be founded on, and rePromises. Hence essentially a Promise and a Covenant are all one, and God calls an absolute Promise founded on an absolute Decree, his Covenant, Gen. 9. 11. And his Purpose for the continuation of the course of nature unto the end of the World he calls his Covenant with day and night, Jer. 33. 20. The Being and Essence of a Divine Covenant lies in the Promise. Hence are they called the Covenants of Promise, Ephes. 2. 12. Such as are founded on and consist in Promi
1. The Nature of God who maketh these Covenants requireth that so it should be. It becometh his Greatness and Goodness in all his voluntary Transactions with his Creatures, to propose that unto them, wherein their advantage, their hapDisputes about it are fond. We have no measures of what is infinite. May he not do with his own what he pleaseth? Are we not in his hands, as Clay in the hands of the Potter? And whether he make or marr a Vessel, who shall say unto him, What doest thou? He giveth no account of his matters. But upon supposition that he will condescend to enter into Covenant with his Creatures, and to come to agreement with them according unto the terms of it, it becometh his Greatness and
eternal Spring and Fountain of all Power and Goodness. Had he treated with us meerly by a Law, he had therein only revealed his Soveraign Authority and Holiness; the one in giving of the Law, the other in the nature of it. But in Promises he revealeth himself as the eternal Spring of Goodness and Power. For the matter of all Promises is somewhat that is good; and the communication of it depends on Soveraign Power. That God should so declare himself in his Covenant, was absolutely necessary to direct and encourage the Obedience of the Covenanters. And he did so accorGen. 17. 1. Gen. 15. 1. Hereby he reserves the glory of the whole unto himself. For although the terms of agreement which he proposeth between himholy, just and good, which sets forth his praise and glory, yet if there were not something on his part, which hath no antecedent respect unto any goodness, obedience or desert in us, we should have wherein to glory in our selves, which is inconsistent with the glory of God. But the matter of those Promises wherein the Covenant is founded, is free, undeserved, and without respect unto any thing in us, whereby it may in any sense be procured. And so in the first Covenant which was given in a form of Law, attended with a Penal Sanction, yet the foundation of it was in a Promise of a free and undeserved Reward, even of the eternal enjoyment of God, which no goodness or obedience in the Creature could possibly merit the attainment of. So that if a man should by vir
2. It was also necessary on our part, that every Divine Covenant should be founded and established on Promises. For there is no state wherein we may be taCovenant any more, seeing we shall be in eternal rest in the enjoyment of all the blessedness whereof our nature is capable, and shall immutably adhere unto God without any farther expectation. But whilst we are in the way, we have still somewhat, yea principal parts of our blessedness, to desire, expect, and believe. So in the state of Innocency, though it had all the Perfection which a state of Obedience according unto a Law was capable of, yet did not the Blessedness of eternal Rest, for which we were made, consist therein. Now whil'st it is thus with us, we cannot but be desiring and looking out after that full and compleat happiness, which our nature cannot come to rest without. This therefore renders it necessary that there should be a Promise of it given as the foundation of the Covenant, without which we should want our principal encouragement unstate of Sin and Apostasie from God. For we are now not only most remote from our utmost happiness, but inmisery, without a deliverance from which, we cannot be any ways induced to give our selves up unto Covenant Obedience. Wherefore unless we are prevented in the Covenant with Promises of deliverance from our present state, and the enjoyment of future Blessedness, no Covenant could be of use or advantage unto us.
3. It is necessary from the nature of a Covenant. For every Covenant that is proposed unto men, and accepted by them, requires somewhat to be performed on their part, otherwise it is no Covenant. But where any thing is required of them that accept of the Covenant, or to whom it is proposed, it doth suppose that somepromised on the behalf of them by whom the Covenant is proposed, as the foundation of its acceptance, and the reason of the duties required in it.
All this appears most evidently in the Covenant of Grace, which is here said to be established on Promises; and that on two Accounts. For
(1) At the same time that much is required of us in the way of Duty and Obedience, we are told in the Scripture, and find it by experience, that of our selves
we can do nothing. Wherefore unless the Precept of the Covenant be founded in a Promise of giving grace and spiritual strength unto us, whereby we may be enbe of no benefit or advantage unCovenant is founded in Promises, and that the Promises give life unto the Precepts of it, hath perverted the minds of many to suppose an ability in our selves of yielding Obedience unto those Precepts, without Grace antecedently received to enable us thereunto, which over
(2) As was observed, we are all actually guilty of sin before this Covenant was made with us. Wherefore unless there be a Promise given of the pardon of sin, it is to no purpose to propose any new Covenant terms unto us. For the wages of sin is death; and we having sinned must die, whatever we do afterwards, unless our sins be pardoned. This therefore must be proposed unto us as the foun
2. These Promises are said to be better Promises. The other Covenant had its Promises peculiar unto it, with respect whereunto this is said to be established on better Promises. It was indeed principally represented under a System of Precepts, and those almost innumerable. But it had its Promises also, into the nature whereestablished on better Promises. That it should be founded in Promises, was necessary from its gene
1. There is infinite Grace in every Divine Covenant, inasmuch as it is established on Promises. Infinite condescension it is in God, that he will enter into Covenant with dust and ashes, with poor Worms of the earth. And herein lies the Spring of all Grace, from whence all the streams of it do flow. And the first expression of it is in laying the foundation of it in some undeserved Promises. And this was that which became the Goodness and Greatness of his Nature, the means whereby we are wrought to adhere unto him in Faith, Hope, Trust and Obedience, until we come unto the enjoyment of him. For that is the use of Promises to keep us in adherence unto God, as the first Original and Spring of all Goodness, and the ulCor. 7. 1.
2. The Promises of the Covenant of Grace are better than those of any other Covenant, as for many other Reasons, so especially because the grace of them prevents any condition or qualification on our part. I do not say, the Covenant of Grace is
This entrance hath the Apostle made into his Discourse of the two Covenants, which he continues unto the end of the Chapter. But the whole is not without its difficulties. Many things in particular will occur unto us in our progress, which may be considered in their proper places. In the mean time there are some things in general which may be here discoursed, by whose determination much light will be communicated unto what doth ensue.
First therefore the Apostle doth evidently in this place dispute concerning two Covenants or two Testaments, comparing the one with the other, and declaring the disannulling of the one by the introduction and establishment of the other. What are these two Covenants in general, we have declared, namely, that made with the Church of Israel at Mount Sinai, and that made with us in the Gospel; not as absolutely the Covenant of Grace, but as actually established in the death of Christ, with all the worship that belongs unto it.
Here then ariseth a difference of no small importance, namely, whether these are indeed two distinct Covenants, as to the essence and substance of them, or only different ways of the dispensation and administration of the same Covenant. And the reason of the difficulty lieth herein. We must grant one of these three things.
(1) That either the Covenant of Grace was in force under the Old Testa
(2) That the Church was saved without it, or any benefit by Jesus Christ who is the Mediator of it alone; or
(3) That they all perished everlastingly. And neither of the two latter can be admitted.
Some indeed in these latter days have revived the old Pelagian imagination, that before the Law men were saved by the conduct of natural light and reason, and under the Law by the directive Doctrines, Precepts and Sacrifices thereof, without any respect unto the Lord Christ or his Mediation in another Covenant. But I shall not here contend with them, as having elsewhere sufficiently refuted these imaginations. Wherefore I shall take it here for granted, that no man was ever saved but by vertue of the New Covenant, and the Mediation of Christ therein.
Suppose then that this New Covenant of Grace was extant and effectual under the Old Testament, so as the Church was saved by vertue thereof, and the Mediaanother Covenant between God and them, of a different nature from this, accompanied with other Promises, and other Effects?
On this consideration it is said, that the two Covenants mentioned, the New and the Old, were not indeed two distinct Covenants, as unto their essence and substance, but only different administrations of the same Covenant, called two Covenants from some different outward Solemnities and Duties of worship attending of them. To clear this it must be observed,
1. That by the Old Covenant, the original Covenant of Works made with Adam and all Mankind in him is not intended. For this is undoubtedly a Cove
2. By the New Covenant, not the New Covenant absolutely and originally as given in the first Promise, is intended; but in its compleat Gospel-administration, when it was actually established by the death of Christ, as administred in and by the Ordinances of the New Testament. This with the Covenant of Sinai were, as most say, but different administrations of the same Covenant.
of two distinct Covenants or Testaments, and such different Natures, Properties and Effects ascribed unto them, as seem to constiWhether two distinct Covenants, or only a twofold administration of the same Covenant be intended. And indeed there is so much agreed on, as that what remains seems rather to be a difference about the ex
1. It is agreed that the way of Reconciliation with God, of justification and salfoolish imagination before-mentioned, that men were sa
2. That the Writings of the Old Testament, namely, the Law, Psalms and Prophets, do contain and declare the Doctrine of Justification and Salvation by Christ, this the Church of old believed, and walked with God in the Faith thereof. This is undeniably proved, in that the Doctrine mentioned is frequently confirmed in the New Testament, by Testimonies taken out of the Old.
3. That by the Covenant of Sinai, as properly so called, separated from its figu
4. That the use of all the Institutions whereby the Old Covenant was admini
These things being granted, the only way of life and salvation by Jesus Christ under the Old Testament and the New is secured, which is the substance of the Truth wherein we are now concerned. On these grounds we may proceed with our enquiry.
The judgment of most Reformed Divines is, that the Church under the Old Testament, had the same Promise of Christ, the same Interest in him by Faith, Reanother Covenant, but only a different administration of it. But this was so different from that which is established in the Gospel after the coming of Christ, that it hath the appearance and name of another Covenant. And the differences between these two Administrations may be reduced unto the en
1. It consisted in the way and manner of the declaration of the mystery of the Love and Will of God in Christ; of the work of Reconciliation and RedemLife and Immortality are brought unto light, doth in plainness, clearness and evidence, much exwith open face we behold the glory of God in a glass, and are changed into the same image, 2 Cor. 3. 18. The man whose eyes the Lord Christ opened, Mark 8. 23, 24. represents these two states. When he first touched him, his eyes were opened, and he saw, but he saw nothing clearly, whence when he looked, he said, I see men as trees walking, ver. 24. But upon his second touch he saw every man clearly, ver. 25. They had their sight under the Old Testament, and the Object was proposed unto them, but at a great distance, with such an interposition of Mists, Clouds and Shadows, as that they saw men like trees walking, nothing clearly and perfectly. But now under the Gospel, the Object, which is Christ, being brought near unto us, and all Clouds and Shadows being departed, we do or may see all things clearly. When a Traveller in his way on Downs or Hills is encompassed with a thick Mist and Fog, though he be in his way, yet he is uncertain, and noMists and Clouds that interTypes and Shadows that they were enclosed in, and which were the only medium they had to view spiritual things in, represented them not unto them clearly and in their proper shape. But they being now removed by the rising of the Sun of Righteousness with healing in his wings in the dispensation of the Gospel, the whole mystery of God in Christ is clearly manifested unto them that do believe. And the greatness of this priviledge of the Gospel above the Law is unexpressible, whereof as I sup
2. In the plentiful communication of Grace unto the community of the Church. For now it is that we receive Grace for Grace, or a plentiful effusion of it by Jesus Christ. There was Grace given in an eminent manner unto many holy Persons under the Old Testament, and all true Believers had true, real, saving Grace comwinked at some things in them, as Polygamy, and the like, which are expresly and severely interdicted under the New, nor are consistent with the present administrations of it; so are sundry Duties, as those of Self-denial, readiness to bear the Cross, to forsake Houses, Lands and Habitations, more expresly enjoined unto us than unto them. And the Obedience which God requireth in any Covenant, or administration of it, is proportionable unto the strength which the administration of that Covenant doth exhibit. And if those who profess the Gospel do content themselves without any interest in this priviledge of it, if they endeavor not for a share in that plentiful effusion of Grace which doth accompany its present administration, the Gospel itself will be of no other use unto them, but to increase and aggravate their condemnation.
3. In the manner of our access unto God. Herein much of all that is called Religion doth consist. For hereon doth all our outward Worship of God de
4. In the way of Worship required under each administration. For under that which was legal, it seemed good unto God to appoint a great number of outward Rites, Ceremonies, and Observances; and these, as they were dark in their signifi
5. In the Extent of the Dispensation of the Grace of God. For this is greatly enAbraham according to the flesh. But under the New Testament it extends it self unto all Nations under Heaven.
Sundry other things are usually added by our Divines unto the same purpose. See Calvin. Institut. lib. 2. cap. 11. Martyr. loc. com. loc. 16. sect. 2. Bucan. loc. 22 &c.
The Lutherans on the other side insift on two Arguments to prove, that not a twofold Administration of the same Covenant, but that two Covenants substantially distinct, are intended in this Discourse of the Apostle.
first and the last, the new and the old.
2. Because the Covenant of Grace in Christ is eternal, immutable, alwayes the same, obnoxious unto no alteration, no change or abrogation, neither can these things be spoken of it with respect unto any administration of it, as they are spoken of the Old Covenant.
To state our thoughts aright in this matter, and to give what light we can unto the Truth, the things ensuing may be observed.
1. When we speak of the Old Covenant, we intend not the Covenant of Works made with Adam, and his whole Posterity in him, concerning which there is no difference or difficulty, whether it be a distinct Covenant from the New or no.
2. When we speak of the New Covenant, we do not intend the Covenant of Grace absolutely, as though that were not before in being and efficacy before the Indispensation of times before the Law, and under the Law, of the same nature and efficacy, unaleverlasting, ordered in all things and sure. All who contend about these things, the Socinians only excepted, do grant that the Covenant of Grace considered absolutely, that is, the Promise of Grace in and by Jesus Christ, was the onely way and means of Salvation unto the Church, from the first entrance of sin. But for two Reasons it is not expresly called a Covenant, without respect unto any other things, nor was it so under the Old Testament. When God renewed the Promise of it unto Abraham, he is said to make a Covenant with him, and he did so, but it was with respect unto other things, especially the proceeding of the promised Seed from his loins. But absolutely under the Old Testament, it consisted only in a Promise, and as such only is proposed in the Scripture,
(1) It wanted its solemn confirmation and establishment by the blood of the only Sacrifice which belonged unto it. Before this was done in the death of Christ, it had not the formal nature of a Covenant or a Testament, as our Apostle proves, Chap. 9. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23. For neither, as he shews in that place, would the Law given at Sinai, have been a Covenant, had it not been conblood of Sacrifices. Wherefore the Promise was not before a formal and solemn Covenant.
(2) This was wanting, that it was not the Spring, Rule and Measure of all the Worship of the Church. This doth belong unto every Covenant, properly so called, that God makes with the Church, that it be the entire Rule of all the Worship that God requires of it, which is that which they are to restipulate in their entrance into Covenant with God. But so the Covenant of Grace was not under the Old Testament. For God did require of the Church many Duties of Worship that did not belong thereunto. But now under the New Testament, this Covenant with its own seals and appointments, is the only Rule and Measure of all acceptable Worship. Wherefore the New Covenant promised in the Scripture, and here opOld, is not the Promise of Grace, Mercy, Life and Salvation by Christ absolutely considered, but as it had the formal nature of a Covenant given unto it, in its establishment by the death of Christ, the procuring cause of all its Benefits, and the declaring of it to be the only Rule of Worship and Obedience unto the Church. So that although by the Covenant of Grace, we oft-times underthe New Covenant, we intend its actual establishment in the death of Christ, with that blessed way of Worship which by it is setled in the Church.
3, Whil'st the Church enjoyed all the spiritual Benefits of the Promise, wherein the substance of the Covenant of Grace was contained, before it was confirmed
any other Covenant, or prescribe unto it what Forms of Worship he pleased. It was not so I say upon these three Suppositions.
(1) That this Covenant did not disannul or make ineffectual the Promise that was given before, but that That doth still continue the only means of Life and SalGal. 3. 17, 18, 19.
(2) That this other Covenant, with all the Worship contained in it, or requifuture establishment of the Promise, in the Sclemnity of a Covenant, by the ways mentioned. And that the Covenant made in Sinai with all its Ordinances did so, the Apostle proves likewise in the place beforementioned, as also in this whole Epistle.
(3) That it be of present use and advantage unto the Church in its present condition. This the Apostle acknowledgeth to be a great Objection against the use and efficacy of the Promise under the Old Testament, as unto Life and Salvathen serves the giving of the Law; whereunto he anLaw unto the Church in its then present condition, Gal. 3. 17.
4. These things being observed, we may consider that the Scripture doth plainly and expresly make mention of two Testaments or Covenants, and distinguish between them in such a way, as what is spoken can hardly be accommodated unto a twofold Administration of the same Covenant. The one is mentioned and described, Exod. 24. ver. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Deut. 5. 2, 3, 4, 5. namely, the Covenant that God made with the people of Israel in Sinai; and which is commonly called the Covenant where the people under the Old Testament are said to keep or break Gods Covenant, which for the most part is spoken with respect unto that Worship which was peculiar thereunto. The other is promised,
These two we call the Old and the New Testament. Only it must be observed that in this Argument, by the Old Testament, we do not understand the Books of the Old Testament, or the Writings of Moses, the Psalms and Prophets, or the Oracles of God committed then unto the Church. I confess they are once so called, 2 Cor. 3. 14. The vail remaineth untaken away in the reading of the Old Testament, that is, the Books of it. Unless we shall say that the Apostle intendeth only the reading of the things which concern the Old Testament in the Scripture. For this Old Covenant or Testament whatever it be, is abrogated and taken away, as the Apostle expresly proves. But the Word of God in the Books of the Old Testament abideth for ever. And those Writings are called the Old Testament, or the Books of the Old Testament, not as though they contained in them, nothing but what belongeth unto the Old Covenant, for they contain the Doctrine of the New Testament also. But they are so termed, because they were committed unto the Church, whil'st the Old Covenant was in force, as the Rule and Law of its Worship and Obe
5. Wherefore we must grant two distinct Covenants, rather than a twofold Adtwofold Administration of the same Covenant, that this being the principal end of a Divine Covenant, if the way of Reconciliation and Salvation be the same under both, then indeed are they for the substance of them but one. And I grant thut this would inevitably follow, if it were so equally by virtue of them both. If Reconciliation and Salvation by Christ were to be obtained not only
1. This Covenant called the Old Covenant, was never intended to be of itself the absolute Rule and Law of Life and Salvation unto the Church, but was made with a particular design, and with respect unto particular ends. This the Apostle proves undeniably in this Epistle, especially in the Chapter foregoing, and those two that follow. Hence it follows that it could abrogate or disannul nothing which God at any time before had given as a general Rule unto the Church. For that which is particular cannot abrogate any thing that was general, and before it; as that which is general doth abrogate all antecedent particulars, as the New Cove
1. God had before given the Covenant of Works, or perfect Obedience unto all Mankind in the Law of Creation. But this Covenant at Sinai did not abrogate or disannual that Covenant, nor any way fulfill it; And the reason is, because it was never intended to come in the place or room thereof, as a Covenant, containing an entire Rule of all the Faith and Obedience of the whole Church. God did not inabrogate the Covenant of Works, and to substitute this in the place thereof. Yea in sundry things it reinforced, established, and confirmed that Cove
1. It revived, decIared and expressed all the Commands of that Covenant in the Decalogue. For that is nothing but a Divine Summary of the Law written in the heart of man at his Creation. And herein the dreadful manner of its delivery or promulgation, with its Writings in Tables of Stone are also to be considered. For in them the nature of that first Covenant, with its inexorableness as unto perfect Obedience was represented. And because none could answer its demands, or comMinistration of Death causing fear and bonCor. 3. 7.
2. It revived the Sanction of the first Covenant in the Curse or Sentence of Death which it denounced against all Transgressors. Death was the penalty of the transgression of the first Covenant, In the day thou eatest thou shalt die the death. And this Sentence was revived and represented anew in the Curse wherewith this Covenant was ratified. Cursed be he that confirmeth not all the words of this Law to do them, Deut. 27. 26. Gal. 3. 10. For the design of God in it was to bind a sense of that Curse on the Consciences of men, until he came by whom it was taGal. 3. 14, 15, 16.
3. It revived the Promise of that Covenant, that of eternal Life upon perfect Obedience. So the Apostle tells us, that Moses thus describeth the Righteousness of the Law, that the man which doth these things shall live by them, Rom. 10. 5. as he doth, Lev. 18. 5. Now this is no other but the Covenant of Works revived. Nor had this Covenant of Sinai any Promise of eternal Life annexed unto it, as such, but only the Promise inseparable from the Covenant of Works which it revived, saying, Do this and live.
Hence it is that when our Apostle disputeth against Justification by the Law, or by the Works of the Law, he doth not intend the Works peculiar unto the CoveSinai, such as were the Rites and Ceremonies of the Worship then instiWorks of the first Covenant, which alone had the Promise of Life annexed unto them.
And hence it follows also, that it was not a New Covenant of Works established in the place of the Old, for the absolute Rule of Faith and Obedience unto the whole Church; for then would it have abrogated and taken away that Covenant, and all the sorce of it, which it did not.
2. The other instance is in the Promise. This also went before it; neither was it abrogated or disannulled by the introduction of this Covenant. This Promise was given unto our first Parents immediately after the entrance of sin, and was established as containing the only way and means of the Salvation of Sinners. Now this Promise could not be abrogated by the introduction of this Covenant, and a
no variableness or shadow of turning. Much less could this be effected by a particular Covenant such as that was, when it was given as a general and eternal Rule.
But whereas there was an especial Promise given unto Abraham, in the Faith whereof he became the Father of the Faithful, he being their Progenitor, it should seem that this Covenant did wholly disannul or supersede that Promise, and take off the Church of his Posterity from building on that foundation, and to fix them wholly on this New Covenant now made with them. So saith Moses, The Lord made not this Covenant with our Fathers, but with us even us, who are all of us alive here this day, Deut. 5. 3. God made not this Covenant on Mount Sinai, with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, but with the People then present, and their Posterity, as he declares, Deut. 29. 14, 15. This therefore should seem to take them off wholly from that Promise made to Abraham, and so to disannul it. But that this it did not, nor could do, the Apostle strictly proves, Gal. 3. 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22. Yea it did divers ways establish that Promise, both as first given and as afterwards conAbraham, two especially.
1. It declared the impossibility of obtaining Reconciliation and Peace with God, any other way but by the Promise. For representing the Commands of the Cove
2. By representing the ways and means of the Accomplishment of the Promise, and of that whereon all the efficacy of it unto the Justification and Salvation of Sinners doth depend. This was the Death, Bloodshedding, Oblation or Sacrifice of Christ the promised Seed. This all its Offerings and Ordinances of Worship didisannulling the Promise, or diverting the minds of the People of God from it, that by all means it established it, and lead unto it. But
3. It will be said, as was before observed, that if it did neither abrogate the first Covenant of Works, and come in the room thereof, nor disannul the Promise made unto Abraham, then unto what end did it serve, or what benefit did the Church receive thereby? I answer
1. There hath been with respect unto Gods dealing with the Church, certain dispensation and disposition of times and seasons, reserved unto the sovereign will and pleasure of God. Hence from the beginning he revealed himChap. 1. 1. And this Dispensation of times had a fulness assigned unto it, wherein all things, namely, that belong unto the Revelation and Communication of God unto the Church, should come to their height, and have as it were the last hand given unto them. This was in the sending of Christ, as the Apostle declares, Eph. 1. 10. That in the dispensation of the fulness of times, he might bring all unto an Head in Christ. Until this season came, God dealt variously with the Church, in manifold or various wisdom, according as he saw it needful and useful for it, in that season which it was to pass through, before the fulness of times came. Of this nature was his entrance into the Covenant with the Church at Sinai, the Reasons whereof we shall immediately inquire into. In the mean time if we had no other Answer to this Enquiry, but only this, that in the order of the disposal or dispensation of the seasons of the Church before the
2. The Apostle acquaints us in general with the ends of this dispensation of God, Gal. 3. 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24. Wherefore then serveth the Law? it was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the Promise was made, and
it was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator. Now a Mediator is not of one, but God is one. Is the Law then against the Promises of God? God forbid; for if there had been a Law given which could have given Life, verily Righteousness should have been by the Law. But the Scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the Promise by Faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. But before Faith came, we were kept under the Law, shut up unto the Faith, which should afterwards be revealed. Wherefore the Law was our Schoolmaster, to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by Faith. Much light might be given unto the mind of the Holy Ghost in these words, and that in things not commonly discerned by
There is a double Enquiry made by the Apostle with respect unto the Law, or the Covenant of Sinai.
(1) Unto what end in general it served.
(2) Whether it were not contrary to the Promise of God. Unto both these the Apostle answereth from the Nature, Office and Work of that Covenant. For there were, as hath been declared, two things in it.
First, A Revival and Representation of the first Covenant of Works, with its Sanction and Curse.
Secondly, A direction of the Church unto the Accomplishment of the Promise. From these two doth the Apostle frame his Answer unto the double Enquiry laid down. And unto the first Enquiry, Unto what end it served? he answers, it was added because of transgressions. The Promise being given, there seems to have been no need of it, why then was it added to it at that season? it was added because of transgressions. The fulness of time was not yet come wherein the Promise was to be fulfilled, accomplished and established as the onely Covenant wherein the Church was to walk with God, or the Seed was not yet come, as the Apostle here speaks, to whom the Promise was made. In the mean time some order must be tasin and transgression, that all the order of things appointed of God were not overflowed by them. And this was done two ways by the Law.
(1) By reviving the Commands of the Covenant of Works, with the sanction of Death, it put an awe on the minds of men, and set bounds unto their lusts, that they should not dare to run forth into that excess which they were naturally incliadded because of transgressions, that in the declaration of Gods severity against them, some Bounds might be fixed unto them; for the knowledge of Sin is by the Law.
(2) To shut up Unbelievers, and such as would not seek for Righteousness, Life and Salvation by the Promise under the Power of the Covenant of Works, and Curse attending it. It concluded or shut up all under sin, saith the Apostle, ver. 20. This was the end of the Law, for this end was it added, as it gave a revival unto the Covenant of Works. Unto the second Enquiry, which ariseth out of this SupThat the Law did convince of sin, and condemn for sin, which is, whether it be not then contrary to the grace of God? The Apostle in like manner returns a double Answer, taken from the second use of the Law before insisted on, with respect unto the Promise. And
First, He says that although the Law doth thus rebuke sin, convince of sin, and condemn for sin, so setting bounds unto Transgressions and Transgressors, yet did God never intend it as a means to give Life and Righteousness, nor was it able so to do. The end of the Promise was to give Righteousness, Justification and SalvaSinai. For although in itself it requires a perfect Righteousness, and gives a Promise of Life thereon, He that doth these things, he shall live in them; yet it could give neither RighteousRom. 8. 3. Chap. 10. 4. Wherefore the Promise and the Law having divers ends, they are not contrary to one an
Secondly, Saith he, The Law had a great respect unto the Promise, and was given of God for this very end, that it might lead and direct men unto Christ, which is sufficient to answer the Question proposed at the beginning of this Discourse, about the ends of this Covenant, and the advantage which the Church received thereby.
1. That whil'st the Covenant of Grace was contained and proposed only in the Promise, before it was solemnly confirmed in the Blood and Sacrifice of Christ, and so legalized or established as the only Rule of the Worship of the Church, the InSinai, did not constitute a new way or means of Righteousness, Life and Salvation; but Believers sought for them alone by the Covenant of Grace as declared in the Promise. This follows evidently upon what we have discoursed, and it secures absolutely that great fundamental Truth, which the Apostle in this and all other his Epistles so earnestly contendeth for; namely, That there neither is, or ever was, either Righteousness, Justification, Life or Salvation, to be attained by any Law, or the works of it, (for this Covenant at Mount
2. That whereas this Covenant being introduced in the pleasure of God, there was prescribed with it a form of outward Worship suited unto that dispensation of times, and present state of the Church, upon the Introduction of the New Covefulness of times to be the Rule of all intercourse between God and the Church, both that Covenant and all its Worship must be disannulled. This is that which the Apostle proves with all sorts of Arguments, manifesting the great advantage of the Church thereby. These things I say do evidently follow on the preceding Discourses, and are the main Truths contended for by the Apostle.
4. There remaineth one thing more only to be considered, before we enter on the Comparison between the two Covenants here directed unto by the Apostle. And this is, how this first Covenant became to be an especial Covenant unto that Peo
1. This People were the Posterity of Abraham unto whom the Promise was made, that in his Seed all the Nations of the earth should be blessed. Wherefore from among them was the promised Seed to be raised up in the fulness of time, or its proper season. From among them was the Son of God to take on him the Seed of Abraham. To this end sundry things were necessary.
1. That they should have a certain abiding place or Countrey which they might freely inhabit, distinct from other Nations, and under a Rule or Scepter of their own. So it is said of them, That the People should dwell alone, and not be reckoned among the Nations, Numb. 23. 9. and the Scepter was not to depart from them until Shilo came, Gen. 49. 10. For God had regard unto his own glory in his faithfulAbraham, not only that they should be accomplished, but that their Accomplishment should be evident and conspicuAbraham, from among whom the promised Seed was to rise, had been, as it is at this day with them, scattered abroad on the face of the Earth, mixed with all Nations, and under their Power, although God might have accomplished his Promise really in raising up Christ from among some of his Posterity, yet could it not be proved or evidenced that he had so done, by reason of the confusion and mixture of the People with others. Wherefore God provided a Land and Countrey for them which they might inhabit by themselves, and as their own, even the Land of Canaan. And this was so suited unto all the ends of God towards that People, as might be declared in sundry instances, that God is said, to have espied this Land out for them, Ezek. 20. 6. He chose it out as most meet for his purpose, towards that People of all Lands under Heaven.
2. That there should be always kept among them an open Confession and visible Representation of the end for which they were so separated from all the Nations of the World. They were not to dwell in the Land of Canaan meerly for secular ends, and to make as it were a dumb shew; but as they were there maintained and preserved to evidence the faithfulness of God in bringing forth the promised Seed in the fulness of time; so there was to be a testimony kept up among them unto that
Ordinances of Worship, of the Tabernacle, Priesthood, Sacrifices and Ordinances, which were all appointed by
2. It becomes not the Wisdom, Holiness, and Soveraignty of God, to call any People into an especial Relation unto himself, to do them good in an eminent and peculiar manner, and then to suffer them to live at their pleasure, without any reLand of Canaan, and the Ordinances of Worship relating unto the great end mentioned, he moreover prescribed unto them Laws, Rules, and Terms of Obedience, whereon they should hold and enjoy that Land, with all the Priviledges annexed unto the possession thereof. And these are both expresstand or fall absolutely by the terms prescribed unto them, they might and would have uttetly forfeited both the Land and all the Priviledges they enjoyed therein. And had it so fallen out, then the great end of God in preserving them a separate People until the Seed should come, and a Representation thereof among them had been frustrate. Wherefore although he punished them for their Transgressions, according to the Threatnings of the Law, yet would he not bring the Curse of the Law upon them, and utterMal. 4. 4, 5, 6.
3. God would not take this People off from the Promise, because his Church was among them, and they could neither please God, nor be accepted with him, but by Faith therein. But yet they were to be dealt withall according as it was meet. For they were generally a People of an hard-heart, and stiff-necked, lifted up with an opinion of their own righteousness and worth above others. This Moses endeaDeuteronomy. Yet was it not effected among the generality of them, nor is to this day. For in the middest of all their wickedness and misery, they still trust to and boast of their own righteousness, and will have it that God hath an especial Obligation unto them on that account. For this cause God saw it necessary, and it pleased him to put a grievous and heavy yoke upon them, to subdue the pride of their spirits, and to cause them to breathe after deliverance. This the Apostle Peter calls a yoke that neither they nor their Fathers were able to bear, Acts 15. 20. that is, with peace, ease, and rest, which therefore the Lord Christ invited them to seek for in himself alone, Matth. 11. 29, 30. And this yoke that God put on them, consisted in these three things.
1. In a multitude of Precepts hard to be understood, and difficult to be obserJews reckon up 613 of them, about the sense of most of which they dispute endlesly among themselves. But the truth is, since the days of the Pharisees they have increased their own yoke, and made obedience unto their Law, in any tolerable manner, altogether unpracticable.
It were easie to manifest, for instance, that no man under Heaven ever did, or ever can keep the Sabbath according to the Rules they give about it in their Talmuds. And they generally scarce observe one of them themselves. But in the Law, as given by God himself, it is certain, that there were a multitude of
2. In the severity wherewith the observance of all those Precepts were enjointhreatning of death. For he that despised Moses's Law died without mercy, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward. Hence was their complaint of old,
Spirit of Bondage unto Fear. This was administred in the giving and dispensation of the Law, even as a Spirit of Liberty and Power is administred in and by the Gospel. And as this respected their present Obedience, and manner of its performance, so in particular it regarded Death not yet conquered by Christ. Hence our Apostle affirms, that through fear of Death, they were all their life-time subject unto Bondage. This state God brought them into, partly to subdue the pride of their hearts trusting in their own righteousness, and partly to cause them to look out earnestly after the promised Deliverer.
4. Into this estate and condition, God brought them by a Solemn Covenant, conExod. 24. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Unto the terms and conditions of this Covenant was the whole Church obliged indispensibly on pain of Extermination, until all was accomplished, Mal. 4. 4, 5, 6. Unto this Covenant belonged the Decalogue, with all Precepts of Moral Obedience thence educed. So also did the Laws of Political Rule established among them, and the whole Systeme of Religious Worship given unto them. All these Laws were brought within the verge of this Covenant, and were the matter of it. And it had especial Promises and Threatnings annexed unto it as such, whereof none did exceed the Bounds of the Land of Canaan. For even many of the Laws of it were such as obliged no where else. Such was the Law of the Sabbatical year, and all their Sacrifices. There was Sin and Obedience in them, or about them in the Land of Canaan, none elsewhere. Hence
5. This Covenant thus made with these Ends and Promises, did never save nor condemn any man eternally. All that lived under the Administration of it, did atvertue of this Covenant as forMinistry of condemnation, 2 Cor. 3. 9. For by the
6. Hereon occasionally fell out the ruine of that People; their Table became a snare unto them, and that which should have been for their welfare, became a trap, according to the Prediction of our Saviour, Psal. 69. 22. It was this Covethat raised and ruined them, it raised them to Glory and Honour when given of God; it ruined them when abused by themselves, contrary to express declaratiCovenant to be the only Rule and Means of righteousness, life and salvation, as the Apostle declares, Rom. 9. 31, 32, 33. Chap. 10. 3. For, as we have often said, there were two things in it, both which they abused unto other ends than what God designed them.
(1) There was the Renovation of the Rule of the Covenant of Works for righ
(2) There was ordained in it a Typical Representation of the way and means whereby the Promise was to be made effectual, namely, in the Mediation and Sacripernicious Errors, the Apostle disputes expresly in his Epistle unto the Romans and the Galatians, to save them, if it were possible, from that ruine they were casting themselves into. Hereon the Elect obtained, but the rest were hard ned. For hereby they made an absolute renunciation of the Promise, wherein alone God had enwrapped the way of life and salvation.
nature and substance of that Covenant which God made with that People; a particular temporary Covenant it was, and not a meer dispensation of the Covenant of Grace.
That which remains for the declaration of the mind of the Holy Ghost in this whole matter, is to declare the differences that are between those two Covenants, whence the one is said to be better than the other, and to be built upon better Promises.
Those of the Church of Rome, do commonly place this difference in three things.
1. In the Promises of them, which in the Old Covenant were temporal onely; in the New, spiritual and heavenly.
2. In the Precepts of them; which under the Old, required onely external Obeoutward man; under the New, they are internal, respecting principally the inner man of the heart.
3. In their Sacraments: For these under the Old Testament, were only outwardly figurative, but those of the New, are
But these things do not express much, if any thing at all, of what the Scripture placeth this difference in. And besides, as by some of them explained, they are not true, especially the two latter of them. For I cannot but somewhat admire how it came into the heart or mind of any man to think or say, that God ever gave a Law or Laws, Precept or Precepts, that should respect the outward man onely, and the regulation of external duties. A thought of it is contrary unto all the essential Properties of the Nature of God, and meet only to ingenerate apprehensions of him unsuited unto all his glorious excellencies. The life and foundation of all the Laws under the Old Testament was, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy Soul, without which no outward Obedience was ever accepted with him. And for the third of the supposed differences, neither were the Sacraments of the Law so barely figurative, but that they did exhibit Christ unto Believers; for they all drank of the spiritual Rock, which Rock was Christ; nor are those of the Gosoperative of Grace, but that without Faith they are useless unto them that do receive them.
The things wherein this difference doth consist, as expressed in the Scripture, are partly circumstantial, and partly substantial, and may be reduced unto the Heads ensuing.
1. These two Covenants differ in the circumstance of time as to their promulJeremiah in the 9th verse of this Chapter, where it must be more fully spoken unto. In brief, the first Covenant was made at the time that God brought the children of Israel out of Egypt, and took its date from the third month after their coming up from thence, Exod. 19. Chap. 24. From what is reported in the latter place, wherein the people give their actual consent unto the terms of it, it began its formal obligation as a Covenant. And we must afterwards enquire when it was abrogated and ceased to oblige the Church. The New Covenant was declared and made known in the latter days, Heb. 1. 1. in the dispensation of the fulness of time, Eph. 1. 10. And it took date as a Covenant formally obliging the whole Church from the Death, Resurrection, Ascension of Christ, and sending of the HoEpocha of this Covenant, because though principally it was established by the first, yet was it not absolutely obligatory as a Covenant until after the last of them.
2. They differ in the circumstance of place as to their promulgation, which the Scripture also taketh notice of. The first was declared in Mount Sinai, the manstation of the people in receiving the Law, I have in my Exercitations unto the first Part of this Exposition, at large declared, and thither the Reader is referred,
3. They differ in the manner of their promulgation and establishment. There were two things remarkable that accompanied the Solemn Declaration of the first Covenant.
1. The dread and terror of the outward appearance on Mount Sinai which filled all the People, yea Moses himself, with fear and trembling, Hebr. 12. 18, 19, 20, 21. Exod. 19. 16. Chap. 20. 18, 19. Together herewith, was a Spirit of Fear and Bondage administred unto all the People, so as that they chose to keep at a distance, and not draw nigh unto God, Deut. 5, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27.
2. That it was given by the ministry and disposition of Angels, Acts 7. 13. Gal. 3. 19. Hence the People was in a sense put in subjection unto Angels, and they had an authoritative ministry in that Covenant. The Church that then was, was put into some kind of subjection unto Angels, as the Apostle plainly intimates, Hebr. 2. 5. Hence the worshipping or adoration of Angels began among the PeoCol. 2. 18. Which some, with an addition unto their Folly and Superstition, would introduce into the Christian Church, wherein they have no such authoritative Ministry as they had under the Old Covenant.
Things are quite otherwise in the promulgation of the New Covenant. The Son of God in his own Person did declare it. This he spake from heaven, as the Apostle observes, in opposition unto the giving of the Law on the earth, Hebr. 12. 25. yet did he speak on the earth also; the mystery whereof himself declares, John 3. 13. And he did all things that belong unto the establishment of this Coweary, the burdened, the heavy and laden to come unto him. And by his Spirit he makes his Disciples to carry on the same work until the Covenant was fully declared, Hebr. 2. 3. see John 1. 17, 18.
And the whole Ministry of Angels in the giving of this Covenant, was meerly in a way of service and obedience unto Christ, and they owned themselves the Felhave the testimony of Jesus, Rev. 19. 10. So that this world to come as it was called of old, was no way put in subjection unto them.
4. They differ in their Mediators. The Mediator of the first Covenant was Moses. It was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator, Gal. 3. 19. And this was no other but Moses who was a Servant in the House of God, Hebr. 3. 6. And he was a Mediator as designed of God, so chosen of the people in that dread and consternation which befell them, upon the terrible promulgation of the Law. For they saw that they could no way bear the immediate presence of God, nor treat with him in their own persons. Wherefore they desired that there might be an Internuntius, a Mediator between God and them, and that Moses might be the person, Deut. 5. 25, 26, 27. But the Mediator of the New Covenant, is the Son of God himself. For there is one God, and one Mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself a ransom for all, 1 Tim. 2. 4, 5. He who is the Son, and the Lord over his own House, graciously undertook in his own Person to be the Mediator of this Covenant; and herein it is unspeakably preferred be
5. They differ in their subject matter, both as unto Precepts and Promises, the advantage being still on the part of the New Covenant. For
(1) The Old Covenant in the preceptive part of it, renewed the Command of the Covenant of Works, and that on their original terms. Sin it forbad, that is all and every sin in matter and manner, on the pain of death, and gave the promise
perfect sinless obedience only. Whence the Decalogue itself, which is a Transcript of the Law of Works, is called the Covenant, Exod. 34. 28. And besides this, as we observed before, it had other Precepts innumerable, accommoaccomplishment and establishment of the Covenant of Works, both as unto its Commands and SanCommands of it as unto the obedience of the Covenanters are not grievous, the yoke of Christ being easie, and his burden light.
2. The Old Testament absolutely considered, had
(1) No promise of grace, to communicate spiritual strength, or to assist us in obedience; nor
(2) Any of eternal life, no otherwise but as it was contained in the promise of the Covenant of Works, The man that doth these things, shall live in them; and
(3) Had promises of temporal things in the Land of Canaan inseparable from it. In the New Covenant all things are otherwise, as will be declared in the ExpoVerses.
6. They differ, and that principally, in the manner of their Dedication and Sanction. This is that which gives any thing
7. They differ in the Priests that were to officiate before God in the behalf of the People. In the Old Covenant Aaron and his Posterity alone were to discharge that Office; in the New, the Son of God himself is the only Priest of the Church. This difference, with the advantage of the Gospel state thereon, we have handled at large in the Exposition of the Chapter foregoing.
8. They differ in the Sacrifices whereon the Peace and Reconciliation with God which is tendred in them, doth depend. And this also must be spoken unto in the ensuing Chapter, if God permit.
9. They differ in the way and manner of their solemn writing or enrollment. All Covenants were of old solemnly written in Tables of Brass or Stone, where they might be faithfully preserved for the use of the Parties concerned. So the Old Covenant as to the principal fundamental part of it, was engraven in Tables of Stone, which were kept in the Ark, Exod. 31. 18. Deut. 9. 10. 2 Cor. 3. 7. And God did so order it in his Providence, that the first draught of them should be brofleshly Tables of the hearts of them that do believe, 2 Cor. 3. 3. Jer. 31. 33.
10. They differ in their ends. The principal end of the first Covenant was to discover sin, to condemn it, and to set Bounds unto it. So saith the Apostle, It was added because of transgressions. And this it did several ways.
(1) By Conviction; for the knowledge of sin is by the Law; it convinced sinners, and caused every mouth to be stopped before God.
condemning the Sinner in an application of the Sanction of the Law unto his Conscience.
(3) By the judgments and punishments wherewith on all occasions it was accompanied. In all it manifested and represented the justice and severity of God. The end of the New Covenant is, to declare the love, grace and mercy of God, and therewith to give Repentance, Remission of Sin, and Life Eternal.
11. They differed in their effects. For the first Covenant being the ministration of death and condemnation, it brought the minds and spirits of them that were under it,
1. The Renovation of the terms and sanction of the Covenant of Works contriSinai, which therefore gendred unto bondage. All the prospect they had of deliverance was from the Promise.
2. It arose from the manner of the delivery of the Law, and Gods entring there
3. From the severity of the Penalties annexed unto the Transgression of the Law. And God had taken upon himself, that where punishment was not exacted according to the Law, he himself would cut them off. This kept them always anxious and sollicitous, not knowing when they were safe or secure.
4. From the Nature of the whole Ministry of the Law, which was the ministration of death and condemnation, 2
5. From the Darkness of their own minds in the means, ways and causes of deliverance from all these things. It is true, they had a promise before of Life and Salvation, which was not abolished by this Covenant, even the Promise made unto
6. It was increased by the yoke of a multitude of Laws, Rites and Ceremonies imposed on them, which made the whole of their Worship a burden unto them, and unsupportable, Acts 15. 9.
In and by all these ways and means there was a Spirit of Bondage and Fear ad
On the other hand, the New Covenant gives liberty and boldness, the liberty and boldness of Children unto all Believers. It is the Son in it that makes us free, or gives us universally all that liberty which is any way needful for us, or useful unto us. For where the Spirit of God is, there is liberty, namely, to serve God not in the oldness of the Letter, but in the newness of the Spirit. And it is declared that this
Abraham, namely, that we being delivered from the hands of all our enemies, might serve God without fear all the days of our lives, Luke 1. 72, 73, 74, 75. And we may briefly consider wherein this Deliverance and Liberty by the New Covenant doth consist, which it doth in the things ensuing.
1. In our freedom from the commanding power of the Law, as to sinless perlife and salvation. For unthe end of the Law for Righteousness to every one that believeth, Rom. 10. 4.
2. In our freedom from the condemning power of the Law, and the Sanction of it in the Curse. This being undergone and answered by him, who was made a curse for us, we are freed from it, Rom. 7. 6. Gal. 3, 13, 14. And therein also are we delivered from the fear of death, Heb. 2. 15. as it was paenal, and an entrance into judgment or condemnation, John 5. 24.
3. In our freedom from conscience for sin, Heb. 10. 2. That is, Conscience dissprinkled from an evil conscience by the blood of Christ.
4. In our freedom from the whole System of Mosaical Worship in all the Rites and Ceremonies, and Ordinances of it, which what a burden it was, the Apostles do deActs 15. and our Apostle at large in his Epistle to the Galatians.
5. From all the Laws of men in things appertaining unto the Worship of God, 1 Cor. 7. 23. And by all these, and the like instances of spiritual liberty, doth the Gospel free Believers from that Spirit of bondage unto fear, which was administred under the Old Covenant.
It remains only that we point at the Heads of those Ways whereby this Liberty is communicated unto us under the New Covenant. And it is done
1. Principally, by the grant and communication of the Spirit of the Son as a Spirit of Adoption, giving the freedom, boldness and liberty of children, John 1. 12. Rom. 8. 15, 16, 17. Gal. 4. 6, 7. From hence the Apostle lays it down as a certain Rule, that where the Spirit of God is, there is liberty, 2 Cor. 3. 17. Let men pretend what they will, let them boast of the freedom of their outward condition in this world, and of the inward liberty or freedom of their wills, there is indeed no true liberty where the Spirit of God is not. The ways whereby he giveth freedom, power, a sound mind, spiritual boldness, courage and contempt of the Cross, holy confidence before God, a readiness for obedience and enlargedness of heart in duties, with all other things wherein true liberty doth consist, or which any way belongs unto it, I must not here divert to declare. The world judges that there is
2. It is obtained by the evidence of our justification before God, and the causes of it. This men were greatly in the dark unto, under the first Covenant, although all stable peace with God doth depend thereon. For it is in the Gospel, that the Righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith, Rom. 1. 17. Indeed the Righteousness of God without the Law, is witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, Rom. 3. 21. That is, Testimony is given to it in legal Institutions, and the Promises re
3. By the spiritual light which is given to Believers into the mystery of God in Christ. This the Apostle affirms to have been hid in God from the beginning of the world, Eph. 3. 9. It was contrived and prepared in the counsel and wisdom of
intimation was given of it in the first Promise, and was afterwards shadowed out by sundry legal Institutions. But the depth, the glohid in God, in his mind and will, until it was fully revealed in the Gospel. The Saints under the Old Testament believed that they should be delivered by the promised Seed, that they should be saved for the Lords sake, that the Angel of the Covenant would save them, yea, that the Lord himself would come to his Temple; and they diligently enquired into what was foresignified concerning the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should ensue. But all this while their thoughts and conceptions were exceedingly in the dark as to those glorious things which are made so plain in the New Covenant, concerning the Incarnation, Mediation, Sufferings and Sacrifice of the Son of God, concerning the way of Gods being in Christ reconciling the World unto himself. Now as dark
4 We obtain this liberty by the opening of the way into the Holiest, and the entrance we have thereby with boldness unto the Throne of Grace. This also the Apostle insists upon peculiarly in sundry places of his ensuing Discourses, as
5. By all the Ordinances of Gospel-Worship. How the Ordinances of Worship under the Old Testament did lead the People into Bondage, hath been declared. But all those of the New Testament, through their plainness in signification, their imEvangelical liberty. And of such importance is our liberty in this instance of it, that when the Apostles saw it necessary for the avoiding of offence and scandal, to continue the observance of one or two legal Institutions, in abstinence from some things in themselves indifa season, and declared that it was only in case of scandal, that they would allow this temporary abridgment of the liberty given us by the Gospel.
12. They differ greatly with respect unto the Dispensation and Grant of the Holy Ghost. It is certain, that God did grant the Gift of the Holy Spirit under the Old Testament, and his operations during that season as I have at large elsewhere de
the Declaration made in them of the Kingdom of God. It is the observation of Austin, that the very name of the Kingdom of Heaven is pecureigned in and over the Church unLand of Canaan, and the flourishing conappearance of a Kingdom of this world. And that it was so, and was so to be, consisting in Empire, Power, Victory, Wealth and Peace was so deeply sixed on the minds of the generality of the PeoDisciples of Christ themselves could not free themselves of that appreKingdom of God, where it is, and wherein it consists, is plainly and evidently declared, unto the unspeakable consolation of Believers. For whereas it is now known and experienced to be internal, spiritual and heavenly, they have no less assured interest in it, and advantage by it, in all the troubles which they may undergo in this World, than they could have in the fullest possession of all earthly enjoyments.
14. They differ in their substance and end. The Old Covenant was typical, shadowy and removeable, Heb. 10. 1. The New Covenant is substantial and permanent, as containing
15. They differ in the extent of their administration, according unto the Will of God. The first was confined unto the Posterity of Abraham, according to the flesh, and unto them especially in the Land of Canaan, with some few Proselytes that were joined unto them, Deut. 5. 3. excluding all others from the participation of the benefits of it. And hence it was, that whereas the personal Ministry of our SaPeople of Israel, Mat. 15. 24. And he was the Minister of the Circumcision, Rom. 15. 8. such narrow bounds and limits had the Administration of this Covenant affixed unto it by the will and pleasure of God, Psal. 141. 19, 20. But the Administration of the New Covenant is extendall Nations under Heaven, none being excluded on the account of Tongue, Language, Family, Nation, or place of Habitation. All have an equal interest in the rising Sun. The partition wall is broken down, and the gates of the new JeruMatt. 28. 19. Mark 16. 15. John 11. 51, 52. John 12. 32. Acts 11. 18. Acts 17. 30. Gal. 5. 6. Ephes. 2. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. Chap. 3. 8, 9, 10. Col. 3. 10, 11. 1 John 2. 12. Rev. 5. 9. This is the grand Charter of the poor wandering Gentiles. Having wilfully fallen off from God, he was pleased in his Holiness and Severity to leave all our Ancestors for many Generations to serve and worship the Devil. And the mystery of our recohid in God from the foundation of the world, Ephes. 3. 8, 9, 10. And although it was so foretold, so prophesied of, so promised under the Old Testament; yet such was the Pride, Blindness and Obstinacy of the greatest part of the Church of the Jews, that its accomplishment was one great part of that stumbling Block whereat they fell; yea, the greatness and glory of this mystery was such, that the Disciples of Christ themselves comprehended it not, until it was testified unto them, by the pouring out of the Holy Ghost, the great Promise of the New Covenant, upon some of those poor Gentiles, Acts 11. 18.
16. They differ in their efficacy. For the Old Covenant made nothing perfect, it could effect none of the things it did represent, nor introduce that
Lastly, They differ in their duration; for the one was to be removed, and the other to abide for ever, which must be declared on the ensuing Verses.
It may be other things of an alike nature may be added unto these that we have mentioned, wherein the difference between the two Covenants doth consist; But these instances are sufficient unto our purpose. For some when they hear that the Covenant of Grace was always one and the same, of the same nature and efficacy under both Testaments, that the way of Salvation by Christ was always one and the same, are ready to think that there was no such great difference between their state and ours as is pretended. But we see that on this Supposition, that Covenant which God brought the People into at Sinai, and under the yoke whereof they were to abide until the New Covenant was established, had all the disadvantages attendCovenant of Grace, as to the administration of it by the introduction and establishment of the New Cove
There remaineth yet one thing more which the Socinians give us occasion to speak unto from these words of the Apostle, that the New Covenant is established on better Promises. For from hence they do conclude, that there were no Promises of Life under the Old Testament, which in the latitude of it is a sensless and bru
1. The Apostle in this place intends only those Promises whereon the New Testalegally ratified and reduced into the form of a Covenant, which were, as he declares, the Promises of especial pardoning mercy, and of the efficacy of Grace in the renovation of our Natures. But it is granted that the other Covenant was legally established on Promises which respected the Land of Canaan. Wherefore it is granted that as to the Promises whereby the Covenants were actually established, those of the New Covenant were better than the other.
2. The Old Covenant had express Promises of eternal life. He that doth these things shall live in them. It was indeed with respect unto perfect Obedience that it gave that Promise; however that Promise it had, which is all that at present we enquire after.
3. The Institution of Worship which belonged unto that Covenant, the whole Ministry of the Tabernacle as representing heavenly things, had the nature of a Promise in them; for they all directed the Church to seek for Life and Salvation in and by Jesus Christ alone.
4. The question is not what Promises are given in the Law itself, or the Old Covenant formally considered as such; but what Promise they had who lived under that Covenant, and which were not disannnlled by it. For we have proved suffirst Promise, and that given unto Abraham confirmed with the Oath of God were not Promises of eternal life, is to overthrow the whole Bible, both Old Testa
1. That although one state of the Church hath had great Advantages and Priviledges above another, yet no State had whereof to complain, whilest they observed the terms prescribed unto them. We have seen in how many things, and those most of them of the highest importance, the state of the Church under the New Covenant, excel
1. It was a state of near Relation unto God by vertue of a Covenant. And when all Mankind had absolutely broken Covenant with God by sin, to call any of them into a New Covenant Relation with himself, was an Act of Soveraign Grace and Mercy. Herein were they distinguished from the residue of Mankind, whom God suffered to walk in their own ways, and winked at their ignorance, whilest they perished all in the pursuit of their foolish imaginations. This a great part of the Book of Deuteronomy is designed to impress a sense of upon the minds of the People; and it is summarily expressed by the Psalmist, Psal. 147. 19, 20. And by
We are thine, thou never bearest Rule over them; thy Name was not called upon by them, Isa. 64. 19.
2. This Covenant of God was in it self holy, just and equal. For although there was in it an imposition of sundry things burthensom, they were such as God in his infinite wisdom saw necessary for that People, and such as they could not have been without. Hence on all occasions God refers it even unto themselves to judge whether his ways towards them were not equal, and their own unequal; and it was not only just, but attended with Promises of unspeakable advantages above all other People whatever.
3. God dealing with them in the way of a Covenant, whereunto the mutual consent of all Parties Covenanting is required, it was proposed unto them for their acceptance, and they did accordingly willingly receive it, Exod. 24. Deut. 5. so as that they had not whereof to complain.
4. In that state of Discipline wherein God was pleased to hold them, yet they enjoyed the way of life and salvation in the Promise; for as we have shewed at large, the Promise was not disannulled by the introduction of this Covenant. Wherefore although God reserved a better and more compleat state for the Church under the New Testament, having ordained better things for us, that they without us should not be made perfect; yet was that other state in itself good and holy, and sufficient to bring all Believers unto the enjoyment of God.
2. The state of the Gospel, or of the Church under the New Testament being accompanied with the highest spiritual Priviledges and Advantages that it is capable of in this world, two things do thence follow.
1. The great Obligation that is on all Believers unto holiness and fruitfulness in obedience unto the glory of God. We have here in the utmost condescension of Divine Grace, and the greatest effects of it that God will communicate on this side Glory. That which all these things tend unto, that which God requireth and ex
2. The Heinousness of their Sin by whom this Covenant is neglected or despiChap. 2. 2, 3. Chap. 10. 28, 29.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
For if that first[Covenant]had been blameless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
IN this Verse, and so also in those that follow unto the end of this Chapter, the Apostle designeth a confirmation of what he had before asserted and undertathat there is a necessity of a new and better Covenant, accompanied with better Promises and more excellent Ordinances of Worship than the former. Hereon it follows, that the first was to be disannulled and abolished, which was the main Thesis he had to prove. And there are two parts of his Argument to this purpose. For first he proveth, that on the supposition of another better Covenant to be introduced, it did unavoidably follow, that the first was to be abo
What he had before confirmed in sundry particular Instances, he summarily congeneral Argument in this Verse, and that built on a Principle geneAll the Priviledges, all the Benefits and Advantages of the Aaronical Priesthood and Sacrifices, do all belong unto the Covenant whereunto they were annexed, a chief part of whose outward administrations consisted in them. This the
Hereon he subsumes; But there is mention of another Covenant to be made with the whole Church, and to be introduced long after the making of that at Sinai. Neither could this be denied by them. However to put it out of Controversie, the Apostle proves it by an express Testimony of the Prophet Jeremiah. In that Testimony it is peculiarly declared, that this New Covenant that was promised to be introduced in the latter days, should be better and more excellent than the former, as is maverse the Apostle proceeds no further, but unto the general consideration of Gods promising to make another Covenant with the Church, and what would follow thereon.
From this Supposition the Apostle proves, that the first Covenant is imperfect, blameable, and removeable; and the force of his Inference depends on a common Notion or Presumption that is clear and evident in its own light. And it is this, Where once a Covenant is made and established, if it will serve unto and effect all that he who makes it doth design, and exhibit all the good which he intends to communicate, there is no reason why another Covenant should be made. The making of a New for no other ends or purposes but what the Old was every way sufficient for, argues lightness and mutability in him that made it. Unto this purpose doth he argue,
Sinai, or not like unto it, as the Prophet speaks, is sufficient of it self to overthrow the vain preJews wherein they are hardned to this day. The absolute perpeSinai is the principal fundamental article of their present faith or rather unbelief. But this is framed by them in direct opposition unto the Promises of God. For let it be demanded of them whether they believe that God wil make another covenant with the Church, not according to the covenant which he made with their Fathers at Sinai. If they shall say they do not believe it, then do they plainly renounce the Prophets and the promi
The general design of the Apostle in this verse being cleared, we may consider the words more particularly. And there are two things in them.
1. A positive assertion included in a supposition. If the first Covenant had been blameless, had not been defective; that is, it was so.
2. The proof of this assertion; if it had not been so, place would not have been sought for a second, which that there was he proves in the following verses.
In the first part of the words there is. (1.) A causal conjunction rendring a reaFor (2.) The subject spoken of; that former Covenant, (3.) What is affirmed of it as the affirmation is included in a negative supposition. It was not blameless, it is not blameless.
1. The conjunction the better promises of the New TestLevitical Priesthood and the whole worship of the first Covenant depending thereon.
2. The Subject spoken of is that first; that is that former Covenant. The Covenant made with the Fathers at Sinai with all the Ordinances of worship thereunto belonging, whose nature and use we have before declared.
3. Hereof it is said Si culpâ vacasset. And so we, if it had been faultless. I am sure the expression is a little too harsh in our Translation and such as the Original word will not bear, at least doth not require. For it seems to intimate, that absolutely there was something faulty or blame worthy in the CoveGood, Just and Holy. There is indeed an intimation of a defect in it. But this was not with respect to its own particular end but with respect to another general end, whereunto it was not designed. That which is defective with respect unto its own particular end whereunto it is ordained, or which it is designed to accomplish, is really faulty. But that which is or may be so, with respect unto some other general end, which it was never designed to acGal. 3. 19, 20, 21, 22. We must therefore state the signification of the word from the subject matter that he treats about in this place: And this is the perfection and consummation, or the Sanctification and Salvation of the Church. With respect hereunto alone it is that he asserts the insufficiency and imperfection of the first Covenant. And the enHebrews was not whether the first Covenant was not in it self Good, Just, Holy and Blameless, every way perfect with respect unto its own
Arithmetick if it be perfectly taught, is suffifirst Covenant was not
blameless. If it had been such as unto which nothing more was required or needgeneral end God aimed at, it had been absolutely perfect. But this it was not, in that it never was designed for the means of it. To the same purpose he argues, Chap. 7. 11. 19. And with respect unto this end it is said that the Law was weak, Rom. 8. 3. Gal. 3. 21. Act. 13. 38, 39.
In brief, that which the Apostle designeth to prove is that the first Covenat was of that constitution, that it could not accomplish the perfect administration of the Grace of God unto the Church, nor was ever designed unto that end, as the Jews then falsely, and their posterity still foolishly also imagin it to have done.
The ensuing words in this verse include the general proof of his assertion concerThe promise of a new Covenant doth unavoidably prove insufficiency of the former, at least unto the ends for which the new one is promised. For otherwise unto what end serves the promise and covenant promised? But there is some difficulty in the manner of the exThe place of the second had not been sought; so the words lie in the Original. place of the second is no more but the second taking place; the bringing in, the introduction and establishment of it. And this is said to be sought, but improinsufficient for some end they do intend, they take counsell and seek out after other waies and means, or an agreement and covenant on such other terms as may be effectual unto their purpose. Wherefore this signifies no alteration, no defect in the wisdome and counsel of God, as unto what is now to be done, but only the outward change which he would now effect in the introduction of the new Covenant.
For as such changes among men are the issue of the alteration of their minds, and the effect of new counsels for the seeking out of new means for their end, so is this outward change in the taking away of the old Covenant and introduction of the new represented in God; being only the second part of his counsel or purpose which he had purposed in himself before the foundation of the World. And we may hence observe.
1. That what ever God had done before for the Church, yet he ceased not in his wisdom and grace, until he had made it partaker of the best and most blessed condition whereof in this world it is capable. He found out place for this better Covenant.
2. Let those unto whom the terms of the new Covenant are proposed in the Gospel take heed to themselves, that they sincerely embrace and improve them, for there is neither promsse nor hopes of any farther or fuller administration of grace.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
For finding fault with them,[complaining of them]he saith, Behold Ver. viii. the dayes come, saith the Lord, and I will make[when I will make]a new Covenant with the House ofIsrael,and the House ofJudah.
IN this Verse the Apostle entreth upon the Proof of his Argument laid down in that foregoing. And this was, that the first Covenant was not
Of this Covenant so to be introduced, he declareth in the Testimony of the Pro
(1) The qualification of it, or its especial Adjunct; it was new, ver. 8.
(2.) A description of it; first, Negative with respect unto the old, ver. 9. 2dly, Positive in its nature and effectual properties, ver. 10, 11, 12. From all which he inferreth the conclusion which he was contending for, inforced with a new consiver. 13. which is the Sum of the last Part of this Chapter.
There are two general Parts of this Verse.
(1) The Introduction of the Testimony to be improved from the occasion of it, as expressed by the Apostle.
(2) The Testimony itself, which he insists on.
The first is in these words; For finding fault with them he saith. Wherein we have (1) The note of Connexion; (2) The ground whereon the Testimo
1. There is the causal Conjunction
For, which gives them connexion unto Verse. That which is designed, is the confirmation of the foregothat place was sought for another Covenant, which evinced the insufficiency of the former,
2. There is the ground intimated, of what is affirmed in the ensuing Testimounblameable. Therefore the Apostle shews, that God brought it in in a way of blame. He did it finding fault with them.
3. These words may be diversly distinguished and read. For (1) placing the note of distinction thus, finding fault, complaining, blaming; he saith unto them: so that expression finding fault, respects the Covenant itself. Piscator was the first that I know of, who thus distinguished the words, who is followed by Schlictingius and others. But place the note of distinction at English Translation; For finding fault with them (that is the People) he saith; and
The Reasons for fixing the distinction in the first place are (1) Because finding fault, answers directly unto was not without fault. And this contains the true Reason why the New Covenant was brought in. And (2) It was not Gods complaint of the People, that was any cause of the introduction of the New Covenant, but of the Old Covenant itself, which was in
(1) Although the first Covenant was not every way perfect with respect unto Gods general end towards his Church, yet it may be it is not so safe to say, that God complained of it. When things or persons change the state and condition wherein they were made or appointed of God, he may complain of them, and that justly. So when man filled the world with wickedness, it is said, that he repented him at his heart that he made man upon the earth. But when they abide unaltered in the state wherein they were made by him, he hath no reason to complain of them; and so it was with the first Covenant. So our Apostle disputes about the Law, that all the weakness and imperfection of it arose from sin, where there was no reason to complain of the Law, which in itself was holy, just and good.
(2) God doth in this Testimony actually complain of the People, namely, that they brake his Covenant, and expresseth his indignation thereon, he regarded them not. But there is not in this Testimony, nor in the whole Context or Prophesie whence it is taken, nor in any other place of Scripture any word of complaint against the Covenant itself, though its imperfection as unto the general end of perfecting the Church State, be here intimated.
(3) There is an especial Remedy expressed in the Testimony against the evil which God complains of, or finds fault with in the People. This was, that they continued not in his Covenant. This is expresly provided against in the Promise of this New Covenant, ver. 10. Wherefore
(4) God gives this Promise of a New Covenant, together with a complaint against the People, that it might be known to be an effect of free and soveraign grace. There was nothing in the People to procure it, or to qualifie them for it, unless it were that they had wickedly broken the former. And we may hence ob
1. God hath oft-times just cause to complain of his People, when yet he will not utterly cast them off. It is meer mercy and grace that the Church at all seasons lives upon; but in some seasons, when it falls under great provocations, they are signa
2. It is the Duty of the Church to take deep notice of Gods complaints of them. This indeed is not in the Text, but ought not to be passed by on this occasion of the mention of Gods complaining, or finding fault with them. And God doth not thus find fault only when he speaks immediately by new Revelations, as our Lord Jesus Christ found fault with, and rebuked his Churches, in the Revelation made unto the Apostle John, but he doth it continually by the Rule of the Word. And it is the especial Duty of all Churches, and of all Believers, to search diligently into what God finds fault withall, in his Word, and to be deeply affected therewith, so far as they find themselves guilty. Want hereof is that which hath laid most Churches in the world under a fatal security. Hence they say or think, or carry themselves, as though they were rich and increased in Goods, and had need of nothing, when indeed they are wretched and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked. To consider what God
(1) The times and seasons that are passing over them. God brings his Church under variety of seasons; and in them all, requires especial duties from them, as those wherein he will be glorified in each of them. If they miss it hereblames and complains of. Faithfulness with God in their generation, that is, in the especial duties of the times and seasons wherein they live, is that which Noah and David, and other holy men are commended for. Thus there are seasons of the great abounding of wickedness in the world, seasons of great Apostasie from Truth and Holiness; seasons of Judgment and of Mercy, of Persecution and Tranquility. In all those, and the like, God requireth especial duties of the Church, whereon his glory in them doth much depend. If they fail here, if they are not faithful as unto their especial duty, God in his Word finds fault with them, and lays them under blame. And as much wisdom is required hereunto, so I do not judge that any Church can discharge its duty in any competimes and seasons, and an application of our selves unto the duties of them, consists that Testimony which we are to give unto God and the Gospel in our Generation. That Church which considers not its especial duty in the days wherein we live, is fast asleep, and it may be doubted whether when it is awaked, it will find oil in its vessel or no.
(2) The Temptations which are prevalent, and which unavoidably we are exposed unto. Every age and time hath its especial temptations. And it is the Will of God that the Church should be exercised with them and by them; and it were easie to manifest, that the darkness and ignorance of men in not discerning the especial temptations of the Age wherein they have lived, or neglecting of them, have been al
Ob. 3. God often surprizeth the Church with Promises of Grace and Mercy. In this place where God complaineth of the People, findeth fault with them, charging them for not continuing in his Covenant, and declares that as unto any thing in themselves he regarded them not, it might be easily expected that he would proceed unto their utter casting off and rejection. But instead hereof God surpriseth them as it were with the most eminent Promise of Grace and Mercy that ever was made or could be made unto them. So he doth in like manner, Isa. 7. 13, 14. Chap. 54. 17, 18, 19. And this he will do,
(1) That he may glorifie the riches and freedom of his Grace. This is his principal end in all his dispensations towards his Church. And how can they be made more conspicuous than in the exercise of them, then when a People are so far from all appearance of any desert of them, as that God declares his judgment that they deserve his utmost displeasure?
(2) That none who have the least remainder of sincerity, and desires to fear the Name of God, may utterly faint and despond at any time under the greatest confluence of discouragements. God can come in, and will oft-times, in a way of soveraign grace, for the relief of the most dejected sinners. But we must proceed with our Exposition.
2. The second thing contained in this Verse, is the Testimony itself insisted on. And there is in the Testimony,
1. The Author of the Promise declared in it, He saith; as afterwards, Saith the Lord.
2. The Note of its Introduction, signalizing the thing intended, Behold.
3. The time of the accomplishment of what is here foretold, and here promidays come wherein.
4. The thing promised is a Covenant, concerning which is expressed, (1) He that makes it, I; I will make. (2) Those with whom it is made, The House of Israel, and the House of Judah. (3) The manner of its making, property of it, it is a New Covenant.
1. He who gives this Testimony is included in tht word he saith. For
finding fault with them, he saith. He who complains of the People for breaking the Old Covenant, promiseth to make the New. So in the next Verse it is expresSaith the Lord. The Ministry of the Prophet was made use of in the declara
1. He saith, that is saith the Lord, is the formal object of our faith and obedience. Hereinto are they to be refered, herein do they acquiesce, and in nothing else will they so do. All other foundations of Faith, as thus saith the Pope, or thus saith the Church, or thus said our Ancestors, are all but delusions. Thus saith the Lord, gives rest and peace.
Note of Introduction calling unto attendance, Behold. It is always found eminent either in itself, or in some of its circumstances that is thus performed. For the word calls for a more than ordinary diligence in the consideration of an attention unto what is proposed. And it was needful to signalize this Promise; for the People unto whom it was given were very difficultplainly proposed unto them concerned, so as that they may look upon it, and behold it clearly and speedily. And so is this New Covenant, here proposed so evidently and plainly, both in the entire nature and properties of it, that unless men wilfully turn away their eyes, they cannot but see it.
2. Where God placeth a Note of Observation and Attention, we should carefully fix our Faith and Consideration. God sets not any of his marks in vain. And if upon the first view of any place or thing so signalized, the evidence of it doth not appear unto us, we have a sufficient call unto farther diligence in our enquiry. And if we are not wanting unto our Duty, we shall discover some especial impression of Divine Excellency or another upon every such thing or place.
3. The things and concernments of the New Covenant, are all of them Objects of the best of our consideration. As such are they here proposed; and what is spoken of the declaration of the nature of this Covenant in the next Verse, is sufficient to confirm this Observation.
3. The time is prefixed for the accomplishment of this Promise, The days come. Known unto God are all his works from the founthe sojourning of the children of Israel in Egypt, of the Babylonish Captivity, and of the coming of the Messiah after the return of the People, Dan. 9. But from the giving of the first Promise, wherein the foundation of the Church was laid, the accomplishment of it is frelatter days. See our Exposition on Chap. 1. ver. 1. Hence under the Old Testament the days of the Messiah were called the world to come, as we have shewed, Chap. 2. 5. And it was a Periphrasis of him, that he was He that was to come. And the Faith of the Church was principally exercised in the expectation of his coming. And this time is here intended. And the expression in the Original is in the Present Tense, Hebrew
The days coming, not the days that come, but the days come. And two things are denoted thereby.
1. The near approach of the days intended. The time was now hastening apace, and the Church was to be awaken'd unto the expectation of it. And this accompanied with their earnest desires and prayers for it, which were the most ac
2. A certainty of the thing itself was hereby fixed in their minds. Long exBabylonish Captivity. For this seemMalachi speaking of the same season, affirms, That the Lord whom they sought, should suddenly come unto his Temple, Mal. 3. 1.
Ob. There is a time limited and fixed for the accomplishment of all the Promises of God, and all the Purposes of his Grace towards the Church. See Hab. 2. 3, 4. And the Consideration hereof is very necessary unto Believers in all Ages.
1. To keep up their hearts from desponding, when difficulties against their accomplishment do arise, and seem to render it impossible. Want here
(2) To preserve them from putting themselves on any irregular ways for their accomplishment.
(3) To teach them to search diligently into the wisdom of God, who hath dis
4. The Subject matter of the Promise given is a Covenant,
a Testament. And that is more proper in this place than a Covenant in a strict and proper sense, it hath indeed no place between God and man. For a Covenant strictly taken, ought to proceed on equal terms, and a proportionate consideration of things on both sides. But the Covenant of God is founded on Grace, and consists essentially in a free undeserved Promise. And therefore a Covenant is never spoken of between God and man, but on the part of God it consists in a free Promise, or a Testament. And a Testament which is the proper signification of the word here used by the Apo
(1) Such a Covenant is intended as is ratified and confirmed by the death of him that makes it. And this is properly a Testament. For this Covenant was conTestator, and as it was accompanied with the blood of a Sacrifice, whereof we must treat after
(2) It is such a Covenant, as wherein the Covenanter, he that makes it, bequeatheth his Goods unto others in the way of a Legacy. For this is done by Christ herein, as we must also declare afterwards. Wherefore our Saviour calls this Co
1. Because it was confirmed by death; that is, the death of the Sacrifices that were slain and offered at its solemn establishment. So faith our Apostle, The first Testament was not dedicated without blood, Chap. 9. 15. But there is more requi
2. God did therein make over and grant unto the Church of Israel the good things of the Land of Canaan, with the Priviledges of his Worship.
3. The principal Reason of this denomination, the Old Testament, is taken from its being typically significative of the Death and Legacy of the great Testator, as we have shewed.
We have treated somewhat before concerning the Nature of the New Testament, as considered in distinction from, and opposition unto the Old. I shall here only briefly consider what concurreth unto the constitution of it, as it was then future, when this Promise was given, and as it is here promised. And three things do con
1. A Recapitulation, Collection and Confirmation of all the Promises of Grace that had been given unto the Church from the beginning, even all that was spoken by the mouth of the holy Prophets that had been since the world began, Luke 1. 70. The first Promise contained in it the whole essence and substance of the Covenant of Grace. All those afterwards given unto the Church on various occasions, were but explications and confirmations of it. In the whole of them there was a full declarahis Oath, namely, that they should be all accomplished in their appointed season. Whereas therefore the Covenant here promised included the sending of Christ for the accomplishment of those Promises, they are all gathered into one head therein. It is a constellation of all Promises of Grace.
actual Covenant or Testament two ways.
1. In that as unto the accomplishment of the grace principally intended in them, they received it in the sending of Christ; and as to the confirmation and establish
2. They are established as the Rule and Law of Reconciliation and Peace beterms of Peace between various Parties, with the confirmation of them.
3. They are reduced into such form of Law, as to become the only Rule of the Ordinances of Worship and Divine Service required of the Church. Nothing unto these ends is now presented unto us, or required of us, but what belongeth immeReader must consult what hath been discoursed at large unto this purpose on the 6th verse.
And we may see from hence, what it is that God here promiseth and foretelleth, as that which he would do in the days that were coming. For whereas they had the Promise before, and so virtually the grace and mercy of the New Covenant, it may be enquired what is yet wanting that should be promised solemnly under the name of a Covenant. For the full resolution of this question, I must, as before, reReader unto what hath been discoursed at large about the two Covenants, and the difference between them on ver. 6. Here we may briefly name some few things, sufficient unto the exposition of this place. As
1. All those Promises which had before been given out unto the Church from the beginning of the world, were now reduced into the form of a Covenant, or rather of a Testament. The name of a Covenant is indeed sometimes applied unto the Promises of Grace before or under the Old Testament. But a free, gratuitous Promise, Gen. 9. 9. Chap. 17. 4. But they were none of them, nor all of them together, reduced into the form of a Testament; which they could not be, but by the death of the Testator. And what blessed Priviledges and Benefits were included herein, hath been shewed before, and must yet further be insisted on in the Exposition of the 9th Chapter, if God permit.
2. There was another Covenant superadded unto the Promises which was to be the immediate Rule of the Obedience and Worship of the Church. And accordsuperadded Covenant, they were esteemed to have kept or broken Covenant with God. This was the Old Covenant in Sinai, as hath been declared. Wherefore the Promises could not be in the form of a Covenant unto the People, inasmuch as they could not be under the power of
3. Notwithstanding the Promises which they had received, yet the whole System of their Worship sprang from, and related unto the Covenant made at Sinai. But now God promiseth a new state of spiritual Worship relating only unto the Promises of grace as brought into the form of a Covenant.
The New Covenant as recollecting into one all the Promises of Grace given from the foundation of the World, accomplished in the actual exhibition of Christ, and confirmed in his death, and by the Sacrifice of his blood, thereby becoming the sole Rule of new spiritual Ordinances of Worship suited thereunto, was the great Object of the Faith of the Saints of the Old Testament, and is the great foundation of all our present mercies.
(1) There was in it a Recapitulation of all Promises of Grace. God had not made any promise, any intimation of his Love, or Grace unto the Church in geneall into this Covenant, so as that they should be esteemed all and every one of them, to be given and spoken unevery individual person that hath an interest in this Covenant. Hence all the Promises made unto Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, with all the other Patriarchs, and the Oath of God whereby they were confirmed, are all of them made unto us, and do belong unto us no less than they did unto them to whom they were first given, if we are made partakers of this Covenant. Hereof the Apostle gives an instance in the singular promise made unto Joshua, which he applies unto Believers, Chap. 13. 5. There was nothing of love nor grace in any of them, but was gathered up into this Covenant.
(2) The actual exhibition of Christ in the flesh, belonged unto this Promise of making a New Covenant; for without it, it could not have been made. This was the desire of all the Faithful from the foundation of the world; this they longed after, and fervently prayed for continually. And the prospect of it was the sole ground of their joy and consolation. Abraham saw his day and rejoiced. This was the great Priviledge which God granted unto them that walked uprightly beshall dwell on high, his place of defence shall be the munition of rocks; bread shall be given him, his waters shall be sure; thine eyes shall see the King in his beauty, they shall behold the land that is very far off, Isa. 33. 16, 17. That prospect they had by faith of the King of Saints in his beauty and glory, though yet at a great distance, was their relief and their reward in their sincere Obedience. And those who understand not the glory of this Priviledge of the New Covenant, in the Incarnation of the Son of God, or his exhibition in the flesh, wherein the depths of the counsels and wisdom of God in the way of grace, mercy and love, opened themselves unto the Church, are strangers unto the things of God.
(3) It was confirmed and ratified by the death and bloodshedding of Christ, and therefore included in it the whole work of his Mediation. This is the spring of the life of the Church; and until it was opened, great darkness was upon the minds of Believers themselves. What peace, what assurance, what light, what joy, depend hereon, and proceed from it, no Tongue can express.
(4) All Ordinances of Worship do belong hereunto. What is the benefit of them, what are the advantages which Believers receive by them, we must declare when we come to consider that comparison that the Apostle makes between them, and the carnal Ordinances of the Law, Chap. ix. Whereas therefore all these things were contained in the New Covenant, as here promised of God, it is evident how great was the concernment of the Saints under the Old Testa
5thly, The Author or Maker of this Covenant is expressed in the words, as also those with whom it was made. The first is included in the Person of the Verb, I will make; I will make, saith the Lord. It is God himself that makes this CoveI will make a Covenant; God hath made a Covenant. He hath made with me an everlasting Covenant. And sundry things are we taught therein.
(1) The freedom of this Covenant, without respect unto any merit, worth or condignity in them with whom it is made. What God doth, he doth freely, ex mera gratia & voluntate. There was no cause without himself for which he should make this Covenant, or which should move him so to do. And this we are eminently taught in this place, where he expresseth no other occasion of his mathe Sins of the People in breaking that which he formerly made with them. And it is expressed on purpose to declare the free and soveraigns grace, the goodness, love and mercy, which alone were the absolute springs of this Covenant.
The wisdom of its contrivance. The making of any Covenant to be good and useful, depends solely on the wisdom and foresight of them by whom it is made. Hence men do often make Covenants, which they design for their good and advantage, but they are so ordered for want of wisdom and foresight, that they turn unto their hurt and ruine. But there was infinite wisdom in the constitution of this Covenant, whence it is and shall be infinitely effective of all the blessed ends of it. And they are utterly unacquainted with it, who are not affected with an holy admiration of Divine Wisdom in its contrivance. A man might comforfinding out the Almighty in it unto perfection. Hence is it, that it is so Divine a Mystery in all the parts of it, which the wisdom of the flesh cannot comprehend. Nor with
(3) It was God alone who could prepare and provide a Surety for this CoveSurety in this Covenant, seeing no Covenant between God and man could be firm and stable without one, by reason of our weakness and mutability. And considering of what a nature this Surety must be, even God and man in one person, it is evident that God himself alone must make this Covenant. And the provision of this Surety doth contain in it the glo
(4) There is in this Covenant a soveraign Law of Divine Worship, wherein the Church is consummated, or brought into the most perfect estate whereof in this world it is capable, and established for ever. This Law could be given by God alone.
(5) There is ascribed unto this Covenant such an efficacy of grace, as nothing but Almighty Power can make good and accomplish. The grace here mentioned in the promises of it, directs us immediately unto its Author. For who else but God can write the Divine Law in our hearts, and pardon all our sins? The SanGod hath spoken once, twice have I heard this, that power belongeth unto God; also unto thee, O Lord, belongeth mercy, Psal. 62. 11, 12.
(6) The Reward promised in this Covenant is God himself. I am thy Reward. And who but God can ordain himself to be our Reward?
Ob. All the efficacy and glory of the New Covenant do originally arise from, and are resolved into the Author and Supreme Cause of it, which is God himself. And we might consider unto the encouragement of our Faith, and the strengthning of our consolation,
(1) His infinite condescension to make and enter into Covenant with poor, lost, fallen, sinful man. This no heart can fully conceive, no tongue can express; only we live in hope to have yet a more clear prospect of it, and to have an holy admi
(2) His wisdom, goodness and grace in the nature of that Covenant which he hath condescended to make and enter into. The first Covenant he made with us in Adam which we brake, was in itself good, holy, righteous and just; it must be so, because it was also made by him. But there was no provision made in it absufficiency of ability for our own preservation, so as we could no way fall but by a wilful Apostasie from him. But this Covenant is of that nature as that the grace administred in it, shall effectually preserve all the Covenanters unto the end, and secure unto them all the bene
(3) His power and faithfulness are engaged unto the accomplishment of all the Promises of it. And these Promises do contain every thing that is spiritually and eternally good or desirable unto us. O Lord our Lord, how excellent is thy Name
in all the Earth? How glorious art thou in the ways of thy grace towards poor sinful Creatures, who had destroyed themselves? And
(4) He hath made no created good, but himself only to be our Re
Secondly, The Persons with whom this Covenant is made are also expressed. The House of Israel, and the House of Judah. Long before the giving of this Promise, that People were divided into two parts. The one of them in way of distinction from the other, retained the name of Israel. These were the Ten Tribes which fell off from the House of David, under the conduct of Ephraim, whence they are often also in the Prophets called by that name. The other consisting of the Tribe properly so called, with that of Benjamin and the greatest part of Levi, took the name of Judah; and with them, both the Promise and the Church remained in a peculiar manner. But whereas they all originally sprang from Abraham, who reAbraham might be excluded from the tender of this Covenant. Unto the whole Seed of Abraham according to the flesh it was, that the terms and grace of this Covenant was first to be offered. So Peter tells them in his first Sermon, That the Promise was unto them and their Children who were there present, that is, the House of Judah, and to them that are afar off, that is the House of Israel in their dispersions, Acts 2. 39. So again he exAbraham, Acts 3. 25, 26. Ye are the Children of the Prophets, and of the Covenant which God made with our Fathers, saying unto Abraham, and in thy Seed shall all the Kindreds of the earth be blessed; unto you first, God having raised his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you; namely, in the preaching of the Gospel. So our Apostle in his Sermon unto them, affirmed that it was necessary that the Word should be first spoken unto them, Acts 13. 46. And this was all the Priviledge that was now left unto them. For the Partition-wall was now broken down, and all Obstacles against the Gentiles taken out of the way. Wherefore this House of Israel and of Judah may be considered two ways:
(1) As that People were the whole entire Posterity of Abraham.
(2) As they were typical, and mystically significant of the whole Church of God. Hence alone it is that the Promises of Grace under the Old Testament are given unto the Church under those names, because they were Types of them who should really and effectually be made Partakers of them.
In the first sense, God made this Covenant with them, and this on sundry ac
(1) Because He, in and through whom alone it was to be established and made effectual, was to be brought forth amongst them of the Seed of Abraham, as the Apostle plainly declares, Acts 2. 25.
(2) Because all things that belonged unto the Ratification of it, were to be transacted amongst them.
(3) Because in the outward dispensation of it, the terms and grace of it was first in the counsel of God to be tendred unto them.
(4) Because by them, by the Ministry of men of their Posterity, the dispensation of it was to be carried unto all Nations as they were to be blessed in the Seed of
The whole Church of elect Believers is intended under these denominations, being typified by them. These are they alone, being one made of twain, namely, Jews and Gentiles, with whom the Covenant is really made and established, and unto whom the grace of it is actually communicated. For all these with whom this Covenant is made, shall as really have the Law of God written in their hearts, and their sins pardoned, according unto the promise of it, as the People of old were brought into the Land of Canaan, by vertue of the Covenant made with Abraham. These are the true Israel and Judah prevailing with God, and confessing unto his Name.
Obs. The Covenant of Grace in Christ, is made only with the Israel of God the Church of the Elect. For by the making of this Covenant with any, the effectual communication of the grace of it unto them is principally intended. Nor can that Covenant be said to be made absolutely with any, but those whose sins are pardoCovenant was promised to be made with them. See Rom. 9. 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33. Chap. 11. 7. But in respect of the outward dispensation of the Covenant, it is extended beyond the effectual commuAbraham lie.
2. Those who are first and most advanced as unto outward Priviledges, are oftentimes last and least advantaged by the grace and mercy of them. Thus was it with these
3. The manner of making this Covenant, is expressed by perficiam, consummabo; I will perfect or consummate. In the Hebrew it is only pangam,
4. As unto its distinguishing Character, it is called a New Covenant; so it is with respect unto the Old Covenant made at Sinai. Wherefore by this Covenant as here considered, is not understood the promise of grace given unto Adam absoluteAbraham, which contained the substance and matter of it, the grace exhibited in it, but not the compleat Form of it as a Covenant. For if it were only the Promise, it could not be called a New Covenant with respect unto that made at Sinai. For so it was before it absolutely 2500 years, and in the perAbraham 400 years at the least. But it must be considered as before deSinai 800 years. Howbeit it may be called a New Covenant in other respects also. As first because of its eminency. So it is said of an eminent work of God, Behold I work a new thing in the earth; And its duration and continuance as that which shall never wax old, is denoted thereby.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
For the Quotation and Translation of these words out of the Prophet Jeremiah, the Reader may consult the
Non secundum Testamentum; secundum illud Testamentum, and so the Syriack,
Not according unto that Testament; others, faedus, and illud faedus. Of the different Translation of this word by a Testament and a Covenant, we have spoken before.
which I gave; quod feci, which I made;
Syriack omitting the Preposition, turns the Verb into gave; gave to the Fathers which is proper, cum Patribus eorum.
non permanserunt; others, perstiterunt. So the Syriack,
they stood not, they continued not. Maneo is used to express stability in Prout tu dicti Albani maneres; and tu modo promissis maneas. So is permaneo in officio, in Armis, in Amicitia, to continue stedfast unto the end. Wherefore it is as well so rendred, as by persisto.
Thycidydes,
to abide firm and constant in Covenants. And firm, stable, constant in Promises, and Engagements.
Ego neglexi, despexi, neglectui habui; Syr. I despised, I necurae non habeo, negligo, contemno; a word deno
Not according to that Covenant which I made with their fathers, in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land ofEgypt,because they continued not in my Covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
THE greatest and utmost mercies that God ever intended to communicate unNew Covenant. Nor doth the efficacy of the Mediation of Christ extend itself beyond the verge and compass thereof. For he is onely the Mediator and Surety of this Covenant. But now God had before made a Covenant with his People, a good and holy Coeffectual, but that multitudes of them with whom God made that Cotemporal benefits that were included therein. Wherefore as God hereon promiseth to make a New Covenant with
ineffectual. So must God give, and the Church receive one Covenant after another, and yet the ends of them never be obtained.
To obviate this Objection, and the Fear that thence might arise, God who prosafety of his Church, but also for their comfort and assurance, declares before-hand unto them, that it shall not be of the
And there are some things remarkable herein.
(1) That the Preface unto the Promise of this New Covenant, is a blame charged on the People finding fault with them, blaming them, charging them with sin against the Covenant that he had made with them.
(2) That yet this was not the whole ground and reason of making this New Covenant. It was not so, I say, that the People were not stedfast in it, and unto the terms of it. For had it been so, there would have no more been needful to re-inpardon their former sins, and renew the same Covenant unto them again, and give them another venture or trial thereon. But inasmuch as he would do so no more, but will make another Covenant of another nature with them, it is evident that there was some defect in the Covenant itself, it was not able to communicate those good things which God designed to bless the Church withall.
(3) These two things being the only reason that God gives, why he will make this New Covenant, namely, the sins of the People, and the insufficiency of the first Covenant to bring the Church into that blessed estate which he designed them; it is manifest that all his dealings with them for their spiritual and eternal good, are of meer soveraign grace, and such as he hath no motive unto, but in and from himself alone. There are sundry things contained in these words.
1. An Intimation that God had made a former Covenant with his People. Verses a repetition three times of making Covenant. And in every place in the Hebrew the same words are used Verb in every place. First he expresseth it by ver. 8. and in the last place by v. 10. alterable Covenant from that which was to be unalterable, and was confirmed with greater Solemnity. God made this CoChap. 12. 27. The change of the things that are shaken, is as of things that are made, made for a season; so made as to abide and endure for an appointed time only: such were all the things of this Covenant, and such was the Covenant itself. It had no Criteria Aeternitatis upon it, no evidences of an eternal duration. Nothing hath so but what is founded in the blood of Christ. He is the everlasting Father, or the immediate Author and Cause of every thing that is or shall be everlasting in the Church. Let men labour and contend about other things whilest they please. They are all shaken, and must be removed.
Obs. 1. The Grace and Glory of the New Covenant are much set off and manifested by the comparing of it with the Old. This is done here by God on purpose for the illustration of it. And it is greatly made use of in this Epistle, partly to prevail with us to accept of the terms thereof, and to abide faithful therein; and partly to declare how great is their sin, and how sore will be the destruction of them by whom it is neglected or despised. As these things are insisted on in other places, so are they the Subject of the Apostles discourse, Chap. 12. from ver. 15. unto the end.
2. All Gods Works are equally good and holy in themselves, but as unto the use and advantage of the Church, he is pleased to make some of them means of communicating more grace than others. Even this Covenant which the New
3. Though God makes an alteration in any of his Works, Ordinances of Worship or Institutions, yet he never changeth his intention, or the purpose of his Will. In all outward Changes there is with him no variableness nor shadow of turning. Known unto him are all his works from the foundation of the world; and whatever change there seems to be in them, it is all effected in pursuance of the unchangeable purpose of his Will concerning them all. It argued not the least change or shadow of turning in God, that he appointed the Old Covenant for a season, and for some cer
2. It is declared with whom this former Covenant was made, with their Fathers. Some Latine Copies read, cum Patribus vestris, with your Fathers.
of the House of Judah, and of the House of Israel in the third person, he continueth to speak still in the same. So likewise is it in the Protheir Fathers.
Their Fathers, their Progenitors, were those that this People always boasted of. For the most part, I confess, that they rose higher in their claim from them, than those here principally intended, namely, unto Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and the twelve Patriarchs. But in general their Fathers it was whereof they made their boast; and desired no more but only what might descend unto them in the right of these Fathers. And unto these God here sends them, and that for two ends.
1. To let them know that he had more grace and mercy to communicate unto the Church, than ever those Fathers of theirs were made partakers of. So would he take them off from boasting of them, or trusting in them.
2. To give warning by them to take heed how they behaved themselves under the tender of this new and greater mercy. For the Fathers here intended were those that God made the Covenant withall at Sinai. But it is known, and the Apostle hath declared at large in the third Chapter of this Epistle, how they brake and rejected this Covenant of God, through their unbelief and disobedience, so perishing in the Wilderness. These were those Fathers of the People with whom the first Covenant was made, and so they perished in their unbelief. A great warn
Ob. The disposal of Mercies and Priviledges as unto Times, Persons, Seasons, is wholly in the hand and power of God. Some he granted unto the Fathers, some to their Posterity, and not the same to both. Our wisdom it is to improve what we enjoy, not to repine at what God hath done for others, or will do for them that shall come after us. Our present mercies are sufficient for us, if we know how to use them. He that wanteth not a believing heart, shall want nothing else.
2. Who these Fathers with whom God made this Covenant were, is farther eviTime, Season, and Circumstances of the making of it.
time of it, it was done in that day. That a day is taken in the Scripture for an especial time and season, wherein any work or Chapter. And the time here intended is often called the day of it, Ezek. 20. 6. In the day I lifted up my hand to bring them out of the Land of Egypt; at that time or season. A certain, determinate, limited time, suited with means unto any work, occasion, or duty, is so called a day. And it answereth unto the description of the time of making the New CoVerse foregoing; Behold the days are coming, the time or seaWho may abide the day of his coming; the illustrious Glory and Power that shall appear, and be exerted at his coming. In the day, is, at that great eminent season so famous throughout all their Generations.
2. This day or season is described from the work of it, that I firmly laid hold. And to take hold of, with
1. The woful helpless condition that they were in then in Egypt. So far were they from being able to deliver themselves out of their captivity and bondage, that like children they were not able to stand or go, unless God took them, and led them by the hand. So he speaks, Hos. 11. 3. I taught them to go, taking them by the arms. And certainly never were weakly froward children so awkward to stand and go of themselves, as that people were to comply with God in the work of their deliverance. Sometimes they refused to stand, or to make a trial of it. Sometimes they cast themselves down after they were set on their feet; and somewent backwards as to what God directed them unto. He that can read the Story of their deliverance with any understanding, will easily discern what pains God was at with that people, to teach them to go when he thus took them by the hand.
It is therefore no new thing, that the Church of God should be in a condition of itself able neither to stand nor go. But yet if God will take them by the hand for their help, deliverance shall ensue.
2. It expresseth the infinite condescension of God towards this people in that condition, that he would bow down to take them by the hand. In most other plathe lifting up, or stretching out of his hand, Ezek. 20. 6. See the description of it, Deut. 4. 34. Chap. 26. 8. It was towards their Enemies a work of mighty power, of the lifting up of his hand; but towards them it was a work of infinite condescension and patience. A bowing down to take them by the hand. And this was the greatest work of God. For such was the frowardness and unbelief, so multiplied were the provocations and temptations of that People, that if God had not held them fast by the hand with infinite grace, patience, forbearance and condescension, they had inevitably ruined themselves. And we know in how many instances they endeavoured frowardly and obstinately to wrest themselves out of the hand of God, and to have cast themselves into utter destruction. Wherefore this word, when I took them by the hand, for the end mentioned, compriseth all the grace, mercy and patience which God exercilifting up his hand amongst and against their Adversaries.
And indeed no heart can conceive, no tongue can express that infinite condescenholds us by the hand to lead us unto rest with himself. Our own hearts, in some measure, know with what waywardness, and frowardness, with what wandrings from him, and withdrawing from his holy conduct, we exercise, and are ready to weary his patience continually. Yet do not mercy and grace let go that hold which they have taken on us. Oh that our Souls might live in a constant admiration of that divine grace and patience which they live upon; that the remembrance of the times and seasons wherein, if God had not strengthned his hand upon us, we had utterly destroyed our selves, might increase that admiration daily, and enliven it with thankful Obedience.
power of this work intended is also included herein; not directly, but by consequence. For as was said, when God took them by the hand by his grace and patience, he lifted up the hand of his power by the mighty works which he wrought among their Adversaries. What he did in Egypt at the Red Sea, in the Wilderness, is all included herein. These things made the day mentioned eminent and glorious. It was a great day wherein God so magnified his name and power in the sight of all the world.
4. All these things had respect unto and issued in that actual deliverance which God then wrought for that People. And this was the greatest mercy which that People ever were, or ever could be made partakers of in that condition wherein they were under the Old Testament. As unto the outward part of it, consider what they were delivered from, and what they were led into, and it will greatly appear to be as great an outward mercy, as humane nature is capable of. But begloriously typical, and representative of their own and the whole Churches spiritual deliverance from Sin and Hell, from our bondage to Satan, and a glorious traduction into the liberty of the Sons of God. And therefore did God engrave the memorial of it on the Tables of Stone, I am the Lord thy God which brought thee out of the Land of Egypt, out of the House of Bondage. For what was typified and signified thereby, is the principal motive unto Obedience through
And these things are here called over in this promise of giving a new Covenant; partly to mind the People of the mercies which they had sinned against, and partly to mind them that no concurrence of outward mercies and priviledges, can secure our Covenant-relation unto God, without the special mercy which is administred in the New Covenant, whereof Jesus Christ is the Mediator and Surety.
Thus great on all accounts was the day, and the glory of it, wherein God made the Old Covenant with the People of Israel, yet had it no glory in comparison of that which doth excell. The light of the Sun of Glory was on this day, seven fold, as the light of seven days, Isa. 30. 26. A perfection of light and glory was to accompany that day, and all the glory of Gods work and his rest therein, the light of seven days was to issue in it.
