---
title: "systemPipeR: Workflow Environment for Data Analysis and Report Generation"
author: "Author: Daniela Cassol, Le Zhang and Thomas Girke"
date: "Last update: `r format(Sys.time(), '%d %B, %Y')`"
output:
BiocStyle::html_document:
toc_float: true
code_folding: show
package: systemPipeR
vignette: |
%\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8}
%\VignetteIndexEntry{systemPipeR: Workflow design and reporting generation environment}
%\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown}
fontsize: 14pt
bibliography: bibtex.bib
editor_options:
chunk_output_type: console
weight: 7
type: docs
---
```{css, echo=FALSE}
pre code {
white-space: pre !important;
overflow-x: scroll !important;
word-break: keep-all !important;
word-wrap: initial !important;
}
```
```{r setup_dir, echo=FALSE, include=FALSE, message=FALSE, warning=FALSE}
unlink("rnaseq", recursive = TRUE)
systemPipeRdata::genWorkenvir(workflow = "rnaseq")
knitr::opts_knit$set(root.dir = 'rnaseq')
```
```{r style, echo = FALSE, results = 'asis'}
BiocStyle::markdown()
options(width=80, max.print=1000)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(
eval=as.logical(Sys.getenv("KNITR_EVAL", "TRUE")),
cache=as.logical(Sys.getenv("KNITR_CACHE", "TRUE")),
tidy.opts=list(width.cutoff=80), tidy=TRUE)
```
```{r setup, echo=FALSE, message=FALSE, warning=FALSE}
suppressPackageStartupMessages({
library(systemPipeR)
library(BiocParallel)
library(Biostrings)
library(Rsamtools)
library(GenomicRanges)
library(ggplot2)
library(GenomicAlignments)
library(ShortRead)
library(ape)
library(batchtools)
library(magrittr)
})
```
Source code download:
[ [.Rmd](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tgirke/GEN242//main/content/en/tutorials/systempiper/systemPipeR.Rmd) ]
[ [.R](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tgirke/GEN242//main/content/en/tutorials/systempiper/systemPipeR.R) ]
## Introduction
[_`systemPipeR`_](http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/html/systemPipeR.html)
is a Workflow Management System (WMS) for data analysis that integrates R with
command-line (CL) software [@H_Backman2016-bt]. This platform allows scientists
to analyze diverse data types on personal or distributed computer systems. It
ensures a high level of reproducibility, scalability, and portability (Figure
\@ref(fig:utilities)). Central to `systemPipeR` is a CL interface (CLI) that
adopts the Common Workflow Language [CWL, @Crusoe2021-iq]. Using this CLI,
users can select the optimal R or CL software for each analysis step. The
platform supports end-to-end and partial execution of workflows, with built-in
restart capabilities. A workflow control container class manages analysis tasks
of varying complexity. Standardized processing routines for metadata facilitate
the handling of large numbers of input samples and complex experimental
designs. As a multipurpose workflow management toolkit, `systemPipeR` enables
users to run existing workflows, customize them, or create entirely new ones
while leveraging widely adopted data structures within the Bioconductor
ecosystem. Another key aspect of `systemPipeR` is its ability to generate
reproducible scientific analysis and technical reports. For result
interpretation, it offers a range of graphics functionalities. Additionally, an
associated Shiny App provides various interactive features for result
exploration, and enhancing the user experience.
```{r utilities, eval=TRUE, warning= FALSE, echo=FALSE, out.width="100%", fig.align = "center", fig.cap= "Important functionalities of systemPipeR. (A) Illustration of workflow design concepts, and (B) examples of visualization functionalities for NGS data.", warning=FALSE}
knitr::include_graphics("../utilities.png")
```
### Workflow control class
A central component of `systemPipeR` is `SYSargsList` (or short `SAL`), a
container for workflow management. This S4 class stores all relevant
information for running and monitoring each analysis step in workflows. It
captures the connectivity between workflow steps, the paths to their input and
output data, and pertinent parameter values used in each step
(see Figure \@ref(fig:sysargslistImage)). Typically, `SAL` instances are constructed
from an intial metadata targets table, R code and CWL parameter files for each
R- and CL-based analysis step in workflows (details provided below).
For preconfigured workflows, users only need to provide their input data (such as FASTQ
files) and the corresponding metadata in a targets file. The latter describes the
experimental design, defines sample labels, replicate information, and other
relevant information.