From the things we have observed, it is fully evident both what was the Covenant that God made, and
A comparison being intended between the two Covenants, this is the first general part of the foundation of it with respect unto the Old.
The second part of it is in the event of making this Covenant: and this is ex
1. The event on the part of the People in these words, Because they continued not in my Covenant,
because
Relative, sometimes a Redditive, which, or because. If we follow our Translation, because, it seems to give a reason why God made a Covenant with them not like the former; namely, because they continued not in the former, or brake it. But this indeed was not the reason of it. The reason, I say, why God made this new Covenant not according unto the former, was not because they abode not in the first. This could be no reason of it, nor any motive unto it. It is therefore
breaking of it by the grace which it doth administer. Wherefore I had rather render [which] as we render which my Covenant, or for; for they abode not. And if we render it because, it respects not Gods making a New Covenant, but his rejecting them for breaking the Old.
That which is charged on them is, that they continued not, they abode not in my Covenant; because he was the Author of it, the sole contriver and probrake, they rescinded, removed it, made it void. The Hebrew word expresseth the matter of fact what they did, they brake or made void the Covenant: the word used by the Apostle, the manner how they did it, namely, by not continuing faithful in it, not abiding by the terms of it. The use of the word
1. God made this Covenant with the People in Sinai, in the authoritative propoExod. 19. 8. especially Chap. 24. 3, 7. The people answered with one voice, all the words which the Lord hath said, we will do. And all that the Lord hath said, we will do and be obedient. So Deut. 5. 27. Hereupon the Covenant was ratified and confirmed between God and them, and thereon the blood of the Covenant was sprinkled on them, Exod. 24. 8. This gave that Covenant its solemn Ratification.
2. Having thus accepted of Gods Covenant, and the terms of it, Moses ascendGolden Calf. And this fell out so suddenly after the making of the Covenant, that the Apostle expresseth it by, they continued not in it; They made haste to break it. He expresseth the sense of the words of God hereon, Exod. 32. 7, 8. Go get thee down, for thy people which thou broughtest out of the Land of Egypt have corrupted themselves, they have turned aside greatly out of the way which I commanded them, they have made them a molten Calf, and have worshipped it, and have sacrificed thereunto; And said these be thy Gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the Land of Egypt. For therein they brake the Covenant wherein God had in a peculiar manner assumed the glory of that deliverance unto himself.
3. Wherefore the breaking of the Covenant, or their not continuance in it, was firstly and principally the making of the molten Calf. After this indeed that GeneGod sware in his wrath that they should never enter into his rest. This fell out on their professed unbelief, and murmuring at the return of the Spies, Numb. 14. whereof we have treated at large on Chap. 3. wherefore this expression is not to be extended unto the sins of the following Generation, neither in the Kingdom of Israel, nor in that of
1. That Sins have their Aggravations from Mercies received. This was that which rendred this first sin of that people of such a flagitious nature in itself, and so provoking unto God, namely, that they who contracted personally the guilt of it, had newly received the honour, mercy and priviledge of being taken into Covenant with God. Hence is that threatning of God with respect hereunto; Nevertheless in the day that I visit, I will visit their sin upon them, Exod. 32. 34. He would have a remembrance of this provoking sin in all their following visitations. Let us there
Nothing but effectual Grace will secure our Covenant Obedience one moment. Greater motives unto Obedience, or stronger outward Obligation thereunto, no Peoquickly turned out of the way. And therefore in the New Covenant is this Grace promised in a peVerse.
2. The acting of God towards them hereon is also expressed. And I regarded
them not. There seems to be a great difference in the Translation of the words of the Prophet, and these of the Apostle taken from them. In the former place we read, Although I was an Husband unto them: In this I regarded them not. And hereby the utmost difference that can be objected against the rendring of these words by the Apostle, is represented. But there was no need of rendering the words in the Prophet, Although I was an Husband to them, as we shall see. Howbeit many learned men have exceedingly perplexed themselves and others in attempting a reconciliation between these passages or expressions, be
1. That nothing of the main Controversie, nothing of the substance of the truth, which the Apostle proves and confirms by this Testimony, doth any way depend on the precise signification of these words. They are but occasional as to the principal design of the whole promise, and therefore the sense of it doth not depend on their signification. And in such cases liberty in the variety of Expositi
2. Take the two different senses which the words as commonly Translated do present, and there is nothing of contradiction, or indeed the least disagreement beexpress an aggravation of the Sin of the People. They broke my Covenant, although I was (that is therein) an Husband unto them, exercising singular kindness and care toeffect of that sin so aggravated. He regarded them not; that is, with the same tenderness as formerly; for he denied to go with them as before, and exercised severity tobroken by them, and that they were dealt withall accordingly.
But Expositors do find or make great difficulties herein. It is generally supOriginal Copies might differ in some letters from these we now enjoy. Therefore it is thought they might read as some think neglexi, or fastidivi, I neglected or loathed them. And those who speak most modestly, suppose that the Copy which the LXX made use of, had one of these words instead of Hellenistical Jews.
But the best of these Conjuectures are uncertain, and some of them by no means to be admitted. Uncertain it is that the Apostle made any of his quotations out of the Translation of the LXX; yea, the contrary is certain enough, and easie to be demonstrated. Neither did he write this Epistle unto the Hellenistical Jews, or those who lived in or belonged unto their dispersions, wherein they made use of the Greek Tongue; but unto the Nations of Hierusalem and Judaea principally and in the first place, who made no use of that Translation. He expressed the mind of the Scripture as he was directed by the Holy Ghost in words of his own. And the coincidence of them with those in the present Copies of the LXX, hath been ac
Dangerous it is as well as untrue, to allow of alterations in the Original Text, and then upon our Conjectures to supply other words into it, than what are con(Pocock in Miscellan.) hath endeavoured to prove, that despise and neglect, and ought to have been so Translated. And this he confirms from the use of it in the
My apprehensions are grounded on what I have before observed and proved. The Apostle neither in this, nor in any other place, doth bind up himself precifely unto the Translation of the words, but infallibly gives us the sense and meaning, and so he hath done in this place. For whereas Husband, or to be an Husband or a Lord, jure usus sum Maritali, I exercised the right, power and authority of an Husband towards them; I dealt with them as a Husband with a Wife that breaketh Covenant; that is, saith the Apostle, I regarded them not, with the love, tenderness and affection of an Husband. So he dealt indeed with that generation which so suddenly brake Covenant with him. He provided no more for them as unto the enjoyment of the inheritance, he took them not home unto him in his habitation, his resting place in the Land of Promise, but he suffered them all to wander, and bear their Whoredoms in the Wilderness, until they were consuexercise the Right and Power, and Authority of an Husband towards a Wife that had broken Covenant. And herein, as in many other things in that dispensation, did God give a representation of the nature of the Covenant of Works, and the issue of it.
4 There is a confirmation of the truth of these things in that expression, Saith the Lord. This Assertion is not to be extended unto the whole matter, or the prov. 8. saith the Lord. But it hath a peculiar severity towards. I used the authority of a Husband, I
Now God thus uttereth his severity towards them, that they might consider how he will deal with all those who despise, break or neglect his Covenant. So, saith he, I dealt with them, and so shall I deal with others who offend in an alike manner.
This was the issue of things with them, with whom the first Covenant was made. They received it, entred solemnly into the bonds of it, took upon themcontinued not in it, and were dealt withall accordingly. God used the right and authority of an Husband with whom a Wise breaketh Covenant; he neglected them, shut them out of his house, he deprived them of their Dowry or Inheritance, and slew them in the Wilderness.
On this Declaration, God promiseth to make another Covenant with them, whereAaronical Priests, whose office and service belonged wholly unto the administration of that first Conature of this Covenant itself, especially with respect unto its efficacy and duration. And hereunto this Testimony is ex
Hence, he says of it, not according unto it, a Covenant agreeing with the former neither in promises, efficacy, nor duration. For what is principally progiving of a new heart, Moses expresly affirms, that it was not done in the administration of the first Covenant. It is neither a Renovation of that Covenant, nor a Reformation of it, but utterly of another nature, by whose introduction and establishment that other was to be abolished, abrogated and taken away, with all the Divine Worship and Service which was peculiar thereunto. And this was that which the Apostle principally designed to prove and convince the Hebrews of. And from the whole we may observe sundry things.
No Covenant between God and man ever was, or ever could be stable and effectual as unto the ends of it, that was not made and confirmed in Christ. God first made a Covenant with us in Adam. There was nothing therein but the meer defectibility of our natures as we were creatures, that could render it ineffectual. And from thence did it proceed. In him we all sinned, by breach of Covenant. The Son of God had not then interposed himself, nor undertaken on our behalf. The Apostle tells us, that in him all things consist, without him they have no consistency, no stability, no duration. So was this other Covenant immediately bro
2. No external administration of a Covenant of Gods own making, no obligation of mercy on the minds of men, can enable them unto stedfastness in Covenant obedience, without an effectual influence of grace from and by Jesus Christ. For we shall see in the next
3. God in making a Covenant with any, in proposing the terms of it, retains his right and authority to deal with persons according to their deportment in and towards that Covenant: They brake my Covenant, and I regarded them not.
4. Gods casting men out of his especial care upon the breach of his Covenant, is the highest judgment that in this world can fall on any persons.
And we are concerned in all these things. For although the Covenant of Grace be stable and effectual unto all who are really partakers of it, yet as unto its exterTake heed of the golden Calf.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
THE design of the Apostle, or what is the general Argument which he is in pursuit of, must still be born in mind throughout the consideration of the Testimonies he produceth in the confirmation of it. And this is to prove, that the Lord Christ is the Mediator and Surety of a better Covenant than that wherein the Service of God was managed by the High Priests according unto the Law. For hence it follows, that his Priesthood is greater and far more excellent than theirs. To this end he doth not only prove that God promised to make such a Covenant, but also declares the nature and properties of it in the words of the Prophet. And so by comparing it with the former Covenant, he manifests its excellency above it. In particular in this Testimony the imperfection of that Covenant is demonstrated from its issue. For it did not effectually continue peace and mutual love between God and the people; but being broken by them, they were thereon rejected of God. This rendered all the other benefits and advantages of it useless. Wherefore the Apostle insists from the Prophet on these properties of this other Covenant, which infallibly prevent the like issue, securing the peoples obedience for ever, and so the love and relation of God unto them as their God.
Wherefore these three Verses give us a description of that Covenant whereof the Lord Christ is the Mediator and Surety not absolutely and entirely, but as unto those properties and effects of it wherein it differs from the former, so as infallibly to secure the Covenant relation between God and the people. That Covenant was broken, but this shall
And we may consider in the words,
First, Of Sanctifying, Inherent Grace; described by a double Conse
(1) Of Gods relation unto them, and theirs to him; I will be their God, and they shall be my people, ver. 10.
(2) Of their advantage thereby, without the use of such other aids as formerver. 11.
2dly, Of Relative Grace, in the pardon of their sins, ver. 12. And sundry things of great weight will fall into consideration under these several Heads.
For this is the Covenant that I will make with the House ofIsraelafter those days, saith the Lord, I will give my Laws into their mind, and write them upon their hearts: and I will be unto them a God, and they shall be to me a people.
THE Introduction of the declaration of the New Covenant is by the Particle
Hebrew
Exceptive, Sed; some by an Illative, Quoniam. And in this place Quamobrem, Wherefore; and others Nam, or Enim, as we do it by For. And it doth intimate a reason of what was spoken before, namely, that the Covenant which God would now make, should not be according unto that, like unto it, which was before made and broken.
2. The thing promised is a Covenant, in the Prophet cut, to strike, to divide, respect is had in it unto the Sacrifices wherewith Covenants were confaedus percutere, and faedus ferire. See Gen. 15. 9, 10, 18. cum, which is joined in construction with it, Gen. 15. 18. Deut. 5. 2. The Apostle renders it by dative case without a preposition,
I will make or confirm unto. He had used before
We render the words Covenant, though afTestament. A Covenant properly is a Compact or Agreement on certain terms mutually stipulated by two or more ParPromises are the foundation and rise of it, as it is between God and man; so it compriseth also Precepts, or Laws of Obedience which are prescribed unto man on his part to be observed. But in the description of the Covenant here annexed, there is no mention of any condition on the part of man, of any terms of Obedifree gratuitous Promises, as we shall see in the explication of it. Some here conclude that it is onely one part of the Covenant that is here described. Others observe from hence, that the whole Coveas a Covenant is absolute, without any conditions on our part; which sense Estius on this place contends for. But these things must be farther enquired into.
1. The word Berith used by the Prophet, doth not only signifie a Covenant or Compact properly so called; but a free, gratuitous Promise also. Yea, sometimes it is used for such a free purpose of God with respect unto other things, which in their own nature are uncapable of being obliged by any moral condition. Such is Gods Covenant with day and night, Jer. 33. 20, 25. And so he says, that he made his Covenant not to destroy the World by water any more with every living creature, Gen. 9. 10, 11. Nothing therefore can be argued for the necessity of Conditions to belong unto this Covenant from the name or term whereby it is exHebrew Language of that precise signification.
The making of this Covenant is declared by mutual stipulation upon terms and conditions prescribed unto an entrance into Covenant. For it refers unto the Sacrifices wherewith Covenants were congratuitous Promise, Gen. 15. 18. In that day did God make a Covenant with Abraham, saying, Unto thy Seed will I give this Land.
testamentary disposition. And this may be without any conditions on the part of them unto whom any thing is bequeathed.
2. The whole of the Covenant intended is expressed in the ensuing description of it. For if it were otherwise, it could not be proved from thence, that this Covewas more excellent than the former; especially as to security that the Covenant Relation between God and the People should not be broken or disannulled. For this is the principal thing which the Apostle designs to prove in this place; and the want of an observation thereof, hath led many out of the way in their exposition of it. If therefore this be not an entire description of the Covenant, there might yet be something reserved essentially belonging thereunto which might frustrate this end. For some such conditions might yet be required in it as we are not able to observe, or could have no security that we should abide in the observation of them. And thereon this Covenant might be frustrated of its end, as well as the former; which is directly contrary unto Gods declaration of his design in it.
3. It is evident that there can be no condition previously required, unto our entering into, or participation of the benefits of this Covenant antecedent unto the making of it with us. For none think there are any such with respect unto its original constitution; nor can there be so in respect of its making with us, or our entering into it. For
1. This would render this Covenant inferior in a way of Grace unto that which God made with the people at Horeb. For he declares that there was not any thing in them that moved him either to make that Covenant, or to take them into it with himself. Everywhere he asserts this to be an Act of his meer Grace and Favor. Yea, he frequently declares, That he took them into Covenant, not only without respect unto any thing of good in them, but although they were evil and stubDeut. 7. 7, 8. Chap. 9. 4, 5.
2. It is contrary unto the Nature, Ends and express Properties of this Covenant. For there is nothing that can be thought, or supposed to be such a condition, but it is comprehended in the Promise of the Covenant itself. For all that God requi
4. It is certain, That in the outward dispensation of the Covenant, wherein the Grace, Mercy and Terms of it are proposed unto us, many things are required of us in order unto a participation of the benefits of it. For God hath ordained, that all the Mercy and Grace that is prepared in it, shall be communicated unto us ordioutward means, wherewith a compliance is required of us in a way of Duty. To this end hath he appointed all the Ordinances of the Gosin order unto the participation of the benefits of this Covenant. And if therefore any one will call our attendance unto such Duties the condition of the Covenant, it is not to be contended about, though properly it is not so. For
(1) God doth work the Grace of the Covenant, and communicate the Mercy of it, antecedently unto all ability for the performance of any such duty; as it is with elect Infants.
(2) Amongst those who are equally diligent in the performance of the duties intended, he makes a discrimination, preferring one before another. Many are cal
(3) He actually takes some into the Grace of the Covenant, whilest they are engaged in an opposition unto the outward dispensation of it. An example of this Grace he gave in Paul.
5. It is evident, That the first grace of the Covenant, or Gods putting his Law in our hearts, can depend on no condition on our part. For whatever is antecedent thereunto, being only a work or act of corrupted nature, can be no condition whereon the dispensation of spiritual Grace is superadded. And this is the great ground of them, who absolutely deny the Covenant of Grace to be conditional; namely, that the first grace is absolutely promised, whereon and its exercise the whole of it doth depend.
Faith on our part, from which Evangelical Repentance is inseparable, is required. But whereas these also are wrought in us by vertue of that Promise and Grace of the Covenant which are absolute, it is a meer strife about words to contend whether they may be called conditions or no. Let it be granted on the one hand, that we cannot have an actual participation of the relative grace of this Covenant in Adoration and Justification, without Faith or Believing; and on the other, that this Faith is wrought in us, given unto us, bestowed upon us, by that Grace of the Covenant which depends on no condition in us as unto its discriminating administration, And I shall not concern my self what men will call it.
7. Though there are no conditions properly so called of the whole grace of the Covenant, yet there are conditions in the Covenant, taking that term in a large sense for that which by the order of divine constitution precedeth some other things, and hath an influence into its existence. For God requireth many things of them whom he actually takes into Covenant, and makes Partakers of the Prowhole Obedience which is prescribed unto us in the Gospel, in our walking before God in uprightness; and there being an order in the things that belong hereunto, some acts, duties and parts of our graconditions required of us in the Covenant, as well as duties prescribed unto us.
8. The Benefits of the Covenant are of two sorts: (1) The Grace and Mercy which it doth collate. (2) The future Reward of glory which it doth promise. Those of the former sort are all of them means appointed of God, which we are to use and improve unto the obtaining of the latter; and so may be called conditi
9. Although Covenant, in the same manner as Testament, or a Testamentary disposition of good things. It is the Will of God in and by Jesus Christ, his death and bloodshedding, to give freely unto us the whole inheritance of grace and glory. And under this notion the Covenant hath no condition, nor are any such either expressed or intimated in this place.
Obs. 1. The Covenant of Grace as reduced into a form of a Testament confirmed by the blood of Christ, doth not depend on any condition or qualification in our persons, but in a free grant and donation of God, and so are all the good things prepared in it.
2. The Precepts of the Old Covenant are turned all of them into Promises under the New. Their preceptive commanding power is not taken away, but grace is promised for the performance of them. So the Apostle having declared that the People brake the Old Covenant, adds that in the New, grace shall be supplied for all the Duties of Obedience that are required of us.
3. All things in the New Covenant being proposed unto us by the way of promise, it is Faith alone whereby we may attain a participation of them. For Faith onely is the grace we ought to exercise, the duty we ought to perform, to render the proHeb. 3. 1.
4. Sense of the loss of an interest in and participation of the benefits of the Old Covenant, is the best preparation for receiving the mercies of the New.
Thirdly, The Author of this Covenant is God himself. I will make it, saith the
Lord. This is the third time that this expression, saith the Lord, is repeated in this Testimony. The work expressed in both the parts of it, the disannulling of the Old Covenant, and the establishment of the New, is such as calls for this solemn interI will do it, saith the Lord. And the mention hereof is thus frequently inculcated, to beget a reverence in us of the work which he so emphatically assumes unto himself. And it teacheth us, that
God himself, in and by his own soveraign Wisdom, Grace, Goodness, Allsufficiency and Power, is to be considered as the onely Cause and Author of the New Covenant.
Fourthly, It is declared who this New Covenant is made withall. With the
House of Israel, ver. 8. They are called distinctlythe House of Israel, and the House of Judah. The distribution of the Posterity of Abraham into Israel and Judah ensued upon the division that fell among the people in the days of Rehoboam. BeIsrael only. And as before they were mentioned distinctly, to testifie that none of the Seed of Abraham should be absolutely excluded from the grace of the Covenant, however they were divided among themselves; so here they are all jointly expressed by their ancient name of Israel, to manifest that all distinctions on the account of precedent Priviledges should be now taken away, that all Israel might be saved. But we have shewed before, that the whole Israel of God, or the Church of the Elect, are principally intended hereby.
Fifthly, The Time of the accomplishment of this Promise, or making of this Covenant is expressed, After those days. There are various conjectures about the time of giving the Law on Mount Sinai. Then was the Old Covenant made with the Fathers. But after those days another should be made. But whereas that time, those days were so long past before this Prophesie was given out by Jeremy, namely, about 800 years, it was impossible but that the New Covenant which was not yet given, must be after those days. Wherefore it was to no purpose so to express it that it should be after those days, seeing it was impossible that otherwise it should be.
Some think that respect is had unto the Captivity of Babylon, and the return of the People from thence. For God then shewed them great kindness, to win them unto Obedience. But neither can this time be intended; for God then made no New Covenant with the People, but strictly obliged them unto the terms of the Old, Mal. 4. 3, 4, 5. But when this New Covenant was to be made, the old was to be abolished and removed, as the Apostle expresly affirmeth, ver. 13. The promise is not of new obligation, or new assistance unto the observance of the Old Cove
Some judge that these words, After those days, refer unto what went immediately before, And I regarded them not: which words include the total rejection of the Jews. After those days wherein both the House of Judah and Israel shall be rejected, I will make a New Covenant with the whole Israel of God. But neither will this hold the Tryal. For
(1) Supposing that expression, And I regarded them not, to intend the reJews, yet it is manifest, that their excision and cutting off absolutenon-continuance in the Old Covenant, or not being faithrejection of the New when proposed unto them. Then they fell by unbelief, as the Apostle fully manifests, Chap. 3. of this Epistle, and Rom. 11. Wherefore the making of the New Covenant cannot be said to be after their re
(2) By this interpretation, the whole House of Israel, or all the natural PosteriAbraham would be utterly excluded from any interest in this Promise. But this cannot be allowed. For it was not so de facto, a Remnant being taken into Covenant; which though but a remnant in comparison of the whole, yet in themselves so great a multitude, as that in them the Promises made unto the Fathers were confirmed. Nor on this Supposition would this Prediction of a New Covewith them, as he did the former with their Fathers, which is a promise of grace and mercy.
Wherefore after those days, is as much as in those days; an indeterminate season for a certain. So, in that day, is frequently used in the Prophets, Isa. 24. 21, 22. Zech. 12. 11. A time therefore certainly future, but not determined, is all that is intended in this expression, After those days. And herewith most Expositors are satis
Those days seem to me to comprize the whole time alotted unto the oeconomy of the Old Testament, or dispensation of the Old Covenant. Such a time there was appointed unto it in the counsel of God; during this season, things fell out as dever. 9. The certain period fixed unto these days, is called by our Apostle the time of Reformation, Chap. 9. 10. After those days; that is in or at their expiafter those days, because being made in the wane and declension of them, it did by its making, put a full and final end unto them.
This in general was the time here designed for the making and establishing of the New Covenant. But we must yet farther enquire into the precise time of the accomplishment of this Promise. And I say, the whole of it cannot be limited unto any one season absolutely, as though all that was intended in Gods making of this Covenant, did consist in any one individual act. The making of the Old Covenant with the Fathers, is said to be in the day wherein God took them by the hand, to bring them out of the Land of Egypt. During the season intended, there were many things that were preparatory to the making of that Covenant, or to the solemn establishment of it. So was it also in the making of the New Covenant. It was gradually made and established, and that by sundry Acts preparatory for it, or confirmatory of it. And there are six degrees observable in it.
1. The first peculiar entrance into it was made by the Ministry of John the Baptist. Him had God raised to send under the name, in the spirit and power of Elijah, to prepare the way of the Lord, Mal. 4. Hence is his Ministry called the beginning of the Gospel, Mark 1. 1, 2. Until his coming, the People were bound absolutely and universally unto the Covenant in Horeb, without alteration or adMinistry was designed to prepare them, and to cause them to look out after the accomplishment of this promise of making the New Covenant, Mal. 4. 4, 5, 6. And those by whom his Ministry was despised, did reject the counsel of God against themselves, that is unto their ruine; and made themselves liable to that utter excision, with the Threatnings whereof the Writings of the Old Testament are closed, Mal. 4. 6. He therefore called the People off from resting in, or trusting unto the Priviledges of the first Covenant, Mat. 3. 8, 9, 10. preached unto them a Doctrine of Repentance, and inRelation unto God. And in his whole Ministry he pointbeginning of the accomplishment of this Pro
2. The coming in the Flesh and personal Ministry of our Lord Jesus Christ himself, was an eminent advance and degree therein. The dispensation of the Old Covemade of a Woman, was made under the Law, yielding Obedience unto it, observing all its Precepts and Institutions. But his coming in the Flesh laid an Axe unto the Root of that whole dispensation. For therein the main end that God designed thereby towards that People was accomLuk. 2. 13, 14. But it was more fully and evidently carried on in and by his personal Ministry. The whole doctrine thereof was preparatory unto the immediate introduction of this Covenant. But especially there was therein and thereby, by the truth which he taught, by the manner of his teaching, by the miracles which he wrought, in conjunction with an open accomplishment of the Prophesies concerning him, eviMessiah, the Mediator of the New Covenant. Herein was a declaration made of the Person in and by whom it was to be established; and therefore he told them, That unless they believed it was he who was so promised, they should dye in iheir sins.
3. The way for the introduction of this Covenant being thus prepared, it was solemnly enacted and confirmed in and by his death. For herein he offered that
Sacrifice to God whereby it was established. And hereby the Promise properly bea Testament, as our Apostle proves at large, Chap. 9. 14, 15, 16. And he declares in the same place, that it answered those Sacrifices whose blood was sprinkled on the People, and the Book of the Law, in the confirmation of the first CoCenter whereOld Covenant, and all its administrations, having reEph. 2. 14, 15, 16. Col. 2. 14, 15. But our obligation unto Obedience, and the observance of Commands, though formally and ultimately it be resolved into the Will of God, yet immediately it respects the Revelation of it, by which we are directly obliged. Wherefore although the causes of the removal of the Old Covelawful but useful unto the Worshippers, until the Will of God concerning their abrogation was fully declared.
4. This New Covenant had the complement of its making and establishment in the Resurrection of Christ. For in order hereunto the Old was to have its perfect end. God did not make the first Covenant, and therein revive, represent and condie of its self, and be arbitrarily remohad an end which was to be accomplished, and without which it was not consistent with the wisdom or righteousness of God to remove it, or take it away. Yea nothing of it could be removed, until all was fulfilled. It was easier to remove Heaven and Earth, than to remove the Law as unto its Right and Title to rule the Souls and Consciences of men before all was fulfilled. And this end had two parts.
(1) The perfect fulfilling of the Righteousness which it required. This was done in the Obedience of Christ, the Surety of the New Covenant, in the stead of them with whom the Covenant was made.
(2) That the Curse of it should be undergone. Until this was done, the Law could not quit its claim unto power over sinners. And as this Curse was underSuffering, so it was absolutely discharged in the Resurrection of Christ. For the pains of death being loosed, and he delivered from the state of the dead, the sanction of the Law was declared to be void, and its curse answered. Hereby did the Old Covenant so expire, as that the Worship which belonged unto it, was only for a while continued in the patience and forbearance of God towards that People.
5. The first solemn promulgation of this New Covenant, so made, ratified and established, was on the day of Pentecost seven weeks after the Resurrection of Christ. And it answered the promulgation of the Law on Mount Sinai, the same space of time after the delivery of the people out of Egypt. From this day for
6. The Question being stated about the continuance of the obligatory force of the Old Covenant, the contrary was solemnly promulged by the Apostles under the infallible conduct of the Holy Ghost, Acts 15.
These were the Articles, or the degrees of the time intended in that expression, After those days, all of them answering the several degrees whereby the Old vani
The circumstances of the making of this Covenant being thus cleared, the nature of it in its Promises is next proposed unto us. And in the exposition of the words, we must do these two things. (1) Inquire into the general nature of these ProParticularly and distinctly explain them.
1. The general nature both of the Covenant, and of the Promises, whereby it is here expressed, must briefly be enquired into, because there are various apprehenespecial efficacy towards the
thing mentioned, intended in these Promises and no more; some judge that the things themselves, the event and end are so promised.
In the first way Schlictingius expresseth himself on this place, Non ut olim curabo leges meas in lapideis tantum tabulis inscribi, sed tale faedus cum illis feriam ut meae leges ipsis eorum mentibus & cordibus insculpantur—Apparet haec verba intra vim & efficaciam accipienda esse, non vero ad ipsum inscriptionis effectum necessariò porrigenda, qui semper in libera hominis potestate positus est; quod ipsum docent & sequentia Dei verba, v. 12.
And another, I will instead of these external carnal Ordinances and Observations, give them spiritual Commands for the regulating of their Affections, Precepts most agreeable unto all men, (made)
The sense of both is, that all which is here promised, consisteth in the nature of the means, and their efficacy from thence, to incline, dispose, and engage men unto the things here spoken of; but not to effect them certainly and infallibly in them to whom the Promise is given. And it is supposed that the efficacy granted, ariseth from the nature of the Precepts of the Gospel which are rational, and suited unto the principles of our intellectual natures. For these Precepts enlivened by the Promeet to prevail on our minds and wills unto Obedience; but yet when all is done, the whole issue depends on our own wills, and their determination of themselves one way or other.
But these things are not only liable unto many just exceptions, but do indeed overthrow the whole nature of the New Covenant, and the Text is not expounded, but corrupted by them; wherefore they must be removed out of the way And
1. The Exposition given, can no way be accommodated unto the words, so as to grant a Truth in their plain literal sense. For whereas God says, he will put his Laws in their mind, and write them in their heart, and they shall all know him, which declares what he will effectually do; the sense of their Exposition is, that indeed he will not do so, only he will do that which shall move them, and persuade them to do that themselves which he hath promised to do himself, and that whether they ever do so or no. But if any one concerning whom God says that he will write his Law in his heart, have it not so written, be it on what account it will, supthe man will not have it so written, how can the Promise be true, that God will write his Law in his heart? It is a sorry Apology to say, that God in making that Promise, did not foresee the obstruction that would arise, or could not remove it when it did so.
2. It is the event, or the effect itself that is directly promised, and not any such efficacy of means as might be frustrate. For the weakness and imperfection of the first Covenant was evidenced hereby, that those with whom it was made continued not in it. Hereon God neglected them, and the Covenant became unprofitable, or at least unsuccessful as unto the general end of continuing the Relation between God and them, of his being their God, and they being his people. To redress this evil, and prevent the like for the future, that is, effectually to provide that God and his people may always abide in that blessed Covenant Relation, he promiseth the things themselves, whereby it might be secured. That which the first Covenant could not effect, that God promised to work in and by the New.
3. It is nowhere said nor intimated in the Scripture, that the efficacy of the New Covenant, and the accomplishment of the promises of it, should depend on and arise from the suitableness of its Precepts unto our Reason, or natural principles, but
4. It is true, that our own wills, or the free actings of them, are required in our Faith and Obedience; whence it is promised, that we shall be willing in the day of his power. But that our wills are left absolutely herein unto their own liberty and power, without being inclined and determined by that grace of God, is that Pelagianism which hath long attempted the Church, but which shall never absolutely prevail.
5. The putting the Laws of God in our minds, and the writing of them in our hearts, that we may know him, and fear him always, is promised in the same way and manner, as is the forgiveness of sin, ver. 11. And it is hard to affix such a sense unto that Promise, as that God will use such and such means, that our sins may be pardoned, which yet may all of them fail.
6. As this Exposition is no way suited unto the words of the Text, nor of the Context, or scope of the place, so indeed it overthrows the nature of the New Co
1. If the effect itself, or the thing mentioned are not promised, but only the use of means left unto the liberty of mens wills whether they will comply with them or no, then the very Being of the Covenant whether it shall ever have any existence or no, depends absolutely on the wills of men, and so may not be. For it is not the Proposal of the terms of the Covenant, and the means whereby we may enter into it, that is called the making of this Covenant with us, but our real partinot a Covenant: Nor without it, is it properly made with any.
2. The Lord Christ would be made hereby the Mediator of an uncertain Covenant. For if it depend absolutely on the wills of men, whether they will accept of the terms of it, and comply with it or no, it is
3. The Covenant can hereon in no sense be a Testament, which our Apostle afdeath of the Testator. For there can on this supposition be no certain Heir unto whom Christ did bequeath his Goods, and the inheritance of Mercy, Grace and Glory. This would make this Testament inferior unto that of a wise man, who determines in particular unto whom his Goods shall come.
4. It takes away that difference between this and the former Covenant, which it is the main scope of the Apostle to prove; at least leave the difference, to consist only in the gradual efficacy of outward means, which is most remote from his purpose. For there were by the Old Covenant means supplied to induce the PeoMoses, in the whole Book almost of Deuteronomy. For the scope of all his exhorProfligacy in wickedness could turn them from it. To this purpose are discourses multiplied in that Book. And yet notwithThat God had not circumcised their hearts to fear him and obey him always, as it is here promised. The communication of grace effectual, producing infallibly the good things proposed and promised in the minds and hearts of men, belonged not unto that Covenant. If therefore there be no more in the making of the New Covenant, but only the adding of more forcible outward means and motives, more suitable unto our Reasons, and meet to work on our Afunassignable degrees from the former. But this is
That it shall not be according unto it, or of the same kind, no more than Christ the High-Priest of it should be a Priest after the Order of
5. It would on this Supposition follow, That God might fulfill his promise of putting his Laws in the minds of men, and writing them in their hearts, and yet none have the Law put into their minds, nor written in their hearts; which things are not reconcileable by any distinction unto the ordinary reason of Man
Wherefore we must grant, That it is the effect, the event in the communication of the things promised, that is ascribed unto this Covenant, and not only the use and application of means unto their production. And this will yet further appear in the particular Exposition of the several parts of it. But yet before we enter thereon, two Objections must be removed, which may in general be laid against our interpretation.
1. This Covenant is promised as that which is future, to be brought in at a cerafter those days, as hath been declared. But it is certain, that the things here mentioned, the grace and mercy expressed were really communicated unto maeffected in them by grace; wherefore their effectual communication cannot be esteemed a property of this Covenant which was to be made afterwards.
Ans. This Objection was sufficiently prevented in what we have already discourCovenant of Sinai, and with respect unto its outward solemn confirmation.
2. If the things themselves are promised in the Covenant, then all those with whom this Covenant is made, must be really and effectually made partakers of them. But this is not so; they are not all actually sanctified, pardoned and saved, which are the things here promised.
Ans. The making of this Covenant may be considered two ways. (1) As unpreparation and proposition of its terms and conditions. (2) As unto the internal stipulation between God and the souls of men. In this sense alone God is properly said to make this Covenant with any. The preparation and proposition of Laws is not the making of the Covenant. And therefore all with whom this Co
These things being premised, as it was necessary they should be, unto the right understanding of the mind of the Holy Ghost, I shall proceed unto the particular parts of the Covenant as here expressed; namely, in the blessed properties and ef
The two first expressions are of the same nature and tendency, I will put my Laws in their mind, and write them in their hearts. In general it is the reparation of our nature, by the restauration of the image of God in us, that is, our sanctifica
(1) The Subject wrought upon, which is the mind and the heart.
(2) The manner of producing the effect mentioned in them, and that is by putting and writing. And
(3) The things by these means so communicated, which is the Laws of God.
1. The Subject spoken of, is the mind and heart. When the Apostle treats of the depravation and corruption of our nature, he placeth them Ephes. 4. 18. that is, the mind and the heart. These are in the Scripture the seat of natural corruption, the residence of the principle of alienation from the life of God, which is in us. Wherefore the renovation of our natures consists in the recti
The Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ in the New Covenant, in its being and existence, in its healing repairing efficacy, is as large and extensive as sin in its residence and power to deprave our natures. This is the difference about the extent of the New Co
2. The way whereby God in the Covenant of Grace thus works on the mind, is expressed by I will give.
giving,
To shew in general before we proceed to the nature of this work, so far as is necessary unto the exposition of the words, we may here consider what was obserwhat it is that is thus promised to be communicated, and so carry it on with us unto the other clause of this Promise.
That which is to be put into this spiritual Receptacle, is in those words, my Laws, in the plural number. Expositors inquire what Laws are here inMetonomy of the subject and effect in the words. It is that knowledge of the mind and will of God, which is revealed in the Law, and taught
largely, for the whole revelation of the mind and will of God. So doth Doctrine, or Instruction. By what way or revelation soever God makes known himself and his will unto us, requiring our obedience therein, it is all comof his Laws.
From these things we may easily discern the nature of that Grace which is coneffectual operation of his Spirit in the renovation and saving illumination of our minds, whereby they are habitually made conformable unto the whole Law of God, that is, the Rule and the Law of our obedience in the New Covenant, and enabled unto all Acts and Duties that are required of us. And this is the first grace promised and communicated unto us by vertue of this Covenant, as it was necessary that so it should be. For (1) The mind is the principal seat of all spiritual obedience. (2) The proper and peculiar actings of the mind in discerning, knowing, judgCor. 4. 4, 6. So
All the beginnings and entrances into the saving knowledge of God, and thereon of obedience unto him, are effects of the Grace of the Covenant.
Secondly, The second Part of this first Promise of the Covenant is expressed in And will write them upon their hearts; which is that which renders the former part actually effectual.
Expositors generally observe, that respect is had herein unto the giving of the Law on Mount Sinai, that is, in the first Covenant. For then the Law, that is the ten words, was written in Tables of Stone. And although the original Tables were broken by Moses when the People had broken the Covenant, yet would not God alter that dispensation, nor write his Laws any other way, but commanded new Tables of Stone to be made, and wrote them therein. And this was done, not so much to secure the outward letter of them, as to represent the
1. The work of Grace in the New Covenant passeth on the whole Soul in all its faculties, powers and affections, unto their change and renovation. The whole was
Thess. 5. 23.
2. To take away the necessity and efficacy of renewing, changing, sanctifying Grace, consisting in an internal, efficacious operation of the principles, habits and acts of internal grace and obedience, is plainly to overthrow and reject the New Covenant.
3. We bring nothing to the New Covenant but our hearts as Tables to be writters in, with the sense of the insufficiency of the Precepts and Promises of the Law with respect unto our own ability to comply with them.
The last thing in the words, is the Relation that ensues hereon between God and his people. I will be unto them a God, and they shall be my people. This is indeed center of the account given of the whole, as that from whence all the grace of it doth spring, wherein all the blessings of it do consist, and whereby they are secured. Howbeit in this place it is pecumutual Acquiescency in each other, could not be, nor ever had been, if the minds and hearts of them who are to be taken into it, were not changed and renewed. For neither could God approve of, and rest in his love towards them, whilest they were enemies unto him in the depravation of their na
This is the general expression of any Covenant-relation between God and men; He will be unto them a God, and they shall be a people unto him. And it is frequent
Nor can this be spoken of God and any People, but on the ground of an esGod is the God of all the world, and all People are his, yea, he is a God unto them all. For as he made them, so he sustains, rules, and gofreely promise that he will be a God unto any, nor can so do. For his power over all, and his rule of all things is essential and natural unto him, so as it cannot otherwise be. Wherefore as thus declared, it is a peculiar expression of an especial Covenant Relation. And the nature of it is to be expounded by the na
Two things we must therefore consider, to discover the nature of this Relation. (1) The foundation of it. (2) The mutual actings in it by vertue of this Relation.
Unto the manifestation of the foundation of it, some things must be pre
1. Upon the entrance of Sin there continued no such Covenant Relation between God and man, as that by virtue thereof, he should be their God, and they should be his people. God continued still in the full enjoyment of his Soveraignty over men, which no Sin, nor Rebellion, nor Apostasie of man could in the least impeach. And man continued under an obligation unto dependance on God, and subjection unto his will in all things. For these cannot be separated from his nature and being, unGod rules over them only by power, with
2. God would not enter into any other Covenant with sinful fallen man to be a God unto them, and to take them to be a peculiar people unto him immediately in their own persons; nor was it consistent with his wisdom and goodness so to do. For if man was not stedfast in Gods Covenant, but brake and disannulled it when he was sinless and upright, only created with a possibility of defection, what expectations could there be that now he was fallen, and his nature wholly depraved, any new Covenant should be of use unto the glory of God, or advantage of man? To enter into a new Covenant that must necessarily be broken unto the aggravation of the
Divine wisdom and goodness to have dealt better with men after their Rebellion and Apostasie than before, namely on their own account. He did in our first Creation communicate unto our nature all that grace, and all those primeet to endow it withall, and all that was necessary to make them who were partakers of it everlastingly blessed. To suppose that on its own account alone he would immediately collate more grace upon it, is to suppose him singularly well pleased with our Sin and Rebellion. This then God would not do. Wherefore
3. God provided in the first place that there should be a Mediator, a Sponsor, an Undertaker, with whom alone he would treat about a New Covenant, and so establish it. For there were in the contrivance of his grace and wisdom concerning it, many things necessary unto it that could no otherwise be enacted and accomplished. Nay there was not any one thing in all the good which he designed unto Mankind in this Covenant in a way of love, grace and mercy, that could be communicated unto them, so as that his honor and glory might be advanced thereby, without the conMediator, and what he undertook to do. Nor could Mankind have yielded any of that obedience unto God, which he would require of them, without the interposition of this Mediator on their behalf. It was therefore with him that God firstly made this Covenant.
How it was needful that this Mediator should be God and man in one person; how he became so to undertake for us, and in our stead; what was the especial Covenant between God and him as unto the work which he undertook personally to perform, have according unto our poor weak measure and dark apprehension of these heavenly things, been declared at large in our Exercitations on this
1. God neither would, nor Salvâ justitiâ, sapientiâ & honore, could treat imsatisfaction was undertaken to be made for sins past, or such as should afterwards fall out. This was done by Christ alone, who was therefore the
2. No Restipulation of obedience unto God could be made by man, that might be a ground of entering into a Covenant intended to be firm and stable. For whereas we had broken our first Covenant engagement with God in our best condition, we were not likely of our selves to make good a new engagement of an higher nature than the former. Who will take the word or the security of a Bankrupt for Thousands, who is known not to be worth
3. That Grace which was to be the Spring of all the blessings of this Covenant unto the glory of God, and salvation of the Church, was to be deposited in some safe hand, for the accomplishment of these ends. In the first Covenant God at once committed unto man that whole stock of grace which was necessary to enable him unto the obedience of it. And the grace of reward which he was to receive upat once that was committed unto our keeping, so as that nothing at all was left to give us the least relief as unto any new endeavors. Wherefore God will now secure all the good things of this Covenant, both as to grace and glory, in a third hand, in the hand
Mediator. Hereon the Promises are made unto him, and the fulness of grace is laid up in him, John 1. 14. Col. 1. 17. Chap. 2. 2. Eph. 3. 8. 2 Cor. 1. 21.
4. As he was the Mediator of this Covenant, God became his God, and he beServant of God in a peculiar manner. For he stood before God in this Covenant, as a publick Representative of all the Elect. See our Comment on Chap. 1. 5, 8. Chap. 2. 13. God is a God unto him in all the Promises he received on the behalf of his mystical Body; and he was his Servant in the accomplishment of them, as the pleasure of the Lord was to prosper in his hand.
5. God being in this Covenant a God and Father unto Christ, he became by vertue thereof to be our God and Father, John 20. 17. Heb. 2. 12, 13. And we became heirs of God, joint heirs with Christ; and his People to yield him all sincere obedience. And these things may suffice briefly, to declare the foundation of that Covenant Relation which is here expressed. Wherefore
The Lord Christ God and man undertaking to be the Mediator between God and man, and a Surety on our behalf, is the spring and head of the New Covenant, which is made and established with us in him.
Secondly, The nature of this Covenant-Relation is expressed on the one side and the other; I will be unto them a God, and they shall be to me a People.
1. On the part of God it is, I will be unto them a God; or as it is elsewhere exI will be their God. And we must make a little enquiry into this unspeak
1. The person speaking is included in the Verb, I will be; I Jehovah who make this Promise. And herein God proposeth unto our Faith all the gloriI who am that I am, Jehovah, Goodness and Being itself, and the cause of all Being and Goodness to others; infinitely wise, power&c. I that am all this, and in all that I am, will be so. Here lies the eternal Spring of the infinite Treasures of the supplies of the Church here and for ever. Whatever God is in himself, whatever these Properties of his Nature extend to, in it all God hath promised to be our God. Gen. 17. 1. I am God Almighty, walk before me. Hence to give establishment and security unto our Faith, he hath in his Word revealed himself by so many names, titles, properties, and that so frewho is our God, what he is, and what he will be unto us. And the knowledge of him as so revealing himself, is that which sePsal. 9. 9, 10.
2. What he promiseth is, that he will be a God unto us. Now although this compriseth absolutely every thing that is good, yet may the notion of being a God unto any, be referred unto two general Heads. (1) An all-sufficient Preserver; and (2) An all-sufficient Rewarder: So himself declares the meaning of this exGen. 17. 1. Gen. 15. 1. I will be all this unto them that I am a God unto in the way of preservation and recompence, Heb. 11. 6.
3. The declared rule and measure of Gods actings towards us as our God, is the promises of the Covenant both of mercy, grace, pardon, holiness, perseverance, proGod unto those whom he takes into this Covenant.
4. It is included in this part of the Promise, that they that take him to be their God, they shall say, Thou art my God, Hos. 2. 23. and carry it towards him accord
And we may observe,
1. As nothing less than God becoming our God could relieve, help and save us, so nothing more can be required thereunto.
2. The efficacy, security and glory of this Covenant depend originally on the nature of God, immediately and actually on the mediation of Christ. It is the Covenant that God makes with us in him as the Surety thereof.
3. It is from the engagement of the properties of the Divine Nature that this Covenant is ordered in all things and sure. Infinite wisdom hath provided it, and infinite power will make it effectual.
As the Grace of this Covenant is inexpressible; so are the obligations it puts upon us unto obedience.
The Relation of man unto God is expressed in these words, And they shall be
unto me a People, or they shall be my People. And two things are contained herein.
(1) Gods owning of them to be his in a peculiar manner, according to the tenor and promise of this Covenant, and dealing with them accordingly. Pet. 2. 5. A peculiar People. Let others take heed how they meddle with them, lest: they intrench on Gods propriety, Jer. 2. 3.
(2) There is included in it that which is essentially required unto their being his People, namely, the profession of all subjection or obedience unto him, and all deavouching this God to be their God, and their free engagement unto all that obedience which in the Covenant he requireth. For although this expression. And they shall be unto me a People, seem only to denote an Act of Gods Grace, assuming of them into that Relation unto himself; yet it includes their avouching him to be their God, and their voluntary engagement of obedience unto him as their God. When he says, Ye are my People; they also say, Thou art my God, Hos. 2. 23. yet is it to be observed,
1. That God doth as well undertake for our being his People, as he doth for his being our God. And the Promises contained in this Verse do principally aim at that end, namely the making of us to be a People unto him.
2. Those whom God makes a Covenant withall, are his in a peculiar manner, And the profession hereof is that which the world principally maligneth in them, and ever did so from the beginning.
And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.
THE second general Promise declaring the nature of the New Covenant, is expressed in this Verse. And the matter of it is set down, (1) Negatively, in opposition unto what was in use and necessary under the first Covenant. (2.) Positively, in what should take place in the room of it, and be enjoyed under this New Covenant, and by vertue of it.
1. In the former part we may observe the vehemency of the negation in the reThey shall by no means do so, that shall not be the way and manner with them whom God makes this Covenant withall. And this is designed to fix our minds on the consideration of the priviledge which is enjoyed under the New Covenant, and the greatness of it.
2. The thing thus denied is Teaching, not absolutely, but as unto a certain way
and manner of it. The Negation is not universal as unto Teaching, but restrained unto a certain kind of it, which was in use and necessary under the Old Covenant. And this necessity was either from Gods institution, or from practice taken up among themselves which must be inquired into.
3. The subject matter of this Teaching, or the matter to be taught, was the knowKnow the Lord. The whole knowledge of God prescribed in the Law is here intended. And this may be reduced unto two Heads. (1) The knowing of him, and the taking him thereon to be God, to be God alone which is the first command. (2)
4. The manner of the Teaching whose continuation is denied, is exemplified in a Teachers, and them that are taught; every man his brother, and every man his neighbour. And herein (1) The universality of the Duty, every one, is expressed; and therefore it was reciprocal. Every one was to teach, and every one was to be taught, wherein yet respect was to be had unto their several capacities. (2) The opportunity for the discharging of the Duty is also declared from the muevery one his neighbour, and his brother.
Secondly, The positive part of the Promise consists of two Parts.
1. The things promised, which is the knowledge of God, They shall all know me. And this is placed in opposition unto what is denied; They shall not teach one another,
saying, Know the Lord. But this opposition is not as unto the Act or Duty of Teaching, but as unto the
2. There is added the universality of the Promise with respect unto them with All of them from the least udto the greatest. A proJerem. 8. 10. Every one from the least unto the greatest, is given unto covetousness.
This Text hath been looked on as attended with great difficulty and much obscuExpositors generally rather conceal, than remove. For from the vehesort or kind of Teaching which was in use under the Old Testament, some have apprehended and contended that all outward stated ways of instruction under the New Testament are useless and forbidden. Hereon
all the Ordinances of the Church, the whole Ministery and Guidance of it hath been rejected; which is in sum, that there is no such thing as a professing Church in the world. But yet those who are thus minded, are no way able to advance their opinion, but by a direct contradiction unto this Promise in their own sense of it. For they endeavor in what they do to teach others their opinion, and that not in the way of a publick Ordinance, but every one his neighbor; which if any thing, is here denied in an especial manner. And the truth is, that if all outward Teaching be absolutely and universally forbidden, as it would quickly fill the world with darkness and brutish ignorance, so if any one should come to the knowledge of the sense of this or any other Text of Scripture, it would be absolutely unlawful for him to communicate it unto others. For to say know the Lord, or the mind of God in this Text, either to neighbor or brother would be forbidden. And of all kinds of Teaching that by a Publick Ministery in the administration of the Ordinances of the Church, which alone is contended against from these words, seems least to be intended. For it is private, neighborly, brotherly instruction only that is expressed. Wherefore if on a Supposition of the Prohibition of such outward instruction any one shall go about to teach another, that the Publick Ordinances of the Church are not to be allowed as a means of Teaching under the New Testament, he directProhibition here given in his own sense, and is guilty of the viola
Howbeit some learned men have been so moved with this Objection, as to affirm, that the accomplishment of this Promise of the Covenant belongs unto Heaven, and the state of glory. For therein alone they say we shall have no more need of TeachTeaching of the New Covenant, and the Testator thereof, when he intends only that of the Old, and exalts the New above it; so there is no such difficulty in the words, as to force us to carry the interpretation of them into another world. Unto the right understanding of them sundry things are to be observed.
1. That sundry things seem in the Scripture oft-times to be denied absolutely as unto their nature and being, when indeed they are so only comparatively with reJerem. 7. 22, 23. I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt-offerings or sacrifices; but this thing commanded I them, saying, obey my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my People, and walk in all the ways that I commanded you, that it may be well unto you. The Jews of that time preferred the Ceremonial Worship by Burnt-offerings and Sacrifices above all moral Obedience, above the great Duties of Faith, Love, RighProphets declared the utter insufficiency of these Sacrifices and Burntthat he commanded them not. And the instance is given in that time wherein it is known that all the Ordinances of WorBurnt-Offerings and Sacrifices were solemnly instituted. But a comparison is made between Ceremonial Worship, and Spiritual Obedience, in respect whereof God says, he commanded not the former, namely, so as to stand in competition with the latter, or to be trusted unto in the neglect of it, wherein the evils and miscarBlessed Saviour expounds this and the like pasCeremonial Law, such as
2. The Teaching intended whose continuance is here denied, is that which was then in use in the Church; or rather was to be so when the New Covenant state was solemnly to be introduced. And this was twofold, (1) That which was instituted by God himself; And (2) that which the People had
The first of these is, as in other places, so particularly expressed, Deut. 6. 6, 7, 8, 9. And these words which I command thee this day shall be in thine heart. And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thy house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up. And thou shalt bind them for a sign on thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes. And thou shalt write them on the posts of thy house, and on thy gate. Add hereunto the
Two things may be considered in these Institutions. (1) What is natural and moral, included in the common mutual Duties of men one towards another. For of this nature is that of seeking the good of others, by instructing them in the knowledge of God, wherein their chiefest happiness doth consist. (2) That which is Ceremonial, as to the manner of this Duty, is described in sundry instanFrontlets and Fringes, writing on Posts and Doors. The first of these is to abide for ever. No Promise of the Gospel doth evacuate any Precept of the Law of Nature; such as that of seeking the good of others, and that their chiefest good by means and ways proper thereunto, is. But as unto the later, which the Jews did principally attend unto and rely upon, it is by this Promise, or the New Covenant, quite taken away.
2. As unto the Practice of the Church of the Jews in these Institutions, it is not to be expressed what extremities they ran into. It is probable that about the time spoken of in this Promise, which is that of the Babylonian Captivity, they began that intricate, perplexed way of Teaching, which afterwards they were wholly adteaching and learning of the Law. But herewithall they mixed so many vain Curiosities and Traditions of their own, that the whole of their endeavor was distheir Practice of this way of teaching, he threatens to destroy all them that attended unto it, Mal. 2. 12. The Lord will cut off the Master and the Scholar out of the Tabernacles of Jacob. It is true, we have not any Monuments or Records of their teaching all that time, neiSchools derived from these first Inventers. And of such reputation were those Schools among them, that none was esteemed a wise man, or to have any understanding of the Law who was
manner of their teaching, or what course they took therein, is in the
Wherefore the denial of the continuation of this Teaching may be considered two wayes.
(1) As it was external in opposition unto and comparison of the effectual internal Teaching by the grace of the New Covenant; so it is laid aside, not
(2) It may be considered in the manner of it, with especial respect unto the Ceremonial Law, as it consisted in the observance of sundry Rites and Ceremonies. And in this sense it was utterly to cease; above all with respect unto the additions which men had made unto the Ceremonial Institutions wherein it did consist; Such was their Teaching by writing parts of the Law on their Fringes, Frontlets, and Doors of their Houses; especially as these things were enlarged, and Precepts conJewish Church. It is promised conabsolutely removed as useless, burdensom, and inconsistent with the spiritual Teaching of the New Covenant. But as unto that kind of instruction, whether by publick, stated preaching of the Word, or that which is more private and occasional, which is subservient unto the promised Teach
And these things are spoken in exposition of this place, taken from the meaning and intention of the word Teaching, or the Duty itself, whose continuance and farknow the Lord. Concerning which, two things may be ob
1. That there was a knowledge of God under the Old Testament, so revealed as that it was hidden under Types, wrapt up in Vails, expressed only in Parables and Dark-sayings. For it was the mind of God, that as unto the clear perception and revelation of it, it should lie hid, until the Son came from his bosom to declare him; to make his name known, and to bring life and immortality to light; yea, some things belonging hereunto, though virtually revealed, yet were so compassed with darkness in the manner of their Revelation, as that the Angels themselves did not clearly and distinctly look into them. But that there were some such great and exMoses and the Prophets, with their Institutions of Worship, they did understand. But the best
time, nature and state of the things so revealed. For it was revealed unto them, that not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister in their Revelation of those things, 1 Pet. 1. 12. And as our Apostle informs us, Moses in his Ministery and Institutions, gave testimony unto the things which were to be spoken (that is clearly) afterwards, Chap. 3. 5. This secret hidden knowledge of God principally concerned the Incarnation of Christ, his mediation and suffering for Sin, with the Call of the Gentiles thereon. These and such like Mysteries of the Gospel they could never attain the comprehension of. But yet they stirred up each other diligently to enquire into them as to what they were capable of attainKnow the Lord. But it was little that they could attain unto, God having provided some better things for us, that they without us should not be made perfect. And when that Church ceased to make this the principal part of their Religion, namely, a diligent enquiry into the hidden knowledge of God, in and by the promised Seed, with a believing desire and expectation of its full maletter of the Word, looking on types and shadows as things present and substances, they not only lost the glory of their Prounbelief of the things signified unto them in their real exhibition. Now this kind of teaching by mutual encouragement to look into the vailed things of the Mystery of God in Christ, is now to cease at the solemn Introduction of the New Covenant, as being rendered useless by the full, clear reveshall no more, that is, they shall need no more, to teach, so to teach this knowledge of God, for it shall be made plain to the understanding of all Believers. And this is that which I judge to be principally intended by the Holy Ghost in this part of the Promise, as that which the positive part of it doth so directly answer unto.
2. The knowledge of the Lord may be here taken not objectively and doctrinally, but subjectively, for the renovation of the mind in the saving knowledge of God. And this neither is, nor can be communicated unto any by external teaching alone, in respect whereunto it may be said comparatively to be laid aside, as was intimated before.
We have, I hope, sufficiently freed the words from the difficulties that seem to attend them, so as that we shall not need to refer the accomplishment of this proHeaven with many ancient and modern Expositors; nor yet with others, to restrain it unto the first Converts in Christianity, who were miraculously illumiexclude the Ministery of the Church in teaching, or any other effectual way thereof. Somewhat may be observed of the particular expressions used in them.
1. There is in the original Promise the word amplius, no more. This is omitted by the Apostle, yet so, as that it is plainly included in what he extime and season which was limited unto that kind of teaching which was to cease. This season being to expire at the publicathey shall not teach, what the Prophet before declared with the limited season now expired, they shall do so no more.
2. The Prophet expresseth the Subject spoken of indefinitely A man his neighbour, a man his brother; that is any man; the Apostle by the unievery man, which is also reducible unto any one; every one that is or may be called to this work, or hath occasion or opportunity for it. For of this teaching the Rule is Ability and Opportunity. He that can do it, and hath an op
3. That which they taught, or intended in that expression, Know the Lord, is the same with what is promised in the latter part of the Verse, where it must be spo
1. The instructive Ministry of the Old Testament, as it was such only, and with respect unto the carnal Rites thereof, was a Ministery of the Letter, and not of the Spirit, which did not really effect in the hearts of men the things which it taught. The spipromise, and not from
the efficacy of the Law, or the Covenant made at Sinai. For as such, as it was lelaid aside.
2. There is a Duty incumbent on every man to instruct others according to his ability and opportunity, in the knowledge of God; the Law whereof being natural and eternal, is always obligatory on all sorts of persons. This is not here either prohi
3. It is the Spirit of Grace alone as promised in the New Covenant, which frees the Church from a laborious, but ineffectual way of teaching. Such was that in use among the Jews of old; and it is well if somewhat not much unlike it, do not prevail among many at this day. Whoever he be who in all his teaching doth not take his encouragement from the internal, effectual teaching of God under the Covenant of Grace, and bends not all his endeavors to be subservient thereunto, hath but an Old Testament Ministery, which ceaseth as unto any divine approba
4. There was an hidden treasure of Divine wisdom, of the knowledge of God laid up in the mystical Revelations and Institutions of the Old Testament, which the people were not then able to look into, nor to comprehend. The confirmation and explanation of this truth, is the principal design of the Apostle in this whole Epistle. This knowKnow the Lord; howbeit their attainments were but small, in comparison of what is contained in the ensuing Promise.
5. The whole knowledge of God in Christ is both plainly revealed and savingly communicated by virtue of the New Covenant unto them who do believe, as the next words declare.
The positive part of the Promise remaineth unto consideration. And two things must be enquired into, (1) Unto whom it is made. (2) What is the subject matter of it.
1. Those unto whom it is made, are so expressed in the Prophet, emphatical. The former the Apostle renders in the plural numEmphasis,
The Proposition is universal, as to the modification of the Subject all; but in the word of them, it is restrained unto those alone with whom this Covenant is made.
The distribution of them is made in a Proverbial Speech, from the least to the
greatest, used in a peculiar manner by this Prophet, Chap. 6. 13. Chap. 8. 10. Chap. 31. 32. Chap. 42. 1. Chap. 44. 12. It is only once more used in the Old Testament, and not elsewhere, Jon. 3. 5. And it may denote either the universality,
But whereas it is the internal, effectual Grace of the Covenant, and not only the means, but the infallible event thereon, not only that they shall be all taught to know, but that they shall, all actually know the Lord, all individuals are intended; that is that whole Church, all whose Children are to be taught of God, and so to learn as to come unto him by saving Faith in Christ. So doth this part of the Promise hold proportion with the other, of writing the Law in the hearts of the Covenanters. As unto all these it is promised absolutely, that they shall know the Lord.
But yet among them there are many distinctions and degrees of persons, as they are variously differenced by internal and external circumstances. There are some that are greatest, and some that are least, and various intermediate degrees between them. So it hath been, and so it ever must be, whilest the natural, acquired and spiritual abilities of men have great variety of degrees among them; and whilest mens outward advantages and opportunities do also differ. Whereas therefore it is promised that they shall all of them know the Lord, it is not implied that they shall all do so equally, or have the same degree of spiritual wisdom and understand
1. There are and ever were different degrees of persons in the Church, as unto the saving knowledge of God. Hence is that distribution of them into Fathers, Young men and Children, 1 John 2. 13, 14. All have not one measure, all arrive not to the same stature; but yet as to the ends of the Covenant, and the duties required of them in their walk before God, they that have most have nothing over, nothing to spare; and they that have least, shall have no lack. Every ones duty it is to be content with what he receives, and to improve it unto the uttermost.
2. Where there is not some degree of saving knowledge, there no interest in the New Covenant can be pretended.
Secondly, The thing promised, is the knowledge of God. They shall all know me. No duty is more frequently commanded than this is, nor any grace more frequently promised. See Deut. 30. 6. Jer. 24. 7. Ezek. 11. 19. Chap. 36. 26, 27. For it is the foundation of all other duties of obedience, and of all communion with God in them. All graces as unto their exercise, as Faith, Love and Hope are founded therein. And the woful want of it which is visible in the world, is an evidence how little there is of true Evangelical Obedience among the generality of them that are called Christians. And two things may be considered in this Promise. (1) The object, or what is to be known. (2) The knowledge itself, of what kind and nature it is.
The first is God himself; They shall know me, saith the Lord. And it is so not absolutely, but as unto some especial Revelation of himself. For there is a knowledge
2. The knowledge of these things, is that which is promised. For notwithstand
1. The full and clear declaration of God as he is to be known of us in this life, is a priviledge reserved for and belonging unto the days of the New Testament. Before it was not made, and more than is now made, is not to be expected in this world. And the reason hereof is, because it was made by Christ. See the Exposition on Chap. 1. v. 1, 2.
2. To know God as he is revealed in Christ, is the highest priviledge whereof in this life we can be made partakers. For this is life eternal, that we may know the Father the onely true God, and Jesus Christ whom he hath sent, John 17. 3.
3. Persons destitute of this saving knowledge, are utter strangers unto the Covenant of Grace. For this is a principal promise and effect of it, wherever it doth take place.
For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.
THis is the great fundamental Promise and Grace of the New Covenant. For though it be last expressed, yet in order of nature it precedeth the other merProphet, doth demonstrate. What I have spoken, faith the Lord, shall be accomFor I will be merciful, &c. without which there could be no participation of the other things mentioned. Wherefore not only an addition of new grace and mercy is expressed in these words, but a reason also is rendered why or on what grounds he would bestow on them those other mercies.
The House of Israel and Judah with whom this Covenant was made in the first place, and who are spoken of as Representatives of all others who are taken into it, and who thereon become the Israel of God, were such as had broken and disannulwhich my Covenant they brake. Nor is there any mention of any other qualification, whereby they should be prepafirst thing in order of nature that is to be done unto this end, is the free pardon of sin. Without a supposition hereof, no other mercy can they be made partakers of. For whilest they continue under the guilt of sin, they are also under the curse. Whereonely reason, why God will give unto them the other blessings mentioned, For I will be merciful.
Free and sovereign, undeserved grace in the pardon of sin, is the original spring and foundation of all Covenant mercies and blessings. Hereby and hereby alone is the glory of God, and the safety of the Church provided for. And those who like not Gods Covenant on those terms, as none do by nature, will eternally fall short of the grace of it. Hereby all glorying, and all boasting in our selves is excluded, which was that which God aimed at in the contrivance and establishment of this Covenant, Rom. 3. 27. 1 Cor. 1. 29, 30, 31. For this could not be, if the funfree pardon of sin without respect unto any thing in those that receive it, we renounce the Gospel. Pardon of sin is not merited by antecedent duties, but is the strongest obligation unto future duties. He that will not receive pardon, un
In the Promise itself we may consider, (1) Who it is made unto. (2) What it is that is promised.
The first is expressed in the Pronoun their, three times repeated. All those absolutely, and only those with whom God makes this Covenant, are intended. whose sins are not pardoned, do in no sense partake of this Covenant, it is not made with them. For this is the Covenant that God makes with them, that he will be merciful unto their sins, that is unto them in the pardon of them. Some speak of an universal conditional Covenant made with all Mankind. If there be any such thing, it is not that here intended. For they are all actually pardoned with whom this Covedeclaration of the nature and terms of the Comaking of a Covenant with any. And what should be the conLaw, and the curse of it, for so
But then on the other hand it will follow, they say, that men are pardoned before they do believe, which is expresly contrary unto the Scripture. And (1) The communication and donation of faith unto us, is an effect of the same grace whereapplication of pardoning mercy unto our souls, is in order of nature consequent unto believing, but in time they go together. (3) Faith is not required unto the procuring of the pardon of our sins, but unto the receiving of it. That they may receive the remission of sins. But that which we shall observe from hence is, That
The New Covenant is made with them alone, who effectually and eventually are made partakers of the grace of it. This is my Covenant that I will make with them, I will be merciful unto their unrighteousness, &c. Those with whom the Old Covenant was made, were all of them actual Partakers of the benefits of it; and if they are not so with whom the New is made, it comes short of the Old in efficacy, and may be utterly frustrate. Neither doth the indefinite Proposal of the terms of the Covenant prove that the Covenant is made with them, or any who enjoy not the benefits of it. Indeed this is the excellency of this Covenant, and so it is here declared, that it doth effectually communicate all the grace and mercy con
Secondly, The subject matter of this Promise, is the pardon of sin. And that which we have to consider for the exposition of the words, is (1) What is meant by sins. (2) What by the pardon of them. (3) What is the reason of the pecu
Sin is spoken of with respect unto its guilt especially, so is it the object of mercy and grace. Guilt is the desert of punishment, or the obligation of the sinner un
Sin is here expressed by three terms, unrighteousness, sin and transgression, as we render the words. In the Prophet there is only all three used, where mention is made of the pardon of sin, or the causes of it. As (1) in the declaration of the Name of God with respect thereunto, Exod. 34. pardoning iniquity, transgression and sin. (2) In the confession of sin for the reLev. 16. 21. Aaron shall confess over him,
all their iniquities, all their transgressions, in all their sins. (3) In the expression of the forgiveness of sin in justificaPsal. 32. 1, 2. Wherefore the Apostle might justly make up the expression and general enumeration of sins here defective in the Prophet, seeing it is elsewhere so constantly used to the same purpose, and on the like occasion.
Nor are those terms needlesly multiplied, but sundry things we are taught thereall sorts of sins. (2) That in the grace of the Covenant there is mercy provided for the pardon of them all, even of them from which they could not be justified by the Law of Moses, Acts 13. 42. And that (3) Therefore none should be discouraged from resting on the faithfulness of God in this Covenant, who are invited unto a compliance therewith.
But there is yet more intended in the use of these words. For they do distinctby which the Conscience of a sinner is affected, burdened and terrified; as also whereon the equity of the curse and punish
The first is unrighteousness. This is usually taken for sins against the second Table, or the transgression of that rule of righteousness amongst men, which unequal and unrighteous it is, that man should sin against God his Sovereign Ruler and Benefactor. As God is the Supreme Lord and Governor of all, as he is our onely Benefactor and ReRighteousness in us is the rendering unto God what is due unto him, that is, univerRighteousness towards man is but a branch springing from this root; and where this is not, there is no Righteousness amongst men whatever is pretended. If we give not unto God the things that are Gods, it will not avail us to give unto Caesar the things that are Caesars, nor unto other men what is their own. And this is the first consideration of sin, that renders the sinunrighteous thing. Herewith the Conscience of the sinner is affect
The second is erring from that end and scope which it is our duty to aim at. There is a certain end for which we rule proper unto us whereby we may attain it. And this end being our onely blessedness, it is our interest, as it was in the principles of our natures, to be always in a tendency towards it. This is the glory of God, and our eternal salvation in the enjoyment of him. Thereunto the Law of God is a perfect Guide. To sin therefore, is to forsake that Rule, and to forgo therein our aim at that end. It is to place self and the world as our end, in the place of God and his glory, and to take the imaginations of our hearts for our Rule. Wherefore the perverse folly that is in sin, in wandering away from the chiefest good as our end, and the best guide as our rule, embracing the greatest evils in their stead, is
3. There is Transgression of the Law.
a lawless person; whom the Hebrews call a Son of Belial, one who owns no yoke nor rule. And a voluntary unconformity unto the Law. Herein the formal nature of sin consists, as the Apostle tells us, 1 Joh. 3. 4. And this is that which in the first place passeth on the Conscience of a sinner. Wherefore as all sorts of particular sins are included in these multiplied names of sin; so the general nature of sin in all its causes and respects, terrifying the sinner, and manifesting the righteousness of the Curse of the Law, are declared and represent
1. That the aggravations of Sin are great and many, which the Consciences of convinced Sinners ought to have regard unto.
2. There is grace and mercy in the New Covenant provided for all sorts of sins, and all aggravations of them, if they be received in a due manner.
3. Aggravations of Sin do glorifie grace in pardon. Therefore doth God here so express them, that he may declare the glory of his grace in their re
4. We cannot understand aright the glory and excellency of pardoning mercy, unless we are convinced of the greatness and vileness of our sins in all their aggravations.
Secondly, That which is promised with respect unto these sins, is two ways expresI will be merciful. (2) I will remember
(1) A respect unto the Mediator of the Covenant, and the propitiation for sin made by him. Without this, there can be no remission, nor is any pro
(2) The dissolution of the obligation of the Law binding over the guilty sinEvangelical Pardon, and respect is had in these words unto them both.
merciful, is propitious, gracious through a propitiapropitiation under the New Testament, Rom. 3. 25. 1 John 2. 2. And he died, propitiate God for sin; to render him propitious unto sinners, Heb. 2. 17. in him alone God is
2. The Law with the sanction of it was the means appointed of God to bring judicial remembrance and tryal. Wherefore the dissolution of the obliremembring sin no more. The Assertion whereof is fortified by a double Negative: Sin shall never be called legally to remembrance. But the whole Doctrine of the Pardon of Sin, I have so largely handled in the Exposition of Psalm 130. that I must not here again reassume the same Argument.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
HAving in the foregoing Verses proved in general the insufficiency of the Old Covenant, the necessity of the New, the difference between the one and the other, with the preference of the later above the former, in all confirming the excellency of the Priesthood of Christ, above that of
In that he saith a new[Covenant]he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old, is ready to vanish away.
A double Argument the Apostle here maketh use of. (1) From a special word or testimony. (2) From a general Maxim of truth in all kinds.
In the former we may consider, (1) The Testimony he makes use of. (2) The Inference unto his own purpose which he makes from it.
1. The first consisteth in the Adjunct of this other promised Covenant. It is by God himself called New;
in that, or whereas it is said a a New. So it is expresly in the Prophet, Behold I will make a new Covenant. Thus every word of the Holy Ghost, though but occasional unto the principal Subject spoken of, is a sufficient evidence of what may be deduced from it. And by this kind of arguing are we taught, that the Word of God is full of holy mysteries, if with humility and under the conduct of his holy Spirit, we do, as we ought, diligently enquire into them. This therefore he layeth down as the foundation of his present Argument; That God himself doth not call this promised Covenant another Covenant, or a second; nor only declare the excellency of it; but signally calls it a New Covenant.
2. That which he infers from hence, is that he hath made the first Old. The force of the Argument doth not lie in this, that he calleth second New; but that he would not have done so, had not he made the first Old. For active signification, and denotes an authoritative act of God upon the Old Covenant, whereof the calling the other New was a Sign and eviother Old: For with respect thereunto this is called New. But yet it was the designation of the New Covenant, that was the foundation of making the other Old.
The word respecting the time past, we must enquire what time it doth refer untime of the prediction and promise of the New Covenant, or the time of its introduction and establishment. And it is the first seaactually take away and abolish the Old, making it to disappear: But the act of God here intendmaking it Old in order thereunto. And he did this upon and by the giving of this Promise, and afterwards by various acts, and in various de
1. He did it by calling the Faith of the Church from resting in it, through the expectation of the bringing in of a better in the room of it. This brought it unSo did God make it Old.
2. He did it by a plain declaration of its infirmity, weakness and insufficiency for the great ends of a perfect Covenant between God and the Church. Many things unto this purpose might have been collected out of the nature of its institutions and promises, from the first giving of it, as is done by our Apostle in his present disvail was on them that they could not see at all unto the end of the things that were to be done away. But now when God himself comes positively to declare by that Prophet, that it was so weak and insufficient, and that therefore he would make another, a better with them; this made it Old, or declared it to be in a tendency unto a dissolution.
3. From the giving of this Promise, God did variously by his Providence break in upon and weaken its administration, which by its decaying age was more and more manifested. For,
1. Immediately after the giving of this Promise, the Babylonian Captivity gave a total intercision and interruption unto the whole administration of it for seventy years. This, having never before fallen out from the making of it on Mount Sinai, was an evident token of its approaching period, and that God would have the Church to live without it.
2. Upon the return of the People from their Captivity, neither the Temple, nor
the Worship of it, nor any of the administrations of the Covenant, nor the Priestutter end unto all the administrations of it, Hag. 2. 6, 7, 8, 9. And from that time forwards it were easie to trace the whole prodeclined towards the end.
Thus did God make it Old, by variously disposing of it unto its end; and to give an evidence thereof, called the other Covenant which he would make, a New One. And it did not decay of it self. For no institution of God will ever wax old of it self; will ever decay, grow infirm, nor perish, unless it be disannulled by God himself. Length of time will not consume Divine Institutions, nor can the sins of Men abate their force. He only that sets them up, can take them down.
And this is the first Argument of the Apostle, taken from this testimony, to prove that the first Covenant was to be abolished. But whereas it may be questioned, whether it directly follows or no, that it must be taken away because it is made old, he confirms the truth of his Inference from a general maxim, which hath the nature of a new argument also. Now, saith he, that which decayeth and waxeth old, is ready to vanish away.
Old is significative of that which is to have an end, and which draws towards its end. Every thing that can wax old hath an end; and that which doth so, draws towards that end. So the Psalmist affirming that the Heavens themselves shall perish, adds as a proof thereof, they shall wax old as a garment; and then none can doubt but they must have an end, as unto their substance or their use.
There is in the words, 1. The Notation of the Subject, but that, or that whatever it be that waxeth old.
2. The description of it in a double expression, synonyma, and to be used for emphasis onely. decay, that which decayeth, to avoid the repetition of the same word, we having no other to express waxing old, or made old by. But decayeth, it is that which hath the effect passively of made old; and it properly respecteth things. Things are so said to be made old, not persons. But the other word respects persons, not things. Men and not Inanimate things are said
That which is affirmed of this subject of the Proposition, is, that it is near unto a disappearance, that is an abolition, and taking out of the way.
The Proposition is universal, and holds absolutely in all things, as is evident in the light of nature. Whatever brings things unto a decay and age, will bring them unto an end; for decay and age are the expressions of a tendency unto an end. Let an Angel live never so long, he waxeth not old, because he cannot dye. Waxing old is absolutely opposed unto an eternal duration, Psal. 102. 26, 27.
It being the removal of the Old Covenant and all its administrations that is rea disapappearance
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
THE general Design of the Apostle in these Discourses, is to manifest and prove that the Old Covenant made with the Church at Sinai, with all the Ordinances of Worship and Priviledges thereunto betaken away, or ceased to be of any force in the Church. Hereon did a total Alteration of the whole present Church state of the Hebrews depend; which, it is easy to think how difficult it was with them, to forede facto that Covenant was ceased, but evinceth by all sorts of Reanecessary that so it should do; and that unspeakable Advantages did accrue unto the Church thereby.
In the pursuit of this Design, he unfolds unto them the greatest Mysteries of the Wisdom and Counsel of God, that ever were revealed unto the Church before he spake unto us by the Son. For
1. On this occasion he takes off the vail from the face of Moses, declaring the nature and end of the Old Covenant, the use, Signification and Efficacy of all the Institutions and Ordinances of Worship thereunto belonging. They were all prescribed unto the diligent Observation of the Church of the Old Testament; and their adherence unto them, was the great Trial of their Obedi
2. He takes occasion from hence to declare the great Mystery of the Redemption of the Church by Christ; of the Office that he bare, and the work that he performed therein. This was that which he principally designed, as being indeed the
Unto the general end mentioned, the Apostle makes use of all sorts of ArConstitution, Nature, Use, Efficacy, Officers and Ordinances of the
In order unto the first of these, he hath done two things in the Preceding Chapters. (1.) He hath declared that there were Prefigurations and Predictions of the Cessation of the first Covenant and all its Administrations. As also that God had so ordered all things in and under that Covenant, as that they must neexpire and cease at a certain appointed time. (2.) He hath evinced the Necessity hereof, because that Covenant could not consummate the state of the Church, nor give assured Rest and Peace unto the consciences of them that apTypical Nature of all its Ordinances and Institutions. For whereas there was in and by them a Representation made of Heavenly things, those Heavenly things themselves could not be introduced without their Removal.
It is the second thing mentioned, or the Advantage of the Church by the taking away of the first Covenant, and all its sacred Administrations, that he principally insists upon. For herein he designed (as was before observed) to declare the Glorious Mystery of the Counsell of God, concerning the Redemption and Salvation of the Church by Jesus Christ. But whereas this in general is the substance of the Gospel, and the Subject of all his other Epistles, he doth not here consider and declare it absolutely, but as it was Prefigured and Typed out by those Institutions of Worship, whereby God both instructed the Church and exercised their Faith and Obedience, under the Old Testament.
Three things there were, which were the Glory of those Administrations, and which the Hebrews so rested in, as that they refused the Gospel out of an Adherence unto them. (1.) The Priestly Office. (2.) The Tabernacle with all its furniture, wherein that Office was exercised. (3.) The Duties and Worship of the Priests in that Tabernacle by Sacrifices; Especially those wherein there was a solemne Expiation of the sins of the whole Congregation.
In reference unto these, the Apostle proves three things.
1. That neither any, nor all of them could consummate or make perfect the
Peace and Confidence beGod and the Worshippers.
2. That they were all Typical and Figurative, ordained to represent things that were far more Sublime, Glorious and Excellent than themselves.
3. That indeed the Lord Christ in his Person and Mediation was all those things really and substantially, which they did but Obumbrate and Prefigure; that he was and did what they could only direct unto an expectation of.
1. These things he declareth and evinceth fully with respect unto the Priestly Office, in the
2. He doth the same as unto the Tabernacle in general in the Eighth Chapter, confirming his Discourse with that great collateral Argument taken from the Nature and Excellency of that
3. There remains only the consideration of the Services and Sacrifices which belonged unto the Priestly Office in that Tabernacle. Herein the Hebrews plaChurch-State and Worship. This the Apostle knew to be the great point in Difference between him and them, and that whereon the whole Doctrine of the Iustification of Sinners before God did depend. This therefore was exactly to be discussed, from the nature of the things themselves, and the Testimonies of the Holy Ghost in the Scripture, on which Principles alone he deals with these Hebrews. This is that which he now in particular ingageth into, handling it at large in this and the next Chapter unto ver. 23. where he returns unto his first Exhortation, in an use of the Truth which he had evinced.
Two things unto this Purpose he designs in general. (1.) To declare the Nature, Use and Efficacy of the Rites, Services and Sacrifices of the Law. (2.) To manifest the Nature, Glory and Efficacy of the Sacrifice of Christ, wherePerson and Mediation of Christ. And those things are duly to be considered by all who desire to understand the mind of the Holy Ghost in this Epistle.
This Chapter hath two general Parts.
1. A Proposition and Declaration of the Fabrick of the Tabernacle, its Furniver. 11.
2. A Declaration of the Nature of the Tabernacle and Sacrifice of the Lord Christ, with the end and Efficacy thereof; from ver. 11. unto the end.
Of the first general there are four Parts.
1. A Proposition of the Constitution of the Tabernacle of Old, with all its UtenV. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
2. The Use of that Tabernacle and the things in it, in and unto the sacred DuVer. 6. 7.
3. The Iudgement of the Apostle upon the Whole both of the Fabrick and its Use, ver. 8.
4. The Reasons of that Judgment; ver. 9. 10.
In the first Part there is; (1.) A General Proposition of the whole, ver. 1. (2.) A particular Explanation of it; ver. 2, 3, 4, 5.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
SOme things must be premised unto the Reading of these Words. the first, doth in the original answer in Gender unto all things which the Apostle treats of; namely, the Priesthood, the Tabernacle, and the Covenant. But many Greek Copies do expresly read The Tabernacle. So is the Text expressed in Stephen's Edition, wherein he followed sixteen antient Manuscripts, adhering generally unto the Concurrent Agreement of the greatest number: And the Word is retained in the most common Edition. But there are antient Copies also, where it is omitted: And they are attested unto by all antient Translations, as the Syriack and Vulgar Latine, the Arabick supplying, Covenant, in the room of it. Wherefore
As first; In the last verse of the preceding Chapter whereunto this immeOld Covenant, calleth it absolutethe first, without the addition of that first, it is irrational to think that he refers it to another Subject.
2. His Design requires that the first Covenant be intended. For he is not inTabernacle and the New Testament; but between the Old Covenant, and the New. And the words of the Text with those that follow, contain a concession of what belonged unto the Old Covenant, particularly in the Administration of Divine Worship; as it is observed by
3. The Expression in the close of the verse, A Worldly Sanctuary, is no more nor less, but the Tabernacle: For it is that which the Apostle immediately describes in its Parts and Furniture, which are the Parts of the Tabernacle, and no other. And if the word Tabernacle, be here retained, the sense must be; and verily the first Tabernacle had Ordinances of Worship and the Tabernacle.
4. In the next verse adding an Account of what he had affirmed, he saith, For there was a Tabernacle prepared; the first; which would render this sense to the context; For the first Tabernacle, had a Tabernacle; for there was a Tabernacle prepared: Wherefore I shall adhere unto the supplement made by our
construction, from the Ambiguity of the case and number of
Syr: But in the first there were in it. As the Arab: In the first Covenant there was contained. Vul. Lat. habuit quidem & prius; the
a worldly holy house. The Tabernacle was frequently called the House of God, and the House of the Sanctuary. Vul: Sanctum seculare. Rhem: a secular Sanctuary; which the Interlinear changeth into mundanum: seculare deduration but it is not the Design of the Apostle to speak of the duration of that, which he is proving to be ceased. Beza. Sanctuarium mundanum, some respect the particles illudque.
Then verily even that first Covenant, had Ordinances of worship, and also a worldly Sanctuary.
PRoceeding unto the comparison designed between the old Covenant and the new, as unto the services and sacrifices wherewith the one and the other was established and confirmed, He introduceth the concession, as unto what really belonged thereunto. And this is the constant Method of the Apostle in all the
There is in this Verse,
1. An Introduction of the concession intended. Particles is some what unusual. Hence some would have, redundant; some joyn it in construction with Beza, whom our translators follow, For the word, Also; [had also Ordinances;] renders,
The subject spoken of is first Covenant whereof we treat. The Covenant made with the Fathers at Sinai, which as unto the Administrations of it the Hebrews as yet adhered unto. The nature of this Covenant we have spoken unto at large on the foregoing chapter, and thither reCovenant it is affirmed in general, that it had two things, (1) Ordinances of worship. (2) A worldly Sanctuary; and the Relation of them unto it, is, that it had them.
1. It had them it hath them, but, it had them. That is, say some, it had so whilest that Tabernacle was standing, and whilest these things were in force; but now the Covenant is de facto to have been yet in Being, in the patience and forbearance of God. Only he afready to disappear. Nor was he to take for granted, what was the principal Hebrews, but to prove it, which he doth accordingly. Hence he grants that there were
Every Covenant of God had its proper Priviledges and Advantages, Even the first Covenant had so, and those such as were excellent in themselves, though not comparable with them of the new. For to make any Covenant with men, is an eminent fruit of Goodness, Grace and Condescention in God, whereon he will annex such Priviledges thereunto, as may evince it so to be.
2. This first Covenant had two things in general. 1.
Greek Versions; and next unto that by legal and right. The Vulgar Latine rendets it by Iustificationes; from the inclusion of Ius, Iustum in Luk. 1, 6. Rom. 1. 32. chap. 2. 26. chap. 5. 16. chap, 8. 4. Heb. 9. 1. ver. 10. Rev. 15. 4. chap. 19. 8. And in no one place doth it signifie Institution, but it may be better renRighteousness when alone we so translate it. Rom. 5. 16. In the context and construction wherein it is here placed, it can have no signification, but that of Ordinances, Rites, Institutions, Statutes, the constant sense of Rites of the Law may be called Iustifications, or whether
These Ordinances, or Statutes were so (of service) that is, as we render it divine service.
Divine service, Ioh. 16. 2. Rom. 9. 4. chap. 12. 1. Cultus, of worship, and so were it better rendred, than by Divine service. In one place it signifies by it self, as much as Rom. 9. 4, unto whom belonged the giving of the Law, and the worship; that is,
Ordinances of worship. The Ordinances of the Ceremonial Law. For although God were served in and according to the commands of the
And this was that part of Divine worship about which God had so many controversies with the People of Israel under the Old Testament. For they were always apt to run into noxious extreams about it: For the most part they were prone to neglect it, and to run into all manner of superstition and Idolatry. For the Law of this worship was an hedge that God had set about them to keep them from those Abominations. And if at any time they brake over it, or neglected it, and let it fall, they failed not to rush into the most athe external observance of the ordinances and institutions of it. And hereby they countenanced themselves not only in a neglect of moral Duties and spiritual Obedience, but in a course of flagitious sins and wickednesses. To repress these exorbitances with respect unto both these extreams, the ministry of the Prophets was in an especial manner directed. And we may observe some things here in our passage, as included in the Apostle's assertion, though not any part of his present Design.
1. There was never any Covenant between God and man, but it had some Ordinances or Arbitrary Institutions of external Divine worship annexed unto it. The original Covenant of works had the Ordinances of the
2. It is an hard and rare thing to have the minds of men kept upright with God in the Observation of the Institutions of Divine worship. Adam lost himself and us all by his failure therein. The Old Church seldom attained unto it, but continually wandred into one of the extreams mentioned before. And at this day there are very few in the world who judge a diligent observation of Divine Institutions to be a thing of any great importance. By some they are neg
That these Ordinances of divine worship might be duly observed and rightPlace appointed of God for their solemnization. It had, also a worldly Sanctuary: He renders holy Place, a Sanctuary. And why
services, sacrifices, and place of worship unTemple, with its fabrick, and the order of its services; but in the Tabernacle set up by Moses in the wilderness. And this he doth for the ensuing Reasons.
1. Because his principle Design is to confirm the preeminence of the New Covenant above the Old. To this end he compares them together in their first Introduction and establishment with what did belong unto them therein. And as this in the new Covenant was the Priesthood, Mediation, and Sacrifice of Christ; so in the old it was the Tabernacle with the services and sacrifices that belonged unto it. These the first covenant was accompained with and established by; and therefore were they peculiarly to be compared with the Tabernacle of Christ, and the sacrifice that he offered therein. This is the principle Reason why in this disputation he hath all along respect unto the Tabernacle, and not unto the Temple.
2. Although the Temple with its glorious fabrick and excellent order added much unto the outward Beauty and Splendor of the sacred worship, yet was it no more but a large exemplification of what was vertually contained in the Tabernacle and the institutions of it, from whence it derived all its Glory. And therefore these Hebrews principally rested in, and boasted of the Revelation made unto Moses and his institutions. And the excellency of the worship of the new Covenant being manifested above that of the Tabernacle there is no plea left for the additional outward Glory of the Temple.
2. Designing to treat of this Holy Tent or Tabernacle, he confines himself unto the first general Distribution of it. Exod. 26. 33. And thou shalt hang up the Vail under the Taches, that thou mayst bring in thither the Ark of the Testimony, and the Vail shall divide unto you, between
It is observed by the Apostle that the first Covenant had this Sanctuary; (1) Because so soon as God had made that Covenant with the people, he prescribexposition of the Text, as to the design of the Apostle in it, that we consider what that priviledge was, or wherein it did consist. And
1. This Tabernacle with what belonged thereunto was a Visible Pledge of the presence of God among the people, owning, Blessing and protecting of them. And it was a pledge of Gods own Institution, in imitation whereof, the suNumb. 10. 35, 36. Rise up Lord and let thine enemies be scattered, and let them that hate thee, fly before thee. And when it rested he said, Return O Lord unto the many thousands of Israel. And thence the Ark was called the Ark of Gods strength; see Psal. 68. 1, 2. 13. 2, 8. 2 Chron. 6. 41. because it was a pledg of Gods putting forth his strength and power in the behalf of the people. And according unto this Institution it was a most effectual means to strengthen their faith and confidence in God. For what could they desire more in Reference thereunto, than to enjoy such a gracious earnest of his powerful presence among them? But when they ceased to trust in God, and put their confidence in the things themselves, which were no otherwise useful but as they were Pledges of his Presence, they proved their Ruine. Hereof we have a fatal instance in their bringing the Ark into the field, in their battell against the Philistines. 1 Sam. 4. 5, 6. And it will fare no better with others who shall rest satisfied with outward Institutions of divine worship, neglecting the end of them all, which is faith and trust in God. Ierem. 7. 4. But men of corrupt minds had rather place their trust in any
2. It was the Pledge and means of Gods Residence or dwelling among them, which expresseth the peculiar manner of his presence mentioned in geExod. 15. 17. Chap. 25. 8. Chap. 29. 44, 45, 46. Numb. 5. 3. And the consideration hereof was a powerful motive unto Holiness, Fear and Reverence; unto which ends it is e
3. It was a fixed Seat of all divine worship wherein the truth and purity of it was to be preserved. Had the observation of the Ordinances of divine serfoolish practices, or have been utterly neglected. But God appointed this Sanctuary for the preservation of the purity of his worship, as well as for the solemnity thereof: see Deut. 12. 8, 9, 10, 11. Here was the Book of the Law laid up, according unto the Prescript whereof the Priests were obliged in all generations to take care of the publick worship of God.
4. It was principally the priviledge and glory of the Church of Israel, in that it was a continual Representation of the Incarnation of the Son of God; a Type of his coming in the flesh to dwell among us, and by the one sacrifice of himself to make Reconciliation with God, and Atonement for sins. It was such an expression of the Idea of the mind of God concerning the person and memystery, which they had no comprehension of?
But yet the Sanctuary the Apostle calls worldly. Expositors both antient and modern do even weary themselves in their enquiries why the Aworldly. But I think they do so without cause, the Reason of the Appellation being evident in his design and the context. And there is a difficulty added unto it by the Latine translation which renders the word Seculare, which denotes Continuance or duration. This expresseth the Hebrew outward Court of the Temple, whereunto the Gentiles or men of the world were admitted, whence it was called worldly and not sacred: But this exposition though countenanced by many of the Ancients, is contrary unto the whole design of the Apostle. For (1) He speaks of the Tabernacle, whereSanctuary, whereof he speaks, he immediately distributes into two parts, as they were divided by the Vail; namely, the Holy and the most Holy Place, which were the two parts of the Tabernacle itself. (3) He treats of the Sanctuary only with respect unto the divine service to be performed in it by the Priests, which they did not in any outward court whereunto the Gentiles might be admitted.
Wherefore the Apostle terms this Sanctuary worldly, because it was every way in and of this world. For (1) The Place of it was on the earth in this world, in opposition whereunto the Sanctuary of the new Covenant is in Heaven. chap. 8. 2. (2) Although the materials of it were as durable as any thing in that kind could be procured, as Gold and Shittim wood, because they were to be of a long continuance, yet were they worldly; that is, caduca, fading and perishing things, as are all things of the world; God intimat
1. That Divine institution alone is that which renders any thing acceptable unto God. Although the things that belonged unto the Sanctuary, and the Sanctuary itself, were in themselves but
2. God can animate outward carnal things with an hidden invisible Spring of Glory and Efficacy; so he did their Sanctuary with its relation unto Christ; which was an Object of faith, which no eye of flesh could behold.
3. All divine service or worship must be resolved into divine ordination or Institution. A worship not ordained of God is not accepted of God.
4. A worldly Sanctuary is enough for them whose service is worldly; and these things the men of the world are satisfied with.
TWo things were ascribed unto the first Covenant in the verse foregoing. (1)Ordinances of worship;(2)A worldly Sanctuary.In this verse the Apostle enters upon a description of them both, inverting the Order of their proposal, beginning with the latter, or the Sanctuary itself.
Vul. Lat. Tabernaculum enim factum est primum, The first Tabernacle was made, ambiguously, as we shall see. Syr.
in Tabernaculo primo quod factum erat. In the first Tabernacle that was made.
For there was a Tabernacle made,(prepared)The first wherein was the Candlestick and the Table, and the shew-bread; which is called the Sanctuary.
Our Translation thus rendring the words avoids the ambiguity mentioned in the Vulgar Latine. First of all there was a Tabernacle made. But whereFirst being mentioned, where only one thing went before, which yet includes a distribution supposed, I would supply it with two parts. There was a Tabernacle made consisting of two parts. Tabernaculum bipartitè extructum. For the following words are a distinct de
1. The subject spoken of is the Tabernacle. 2. That which in general is affirmed of it is, that it was made. 3. There is a distribution of it into two parts in this and the following verse. 4. These parts are described and dinames. (2) Their situation with respect unto one another. (3) Their Contents or sacred Utensils. The one is so dethe first, that which was first entred into. (2) By its Utensils which were three. (1) The Candlesticks. (2) The Table. (3) The Shew-bread. (3) By its name it was called the Sanctuary.
1 The subject treated of is fabrick, as the Temple was afterwards of the House built by Solomon.
An Eminent Type this was of the Incarnation of Christ, whereby the fulness of the Godhead dwelt in him bodily; Col. 2. 9. Substantially in the humane nature, as it dwelt
The consideration hereof, the Apostle on set purpose fixed on, as the great Concomitant, Priviledge or Glory of the first Covenant whereof he treats; and whose consideration was excellently suited unto his Design. Immediately on the giving of the Law and making that Covenant in Horeb, which was accepted of by the People and solemnly ratified, (Exod. 24. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.) the whole of their remaining station in that place for some months, was taken up, in Moses his receiving Revelations, and the People's making proviMoses in the Mount with God, whilest he instructed him in all things that belonged unto it; so great and glorious was the Design of Divine wisdom in this Tabernacle and its appurtenances. For it was the House wherein his Glory was to dwell; and not only so but a Type and Representaincarnation of his Son, whereby the Divine Nature would personally dwell in the Humane for ever.
2. It is affirmed of this Tabernacle that it was made. Tabernaculum extructum,
The first Part of this Tabernacle being so prepared it had its furniture, that was to abide and be used in it.
1. There was in it the Candlestick. The Vulgar Latine reads candelabra in the plural number. Hence many disputes arise among the exposi
The making of this Candlestick is particularly described; Exod. 25. 31. to
the Vails that covered the most Holy Place; and over against it on the North side was the Table with the Shew-bread. And in the midst, at the very entrance of the most Holy Place was the Altar of Incense. see Exod. 40. 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27. And this Candlestick was made all of beaten Gold, of one peice, with its lamps and appurtenances without either joynts or screws, which is not without its Mystery. To fit it for its service pure Oyl Olive was to be provided by the way of offering from the People. Exod. 27. 20. And it was the office of the High Priest to order it, that is, to dress its Lamps, every evening and eExod. 27. 21. And this is called a statute for ever unPriests; on the behalf of the Children of Israel; which manifests the great concernment of the Church in this holy Utensil.
On the other side of the Sanctuary over against the Candlestick was the Table and the Shew-bread, which the Apostle reckons as the second Part of the furExod. 25. 23, 24. 25, 26, 27. 28, 29. chap, 37. 10, &c. Beauty and Glory.
Upon this Table, which the Apostle adds, was the Shew-bread. It is here rendred by the Apostle Proposition of the Bread or Leaves; by an Hypallage for Bread of Proposition as it is Matth. 12. 4. the Bread that was proposed or set forth. In the Hebrew it is Plural, as also doth the Evangelist. For that Bread consisted of many loaves; as Exod. 25. 30.
The number of these leaves or cakes as we call them, was, twelve; and they were set on the Table in two Rows, six in a Row, being laid one upon the other. The Jews say that every loaf was ten hands breadth long, and five hands breadths broad, and seven fingers thick. But this cannot well be reconciled unto the Proportion of the Table. For the Table itself was but two cubits long, and one cubit broad. And whereas it had a Border of an hands breadth round about, nothing could lie on the Table but what was placed within that Border. And seeing a cubit was but five hands breadth, it cannot be conRows of loaves, that were ten hands breadth long, and five hands breadth broad, could be placed within that Border. Wherefore they suppose that there were Props of Gold coming up from the Ground that bore the ends of the Cakes. But if so, It could not be said that they were placed on the Table which is expresly affirmed. Wherefore it is certain that they were of such shape, proportion, and measures, as might fitly be placed on the Table within the Border; and more we know not of them.
These Cakes were renewed every Sabbath in the morning; the renovation of them being part of the peculiar worship of the Day. The manner of it, as also of the making of them is described; Levit. 24. 5. 9. And because the new Bread was to be brought in and immediately placed in the Room of that which was taken away, it is called absolutely continual Bread; Numb. 4. 7. For God says it was to be before him jugiter; Exod. 25. 30; alwaies or continually. Why it is called Bread of faces there is great enquiry. One of the Targums render it inward Bread, for the word is used sometimes for that which looks inward. The LXX present Bread; or Bread presented. Many think they were so called because they were set forth before the faces of the Priests, and stood in their view when they first entred the Tabernacle. But the Reason of it is plain in the Text. The Shewbread before my face, saith God. They were presented before the Lord as a me
This is all that the Apostle observes to have been in the first Part of the Tabernacle. There was in it moreover the
Concerning this Part of the Tabernacle, the Apostle affirmes that it was called Holy. This name of it was given and stated; Exod. 26. 33. The between the Holy, that is, that Part of the Sanctuary, and the most Holy, which our Apostle describes in the next Place. And we may observe; that,
Every Part of Gods House, and the Place wherein he will dwell, is filled and adorned with Pledges of his Presence, and meanes of communicating his Grace; Such were all the Parts of the furniture of this Part of the Tabernacle. And so doth God dwell in his Church, which in some sense is his Tabernacle with men.
But the Principal enquiry about these things is concerning their mystical signification and use. For by the Apostle they are only proposed in general, un
We may in this matter be supplyed by expositors with variety of ConjectTrial and Measure of such conjectures, nor to guide us in the interpretation of this mystery.
Some say the Candlestick with its Branches, represented the seven Planets, the Sun in the midst, as the Scapus of the Candlestick was in the midst of the six Branches, three on the one side and three on the other. And the Loaves of Bread, say they, did represent the fruits of the earth, as influenced by the HeavenPhilo, a Iew and Platonical Philosopher; and it doth not unbecome his Principles. But that any Christian writer should approve of it, I somewhat wonder, nor doth it deserve a confutation.
Some say that the Altar of Incense signified those that are of a contemplative Life; the Table of Shew-bread those that follow the active Life; and the Candlestick those that follow both of them. The pretended Reasons of this Applica
Some with more Sobriety and Probability, affirm the Candlestick to repreMinistry of the Church, appointed for the Illumination of it, and the Table with the Shew-bread, the Ordinances as administred by them; which things are declared succinctly by Gomarus on this Place; and unto them they may have safely a secondary Application.
But as was said, a Rule is to be fixed to guide us in the Interpretation of the mystical signification of these things and the application of them, without which we shall wander in uncertain and unapproveable conjectures. And it is plainly given us in the context. For therein are two things manifest. (1) That the Tabernacle and all contained in it were Typical of Christ. This is diUtensils and Services, is not considered absolutely, but as the Church is in mystical Union with him. For he is proDischarge of his Office, and by them did God instruct the Church as unto their faith in him and expectation of him.
This is excellently observed by Cyrill. in Iohan. lib. 4. chap. 28. Christus licét unus sit, multifariam tamen à nobis intelligitur. Ipse est Tabernaculum propter carnis tegumentum; Ipse est mensa, quia noster cibus est et vita; Ipse est Arca habens legem Dei reconditam, quia est verbum Patris; Ipse est candelabrum, quia est Lux Spiritualis; Ipse est Altare incensi, quia est odor suavitatis in Sanctificationem; Ipse est Altare Holocausti, quia est hostia pro totius mundi vit a in cruce oblata. And other Instances he gives unto the same purpose. And al
1. The Candlestick with its seven Branches and its perpetual Light with pure Oyl, giving Light unto all Holy Administrations, did represent the fullness of Spiritual Light, that is in Christ Jesus, and which by him is communiIn him was Life, and the Life was the Light of men; Ioh. 1. 4. God gave unto him the Spirit not by measure; Ioh. 3. 34. And the Holy Spitit rested on him in all variety of his Gifts and Operations, especially those of Spiritual Light, Wisdom and Understanding Isa. 11. 2. 3. And in allusion unto this Candlestick with its seven Lamps, is called the seven Spirits that are before the Throne of God; Revel. 1. 4; as He, in and by whom the Lord Christ gives out the fullness and perfection of spirituall Light and Gifts unto the illumination of the Church; even as the Light of the Tasubjectively enlightens their minds by his Spirit; Ephes. 1. 17, 18, 19. and objectively and doctrinally conveys the means of Light unto them by his word.
Again; There was one Candlestick which contained the holy Oyl, (a Type of the spirit) in it self. Thence was it communicated unto the Branches on each side of it, that they also should give Light unto the Tabernacle; Yet had they originally no oyl in themselves, but only what was continually combody of the Candlestick. And so the communiunto every one of us is given Grace according unto the measure of the Gift of Christ even as he pleaseth. Ephes. 4. 7.
But hereon we must also remember, that this Candlestick was all one beaten work of pure Gold both the Scapus, the Body, and all the Branches of it. There were neither joynts, nor screws, nor pins in or about it. Exod. 25. 36. WherePartakers of the divine nature of Christ, by that faith which is more precious than Gold, and are intimately united unto him, so as mystically to become one with him, no pretended conjunction unto him by joynts and screws of outward order, will enable them to derive that pure oyl from him, with whose burning Light they may illuminate the Church. But this I submitt unto the Judgment of others.
This is of faith herein. That which God instructed the Church in by this holy Utensil and its Use, was that the promised Messiah, whom all these things typed and represented, was to be by the fullness of the spirit in himself, and the communication of all Spiritual Graces and Gifts unto others, the only cause of all true saving Light unto the Church.
He is the true Light which lighteneth every man coming into the world, namely, that is savingly enlightened. Upon the entrance of Sin, all things fell into Darkness; spiritual darkness covered mankind, not unlike that which was on the face of the deep, before God said let there be Light and there was Light. 2 Cor. 4, 6. And this darkness had two parts; first, that which was external
double Vail, the Vail vailed and the Covering covered over the face of all Nations, which was to be destroyed; Isa. 25. 7. And they are both removed by Christ alone, the former by his Doctrine, the latter by his Spirit. MoreoLight at all in the Sanctuary for the performance of any holy Administrations, but what was given unto it by the Lamps of this Candlestick. And therefore was it to be carefully dressed every morning and evening by a perpetual Statute. And if the communication of spiritual Gifts and Graces do cease, the very Church it self notwithstanding its outward order, will be a place of Darkness.
Obs. 1. The Communication of sacred Light from Christ in the Gifts of the Spirit, is absolutely necessary unto the due and acceptable performance of all holy Offices and Duties of worship in the Church. And,
2. No man by his utmost endeavours in the use of outward means can obtain the least beam of saving Light, unless it be communicated unto him by Christ, who is the only fountain and cause of it.
The Table and the Shew-bread mentioned in the next place, respected him also under another consideration. The use of the Table which was all overlaid with Gold was only to bear the bread which was laid upon it. What resemDivine Person of Christ, which sustainmost fine Gold; Cant. 5. 11. Wherefore the matter of it bewhich is of this Creation, as all these things were; ver. 11. But that the Lord Christ is the only Bread of life unto the Church, the only Spiritual Food of our Souls, he himself doth fully testifie. Ioh. 6. 32. 35. He therefore, He alone was represented by this continual Bread of the Sanctuary
〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
But after the second Vail, or Covering. Our Latine Translation reads; post medium velum; that is, after the Vail that was in the midst; For there were not three Vails whereof this should be in the midst, but two only. The Syriack somewhat changeth the words. The inner Tabernacle which was within the face of the second Gate. The same thing is intended; but the inner is added; and after the second Vail is expressed by an Hebraism. what velum, and velamentum, a Vail, a Coverng, and by the Syriack a Gate of entrance; we shall see afterwards.
quod dicitur; quod vocatur. Syr. it was called.
aureum habens thuribulum; having the Golden Censer; Syr. and there were in it the house of incense of Gold; whereby either the Altar or the Censer may be understood. Syr. and there was in it; refer
non est tempus; non est propositum; It is not a time or place; It is not my purpose to speak; non est mode dicendum;
And after the Vail the Tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all; which had the Golden Censer and the Ark of the Covenant overlaid(covered)round about (on every side) with Gold; wherein was the Golden Pot that had Manna; and Aaron's Rod that budded, and the Tables of the Covenant; and over it the Cherubims of Glory shadowing the Mercy-seat; of which(things)we cannot(shall not)now speak particularly.
The Apostle in these verses proceedeth unto the description of the second part of the Tabernacle, with the things contained in it, or the holy furniture thereof. His design is not to give us an
A due consideration hereof renders the anxious enquiry, that hath been made about the assignation of holy Utensils unto this part of the Sanctu
He describes this part of the Tabernacle; (1) From its Situation; it was after the second Vail. (2) From its name given unto it by God himself; it was called the Holiest of all, or the Holy of Holies. (3) From its Utensils or Vessels which were, (1) The Golden Censer. (2) The Ark. (3) What was in it or with it. (1) The Golden Pot that had Manna. (2) Aaron's Rod. (3) The Tables of the Covenant. (4) The Cherubims; which he describes, (1) From their Quality; Cherubims of Glory. (2) Their
With respect unto these things among others in another place, he affirms that the ministration of divine worship under the Law was glorious. But withal he adds that it had no glory in comparison of that which doth excel; namely, the spiritual ministration of divine worship under the Gospel. 2 Cor. 3. 1. And this is that which we should always mind in the consideration of these things. For if we yet look after, and value such an outward glory as they did exhibit, we are carnal, and cannot be
The verbal difficulties which occur in this context, have occasioned Critical Expositors to labour greatly about them. That is the Field wherereal interpretation
conjectures, that there is no room left for any addition in the same kind: And it were but lost labour to repeat what must be confuted if it were mentioned. I shall therefore take no farther notice of any difficulty in the words, but as the explication of it is necessary unto the
The first thing mentioned by the Apostle, is the Situation of this part of the Tabernacle; it was after the second Vail. It was so unto Partition of the two parts of the Sanctuary, the second Vail, the Apostle intimates that there was a former. Howbeit that former was not a seperating Vail of any part of the Tabernacle as this was. It was only the hanging of the Door of the Tent. This the Apostle here reckons as a Vail, because as by this Vail the Priests were hindred from entering into, or looking into the most Holy Place, so by that other the People were forbidden to enter or look into the first part of the Sanctuary, whereinto the Priests entered daily. The making of the first Vail is declared, Exod. 26. 36.r 37. and it is called hanging or covering for the door. The making of this second Vail is declared, Exod 26. ver. 31, 32, 33. and it is calVail or Covering.
The Apostle renders it by Matth. 27. 51. where it is spoken of in the Temple: And so it is rendred by the LXX. Exod. 26. 31. As the former is called Covering. From extend, to stretch out so as to cover with it what is so extended, is
The End, Use and Signification of it the Apostle expresly declares ver. 8th. where they must be spoken unto.
2. He describes this Part of the Tabernacle by its name; it is called the most Holy; the Holy of Holies.
Exod. 26. 33, 34. The Holy of Holies; that is, most Holy; the SuperRepetition of the Substantive, as is usual in the Hebrew. Some give instances of this kind of Phraseology in Greek wriHebraisms; as Sophocles.
misera miserarum es; that is,
The more of Christ by the way of representation or exhibition any institutions of divine worship do contain or
It is Christ alone who in himself is really the Most Holy, the Spring and Fountain of all holiness unto the Church.
3. The first Utensil reckoned unto this second part of the Tabernacle is, had it;
it was in it, but it had it. If any one would see the various conjectures of learned men about this assertion of the Apostle, as also about that following concerning what was contained in the Ark, He may consult the collections of Mr. Pool on the place, where he will find them represented in one view. My design being only to declare what I conceive consonant unto the truth, I shall not spend time in repeating or refuting the conjectures of other men.
Censer; but it may as well be rendred the Alar of Incense; as it is by the Syriack the
And of this Altar he says not, that it was in the second Tabernacle, but that it had it. And in that expression he respects not its situation, but its Use. And the most Holy Place may well be said to have the Altar of Incense; beCenser from this Altar. Whereas therefore there was a two fold use of the Altar of Incense; the one of the Ordinary Priests, to burn Incense in the Sanctuary every day, and the other of the High Priest to take Incense from it when he entered into the most Holy Place, to fill it with a cloud of its smoak; the Apostle intending a comparison peculiarly between the Lord Christ and the High Priest only in this Place, and not the other Priests in the daily discharge of their office, he takes no notice of the use of the Altar of Incense in the Sanctuary, but only of that which respected the most Holy Place, and the entrance of the High Priest thereinto. For so he expresly applyes it ver. 12. And therefore he affirms this Place to have had this Golden Altar, its principal use and end being designed unto the service thereof. This I judge to be the true meaning of the Apostle, and sense of his words, and shall not therefore trouble my self nor the reader with the repetition or confutation of other conjectures. And that this was the principal use of this Altar is plainly declared in the order for the making and disposal of it. Exod. 30. 6. Thou shalt put it before the Vail, that is, by the Ark of the Testiover the Testimony where I will meet with them. Although it was placed without the Vail, and that for this end, that the High Priest might not enter one step into the most Holy Place, until the smoak of the Incense went before him; yet had it peculi
And this is yet made further evident in that when the High Priest enatonement on this Altar with the blood of the Sin-offering, as he did on the Ark and Mercy-seat, Exod. 30. 10. This is an undeniable demonstration that as unto the use of it, it belonged principally unto the most Holy Place, and is here so declared by the Apostle. Wherefore the assignation hereof unto that place by the Author is so far from an objection against the Authority of the Epistle, unto which end it hath by some been made use of, as that it is an argument of his divine wisdom and skill in the nature and use of these institutions.
The manner of the service of this Altar intended by the Apostle was briefly thus. The High Priest on the solemn day of expiation that is once a year, took a Golden Censer from this Altar: After which going out of the Sanctuary he put fire into it, taken from the Altar of Burnt-Offerresidence of the Spices. And this Altar being placed just at the entrance of the most Holy Place over aCenser, and entred the Holy Place with a cloud of the smoak thereof. see Levit. 16. 12. 13. The composition and making of this InExod. 30. 34. 35. &c. And being compounded it was beaten small, that it might immediately take fire, and so placed on this Alver. 36. And the placing of this Incense before the Testimony, as is there affirmed, is the same with what our Apostle affirms, that the most Holy Place had it.
Incense, Prayer is signified, the Scripture expressly testiLet my Prayer come before thee as Incense, Psal. 141. 2. And there is a fourfould Resemblance between them. (1.) In that it was Beaten and Pounded before it was used. So doth acceptable Prayer proceed from
In this general sense even the Prayers of the Saints might be typified and represented in that daily burning of Incense which was used in the Sanctuary. But it must be granted that this Incense is distinguished from the Prayers of the Saints, as that which is in the hand of Christ alone, to give Vertue and Efficacy unto them, Revel. 8. 4. Wherefore this Golden Altar of Incense as placed in the Sanctuary, and whereon Incense burned continually every Morning and Evening, was a Type of Christ, by his Mediation and Intercessicontinual Prayers of all Believers.
But that which the Apostle in this place hath alone respect unto, was the burning of the Incense in the Golden Censer on the day of Expiation when the High Priest entered into the most Holy Place. And this Represented only the personal Mediatory Prayer of Christ himselfe. Concerning it we may observe.
1. That the time of it was after the Sacrifice of the Sin-Offering. For the High Priest was to take along with him the Blood of that Sacrifice, to carry with him into the Holy Place, Levit. 16.
2. That the Incense was kindled with Fire taken from the Altar, where the Blood of the Sacrifices was newly offered. And two things in the Mediatory Prayer of Christ are hereby intimated unto us.
1. That the Efficacy of them ariseth from, and dependeth on the Sacrifice of himself. Hence Intercession is best apprehended, as the Representation of himself, and the Efficacy of his sacrifice in Heaven before the Throne of God.
2. That this Prayer was quickened and enlivened by the same fire whereeternal spirit, whereof we shall treat on ver. 14th.
Yet we must not so oblige our selves unto the times, seasons, and order of these things, as to exclude the prayers which he offered unto God, before the oblation of himself. Yea that solemn prayer of his recorded Ioh. 17. wherein he sanctified himself to be an oblation, was principalimperfection of these Types and their accommodation unto the present service of the Church so far as it was carnal, they could not represent the order of things as they were to be accomplished in the person of Christ, who was both Priest and Sacrifice, Altar, Tabernacle and Incense. For the Law had onshadow of these things and not the perfect image of them. Some obscure lines of them were drawn therein, but their beautiful order was not represented in them. Although therefore the offering of incense from the Golden Altar in the most holy Place, was after the offering of Sacrifice on the Altar of burnt-offerings, yet was the mediatory Prayer of Christ for the Church of the elect, wherein he also prepared and sanctified himbeating or bruising of the incense before its firing did represent the Agony of his soul, with strong cryes and supplications that he offered unto God therein. And we may observe.
The mediatory intercession of Iesus Christ was a sweet savour unto God, and essicacious for the salvation of the Church. The smoak of this perfume was that which covered the Ark and Mercy-seat. Hereby the Law itself which was contained in the Ark, became compliant unto our salvation. For here
2. The efficacy of Christs Intercession dependeth on his oblation. It was fire from the Altar of Burnt-Offerings, wherewith the incense was kindled.
3. The Glory of these Types did no way answer the Glory of the Antitype, or that which was represented by them. It is acknowledged that the serveneration in the minds of the People. Howbeit they were all but carnal things, and had no glory in comparison of the spiritual Glory of Christ in the discharge of his office. We are apt in our minds to admire these things, and almost to wish that God had orImages of things which men create and are delighted withal in their minds. And besides, they love in divine service to be taken up with such a bodily exercise, as carries Glory with it, an appearance of solemn veneration. Wherefore many things are found out by men unto these ends. But the reason of all is because we are car
4. We are alwaies to reckon that the Efficacy and Prevalency of all our Prayers depends on the Incense which is in the hand of our merciful High Priest. It is offered with the Prayers of the Saints, Revel. 8. 4. In themselves our Prayers are weak, and imperfect, it is hard to conceive how they should find acceptance with God. But the unvaluable Incense of the Intercession of Christ, gives them Acceptance and Prevalency.
The second thing in this Part of the Tabernacle mentioned by the Aposte is the Ark. This he describes(1.)from its Appellation; the Ark of the Covenant. (2.) From one particular in its Fabrick, it was overlaid round about with Gold. (3.) From the things that were in it, accompanied it, and had no other use but to be laid up in it; The Golden Pot that had Manna; and Aarons Rod that Blossomed. (4.) From what was Placed in it, which to preserve was its principal use; The Tables of the Covenant.
This Vessel in the Hebrew is called La
Arca. This with the Mercy-Seat wherewith it was covered, was the most Glorious and Mysterious Utensil of the Tabernacle and afterwards of the Temple; the most eminent Pledge of the Divine presence the most Mysterious Representation of the Holy Properties of his Nature in Christ. This, as the Heart of all Divine service, was first formed; all other things had a Relation unto it, Exod. 25. 10, 11.
To treat of the Fabrick, that is, the Materials, Dimensions and Fashion of this Ark is not unto our present purpose. For these things the Apostle himdeclares, as being no season to treat of them particularly. This he in
1. The Name of it is the Ark of the Covenant. Sometimes it is called the Ark of the Testimony, Exod. 26. 33. Chap. 29. 35. Chap. 40. 3, 5. Most comArk of the Covenant. Numb. 10. 33. Chap. 14. 44. Deut. 10. 8. &c. Sometimes the Ark of God, 1 Sam. 3. 3. Sam. 6. 2. &c. The Ark of the Testimony it was called, because God called the
2. As to the Fabrick of it, the Apostle observes in particular that it overlaid or covered with Gold.
every way, within and without, with Plates of beaten Gold.
This, as I said before, was the most sacred and glorious Instrument of the SanChurch of Israel, was built for no other end but to be as it were an house and habit ation for this Ark, Exod. 26. 33. Chap. 40. 21. Hence Sanctification proceeded unto all the other Parts of it; for, as Solomon observed, the places were holy whereunto the Ark of God came. 2 Chron. 8. 11. And of such sacred veneration was it among the People, so severe was the Exclusion of all flesh from the sight of it, the High Priest only excepted, who entered that holy Place once a year and that not without Blood; as that the Nations about, took it to be the God that the Israelites worshiped. 1
This was the most signal Token, Pledge or Symbol of the Presence of God among the People. And thence Metonymically it hath sometimes the name of God, ascribed unto it, as some think; and of the Glory of God, Psal. 73. 61. And all neglects about it, or contempt of it were most severely punished. From the Tabernacle it was carried into the Temple built by Solomon; where it continued untill the Babylonian Captivity; and what became of it afterwards is altogether uncertain.
God gave this Ark that it might be a Representation of Christ, as we shall shew; and he took it away, to increase the desire and expectation of the Church, after him and for him. And,
As it was the Glory of God to hide and cover the mysterious counsels of his Will under the Old Testament, whence this Ark was so hidden from the Eyes of all men; so under the New Testament it is his Glory to reveal and make them open in Iesus Christ. 2 Cor. 3. 18.
4. In this Ark, as it was placed in the Tabernacle, the Apostle affirmeth that there were three things. (1.) The Golden Pot that had Manna. When the ManOmer, for his own eating Exod. 16. 16. Hereon God appointed that a Pot should be provided, which should hold an Omer, to be filled with Manna to be laid up before the Lord for their generations, ver. 33. There was it miraculously preserved from Putresaction, whereas of it self it would not keep
It is not said in this Place where the making of it is appointed, that it is of Gold; nor is there any mention of what matter it was made. That it was of Gold the Apostle here declares who wrote by Inspiration, and the thing is evident it self: For it was to be placed in that part of the Sanctuary wherein all the Vessels were either of pure Gold, or at least overlaid with it; and a Pot of another Nature would have been unsuitable thereunto. And it was to be made of that which was most durable, as being to be kept for a Memorial through
The Reason of the sacred Preservation of this Manna in the most Holy Place Type of Christ; as himself declares; Ioh. 6. 48, 49, 50, 51.
5. The next thing mentioned is Aaron's Rod that budded. This Rod origiMoses fed the sheep of his Father-in-Law Iethro, in the Wilderness, which he had in his hand when God called unto him out of the Bush. And thereon God ordained it to be the Token of the putting forth of his
Miracles, having by a trial confirmed the Faith of Moses concerning it, Exod. 4. 17. Hereby it became sacred; and when Aaron was called unto the Office of the Priesthood, it was delivered unto his keepArk, Numb. 17. 10. That same Rod did Moses take from before the Testimony, when he was to smite the Rock with it, and work a miracle, whereof this was consecrated to be the outward sign, Numb. 20. 8, 9, 10, 11. Hereof the Apostle affirms only that it budded; but in the story it is, that it brought forth Buds and Bloomed Blossoms, and yielded Almonds; being originally cut from an Almond Tree, Numb. 17. 8. But the Apostle mentions what was sufficient unto his Purpose.
This Rod of Moses belonged unto the Holy Furniture of the Tabernacle; beWaters of Life unto the Church.
6. The last thing mentioned is the Tables of the Covenant. The two Tables of Stone cut out by Moses and written on with the finger of God, containTen Commandments, which were the substance of Gods Covenant with the People. This Testimony, this Covenant, these Tables of Stone with the Moral Law engraven in them, were by the express command of God put into the Ark, Exod. 25. 16. Chap. 33. 18. Chap. 40. 20. Deut. 10. 5. And there was nothing else in the Ark but these two Tables of Stone with the Law written in them; as is expresly affirmed, 1 Kings 8. 9. 2 Chron. 5. 10. Wherefore whereas it is said of Aaron's Rod, and the Pot of Manna, that they were placed before the Testimony, Exod. 16. 34. Numb. 17. 10. that is, the Ark; and the Book of the Law was also put into the side of it, that is, laid beside it; Deut. 31. 26. and not only are the Tables of Stone appointed expresly to be put into the Ark; but also it is likewise affirmed that there was nothing else in the Ark but these Tables of Stone; This Place of the Apostle hath been exceedingly tortured and perplexed by
And over it the Cherubims of Glory, Shadowing the Mercy-Seat; of which things we cannot now speak particularly.
THE Apostle proceedeth in his Description of the immediate appurteGolden Censer; what was before it, as the Pot of Manna and Aaron's Rod; what was within it, namely, the Tables of the Covenant. Now he sheweth what was over it, so giving an account of its whole Furniture, and all that any way belonged unto it.
Two things he adds; namely, (1.) The Cherubims; (2.) The Mercy-Seat. And first he describes the Cherubims; (1.) By their positure; they were over the Ark. (2.) By their Title; Cherubims of Glory. (3.) Their use; they Shadowed the Mercy-Seat.
The Making, Form, Fashion and Use of these Cherubims is declared Exod. 25. signification of the Name, and their original shape or form, any farther then that they were alata animata, winged Creatures, are not certainly known. Most as unto the Derivation of the Name follow Kimchi; who affirms the Letter Caph to be servile and a note of Similitude; and the word to signify a Youth or a Child. Such these Images are thought to represent; only they had Wings instead of Arms, as we now usually paint Angels; for their Bodies, Sides and Feet are mentioned in other places, Isa. 6. 2. Ezek. 1. 5, 6, 7. where they are expresly said to have the Shape of a man. Wherefore both as they were firstDimensions were exceedingly enlarged, they were of humane shape; only with wings to denote the Angelical Nature.
They were two of them, one at each end of the Ark or Mercy-Seat. Their faces were turned inwards one towards another, so as that their wings touched one another. This Posture, gave unto the whole work of the Ark, Mercy-Seat and Cherubims, the form of a Seat, which represented the Throne of God. From thence he spake, whence the whole was called
As unto their place and posture, they were over the Ark. For these Chefeet whereon they stood, 2 Chron. 3. 13. And these feet were joyn
2. As unto the Apellation whereby he describes them, it is Cherubims of
Glory: That is say Expositors generally, Glorious Cherubims. If so, this term is not given them from the matter whereof they were made. Those indeed in the Tabernacle were of beaten Gold, being but of a small meaExod. 25. 18. Those in the Temple of Solomon were made of the wood of the Olive Tree only overlaid with Gold. For they were very large extending their wings unto the whole breadth of the Oracle which was twenty Cubits, 1 King. 6. 23. 2 Chron. 3. 10. But such was the matter of other utensils also, as the Candlesticks, which yet are not called the Candlesticks of Glory. Nor are they so called from their shape and fashion: For this, as I have shewed, most probably was
But I must add, that by glory here, the Majestatical Presence of God himCherubims, that represented the glorious Presence of God himself, as he dwelt among the People. So the Apostle reckoning up the Priviledges of the Hebrews, Rom. 9. 4. affirms that unto them apperAdoption and the Glory. And therein not the Ark is intended, alGlory, or signified under that name, as 1 Sam. 4. 21, 22. Psal. 26. 8. But it is God himself in his peculiar Residence among the People; that is, in the Representation of his Presence which is in Christ, who is Immanuel, and therefore called the Glory of Israel Luk. 2. 32. The Cherubims being designed to make a Representation hereof, as we shall immediately declare, are called the Cherubims of Glory.
As unto their use it is expressed by Hebrew word in that Masculine Gender, but the Apostle here useth it in the Neuter, as appeares by this Participle, and so do the LXX where they make menti
Shadowing, Covering, Protecting,
Exod. Chap. 25. Verse 20. They shall stretch forth their wings on high, covering over the Mercy-Seat with their wings; or their wings covering over the Mercy-Seat. But this Office of the Cherubims we cannot understand, untill we have declared what was that Mercy-Seat, which they so covered over, and which the Apostle makes men
The making and frame of it is declared, Exod. 25. 17. In the Hebrew it is called Capporeth or Cipporeth; from Caphar. The verb in Kal, signifies to cover, pitch over and thereby to cover, Gen. 6. 14. Thence is Capporeth a CoveCipporeth is rendred by our Apostle Propitiatory, a Mercy-Seat; as it is also by the LXX sometimes, and sometimes by imposed Covering. But whereas in Allusion hereunto, the Lord Christ is said to be Rom. 3. 25. and Ioh. 2. 2. that sense must be taken in, and so it is constantly rendred by our Translation the Mercy-Seat. And in that sense it is derived from Cipper in Pihel which signifies to remove or take away, and consequently to be propitious and merciful in taking away of sin, as also to appease, atone, reconcile, and purge, whereby sin is taken away. See Gen. 32. 20. to appease; Prov. 16. 14. to pacify; Psal. 65. 3. to purge away, applied to sin. Psal. 78. 38. to forgive Iniquities. Deut. 21. 8. to be merciful, Psal. 79. 9. to expiate. Thence is the day of expiation; the great day of fast unto the Iews. This is the fast which was said to be over, in the storm that Paul and his compa
Hence Cipporeth is rendred Exodus; we may render it a covering Mercy-seat.
The matter of this Mercy-seat was of pure beaten Gold; the measures of it exactly commensurate and answering unto that of the Ark; two cubits and an half the length of it, and a cubit and an half the breadth of it. Exod. 25. 10, 17. As unto the use of it was put Thickness of it, there is no mention. The Jews say it was an hand breadth, which is not likely. However it was of considerable substance; For the Cherubims were beaten out of it, at its ends. ver. 18, 19.
Posture of it; some suppose that it was held in the hands of the Cherubims at a good distance from the Ark: And the reason they give for this conjecture is, that so it did best represent a Throne. The Mercy-seat was as the seat of it, and the Ark as the footstool, for so they say it is called when the Church is invited to worship at his footstool. Psal. 99.
5. But this reason indeed everts the supposition which it was produced to confirm. For the Ark and Mercy-seat being exactly commensurate, and the one placed directly over the other, it could have no appearance of a footstool, which must be placed before the seat itself: Nor is there any mention of the hands of the Cherubims, as there is directly of their feet in those made by Solomon. Nor is it probable they had any, but only wings instead of them; although those in Ezekiel's vision, as they served the providence of God, had the hands of a man under their wings. Chap. 1. 8. Nor could it be called a covering unto the Ark, if it were at that distance from it, as this conceit will make it to be.
It was therefore laid immediately on the Ark, so as the Cherubims were represented to be above the Throne; as the Seraphims were in Isaiah's vision. chap. 6. 2. It had, as we observed, the just dimension of the Ark. But the Ark had a crown of Gold round about it; that is, on its sides and its ends. Exod. 25. 11. chap. 37. 2. But this crown or fringe of Gold, was so placed on the outsides of it, that it diminished nothing of its Proportion of two cubits and an half in length, and a cubit and an half in breadth. Wherefore the Mer
It remains only that we enquire whether it were itself the covering of the Ark, or whether the Ark had a covering of its own which it was placed upon. It is certain that the Ark was open when the Testimony or Tables of stone with the Law written in them were put into it. And there is no mention of of the opening or shutting of it, how it should be closed and fastened when the tables were put into it.
These things I suppose would not have been omitted had it had a Covering of its own. Besides it is certain that this Propitiatory, and the Cherubims belonging thereunto, were never to be seperated from the Ark; but when the Ark was removed and carried
This is a brief description of the Utensils of the most holy place. The Ark which was as the heart and center of the whole was placed at the West end of it, with its ends towards the sides of the place, the face as unto the entrance, and the back part unto the West end. Before it, was placed the pot of Manna, and the Rod that budded as afterwards; at one end of it was placed the book of the Law.
In the Ark was the Testimony or the 2 Tables of stone with the Law written in them by the finger of God, and nothing else. When they were put into it, it was covered with the Mercy-seat, and that shadowed with the wings of the Cherubims. At the entrance into it was the Golden Altar of Incense with the Golden Censer; which although, as our Apostle shews, it did in its use principally respect the service of this part of the Tabernacle, yet could not
The Apostle having given this account of the Sanctuary in both parts of it, of which we now cannot speak particularly; or rather,
As was said before, so must I say again, expositors either pass by these things without any notice, or indulge unto various conjectures without any certain rule of what they assert. Those of the Roman Church, are generally so taken up with their fourfold sense of the Scripture, Literal, Allegorical, Tropological, and Anagogical, wherein for the most part they know not how to distinguish one from another, that they wrest this and the like passages unto what sense they please. I shall keep my self unto a certain rule, and where that will not guide me, I shall not venture on any conjectures.
When Ezekiel had his vision of God in the administration of his providence, he sayes of it, this was the appearance of the likeness of the Glory of the Lord; chap. 1. 28. And we may say of this Holy Place with its furniture; This was the appearance of the likeness of the Glory of the Lord in the administration of Grace.
Why God would in this manner, by these means, represent himself and the Glory of his Grace absolutely, we can give no reason but his own holy will and infinite wisdom. But this we find he did, and that with great solemnity. For first he made a glorious Representation of it immediately by his own power in the Mount. He shewed a pattern of it in the Mount, which was not only an Exemplar of what he would have framed here below, but expressive of the Idea in his own mind of good things to come. And thereon he gave com
1. The Nature of the things themselves, or the materials of the whole, being earthly, and the state of the Church unto whose service it was allotted being imperfect and designed so to be, two things did necessary follow thereon;
1. That sundry concernments of it, as the outward shape, form, and dimensions both of the Tabernacle and all its Utensils were accomodated unto the
2. That the resemblance of heavenly things in them, was but dark and obscure as the Apostle expresly affirms, chap. 10. 1. This both the nature of the
2. This yet is certain and indubitable, which gives us our stable rule of the Interpretation of their significancy, that God chose this way and these means to represent his glorious presence in and with the Lord Christ, unto all the ends of his mediation. For with respect unto them it is said, that the fullof the Godhead dwelt in him bodily, Col. 2. 9. namely, as it dwelt Typically in the Tabernacle by the
1. The Spring, the Life and Soul of all this service was the Decalogue, the ten words written in Tables of stone, called the Tables of the Covenant. This is the eternal unalterable rule of our Relation unto God, as rational creatures capable of moral obedience, and eternal rewards. Hereunto all this service related, as prefiguring the way whereby the Church might be freed from the guilt of its transgressions, and obtain the accomplishment of it in them and for them. For,
(1.) It was given and prescribed unto the People, and by them accepted as the Terms of Gods Covenant, before any of these things were revealed or apDeut. 5. 27. Wherefore all these following institutions did only manifest, how that Covenant should be complyed withal and fulfilled.
(2.) It was written in Tables of stone, and those renewed after they were broken, before any of these things were prepared or erected. Exod. 34. 1. God by the occasional breaking of the first Tables, on the sin of the People, declared that there was no keeping, no fullfiling of that Covenant, before the Provision made in these Ordinances was granted unto the People.
(3.) The Ark was made and appointed for no other end, but to preserve and keep these Tables of the Covenant or Testimony of God. Exod. 25. 16. And it was hereon the great token and Pledge of the presence of God among the People, wherein his glory dwelt among them. So the wife of Phinehas the Priest made the dying confession of her faith, she said, the Glory is departed from Israel for the Ark of
(4.) All other things, the whole Tabernacle with all the furniture, Utensils and services of it, were made and appointed to minister unto the Ark, and when the Ark was removed from them they were of no use nor signification. Wherefore when it was absent from the Tabernacle, all the House of Israel lamented after the Lord, 1 Sam. 7. 2. For the remaining Tabernacle was no longer unto them a Pledge of his presence. And therefore when Solomon afterwards had finished all the Glorious work of the Temple, with all that belonged unto it, he assembled all the Elders of Israel, and all the Heads of the Tribes, the chief of the Fathers of the Children of Israel, to bring the Ark of the Covenant into its place in the Temple, 1. Kings 8. 1, 2, 3, 4. Before this was done, all that glorious and costly structure was of no sacred use. This order of things doth sufficiently evidence, that the Spring of all these services lay in the Tables of the Covenant.
2. This Law as unto the substance of it, was the only Law of creation, the rule of the first Covenant of works. For it contained the summe and subtranscript of what was written in
returned thither again by the Grace of the new Covenant. Ier. 32. 35. 2 Cor. 3. 3.
3. Although this Law as a Covenant, was broken and disanulled by the entrance of sin, and became insufficient as unto its first ends of the Justification and Salvation of the Church thereby.
4. This Law was given unto the People with great dread and terrour. Hereby were they taught and did learn, that they were no way able of themselves, to answer or stand before the holiness of God therein. Hereon they desired that on the account thereof, they might not appear immediately in the presence of God, but that they might have a
5. God himself by all ways declared, that if he should deal with the PeoTenor and Rigor of this Law, they could not stand beObedience thereunto, but in his Mercy and Grace. And that this was their Faith themselves professed on all occasions. See Psal. 130. 3, 4. Psal. 142. 3.
6. All this God instructed them in, by those mystical Vessels of the most Holy Place. For after the Tables were put into the Ark, as under his Eye and in his presence; he ordained that it should be covered with the Mercy-seat. For hereby he did declare both that the Law was to be kept and fulfilled, and yet that mercy should be extended unto them.
7. This great mystery he instructed them in three ways. (1.) In that the Covering of the Ark was a Propitiatory, a Mercy-Seat, and that its use was to cover the Law in the Presence of God. This was a great Instruction. For if God should mark Iniquities according unto the Law, who should stand? (2.) In that the Blood of Atonement for sin was brought into the Holy Place and sprinkled on the Mercy-seat. Levit. 16. 14. And this was done seven times to denote the Perfection of the Reconciliation that was made. And herein were they also taught, that the covering of the Law by the Mercy-seat, so as that Mercy and Pardon might be granted notwithstanding the sentence and curse of the Law, was from the Atonement made for sin, by the expiatory Sacrifice. (3.) By the cloud of Incense that covered both Ark and Mercy-seat, testifying that God received from thence a savour of Rest, Levit. 16. 13.
8. The Cherubims, or Angels under that denomination, were the Ministers of God in executing the curse and Punishment on man when after his sin, he was driven out of the Garden of God. Gen. 3. 24. Hence ensued a fear and dread of Angels on all mankind, which they abused unto manifold superstitions. But now to testifie that all things in Heaven and Earth, should be reconciled and brought under one Head; Ephes. 1. 10. There was a representation of their Ministry, in this great mystery of the Law and the Mercy-seat. Wherefore they are ready unto the Ministry of the Church of mankind, all things being now reconciled Heb. 1. 14. purely with respect unto the Mercy-seat which their faces were turned towards, and which they shadowed with their wings.
9. Yet was this Mystery so great, namely, that which was represented by these Types, that the Angels themselves were to bow down to look into it. 1 Pet. 1. 11. So are they here represented in a posture of admiration and adoration. And in their overshadowing of the Mercy-seat with their wings, they declared how this Mystery in the fullness of it was hid from the eyes of all men. See Eph. 3. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12.
Ground was originally blessed of God, to bring forth food for man, for the preservation of his life in that state and condition wherein he was to live unto God according unto the Covenant of works, Gen. 1. 29. But upon the entrance of sin it was cursed, neither are the fruits of it any more a Token or Pledge of the favour of God, nor are they sufficient to maintain a life unto God. Gen. 3. 17, 18. Wherefore God declared that there must be bread given the Church from Heaven, which might maintain a spiritual life in them. This God did by giving them Manna in the wilderness. And that all inPot filled with it was placed for a memorial in this Holy Place before the Ark and Mercy-Seat. See Psal. 78. 24, 25. Iohn 6. 31. Hereby were they taught to look for the bread of life from Heaven, which should maintain them in their spiritual, and nourish them unto eternal life.
11. When the whole Church was ready to perish for want of water; a Rock was smitten with the Rod of Moses, which brought water out of it unto their refreshment; God taught them thereby, that the Rock of Ages was to be smitten with the Rod of the Law, that the waters of life might be brought forth thereby. 1 Cor. 10. 4. Wherefore this Rod also was laid up for an in
In all these things did God instruct the Church, by the Tabernacle, esexhibition in the flesh. Hence he is declared in the Gospel to be the Body and Substance of them all. And I shall endeavour with all humble reverence, to make that application of them unto him, which Scripture Light guides us unto.
1. In his Obedience unto God according unto the Law, he is the true Ark wherein the Law was kept inviolate, that is, was fullfilled, answered and accomplished, Matt. 5. 17. Rom. 8. 3. chap. 10. 3. Hence by Gods graRom. 3. 31. That this was to be done, that without it no Covenant between God and man could be firm and stable, was the principal design of God to declare in all this Service; without the consideration whereof it was wholly insignificant. This was the original mystObedience of the promised seed, the everlasting unalterable Law should be fulfilled. In him, as the Jews speak, was the Law restored unto its pristine Crown, signifyed by that Crown of Gold which was round about the Ark, wherein the Law was kept. Then had the Law its crown and glory when it was fulfilled in Christ. This the Church of Israel ought to have learned and believed, and did so whilest they contimercy for the Lord's sake, as Dan. 9. 17. But afterwards when they rejected the knowledge hereof, and adhered unto the Law absoRom. 9. 31, 32, 33. chap. 10. 2, 4. And they do all yet, what lieth in them, return unto the material Ark and Tables of stone, who reject the accomplishment of the Law, in and by Jesus Christ.
2. He was the Mercy-Seat, that is, he was represented by it. So the Apostle speaks expresly, God set him forth to be Rom. 3. 25. A Propitiation, that is, to answer the Mercy-Seat and what was signifyed therethat he may not enter into judgment with us, in pursuit of the curse of it. The Law required Obedience, and threatned the curse in case of disobedience. With respect unto the obe
3. It was his blood in figure that was carried into the Holy Place to make Atonement; as the Apostle declares at large in this Chapter. The Efficacy of
his blood when he offered himself an expiatory Sacrifice for sin unto God, that prevailed for an atonement in the Holy Place not made with hands. See chap. 10. 11, 12, 13.
4. It is his Intercession that is the cloud of Incense which covers the Ark and Mercy Seat. This gives a continual sweet Savour unto God from his oblation, and renders acceptable all the worship of the Church in their ap
5. It was He who took off the original curse of the Law, whose first execuCherubims when man was driven out of the GarTree of Life. Hereby he made reconciliation between them and the elect Church of God. Ephes. 1. 10. Hence have they now a ministery with respect unto the Mercy-Seat, for the good of the heirs of salvation. Heb. 1. 14.
6. He was the Bread of Life typed by the Manna kept in the Golden Pot before the Mercy-Seat. For he alone is the nourishment of the spiritual life of men. The mystery hereof, himself at large declares. John. 6. 31, 32, 33, 34. This were they taught to expect in the memorial of that heavenly food which was preserved in the Sanctuary.
7. He was that Spiritual Rock which was smitten with the Rod of Moses, the curse and stroke of the Law: Hereon the waters of Life flowed from him; for the quickning and refreshment of the Church. 1 Cor. 10. 3, 4.
Thus was the Lord Christ All and in All from the beginning. And as the general design of the whole structure of the Tabernacle with all that belonged thereGod was reconciled to sinners, with a blessed provision for the glory of his Holiness and the honour of the Law, which is in and by Jesus Christ alone; so every thing in it directed unto his Person, or his Grace, or some Act of his Mediation. And two things do now attend all these inGospel Light, they are a gloone holy property of the nature of God; nothing of his wisdom, Goodness, Greatness, Love or Grace, but are low and carnal, base and beggarly. And that we may have a due apprehension of them, some things in general concerning them may be considered.
1. The whole Scheme, Frame, Fashion, Use and Service of the Tabernacle with all that belonged thereunto, was a meer arbitrary effect of the soveappeased unto the Church, and he would graciously dwell amongst them; why he would by them type out and prefigure the incarnation and mediation of Christ, no other reason can be given but his own will which in all things is to be adored by us. Other wayes and means unto the same ends were not wanting unto divine wisdom, but this in the good pleasure of his will he determined on. In the
2. It must be acknowledged, that the Instruction given by these things indark, obscure and diffiTeaching under the old Testament was one reason for the abolishing of that CoveIllumination might be introevery one unto his Brother, andevery one unto his Neighbour, saying, know the Lord. For the true knowledge of him and of the mysteries of his will was by these means very difficultly to be obtained. And now the Jews have lost all that prospect unto the promised seed which their forefathers had in these things, it is sad to consider what work they make with them. They have turned the whole of all legal institutions into such an
3. This instruction was sufficient unto the end of God in the edification and salvation of them that did believe. For these things being diligently and humbly enquired into, they gave that Image and Resemblance of the work of Gods Grace in Christ, which the Church was capable of in that state, before its actual accomplishment. Those who were wise and holy among them, knew full well that all these things in general were but Types of better things, and that there was something more designed of God in the Pattern shewed unto Moses, than what they did contain. For Moses made and did all things for a Testimony unto what should be spoken afterwards. chap. 3. 5. In brief, they all of them believed, that through the Messiah, the promised seed, they should really receive all that Grace, Goodness, Pardon, Mercy, Love, FaTabernacle and all the Services of it. And because they were not able to make distinct, particular apprincipally fixed on the person of Christ as I have elswhere demonstrated. And with respect unto him, his sufferings, and his glory, they
4. Their diligent enquiry into these things and the meaning of them was the principal exercise of their faith and subjection of soul unto God. For even in these things also did the Spirit testify beforehand the sufferings of Christ and the Glory that did ensue. And as the exercise of faith herein was acceptable unto God, so the discoveries of Grace which they received therein were refreshing unto their souls. For hereby they often saw the King in his Beauty, and beheld the pleasant land, which was far off. Isa. 33. 17.
5. That worship which was outwardly performed in and by these things was full of Beauty and Glory. 2 Cor. 3. It was also suited to beget a due reverence of the Majesty and Holiness of God. It was God's way of worship; It was God's order, and so had
signify beforehand the coming of Christ, his sufferings, and the Glory that ensued; the principal reason why the Church of the Jews rejected him at his coming was, that they preferred these institutions and their carnal use above and before him who was the substance and life of them all. And no otherwise will it fall out with them all, who prefer any thing in religion before him, or suppose that any thing is accepted with God without him. Some things we may al
1. Although the soveraign will and pleasure of God be the only reason and original cause of all instituted worship, yet there is, and ever was in all his institutions such an evidence of divine wisdom and Goodness, as gives them beauty, desirableness and usefulness unto their proper end. There is that in them which unto an enlightned mind will distinguish them for ever, from the most plausible in
2. All the Counsels of God concerning his worship in this world, and his eternal glory in the salvation of the Church, do center in the Person and Mediation of Christ. The Life, Glory and Usefulness of all things whereof we have discoursed, arose from hence, that there was in them all a representati
HAving given an account of the Structure or Fabrick of the Tabernacle in the two parts of it, and the furniture of those several parts distinctly, to compleat his argument, the Apostle adds in these verses the consideratiuses they were designed unto in the service of God. For in the ApStructure of the Tabernacle with its
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Vul. Lat. His verò ita compositis; so composed, so framed and put together, Syr.
Quae ita disposita erant; which things were sodisposed; altering the absolute construction of the words, and carrying on the sense of the former thus far. Others; His verò ita ordinatis; i
thus ordered, thus prepared, thus ordained.
Vul. Lat. in priori Tabernaculo; for in prius Tabernaculum. Syr.
Vul. Lat. Semper, alwayes. Syr.
in omni tempore;
quovis tempore; at every season, at any time, as occasion required.
Vul. Lat. Sacrificiorum Officia consummantes, perfecting to this part or offices of the sacrifices. But the sacrifices belonged not at all unSyr.
Ritus obeuntes, cultus obeuntes; Beza. Ritus cultûs obeuntes; performing the Rites of sacred worship.
Vul. Lat. in secundo autem. Syr.
In secundum autem: sed in alterum; but into the second, or the other. Syr.
Boderus renders substantively; unum est; that inward Tabernacle was one. But the reference is unto what follows, and is better rendred adverbialsemel, once.
Non sine sanguine; Syr. cum sanguine illo, with that blood.
Vul. Lat. Eras. quem offert; Syr. which he was offering; which he offereth.
Vul. Lat. Pro sua et populi ignorantia, very corruptly. Syr.
Now when these things were thus ordained, the Priests went alwayes into the first Tabernacle, accomplishing the service of God. But into the second went the High Priest alone every year, not without blood which he offered for himself and the errors of the People.
I follow the common Translation, but shall take notice of what it seems defective in. And there is in the words. (1) A
1. The manner of the Inference is the particle, now when; verò, but; now, when, is included in the tense of the participle.
2. The subject spoken of, these things; that is, the things spoken of furniture of them.
3. That which is affirmed of them is, that they were ordained, and the manner thereof is also added that they were thus ordained;
once rendred it by, ordinatis, whom I suppose ours follow, rendring it by ordained. But ordinatis is rather ordered than ordained. To be ordained, sigOrder. So the word is used for the making of the Tabernacle, ver. 2. A Tabernacle was made. These things being prepared, made and finished. The preparation, structure and finishUtensils, with their disposition into their sacred order are respected in this word. They were
When these things were thus prepared and ordered they stood not for a magnificent shew, but were designed unto constant use in the service of God. This the Apostle declares in the same order wherein he had described the parts of the Tabernacle in their distribution into the first and the second; the outward and inward Tabernacle.
As to the first Tabernacle wherein were the Candlestick and the Tables and
persons for whose
1. The Persons who administred therein were the Priests. They, and they alone, entred into the Sanctuary. All others were forbidden to approach unExcision. These Priests who had this priviledge were all the posterity of Aaron unless they fell under exception by some legal incapacitating blemish. For a long time, that is, from the preparing of the Tabernacle unInspection of the whole was committed in an especial manner unto the
In process of time when the Priests of the Posterity of Aaron were multiservices of the Sanctuary were to be encreased by the building of the Temple, wherein instead of one candlestick there were ten; David by Gods direction cast all the Priests into 24 courses or orders, that should serve in their turns, two courses in a month, which rule continued unto the destruction of the second Temple. 1 Chron. 24. Luk. 1. 5. And he did it for sundry ends. (1) That none of the Priests of the Posterity of Aaron might be utterly excluded from this Priviledge of approaching unto God in the Sanctuary; and if they were, it is likely they would have disposed of themlies on all promiscuously, is too often neglected by all. For although the High Priest were to keep the charge, to judge the house, and to keep the courts, Zech. 3. 7. and so take care for the due attendance unto the daily Ministration; yet was the provision more certain, when being ordained by Law or by divine Institution, all Persons concerned herein knew the times and seasons wherein they might and wherein they ought to attend on the Altar.
These were the officers that belonged unto the Sanctuary: The Persons who alone might enter into it on a sacred account. And when the Structure of the whole was to be taken down, that it might be removed from one place to another, as it was frequently in the wilderness, the whole was to be done by the Priests, and all the holy Utensils covered, before the Levites were adNumb. 4. 15.
Yet must it be observed, that although this were the peculiar service of the Priests, yet was it not their only service. Their whole sacred imployment was not confined unto this their entrance into the Sanctuary. There was a work committed unto them, whereon their whole service in the Sanctuary did depend. This was the offering of Sacrifices which was accomplished in the court without, on the brazen Altar, before the door of the Tabernacle; which belonged not unto the purpose of the Apostle in this Place.
This was the great priviledge of the Priests under the old Testament, that they alone might and did enter into the Sanctuary, and make an approach unto God. And this priviledge they had as they were Types of Christ, and no otherwise. But withal it was a great part and a great means of that state of servitude and fear, wherein the People or the Body of the Church was kept. They might not so much as come nigh the Pledges of Gods Presence, it was forbidden them under the penalty of death and being cut off, whereof they sadly complained. Numb. 17. 12, 13.
This state of things is now changed under the Gospel. It is one of the principal priviledges of Believers, that, being made Kings and Priests unto God
Rev. 1. 5. Ephes. 2. 18. Rom. 5. 2. Neither doth this hinder but that yet there are and ought to be Officers and Ministers in the house of God, to dispense the holy things of it, and to minister in the name of Christ. For in their so doing they do not hinder but promote the approach of the Church into the presence of God, which is the principal end of their ofpeculiar honour for which they must be accountable, Heb. 13. 17. So the Church of Believers itself, ought alwayes to consider how they may duely improve, and walk worthy of this Priviledge, purchased for them by the blood of Christ.
2. The general foundation of the service of these Priests in the Sanctuary entred into the first Tabernacle, but they
But moreover the equity of the command extends itself unto that especial reverence of God which we ought to have in all holy services. And although this be not confined unto any Postures or Gestures of the Body, yet those that naturally express a reverential frame of Spirit, are necessary unto this duty.
3. The time of this their entrance into the Sanctuary to discharge their quovis tempore; alwayes, say we;
There was also an especial service when the High Priest entred into this Sanctuary, which was neither daily nor weekly, but occasional, which is menLevit. 4. 6, 7. For when the anointed Priest was to offer a Sacriown sins, he was to carry some of the blood of it into the Sanctuary, and sprinkle it towards the vail that was before the most Holy Place. This he was to do seven times, which is a mystical number, denoting that perfect Atonement and expiation of sin, which was to be made by the blood of Christ. But this being an occasional service, the Apostle seems to have had no respect unto it.
4. The service itself performed by them is expressed, accomplishing the services. The expression is sacred, respecting mystical rites and ceremonies, such as were the things here intended. Officiating in the Misacredly ministring. In discharge of the Priestly office, acDaily. (2) Weekly. Their daily services were two.
(1) The dressing of the Lamps of the Candlestick, supplying them with the holy oyl, and taking care of all things necessary unto the cleansing of them, that their light might be preserved. This was done morning and evening, a continual service in all generations. The service of the Candlestick.
service of the Golden Altar, the Altar of Incense in the midst of the Sanctuary, at the entrance of the most Holy Place, before or over against the Ark of the Testimony. Hereon the Priests burnt Incense every day with fire taken from the Altar of Burnt-offerings that was in the court before the door of the Tabernacle. This service was performed evening and morning immediately after the offering of the daily
It is uncertain whether they were all performed at the same time or no; namely, those of the Candlestick and the Altar of Incense: If they were, it should seem that they were done by no more but one Priest at one time, that is, eZechariah it is said that it was his Lot to burn Incense in the Temple, and no other was with him there when he saw the vision, Luk. 1. 8, 9, 21, 22, 23. Wherefore whereas it is said in the Institution of these things, Aaron and his Sons shall do this service; it is in
2. The weekly service of the Sanctuary was the change of the bread on the Table of Shew-bread. This was performed every sabbath day in the morning and not else. Now all this daily service was Typical. And that which it did reapplication of the Benefits of the Sacrifice and whole mediation of Christ unto the Church here in this world. That the Tabernacle itself and the Inhabitation of God therein was a Type of the Incarnation of the Son of God, we have shewed before. And have also declared that all the Utensils of it were but representations of his Grace in the discharge of his ofLight and Life of the Church, the Lamp and the bread therecontinual application made unto these things without Intermission every day. And we may thence observe that,
A continual application unto God by Christ, and a continual application of the Benefits of the Mediation of Christ by faith, are the Springs of the Light, Life and comfort of the Church.
But into the second went the High Priest alone once every year, not without blood, which he offered for himself and the errors of the People.
THe use and service of the second part of the Tabernacle or the most Holy Place, which the Apostle designeth principally to apply unto his present argument, are declared in this present verse. And he describes them; (1) By the person who alone might perform the service which belonged unto this part of the sanctuary. And this was the High Priest. (2) By that which in general was required unto the other parts of it. He went into it. This is not here expressed, but the sense of it is traduced from the foregoing verse, The other Priests entred into the Sanctuary; and the High Priest into this; that is, he entred or went into it. (3) From the time and season of this his entrance, which was once a year only; in opposition unto the entrance of the Priests into the other part, which was at all times, every day. (4) By the manner of his entrance, or what he carried with him to administer or perform the holy service of the Place, expressed negatively; not without blood; that is, with blood. (5) From the use of the Blood which he so carried in with him; it was that which he offered for himself and the errors of the People.
That which the Apostle here respects and describes was the great Anniversary Sacrifice of expiation, whose Institution, Rites and Solemnities are at large declared.
1. The Person designed unto this service was the High Priest alone and no Levit. 16. 2, 32. And he was to be so alone, as that none were to attend, assist or accompany him in any part of the service. Yea, it was so far from it, that any person entred with him into the Holy Place, that no one was allowed to be in the other part of the Sanctuary where he might so much as see the vail opened, or look in after him whilst he performed his server. 17. As all the People were kept out of the Sanctuary whilst the Priests entred daily into it and waited at the door; so all the Priests were kept without the Sanctuary, whilst the High Priest entred into the most HoSickness or occasional Pollutions of him who was actually High Priest. And he was called the
Some say that indeed the High Priest went alone into the Holy Place once a year only, but with other Priests and on other occasions he might enter oftenadmission with boldness unto the Throne of Grace, was as the Apostle declares in the next verse, not as yet made known.
2. The way whereby he ingaged into this service was that he went into this Holy Place. This, as we observed before, is not here expressed, but is neentrance through the vail that is intended; which also was a part of his service. For it was a Type both of the entrance of Christ into Heaven, and of our entrance by him unto the Throne of Grace. ver. 24. chap. 10. 19, 20. This was that vail which in the Temple was rent from the top to the bottom upon the death of our SaMatth. 27. 51. For hereby the way was laid open into the Holy Place, and the gracious Presence of God discovered unto all that come unto him by Christ.
3. The Time of this service is expressed, that it was once only every year.
Prohibition or negative precept that the High Priest should not come at all times into the Holy Place, Lev. 16. 2. that is, not every day, as he did into the Sanctuary; not at any time of his own choice. He might not choose, he might not appoint a time for the service of this Holy Place; whatever occasion he apprehended of it, or necessity for it. Times of sacred worship are the Lords, no less then the things of it. Our own stated times are no less disapproved by him, than any other parts of sacred worship of our own finding out. 1 Kings 12. 32, 33.
And as this time of the entrance of the High Priest into the most Holy Place was limited unto once a year, which our Apostle observes; so the precise day of the year was determined by the Law. It was fixed unto the
But whereas it is said that he entred once every year, the meaning is, that upon one day in the year only he did so, and had liberty so to do: For it is evitwice into it, yea, most probable that he did so four times. He had three offerings or sacrifices to offer on the day of expiaBullock and a Ram for himself and his houshold. Lev. 16. 3. This the Apostle notes distinctly, which he offered for himself. Secondly, a Goat, for a Sin-offering, which he offered for the People, for the errors of the People, ver. 9. Thirdly, the service of the scape Goat, which also had the nature of a Sacrifice, ver. 10. Of the two first whose blood was offered on the Altar, it is said distinctly, that he carried of the blood into the most Holy Place. He did so, first that of the Bullock and the Ram, before he offered the Goat for the sins of the People. He killed not the Goat until he came out of the Holy Place, after he had carried in the blood of the Sacrifice for himself, ver. 11, 12, 13, 14. After this he carried in the blood of the Goat that was offered for the sins of the People, ver. 15. So that of necesone day into the most Holy Place.
Yea, it is most probable and almost very certain that he entred into it four times on that day: For before he carried in the blood he was to go in with the Incense to make a cloud over the Mercy-seat. And it is evident that he could not carry in the Incense and the blood at the same time: For when he went in with the Incense, he had in one hand a Censer full of burning coals from the Altar, and he so carried it, 'that besides both his hands were filled with Incense, ver. 12. that he could carry no blood with him at that time. For when he carried in the blood also, both his hands were in like manner emseven times, which could not be done with the blood that was at once upon the finger wherewith he sprinkled it. Wherefore this once every year is on one day on
When all this was done, that there might be a full representation of the Atonement to be made by the Lord Christ, and of the plenary remission of sins by his blood, the High Priest laid all the sins of the People on the Head of the scape Goat who carried them away into the wilderness of everlasting obver. 20, 21, 22.
As these Institutions were multiplyed to typifie the one single sacrifice and oblation of the body of Christ, because of the imperfection inseparable from the nature of earthly things, whereby no one of them could absolutely rescape Goat into the wilderness. Hence the Jews have a saying that on the day of expiation all Israel was made as innocent as in the daies of creation. How all this was accomplished in and by the Sacrifice of Christ must be afterwards declared.
4. As to the nature of this service, the Apostle tells us that is was not without
5. This blood is farther described by the use of it; which he offereth. Where oblation consisted principally in the atonement made by the blood at the Altar of burnt-offerings. It was given and appointed for that end, to make atonement with it at that Altar, as is expresly affirmed. Lev. 17. 11. After this, it was sprinkled for purification. Wherefore by Lev. 16. 15. which is only to bring and not to offer properly. Or he hath respect unto the offering of it that was made at the Altar without the Sanctuary. The blood which was there offered he brought a part of it with him into the most Holy Place, to sprinkle it according unto the Institution.
6. The Apostle declares for whom this blood was offered; and this was for himself and the People; first for himself and then for the People. For he distinct Sacrifices that were to be offered on that day; The first was of a Bullock and a Ram which was for himself. And this argued, as the Apostle observes, the great imperfection of that Church-state. They could have no Priests to offer Sacrifices for the sins of the People, but he must first offer for himself, and that the blood of other creatures. But the true High Priest was to offer his own blood and that not for himself at all, but for others only. He offered for himself; that is, for his own sins. Lev. 16. 6. Wherefore the Vul. Lat. reads the words, pro suâ et Populi ignorantiâ, very corruptly, changing the number of the substantive, but very tru
2. The blood was offered also for the People, that is, the People of Israel, the People of God, the Church, the whole congregation. And as the
7. That which he offered for; it was their errors; or their sins. The Socinians,
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Vul. Lat. Hoc significante. Hoc declarante. Hoc innuente. Syr. by this manifesting. Manifestans, Patefaciens, notum faciens, making known.
is openly manifest.
manifestly, plainly, perspicuously to declare.
Vul. Lat. nondum propalatam esse; made palàm, open, manifest. Syr.
Vul. Lat. Viam sanctorum, the way of the Holies; Beza, Viam ad sacrarium, the way into the sanctuary. Viam in Sancta Sanctorum, the way into the most Holy Place. None suspect masculine gender.
Vul. Lat. habente statum; having or continuing its state or condition; and
The Holy Ghost this signifying,(Syr.signifying hereby) evidently declaring, that the way into the Holiest of all, (the way of the most Holy Place; of the Holies) was not as yet made manifest, whilst yet the first Tabernacle was standing, (kept its station,)
THe Apostle in this verse, enters on a declaration of the use which he de
The first Inference which he makes unto this purpose, is laid down in this verse. And it is taken from what he had observed immediately before concernNone of the People were ever suf
Who gave that Instruction; it was the Holy Ghost.The way whereby he gave it; It was by the manifest signification of his mind, in and by what he did, appointed, ordered or prescribed.Instruction he gave; namely, that the way into the Holiest
1. The Author of this Instruction was the Holy Ghost. The Holy Ghost
this signifying, that is, saith Grotius, Deus per afflatum suum Mosi praecipiens. So they speak by whom the divine personality of the Holy Ghost is denyed. But it is not only here supposed, but it may be hence undeniably proved. For he that by his word and works teacheth and instructeth the Church, is a perdivine Person: For he who by his authority and wisdom disposed of the worship of God under the old Testament, so as it might typifie and represent things afterwards to come to pass, and be revealthe holy Spirit. And as he is the immediate Author and Appointer of all divine worship; so there are characters of his wisdom and holiness on all the Parts of it.
2. The way whereby he gave this Instruction was by the signification of signifying, declaring manifestly, evidently, openly. He did it not by any especial revelation made unto Moses about it, he did not in words declare it, or express it as a doctrinal truth: But this signification was made in the nature and order of the things appointed by him. The framing of the Tabernacle and the constitution of the services belonging thereunto, made this declaration. For things in his wisdom were thus disposed, that there should be the first Tabernacle whereinto the Priests did enter every day, acboldness thereinto. For unto what end else did he allow and appoint that once a year, there should be an entrance into it by the High Priest, in the name of, and for the service of the Church? But this entrance being only once a year by the High Priest only, and that with the blood of atonement, which was always to be observed whilst that Tabernacle continued, he did manifest that the access represented was not to be obtained during that season. For all believers in their own per
1. [That the divine ordinances and institutions of worship are filled with wisdom sufficient for the instruction of the Church in all the mysteries of faith and obedience.] How eminent was the divine wisdom of the Holy Ghost, in the structure and order of this Tabernacle? What Provision of Instruction for the present and future use of the Church, was laid up and stored in them? What but infinite wisdom and praescience could order things so in their typical signification? He that considers only the outward frame and state of these things, may see a curious and beautiful structure, a beautiful order of external worship: Yet can he find nothing therein, but what the wisdom and contrivance of men might attain unto: At least, they might find out things that should have as glorious an outward appearance. But take them in their proper state, as unto their signification and representation of spiritual and heahumane wisdom and projection. He alone in
2. It'is our duty with all humble diligence to enquire into the mind of the Holy Ghost in all Ordinances and Institutions of divine worship. Want hereof lost the Church of Israel. They contented themselves with the consideration of outward things, and the external observance of the services enjoyned unto them. Unto this day the Jews perplex themselves in numberless curious enquiries into the outward frame and fashion of these things, the way, manner, and circumstances of the external observation of the services of it. And they have multiplyed determinations about them all and every minute circum
And whereas the Apostle affirms that this frame of things did plainly sigdiligence into sacred Institutions of divine worship. If any thing seem to be wanting or defective therein; if any thing be obscure and not determined as they suppose in the express words, without more adoe they supply it with somewhat of their own. But there are many things useful and necessary in the worship of God which are to be gathered from such intimations of the mind of the Holy Ghost, as he hath in any place given of them; And those who with humility and diligence do exercise themselves therein, shall find plain satisfactory significations of his mind and Will, in such things as others are utterly ignorant of.
3. That which the Holy Ghost did thus signifie and instruct the Church in, This, in the words, was that the way into the most Holy Place, the way of the Holies was not yet made manifest. And for the explication hereof, we must consider the things before proposed.
1. What the Apostle intends by the Holies; It is generally supposed by exHeaven itself which is hereby intended. Hence some of the Antients, the School-men and sundry expositors of the Roman Church have concluded, that no believers under the old Testament, none of the antient PaAbraham, Isaac or David were admitted into Heaven whilst the first Tabernacle stood, that is, untill the Ascension of Christ. Hereon they framed a Limbus for them in some subterranean Receptacle, whither they suppose the soul of Christ went, when it is said that he descended into hell where they were detained, and whence by him they were delivered. But whatever becomes
Ribera, Estius, Tenae, Maldenat, A Lapide do not fix it on this Text: For the supposition whereon it is founded, is wholly alien from the scope of the Apostle, and no way useful in his present argument: For he discourseth about the Priviledges of the Church by the Gospel and Priesthood of Christ in this world, and not about its future state and condition. Besides he saies not that there was no entrance into the Holies during that season, but only that the way of it was not yet manifest. Wherefore they might enter into it, although the way whereby they did so was not yet openly declared; for they had but a shadow, or dark, obscure representation of good things to come.
And this is the interpretation that most sober expositors do give of the words. Heaven with eternal Blessedness was proposed unto the Faith, Hope and expectation of the Saints under the old Testament. This they believed, and in the hopes of it walked with God, as our Apostle proves at large, chap. 11. HowHeavenly Inheritance unto them, namely, by the Mediation and Sacrifice of Christ, was but obscurely represented, not illustriously manifested as it is now; Life and Immortality being brought to Light by the Gospel. And as these things are true, so this Interpretation of the words being consonant unto the Analogy of faith, is safe, only we may enquire whether it be that which is peculi
The Comment of Grotius on these words is, that the Apostle signifies, super aetherias sedes, via eò ducens est evangelium praecepta habens verè coelestia. Eam viam Christus primus patefecit; aditumque fecit omnibus ad summum coelum. Pervenit quidem eò, Abrahamus, Jacobus,
1. How far the Gospel is this way into the Holiest, shall be declared immeHeavenly precepts which it gives, that is, which were not given under the old Testament is most untrue. For the Gossubstance of them contained in the Law. There is no precept in the Gospel ex
2. That Christ should be no otherwise the way, but only as he revealed and declared the Gospel and the precepts of it, is not only untrue and injurous unto the honour of Christ, but directly contrary unto the design of the Apostle in this Place. For he is treating of the Sacerdotal office of Christ only, and the Benefit which the Church doth receive thereby. But the revelation of the Doctrine, or precepts of the Gospel was no duty of that office, nor did it beThat he did as the Prophet of the Church. But all his Sacerdotal Actings are towards God in the behalf of the Church, as hath been proved.
3. That the antient Patriarchs went to Heaven by a secret Engine, and that some of them only in an extraordinary way, is plainly to deny that they were saved by faith in the promised seed, that is, that they were not saved by the mediation of Christ, which is contrary unto the whole Oeconomy of God in the salvation of the Church, and many express Testimonies of the Scripture. These Socinian fictions do not cure but corrupt the Word of God, and turn away the minds of men from the truth unto fables. We shall there
The Apostle by ver. 3. he called Verse: Only whereas he there spake of the material Fabrick of the Tabernacle, and the things contained in it, here he designs what was signified thereby: For he declares not what these things were, but what the Holy Ghost did signifie in and by them. Now in that most Holy Place were all the Signs and Pledges of the gracious Presence of God; the Testimonies of our Reconciliation by the Blood of the Atonement, and our Peace with him thereby. Wherefore to enter into these Holies, is nothing but an Access with liberty, freedom and boldness, into the gracious Presence of God, on the acChap. 10. 19, 20, 21, 22. that I somewhat admire so many worthy and learned Expositors should utterly miss of his meanGracious Presence of God, whereunto Believers draw nigh, in the confidence of the Atonement made for them, and acceptance thereon: see Rom. 5. 1, 2, 3. Ephes. 2. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. Heb. 4. 14, 15. Chap. 10. 19. The Atonement being made and received by Faith, Conscience being purged, Bondage and Fear being removed, Believers do now under the Gospel, enter with Boldness into this Gracious Presence of God.
2. We must consider what is the way into these Holies, which was not yet made manifest. And here also Expositors indulge unto many Conjectures, very needlesly, as I suppose. For the Apostle doth elsewhere expresly declare himself, and interpret his own meaning, namely, Chap. 10. 19, 20. This way is no other but the Sacrifice of Christ, the true High Priest of the Church. For by the entrance of the High Priest into the most Holy Place with Blood, the Holy Ghost did signifie that the way into it, namely, for Believers to enter by, was only the one true Sacrifice which he was to offer, and to be. And acMatth. 27. 51. And an evidence this is, that the Lord Christ offered his great expiatory Sacrifice in his Death here on Earth, a true and real Sacrifice, and that it was not an Act of Power after his AscenSocinians dream. For until that Sacrifice was offered, the way could not be opened into the Holies; which it was immediately after his Death, and signified by the renting of the Vail. This
3. Of this way it is affirmed that it was not yet made manifest, whil'st the first Tabernacle was standing. And a word is peculiarly chosen by the Apostle open manifestation of it. There was an entrance under the Old Testament into the Presence of God, as unto Grace and Glory, namely, the vertue of the Oblation of Christ: But this was not as yet made manifest. Three things were wanting thereunto.
1. It was not yet actually existent, but only was vertually so. The Lord Christ had not yet actually offered himself unto God, nor made Atonement for Sin. Howbeit by vertue of the Eternal Agreement that was between the Faa Lamb slain from the foundation of the world; that is, in and from the giving of the first Promise.
2. Although the coming of his Person was promised, and his Sacrifice variously shadowed out, or represented unto the Church, yet their perception and understanding thereof, was weak and dark, proportionate unto the means of its Revelation. Hence whatever were its vertue and efficacy, yet was it not
3. There were many blessed Priviledges that attended the opening of this
essence of the way, yet they did so as unto our entrance into it. We could not without them, that is, the Administration of the spirit in Gospel-Ordinances, make use of this way though prepared and set open unto the Glory of God, and our own spiritual advantage.
Wherefore the plain open manifestation of the way into the Holiest, which the Apostle denies unto the Church under the old Testament, consists in these three things.
1. In the actual exhibition of Christ in the flesh, and his Sacrifice of himself, making atonement for sin: For hereby alone was the way laid open unto an access with boldness into the gracious presence of God. Without this the Law and its Curse were like the Cherubims and flaming Sword that turned every way to keep sinners from drawing nigh unto God. Hereby were they re
2. In the full plain declaration of the nature of his Person and of his MediGospel be not this way in the Precepts of obedience which it gives unto us, yet is it the declaration and manifestation of this way, and our sole direction how to make use of it, or how to enter by it into the most Holy Place. This they enjoyed not under the old Testament but were limited unto typical institutions directing the Priests how to enter into the Sanctuary made with hands, which were but an obscure representa
3. In the Introduction or Revelation and Establishment of those Priviledges of Gospel-worship, whereby believers are led comfortably into the presence of God, as our Apostle declares; cap. 10. 19, 20. For they are full of Light and Grace, and a Guide unto all the steps of faith and obedience in this way. Hereunto may be added all those things which we have declared to belong unto that perfection or consummation of the Church-state which the Law could not bring it unto; on chap. 7. ver. 11.
In these things consisted that manifestation of the way into the most Holy Place, which is here denyed unto the old Testament.
4. The continuance of this state is added: Whilst the first Tabernacle was standing
1. By the first Tabernacle the Apostle understands not that first Part of the Tabernacle into which the Priests entred continually accomplishing the divine services, which before he had so called: But he intends the whole Tabernatrue Tabernacle of the Body of Christ which succeedunsettled condition. But he intends the whole worship instituted together with it, and belonging unto it, cele
2. It was continued whilst this first Tabernacle, or the Tabernacle in this sense, Having its station, that is, according unto the mind of God, it had its state and use in the Church. This it had absolutely until the death of Christ and no longer: For until then both the Lord Christ himself and all his Disciples continued the observation of all its services according to the mind of God: For he was made under the Law of it whilst it was in force. Declaratively it continued until the day of Pentecost: For then was in the comnew way of worship being established, the abrogation of the old was declared. And this was yet farther made known by the Determination put unto the Observation of it by the Holy Ghost
Gentile converts in the Council of the Apostles and Elders at Ierusalem. Actually it continued until the destruction of the Temple, City and People some years after. Its first station it had in Gods appointment, the second in his connivence, and the third in his patience.
It is the first of these that is here intended. The Tabernacle, that is, the Laws and Service of it, preserved its station and use in the Church, by Gods ordinance and appointment unto the Death of Christ. Then did he pronounce concerning it and all things belonging unto it; It is finished. Then was the Vail rent, and the way into the Holiest laid open. Then was peace with God publickly confirmed by the blood of the Cross, Ephes. 2. 14, 15. and the na
1. Although the Lord Christ were not actually exhibited in the flesh under the old Testament, nor had actually offered himself unto God for us, yet had Believers then an access into the Grace and favour of God, though the way, the cause and means of it was not manifestly declared unto them. The Apostle doth not exclude them all from the Grace and Favour of God, but only shew their disadvantage in comparison of Believers under the Gospel, in that this way was not manifested unto them.
2. The design of the Holy Ghost in all the Tabernacle, Ordinances and Institutions of worship, was to direct the faith of Believers unto what was signifyed by them.
3. Typical Institutions attended diligently unto, were sufficient to direct the faith of the Church, unto the expectation of the real expiation of sin, and acceptance with God thereon. God was never wanting unto the Church in what was necessary unto it in its present condition, so as that it might be guided in its faith and encouraged unto obedience
4. Though the standing of the first Tabernacle was a great Mercy and Priviledge, yet the removal of it was a greater; for it made way for the bringing in of that which was better.
5. The divine wisdom in the Oeconomy and disposal of the Revelation of the way into the Holiest, or of Grace and acceptance with himself, is a blessed object of our contemplation. The several degrees of it we have considered, on chap. 1. ver. 1.
6. The clear manifestation of the way of Redemption, of the Expiation of sin, and peace with God thereon, is the great Priviledge of the Gospel.
7. There is no access into the gracious Presence of God, but by the sacrifice of Christ alone.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
quae Parabola est, Syr. an Exemplar or Example; so all render it, though it answer the Hebrew
a Parable or
Tempor is instantis, of the instant time or season; which Arias rectifies into, in tempus praesens, for the time present; Beza, pro tempore illo praesente, for that present time; pro tempore tum praesente, for the time that was then present, Syr.
juxta quam; it being uncertain what he refers quam unto, Arias rectifieth it, juxta quod; for quo, wherein; Syr. in quo, wherein.
Munera & Hostiae, Dona & Sacrificia; Syr. Gifts; that is, Meat and Drink Offerings, and Sacrifices by Blood, Syr. Oblations and Victims, or bloody Sacrifices.
juxta Conscientiam perfectum facere servientem; make him that did the service perfect according to Con
in Meat and Drink, in the singular number.
and in the washing of kinds; Kinds, that is, various kinds; with respect not unto the various rites of washing, but the various kinds of things that were washed.
Iustitiis Carnis; so it renders Iustitia, or Iustificatio, constantly but very improperly; Syr.
Ritibus carnalibus, Ordinances, Institutions, Rites of the flesh, concerning fleshly things.
Impositis; others, Imposita, incumbent on, lying on them.
Whichwasa figure for the time then present, in which were offered both Gifts and Sacrifices, that could not make him that did the serWhich stoodvice perfect, as pertaining to the Conscience, onely in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal Ordinances imposed until the time of Reformation.
I shall not alter the Translation, but shew what might be more properly ex
Expositors have made use of various Conjectures in their Commentaries on this place. What is material in the most eminent of them, the Reader may see in Mr. Pool's Collections. But I must needs say, that in my judgment, they have brought more difficulty unto the Text, than they have freed it from. Wherefore I shall not detain the Reader in the examination of them; but I shall give that interpretation of the Text, which I hope will evidence its Truth unto such who impartially seek after it, and are in any measure acquaint
Verses gives a summary Account and Reason of the Imperfection of the Tabernacle, and all its Services, wherein the AdminiPreeminence of the New Covenant above the Old, from the excellency of the High Priest thereof, with his Tabernacle and Sacrifice. Unto this end a discovery of the imperfections and weakness of the first Tabernacle and Services, was indispensably necessary. And if notwithstanding its outward Excellency and Glory, it was no other but what it is here declared to be, as evidently it was not, then was it not only an unreasonable thing, and a plain rejection of the Wisdom and Grace of God, to adhere unto it in opposition unto the Gospel, which was done by the most of the Hebrews; but it was altogether unmeet and useless to be retained with the Profession of the Gospel, which the residue of them earnestly contended for. This was that which the Apostle designed ultimately to convince them of; and a work herein both great and difficult was committed unto him. For there is nothing more difficult, than to dispossess the minds of men of such Persuasions in Religion, as they have been bred up in, and received by a long Tract of Tradition from their Fathers. So we find it to be in such PersuaRoman Church, and others. But these Hebrews had a Pretence or Plea for their obstinacy herein, which none other ever had in the like case but themselves. For the things which they adhered unto, were confessedly of Divine Institution. Wherefore the Apostle labours principally to prove, that in the Will and Wisdom of God, they were to continue only for a season, and also that the season of their Expiration was now come. And this he doth in this place, by a declaration of their nature and use whil'st they did continue, whence it is evident, that God never designed them a perpetual station in the Church; and that because they could not effect what he pur
There is in the words themselves,
1. The Subject spoken of is expressed by Which. Some would rewhich figure was for the time present. But there is no cause for this Traduction of the words. The Verb Substantive
Which was; Which, that is, the Tabernacle. Not only the Fabrick and Structure of it, but the Tabernacle in both parts of it, with all its Furniture, Vessels, Utensils and Services, as before described.
2. As unto its proper Use and End, the Apostle affirms that it was Figura, Exemplar, Exemplum, Comparatio, Similitudo, Typus, Representatio: So variously is this word rendred by Interpreters. Most fix on Exemplar or Exemplum; but they are Syriack.
Psal. 49. 4. Psal. 78. 2. And whereas it is said that the Queen of Sheba tried the wisSolomon
Kin. 10. 1. The Targum renders it by Chaldee,
Syriack
anigma, problema,
a Riddle, an hard Question; and anigmatically, obscurely, so as that one thing is to be gaEzek. 20. 49. is he not Proverbiator Proverbiorum; one that speaks darkly, and obscurely; that expresseth one thing and intends another, using similitudes and Metaphors: An obscure mystical Instruction by
Thus is speaking in parables, unto a clear, plain, open teaching, so as to be understood of all. See Mat. 13. 10, 11, 12, 13. Ioh. 16. 28, 29. Now speakest thou openly, and no Parable. Wherefore an obscure mystical Metaphorical Instruction. God taught the Church of old, the mysteries of our Redemption by Christ, by the Taparabolical, a figurative Instruction. So should the word here be rendred, a figurative Instruction, or the word Parable be here retained as it is in other plac
3. The third thing in the Text is the time or season wherein the Tabernacle was so parabolically or mystically instructive. It was Vnto this present time. This reading is generally rejected by Expositors; as not suited unto the mind of the Apostle in this Place. For he intends not the time that was then present when he wrote the Epistle, not the times of the Gospel, not the time after the resurrection of Christ until the destruction of the Temple, which the addition of that word would denote: For God had prepared anoParables, or mystical Metaphors. But yet the word may be retained, and a sense given of the words both sound and proper. For,
But I shall rather follow the reading of the most copies though the Vulgar Latine reading temporis instantis seems to favour the first. And Arias rectiin tempus praesens, gives the same sense also. But the word praeterimperfect tense, signifies a time that was then present, but is now past. And it is therefore well rendred by our Translators, the time then present; as if time then present when the Tabernacle was made and erected. was then present. For the Apostle in this whole discourse, not only respects the Tabernacle, and not the Temple, but he considers the first Erection of the Tabernacle in a peculiar manner: For then was it proposed as the means of the Administration of the first Covenant and the worship thereunto belonging. It is the Covenants which he principally designeth a comparison between. And he doth in that way of the
Wherefore the time then present was the state and condition of the Church
whole of what God granted unto the Church, during that state whereobscure, mystical and figuratively representative; yet was it sufficierre but either by a neglect of enqui
And this sense those who render Figure, Type, or Example, must come unto: For the use of it is confined unto the time of the erection of the Tabernacle and the Institution of the ordinances thereunto belonging. But a Type or Figure was unto them of no use, but so far as it was instructive, which was obscurely and mystically. And that this is the sense of the word the Apostle declares, ver. 8. Where he shews the substance of what the Holy Ghost signified by the building, disposal, and services of the Tabernacle; that is, what he taught the Church thereby, parabolically and figuratively.
This kind of Instruction, whatever now it seem to us, was meet and fit for them unto whom it was given. And by the administration of Grace in it, it was a blessed means to ingenerate Faith, Love and Obedience in the hearts and lives of many unto an eminent degree. And we may consider from hence what is required of us unto whom the clear Revelation of the Wisdom, Grace, and Love of God are made known from the Bosome of the Father by the Son himself.
4. The especial nature and use of this Tabernacle and its service is declared. were offered both gifts and sacrifices.
juxta quam; making the Relative to answer unto Gender will not allow it in the Original.
in which time; during which season: For immediately upon the setting up of the Tabernacle, God gave unto Moses Laws and Institutions for all the Gifts and Sacrisices of the People, which were to be offered therein. This was the first direction which God gave after the setting up of the Tabernacle, namemanner of offering all sorts of Gifts and Sacrifices unto him.
And the Apostle here distributes all the sacred offerings inchap. 5. 10. where the distinction hath been explained.
Of them all he affirms, they are offered; not that they were so:
Scheme at the first Tabernacle and all its services at its first Institution, and presents it unto the consideration of the Hebrews, as if it were then first erected. He doth indeed sometimes speak of the Priests and Sacrifices as then in being, with respect unto that continuance of the Temple and its worship which it had in the Patience of God, as we have shewed on chap. 8. ver. 4. But here treating only of the Tabernacle and its worship, as that which was granted in the confirmation, and for the adthen entred into, as the Tabernacle, Priestrepresents that as present, which was past long before. The Tabernacle serv
5. On these concessions the Apostle declares the imperfection of this whole order of things, and its impotency as unto the great end that might be expectGifts and Sacrifices could not make perfect him that did the service as pertaining unto the conscience. This was the end aimed at; this was represented in them and by them. And if they could not really effect it,
weak and imperfect, and so not always to be continued. The end represented in and by them, was to make Atonement for Sin, that the Anger of God being pacified, they might have Peace with him. The Covenant was then newly established between God and the Church, beExod. 24. God knew that there would be among the People, and even the Priests themselves many sins and transgressions against the Rules and Laws of that Covenant. This of it self it could not dispense withal. For its Sanction was the Curse against every one that continued not in all things written in the Book of it; wherefore if this Curse on all just and righteous occasions should rigidly haveexcision of the whole People. For there is no man that liveth, and sinneth not. And on many occasions sin abounded in that state of the Church, wherein Light and Grace were but sparingly dispensacred Gifts and Offerings atonement should be made for sin, so as that the Curse of the Covenant should not be put in immediate execution against the sinner, Lev. 17. 11. But there were two things to be considered in those sins which God had appointed that atonement should be made for. The first was, the external temporal Punishment which was due unto them according unto the Place which the Law or Covenant had in the Politie or Commonwealth of Israel. The other, that eternal Punishment was due unto every sin by the Law, as the Rule of all Moral Obedience; For the wages of sin is death. In the first of these, the Person of the Sinner in all his outward circumstances, his Life, his Goods, his Liberty, and the like, were concerned. In the latter, here his Conscience, or the inward man alone was so. And as unto the first of them, the Gifts and Sacrifices mentioned being rightly offered, were able in themselves ex opere operato, to free the Sinner from all temporal political inconvenience or detriment, so as that his Life and InCanaan, or his state preserved entire in the Commonwealth of Israel. This the Apostle here tacitely acknowthat the Gifts and Sacrifices were able to free the Sinner from temporal Punishment, and give him outward Peace in his Possessions. But as unto the latter, wherein Conscience was concerned, he denies that they had any such efficacy.
They were not able, Gender with Neuter Gender, usually regulates the conantecedent Substantives. And instances may be given where a Participle reantecedent Substantives than one, may agree in Gender with either of them. As Leges & Plebiscita coactae. But I rather think that the Apostle confines the Impotency he mentions unto Sacrifices only; that is, slain and bloody Sacrifices. For these things which were offered Gifts and Sacrifices that could not persect.
These Sacrifices were impotent and ineffectual unto this end, Epistle, I have persect, to consummate, to
They could not do it unto the Conscience of the Sinner before God. What he intends hereby, he doth more fully declare, Chap. 10. ver. 2. Conscience condemning for sin. This could not be taken away by these Sacrifices. They were not able to do it; for if they could have done so, the sinoften repeated, because of their disability unto this end; wherefore
6. The Person is described towards whom this effect of purifying the ConHim that did the Service, saith our Translation, I think not so properly. He that did the Service was the Priest only. But respect is had unto every one that brought his Gift or Offering unto the Altar. ver. 6. But Chap. 10. 1. that is, every one who brought his Sacrifice to be offered, that Atonement might be made for him. And Divine Worship in all Individuals. Mat. 4. 10. But he also may be said to do the Service, on whose account and in whose stead it was performed.
But the Defect charged, doth not in the first place reflect on the Persons, as though it was by their default. They worshiped God according unto his own Institutions, but it was in the Sacrifices themselves. And if they could not make the Worshipers, those who did the Service, perfect, they could make none so, for it was they alone who had the benefit of them.
The Note of Grotius on this place is, Isti cultus non possunt Sectatorum suorum animos purgare à vitiis quemadmodum Evangelium; most remote from the mind of the Holy Ghost. For he speaks not of
1. There is a state of perfect Peace with God to be attained under imperfect Obedience. For it is charged as a weakness in the legal Administrations, that they could not give such a Peace, where any sin remained. It is therefore to be found in the Sacrifice of Christ, as is proved at large in the next Chapter. Being justified by Faith, we have peace with God.
2. Nothing can give perfect peace of Conscience with God, but what can make Atonement for sin. And whoever attempt it any other way but by vertue of that Atonement, will never attain it in this world nor hereafter.
Onely in Meats and Drinks, and divers Washings, and carnal Ordinances imposed on them until the time of Reformation.
IT is acknowledged that there is no small difficulty in the connexion of these words, or their relation unto what doth immediately precede; and therefore Expositors have multiplied conjectures about it, in whose ex
Two things are plain and evident unto this purpose.
1. That the design of the Apostle in the words themselves, is to manifest and declare the weakness of the services of the Tabernacle, and their insufficien
2. That the things instanced in, do comprise a great part of the Levitical Institutions, and his Assertion concerning them may by a parity of Reason be extended unto them all. For to render his description of them comprehenMeats and Drinks, and divers Washings. And then (2) to shew that he intends all things of an alike nature with them, he adds the general nature of them all, they were carnal Ordinances.
1. A great part of their Levitical Religious Observances, may be reduced unto these Heads of Meats and Drinks, and various Washings. Laws and Institutions were multiplied about these things; what they might eat, and what they might not; what was clean, and what was unclean unto that end; what they might drink, and what vessels defiled all liquors; what were to be their eatings and drinkings, and when upon their Peace-offering, and at their solemn Feasts; their great variety of Washings, of the Priests, of the People, of their Garments, and their Flesh, stated and occasional, do take up a great part of the entire System of their Ordinances. And as Laws were multiplied concerning these things, so many of them were enforced with very severe Penalties. Hence they were difficultly to be learned, and always impossible to be observed. The
2. All the Laws concerning these things were carnal, Carnal Ordinances; such as for the matter, manner of performance, and end of them, were Carnal. This being their nature, it evidently follows, that they were instituted
The scope and design of the Apostle being thus fixed, the Coherence and In
Onely in Meats and Drinks, &c. Our Translators observElliptical, have supplied it with, Which stood; Which stood onely in
Meats and Drinks; And that Supplement may give a double sense. (1) It may respect the substance of the things spoken of: Which, relates to Gifts and Sacrisices. And so the sense intended is, that they consisted in Meats and Drinks, and divers Washings. And this was the natural substance of them. They consisted in such things as might be eat and drunk, being duly prepared, as Flesh, Flower, Salt, Oyl and Wine. Hence were they called Meat and DrinkWashings also that belonged unto them, as the washExod. 29. 17. and of the Burnt-offerings peculiarly, Ezek. 40. 38. of the hands and feet of the Priests, Exod. 30. 18. and of the Leper, Lev. 14. 9. Howbeit it cannot be said, that the Gifts and Sacrifices, as they were such, did consist in these things, though in them, things of this naWhich stood, canconsummation of these Gifts and Sacrifices, or the Celebration of the whole Service that belonged unwhich stood in these things; that is, which were accompanied with them, and not perfected without them.
The Argument in the words, is to prove the insufficiency of the Gifts and Sacrifices of the Law, unto the end mentioned of perfecting Conscience benecessary Adjuncts, or what belonged unto them, and were inseparable from them. It is not said, that these
But whereas there is an Ellipsis in the Connexion of the words, it may be otherwise supplied. For having mentioned the Gifts and Sacrifices of the Law, insufficiency unto the end enquired after. And other Laws, onely concerning Meats and Drinks, and divers Washings; which in general he calls Carnal Rites. Hereby is the Argument in hand carried on and compleated.
There are four things in the words. (1) An Account of the legal InstituNature in general, with that of others of the same kind; they were carnal Ordinances, or fleshly Rites. (3) The way of the Relation of the People unto them, they were imposed on them. (4) The Time for which they were imposed, or the measure of their durauntil the time of Reformation.
1. For the Nature of them, they consisted in Meats and Drinks. Take the meats, or things to be eaten or not eaten, as being clean or unclean; an account whereof is given, Lev. 11. throughout. With reference thereunto doth the Apostle reflect on the Levitical Institutions, in those words,
2. They consisted in, or were concerning divers Washings.
washings there were various sorts or kinds under the Law. For the Priests were washed, Exod. 29. 4. and the Levites, Numb. 8. 12. and the People after they had contracted any impurity, Lev. 15. 8, 16. But the Apostle seems to have particular respect unto the washings of the Priests, and of the Offerings, in the Court of the Tabernacle before the Altar; For these were such, as without which the Gifts and Sacrifices could not be rightly offered unto God.
3. It is added in the description of these things, institutis carnalibus, ritibus, ceremoniis, justitiis justificationibus carnis. Carnal Or
The words may be an expression of the nature in general of the Law, about Meats, Drinks, and Washings, they were carnal Ordinances. But the distinctive copulative
and, will not admit of that sense. It seems therefore to con
The force of the reasonings in these words is evident. For the design of the Apostle is to prove, that in the perfect Church-state which God would bring in under the New Covenant, the Worshipers were to enjoy peace of Conscience, with joy and boldness in the presence of God, from a perfect Atonement and Purification of Sin. How this is effected by the one Sacrifice of Christ, he afterwards declares. But the Ordinances of the Law, and the Levitical Sacrifices were weak and imperfect as unto this end. For in them, and by them, men were conversant wholly in
3. Concerning all these things it is affirmed, that they were imposed on the People, Syntax of this word, which all Substantives immediately foregoing Case; if unto Verse, it agrees not with it in Gender. And the Apostle had before adjoined unto it a Participle of the Feminine Gender,
Iota is added unto the first word, or taken from the latGender. But whereas the Apostle had put together Neuter, the other of the Feminine Gender, he might apply his Adjectives either to one or both, without offence to Grammar. Yet I rather judge that in this word he had reChapter. Concerning them all he declares that they were thus imposed, and so the use of the word in the
Many judge that there is an Objection anticipated in these words. For upperfect the Worshipers that attended unto them. Hereon it might be well enquired, To what purpose then were they appointed? Unto what end did they serve? Hereunto he replies, That they were never designed unto perpetual use, but only imposed on the people unto the time of Reformation.
But whether there be a respect unto any such Objection or no, he plainly declares their use and duration according unto the mind of God, which were such as their nature did require. And hereby also he confirms his Argument, of their insufficiency unto the great end of perfecting, sanctifying, or conse
1. They were things imposed; that is, on the people under the Law. They were laid on them as a Burden. The word is properly, incumbentia, lying on them, that is, as a Burden. There was a weight in all these legal Rites and Ceremonies, which is called a Yoke, and too heavy for the people to bear, Acts 15. 10. And if the imposition of them be principally intended, as we render the word, imposed, it respects the Bondage they were brought into by them. Men may have a weight lying on them, and yet not be brought into Bondage thereby. But these things were so imposed on them, as that they might feel their weight, and groan under the burden of it. Of this Bondage the Apostle treats at large in the Epistle unto the Galatians. And it was imBurden, and effective of such a Bondage.
2. As unto the duration assigned unto them, they were thus imposed for a determined limited season. They were never designed to conIews. The principal foundation of their present unbelief is, That the Law of Moses is eternal, and that the observation of its Rites and Institutions is to be continued unto the end of the world. The contrary hereunto the Apostle had evidently proved in the foregoing
This was the season, Correction, say some; Direction, others; of Reformation; restraining the word unto the things spoken of, and reprimitive Institution, by abolishing and taking away the Abuses that have crept into it, or corrupt Additions that have been made unto it: But nothing of that nature is here inReduction of the Tabernacle and its Services unto its first Institution is intended, but its utter removal and taking away out of the Service of God in the Church. But if respect be had unto the whole state of the Church in general, and what God designed unto it, taking the word Reformation in an universal sense, for the Introduction of a new animating form and life, with new means and ways of their expression and exercise in new Ordinances of Worship, the word may be of use in this place.
of Correction, are no less out of the way. For Correction might be applied unto the
The Time intended is sufficiently known and agreed upon. It is the great time or season of the coming of the Messiah, as the King, Priest and Prophet of the Church, to order and alter all things, so as it might attain its perfect state. This was the season that was to put an end unto all legal observances, wherein they were to expire. Unto the bringing in of this season, God had ordered and disposed all things from the foundation of the world. See Luke 1. 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74. And it is called Ephes. 1. 10. And we may observe from the whole Verse,
1. That there is nothing in its own nature so mean and abject, but the Will and Authority of God can render it of sacred use, and sacred efficacy, where he is pleased to ordain and appoint it. Such were the
2. The fixing of Times and Seasons, for the state of things in the Church, is solely in the hand of God, and at his sovereign disposal. He alone appointed this time of Reformation; the Church could neither hasten it, nor was to re
3. It is a great part of the blessed Liberty which the Lord Christ brought into the Church, namely, its freedom and liberty from legal Impositions, and every thing of the like nature in the worship of God.
4. The time of the coming of Christ, was the time of the general final Reformation of the worship of God, wherein all things were unchangeably directed unto their proper use.
UNto this verse the account of the Levitical Priesthood, its Sanctuary and Services is continued. Amongst them the service of the High Priest in the most Holy Place on the day of expiation was principally designed: For this was looked on and trusted unto by the Hebrews, as the principal Glory of their worship, and of the greatest efficacy as unto Atonement and Reconciday of Expiation, when the High Priest entred into the most Holy Place, all Israel were made as innocent as in the day of Creation. In what sense it neither was nor could be so shall be declared on chap. 10. ver. 1, 2, 3. But in these things the Glory of the administration of the old Covenant did consist, which the Apostle allows unto it in his deon that day he hath an especial respect unto, in the account he gives of the Priesthood of Christ and its Administration.
But yet although he hath a principal regard hereunto, yet he doth not resdescription of the Sanctuary and its serExpositors into mistakes: For they would confine all that he sayes unto a correspondency with what was done on that solemn day by the High Priest; whereas he doth also expresly declare that the Truth, Reality and Substance of the Tabernacle, all its Utensils, its Services and Sacrifices were to be found in him alone: For unto this end doth he give us such a description of them all in particular.