```{r sysargslistImage, warning= FALSE, eval=TRUE, echo=FALSE, out.width="100%", fig.align = "center", fig.cap= "Workflow design overview.", warning=FALSE}
knitr::include_graphics("../spr_overview.png")
```
Figure \@ref(fig:sysargslistImage) illustrates the design of the `systemPipeR` (SPR)
WMS. (A) The root directory of a SPR Project includes files and directories
that contain the input data, metadata and parameters required for running a
workflow. This project environment can be autogenerated with the functions
given under (E). (B) The workflow instructions are loaded from the project
environment into the Workflow Management Class `SAL`. (C) Subsequently,
the workflow can be executed and monitored. (D) After completion or during a
run various reports can be generated, including scientific and technical
reports, as well as interactive workflow graphs illustrating the workflow
topology as well as run and completion statistics. (E) The corresponding
commands (1-4) for the initialization, execution and report generation of
workflows are listed, which can be run with a single execution command.
Workflow steps and reporting instructions are specified in the Rmd
file (A), which is the source file for generating the scientific report (D).
Input data required for a workflow run are stored in the data directory, and
output files generated by a workflow run are written to the results directory
(A). The input/output and dependencies between steps are automatically
generated and managed by `SAL`. Status information is auto-saved to the
`SPRproject` directory, allowing for workflow tracking and restarts.
### CL interface (CLI) {#cl-interface}
_`systemPipeR`_ adopts the [Common Workflow Language
(CWL)](https://www.commonwl.org/index.html), which is a widely used community
standard for describing CL tools and workflows in a declarative, generic, and
reproducible manner [@Amstutz2016-ka]. CWL specifications are human-readable
[YAML](https://www.commonwl.org/user_guide/topics/yaml-guide.html) files that
are straightforward to create and to modify. Integrating CWL in `systemPipeR`
enhances the sharability, standardization, extensibility and portability of
data analysis workflows.
Following the CWL Specifications, the basic description for executing a CL
software are defined by two files: a cwl step definition file and a yml
configuration file. Figure \@ref(fig:sprandCWL) illustrates the utilitity of
the two files using “Hello World” as an example. The cwl file (A) defines the
parameters of CL tool or workflow (C), and the yml file (B) assigns the input
variables to the corresponding parameters. For convenience, in `systemPipeR` parameter
values can be provided by a targets file (D, see above), and automatically
passed on to the corresponding parameters in the yml file. The usage of a
targets file greatly simplifies the operation of the system for users, because
a tabular metadata file is intuitive to maintain, and it eliminates the need of
modifying the more complex cwl and yml files directly. The structure of
`targets` files is explained in the corresponding section
[below](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#targets-files). A detailed overview of the CWL syntax is provided in
the [CWL syntax](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cwl) section below, and the details for connecting the input
information in `targets` with CWL parameters are described
[here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cwl_targets).
```{r sprandCWL, warning=FALSE, eval=TRUE, echo=FALSE, out.width="100%", fig.align = "center", fig.cap= "Parameter files. Illustration how the different fields in cwl, yml and targets files are connected to assemble command-line calls, here for 'Hello World' example.", warning=FALSE}
knitr::include_graphics("../SPR_CWL_hello.png")
```
### Workflow templates
`systemPipeRdata`, a companion package to `systemPipeR`, offers a collection of
workflow templates that are ready to use. With a single command, users can
easily load these templates onto their systems. Once loaded, users have the
flexibility to utilize the templates as they are or modify them as needed. More
in-depth information can be found in the main vignette of systemPipeRdata,
which can be accessed
[here](https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/data/experiment/vignettes/systemPipeRdata/inst/doc/systemPipeRdata.html).
### Other functionalities
The package also provides several convenience
functions that are useful for designing and testing workflows, such as a
[CL rendering function](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cmd-step) that assembles from the parameter files (cwl, yml and
targets) the exact CL strings for each step prior to running a CL tool.
[Auto-generation of CWL](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cwl-auto-generation) parameter files is also supported. Here, users can simply
provide the CL strings for a CL software of interest to a rendering function that generates
the corresponding `*.cwl` and `*.yml` files for them. Auto-conversion of workflows to
executable [Bash scripts](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#bash-script) is also supported.
## Quick start
### Installation
The [_`systemPipeR`_](http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/html/systemPipeR.html)
package can be installed from the R console using the [_`BiocManager::install`_](https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BiocManager/index.html)
command. The associated [_`systemPipeRdata`_](http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/data/experiment/html/systemPipeRdata.html) package can be installed the same way. The latter is a data package for generating _`systemPipeR`_
workflow test instances with a single command. These instances contain all parameter files and
sample data required to quickly test and run workflows.
```{r install, eval=FALSE}
if (!requireNamespace("BiocManager", quietly=TRUE)) install.packages("BiocManager")
BiocManager::install("systemPipeR")
BiocManager::install("systemPipeRdata")
```
For a workflow to run successfully, all CL tools used by a workflow need to be installed and executable on a user's system, where the analysis will be performed (details provided [below](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#third-party-software-tools)).
### Five minute tutorial {#five-min}
The following demonstrates how to initialize, run and monitor workflows, and subsequently create analysis reports.