But as was said, that which he principally respects in the comparison he makes between the Type and the Antitype, is the High Priest and his especi
〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 VER. 11.
Assistens; assisting; Syr. adveniens; coming.
per amplius & perfectius Tabernaculum; barbarously for
non hujus Creationis. Syr. or from among these Creatures. most, hujus structurae, of this building.
But Christ being come, an High Priest of Good Things to come, by a greater and more perfect Tabernacle not made with hands, that is to say, not of this Building.
THe Introduction of the comparison in the redditive Conjunction 5 But, answers unto first verse of the Chapter, which are the comThat had truly; But Christ, &c. In this and the next verse, the Apostle lays down in general what he proves and confirms by Instances in this, and unto the twentieth verse of the following chapter.
And there are two things which he declares in this and the verse en
1. Who is the High Priest of the new Covenant, and what is the Tabernanacle wherein he administred his Office, ver. 11.
2. What are the especial services he performed in answer unto those of the Legal High Priest, and their Preference above them, ver. 12.
In this verse he expresseth the subject whereof he treats, or the Person of the High Priest concerning whom he treats. And he describes him (1) By his name, it is Christ. (2) By his entrance on his office: being come. (3) His Office itself; an High Priest. (4) The effects of his office, or the especiGood things to come. (5) The Tabernacle wherein he adPositively; that it was greater and more perfect or more excellent than it. (2) By a double negation, the latter exegetical of the former; not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building or Creation. All these particulars must be distinctly opened to give a right understanding of the sense of the place and meaning of the words.
1. The Person spoken of is Christ. I have observed before the variety of ApIesus only, sometimes Christ, sometimes Iesus Christ, sometimes the Son, and sometimes the Son of God. And he had respect hereIesus is come, or the Son, or the Son of God, but Christ being come; that is, the Messiah being come. Under that name and notion was he promised from the beginning, and the fundamental Article of the faith of the Church was, that the Messiah was to come; all their desires and expecthe that was to come, was the name whereby they expressed their faith in him. Matth. 11. 3. Art thou he who is to come? And the coming of Christ or the Messiah, was the time and the cause wherein and whereby they expected the last Revelation of the Will of God, and the utmost perfectpromised of old that he should come, upon whose coming the faith of the Church was built, by whom and at whose coming they expected the last Revelation of the Will of God, and consequently a change
promised Messiah being come. The Church was founded of old on the name Iehovah, as denoting the unchangeExod. 6. 3. And this Name of Christ is declarative of the accomplishment of them. Wherefore by calling him by this name, as it was most proper when he was to speak of his coming, so in it he minds the Hebrews of what was the anti
2. As a general foundation of what is afterwards ascribed unto him, or as the way whereby he entred on his office, he affirms that he is come. Christ beassistens, which as it doth not signifie to come, so the sense is corrupted by it. The Rhemists render that translation, but Christ assisting an High Priest. But this encreaseth the ambiguity of the mistake of that Translation, as not declar
That which is intended is the accomplishment of the promise of God in the sendan High Priest; being come an High Priest; yet his coming itself in order unto the susception and discharge of that office is included in it. And upon this coming itself depended the demonstration of the faithfulness of God in his promises. And this is the great fundamental Article of Christian Religion in opposition unto Iudaism; as it is declared, 1 Iohn 4. 2, 3. Wherefore by his being come in this place, no one single act is intended, as his Advent or Coming doth usually signifie his Incarnation only; But the sense of the word is comprehensive of the whole Accomplishment of the promise of God in sending him, and his performance of the work whereunto he was designed thereon. In that sense is he frecome, or to be come. 1 Iohn 5. 20.
And, as was before observed, there is not only Argument herein unto the Apostle's design, but that which being duly weighed, would fully deterHebrews. For all their legal Adcoming, and Representations thereof, all given in confirmation of the truth of the promises of God, that so he should come. Wherefore upon his coming they must all necessarily cease and be removed out of the Church.
3. There is in the words a determination of the especial end of his coming unHigh Priest; Being come an High Priest; that is, in answer unto, and in the room of the High Priest under the Law. This states the subject of the Apostles argument. He had before proved that he was to be a Priest, that he was a Priest, and how he came so to be. He now asserts it as the foundation of those Actings which he was to ascribe unto him in answer unto those of the legal High Priests, whose offices and services with the effects of them, he had before declared. Those High Priests did so, but Christ being come an High Priest, &c.
4. He adds the especial object of his office, or the things about which he things to come. As the asGood things, that is absolutely, or such as were necessary unto the purification, sanctificaGood things present; not of the Good things promised, that were for to come. And this is the force of the article Of the Good things; namely, that God had promised unto the Church.
Priest of the things that he doth in the execution of his office; or of the things which he procureth there
The things whereof Christ is an High Priest, are said to be things to come; that is, they are yet so, absolutely so; or they were so called with respect unto the state of the Church under the old Testament.
Most Expositors embrace the first sense, these good things to come, they say are that future eternal salvation and glory which were procured for the Church by the Priesthood of Christ; and were not so by the Levitical Priesthood. To the Administration of the Priesthood under the Law he assigns only things prehath procured for us eternal Redemption. The eternal Salvation and Glory of the Church was procured by the Priesthood of Christ, or Christ himself in the discharge of that office, and were not so by the Levitical Priests. These things are true, but not the meaning, at least not the
1. This confines the relation of the Priesthood of Christ in this place unto the effects of it only, and excludes the consideration of his sacerdotal actings in the great sacrifice of himself: For this was not now to come, but was already past and accomplished. But this is so far from being excluded by the Apostle, as that it is principally intended by him. This is evident from the words ensuing, wherein the Tabernacle is described in which he was thus an High Priest of Good things to come: For this was his humane nature wherein he offered himself, as we shall see.
2. He doth not in this place compare together and oppose the future state of Glory which we shall have by Christ, with and unto the state of the Church in this world under the old Testament, which were not equal, nor would be cogent unto his purpose, seeing the Saints of old were also made Partakers of that Glory. But he compares the present state of the Church, the PriviAaronical Priesthood: For the fundamental Prinpresent Perfection of the Church is the effect of the Priesthood of Christ.
Wherefore the Apostle expresseth these things by that notion of them which was received under the old Testament and in the Church of the Hebrews; namely, the
1. Those wherein the actual Administration of his Office did consist: For as we said, he was the High Priest of the duties of his own office; he by whom they were performed. These in general were his Oblation and Intercession: For although his Intercession be continued in Heaven, yet was it begun on the earth; as his oblation was offered on the earth, but it is continued in Heaven, as unto the perpetual exercise of it. The whole preparation unto, and actual oblation of himself, was accompanied with most fervent and ef
2. The effects of these Sacerdotal actings are also intended: For these also are reckoned hereunto in the close of the next verse, in the Instance of one of them; namely, eternal Redemption, which is comprehensive of them all. And these also were of two sorts.
1. Such as immediately respected God himself. Of this nature was the Atonement and Reconciliation which he made by his blood, and peace with God for sinners thereon. See 2 Cor. 5. 19, 20. Ephes. 2. 14, 15, 16.
2. The Benefits which hereon are actually collated on the Church, whereconsummate state in this world. What they are we have discoursed at large on chap. 7. 11.
These therefore are the Good things to come, consisting in the bringing forth and accomplishing the glorious effects of the hidden wisdom of God according unto his promises from the beginning of the world, in the sacrifice of Christ with all the benefits and priviledges of the Church, in Righteousness, Peace and Spiritual Worship which ensued thereon. And we may observe;
1. These things alone were the true and real Good things that were intended for and promised unto the Church from the beginning of the world. The Iews had now utterly lost the true notion of them, which proved their ruine; and yet do they continue in the same fatal mistake unto this day. They found that great and glorious things were spoken of by all the Prophets, to be brought in at the coming of the Messiah. And the Hope of Good things to come they lived upon, and continue yet so to do. But being carnal in their own minds, and obstinately fixed unto the desire of earthly things, they fancied them to consist in things quite of another nature; Honour, Riches, Power, a Kingdom and Dominion on the earth, with a possession of the wealth of all nations were the Good things which they hoped were to come. As to Recon
2. These things alone are absolutely Good unto the Church; all other things are good or evil as they are used or abused. Outward Peace and Prosperity are Good in themselves, but oftentimes they prove not so to the Church. Many a time have they been abused unto its great disadvantage. They are not such things as are too earnestly to be desired, for who knows what will be the end of them? But these things are absolutely Good in every state and condition.
3. So excellent are these Good things, as that the performance and procuring of them, was the cause of the coming of the Son of God, with his susception and discharge of his sacerdotal office. They are excellent in their Relation unto the Wisdom, Grace and Love of God, whereof they are the principal effects; and excellent in Relation unto the Church, as the only means of its eternal Re
4. Such a Price and value did God put on these things, so good are they in his eyes, as that he made them the subject of his promises unto the Church from the
foundation of the world. And in all his promises concerning them, he still op
5. That which the Apostle hath immediate respect unto in the declaraTabernacle and the Service of the High Priest therein. Wherefore he assigns a Tabernacle unto this High Priest, in answer unto that under the Law whereby he came, or wherein he administred the duties of his office. And concerning this he (first) asserts, that he came by a Tabernacle. (2)
1. He came by a Tabernacle. These words may have prospect unto what is afterwards declared in the next verse, and belong thereunto. As if he had said, being come an High Priest he entred into the Holy Place by a perfect Tabernacle with his own blood; for so the High Priest of the Law entred into the Holy Place,
Being come an High Priest by such a Tabernacle; that is, wherein he admiChurch of the new Testament, as Chrysostome who is followed by many. Some say it is Heaven itself. This is embraced and pleaded for by Schlictingius who labours much in the explanation of it. But whereas this is usually opposed, because the Apostle in the next verse affirms that Christ entred into the Holies, which he exHeaven itself, by this Tabernacle, which therefore cannot be Heafirst of these he would have to be the dwelling Place of the Angels; the other the Place of the Throne of God himself, represented by the most Holy Place in the Tabernacle. Through the first of these he saies the Lord Christ passed into the second, which is here called his Tabernacle. And it is indeed said that the Lord Christ in his exaltation did pass through the Heavens, and that he was made higher than the Heavens, which would seem to favour that conceit, though not ob
But there is no ground to conceit or fancy such distinct Places in Heaven above; yea, it is contrary to the Scripture so to do: For the
This Tabernacle whereby he came an High Priest, was his own humane nature.
And this gives us an understanding of the description given of this TaberAdjuncts of it, with reference unto that of old. This is given us, (1) Positively, in a double comparative property. (1) That it was Greater than it. Greater in dignity and worth, not quantity and measures. The Humane nature of Christ, both in itself, its Conception, Framing, gracious Qualifi
2. More perfect. This respects its Sacred use. It was more perfectly fitted
chap. 10. 5. Sacrifice and Burnt-offering thou wouldst not have, but a body hast thou prepared me.
This was that which God accepted, wherewith he was well pleased, when he rejected the other as insufficient unto that end. And we may hence ob
The humane nature of Christ wherein he discharged the duties of his Sacerdotal Office in making Atonement for sin, is the greatest, the most perfect and excellent Ordinance of God; far excelling those that were most excellent under the old Testament. An Ordinance of God it was, in that it was what he designed, ap
2. The Son of God undertaking to be the High Priest of the Church, it was of necessity that he should come by, or have a Tabernacle wherein to discharge that Office. He came by a Tabernacle. So it is said unto the same purpose, that it was of necessity that he should have somewhat to offer, chap. 8. 3. For being to save the Church by vertue of and in the discharge of that Office, it could not be otherwise done, than by the Sacrifice of himself, in and by his own Taber
Secondly, He describes this Tabernacle by a double Negation; (1) That it was not made with hands. (2) That it was not of this building. And this latter clause is generally taken to be exegetical of the former only, and that because of its introduction by that is to say. I shall consider both.
1. It was not made with hands. The Old Tabernacle whil'st Temple of God. So it is constantly called by David in the Psalms. Temples were generally sumptuous and glorious Fabrics, always anbest therein they esteemed irreligious. For they designed to express somegreatness of what they worshiped, and to beget a veneration of what was performed in them. And this men in the degenerate state of Christianity are returned unto, endeavouring to represent the
This Solomon acknowledgeth concerning the Temple which he had built, which yet was the most glorious that ever was erected, and built by God's own appointment. 2 Chron. 2. 5, 6. The house which I build, is great: for great is our God above all Gods. But who is able to build him an house, seeing the heaven, and heaven of heavens cannot contain him? who am I then, that I should build him an house, save onely to burn sacrifice before him? And 1 Kings 8. 27. Will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven, and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee: how much less this house that I have builded? Service was to be done unto God in that Temple according unto his appointment, but a meet habitation for him it was not. And our Apostle lays it down as a Printhat God, who made all things, could not dwell
in Temples made with hands. Such was the Tabernacle of Old, but such was not that wherein our Lord Jesus admini
There seems to me to have been an apprehension among the Iews, that there should be a Temple wherein God would dwell, that should not be made with hands. Our Lord Jesus Christ in the first year of his Ministry, upon his purAuthority in what he had done, says no more, but only,
This is that which the Apostle intimates. Whereas Solomon openly affirms, that the Habitation of God could not be in the Temple that he had built, be
Respect also is had herein unto the framing of the Fabric of the Old TaBezaliel. For although the pattern of it was shewn unto Moses in the Mount from Heaven, yet the actual framing and erection of it, was by the hands of Workmen, skilful to work in all kind of earthly materials, Exod. 32. 3, 4, 5, 6. Chap. 36. 1. And although by reason of the wisdom, cunning and skill which they had received in an extraordinary way, they framed, made and reared a Tabernacle most artificial and beautiful; yet when all was done, it was but the work of mens hands. But the Constitution and Production of the Humane Nature of Christ, was an immediate effect of the Wisdom and Power of God himself, Luke 1. 36.
Nothing of Humane Wisdom or Contrivance, nothing of the Skill or Power of Man, had the least influence into or concurrence in the provision of this glowas made of a Woman, of the substance of the blessed Virgin; but she was purely passive therein, and concurrent in no efficiency either Moral or Physical thereunto. It was the contrivance of Divine Wisdom, and the effect of Divine Power alone.
2dly, The Apostle adds, as a farther dissimilitude unto the other Tabernacle; that is not of this Building. Expositors generally take these words to be exegetical of the former; not made with hands; that is, not of this Building. To me there seems to be an order of any other created thing; not of the same make and constitution with any thing else in the whole Creation here below. For although the substance of his Humane Nature were of the same kind with ours, yet the Production of it in the World was such an Act of Divine Power, as excels all other Divine Operations whatever. Wherefore God speaking of it, saith, The Lord hath created a new thing in the earth, A woman shall compass a man, Jer. 31. 22. or conceive him without natural Generation.
Testament, and sometimes it signifies the things that are created. Neither is it ever used, or not of this Building, should be, not made with hands as that Tabernacle was. It is therefore not of the order of created things here below, either such as were immediately created at the beginning, or educed out of them by a creating Act or Power. For although it was so as unto its substance, yet in its constitution and production it was an effect of the divine power above the whole order of this Creation, or things created.
God is so far from being obliged unto any means for the effecting of the Holy Counsels of his Will, as that he can when he pleaseth exceed the whole order and course of the first creation of all things, and his providence in the rule thereof.
FRom the comparison between the Tabernacle of old, and that of the High Priest of the new Covenant, there is a procedure in this verse unto aSacerdotal actings and those of the High Priest under the Law. And whereas in the description of the Tabernacle and its especial seranswered thereunto in the Sacerdotal Administrations of Christ; and how much on all accounts, both of the Sacrifice, in the vertue whereof he entred into the most Holy Place, and of the Place itself whereinto he entred, and of the Time when it did in Glory and Efficacy excel that ser
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Syr.
the blood of his own Soul or Life. He made his soul an offering for sin; Isa. 5. 3. Blood is the Life of the SaSyr.
one time; not many times, not once every year as they did under the Law. Syr.
into the House of the Sanctuary; less properly; for by that expression the old Tabernacle is inHeaven itself; in Sancta, Sancta Sanctorum, Sacrarium. That which answers unto the most Holy Place in the Tabernaaeterna Redemptione inventa; aeternam Redemptionem nactus; aeterna Redemptione acquisita; most properly, and according unto the use of the word in all good Authors.
Neither by the Blood of Goats and Calves, but by his own Blood he entered in once into the(most)Holy Place, having obtained eternal Redemption.
IN this Verse there is a direct entrance into the great Mystery of the SaTypes of it un
And here because part of our design in the Exposition of this whole Epistle, is to free and vindicate the Sense of it, from the corrupt Glosses which the Socinians, and some that follow them, have cast upon it; I shall on this great Head of the Sacrifice of Christ, particularly insist on the removal of them. And indeed the substance of all that is scattered up and down their Writings against the proper Sacrifice of Christ, and the true nature of his Sacerdotal Office, is comprised in the Comment on this Epistle composed by Crellius and Schlictingius. I shall therefore first examine their corrupt wrestings of the words, and false interpretations of them, before I proceed unto their Expo
They begin; Nunc etiam opponit Sacrificium ipsius Christi, Sacrificio Pontificis antiqui. This is the
They add in Explication hereof, Pontifex antiquus per sanguinem Hircorum & Vitulorum ingrediebatur in Sancta, Christus verò non per sanguinem tam vilem, sed pretiosissimum; quod alius esse non potuit quam ipsius proprius. Nam sanguis quidem humanus sanguine Brutorum, sed sanguis Christi, sanguine caeterorum omnium hominum longe est pretiosior; cum ipse quoque caeteris hominibus omnibus imò omnibus creaturis longe sit praestantior, Deoque charior & proprior, utpote unigenitus cjus filius. What they say of the
Nor do I know of what consideration the Preciousness of the Blood of Christ can be with them in this matter; for it belonged not unto his Sacrifice, or the Oblation of himself, as they pretend. For they would have the Offering of himself to consist onely in his entrance into Heaven, and appearing in the presence of God, when as they also imagine he had neither Flesh nor Blood.
They proceed unto a Speculation about the use and signification of the Preposition, Per, By, or Not andum est Autorem, ut elegantiae istius comparationis consuleret, usum esse in priori membro voce, Per; licet Pontifex legalis non tantum per sanguinem hircorum & vitulorum, hoc est, fuso prius sanguine istorum animalium, seu interveniente sanguinis eorum fusione, sed etiam cum ipsorum sanguine in Sancta fuerit ingressus, ver. 7.
The design of this whole Discourse, is to overthrow the Nature of the SaSophistry being animated by a fanPer, or falsly pretended Reason of the use of it by the Apostle. For (1) the High Priest did indeed carry of the Blood of the Sacrifice into the Holy Place, and so may be said to enter into it with Blood; as it is said he did it, Not without Blood, ver. 7. Yet is it not that which the Apostle hath here respect unto; but it was the Sacrifice at the Altar, where the Blood of it was shed and offered, which he intends, as we shall see immediately. (2) There is therefore
They encrease this confusion in their ensuing Discourse. Aliter enim ex parte Christi res sese habuit, quam in illo antiquo. In antiquo illo, ut in aliis quae pro peccato lege divina constituta erant, non offerebatur ipsum animal mactatum, hoc est, nec in odorem suavitatis, ut Scriptura loquitur, adolebatur, sed renes ejus & adeps tantum; nec inferebatur in Sancta, sed illius sanguis tantum. In Christi autem Sacrificio, non sanguis ipsius quem mactatus effudit, sed ipse offerri, & in illa Sancta coelestia ingredi debuit. Idcirco infra ver. 14. dicitur, seipsum, non vero sanguinem suum Deo obtulisse; licet alias comparatio cum Sacrificiis expiatoriis postulare videretur, ut hoc posterius potius doceretur.
1. Here they fully declare that according to their Notion, there was indeed no manner of similitude between the things compared; but that, as to what they are compared in, they were opposite, and had no agreement at all. The ground of the comparison in the Apostle is, that they were both by Blood; and this alone. For herein he allows a dissimilitude in that Christ was by his own Blood, that of the High Priests by the Blood of Calves and Goats. But according unto the sense of these men, herein consists the difference between them, that the one was with Blood, and the other without, which is expresly contradictory to the Apostle.
2. What they observe of the Sacrifices of old, that not the Bodies of them, but only the Kidneys and Fat were burned, and the Blood only carried into the Holy Place, is neither true, nor any thing to their purpose. For (1) the whole Bodies of the Expiatory Sacrifices were burnt and consumed with fire; and this was done without the Camp, Lev. 16. 27. to signifie the suffering of Christ, and therein the offering of his Body without the City, as the Apostle observes, Chap. 13. 11, 12. (2) They allow of no use of the Blood in Sacrifices, but only as to the carrying of it into the Holy Place; which is ex
They add, as the Exposition of these words, He entred into the Holiest; Ingressus in Sancta, necessario ad Sacrificium istud requiritur. Nec ante Oblatio, in qua Sacrificii ratio potissimum consistit, peragi potuit, cum ea in Sanct is ipsis fieri debuerit. Hinc manifestum est Pontificis nostri Oblationem & Sacrificium non in Cruce, sed in Coelis per actam esse, & adhuc per agi.
Ans. (1) What they say at first is true; but what they intend and infer from thence is false. It is true that the entrance into the Holy Place, and carAnniversary Sacrifice inOblation did consist therein is false. For it is directly affirmed, that both the Bullock and Goat for the Sin-offerLev. 16. 6, 9.
(2) It doth not therefore hence follow as is pretended, that the Lord Christ offered not himself a Sacrifice unto God on the earth, but did so in Heaven only; but the direct contrary doth follow. For the Blood of the Sin-offer
(3) What they say that the Sacrifice of Christ was performed or offered in Heaven, and is yet so offered; utterly overthrows the whole Nature of his Saone Offering once offered, not repeated, or continued. Herein lies the foundation of all his Arguments for its excellency and efficacy. Hereof, the making of it to be nothing but a continued Act of Power in Heaven, as is done by them, is utterly destructive.
What they add in the same place about the Nature of Redemption, will be removed in the consideration of it immediately. In the close of the whole they affirm, that the obtaining of everlasting salvation by Christ, was not an Act antecedent unto his entering into Heaven, as the word seems to import,
having obtained; but it was done by his entrance it self into that Holy Place, whence they would rather read the word
Obtaining. But whereas our Redemption is everywhere constantly in the Scripture assignEph. 1. 7. Col. 1. 14. 1 Pet. 1. 18, 19. Rev. 5. 9. hast redeemed us unto God by thy Blood; it is too great a confihis entrance into Heaven, without any offerthe purging of our Consciences from dead works, ver. 14. which is ascribed directly unto his Blood.
These Glosses being removed, I shall proceed unto the Exposition of the words.
The Apostle hath a double design in this Verse, and those two that follow.
1. To declare the Dignity of the Person of Christ in the discharge of his Priestly Office, above the High Priest of old. And this he doth, (1) From the excellency of his Sacrifice, which was his own Blood. (2) The Holy Place whereinto he entred by vertue of it, which was Heaven it self. And (3) the effect of it, in that by it he procured Eternal Redemption; which he doth in this Verse.
2. To prefer the efficacy of this Sacrifice of Christ for the purging of Sin, or the purification of Sinners, above all the Sacrifices and Ordinances of the Law, ver. 13, 14.
In this Verse, with respect unto the end mentioned, the entrance of Christ into the Holy Place, in answer unto that of the Legal High Priest described,
manner and way of it is expressed; (1) Negatively; It was not by the blood of Goats and Calves. (2) Positively; it was by his own blood.
2. For the Time of it, it was once, and but once.
3. The Effect of that blood of his, as offered in Sacrifice, was, that he ob
The thing asserted is the entrance of Christ the High Priest into the Holy Place. That he should do so, was necessary, both to answer the Type, and for the rendring his sacrifice effectual in the Application of the Benefits of it unto the Church, as it is afterwards declared at large. And I shall open the words not in the order wherein they lie in the Text, but in the natural orHoly Place whereinto Christ entred. (2) What was that Entrance. (3) How he did it once; whereon will follow the consideration of the means where
1. For the Place whereinto he entred, it is said he did so, Into
the Holies. It is the same word whereby he expresseth the Sanctuary, the second Part of the Tabernacle whereinto the High Priest entred once a year. But in the Application of it unto Christ, the signification of it is changed. He had nothing to do with, he had no right to enter into that Holy Place, as the Apostle affirms, chap. 8. 4. That therefore he intends which was signified thereby; that is, Heaven itself, as he explains it in ver. 24. The Heaven of Heavens, the Place of the glorious Residence of the Presence or Majesty of God, is that whereinto he entred.
2. His Entrance itself into this Place is asserted. He entred. This entrance Regal, Glorious and Triumphant; so it belonged properly unto his Kingly Office, as that wherein he triumphed over all the enemies of the Church. See it described, Ephes. 4. 8, 9, 10. from Psal. 68. 18. SaRegal. (2) As it was Sacerdotal. Peace and Reconciliation being made by the blood of the Cross, the Covenant being confirmed, eternal Redemption ob
This he did once only, once for all. In the foregoing description of the once every year; that is, on one day, wherein he went to offer. And the repetiti
Of this entrance of Christ into, it is said, (1) Negatively, that he did not do it by the blood of Goats and Calves; and this is introduced with the disneither; which refers unto what was before denied of him, as unto his entrance into the Tabernacle made with hands. He did not do so, neither did he make his entrance by the blood of Calves and Goats. A difference from and opposition unto the entrance of the High Priest annually into the Holy Place is intended. It must therefore be considered how he so entred.
This entrance is at large described. Lev. 16. And (1) It was by the blood of a Bullock and a Goat which the Apostle here renders in the plural number, Calves and Goats; because of the annual repetition of the same Sacrifice. (2) The order of the Institution was that first the Bullock or Calf was offered, then the Goat; the one for the Priest, the other for the People. This orGoats and Calves.
Totum genus Caprinum; that whole kind of Creature, be it young or old. So the Goats of his offering
Kids; ver. 5. that is, young He-Goats; for the precise time of their age is not determined. So the Bullock the Priest offered for himself, was juvencus ex genere bovino; which is
genus vitulinum; all young Cattel
Concerning these it is intimated in this negative as unto Christ, that the High Priest entred into the Holy Place by their blood; which we must enquire into.
Two things belonged unto the office of the High Priest with respect unto this blood. For (1) He was to offer the blood both of the Bullock and the Goat at the Altar for a sin-offering. Lev. 16. 6, 11. For it was the blood wherewith alone Atonement was to be made for sin, and that at the Altar. Lev. 17. 11. so far is it from truth, that expiation for sin was made only in the Holy Place; and that it is so by Christ, without blood, as the Socinians imagine. (2) He was to carry some of the blood of the Sacrifice into the Sansprinkle it there to make Atonement for the Holy Place, in the sense be
Some say it is the latter; and that by for with. He entred with the blood of Goats and Calves; namely, that which he carried with him into the Holy Place. So plead the Socinians and those that follow them; with design to overthrow the Sacrifice which Christ offered in his Death and bloodsheding, confining the whole expiation of sin in their sense of it unto what is done in Heaven. But I have before disproved this surmise. And the Apostle is so far from using the particle with, would intimate: For he doth not declare with what the High Priest entred into the Holy Place, for he entred with Incense as well as with blood; but what it was by vertue whereof he so entred as to be accepted with God. So it is expresly directed. Lev. 16. 2, 3. Speak unto Aaron that he come not at all times into the Holy Place, with a young Bullock for a sin-offering, and a Ram for a burnt-offering shall he come. Aaron was not to bring the Bullock into the Holy Place, but he had Right to enter into it by the Sacrifice of it at the Altar. Thus therefore the High Priest entred into the Holy Place by the blood of Goats and Calves; namely, by vertue of the Sacrifice of their blood which he had offered without at the Altar. And so all things do exactly cor
2. It is affirmed positively of him that he entred by his own blood; and that in opposition unto the other way; but by his own
blood.
It is a vain speculation contrary to the Analogie of faith, and destructive of the true nature of the oblation of Christ, and inconsistent with the dignity of his Person, that he should carry with him into Heaven a part of that mate
The design of the Apostle is only to declare by vertue of what he entred as a Priest into the Holy Place. And this was by vertue of his own blood when it was shed, when he offered himself unto God. This was that which laid the foundation of, and gave him right unto the administration of his Priestly office in Heaven. And hereby were all those good things procured which he effectually communicates unto us in and by that Administration.
This Exposition is the Center of all Gospel-Mysteries, the object of the Admiration of Angels and Men unto all eternity. What heart can con
1. The unspeakable Love of Christ in offering himself and his own blood for us. See Gal. 2. 20. Rev. 1. 5. 1 Ioh. 3. 16. Ephes. 5. 26, 27. There being no other way whereby our sins might be purged and expiated, chap. 10. 5, 6, 7. out of his infinite Love and Grace he condescended unto this way whereby God might be glorified, and his Church sanctified and saved. It
2. The Excellency and Efficacy of his Sacrifice is hereby demonstrated, that through him our faith and hope may be in God. He who offered this Sacriown Blood. God purchased his Church with his own Blood, Acts 20. 28. How unquestionable, how perfect must the Atonement be that was thus made, how glorious the Redemption that was procured thereby?
This is that which the Apostle mentions in the close of this Verse, as the effect of his Blood-shedding; Having obtained eternal Redemption. The word Vulgar Latin reads, Redemptione aeterna inventa. And those that follow it, do say, that things rare and so sought after, are said to be found. And
Three things must be inquired into, with what brevity we can, for the ExRedemption. (2) Why is this ReEternal. (3) How Christ obtained it.
1. All Redemption respects a state of Bondage and Captivity, with all the Events that do attend it. The Object of it, or those to be redeemed, are onver. 15. of the Redemption of Transgressions, but it is by a Metonymy, of the Cause for the Effect. It is Transgressions which cast men into that state from whence they are to be reRedemption is the deliverance of persons from a state of Bondage. And this may be done two ways: (1) By Power; (2) By payment of a Price. That which is in the former way is only improperly and metaphorically so called. For it is in its own nature a bare deliverance, and is termed Redemption only with respect to the state of Captivity from whence it is a deliverance. It is a vindication into liberty by any means. So the deliverance of the Israelites from Egypt, though wrought meerly by Acts of Power, is called their Redemption. And
The Price or Ransom in this Redemption is two ways expressed: (1) By that which gave it its worth and value, that it might be a sufficient Ransom for all. (2) By its especial nature. The first is the Person of Christ himself, He gave himself for us, Gal. 2. 20. He gave himself a Ransom for all, 1 Tim. 2. 6. He offered himself to God, ver. 14. Eph. 5. 2. This was that which made the Ransom of an infinite value, meet to redeem the whole Church. God purchased the Church with his own Blood, Acts 20. 28. The
That the Lord Jesus Christ did give himself a Ransom for Sin; that he did it in the shedding of his Blood for us, wherein he made his Soul an offerRedemption is nothing but the Expiation of Sin, and that Expiation of Sin nothing but an Act of Power and Authority in Christ now in Heaven, as the Socinians dream, is to reject the whole Gospel.
Though the nature of this Redemption be usually spoken unto, yet we must not here wholly put it by. And the nature of it will appear in the consideraMeritorious Cause of it was Sin, or our Original Apostasie from God. HereSupreme Efficient Cause is God himself: As the RuIudge of all, he cast all Apostates into a state of Captivity and BonLiberty is nothing but peace with him. But he did it with this difference: Sinning Angels he designed to leave irrecoverably under this conInstrumental Cause of it, was the Curse of the Law. This falling on men, brings them into a state of Bondage. For it separates as to all relation of love and peace beBondage. (4) The External Cause, by the application of all other causes unto the Souls and Consciences of men, is Satan. His was the power of darkness, his the power of death over men in that state and condition; that is, to make application of the terror of it unto their Souls, as threatned in the Curse, Heb. 2. 14, 15. Hence he apcauses of Bondage is committed unto him.
From hence it is evident, that four things are required unto that Redemption, which is a deliverance by Price or Ransom, from this state. For (1) it must be by such a Ransom, as whereby the Guilt of Sin is expiated; which was the Meritorious Cause of our Captivity. Hence it is called the Redemption of Transgressions, ver. 14. that is, of persons from that state and condition whereAtonement must be made, and satisfaction unto his Justice, as the Supreme Ruler and Judge of all. (3) Such as whereby the Curse of the Law might be removed, which could not be without undergoing of it. (4) Such as whereby the Power of Satan might be destroyed. How all this was done by the Blood of Christ, I have at large declared elsewhere.
2. This Redemption is said to be Eternal. And it is so on many acSubject Matter of it, which are things eternal, none of them are carnal or temporal. The state of Bondage from which we are deDuration. It was not for a season, like that of the people out of Egypt, or the deliverances which they had afterwards under the Judges, and on other occasions. They endueternal in all the effects of it; none that are partakers of it, do ever return into a state of Bondage. So (3) it en
3. This Redemption Christ obtained by his Blood. Having done all in the Sacri
The Entrance of our Lord Iesus Christ as our High Priest into Heaven, to appear in the presence of God for us, and to save us thereby unto the uttermost, was a thing so great and glorious, as could not be accomplished but by his own blood. No other Sacrifice was sufficient unto this end. Not by the Blood of Bulls and Goats. The reason hereof the Apostle declares at large, Chap. 10. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Men seldom rise in their thoughts unto the greatness of this Mystery. Yea with the most this Blood of the Covenant wherewith he was sanctified unto the remainder of his work, is a common thing. The ruine of Christian Religion lies in the slight thoughts of men about the Blood of Christ; and pernicious Errors do abound in opposition unto the true nature of the Sacrifice which he made thereby. Even the faith of the best is weak and imperfect as to the comprehension of the glory of it. Our relief is, that the uninterrupted contemplation of it, will be a part of our blessedness unto eter
2. Whatever difficulty lay in the way of Christ as unto the accomplishment and perfection of the work of our Redemption, he would not decline them, nor desist from his undertaking, whatever it cost him. Sacrifice and Burnt-offering thou would'st not have; then said I, Lo I come to do thy Will, O God. He made his way into the Holy Place by his own Blood. What was required of him for us that we might be saved, he would not decline, though never so great and dreadful; and surely we ought not to decline what he requires of us, that he may be honoured.
3. There was an Holy Place meet to receive the Lord Christ after the Sacrifice of himself; and a sutable Reception for such a Person, after so glorious a Performance. It was a place of great glory and beauty whereinto the High Priest of old entred by the Blood of Calves and Goats; the visible pledges of the presence of God were in it, whereunto no other person might approach. But our High Priest was not to enter into any Holy Place made with hands, unto outward visible pledges of the presence of God, but into the Heaven of Heavens, the place of the glorious residence of the Majesty of God it self.
4. If the Lord Christ entred not into the Holy Place until he had finished his work, we may not expect an entrance thereinto until we have finished ours. He fainted not, nor waxed weary, until all was finished. And it is our duty to arm our selves with the same mind.
5. It must be a glorious Effect, which had so glorious a Cause; and so it was, even Eternal Redemption.
6. The Nature of our Redemption, the way of its procurement, with the Duties required of us with respect thereunto, are greatly to be considered by us.
THere is in these Verses an Argument and Comparison. But the Comparison is such, as that the ground of it is laid in the Relation of the Comparates the one unto the other; namely, that the one was the Type, and the other the Antitype, otherwise the Argument will not hold. For although it follows, that he who can do the greater, can do the less, whereon an Argument will hold à majori ad minus; yet it doth not absolutely do so, that if that which is less can do that which is less, then that which is greater can do that which is greater; which would be the force of the Argument, if there were nothing but a naked comparison in it. But it necessarily follows hereon, if that which is less, in that less thing which it doth or did, was therein a Type of that which was greater, in that greater thing which it was to effect. And this was the case in the thing here proposed by the Apostle. The words are:
; 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
The words have no difficulty in them as to their Grammatical Sense; nor is there any considerable variation in the rendring of them in the old TranslaSyriac retains ver. 11. instead of Vulgar, place
For Vulgar reads per Spiritum Sanctum. The Syriac follows the Original, by the Eternal Spirit.
our, but most your; which our Translators follow.
For if the blood of Bulls and of Goats, and the ashes of an Heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth unto the purifying of the flesh:
How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot unto God, purge your Conscience from dead works, to serve the living God?
The words are Argumentative, in the form of an Hypothetical Syllogism; wherein the Assumption of the Proposition is supposed, as proved before. That which is to be confirmed, is what was asserted in the words foregoing; nameThat the Lord Iesus Christ by his blood hath obtained for us eternal redemption.
Causal Redditive Conjunction, For, doth manifest; whereunto the Note of a Supposition, If, is premised as a Note of an Hypothetical Argumentation.
There are two Parts of this Confirmation: (1) A most full declaration of the way and means whereby he obtained that Redemption; it was by the offering himself through the Eternal Spirit without spot unto God. (2) By comad homines, that is, unto the satisfaction and conviction of the Hebrews, the Apostle makes use of their Confessions, to confirm his own Asser
To make evident the force of his Argument in general, we must observe, (1) That what he had proved before, he takes here for granted, on the one side and the other. And this was that all the Levitical Services and Ordinancarnal earthly things were Types and Resemblances in God's appointment of them, of these which are spiritual and eternal.
From these Suppositions the Argument is firm and stable, and there are two Parts of it; (1) That as the Ordinances of old being carnal, had an efficacy unto their proper end to purifie the unclean as to the flesh; so the Sacrifice of Christ hath a certain efficacy unto its proper end; namely, the purging of our Consciences from dead works. The force of this Inference depends on the Regreater efficacy; and that which gave a greater evidence of it self in the Sacrifice of Christ with respect unto its proper end, than theirs was in those Sacrifices and Ordinances with respect unto their proper end. How much more. And the reason hereof is, because all their efficacy depended on a meer arbitrary Institution. In themselves, that is, in their own Nature, they had neither worth, value nor efficacy, no not as unto those
THere are two things in this Verse, which are the ground from whence the Apostle argueth and maketh his Inference in that which follows. (1) A Proposition of the Sacrifices and Services of the Law which he had respect unto. (2) An Assignation of a certain efficacy unto them.
The Sacrifices of the Law he refers unto two Heads. (1) The Blood of Bulls and Goats. (2) The Ashes of an Heifer. And the distinction is, (1) from the matter of them, (2) the manner of their performance. For the manoffered, which is supposed and included; the Ashes of the Heifer was sprinkled, as it is ex
The matter of the first is the Blood of Bulls and Goats. The same, say some, Goats and Calves mentioned in the Verse foregoing. So generally do the Expositors of the Roman Church; and that because their Translation reads Hircorum & Vitulorum, contrary unto the Original Text. And some instances they give of the same signification of
But the Apostle had just reason for the alteration of his expression. For in the foregoing Verse, he had respect only unto the Anniversary Sacrifice of the High Priest, but here he enlargeth the Subject unto the consideration of all other expiatory Sacrifices under the Law. For he joins unto the Blood of Bulls and Goats, the Ashes of an Heifer, which was of no use in the Anniverpurified the unclean as unto the flesh, are not to be restrained unto them immediately foregoing, the Ashes of an Heifer sprinkled; but an equal respect is to be had unto the other sort, or the Blood of Bulls and Goats.
Socinian Expositor, in his entrance into that wresting of this Text wherein he labors in a peculiar manner, denies that the water of sprinkling is here to be considered as Typical of Christ, and that because it is the Annivera Type of Christ; so wresting the Truth against his own Convictions, to force his design. But the Conclusion is strong on the other hand; because it was a Type of Christ, and is so here considered, whereas it was not used in the great Anniversary Sacrifice, it is not that Sa
Wherefore by Bulls and Goats, by an usual Synecdoche, all the several kinds of clean Beasts, whose blood was given unto the People to make Atonement withal, are intended. So is the matter of all Sacrifices expressed, Psal. 50. 13. Will I eat the flesh of Bulls, or drink the blood of Goats? Sheep are contained under Goats, being all Beasts of the Flock.
And it is the Blood of these Bulls and Goats which is proposed as the first way or means of the Expiation of Sin, and Purification under the Law. For it was by their Blood, and that as offered at the Altar, that Atonement was made, Lev. 17. 11. Purification was also made thereby, even by the sprink
The second thing mentioned unto the same end, is the Ashes of an Heifer;
sprinkling. The Institution, use and end of this Ordinance, is described at large, Numb. 19. And an eminent Type of Christ there was therein, both as unto his suffering, and the continual efficacy of the cleansing vertue of his Blood in the Church. It would too much di
(1) It was to be a Red Heifer, and that without spot or blemish, whereon no yoke had come, ver. 2. Red is the colour of guilt, Isa. 1. 18. yet was there no spot or blemish in the Heifer; so was the guilt of Sin upon Christ, who in himself was absolutely pure and holy. No yoke had been on her; nor was there any constraint on Christ, but he offered himself willingly through the eternal Spirit.
(2) She was to be had forth without the Camp, ver. 3. which the Apostle alludes unto Chap. 13. 11. representing Christ going out of the City unto his Suffering and Oblation.
(3) One did slay her before the face of the Priest, and not the Priest himIews and Gentiles were used in the slaying of our Sacrifice.
(4) The Blood of the Heifer being slain, was sprinkled by the Priest seven times directly before the Tabernacle of the Congregation, ver. 4. So is the whole Church purified by the sprinkling of the Blood of Christ.
(5) The whole Heifer was to be burned in the sight of the Priest, ver. 5. So was whole Christ, Soul and Body, offered up to God in the fire of love, kindled in him by the eternal Spirit.
(6) Cedar wood, Hysop and Scarlet were to be cast into the midst of the burning of the Heifer, ver. 6. which were all used by God's Institution in the purification of the unclean, or the sanctification and dedication of any thing unto sacred use; to teach us that all spiritual vertue unto these ends, really and eternally, was contained in the one offering of Christ.
Priest who sprinkled the Blood, the men that slew the Heifer, and he that burned her, and he that gathered her ashes, were all unver. 7, 8, 9, 10. So when Christ was made a Sin-offering, all the legal Uncleannesses, that is, the Guilt of the Church, were on him, and he took them away.
But it is the use of this Ordinance which is principally intended. The Ashes of this Heifer being burned, was preserved, that being mixed with pure water, it might be sprinkled on persons, who on any occasion were legally unclean. Whoever was so, was excluded from all the Solemn Worship of the Church. Wherefore without this Ordinance, the worship of God, and the holy state of the Church could not have been continued. For the means, cauTent and House, and all persons in them were defiled, if any one died among them, which could not but conpurified. Had not therefore these Ashes, which were to be mingled with living water, been always preserved and in a readi
It is so in the Church of Christ. The Spiritual Defilements which befal Believers are many, and some of them unavoidable unto them whil'st they are in this world; yea, their Duties, the best of them, have defilements adhering unto them. Were it not but that the Blood of Christ, in its purifying vercontinual readiness unto Faith, that God therein had opened a Fountain for Sin and Uncleanness, the Worship of the Church would not be ac
The nature and use of this Ordinance is farther described by its object, the unclean,
made common. All those who had a liberty of approach unto God in his Solemn Worship, were so far sancticommon, and so unclean.
The Unclean especially intended in the Institution, were those who were defiled by the dead. Every one that by any means touched a dead body, whether dying naturally or slain, whether in the house or field, or did bear it, or assist in the bearing of it, or were in the Tent or House where it was, were all defiled; no such person was to come into the Congregation, or near the Tabernacle. But it is certain that many Offices about the dead, are works of Humanity and Mercy, which morally defile not. Wherefore there was a peIews have this Notion, that defilement by the dead, arose from the poyson that is dropt into them that dye by the Angel of death, whereof see our Exposition on Chap. 2. 14. The meaning of it is, that Death came in by Sin, from the poysonous temptation of the old Serpent, and befel men by the Curse which took hold of them thereon. But they have lost the understanding of their own Tradition. This belonged unto the bondage under which it was the Will of God to keep that People, that they should dread Death as an effect of the Curse of the Law, and the fruit of Sin, which is taHeb. 2. 14. 1 Cor. 15. 47. And these works which were unto them so full of defilement, are now unto us accepted Duties of Piety and Mercy.
moral defilements; and it may be it is true, for the matter is dubious. But that it should thence follow, that none under the Gospel should be so excluded, for moral and spiritual Evils, is a fond imagilegally or ceremo
The manner of the application of this purifying water, was by sprinkling.
sprinkling the unclean. Not only the Act, but the Efficacy of it is intended. The manner of it is declared, Numb. 19. 17, 18. The Ashes was kept by it self. Where use was to be made of it, it was to be mingled with clean living water, water from the Spring. The vertue was from the Ashes; as it was the Ashes of the Heifer, slain and burnt as a Sin-offering. The water was used as the means of its application. Being so mingled, any clean person might dip a Bunch of Hysop (see Psal. 51. 7.) into it, and sprinkle any thing or person that was defiled. For it was not consprinkling was that alone in all Sacrifices whereby their continued efficacy unto Sanctification and Purification was expressed. Thence is the Blood of Christ called the
The effect of the things mentioned is, that they sanctified unto the purifying of the flesh; namely, that those unto whom they were applied, might be made Levitically clean, be so freed from the carnal defilements, as to have an admis
Sanctifieth,
sanctifie internally and spiritually. Sometimes it is used in the sense of separate, dedicate, consecrate. So is it by our Saviour, Iohn 17. 19. And for them, I sanctifie my self; that is, separate and dedicate my self to be a Sacrifice. So is it here used. Every defiled person was made
The word is of the singular number, and seems only to respect the next Anthe Ashes of an Heifer. But if so, the Apostle menBlood of Bulls and Goats, without the ascription of any effect or efZeugma unto the one and the other. The whole effect of all the Sacrifices and Institutions of the Law is comprised in this word. All the Sacrifices of Expiation, and Ordinances of Purification had this effect, and no more.
They sanctified unto the purifying of the flesh. That is, those who were legally defiled, and were therefore excluded from an interest in the worship of God, and were made obnoxious unto the curse of the Law thereon, were so legally purified, justified, and cleansed by them, as that they had free admission into the Society of the Church, and the Solemn Worship thereof. This they did, this they were able to effect, by vertue of Divine Institu
external Rites and Ordinances, without internal purity or holiness. Whereown account he had no regard unto them; so by the Apostle they are called worldly, carnal, and beggarly Rudiments. Why then, it will be said, did God appoint and ordain them? Why did he oblige the People unto their observance? I an
This state of things is changed under the New Testament. For now neither Circumcision availeth any thing, nor Uncircumcision, but a new Creature. The thing signified, namely, internal Purity and Holiness, is no less necessary unto a Right unto the Priviledges of the Gospel, than the observance of these ex
Yet is there no countenance given hereby unto the impious opinion of some, that God by the Law required only external Obedience, without respect unto the inward spiritual part of it. For although the Rites and Sacrifices of the Law, by their own vertue, purified externally, and delivered only from temporary Punishments, yet the Precepts and the Promises of the Law, re
How much more shall the Blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot unto God, purifie your Conscience from dead works, to serve the living God?
THis Verse contains the Inference or Argument of the Apostle, from the preceding Propositions and Concessions. The Nature of the Argument is à minori, and à proportione. From the first the Inference follows, as unto its truth, and formally; from the latter as to its greater evidence and materially.
There are in the words considerable,
1. The Subject treated of, in opposition unto that before spoken unto, and that is the Blood of Christ.
2. The means whereby this Blood of Christ was effectual unto the end deHe offered himself (that is, in the shedding of it) unto God without spot, through the eternal Spirit.
3. The end assigned unto this Blood of Christ in that offering of himself, or the effect wrought thereby, in opposition unto the end and effect of legal Ordinances; which is, to purge our Consciences from dead works.
4. The benefit and advantage which we receive thereby, in opposition unthat we may serve the living God. All which must be considered, and explained.
1. The Nature of the Inference is expressed by, How much more. This is Chap. 2. 2, 3. Chap. 3. 3. Chap. 10. 28, 29. Chap. 12. 25. AlComparison is founded; yet were the one incomparably more glorious than the other. Hence elsewhere although he alloweth the administration of the Law to be glorious, yet he affirms that it had no Glory in comparison of what doth excel. 2 Cor. 3. 10. The Person of Christ is the Spring of all the Glory in the Church, and the more nearly any thing relates thereunto, the more glorious it is.
There are two things included, in this way of the Introduction of the preHow much more.
1. An equal certainty of the Event and Effect ascribed unto the Blood of Christ, with the effect of the legal Sacrifices, is included in it. So the Arguà minori. And the Inference of such an Argument is expressed by, much more, though an equal certainty be all that is evinced by it. If these Saà comparatis, and à minori; but from the nature of the things themselves, as the one was appointed to be typical of the other.
2. The Argument is taken from a Proportion between the things themselves that are compared, as to their efficacy. This gives a greater evidence and validity unto the Argument, than if it were taken meerly à minori. For there is a greater reason in the nature of things, that the Blood of Christ should purge our Consciences from dead works, than there is, that the Blood of Bulls and Goats should sanctifie unto the purifying of the flesh. For that had all
infinite dignity of his Person, and the nature of his Oblation, it had a real efficacy in the justice and wisdom of God, to procure the effect mentioned in the way of purchase and merit. This the Apostle refers unto in these words, Who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unto God. That the Offering was
There is such an Evidence of Wisdom and Righteousness, unto a spiritual Eye, in the whole Mystery of our Redemption, Sanctification and Salvation by Christ, as gives an immoveable foundation unto Faith to rest upon, in its receiving of it. The Faith of the Church of Old, was resolved into the meer sovereign pleaCor. 4. 3. 4. And hence will arise the great ag
2. We must consider the things themselves. The Subject spoken of, and whereunto the Effect mentioned is ascribed, is the Blood of Christ. The PerChrist, the Messias, depends the principal force of his present ArguBlood of him who was promised of Old to be the High-Priest of the Church, and the Sacrifice for their Sins. In whom was the Faith of all the Saints of Old, that by him their Sins should be expiated, that in him they should be justified and glorified. Christ who is the Son of the living God, in whose Person God purchased his Church with his own Blood. And we may observe, That
The Efficacy of all the Offices of Christ towards the Church, depends on the Dignity of his Person. The Offering of his Blood was prevalent for the Expiation of Sin, because it was
A late learned Commentator on this Epistle, takes occasion, in this place, to reflect on Dr. Gouge, for affirming that Christ was a Priest in both Natures, which as he says, cannot be true. I have not Dr. Gouge's Exposition by me, and so know not in what sense it is affirmed by him. But that Christ is a Priest in his entire Person, and so in both Natures, is true, and the constant Opinion of all Protestant Divines. And the following words of this learned Author, being well explained, will clear the difficulty. For he saith, that, He that is a Priest is God, yet as God he is not, he cannot be a Priest. For that Christ is a Priest in both Natures, is no more, but that in the discharge of his Priestly Office, he acts as God and Man in one Person, from whence the Dignity and Efficacy of his Sacerdotal Actings do proceed. It is not hence required, that whatever he doth in the discharge of his Office, must be an immediate Act of the Divine, as well as of the Humane Nature. No more is required unto it, but that the Person whose Acts they are, is God and Man, and acts as God and Man, in each Nature sutably unto its essential Properties. Hence although God cannot dye, that is, the Divine Nature cannot do so, yet God purchased his
Church with his own Blood; and so also the Lord of Glory was Crucified for us. The sum is, That the Person of Christ is the Principle of all his MediaTheandrical; which could not be, if he were not a Priest in both Natures. Nor is this impeached by what ensues in the same Author; namely, That a Priest is an Officer, and all Officers, as Officers, are made such by Commission from the Sovereign Power, and are Servants under them. For,
(1) It may be this doth not hold, among the Divine Persons; it may be no more is required in the dispensation of God towards the Church unto an Office in any of them, but their own infinite condescension, with respect unto the order of their subsistence. So the Holy Ghost is in peculiar the Comsent thereon by the Father and Son. Yet is there no more required hereunto, but that the order of the operation of the Persons in the blessed Trinity should answer the order of their subsistence; and so he who in his Person proceedeth from the Father and the Son, is sent unto his work by the Father and the Son; no new Act of Au
(2) The Divine Nature considered in the Abstract cannot serve in an Office; yet He who was in the Form of God, and counted it no robbery to be equal unto God, took on him the form of a Servant, and was obedient unto death. It was in the Humane Nature that he was a Servant, nevertheless it was the Son of God, he who in his Divine Nature was in the Form of God, who so served in OfAct of his entire Person, whereon the dignity and efficacy of all that he did, did depend.
That which the Effect intended is ascribed unto, is the Blood of Christ. And Blood of Christ. (2) How this Effect was wrought by it.
1. It is not only that Material Blood which he shed absolutely considered, that is here and elsewhere called the Blood of Christ, when the work of our Redemption is ascribed unto it, that is intended. But there is a double conHe became obedient unto death, the death of the Cross, whereon his blood was shed. This was the great instance of his Obethe life of the flesh was in it, Lev. 17. 11, 14. So was the life of Christ in his Blood, by the shedding whereof, he laid it down. And by his death it is, as he was the Son of God, that we are redeemed. Herein he made his Soul an Offering for Sin, Isa. 53. 10. Wherefore this Expression of the Blood of Christ, in order unto our Redemption, or the Expiation of Sin, is comprehensive of all that he did and suffered for those Ends, inasmuch as the shedding of it, was the way and means whereby he offered it, or himself (in and by it) unto God.
2. The second Enquiry is, How the Effect here mentioned was wrought by the Blood of Christ. And this we cannot determine, without a general conthe purging of our Conscience from dead works.
shall purge: That is, say some, shall purifie and sanctifie, Chap. 10. 1, 2. will admit of this restrained sense. I grant it is included here
Chap. 1. 3. Expiation, Lustration, carrying away punishment by making Atonement; are expressed by it in all good Authors.
(2) The Context requires this sense in the first place. For, First, The Argument here used is immediately applied to prove that Christ hath obtained for us eternal Redemption. But Redemption consists not in interIn whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins, Eph. 1. 7.
Secondly, In the Comparison insisted on, there is distinct mention made of the Blood of Bulls and Goats, as well as of the Ashes of an Heifer sprinkled. But the first and principal use of Blood in Sacrifice, was to make Atonement for sin, Lev. 17. 11.
Thirdly, The End of this Purging, is to give boldness in the service of God, and peace with him therein, that we may serve the living God. But this is done by the expiation and pardon of Sin, with justification thereon.
Fourthly, It is Conscience that is said to be purged. Now Conscience is the proper seat of the guilt of Sin; it is that which chargeth it on the Soul, and which hinders all approach unto God in his service with liberty and boldness, unless it be removed; which,
Fifthly, Gives us the best consideration of the Apostle's Exposition of this expression, Chap. 10. 1, 2. For he there declares, that to have the Conscience purged, is to have its condemning power for sin taken away and cease.
There is therefore under the same name a twofold Effect here ascribed unto the Blood of Christ; the one in answer and opposition unto the Effect of the Blood of Bulls and Goats being offered; the other in answer unto the Effect of the Ashes of an Heifer being sprinkled. The first consisting in making AtoneBy its offering, whereby Sin is expiated. (2) By its sprinkling, whereby our persons are sanctified. The first ariseth from the satisfaction he made unto the justice of God, by undergoing (in his death) the punishment due to us, being made therein a Curse for us, that the blessing might come upon us; therein as his death was a Sacrifice, as he offered himself unto God in the shedapplied unto us by the Holy Spirit, which is the sprinkling of it; so doth the Blood of Jesus Christ the Son of God, cleanse us from all our Sins.
The Socinian Expositor on this place, endeavors by a long perplexed dis
(1) That the Expiation of Sin, is our deliverance from the punishment due unto Sin, by the power of Christ in Heaven. But this is diametrically as oppodoth purge our Consciences from dead works; that is, Christ by his power in Heaven, doth free us from the punishment due to Sin.
(2) That Christ was not a Priest until after his Ascension into Heaven. That this Supposition destroys the whole Nature of that Office, hath been sufficient
(3) That his offering himself unto God, was the presenting of himself in Heaven before God, as having done the Will of God on the earth. But as this hath nothing in it of the nature of a Sacrifice, so what is asserted by it, can, ac
That the Resurrection of Christ gave all Efficacy unto his Death. But the truth is, it was his Death, and what he effected therein, that was the ground of his Resurrection. He was brought again from the dead through the blood of the Covenant. And the efficacy of his death depends on his Reevidence of his acceptance with God therein.
(5) That Christ confirmed his Doctrine by his Blood; that is, because he rose again.
All these Principles I have at large refuted in the Exercitations about the Priesthood of Christ, and shall not here again insist on their examination. This is plain and evident in the words, unless violence be offered unto them; namely, that the Blood of Christ, that is, his suffering in Soul and Body, and his obedience therein, testified and expressed in the shedding of his Blood, was the procuring cause of the expiation of our Sins, the purging of our Consciences from dead works, our justification, sanctification and acceptance with God thereon. And
There is nothing more destructive unto the whole Faith of the Gospel, than by any means to evacuate the immediate efficacy of the Blood of Christ. Every opini
The second thing in the words, is the means whereby the Blood of Christ came to be of this efficacy, or to produce this effect. And that is, because in the shedding of it, he offered himself unto God through the eternal Spirit without spot. Every word is of great importance, and the whole Assertion filled with the mystery of the wisdom and grace of God, and must therefore be distinct
There is declared what Christ did unto the End mentioned, and that is exHe offered himself. (2) To whom; that is to God. (3) How, or from what principle, by what means by the eternal Spirit. (4) With what qualifications; without spot.
He offered himself. To prove that his Blood purgeth our Sins, he affirms offered himself. His whole Humane Nature was the Offering; the way of its Offering, was by the shedding of his Blood. So the Beast was the SaHimself, the whole Humane Nature of Christ is intended. And that,
(1) Not in distinction or separation from the Divine. For although the Humane Nature of Christ, his Soul and Body, only was offered, yet he offered himself through his own eternal Spirit. This Offering of himself therefore was the Act of his whole Person, both Natures concurred in the Offering, though one alone was offered.
(2) All that he did or suffered in his Soul and Body when his Blood was shed, is comprised in this Offering of himself. His Obedience in Suffering was that which rendred this Offering of himself, a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savor unto God.
And he is said thus to offer himself, in opposition unto the Sacrifices of the High Priest under the Law. They offered Goats and Bulls, or their blood; but he offered himself. This therefore was the Nature of the Offering of Christ; It was a Sacred Act of the Lord Christ as the High Priest of the Church, wherein according unto the Will of God, and what was required of him by vertue of the eternal Compact between the Father and him, concerning the Redemption of the Church, he gave up himself in the way of most profound Obedience, to do and suffer whatever the Iustice and Law of God required unto the expiation of Sin, expressing the whole by the shedding of his Blood, in answer unto all the Typical Representations of this his Sacrifice, in all the Institutions of the Law.
And this Offering of Christ was proper Sacrifice.
Office whereof it was an Act; it was so of his Sacerdotal Office; he was made a Priest of God for this end, that he might thus offer himself, and that this Offering of himself should be a Sacrifice.
(2) From the Nature of it; For it consisted in the sacred giving up unto God the thing that was offered in the present destruction or consumption of it. This is the Nature of a Sacrifice; it was the destruction and consumption by Death and Fire, by a sacred Action, of what was dedicated and offered unto God. So was it in this Sacrifice of Christ. As he suffered in it, so in the giving himself up unto God in it, there was an effusion of his Blood, and the destruction of his Life.
(3) From the End of it, which was assigned unto it in the wisdom and sovereignty of God, and in his own intention, which was to make Atonement for Sin, which gives an Offering the formal Nature of an Expiatory Sa
(4) From the way and manner of it. For therein,
1. He sanctified or dedicated himself unto God to be an Offering, Iohn 17. 19.
2. He accompanied it with Prayers and Supplications, Heb. 5. 7.
3. There was an Altar which sanctified the Offering, which bore it up in its Oblation, which was his own Divine Nature, as we shall see imme
4. He kindled the Sacrifice with the fire of Divine Love, acting it self by zeal unto God's Glory, and compassion unto the souls of men.
5. He tendred all this unto God, as an Atonement for Sin, as we shall see in the next words.
This was the free, real, proper Sacrifice of Christ, whereof those of old were only Types, and obscure Representations; the Prefiguration hereof was the sole cause of their Institution. And what the Socinians pretend, namely, that the Lord Christ offered no real Sacrifice, but only what he did was called so Metaphorically, by the way of allusion unto the Sacrifices of the Law, is so far from truth, as that there never had been any such Sacrifices of Divine Appointment, but only to prefigure this which alone was really and substanforced accommodation of what Christ did unto those Sacrifices of old, by way of allusion, and by reason of some resemblances, but shews the uselesness and weakness of those Sacrifices in themselves, any farther but as they represented this of Christ.
The Nature of this Oblation and Sacrifice of Christ is utterly overthrown by the Socinians. They deny that in all this there was any offering at all; they deny that his shedding of his Blood, or any thing which he did or suffered therein, either actually or passively, his obedience, or giving himself up unto God therein was his Sacrifice, or any part of it, but only somewhat required previously thereunto, and that without any necessary cause or reason. But his Sacrifice, his Offering of himself, they say is nothing but his appearance in Heaven, and the Presentation of himself before the Throne of God, whereon he receiveth power, to deliver them that believe in him from the punishment due to sin. But,
(1) This appearance of Christ in Heaven is no where called his Oblation, his Sacrifice, or his Offering of himself. The places wherein some grant it may be so, do assert no such thing, as we shall see in the Explanation of them, for they occur unto us in this Chapter.
(2) It no ways answers the Atonement that was made by the Blood of the Sacrifices at the Altar, which was never carried into the Holy Place: yea, it overthrows all Analogy, all Resemblance and Typical Representation be
(3) The Supposition of it utterly overthrows the true Nature of a proper and real Sacrifice, substituting that in the room of it which is only metaphorical, and improperly so called. Nor can it be evidenced wherein the
(4) It overthrows the Nature of the Priesthood of Christ, making it to consist in his actings from God towards us in a way of power; whereas the Naact with God, for and on the behalf of the Church.
(5) It offers violence unto the Text; For herein Christ's offering of himself is expressive of the way whereby his
1. This was the greatest expression of the unexpressible love of Christ; he ofoffered himself for us. Whatsoever might be effected by the glorious dignity of his Divine Person, by his profound Obedience, by his unspeakable Sufferings, all offered as a Sacrifice unto God in our behalf, is really accomplished.
2. It is hence evident, how vain and insufficient are all other ways of the expiation of sin, with the purging of our consciences before God. The sum of all false Religion consisted always in contrivances for the expiation of sin, what is false in any Religion hath respect principally thereunto. And as Superstition is restless, so the Inventions of men have been endless, in finding out means unto this end. But if any thing within the power or ability of men, any thing they could invent or accomplish, had been useful unto this end, there would have been no need that the Son of God should have
2dly, The next thing in the words, is unto whom he offered himself, that is to God. He gave himself an Offering, and a Sacrifice to God. A Sacrifice is the highest and chiefest Act of Sacred Worship; especially it must be so, when one offereth himself according unto the Will of God. God as God, or the Divine Nature, is the proper Object of all Religious Worship, unto whom as such alone, any Sacrifice may be offered. To offer Sacrifice unto any, under any other Notion, but as he is God, is the highest Idolatry: But an offering an expiatory Sacrifice for Sin, is made to God as God, under a peculiar Notion or Consideration. For God is therein considered as the Author of the Law against which Sin is committed, as the Supreme Ruler and Governor of all unaverruncare malum, to avert displeasure and punishJudge of all, Heb. 12. 23. With him, as such, the Lord Christ had to do in the offering of himself, conChap. 5. v. 7. It is said if Christ was God himself, how could he offer himself unto God? That one and the same Person should be the Offerer, the Oblation, and he unto whom it is offered, seems not so much a mystery, as a weak imagination.
Ans. 1. If there were one Nature onely in the Person of Christ, it may be this might seem impertinent. Howbeit there may be cases, wherein the same individual Person, under several capacities, as of a good man on the one hand, and a Ruler or Judge on the other, may for the benefit of the Publick, and the preservation of the Laws of the Community, both give and take satisfaction himself. But whereas in the one Person of Christ there are two Natures so infinitely distinct as they are, both acting under such distinct capacities as they
But, 2. It is not the same Person that offereth the Sacrifice, and unto whom it is offered. For it is the Person of the Father, or the Divine Nature, conformally offer himself unto himself, but unto God, as acting Supreme Rule, Go
As these things are plainly and fully testified unto in the Scripture, so the way to come unto a blessed satisfaction in them, unto the due use and comthat the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of Glory, would give unto us the Spirit of wisdom and revelation, in the knowledge of him, that the eyes of our understandings being enlightned, we may come unto the full assurance of understanding, to the acknowledgment of the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ.
3dly, How he offered himself is also expressed, it was by the eternal SpiBy,
principally efficient, John 1. 5. Rom. 11. 34. Heb. 1. 2. So it doth here; the eternal Spirit was not an inferior instrument whereby Christ offered himself, but it was the principal efficient cause in the work.
The Variety that is in the reading of this place, is taken notice of by all. Eternal Spirit, some, by the Holy Spirit; the latter is the reading of the Vulgar Translation, and countenanced by sundry ancient Copies of the Original. The Syriac retains, the Eternal Spirit, which also is the reading of most ancient Copies of the Greek. Hence follows a double interpretation of the words; some say, that the Lord Christ offered himself unto God, in and by the acting of the Holy Ghost in his Humane Nature. For by him were wrought in him that servent zeal unto the glory of God, that love and compassion unto the souls of men, which both carried him through his sufferings, and rendered his obedience therein acceptable unto God as a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savor; which work of the Holy Spirit in the Humane Nature of Christ, I have elsewhere declared. Others say, that his own Eternal Deity, which supported him in his sufferings, and rendred the SaEternal Spirit. For the Holy Spirit is no less an Eternal Spirit, than is the Deity of Christ him
The truth is, both these concurred in, and were absolutely necessary unto, the offering of Christ. The acting of his own Eternal Spirit was so unto the efficacy and effect. And those of the Holy Ghost in him were so, as unto the manner of it. Without the first, his offering of himself could not have purged our Consciences from dead works. No Sacrifice of any meer creature could have produced that effect. It would not have had in itself a worth and dignity whereby we might have been discharged of sin unto the glory of God. Nor without the subsistence of the Humane Nature in the Divine Person of the Son of God, could it have undergone and passed through unto victory, what it was to suffer in this offering of it.
Wherefore this sense of the words is true. Christ offered himself unto God, through or by his own Eternal Spirit, the Divine Nature acting in the person of
For (1) it was an Act of his entire Person, wherein he discharged the office of a Priest. And as his Humane Nature was the Sacrifice, so his Person was the Priest that offered it, which is the only distinction that was between the Priest and Sacrifice herein. As in all other Acts of his Mediation, the taDivine Person of the Son, the Eternal Spirit in him, acted in love and condescension; so did it in this also, of his offering himself.
(2) As we observed before, hereby he gave dignity, worth and efficacy unto the Sacrifice of himself. For herein God was to purchase his Church with his own blood. And this seems to be principally respected by the Apostle. For he intends to declare herein, the dignity and efficacy of the Sacrifice of Christ, in opposition unto those under the Law. For it was in the will of man, and by material fire, that they were all offered. But he offered himself by the Eternal Spirit, voluntarily giving up his Humane Nature to be a Sacrifice, in an Act of his Divine Power.
(3) The Eternal Spirit is here opposed unto the Material Altar, as well as unto the Fire. The Altar was that whereon the Sacrifice was laid, which bore it up in its Oblation and Ascension. But the Eternal Spirit of Christ was the Altar whereon he offered himself. This supported, and bore it up under its sufferings, whereon it was presented unto God as an acceptable Sacrifice. Wherefore this reading of the words gives a sense that is true and proper unto the matter treated of. But on the other side it is no less certain that he ofHumane Nature by the Holy Ghost. All the gracious actMan Christ Iesus, in the gracious voluntary acting of all the faculties of his Soul, offered himself unto God. His Humane Nature was not only the matter of the Sacrifice, but therein and thereby, in the gracious actings of the faculties and powers of it, he offered himself unto God. Now all these things were wrought in him by the Holy Spirit wherewith he was filled, which he received not by measure. By him was he filled with that love and compassion unto the Church, which acted him in his whole Mediation, and which the Scripture so frequently proposeth unto our Faith herein. He loved me, and gave himself for me. He loved the Church, and gave himself for it. He loved us, and washed us in his own blood. By him there was wrought in him that zeal unto the glory of God, the fire whereof kindled his Sacrifice in an eminent manner. For he designed with arholy submission unto the Will of God, under a prospect of the bitterness of that Cup which he was to drink, as enNot my Will, but thy Will be done. He filled him with that faith and trust in God, as unto his supportment, deliverance and success, which carried him steadily and safely unto the issue of his tryal, Isa. 50. 7, 8, 9. Through the actings of these graces of the Holy Spirit in the Humane Nature, his offering of himself was a free voluntary Ob
I shall not positively determine on either of these Senses unto the exclusion of the other. The latter hath much of spiritual light and comfort in it on many accounts: But yet I must acknowledge that there are two Considerations, that peculiarly urge the
1. The most, and most ancient Copies of the Original read by the Eternal Spirit; and are followed by the
2. The design of the Apostle is to prove the efficacy of the Offering of Christ above those of the Priests under the Law. Now this arose from hence, partly that he offered himself, whereas they offered only the blood of Bulls and Goats; but principally from the dignity of his Person in his Offering, in that he offered himself by his own Eternal Spirit, or Divine Nature. But I shall leave the ReaAnalogy of Faith.
Socinians understanding that both these Interpretations are equally destructive to their Opinions, the one concerning the Person of Christ, the other about the Nature of the Holy Ghost, have invented a sense of these words never before heard of among Christians. For they say that by the Eternal Spirit, a certain Divine Power is intended, whereby the Lord Christ was freed from Mortality, and made Eternal, that is, no more obnoxious unto death. By virtue of this Power, they say, he offered himself unto God when he entred into Heaven; than which nothing can be spoken more fond or impious, or con
(1) Such a Power as they pretend, is no where called the Spirit, much less the Eternal Spirit; and to feign significations of words without any counte
(2) The Apostle is so far from requiring a Divine Power rendering him immortal antecedently unto the offering of himself; as that he declares that he offered himself by the Eternal Spirit in his death, when he shed his blood, whereby our consciences are purged from dead works.
(3) This Divine Power rendering Christ immortal is not peculiar unto him, but shall be communicated unto all that are raised unto glory at the last day. And there is no colour of an opposition herein unto what was done by the High Priests of old.
(4) It proceeds on their
in this matter; which is, that the Lord Christ offered not himself unto God, before he was made immortal; which is utterly to exclude his death and blood from any concernment therein, which is as contrary unto the truth and scope of the place, as darkness is to light.
(5) Wherever there is mention made elsewhere in the Scripture of the Holy Spirit, or the Eternal Spirit, or the Spirit absolutely with reference unto any actings of the Person of Christ, or on it, either the Holy Spirit, or his own Divine Nature is intended. See Isa. 61. 1, 2. Rom. 1. 3. 1 Pet. 3. 18.
Wherefore Grotius forsakes this Notion, and otherwise explains the words. Spiritus Christi qui non tantum fuit vivus ut in vita terrena, sed in aeternum corpus sibi adjunctum vivificans. If there be any sense in these words, it is the
This is the second thing wherein the Apostle opposeth the Offering of Christ unto the offerings of the Priests under the Law.
(1) They offered Bulls and Goats; He offered Himself.
(2) They offered by a material Altar and Fire, He by the Eternal Spirit.
That Christ should thus offer Himself unto God, and that by the Eternal Spirit, is the center of the mystery of the Gospel. An attempt to corrupt, to pervert this glorious Truth, are designs against the
without spot. This Adjunct is descriptive not of the
Schlictingius would have it, that this word denotes not what Christ was in himself, but what he was freed from. For now in Heaven where he offered him
(1) There was no spot in the mortality of Christ, that he should be said to be freed from it, when he was made immortal. A spot signifies not so much a desect as a fault. And there was no fault in Christ from which he was freed.
(2) The Allusion and respect herein unto the legal institutions is evident and manifest. The Lamb that was to be slain and offered was antecedently thereunto, to be without blemish; it was to be neither lame, nor blind, nor have any other defect. With express respect hereunto, the Apostle Peter affirms, that we were redeemed with the precious blood of Christ, as of a Lamb without blemish and without spot, 1 Pet. 1. 18. And Christ is not only called the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sins of the world, John 1. 29. that is, by his being slain and offered; but is represented in the worship of the Church as a Lamb slain, Rev. 5. 6. It is therefore to offer violence unto the Scripture and common understanding, to seek for this qualification any where but in the
Wherefore this expression, without spot, respects in the first place the purity of his Nature, and the
It may be not unuseful to give here a brief Scheme of this great Sacrifice of Christ, to fix the thoughts of Faith the more distinctly upon it.
1. God herein, in the Person of the Father, is considered as the Law-giver, the Governor and Judge of all, and that as on a Throne of Judgment, the Throne of grace being not as yet erected. And two things are ascribed, or do belong unto him.
(1) A Denunciation of the sentence of the Law against Mankind; Dying ye shall dye, and cursed be every one that continues not in all things written in the Law to do them.
(2) A Resusal of all such ways of Atonement, Satisfaction, and Reconall or any creatures could perform; sacrifice and offerings, and whole burnt-offerings for sin he would not have, Heb. 10. 5, 6. he rejected them as insufficient to make Atonement for sin.
2. Satan appeared before this Throne with his Prisoners; he had the power of death, Heb. 2. 14. and entered into judgment as unto his right and title, and therein was judged, John 16. 11. And he put forth all his power and policy in opposition unto the deliverance of his Prisoners, and to the way or means of it. That was his hour wherein he put forth the power of darkness, Luke 22. 53.
3. The Lord Christ the Son of God, out of his infinite love and compassion appears in our Natures before the Throne of God, and takes it on himself to answer
4. This stipulation and engagement of his, God accepteth of, and withal as the sovereign Lord and Ruler of all, prescribeth the way and means whereby he should make Atonement for sin, and Reconciliation with God thereon. And this was that he should make his soul an offering for sin, and therein bear their iniquities, Isa. 53. 10, 11.
5. The Lord Christ was prepared with a Sacrifice to offer unto God, unto this end. For whereas every High Priest was ordained to offer Gifts and Sacrifices, it was of necessity that he also should have somewhat to offer, Heb. 8. 3. This was not to be the Blood of Bulls and Goats, or such things as were offered by the Law, ver. 4. But this was, and was to be himself, his humane nature, or his body.
For (1) this body or humane nature was prepared for him, and given unto him for this very end, that he might have somewhat of his own to offer, Heb. 10. 5.
(2) He took it, he assumed it unto himself to be his own, for this very end, that he might be a sacrifice in it, Heb. 2. 14.
(3) He had full power and authority over his own body, his whole humane nature, to dispose of it in any way, and into any condition, unto the glory of God. No man, saith he, taketh my life from me, I lay it down of my self, I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again, John 10. 18.
6. This therefore he gave up to do and suffer according unto the Will of God. And this he did,
(1) In the Will, Grace and Love of his Divine Nature, he offered himself unto God through the eternal Spirit.
(2) In the gracious holy actings of his humane nature, in the way of zeal, love, obedience, patience, and all other graces of the Holy Spirit, which dwelt in him without measure, acted unto their utmost glory and efficacy. Hereby he gave himself up unto God to be a Sacrifice for Sin, his own Divine Nature beAltar and Fire, whereby his Offering was supported and confirmed, or brought unto the Ashes of Death. This was the most glorious spectacle unto God, and all his holy Angels. Hereby he set a Crown of Glory on the head of the Law, fulfilling its precepts in matter and manner unto the uttermost, and undergoing its penalty or curse, establishing the truth and righteousness of God in it. Hereby he glorified the holiness and justice of God, in the demonstration of their nature and compliance with their demands. Herein issued the eter
7. Herewith God was well pleased, satisfied and reconciled unto sinners. Thus was he in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing our sins unto us, in that he was
1. God was well pleased with and delighted in his obedience; it was a Sacrifice unto him of a well-smelling savor. He was more glorified in that one instance of the Obedience of his onely Son, than he was dishonoured by the sin of Adam, and all his Posterity, as I have elsewhere declared.
2. All the demands of his Justice were satisfied, unto his eternal glory. Wherefore,
8. Hereon Satan is judged, and destroyed as unto his power over sinners, who receive this Atonement, all the grounds and occasions of it are hereby removed, his
9. Hereon the poor condemned sinners are discharged. God says deliver them, for I have found a ransom. But we must return to the Text.
The effect of the Blood of Christ through the offering of himself, is the purging of our Consciences from dead works. This was somewhat spoken unto in general before, especially as unto the nature of this purging. But the words require a more particular Explication. And,
The word is in the Future Tense, Shall purge. The blood of Christ as ofdouble respect and effect.
(1) Towards God, in making Atonement for sin. This was done once, and at once, and was now past. Herein by one Offering he for ever perfected them that are sanctified.
(2) Towards the Consciences of men, in the application of the vertue of it unto them; this is here intended. And this is expressed as future; not as though it had not this effect already on them that did believe, but upon a double account.
1. To declare the certainty of the event, or the infallible connexion of these things, the blood of Christ, and the purging of the Conscience; that is, in all that betake themselves thereunto. It shall do it; that is, effectually and infallibly.
2. Respect is had herein unto the generality of the Hebrews, whether already professing the Gospel, or now invited unto it. And he proposeth this unto them as the advantage they should be made partakers of, by the relinMosaical Ceremonies, and betaking themselves unto the Faith of the Gospel. For whereas before by the best of legal Ordinances, they attainoutward sanctification as unto the flesh, they should now have their Conscience infallibly purged from dead works.
Hence it is said, your Conscience. Some Copies read our. But there is common reading, as that which refers unto the Hebrews, who had been always exercised unto thoughts of Purification and Sanctification by one means or another.
For the Explication of the words we must enquire, (1) What is meant by dead works. (2) What is their relation unto Conscience. (3) How Conscience is purged of them by the blood of Christ.
1. By dead works, sins as unto their guilt and defilement are intended, as all several Reasons are given why they are so called. As,
(1) Because they proceed from a principle of spiritual death, or are the works of them who have no vital principle of holiness in them, Eph. 2. 1, 5. Col. 2. 13.
(2) Because they are useless and fruitless, as all dead things are.
(3) They deserve death, and tend thereunto. Hence they are like rotten bones in the Grave, accompanied with worms and corruption. And these things are true. Howbeit I judge there is a peculiar reason why the Apostle calls them dead works in this place. For there is an allusion herein unto dead bodies, and legal defilement by them. For he hath respect unto Purification by the Ashes of the Heifer. And this respected principally uncleanness by the dead, as is fully declared in the institution of that Ordinance. As men were purified by the sprinkling of the Ashes of an Heifer mingled with living water from defilements contracted by the dead, without which they were separated from God and the Church; so, unless men are really purged from their moral defilements by the
This gives us the state of all men who are not interessed in the Sacrifice of Christ, and the purging vertue thereof. As they are dead in themselves, dead
in trespasses and sins; so all their works are dead works: Other works they have none. They are as a Sepulchre filled with bones and corruption. Every thing they do is unclean in it self, and unclean unto them. Unto them that are defiled nothing is pure, but even their mind and conscience is defiled, Tit. 1. 15. Their works come from spiritual death, and tend unto eternal death, and are dead in themselves. Let them deck and trim their carkases whil'st they please, let them within they are full of dead bones, of rotten, defiled, polluting works. That world which appears with so much outward beauty, lustre and glory, is all polluted and defiled under the eye of the most Holy.
2. These dead works are further described by their relation unto our persons,
peculiarly affected with them, where they have, as it were, their seat and residence: And this is the Conscience. He doth not say purge your souls, or your minds, or your persons, but your conscience. And this he doth,
(1) In general, in opposition unto the purification by the Law. It was there the dead body that did defile, it was the body that was defiled; it was the body that was purified; those Ordinances sanctified to the purifying of the flesh. But the defilements here intended are spiritual, internal, relating unto Conscience, and therefore such is the purification also.
(2) He mentions the respect of these dead works unto Conscience in particular, because it is
This being the state of our Conscience, this being the respect of dead works, and their defilement to it and us, we may consider the relief that is necessary in this case, and what that is which is here proposed.
1. Unto a compleat relief in this condition, two things are necessary.
(1) A discharge of Conscience from a sense of the guilt of sin, or the con
(2) The cleansing of the Conscience, and consequently our whole persons
inherent defilement of sin. The first of these was typified by the blood of Bulls and Goats offered on the Altar, to make Atonement. The latter was represented by the sprinkling of the unclean with the Ashes of the Heiser unto their purification.
Both these the Apostle here expresly ascribes unto the Blood of Christ, and we may briefly enquire into three things concerning it.
(1) On what ground it doth produce this blessed effect.
(2) The way of its operation and efficacy unto this end.
(3) The Reason whence the Apostle affirms that it shall much more do this, than the legal Ordinances could, sanctifying unto the purifying of the flesh.
1. The grounds of its efficacy unto this purpose are three.
(1.) That it was Blood offered unto God. God had ordained that Blood should be offered on the Altar to make Atonement for sin, or to purge Conscience from dead works. That this could not be really effected by the Blood of Bulls and Goats, is evident in the
(2) It was the Blood of Christ. Of Christ, the Son of the living God, Mat. 16. 18. whereby God purchased his Church with his own Blood, Acts 20. 28. The dignity of his Person gave efficacy unto his Office and Offering. No other perDivine Person is denied, do also evacuate his Offices. By what they ascribe unto them, it is imSovereign Power in God, which make the Cross of Christ of none effect.
(3) He offered this Blood or himself by the eternal Spirit. Though Christ in his Divine Person was the Eternal Son of God, yet was it the humane nature only that was offered in Sacrifice. Howbeit it was offered by and with the concurrent actings of the Divine Nature, or Eternal Spirit, as we have de
2. The second Enquiry, is concernig the way whereby the Blood of Christ doth thus purge our Conscience from dead works. Two things, as we have seen, are contained therein.
(1) The expiation, or taking away the guilt of sin, that Conscience should not be deterred thereby from an access unto God.
(2) The cleansing of our souls from vicious defiling habits, inclinations and acts, or all inherent uncleanness. Wherefore under two considerations doth the Blood of Christ produce this double effect.
First, As it was offered; so it made Atonement for Sin, by giving satisfactiProphets foretold, and this the Gospel witnesseth unto. To deny it, is to deny any real efficacy in the Blood of Christ unto this end, and so expresly to contradict the Apostle. Sin is not purged from the Con
Secondly, As it is sprinkled, it worketh the second part of this effect. And this sprinkling of the Blood of Christ, is the communication of its sanctifying vertue unto our souls, see
3. The Reason why the Apostle affirms that this is much more to be expected from the Blood of Christ, than the Purification of the Flesh was from legal Ordinances hath been before spoken unto.
Socinians plead on this place, that this effect of the death of Christ doth as unto us depend on our own duty. If they intended no more, but that there is duty required on our part unto an actual participation of it, namely Faith, whereby we receive the Atonement, we should have no difference with them. But they are otherwise minded. This purging of the conscience from dead works, they would have to consist in two things.
(1) Our own relinquishment of sin.
(2) The freeing us from the punishment due to sin, by an act of power in Christ in Heaven. The first they say hath therein respect unto the blood of Christ; in that thereby his doctrine was confirmed in obedience whereunto we forsake sin, and purge our minds from it. The latter also relates thereunto, in that the sufferings of Christ were antecedent unto his Exaltation, and Power in Heaven. WhereChrist, is what we do our selves in obedience unto his doctrine, and what he doth thereon by his power, and therefore may well be said to depend on our duty. But all this while there is nothing ascribed unto the blood of Christ, as it was offered in Sacrifice unto God, or shed in the offering of himself, which alone the Apostle speaks unto in this place.
Others chuse thus to oppose it. This purging of our consciences from dead works, is not an immediate effect of the death of Christ; but it is a benefit contained therein, which upon our faith and obedience we are made partakers of. But,
(1) This is not, in my judgment, to interpret the Apostles words with due reverence; he affirms expresly, that the blood of Christ doth purge our conscience from dead works, that is, it doth make such an Atonement for sin, and Expiation of it, as that
(2) The blood of Christ is the immediate cause of every effect assigned unto it, where there is no concurrent nor intermediate cause of the same kind with it in the production of that effect.
(3) It is granted that the actual communication of this effect of the death of Christ unto our Souls is wrought according unto the method which God in his sovereign wisdom and pleasure hath designed. And herein (1) the Lord Christ by his blood made actual and absolute Atonement for the sins of all the Elect. (2) This Atonement is proposed unto us in the Gospel, Rom. 3. 25. (3) It is required of us unto an actual participation of the benefit of it, and peace with God thereby, that we receive this atonement by faith, Rom. 5. 11. but as wrought with God, it is the immediate effect of the blood of Christ.
The last thing in these words, is the consequent of this purging of our conadvantage which we receive thereby. To serve the living God. The words should be rendred, that we may serve; that is, have right and liberty so to do, being no longer excluded from the priviledge of it, as persons were under the Law whilest they were defiled and unclean. And
1. God in the Scripture is called the living God.
(1) Absolutely; and that (1) As he alone hath life in himself, and of himself.
(2) Comparatively; with respect unto Idols and false Gods, which are dead things; such as have neither life nor operation. And this Title is in the Scri
(1) To beget faith and trust in him, as the Author of temporal, spiritual, and eternal life, with all things that depend thereon, 1 Tim. 1. 10.
(2) To beget a due fear and reverence of him, as he who lives and sees, who hath all life in his power; so it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. And this Epistle being written principally to warn the Hebrews of the danger of Unbelief and Apostasie from the Gospel, the Apostle in several places makes mention of God with whom they had to do, under
2. What is it to serve the living God? I doubt not but the whole life
of Faith in universal obedience, is consequentially required hereunto. That we may live unto the living God in all ways of holy obedience, not any one act or duty of it can be performed as it ought, without the antecedent purging of our consciences from dead works. But yet it is sacred and solemn worship that is intended in the first place. They had of old sacred Ordinances of worship, or of Divine Service. From all these those that were
3. What is required on our part hereunto, is included in the manner of the that we may serve. And two things are requiLiberty. 2. Ability. The first includes right and boldness, and is expressed by an access with freedom and confidence. This we must treat of on Chap. 10. v. 19, 20, 21. The other respects all the supplies of the holy Spirit, in grace and gifts. Both these we receive by the blood of Christ, that we may be meet and able in a due manner to serve the living God. We may yet take some obser
1. Faith hath ground of Triumph in the certain efficacy of the blood of Christ for the expiation of sin. [How much more.] The Holy Ghost here and elsefull assurance. The reasonings which he proposeth, and insisteth unto this end are admirable, Rom. 8. 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39. Many Objections will arise against believing, madifficulties do lie in its way. By them are the generality of Believers left under doubts, fears and temptations all their days. One great relief provià minore ad majus; If the blood of Bulls and Goats did so purifie the unclean, how much more will the blood of Christ purge our Consciences? How heavenly, how divine is that way of arguing unto this end, which our blessed Saviour proposeth unto us, in the Parable of the unjust Judge and the
2. Nothing could expiate sin and free conscience from dead works, but the blood of Christ alone, and that in the offering himself to God through the eternal Spirit. The redemption of the souls of men is precious, and must have ceased for ever, had not infinite wisdom found out this way for its accomplishment. The work was too great for any other to undertake, or for any other means to effect. And the glory of God is hid herein, only unto them that perish.
It was God as the Supreme Ruler and Lawgiver, with whom atonement for sin was to be made, [He offered himself unto God.] It was he whose Law was violated, whose Justice was provoked; to whom it belonged to require and resatisfaction. And who was meet to tender it unto him, but the man that was his Fellow, who gave efficacy unto his oblation by the dignity of his Per
4. The Souls and Consciences of men are wholly polluted, before they are purged by the blood of Christ. And this Pollution is such, as excludes them from all right of access unto God in his worship, as it was with them who were le
5. Even the best works of men, antecedently unto the purging of their Consciences by the blood of Christ, are but dead works. However men may please themselves in them, perhaps think to merit by them, yet from death they come, and unto death they tend.
6. Justification and Sanctification are inseparably conjoined in the design of God's grace by the blood of Christ. Purge our Consciences that we may serve the living God.
7. Gospel-worship is such in its spirituality and holiness, as becometh the living God; and our duty it is always to consider, that with him we have to do in all that we perform therein.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Et ideo; and therefore; Syr. propter hoc, For this; or propterea, itaque ob id; And for this cause.
Syr.
He himself was the Mediator. He is the Mediator. Heb.
A man coming between.
ut morte intercedente; by the Interposition of death. The Syriac reads the passage; who by his death was a redeemer unto them who had transgressed against the first Testament; probably to avoid the difficulty of that Expression: For the Redemption of transgressions. The Aethiopic corrupts the whole Text.
In Redemptionem eorum praevaricationum. Vul. Ad Redemptionem eorum transgressionum; properly, for the Redemption of transgressions, or those transgressions which were.
That they may receive the promise who are called to the eternal Inheritance. But in the
And for this cause he is the Mediator of the new Testament, that by means of death, for the Redemption of the transgressions under the first Testament, they who are called might receive the promise of eternal Inhe ritance.
THe things which are to be considered in this verse are, (1) The note of Connexion in the Conjunction; And. (2) The Ground of the ensuing Assertion. For this cause. (3) The Assertion itself. He is the Mediator of the new Testament. (4) The especial Reason why he should be so. For the Redemption of Transgressions under the first Testament. (5) The
But before we proceed unto the Exposition of the whole or any part of it, a difficulty must be removed from the words as they lie in our Translation: For an enquiry may be justly moved, why we render the word Testament in this place, whereas before we have constantly rendred it by a Covenant. And the plain reason of it is, because from this verse unto the end of the Chapter, the Apostle argues from the nature and use of a Testament among men, as he directly affirms in the next verse. Hereby he confirms our faith in the expectation of the Benefits of this Covenant or Testament. We may answer he doth it because it is the true and proper sigTestamentary disposition of things; as Covenant. For in the Composition of the word there is nothing to intimate a mutual compact or agreement, which is necessary unto a Covenant; and is expressed in Covenants which have in them free Grants and Donations, which is of the nature of a Testament. And there are Testaments whose force is resolved into some Conventions, Conditions and Agreements which they borrow from the nature of Covenants. So there is such an affi
But against this it will be replied that what the Apostle speaks unto is in the Hebrew called Covenant and no where signifies a TestaTranslation which is fallible throughout, and (at least as it is come to us) filled with actual mistakes. We must therefore give another an
(1) The word distributive Iustice between disdispose and communicate Good things unto us, which hath more of the nature of a Testament than of a Covenant in it.
(2) The word free promise with an effecTestament than of a Covenant.
(3) There is no word in the Hebrew language whereby to express a TestaSyriack: Their order, dispose, give command concerning the house or houshold of a dying man. Isa. 38. 2. 2 Sam. 17. 23. But they have no other word but Berith to signifie it; and therefore where the nature of the thing spoken of requires it, it is properly rendred a Testament and ought so to be.
Wherefore there is no force used unto the signification of the word in this place by the Apostle. But that which makes the proper use of it by him evident in this place, is that he had respect unto its signification in the making of the Covenant with the people at Sinai: For this he compares the New Testament unto in all its causes and effects. And in that Covenant there were three things;
1. The Prescription of Obedience unto the People on the part of God, which was received by their consent in an express compliance with the Law and Terms of it, Deut. 5. 14. Herein the nature of it, so far as it was a Covenant, did consist.
2. There was a Promise and Conveyance of an Inheritance unto them, nameLand of Canaan, with all the Priviledges of it. God declared that the land was his, and that he gave it unto them for an Inheritance. And this Promise or Grant was made unto them without any consideration of their preDeuteronomy is to inlay this Principle in the foundation of their obedience. Now the free Grant and Donation of an Inheritance of the Goods of him that makes the Grant is properly a Testament. A free disposition it was of the Goods of the Testator.
3. There was in the confirmation of this Grant, the intervention of Death. The Grant of the Inheritance of the Land that God made was confirmed by death, and the Blood of the Beasts offered in sacrifice, whereof we must treat on v. 18, 19, 20. And although Covenants were confirmed by Sacrifices, as this was, so far as it was a Covenant, namely, with the Blood of them; yet as in those Sacrifices death was comprised, it was to confirm the Testamentary Grant of the Inheritance. For death is necessary unto the Confirmation of a Testament, which then could only be in Type and Representation; the Testator himself was not to die, for the establishment of a Typical Inhe
Donation and Communication of Good things by it, with the Confirmation of the Grant of them by death; in which sense it was a Testament and not a Covenant properly so called. And the arguing of the Apostle from this word, is not only just and reasonable; but without it we could never have rightly understood the Typical Representati
This difficulty being removed, we may proceed in the Exposition of the words.
That which first occurs is the Note of Connexion in the Conjunction, And.
infer a Reason of what was spoken before, but is emphatically expletive, and denotes a progress in the present Argument; As much as, Also, Moreover.
2. There is the Ground of the ensuing Assertion, or the manner of its IntroFor this cause. Some say that it looks backward, and intimates a our Consciences should be purged from dead works by the Blood of Christ, namely, because
It is evident that there is a reason rendred in these words of the necessity of the death and Sacrifice of Christ, by which alone our Consciences may be purgFor this cause. And this necessity of the death of Christ, the Apostle proves both from the nature of his office, namely, that he was to be the Mediator of the new Covenant, which, being a Testament, required the death of the Testator; and from what was to be effected thereby, namely, the Redemption of Transgressions and the purchase of an eternal Inheritance. Wherefore these are the things which he hath respect unto in these words For this cause.
But withal the Apostle in this verse enlargeth his discourse, as designing to comprehend in it the whole dispensation of the will and Grace of God unto the Church in Christ, with the Ground and Reason of it. This reason he layeth down in this verse, giving an account of the effects of it in those that follow: Here
For the exposition of the words themselves, that is the declaration of the mind of the Holy Ghost, and nature of the things contained in them, we must leave the order of the words and take that of the things themselves. And the things ensuing are declared in them.
(1) That God designed an eternal Inheritance unto some persons. (2) The way and manner of conveying a Right and Title thereunto was by promise. (3) That the Persons unto whom this Inheritance is designed, are those that are called. (4) That there was an obstacle unto the enjoyment of this Inheritance, which was Transgression against the first Covenant. (5) That this obstacle might be removed, and the Inheritance enjoyed, God made a New Covenant; because none of the Rites, Ordinances, or Sacrifices of the first Covenant could remove that Obstacle, or expiate those Sins. (6) The Ground of the Efficacy of the New Covenant unt o this End, was, That it had a Mediator, an High Priest, such as had been already described. (7) The way and means whereby the Mediator of the New Covenant did expiate Sins under the Old, was by death; nor could it otherwise be done, seeing this New Covenant, being a Testament also, required the death of the Testator. (8) This Death of the Mediator of the new Testament did take away sins by the Redemption of them. For the Redemption of Transgressions. All which must be opened for the due Exposition of these words.
1. God designed unto some an Eternal Inheritance. And both the Reason of this grant, with the nature of it must be enquired into. (1) As unto the Reason of it; God in our first Creation gave unto man, whom he made his Son and Heir as unto things here below, a great Inheritance of meer Grace and Bounty. This Inheritance consisted in the use of all the Creatures here below,
Title unto them, and dominion over them. Neither did it consist absolutely in these things, but as they were a Pledge of the present favour of God, and of mans future blessedness upon his Obedience. This whole Inheritance man forfeited by sin. God also took the forfeiture, and ejected him out of the possession of it, and utterly despoiled him of his Title unto it. Ne
(2) As unto the Nature of it; it is declared in the Adjunct mentioned, it is eternal. And it is so called in opposition unto the Inheritance which by vertue of the first Testament God granted unto the Israelites in the Land of Canaan. That was an Inheritance and was conveyed by a Promise. And when God threatned to deprive them of that Land, he said he would disinherit them, Numb. 14. 12. And this Inheritance consisted not only in the Land itself, but principally in the Priviledges of Holy Worship and Relation unto God which they enjoyed therein, Rom, 9. 5. But yet all things that belonged unto it, were in themselves carnal and temporary, and only Types of Good things to come. In opposition hereunto God provided an eternal Inheritance. And as the State of those who are to receive it, is twofold, namely, that in this life, and that in the life to come; so there are two parts of their Inheritance; namely, Grace and Glory: For although Grace be bestowed and continued only in this life, yet the things we enjoy by vertue of it are Eternal. The other part of their InheriGlory, which is the way of the full, unchangeable possession and enprincipally and in the first Place intended by it, is that state of things whereinto believers are admitted in this life. The whole inheritance of Grace and Glory was in the first place given and committed unto Jesus Christ. He was appointed Heir of all things, chap. 1. 3. By him is it communicated unto all believers, who thereby become Heirs of God, and joynt Heirs with Christ, Rom. 8. 15, 16, 17. For the Lord Christ as the Great Testator did in and by his Death bequeath unto them all his Goods, as an eternal Legacy. All that Grace, Mercy and Glory, all the riches of them which are prepared in the CoveGoodly Inheritance it is, the Lines are fallen unto Believers in pleasant Places. And the way whereby we begratuitous Adoption. If Sons, then Heirs.
This is that which is the end of all, and regulates all that preceeds in this verse. It declares the way whereby God would communicate unto some persons the Inheritance which in free Grace and Bounty he had provided. And,
It is an Act of meer sovereign Grace in God to provide such a blessed Inheritance for any of them, who had sinfully cast away what they were before entrusted withal. And into this are all Gods following dealings with the Church to be resolved. If there were nothing in us to move God to
2. The way whereby God did convey or would communicate this Inheritance unto any, was by promise [Might receive the promise of an eternal Inheritance.]
Syriac Translation refers the Inheritance unto the called: Those that are called to an eternal Inheritance. But in the Original it respects the Promise; the Promise of an eternal Inheritance: For by the Promise is assurance given of it, and it is the means of the actual conveyance of it unto us. And the Apostle
Chap. 6. 15, 16, 17, 18. So he declares it also, Gal. 3. 18. The promise made unto Abraham and confirmed by the Oath of God, was concerning the eternal Inheritance by Christ. The InheriCanaan was by the Law, or the first Covenant; But this was by Promise. And we may consider
1. The Promise principally intended, is that which was given unto Abraham and confirmed by the Oath of God: For the Inheritance, that is, the
2. We must enquire how and why this Inheritance is conveyed by Promise. And God made this settlement by Promise for these ends;
(1) To evince the absolute freedom of the preparation and grant of it. The Promise is everywhere opposed unto every thing of works or aesert in our selves. It hath no respect unto what we were or did deserve. The Land of Canaan was given to the Posterity of Abraham by Promise. And therefore doth God so often mind them of the freedom of it, that it was an act of meer Love and sovereign Grace, which in themselves they were so far from deserving as that they were altogether unworthy of it, Deut. 9. 4, 5. chap. 7. 7, 8. Much less hath the Promise of the eternal Inheritance respect unto any thing of works in our selves
(2) To give security unto all the Heirs of it unto whom it was designed. Hence in this Promise and the Confirmation of it, there was the highest engagement of the faithfulness and veracity of God. There was so unto the end that the Promise might be sure unto all the seed, Rom. 4. 16. Wherefore God doth not only declare the Relation of it unto his essential Truth; God who cannot lye hath given this promise of eternal life, Tit. 1. 1. but confirmed it with his Oath, that by two immutable things wherein it was impossible that God should lye, it might be established. The Reasons of the use and necessity hereof, have been declared on chap. 6. 17, 18.
(3) It was thus conveyed and is communicated by Promise unto all the Heirs of it in their sucessive Generations, that the way of obtaining this Inheritance on our part, might be by faith and no otherwise: For what God had only promismixing of it with faith, chap. 4. 2. And it is
3. We may enquire what it is to receive the promise. And it hath a double sense. (1) As the Promise may be considered formally or materially. To receive the Promise formally as a Promise, is to have it declared unto us, and
mix it with faith, or to believe it. This it is to receive the Promise in opAbraham is said to receive the Promises, Heb. 11. 17. in that when they were given unto him, he staggered not through Unbelief, but was strong in faith, giving Glory to God, Rom. 4. 21, 22. As the Promise is
1. All our Interest in the Gospel Inheritance depends on our receiving the Promise by faith. Though it be
2. The conveyance and actual communication of the eternal Inheritance by Promise to be received by faith alone, tends exceedingly unto the exaltation of the Glory of God, and the security of the salvation of them that do believe. For, as unto the latter, it depends absolutely on the veracity of God, confirmed by his Oath. And faith on the other hand is the only way and means of ascribing unto God the Glory of all the Holy properties of his nature which he designs to exalt in this dispensation of himself.
Thirdly, The Persons unto whom this Inheritance is designed, and who do receive the promise of it, are those that are called. It is to no purpose to disoutward and inward calling, effectual and ineffectual, comall the called should receive the Promise, and if they do not so, his Counsel, and that in the greatest work of his Wisdom, Power and Grace, is frustrate. They are the
the called here, those only are intended, who were so under the Old Testament. For mention is made only of the Redemption of Transgressions under that Covenant; in what sense, shall be immediately decladesign of the Apostle, and the use of the word. For on that supposition he says no more, but that Christ was the Mediator of the New Testament, that those might be saved who lived and dyed under the Old. But his principal design is to prove the advantage that we now have, even above the Elect themselves under the Old Testament; yet so, as not to exclude them from the same benefit with us by the Mediation of Christ as unto the substance of it. And the called in the language of this Apostle, doth principally signifie the called in Christ Jesus.
Effectual Vocation is the onely way of entrance into the eternal inheritance. For it is accompanied with Adoption, which gives us right and title thereunto, John 1. 12. In vain do they expect it who are not so called.
Fourthly, Things being thus prepared in the Counsel and Grace of God, yet there was an obstacle in the way of actual receiving the Promise; namely, the transgressions that were under the first Testament. God designed unto the Elect an eternal inheritance; yet can they not be made partakers of it, but in such a way as was suited unto his glory. It was unjust and unreasonable that it should be otherwise. Whereas therefore they were all of them guilty of sin, their sins must be expiated, and taken out of the way, or they cannot receive the promise of the inheritance.
Transgressions doth properly express the original word. And in the distribution of sins by their names into Lev. 16. 21. We render expiated, or the Inheritance cannot be enjoyed.
Though God will give Grace and Glory unto his Elect, yet he will do it in such a way, as wherein and whereby he may be glorified also himself. Satisfaction must be made for Transgression, unto the honour of his Righteousness, Holiness and Law.
There are yet sundry difficulties in this Expression, which must be enquired into. For,
1. The Redemption or Expiation of Sins, is confined unto those under the Old Testament; whence it should seem that there is none made for those unNew.
Ans. The Emphasis of the Expression, Sins under the Old Testament, respect either the Time when the sins intended were committed, or the Testament against which they were committed. And the Preposition
à fortiori, as unto the Sins committed under the New Testament, though there be no Exfinal Unbelief and Impenitency. For the
But yet more probably the meaning may be, the Sins that were and are committed against that first Covenant, or the Law and Rule of it. For whereas that Covenant did in its Administration comprise the Moral Law, which was the substance and foundation of it, all Sins whatever have their form and nato love the Lord our God with all our hearts, and all our strength. Either way the Sins of them who are called under the New Testament, are included.
Nature of the Sins intended, that is rePersons guilty of them also under that Testament. The Syriac Translation avoids this difficulty, by rendring the words of the Abstract, the Redemption of Transgressions, in the Concrete, a Redeemer unto them who had transgressed. That it is a certain sort of Sins that is intended, Socinus was the first that invented. And his invention is the foundation of the Exposition not only of Schlictingius, but of Grotius also on this place. Such Sins they say they are, as for which no Expiation was to be made by the Sacrifices of the Law; Sins of a greater Nature than could be expiated by them. For they only made Expiation of some smaller Sins, as Sins of Ignorance, or the like. But there is no respect unto the Persons of them who lived under that Testament, whom they will not grant to be redeemed by the blood of Christ. Wherefore according unto them, the difference between the Expiation of Sin by the SaLaw, and that by the Sacrifice of Christ, doth not consist in their nature, that the one did it only typically, and in an external representation by the purifying of the flesh, the other really and effectually; but in this, that the one expiated lesser Sins only, the other greater also.
But there is nothing sound or consonant unto the Truth in this Interpreta
(1) It proceeds on a false Supposition, that there were Sins of the people, (not only presumptuous Sins, and which had impenitency in them) for which no Atonement was made, nor Expiation of them allowed, which is expresly contrary unto Lev. 16. 16, 21. And whereas some offences were capital amongst them, for which no Atonement was allowed to free the Sinner from death, yet that belonged unto the Political Rule of the people, and hindred not but that typically all sorts of Sins were to be expiated.
(2) It is contrary unto the express design of the Apostle. For he had proSacrifices of the Law could not expiate any Sin, could not purge the Conscience from dead works; that they made nothing perfect. And this he speaks not of this or that Sin, but of every Sin wherein the Conscience of a Sinner is concerned, Chap. 10. 2. Hence two things follow.
First, That they did not, in and of themselves, really expiate any one Sin, small or great. It was impossible, saith the Apostle, that they should do so, Heb. 10. 4. only they sanctified to the purifying of the flesh; which overthrows the foundation of this Exposition.
Secondly, That they did typifie and represent the Expiation of all sorts of Sins whatever, and made application of it unto their Souls. For if it was so, that there was no Atonement for their Sins, that their Consciences were not purged from dead works, nor themselves consummate, but only had some outward purification of the flesh, it cannot be but they must all
3. Whereas the Apostle mentions only the Sins under the first Covenant as unto the time passed before the Exhibition of Christ in the flesh, or the death of the Mediator of the New Testament, what is to be thought of them who lived during that season, who belonged not unto the Covenant, but were strangers from it, such as are described, Eph. 4. 12. I answer; The Apostle takes no
this place. Those who live and dye strangers from God's Covenant, have no interest in the Me
Wherein the Redemption of these Transgressions did consist, shall be decla
1. Such is the malignant Nature of Sin, of all Transgression of the Law, that unless it be removed, unless it be taken out of the way, no Person can enjoy the Promise of the Eternal Inheritance.
2. It was the Work of God alone to contrive, and it was the Effect of infinite Wisdom and Grace to provide a way for the removal of Sin, that it might not be an everlasting Obstacle against the Communication of an Eternal Inheritance unto them that are called.
Fifthly, We have declared the design of God here represented unto us, who are the Persons towards whom it was to be accomplished, and what lay in the way as an hindrance of it. That which remains in the words, is the way that God took, and the means that he used, for the removal of that hindrance, and the effectual accomplishment of his design.
This in general was first, the making of a New Testament. He had fully proPriests, nor Sacrifices, nor any other Duties of it. Therefore had he promised the
Sixthly, In general all this arose from hence, that it had a Mediator; and that the Lord Christ, the Son of God, was this Mediator. The dignity of his Person, and thereon both the Excellency and Efficacy of his Priestly Office, whereunto alone respect is had in his being called here a Mediator, he had abundantly before demonstrated. Although the word in general be of a larChap. 8. 6. yet here it is restrained unto his Priestly Office, and his acting therein. For whereas he had treated of that alone in the foregoing Chapter, here declaring the Grounds and Reasons of the necessity of it, he says, for this cause is he the Mediator. And proceedTestator and dying, which belongs to his Priestly Office alone. And the sole end which in this place he assigns unto his Mediatory Office, is his death. That by means of death. Whereas therefore there were Sins committed unfirst Covenant, and against it, and would have been so for ever, had it continued, which it was no way able so to take away as that the called might receive the Inheritance, the Lord Christ undertook to be the Mediator of that Covenant, which was provided as a Remedy against these Evils. For herein he undertook to answer for and expiate all those Sins. Whereas therefore Expiasuffering death in our stead, in the behalf of all that are called, he made Atonement for Sin.
further design herein. He would not only free them that are called from that death which they deserved by their Sins against the first Covenant, but give them also a Right and Title unto an Eternal Inheritance, that is, of Grace and Glory. Wherefore the Procurement hereof also depends on the Mediation of Christ. For by his
The Provision of this Mediator of the New Testament is the greatest Effect of the infinite Wisdom, Love and Grace of God. This is the Center of his Eternal Counsels. In the womb of this one Mercy, all others are contained. Herein will he be glorified unto Eternity.
(1) The first Covenant of Works was broken and disannulled, because it had no Mediator.
(2) The Covenant at Sinai had no such Mediator as could expiate Sin. Hence,
(3) Both of them became means of Death and Condemnation.
(4) God saw that in the making the New Covenant, it was necessary to put all things into the hand of a Mediator, that it also might not be frustrated.
(5) This Mediator was not in the first place to preserve us in the state of the New Covenant, but to deliver us from the guilt of the breach of the former, and the Curse thereon. To make provision for this End, was the Effect of Infinite Wisdom.
Seventhly, The especial way and means whereby this Effect was wrought by death. Morte obita, facta, interveniente, intercedente; by means of death, say we.
It was therefore necessary unto the End mentioned, that the Mediadye; not as the High Priests of old dyed, a natural death for themselves; but as the Sacrifice dyed that was slain and offered for others. He was to dye that death which was threatned unto Transgressions against the first Covenant; that is, death under the Curse of the Law. There must therefore be some great Cause and End why this Mediator being the onely begotten of the Father, should thus dye.
This was, say the Socinians, that he might confirm the Doctrine that he taught. He dyed as a Martyr, not as a Sacrifice. But,
(1) There was no need that he should dye unto that End. For his
(2) Notwithstanding their pretence, they do not assign the Confirmation of his Doctrine unto his Death, but unto his Resurrection from the dead. Neither indeed do they allow any gracious Effect unto his death, either toGod or men, but only make it something necessarily antecedent unto what he did of that kind. Nor do they allow that he acted any thing at all towards God on our behalf. Whereas the Scripture constantly assigns our Redemption, Sanctification and Salvation to the death and blood of Christ. These Persons (1) deny that of it self it hath any influence into them: wherefore (2) they say that Christ by his death confirmed the New Covenant; but hereby they intend nothing but what they do also in the former, or the
Eighthly, The death of the Mediator of the New Testament, was for the
Redemption of Transgressions, and for this End it was necessary. Sin lay in the way of the enjoyment of the Inheritance which Grace had prepared. It did so in the Righteousness and Faithfulness of God. Unless it were removed, the Inheritance could not be received. The way whereby this was to be done, was by Redemption. The Redemption of Transgressions, is the deliverance of the Transgressors from all the Evils they were subject unto on their account, by the payment of a satisfactory price. The words used to express it, purging of Conscience by the blood of Christ. And he calls his life a Ransom, or Price of Redemption. And this utterly deSocinian Redemption and Expiation for Sin. For they make it only a freedom from Punishment, by an Act of Power. Take off the covering of the words which they use in a sense foreign to the Scripture, and their proper signification, and their sense is expresly contradictory unto the sense and words of the Apostle. He declares Christ to have been the High-Priest and Mediator of the New Testament, in the same Acts and Duties. They teach that he ceased to be a Mediator, when he began to be a Priest. He affirms that the Blood of Christ doth expiate Sins; They, that he doth it by an Act of Power in Heaven, where there is no use of his Blood. He says that his death was necessary unto, and was the means or cause of the Redemption of Transgressions, that is, to be a price of Redemption or just Compensation for them; They contend that no such thing is required thereunto. And whereas the Scriptures do plainly assign the Expiation of Sin, Redemption, ReconciliaThey deny them all and every one to be in any sense Effects of it, only they say it was an antecedent sign of the Truth of his Doctrine in his Resurrection, and an antecedent condition of his Exaltation and Power; which is to reject the whole Mystery of the Gospel.
1. A New Testament providing an Eternal Inheritance in Sovereign Grace, the Constitution of a Mediator, such a Mediator for that Testament in infinite Wisdom and Love, the Death of that Testator for the Redemption of Transgressions, to fulfil the Law, and satisfie the Iustice of God, with the communication of that Inheritance by Promise to be received by Faith in all them that are called, are the substance of the Mystery of the Gospel. And all these are with wonderful wisdom comprised by the Apostle in these words.
2. That the Efficacy of the Mediation and Death of Christ extended it self unto all the called under the Old Testament, is an evident Demonstration of his Divine Nature, his Pre-existence unto all these things, and the Eternal Covenant, between the Father and him about them.
3. The first Covenant did only forbid and Condemn Transgressions, Redemption from them is by the New Testament alone.
4. The Glory and Efficacy of the New Covenant, and the Assurance of the Communication of an Eternal Inheritance by vertue of it, depend hereon, that it was made a Testament by the death of the Mediator; which is farther proved in the following Verses.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Mors intercedat necesse est. Necesse est mortem intercedere. Ar.
For where a Testament is, there must also of necessity be brought in the death of the Testator. For a Testament is firm(or ratified)after men are dead; otherwise it is of no force whil'st the Testator liveth.
There is not much more to be considered in these verses, but only how the Observation contained in them, doth promote and confirm the Argument which the Apostle insists upon. Now this is to prove the necessity and use of the death of Christ, from the Nature, Ends and Use of the Covenant, whereof he was the Mediator. For it being a Testament, it was to be confirmed with the death of the Testator. This is proved in these Verses from the Notion of a Testament, and the only use of it amongst men. For the Apostle in this Epistle doth argue several times, from such usages amongst men, as proceedassurance given by the Oath of God, Chap. 6. And here he doth the same from what was commonly agreed upon; and suitable unto the reason of things, about the nature and use of a Testament. The things here mentioned were known to all, approved by all, and were the principal means of the preservation of Peace and Proespecial Regulation owe their original unto the Roman Civil Law; yet as unto the substance of them, they were in use amongst all Mankind from the foundation of the world. For a Testament is the just determination of a Man's Will con
Of the like nature is his observation, that a Testament is of no force whil'st the Testator liveth; the nature of the thing it self expounded by conTestament, nor hath any thing of the nature of a Testament in it. For that is only the Will of a man concerning his Goods when he is dead.
These things being unquestionable, we are only to consider, whence the
Mediator of the New Testament.
Now this is not meerly from the signification of the word two Covenants, it is the Affinity that is between a Solemn Covenant and a Testament, that he hath respect unto. For he speaks not of the death of Christ meerly as it was death, which is all that is required unto a Testament properly so called, without any consideration of what nature it is; but he speaks of it also as it was a Sacrifice by the effusion of his blood, which belongs unto a Covenant, and is no way required unto a Testament. Whereas therefore the word may signifie either a Covenant or a Testament precisely so called, the Apostle hath respect unto both the significations of it. And having in these Verses mentioned his death, as the death of a Testator, which is proper unto a Testament, in the 14th Verse and those that follow, he insists on his blood as a Sacrifice which is proper unto a Covenant. But these things must be more fully explained, whereby the difficulty which appears in the whole Context will be removed.
Unto the confirmation or ratification of a Testament, that it may be sure, stable, and of force, there must be death, the death of the Testator. But there is no need that this should be by blood, the blood of the Testator, or any other. Unto the consideration of a Covenant, blood was required, the blood of the Sacrifice, and death only consequentially, as that which would ensue therehim that made the Covenant. Wherefore the Apostle declaring the necessity of the death of Christ, both as to the nature of it, that it was really death, and as to the manner of it, that it was by the effusion of his blood, and that from the consideration of the two Covenants, the Old and the New Testament, and what was required unto them, he evinceth it by that which was essential unto them both, in a Covenant as such, and in a Testament preciseTestament, is, that it is confirmed and made irrevocable by the death of the Testator. And that which is the excellency of a Solemn Covenant, whereby it is made firm and stable, is, that it was confirmed with the blood of Sacrifices, as he proves in the instance of the Covenant made at Sinai, v. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22. Wherefore whatever is excellent in either of these, was to be found in the Mediator of the New Testament. Take it as a Testament, which, upon the Bequeathment made therein of the Goods of the Testator unto the Heirs of Promise, of Grace and Glory, it hath the nature of, and he dyed as the Testator, whereby the Grant of the Inheritance was made irrevocable unto them. Hereunto no more is required but his death, without the consideration of the nature of it in the way of a Sacrifice. Take it as a Covenant, as upon the consideration of the Promises contained in it, and the Prescription of Obedience, it hath the nature of a Covenant, though not of a Covenant strictly so called; and so it was to be confirmed with the blood of the Sacrifice of himself, which is the Eminency of the Solemn Confirmation of this Covenant. And as his death had an Eminency above the death required unto a Testament, in that it was by blood, and in the Sacrifice of himself, which it is no way necessary that the death of a Testator should be, yet it fully answered the death of a Testator, in that he truly dyed; so had it an Eminency above all the ways of the confirOld Covenant, or any other Solemn Covenant whatever; in that whereas such a Covenant was to be confirmed with the blood of Sacriblood of him that made the Covenant, as here it was.
The consideration hereof solves all the appearing difficulties in the nature and manner of the Apostles Argument. The word free grant and disposition of things by promise, which hath the nature of a Testament. And in the Old Covenant, there was a free grant and donation of the Inheritance of the Land of Canaan
blood, the other by death. Hereon the Apostle in the use of the word death of the Mediator of the New Testament. He was to dye in the confirmation of it as it was a Testament, he being the Testator of it; and he was to offer himself as a Sacrifice in his blood, for the establishment of it, as it had the nature of a Covenant. Wherefore the Apostle doth not argue as some imagine, meerly from the signification of the word, whereby, as they say, that in the original is not exactly rendred. And those who have from hence troubled themselves and others about the Authority of this Epistle, have nothing to thank for it, but their own ignorance of the design of the Apostle, and the nature of his Argument. And it were well if we all were more sensible of our own ignorance, and more apt to acknowledge it, when we meet with difficulties in the Scripture, than for the most part we are. Alas! how short are our Lines, when we come to fathom the depths of it! How inextricable difficulties do appear sometimes in passages of it, which when God is pleased to teach us, are all pleasant and easie!
These things being premised, to clear the scope and nature of the Apostles Argument, we proceed unto a brief Exposition of the words.
For where a Testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the Testator.
THere are two things in the words. (1) A Supposition of a Testament. (2) What is required thereunto.
In the first there is, (1) The Note of Inference. (2) The Supposition it self.
The first is the Particle, For. This doth not infer a Reason to ensue of before affirmed, which is the common use of that Illative, but onIllustration of it, from what is the usage of Mandeath of the Testator, as it is in all Testaments amongst men.
The Supposition it self is in those words, Verb Substantive
[where a Testament is] so it is by us supplied, it may be, not newhere a Testament is, may suppose that the death of the Testator is required unto the making of a Testament; which, as the Apostle sheweth in the next Verse, it is not, but only unto its Execution. In the case of a Testament, namely, that it may be executed, is the meaning of the words, where; that is, wherever. Amongst all sorts of men, living according unto the light of Nature, and the conduct of Reason, the making of Testacommon usage of mankind, resolved into the Principles of Reason and Equity.
2. What is required unto the Validity of a Testament, and that is the death of the Testator. And the way of the Introduction of this death unto the being brought in;
living man; but whil'st he lives, it is dead, or of no use. That it may operate and be effectual, death must be brought into the account.
This death must be the death of the Testator,
disposeth of things; who hath right so to do, and actually doth it. This in a Testament is the Testator. And Greek the same respect unto one another, as Testamentum and Testator in the Latine.
Wherefore if the New Covenant hath the nature of a Testament, it must have a Testator, and that Testator must dye, before it can be of force and effi
This is further confirmed,
For a Testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all, whilest the Testator liveth.
IT is not of the making and constitution of a Testament, but of the force and execution of it, that he speaks. And in these words he gives a Reason of the necessity of the death of the Testator thereunto. And this is because the validity and efficacy of the Testament depends solely thereon. And this reason he introduceth by the Conjunction For.
A Testament, is of force, say we; that is, firm, stable, not to be disannull'd. For if it be but a mans Testament, yet if it be condisannulleth or addeth thereunto, Gal. 3. 15. It is ratified,
among them that are dead; after men are whil'st the Testator liveth. For Testaments are the Wills
Living men have no Heirs. And this sense is declared in those words, quandoquidem, quoniam, seeing that; otherwise, say we;
Two things must yet farther be declared. (1) What are the Grounds or general Reasons of this Assertion. (2) Where lies the force of the Argu
1. The force of a Testament depends on the death of the Testator; or the death of the Testator is required to make it effectual for these two Rea
(1) Because a Testament is no Act or Deed of a man, whereby he preTestament is only the signification of the Will of a man, as unto what he will have done with his Goods after his death. Wherefore unto the force and execution of it his death is necessary.
(2) A Testament, that is only so, is alterable at the pleasure of him that makes it whil'st he is alive. Wherefore it can be of no force whil'st he is so; for that he may change it or disannul it when he pleaseth. The foundation therefore of the Apostles Argument from this usage amongst men, is firm and stable.
2. Whereas the Apostle argueth from the Proportion and Similitude that is between this New Testament or Covenant, and the Testaments of men, we may consider what are the things wherein that Similitude doth consist, and shew also wherein there is a dissimilitude whereunto his Reasonings are not to be extended. For so it is in all comparisons; the Comparates are not alike in all things, especially where things spiritual and temporal are compared toTypes of old. Every person or every thing that was a Type of Christ, were not so in all things, in all that they were. And therefore it requires both wisdom and diligence to distinguish in what they were so, and in what they were not, that no false Inferences or ConcluComparisons; and therefore in the present instance, we must consider, wherein the things compared do agree, and wherein they differ.
1. They agree principally in the death of the Testator. This alone makes a Testament among men, effectual and irrevocable. So is it in this New Testadeath of the Testator, Jesus Christ, and otherwise could not have been of force. This is the fundamental agree
2. In every Testament amongst men, there are Goods disposed and bequeathdisposal of his own Goods after his deappointed Heir of all things. But in his death, as a Testator, he made a Bequeathment of them all unto the Elect, appointing them to be Heirs of God, Coheirs with himself. And this also is required unto the nature and essence of a Testament.
3. In a Testament there is always an absolute Grant made of the Goods
absolutely unto all the Elect, so as that no intervenience can defeat them of it. And what there is in the Gospel which is the Instrument of this Testament, that prescribes Conditions unto them, that exacts terms of Obedience from them, it belongs unto it, as it is a Covenant, and not as a Testament. Yet,
4. It is in the Will and Power of the Testator, in and by his Testament, to assign and determine both the time, season and way, whereby those to whom he hath bequeathed his Goods, shall be admitted unto the actual possession of them. So is it in this case also. The Lord Christ, the great Testator, hath determined the way whereby the Elect shall come to be actually possest of their Legacies, namely, by Faith that is in him, Acts 26. 18. So also he hath reserved the time and season of their Conversion in this world, and entrance into future glory in his own hand and power. And these things belong unto the Illustration of the Comparison insisted on, although it be only one thing that the Apostle argues from it, touching the necessity of the death of the Testator. But notwithstanding these instances of agreement, between the New Covenant and the Testaments of men, whereby it appears to have in it in sundry respects the nature of a Testament, yet in many things there is also a disagreement between them, evidencing that it is also a Covenant, and abideth so, notwithstanding what it hath of the nature of a Testament, from the death of the Testator. As,
1. A Testator amongst men ceaseth to have any right in, or use of the Goods bequeathed by him, when once his Testament is of force. And this is by reason of death, which destroys all title and use of them. But our Testator devests himself neither of Right nor Possession, nor of the use of any of his Goods. And this follows on a twofold difference, the one in the Persons, the other in the Goods, or things bequeathed.
(1) In the Persons: For a Testator, amongst men, dyeth absolutely; he liveth not again in this world, but lieth down and riseth not, until the Heavens be no more. Hereon all Right unto, and all use of the Goods of this life, ceaseth for ever. Our Testator dyed actually and really to confirm his Testawhole Person; (2) In that Nature wherein he dyed, he lived again, and is alive for evermore. Hence all his Goods are still in his own power.
(2) In the things themselves. For the Goods bequeathed in the TestaPropriety of them cannot be vested in many, so as that every one should have a right unto and the enjoyspiritual good things of the New Testament are such, as that in all the riches and fulness of them, they may be in the possession of the Testator; and of those also unto whom they are beRiches, nor exhausts any thing from his own Fulness, by his communica
2. In the Wills of men, if there be a Bequeathment of Goods made unto many, no one can enjoy the whole Inheritance, but every one is to have his own share and Portion only. But in and by the New Testament, every one is made Heir to the whole Inheritance. All have the same, and every one hath the whole. For God himself thence becomes their Portion, who is All unto All, and All unto every one.
3. In Humane Testaments, the Goods bequeathed are such only as either descended unto the Testators from their Progenitors, or were acquired during their lives by their own industry. By their death they obtained no new Right or Title unto any thing, only what they had before, is now disposed of acWills. But our Testator, according unto an antecedent Contract between God the Father and him, purchased the whole Inheritance by his own blood, obtaining for us eternal Redemption.
4. They differ principally in this, That a Testament amongst men, is no more but meerly so; it is not moreover a Solemn Covenant that needs a confirmaWill of the Testator
Mystery the Testament is not meerly so, but a Covenant also. Hence it was not sufficient unto its force and establishment, that the Testator should dye only; but it was also required that he should
1. It is a great and gracious Condescension in the Holy Spirit, to give Encouragement and Confirmation unto our Faith, by a Representation of the Truth and reality of spiritual things, in those which are temporal and agreeing with them in their general nature, whereby they are presented unto the common understandings of Men. This way of proceeding the Apostle calls a speaking,
2. There is an irrevocable Grant of the whole Inheritance of Grace and Glory, made unto the Elect in the New Covenant. Without this it could not in any sense have the Nature of a Testament, nor that Name given unto it. For a Testament is such a free Grant, and nothing else. And our best Plea for them, for an interest in them, for a participation of them, before God, is from the free Grant and Donation of them, in the Testament of Jesus Christ.
3. As the Grant of these things is free and absolute, so the Enjoyment of them is secured from all interveniences by the death of the Testator.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
unde; hence, Therefore, Syr. propter hoc, quia, propter. For this Cause. And hence it is: Arab.
Syr.
dedicatum fuit; was dedicated, consecrated, separated unto sacred use.
Syr. When the whole Command was enjoyned. Vul. Lat. lecto omni mandato legis: The command of the Law being read; taking Arias exposito secundum legem. Most cum recitasset; having repeated, recited, namely out of the Book.
Syriack reads only Heifer; as the Arabick omits Moses, withSyriack.
Whereupon neither the first (Testament) was dedicated without Blood. For when Moses had spoken every Precept to all the People according to the Law, he took the blood of Calves and of Goats with water and Scarlet wool, and Hyssop, and sprinkled both the Book and all the People; Saying, This is the Blood of the Testament which God hath enjoyned unto you. Moreover he sprinkled with Blood, both the Tabernacle, and all the Vessels of the Ministry; And almost all things are by the Law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no Remission.
What we have before observed is fully confirmed in this Discourse; namely, that the Apostle intended not to argue absolutely and precisely from the Name and Nature of a Testament properly so called, and the use of it among men. For he makes use of these things no further, but as unto what such a Testament hath in common with a Solemn Covenant; which is, that they are both confirmed and ranew Testament, as it was a Testafirst Covenant was con
But the Apostle in this Discourse, doth not intend merely to prove that the first Covenant was dedicated with Blood, which might have been dispatched in a very few words: But he declares moreover in general what was the use of blood in SaBlood under the old Testament he declares to have been two; namely Purification and Pardon, both which are comprised in that one of the Expiation of Sin. And these things are all of them applyed unto the blood and Sacrifice of Christ in the following verses.
In the Exposition of this Context we must do three things, (1) Consider the Difficulties that are in it. (2) Declare the Scope, Design, and force of the ArExplain the particular passages of the whole.
1. Sundry Difficulties there are in this Context which arise from hence, that the account which the Apostle gives of the Dedication of the first Covenant, and of the Tabernacle, seems to differ in sundry things from that given by Moses, when all things were actually done by him, as it is recorded, Exod. 24. And they are these that follow.
1. That the blood which Moses took, was the blood of Calves and Goats whereGoats or their blood, in the story of Moses.
Water, Scarlet-wool, and Hyssop, to sprinkle it withal; where
3. That he sprinkled the Book in Particular; which Moses doth not affirm.
4. That he sprinkled all the People; that is, the People indefinitely, for all the individuals of them could not be sprinkled.
5. There are some Differences in the words, which Moses spake in the Dedicaver. 20.
6. That he sprinkled the Tabernacle with blood, and all the Vessels of it; when at the Time of the Making, and Solemn Confirmation of the Covenant, the Tabernacle was not Erected, nor the
For the Removal of these Difficulties some things must be premised in general; and then they shall all of them be considered distinctly.
1. This is taken as fixed, that the Apostle wrote this Epistle by Divine Inspiration. Having evidence here of abundantly satisfactory, it is the vainest thing ima
2. There is nothing in all that is here affirmed by the Apostle, which hath the least appearance of Contradiction unto any thing that is recorded by Moses in the story of these things. Yea, as I shall shew, without the Consideration and Addition of the things here mentioned by the Apostle, we cannot aright apprehend nor understand the account that is given by him. This will be made evident in the Consideraparticulars, wherein the difference between them is supposed to consist.
3. The Apostle doth not take his Account of the things here put together by him from any one place in Moses, but gathers up what is declared in the Law, in several Places unto various Ends. For as hath been declared, he doth not design only to prove the dedication of the Covenant by Blood, but to shew also the whole use of blood under the Law, as unto Purification and Remission of Sin. And this he doth to declare the Vertue and Efficacy of the blood of Christ under the new Testament, whereunto he makes an Application of all these things in the verses ensuing. Wheresprinkling of blood was of use under the Law, as they are occasionally expressed in sundry Places. And this one observation removes all the difficulties of the Context; which all arise from this one supposition, that the Apostle gives here an account only of what was done at the Dedication of the first Covenant. So in particular by the Addition of those Partiver. 21. which we well render, moreover, he plainly intimates that what he affirms of the Tabernacle and the vessels of its Ministry, was that which was done afterwards, at another time, and not when the Covenant was first con
On these Grounds we shall see that the Account given of these things by the Apostle is a necessary
1. He affirms, that Moses took the blood, of Calves and Goats. And there is a double difficulty herein; For, (1) The blood that Moses so used was the blood of Oxen, Exod. 24. 5, 6. which seems not to be well rendered by Calves. But this hath no weight in it. For Herd, great and small; every thing that is generis bovini: And there is no necessity from the words, that we should render Oxen, nor Calves; we might have rendered both words by Bullocks. But (2) There is no mention at all of Goats in the story of Moses, and as we observed it is here omitted by the Syriack Translator, but without cause. Ans.
1. There were two sorts of offerings that were made on this occasion; (1) Burntofferings; (2)
2. The Apostle observes that one End of the Sacrifice at the Dedication of the first Covenant was purging and making Attonement, ver. 22, 23. For in all Solemn Sacrifices blood was sprinkled on the Holy Things, to purify them, and make AtDeut. 16. 14, 19, 20. Now this was not to be done, but by the blood of an expiatory Sacrifice, it was not to be done by the blood of Peace-offerings. Wherefore the
3. In the Dedication of the Priests, these two sorts of offerings were conjoyned; namely, Peace-offerings and Sin-offerings, or burnt offerings for Sin, as here they were. And therein expresly the blood of Goats was used, namely, in the Sin-offerings, as the blood of Bullocks was in the
2. It is affirmed in the Text, that he took the Blood with Water, Scarlet-wool, and Hyssop and Sprinkled it; But there is mention of none of these things in the story of Moses, but only that he sprinkled the blood. But the Answer hereunto is plain and easie. Blood under the Law was sprinkled either in less or greater quantities. Hereon there were two ways of sprinkling; the one was with the finger, when a small quantity of blood, it may be, some few drops of it were to be sprinkled, it was done with the finger; Levit. 8. 15. Chap. 16. 13. The Quantity being small, though the blood were immixed, and almost congealed, it might be so sprinkled. But there was a Sprinkling whereunto a greater proportion of blood was required; as namely, when an house was to be sprinkled and thereby purifyed; This was done by mixing running water with the blood, and then sprinkling it with Scarlet-wool and Hyssop. Levit. 14. 50, 51, 52. For these things were needful thereunto. The water prevented the blood, from being so congealed, as that it would not be sprinkled in any quantity. The
3. It is added by the Apostle that he sprinkled the Book which is not expressed in the Story. But the Design of the Apostle is to express at large the whole Solemfirst Covenant, especially not to omit any thing that blood was applyed unto; because in the application he referrs the Purification and Dedication of all things belonging unto the new Covenant, unto the blood of Christ. And this was the order of the things which concerned the Book. Moses coming down from the Mount, told the People by word of Mouth, all things which God had spoken unto him, or the Sum and Substance of the Covenant which he would make with them, ver. 5. And Moses came and told the People all the words of the Lord; that is, the words spoken on Mount Sinai, the ten Commandments, and all the Judgments of the Lord, that is, all the Laws contained in Chap. 21, 22, 23.
these are the judgments, Chap. 21. 1. Upon the Oral Rehearsal of these words and Judgments the People gave their consent unto the Terms of the Covenant. The People answered with one voice, all the words which the Lord hath said, we will do, ver. 3. Hereon Moses made a Record, or wrote all the words of the Lord in a Book; ver. 4. This being done, the Altar and
4. In the Text of Moses it is said that he sprinkled the People; in Explanation whereof the Apostle affirms that he sprinkled all the People. And it was necessary that so it should be, and that none of them should be excluded from this Sprinkling. For they were all taken into Covenant with God; Men, Women and Children. But it must be granted, that for the blood to be actually Sprinkled on all individuals in such a Numberless Multitude, is next unto what is naturally impossible; wherefore it was done in their
5. The words which Moses spake unto the People upon the Sprinkling of the Blood, are not absolutely the same in the story, and in the Repetition of it by the Apostle. But this is usual with him in all his Quotations out of the old Testament in this Epistle. He expresseth the true sense of them, but doth not curiously and precisely render the sense of every word and syllable in them.
6. The last Difficulty in this context, and that which hath an appearance of the greatest, is in what the Apostle affirmes concerning the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of it; namely, that
The manner of his Introduction of it and moreover the Tabernacle, doth plainly intimate a Progress unto
The second thing to be considered, is the nature of the Argument in this context; and there are three things in it, neither of which must be omitted in the Exposition of the words.
He designeth, 1. to prove yet farther the necessuy of the Death of Christ, as he was the Mediator of the New Testament, both as it had the nature of a Testament, and that also of a Solemn Covenant.
2. To declare the necessity of the Kind of his Death, in the way of a Sacrifice by the effusion of Blood; because the Testament as it had the nature of a Solemn Co
3. To manifest the Necessity of shedding of Blood in the confirmation of the Co
There are in the words themselves,
1. A Proposition of the Principal Truth asserted; ver. 18.
2. The Confirmation of that Proposition; which is twofold, (1) From what Moses did, ver. 19. (2) From
3. A farther Illustration of the same Truth, by other Instances, ver. 21.
4. A general Inference or Conclusion from the whole, comprizing the Substance of what he intended to demonstrate.
In the Proposition there are five things considerable. (1) A note of Introduction; Whereupon. (2) The Quality of the Proposition, it is negative; neither was. (3) The Subject spoken of; The first. (4) What is affirmed of it; it was dedicated. (5) The way and manner thereof;
1. The Note of Introduction is in the Particle Therefore, and Wherefore; here, Whereupon. For it intimates a confirmation of a general Rule by especially Instances. He had before laid it down as a general Maxime, that a Testament was to be confirmed by Death. For thereupon the first Testament was confirmed with the Blood of Sa
II. The Proposition hath a double Negative in it, neither
was it without Blood; that is, it was with Blood, and could not otherwise be.
the first, that is, Testament, or first or old Covenant, whereof he discoursed at large, chap. 8. It was the Covenant made with the People at Horeb. For that and no other was dedicated in the way here described. And to take a brief Prospect into this Covenant, the things ensuing may be observed.
1. The matter of it, or the Terms of it materially considered, before it had the formal nature of a Covenant. And these were all the things that were written in the Book, before it was laid on the Altar. Namely, it was that Epitome of the whole Law which is contained in Chap. 20, 21, 22, 23, of Exodus. And other ComBook then written.
2. The Manner of the Revelation of these Terms of the Covenant. Being proDecalogue. He spake it himself on the Mount, in the way and manner declared;
3. The manner of its Proposal; and this also was twofold. (1) Preparatory. For before the Solemn Covenanting between God and the People, Moses declared all the Matter of it unto the People, that they might consider well of it, and wheSolemn, in their actual and absolute Acceptance of it, whereby they became obliged throughout their Generations. This was on the reading of it out of the Book, after it was sprinkled with the Blood of the Covenant on the Altar, ver. 7.
4. The Author of this Covenant was God himself. The Covenant which the Lord hath made with you; ver. 8. And immediately after, he is thereon called the God of Israel; ver. 20. which is the first time he was called so; and it was by vertue of this Covenant. And the Pledge or Token of his Presence, as CovenantAltar of Jehovah; as there was a Representative Pledge of the Presence of the People in the twelve Pillars or Statues.
5. Those with whom this Covenant was made were the People; that is, all the People, as the Apostle speaks, none exempted or excluded. It was made with the Men, Women, and Children; Deut. 31. 22. even all on whom was the Blood of the Covenant, as it was on the Women; or the Token of the Covenant, as it was on the Male Children in Circumcision; or both, as in all the men of Israel.
6. The Manner on the Part of the People of entring into Covenant with God, was in two Acts before mentioned. (1) In a previous Approbation of the matter of it; (2) In a Solemn engagement into it; And this was the Foundation of the Church of Israel.
This is that Covenant whereof there is afterwards in the Scripture such frequent mention between God and that People, the Sole foundation of all especial Relation between him and them. For they took the Observation of its Terms on themselves for their Posterity in all Generations until the end should be. On their Obedience hereunto, or Neglect hereof, depended their Life and Death in the Land of Canaan. No farther did the Precepts and Promises of it, in it self extend. But whereas it did not disanull the Promise that was made unto
1. The Foundation of a Church-state among any People, wherein God is to be honoured in Ordinances of instituted Worship, is laid in a Solemn Covenant between him and them. So it was with this Church of Israel. Before this they served God in their FamiAbraham; but now the whole People were gathered into a Church-State, to worship him according to the Terms, Invertue of a Covenant. Unto natural Worship and ObediRites be an Act of Soveraign Pleasure, yet God will not oblige us unto the Observance of them, but by vertue of a Covenant between him and us, wherein we voluntarily consent unto and accept of the Terms of it, whereby those Ordinances of worship are prescribed unto us. And it will hence follow,
(1.) That Men mistake themselves, when they suppose that they are interested in a Church-state by Tradition, Custom, or as it were by Chance, they know not how. There is nothing but Covenanting with God that will enstate us in this Priviledge. And therein we do take upon our selves the observance of all the Terms of the New Coto renew this Covenant without any Addition, Alteration or Mixture of things of another nature.
(2.) That so much disorder in the Worship of God under the Gospel, hath entered into many Churches, and that there is so much negligence in all sorts of Persons, about the Observance of Evangelical Institutions, so little conscientious care about them, or Reverence in the use of them, or benefit received by them; it is all much from hence, that men understand not aright the Foundation of that Obedience unto God, which is required in them and by them. This indeed is no other but that solemn Covenant between God and the whole Church, wherein the Church takes upon it self their due observance. This renders our Obedience in them and by them, no less ne
2. Approbation of the Terms of the Covenant, Consent unto them, and solemn Acceptance of them, are required on our part unto the establishment of any Covenant between God and us, and our Participation of the Benefits of it. Thus Solemnly did the People here enter into Covenant with God, whereby a peculiar Relation was esta
3. It was the way of God from the Beginning, to take Children of Covenanters into the same Covenant with their Parents; So he dealt with this People in the establish
IV. Of this Covenant it is affirmed, that it was consecrated with Blood; or was Hebrew. And it is not the Sanction of the Coveuse of it. The Covenant had its Sanction, and was confirmed on the Part of God, in offering of the Sacrifices. In the killing of the Beasts, and offering of their Blood, did the Ratification of the Covenant consist. This is included and supposed in what is sigeffect of the shedding and offering of Blood, but only of the sprinkling of it on the Book and the People. Thereby had it its consecration or dedication unto Sacred use, as the InstruBook was the Record. So was every thing consecrated unto its proper use under the Law, as the Apostle declares. This therefore is the meanMount Sinai, wherein he became their God, the God of Israel, and they became his People, was dedicated unto sacred use by Blood, in that it was sprinkled on the Book and the People, after part of the same Blood had been offered in Sacrifice at the Altar. Hence it follows that this which belongs so essentially unto the solemn confirmation of a Covenant between God and the Church, was necessary also unto the Dedication and Confirmation of the New Covenant, which is that that is to be proved.
It is by the Authority of God alone that any thing can be effectually and unchangea general Rule, as well as by an especial Command.
V. The Assertion of the Apostle concerning the Dedication of the first Covenant with Blood, is confirmed by an account of the matter of Fact, or what Moses did therein. ver. 19.
For when Moses had spoken every Precept unto all the People according unto the Law; he took the Blood of Calves and of Goats, with Water and Scarlet Wool and Hyssop, and sprinkled both the Book and all the People.
There are two things considerable in the words.
1. The Person made use of in the Dedication of the Covenant, which was Moses.
2. What he did therein; which is referred unto two Heads. (1) His speaking or reading the Terms of the Covenant, every Precept out of the Book. (2) His sprinkling of the Book and People with Blood.
1. Moses was the Internuntius between God and the People in this great TransExod. 3. And on the part of the People he was chosen and desired by them to transact all things between God and them, in the making and confirmation of this Covenant, because they were not able to bear the effects of Gods immediate Presence, Exod. 19. 19. Deut. 5. 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27. And this choice of a Spokesman on their part, God did approve of, ver. 27. Hence he became in a general sense a Mediator between God and Men in the giving of the Law:
Mediator. The first Covenant in the state of Innocency, was immediMeetness nor confidence to treat immediately with God. Nor (2) Any Credit or Reputation with him, so to be admitted as an Undertaker in his own Person. Nor (3) Any Ability to perform the conditions of any Cove
2. A Mediator may be either only an Internuntius, a Messenger, a Days-man; or also a Surety and an Undertaker. Of the first sort was the Mediator of the old Covenant; of the latter of the New.
3. None can interpose between God and a People in any sacred Office, unless he be called of God and approved of the People, as was Moses.
2dly. That which Moses did in this Affair, was first in way of Preparation; And there are three things in the Account of it. (1) What he did precisely. (2) With respect unto whom. (3) According to what Rule or Order he did it.
1. He spake every Precept, Vul. Lat. lecto omni Mandato; having read every command; which is the sense intended. recited.
1. A Covenant that consisted in meer Precepts without an Exhibition of Spiritual strength to enable unto Obedience, could never save sinners. The insufficiency of this Covenant unto that end, is that which the Apostle designs to prove in all this DisWhy God gave this Covenant which was so insufficient unto this great End? This Question is propoGal. 3. 19. (2) How then did any of the PeoFaith in the Promise, which was given before, and not disanulled by this Cove
2. In all our Dealings with God, respect must be had unto every one of his Precepts. And the Reason hereof is given by the Apostle James, namely, that the AuthoriJam. 2. 10, 11.
2dly. To whom did Moses thus read every Precept; It was, saith the Apostle, to All the People. In the story it is said indefinitely, in the Audience of the People; as afterwards, he sprinkled the People. The Apostle adds the note of Universality in both places;
1. The first eminent use of the writing of the Book of the Law, that is, of any part of the Scripture, (for this Book was the first that was written,) was that it might be read unto the People. He gave not this Book to be shut up by the Priests; to be concealed from the People, as containing Mysteries unlawful to be divulged, or impossible to be understood. Such conceits befell not the Minds of men, until the Power and Ends of Religion being lost, some got an opportunity to order the con
2. This Book was both written and read in the Language which the People understood and commonly spake. And a Rule was herein prescribed unto the Church in all Ages; if so be the Example of the Wisdom and Care of God towards his Church may be a Rule unto us.
3. God never required the Observance of any Rites or Duties of Worship, without a previous warranty from his Word. The People took not on them, they were not obliged unto Obedience with respect unto any positive Institutions, until Moses had read unto them every precept out of the Book.
4. The writing of this Book was an eminent Priviledge, now first granted unto the Church, leading unto a more perfect and stable condition, then formerly it had enjoyed. Hitherto it had lived on Oral Instructions, from Traditions, and by new immedi
3dly. There is the Rule whereby Moses proceeded herein, or the Warranty he According to the Law. He read every Precept according to the Law. It cannot be the Law in general that the Apostle intends, for the greatparticular Law, Rule or Command, that is intended. According unto the OrdiMoses for the framing of the Tabernacle;
The second thing in the words is, what Moses did immediately and Directly toWhat he made use of. (2) How he used it. (3) With respect unto what and whom.
1. The first is expressed in these words. He took the Blood of Calves and Goats, with water and Scarlet-wool and Hyssop. He took the Blood of the Beasts that were offered for Burnt-offerings and Peace-offerings; ver. 5, 6. Unto this End, in their slaying he took all their Blood in Basons; and made an equal Division of it. The one half he sprinkled on the Altar; and the other half he sprinkled on the People. That which was sprinkled on the Altar, was Gods Part; and the other was put on the People. Both the Mutual stipulation of God and the Congregation in this CoveBlood was used in the Dedication of the first Covenant. This was the Blood of the Beasts offered in Sacrifice unto God. Wherefore both Death, and Death by blood-shed
This Distribution of Blood, that half of it was on the Altar, and half of it on the People; the one to make Attonement, the other to purifie or Sanctifie; was to teach the two-fold Efficacy of the Blood of Christ, in making Attonement for Sin unto our Justification, and the purifying of our Natures in Sanctification.
put into Basons, and having water mixed with it to keep it fluid and aspersible, He took a bunch or bundle of Hyssop bound up with Scarlet wool, and dipping it into the Basons sprinkled the Blood, until it was all spent in that Service.
This Rite or way of Sprinkling was chosen of God as an expressive token or sign of the effectual Communication of the Benefits of the Covenant unto them that were sprinkled. Hence the Communication of the Benefits of the Death of Christ unto Sanctification is called the Sprinkling of his Blood. 1 Pet. 1. 2. And our Apostle comprizeth all the effects of it unto that end, under the name of the blood of Sprinkling, chap. 12. 24. And I fear that those who have used the expression with some contempt, when applyed by themselves unto the sign of the Communication of the Benefits of the Death of Christ in Baptisme, have not observed that Reverence of Holy things, that is required of us. For this Symbol of Sprinkling was that which God himself chose and appointed, as a meet and apt token of the Communication of Covenant-Mercy, that is, of his Grace in Christ Jesus unto our Souls. And,
The Blood of the Covenant will not benefit or advantage us without an especial and particular Application of it unto our own Souls and Consciences. If it be not as well Sprinkled upon us, as it was offered unto God, it will not avail us. The Blood of Christ was not divided as was that of these Sacrifices, the one half being on the Altar, the other on the People; but the Efficacy of the whole produced both these effects, yet so, as that the one will not profit us without the other. We shall have no Benefit of the Attonement made at the Altar, unless we have its efficacy on our own Souls unto their Purification. And this we cannot have unless it be sprinkled on us; un
3. The Object of this Act of Sprinkling was the Book it self and all the People. The same Blood was on the Book wherein the Covenant was recorded, and the
But whereas this Sprinkling was for purifying and purging, it may be enquired, Unto what end the Book it self was sprinkled, which was holy and undefiled? I AnBook it self should be sprinkled. (1) As we observed before, it was sprinkled as it lay upon the Altar, where Attonement was made; And this was plainly to signifie that Attonement was to be made by blood, for sins committed against that book or the Law contained in it. Without this that book would have been unto the People like that given to Ezekiel, that was written within and without, and there was written therein Lamentations and Mourning and Woe; Chap. 2. 10. Nothing but Curse and Death could they expect from it. But the Sprinkling of it with blood as it lay upon the Altar, was a Testimony and AssurBook in it self was Pure and Holy; and so are all Gods Institutions; but unto us every thing is unclean that is not sprinkled with the blood of Christ. So afterwards the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of it were pubecause of the Uncleannesses of the People in their Transgressions. Levit. 16. Wherefore on both these accounts, it was necessary that the Book it self should be sprinkled.
The blood thus sprinkled was mingled with water. The natural Reason of it was, as we observed, to keep it fluid and aspersible. But there was a Mystery in it also. That the blood of Christ was typified by this blood of the Sacrifices used in the Dedication of the Old Covenant, it is the Apostle's Design to declare. And it is probable that this mixture of it with water might represent that Blood and Water which came out of his side when it was pierced. For the Mystery thereof was very great. Hence that Apostle which saw it and bare Record of it in particular. Joh. 19. 34, 35. affirms likewise that he came by water and blood; and not by blood only, 1 Epist. chap. 5. ver. 6. He came not only to make Attonement for us with his blood, that we might be justifyed; but to sprinkle us with the efficacy of his blood in the communication of the Spirit of Sanctification compared unto water.
Sprinkler it self composed of Scarlet wool and Hyssop, I doubt not but that the Humane Nature of Christ, whereby and through which all Grace is communicaHyssop was an humble Plant, the meanest of them, yet of a sweet savour, 1. Kings 4. 33. So was the Lord Christ amongst men in the days of his flesh, in comparison of the tall Cedars of the Earth. Hence was his complaint; that he was as a worm and no man, a reproach of men, and despised of the People; Psal. 22. 6. And the Scarlet wool might represent him as red in the blood of his Sacrifice. But I will not press these things, of whose Interpretation we have not a certain Rule.
Secondly; The principal Truth asserted is confirmed by what Moses said, as well as what he did.
Saying; This is the Blood of the Testament which God hath enjoyned unto you.
The Difference between the words of Moses and the Repetition of them by the Apostle is not material, as unto the sense of them. Behold, in Moses, is rendred by This; both demonstrative Notes of the same thing. For in proMoses shewed the Blood unto the People; And so Behold the Blood, is all one as if he had said, this is the Blood. The making of the Covenant in the words of Moses is expressed by hath cut, divided, solemnly made. This the Apostle renders by hath enjoyned or commanded you. And this he doth partly to signify the Foundation of the People's Acceptance of that Covenant, which was the Authority of God, enjoyning them or requiring them so to do; partly to intiPrecepts and Injunctions principally, and not absolutely in Promises as the New Covenant doth. The last words of Moses, Concerning all these words, the Apostle omits. For he includes the sense of them in that word, which the Lord commanded you. For he hath respect therein both unto the words themselves written in the Book, which were Precepts and Injuncti
That which Moses said, is, This is the blood of the Testament. Hence the Apofirst Testament. For so Moses expresly affirms in the Dedication of it; This is the blood of the Covenant; without which it could not have been a firm Covenant between God and the People; Not I confess from the nature of a Covenant in general; for a Covenant may be solemnly established withnot confirmed without Blood. Wherefore, whereas God had solemnly proBlood of the Mediator, (for by the blood of Beasts it could not be) which is that Truth wherein he did instruct them; And no
For the Enuntiation it self, This is the blood of the Covenant, it is figurative and Sacramental. The Covenant had no blood of its own; but the blood of the SaPaschal Lamb was calGods Pass-over, because it was a sign and token of Gods passing over the houses of the Israelites when he destroyed the Aegyptians, Exod. 12. 11, 21. With reference it was unto those Sacramental Expressions, which the Church under the Old TeBread and the Wine, whose use he appointed therein, by the names of his Body and Blood; and any other Interpretation of the words wholly overthrows the Nature of that holy Ordinance.
Wherefore this Blood was a confirmatory Sign of the Covenant. And it was so, (1) From Gods Institution, he appointed it so to be, as is express in the words of Moses. (2) From an Implication of the Interest of both Parties in the blood of the Sacrifice; God, unto whom it was offered, and the People on whom it was sprinkled. For it being the blood of Beasts that were slain, in this use of it each Party as it were engaged their lives unto the Observation and Performance of what was reTypically, in that it represented the blood of Christ, and fore-signified the Necessity of it unto the confirmation of the New Covenant; See Zech. 9. 11. Matth. 26. 28. Luk. 22. 20. 1 Cor. 11. 15. So was it the blood of the Covenant, in that it was a sign between God and the Peo
The Condescension of God in making a Covenant with men, especially in the ways of the Confirmation of it, is a blessed Object of all holy Admiration. For, (1) The infi
The Apostle having given this full Confirmation unto his principal Assertion, he adds, for the Illustration of it, the use and efficacy of blood, that is, the blood of Sacrifices, unto Purification and Attonement.
Moreover he sprinkled with Blood both the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of the Ministry. And almost all things are by the Law purged with Blood; and without shedding of Blood is no Remission.
The manner of the Introduction of this Observation, ver. 21. by and in like manner, do manifest that this is not a continuation of the former Instance, in that which belongs thereunto; but that there is a Proceed unto another Argument, to evince the farther use of the sprinkling of blood unto Purification and Attonement under the Old Testament. For the Design of the Apostle is not only to prove the Necessity of the Blood of Christ in Sacrifice, but also the Efficacy of it in the taking away of Sins. Wherefore he shews that as the Covenant it self was dedicated with blood, which proves the Necessity of the blood of Christ unto the confirmation of the New Covenant; so all the ways and means of Solemn Worship were purged and purified by the same means which demonstrates its Efficacy.
I will not absolutely oppose the usual Interpretation of these words; namely, that at the Erection of the Tabernacle, and the Dedication of it with all its Vessels and Utensils, there was a Sprinkling with Blood, though not expresly mentioned by Moses, for he only declares the Unction of them with the Holy Oyl, Exod. 40. 9, 10, 11. For as unto the Garments of Aaron and his Sons, which belonged unto the Service of the Tabernacle, and were laid up in the holy places, it is expresly dewere sprinkled with Blood, Exod. 29. 21. And of the Altar, that it was Sprinkled when it was Anointed, though it be not said whereJosephus who was himself a Priest, affirms that all the things bededicated with the sprinkling of the blood of the Sacrifices; which things are usually pleaded for this Interpretation.
I shall not as I said, absolutely reject it; yet because it is Evident that the Apoa Progress in these words, from the Necessity of the Dedication of the Covenant with blood, unto the use and efficacy of the Sprinkling of blood in all holy Administrations, that they might be accepted with God, I choose rather to referre the words unto that solemn sprinkling of the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of it by the High Priest with blood of the Expiatory Sacrifice which was made annually on the day of Attonement. This the Introduction of these words by
All the Difficulty in this Interpretation is, that Moses is said to do it. But that which we intend, was done by Aaron and his Successors. But this is no way to be compared with that of applying it unto the Dedication of the Tabernacle, whereMoses is said to do what he appointed to be done, what the Law required which was given by him. So Moses is frequently used for the Law given by him. Act. 15. 21. For Moses of old time hath in every City them that preach him, being read in the Synagogues every Sabbath-day; that is, the Law.
This Sprinkling therefore of the Tabernacle and its Vessels was that which was done annually on the Day of Attonement, Levit. 16. 14, 16, 18. For therein, as the Apostle speaks, both the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of the Ministry were sprinkled with blood; as the Ark, the Mercy-seat, and the Altar of Incense; And the End of it was to purge them because of the Uncleannesses of the People, which is that the Apostle intends. And that which we are taught herein, is, that
I. In all things wherein we have to do with God, whereby we approach unto him, it is the blood of Christ, and the Application of it unto our Consciences, that gives us a gracious Acceptance with him. Without this all is unclean and defiled.
II. Even Holy things and Institutions, that are in themselves clean and unpolluted, are relatively defiled, by the unholiness of them that use them; defiled unto them. So was the Tabernacle because of the uncleannesses of the People among whom it was. For unto the unclean all things are unclean.
From this whole Discourse the Apostle makes an Inference which he afterwards applies at large unto his present Purpose.
And almost all things are by the Law purged with blood; And without shed
There are two Parts of this Verse; or there is a double Assertion in it. (1) That almost all things are by the Law purged with Blood. (2) That without shedding of Blood is no Remission.
In the first of these there is considerable the Assertion it self, and the Limitation of it.
1. The Assertion it self is, that by the Law all things were purged with Blood;
according unto the Law; the Rule, the Commands, the Institution of it; In that way of worship, Faith and Obedience, which the People were obliged unto by the Law. According unto the Law, there was a Necessity of the Blood of SaNecessity of the Death of Christ, and the Efficacy of his Blood for the purging of Sin, whereof those legal things were Types and Repurgings by Blood, we have treated already.
Limitation of this Assertion is in the word almost. Some few Puver. 13. But I am not certain that this may be esteemed a Purification without Blood. For the Heifer whose Ashes were used in it was first slain, and its blood poured out. Afterwards the blood as well as the flesh was burnt and reduced unto Ashes. Wherefore that way of Purification cannot be said to be without blood. And it was a Type of the Purifying efficacy of the blood of Christ, who offered himself an whole Burnt-offering unto God, through the fire of the Eternal Spirit. But there were two sorts of Purifications under the Law, wherein blood was neither formally nor virtually applyed or used. The one was by Fire in things that would endure it; Numb. 31. 23. And the Apostle speaks of things as well as Persons, as the word water, whereof there were many InExod. 19. 10. Levit. 16. 26, 28. chap. 22. 6, 7.
All other Representations were in Blood;
by the Offering and Sprinkling of Blood.
From the consideration of the Purifications mentioned, the Apostle adds the LiAlmost. For the conceit of some of the Antients, that ferè, and is to be joyned with purged, were almost purged, that is, they were so only ineffectually, is most improper. For it is contrary to the natural construction of the words, and the direct intention of the Apostle.
Only we may observe, that the Purifications which were by fire and water, were of such things as had no immediate Influence into the Worship of God, or in such cases as wherein the Worship of God was not immediately concerned; nor of such things wherewith Conscience was defiled. They were only of external Pollutions, by things in their own nature Indifferent; and had nothing of Sin in them. And the Sacred Institutions which were not concerning the immediate Worship of God, nor things which in themselves did defile the Consciences of Men, were as hedges and fences about those which really did so. They served to warn Men not to come near those things which had a real defilement in themselves. See Matth. 15. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. Thus almost all things, that is, absolutely all, which had any inwere purged with Blood, and directed unto the purg
1. There was a great variety of legal Purifications. For as all of them together could not absolutely purge Sin, but only direct unto what would do so; so none of them by themselves could fully represent that one Sacrifice by blood, whereby all sin was to be purged; therefore were they multiplyed.
2. This variety argues that in our selves we are ready to be Polluted on all oc
3. This variety of Institutions was a great part of the Bondage-state of the Church under the Old Testament; a Yoke that they were not able to bear. For it was alto make our Address by Faith on all occasions unto that one Sacrifice by the Blood of Christ, which cleanseth us from all our sins. Howbeit many that are called Christians, being ignorant of the Mystery thereof, do again betake themselves unto other ways for the Purification of Sin, which are multiplied in the
4. The great Mystery wherein God instructed the Church from the Foundation of the World, especially by and under legal Institutions, was that all purging of Sin was to be by blood. This was that which by all Sacrifices from the Beginning, and all Legal Institutions, he declared unto Mankind. Blood is the only means of Purging and Attonement. This is the Language of the whole Law. All was to manifest, that the washing and purging of the Church from Sin, was to be looked for from the blood of Christ alone.
The second Assertion of the Apostle is, that without shedding of blood there is no Remission. Some would have these words to contain an Application of what is spoaccording to the Law, or by vertue of its Institutions, are here to be repeated. By the Law without shedding of blood, that is, in Sacrifice, there was no Remission. Yet, though that Season be particularly intended, the Axiom is universally true, and apwithout shedding of blood is no Remission.
The Curse of the Law was, that he that sinned should die; But whereas there is no man that liveth and sinneth not, God had provided that there should be a Testification of the Remission of Sins, and that the Curse of the Law should not be imme
And whereas the sins of the People were of various kinds, there were particular Sacrifices instituted to answer that variety. This variety of Sacrifices with respect unto the various sorts or kinds of sins, for which they were to make Attonement, I have elsewhere discussed and explained. Their Institution and Order is recorded, Levit. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. And if any Person neglected that especial Sacrifice which was appointed to make Attonement for his especial Sin, he was left under the senno Remission. Yea also, there might be, there were sins that could not be reduced directly unto any of those for whose Remission sacrifices were directed in particular. Wherefore God graespecial ways of Attonement, or had contracted the Guilt of such sins, as they knew not how to reduce unto any sort of them that were to be expiated, he had gratiously preAnniversary Sacrifice, wherein publick Attonement was made for all the Sins, Trangressions and Iniquities of the whole People, of what sort soever they were; Levit. 16. 21. But in the whole of his Ordinances he established the Rule, that without shedding of blood was no Remission.
There seems to be an Exception in the case of him who was so poor that he could not provide the meanest offering of blood for a Sin-offering. For he was allowed by the Law to offer the Tenth part of an Ephah of fine flower for his Sin, and it was forgiven him. Levit. 5. 11, 12, 13. Wherefore the word almost, may be here again repeated, because of this single case. But the Apostle hath respect unto the general Rule of the Law. And this exception was not an ordinary Constitution, but depended on the Impossibility of the thing it self, whereunto it made a gracious Condescension. And this Necessity oft-times of it self without any Constitution susDavid, when he eat of the Shew-bread in his hunger; and as to works of Mercy on the Sabbath day, which Instances are given by our Saviparticular exception on this consideration did rageneral Rule of the Law. Besides the nearest ap
The Expositors of the Roman Church do here greatly perplex themselves, to secure the Sacrifice of their Mass, from this destroying sentence of the Apostle. For a Sacrifice they would have it to be, and that for the Remission of the sins of the livunbloody Sacrifice. For if there be any blood shed in it, it is the Blood of Christ, and then he is Crucified by them afresh every day; as indeed in some sense he is, though they cannot shed his Blood. If it be unbloody, the Rule of the Apostle is, that it is no way available for the Remission of
Mass to be a proper Sacrifice for the Remission of Sins, which is done expresly by Estius upon the place. But this is contrary unto the direct assertions contained in the Mass it self, and razeth the very Foundation of it.
Now if God gave them so much Light under the Old Testament, as that they should know, believe, and profess, that without shedding of Blood is no Remission, how great is the Darkness of Men under the New Testament, who look, seek, or endeavour any other way after the pardon of sin, but only by the Blood of Christ.
2. This is the great Demonstration of the Demerit of sin, of the Holiness, Righteousness, and Grace of God. For such was the Nature and Demerit of Sin, such was the Righteousness of God with respect unto it, that
In the following Verses unto the End of the Chapter, the Apostle makes an Application of all that he had discoursed concerning the Services and Sacrifices of the Tabernacle, with their
That wherein in general there was a Similitude in these things, is expressed, Verse 23.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
There is no Difference of Importance in the Translation of these words by any Interpreters of Reputation, and singly they have been all of them before spoken unto. Only the Syriack renders Similitudes, not unaptly.
It was therefore necessary that the Patterns of things in the Heavens should be purified with these; but the Heavenly things themselves with better Sacrifices then these.
An Entrance is made in these words into the comparison intended. For as unto both sorts of Sacrifices compared, it is here granted in general, that they purged the things whereunto they were applyed. But there is a Difference also laid down in this verse, namely, as unto the things that were purified by them, and conse
There is in the words, (1) A note of Inference, or dependance on the former Discourse; Therefore. (2) A Double Proposition of things of divers natures comThe Modification of both those Propositions, It was necessary. (4) In the first Proposition there is (1) The subject Matter spoken of; The Patterns of things in the Heavens. (2) What is affirmed of them as necessary to them; that they should be purified. (3) The Means whereby; with these. (5) The same things are proposed in the second, namely, (1) The things spoken of, or the Heavenly things themselves. (2) What is affirmed of them is traduced from the other Proposition; they also were purified. (3) The means whereby they were so; with better Sacrifices then these.
1. That which first occurrs is the Note of Inference, or Dependance on the forTherefore. And it hath an equal respect unto both parts of the Assertion. And it is not the Being of the things but their Manifestation that is in
2. Of both the things affirmed it is said that it was necessary they should be so; that is, it was so from Gods Institution and Appointment. There was no Necessity
3. The Subject of the first Proposition is the Patterns of things in the Heavens. The Things in the Heavens are Heavenly things. And they are the same with figures of the true things. The things intended are those which the ApoCovenant, the Book, the People, the Tabernacle, with
all the Vessels of its Ministry. These he calls Patterns. And Patterns are of two sorts, (1) Such as are Exemplaria; Those from and according unto which any other thing is framed. That is the PatScheme or Frame drawn and delineated is the Pattern of an Edifice. (2) Such as are exemplata,
The things mentioned were not Patterns of the Heavenly things in the first sense. The Heavenly things were not framed by them, to answer, resemble and repreoriginal Pattern shewed in the Mount. Or they were framed according unto the Idea of the Heavenly things themselves, whereof he made a Representation unto Moses and communicated a Resemblance of them unto him according unto his own Good Pleasure.
This is the Order of these things. The Heavenly things themselves were designed, framed and disposed in the Mind of God, in all their Order, Causes, Beauty, Efhid in God from the Foundation of the World. Ephes. 3. 8, 9, 10. Of these things did God grant a Typical Resemblance, Similitude, and Pattern in the Tabernacle and its services. That he would make such a kind of Resemblance of those Heavenly things as unto their kind, nature and use, that he would instruct the Church by them, was an Act of his meer Soveraign Will and Pleasure. And this is that effect of his Wisdom, which was manifest under the Old Testament; whereon the Faith and Obedience of the Church was wholly to acquiesce in his Soveraignty. And this their Resempresent Jews do, as their Forefathers did under the Degeneracy of their Church, conceive
Materials and curious structure of them, things that the wealth and Art of men might exceed. But in themselves they were all earthly, carnal, perishing, and liable unto all sorts of Corruption. Much inferior they were in Nature and Glory, unto the Souls of Men, which were conversant in their highest and most noble Acts about them. But herein alone consisted their honour, worth and use; They were Patterns of Heavenly things. And we may observe, that
The Glory and Efficacy of all ordinances of Divine Worship, which consist in outward Observance (as it is with the Sacraments of the Gospel) consist in this, that they represent and exhibit Heavenly things unto us. And this Power of Representation they have from divine Institution alone.
2. What they were Patterns of is expressed; namely, of Heavenly things. What these were in particular, must be spoken unto in the Exposition of the next The Heavenly things themselves.
3. Of these things it is affirmed that they were purified. The Apostle had treatdouble Purification. (1) Of that which consisted in a cleansing from Defilements of its own; Sprinkling the Unclean, and Sanctifying to the Purifying of the Flesh, ver. 13. 22. (2) That which consisted in a Dedication unto Sacred Use. But this also had some respect unto uncleanness. Not unto any that the things so DeLevit. 16. 15, 16, 17. And this he would do, that he might teach them the abthis Purification he gives us in this Discourse two Instances. (1) That which was Initial, at the first Solemnization of the Cover. 18, 19, 20. (2) That which was Annual in the Sprinkling of the Tabernacle and its Vessels, because of the Uncleannesses of the People; ver. 22. This latter Purification is that which is intended.
4. The means whereby they were thus to be purifyed, is, with these. In the Heavenly things themselves are said to be purified with Sacrifices. But the Purification of these Patterns was not absolutely confined unto Sacrifices. Water and Scarlet wool and Hyssop, and the Ashes of an Heifer in some cases were required thereunto. With these, that is, with all those things which were appointed by the Law to be used in their Purification or Dedication unto sacred Use.
5. If enquiry be made, Why these Patterns were thus purified, the Apostle affirms it was necessary it should be so. This as it respects both Propositions in this verse equally, was spoken unto in general before. The grounds of this Necessity with respect unto these Patterns, were these,
1. The Will and Command of God. This is that which originally or in the first place makes any thing necessary in Divine worship. This is the only spring of rational Obedience in instituted Worship; Whatever is without it, whatever is beyond it, is no part of Sacred Service. God would have them thus purified. Yet also was there herein this manifest Reason of his Will, namely, that thereby he might represent the Purification of Heavenly things. On this Supposition that God would so represent heavenly things by them, it was necessary that they should be purifyed. (2) Seeing he would have them purified there was a Meetness that they should be so with these things. For being themselves carnal and earthly, as were the Tabernacle and all the vessels of it, it was meet they should be purifyed with things carnal also; Such as were the Blood of Beasts, Water, Hyssop, and Scarlet-wool. (3) In particular it was necessary that they should be purified with the Blood of Sacrifices; because they were Types of those things; which were to be purified with the only proper Expiatory Sacrifice. These were the Foundatiwhole Systeme of Mosaical Rites and Ordinances; and on them they stood, until they were removed by God himself.
And that which we should learn from hence, is, a due consideration of that Respect which we ought to have to the Holiness of God in his Worship and Service. He did manifest it unto us, to beget in us a due Reverence of it; He would never admit of any thing therein, but was
The other Proposition in the Text, is, that the Heavenly things themselves were to be purified with better Sacrifices.
The first thing in the words is the Subject of the Proposition. The Heavenly
things themselves; that is, the things whereof the other were the Patterns, by which God represented them unto the Church. But what these things are, is not easie to determine.
Some say that Heaven it self is intended, the Superetherial Heavens; the Place of the present Residence of Christ, and of the Souls of them that are saved by him. But taking the Heavens absolutely, especially for that which is called the Heaven of Heavens, with respect unto their Fabrick, and as the Place of Gods Glorious Residence, and it is not easie to conceive how they stood in need to be purified by Sacrifice.
Some say it is Spiritual things, that is, the Souls and Consciences of men, that are intended. And they are called Heavenly in opposition unto the things of the Law, which were all carnal and Earthly. And it is certain, they are not to be excluded out of this Expression. For unto their Purification, is the vertue of the Sacrifice of Christ directly applyed; ver. 14. Yet the whole context, and the Antithesis in it, between the Types and the things typified, make it evident, that they alone are not intended.
To clear the Mind of the Apostle in this expression, sundry things must be ob
1. The Apostle treats of a double Purification, as was immediately before declaApplication of his Discourse he intends them both. But whereas some things stood in need of the one only, namely, of that of Dedication unto God, and some of the other, namely, purging from Defilements, as the Souls and Consciences of Men; they are distinctly to be applyed unto the things spoken of according to their Capacity. Some were purified by Dedication; some by actual cleansing from real Defilements; both which are included in the Notion of Sacred Purification, or Sanctification.
2. These Heavenly things must be all those and only those whereof the other were Patterns or Resemblances. This is plain in the Context and Antithesis. Wherefore,
3. By Heavenly things, I understand all the effects of the Counsel of God in Christ, in the Redemption, Worship, Salvation, and Eternal Glory of the Church; that is, Christ himself in all his Offices, with all the Spiritual and Eternal Effects of them on the Souls and Consciences of men, with all the worship of God by him acPatterns. He did in and by them give a Representation of all these things, as we may see in particular.
(1.) Christ himself, and the Sacrifice of himself were typed out by these things. To prove this is the principal Purpose of the Apostle. They were the Shadow, he the Body or Substance, as he speaks elsewhere. He was the Lord from Heaven; who is in Heaven, who speaks from Heaven. 1 Cor. 15. 49. Joh. 3. 13. (2) All spiritual and eternal Grace, Mercy, Blessings, whereof the Souls of Men are made Partakers by the Mediation and Sacrifice of Christ, are Heavenly things, and are constantly so called, Heb. 3. 1. Ephes. 1. 3. Joh. 3. 12. Eph. 2. 6. (3) The Church it self and its worship are of the same kind; the things principally to be puEphes. 5. 25, 26. (4) Heaven it self is comprised herein, not absolutely, but as it is the Mansion of Christ, and the Redeemed in the Presence of God for evermore.
Hereon, the Enquiry will be, how these things are said to be purified? For of real Purification from Uncleanness not one of them is capable, but only the Church, that is, the Souls and Consciences of men. I Answer, That we are to have recourse unto that twofold sense of Purification before laid down; namely, of external Dedication, and
But yet there was moreover a real Purification of the most of these things. The Church, or the Souls and Consciences of Men, were really Cleansed, Purified and Sanctified with an internal Spiritual Purification Eph. 5. 25, 26. Tit. 2. 14. It was washed in the blood of Christ, Rev. 1. 5. and is thereby cleansed from Sin. 1 Joh. 1. 7. And Heaven it self was in some sense so Purified, as the Tabernacle was beLevit. 16. 16. Sin had enApostacy of Angels; whence it was not pure in the sight of God. Job 15. 15. And upon the sin of man, a state of Enmity ensued beEph. 1. 10. Hence if the Heavenly things were not defil
The Summ is; As the Covenant, the Book, the People, the Tabernacle were all purified and dedicated unto their especial ends, by the Blood of Calves and Goats, wherein was laid the Foundation of all gracious entercourse between God and the Church, under the Old Covenant; So all things whatever, that in the Counsel of God belonged unto the New Covenant, the whole Mediation of Christ with all the Spiritual and Eternal Effects of it, were Confirmed, Dedicated unto God, and made effectual unto the ends of the Covenant, by the Blood of the SacriPurified and Sanctiwithout spot or wrinkle, or any such thing. And we are taught, that
The one Sacrifice of Christ with what ensued thereon, was the only means to render effectual all the Counsels of God, concerning the Redemption and Salvation of the Church Eph. 1. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Rom. 3. 24, 25, 26.
Of these Heavenly things, it is said, that they were purified with better Sacrifices than these; Enallage of Number, the plural put for the singular. The one Sacrifice of Christ is alone intended. But because it anGrotius on these words is intolerable, and justly offensive unto all Pious Souls. quia non tantum Christi perpessiones intelligit, sed eorum qui ipsum sectantur, unà cum precibus & operibus Misericordiae. Is it possible that any Christian should not tremble to joyn the Sufferings of Men and their works, with the Sacrifice of Christ, as unto the same kind of Efficacy in purifying of these Heavenly things? Do they make Attonement for Sin? Are they offered unto God for that end? Are they sprinkled on these things for their Purification?
4. The Modification of the former Proposition belongs unto this also. It was necessary these things should be thus purified. (1) As that which the Holiness of God required, and which therefore in his Wisdom and Grace he appointed. (2) As that which in it self was meet and becoming the Righteousness of God; Heb. 2. 10. Nothing but the Sacrifice of Christ, with the everlasting Efficacy of his most pre
The last thing we shall observe hereon, is, that it was slain Sacrifice, a Sacrifice as slain; a Sacrifice by Mactation, Killing or shedding of blood; so is Schlictingius on this Place. His Words are,
Licet enim non Sanguinem suum Christus deo obtulerit, sed se ipsum; tamen sine sanguinis effusione offerre se ipsum non potuit ne
Ans. (1) The
From the Words thus opened, we may Observe unto our own Use.
1. Neither could Heavenly Things have been made meet for us, or our use, nor we have been meet for their enjoyment, had they not been dedicated, and we been purged by the Sacrifice of Christ. There was no suitableness neither in them unto us, nor in us unto them, until it was introduced by the Blood of Christ. Without the Effiunclean and defiled unto them. Tit. 1. 15.
2. Every eternal Mercy, every spiritual Priviledge is both purchased for us, and sprinkled unto us, by the Blood of Christ.
3. There is such an Uncleanness in our Natures, our Persons, our Duties and Worship;
4. The Sacrifice of Christ is the one, only, everlasting fountain and spring of all Sanctification and sacred Dedication; whereby the whole new Creation is purified and dedicated unto God.
The Opposition between the High Priests of the Law, and their Sacrifices, with their Efficacy, and the Lord Christ with his Sacrifice and its Efficacy, is farther carried on in this verse. And this is done in an Instance of a Dissimil tude between them, as it was shewed in general before, in how many things they did agree. And this Dissimilitude consists in the place and manner of the Discharge of their Office, after the great Expiatory Sacrifice, which each of them did offer.
The Causal Connexion of the words doth also intimate, that a farther Evidence is given unto what was before laid down; namely, that Heavenly things were purified by the Blood of Christ. For as an Assurance thereof, upon the Dedi
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Syr.
into the House of the Sanctuary. Sancta; Sacrarium; Sanctuarium; Sancta Sanctorum; the most holy Place.
Manufacta; manibus extructa; built with hands.
Syriack,
which is the similitude of that which is true. Vul. Exemplaria verorum. Exemplar respondens veris illis. An example answering unto the true, a Resemblance of the True.
Syr.
before the face; faciei, vultui, conspectui; in the Presence.
For Christ is not entered into the Holy Places,(the Sanctuary)made with hands, the figures of the true; But into Heaven it self now to appear in the Presence of God for us.
There is in the words a Dissimilitude between the Lord Christ and the Priests of the Law, or an Opposition between what was done by the one and the other. And one Branch of the Antithesis, as unto Affirmation on the one hand, is includhe is not entered into the Holy Places made with hands, it is affirmed that the High Priest did so of Old, and no more.
In the words there is,
1. The Subject spoken of is Christ. Jesus, saith the Vulgar Latine. But all Greek Copies with the Syriack, have Christ. From the 15th. verse he had spoken indefinitely of the Mediator of the New Covenant, what he was to be, and what he had to do, whoever he were. This Mediator and the High Priest of the Church are one and the same. He makes Application of all he had said, unto one singular Person, Christ our High Priest.
That which in general is ascribed unto him, or spoken of him both negatively
Entrance; That which was the peculiar Dignity of the enter into the Holy Place, the Typical Representation of the Presence of God. Wherefore such an entrance must our High Priest have after he had offered himself once for all.
II. This entrance of our High Priest as unto the place whereinto he entred, is Negatively; not into the Holy Places made with hands. The place intended is the Sanctuary or most Holy Place in the Tabernacle. It is here expresPlural Number to answer the Hebrew
A Double Description is here given of this Place. (1) As unto its Nature; (2) As unto its Use.
1. As unto its Nature, it was made with hands; built by the hands of Men. The Heaven it self.
2. As unto the use of these Holies, they were that which is signified by the Type; and this Antitype. So is the word used by the Apostle Peter, 1 Pet. 3. 21. The Substance of what is typified. Sometimes it is used for Type and Resemblance of the thing signified. So is it here used, and well rendered Figures. And what the Apostle calls Similitudes, Resemblances of Heavenly things; As that Representation which they had and made of them, was a Transcript from the Original Pattern and Idea in the Mind of God, and shewed unto Moses in the Mount, they were
And they were thus Figures of the True; that is, the true Holies. True in these expressions is opposed unto Shadowing and Typical, not unto that which is false or Joh. 1. 17, 18. real, substantial, the things originally in all these Institutions.
This is a brief Description of the Place whereinto the High Priest under the Law did enter, wherein his great Priviledge did consist, and whereon the Efficacy of all his other Administrations did Depend. And it is described, (1) With respect unto its Institution, it was the most Holy Place, peculiarly dedicated unto the Reception of the especial Pledges of the Presence of God. (2) As unto its Fabrick; it was made with hands; though of an excellent structure, directed by God himself, and framed by his especial command; yet was it in its self no more but the work of Mens hands. (3) As unto its principal end and use; it was a figure and Resemblance of Heavenly things. All Gods Appointments in his service, have their proper seamade with mens hands, had so, whilst they had the force of a Divine Institution. To enter into the Presence of God represented by the Tyif the Lord Jesus Christ be the High Priest of the Church, hither or into this place he ought to have entered. I Answer, He ought indeed so to have done, if by his Sacrifice he had purified only earthly things. But whereas he had no such Design, nor were the temporal things of the whole Creation worth the Purification with one drop of his Blood, but they were things Spiritual and Heavenly that were purified by his Sacrifice, he was not to enter into the Holy Place made
with hands, the Figures of the same, but into Heaven it self.
In opposition unto what is denyed of him, and which is therein ascribed unto the High Priest of the Law; the place whereinto he did enter is called Heaven it self.
Entrance spoken of was Sacerdotal, not Triumphant and Regal, as I have elsewhere declared. And by this Heaven it self a peculiar place is intended. The Apostle hath in several places affirmed that in his Ascension he passed through the Heavens; and was made higher then the Heavens. Wherefore by this, Heaven it self, some place that is called so by the way of Eminency, is intended. This in the Scripture is sometimes called the Heaven of Heavens, and the third Heaven; The place of the peculiar Residence of the Presence, Majesty and Glory of God, and of his Throne; where all his Blessed Saints enjoy his Presence, and all his Holy Angels minister unto him. A Place above all these aspectable Heavens, the Heavens which we do behold.
The Entrance of Christ into Heaven as our High Priest, was into it as the TemThrone of Grace. For it is that which answers unto and was signified by the entrance of the High Priest into the most Holy Place in the Tabernacle. And there was nothing therein but the Ark and the Mercy-seat, with the Cherubims of Glory overshadowing them, which, as we have declared, was a Representation of a Throne of Grace. He enTriumphantly as it was the Palace of God, the Throne of the Great King, and sat down at the Right hand of the Majesty on high; But this he did with respect unto the Execution of his Kingly Office with Authority and PoHeaven it self wherein he now dischargeth them all, is proposed unto us, under divers Considerations, distinctly answering unto the work that the Lord Christ hath yet to perform therein. And this serves,
1. Unto the Direction and Encouragement of Faith. When we apply our selves unto Christ to seek for Aid for the subduing and destruction of our spiritual Adversaries, by his
2. This Representation is the spring of all Spiritual Consolation. God on a Throne of Grace, the Lord Christ before it in the Exercise of his office with Faithfulness, Compassion and Power, is the Spring and Center of all the Comforts of the Church.
Schlictingius affirms on this Place, that these things are spoken of Christ, only in a neat and handsom Metaphor under which he is compared unto the Priests of old. And the whole of his Discourse tends unto this, that it is a Comparison framed or coyned by the Apostle for the Illustration of what he intends. But this is not to intera fancied framed. Comparison that the Apostle insists on, but a Declaration of the Typical Significancy of legal Institutions; and his Purpose is to manifest the Accom
Lastly; The End of this Sacerdotal Entrance of Christ into Heaven is expressed; Now to appear in the Presence of God for us.
A farther Degree of Opposition between our High Priest and those of the Law, is expressed in these words. They entred into the Holy Place to appear for the PeoMaterial Ark and Mercy-Seat. In what is here ascribed unto Christ, there are many differences from what was so done by them.
1. In the Time of what he did or doth; Now: At this present Season and NOW is exHe now appeareth for us.
2. In the End of his Entrance into this Heavenly Sanctuary: to appear; Absolutely his Entrance into Heaven had other Ends, but this is the only End of his entring into Heaven as Gods Temple, the Seat of the Throne of Grace, as our High Priest. And the whole Discharge of the remaining Duties of his Sacerdotal Office are comprized in this word, as we shall immediately demonstrate.
3. In that he doth thus appear Vultui, Conspectui, Faciei
Dei; That is, the immediate Presence of God, in opposition unto the Typical Symbols of it in the Tabernacle, before which the High-Priest presented him
The High Priest appeared before the Ark, the Cherubims and Mercy-seat comappeared with Confidence and Bold
Lastly; This is said to be done For us. This referrs only to Appear;
The words being Opened, the Nature of the thing it self, namely of the present Appearance of Christ in Heaven, must be farther enquired into. And it may be declared in the ensuing Observations.
1. It is an Act of his Sacerdotal Office. Not only He who is our High Priest doth so appear, but he so doth as the High Priest of the Church. For such was the Duty of the High Priest under the Law, whereby it was typified and represented. His Entrance into the Holy Place and Presentation of himself before the Mercy-seat was in the discharge of his office, and he did it by Vertue thereof. And this is one principal Foundation of the Churches Comfort, namely that the present Appearance of Christ in the Presence of God, is a part of his Office, a Duty in the Dis
2. It is such an Act and Duty of our High Priest as supposeth the Offering of himself a Sacrifice for Sin, antecedent thereunto. For it was with the blood of the ex
3. It supposeth the Accomplishment of the Work of the Redemption of the Church. His words in this Appearance before God, are expressed, Joh. 17. 4. I have glorified thee on the Earth, I have finished the work thou gavest me to do; and now I come unto thee. He was sent of God into the World on this great Errand, for this great Work; and he returned not unto him, he appeared not in the Presence of
4. In this his Appearance he presents himself unto God as a Lamb that had been slain. Rev. 5. 6. He is now alive and lives for ever. But there must as unto EffiLamb slain and offered unto God. And this was to be so in Answer unto the blood of the Expiatory Sacrifice, which the High Priest carried into the Holy Place. For he was himself both the Priest and the Sacrifice, the Offerer and the Lamb. And as that Blood was sprinkled before the Ark and the Mercy-seat, to apply the Attonement made unto all the sacred pledges of Gods Presence and Good Will; so from this Representation of the Offering of Christ, of himself as a Lamb that had been slain, in this his Appearance before God, doth all the Application of its Benefits unto the Church proceed.
5. He thus appears for us. He is therein therefore the great Representative of the Church, or he represents the whole Church of his Redeemed, unto God.
for our Good. It is as it were the Appearance of an Advocate, a Law-Appearance in the behalf of others. So is it declared 1 Joh. 2. 1, 2. He will at the end of all present his whole Church unto God, with the whole work of his Love and Grace accomplished towards them. He first so preEph. 5. 26, 27. Now he presents them as the Portion given unto him of God out of fallen Mankind to be Redeemed and Saved; saying, behold I and the children which thou gavest me; thine they were and thou gavest them to me. I present them unto thy Love and Care, holy Father, that they may enjoy all the fruits of thine Eternal Love, all the Benefits of my Death and Sacrifice.
6. This is the great Testimony of the Continuation of his Love, Care and ComAppearance in the presence of God for us.
7. This also comprizeth his being an Advocate. He is hereby in a continual readiness to plead our Cause against all Accusations, which is the especial Nature of his work as an Advocate; which is distinct from his Intercession, whereby he procures supplies of Grace and Mercy for us.
8. This Account of the Appearance of Christ before God on the Throne of Grace, gives direction into a right Apprehension of the way of the Dispensation of all saving Grace and Mercy unto the Church. The Spring and Fountain of it is God himself, not absolutely considered, but as a on Throne of Grace. Goodness, Grace, Love and Mercy are natural unto him; but so also are Righteousness and Judgment. That he should be on a Throne of Grace is an Act of his Soveraign Will and Pleasure, which is the original Spring of the Dispensation of all Grace unto the Church. The procuring Cause of all Grace and Mercy for the Church, as issuing from this Throne of Grace, is the Sacrifice of Christ, whereby Attonement was made for Sin, and all Heavenly things purifyed unto their proper End. Hence he is continually reLamb that had been slain. The ActuAppearance before God, and the Intercession wherewith it is accompanied.
Schlictingius grants on the place, that Christ doth indeed Solicitously take care of the Salvation of the Church; but yet God, saith he, doth grant it of meer Mercy without any regard unto Satisfaction or Merit; which, saith he,
But to declare their Apprehension of these things, the same Author adds; Porro in Pontifice legali, apparitio distincta erat ab oblatione, licet utra
1. It is not true that the Oblation or Offering of the Sacrifice, by the High Priest and his Appearance in the Holy Place was at the same time. For he offered his Sacrifice at the Altar without, and afterwards entred with the blood into the Holy Place. 2. He grants that the Blood of the Sacrifice was offered; but will not allow that the Blood of Christ was offered at all, nor that Christ offered himself before he had laid aside both
This Continual Appearance of the Lord Christ for us, as our High Priest in the Presence of God, in the way explained, is the Foundation of the Safety of the Church in all Ages; and that whereon all our Consolation doth depend; whence Relief is derived by Faith on all occasions. The Consideration hereof being right
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Syr.
and not also; neque, neither; nor yet.
Syr.
his Soul; He made his Soul an offering for Sin. Syr.
many times.
Syr.
in or with Blood that was not his own properly, Heb.
other blood, or the blood of another.
Nor yet that he should offer himself often as the High Priest entreth into the Holy-Place every year with the blood of others.
In the foregoing verse there is an Opposition in the Comparison between the Lord Christ, and the High Priest of the Law; yet is it such as hath its Foundation in a Similitude that is between them; and therefore respects not so much the things themselves opposed, as the manner of them. For as the Lord Christ entred not into the Holy Place made with hands, but into Heaven it self; So the High Priest had an entrance also, yet not into Heaven, but into that other Holy Place. But in this verse there is an opposition in the Comparison that hath no Foundation in any similitude between them, and that is absolutely denyed of Christ which belonged essentially unto the Discharge of the Office of the High Priest of Old. Many things ensued on the Weakness and Imperfection of the Types, which would not allow that there should be a perfect compleat Resemblance in them of the Substance it self, that all things between them exactly should answer unto One another. Hence they did at best but obscurely represent the good things to come, and in some things it was not possi
The Assertion in these Words proceeds on a Supposition of the Duty of the High Priest, which had that Reason for it, as that it was absolutely necessary that our High Priest should not do after the same manner. The High Priest ended not his
Type, might be expected from Christ also; namely, that whereas he offered himself unto God through the Eternal Spirit, and afterwards entred into the Holy Place or Heaven it self, he should offer himself again, and so have another entrance into the Presence of God. This the Apostle denies him to have done, and in the next verse gives a demonstration, proving it was impossible he should so do. And hereof he gives the Reason both in the remaining verses of this Chapter and the beginning of the next. The Repetition of the annual Sacrifices under the Law was mainly from hence, because they were not able perfectly to effect that which they did signifie; But the One Sacrifice of Christ did at once perfectly accomplish what they did represent. Herein therefore of necessity there was to be a difference, a Dissimilitude, an Opposition between what those High Priests did as unto the Repetition of Sacrifices, and what was done by our High Priest, which is expressed in this verse.
The Introduction of the Apostles Assertion is by the disjunctive Negative,
nor yet; It answers the Negative in the first part of the preceding verse. He entred not into the Holy Place made with hands as the High Priest; nor yet to do what the High Priest did afterwards.
In the words themselves there are two things. (1) What is denyed of the Lord Christ. (2) The Limitation of that Denial unto the other part of the Comparison as unto what the High Priest did.
1. It is denied of him that he did thus enter into Heaven that he should offer himthat because as an High Priest he entred into Heaven, as the High Priests of the Law entred into the Holy Place made with hands, that he should therefore offer himself often, as that High Priest offered every year. It was not required of him, there was no need of it for the Reasons mentioned, it was impossible he should. For this
The Socinians plead from hence that the Sacrifice of Christ, or his offering of himAppearance in Heaven, and the Presentation of himself in the Presence of God; and they do it out of Hatred unto the Attonement made by his Blood. For, say they, it is here compared unto the entrance of the High Priest into the Holy Place every year; which was only an Appearance in the Presence of God.
Answ. 1. There is no such Comparison intended in the words. The Apostle mentioning the entrance of the High Priest with Blood into the Holy Place, intends only to evince the Imperfection of that Service, in that after he had done so, he was again to offer renewed Sacrifices every year, a sufficient Evidence that those SaComparison beOpposition between their Effects.
2. It is granted that the entrance of the High Priest into the Holy Place, belongComparison in the words and no further.
3. That the Sacrifice of Christ or his offering himself once for all, once and not often, is the same with his continual Presentation of himself in the Presence of God, is both false in it self, and contrary to the express design of the Apostle. For
(1) It is slain or bloody Sacrifice, whereof he treats, as he expresly calls it, ver. 25, 26. But there is no shedding of blood in the Appearance of Christ in Heaven; nor, according to these men, any such thing appertaining unto his Nature.
distinguished in the Scripture from their different Natures and Effects. 1 Joh. 2. 1, 2.
(3) His Sacrifice or the offering of himself, is so affirmed to be one, as to conOne individual Act. It is not only said that it was one Offering, but that it was once only offered, ver. 26, 28. This is no way reconcileable unto his continual Appearance in the presence of God.
(4) His Offering is mentioned by the Apostle as that which was then past, and no more to be repeated. He hath by one Offering perfected them that are Sanctified.
(5) His Oblation was accompanied with, and inseparable from suffering; So he declares in the next verse; proving that he could not often offer himself, beactual Suffering, but also with any obnoxiousness thereunto. It belongs unto his state of Exaltation and Glory.
(6) The time of the offering himself is limited unto the End of the World; now once in the end of the World; in opposition unto the Season that passed before; denoting a certain determinate Season in the dispensation of times; of which afterwards.
(7) This Imagination is destructive of the principal design and Argument of the Apostle. For he proves the Imperfection of the Sacrifices of the Law, and their insufficiency to consummate the Church, from their annual Repetition; affirming that if they could have perfected the Worshippers, they would have ceased to have been offered. Yet was that Sacrifice, which he respects, repeated only once a year. But, on this Supposition, the Sacrifice of Christ must be offered always, and never cease to be actually offered, which reflects a greater Imperfection on it, then was on those which were repeated only once a year. But the Apostle expresly affirms that the Sacrifice, which could effect its End, must cease to be offered; Chap. 10. 2. Whereas therefore by One offering he hath for ever perfected them that are Sanctified; he doth not continue to offer himself; though he doth so, to appear in the Pre
The Expositors of the Roman Church do raise an Objection on this place, for no other End, but that they may return an Answer unto it, perniciously opposite unthat if Christ cease to offer himself, then it seems that his Sacerdotal Office ceaseth also. For it belongs unto that office to offer Sacrifices continually. But there is no force in this Objection. For it belongs to no Priest to offer any other, or any more Sacriactually repeated, yet it is
It is better never to raise Objections then thus to answer them. For this is not to expound the words, but to dispute against the Doctrine of the Apostle; As I shall briefly evince.
1. That the Lord Christ hath by the One offering of himself for ever perfected them that are Sanctified, is a Fundamental Article of Faith. Where this is denied, or overthrown, either directly or by just Consequence, the Church is overthrown also. But this is expresly denied in the Doctrine of the frequent Repetition of his Sacrifice, or of the offering of himself. And there is no Instance, wherein the Romanists do more expresly oppose the Fundamental Articles of Religion.
2. The Repetition of Sacrifices arose solely from their Imperfection, as the ApoChap. 10. 2. And if it undeniably proved an Imperfection in the Saonce every year in one place only; how
it be repeated every day, and that, it may be, in a thousand Places?