__1. Create workflow environment.__ The chosen example uses the `genWorenvir` function from
the `systemPipeRdata` package to create an RNA-Seq workflow environment that is fully populated with a small test data set, including FASTQ files, reference genome and annotation data. After this, the user's R session needs to be directed
into the resulting `rnaseq` directory (here with `setwd`). A list of available workflow templates
is available in the vignette of the `systemPipeRdata` package [here](https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/data/experiment/vignettes/systemPipeRdata/inst/doc/systemPipeRdata.html#wf-bioc-collection).
```{r eval=FALSE}
systemPipeRdata::genWorkenvir(workflow = "rnaseq")
setwd("rnaseq")
```
__2. Initialize project and import workflow from `Rmd` template.__ New workflow
instances are created with the `SPRproject` function. When calling this
function, a project directory with the default name `.SPRproject` is created
within the workflow directory. Progress information and log files of a workflow
run will be stored in this directory. After this, workflow steps can be loaded
into `sal` one-by-one, or all at once with the `importWF` function. The latter
reads all steps from a workflow Rmd file (here `systemPipeRNAseq.Rmd`)
defining the analysis steps.
```{r eval=FALSE}
library(systemPipeR)
# Initialize workflow project
sal <- SPRproject()
## Creating directory '/home/myuser/systemPipeR/rnaseq/.SPRproject'
## Creating file '/home/myuser/systemPipeR/rnaseq/.SPRproject/SYSargsList.yml'
sal <- importWF(sal, file_path = "systemPipeRNAseq.Rmd") # import into sal the WF steps defined by chosen Rmd file
## The following print statements, issued during the import, are shortened for brevity
## Import messages for first 3 of 20 steps total
## Parse chunk code
## Now importing step 'load_SPR'
## Now importing step 'preprocessing'
## Now importing step 'trimming'
## Now importing step '...'
## ...
## Now check if required CL tools are installed
## Messages for 4 of 7 CL tools total
## step_name tool in_path
## 1 trimming trimmomatic TRUE
## 2 hisat2_index hisat2-build TRUE
## 3 hisat2_mapping hisat2 TRUE
## 4 hisat2_mapping samtools TRUE
## ...
```
The `importWF` function also checks the availability of the R packages and CL
software tools used by a workflow. All dependency CL software needs to be installed and exported to a user's
`PATH`. In the given example, the CL tools `trimmomatic`, `hisat2-build`, `hisat2`,
and `samtools` are listed. If the `in_path` column shows `FALSE` for
any of them, then the missing CL software needs to be installed and made available in a user's
`PATH` prior to running the workflow. Note, the shown availability table of CL tools can
also be returned with `listCmdTools(sal, check_path=TRUE)`, and the availability of individual CL
tools can be checked with `tryCL`, _e.g._ for `hisat2` use: `tryCL(command = "hisat2")`.
__3. Status summary.__ An overview of the workflow steps and their status
information can be returned by typing `sal`. For space reasons, the following
shows only the first 3 of a total of 20 steps of the RNA-Seq workflow. At this
stage all workflow steps are listed as pending since none of them have been executed yet.
```{r eval=FALSE}
sal
## Instance of 'SYSargsList':
## WF Steps:
## 1. load_SPR --> Status: Pending
## 2. preprocessing --> Status: Pending
## Total Files: 36 | Existing: 0 | Missing: 36
## 2.1. preprocessReads-pe
## cmdlist: 18 | Pending: 18
## 3. trimming --> Status: Pending
## Total Files: 72 | Existing: 0 | Missing: 72
## 4. - 20. not shown here for brevity
```
__4. Run workflow.__ Next, one can execute the entire workflow from start to
finish. The `steps` argument of `runWF` can be used to run only selected steps.
For details, consult the help file with `?runWF`. During the run, detailed status
information will be provided for each workflow step.
```{r eval=FALSE}
sal <- runWF(sal)
```
After completing all or only some steps, the status of workflow steps can
always be checked with the summary print function. If a workflow step was
completed, its status will change from `Pending` to `Success` or `Failed`.
```{r eval=FALSE}
sal
```
```{r wf-status-image, warning=FALSE, eval=TRUE, echo=FALSE, out.width="100%", fig.align = "center", fig.cap= "Status check of workflow. The run status flags of each workflow step are given in its summary view.", warning=FALSE}
knitr::include_graphics("../runwf.png")
```
__5. Workflow topology graph.__ Workflows can be displayed as topology graphs
using the `plotWF` function. The run status information for each step and various
other details are embedded in these graphs. Additional details are provided in the [visualize workflow
section](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#visualize-workflow) below.