3. To say that Christ offereth himself often, is expresly and in Terms contradictooffering of him by their Priests, yet most certain it is, that he doth not every day offer himself. But as the Faith of the Church is concerned in no offering of Christ but that which he offered himself, of himself, by the eternal Spirit once for all; so the pretence to offer him often by the Priests is highly Sacrilegious.
4. The infinite actings of the Divine Nature in Supporting and Influencing of the Humane, the inexpressible Operation of the Holy Ghost in him, unto such a peoffering of himself a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling Savour unto God. And how can a poor sinful Mortal man, such as are the best of their Priests; pretend to offer the same Sacrifice unto God?
5. An unbloody Sacrifice, is, (1) A Contradiction in it self. victimae mactatio, as well as victimae mactatae oblatio. It is a Sacrifice by death, and that by blood-shedding; other
To sum up the substance of this whole Controversie; The Sacrifice or Offering of Christ, was (1) By Himself alone through the eternal Spirit. (2) Was of his whole Humane Nature as to the matter of it. He made his Soul an offering for Sin. (3) Was by Death and Bloodshedding, whereon its entire Efficacy as unto Attoneonce only offered, and could be so no more from the Glory of his Person, and the Nature of the Sacrifice it self. (5) Was offered with such glorious internal actings of Grace, as no Mortal creature can comprehend. (6) Was accompanied with his bearing the Curse of the Law, and the Punishment due unto our Sins; which were taken away thereby. And in all this the Humane Nature was supported, sustained and acted by the Divine in the same Person, which gave the whole Duty its EfficaOffered by Priests without Him, or those which call themselves so; who therefore rather represent them by whom he was Crucified, then himself who offered himself alone. (2.) Is only of Bread and Wine, which have nothing in them of the Soul of Christ, allowing their Transubstantiation. (3.) Can have no Influence into the Remission of Sins, being confessedly
1. Such is the absolute Perfection of the One offering of Christ, that it stands in need of, that it will admit of no Repetition in any kind. Hence the Apostle affirms that if it be despised or neglected, there remains no more sacrifice for Sin. There is none of any other kind, nor any Repetition to be made of it self; as there was of the most solemn legal Sacrifices. Neither of them are consistent with its perfection. And this absolute Perfection of the One offering of Christ ariseth, (1) From the Dignity of his Person, Acts 20. 28. There needs no new offering after that, whereNature of the Sacrifice it self; 1. In the internal gracious actings of his Soul; He offered himself unto God through the eternal Spirit. Grace and Obedience could never be more glorified. 2. In the
2. This one offering of Christ is always effectual unto all the Ends of it, even no less then it was in the day and hour when it was actually offered. Therefore it needs no Repetition like those of old, which could affect the Conscience of a sinner only for a season, and until the Incursion of some new sin. This is always fresh in the Ver
3. The great Call and Direction of the Gospel is to guide Faith, and keep it up unto this One offering of Christ, as the spring of all Grace and Mercy. This is the imme
But we must proceed to a brief Exposition of the remainder of this Verse. The One offering of Christ is not here proposed absolutely, but in Opposition unto the High Priest of the Law, whose entrance into the Holy Place did not put an end unto his offering of Sacrifices, but his whole Service about them was to be annually repeated. This Sacrifice of the High Priest we have treated of before, and shall therefore now only open these words wherein it is expressed.
1. The Person spoken of is the High Priest; that is, any One, every One that As the High Priest; in like manner so he did.
2. It is affirmed of him, that he entreth, in the present Tense. Some think that entreth, that is, he continueth so to do. And this the Apostle sometimes admits of, as
3. This Entrance is limited unto the Holy Place. The most Holy Place in the
4. There is the Season of their Entrance; yearly. Once in an annual Rethe tenth day of the Month Tisri or our September.
5. The Manner of his entrance was, with the blood of others; Blood that was not Syriack expresseth it. The Blood of the Sacrifice of Christ was his own. He redeemed the Church, Acts 20. 28. Hereunto the Blood of others; that is, the blood
in for cum, say most Expositors, which is not unusual. See 1 Joh. 5. 6. Gen. 32. 10. Hos. 4. 3. The meaning is, by vertue of the Blood of others, which he carried with him into the Holy Place.
That which is denied of Christ the Antitype is the Repetition of this Service, and that because of the Perfection of his Sacrifice, the other being repeated because of their Imperfection. And we may observe, that
Whatever had the greatest Glory in the Old Legal Institutions, carried along with it the evidence of its own Imperfection, compared with the thing signified in Christ and his Office. The Entrance of the High Priest into the Holy Place, was the most gloriannual Repetition of it was a sufficient Evi
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Causal; quia, quandoquidem, quoniam. But it is generally rendred in this Place by all Expositors, alioqui; by Concession; if it were so that he would offer, offer himself; for otherwise,
Syr.
He would have been a Debter; it would have been due from him. Oportebat, oportuisset; He ought.
frequenter pati. Others, saepe, saepius passum fuisse; to have suffered often, more often, frequently; that is, once every year. Syriack,
many times, and not once only. ab origine mundi; Others, à condito mundo; from the Foundation of the world; that is, after the entrance of Sin. Syr.
in the end of the World. Vul. in consummatione seculorum; sub consummationem seculorum; towards the Consummation of all things. In the fulness of Time.
For then(if otherwise)must he(he ought)often(to)have suffered since(from)the Foundation of the World: But now once in the End of the World(in the Consummation of times)hath he appeared,(been made manifest)to put away(to abolish, or for the Destruction of)Sin, by the Sacrifice of himself.
There are sundry Difficulties in these words, both as to the Signification and ConReader. But I shall only give that Account of the whole, and the several Parts of it, which according unto the best of my understanding doth represent the mind of the Holy Ghost with perspicuity and clearness.
There are two Parts of the Words.
(1.) A Reason confirming the foregoing Assertion, that Christ was not often to offer himself, as the High Priest did offer Sacrifice every year when he entred into the Holy Place. For then must he &c.
(2.) A Confirmation of that Reason from the Nature and End of the Sacrifice of Christ, as stated in matter of Fact according unto the Appointment of God. But now once in the End; &c.
first, we may consider (1) The note of Connexion, and of the Introduction of the
1. The Note of Connexion is for then: If it were so; alioquin. Either way the intention of the Apostle is expressed, which is to confirm what he had before affirmed by the Introduction of a new Reason of it.
2. From a Supposition of the contrary unto what he had affirmed, the Apostle proves not only the Truth, but the necessity of his Assertion.
For then; (1) He must, He ought; he would have been a Debtor, as the Syriack
(2.) That which he ought so to have done is to suffer in the offering of himself. Chap. 5. 8. But the suffering here inactual Sacrifice, or the immactation of himself; to have died, to have shed his blood, to have underwent the Pe
(3) Often; frequently; as the High Priest offered Sacrifice of Old; once every year.
(4.) Since, or rather, from the Foundation of the World. This expression is somabsolutely for the Original of the World in its Creation; For the absoEph. 1. 4. Mat. 25. 34. Joh. 17. 24. 1 Pet. 1. 20. Sometimes from what immediately succeeded on that beMat. 13. 35. Luk. 11. 5. Heb. 4. 3. Rev. 13. 8. And it is in the latter sense, that it is here used. From the Foundation of the World, that is, from the first entrance of Sin into the World, and the giving of the first Promise, which was imSo God spake by the Mouth of his Holy Prophets, since the World began. Luk. 1. 71. that is, the first ReMessia, with all that succeeded. So Christ is said to be a Lamb slain from the Foundation of the World, Rev. 13. 8. beFoundation of the World absolutely is in its Creation. Before the Foundation of the World, is an expression of Eternity, and the Counsels of God therein.
3. The third thing considerable in the Words is the Nature and Force of the Arcogent Topicks. For it is founded on these evident suppositions.
1st. That the Suffering and Offering of Christ are inseparable. For although abstracted from the present Subject Matter,
And herein doth the force of the Argument principally consist. For he proves that Christ did not, nor could offer himself often, not absolutely as though the Reiteration of any kind of Oblation were impossible, but from the
But the Argument of the Apostle against the Repetition of the Sacrifice of Christ, from the necessity of his suffering therein, is full of Light and Evidence; For
1. It was inconsistent with the Wisdom, Goodness, Grace and Love of God, that Christ should often suffer in that way which was necessary unto the offering of himself, namely, by his Death and Bloodshedding. It was not consistent with the Wisdom of God to provide that as the ultimate and only effectual Means of the Expiation of Sin, which was insufficient for it; For so it would have been, if the Repetition of it had been necessary. Nor was it so with his unspeakable love unto his Son, namely, that he should frequently suffer an ignominious and cursed death. It is the Eternal Obonce. Had it been done often, who could have understood the Love of the Father unto the Son, and not rather have conceived that he regarded him not in comparison of the Church? Whereas indeed his Love to him, is greater than that unto all others, and the Cause of it. And moreover it would have been highly dishonourable unto the Son of God, giving an Appearance that his Blood was of no more Value or Excellency then the blood of Beasts, the Sacrifice whereof was often repeated.
2. It was impossible from the Dignity of his Person. Such a Repetition of Suffering was not consistent with the Glory of his Person, especially as it was necessary to be demonstrated unto the Salvation of the Church. That he once emptied himself and made himself of no Reputation that he might be obedient unto the Death, the Death of the Cross, proved a stumbling block unto the unbelieving Jews and Gentiles. The Faith of the Church was secured by the Evident Demonstration of his Divine Glofrequent Repetition hereof would have been utterly inconsistent with the Dignity of his Divine Person, so the most raised Faith could never have attained a prospect of his Glory.
3. It was altogether needless, and would have been useless. For, as the Apostle Demonstrates, by One offering of himself and that once offered, he took away sin, and for ever perfected them that are Sanctified.
Wherefore the Argument of the Apostle is firm on this Supposition, that if he were often to offer himself, then was he often to suffer also. But that he should so do, was as inconsistent with the Wisdom of God, and the Dignity of his own Person, as altogether needless as unto the End of his Offering. And
As the sufferings of Christ were necessary unto the Expiation of Sin, so he suffered neither more, nor oftener then was necessary.
2dly. The Argument is also built on another Supposition; namely, that there was a necessity of the Expiation of the Sin of all that were to be saved from the Foundation of the World. For otherwise it might be objected, that there was no need at all that Christ should either offer or suffer before he did so, and that now it may be yet necessary that he should often offer himself, seeing that all Sins before were either punished absolutely, or their sins were
The assured Salvation of the Church of Old from the Foundation of the World by Vertue of the one offering of Christ, is a strong Confirmation of the Faith of the Church, at present to look for and expect everlasting Salvation thereby. To this End we may consider,
First, That their Faith had all the Difficulties to conflict withal, that our Faith is to be exercised with; and yet it carried them through them all and was Victorious. This Argument, for the strengthening of our Faith, the Apostle insists upon in the whole
Secondly, They wanted many Advantages of Faith and Holiness which we enjoy. For (1) They had not a clear Revelation of the Nature of Gods way of Salvation. This is that which gives Life and Vigour unto Gospel-Faith. Yet did they follow God through the dark Representation of his Mind and Grace unto the eternal Enjoywilfully neglect so great Salvation. (2) They had not such plentiful Communications of the Holy Spirit, as are granted under the Gospel. But being Faithful in that little which they received, they misthat Light, those Directions for the actings of Faith unto Consolation and Assurance, with many more Advantages unOne offering of Christ, they were all pardoned and
The latter Part of this Verse contains the Confirmation of the Argument proposed in the former. And it consists in a Declaration of the true State, Nature, Efficacy and Circumstances of the One offering of Christ now accomplished according unto the Will of God.
There are three things in the Words, (1) An Opposition unto, or a Rejection of the Supposition of Christs offering himself often since the Foundation of the World. (2) An Assertion of the Use, End and Efficacy of that Offering; manifesting the Uselessness of its Repetition. (3) The means of accomplishing that End, or whereoffer himself.
1. The Opposition unto the rejected Supposition is in these Words; but now once in the End of the World. And every word hath its distinct force in the Oppo
1. As unto the Time in general: But now:
now generally is a limitation of time unto the present season; opposed to then. But sometimes it is only a Note of Opposition when joyned with but, as in this place. It may be taken in either sense or include both In the latter, But now, is no more, but it is not so, it is otherwise, and so declared to be; he did not offer himself often since the World began. A Limitation of Time may also be included in it. Now, at this time and
season, it is declared that things are otherwise ordered and disposed. This makes the Opposition more Emphatical. Now it is, and now only, that Christ hath suffered, and not before.
2. He did this once;
often. The Apostle ver. 28; Chap. 10. 2. So 1 Pet. 3. 18. So he doth once for all, Chap. 10. 10. He hereby confines our thoughts about the offering of Christ unto that Time and Action wherein he offered himself unto God in his death. He speaks of it as a thing once performed and then past, which cannot be referred unto the continual Presentation of himself in Heaven. Thus it is, saith he, in matter of fact, he hath not often but once only offered himself.
3. He confirms his Opposition unto the reiterated supposition, by an especial Denotation
There is no Question as unto the thing it self, or the Time intended in this ExTime when our Lord Jesus Christ appeared in the flesh, and offered himself unto God. But why he should express that time, by the End of the world, in the words that our Saviour designeth the End of the world absolutely by, Mat. 28. 20. is not so plain. For there was after this a long continuance and du
Various are the Conjectures of Learned Men, about this Expression; I shall not detain the Reader with their Repetition. My thoughts are determined by what I have discoursed on Chap. 1. 1. the Exposition of which place the Reader may conshort Account of what more largely I have explained and fully confirmed in the place referred unto; Hebrew
world, not absolutely with respect unto its Essence or substance, but its duration and the Succession of Ages therein, is signified by them. And the Succession of the Times of the world, is considered unto Gods Distinction and Limitation of things in his dealing with the Church, called Eph. 1. 10. And Gods Distinction of Time with respect unto the Dispensation of himself in his Grace to the Church may be referred unto
With respect unto this season so stated, three things are affirmed of Christ in the following words; (1.) What he did; He appeared. (2.) Unto what end; to take away sin. (3.) By what means, by the Sacrifice of himself.
But there is some Difficulty in the Distinction of these words, and so variety in
Interpretation, which must be removed. For those words by the Sacrifice of himself, may be referred either unto the putting away of sin, that goes before; or unto
1. There is what he did. He appeared. He was manifested; some say that this
Appearance of Christ is the same with his Appearance in the Presence of God for us, mentioned in the foregoing verse. But it is as another word that is used, so anoafter his Sacrifice, this is in orin Heaven, this was on Earth. That is still continued, this is that which was already accomplished, at the Time limited by the Apostle.
Wherefore this Appearance, this or manifestation of Christ in the end of the world, is the same with his being manifested in the flesh, 1 Tim. 3. 16; or his comAbraham, to this End, that he might suffer and offer himself unto God. For what is affirmed is opposed unto what is spoken immediately before, namely of his suffering often since the Foundation of the world. This he did not do, but appeared, was manifest, that is, in the flesh, in the Ends of the world, to suffer and to expiate sin. Nor is the Word ever used to express the Appearance of Christ before God in Heaven. His
coming into the world by his Incarnation unto the Discharge of his Office. His Appearance before God in Heaven, is his
2. The End of this Appearance of Christ, was to put away sin. And we must sin, and what by the putting of it away. Wherefore by sin the Apostle intends the whole of its Nature and Effects, in its Root and Fruits, in its Guilt, Power, and Punishment; Sin Absolutely and Universally; Sin as it was an Apostacy from God, as it was the Cause of all Distance between God and us, as it was the work of the Devil; Sin in all that it was, and all that it could effect, or all the Consequents of it; Sin in its whole Empire and Dominion; as it entred by the fall of Adam, invaded our Nature in its Power, oppressed our PerCurse of God and Eternal punishment. In the whole Extent of sin, he appeared to put it away, that is, with respect unto the Church, that is sanctified by his Blood, and dedicated unto God.
putting away, is Abrogatio, Dissolutio, Destructio; An Abrogation, Disanulling, Destroying, Disarming. It is the Name of taking away the Force, Power, and Obligation of a Law. The Power of Sin, as unto all its Effects and Consequents whether sinfull or Penal, is called its Law; the Law of Sin, Rom. 8. 2. And of this Law as of others, there are two Parts or Powers. (1.) Its Obligation unto punishment after the nature of all Penal Laws; Hence it is called the Law of Death, that whereon sinners are bound over unto Eternal Death. This force it borrows from its Relation unto the Law of God and the curse thereof. (2.) Its impelling Ruling Power, subjectively in the mindes of men, leading them Captive into all enmity and disobedience unto God, Rom. 7. 23. Christ appeared to abrogate this Law of sin, to deprive it of its whole power, (1.) That it should not condemn us any more, nor bind us over to punishment. This he did by making Attonement for it, by the Expiation of it, undergoing in his own suffering the penalty due unto it, which of necessity he was to suffer, as often as he offered himself. Herein consisted the
By the destruction of its subjective Power, purging our Consciences from dead works, in the way that hath been declared. This was the principal end of the ApJoh. 3. 8.
3. The way whereby he did this was by the Sacrifice of himself;
Sacrifice wherein he both suffered and offered himself unto God. For that both are included, the opposition made unto his often suffering doth evince.
This therefore is the design and meaning of these words, to evidence that Christ did not offer himself unto God often, more then once, as the High-Priest offered every year before his entrance into the Holy place; the Apostle declares the End and Effect of his offering or Sacrifice which render the Repetition of it needless. It was one, once offered, in the end of the world, nor need be offered any more, beTotal abolition and destruction of sin at once made thereby. What else concerns the things themselves spoken of will be comprized under the ensuing observations
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
& sicut, & quem admodum.
Statutum, constitutum est.
Syr.
to the Sons of men; of Adam, all his Posterity.
Syr.
that at one time; a certain appointed time.
post hoc autem. Postea verò; and afterward, Syr.
and after their death, the death of them.
So also Christ Syr.
one time; at one time,
ad exhaurienda peccata; Rhem. to exhaust the sins of many; without any sense. to lift or bear up; not at all to draw out of any deep place, though there may be something in that allusion. Syr.
and in himself he slew or sacrificed the sins of many; in himself, that is, by the Sacrifice of himself he took them away. Bez. ut in seipso attolleret multorum peccata; that he might lift or bear up the sins of many in himself; he took them upon himself as a Burden which he bare upon the Cross, as opposed to not burdened with sin. Others, ad attollendum peccata multorum in semet ipsum; to take up unto himself (that is, upon himself) the sins of many.
The Syriack reads the last He shall appear the second time unto the Salvation of them that expect or look for him. All others;
And(in like manner)as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this(afterwards)the judgment: So also Christ was once offered to bear(in himself)the sin of many, and unto them that look for him, shall he appear the second time, without Sin unto Salvation.
These verses put a close unto the Heavenly Discourse of the Apostle, concerning the Causes, Nature, Ends and Efficacy of the Sacrifice of Christ, wherewith the new Covenant was dedicated and confirmed. And in the words there is a treble Confirmation of that Singularity and Efficacy of the Sacrifice of Christ, which he had pleaded before.
1. In an Elegant instructive Similitude; And as it is appointed, ver. 27.
2. In a declaration of the use and end of the Offering of Christ; he was once offered to bear the Sins of many.
3. In the consequent of it; his second Appearance, unto the Salvation of Believers; ver. 28.
In the comparison, we must first consider the force of it in general, and explain the words.
That (as we have observed) which the Apostle designeth to confirm and illustrate, is what he had pleaded in the foregoing verses, concerning the
But there is more in the words and design of the Apostle than a bare Similitude and illustration of what he treats of, though Expositors own it not. He doth not only illustrate his former Assertion by a fit comparison, but gives the Reason of the one offering of Christ from what it was necessary for and designed unto. For that he introduceth a Reason of his former Assertion, the Causal connexion
in quantum, inasmuch as; in which sense he constantly useth that expression; chap. 3. 3. chap. 7. 20. chap. 8. 6. And in as much as it was so with mankind, it was necessary that Christ should suffer once for the expiation of Sin, and the Salvation of Sinners. How was it with mankind in this matter? On the account of sin they were all subject unto the Law and the curse thereof. Hereof there were two parts; (1) Temporal Death to be underEternal judgment wherein they were to perish for evermore. In these things consist the effects of sin, and the curse of the Law. And they were due unto all men unavoidably to be inficted on them by the judgment and sentence of God. It is appointed, decreed, determined of God, that men, sinful men shall once die, and after that come to judgment for their Sins. This is the sense, the sentence, the substance of the Law. Under this Sentence they must all perish eternally, if not Divinely relieved. But inasmuch as it was thus with them, the one offering of Christ, once offered is prepared for their Relief and delirelief is in the infinite Wisdom of God eminently proportionate unto the evil, the remedy unto the disease. For
1. As man was to dye once legally and penally for sin by the sentence of the Law, and no more; So Christ died, suffered, and offered once and no more, to bear Sin, to expiate it, and thereby to take away death so far as it was penal.
2. As after death men must appear again the second time unto judgement, to unafter his once offering to take away Sin and Death, Christ shall appear the second time to free us from judgement, and to bestow on us eternal Salvation.
In this interpretation of the words I do not exclude the use of the comparison, nor the design of the Apostle to illustrate the one offering of Christ once offered by the certainty of the death of men once onely; for these things do illustrate one another as so compared. But withal I judge there is more in them than a meer comparison between things no way related one to another, but onely have some mutual resemblance in that they fall out but
And this is the proper sense of in quantum, which Interpreters know not what to make of in this place, but endeavour variously to change and alter. Some pretend that some Copies read Reason why the word is not liked, is because the sense is not understood. Take the mind of the Apostle aright, and his expression is proentire opposition and comparison between the Law and the Gospel; the Curse due to Sin, and the Redemption that is by Christ Jesus. And we may observe; That
God hath eminently suited our Relief, the means and causes of our spiritual Deliverance, unto our Misery, the means and causes of it, as that his own Wisdom and Grace may be exalted and our faith established. That which is here summarily represented by our Apostle in this Elegant
But we proceed with the interpretation of the words. In the first part of the Antithesis and comparison, ver. 27. there are three things asserted. (1) The Death
of men, (2) The judgment that ensues, and (3.) The cause of them both. The last is first to be explained.
It is Appointed, Determined, Enacted, statutum est. It is so by him who hath a unalterable Law, which none can transgress. God himself hath thus appointed it; none else can determine and dispose of these things. And the word equally respects both parts of the Assertion, Death and Judgment. They are both equally from the constitution of God, which is the cause of them both.
The Socinians do so divide these things, that one of them, namely Death, they would have to be natural; and the other or judgment, from the constitution of God; which is not to interpret, but to contradict the words. Yea, death is that which in the first place and directly is affirmed to be the effect of this Divine Constitution, bePenal, by the curse of the Law for sin; and judgment falls under the same constitution, as consequential thereunto. But if death as they plead, be meerly and only natural, they cannot refer it unto the same Divine Constitution with the future judgment, which is natural in no sense at all.
Death was so far natural from the beginning, as that the frame and constitution of our nature were in themselves liable and subject thereunto. But that it should actually have invaded our nature unto its dissolution, without the intervention of its meritorious Cause in Sin, is contrary unto the Original state of our Relation unto God, the nature of the Covenant whereby we were obliged unto Obedience, the Reward promised therein, with the threatning of Death in case of disobedience. Wherefore the Law, Statute, or Constitution here related unto, is no other but that of, Gen. 2. 17. In the day thou eatest thereof, thou shalt surely dye; with that addition, dust thou art, and unto dust thou shalt return, Chap. 3. 19. God enacted it as an everlasting Law concerning Adam and all his Posterity, that they should dye; and that once, as they were once taken out of the Dust. But in the words of God before mentioned, there are two things, (1.) A penal Law enacted, Gen. 3. 17. (2.) A judicial sentence denounced,
Thus it is appointed to men; that is, to all men, or men indefinitely without exceptias men, but as sinners, as sinful men. For it is of sin and the effects of it, with their removal by Christ, that the Apostle discourseth.
It is appointed unto them to dye; that is, penally for sin, as Death was threatned Penal statute, mentioned in the curse of the Law; And death under that consideration alone, is taken away by the death of Christ. The sentence of dying naturally is continued towards all; but the moral nature of dying with the conseabsolutely reversed; but what was formally penal in it is taken away. Observe,
1. Death in the first constitution of it was penal. And the entrance of it as a penalty keeps the fear of it in all living. Yea, it was by the Law
2. It is still penal, Eternally penal, unto all unbelievers. But there are false notions of it amongst men as there are of all other things. Some are afraid of it when the penalty is separated from it. Some on the other hand, look on it as a Relief and so either seek it or desire it; unto whom it will prove only an entrance unto judgment. It is the interest of all living to enquire diligently what death will be unto them.
3. The death of all is equally determined and certain in Gods constitution. It hath various wayes of approach unto all individuals. Hence is it generally looked on as an accident befalling this or that man. But the Law concerning it is general and equal.
The Second part of the Assertion is; that after this is the judgment. This by the same Divine unalterable constitution is appointed unto all. God hath appointed a day wherein he will judge the world in Righteousness. Death makes an not end of men as some think, others hope, and many would desire it should: Ipsa mors nihil & post mortem nihil: But there is something yet remaining which death is subservient unafter this. As surely as men dye, it is sure that somewhat
after doth not denote the immediate succession of one thing unto another; if one go before, and the other certainly follow after, what ever length of time be interposed between them, the Assertion is true and proper. Many have been long dead, probably the most that shall dye, and yet judgment is not come after. But it shall come in its appointed season; and so as that nothing shall interpose bedeath leaves men, so shall judgment find them.
The second part of this penal constitution is judgment, after death judgment. It particular judgment on every individual person immediately on his death, although such a judgment there be, For in and by death there is a declaration made concerning the eternal condition of the deceased; But judgment here is opposed unto the second appearance of Christ unto the Salvation of believers, which is the great or general judgment of all at the last day. condemnatory sentence only; the resurrection of or unto judgment, is opposed unto the resurrection of or
This verse gives us the Relief provided, in the wisdom and Grace of God for and from this condition. And there is in the words (1.) The Redditive note of comparison and opposition; So (2.) The subject spoken of; the offering of Christ. (3.) The End of it, to bear the sin of many. (4) The consequent of it, which must be spoken to distinctly.
1. The Redditive note is So, in like manner, in answer unto that state of things blessed condecency unto Divine wisdom, goodness and Grace.
The Subject spoken of is the offering of Christ. But it is here mentioned passively;
The circumstance of his being thus offered, is that it was once only. This joynpreter tense, can signify nothing but an action or passion then past and determin'd. It is not any present continued action such as is the presentation of himself in heaven, that can be signified hereby.
3. The end of Christs being thus once offered and which his one offering did perbear the sins of many. There is an Antithesis between of many, and unto men in the verse foregoing. Men, expressed indefinitely in that necessary proposition, intends
He was thus offered for those many, to bear their sins, as we render the words. It is variously translated as we have seen before, and various senses are sought after by Expositors. Grotius wholly follows the Socinians in their endeavours to pervert the sense of this word. It is not from any difficulty in the word, but from mens hatred unto the Truth, that they put themselves on such endeavours. And this whole attempt lies in finding out one or two places where
Moreover, where-ever in the Old Testament Numb. 14. 33. Isai. 53. 12. or by bear the punishment of it. Yea, it doth so when with respect unto the Event, it is rendred by Levit. 10. 17. And the proper signification of the word is to be taken from the
The ground of the Expiation of Sin by the offering of Christ is this, that therein he bare the Guilt and Punishment due unto it.
Upon this offering of Christ the Apostle supposeth what he had before declared,
that he entred into heaven to appear in the presence of God for us; And hereon he declares, what is the end of all this dispensation of Gods Grace. Unto them that look for him, he shall appear the second time without sin unto Salvation. And he shews, (1) What de facto Christ shall yet do; He shall appear; (2) To whom he shall so appear; Unto them that look for him; (3) In what manner; Without sin. (4) Unto what end; Unto Salvation. (5) In what order; the second time.
The last thing mentioned is first expressed; and must first be explained. The second
2. That which he affirms of him is, He shall appear unto, he shall be seen of.
the time of the restitution of all things. He can indeed appear unto whom he pleaseth, by an Extraordinary dispensation. So he was seen of Stephen standing at the right hand of God, Act. 7. So he appeared unto Paul, 1 Cor. 15. 8. But as unin general, and in the discharge of his mediatory Office, he is not seen of any. So the High-priest was not seen of the people, after his entrance into the Holy place until he came forth again. Even concerning the Person of Christ we
The present long continued absence of Christ in Heaven is the great tryal of the world. God doth give the world a trial by faith in Christ, as he gave it a trial by obedience in Adam. Faith is tryed by difficulties. When Christ did appear, it was under such circumstances, as turned all unbelievers from him. His state was then a state of Infirmity, Reproach and Suffering. He appeared in the flesh. Now he is in Glory he appeareth not. As many refused him when he appeared, because it was in outward weakness; so many refuse him now he is in Glory, because he appeareth not. Faith alone can conflict with, and conquer these difficulties. And it hath sufficient evidences of this
3. To whom shall he thus appear? Of whom shall he be thus seen? To them that look for
him. But the Scripture is plain and express in other places, that he shall appear unto all; shall be seen of all, even of his enemies, Rev. 1. 7. And the work that he hath to do at his appearance, requires that so it should be. For he comes to judge the world in general; and in particular to plead with ungodly men about their ungodly deeds and speeches, Jud. 15. So therefore must and shall it be. His second Illustrious Appearance shall fill the whole World with the beams of it: The whole rational creation of God shall see and behold him. But the Apostle treats of his Appearance here with respect unto the Salvation of them unto whom he doth apHe shall appear unto Salvation. And this word unto Salvation is capable of double Explication. For it may refer unto them that look for him; that look for him unto Salvation; that is, that look to be saved by him. Or it may do so, unto his Appearance; He shall appear unto the Salvation of them that look for him. The sense is good either way.
This looking for the coming of Christ, which is a description of Faith by a princiwaiting, expecting, longing, earnest expectation, consists in five things. (1) Stedfast Faith of his Coming and Appearance. This is in the Foundation of Christian Religion. And whatever the generality of HypoLove unto it, as that which is most desirable, which contains in it every thing wherein the Soul takes delight and Satisfaction. That love his appearing, 2 Tim. 4. 5. (3) Longing for it or desires after it. Even so come, Lord Jesus; that is, come quickly; Rev. 22. 20. If the Saints of the Old Testament longed after his Appearance in the flesh, how shall not we do so for his Appearance in Glory. See Tit. 2. 13. Looking for and hasting unto. 2 Pet. 3. 12. (4) Patient waiting for it, in the midst of all discouragements. These the World is filled withal; and it is the great trial of Faith, Jude 20, 21. (5) Preparation for it, that we may be ready and meet for his reception, which is the Substance of what we are taught in the Parable of the Virgins; Mat. 25. Unto those that thus look for him shall the Lord Christ appear unto Salvation.
4. The manner of his Appearance, is, without Sin. This may either respect himself, or the Church, or both. In his first Appearance in the flesh he was absolutely in himself
5. The End of his appearance is the Salvation of them that look for him. If this immediately unto his Appearance; the meaning is, to bestow, to collate Salvation upon them; Eternal Salvation. If it respect them that look for him, it exqualification of their persons, by the Object of their Faith and Hope; they look for him to be perfectly and compleatly saved by him. Where both senses
1. Christs Appearance the Second time, his Return from Heaven to compleat the Salvation of the Church, is the great Fundamental Principle of our Faith and Hope, the great Testimony we have to give against all his and our Adversaries. And
2. Faith concerning the second coming of Christ, is sufficient to support the Souls of believers, and to give them satisfactory Consolation in all Difficulties, Trials and Distresses.
3. All true believers do live in a waiting, longing expectation of the coming of Christ. It is one of the most distinguishing Characters of a Sincere Believer so to do.
4. To such alone as so look for him, will the Lord Christ appear unto Salvation.
5. Then will be the great distinction among Mankind, when Christ shall appear unto the Everlasting Confusion of some, and the Eternal Salvation of others; A thing that the World loves not to hear of.
6. At the second Appearance of Christ, there will be an end of all the business about Sin, both on his part and ours.
7. The Communication of actual Salvation unto all Believers, unto the Glory of God, is the final End of the Office of Christ.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
THere are two parts of this Chapter. The first concerneth the necessity and efficacy of the Sacrifice of Christ; from the beginning unto v. 20. The other is an improvement of the Doctrine of it unto Faith, Obediv. 20. to the end of the Chapter.
Of the first general Proposition of the Subject to be treated of, there are two parts: (1.) A Demonstration of the Insufficiency of Legal Sacrifices for the expiation of sin: v. 1, 2, 3, 4; (2.)
In the first particular, of the first general part, there are three things: (1.) An Assertion of the insuffciency of Legal Sacrifices unto the expiation of sin, wherev. 1. (2.) A Confirmation of the Truth, of that Assertion from the consideration of the frequency of their Repetition, which manifestly evidenceth that insufficiency; v. 2, 3. (3.) A General Reason taken from the nature of them, or the matter whereof they did consist; v. 4.
The first of these is contained in the first verse.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
There is no difficulty in the reading, nor much difference about the TranslaSyr.
For the Law, a shadow was in it,
For the Law having a shadow of good things to come, not the very Image of the things, can never with those Sacrifices which they offer year by year continually, make the comers thereunto(the Worshippers)perfect.
There are in these words, (1.) A note of Inference, giving a connexion unto the preceding discourse, For. (2.) The Subject spoken of, The Law. (3.) An Ascription made unto it; It had a shadow of good things to come. (4.) A negation concerning it, derogatory unto its perfection; It had not the very image of the things themselves. (5.) An inference or conclusion from both; can never with those sacrifices, &c.
1. The conjunctive particle
intimates that what follows or is introduced
2. The Subject spoken of is The Law.
Sacrifices of the Law, especially those which were offered yearly by a perpetual Statute, as the words immediately following do declare. But he refers what he speaks unto the Law it self; as that whereby these Sacrifices were instituted, and whereon all their vertue and efficacy did depend. They had no more of the one or other, but what they had by and from the Law.
And the Law, here, is the Covenant which God made with the people at Sinai, with all the institutions of worship thereunto belonging. It is not the Moral Law which Originally and as absolutely considered, had no Expiatory Sacrifices belonging unto it; nor is it the Ceremonial Law alone, whereby all the Sacrifices of old were eifirst Testament, the first Covenant, as it had all the ordinances of Worship annexed unto it, as it was the Spring and cause of all the priviledges and advantages of the Church of Israel; And whereSinai, and both the Ceremonial Law and the Judicial also did belong. This he calls the Law, chap. 7. 19; and the Covenant or
Concerning this Law or Covenant, the Apostle declares two things; (1.) PoIt had a shadow of good things to come. (2.) Negatively, that it had not the very Image of the things themselves; which we
These expressions are Metaphorical, and have therefore given occasion unto various conjectures about the nature of the Allusions in them, and their applicatiReader with a Repetiti
Both the Expressions used and the things intended in them, a shadow, and the very Image, have respect unto the good things to come. The Relation of the Law unto them is that which is declared. Wherefore the true notion of what these good things to come are, will determine what it is to have a shadow of them, and not the very Image of the things themselves.
good things intended may be said to be Law, or with respect unto the Gospel; and were so, either when the Law was given, or when this Epistle was written. If they were yet to come with respect unto the Gospel, and were so when he wrote this Epistle, they can be nogood things of Heaven and Eternal Glory. These things were then, are still, and will alwayes be unto the Church Militant on the earth good things to come; and are the Subject of Divine Promises concerning future things. In hope of Eternal Life, which God that cannot lye promised before the world began, Tit. 1. 2.
But this cannot be the sense of the words. For,
1. The Gospel it self hath not the very Image of these things, and so should not herein differ from the Law. For that the very Image of these things are the things themselves shall be immediately declared.
2. The Apostle in this whole discourse designes to prove that the Law with all the Rites of worship annexed unto it, were a Type of the good things that were really and actually exhibited in and by the Gospel, or by the Lord Christ himgood things to come with respect unto the time of the administration of the Law; They were so whilest the Law or first Covenant was in force; and whilest the institutions of it were continued. They had indeed their Original in the Church, or were good things to come, from the first promise. They were more declared so to be, and the certainty of their coming more confirmed by the Promise made unto Abraham. After these promises and their various confirmations, the Law was given unto the people. Howbeit the Law did not bring in, exhibit, or make present the good things so promised, that they should no more yet be to come. They were still good things to come whilst the Law was in force. Nor was this absolutely denyed by the Jews, nor is yet so to this day. For though they place more in the Law and Covenant of Sinai than God ever placed in them; yet they acknowledge that there are good things to come, promised and fore-signified in the Law, which as they suppose are not yet enjoyed. Such is the coming of the Messiah; in which sense they must grant, that the Law had a shadow of good things to come.
Hence it is evident what are those good things to come; namely, Christ himself, with all the Grace, and mercy, and previledges which the Church receiveth by his actual exhibition and coming in the flesh, upon the discharge of his Office. For he him
And these things are called these good things; (1.) Because they are absolutely so without any allay or mixture. All other things in this world, however in some respect, and as unto some peculiar end, they may be said to be good, yet are they not so absolutely. Wherefore, (2.) These things only are good things: Nothing is good either in it self, nor unto us, without them, nor but by vertue of what they receive from them. There is nothing so but what is made so by Christ and his Grace. (3.) They are eminently good things. These good things which were promised unto the Church from the foundation of the world, which the Prophets and wise men of old desired to see; The means of our Deliverance from all the evil things which we had brought upon our selves by our Apostasie from God.
These being evidently the good things intended, the Relation of the Law unto them, namely that it had the shadow but not the very Image of them, will also be apparent.
The Allusion in my Judgment unto the Art of painting, wherein a shadow is first drawn, and afterwards a picture to the life, or the very Image it self, hath here no place, nor doth our Apostle any where make use of such curious similitudes taken from things artificial, and known to very few; Nor would he use this among the Hebrews, who of all people were least acquainted with the Art of painting. But he declares his intention in another place, where speaking of the
They are a shadow of things to come, but the body is of Christ. They are a shadow of things to come, is the same with this, The Law had a shadow of good things to come: For it is the Law with its ordinances and institutions of worship concerning which the Apostle there discourseth, as he doth in this place. Now the shadow there intended by the Apostle from whence the Allusion is taken, is the shadow of a body in the Light or Sun-shine, as the Antithesis declares: but the body is of Christ.
Now such a shadow is, (1.) A Representation of the body. Any one who bebody, follows it in all its variations, and is inseparable from it. (2.) It is a just representation of the hody, as unto its proportion and dimensions. The shadow of any body represents that certain individual body, and nothing else: It will add nothing unto it, nor take any thing from it; but, without an accidental hinderance, is a just representation of it: much less will it give an appearance of a body of another form and shape, difan obscure representation of the body; so as that the principal concernments of it, especially the vigor and spirit of a living body, are not figured nor represented by it.
Thus is it with the Law or the Covenant of Sinai and all the ordinances of worgood things to come. For it must be observed that the opposition which the Apostle makes in this place, is not between the Law and the Gospel, any otherwise but as the Gospel is a full debetween the Sacrifices of the Law, and the Sacrifice of Christ himself. Want of this observation hath given us mistaken interpretations of the place.
This shadow the Law had; Having it. It obtained it, it was in it; it was
inlaid in it; it was of the substance and nature of it; it contained it, in all that it prescribed, or appointed; some of it in one part, some in another, the whole in the whole. It had the whole shadow; and the whole of it was this shadow. It was so,
1. Because in the Sanction, dedication, and confirmation of it by the blood of Sacrifices, in the Tabernacle, with all its holy utensils, in its High Priest and all other Sacred Administrations, in its Solemn Sacrifices and Services, it made a Representation of good things to come. This hath been abundantly manifested and proved in the Exposition of the foregoing Chapter. And according unto the first property of such a shadow, without this use it had no bottom, no foundatishadow, they are absolutely dead and useless.
2. They were a just Representation of Christ only, the second property of such a shadow. They did not signify any thing more or less, but Christ himself, and what belongs unto him. He was the Idea in the mind of God, when Moses was charged to make all things according to the pattern shewed him in the Mount. And it is a blessed view of Divine Wisdome, when we do see and understand aright, how every thing in the Law belonged unto that shadow which God gave in it, of the substance of his counsel in and concerning Jesus Christ.
3. They were but an obscure Representation of these things, which is the third property of a shadow. The Glory and efficacy of these good things appeared not visible in them. God by these means designed no further Revelation of them, unto the Church of the Old Testament, but what was in Types and Figures, which gave a shadow of them, and no more.
Secondly, this being granted unto the Law, there is added thereunto what is denied of it, wherein the Argument of the Apostle doth consist. It had not the very Image of the things. The negation is of the same whereof the concession was made, the grant being in one sence, and the denial in another. It had not the very Image it self. That is, it had not the things themselves. For that is intended by this Image of them. And the Reasons why I so interpret the words, are these:
had not this Image. But suppose the Law to have had this full and clear description and delineation of them, were it never so lively and compleat, yet could it not by its Sacrifices take away sin. Nothing could do it but the very substance of the things themselves, which the Law had not, nor could have.
2. Where the same Truth is declared the same things are expresly called the body, and that of Christ; that is the substance of the things themselves, and that in opposition unto the shadow which the Law had of them, as it is here also. Col. 2. 17. Which are a shadow of things to come, but the body is of Christ. And we are not without cogent Reasons to depart from the explication of the Metaphor there given us. For these expressions are every way the same; They had not the body which is Christ.
3. That is intended which doth compleatly expiate sin, which doth consummate and perfect the Church, which is denyed unto the Law. Now this was not done by an expresse and clear declaration of these things, which we acknowledge to be contained in the Gospel, but it was done by the things themselves, as the Apostle hath proved in the foregoing Chapter, and doth further confirm in this: that is, it was done by Christ alone in the Sacrifice of himself.
4. It is confessed by all that there is an substantial Image; so called, not because it is a representation of what it is not, but because it is that whereof somewhat else is an Image and Representation, as the Law in its institugood things. And this the Apostle directs us unto by his Emphatical expression; ipsissimam rerum Imaginem; the things themselves; So it is rendred by the Syriac Translation, ipsam rem; or ipsam substantiam; the substance it self. And Rom. 1. 23. Into the likeness of the Image of a corruptible man; that is, into the likeness of a corruptible man. The Image of the man is not something distinct from him, something to represent him; but the man himself. See Rom. 8. 29. 2 Cor. 4. 4. Col. 1. 15. chap. 3. 10.
This therefore is that which the Apostle denyes concerning the Law. It had not the actual accomplishment of the promise of good things; it had not Christ exhithings themselves. Hence was its imperfection and weakness, so that by none of its Sacrifices it could make the Church perfect.
Obs. Whatever there may be in any Religious Institutions, and the diligent observation of them, if they come short of exhibiting Christ himself unto Believers with the Benefits of his Mediation, they cannot make us perfect, nor give us acceptation with God. For, (1.) It was he himself in his own person, that was the prin
This being the state of the Law or first covenant, the Apostle makes an Applican never with those Sacrifices, which they offer year by year continually, make the comers thereunto perfect. We must first speak unto the Reading of the Words, and then unto the sense and meaning.
Expositors generally take notice that in the Original there is a Trajection in the words, or that they are placed out of their proper order, which Translators do
every year, or yearly, with the Sacrifices
which they offer; For with those Sacrifices which they offer year by year, as we have rendred the words. But the Apostle seems to place annual Sacrifice which he principally intended. But there is a great difficulty in the distinction and pointing of the words that follow; in perpetuum, continually, or for ever; that is, which they were so to do indispensably by the Law, whilest the Tabernacle or
But neither the signification of the Word, not the use of it in this Epistle will allow it in this place to belong unto the Words and Sentence going before. For it doth not any where signifie a duration or continuance with a limitation. And the Apostle is far from allowing an absolute perpetual duration unto the Law and its Sacrifices, were they of what use soever, especially in this place where he is provperpetual, nor had an efficacy to accomplish any thing perfectly, which is the other signification of the word. And it is used only in this Epistle, chap. 7. 3. In this place, and ver. 12, 14, of this Chapter. But in all these places it is applyed only unto the Office of Christ, and the efficacy of it in his personal Ministry. It is of the same signification with chap. 7. 25. for ever, to the uttermost, perfectly. Wherefore that which is affirmed of Christ and his Sacrifice, ver. 12, 14, of the chapter, is here denyed of the Law. And the words should be joyned with those that follow. The Law by its Sacrifices could not perfect for ever, or unto the utmost, the comers thereunto.
In the words thus read there are three things.
1. The Impotency of the Law;
It can never.
2. That with respect whereunto this impotency is charged on it; that is, the Sacrifices which it offered.
3. The effect it self denyed with respect unto that Impotency; which is, to perfect for ever the comers thereunto.
1. The Impotency of the Law as unto the end mentioned is Emphatically expresit can never do it: It can do it by no means, no way, it is impossible
2. That with respect whereunto this impotency is ascribed unto the Law is its SacriSacrifices are expressed with respect unto their nature, the time of their offering, and those by whom they were offered.
For their nature he says Iisdem Sacrificiis; iis ipsis hostiis
Sacrificiis. Our Translation rendereth not the Emphasis of the Expression. Iis hostiis quas quotannis—: with the same Sacrifices, or those Sacrifices which were of the same kind and nature.
with those Sacrifices; the Article being demonstrative. The same; not individually the same, for they were many, and offered often, or every year, when a Sa
2. He describes them from the time and season of their Offering. It was yearly, every year, year by year. It is hence manifest, what Sacrifices he prinAnniversary Sacrifices of Expiation, when the High Priest entred into the most holy place with blood, Levit. 16. And he instanJews princiSacrifices in general, it might have been replyed, that although the Sacrifices which were daily offered, or those on especial occasions, might not perfect the Worshippers, at least not the whole congreat. Sacrifice which was offered yearly, with the blood whereof the High-Priest entred into the presence of God. Accordingly the Jews have such a Saying among them, that on the day of expiation all Israel was made as righteous, as in the day wherein man was first created. But the Apostle applying his argument unto those Sacrifices and proving their insufficiency unto the end mentioned, leaves no reserve unto any thoughts that it might be attained by other Sacrifices which were of another nathe least of what he proves their imperonce a year. And if this repetition of them once a year proves them weak and imperfect, how much more were those so, which were repeated every Day, or Week, or Month?
3. He refers unto the Offerers of those Sacrifices; which they offer, that is, the High-Priests, of whom he had treated in the foregoing Chapter. And he speaks of things in the present tense. The Law cannot, which they offer: not the Law could not, and which they offered. The reason hereof hath been before declared. For he sets before the Hebrews a Scheme and representation of all their Worship at its first institution, that they might discern the Original intention of God therein. And therefore he insists only on the Tabernacle, making no mention of the Temple. So he states what was done at the first giving of the Law, and the institution of all its Ordinances of Worship, as if it were now present before their eyes. And if it had not the power mentioned at their first Institution, when the Law was in all its vigor and Glory, no accession could be made unto it by any continuance of time, any otherwise but in the false Imagination of the people.
That which remains of the words is an Account of what the Law could not do or effect by its Sacrifices, It could not make the comers thereunto perfect for ever.
There is in the words, (1.) The Effect denyed. (2.) The Persons with respect unto whom it is denyed. (3.) The Limitation of that denyal.
1. The Effect denied, what it cannot do, is dedicate, consummate,
consecrate, perfect, sanctifie. Of the meaning of the word in this Epistle, I have spoken often before. As also I have shewed at large what that chap. 7. v. 11. Here it is the same with chap. 9. 9. perfect as appertaining unto the conscience; which is ascribed unto the Sacrifice of Christ,
2. Those with respect unto whom this power is denyed unto the Law, are the comers thereunto; Accedentes. The expression is every way the same with that of chap. 9. 9. the Worshippers and the comers are the same, as is declared v. 2. 3. those who make use of the Sacrifices of the Law in the worship of God, who approach unto him by Sacrifices. And they are thus expressed by the comers, partly from the Original direction given about the observation, and partly from the nature of the service it self. The first we have, Levit. 1. 2. draw nigh, to come near with an oblation. These are the comers, those who draw nigh with, and bring their oblations unto the Altar. And such was the nature of the Sacrifice it self. It consisted in coming
But as the Priests were included in the foregoing words, which they offer; So by these comers, the people are intended, for whose benefit these Sacrifices were offered. For, as was said, respect is had unto the great Anniversary Sacrifice, which was offered in the Name and on the behalf of the whole congregation. And these, if any, might be made perfect by the Sacrifices of the Law, namely those that came unto God by them, or through the use of them, according unto his insti
3. That wherein the Law failed as unto the appearance it made of the ExpiatiAbsolutely, compleatly and for ever. It made an expiation, but it was temporary only, not for ever. It did so both in respect unto the consciences of the worshippers, and the outward effects of its Sacrifices. Their effect on the consciences of the Worshippers was tempooutward effects of them, they consisted in the removal of temporal punishperfect them for ever, which was done by the Sacrifice of Christ; this they could not do, but only represent what was to be done afterwards.
If any shall think meet to retain the ordinary distinction of the words, and reAdverbially, they offered them year by year continually, then the necessity of the Annual Repetition of those Sacrifices is intended in it. This they did, and this they were to do always whilst the Tebernacle was standing, or the Worship of the Law continued. And from the whole verse sundry things may be observed.
1. Whatever hath the least Representation of Christ, or Relation unto him, the obscurest way of teaching the things concerning his Person and Grace whilest it is in force, hath a Glory in it. He alone in himself originally bears the whole Glory of God in the Worship and Salvation of the Church; and he gives Glory unto all institutions of Divine Worship. The Law had but a shadow of Him and his Office; yet was the Ministration of it Glorious. And much more is that of the Gospel and its ordinances so, if we have faith to discern their relation unto him, and experience of his exhibition of himself and the benefits of his mediation unto us by them. Without this they have no Glory, whatever order or pomp may be ap
2. Christ and his Grace were the only good things, that were absolutely so, from the foundation of the world, or the giving of the first Promise. In and by them there is not only a Deliverance from the curse, which made all things evil; and a Restoration of all the good that was lost by sin, in a sanctified blessed use of the Creatures; but an Encrease and Addition is made unto all that was good in the State of Innocency, above what can be expressed. Those who put such a valuation on the meaner uncertain enjoyment of other things, as to judge them their Good things, their Goods, as they are commonly called; so as not to see that all which is absolutely good is to be found in him alone; much more they who seem to judge almost all things Good besides, and Christ with his Grace Good for nothing, will be filled with the fruit of their own wayes, when it is too late to change their minds.
3. There is a great difference between the shadow of good things to come, and the good things themselves actually exhibited and granted unto the Church. This is the Fundamental difference between the two Testaments, the Law and the Gospel, from whence all others do arise, and whereinto they are resolved. Some when they
Old Covenant, and its administrations, by vertue of the Promise which they all had respect unto, are ready to think that there was no material difference between the two Covenants. I have spoken at large hereunto in the 8th chapter. I shall now only say, that he who sees not, who finds not a Glory, excellency and satisfaction, producing peace, rest and joy in his soul from the actual exhigood things as declared and tendred in the Gospel, above what might be obtained from an obscure representation of them as future, is a stranger unto Gospel Light and Grace.
4. The principal interest and design of them that come to God, is to have assured Evidence of the perfect Expiation of sin. This of Old they
5. What cannot be effected for the Expiation of Sin at once by any Duty or Sacrifice, cannot be effected by its reiteration or repetition. Those generally who seek for
6. The Kepetition of the same Sacrifices, doth of it self demonstrate their insufficiency unto the end sought after. Wherefore those of the Roman Church who would give countenance unto the
7. God alone Limiteth the ends and efficacy of his own Institutions. It may be said that if these Sacrifices did not make perfect them that came unto God by them, then their so coming unto him was lost labour, and to no purpose. But there were other ends and other uses of this their coming unto God as we have declared; and unto them all they were effectual. There never was, there never shall be any loss in what is done according unto the Command of God. Other things, how
〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
THe Syriack Translation refers that unto the Persons, which is affirmed of their Offerings;
for if they had been perfect or made perfect; referring unto what went before, that they were not made perfect,
they would have long since ceased or rested from their Oblations or Offerings. They would have offered them no more. And although it doth not at all express Because their conscience would no more have tossed or disquieted them for their sins, who had at one time been purified; which is a good Exposition though not an exact Translation of the Words. And so it renders the next Verse; but in these Sacrifices their Sins are remembred, called to mind every year.
negative,
Vul. Alioquin; and so others generally; of the word see Chap. 9. 26. For if so,
cessassent (semel) oblata, they would have ceased being once offered. Most render the Participle by the Infinitive Mood; desiissent offerri; they would have ceased to be offered.
cultores, the
But in these they remembred their Sins. Recommemoratio, repetita mentio. A calling to remembrance by acknowledgment.
There is, as was observed, a different reading in the ancient Copies of the First words in the Second Verse. The Syriack and the vulgar Latin take no notice of the Negative Particle
positively, then would they have ceased. Those who follow other Copies take non, for, nonne; and renInterrogatively, as doth our Translation; for then would they not have ceased? That is, they would have done so: And then Adversatively, by alioqui, as it is by Most, for otherwise. But it may be rendred Causally by, for then, if an Interrogation be allowed. But the sense is the same in both Readings as we shall see.
For otherwise they would have ceased to be offered; because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.
THe words contain a confirmation by a new argument of what was affirmed in the verse foregoing. And it is taken from the frequent repetitions of those Sacriinsufficiency of the Law to perfect the Worshippers by its Sacrifices. This he proves in the foregoing verse, from the formal cause of that insufficiency; which is, that in them all it had but a shadow of good things to come, and so could not effect that which was to be done only by the good things themselves. Here the same truth is proved
The present Argument therefore of the Apostle is taken from a sign of the Impotency and
That which the Apostle designes to prove, is that they did not by their own force and efficacy for ever perfect the Church or bring it unto that State of Justification, Sanctification and acceptance with God, which was designed unto it, with all the priviledges and spiritual worship belonging unto that State. That this they did not do, he declares in the words following, by a notable instance included in their Re
In opposition unto this argument in general it may be said that this reiteration or repetition of them was not because they did not perfectly expiate Sins, the Sins of the offerers, all that they had committed and were guilty of before their offering; But because those for whom they were offered did again contract the guilt of Sin, and so stood in need of a renewed expiation hereof.
In answer unto this Objection which may be laid against the foundation of the Apostles Argument, I say there are two things in the Expiation of Sin. First, The Effects of the Sacrifice towards God in making attonement; Secondly, The Application of those Effects unto our
Supposing therefore the end of Sacrifices to be the making of Attonement with God for sin, and the procurement of all the priviledges wherewith it is accompaJews concerning them, and the Repetition of them doth invincibly prove that they could not of themselves effect, what they were apperpetual, whilst the Law continued in force. If they could at any time have perfected the Worshippers, they would have ceased to be offered; for unto what end should that continuance serve? To abide in a shew or pretence of doing that which is done already, doth no way answer the wisdom of Divine Institutions.
And we may see herein both the obstinacy and miserable state thereon of the preJews. The Law doth plainly declare, that without Attonement by blood there is no Remission of sins to be obtained. This they expect by the sacrifices of the Law, and their frequent repetition, not by any thing which was more perfect, and which they did represent. But all these they have been utterly deprived of for many GeCurse. The woful superstitious follies whereby they endeavour to sup
And it is hence also evident, that the superstition of the Church of Rome, in their Masse, wherein they pretend to offer and every day to repeat a propitiatory Sacrifice for the sins of the living and the dead, doth evidently demonstrate, that they disbelieve the efficacy of the one
these Sacrifices would have ceased to be offered, if they could have made the Church perfect; for, saith he, the worshippers being once purged they should have had no more conscience of Sin. And we must enquire (1.) who are intended by the worshippers. (2.) what it is to be purged. (3.) what is the effect of this purging, in having no more conscience of sins. (4.) How the Apostle proves his intention hereby.
The Worshippers,
Comers in the Priests who offered the Sacrifices, but the people for whom they were offered, are intended. They it was who made use of these Sacrifices for the Expiation of Sin.
Concerning these persons it is supposed that if the Sacrifices of the Law could perfect, then would they have been purged; wherefore purged of being made perfect. For the Apostle supNegation of the latter, from the Negation of the former. If the Law did not make them perfect, then were they not purged.
This Sacred guilt of Sin, or the filth of it: The one is removed by Justification, the other by Sanctification. The one is the effect of the Sacerdotal actings of Christ towards God in making attonement for Sin, the other of the application of the Virtue and Efficacy of that Sacrifice unto our Souls and Consciences, whereby they are purged, cleansed, renewed and changed. It is the purging of the first sort that is here intended; such a purging of Sin as takes away the Condemning Power of Sin from the Conscience on the account of the guilt of it. If they had been purged (as they would have been, had the Law made the Comers unto its Sacrifices perfect) that is, if there had been a compleat Expiation of Sin made for them.
And the supposition denyed hath its qualification and limitation in the word once. By this word he expresseth the efficacy of the Sacrifice of Christ, which being one, at once effected what it was designed unto. And it doth not design only the doing of a thing at one time, but the so doing of it as that it should never more be done.
That these Worshippers were not thus purged by any of the Sacrifices which were offered for them, the Apostle proves from hence; because they had not the necessary effect and consequence of such a Purification. For if they had been so had no more conscience of Sin, there would have been no need of offering Sacrifices for their Expiation any more.
(1.) The Introduction of the Assertion is by the Particles
because that,
they would have ceased to be offered, because their end would have been accomplished, and so themselves taken away.
(2.) On the Supposition made, there would have been an alteration made in conscience of Sin. This is unavoidable unto a Sinner before Expiation and Attonement be made for it: Afterwards, if they were purged, it should be so no more with them; they should no more have conscience of Sin.
They should no more have conscience of Sin; or rather, they should not any more,
or farther, have any conscience of Sins; or they should have no conscience of Sins any more. The meaning of the word is singularly well expressed in the Syriack Translation. They should have no conscience agitating, tossing, disquieting, perplexing for Sins; no conscience judging and condemning their persons for the Guilt of Sin, so depriving them of Solid Peace with God. It is
The Apostle speaks on the one side and the other of them, who were really incomers to them, and the worshippers. The way and means of our interest in the Sacrifice of Christ is by Faith only. In this state it often falls out, that true Believers have a conscience, judging and condemning them for Sin, no less than they had under the Law: but this trouble and power of conscience doth not arise from hence, that Sin is not perfectly exdue interest in that Sacrifice, and the benefits of it. Under the Old Testadue interest in their Sacrifices, which depended on the performance of the Rites and Ordinances of Service belonging unto them: but their consciences charged them with the Guilt of Sin, through an apprehensi
It is quite otherwise as unto conscience for Sin remaining in Believers under the New Testament; for they have not the least Sense or Fear concerning any insufficiency or imperfection in the Sacrifice whereby it is expiated. God hath ordered all things concerning it, so as to satisfie the consciences of all Men in the perfect Expiation of Sin by it; only they who are really purged by it, may be in the dark sometimes, as unto their personal interest in it.
But it may be objected, that if the Sacrifices neither by their native efficacy, nor by the frequency of repetition could take away Sin, so as that they who came unto God by them, could have peace of conscience, or be freed from the trouble of a continual Condemnatory Sentence in themselves; then was there no true real peace with God under the Old Testament, for other way of attaining it there was none. But this is contrary unto innumerable Testimonies of Scripture, and the promises of God made then unto the Church. In answer hereunto, I say, the Apostle did not, nor doth in these words declare what they did and could, or could not attain unto under the Old Testament; only what they could not attain by the means of their Sacrifices: so he declares it in the next Verse; for in them remembrance is made of Sins. But in the use of them, and by their frequent repegreat Expiatory Sacrifice; whose Virtue was laid up for them in the promise, whereby they had peace with God.
Obser. 1. The discharge of conscience from its condemning Right and Power, by vertue of the Sacrifice of Christ, is the foundation of all other priviledges we receive by the Gospel. Where this is not, there is no real participation of any other of them.
2. All peace with God is resolved into a purging Attonement made for sin: Being once purged.
3. It is by a principle of Gospel-light alone, that conscience is directed to condemn all Sin, and yet to acquit all Sinners that are purged: Its own natural Light can give it no guidance herein.
But in those Sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of Sins every year.
IT is the latter part of the foregoing assertion; namely, that the Worshippers were not purged or perfected by them, in that they had still remaining a conscience for Sin, which is proposed unto
There are Four things to be opened in the words. (1.) The Introduction of the Reason intended, by an adversative conjunction,
but. (2.) The Subject spoken of, those Sacrifices. (3.) What belonged unto them by Divine Institution, which is a renewed remembrance of Sin. (4.) The seasons of it, it was to be made every year.
note of introduction gives us the nature of the Argument insisted on: Had the Worshippers been perfect, they would have had no more conscience for Sins.
saith he, it was not so with them; for God appoints nothing in vain: And he had not only appointed the Repetition of these Sacrifices, but also that in eveRemembrance made of Sin, as of that which was yet to be expiated.
2. The Subject spoken of is expressed in these words, in them. But this Relative is remote from the Antecedent which is in the first Verse, by the infirst Verse in our Translation; but in these Sacrifices. And we supply the deVerb Substantive by, there is; for there is no more in the Original than but in them a Remembrance again of Sins. The Sacrifices intended are prinSolemn day of Expiation: For he speaks of them that were reyearly; that is, once every year. Others were repeated every day, or as often as occasion did require; these only were so yearly: And these are peculiar
3. That which is affirmed of these Sacrifices, is, their inseparable adjunct, that in them there was a remembrance of Sin again: That is, there was so by virtue of remembrance of Sin by Gods own Institution was such as sufficiently evidenced that the Offerers had yet a conscience condemning them for sins. Respect is had unto the command of God unto this purpose, Levit. 16. 21, 22. express remembrance, or a remembrance expressed by Confession or Acknowledgment. See Gen. 40. 9. chap. 42. 21. For where it respects Sin, it is a recalling of it unNum. 5. 15. 1 King. 17, 18. And hereby the Apostle proves effectually that these Sacrifices did not make the worshippers perfect. For notwithstanding their Offering of them, a sense of Sin still returned upon their Consciences, and God himself had appointed that every year they should make such an acknowledgment and confession of Sin, as should manifest that they stood in need of a farther Expiation than could be at
But a difficulty doth here arise of no small Importance. For what the Apostle denys unto these Offerings of the Law, that he ascribes unto the One only Sacrifice of Christ. Yet notwithstanding this Sacrifice and its Efficacy, it is certain that Beremembrance, and to make Confession thereof. Yea, our Lord Jesus Christ himself hath taught us to pray every day for the pardon of our sins, wherein there is a calling of them unto Remembrance. It doth not therefore appear wherein the difference lyes between the Efficacy of their Sacrifices, and that of Christ, seeing after both of them there is equally a Remembrance of Sin again to be made.
An. The difference is evident between these things. Their Confession of Sin was in order unto, and preparatory for, a new Attonement and Expiation of it. This sufficiently proves the insufficiency of those that were offered before. For they were to come unto the new Offerings, as if there had never been any before them: Our remembrance of Sin, and confession of it, respects only the Applicaremembrance of Sin respect was had unto the curse of the Law which was to be answered, and the wrath of God which was to be appeased; it belonged unto the Sacrifice it self, whose Object was God: Ours respects only the application of the benefits of the Sacrifice of Christ unto our own Consciences, whereby we may have assured peace with God. The Sentence or Curse of the Law was on them, until a new Attonement was made; for the Soul that did not joyn in this Sacrifice, was to be cut off: But the Sentence and Curse of the Law was at once taken away, Eph. 2. 14, 15, 16. And we may observe.
1. An Obligation unto such Ordinances of Worship as could not expiate sin, nor testifie that it was perfectly expiated, was part of the Bondage of the Church under the Old Testament.
It belongs unto the Light and Wisdom of Faith, so to remember Sin, and make Confession of it, as not therein, or thereby to seek after a new Attonement for it, which is made once for all. Confession of Sin is no less necessary under the New Testament, than it was under the Old; but not for the same end. And it is an emispirit of Bondage, and that of Liberty by Christ. The one so confesseth Sin as to make that very Confession a part of Attonement for it; the other is encouraged unto Confession, because of the Attonement alaffect our own Minds and Consciences with a sense of the Guilt of Sin in it self; so as to keep us humble and filled with self-abasement. He who hath no sense of Sin but only what consists in dread of future judgment, knows little of the mystery of our Walk before God, and Obedience unto him, according unto the Gospel. (2.) To engage our Souls unto watchfulness for the future against the sins we do confess; for in confession we make an abrenuntiatiRighteousness, Holiness and Aversation from Sin. This is included in every Confession we make of Sin; for the reason why we acknowledge the Evil of it, why we detest and abhor it, is its contrariety unto the Nature, holy Properties, and Will of God. (4.) To give unto him the glory of his infinite Grace and Mercy in the pardon of it. (5.) We use it as an instituted means to let in a sense of the pardon of Sin into our own Souls and Consciences, through a fresh Application of the Sacrifice of Christ, and the benefits thereof, whereunto Confession of Sin is required. (6.) To exalt Jesus Christ in our Hearts, by the application of our selves unto him, as the only procurer and purchaser of Mercy and Pardon; without which, Confession of Sins is neither acceptable unto God, nor useful unto our own Souls. But we do not make Confession of Sin, as a part of a Compensation for the Guilt of it; nor as a means to give some present pacification unto Conscience, that we may go on in Sin, as the manner of some is.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
THere is no difficulty in the Words, and very little difference in the Translations of them. The
For it is impossible that the Blood of Bulls and Goats should take away Sin.
This is the last determinate resolution of the Apostle concerning the insufficiency of the Law, and its Sacrifices for the Expiation of Sin, and the perfecting them who come unto God, as unto their Consciences. And there is in the Argument used unto this end, an inference from what was spoken before, and a new enforcement from the Nature or subject matter of these Sacrifices.
Something must be observed concerning this Assertion in general, and an Obthe Blood of Bulls and Goats, he intends all the Sacrifices of the Law: Now if it be impossible that they should take away Sin, for what end then were they appointed? Especially, considering that in the Institution of them, God told the Church that he had given the Blood to make Attonement on the Altar, Levit. 17. 11. It may therefore be said as the Apostle doth in another place, with respect unto the Law it self; if it could not by the works of it justifie us before God, to what end then served the Law? To what end serve these Sacrifices, if they could not take away Sin?
The Answer which the Apostle gives with respect unto the Law in general, may be applyed unto the Sacrifices of it, with a small Addition from a respect unto their special Nature. For as unto the Law, he answers two things: (1.) That
because of Transgressions, Gal. 3. 19. (2.) That it was a Schoolmaster to guide and direct us unto Christ, because of the severities wherewith it was accompanied like those of a School-master; not in the Spirit of a tender Fa
1. They were added unto the promise because of Transgressions. For God in them, and by them did continually represent unto Sinners the Curse and Sentence of the Law; namely, that the Soul that sinneth must dye; or that Death was the Wages of Sin. For although there was allowed in them a Commutation, that the Sinner himself should not dye, but the Beast that was Sacrificed in his stead, which bethey who commit Sin are worthy of Death. And this was, as the whole Law, an Ordinance of God to deterr Men from Sin, and so put bounds unto Transgressions. For when God pasJudgment speedily executed, nor any Tokens or Indications that so it would be, therefore was their Heart wholly set in them to do Evil. But God dealt not thus with the Church. He let no Sin pass without a Representation of his displeasure against it, though mixed with Mercy in a direction unto the Reonce a year there was gathered up a Remembrance of all the Sins, Iniquities and Transgressions of the whole Congregation, Levit. 16.
2. They were added as the Teaching of a School-master to lead unto Christ. By them was the Church taught and directed to look continually unto, and after that Sacrifice which alone could really purge and take away all Iniquity. For God appointed no Sacrifices until after the Promise of sending the Seed of the Woman to break the Head of the Serpent. In his so doing was his own Heel to be bruised, in the suffering of his Humane Nature, which he offered in Sacrifice unto God; which these Sacrifices did represent. Wherefore the Church knowremembrance, representing the displeasure of God against Sin, which was their First end; and that although there was an Intimation of Grace and Mercy in them by the commutation and substitution which they allowed; yet that they could not of themselves take away Sin, it made them the more earnestly, and with longing desires look after him and his Sacrifice, who should perfectly take away Sin and make peace with God, wherein the prin
3. As unto their especial nature, they were added as the great instruction in the way and manner whereby Sin was to be taken away. For although this arose originally from Gods meer Grace and Mercy; yet was it not to be extaking away of Sin would have been inconsistent with his Truth, Holiness, and Righteous Government of Mankind, as I have elsewhere at large demonstrated. It must be done by the Interposition of a Ransome and Attonement by the substitution of one who was no Sinner in the room of Sinners, to make satisfaction unto the Law, and Justice of God for Sin. Hereby they became the principal direction of the Faith of the Saints under the Old Testament, and the means whereby they acted it, on the original promise of their Recovery from Apostasie.
These things do evidently express the Wisdom of God in their Institution, altake away Sin. And those by whom these ends of them are denyed, as they are by the Jews and Socinians, can give no account of any end of them, which should answer the Wisdom, Grace and Holi
This Objection being removed, I shall proceed unto the Exposition of the words in particular. And there are Four things in them as a Negative Proposition. (1.) The
1. The Illative Conjunction, For, declares what is spoken to be introduced in Proof and Confirmation of what was before affirmed. And it is the closing Argument against the Imperfection and Impotency of the Old Covenant, the Law, Priesthood and Sacrifices of it, which the Apostle maketh use of. And indeed it is comprehensive of all that he had before insisted on; yea, it is the Foundation of all his other Reasonings unto this purpose. For if in the Nature of the thing it self it was impossible that the Sacrifices consisting of the Blood of Rulls and Goats should take away Sin, then however, whensoever, and by whomsoever they were offered, this effect could not be produced by them. Wherefore in these words the Apostle puts a Close unto his Argument, and reassumes it no more in this Epistle, but only Once or Twice makes mention of it in the way of an Illustration to set forth the excellency of the Sacrifice of Christ; as,
2. The subject spoken of is the Blood of Bulls and Goats. The reason why the Calves and Kids of the Goats, hath been declared on Chap. 9. ver. 11, 12. And some things must be ob
1. That he makes mention of the Blood of the Sacrifices only; whereas in many of them the whole Bodies were offered, and the Fat of them all was burnBlood alone whereby Attonement was made for Sin and Sinners. The Fat was burned with Incense only, to shew that it was accepted as a sweet savour with God. (2.) Because he had respect principally unto the
2. He recalls them by this Expression of their Sacrifices, the Blood of Bulls and Goats, unto a due consideration of what effect might be produced by them. They were Accompanied with great Solemnity and Pomp of Ceremony in their Celebration. Hence arose a great Esteem and Veneration of them in the Minds of the People. But when all was done, that which was Offered was but the Blood of Bulls and Goats. And there is a Tacit Opposition unto the matter of that Sacrifice, whereby Sin was really to be Expiated, which was the precious Blood of Christ, as Chap. 9. 13, 14.
3. That which is denyed of these Sacrifices, is,
the taking away of sins. The thing intended is variously expressed by the Apostle, as by
The Interpretation of these words by the Socinians, is contrary unto the signiImpossibile est (saith
1. Nothing can be more Alien from the Design of the Apostle, and Scope of the Context. They are both of them to prove, that the Sacrifices of the Law could not Expiate Sins, could not make Attonement for them, could not make Reconciliation with God, could not produce the effect which the Sacrifice of Christ alone was appointed and ordained unto. They were only Signs and Figures of it. They could not effect that which the Hebrews looked for from them, and by them. And that which they expected by them was, that by them they should make Attonement with God for their sins. Wherefore the Apostle denies that it was possible they should effect what they looked for from them, and nothing else. It was not that they should be Arguments to turn them from Sin unto newness of life, so as that they should sin no more. By what way, and on what consideration they were means to deter Men from Sin, I have newly declared. But they can produce no one place in the whole Law, to give counAnniversary Sacrifice on the day of Expiation was appointed so exto make Attonement for Sin, to procure its Pardon, to take away its Guilt in the sight of God, and from the Conscience of the Sinner, that he should not be punished according unto the Sentence of the Law; as that it cannot be denyed. This is that which the Apostle declares, that of themselves they could not effect or perform, but only Typically, and by way of Represen
2. He declares directly and positively what he intends by this taking away of Sin, and the ceasing of Legal Sacrifices thereon, ver. 17, 18. Their Sins and their Iniquities will I remember no more; now where Remission of these is, there is no more Offering for Sin. The cessation of Offerings for Sin, follows directly on the Remission of Sin, which is the effect of Expiation and Attonement; and not upon the turning away of Men from Sin for the future. It is therefore our Justification, and not our Sanctification that the Apostle discourseth of.
3. The words themselves will not bear this sense. For the Object of Act upon Sin it self, and not immediately upon the Sinner. Nor can it signifie any thing but to take away the Guilt of Sin, that it should not bind over the Sinner unto punishment; whereon
4. The manner of the Negation is, that, it was impossible that it should be otherwise.
1. From Divine Institution. Whatever the Jews apprehended, they were neVirtue of Ordinances of Worship depends on their Designation unto their end. The Blood of Bulls and Goats as offered in Sacrifice, and carried into the most Holy Place, was designed of God to represent the way of taking away sin, but not by it self to effect it; and it was therefore impossible that so it should do.
2. It was impossible from the Nature of the things themselves, in as much as there was not a Condecency unto the Holy perfections of the Divine Nature, that Sin should be Expiated, and the Church perfected by the Blood of Bulls and Goats. For, (1.) There would not have been so unto his Infinite Wisdom. For God having declared his severity against Sin, with the necessity of its punishCondecency could there have been herein unto infinite Wisdom? What Consistency between the severity of that Declaration, and the taking away of Sin by such an Inferiour Beggarly means, as that of the Blood of Bulls and Goats? A great appearance was made of infinite displeasure against sin, in the giving of the Fiery Law, in the Curse of it, in the threatnings of Eternal Death; should all have ended in an outward shew, there would have been no manner of proportion to be discerned between the Demerit of Sin, and the
Condecency unto Divine Justice. For, (1.) As I have elsewhere proved at large, Sin could not be taken away without a Price, a Ransome, a Compensation and satisfaction made unto Justice for the Injuries it received by Sin. In satisfaction unto Justice by way of ComBlood of Bulls and Goats, on the other. No Man living can apprehend wherein any such proportion should lye or consist: Nor was it possible that the Conscience of any Man could be freed from a Sense of the Guilt of Sin, who had nothing to trust unto but this Blood to make Compensation or Attonement for it. (2.) The apprehension of it, (namely, a suitableness unto Divine Justice, in the Expiation of Sins by the Blood of Bulls and Goats,) must needs be a great Incentive unto prophane persons, unto the Comlow a price, but what may have Attonement made for it by the Blood of Beasts, why should they not give satisfaction unto their Lusts by living in Sin? (3.) It would have had no consistency with the Sentence and Sanction of the Law of Nature;
1. It is possible that things may usefully represent, what it is impossible, that in, and by themselves they should effect. This is the Fundamental Rule of all Institutions of the
2. There may be great and eminent uses of Divine Ordinances and Institutions, although it be impossible that by themselves in their most exact and diligent use, they should work out our Acceptance with God. And it belongs unto the Wisdom of Faith, to use them unto their proper end, not to trust unto them, as unto what they cannot of themselves effect.
3. It was utterly impossible that Sin should be taken away before God, and from the Conscience of the Sinner, but by the Blood of Christ. Other ways Men are apt to betake themselves unto for this end, but in vain. It is the Blood of Jesus Christ alone that cleanseth us from all our Sins; for he alone was the Propitiation for them.
4. The Declaration of the Insufficiency of all other ways for the Expiation of Sin, is an evidence of the Holiness, Righteousnes, and Severity of God against Sin, with the unavoidable Ruin of all Unbelievers.
5. Herein also consists the great Demonstration of the Love, Grace and Mercy of God, with an encouragement unto Faith; in that when the Old Sacrifices neither would, nor could perfectly Expiate Sin, he would not suffer the work it self to fail, but provided a way that should be infallibly effective of it; as is declared in the following Verses.
THe Provision that God made to supply the Defect and Insufficiency of Legal Sacrifices, as unto the Expiation of Sin, peace of Conscience with himself, and the Sanctification of the Souls of the Worshippers, is declared in this Conblessed undertaking of our Lord Jesus Christ, to do, fulfil, perform and suffer all things required in the Will, and by the WisQuotation out of the Old Testament, with the Validity of his Inferences from the Testimony which he chuseth to insist on unto this purpose.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Some few differences may be observed in the Antient and best Translations.
Vulg. Lat. ideo quapropter. Syr.
for this, for this cause.
Hostiam & oblationem, Sacrificium, victimam. The Syriack renders the words in the Plural Number, Sacrifices and Offerings.
Aptâsti, adaptâsti mihi; praeparâsti, perfecisti. A Body hast thou prepàred, i. e. fitted for me, wherein I may do thy Will. Syr.
But thou hast Cloathed me with a Body; very significantly, as unto the thing inIncarnation of the Son of God. The Aethiop. renders this Verse somewhat strangely: And when he entred into the World, he saith, Sacrifices and Offerings I would not; thy Body he hath purified unto me. Making them, as I suppose, the words of the
Vulg. non tibi placuerant; reading the preceding words in the Nominative Case, altering the Person and Number of the Verb. Syr.
Thou didst not require; non approbâsti: that is, they were not well pleasing, nor accepted with God, as unto the end of the Expiation of Sin.
Ecce adsum, venio.
Syriack omitteth the last word, which yet is Emphatical in the discourse.
Vul. tunc dixi, then I said; that is, he said; for the Apostle doth not speak these words, but repeats the words of the Psalmist.
The reading of the words out of the Hebrew by the Apostle, shall be consi
A Blessed and Divine Context this is, Summarily representing unto us the Love, Grace and Wisdom of the Father; the Love, Obedience and SufFederal Agreement between the Father and the Son, as unto the work of the Redemption and Salvation of the Church, with the Blessed Harmony between the Old and New Testament, in the Declaration of these things. The Divine Authority and Wisdom that Evidence themselves herein, are ineffable, and do cast contempt on all those by whom this Epistle hath been called in question; as sundry other passages in it do in a peculiar manner. And it is our Duty to enquire with diligence into the Mind of the Holy Spirit herein.
As unto the general Nature of the arguing of the Apostle, it consists in Two Parts. (1.) The Introduction of a pregnant Testimony out of the Old Testament unto his purpose, v. 5, 6, 7, 8, and part of the 9th. (2.) Inferences from that Testimony, Asserting and Confirming all that he had pleaded for.
In the Testimony he produceth, we may consider, (1.) The manner of its Introduction, respecting the reason of what is asserted;
1. The Introduction of this Testimony is by the word, wherefore, for which
cause, for which end. It doth not give an account why the words following were spoken, but why the things themselves were so ordered and disposed: And we are directed in this word, unto the due consideration of what is designed to be proved: And this is, that there was such an Insufficiency in all Legal Sa
2. Who spake the words contained in the Testimony: He saith. The words Threefold respect.
(1.) As they were given out by Inspiration, and are Recorded in the Scripture. So they were the words of the Holy Ghost, as the Apostle expresly affirms of the like words, ver. 15, 16. of this Chapter.
(2.) As they were used by the Penman of the Psalm, who speaks by Inspiration. So they were the words of David, by whom the Psalm was Composed. But although David spoke or wrote these words, yet is not he himself the person spoken of, nor can any passage in the whole Context be applyed unto him, as we shall see in particular afterwards. Or if they may be said to be spoken of him, it was only as he bare the person of another, or was a Type of Christ. For although God himself doth frequently prefer Moral Obedience before the SaDavid did not, would not, ought not in his own Name and Person re
(3.) The words are the words of our Lord Jesus Christ; when he cometh into the World, he saith. And it is a vain Enquiry, when in particular he spake these words; unto whom or where any mention is made of them in the story of him. It is no way needful that they should be Literally or Verbally pronounced by him. But the Holy Ghost useth these words in his Name as his, because they
Insufficiency of Legal Sacrifices (the only appearing means unto that pur
The Ascription of these words unto the Lord Christ on the reason mentioned, gives us a prospect into, (1.) The Love of his undertaking for us, when all other ways of our Recovery failed, and were disallowed as Insufficient: (2.) Into the Foundation of his undertaking for us, which was the Declaration of the Will of God concerning the Insufficiency of these Sacrifices: (3.) Into his readiness to undertake the work of Redemption, notwithstanding the difficulties that lay in the way of it, and what he was to undergo in the stead of the Legal Sa
We have the Solemn word of Christ in the Declaration he made of his readiness
3. The Season of his speaking these words in the manner declared, was, on
his coming into the World; wherefore coming (or when he cometh) into the World, he saith,
veniens or venturus; when he was to enter into the World, when the design of his future coming into the World was declared. So is to come, Mat. 11. 3. and Joh. 4. 45. That therefore may be the sense of the words; upon the First prediction of the fu
Refer the words unto some actual coming of the person spoken of into the World, and various interpretations are given of them. When he came in SaTypically, say some: But this seems not to be a word accompanying the First Institution of Sacrifices; namely, Sacrifices thou wouldst not have. His coming into the World was his appearance, and publick shewing of himself unto the World, in the beginning of his Ministery, as David came out of the Wilderness and Caves to shew himself unto the people, as King of Israel, saith Grotius. But the respect unto David herein is frivolous; nor are those words used with respect unto the Kingly Office of Christ, but meerly as unto the Offer
The Socinians contend earnestly, that this his coming into the World, is his entrance into Heaven after his Resurrection. And they embrace this uncouth Interpretation of the words, to give countenance unto their pernicious Errour, that Christ offered not himself in Sacrifice to God, in his Death, or whilest he was in this World. For his Sacrifice they suppose to be Metaphorically only so called, consisting in the representation of himself unto God in Heaven, after his Obedience and Suffering. Wherefore they say that by the World which he came into, the World to come mentioned, Chap. 2. 5. is intended. But there is nothing sound, nothing probable or specious in this wresting of the words and sense of the Scripture. For, (1.) the words in the places compared are not the same. This is Habitable part of the Earth, and can on no pretence be applyed unto Heaven. (3.) I have fully proved on that place, that the Apostle in that expression intendeth only the Days and Times of the Messia, or of the Gospel, commonly called among the Jews,
World to come, that new Heaven and Earth, wherein Righteousness should dwell. But they add that Rom. 4. 13. he should be the Heir of the World; that is, of Heaven, the World above. But this Imagination is vain also. For Abrahams being Heir of the World, is no more but his being the Father of many Nations: Nor was there ever any other promise which the Apostle should refer unto, of his being Heir of the World, but only that of his being the Father of many Nations, not of the Jews only, but of the Gentiles also; as the Apostle explains it,
Rom. 15. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. Respect also may be had unto the promised Seed pro
That which they intend by his coming into the World, is what himself conleaving of the World, and going out of it. See Joh. 17. 11, 12. 18. Chap. 13. 1. I leave the World, I am no more in the World; they are in the World. This therefore cannot be his coming into the World. And this Imacoming into the World, to be the season whereBody was fitted for him, so that which he had to do herein, was what he had to do in this World, before his departure out of it, v. 12. Wherefore this Figment is contrary unto common sense, the meaning of the words, the deWrest the Scripture for their ends unto their own destruction.
The General Sense of the best Expositors, antient and modern, is, that by the coming of Christ into the World, his Incarnation is intended: See Joh. 9. 10. Chap. 3. 16, 17. 19. Chap. 6. 14. Chap. 9. 5, 39. Chap. 11. 27. Chap. 12. 46. Chap. 16. 28. The same with his coming in the Flesh, his being made Flesh, his being manifest in the Flesh; for therein and thereby he came into the World.
Neither is there any weight in the Objection of the Socinians, unto this Excoming in the Flesh, and in his Infancy, could not do the will of God, nor could these words be used of him. For, (1.) His coming into the World in the Act of the Assumption of our Nature, was in Obedience unto, and for the fulfilling of the Word of God. For God sent him into the World, Joh. 3. 17. And he came not to do his own will, but the will of him that sent him. (2.) His doing the will of God, is not confined unto any one single Act or Duty, but extends it self unto all the Degrees, and whole progress of what he did and suffered in compliance with the Will of God, the Foundation of the whole being laid in his Incarnation.
But as these words were not verbally and litterally spoken by him, being only a real Declaration of his Design and Intention; so this expression of his coming into the World, is not to be confined unto any one single Act or Duty, so as to exclude all others from being concerned therein. It hath respect unto all the Solemn Acts of the Susception and Discharge of his Mediatory Office for the Salvation of the Church. But if any shall rather Judge that in this expressisome single season and act of Christ is intended, it can be no other but his Incarnation, and his coming into the World thereby. For this was the Foundation of all that he did afterwards, and that whereby he was fitted for his whole work of Mediation, as is immediately declared. And we may observe,
(1.) The Lord Christ had an Infinite prospect of all that he was to do and suffer
in the World, in the discharge of his Office and Undertaking. He declared from the beginning his willingness unto the whole of it. And an Eternal evidence it is of his Love, as also of the Justice of God, in laying all our Sins on him, seeing it was done by his own Will and Consent.
4. The Fourth thing in the words is, what he said. The substance of it is laid down, ver. 5. Unto which the farther Explication is added, ver. 6, 7. And the Application of it unto the Intention of the Apostle, in those that follow.
The Words are recorded, Psal. 40. v. 6, 7, 8. being Indited by the Holy Ghost in the Name of Christ, as declarative of his Will.
Of the First thing proposed, there are Two Parts. (1.) What concerned the Sacrifices of the Law. (2.) What concerneth himself. As unto what concerneth the Sacrifices, there is, (1.) the expression of the Subject spoken of; that is, Sacrifice and Offering. In the next Verse, the one of them, namely
Of these Sacrifices it is affirmed, that God would them not, ver. 5. and that had no pleasure in them, ver. 6. The First in the Original is thou wouldst not. We render it in the Psalm, thou didst not desire.
to will, but always with desire, complacency and
All the difficulty in the words may be reduced unto these two Enquiries. (1.) In what sense it is affirmed that God would not have these Sacrifices, that he had no pleasure in them, that he rested not in them. (2.) How was this made known, so as that it might be declared, as it is in this place. As unto the First of these, we may observe,
1. That this is not spoken of the Will of God, as unto the Institution and Appointment of these Sacrifices; for the Apostle affirms, that they were
2. It is not with respect unto the Obedience of the people in their attendance unto them, during the Oeconomy of the Law. For God both required it strictly of them, and approved of it in them, when duly performed: The whole Law and Prophets bare Testimony hereunto. And it was the great Injunction which he left with the people, when he ceased to grant any more immediate ReMal. 4. 4. And the Lord Christ himself under the Judaical Church, did observe them.
3. God doth frequently reject or disallow them in the people, as they were attended unto and performed by them. But this he did only in the case of their gross Hypocrisie, and the
Yet neither was this the Case under consideration in the Psalm. For there is no respect had unto any miscarriages of the people about these Sacrifices, but unto the Sacrifices themselves.
Wherefore some say that the words are Prophetical; and declare what the Will of God would be after the coming of Christ in the Flesh, and the Offering of his Sacrifice once for all. Then God would no more require them nor accept them. But yet neither is this suited unto the Mind of the Holy Ghost. For, (1.) The Apostle doth not prove by this Testimony that they
The Mind of the Holy Ghost is plain enough, both in the Testimony it self, and in the Improvement of it by the Apostle. For the Legal Sacrifices are spoken of only with respect unto that end which the Lord Christ undertook to accomplish by his Mediation. And this was the perfect real Expiation of Sin, with the Justification, Sanctification and Eternal Salvation of the Church; with that perfect State of Spiritual Worship which was ordained for it in this World. All these things these Sacrifices were appointed to prefigure and represent. But the Nature and Design of this Prefiguration being Dark and Obscure, and the things signified being utterly hid from them, as unto their especial Nature and the manner of their Efficacy, many in all Ages of the Church expected them from these Sacrifices, and they had a great appearance of being Divinely Ordained untook pleasure in them with reference thereunto; they were insufficient in the Wisdom, Holiness and Righteousness of God unto any such purpose. Wherefore the Sense of God concerning them as unto this end, is, that they were not appointed, not approved, not accepted for it.
2. It may be enquired, how this Mind and Will of God, concerning the refusal of these Sacrifices unto this end, might be known, so as that it should be here spoken of, as of a Truth unquestionable in the Church. For the Words, thou wouldst not, thou tookst no Pleasure, do not express a meer internal act of the Divine Will, but a Declaration also of what is, and what is not well-pleasing unto God. How then was this Declaration made, how came it to be known? I answer,
1. The Words are the words of our Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God, consiIncarnate, for the Redemption of the Church. As such, he was always in the Bosome of the Father, participant of his Counsels; especially of those which concerned the Church, the Children of Men, Prov. 8. 22, 23, 24. &c. He was therefore always acquainted with all the thoughts and coun
2. As unto the Penman of the Psalm, the words were dictated unto him by immediate Revelation, which if nothing had been spoken of it, or intiDeclaration of the Will of God there
3. In, by and together with the Institution of all these Legal Sacrifices, God had from the beginning intimated unto the Church, that they were not the absolute, ultimate way for the Expiation of Sin, that he designed or would approve of. And this he did partly in the Nature of the Sacrifices themimpossible that the Blood of Bulls and Goats should take away Sin; partly in giving various intimations first, and then express Declaration of his Will, that they were only prescribed for a season, and that a time would come when their Observance should utterly cease, which the Apostle proves, Chap. 7. and 8. and partly by evidencing that they were all but Types and Figures of good things to come, as we have at large declared. By these, and sundry other ways of the like kind, God had in the Institution and Command of these Sacrifices themselves sufficiently manifested, that he did neither design them, nor require them, nor approve of them, as unto this end of the Expiation of Sin. Wherefore there is in the words no new Revelation absolutely, but only a meer express Declaration of that Will and Counsel of God, which he had by various ways given intimation of before. And we may observe,
1. No Sacrifices of the Law, not all of them together, were a means for the Expiation of Sin, suited unto the Glory of God, or necessities of the Souls of Men. From the First appointment of Sacrifices immediately after the entrance of Sin,
Gentiles retained them by Tradition, helped on by some Conviction on a Guilty Conscience, that by some way or other
2. Our utmost diligence, with the most Sedulous improvement of the Light and Wisdom of Faith is necessary in our search into, and enquiry after the Mind and Will of God, in the Kevelation he makes of them. The Apostle in this Epistle proves by all sorts of Arguments taken from the Scriptures of the Old TestaEternal Expiation of Sin. And he doth not deal herein with these Hebrews on his
3. The constant use of Sacrifices to signifie these things, which they could not effect or really exhibit unto the Worshippers, was a great part of the Bondage that the Church was kept in under the Old Testament. And hereon, as those who were Carnal, bowed down their Backs unto the Burthen, and their Necks unto the Yoke; so those who had received the Spirit of Adoption, did continually Pant and Groan after the coming of him, in and by whom all was to be fulfilled. So was the Law their Schoolmaster unto Christ.
4. God may in his Wisdom appoint and accept of Ordinances and Duties unto one end, which he will refuse and reject, when they are applyed unto another. So he doth plainly in these Words, those Sacrifices which in other places he most strictly enjoyns. How express, how multiplyed are his Commands for good works, and our abounding in them? Yet when they are made the matter of our Righteousness before him, they are as unto that end, namely, of our Justification, rejected and disapproved.
The First Part of ver. 5. declares the Will of God concerning the Sacrifices of the Law. The latter contains the supply that God in his Wisdom and Grace, made of the defect, and insufficiency of these Sacrifices. And this is not any thing
This he expresseth in the last clause of this Verse. But a Body hast thou prepared me. The
But yet this way must be such, as should not render those Sacrifices utterly useless from their First Institution, which would reflect on the Wisdom of God by whom they were appointed. For if God did never approve of them, never delight in them; unto what end were they Ordained? Wherefore although the real way of the Expiation of Sin, be in it self of another Nature than those Saprefigure and represent unto the Faith of the Church. The Church was taught by them that without a Sacrifice there could be no Attonement made for Sin; whereDeliverance must be by a Sacrifice. It is so, saith the Lord Christ, and therefore the First thing God did in the preparation of this new way, was the Preparation of a Body for me, which was to be Offered in Sacrifice.
And in the Antithesis intimated in this Adversative Conjunction, respect is had unto the Will of God. As Sacrifices were that which he would not unpreparation of the Body of Christ was that, which he would, which he delighted in, and was well pleased withal. So the whole of the work of Christ and the effects of it, is expresly referred unto this Will of God, ver. 9, 10.
And we must, First, speak unto the Apostles rendring these words out of the Psalmist. They are in the Original, my Ears hast thou digged, bored, prepared. All sorts of Critical Writers and Expositors have so laboured in the resolution of this difficulty, that there is little to be added unto the Industry of some, and it were endless to confute the Mistakes of others. I shall there
1. That the Reading of the words in the Psalm is incorrupt, and they are the precise words of the Holy Ghost. Though of late years sundry persons have used an unwarrantable boldness in feigning various Lections in the Hebrew Text, yet none of any judgment have attempted to conjecture at any word that might be thought to be used in the room of any one of them. And as for those which some have thought the LXX. might possibly mistake, that signifie a Body, as Body in the Chaldee Dialect, or, Analogy unto
2. It doth not seem probable unto me, that the LXX. did ever Translate these Words, as they are now Extant in all the Copies of that Translation, Translation of the Original words, but an Interpretation, and Exposition of the sense and meaning of them, which was no part of their design. (2.) If they made this Exposition, they did so either by chance, as it were, or from a right understanding of the Mystery contained in them. That they should be cast upon it by a meer conjecture, is altogether improbable. And that they understood the mystery couched in that Metaphorical expression (without which no account can be given of the Version of the words) will not be granted by them who know any thing of those
3. The words therefore in this place were the words whereby the Apostle expressed the sense and meaning of the Holy Ghost in those used in the Psalmist, or that which was intended in them. He did not take them from the Translation of the LXX; but used them himself, to express the sense of the
4. This is certain that the sense intended by the Psalmist, and that expressed by the Apostle, are the same or unto the same purpose. And their Agreement is both plain and evident. That which is spoken, is, an act of God the Father towards the Son. The end of it, is, that the Son might be fit and meet to do the Will of God in the way of Obedience. So it is expressed in the Text, mine Ears hast thou bored, or a Body hast thou prepared me; Then said I, Lo, I come to do thy Will, O God. This is the sole end why God so acted towards him: What this was, is so expressed in the Psalmist, my Ears hast thou bored, with a double Figure: (1.) A Metaphor from the Ear, wherewith we hear the comhearing and hearkening, as is known. Wherefore the ascription of Ears unto the Lord Christ by an act of God, is the preparation of such a State and Nature for him, as wherein he should be meet to yield Obedience unto him. (2.) By a Synecdoche; wherein the part is put for the whole. In his Divine Nature alone it was impossible that the Lord Christ should come to do the Will of God, in the way whereby he was to do it. Wherefore God prepared anoSynecdochically by the Ears for the whole Body; and that significantly, because as it is impossible that any one should have Ears of any use, but by Vertue of his having a Body; so the Ears are that part of the Body, by which alone Instruction unto Obedience, the thing aimed at, is received. This is that which is directly expressed of him, Isa. 59. 4, 5. He wakeneth, Morning by Morning, he wakeneth my Ear to hear as the Learned. The Lord God hath opened my Ear, and I was not rebellious; or, I was obedient. And so it is all one in what sense you take the word common and usual, to dig or bore, or in that whereunto it is sometimes applyed, to fit and perfect. For I do not judge there is any allusion in the exboring the Ear of the Servant that refused to make use of his Liberty at the year of release. Nor is the word, used in that case, Exod. 21. 6. But it respects the framing of the Organ of hearing which is as it were bored; and the internal sense in readiness unto Obedience, is exoutward Instrument of Hearing, that we may learn to obey thereby.
Wherefore this is, and no other can be the sense of the words in the Psalmist; namely, that God the Father did order things towards Jesus Christ, that he should have a Nature wherein he might be free, and able to yield Obedience unto the Will of God, with an intimation of the quality of it, in having Ears to hear, which belong only unto a Body.
This Sense the Apostle expresseth in more plain terms now after the accomProphesie, and thereby the Veil which was upon Divine Revelations under the Old Testament, is taken away.
There is therefore nothing remaining but that we give an Exposition of these words of the Apostle, as they contain the sense of the Holy Ghost in the Psalm;
two things we must enquire into, (1.) What is meant by this body; (2.) How God prepared it.
1. A Body is here a Synecdochical expression of the Humane nature of Christ. flesh taken, where he is said to be made flesh, and the Flesh and Blood whereof he was partaker. For the general end of his having this Body, was, that he might therein and thereby yield Obedience, or do the Will of God. And the especial end of it, was, that he might have what to offer in Sahis Body alone. For it is the Soul, the other essential part of Humane Nature, that is the prinBody of Christ alone, Offered in Sacrifice unto God. He made his Soul an Offering for Sin, Isa. 53. 10. which was TypiBlood of the Sacrifice. Wherefore it is said, that he offered himself unto God, Chap. 9. 14. Ephes. 5. 2. That is, his whole entire Humane Nature, Soul and Body, in their Substance, in all their Faculties and Powers; But the Apostle both here and ver. 10. mentions only the Body it self, for the reasons ensuing. (1.) To manifest that this Offering of Christ was to be by Death, as was that of the Sacrifices of Old; and this the Body alone was subject unto. (2.) Because as the Covenant was to be confirmed by this Offering, it was to be by Blood which is contained in the Body alone, and the separation of it from the Body carries the Life along with it. (3.) To testifie that his Sacrifice was visible and substantial, not an outward appearance of things, as some have fancied; but such as truly answered the real Bloody Sacrifices of the Law. (4.) To shew the Alliance and Cognation between him that Sanctifieth by his Offering, and them that are
2. Concerning this Body, it is affirmed that God prepared it for him. Thou
hast prepared for me; that is, God hath done it, even God the Father; For unI come to do thy will O God, a Body hast thou prepared me. The coming of Christ the Son of God into the World, his comWill, what was his design, what he would have done. This proposal is here repeated, as unto what was Negative in it, which includes the Opposite Positive; Sacrifice and Burnt Offerings thou wouldst not have, but that which he would, was the Obedience of the Son unto his Will. This Proposal the Son closeth withLo, saith he, I come. But all things being Originally in the Hand of the Father, the Provision of things necessary unto the fulfilling of the Will of God, is left unto him. Among those the principal was, that the Son should have a Body prepared for him, that so he might have somewhat of his own to offer. Wherefore the preparation of it is in a peculiar manner assigned unto the Father; a Body hast thou prepared me. And we may observe; that
1. The Supream contrivance of the Salvation of the Church, is in a peculiar manner ascribed unto the person of the Father. His Will, his Grace, his Wiscame to do his Will, to seek his Glory, to make known his Name, that the praise of his Grace might be exalted. And we through Christ do believe in God even the Father, when we assign unto him the Glory of all the Holy Properties of his Nature, as acting Originally in the contrivance, and for the effecting of our Salvation.
The Furniture of the Lord Christ (though he were the Son, and in his Divine person the Lord of all,) unto the discharge of his work of Mediation, was the peculiar Act of the Father. He prepared him a Body; he anointed him with the Spirit;
3. Whatever God designes, appoints and calls any unto, he will provide for them all that is needful unto the Duties of Obedience, whereunto they are so appointed and called. As he prepared a Body for Christ; so he will provide Gifts, Abilities and Faculties suitable unto their work, for those whom he calleth unto it. Others must provide as well as they can for themselves.
But we must yet enquire more particularly into the nature of this preparation of the Body of Christ, here ascribed unto the Father. And it may be considered two ways.
1. In the Designation and Contrivance of it. So preparation is sometimes used for Predestination, or the Resolution for the effecting any thing that is future in its proper season. Isa. 30. 33. Matt. 20. 23. Rom. 9. 23. 1 Cor. 2. 9. In this sense of the word, God had prepared a Body for Christ, he had in the Eternal Counsel of his Will determined that he should have it in the appointed time. So he was Forc-ordained before the Foundation of the World, but was manifest in these last times for us; 1 Pet. 1. 20.
2. In the actual effecting, ordering and creating of it; that it might be fitted and suited unto the work that it was ordained unto. In the former sense the Body it self is alone the Object of this preparation. A Body hast thou prepared me, that is, designed for me. This latter sense comprizeth the use of the Body also; it is fitted for its work. This latter sense it is, that is proper unto this place. Only it is spoken of by the Psalmist in a Prophetical Style, wherein things certainly future, are expressed as already performed. For the word signifies such a preparation, as whereby it is made actually fit and meet for the end it is designed unto. And therefore it is variously rendred, to fit, to adapt, to peradapted a Body unto my work, fitted and suited an Humane Nature unto that I have to perform in it and by it. A Body it must be; yet not every body, nay not any Body brought forth by Carnal Generation according to the course of Nature, could effect, or was fit for the work designed unto it. But God prepared, provided such a
1. He prepared him such a Body, such an Humane Nature, as might be of the same Nature with ours, for whom he was to accomplish his work therein. For it was necessary that it should be Cognate and Allied unto ours, that he might be meet to act on our behalf, and to suffer in our stead. He did not form him a Body out of the Dust of the Earth, as he did that of Adam whereby he could not have been of the same Race of Mankind with us; nor meerly out of nothing as he created the Angels, whom he was not to save. See, Chap. 2. ver. 14, 15, 16. and the Exposition thereon. He took our Flesh and Blood proceeding from the Loyns of Abraham.
2. He so prepared it, as that it should be no way subject unto that depravation and pollution, that came on our whole Nature by Sin. This could not have been done, had his Body been prepared by Carnal Generation, the way and means of conveying the taint of Original Sin, which befel our Nature, unto all indiviLuke 1. 35. Heb. 7. 26.
He prepared him a Body consisting of Flesh and Blood, which might be Offered as a real substantial Sacrifice, and wherein he might Suffer for Sin, in his Offering to make Attonement for it. Nor could the Sacrifices of Old which were Real, Bloody and Substantial, prefigure that which should be only Metaphorical and in appearance. The whole evidence of the Wisdom of God in the Institution of the Sacrifices of the Law, depends on this, that Christ was to have a Body consisting of Flesh and Blood, wherein he might answer all that was prefigu
4. It was such a Body as was Animated with a Living Rational Soul. Had it been only a Body, it Might have Suffered as did the Beasts under the Law, from which no Act of Obedience was required, only they were to suffer what was done unto them. But in the Sacrifice of the Body of Christ, that which was principally respected, and whereon the whole Efficacy of it did depend, was his Obedience unto God. For he was not to be Offered by others, but he was to Offer himself in Obedience unto the Will of God, Chap. 9. 14. Ephes. 5. 2. And the principles of all Obedience lye alone in the Powers and Fa
5. This Body and Soul were obnoxious unto all the Sorrows and Sufferings which our Nature is liable unto, and we had deserved as they were poenal, tending unto Death. Hence was he meet to Suffer in our stead, the same things which we should have done. Had they been exempted by special priviledge from what our Nature is liable unto, the whole work of our Redemption by his Blood had been frustrate.
6. This Body or Humane Nature thus prepared for Christ, was exposed unto all sorts of Temptations from outward Causes. But yet it was so Sanctified by the perfection of Grace, and fortified by the fulness of the Spirit dwelling therein, as that it was not possible it should be touched with the least Taint or Guilt of Sin. And this also was absolutely necessary unto the work whereunto it was designed, 1 Pet. 2. 22. Heb. 7. 26.
7. This Body was liable unto Death, which being the Sentence and Sanction of the Law, with respect unto the First and all following Sins (all and every one of them) was to be undergone actually by him, who was to be our DeHeb. 2. 14, 15. Had it not died, Death would have borne Rule over all unto Eternity. But in the death thereof, it was swallowed up in Victory, 1 Cor. 15. 55, 56, 57.
8. As it was subject unto Death and died actually, so it was meet to be raised again from Death. And herein consisted the great pledge and evidence that our dead Bodies may be and shall be raised again unto a Blessed Immortality. So it became the Foundation of all our Faith, as unto things Eternal, 1 Cor. 15. 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23.
9. This Body and Soul being capable of a real separation, and being actually separated by Death, though not for any long continuance, yet no less truly and really than them who have been dead a Thousand years, a Demonstration was given therein of an active Subsistence of the Soul, in a State of Separation from the Body. As it was with the Soul of Christ when he was dead, so is it with our Souls in the same State. He was alive with God and unto God, when his Body was in the Grave; and so shall our Souls be.
10. This Body was visibly taken up into Heaven and there resides; which, considering the ends thereof, is the great encouragement of Faith, and the Life of our Hope.
These are but some of the many instances that may be given of the Divine Wisdom in so preparing a Body for Christ, as that it might be fitted and adapted unto the work which he had to do therein. And we may Observe, that
Not only the Love and Grace of God in sending his Son, are continually to be admired and Glorified, but the acting of this Infinite Wisdom, in fitting and preparing his humane Nature, so as to render it every way meet unto the work which it was designed for, ought to be the especial Object of our Holy Contemplation. But having treated hereof distinctly in a peculiar
The last thing Observable in this Verse, is, that this preparation of the Body of Christ, is ascribed unto God even the Father, unto whom he speaks these words; a Body hast thou prepared me. As unto the Operation in the production of the Substance of it, and the forming its Structure, it was the peculiar and imLuk. 1. 35. This work I have at large elseArticle of Faith, that the Formation of the Humane Nature of Christ in the Womb of the Virgin, was the peculiar Act of the Holy Ghost. The Holy taking of this Nature unto himself, the Assumption of it to be his own Nature by a Subsistence in his Person, the Divine Nature assuming the Humane in the Person of the Son, was his own Act alone. Yet was the preparation of this Body, the work of the Father in a peculiar manner; it was so in the Infinitely Wise, Authoritative contrivance and ordering of it, his Counsel and Will therein being acted by the immediate Power of the Holy Ghost. The Father prepared it in the Authoritative Disposition of all things; the Holy Ghost actually wrought it; and he himself assumed it. There was no distinction of time in these distinct actings of the Holy Persons of the Trinity in this matter, but only a disposition of Order in their Operation. For in the same instant of time, this Body was prepared by the Father, wrought by the Holy Ghost, and assumed by himself to be his own. And the actings of the distinct Persons, being all the actings of the same Divine Nature, Understanding, Love, and Power, they differ not fundamentally and radically; but only terminatively with respect unto the work wrought and effected. And we may
The Ineffable, but yet distinct Operation of the Father, Son and Spirit, in, about and towards the Humane Nature assumed by the Son, are, as an uncontroulable evidence of their distinct Subsistence in the same Individual Divine Essence; so a Guidance unto Faith, as unto all their distinct actings towards us in the Application of the work of Redemption unto our Souls. For their actings towards the
In Burnt Offerings and Sacrifices for Sin thou hast had no pleasure; Then said I, Lo, I come (in the Volume of the Book it is written of me) to do thy Will, O God.
TWo things are asserted in the Foregoing Verse in general. (1.) The Rejection of Sacrifices for the end of the compleat Expiation of Sin. (2.) The Provision of a new way or means for the accomplishment of that end. Both these things are spoken unto apart, and more distinctly in these two verses: The former
Ver. 6. He reassumes and farther declares what was in general before affirmver. 5. Sacrifice and Offering thou wouldst not. Hereof we have yet a farConfirmation and Explication, which it stood in need of. For notwithstandassertion, two things may yet be enquired about. (1.) What were those Sacrifices and Offerings which God would not. For they being of various sorts, some of them only may be intended, seeing they are only mentioned in
What is meant by that Expression, that God would them not; seeing it is certain that they were appointed and commanded by him.
Wherefore our Lord Jesus Christ whose words in the Psalm these are, doth not only reassert what was spoken before in general, but also gives a more particular account of what Sacrifices they were which he intended. And two things he declares concerning them.
1. That they were not such Sacrifices as Men had found out and appointed. Such the World was filled withal, which were offered unto Devils, and which the people of Israel themselves were addicted unto. Such were their Sacrifices unBaal and Moloch, which God so often complaineth against and detesteth. But they were such Sacrifices as were appointed and commanded by the Law. Hence he expresseth them by their Legal Names, as the Apostle immediately takes notice, they were Offered by the Law, ver. 8.
2. He shews what were those Sacrifices appointed by the Law, which in an especial manner he intended; and they were those which were appointed for the
1. Burnt Offerings. In the Hebrew it is Singular Number, which is usually rendred by in the Plural, and Sacrifices of this kind were Ascensions, from their Adjunct, the rising up, or ascending of the Smoak of the Sacrifices in their Burning on the Altar; a Pledge of that sweet savour which should arise unto God above, from the Sacrifice of Christ here below. And sometimes they are called firings, from the way and means of their Consumption on the Altar, which was by fire. And this recontinual Sacrifice, Morning and Evening, for the whole Congregation, which was a Burnt Offering; and all those which on especial occasions were offered with respect unto the Expiation of Sin.
2. The other Sort is expressed by Greek renders by for or concerning Sin. For Verb in Kal signifieth to Sin, and Piel, to expiate Sin. Hence the Substantive
Greek renders it by Sacrifice for Sin; which expression is retained by the Apostle, Rom. 5. 3. and in this place. And the Sacrifices of this kind were of two sorts; or this kind of Sacrifices had a double use. For, (1.) The great Anniversary Sacrifice of Expiation for the Sins of the whole Congregation,
Concerning all these Sacrifices it is added, thou hadst no pleasure.
opposition hereunto, God gives Testimony from Heaven concerning the Lord Christ and his undertaking; This is my Beloved Son,
In whom I am well pleased, Matt. 3. 17. Chap. 17. 5. See, Isa. 42. 1. Ephes. 1. 6. This is the great Antithesis between the Law and the Gospel; Sacrifices and Offerings for sin,
This is my Beloved Son,
approve of with delight, to rest in with satisfaction, the exercise of Divine good Will, The Original word in the Psalm is, ask, to seek, to enquire, to require. Wherefore, as we observed before, although
exactly render the words in their precise sigPsalmist are exactly represented in these used by the Apostle.
There are two Reasons of this seeming Repetition, thou wouldst not, thou hadst no pleasure. (1.) A Repetition of the same words, almost of the same significasame subject, signifies the determinate certainty of the Removal of these Sacrifices, with the disappointment and ruin of them, who should contwo things pretenFirst, their Institution by God himself, and Secondly, his acceptance of them, or being well pleased with them; one of these words is peculiarly applyed unto the former; the other unto the latter; God did neither Institute them, nor ever accepted of them un
1. It is the Will of God that the Church should take especial notice of this sacred truth, that nothing can expiate or take away Sin, but the Blood of Christ alone. Hence is the vehemency of the rejection of all other means in the Repetition of these words. And it is necessary for us so to apprehend his Mind, consideRom. 10. 3. 4.
2. Whatever may be the Use or Efficacy of any Ordinances of Worship, yet if they are employed or trusted unto for such ends as God hath not designed them unto, he accepts not of our persons in them, nor approves of the things themselves. Thus he declares himself concerning the most Solemn Institutions of the Old Testament. And those under the New have been no less abused in this way, than those of Old.
Then said I, Lo, I come (in the Volume of the Book it is written of me) to do thy Will, O God.
THis is the Close of the Testimony used by the Apostle out of the Psalmist, which in the next Verses he interprets, and makes Application of unto his purpose. And it contains the second branch of the Antithesis, that he insists on. The Lord Christ having declared the Will of God, and what God said ungreat work should be wrought, however he disapproved of Legal Sacrifices as the means thereof. For there is herein represented unConsultation between the Father and the Son, with re
In the words we may consider, (1.) How the Son expressed his Mind in this matter; he said; I said. (2.) When or on what consideration he so expressed himself; It was
1. The expression of his Mind is in that word I said. There is no necessity, as was before observed, that these very words should at any
And we ought in like manner, to be faithful in all the Engagements that we make to him and for him. Surely, faith he, they are my people, Children that will not Lie.
2. There is the season, wherein he thus said, then, or thereon. For it may respect either the Order of the Time, or the stating of the Case in hand. First, it may respect an Order of Time; He said, Sacrifice and Burnt Offerings thou wouldst not have; Then said I. But it is, as I judge, better extended unto the whole Case in hand. When things were come to this pass, when all the Church of Gods Elect were under the Guilt of Sin, and the Curse of the Law thereon; when there was no hope for them in themselves, nor in or by any Divine Institution; when all things were at a loss, as unto our Recovery and Salthen did Jesus Christ the Son of God in Infinite Wisdom, Love and Grace, interpose himself in our behalf, in our stead, to do, answer and perform all that God in Infinite Wisdom, Holiness and Righteousness required unto that end. And we may observe, that
There is a Signal Glory put upon the undertaking of Christ, to make Reconciliation for the Church by the Sacrifice of himself.
3. This undertaking of Christ is Signalized by the Remark that is put on the Declaration of it, Behold. A Glorious Spectacle it was to God, to Angels and to Men: To God, as it was filled with the highest Effects of Infinite goodEph. 1. 10. which therefore they enFear and Reverence to look into, 1 Pet. 1. 12, 13. And as unto Men, that is, the Church of the Elect, nothing could be so Glorious in their Sight, nothing so desirable. By this call of Christ, behold I come, the Eys of all Creatures in Heaven and Earth ought to be fixed on him, to behold the glori
4. There is what he thus proposed himself for, saying Behold me. This in geI come. This coming of Christ, what it was, and wherein it did consist, was declared before. It was by assuming the Body that was prepared for him. This was the Foundation of the whole work he had to do, wherein he came forth like the Rising Sun, with Light in his Wings, or as a Giant rejoycing to run his Race.
The Faith of the Old Testament, was, that he was thus to come: And this is the Life of the New, that he is come. They by whom this is denyed; do overthrow the Faith of the Gospel. This is the Spirit of Antichrist, 1 Joh. 3. 1, 2, 3. And this may be done two ways. (1.) Directly and Expresly. (2.) By just consequence. Directly, it is done by them who
It may be Objected against this fundamental Truth, that if the Son of God would undertake this work of Reconciliation between God and Man, why did he not do the Will of God by his mighty Power and Grace, and not by this way of coming in the Flesh, which was attended with all Dishonour, Reproaches, Sufferings and Death it self? But besides what I have at large elsewhere disnecessity and suitableness of this way of his coming unto the manifestation of all the Glorious properties of the Nature of God, I shall only say, that God, and he alone knew what was necessary unto the accomplish
(2.) The End for which he thus promiseth to come, is to do the Will of God; Lo, I
come to do thy Will, O God.
The Will of God is taken two ways. (1.) For his Eternal purpose and design, called the Counsel of his Will, Eph. 1. 11. and most commonly his Will it self; The Will of God as unto what he will do, or cause to be done. (2.) For the Declaration of his Will and Pleasure, as unto what he will have us to do in a way of Duty and Obedience; that is, the Rule of our Obedience.
It was the Will of God in the former sense that is here intended; as is eviby this Will of God we are Sanctified, that is,
Wherefore this Will of God, which Christ came to fulfil, is that which elseEphes. 1. 5, 11. &c. His good pleasure, his purpose, the Counsel of his Will; his good pleasure which he purposed in himself, that is, freely without any Cause or Reason taken from us, to call, justifie, sanctifie and save to the uttermost, or to bring them unto Eterfrom the beginning of the World, Ephes. 3. 8, 9. So as that it was beyond the Wisdom and Indagation of all Angels and Men to make a Discovework he had graciously designed, and gave in the First promise, and otherwise some obFaith in them that were called. Afterwards God was pleased in his Soveraign Authority over the Church for their good, and unto his own Glory, to make a representation of this whole work in the Institutions of the Law, especially of the Sacrifices thereaccomplishing this Will of God, in the Expiation of Sin, with the Salvation of the Church. But God had now by various ways and means witnessed unto the Church, that inpacify Conscience, and that the strict performance of them was a Yoke and Burden. In this state of things when the fulness of time was come, the glorious Counsels of God, namely of the Father, Son and Spirit brake forth with Light, like the Sun in its strength from under a Cloud, in the tender made of himself by Jesus Christ unLo, I come to do thy Will O God. This, this is the way, the only way whereby the Will of God might be accomplished. Herein were all the Riches of Divine Wisdom displayed, all the Treasures of Grace laid open, all Shades and Clouds dispelled, and the open door of Salvation evidenced unto all.
(3.) This Will of God Christ came to do,
effect, to establish and perfectly
This seems to me the First Sense of the place. Howbeit, I would not as I said before, exclude the former mentioned also. For our Lord in all that he did was the Servant of the Father, and received especial commands for all that he did. This Commandment, saith he, have I received of my Father. Hence in this sense also he came to do the Will of God. He fulfilled the Will of his purpose, by Obedience unto the Will of his Commands. Hence it is added in the Psalm, that he delighted to do the Will of God, and that his Law was in the midst of his Bowels. His delight in the Will of God, as unto the laying down of his Life at the Command of God, was necessary unto this doing of his Will. And we may observe,
1. The Foundation of the whole glorious work of the Salvation of the Church, was laid in the Soveraign Will, Pleasure and Grace of God, even the Father. Christ came only to do his Will.
2. The coming of Christ in the Flesh, was in the Wisdom, Righteousness and Holiness of God, necessary for to fulfil his Will, that we might be saved unto his Glory.
3. The fundamental motive unto the Lord Christ in his undertaking the work of Mediation, was the Will and Glory of God; Lo, I come to do thy Will.
5ly. The last thing in this Context is the Ground and Rule of this undertaking of the Lord Christ; and this is the Glory of the Truth of God in his promises
In the Volume of the Book it is written of me, that I should fulfil thy Will O God. There is a difficulty in these words, both as to the Translation of the Original Text, and as unto the Application of them. And therefore Critical Observations have been multiplied about them, which it is not my way or work to repeat. Those that are Learned, know where to find them, and those that are not so, will not be edified by them. What is the true meaning and intention of the Holy Spirit in them, is what we are to enquire into.
The Socinian Expositors have a peculiar conceit on this place. They supespecial Chapter or place in the Law. This they conjecture to be that of
1. David is not at all intended in these words of the Psalmist, any otherPenman of the Holy Ghost, and a Type of Christ, on which account he speaks in his name. They are the words of Christ, which David was inspired by the Holy Ghost to declare and utter, neither would David speak these words concerning himself; because he that speaks, doth abDavid could not do justly.
2. There is nothing spoken in this place of Deuteronomy concerning the Sacerdotal Office, but only of the
3. The words there recorded contain a meer prescription of Duty, no prediPsalmist are a Prophesie, a Divine Prediction and Promise which must be actually accomplished. Nor doth our Lord Christ in them, declare what was prescribed unto him, but what he did undertake to do, and the record that was made of that undertaking of his.
4. There is not one word in that place of Moses concerning the removal of Sacrifices and Burnt Offerings, which, as the Apostle declares, is the principal thing intended in those of the Psalmist. Yea, the contrary as unto the season intended, is expresly asserted. For the King was to read in the Book of the Law continually, that he might observe and do all that is written therein, a great part whereof consists in the Institution and Observation of Sacrifices.
5. This Interpretation of the words utterly overthrows what they dispute for immediately before. This is, that the entrance mentioned of Christ into the World, was not indeed his coming into this World, but his going out of it, and entring into Heaven. For it cannot be denied but that the Obedience of reading the Law continually, and doing of it, is to be attended unto in this World, and not in Heaven; and this they seem to acknowledge, so as to recal their own Exposition. Other absurdities which are very many in this place, I shall not insist upon.
Hebrew, in the Volume or Roll. Ribera contends that this Translation of the word, the Volume or Roll of the Book, is absurd; Because, saith he, the Book it self was a Volume or a Roll; and so it is, as if he had said, in the Roll of the Roll. But Book, doth not signifie a Book as written in a Roll, but only an Enuntiation or Declaration of any thing. We now call any Book of greatVolume; but Roll, and the words used by the Psalmist do signifie that the Declaration of the Will of God made in this matter, was written in a Roll. The Roll which contains all the Revelations of his Mind. And the word used by the Apostle, is not remote from this signification, as may be seen in sundry Classick Authors,
volumen; because a Roll is made round after the Fashion of the Head of a Man.
As the Book it self was one Roll, so the Head of it the beginning of it, amongst the first things written in it, is this recorded concerning the coming of Christ to do the Will of God. This includeth both senses of the word; in the Head, in the Beginning of the Roll, namely of that part of the Scripture, which was written when David Penned this Psalm. Now this can be no other but the first promise, which was recorded, Gen. 3. 15. Then it was first declared, then it was first written and Enrolled, that the Lord Christ the Son of God should be made of the Seed of the Woman, and in our Nature come to do the Will of God, and to deSatan. In this promise, and the writing of it in the Head of the Volume, lies the verification of the Psalmists assertion, in the Volume of the Book it is written. Howbeit, the following Declarations of the Will of God herein, are not exwhole Volume of the Law. For indeed it is nothing but a
1. Gods Records in the Roll of his Book are the Foundation and Warranty of the Faith of the Church, in the Head and Members.
The Lord Christ in all that he did and suffered, had continual respect unto what was written of him. See Matt. 26. 24.
3. In the Record of these words, (1.) God was Glorified in his Truth and Faithfulness. (2.) Christ was secured in his work, and the undertaking of it. (3.) A Testimony was given unto his Person and Office. (4.) Direction is given unto the Church in all, wherein they have to do with God, what they should attend unto; namely, what is written. (5.) The things which concern Christ the Meditor, are the
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
THe Use and Signification of most of the words of these Verses, have already in our passage been spoken unto.
Above when he says, &c.
There are two things in these three Verses. (1.) The Application of the TePsalmist, unto the present Argument of the Apostle, ver. 8, 9. (2.) An inference from the whole unto the proof of the only cause and means of the Sanctification of the Church, the Argument he was now en
1. As to the first of these, or the Application of the Testimony of the Psalmist, and his Reassuming it, we may consider,
1. What he designed to prove thereby, and this was, that by the Introduction and establishment of the Sacrifice of Christ in the Church, there was an end put to all Legal Sacrifices; And he adds thereunto, that the ground and reason of this great alteration of things in the Church by the Will of God, was the utter insufficiency of these Legal Sacrifices in themselves, for the Expiation of Sin, and Sanctification of the Church.
In ver. 9. He gives us this sum of his design, He takes away the first, that he may establish the second.
2. The Apostle doth not here directly argue from the matter or substance of the Testimony it self, but from the Order of the words, and the regard they have in their Order unto one another. For there is in them a two fold Proposition; one concerning the
3. This Order in the words of the Apostle is declared in that distribution of above, and then;
above, that is, in the first place; these words, or sayings recorded in the first place.
4. There is in the words themselves these three things.
1. There is a Distribution made of the Legal Sacrifices into their general heads, with respect unto the Will of God concerning them all; Sacrifices and Offering, and whole Burnt Offerings, and Sacrifice for Sin. And in that Distrithey were required according to the Law.
(1.) He had respect not only unto the removal of the Sacrifices, but also of the Law it self, whereby they were retained; so he enters on his present disputativer. 4.
(2.) Allowing these Sacrifices and Offerings, all that they could pretend unto, namely, that they were established by the Law; yet notwithstanding this, God re
Whereas the Apostle doth plainly distinguish and distribute all Sacrifices and Offerings, into those on the one side, which were offered by the Law, and that one Offering of the Body of Christ on the other side; the pretended Sacrifice of the Mass is utterly rejected from any place in the Worship of God.
2. God as the Soveraign Law-giver, had always Power and Authority to make what Alteration he pleased, in the Orders and Institutions of his Worship.
3. That Soveraign Authority is that alone which our Faith and Obedience respects in all Ordinances of Worship.
After this was stated and delivered, when the Mind of God was expresly dethen he said;
he said, Sacrifice, &c.
In the former words he declared the Mind of God, and in the latter his own Intention and Resolution to comply with his Will, in Order unto another way of Attonement for Sin; Lo, I come to do thy Will, O God; which words have been opened before.
In the last place he declares what was intimated and signified in this Order of those things being thus spoken unto; Sacrifices on the one hand, which was the First, and the coming of Christ, which was the Second in this Order and Oppo
1. That these words, he taketh away the First, do intend Sacrifices and Offerings. But he did not so do it immediately, at the speaking of these words, for they continued for the space of some Hundreds of years afterdeclaratively, as unto the Indication of the time; namely, when the Second should be introduced.
2. The end of this removal of the First, was the establishment of the Second. This Second, say some, is the Will of God; but the Opposition made before, is not between the Will of God and the Legal Sacrifices; but between those Sacrifices and the coming of Christ to do the Will of God. Wherefore it is the way of the Expiation of Sin, and of the compleat Sanctification of the Church by the Coming, and Mediation, and Sacrifice of Christ, that is this Second, the thing spoken of in the Second place; this God would establish, approve, confirm, and render unchangeable.
As all things from the beginning made way for the coming of Christ in the minds of them that did believe, so every thing was to be removed out of the way, that would hinder his coming, and the discharge of the work he had undertaken; Law, Temple, Sacrifices, must all be removed to give way unto his coming; So is it testified by his fore-runner, Luke 3. 4. As it is written in the Book of the words of Isaiah the Prophet, saying, the Voice of one crying in the Wilderness, prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his Paths straight, and the rough Ways shall be made smooth, and all flesh shall see the Salvation of God. So it must be in our own Hearts, all things must give way unto him, or he will not come and take his Habitation in them.
By the which Will we are Sanctified through the Offering of the Body of Jesus Christ once for all.
From the whole Context, the Apostle makes an Inference, which is compre
Having affirmed in Christs own words, that he came to do the Will of God, he shews what was that Will of God which he came to do, what was the design of God in it, and the effect of it, and by what means it was accomplished; which things are to be enquired into. As, (1.) What is the Will of God which he inBy which Will. (2.) What was the design of it, what God aimed at in this act of his Will, and what is accomplished thereby; We are sanctified. (3.) The way and means whereby this effect proceedeth from the Will of God; namely, through the Offering of the Body of Jesus Christ, in opposition to Legal Sacrifices. (4.) The
manner of it, in opposition unto their Repetition; it was once for all. But the sense of the whole will be more clear, if we consider the end aimed at in the first place, namely, the Sanctification of the Church. And sundry things must be observed concerning it.
1. That the Apostle changeth his Phrase of Speech into the first person, we are Sanctified, that is, all those Believers whereof the Gospel Church-State was constituted, in opposition unto the Church-State of the Hebrews and those that did adhere unto it; so he speaks before, as also Chap. 4. 3. We who have believed do enter into Rest. For it might be asked of him, you that thus overthrow the Efficacy of Legal Sacrifices, what have you your selves attained in your relinSanctification, that Dedication unPeace with him, and that Expiation of Sin, that all those Sacrifices could not effect. And observe,
1. Truth is never so effectually declared, as when it is confirmed by the experience of its Power in them that believe it, and make profession of it. This was that which gives them the confidence which the Apostle exhorts them to hold fast, and firm unto the end.
2. It is an Holy Glorying in God, and no unlawful boasting, for Men openly to profess what they are made partakers of by the Grace of God, and Blood of Christ. Yea, it is a necessary duty for Men so to do, when any thing is set up in competi
3. It is the best security in differences, in and about Religion (such as these wherein the Apostle is ingaged, the greatest and highest that ever were) when Men have an Internal Experience of the Truth which they do profess.
2. The words he useth are in the Preterperfect tense,
things, but the time of the Offering of the Body of Christ. For although all that is intended herein, did not immediately follow on the Death of Christ, yet were they all in it, as the Effects in their proper cause, to be produced by virtue of it, in their times and seasons; and the principal effect intended was the immediate consequent thereof.
3. This end of God through the Offering of the Body of Christ, was the Sanctification of the Church; we are Sanctified. The principal Notion of Sanctification in the New Testament, is the
The designation of such a State for the Church, and the present Introduction of it by the preaching of the Gospel, is that whose Confirmation the Apostle principally designs in this whole Discourse; the sum whereof he gives us, Chap. 11. 40. God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.
Will of God, even that Will which our Saviour tendred to accomplish; by which Will we are Sanctified. In the Original it is in which Will; in, for by; which is usual. Wherefore we say properly, by which Will, for it is the supream efficient cause of our Sanctification that is intended. And in that expression of our Saviour, Lo, I come to do thy Will O God, it is evident, (1.) That it was the Will, that is, the Counsel, the Purpose, the Decree of God, that the Church should be Sanctified. (2.) That our Lord Christ knew that this was the Will of God, the Will of the Father in whose bosom he was. And, (3.) That God had dehis Will, so as the Church might be Sanctified thereon. Wherefore the Will of God here intended (as was intimated before) is nothing but the Eternal, Gracious, Free act, or purpose of his Will, whereSanctifie them unto himself, and to bring them unto the enjoyment of himself hereafter. See Eph. 1. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.
And this Act of the Will of God was, (1.) Free and Soveraign, without any meritorious cause, or any thing that should dispose him thereunto without himhe purposed in himself. There are every where blessed effects ascribed to it, but no cause any where. All that is designed unto us in it, as unto the Commueffects, not its cause: See Eph. 1. 4. and this place. The whole mediation of Christ, especially his Death and Suffering was the means of its accomplishment; and not the procuring cause of it. (2.) It was accompanied with infinite Wisdom, whereby Provision was made for his own Glory, and the means and way of the accomplishment of his Will. He would not admit the Legal Sacrifices, as the means and way of its accomplishment, befor it is impossible that the Blood of Bulls and Goats should take away Sin. (3.) It was immutable and irrevocable, it depended not upon any condition in any thing or persons without himself; He purposed in himself; nor was it capable of any change or alterations from opposieffectual, in the actual accomplishment of what was designed in it, every thing in its order and season; it cannot in any thing be frustrate or disappointed. The whole Church in every Age shall be Sanctified by it. This
The Soveraign Will and Pleasure of God, acting it self in infinite Wisdom
and Grace, is the sole, supream, original cause of the Salvation of the Church, Rom. 9, 10, 11.
3. The means of accomplishment, and making effectual of this Will of God, is the Offering of the Body of Christ Jesus. Some Copies after who by the Offering of the Body of Christ were once Sanctified. But there is no colour for this supply, for the word, once, doth diOffering of Christ, as the following Verses, wherein it is exArticle belongs not unto the Text, for it is not in the best Copies, nor is taken notice of in our Translation. Why, and in what sense the Sacrifice of Christ is called the Offering of his Body, was before declared. And by which,
cause of our Sanctification which is the Will of God, but unto the effect it self. Our Sanctification is wrought, effected, accomplishOffering of the Body of Christ. (1.) In that the Expiation of our Sin, and Reconciliation with God were perfectly wrought hereby. (2.) In that the whole Church of the Elect was Dedicated unto God, which priviledge they are called into the actual participation of, through Faith in the Blood of Christ. (3.) In that thereEph. 2. 15, 16. (4.) In that he redeemed us thereby from the whole curse of the Law, as given Originally in the Law of Nature, and also renewed in the Covenant of Sinai. (5.) In that thereby he ratified and confirmed the new Covenant and all the promises of it, and all the Grace contained in them to be effectually Comprocured for us, and received into his own disposition, in the behalf of the Church, effectually to Communicate all Grace and Mercy unto our Souls and Consciences. In brief, whatever was prepared in the Will of God for the good of the Church, it is all Communicated unto us through the Offering of the Body of Christ, in such a way as tendeth unto the Glory of God, and the assured Salvation of the Church.
This Offering of the Body of Christ, is the glorious Center of all the Counsels of the Wisdom of God, of all the purposes of his Will for the Sanctification of the Church. For, (1.) No other way or means could effect it. (2.) This will do it infallibly; for Christ Crucified is the Wisdom of God, and the Power of God unto this end. This is the Anchor of our Faith, whereon alone it rests.
4. The last thing in the words gives us the manner of the Offering of the Body of Christ. It was done, once for all, say we, once only, it was never there remains no more Offering for Sin. And this demonstrates both the
Wherefore the Apostle in the next Verses argues from the Dignity and Efoften repeated.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
And every Priest standeth daily Ministring, and Offering oftentimes the same Sacrifices, which can never take away Sins.
But this Man after he had Offered one Sacrifice for Sins, for ever sat down on the Right Hand of God.
From henceforth expecting till his Enemies be made his Footstool.
For by one Offering he hath perfected for ever them that are Sanctified.
THese words are an entrance into the close of that long blessed Discourse of the Apostle, concerning the Priest-hood and Sacrifice of Christ, their Dignity and Efficacy, which he shuts up and sinisheth in the following Verses, confirming the whole with the Testimony of the Holy Ghost before produced by him.
Four things doth he here instruct us in, by way of Recapitulation of what he had declared and proved before. (1.) The state of the Legal Priests and Sacrirepetition of them, by which he had proved before their utter insufficiency to take away Sin, ver. 11. (2.) In that one Offering of Christ, and that once Offered, in opposition thereunto, ver. 12. (3.) The consequence thereState and Condition immediately ensuing thereon,
In the First of these we have, (1.) The Note of its Introduction, and. (2.) The Subject of the Proposition in it, every Priest. (3.) What is ascribed unto Generally, they stood Ministring day by day. 2. Particularly, as unto that part of their Office, which is now under consideration; they often, that is, every day offered the same Sainefficacy of those Sacrifices though often Offered; they could not take away Sin. Besides this work of Daily Offering the same Sacrifices, which could not take away Sin, there was nothing ensued on them, of Glory and Dignity unto themselves, or Benefit unto the Church. This the Apostle in
1. The Introduction is by Copulative, sometimes Redditive, as it is here taken by us and rendred. In this latter way it gives a further reason of progress in the same Argument, by a repetition of the conside
2. The subject spoken of, that is, every Priest, that is, say some, every High-Priest, and so they interpret the words, standeth daily, by a certain day
once a year, referring the whole unto the Anniversary Sacrifice on the day of Expiation. And it is not denied, but that the Apostle hath a special regard
Ch. 9. 7, 25. But it cannot be here so restrained, for he makes Application herein, of what he had spoken before of all the Sacrifices of the Law; and therein he reckons up all sorts of them, as we have seen, some of which, as the whole Burnt Offer
And the following expression of, Standing, Ministring every day, declares the constant discharge of the Priestly Office in every daily
Annual Sacridaily and occasional Sacrifices of all the other Priests; for these Offerings of Blood were also Types of the Sacrifice and Offering of Christ. For all Sacrifices by Blood were to make Attonement for Sin, Lev. 17. 11. And they were of no use but by virtue of the Typical Representation of the Sacrifice of Christ. Therefore all the Priests, and their whole Office, as unto all that belonged unto the Offering of Sacrifices, are comprized in this Assertion. And it was necessary to extend the Comparison unto them all, that there might be no exception unto the Argument from it. And the following words which give a Description of the general way of their Ministration, do inforce this Interpretation, which is the third thing in them.
3. Standeth daily Ministring,
standeth, or rather stood; they did so while their Office was in force, which was their Duty by the Law so to do. For the
Stood, or standeth ready for, and employed in the Work of their Office, Ministring; a general name of imployment about all sacred Duties, Chap. 9. 1. This they did, day by day, as occasion did require, according daily Sacrifice Morning and Evening is intended, nor yet the doubling of them on the Sabbath, and other Festivals, but all the occasional Offerings for the people, as their necessi
For this cause they came to be always in a readiness to stand Ministring daily; and hereunto was their Office confined. There was no end of their work, after which they should enter into an other and better State, as the Apostle shews it of the Lord Christ in the next Verse. And this is an high Argument of the imcease from Ministring, and enter into a condition of rest.
4. Their general Ministry is described by the especial duty which is under present consideration; they Offered oftentimes the same Sacrifices; they were the same Sacrifices that were Offered, of the same general Nature and Kind. They were indeed distributed into several sorts, according unto their occasions and institutions; as, whole Burnt-Offerings, Sin-Offerings, Trespass-Offerings, and the like; but their general Nature was one and the same, falling all under the same centhey could not take away sin. They had not any one peculiar Service that could effect this end: And they Offered them often, daily, monthly, occa
In the last place the Apostle passeth that Sentence concerning them all, whose Truth he had before sufficiently confirmed, they cannot, they never could take
away sin. They could not take them out of the way, that is, absoluteAttonement for them, ver. 4. They could not do it as unConscience of the Sinner, giving him assured peace with God thereon. It may be they could not do it at any one time, but in the constant continuance in the Use and Observation of them, they might do it; if they were multiplied, if they were costly, if they were observed in an extraordinary manner, they might effect this end? No, saith the Apostle, they could not do it,
they cannot do it. They could not vehement Negation, reIsa. 1. 11. Mich. 6. 6, 7.
If all those Divine Institutions in the diligent Observation of them could not take away Sin, how much less can any thing do so, that we can betake our selves
unto for that end?
There are innumerable things invented in the Papacy to take away Sin, and its Guilt, especially of those Sins which they are pleased to call venial. And all Men on the conviction of sin, are apt to entertain thoughts that by some enPapal inventions of Confession, Absolution, Indulgences, Masses, Penances, Purgatory, and the like, accommodated. Others trust solely unto their own Repentance and following Duties, as do the Socinians, and all Men in their unrenewed estate. But certainly if the Apostle proveth this Assertion beyond contradiction, that none of them can ever take away any sin, their Legal Institutions of Divine Worship, and their Observations could not do it; how much less can the Inventions of Men effect that great end? This account he gives us of the Inefficacy of the Sacrifices of the Priests, notwithver. 11.
In these Verses the Apostle opposeth that one Sacrifice of Christ unto the Legal Offerings that the Priests attended unto; and that in three things. (1.) In the
1. There is a note of opposition, answering the and, in the Verse foregoing; but, it is not Exceptive, but Alternative.
2. The Person spoken of, He; that is, he of whom we speak, he whose Body was Offered once for all, Jesus Christ the High-Priest of the New Testabut this Man, say we.
3. What is ascribed unto him in those words, After he had Offered one Sacrifice for sin. He Offered as the Priests did; he sin as they did also; so far there was an agreement. But (1.) he Offeone Sacrifice, not many; And what is included therein, that this Sacrifice was of himself, and not the Blood of Bulls and Goats. (2.) It was but once Offerone Sacrifice, because it was but once Offered, and the time when he Offered this Sacrifice, is also proposed, not absolutely, but with respect unto what ensued. It was before he sate down on the Right Hand of God, that is, before his entrance into Glory, after he had Offered one Sacrifice for sin. And the way of mentioning these things doth manifest, that the principal intention of the Apostle, is to speak unto the different consequences of
3. The consequent hereof on the part of Christ is two fold: (1.) What immediately ensued on this Offering of his Body, ver. 12. (2.) What continueth to be his state with respect thereunto; both of them evidencing Gods high approba
1. The immediate consequent of his Offering was, he sat down on the Right Hand of God. This Glorious Exaltation of Christ hath been Ch. 7. 3. Ch. 8. 1. Here it includes a double opposition unto, and preference above the State of the Legal Priests upon their Oblations. For although the High-Priest in his Anniversary Sacrifice for the Expiation of sin, did enter into the most Holy Place, where were the visible pledges of the presence of God; yet he stood in a posture of humble Ministration, he sate not down with any appearance of Dignity or Honour. Again, his abode in the Typical Holy Place was for a
1. Faith in Christ doth joyntly respect both his Oblation of himself by Death, and the Glorious Exaltation that ensued thereon. He so Offered one Sacrifice for
And, 2. Christ in this Order of things is the great exemplar of the Church. He suffered and then entred into Glory. If we suffer with him, we shall also reign with him, ver. 13. From henceforth expecting till his Enemies be made his Footstool. So that,
2. The state and condition of Christ, after his sitting down at the Right Hand of God, not absolutely, but with respect unto his Enemies, is declared in these words. The whole Testimony is taken from Psal. 110. 1. and here explained in these Verses. It is produced in the Confirmation of what the Apostle asserts, concerning the impossibility, as well as the needlesness of the Repetition of his Sasit at the Right Hand of God, expecting his Enemies to be made his Footstool, that is, a state of Majesty and Glory. But Offer himself he could not, without suffering and dying, whereof in this state he is no way capable. And besides, as was before Observed, it is an evidence both of the dignity and eternal efficacy of his own Sacrifice, whereonce his Exaltation did ensue.
I acknowledge my thoughts are inclined unto a peculiar Interpretation of this place, though I will not oppose absolutely that which is commonly received; though in my judgment I prefer this other before it. The Assertion is introduhenceforth, say we: as unto what remains, that is, of the dispenHebrews; some very few believed on him, but the generality of the people, the Rulers, Priests, Guides of the Church engaged against him, persecuted him, falsly accused him, killed him, hanged him on a Tree. Under the Veil of their Rage and Cruelty he carried on his work, of making his Soul an Offering for sin, or taking away sin by the Sacrifice of himself. Having fulfilled this Work, and thereby wrought out the Eternal Salvation of the Church, he sits down on the Right Hand of God. In the mean time those stubborn Enemies of his who hated, rejected, and slew him, continued raging in the fierceness of their implacable tumults against him, and them that believed in him. They hated his Person, his Office, his Work, his Gospel; many of them expresly sinning against the Holy Ghost. Yet did they Triumph that they had prevailed against him, and destroyed him, as some of their accursed posterity do to this day. It was the Judgment of God, that those his obstinate Enemies should by his power be utterly destroyed in this World, as a pledge of the Eternal Destruction of those who will not believe the Gospel. That this was the end whereunto they were designed, himself declares; Matt. 22. 7. Luke 19. 24. Those mine Enemies that would not have me reign over them, bring them hither and slay them before my face.
After our Lord Christ left this World, there was a mighty Contest between the dying Apostate Church of the Jews, and the rising Gospel Church of Believers. The Jews boasted on their success, in that by fraud and cruelty they had destroyed him as a Malefactor; The Apostles and the Church with them gave Testimony unto his Resurrection and Glory in Heaven. Great expectation there was, what would be the end of these things, which way the Scale would turn. After a while, a visible and glorious determination was made of this controversie; God sent forth his Armies and destroyed these Murderers, burning up their City. Those Enemies of the King which would not have him to Reign over them, were brought forth and slain before his face, so were all his Enemies made his Footstool. I do judge that these are the Enemies of Christ, and the making of them his Footstool, which are pecudestruction of the hardned unbelieving Jews, who had obstinately rejected his Ministry, and opposed it unto the end. Then were those his Enemies who so refused him, slain and destroyed thereon. For,
1. This Description of his Enemies as his Enemies, peculiarly directs us unto this sense, the Enemies of his Person, Doctrine and Glory, with whom he had so many contests, whose Blasphemies and Contradictions he underwent; They were his Enemies in a peculiar manner.
2. This the word, expecting, better answers unto, than unto the other sense. For the glorious visible propagation of the Gospel and Kingdom Jerusalem, and the Church of the Jews his Enemies. With reference hereunto, Expectation may be no less distinctly ascribed unto him, than if we extend the word unto the whole time, unto the end of the World.
3. The Act of Vengeance on these his Enemies, is not said to be his own, but peculiarly assigned unto God the Father, and those imployed by him. In the Original promise, the words of God the Father to him are, I will make thine Enemies thy Footstool; I take it upon me, Vengeance is mine, to revenge the injuries done unto thee, and the obstinacy of those Unbelievers. Here in this place respect is had unto the means that God used in the work of their destruRoman Army, by whom they were, as the Footstool
Execution of it, proclaims, that Vengeance is his. For in the following words the Lord Christ is said only to expect it, as that wherein his own cause was vindicated, and revenged, as it were, by another Hand, while he pleaded it himself in the World, by that mild and gentle means of sending his spirit to convince them of Sin, Righteousness and Judg
4. This is that which the Apostle constantly threatens the obstinate Hebrews, and
5. This was that, what remained, as unto the personal Ministry of Christ in this World.
The horrible Destruction of the stubborn Obstinate Enemies of the Person and Office of Christ, which befell the Nation of the Jews, is a standing security of the
endless destruction of all who remain his Obstinate adversaries.
6. I leave this Interpretation of the Words unto the thoughts of them that are Judicious, and shall open the Mind of the Holy Ghost in them according unto the generally received Opinion of their sense. And to this end,
1. The Subject spoken of is the Enemies of Christ, his Enemies. He hath had many Enemies ever since his Exaltation, and so shall have unto the Enemies are of two sorts. (1.) Such as are so immediately and directPerson. (2.) Such as are so to his Office, and Work, with the benefirst sort are either Devils or Men. All the Devils are in a Combination as sworn Enemies unto the Person of Christ and his Kingdom. And for Men, the whole World of Unbelieving Jews, Mahumetans, and Pagans, are all his Enemies, and do put forth all their Power in Opposition unto him. The Enemies unto his Office, Grace, and Work and the benefits of it, are either persons or things.
(1.) The Head of this Opposition and Enmity unto his Person, is Antichrist, with all his Adherents; and in a special manner, all Worldly Power, Authority and Rule, acting themselves in subserviency unto the Antichristian Interest.
(2.) All Pernicious Heresies against his Person and Grace.
(3.) All others which make Profession of the Gospel, and live not as becomes the Gospel, they are all Enemies of Christ and his Office.
The things which rise up in Enmity and Opposition to him, and the work of his Grace, are, Sin, Death, the Grave, and Hell; All these endeavour to obstruct and frustrate all the ends of Christs Mediation, and are therein his Enemies.
2. There is the Disposal of this Subject, of these Enemies of Christ. They shall be made his Footstool,
until they be put, and placed in this conput
Footstool is used in a Threefold sence in the Scripture.
1. For the visible pledge of Gods Presence and his Worship. Gods Throne, as we have shewed, was represented by the Ark, Mercy-Seat, and Cherubims, in the most Holy Place; whereon the Sanctuary it self was his Footstool. 1 Chron. 28. 2. Psal. 99. 5. Psal. 132. 7. So it is applyed unto God, and his presence in the Church; as the
2. It is applyed unto God and his presence in the World: so Heaven above is called his Throne, and this lower part of the Creation is his Footstool, Isa. 66. 1. In neither of these senses are the Enemies of Christ to be his Footstool; Therefore it is taken,
3. For a Despised, Conquered Condition; a State of a mean subjected people, deprived of all power and benefit, and brought into absolute subjection. In no other sense can it be applyed unto the Enemies of Christ, as here it is. Yet
absolutely, as unto all persons and things that are his Enemies; For they are not of one Nature, and their subjection to him is such as their Natures are capable of. But these things are intended in it: (1.) The Deprivation of all Power, Authority, and Glory. They fate on Thrones, but now are under the Seat of him, who is the only Potentate. (2.) An utter defeat of their Design, in opposing either his Person, or the work of his Grace in the Eternal Salvation of his Church. They shall not hurt or destroy no more in the Mountain of the Lord. (3.) Their Eternal Disposal by the Will of Christ, according as his Glory shall be manifested therein. Sin, Death, the Grave, and Hell, as unto their Opposition to the Church, shall be utterly destroyed, 1 Cor. 15. 55, 56, 57. and there shall be no more Death. Sathan and Antichrist shall be destroyed two ways. (1.) Initially and Gradually. (2.) Absolutely and Compleatly. The First they are in all Ages of the Church, from the time of Christs Glorious Ascension into Heaven. They were then immediately put in subjection to him, all of them, because that they should not defeat any one end of his Mediation. And he maketh continual instances, as he pleases, of his Power over them in the visible Destruction of some of his most principal and implacable Enemies. And Secondly, it will be compleat at the last day, when all these Enemies shall be utterly destroyed.
4. The word, until, here hath respect unto both these, the Gradual and Final destruction of all the Enemies of Christ.
5. This, Christ is said to expect; henceforth expecting. Expectation and Waitfaithfulness of Gods promises, and his infinite Wisdom, as unto the season of their accomplishment, that is intended. He doth not so expect these things, as though there were any thing wanting to his own blessed Glory, Power, or Authority, until it be actually and compleatly finished; but, saith the Apostle, as to what remains to the Lord Christ in the discharge of his Office, he henceforth is no more to Offer, to Suffer, no more to Dye, no more to do any thing for the Expiation of Sin, or by way of Sacrifice, all this being absolutely and compleatly perfected, he is for ever in the enjoyment of the Glory that was set before him; satisfied in the Promises, the Power, and Wisdom of God, for the compleat effecting of his Mediatory Office, in the Eternal Salvation of the Church, and by the conquest and destruction of all his and their Enemies in their proper times, and seasons for it. And from this Interpretation of the words, we may take these Observations.
1. It was the entrance of Sin, which raised up all our Enemies against us. From thence took they their Rise and Beginning; as, Death, the Grave, and Hell: Law: and some that had a Radical Enmity, got power thereby to Execute it, as the Devil. The state in which we were created, was a state of Universal peace; all the strife and contention rose from Sin.
2. The Lord Christ in his ineffable Love and Grace put himself between us, and all our Enemies; and took into his breast all their Swords, wherewith they were armed against us, so they are his Enemies.
3. The Lord Christ by the Offering of himself, making peace with God, ruined all the Enmity against the Church, and all the Enemies of it. For all their power arose from the just displeasure of God, and the Curse of his Law.
4. It is the Foundation of all consolation to the Church, that the Lord Christ, even now in Heaven, takes all our Enemies to be his; in whose destruction he is infinitely more concerned than we are.
5. Let us never esteem any thing, or any person, to be our Enemy, but only so far, and in what they are the Enemies of Christ.
6. It is our Duty to conform our selves to the Lord Christ, in a quiet expectancy of the ruin of all our spiritual Adversaries.
Envy not the Condition of the most Proud and Cruel Adversaries of the Church; for they are absolutely in his power, and shall be cast under his Foot
For by one Offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.
The Apostle, 1. Gives the great Reason of this State of things with reference unto the Lord Christ in the discharge of his Office; namely, that he did not repeat his Offering, as the Priests under the Law did theirs, every year, and every day; that he is sate down at the Right Hand of God, expecting his Enemies to be made his Footstool; wherein they had no share after their Oblations: And this is, beby one Offering he hath for ever perfected them that are Sanctified. This being done, there is no need of any daily Sacrifice, nothing that should detain the Lord Jesus out of the possession of his Glory. So the Particle,
for, inferrs a Reason in these words, of all that was assigned before unto him, it was by one Offering.
2. What he did so effect, which rendered all future Offerings and Sacrifices impossible. He hath perfected for ever them that are Sanctified.
For the First, what he did, of the Nature of the thing spoken of, was by one Offering; as what the Priests of old did, was also by OfferEminency of this Offering the Apostle had before deBulls, or Goats, but of himself, he Offered himself to God; of
3. That which is effected hereby, is, that he perfected for ever them that are Sanctified; those on whom his work is effected, are thereby Sanctified. They Sanctifie them, then to perfect them, was the design of Christ in Offering of himself, which he purposed not for all Men Universally. So in the Foundation of the Church of Israel, they were first Sanctified, and Dedicated unto God in, and by the Sacrifices wherewith the Covenant was Confirmed, Exod. 24. and afterperfected, so far as their condition was capable thereof, in the preperfection of Grace, that is intended; the word signimade perfect, nor is ever used to that purpose; nor is it the perfection of Glory, for he treats of the present Church-state of the Gospel in this World. But it is a state and condition of that Grace, and those priviledges which the Law, Priests, and Sacrifices could never bring them unto. He hath by his one Offering wrought and procured for them the compleat parfor ever, so as that there shall never be any Alteration in that Estate whereunto he hath brought them, nor any Addition of Priviledge or Advantage be ever made unto it.
There was a Glorious Efficacy in the One Offering of Christ.
(2.) The end of it must be effectually accomplished towards all, for whom it was Offered; or else it is inferiour unto the Legal Sacrifices, for they attained their proper end.
(3.) The Sanctification, and Perfection of the Church, being that end designed in the Death and Sacrifice of Christ, all things necessary unto that end must be included therein, that it be not frustrate.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us: For after that he had said before.
This is the Covenant that I will make with them, after those days, saith the Lord: I will put my Laws into their Hearts, and in their Minds will I write them.
And their Sins and Iniquities will I remember no more.
Now where remission of these is, there is no more Offering for Sin.
THe Foundation of the whole preceeding Discourse of the Apostle, concernDescription of the New Covenant, whereof he was the Mehis Sacrifice, as the Old Covenant was by the Blood of Bulls and Goats, Chap 8. 10, 11, 12, 13. Having now abunConfirmation of the whole, from the Testimony of the Holy Ghost, in the description of that Covenant which he had given before. And because the Crisis which he had brought his Argument and Disputation unto, was, that the Lord Christ by reason of the dignity of his Person and Office, with the everlasting Efficacy of his Sacrifice, was to Offer himself but once, which virtually includes all that he had before taught and deinsufficiency of all those Sacrifices which were often repeated, and consequently their removal out of the Church; he returns unto those words of the Holy Ghost, for the proof of this particular also. And he doth it from the Order of the words used by the Holy Ghost, as he had Argued before from the Order of the words in the Psalmist, ver. 8, 9.
Wherefore there is an Ellipsis in the words, which must have a supplement to render the sense perfect. For unto that proposition, after he had said before, ver. 11. with what follows, ver. 16. There must be added in the beginning of the 17. Verse; He said; after he had said or spoken of the Internal Grace of the Covenant, he said this also, that their Sins and Iniquities he would remember no more. For from these words doth he make his
There is in the words, 1. The Introduction of the Testimony insisted on, The Holy Ghost also is a witness unto us. The Hebrews might Object unto him, as they were ready enough to do it; that all those things were but his own Conclusions
And there is in the words, (1.) The Author of this Testimony, that is, the Holy Ghost; and it is ascribed unto him, as all that is written in the Scripture is Holy Men of Old wrote as they were acted by him, and so he was the Author of the whole Scripture; but because also of his Presence and Authority in it, and with it continually. Hence whatever is spoken in the Scripture is, and ought to be unto us as the immediate Word of the Holy Ghost: he continues therein to speak unto us, and this gives the reason of
(2.) The manner of his speaking in this Testimony;
he bears witness to
us, he doth it actually and constantly in the Scriptures by his Authority therein. And he doth so unto us, that is, not unto us only who Preach and Teach those things, not unto the Apostles and other Christian Teachers of the Gospel; but unto all of us of the Church of Israel, who acknowledge the Truth of the ScriRule of our Faith and Obedience. So doth he often joyn himself unto them to whom he wrote and spake of, by reason of the common alliance between them as
This is that which the Holy Ghost in the Scripture testifies unto us all, which should put an end unto all controversies about those things. Nothing else is taught you, but what is testified before hand by God himself.
1. It is the authority of the Holy Ghost, alone speaking unto us in the Scripture,
whereinto all our Faith is to be resolved.
2. We are to propose nothing in the Preaching and Worship of the Gospel, but what is testified unto by the Holy Ghost: not traditions, not our own reasons and inventions.
3. When an important Truth consonant unto the Scripture is declared, it is useful and expedient to confirm it with some express Testimony of Scripture.
Lastly, the manner of the Expression is Emphatical,
even
also the Holy Spirit himself. For herein we are directed unto his Holy Divine person, and not an External Operation of Divine Power, as the Socinians dream. It is that Holy Spirit himself that continueth to speak to us in the Scripture.
Thats the First thing in the Introduction of the Testimony.
2. There are two things in this Testimony of the Holy Ghost; The (1.) is the matter or substance of it. (2.) The Order of the things contained in it, or spoken by him. The Introduction of the former is in the words we have spoken unto; that of the latter, in the close of the Verse; In these words, for after he had spoken before.
Of the Testimony it self, which is declarative of the Nature of the New Covenant made in Christ, and
The First of these the Holy Ghost witnesseth in the First place, but he stays not there; afterwards he adds the Latter, concerning the pardon of Sin and Iniquities, this being that alone wherein at present the Apostle is concerned, and from thence he confirms his present Argument; he distinguisheth it from the other, as that which was of particular use in it self. And therefore, ver. 17. is to be supplied by, and thence or thereon also, their Sins and Iniquities I will pardon.
chap. 8. where they are first produced as the great foundation of the enArgument of the Apostle from the latter part of them; And this is, that the Covenant being Confirmed and Established, that is, in the Blood, and by the one Sacrifice of Christ, there can be no more Offering for Sin. For God will never appoint nor accept of any thing that is needless, and useless in his Service, least of all in things of so great importance as is the Offering for Sin. Yea, the
And here we are come unto a full end of the Dogmatical part of this Epistle, A Portion of Scripture filled with Heavenly and Glorious Mysteries, the Light of the Church of the Gentiles, the Glory of the People Israel, the Foundation and Bulwark of Faith Evangelical.
I do therefore here with all humility, and sense of my own weakness and utter disability for so great a work, thankfully own the Guidance and Assimere effect of Soveraign and Undeserved Grace. From that alone it is, that having many and many a time been at an utter loss as to the mind of the Holy Ghost, and finding no relief in the worthy Labours of others, he hath graciously answered my poor weak supplicati
〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Having therefore, Brethren, boldness to enter into the Holiest, by the Blood of Jesus,
By a new and living way which he hath Consecrated for us, through the Vail, that is to say, his Flesh;
And having an High Priest over the House of God:
Let us draw near with a true Heart, in full assurance of Faith, having our Hearts sprinkled from an evil Conscience, and our Bodies washed with pure water:
Let us hold fast the profession of our Faith without wavering: (for he is faithful that promised.)
IN these Words the Apostle enters on the last part of the Epistle, which is wholly Paraenetical, or Hortatory. For though there be some occasional intermixtures of Doctrines consonant unto them before insisted on, yet the professed
In these words there are Three things.
In the First, we have, (1.) A note of Inference, or deduction of the following Exhortation from what was before discoursed; Therefore. (2.) A friendly compellation of them to whom he spake, used formerly, but now restrained after a long interruption; Brethren. (3.) The priviledge it self, which is the foundation of the Exhortation,
having boldness to enter into the holiest. (4.)
1. The Apostle repeats his obliging compellation, Brethren. And herein he hath a peculiar respect unto those among the Hebrews, who had received the
Gospel in sincerity. For although there was a Natural Brotherhood between him and the whole People of Israel, and they were always wonted to call themBrethren in general, on the account of their Original stock and separation from the rest of the World, as Acts 28. 27. yet this Word and Name is used by the Apostle on the account of that spiritual Relation which was between them; Which believe in God through Jesus Christ. See Chap. 3. ver. 1. and the exposition of it. And the Apostle by the use of it here, testifies unto two things. (1.) That although they had not as yet a full understanding of the Nature and Use of all Legal Institutions and Sacrifices, nor of their abolishing by the coming of Christ, and the discharge of his Office; yet this had not forfeited their interest in the Heavenly calling, on account whereof he dealt with them as with Brethren. (2.) That this difference, so far as it had yet continued, had no way alienated his Mind and Affections from them, though he knew how great their mistake was, and what danger, even of eternal ruin, it exposed them unto. Hereby were the Minds of those Hebrews secured from prejudice against his Person and his Doctrin, and inclined unto a compliance with his Exhortation. Had he called them Hereticks and Schismaticks, and I know not what other Names of reproach, which are the terms of use upon the like occasions amongst us, he had, in all probability, turned that which was lame quite out of the way. But he had another Spirit, was under another conduct of Wisdom and Grace, than most Men are now acquainted withal.
It is not every Mistake, every Errour, though it be in things of great importance while it overthrows not the Foundation, that can divest Men of a fraternal
2. There is a Note of Inference from the preceding discourse, declaring it the ground of the present Exhortation, Therefore; seeing that these things are now that the Old Covenant, Sacrifices and Worship, could not make us perfect, nor give us an Access unto God, whereon they are removed and taken away, which the Scripture fully testifies unto; and seeing all this is effected or accomplished in the Office and by the Sacrifice of Christ, which they could not effect; and priviledges are thereInference from his discourse, unto the use and improvement of the Liberty and Priviledges granted unto us in Christ, with the Holy Woranother conclusion implied in the words, though not expressed by him; and this is, that they should cease and give over their attendance unto the Legal Worship and Sacrifices, as those which now were altogether useless, being indeed abolished. This is the principal design of the Apostle in the whole Epistle; namely, to call off the believing Hebrews from all adherence unto, and conjunction in Mosaical Institutions. For he knew the danger, both Spiritual and Temporal, which would accompany and arise from such an ad
For, (1.) It would insensibly weaken their Faith in Christ, and give them a disregard of Evangelical Worship, which did indeed prove unto many of them a cause of that Apostacy, and final Destruction, which he so frequently warns them against.
(2.) Whereas God had determined now speedily to put an utter end unto the City, Temple, and all its Worship by an Universal desolation, for the sins of the people, if they did obstinately adhere unto the observance of that Worinstruct them in that light and knowledge of the truth, that might deliver them from these evils, was the first design of the Apostle in the Doctrinal part of this Epistle: Yet doth he not plainly and in terms express it any where in this Epistle; not in this place, where it was most properly and naturally to be introduced; yet he doth that which evidently includes it, namely, exhort them unto those duties, which, on the principles he hath declared, are utterly inconsistent with Mosaical Worship; and this is our free entrance into the Holiest by the Blood of Jesus. For an entrance, in any sence,
3. There is in the words the Priviledge which is the foundation of the duty
exhorted unto; having therefore boldness to enter into the holiest, for a regular eninto or of the most holy. The priviledge intended is directly opposed ununder the Law; and from the consideration of it, is the nature of it to be learned. For the entrance into the holiest, in the Tabernacle, belonged unto the Worship of the Church; it was the principal part thereof; but it had many imperfection attending it. (1.) It was not into the special presence of God, but only unto a place made with hands, filled with some reHigh-Priest alone, and that only once a year. (3.) The Body of the people, the whole Congregation were therefore joyntly and severally utany entrance into it. (4.) The prohibition of this entrance into this Holy place belonged unto that Bondage wherein they were kept unpriviledge here mentioned being opposed to this state of things among them which respected their present Worship; It is certain that it doth concern the present Worship of God by Christ
entrance into the most holy, to be an entrance into Heaven after this Life for all Believers. For the Apostle doth not here oppose the glorious state of Heaven unto the Church of the Hebrews, and their Legal Services; but the priviledges of the Gospel-state and worship only: Nor would it have been to his purpose so to have done. For the Hebrews might have said, that although the Glory of Heaven after this life do exceed the
There is then a two-fold opposition in these words unto the state of the people under the Law: (1.) As unto the Spirit, and frame of mind in the Worshippers. Or, (2.)
1. The First is in the word, boldness. There were two things with rethose Worshippers in this matter: (1.) A Legal Prohibition from entring
2. This liberty we have, aditus, introitus;
true Sanctuary, the holy place not made with hands: See Chap. 9. 11, 12. The immediate gracious presence of God himself in Christ Jesus. Whatever was Typically represented in the most holy place of Old, we have access unto, that is, unto God himself we have an access in one spirit by Christ.
1. This is the great fundamental priviledge of the Gospel, that believers in all their holy Worship, have liberty, boldness, and confidence, to enter with it and by
it into the gracious presence of God. They are not hindred by any prohibition. God set bounds unto Mount Sinai, that none should pass or break through into his presence in the giving of the Law. He hath set none to Mount Sion, but all believers have Right, Title, and Liberty to approach unto him, even unto this Throne. There is no such Order now, that he who draws nigh shall be cut off, but on the contrary, that he that doth not so do, shall be destroyed.
2. Hence there is no dread, fear, or terror in their Minds, Hearts, or Consciences when they make those approaches unto God. This was a consequent of the same Interdict of the Law, which is now taken away. They have not re
3. The nature of Gospel Worship consists in this, that it is an entrance with boldness into the presence of God. However Men may multiply duties, of what sort or nature soever they be, if they design not in and by them, to
4. Our approach unto God in Gospel Worship, is unto him, as evidencing himself in a way of Grace and Mercy. Hence it is said to be an entrance into the holiest, for in the holy place were all the pledges and tokens of Gods grace and fataking off of the old prohibition gives us liberty, and the institution of the Worship of the Gospel gives us Title unto this priviledge; so the consideration of the naboldness there
5. The procuring cause of this priviledge is in the next place exprest, we have it by the Blood of Jesus, say we. It is the procuring cause of
this priviledge that is intended, which is often so proposed. The Blood of Jesus Christ is the same with his Sacrifice, the Offering of himself, or the Offering of his Body once only. For he Offered himself in and by the effusion of his Blood, whereby he made attonement for Sin, which could not be otherwise effected. And it is here opposed, as also in the whole preceding discourse, unto the Blood of the Legal Sacrifices. They could not procure, they did not effect any such liberty of access unto God in the holy place. This was done
1. By its Oblation, it removed and took away all causes of distance between God and Believers. It made attonement for them, answered the Law, removed the Curse, broke down the partition-wall, or the Law of Commandments conall the prohibitions of approaching unto God with boldness. Hereby also he rent the Veil which interposed and hid the gracious presence of God from us. And these things being removed out of the way by the Blood of the Oblation, or Offering of Christ, peace being thereRom. 5. 11. 2 Cor. 5. 18, 19, 20, 21. Eph. 2. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. Hereon was it the procuring, the purchasing cause of this priviledge.
2. It is the cause of it with respect unto the Consciences of Believers in the Application of it unto their Souls. There are not only all the hindrances menwere filled with fear and dread of God, and durst not so much as desire an immediate access unto him. The efficacy of the Blood of Christ being through believing communicated untakes away all this dread and fear. And this is done principally by his bestowing on them the holy Spirit, which is a Spirit of Liberty, as our Apostle shews at large, 2 Cor. 3. Wherefore we have boldness to enter into the holiest by the Blood of Jesus, on these three accounts:
(1.) In that Attonement is made thereby for sin, and peace with God, so as that he is reconciled unto us; All that anger being turned away, that did deterr us from any such approach.
(2.) Fear, dread, and bondage are taken away, so as the acting of Faith on God through the Blood of Jesus, doth expel them, and remove them out of our Mind.
(3.) We receive the Holy Spirit therewithal; who is a Spirit of Liberty, power, holy boldness, enabling us to cry Abba Father.
1. Nothing but the Blood of Jesus could have given this boldness, nothing that
stood in the way of it, could otherwise have been removed, nothing else could have set our Souls at liberty from that bondage that was come upon them by sin.
Rightly esteem, and duly improve the blessed priviledge which was purchased for us at so dear a rate. What shall we render unto him? How unspeakable are our Obligations unto Faith and Love?
3. Confidence in an access unto God not built on, not resolved into the Blood of Christ, is but a daring presumption which God abhors.
Having told us that we have an entrance into the holiest; he now declares what the way is whereby we may do so. The way into the holiest under the Tabernacle was a passage with Blood through the Sanctuary, and then a turning aside of the Veil, as we have declared before. But the whole Church was forbidden the use of this way, and it was appointed for no other end but to signifie,
1. The preparation of this way is by an by a Dedication. The word hath a double signification, one in things natural, the other in things sacred;
things natural, it is to make new, so as to be ready for use: In things sacred, it is to Dedicate or Consecrate any thing at the first erection or making of it unto sacred services. The latter sence of the word, which we receive in our translation, is here to be imbraced, yet so as it includes the former also. For it is spoken in opposition unto the Dedication of the Tabernacle, and
The way of our entrance into the holiest, is solemnly Dedicated and Consecrated
for us, so as that with boldness we may make use of it. He hath done it for us, for our use, our benefit, and advantage.
2. The properties of this way are two.
1. That it is, New. (1.) Because it was but newly made and prepared. (2.) Because it
2. Living. This Epithet is placed by apposition, without any note
of distinction or conjunction. And it is said to be Living, (1.) In opposition unDeath. NoBlood of the Sacrifices. 2. It was the cause of death unto any one that should make use of it, the High Priest only excepted, and he but once a year. (2.) It is Living as unto its efficacy, it is not a dead thing; it is that which hath a Spiritual vital efficacy in our access unto God. (3.) It is living from its effects: it leads to Life, and effectually brings us thereunto, and is the only way of entring into everlasting Life.
All the priviledges we have by Christ are great, glorious, and efficacious, all tending and leading unto life.
new and living way of our approach unto God, is nothing but the exercise of Faith, for acceptance with God by the Sacrifice of Christ, according un
3. He shews which way it thus leads to the holiest, or what is the tendency it is through the Veil. The Apostle shews here expresly what he alludeth unto in the Declaration he makes of our entrance into the holiest. The Veil here intended by him, was that between the Sanctuary and the most holy place, whose Description we have given on chap. 9. For there was no possible entrance thereinto, but through that Veil, which was turned aside, when the High-Priest entred. What this Veil was unto the High Priest in his entrance into that holy place, that is the Flesh of Christ unto us in ours, as in the last place is described in exposition of this Type, that is, his Flesh.
For the opening of these words, and the vindication of the Apostles application of this Type, we may observe,
1. The Flesh of Christ, the Body of Christ, the Blood of Christ, Christ himself, are all mentioned distinctly, as the
2. This is done on various respects, to express either the dignity, or the efficacy of the Nature, and manner of his Offering.
3. In the Sacrifice of Christ, the Flesh was that which suffered peculiarly, as the great token and evidence of his real sufferings.
4. The whole efficacy of his Sacrifice is ascribed unto every essential part of the Humane Nature of Christ, in that which is either acted, or suffered thereSoul, Isa. 53. his Blood, chap. 9. 14. his Body, ver. 10. his Flesh, as in this place. For these things were not distinctly operative, one in one efbut all of them concurr'd in his Nature and Person, which he Offered once wholly to God. So that where any of them is mentionwhole Humane Nature of Christ as unto the efficacy of it in his Sacri
5. Yet were these things distinctly typified and fore-signified in the Sacrifices and Service of old. So was the Flesh of Christ by the Veil, as his whole Nature by the Tabernacle, his Soul by the Scape-goat, his Body and Blood by the Sinoffering on the day of Expiation, when the Sacrifice was burnt without the Camp.
6. Herein in an especial manner was the whole a Type of the Flesh of Christ, in that there was no entrance to be laid open into the Holy place, but by the rending of the Veil. The time when the High Priest entered into it, it was inturning it aside, whereon it immediately closed again, and forbad an entrance, and a prospect unto others. Wherefore there could be no entrance into that holy place abiding, unless the Veil was rent and torn in pieces; so that it could close no more. For it came to pass on the death of the Lord Jesus, that the Veil of the Temple was rent from the top to the bottom. And that which is signified hereby, is only this, that by virtue of the Sacrifice of Christ, wherein his Flesh was torn and rent, we have a full entrance into the holy place, such as would have been of old, upon the rending of the Veil. This therefore is the gewe enter with boldness unto the most holy place through the Veil, that is to say, his Flesh; We do so by vertue of the Sacrifice of himself wherein his Flesh was rent, and all hindrances thereby taken away from us. Of all which hindrances the Veil was an Embleme, and principal Instance, until it was rent and removed.
The sufficiency of the Sacrifice of Christ unto all the ends of the perfection of the Church, in all duties and priviledges, is that which the Apostle instructs us unto herein. And there is great instruction given us in this Comparison of the Type, and Anti-type, into the way and nature of our access unto God, in all our solemn Worship. It is God as he was represented in the holy place, to whom we address our selves peculiarly, that is, God the Father as on a Throne ef Grace; the manner of our Access is with
way is by Faith, as to the removal of the Obstacles, and the view of God as reconciled. This is given us by the suffering of Christ in the Flesh, which laid open the entrance into the Holy place. Wherefore the Apostle saies not, that the Veil was the flesh of Christ, as some pretend who have hence cavill'd at the Authority of this Epistle on no other ground but because they could not apprehend the spiritual Light and Wisdom that is therein; Only he says,
Another to the same purpose follows.
And having a great high Priest over the House of God.
Having, is understood from v. 19. The word whereby the Apostle expresseth our relation unto Christ, ch. 4. 15. He is our Priest, he exerciseth that Office on our behalf, and our Duty 'tis in all things to be such as becometh this great High Priest to own in the discharge of his Office. What became him that he might be our High Priest, as it is expressed, ch. 7. 26. shews what we ought to be in our measure that belong unto his care, and say with boldness, we have an High Priest; which is another encouragement unto the diligent attendance to the duties we are here exhorted unto. For it may be said, that notwithstanding the provision of a new way into the Holiest, and boldness given us to enter thereinto; yet in our selves we know not how to do it, unless we are under the conduct of a Priest, as the Church of old was in their Worship. All those Priests being removed, how shall we do now to draw nigh unto God, without such a conduct, such a countenance? The Apostle removes this from them, and gives encouragement for what he had proved to be a Duty before, namely, that we have a great High Priest.
Three things are in the words: (1.) That we have a Priest. (2.) That he is a great Priest: (3.) That part of his Office wherein in this duty we are concerned, which is, that
The first hath been spoken unto on many occasions: Onely the Apostle calls him not here, Our High Priest, which he doth most frequently, but a Priest, with the addition of Great, A Great Priest, which answers directly to the Hebrew Expression,
That which unto the particular end designed in this place, we ought to consider in his Office is, that he is over the House of God. The Apostle doth not therein consider the Sacrifice of himself, which he proposed as the foundation of the priviledge whence the ensuing Duty is inferr'd; but what
The Lord Christ doth peculiarly preside over all the persons, Duties, and worship
of Believers in the Church of God; (1.) In that all their worship is of his appointExposition of chap. 4. v. 14, 15, 16.
Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of Faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our Bodies washed with pure water.
The Duty is here exprest whereunto these encouragements and priviledges do direct and lead. And this Duty is described, (1.) By the nature of it, Let us draw near. (2.) The Qualification of the persons by whom it is to be performed, With a true Heart. (3.) The manner of its performance, in full assurance of Faith. (4.) The preparation for it; which is twofold, (1.) That our hearts are sprinkled from an evil conscience. (2.) That our bodies are washt with pure Water.
I. The Duty it self is expressed by whole performance of all Divine, solemn worship was constantly expressed. For God by an approach, an access, a drawing nigh unto that place, the means of their Worpledges of Gods presence therein. So were they to bring their Gifts, their Offerings, their Sacrifices; every thing wherewith they worshipped, in it was an approximation unto God. Now all thele things, Tabernacle, Temple, Altar, as we have shewed, were Types of Christ and the gracious presence of God in him, and they were appointed only unto this end to teach the Church to look for an access to God in and by him alone. Wherefore the Apostle tells the Hebrews, that as they had under the old Testament an approach unto God, and were then those that came and drew nigh unto him, yet it was deThat it was by carnal means, the Blood of Bulls and Goats. (2.) That it was not unto God himself, but only some outward pledges of his presence. (3.) That in this access they were alwayes excluded from an entrance into the Holiest. This way being now removed, there is that appointed in the room thereof, which is lyable to none of these Defects. For, (1.) It is not by
II. The principall qualification of the Persons exhorted unto this duty, is a true heart. God in an especiall manner requireth truth in the inward parts
Joh. 4. 24. Now Truth respects either the mind, and is opposed unto falsehood; or respects the Heart and Affections, and is opposed to Hypocrisie. In the first may all false Worship is rejected, all means of the worship of God not of his own institution. But the Truth of the Heart here intended, is the sincerity of heart,
hypocrisie. Two things are therefore comprized in this qualification:
1. That the Heart is that which God principally respects in our Access unto him. The
2. Universal, internal Sincerity of heart is required of all those that draw nigh
unto God in his holy Worship.
It is so, (1.) From the Nature of God. (2.) From the nature of the Worship it self. (3.)
III. There is the way and manner, together with the Principle to be acted in all
our accesses unto God, in the full assurance of faith. [1.] Without Faith it is impossible to please God. Wherefore
1. That which in other places the Apostle expresseth by open view of the spiritual Glories, of the way and End of our Approach unto God, which they had not. (2.) Liberty and confidence; Liberty of speech, and confidence of being accepted, which in their Bondage confull assurance, and spiritual boldness of Faith. This is the Plerophorie of it; which frame of Mind is plainly directed unto.
2. A firm and unmoveable Perswasion concerning the Priesthood of Christ, whereFaith without wavering. For many of the
1. The actual exercise of Faith is required in all our approaches unto God, in
every particular duty of his Worship. Without this no outward Solemnity of Worship, no exercise of it will avail us.
2. It is Faith in Christ alone that gives us boldness of access unto God.
3. The Person and Office of Christ are to be rested in with full assurance in all our Accesses to the Throne of Grace.
IV. There is a two-fold preparation prescribed unto us for the right discharge of this Duty. (1.) That our Hearts be sprinkled from an evil Conscience. (2.) That our Bodies are washed with pure Water. It is plain that the Apostle in these exLegally defiled, so there were means appointed for their
The Subject spoken of is two-fold: (1.) The Heart. (2.) The Body: That is, the inward and outward Man.
As unto the First, it is required that with respect unto it, it be separated from an evil Conscience; There is no doubt but in this place, as in many others, the Heart is taken for all the Faculties of our Souls, with our Affections. For it is that wherein Conscience is seated, wherein it acts its power, which it doth especially in the practical understanding, as the Affections are ruled and guided thereby.
This Conscience is affirmed to be evil, antecedently unto the means propoas Conscience, is not to be separated from the heart, but as it is evil, it must be so.
Conscience may be said to be evil on two accounts. (1.) As it disquieteth,
perplexeth, judgeth, and condemneth for Sin. In this sence the Apostle speaks of Conscience, ver. 2. A Conscience condemning us for sin, which the Sacrifices of the Law could not take away; so an Heart with an evil Conscience, is a Heart terrified and condemning for Sin. (2.) On account of a vitiated principle in the Conscience not performing its duty, but secure when 'tis filled with all unsecret latent sins in the Heart, which are known only to a Mans own Conscience, opposed unto the Body, or external known Sins, which he speaks of afterwards. I take it here in the latter sence; (1.) Because it is said to be evil, which it cannot be, with respect unto its former Acts and Power, for it doth therein but perform its duty, and is evil not in it self, but unto them in whom it is. And (2.) The way of its removal is by sprinkling, and not by an oblation or offering; now sprinkling is the efficacious application of the Blood of Attonement unto Sanctifi
And this is the last thing in particular, namely, the Way or Means of the
removal of this evil Conscience, which is by sprinkling of our Hearts. The exsprinkling of Blood upon the Offering of the Sacrifices, Exod. 29. 16, 21.
1. Although that Worship whereby we draw nigh unto God be wrought with
respect to Institution and Rule, yet without internal Sanctification of heart we are not accepted in it.
2. Due Preparations by fresh Applications of our Souls unto the efficacy of the Blood of Christ, for the Purification of our hearts, that we may be meet to draw nigh to God, is required of us. This the Apostle hath especial respect unto, and the want of it, is the Bane of publick Worship. Where this is not, there is no due reverence of God, no Sanctification of his name, not any benefit to be expected unto our own Souls.
3. In all wherein we have to do with God, we are principally to regard those internal Sins we are conscious of unto our selves, but are hidden from all others.
The last thing required of us in order to the duty exhorted unto, is, that
our Bodies be washed with pure water. This at first view would seem to refer unto the outward Administration of the Ordinance of Baptism required of all, antecedently unto their orderly Conjunction unto a Church-state in the causes of it; and so it is carried by many Expositors. But, (1.) The Apostle Peter tells us that saving Baptism doth not consist in the Washing away of the filth of the Body, 1 Pet. 3. 21. therefore the expression here must be figurative, and not proper. (2.) Although the sprinkling and washing spoken of, do principally respect our habitual internal qualification, by regenerating Sanctifying Grace; yet they include also the actual, gracious, renewed preparations of our Hearts and Minds, with respect unto all our solemn approaches unto God; but Baptism cannot be repeated. (3.) Whereas the sprinkling of the Heart from an evil Conscience, respects the Internal, and unknown Sins of the Mind; so this of washing the Body doth the Sins that are
2. Pure Water wherewith the Body is to be washed, is that which is promised, Ezek. 36. 25, 26. the assistance of the sanctifying Spirit, by virtue of the Sacrifice of Christ. Hereby all those sins which cleave unto our outward Conver
1. Universal Sanctification upon our whole persons, and the Mortification in an
especial manner of outward Sins, are required of us in our drawing nigh unto God.
2. These are the Ornaments wherewith we are to prepare our Souls for it, and not the Gaiety of outward apparel.
3. It is a great work to draw nigh unto God, so as to Worship him in Spirit and in Truth.
Let us hold fast the profession of our Faith without wavering, for he is faithful who hath promised.
This is the second Exhortation which the Apostle educeth by way of inference from the Principles of Truth which he had before declared and confirmed. And it is the substance or end of the whole parenetical or hortatory part of the Epistle; that, for the obtaining whereof, the whole Doctrinal part of it was written, which gives Life and Efficacy unto it. Wherefore he spends the whole remainder of the Epistle, in the Pressing and Confirming of this Exhortation, on a compliance wherewith the Eternal condition of our Souls doth depend. And this he doth, partly by declaring the means whereby we may be helped in the discharge of this Duty; partly by denouncing the eternal ruine and sure destruction that will follow the neglect of it; and partly by encouragements from their own former Experiences, and the strength of our Faith; and partly by evidencing unto us in a multitude of Examples, how we may overcome the difficulty that would occur unto us in this way, with other various Cogent reasonings; as we shall see, if God pleaseth, in our progress.
In these words, there is a Duty prescribed, and an encouragement added un
As unto the Duty it self, we must enquire: (1.) What is meant by the Profession of our Faith? (2.)
1. Some Copies read, profession of our hope, which Vulgar follows, the profession of the hope that is in us; and so it may have a respect unto the Exhortation used by the Apostle, Chap. 3. 6. And it will come unto the same with our reading of it; for on our Faith our Hope is built, and is an eminent fruit thereof. Wherefore holding fast our Hope, includes in it the holding fast of our Faith, as the Cause is in the Effect, and the Building in the Foundation. But I preferr the other Reading, as that which is more suited unto the design of the Apostle, and his following Discourse; and which his folprofession. See Chap. 3. 1.
Faith is here taken in both the principal acceptations of it, namely, that faith whereby we believe, and the Faith or Doctrine which we do believe. Of both which we make the same profession; of one as the inward Principle, of the other as the outward Rule. Of the meaning of the word it self, joynt profession,
This solemn profession of our Faith, is two-fold. (1.) Initial. (2.) By the way of continuation, in all the Acts and Duties required thereunto. The First, is a solemn giving up of our selves unto Christ, in a professed subjection unto the Gospel, and the Ordinances of Divine Worship therein contained. This of old was done by all Men, at their First accession unto God in the Assemblies of the Church. The Apostle calls it, the beginning of our confidence, or subsistence in Christ and the Church, Chap. 3. 6. And it was ordinarily in the primitive times, accompanied with excellent Graces and Priviledges.
For, (1.) God usually gave them hereon great Joy and Exultation with peace in their own Minds, 1 Pet. 2. 9. Hath translated us out of darkness into his marvellous light. The glorious marvellous light, whereunto they were newmeans whereby they were filled with joy unspeakable and full of Glory. And respect is had unto this frame of Heart in this Exhortation. For it is apt on many accounts to decay and be lost: but when it is so, we lose much of the Glory of our pro
such Communication of the Spirit in Gifts, or Graces, that was a Seal unto them of the promised inheritance, Eph. 1. 13. And although what was extraordinary herein is ceased and not to be looked after, yet if Christians in their initial dedication of themselves unto Christ and the Gospel, did attend unto their duty in a due manner, or were affected with their priviledges as they ought, they would have experience of this Grace, and ad
Secondly, The continuation of their Profession first solemnly made, avowing the Faith on all just occasions, in attendance on all Duties of Worship requithis profession of our Faith that is exhorted unto.
II. What is it to hold fast this profession? The words we so render, are Thes. 5. 23. indefinitely used to this end ch. 3. 6. ch. 4. 14. Rev. 2. 25. ch. 3. 11. So that which is here chap. 4. 14.
And there is included in the sence of either of these words,
III. This is to be done without wavering, that is, the profession must be immovable and constant. The frame of mind which this is opposed unto, is expressed
1. An halting between two opinions, God or Baal, Judaism or Christianity, Truth or Error. This is to waver Doctrinally.
2. Unto a Weakness, or Irresolution of mind as unto a continuance in the profession of faith against difficulties and oppositions.
3. To an yielding in the way of complyance, in any point of Doctrine or Worship contrary unto or inconsistent with the Faith we have professed. In which sense the Apostle would not give place, no not for an hour unto them that taught Cir
4. To final Apostacy from the truth, which this wavering up and down, as the Apostle intimates in his following discourse, brings unto. Wherefore it includes Positively,
(1.) A firm perswasion of mind, as to the truth of the Faith whereof we have made profession. (2.) A constant resolution to abide therein, and adhere thereunto against all oppositions. (3.) Constancy and diligence in the performsumm and substance of that duty which the Apostle with all sorts of Arguments presseth on the Hebrews in this Epistle, as that which was indis
1. There is an Internal Principle of saving Faith required unto our profession
of the Doctrine of the Gospel, without which it will not avail.
2. All that believe, ought solemnly to give themselves up unto Christ and his
Rule, in an express profession of the faith that is in them, and required of them.
3. There will great difficulties arise in, and opposition be made unto, a sincere profession of the Faith.
4. Firmness and constancy of mind with our utmost diligent endeavours, are required unto an acceptable continuance in the profession of the Faith.
5. Uncertainty and wavering of mind, as to the Truth and Doctrine we profess, or neglect of the duties wherein it doth consist, or compliance with errors for fear of persecution and sufferings, do overthrow our profession, and render it useless.
6. As we ought not on any account to decline our Profession, so to abate of the degrees of fervency of spirit therein, is dangerous unto our souls.
Upon the Proposal of this Duty, the Apostle in his passage interposeth an encouragement unto it, taken from the assured benefit and advantage that should be obtained thereby; for, saith he, He is faithfull that hath promised. And nature of the encouragement given us in them.
1. It is God alone who Promiseth. He alone is the Author of all Gospel Promises; by him are they given unto us, 2
2. The Promises of God are of that nature in themselves, as are suited unto the encouragement of all Believers unto constancy, and final perseverance in the Profession of the Faith. They are so, whether we respect them as they contain and exhi
3. The Efficacy of the Promises unto this end, depends upon the faithfulness of God who gives them. With him is neither variableness, nor shadow of turning. The strength of Israel will not lie nor repent. Gods faithfulness is the unchangechap. 6. 18. Titus 1. 2. This therehold fast their profession, seeing he who hath promised them, is absolutely Faithful and Unchangeable.
The Faithfulness of God in his Promises, is the great encouragement and supportment, under our continual Profession of our Faith against all oppositions.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and good works.
LOve and good works are the fruits, effects, and Evidences of the sincere profession of saving faith; Wherefore a diligent attendance unto them, is an effectuExhorts unto, and thence declares the manner whereby we may be excited and enabled unto them. And there is in the words, (1.) A profession of a Duty, as a means unto another end. (2.) The declaration of that end, nameto provoke one another to Love and good Works.
1. chap. 3. 1. A diligent inspection into, an
That those unto whom he wrote, had a deep concernment in one another, their present temporal and future Eternal state. Without this the meer consideration of one another, would only be a fruitless effect of curiosity, and tend unto many evils.
2. That they had also communion together about those things without which this Duty could not be rightly discharged. For it was not then in the world as it is now; but all Christians who were joyned in Church Societies, did meet together for mutual Communion in those things wherein their Edification was concerned, as is declared in the next Verse.
3. That they judged themselves obliged to watch over one another as unto stedfastness in profession, and fruitfulness in Love and good Works. Hence they knew it their Duty to admonish, to exhort, to provoke, to encourage one ano
On these suppositions this consideration respects the Gifts, the Graces, the Temptations, the
II. The special kind of this Duty as here pressed by the Apostle is, that it is Unto the Provocation of Love and good works, that is, as we have rendred the words, to provoke (that is, one another) unto Love and good Works. Provocation is commonly used in an ill sense, namely, for the imbittering of the spirit of another, moving anger, sorrow, and disquietto provoke one, is to imbitter his Spirit, and to stir him up unto anger. And when any provocation is high, we render it strife or contention, such as whereby the Spirits of men are imActs 15. 39. Howbeit, it is used sometimes for an earnest and diligent excitation of the Minds or Spirits of men unto that which is good. See Rom. 11. 14. So it is here used. And there is more in it than a bare mutual Exhortation; An excitation of Spirit by Exhortation, Example, Rebukes, until it be warmed unto a duty. This is the great end of the Communion that is among Christians in the mutual consideration of one another; considering the circumstances, conditions, walkings, abilities for usefulness, of one another, they do excite one another unto love and good works, which is called the provocation of them, or the stirring up of the minds of men unto them. This was the way and practice of the Christians of old, but is now generally lost, with most of the principles of practical Obedience, especially those which concern our mutual edification, as if they had never been prescribed in the Gospel.
The Duties themselves which they are thus mutually to provoke one another unto, are, Love and good works; And they are placed by the Apostle in their proper orLove is the spring and fountain of all acceptable good works. Of mutual love among believers, which is that here intended, as unto the nature and causes of it, and motives unto it, I have treated at large Chap. 6. The good works intendworks proceeding from the shining Light of Truth, whereon God is glorified.
1. The mutual watch of Christians in the particular Societies whereof they
are members, is a duty necessary unto the preservation if the profession of the Faith.
2. A due consideration of the circumstances, abilities, temptations and opportunities for duties, in one another, is required hereunto.
3. Diligence, or mutual Exhortation unto Gospel duties, that men on all grounds of Reason and Example may be provoked unto them, is required of us, and is a most Excellent Duty, which in an especial manner we ought to attend unto.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Not forsaking the assembling of our selves together, as the manner of some is, but Exhorting one another; and so much the more as ye see the day approaching.
THe Words contain an enforcement of the preceding Exhortation, in a cauThe neglect and evil which they are cautioned against, that is, Forsaking the assembling of our selves: (2.) This is exemplified, (1.) In
In the First, there is the thing spoken of,
the assembling of our selves together; for it is not the Church-State absolutely,
actual assemblies of Believers, walking together in that State, which the Apostle intends. For as the Church it self is Originally the Seat and Subject of all Divine Worship, so the actual Assemblies of it, are the only way and means for the Exercise and performance of it. These Assemblies were of two sorts. (1.) Stated on the Lords Day, or first Day of the Week, 1. Cor. 16. 2. Acts 20. 7. (2.) Occasional, as the Duties or Occasions of the Church did require, 1 Cor. 5. 4.
The End of these Assemblies were twofold. (1.) The due performance of all solemn Stated, orderly, Evangelical Worship, in Prayer, Preaching of the Word, Singing of Psalms, and the Administration of the Sacraments. (2.) The exercise of Discipline, or the watch of the Church over its Members, with respect unto their Walking and Conversation, that in all things it be such as becomes the Gospel, and giving no Offence. So to Admonish, Exhort, and Provake one another to Love and Good Works; Comfort, Establish, and Encou&c. Such Assemblies were constantly observed in the first Churches; How they come to be lost is not unknown, though how they may and ought to be revived is difficult.
Two things are evident herein.
1. That those Assemblies, those comìngs together in one place, was the only way whereby the Church, as a Church made its Profession of Subjection unto the Authority of Christ in the Performance of all those Duties of Sacred Worship, whereby God was to be Glorified under the Gospel. Wherefore a Voluntary neglect and relinquishment of those Assemblies, destroys any Church State, if it be persisted in.
2. That those Assemblies were the Life, the Food, the Nourishment of their Souls; Without which they could neither attend unto the Discipline of Christ, nor yield Obedience unto his Commands, nor make Profession of his Name as they ought, nor enjoy the Benefit of Evangelical Institutions: Whereas in a due Observance of them consisted the Tryal of their Faith in the sight of God and Man. For as unto God, whatever Reserves men may have in their minds, that they would still continue to believe in Christ though they attended not unto his Discipline in these Assemblies, he regards it not; because thereunto men, it is not so much Faith it self, as the Profession of it in those assemBelievers in all Ages have constantly ventured their lives in the Observance of them through a thousand difficulties and dangers, esteeming them always aliens from their communion by whom they were neglected.
Wherefore, secondly, The Apostles charge concerning those Assemblies, is, that we should not forsake them. There is a twofold forsaking of these Assemblies. (1.) That which is Total, which is the fruit and evidence of absolute Apostacy. (2.) That which is so Partially only, in want of Diligence and conscientious care in a constant attendance unto them according as the Rule and their Institution do require. It is the latter that the Apostle here intends, as the word in part sig
1. From fear of suffering. These Assemblies were those which exposed them unto Sufferings, as those whereby they made their Profession visible, and evithose Fearful and Unbelieving ones, who in the first place are excluded from the New Jerusalem, Rev. 21. 8. In such a season, all the arguings of Flesh and Blood, will arise in the minds of Men, and be proReserves concerning their State in this frame, with Resolutions to return unto their Duty when the Storm is over; Pleas and Arguments that these Assemblies are not so necessary, but that God will be mercifull unto them in this thing. All which and the like false reasonings do carry them away to ruine. For notwithstanding all these vain pleas, the
2. Spiritual sloth, with the occasions of this life, are the cause in many of this sinful neglect. Other things will offer themselves in competition with the diligent attendance unto these Assemblies. If men stir not up themselves, and shake off the weight that lyes upon them, they will fall under a wofull negspecious pleas, taken for the most part from their occasions and necessities. These things they will plead with men, and there is no contending with them; But let them go to Christ and plead them immediately unto himself, and then ask of themselves, how they suppose they are accepted? He requires that we should attend unto these Assemblies diligently, as the principal way and means of doing that, and observing that which he comcertain indispensible Rule of our Obedience unto him. Will it be accepted with him, if in a neglect of that, we should say unto him, we would have done so indeed, but that one thing or other, this business, this diversion, this or that attendance in our callings would not suffer us so to do? This may indeed fall out sometimes where the Heart is sincere, but then it will be troubled at it, and watch for the future against the like occasions. But where this is frequent, and every trivial diversion is embraced unto a neglect of this Duty, the Heart is not upright before God, the Man draws back in the way unto perdition.
3. Unbelief working gradually towards the forsaking of all profession. This is the first way for the most part, whereby an evil Heart of Unbelief in deHebrews of, chap. 3. I say, hereby usually it first evitotal Apostacy lyes at the door; whereof we have multiplyed instances.
Great Diligence is required of us in a due attendance unto the Assemblies of the Church for the ends of them, as they are instituted and appointed by Jesus
Christ. The benefit we recieve by them, the danger of their neglect, sense of the Authority of Christ, concernment of his glory in them, with the vanity of the pretences for their Neglect, call aloud for this Diligence.
2. The neglect of the Authority and Love of Christ in the appointment of the means of our Edification, will alwayes tend to great and ruinous evils.
Thirdly, The Apostle Exemplifies their sin, which he warms them against in an instance of those who are guilty of it, as the manner of some is. The Church of
the Hebrews, especially that at Jerusalem, had been exposed to great Tryals and Persecutions, as the Apostle declares v. 32, 33. during this State, some of the Members of them, even in those early dayes, began so far to decline their profession, as not to frequent the Assemblies of the Church. They were afraid to be taken at a Meeting, or that their known persecuting Neighbours should take notice of them as they went unto, or came from their Assemblies. And it should seem, they were not a few who were fallen into this sinfull neglect; for the Apostle speaks of it as a thing which was well known among themselves.
Again, There were among the Hebrews at that time great disputes about the continuance of the Temple-worship, with the Rites and Ceremonies of it, which many were entangled withall; and as that error prevailed in their minds, so did they begin gradually to neglect and forsake the Worship and Duties of the Gospel, which ended with many in fatal Apostacy. To prevent the effects of these two evils, was the principal design of the Apostle in writCogent Arguments against them. This was the later cause of their Declension before intimated, namely, Unbelief secretOrdinary Beginning of an entrance into final Apostacy; namely, that men do for sake the Assemblies of the Saints. Only observe, that it is not an occcasional Dereliction of them, but that which they accustomed themselves unto; it was
1. No Church-Order, no outward profession can secure men from Apostacy. PerPurest Churches.
2. Perfection, freedom from Offence, Scandal, and ruinous Evils, is not to be expected in any Church in this World.
3. Men that begin to decline their Duty in Church Relations, ought to be marked, and their wayes avoided.
4. Forsaking of Church Assemblies is usually an entrance into Apostacy.
Fourthly, The Apostle illustrates this great evilby the contrary Duty, Duties of these Assemblies, especially those which are usefull and needfull to prevent Backsliding, and preserve from Apostacy, are proposed under this one, which is the head and chief of them all.
The Nature of this mutual Exhortation among Christian Believers in Church Societies, hath been discoursed on chap. 3. Here it is opposed unto the evil dehorted from, Forsake not, but exhort one another; Wherefore it is comprehensive of the general nature of all the Duties of Believers in Church Societies, and it hath a special respect unto Constancy and
1. Such warnings of Christ there are unto his Church, both by his Word, and by his Providence. For although he speak not now immediately unto them by Revelations, yet he speaks unto them mediately in his Word. All the warnings he hath left on record in the Scripture, given unto his Churches in the various conditions wherein they were, as for instance, Those in the second and third of the Revelations, are given likewise unto all the Churches now, that are in the same State or condition wherein they were. And he doth it by his Providence, in threatnings, Essicacious tryals, and persecutions, 1 Cor. 11. 30, 31, 32.
2. The principal End of these warnings is to stir us up unto more diligence in attendance unto the duties of his worship in the Assemblies of the Church; as is manifest in all his dealings with the seven Churches, as Types of all others. For (1.) Our neglect therein, is the cause of that displeasure which he in his warnmany are sick and weak, many are fallen a sleep. Because thou art luke-warm, I will do so and so. (2.) Because without a diligent care, we cannot pass through trials of any nature, in persecuand so much the rather, what additions unto our performance of those duties is required from this mo
1. A Recovery of our selves from outward neglects in attendance upon Church-Assemblies; such there have been amongst us on various pretences, which if on renewed warnings we recover not our selves from, we are in danger of eter
2. A diligent enquirie into all the duties which belong to the Assemblies of Believers, is comprised here by the Apostle under the
3. Spiritual Diligence in stirring up our hearts and minds unto sincerity, zeal, and delight in the performance of them; in all labouring after a recovery from our decays and backslidings, which is the design of most of the Epistles of Christ unto the Seven Churches. Wherefore,
When especial Warnings do not excite us unto renewed Diligence in known duties, our condition is dangerous as unto the continuance of the presence of Christ
amongst us.
3. The motive it self is, the approach of the day; concerning which we must enquire, (1.) What day it is, that is intended? (2.) How it did approach?
1. The day, an eminent day; The Rule whereby we may determine what day is intended, is this; it was such a day as was a peculiar motive unto Hebrews in their present circumstances, to attend diligently unto the due performance of Gospel Duties. It is not such a day, such a Motive, as is alcommon to all, but only unto those who are in some measure in the same circumstances with them. Wherefore it is neither the day of death personally
future Judgment absolutely that is intended; For those are common unto all equally, and at all times, and are a powerful motive in General unto the performance of Gospel Duties; but not an especial peculiar Motive at some time unto peculiar diligence. Wherefore, this day was no other but that fearful and tremendous day, a season for the destruction of Jerusalem, the Temple, City, and Nation of the Jews, which our Saviour had forewarned his Disciples of, and which they had in continual expectation.
But it may be said, How should the Approach of this day, wherein all things seem to be dissolved, the Church to be scattered, the whole Nation to be conredoubled diligence in attendance unto the duties of Christian Assemblies? It should now seem rather to have been a time for every one to shift for himself, and his Family, than to leave all at uncertainties, and unto ruine, whilest they looked after these Assem
Answ. 1. Whatever Desolations and Destructions may be approaching, our best and wisest frame will be to trust unto God, in the discharge of our duty. All other contrivances will prove not only vain, and foolish, but destructive unto our Souls. The day here intended was coming on the people and Nation for their neglect and contempt of the Gospel, it was the Revenge of their Murder, unbelief, and Obstinacy against Christ. Wherefore if any that made Profes
2. It is impossible that men should go or be carryed through a day of publique Calamity, a destructive day, comfortably and chearfully, without a diligent attendance unto those known duties of the Gospel. For, (1.) The
Approaching Judgments ought to influence unto especial diligence in all Evangelical
2. How did this day approach? It was approaching, coming, drawing nigh, it was in procinctu, gradually coming upon them; Warnings of it, dispositions towards it, intimations of its coming were given them every day. This I have before given an account of, and how the drawings nigh of this day were upon them when this Epistle was written, and how in a short time it brake forth upon them in all its severity. And these things were so evident, as that in the last place, the Apostle takes it for granted, that they themselves did see openly and evidently the approaching day; And it did so in these five things: (1.) In the accomplishment of the signs of its coming, foretold by our Saviour; compare Mat. 24. 9. &c. with the 32, 33, 34, verses of this Chapter. And besides, all the other signs mentioned by our Saviour, were entring on their accomthings were at a great stand as unto the Progress of the Gospel among the Hebrews. At the first Preaching of it multitudes were conthis Epistle the case was changed among them, the Elect obtained, the rest were hardened, Re. 11. The number of the Elect among that people were now gathered in; few addaily nor in multitudes as formerly. And Believers knew full well that when their work was all accomplished, God would not leave the people in their obstinacy, but that wrath should come upon them unto the uttermost. (3.) They saw it approaching in all the Causes of it. For the Body of the people having now refused the Gospel, were given up unHistorian of their own Nation. (4.) The Time and season did manifest it self unto them. For whereas the body of that people were to be cut off, and cast off, as the Apostle expresly declares, Rom. 9. 10, 11. This could not be done untill a sufficient tender of the Gospel and of Grace by Christ Jesus were first made unto them. Notwithstanding all their other wickednesses, God would not surprize them with an overturning destruction. He had before as Types of his dealing with them, warned the old world by Noah, and Sodom by Lot, beday, and make them a sufficient tender of mercy, which he had now done towards forty years. In this space, through the Ministry of the Apostles, and other faithfull dispensers of the Word, the Gospel had been proRom. 10. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. This being now accomplished, they might evidently see that the day was approaching. (5.) In the Preparations for it. For at this time all things began to be fill'd with Confusions, Disorders, Tumults, Seditions, and Slaughters in the whole Nation, being all of them entrances of that woful day, whose coming was declared in them and by them.
1. If men will shut their eyes against evident signs and tokens of approaching
Judgments, they will never stir up themselves, nor engage into the due performance of present duties.
2. In the approach of great and final Judgments, God by his Word and Providence gives such intimations of their coming, as that wise men may discern them. Whoso is wise he will consider these things, and they shall understand the loving kindness of the Lord. The Prudent foreseeth the evil and hideth himself. How is it that you discern not the Signs of the times?
3. To see evidently such a day approaching, and not to be sedulous and diligent in the duties of divine Worship, is a token of a backsliding frame tending unto final Apostacy.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the Truth, there remaineth no more Sacrifice for sins:
But a certain fearfull looking for of Judgment, and fiery indignation which shall devour the Adversaries.
IN these Verses the Apostle gives a vehement enforcement of his preceding Exhortation, from the dreadful Consequences of a total neglect of it, or unBy expressing the nature of the sin which lyes therein. (2.) By an impossibility of deliverance from the Guilt of it. (3.) The Punishment, that would unavoidably follow upon it.
Interpreters have greatly perplexed themselves and others in the interpretatiscope of the Apostle, the argument he had in hand, the circumstances of the people unto whom he wrote, and the present State of Gods Providence towards them. I shall not trouble the Reader with their various conjectures and censures of them; but I shall give such an evident sence of the words, as themselves and the Con
1. As unto the words, wherein the Sin and State of such men is expressed, If we sin wilfully. He puts himself among them, as is his manner in Comminations; both to shew that there is no respect of persons in this matter, but those who have equally sinned, shall be equally punished: And to take off all appearance of severity towards them, seeing he speaks nothing of this nature, but on such suppositions as wherein if he himself were concerned, he pronounceth it against himself also. We sinning, or if we sin wilfully, say we; our former translations, willingly, which we have now avoyded, lest we should give Counthat there is no Recovery after any voluntary sin. If we sin wilfully, that is, Obstinately, Maliciously, and with despight which is the nature of the sin it self, as is declared v. 28. But the word doth not require, nor will scarce bear any such sence. Willingly is of choice, without surprizal, com
The Season and circumstance which states the sin intended is, after we have received the knowledge of the truth. There is no Question but that by the Truth the Apostle intends the Doctrine of the Gospel; and the receiving of it is upon the conviction of it's being truth, to take on us the outward profession of it. Only there is an Emphasis in that word meer conceptions or notions of the mind about truth, but such an acdescription of the persons concerning whom this sin is suptwo heads. (1.) The solemn Dedication of themselves unto Christ in and by their Baptism. (2.) Their solemn joyning themselves unto the Church, and continuance in the duties of its worship, Acts. 2. 41, 42.
On this opening of the words, it is evident what sin it is that is intended, against which this heavy doom is denounced; And that on these two considehead of the precedent Exhortation is, that we would hold fast the profession of our Faith without wavering, v. 22. And the meanes of continuing in that profession, v. 24, 25. Wherefore the sin against this Exhorrelinquishment and renouncing of the profession of the Faith, with all acts and duties thereunto belonging. (2.) The state opposite unto this sin, that which is contrary unto it, is receiving the knowledg of the Truth, which what is required thereunto, we have now declared. Wherefore the sin here, intended is plainly a relinquishment and renunciation of the truth of the Gospel and the promises thereof, with all duties thereunto belonging, after we have been convinced of its truth, and avowed its power and Excellency. There is no more required but that this be done Willingly, as (1.) Not suddain surprizal and temptation, as Peter denied Christ. (2.) Not on those compulsions and fears which may work a present dissimulation, withdarkness, Ignorance making an impression for a season on the minds and reasonings of men; which things, though exceedingly evil and dangerous, may befal them who yet con
But it is required thereunto that men who thus sin, do it, (1.) By choice, and of their own accord, from the internal pravity of their own minds, and an evil heart of unbelief to depart from the living God. (2.) That they do it by, and with the preference of another way of Religion, and a resting theretwo things
foundation of the profession of the Gospel. (1.) The Blood of the Convenant, or the blood of the Sacrifice of Christ with the attonement made thereby; And (2.) The dispensation of the Spirit of Grace; These they did openly renounce, and declare that there was nothing of God in them, as we shall see on, v. 29. Such were they who fell off from the Gospel unto Judaism in those daies. Such are they whom the Apostle here describeth, as is evident in the context. I will say no more unto the sin at present, because I must treat of it under its aggravations on, v. 29.
1. If a voluntary relinquishment of the profession of the Gospel and the duties
of it be the highest sin, and be attended with the height of wrath and punishment; we ought earnestly to watch against every thing that inclineth or disposeth us thereunto.
2. Every declension in or from the profession of the Gospel, hath a proportion of the guilt of this great sin, according unto the proportion that it bears unto the sin it self. Hereof there may be various degrees.
3. There are sins and times wherein God doth absolutely refuse to hear any more from men in order unto their Salvation.
2. The first thing which the Apostle chargeth as an aggravation of this sin, is, that it cannot be expiated, There remains no more Sacrifice for sin. Words not unlike those of God concerning the house of Eli. 1 Sam. 3. 14. I have sworn unto the house of Eli, that the Iniquity of Eli's house shall not be purged with Sacrifice nor offering for ever. An Allusion is had herein unto the SacriMarder, Adultery, Blasphemy; or from the manner of their Commission
This the words express, there remains not, there is not in the Mosaical Law, and all its Sacrifices to bring in that of Christ; Why may not therefore there be another way of Expiation of sin yet
voluntary relinquishment of the Gospel, did forfeit all their interest in the Sacrifice of Christ as he further declares, v. 29. so there was no way appointed for the relief of them by the expiation of their sin for ever.
Further, to clear the mind of the Holy Ghost herein, I should Answer some enquiries that may arise on this interpretation of the words, but in this place I shall only propose them.
1. Whether this Commination may be extended to all Ages, Times, and Seasons? or whether it were confined unto the present state of the Hebrews, with the circumstances they were in? The Reasons of the Enquiry are, (1.) Because
circumstances were eminently peculiar, and such as cannot befall others in any season. (2.) Because there was a temporal Destruction then impendent over them, ready to devour Apostates, which cannot be applied unto them who fall into the same sins at other seasons.
2. Whether the sin intended may include great actual sins after the profession of the Gospel, answering such as under the Law were said to be committed with an high hand?
3. Whether there may be hopes for the persons here intended though no express provision be made in the Covenant for the expiation of this sin.
4. Whether there be any defect in the Priesthood of Christ that it hath but one Sacrifice for sins, which if it be neglected and despised, can never be repeated, nor can any other Sacrifice be added unto it?
5. Whether a person who hath voluntarily forsaken and renounced the Gospel with a great appearance of all the circumstances that concur unto the state of the sin here mentioned, should make profession of repentance, what may be con
The loss of an interest in the Sacrifice of Christ on what account, or by what means soever it fall out, is absolutely ruinous unto the souls of men.
But a certain fearfull looking for of Judgment and fiery indignation which shall devour the adversaries.
When a man under the Law had contracted the guilt of any such sin, as was indispensibly capital in its punishment, for the legal expiation whereof no Sacrifice was appointed or allowed, such as Murder, Adultery, Blasphemy, he had nothing remaining but a fearful expectation of the Execution of the sentence of the Law against him. And it is evident that in this Context, the Apostle argues from the less unto the greater; If it was so, that this was the case of him who so sinned against Moses Law, how much more must it be so with them, that sin against the Gospel, whose sin is incomparably greater, and the punishment more severe?
The Connexion of the words with those foregoing, by the Adversative
there remains; No Sacrifice for sin is left or remains; But there doth remain or abide for such persons a fearful expectation of Judgment.
There are two things in these words.
1. The punishment due unto the sins of Apostates which is three waies exgeneral nature of it, It is Judgment. (2.) By the special nature of that Judgment, it is fiery indignation. (3.) By the efficacy of it unto its end, it devours the adversaries.
2. The certain approach of this Judgment, there remains a fearful expectation. This last lies first in the words. And,
1. That which we render certain, is in the Original only assured expectation, nor the certainty of the punishment; but only diminution, but to intimate something that is inexpressible, such as no heart can conceive, or tongue express; 1 Pet. 4. 17, 18. What shall be the end of them who obey not the Gospel? Where shall the sinners and ungodly appear.
2. expectation, is the frame of mind with respect unto any thing look for what ever it be, which we have reason and grounds to think it will come unto us or befal us.
3. This Expectation is said to be
fearful, tremendous, which men can neither conflict withall, nor avoid, as we shall see further, ver. 31. That expectation of this dreadful and terrible nature, may be taken two
certain Relation that is between the sin, and punishment spoken of; the punishment is unavoidable, as any thing is which upon the most certain grounds is looked for. So they are said only metaphorically to look for that which will certainly ensue. (2.) As it expresseth the frame of the minds of them concerning it. And though the Assertion may be used in the former sence, yet I doubt not but this latter also is included in it; and that also on two accounts: (1.) Because if they did set themselves unto the consiApostacy, nothing else could befal their minds, nothing will present it self unto them for their relief; their minds will not admit of other thoughts but what belongs to this dreadful expectation. (2.) On the account of that dread and terror that God sends at times into the minds and Consciences of such persons. They may bear it high, and with an OstenTyrants, that if their Breasts were opened, it would appear what tortures they have within: I am perswaded, it is probable, that God very seldom lets them pass without tormenting fear and dread of approaching Judgments, in this world, which is a broad en
I. There is an inseparable concatenation between Apostacy and Eternal ruin.
II. God often times visits the minds of cursed Apostates with dreadful expectations of approaching wrath.
III. When men have hardned themselves in sin, no fear of punishment either will rouze or stirr them up to seek after relief.
IV. A dreadful expectation of future wrath without hope of relief, is an open entrance into Hell it self.
2. This dreadful punishment is described by the general nature of it, it is Judgment; it is not a thing that is dubious, that may fall out or may not do so. It is not an unaccountable severity that they are threatned withall, but it is a just and righteous sentence denouncing punishment proportionate unto their sin and crime. Judgment is taken sometimes for punishment it self, Ps. 9. 16. James 2. 13. 1 Pet. 4. 17. 2 Pet. 2. 3. But most commonly it is used for the sentence of judicial condemnation and tryal, determining the offender unto pugeneral Judgment that shall pass on all mankind at the last day, Mat. 10. 15. & 5. 11, 22, 24. chap. 12. 36. Mark 6. 2. 2 Pet. 2. 9. 2 Pet. 3. 1. John 4. 17.
I doubt not but that in the word as here used both these are included, namerighteous sentence of God judging and determining on the guilt of this sin, and punishment it self which ensues thereon, as it is immediately described. And although respect be had herein principally to the Judgment of the great day; yet is it not exclusive of any previous Judgments that are preparatory unto it, and pledges of it; such was that dreadful Judgment which was then coming on the Apostate Church of the Hebrews.
The Expectation of future Judgment in guilty persons, is and will be at one
time or another dreadful and tremendous.
The punishment and destruction of those sinners is described by its partifiery indignation,
the expectation of fiery indignation: but refer immediately unto
What is this fire? and what is this indignation of it?
1. God himself is in the Scripture said to be a consuming fire; Deut. 4. 24. Ch. 9. 3. Isa. 33. 14. Heb. 10. 29. What is intended thereby is declared in a word, Deut. 4. 24. essential holiness and
righteousness of God, whereby he cannot bear with the Iniquities and provocahe will by no means acquit the Guilty, is intended in this Metaphorical expression.
The Judgment of God concerning the Punishment of sin as an Effect of his will, in a way consonant unto the holiness of his nature, and the Exigence of his Righteousness, is called fire 1 Cor. 3. 13. But that is not the fire that is here intended. It is Devouring, Consuming, Destroying, such as answereth the seIsa. 9. 5. chap. 30. 33. chap. 66. 15. Amos 7. 4. Math. 18. 8. 2 Thes. 1. 8. Ps. 11. 7. Deut. 32. 22.
Therefore this indignation or fervor of fire, hath respect unto three things. (1.) The Holiness of the nature of God; from whence Originally this Judgment doth proceed, as that which is most suitable thereunto. (2.) The righteous act of the Will of God; sometimes called his wrath and anger from the effects of it, beThe dreadful severity of the Judgment in self, in its nature and effects, as it is declared in the next words.
I doubt not but respect is had unto the final Judgment, at the last day, and the Eternal destruction of Apostates. But yet also it evidently includeth that sore and fiery Judgment which God was bringing on the Obstinate Apostate Jews, in the total destruction of them and their Church-State by Fire and Sword. For as such Judgments are compared to, and called fire in the Scripture; so this was so sinfiery indignation, or fervor of fire. Besides, it was an eminent pledge and token of the future Judgment, and the severity of God therein. Wherefore 'tis foretold in expressions that are applicable unto the last Judgment. See Math. 24. 29, 30, 31. 2 Pet. 3. 10, 11, 12.
This Indignation to be executed by fire is described in the last place by its efficacy and
Concerning the Efficacy and effect of this fire we may consider, (1.) The Seasons of its application unto this effect,
(1.) It shall do so, it is not yet come to the effect, it is future. Hence Pet. 3. 3, 4, 5, 6. But there are three things intimated in this word. (1.) That it was in procinctu, in readiness, not yet come but ready to come; so is the word used to express that which is future, but ready to make its entrance. (2.) That it is certain, it shall and will be, whatever appearances there are of its turning aside, and mens avoidHab. 2. 3. (3.) The foundation of the Certainty of the coming of this fiery Indignation, is the irreversible Decree of God, accompanied with righte
I. There is a determinate time for the accomplishment of all Divine threatnings,
II. The certain determination of Divine Vengeance on the Enemies of the Gospel, is a Motive unto holiness, a supportment under sufferings, in them that believe. Lift up your heads, know your Salvation is nigh at hand; what manner of persons ought we to be? See, 2 Thes. 1. 7, 8, 9, 10.
2. There is a description of those on whom this fiery indignation shall have its effects, and 'tis the Adversaries,
believe not, and
I. The highest aggravations for the greatest sins, is, when men out of a contrary principle of Superstition and Error, do set themselves maliciously to oppose
II. There is a time when God will make demonstrations of his Wrath and displeasure against all such Adversaries of the Gospel, as shall be pledges of his Eternal Indignation. He will one day deal so with the Antichristian persecuting World.
3. What is the Effect of this fiery indignation against those adversaries? It shall eat them up, or devour them. The expression is Metaphorical, taken from Mal. 4. 1. whence those expressions are taken. Only the similitude is not to be extended beyond the proper intention of it; For fire doth so consume and devour what is put into it, as that it destroys the substance and being thereof, that it shall be no more: It is not so with the fiery indignation that shall consume or devour the Adversaries at the last day; It shall devour them as to all happiness, all blessedness, all hopes, comforts and relief at once; but it shall not at once utterly consume their Being. This is that which this fire shall Eternally prey upon, and never utterly consume. But if we make the application of it unto the temporal destruction that came upon them, the similitude holds throughout, for it utterly consumed them, and devoured them, and all that belonged unto them in this World, they were devoured by it.
The dread and terror of Gods final Judgments against the Enemies of the Gospel, is in it self inconceivable, and only shadowed out by things of the greatest dread and
terror in the World. Whence it is so, I shall now declare.
; 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
He that despised Moses Law dyed without mercy under two or three Witnesses.
Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and counted the Blood of the Covenant, wherewith he was Sanctified an unholy thing, and hath done despight unto the Spirit of Grace?
THe Apostle confirms what he had spoken of the fore and certain destruction of Apostates from the Gospel, by an Argument à comparatis, and à minori ad majus; that is, by the consideration of the two states of the Church, which he had all along compared and expressed. Wherefore to convince the
Ver. 28. he lays down the matter of fact as it was Stated under the Law; Wherein there are three things. (1.) The sin whereunto that of Apostasie from the Gospel is compared, He that despised Moses Law. (2.) The Punishment of that sin according to the Law, he that was guilty of it dyed without Mercy. (3.) The way whereby according unto the Law his sin was to be charged on him, it was under two or three Witnesses.
Unto the first, two things did concur.
1. It was such a sin as by the Law was capital; as, Murder, Adultery, Incest, Idolatry, Blasphemy, and some others. Concerning them it was provided in the Law, that those who were guilty of them should be put to Death. God alone by vertue of his Soveraignty, could dispense with the Execution of this sentence of the Law, as he did in the case of Lavid, 2 Sam. 12. 13. but as unto the peoNumb. 35. 31.
2. It was required that he did it presumptuously, or with an high hand. Ex. 21. 14. Numb. 15. 30, 31. Deut. 17. 12.
He that was thus guilty of sin, in sinning is said to despise Moses Law;
contempt, and abolishing of the Law, as the word signifies,
1. Because of Gods indulgence unto them therein. For although the general senCurse, wherein death was contained against every TransDeut. 29. yet God had ordained and appointed that for all their sins of Ignorance, Infirmity, or surprisals by Temptations, an Attonement should be made by Sacrifice, whereon the guilty were freed as unto the terms of the Covenant, and restored to a right unto all the Promises of it. Wherein they would not abide in those Terms and Conditions of the Covenant but transgress the bounds annext to them, it was a contempt of the whole Law, with the wisdom, goodness, and authority of God therein.
2. They rejected all the Promises of it which were given exclusively unto such sins, nor was there any way appointed of God for their recovery unto an interest in them. Hereby they made themselves Lawless Persons, contemning the ThreatDeut. 29. 18, 19, 20, 21.
It is the contempt of God and his Authority in his Law that is the Gall and
Poyson of sin. This may be said in some measure of all voluntary sins, and the more there is of it in any sin, the greater is their guilt, and the higher is their aggravation who have contracted it. But there is a degree hereof which God will not bear with; namely, when this presumptuous contempt hath such an influence into any sin, as that no ignorance, no infirmity, no special temptation can be pleaded, unto the extenuation of it. I obtained mercy because I did it ignorantly in unbelief. And sundry things are required here
2. The Punishment of this sin, or of him that was guilty of it, was, that he died without mercy. He died, that is, he was put to death, not alvaies, it de facto; but such was the constitution of the Law, he was to be put to death without mercy. There were several waies of inflicting Capital puhanging on a Tree, burning, and stoning. Of all which, and the application of them unto particular Cases, I have given a description in the Exercitations unto the first Volume of these Commentawithout mercy, not only because there was no allowance for any such mercy as should save and deliver him, but Deut. 13. 6, 7, 8, 9. Deut. 19.
This is expresly added unto the highest instance of despising the Law, namely, the decalogue in the foundation of it, whereon all other precepts of the Law were built; and that which comprised a total Apostacy from the whole Law. Wherefore I doubt not but the Apostle had an especial respect unto that sin in its punishment, which had a compleat parallel with that whose hainousness he would represent. However,
When the God of mercies will have men shew no mercy, as in the Temporal punishment; he can and will upon repentance shew mercy as to Eternal punishment.
3. The way of Execution of this Judgment, it was not to be done under two or three witnesses, that is, that were so of the fact and crime. The Law is Deut. 17. 6. Chap. 19. 13. Numb. 35. 30. Although God was very severe in the prescription of these Judgments, yet he would give no advantage thereby unto wicked and malicious persons, to take away the lives of innocent men. He rather chose that those who were guilty should through our weakness go free for want of evidence against them, than that innocence should be exposed unto the malice of one single testimony or witness. And such abhorrency God had of false witnesses in criminal Causes, as that which is most contrary unto his Righteousness in the Government of the world, as that he established a Lex talionis in this case alone; that a false witness should suffer the utmost of what he thought and contrived to bring on another. The Equity of which Law is still continued in force, as suitaDeut. 19. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21.
On this Proposition of the State of things under the Law by Gods apv. 29. Of how sorer punishment, &c. And there is in these words three things, (1.) The nature of the sin unto which punishment is annexed. (2.) The punishment it self expressed comparaMoses Law. (3.) The evidence of the inference which he makes; for this is such as he referrs it unto themselves to judge upon,
The Sin it self is described by a threefold Aggravation of it, each instance having its especial Aggravation: (1.) From the Object sinned against. (2.) From the Act of the minds of men in sinning against it.
1. The first aggravation of the sin intended is from the Object of it, the Person of Christ the Son of God; and that included in it, is the Act of their minds tothey trod, or trampled upon him.
2. The second against the Office of Christ, especially his Sacerdotal Office, and the Sacrifice of his blood which he offered therein; the blood of the covenant wherewith he was Sanctified; And the aggravation included therein from the act of their minds towards it, that they accounted it an unholy thing.
3. A third aggravation as unto the Object, is the Spirit of Christ, or the Spirit of grace; and the aggravation included therein is, that they do despight unto him.
In general, the Nature and Aggravation of the sin intended may be reduced unto these heads.
(1.) The Object of it, which is the summ and substance, a divine constellation of all the blessed effects of infinite Wisdom, Goodness, and Grace, yea the whole diPerson, Office, and Glory of the Son of God, as the Saviour and Redeemer of the Church.
(2.) The Actings of the minds of men towards this Object, which is in and by all the vilest affections that humane nature is capable of. Contempt, Scorn, and Malice are ascribed unto such sins; they trample on, they despise, and do
despight. Wherefore, if it be possible, that any thing, any sins of men, can provoke the heat of divine indignation; if any can contract such a guilt, as that the holiness, righteousness, truth, and faithfulness of God shall be enga
The sin in General is, that which we have spoken to before, namely, sinning wilfully, after we have received the knowledge of the truth, and in an absolute total relinquishment and rejection of the Gospel. In the description of the special Object of this sin, that which is first exprest is the
But how comes this Son of God to be concerned herein? What injury is done him by Apostates from the Gospel? I answer, that as the Lord Christ in his own Person was the special Author of the Gospel; as his Authority is the special Object of our Faith in it; as his Office with all the fruits of it is the Subject, Summ, and Substance of the Gospel; So there is no reception of it in a due manner unto Salvation, no rejection of it unto final condemnation, but what is all of it Originally, fundamentally, and vertually contained in the reception, or rejection of the perLife, the Soul, and Foundation of all Gospel truth; without which it is of no power, or efficacy unto the Souls of men. But I have treated at large of these things elsewhere.
I cannot but Observe, that, as whosoever rejects, refuses, forsakes the Gospel, rethe Person of Christ, so on what account soever men take up the Profession of it, and perform the Duties of it, if the foundation be not laid in a reception of Christ himself, of the Person of Christ, all their profession will be in vain.
first aggravation of this sin, it is committed immediately against the Person of the Son of God, and therein his Authority, Goodness, and Love.
But it may be thought, if the Person of Christ be concerned herein, yet it is indirectly or
Again, it respects his Authority. This the Gospel declared, and those who had come unto any profession of it, as those had done whereof he speaks in this place, as all must have done who contract the guilt of this sin, did avow, and submit themselves unto. The profession they made was to Observe and do all that he had commanded them, because all Power was given unto him in Heaven and Earth; This they now utterly rejected and despised, as unto the outward obseropenly rejected them, betaking themselves unto other Modes, and Rites of Di
I. Though there may be sometimes an appearance of great severity in Gods Judgments
II. Take we heed of every neglect of the Person of Christ or of his Authority, lest we enter into some degree or other of the guilt of this great offence.
III. The sins of men can really reach neither the Person nor Authority of Christ, they only do that in desire, which in effect they cannot accomplish. This doth not take off, or extenuate their sin, the guilt of it is no less than if they did actually trample upon the Son of God.
The Second Aggravation of the sin spoken of, is its Opposition to the Office of
Christ, especially his Priestly Office, and the Sacrifice that he Offered thereby, called here, the Blood of the Covenant. And that included in it, is the frame of their minds in that opposition, they counted it an unholy thing; both which have third Aggravation from the use and efficacy of that Blood, it is that wherein he was Sanctified.
For the First, In what sence the Blood of Christ was the Blood of the Covechap. 9. That whereby the new Covenant was ratified, confirmed, and made effectual as unto all the Grace of it unto them that do believe; And it was the foundation of all the following actings of God toexaltation, and of his Intercession. See chap. 13. 20. The Blood of the Covenant was the great expression of the Grace of God, and of the Love of Christ himself, as well as the Cause of all good unto us; the center of divine wisLife and Soul of the Gospel. Of this Blood of the Covenant it is said, that they who are guilty of the sin intended, accounted it an unholy thing, they judged it so, and dealt with it accordingly. Both the judgment of the mind, and practice thereupon are intended.
common, and opposed unto any thing that is dedicated, and conseprophane and unthat blood wherewith the New Covenant was sealed, confirmed,
common and unholy, not sacred; not of so much use unto the glory of God as the blood of Bulls and Beasts in legal Sacrifices; which is the height of impiety. And there are many degrees of this sin, some Doctrinal, some Practical; which though they arise not unto the degree here intended, yet are they perilous unto the Souls of men. Those by whom the efficacy of his blood unto the expiation of sin by making satisfaction and attonement, is denyed, as 'tis by the
Every thing that takes off from an high and glorious esteem of the blood of Christ as the blood of the Covenant, is a dangerous entrance into Apostacy: Such is the Sacrifice of the Mass, with all things of the like nature.
The last aggravation of this sin with respect unto the blood of Christ, is the Nature, Use and Efficacy of it, it is that wherewith he was sanctified. It is not real, or internal sanctification that is here intended, but it is a separation, and dedication unto God; in which sence the word is often used. And all the disputes concerning the total and final Apostacy from the Faith, of them who have been really, and internally sanctified, from this place, are altogether vain; Though that may be said of a man in aggravation of his sin, which he professeth concerngiving of the Law, or the establishing of the Covenant at Sinai, the people being sprinkled with the blood of the Beasts that were offered in Sacrifice, were sanctified, or dedicated unto God in a peculiar manner: So those who by Baptism, and confession of Faith in the Church of Christ were separated from all others, were peculiarly dedicated to God theredeny the Lord that bought them, or vindicated them from their slavery unto the Law by his Word and Truth for a season, 2 Pet. 2. 1. But the design of the Apostle in the Context leads plainly to another application of these words. It is Christ himself that is spoken of, who was sanctified and dedicated unto God, to be an Eternal high Priest, by the blood of the Covenant which he offered unto God, as I have shewed before. The Priests of old were dedicated and sanctified unto their Office by another, and the Sacrifices which he offered for them, they could not sanctifie themselves; so were Aaron and his Sons sanctified by Moses, anteceoutward Act of men or Angels could unto this purpose pass on the Son of God. He was to be the Priest himself, the Sacrificer himself, to dedicate, consecrate, and sanctifie himJohn 17. 19. Heb. 2. 10. chap. 5. 7, 9. chap. 9. 11, 12. That precious blood of Christ, wherein, or whereby he was sanctified, and dedicated unto God as the Eternal High-Priest of the Church, this they esteemed an unholy thing; that is, such as would have no such effect as to consecrate him unto God and his Office.
However men may esteem of any of the Mediatory actings of Christ, yet are they
in themselves glorious and Excellent. So was the Sacrifice of his own Blood, even
3. The Third aggravation of this Sin is taken from its opposition unto the Spirit of Christ, he hath done despight unto the Spirit of Grace. And as in the two parts of this aggravation. The first taken from the Object of their sin, the Spirit of Grace. The second taken from the manner of their opposition unto him, they do him despight. The holy Spirit of God promised and communicated under the Gospel by Jesus Christ from the Father, as the Author and cause, actually communicating and apSpirit of Grace. And this carries in it innumerable aggravations of this Sin. This Person, the holy Spirit of God, God himself, his Communication of grace and mercy, in the accomplishment of the most glorious Promises of the Old Testament, was he whom these Apostates renounced. But there is a peculiar notion or consideration of the
There are no such cursed pernicious Enemies unto Religion as Apostates.Observ.
Hence are they said to do despite unto the Spirit of Grace, wrong with contempt. And this they did upon a twofold account. For, (1.) The works, many of them which he then wrought, were eminent and evident effects of divine Power; and to ascribe such works unto another cause, is to do despite unto him. (2.) They did so principally, in that by all his works, and in the whole dispensation of him, he gave testimony unto Christ in the Gospel. And what greater despite and wrong could be done unto him, then to question his truth and the veracity of his testimony? No greater despite can be done unto a man of any reputation, than to question his truth, and credit, in that wherelying unto the Holy Ghost is so great a sin, what is it to make the Holy Ghost a Liar? Herein did such perdo him despite. For notwithstanding the publick testimony he gave in, with, and by the preaching of the Gospel, they rejected it as a fable, in despising his Person and Authority.
sin of Apostasie from the Gospel, above those of any sin against the Law of Moses whatever. They were none of them in the vilest sin prohibited by the Law under capital punishment.
Hence therefore the Apostle, 2. Proposeth it unto the Judgment of the Hebrews, of how much sorer punishment, They suppose a sinner guilty of this sin shall
3. The way whereby they are made Obnoxious unto it is, that they are counted Worthy of it, Judge in this case is God himself, as the Apostle declares in the next verse. He alone knows, he alone can justly determine what such Apostates are worthy of. But in general, that this shall unspeakably exceed that annexed unto the transsuppose ye. Ye know and be your selves Judges of what will follow hereon. What do you think in your own hearts will be the Judgment of God concerning these sinners? This argument the Apostle doth frequently insist upon, as chap. 2. 2, 3, 4. chap. 12. 25. and it had a peculiar cogency towards the Hebrews, who had lived under the terror of those legal punishments all their dayes.
I. The inevitable certainty of the Eternal punishment of Gospel-despisers, depends
on the Essential holiness and righteousness of God, as the Ruler and Judge of all. It is nothing but what he in his just Judgment which is according unto truth, acworthy of, Rom. 1. 32.
II. It is a righteous thing with God thus to deal with men. Wherefore all hopes of Mercy, or the least relaxation of Punishment unto all Eternity are vain and false unto Apostates, they shall have Judgment without Mercy.
III. God hath allotted different degrees of Punishment unto the different degrees and aggravations of sin. The wages indeed of every sin is Death, but there is unto such persons as these a Savour of death unto death, and there shall be different de
IV. The Apostacy from the Gospel, here described, being the absolute height of all sin and impiety that the nature of man is capable of, it renders them unto Eternity obnoxious unto all punishment that the same nature is capable of. The greatest sin must have the greatest Judgment.
V. It is our Duty diligently to enquire into the nature of sin, lest we be overtaken
VI. Sinning against the Testimony given by the Holy Ghost unto the truth and power of the Gospel, whereof men have had experience, is the most dangerous Symtom of a perishing Condition.
VII. Threatnings of future Eternal Judgments unto Gospel-despisers belong unto the preaching and declaration of the Gospel.
VIII. The Equity and Righteousness of the most severe Judgments of God in eternal Punishments against Gospel-Despisers, is so evident, that it may be referred to the Judgment of men not obstinate in their Blindness.
IX. 'Tis our Duty to justifie and bear witness unto God in the Righteousness of his Judgments against Gospel-Despisers.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompence, saith the Lord. And again, the Lord shall Judge his People.
It is a fearfull thing to fall into the Hands of the living God.
THere is in these Verses the confirmation of all that was spoken before, by the consideration of what God is in himself, with whom alone we have to do in this matter, and what he assumeth unto himself in this and the like Cases. As if the Apostle had said, In the severe sentence which we have denounced against Apostates, we have spoken nothing but what is suitable unto the holiness of God and what indeed in such cases he hath declared that he will do. The conjunction introduction of a Reason of what was spoken before; but this is not all which he had discoursed on, on this Subject; but more particularly the reference he had made unto their own Judgments, of what sore punishment was due unto Apostates. Thus it will be with them, thus you must needs determine concerning them in your own minds, for we know him with whom we have to do in these things. Wherefore the Apostle confirms the truth of his discourse, or rather illustrates the evidence of it, by a double consideration, (1.) Of the person of him who is, and is to be the sole Judge in this case, who is God alone,
The first consideration confirming the Evidence and certainty of the truth asperson of him who is the only Judge in this case. I confess the Pronoun herein is not exprest in the Original, but as 'tis included in the
I. There can be no right Judgment made of the nature and demerit of sin, without
Fools make a mock of sin, they have no sense of its guilt, nor dread of its punishment. Others have slight thoughts of it, measuring it only either by outgeneral notions of its guilt, as 'tis prohibited by the Divine Law, but never search into the nature of that Law with respect unto its Author. Such false mea
Nothing, therefore, will state our thoughts aright concerning the guilt and demerit of sin, but a deep consideration of the infinite greatness, holiness, righteousness, and power of God against whom it is committed.
And hereunto this also is to be added, That God acts not in the effect of any of these Properties of his nature, but on a preceding contempt of his Goodness, Bounty, Grace and Mercy; As it is impossible that sin should come into the world but by the contempt of these things. Antecedently unto all possibility of sinning, God communicates the effects of his goodness and bounty unto the Creation; And in those sins which are against the Gospel, he doth so also of his Grace and Mercy. This is that which will give us a due measure of the guilt and demerit of sin: Look upon it as a contempt of infinite Goodness, Bounty, Grace, and Mercy, and to rise up against infinite greatness, holiness, righteousness, and power, and we shall have a view of it as it is in it self.
II. Under apprehensions of great severities of Divine Judgments, the consideration
This consideration is confirmed by a double Testimony, wherein God asapplication of them unto his purpose, (2.) The force that is in them unto that end.
1. They are both of them taken from Deut. 32. 35, 36. But in that place they seem absolutely to intend vengeance and Judgment on the Adversaries of his people to make a way for their deliverance. But here they are applyed unto the final deJews, without hopes of deliverance.
I answer,
1. That it is usual with the Apostle in this Epistle, and all other writers of the New Testament to make use of Testimonies out of the old, without respect unto the particular cases and designs which they are originally applyed unto; but with regard unto the Truth and Equity contained in them; Whereon they are equally applicable unto all cases of a like nature. Thus, saith he, God declares himself with respect unto his Stubborn Enemies, whence a Rule is established, that he will deal so with all that are so, who are in the same circumstances with them of whom we speak.
2. What God speaks concerning his Enemies, and the Enemies of his people in Covenant with him, is applicable unto that people it self, when they absolutebreak and reject the Covenant; so was it done by these Apostates, who there
Cruelty and Rage of those adversaries in the persecution and demurdered the Lord Jesus, and persecuted all his followers? Wherefore whatever frame of mind in God is represented in the Scripture, as unto his indignation against the worst of sinners and his adversaries, is fully applica
The First testimony in the Original is, to me vengeance and recompence, which the Apostle renders by Vengeance, is the just retribution, on the con
1. This Vengeance God appropriateth the right of unto himself in a peculiar manner, as that which no Creature in it's full latitude hath any interest in. See Psal. 94. 1, 2. For it respects only sin in its own formal nature, as sin against God. (1.) Though men may inflict punishments on it, yet they do it princivengeance in punishment is meerly an emanation from divine constitution. (2.) No creature can have the just measures of the desert of sin, so as to give it a just and due recompence. (3.) The power of the Creature cannot extend to the just execution of Vengeance, sins deall vengeance unto himself, and all just, final retribuMagistrates and publick persons; yet as unto vengeance, as it denotes giving satisfaction to our selves in the punishment of others, it is forbidden unto all persons both priexecuting vengeance gives satisfaction unto his own inevil affections, which makes it useless and unjust. Hence David blessed God that he had kept him from avenging himself on Nabal. For there is no vengeance but what is exerted by a mans self, in his own case and cause: The Judgment unto punishment is for others. Wherefore the formal Reason of the appropriation of all vengeHe hath made all things for himself, and the wicked for the day of evil.
2. In this appropriation of vengeance unto God, there is supposed and incluI will repay saith God. He doth oftentimes exercise great Patience and forbearance, even then when vengeance might justly be expected and is callHow long doest thou not avenge our blood? This commonly adds unto the security of wicked men, and they learn to despise the threatnings of all the Judgments of God which they have deserved, 2 Pet. 3. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Eccles. 8. 11. They are ready to conclude that either
This being so, God having said that vengeance belongeth unto him, and that it is due unto provoking sins and sinners; that it is in his power, and his saith the Lord, he will repay it; It evidently follows, that in his appointed season, the day and year of vengeance, such horrible provoking sinners as were those treated of, must fall under the most severe punishment and that for evermore.
The Second testimony taken from the same place, is of the same imporThe Lord shall judge his people. In Deuteronomy it is applyed God is the Supream Judge, he is Judge himPsal. 50. 6. This the Apostle makes use of, concluding, that the righteousness of God, as the Supream Judge of all, obligeth him unto this severe destruction of Apostates: For shall not the Judge of all the world do right? Shall not he who is Judg in a peculiar manner of those that profess them
I. A due consideration of the nature of God, his office, that he is the Judge of all, especially of his people, and that enclosure he hath made of vengeance unto himself
II. Although those who are the peculiar people of God do stand in many relations unto him that are full of refreshment and comfort; yet is it their duty constantly to remember that he is the holy and righteous Judge even towards his own people.
Lastly, the Ground of the application of these testimonies unto the present case, is that knowledge of God which they had unto whom he spoke, (for
we know him,) You have the same sence of God, his holiness and truth as I have, and therefore it cannot be strange unto you, that he will deal thus sevengeance is his, and he will repay it; wherefore it must be evident unto you that these things will be as they are now declared.
The knowledge of God in some good measure both what he is in himself, and what
he hath taken on himself to do, is necessary to render either his promises or threatnings effectual unto the minds of men.
It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the Living God.
The Apostle in these words winds up his whole argument against the wilful despisers of the Gospel, taken from the nature and aggravations of that sin, with the severity of the punishment that would certainly befall them that are guilty thereof. And these words are, as an inference from them that go immediately before, so they are a recapitulation of all that he had spoken to this purpose. Let men look to it, look to themselves, consider what they do, for it is a fearful thing, &c.
There are three things in the words. (1.) The description given of God with respect unto the present case, he is the living God. (2.) The event of their sin with respect unto him, it is a falling into his hands. (3.) The nature hereof in general, it is a fearful thing.
1. In what sence God is called the Living God, and with respect unto what ends, hath been declared on chap. 3. 12. chap. 9. 14. In brief, this title is ascribed two accounts. (1.) By way of opposition unto all dead and dumb Idols, those whom the Heathen worshipped; and which are graphically described by the Psalmist, Ps. 115. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. as also by the Prophet, Isa. 44. 9, 10, 11, &c. And this is to impress upon our minds a due sence of his Glory, and Eternal Power, according as we are called to trust in him or to fear him. Life is the foundation of Power. He who hath life in himself, who is the cause of all Life in all other things that are partakers of it, must be the only spring of infinite Power. But God is here called the Living God with respect unto his Eternal Power, whereby he is able to avenge the sins of men. Indeed it calls to mind all
God that liveth and seeth, Gen. 16. 14. And as he seeth, so he judgeth, because he is the Living God, which also is the ground of holy trust in him; 1 Tim 4. 10.
This Name of the Living God is full of Terror or Comfort unto the Souls of men.
2. The Event of the sin spoken against as unto its demerit, with respect unto God, is called falling into his hands. The Assertion is general, but particularly applied unto this case by the Apostle. To fall into the hands, is a common ex
None can be said to fall into the hands of God, as though they were not before in his Power. But to fall into the hands of God absolutely, as it is here intended, is to be obnoxious to the Power and Judgment of God, when and where there is nothing in God himself, nothing in his Word, Promises, Laws, Institutions that should oblige him to Mercy or a mitigation of Punishment. So when a man falls into the hands of his Enemies, between whom and him there is no Law, no Love, he can expect nothing but Death.
Such is this falling into the hands of the Living God; there is nothing in the Law, nothing in the Gospel, that can be pleaded for the least abatement of punish
There is a falling into the hands of God that respects temporal things only, and that's spoken of comparatively. When David knew that an affliction or temporal punishment was unavoidable, he chose rather to
3. Hereof the Apostle affirms in general, that it is fearful, dreadful
thing, that which no heart can conceive, nor tongue express. Men are apt to put off thoughts of it, to have slight thoughts about it; but it is and will be dreadful, terrible, and eternally destructive of every thing that is good, and inflictive of every thing that is evil, or that our nature is capable of.
I. There is an apprehension of the terror of the Lord in the final Judgment, which
is of great use unto the Souls of men, 2 Cor. 5. 11. It is so to them who are not yet irrecoverably ingaged into the effects of it.
II. When there is nothing left of Judgment, nothing remains but the Expectation of it, its foreapprehension will be fill'd with dread and terror.
III. The dread of the final Judgment where there shall be no mixture of ease, is altogether inexpressible.
IV. That man is lost for ever who hath nothing in God that he can appeal unto; nothing in the Law or Gospel which he can plead for himself; which is the State of all wilful Apostates.
V. Those properties of God which are the Principal delight of Believers, the chief object of their Faith, Hope, and Trust, are an eternal spring of dread and terror unto all impenitent sinners; the Living God.
VI. The Glory and Honour of the future state of Blessedness and Misery, are inconceivable either to Believers or Sinners.
VII. The fear and dread of God in the description of his Wrath, ought continually to be on the Hearts of all who profess the Gospel.
Herein by this general assertion, the Apostle summs up, and closeth his blessed disgreatest sin that men can make themselves guilty of, and the greatest punishment that the Righteousness of God will inflict on any sinners. Nor is there any reaching of either part of this Divine discourse unto the utmost. When he treats of this sin and its aggravations, no mind is able to search into, no Heart is able truly to apprehend the evil and guilt which he chargeth it withal. No one can express or declare the least part of the evil which is comprised in every
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
But call to remembrance the former days, in which after ye were illuminated, ye endured a great fight of afflictions:
Partly whilest ye were made a gazing-stock, both by reproaches and afflictions, and partly whilest ye became companions of them that were so used.
For ye had compassion of me in my bonds, and took joyfully the spoyling of your goods, knowing in your selves, that ye have in Heaven a better, and an enduring Substance.
THE words in their Coherence intimated in the Adversative
but, have respect unto the Exhortation laid down v. 25. All the Verses interposed contain a dehortation from the evil which they are warned of. Hence the Apostle returns unto his former Exhortation unto the duties recommended unpresent argument which he makes use of unto this purpose is this now mentioned. And there are in the words,
1. A Direction unto a means useful unto the end of his Exhortation, call to mind the former dayes.
2. A description of those days which he would have them to call to mind: (1.) From the Season of them, and their state therein, after they were enlightned. (2.)
1. There is the Prescription of the Means of this Duty, call to mind. It is not a bare remembrance he intends, call to mind, as to consider withal what supevil and afflictive in them, what we lose, what we endure and underweaken and dispirit us, as unto our future trials.
Hebrews. But if withal we call to mind what was the case for which we suffered, the honour that is in such sufferings out-balpresence of God enreward proposed unto us; the calling them to mind will greatly strengthen us against future trials; provided we retain the same love unto, and valuation of the things for which we suffered, as we had in those forremembrance of what was afflictive in their trials, fills them with fear of the like exercise again. Hence they grow timerous and cautious as to all duties of ReliHebrews. Such as these call to mind only that which is evil and afflictive in their sufferings; and taking the measure thereof in the counsel or representation made of it by flesh and blood, it proves unto their dammage, and oft-times unto their eternal ruine. Others who call to mind with their sufferings, the causes of them, and the presence of God with them therein, are encouraged, emboldened and strengthned unto Duty with zeal and con
A wise management of former Experiences is a great Direction and Encouragement
2. As to the Object of this Duty, the Apostle so expresseth it, call to mind
the former days. It is uncertain what times or Seasons the Apostle doth pecuhazards they were in from their Adverfirst was in the stoning of Stephen, when great Persecution rose against all the Church, and extended it self unto all the Churches of Christ in that Nation, wherein our holy Apostle himself was highly concerned, Acts 8. 1. Chap. 9. 1. ch. 22. 19. ch. 26. 10, 11. And the other was on the occasion of this Apostle himself; for upon his last coming to Jerusalem, after his great successes in preaching the Gospel among the Gentiles, the whole Body of the people was fill'd with rage and madness against him and all the other Disciples. It is no doubt, although express mention be not made of it, but that at that time the Rage and Cruelty of the Priests and the multitude, did put forth themselves unto a general Persecution of the Church. And this season he seems to reflect upon in particular, because he mentions his own bonds at that time, and their comJudea had suffered those things here mentioned from their Countrey-men, as the Apostle himself declares, 1 Thess. 2. 14. At this present time they seemed to have had some outward peace. The occasion whereof were the Tumults and Disorders which were then growing in their whole Nation. Their own intestine discords, and the fear of outward Enemies, by which they were shortly utterly destroysecure hereon; as we are generemembrance of former trials as might prepare for those that we are to expect; for as he tells them, they had still need of Patience,
2. There is a Description of these former days from their State and Condithe days in which they were inlightned, or rather, in which having
been inlightned. The mention of this their illumination, being in a tense of the time past, manifests that their inlightning did precede those days of their sufferExpression is such as argues a nearer conjunction or concurrence between those two things, their illumination, and these dayes of affliction; the
inlightning was that work of Gods grace mentioned, 1 Pet. 2. 9. Their translation out of darkness into his marvellous light. They were naturally
This was the State and condition of those Hebrews, when the days of tryal and affliction came upon them, it was immediately after their first conversion unto God. And 'tis usual with God thus to deal with his people in all ages. He no sooner calls persons to himself, but he leads them into the Wilderness. He no sooner plants them, but he shakes them with storms, that they may be more firmly rooted.
He doth it, (1.) Utterly to take off their expectations from this world, or any thing therein. They shall find that they are so far from bettering their outward Estate in this world by cleaving unto Christ and the Church, as that the whole rage of it would be stirr'd up against them upon that account, and all the things enjoyed in it be exposed unto ruine. This the Lord Christ every where warned his disciples of, affirming that those who are not wilrenounce the world, and to take up the Cross, did not belong unto him. (2.) For the tryal of their faith. 1 Pet. 5. 6, 7. (3.) For the glory and propagation of the Gospel. (4.)
I. All men by nature are darkness and in darkness.
II. Saving illumination is the first fruit of effectual vocation.
III. Spiritual Light in its first Communication puts the soul on the diligent exercise of all Graces.
IV. 'Tis suited unto the wisdom and goodness of God, to suffer persons on their first Conversion to fall into manifold trials and temptations.
This was the State of the Hebrews in those days which the Apostle would have them call to mind. But the words have respect unto what follows immediateyou endured. The description of this State and condition, namely, they were inlightned, is interposed for the ends we have spoken unto. Wherefore the season he would have them call to remembrance, is described by what they suffered therein. This as was observed he expresseth two ways. (1.) In general, (2.) In particular instances. The First in these words, ye endured a great fight of afflictions. (1.) That which he would have them to mind is affliction. (2.) The aggravation of it, it was a great fight of afflictions. (3.) Their deportment under it, in that they
1. We render this word by Afflictions, although by the particulars mentioned Persecutions from men, that the Apostle only inafflictions in the ordinary sence of the word, for chastisements, corrections and trials from God, it is true, that mens persecutions are also
2. Of these Trials, Afflictions, Persecutions they had labour and contention of Spirit, which they had in their profession, with sin and Sufferings, is expressed by these words; which set forth the greatest, most earnest, vehement actings and endeavours of Spirit that our nature can arise unto. It is expressed by Tim. 4. 7. Tim. 2. 5. 1 Cor. 9. 25. The Allusion is taken from their striving, wrestling, fighting, who contended publickly for a Prize, Victovoluntarily or of their own accord engaged themselves into such hardships, difficulties and danuniversal temperance, as the Apostle declares, 1 Cor. 9. 25. And an abstinence from all Sensual pleasures; wherein they offered no small violence unto their natural Inclinations and Lusts. In the conreward that lay before them. And with words, which signify all this contest, doth the holy Ghost express the
Hebrews with respect unto their first trials and sufferings, you endured, and bare patiently, so as not to faint call to remembrance, that they might be strengthened and encouraged unto what yet remains of the same kind. This hath been the lot and portion of sincere Professors of the Gospel in most ages. And we are not to think it a strange thing, if it come to be ours in a high
Partly whilest ye were made a gazing-stock, both by reproaches and afflictions, and partly whilest ye became companions of them that were so used.
Having mentioned their sufferings, and their deportment under them in general, he distributes them into
What referrs unto the first part is their suffering in their own persons; And herein he declares both what they suffered, and the manner how. That which they suffered was reproaches and afflictions, and for the manner of it, they were made a gazing stock unto other men.
The first thing wherein they suffered was Reproaches,
Psalmist in the person of the Lord Christ himself complains that reproaches had broken his Heart, Psal. 69. 20. And elsewhere, frequently he complaineth of it as one of the greatest evils he had to conflict withal. It is that kind of reproach which proceeds from malicious hatred, and is accompanied with contempt and scorn, and vents it self in all manner of obloquies, or hard speeches, such as those mentioned, Jude v. 15. And the nature of it is fully declared by the
1. Take heed of so much softness and tenderness of nature, that may give too deep a sense of reproach, scorn, and shame; which may give too deep an Entrance unto these things into your minds, being such as will weaken them in their duties. This Ordinarily is a frame and disposition of mind that lies at the next door to Vertue, to Mo
We are in this case to harden our Countenances, and to set our faces as a Flint and Adamant, so as to despise all Reproaches and Scorns on the account of our profession.
2. It is required, that we do not put too much value on our Names and Reputations in the world. A good name is a Precious Oyntment, it yields a good savour, but it is so only with these two limitations. (1.) That it is obtained by things that are really Good and Praise-worthy; for some have made their Names famous and acceptable to the multitude by ways and actions that have really nothing praise-worthy in them. And, (2.) that they be good men who esteem their name to be good. Laudari volo, said one, sed à viro Laudato. To have a good recontemptuously of. But if we have not an under-valuation of our names and reputations universally in respect unto Christ and the Gospel, if we are not contented to be made as the Filth and
it will greatly disadvantage us in the
3. That they do not think that any new thing befalls them when they are reproached. No, not when the reproaches are new, and such as never were cast on any that went before them. For the stores of reproach, and false accusations in the treasury of Satan, and hearts of wicked men, will never be exhausted.
4. Know that where reproach goes before, persecution will follow after, in the course of the world. It thunders in Reproaches, and fails in a Storm of persecusufferings consisted in afflictions; these Afflictions did partly
and partly
3. The manner of their Suffering of these things, it is said they were made a gazing-stock,
Theater, there to be reproached, then destroyed. But because the Theater was the place where persons were publickly exposed to be looked upon with scorn and contempt; The word phrase used by the Apostle, 1 Cor. 4. 9. No more is required hereunto, but that they were publickly, and in the sight of all that had occasion or opportunity to behold them, exposed unto these things. So was it with them, when they halled men and women out of their Meetings, who being dragged, or driven in the Streets, were committed some of them into Prisons, Acts 8. 3. then were they loaden with all manner of reproaches, and made a gazing-stock to all that were about them. This way and manner of their suffering was a great addition to it, and an aggravation of it. It requireth ExCause and their Example were sufficient to sup
I. All temporary Sufferings in all their aggravating Circumstances, in their most dreadful preparation, dress, and appearance, are but light things in comparison of
the Gospel and the Promises thereof.
II. There is not any thing in the whole nature of temporary Sufferings, or any circumstance of them, that we can claim an exemption from, after we have undertaken the Profession of the Gospel. This was the first part of the contention with sufferings, which those
The other part of their sufferings was, that they became the Companions of them that were so used. They not only suffered in themselves, on what they gave occasion unto, by their own profession of the Gospel, and practice of its Worship; but also came into a Fellowship of Sufferings with them that were so used as they were.
And we may consider, (1.) Who those are that were so used. (2.) How they became their Companions in that condition.
(1.) word signifies the way, manner, and course of our
Conversation in the World. And in that sence the sufferings of these persons is included as the Effect in the Cause. They so walked in the World as to be expassive sence, and render it so used, used after the same manner which you were. It is also used for to be tossed, overturned, oppressed; which is the sence of it in this place. But the Apostle writing unto the whole Church of the Hebrews, we may enquire who they were who were used in this manner with them, for they seem to be distinguished from them unto whom he wrote. And, (1.) It is not impossible but the Apostle might have respect unto those that were sober and moderate amongst the Jews themselves. For things were now come unto that confusion in Jerusalem and in all Judea, that all such persons were continually exposed unto the violence and rage of Robbers, Oppressors, and seditious Villains. The Christians, being of the same conversation with them, were not known by the multitude, nor disuffer with them in those publick violences, which being not immediately for the professito be made the companions of others. Or, (2.) respect may be had unto the
Things is actual suffering, and a participation of the suffering of others. That of Persons is this, that all those unto whom he wrote, did not actually in their own persons suffer the things which he speaks of, but some of them did so suffer, and the rest of them were companions with them that did so suffer. And for the most part it so falls out in the fiercest persecution of the Gospel. All individual persons are not called forth unto the same actual sufferings; some in the Providence of God, and through the rage of men are singled out for trials; some are hid, or do escape, at least for a season, and it may be are reserved for the same trials at another time. So it may be said of the whole Church, that they endured a great fight of afflictions, while some of them were a gazing-stock, &c. and others of them were Companions of them who were so used.
It is reserved unto the soveraign Pleasure of God to measure out unto all Professors
Hence it appears in what sence those who suffered not in their own persons, were made Companions of them who did so, whereby the whole Church partook of the same troubles.
common Interest in the apprehension that the same sufferings would reach unto themselves, seeing there was the same Cause in them as in others. (3.) By their sorrow, trouble, and compassion for the sufferall duties of Love and Affections which they discharged in owning and visiting of them. (5.) By the
For ye had compassion of me in my bonds, and took joyfully the spoyling of your Goods, knowing in your selves that ye have in Heaven a better and an enduring Substance.
Having distributed the two heads: (1) What they underwent some of them, at least in their own persons; and (2.) What befell them with respect unto others, suffering in the same Cause with themselves. In this Verse the Apostle gives an especial instance of each kind, only he inverts the Order, wherein he had before layd them down. For whereas he first mentionin themselves, and then what they accompanied others in; here he insisteth of the latter of them in the first place, they had compassion of him in his bonds; and of the former in the latter place, and took joyfully the spoyling of their goods. But he adds unto both the frame of their minds in what they did and suffered. As unto others, they were their companions in sympathy and compassion, and as unto their own losses, they them took joyfully.
Of the First, the Apostle gives an instance in himself, Ye had compassion of me in my bonds. And this he affirms as a proof and confirmation of what he had spoken before concerning their being made Companions of them that suffered. This is exprest in the introductive particles
for even you had, as for Example sake. I have proved before the Apostle Paul was the Author of this Epistle, and this very passage is sufficient to confirm it. For who else could there be, whose bonds for the Gospel were so known, so famous among the Believers of the Jews as his own. For the other persons, who some would needs fancy to be Writers of this Epistle, as Luke, Barnabas, and Clemens, there's nothing in the Scripture or Ecclesiastical story of any of their Bonds in Judea, whereimprisonment were peculiar above any other Apostles whatsoever. Hence he stiles himself in particular Philem. 1. the bond-man
for Christ, and gloried in his bonds as his peculiar honour, Acts 26. 29. an Ambassador in bonds, Eph. 6. 20. So
Of what sort or kind the sufferings of any that God employs in the Ministry of the Gospel shall be, is in his soveraign disposal alone. And in this Apostle unto whom as being the Apostle of the Gentiles, God had designed more work and travelling up and down the world, than unto any of the other, it may be unto them all; yet God was pleased that much of his time should be spent in bonds and imprisonments. But although the principal reason hereof must be left hid in the wisdom and soveraign good pleasure of God; yet we may see that two inestimable Advantages did redound unto the Church thereby. For, (1.) His bonds being first at Jerusalem, and afterwards at Rome, as Acts 23. 11. the two capital Cities and seats of the Jews and Gentiles; and he being called out to plead the Cause of the Gospel openly and publickly, the report of it was carried all the world over, and occasion given unto all sorts of men to inquire what it was, that a man remote from the suspicion of any crime, did suffer such things for. I no way doubt but that multitudes by this means were brought to make inquiry after, and into the Doctrine of the Gospel, which otherwise would have taken no notice of it. See Eph. 1. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. And, (2.) During his confinement under those bonds, the Holy Ghost was pleased to make use of him in writing sundry of those blessed Epistles which have been the Light and Glory of the Gospel in all Ages. Wherefore let every one of us be content and rejoyce in what may soever God shall be pleased to call us to suffer for the truth of the Gospel. For although it may seem outwardly to be of the greatest advantage thereunto, which is the only thing we would desire,
Secondly, He expresseth the concernment of these Hebrews in those bonds of his, they suffered together with him therein. They were not uncompassion consists in these things. (1.) A real condolency, grief, and trouble of mind for the bonds of others, as if we our selves were bound. (2.) Continual Prayers for their relief, supportment, and deliverance; as it was with the Church in the Case of Peter in his bonds, Acts 12. (3.) A ministration unto them, as unto the things that may be outwardly wanting, as many did to Paul, Acts 24. 23. (4.) The owning and avowing of them, as not being ashamed of their chains, bonds, or sufferTim. 1. 16, 17. (5.) A readine to undergo hazards, difficulties and dangers, for them who are called thereunto, Rom. 16. 4. It is not a heartless, fruitless, ineffectual pity that the Apostle intends; but such a frame of mind that hath a real concernment in the sufferings of others, and is operative in these and the like duties towards their good. These things are required in us towards all those who suffer for the Gospel, according as we have oportuone with them in the same mystical Body. The remembrance of this frame, and the discharge of all those duties towards them who have suffered, is of singular use to prepare our minds for, and to confirm our hearts in our own sufferings when they do approach.
2. He minds them of their deportment under their own sufferings, they took joyfully. That which they suffered in was their their outward substance, and present enjoyments: It is extended unto Houses, Lands, Posses
The way whereby they were deprived of their goods was rapine and spoil. What pretence of Law, or constitution of the Rulers way of Execution was with savage
3. The frame of mind in the Hebrews as unto this part of their suffering is, that they took their losses and spoiles with joy. Nothing doth usually more affect the minds of men than the suddain spoiling of their goods, what they have laboured Hebrews received and accepted of this rapine of their goods, not only patiently and chearfully; but with a certain peculiar joy. The ground whereof the Apostle declares in the close of this verse, knowing in your selves, that ye have in Heaven a better and an enduring substance.
Some Copies of the Original, and some antient translations, as the vulgar Latin, read the words Order of the words in the Text, or the placing of knowing in your selves that you have a better substance, or as they lye in the Original knowing that ye have a better substance in your selves. In this latter way it is evident that there is no place for that addition in Heaven, which is necessary in the former. For it is not proper to say, knowing that you have in your selves in Heaven, though it be most proper to say, knowing in your selves that you have in Heaven. I confess I should absolutely imbrace the latter reading, knowing that you have in your selves, and so leave out that, in Heaven, for evident reasons, did not the authority of the most antient Copies and Tran
1. Knowing that we have in our selves. The things which they had lost, were their goods, or their substance, as they are called, Luke 15. 13. Unto these he opsubstance, which of what nature it is, he declares in comparison with those other goods. Those other goods were so theirs, as that they were without them, things lyable unto rapine and spoyl, such as they might be, such as they were deprived of; men could and men did take them away. But this substance is in themselves, which none could take away from them, none could spoil them of. Such is the peace and joy that our Lord Jesus Christ gives unto his Church here beJohn 16. 22. chap. 14. 27. And if the substance, here intended, be that which was in themselves, in opposition unto those external goods, which they might be, and were deprived of, then it is that subsistence in the soul and unto the experience of Believers, which Faith gives unto the Grace and Love of God
comforts Believers under all their troubles, this fills them with joy unspeakable and full of Glory, even in their Sufferings. This will make them to
Faith gives us Justification before God, access unto him, and acceptance with him, and therewithal gives joy and rejoycing unto the Soul; and this it doth in an especial manner under Tribulations and Sufferings, enabling men to take joyfully the spoiling of their goods, for it stirreth up all Graces in such a Condition unto their due Exercise issuing in a blessed experience of the Exellency of the Love of God, and of his Glory in Christ with a firm and stable hope of future Glory. Yea and by these things doth the Holy Ghost shed abroad the Love of God in our Hearts, which will give joy in any Condition. And this Substance hath both the Qualifibetter, more excellent, incomabiding, that which will not leave them in whom it is, can never be taken from them. My joy shall no man take from you.
Faith giving an experience of the Excellency of the Love of God in Christ and of the Grace received thereby, with its incomparable preference above all outward
perishing things, will give joy and satisfaction in the loss of them all, upon the account of an interest in these better things.
If we follow the Ordinary reading and retain those words, in heaven, the whole must be somewhat otherwise expounded. For it is not the Grace of faith but hope that is expressed. And, (1.) That expression of knowing in your selves, declares the evidence they had of the grounds whereon they rejoyced in the spoiling of their goods. It was manifest and evident unto them
2. This substance is said to be in Heaven, it is there prepared, there laid up, there to be enjoyed. Wherefore it compriseth the whole of the future Substance, as 'tis also riches, and an inheritance, or a weight of glory; for in comparison of it, all other things temporary have no substance in them.
3. They are said have this Substance, not in present possession, but in right, title, and evidence. They know in themselves that they had undeniable Title unto it, which none could deprive them of, but that they should certainly enjoy it in the appointed season. Wherefore they are said to have it, (1.) Because it is prepared for them in the will, pleasure and Grace of God. It is your Fathers pleasure to give you the Kingdom. (2.) Because 'tis purchased for them by the blood of Christ; he hath purchased, or obtained eternal redemption. (3.) 'Tis promised unto them in the Gospel. (4.) It is secured for them in the Intercession of Christ. (5.) Granted unto them in the First-fruits. (6.) All this is confirmed unto them by the Oath of God. The First-fruits they had in possession and use, the whole in right
hope which will not make ashamed.
4. How this substance is better then outward enjoyments, and abiding, needs not to be explained, they are things in themselves so plain and evident.
This two-fold interpretation of the words is so far coincident and agreeing in the same sence in general, that we may draw our Observations from both or either of them. As,
I. It is the glory of the Gospel, that it will on a just account, from a sense of and interest in it, give satisfaction and joy unto the souls of men in the worst of sufferings
II. It is our duty to take care that we be not surprized with outward sufferings, when we are in the dark as unto our interest in these things. This may often fall out through our carelesness, negligence, and want of keeping our garments about us in our walk before God: They rejoyced as knowing they had in themselves, which otherwise they could not have done.
III. Internal Evidences of the beginnings of Glory in Grace, a sense of Gods love, and assured pledges of our Adoption, will give insuperable joy unto the minds of men under the greatest outward sufferings.
IV. It is our Interest in this world, as well as with respect unto Eternity, to preserve our Evidences for heaven clear and unstain'd, so that we may know in our selves; which is the ground of this great Duty.
V. There is a substance in spiritual and Eternal things, whereunto Faith gives a subsistence in the souls of believers. See chap. 11. 1.
VI. There is no Rule of proportion between Eternal and temporal things. Hence the enjoyment of the one will give joy in the loss of the other.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
Cast not away therefore your Confidence, which hath great recompence of reward.
For ye have need of patience, that after ye have done the will of God, ye might receive the Promise.
IN these two verses there is an Inference from his former argument, and a Confirmation of it from the necessity of what is required thereunto. The first in
1. The inference is plain: seeing you have suffered so many things in your Perespecial force of the infe
2. That which he exhorts them thus unto by this argument is the preservaconfidence. This absolutely neither their Faith nor Profession. But as we have had occasion to mention several times, it is a fruit and effect of faith, whereby the minds of Believers are made prompt, ready, free, unto all duties of profession, against all difficulties and discouragements. It is a boldness of mind with freedom from bondage and fear in the duties of Religion towards God and man, from a prevailing perswasion of our acceptance with God therein. In this frame of Spirit, by this fruit and effect of faith these Hebrews were carried chearfully through all their sufferings for the Gospel. And indeed without it, it is impospromises thereof be betrayed by fear; if the shame of outward sufferings and scorns do enfeeble the mind; if we have not an evidence of better things to lay in the Ballance against pregreat fight of afflictions in a due manner. Unto all these evil habits of the mind is this confidence opposed. This was that Grace, that exercise of Faith, which was once admir'd in Peter and John, Acts 4. 13. And there can be no better account given of it, then what is evident in the behaviour of those two Apostles in that season. Being in bonds, under the power of their enraged enemies for preaching the Gospel, yet without fear, tergiversation, or hesitation, without all questioning what will be the issue, and how they would deal with them whom they charged to have
This frame of Spirit they ought to labour to confirm in themselves, who are or may be called unto sufferings for the Gospel. If they are unprepared, they will be shaken and cast down from their stability.
3. This confidence which hath been of such use unto them, the Apostle Exhorts leave it not, forgo it not; but cast it not away. For where any Graces have been stirred up unto their due exercise, and have had success, they will not fail, nor be lost without some positive act of the mind in rejecting of them, and the refusal of the succours which they tender unto us. And this rejection may be only as unto it's actual exercise, not as unto it's radical in-being in the soul. For as I look on this confidence as a Grace, so it is not the root, but a branch of it: Faith is the root, and confidence is a branch springing out of it. Wherefore it may, at least for a season, be cast away, while
And hence it appears how great is the evil here dehorted from, and what a certain entrance it will prove into the Apostacy it self so judged as before, if
constant in this Grace, yet did once make a forseiture of it unto his unutterable sorrow, namely, the Apostle Peter. And it is not lost but upon the Corrupt reasonings which we have now mentioned that aggravate its guilt.
He that casts away his Confidence as unto his present profession, and the duties thereof, doth what lies in him cast away his interest in future salvapresent Duty is as indispensibly required, as future happiness is faithReason why they should be careful in the preservation of this confidence, which is, that it hath a great recompence of reward.
That which the Apostle as unto the matter of it calls here a recompence of
reward, in the end of the next verse, from the formal cause of it, he calls the promise, and that promise which we receive after we have done the will of God. Wherefore the reward of recompence here intended is the glory of Heaven, proposed as a
3. That this Confidence hath this recompence of reward, (that is) it gives a right and title unto the future reward of glory; it hath it in the promise and constifuture, Faith gives them a present subsistence in the soul, as unto their power and efficacy.
In the times of suffering, and in the approaches of them it is the duty of Believers to look on the Glory of Heaven, under the notion of a refreshing, alsufficient Reward.
For ye have need of Patience, that after ye have done the Will of God, ye might receive the Promise.
The Apostle in these words confirms the necessity of the Exhortation he had insisted on. He had pressed them unto nothing but what was needful for them. For whereas there were two things proposed unto them; one in the way of Duty, namely, that they should do the will of God; the other in the way of Reward, or what they should receive upon their so doing; things were so ordered in the soveraign pleasure and will of God, that they could believe neither of them, not only without the Duty which he exhorted them unto, but without a continuance therein. And indeed, this Exhortation, not to cast away their confidence, that is, to abide in it, and to improve it against all difficulties and dangers, doth include in it that patience which he affirms that they stand in need of. Wherefore there are three things in the words. (1.) The confirmation of the preceding Exhortation by this reason, that
(1.) The rational Enforcement is introduced by the Redditive For. This is had need of Patience. He doth not charge them with want of Patience, but declares the necessity of it as unto its continual Exercise. In Patience possess your Souls.
confidence will ingage men into troubles and difficulties in a way of duty. But if patience take not up the work, and carry it on, confidence will flagg and fail. See chap. 6. 11, 12. and our Exposition thereon. Patience is the perfecting grace of suffering Christians, James 1. 4, 5. And that which all tribulations do excite in the first place unto it's proper actings, whereon the exRom. 5. 4, 5.
This saith the Apostle you have need of. He speaks not absolutely of the Grace it self, as though they had it not, but of its continual exercise in the condition wherein they were, or whereinto they were entring. Men for the most part desire such a state wherein they may have as little need and use of this grace as possion the account of their profession. He that will be the disciple of Christ, must
He that would abide faithful in difficult seasons, must fortifie his soul with an unconquerable Patience. (1.) Then pray for it. (2.) Give it it's due exercise in the approaches of troubles, that it be not pressed and overwhelmed by thoughts contrary unto it. (3.) Take care to keep Faith vigorous and active: it will grow on no other root but that of Faith. (4.) Especially exercise Faith unto a view of Eternal things, which will ingage the aid of Hope, and administer the food that Patience lives upon. Wherefore in this case, (5.) Remember, 1. That the want of it layes the soul open unto the power and efficacy of all sorts of temptations, for this is the only Armour of proof against the assaults of Satan and the World in a suffering season. 2. 'Tis that alone which will asswage the pain of sufferings, ease the burden of them, rebate their edge, and make them easy to be born. All other things will fall before the sharpness of them, or give relief that shall end in ruine. 3. It is this alone whereby God is glo
The next thing in the words is the season of the necessity of the continuance of the exercise of this Grace and Obedience, untill we have done the will of God.
dismission from the discharge of this duty untill we have done the whole will of God. The Will of God is twofold; (1.) The Will of his Purpose and good pleasure, the Eternal act of his Counsel, which is accompanied with infinite wisdom concerning all things that shall come to pass. (2.) The Will of his Command presenting unto us our Duty, or what it is that he requireth of us. Respect may be, and I judge is had unto the will of God in both these sences in this place; For (1.) A respect is had unto the will of God dispoPet. 3. 17. He could, if it had seemed good unto him have placed the Church in such a condition in the world, as that it should have been freed from all outward troubles and distresses. But it is his will that it should be otherwise, and 'tis for the ends of his own glory, as also the good of the Church in that state wherein they are to continue in this world. This therefore is that which we are to acquiesce in as unto all the sufferings we may de exposed unto in this world. It is the will of God, that it should be so. And he seldom leaves us destitute without a prospect into those holy Reasons and ends of it, for which it is necessary that it should be so. But whereas this principally respects sufferings, it will be said, How can we do this will of God, when nothing is required of us but outwardly to endure what we do undergo? I answer, (1.) Though sufferings be principally intended in this place, yet they are not so only. The whole state and condition of our lives in this world deweariness of the effects of this will of God, that is in the most the cause of their departure from their profession. Wherefore this sence is not to be excluActs 13. 26. But, (2.) The will of God is that whereby our whole duty is presented unto us as unto our Faith, Obedience, and Worship. As our Lord Christ came to do the will of him that sent him, according to the Commandwhole of our duty is resolved into the will of God, (that is) the will of his Command; and so to do the will of God in this sence is to abide constant in all the duties of Faith and Obedience, Worship and Profession, which he requireth of us. And there is no release in this matter whilest we are in this world. Wherefore, sayes the Apostle, you have need of patience, during the whole course of obedience presented unto you, as that without which you cannot pass through it, so as thereon to inherit the promises.
What is meant here by the promise is evident from the Context. All the promises of all these things, but he had given them the good things themselves that were promised, as to the degrees and measures of their enjoyment in this world. And as unto the promise of Eternal life and glory, they had received that also, and did mix it with Faith. But the thing promised it self they had not received. This different notion of the proChap. 11. as we shall see, God willing.
I. The glory of Heaven is an abundant recompence for all we shall undergo in our
way towards it.
II. Believers ought to sustain themselves in their sufferings with the promise of future glory.
III. The future Blessedness is given unto us by the promise, and is therefore free and undeserved.
IV. The consideration of Eternal Life as the free effect of the grace of God and Christ, and as proposed in a gracious promise, is a thousand times more full of Spiritual refreshment unto a believer, than if he should conceive of it or look upon it meerly as a reward proposed unto our own doings or merits.
. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉
For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry.
Now the Just shall live by Faith: but if any man draw back, my Soul shall have no pleasure in him.
But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition: but of them that believe to the saving of the Soul.
THe substance of the Apostolical exhortation, as hath been often observed, is the Constancy of the Hebrews in their profession against persecutions and temptations. Unto this end he commends unto them the necessary use of
And there are three things in these three verses. (1.) A Proposal of the Object of faith, which is the coming of Christ with the circumstances of it, v. 37. (2.) The necessity and efficacy of Faith on that proposal, with the certain ruine of them that are strangers unto it, confirmed by prophetical testimony, v. 38. (3.) The Judgment of the Apostle concerning these Hebrews, as unto their Faith, and the sincerity of it; from whence he proceeds to declare it's nature, and confirm its efficacy, v. 39.
For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry.
It might arise in the minds of these Hebrews, weakning and discouraging them from a complyance with this Exhortation of the Apostle, that it was a long time that they were to be exposed unto, and exercised with these troubles, so as that they might justly fear that they should be worn out by them. And indeed there is nothing doth more press upon, and try the minds of men in their sufferings, than that they can see no issue out of them. For we are all naturally inclined to desire some rest and peace, if it may stand with the will of God, whilest we are in this world. To encourage them against the influProphet Habakkuk, which leads him directly unto the consideration of the
1. He respects in this Verse the season of the accomplishment of what he now proposeth unto them. And there are three things therein.
(1.) An Acknowledgment that it is not immediately to be looked for. For it is a thing yet to be waited for, yet there remains some time for its accomplishso necessary, as he had before observed.
The delay of the Accomplishment of Promises is a great exercise of Faith and Patience. Whence are all the Exhortations not to faint in our minds, nor to be
weary.
(2.) There is a limitation of the time for the accomplishment of what seems so to be delayed, it is a little space. Though it seem to tarry, wait for it, it short space of time.
(3.) A farther declaration of the Nature of this Season in these words quantum quantum, or quantillum quantillum; the reduplication of the word may yield a double sence. (1.) A Limitation of the time, a very little, a short space not to be fear'd or reckon'd on. (2.) On the other side, a supposition of some Duration how long soever it be, yet it is but a little while. According unto either sence the design of the Apostle is the same, which is to satisfie the Hebrews that there shall be no such delay in what they looked after and expected, as should be a just cause of despondencies or weariness in them. As if he had said, My Brethren, faint not, be not weary nor discouraged, keep up Confidence and Patience, you know what you wait for and expect, which will be an abundant recompence unto you for all your Sufferings; And whatever appearances there may be of its tarrying or delay, whatever it may seem to you, yet if you have but a prospect into Eternity, be it what it will, it is but a very little while, and so is to be esteem
2. That which is proposed unto them under this Limitation is this, that he who shall come will come, and will not tarry. What the Prophet spake of the Vision he saw, the Apostle applies unto the Person of Christ, for the reasons before mentioned: He that shall come, is a Periphrasis of Christ, Eternity, Rev. 1. 8. but generally it hath respect unto the Promise of him. The Foundation of the Church was laid in the
1. In the Power of his Spirit, and the exercise of his Royal Authority, for the setting up and settling his Church in the world; whereof there are two parts:
powers of the world to come, John 16. 7, 8. This was an illustrious Advent of Christ, not in his own person, but in that of his Vicar and Substitute, whom he promised to send in his stead. Hereby he was acquitted from all that dishonour, contempt andreproach, that was cast on him in the world.
(2.) He was to come for the punishment and destruction of his stubborn and inveterate Adversaries. And these also were of three sorts. (1.) Those that were so directly unto his own Person, and by consequence unto his Gospel. (2.) Such as were directly Enemies unto his Gospel, and by consequence unto his Person. (3.) Such as were declared Enemies to them both. (1.) Of the First sort were the Jews who slew him, who murdered him, and cast him out of the Vineyard, and thereon continued their hatred against the Gospel, and all that made profession thereof. He was to come to destroy those murderers, and to burn their City, which fell out not long after the writing of this Epistle, and is properly intended in this place. See Matth. 24. 3, 27, 30. 2 Pet. 3. 4. Jude 14. Rev. 1. 7. Mark 16. 28. James 5. 7, 8. For hereon enJews, with the illustrious propagation of the Gospel throughout the world. (2.) The Pagan Roman Empire was the Second sort of his Adversaries who were immediate Enemies unto his Gospel, and consequently to his Person. These after the destruction of the former sort, raged with all Blood and Crushould come, would come, and would not tarry. The decoming of Christ is given us; Rev. 6. 7, 8, 9, 10. (3.) After this arose a third sort of Enemies, who in words owning his person and Gospel opposed all his Offices, and persecuted all that would yield Obedience unto him in the Exercise of them, and were thereby consequentially Enemies both to his Person and Gospel. This was the Apostate Christian Church of Rome, or the New Testament Babylon. And in respect of these Enemies of his, Christ is still he that is to come, and as such is believed in, and his coming prayed for by all the Saints. For he is to destroy the Man of Sin, the Head of that Apostasie, by the Brightness of his coming. For as the opposition made unto him did not arise suddenly, and
2. Christ is coming at the last day unto Judgment. This is known and confessed, and the business of his coming therein is the Prayer of the whole Church, Rev. 22. 20. And it is an Article of Faith, whose nature we have described on Chap. 6. 5.
It may be now inquired, with respect unto whether of these comings, it is said here he shall come, that he is last Advent at the day of Judgment. I doubt not but that also is included, but I dare not exclude the other Comings mentioned, as things which were principally suited unto the relief of the Church under it's distress. For unto every state of the Church there is a coming of Christ suited and accommodated unto their condition, whereby their Faith is kept in continual exercise of desires after it. This was the life of faith under the Old Testament as to his coming in the flesh, until it was accomplished. This faith after his Resurrection they lived on, though but for a short season, unJust can live by faith, without a continual expectation of the coming of Christ in a way suited to the Sufferings and Deliverance of his
Hebrews, that if an end were not put unto it, or the dayes were not shortned, no flesh among them could have been saved, as our Saviour speaks,
Wherefore, the End for which this coming of Christ is proposed unto the Church, being the supportment and encouragement of their Souls unto Faith and Patience, a respect must be had unto such a coming as is suited to their relief in their present state and condition. And this unto these Hebrews was then literal sence. So it is to be accommodated unto all other states of the Church. And therein, the consideration of the coming of Christ at the last day unto the final and eternal Judgment, ought not to be omitted. This is that Anchor and great Reserve of Believers in all their diwherein God will judge the World in righteousness, by the Man whom he hath ordained. That the Lord Christ shall assuredly come unto that JudgThess. 1. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.
I. It is essential unto Faith to be acted on the promised Coming of Christ to
all that look for his appearance.
II. There is a Promise of the Coming of Christ suited unto the state and condition of the Church in all ages.
III. The appearing delay of the accomplishment of any of these Promises requires an exercise of the faith and patience of the Saints.
IV. Every such coming of Christ hath its appointed season beyond which it shall not tarry.
V. This divine disposition of things gives a necessity unto the continual exercise of Faith, Prayer and Patience, about the coming of Christ.
VI. Although we may not know the especial Dispensations and moments of time that are passing over us, yet all Believers may know the state in general of the Church under which they are, and what coming of Christ they are to look for and expect. So is it with us who live under the Antichristian state, which Christ in his appointed time will come and destroy.
VII. Faith in any Church satisfies the souls of men with what is the Good and deliverance of that state; Although a man do know or is perswaded that personally he shall not see it himself, nor enjoy it. The Faith of this kind is for the Church, and not for mens individual persons.
VIII. Under despondencies as to peculiar appearances or comings of Christ, it is the duty of Believers to fix and exercise their Faith on his illustrious Appearance at the last day.
Every particular coming of Christ in a way suited unto the present deliverance of the Church, is an infallible pledge of his coming at the last unto Judgment.
X. Every promised coming of Christ is certain, and shall not be delayed beyond its appointed season, when no difficulties shall be able to stand before it.
Now the just shall live by Faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him.
But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition: but of them that believe to the saving of the Soul.
The Apostle proceedeth in the Allegation of the Testimony taken out of the Prophet, and the application of it unto his present purpose. And he obtwo things he designeth in these two Verses. (1.) To declare the Event of the Proposal made unto them of the coming of Christ, whereby he confirmed his Exhortation unto Faith and Patience in their sufferv. 38. (2.) An Application of the different Events mentionHebrews, v. 39. In the First there are two different events expressed of the Proposal and Exhortation before given and made, with the means of them; the one is, that the just shall live by his Faith; and the other which is built on the Supposition, if any man draw back, that is, then my soul shall have no pleasure in him.
In the First, there are to be considered, (1.) The note of Connexion in the Adversative particle Qualification of the Person spoken of, he is the just. (3.) The means of his being so, or of his obtaining the event mentioned, which is by Faith. (4.) What is the event it self, he shall live.
Three times doth the Apostle in his Epistles make use of this Prophetical testimony, Rom. 1. 17. Gal. 3. 11. and in this place.
The Note of Inference in the Exceptive Particle
Now, as But. The first proper sence might as well have been retained; But in the first place, and And afterwards. But the difference is of no importance, Prophet, which is oft times exceptive,
contrary frame unto what is here asserted; He whose heart is lifted up: But transposition of the Words used by the Apostle, (for he first repeats the last clause of the words, and then the former afterwards, which was more accommodate unto his purpose,) doth not seem to have the force of an exceptive: nor hath it so indeed, in respect unto what was affirmed in the foregoing Verse; but it hath so unto the diffiBut, saith the Apostle, however, notwithstanding these things, the just shall live by Faith.
2. The Person spoken of is a just person, a man really made just, justified by faith, every one that is really and truly so. I doubt not but this is included in the word, and the state of Justification is intended in it. To which purpose the words are elsewhere cited by the Apostle. But yet that which is here principally intended, is that qualification of a Righteous man which is opposed to Pride, and haste of Spirit through Unbelief, whereon men draw back from God in the Profession of the Gopel. The just man, he
he shall live; for he is free from that principle of Pride and Unbelief which ruines the souls of men in times of trial.
There are especial Qualifications of Grace required unto stedfastness in Profession
Shall live by Faith, so we: Instrumental cause, way and means whereby a man comes to be just; that is, justified, which is by faith. For it is by faith both that a man is justified, and also those gracious Qualifications are wrought in him which enable him to persevere in his Profession. It puriway and means whereby a Just man doth abide and persevere in his Profession unto life. And this sence I embrace, because it is the entrance of the Apostle into his demonstration of the mighty things which faith will doe, and which have been done and suffered through Faith by Believers, which he declares here in general, namely, whatever diffifaith will carry him through them with safety and success.
He shall live: Life in both the principal sences of it is here intended. (1.) He life of God, as the Psalmist speaks, I shall not die but live, and declare the loving kindness of the Lord. (2.) He shall live, or attain the Promise of Eternal Life, so is the word expounded in the close of the next Verse, Believe unto the saving of the Soul.
I. Many things are required to secure the success of our Profession in times of
difficulties and trials: As, (1.) That our Persons are righteous or justified by Grace. (2.) That we be furnished with those Graces that are appointed unto that end. (3.) That faith be kept unto a diligent exercise.
II. The continuance of the spiritual Life, and Eternal salvation of true Believers are secured from all oppositions whatever. As 'tis confest there is in these words a
In the latter part of the Verse there is a description of others, on a Supposition of a contrary state, frame and event. In the former, the person is righteous, the way of his acting in the present case is by faith, and the event is Life, he shall live. On the other hand there is a supposition made of a person not so qualified, not so acting, not so living, not having the same success, but conThe just shall live by Faith, and if any draw back, &c. is contrary to the orProphet and the Apostle, and the express declaProphet, this of the Just living by Faith is a direct exception unto and rethe Just, it shall not be so with him; that is, the Just he shall live by his Faith, which is a direct opposition unto the other sort of persons. And although the order of the words be changed by the Apostle, yet the opposition between the two sorts of persons is evidently continued. Wherefore in the next Verse the Apostle makes an express distinction of these unto whom he spake, or concerning whom he speaks in the two states, the one
There is an appearance of a great change in the words of the Prophet, his Soul, which in the Prophet is referr'd unto the persons offending, is in the Apostle referr'd unto God who is offended. For indeed the word plain general sence and meaning of the words, with an Exposition of them, as he hath done, since he seldom keeps unto the proper words of the testimonies he quotes, but alwayes gives the mind of the Holy Ghost in them.
There are two things in the words: (1.) A Crime supposed with reference unto the case under consideration, which is perseverance under trials and temProphet denotes the cause of the sin intended. Original of all defection from the GoWill of God, not satisfied with the condition of Temporal sufferings on the account of the Eternal Reward. When men are under the power of this evil frame of heart, they will draw back, subduct themselves out of that state and condition wherein they are exposed to these inconveniences. if any man who hath made, doth make profession of Faith in Christ and of the Gospel, upon the invasion and long continuance of trials, temptations, and sufferings for them, do through want of submission unto, and acquiescence in the Will of God, withdraw himself from that Profession, and Communion therein with them who persist faithfull in it, my heart shall not, &c. This is the evil which the great design of the whole Epistle is to obviate and prevent, which the Apostle applies himself unto with all manner of Arguments, Motives, Exthat sin which by reason of their sufferings and persecutions Professors were exposed unto, and which was absolutely ruinous unto the souls of them that fell under the power of it.
I. No persons whatever, ought to be on any consideration secure against those
sins which present circumstances give an efficacy unto.
II. It is an Effect of spiritual Wisdom to discern what is the dangerous and prevailing Temptation of any Season, and vigorously to set our selves in opposition unto it.
III. It is much to be feared that in great Trials, some will draw back from that Profession of the Gospel wherein they are engaged.
IV. This defection is commonly durable, continued by various pretences. This is included in the word
2. The Sentence denounced against this sin is Soul of God is God himself: But he so speaks of himself, to affect us with rejoyce over them with his whole heart, and with his whole Soul. So is it here. What God thus affirms of himself, that he hath no delight in such a Person, he is not pleased with him, he shall not live before him. There is a he shall have no delight in him, that is, he will abhorr him, despise him, and in the end utterly destroy him. But I suppose it may be thus expressed also to obHebrews against the Apostle at that season, namely,
Judaism, they did that which was pleasing unto God, and wherein they should find acceptance with him. For as they supposed, they returned again unto those Insome pretence for what they do, wherewith they justifie themselves untill their iniquity be found out to be hatedeprive them of this pretence, the Apostle declares that the soul of God takes no pleasure in them. And in this Negation all positive evils are included. When God will not, doth not delight in any persons, the consequent is, that he will utterly destroy them. See Jer. 15. 1.
I. It is our great Duty to look diligently that we are of that holy frame of mind,
that due exercise of Faith, as that the Soul of God may take pleasure in us.
II. Though there appear as yet no outward tokens or evidences of the anger and displeasure of God against our ways; yet if we are in that state wherein God hath no pleasure in us, we are entring into certain Ruine.
III. Backsliders from the Gospel are in a peculiar manner the Abhorrency of the Soul of God.
IV. When the Soul of God is not delighted in any, nothing can preserve them from utter destruction.
But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition: but of them that believe, to the saving of the Soul.
An Application is made in these words unto the State and Condition of these Hebrews at present, at lest unto them whom the Apostle designs in an especial manner. As also a transition is made unto that which now lay in his Eye, namely, the full demonstration of the power and efficacy of faith to make us accepted with God, and to carry us through in the course of our greatest trials and temptations with success and victory. The Application he makes unto the believing Hebrews, is of the same nature and kind with that which on the same occasion he had made unto them before, chap. 6. 9. In both places having treated of the danger of Apostacy and the woful state of Apostates, he relieves the minds of Believers by letting them know, that although for their awakening and instruction, as for other ends, he declared the dreadful Judgments of God against unprofitable professors and Apostates, yet was it not as though he apprehended that that were their condition, or that they were cast out of the favour of God, or cursed by the Law, but he was perswaded better things of them. Such ministerial encouragements are needful in like cases, that persons be not exasperated through an apprehension that undue surmises are entertained against them, nor too much dejected with fears that their condition makes them obnoxious unto the threatning. Both which are diligently to be avoided.
The Apostle's reckoning himself, in his ministerial dealing with them, in their state and condition as here, we are not, hath been spoken unto elswhere, with the reasons of it. And whereas he sayes we are not, it is frivolous to interpret it by we ought not to be, as 'tis done by some; For so the words have nothing of comfort or supportment in them, which yet is the total deabsolute infallible declaration of the state and conindividuals concerning whom he speaks; but he gives the intergrounds it was built, and what it was resolved into, which was spoken of in the other place, whether the Reader is referred.
In the words there is a double supposition of a twofold opposite state and a
twofold opposite event, whose foundation is laid in the verse foregoing. The States are Events are perdition on the one hand, and saving the Soul on the other. The first of these is denyed, the latter affirmed concerning these Hebrews.
1. We are not called in those days this twofold state was found. No small number there were who were Tim. 2. 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22. They were appointed to stumble at the Word, being of old ordained unto this conIsrael unto whom the Lord Christ was a Stone of stumbling, and a
I. The Scripture every where testifieth, that in the visible Church there is a certain number of false Hypocrites, whose end and lot it is to be destroyed.
II. 'Tis our duty to evidence unto our own Consciences, and give evidence unto others, that we are not of this sort or number.
III. Nothing can free Apostates from Eternal ruine.
That which is asserted of these believing Hebrews is, that they belonged unto another state that had another event. (1.) This state is, that they were of the Faith, so our Apostle useth this expression, Gal. 3. 7, 8. That is true believers, and heirs of the Promises. He there declares, not only such as make profession of the Faith, but such as truly and really believe. A State of them unto whom all the promises as unto present preservation and Eternal salvation were made in the word. We that are of that faith which is effectual unto the saving of the soul. Both here and in the former clause not only the Event but the actual influence of Apostacy on the one hand unto destruction, and of faith on the other to the saving of the soul, is intended; so the Preposition
Faith that is effectual unto the acquisition of life, that is, to the obtaining of it as by a due means for the saving of our souls from Eternal ruine, and the obtaining of Eternal Life, Acts 26. 18. For sincere faith will carry men through all difficulties, hazards, and troubles, unto the certain enjoyment of Eternal Blessedness.