```{r eval=FALSE}
plotWF(sal)
```
```{r rnaseq-toplogy, eval=TRUE, warning= FALSE, echo=FALSE, out.width="100%", fig.align = "center", fig.cap= "Toplogy graph of RNA-Seq workflow.", warning=FALSE}
knitr::include_graphics("../plotWF.png")
```
__6. Report generation.__ The `renderReport` and `renderLogs` function can be used
for generating scientific and technical reports, respectively. Alternatively, scientific
reports can be generated with the `render` function of the `rmarkdown` package. The latter
option with `rmarkdown::render` is often more flexible and preferred for most users, since
it provides the advantage that any modifications to the Rmd file are
instantly reflected in the HTML report, eliminating the necessity to update the `sal` object.
```{r eval=FALSE}
# Scietific report
sal <- renderReport(sal)
rmarkdown::render("systemPipeRNAseq.Rmd", clean = TRUE, output_format = "BiocStyle::html_document")
# Technical (log) report
sal <- renderLogs(sal)
```
## Directory structure {#wf-directories}
The root directory of `systemPipeR` workflows contains by default three user
facing sub-directories: `data`, `results` and `param`. A fourth sub-directory is
a hidden log directory with the default name `.SPRproject` that is created when initializing
a workflow run with the `SPRproject` function (see above). Users can change
the recommended directory structure, but will need to adjust in some cases the code in
their workflows. Just adding directories to the default structure is possible without requiring changes
to the workflows. The following directory tree summarizes the expected content in
each default directory (names given in ***green***).
* _**workflow/**_
+ This is the root directory of a workflow. It can have any name and includes the following files:
+ Workflow *Rmd* and metadata targets file(s)
+ Optionally, configuration files for computer clusters, such as `.batchtools.conf.R` and `tmpl` files for `batchtools` and `BiocParallel`.
+ Additional files can be added as needed.
+ Default sub-directories:
+ _**param/**_
+ CWL parameter files are organized by CL tools (under _**cwl/**_), each with its own sub-directory that contains the corresponding `cwl` and `yml` files. Previous versions of parameter files are stored in a separate sub-directory.
+ _**data/**_
+ Raw input and/or assay data (*e.g.* FASTQ files)
+ Reference data, including genome sequences, annotation files, databases, etc.
+ Any number of sub-directories can be added to organize the data under this directory.
+ Other input data
+ _**results/**_
+ Analysis results are written to this directory. Examples include tables, plots, or NGS results such as alignment (BAM), variant (VCF), peak (BED) files.
+ Any number of sub-directories can be created to organize the analysis results under this directory.
+ _**.SPRproject/**_
+ Hidden log directory created by `SPRproject` function at the beginning of a workflow run. It is a hidden directory because its name starts with a dot.
+ Run status information and log files of a workflow run are stored here. The content in this directory is auto-generated and not expected to be modified by users.
## The _`targets`_ file {#targets-files}
A `targets` file defines the input files (_e.g._ FASTQ, BAM, BCF) and
sample comparisons used in a data analysis workflow. It can also store any number of
additional descriptive information for each sample. How the input
information is passed on from a `targets` file to the CWL parameter files is
introduced [above](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cl-interface), and additional details are given [below](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cwl). The following
shows the format of two _`targets`_ file examples included in the package. They
can also be viewed and downloaded from _`systemPipeR`'s_ GitHub repository
[here](https://github.com/tgirke/systemPipeR/blob/master/inst/extdata/targets.txt).
As an alternative to using targets files, `YAML` files can be used instead. Since
organizing experimental variables in tabular files is straightforward, the following
sections of this vignette focus on the usage of targets files. Their usage also
integrates well with the widely used `SummarizedExperiment` object class.
Descendant targets files can be extracted for each step with input/output
operations where the output of the previous step(s) serves as input to the
current step, and the output of the current step becomes the input of the next
step. This connectivity among input/output operations is automatically tracked
throughout workflows. This way it is straightforward to start workflows at
different processing stages. For instance, one can intialize an RNA-Seq workflow
at the stage of raw sequence files (FASTQ), alignment files (BAM) or a precomputed
read count table.
#### Single-end (SE) data
In a `targets` file with a single type of input files, here FASTQ files of
single-end (SE) reads, the first three columns are mandatory including their
column names, while it is four mandatory columns for FASTQ files of PE reads.
All subsequent columns are optional and any number of additional columns
can be added as needed. The columns in `targets` files are
expected to be tab separated (TSV format). The `SampleName` column contains
usually short labels for referencing samples (here FASTQ files) across many
workflow steps (_e.g._ plots and column titles). Importantly, the labels used in
the `SampleName` column need to be unique, while technical or biological
replicates are indicated by the same values under the `Factor` column. For
readability and transparency, it is useful to use here a short, consistent and
informative syntax for naming samples and replicates. This is important
since the values provided under the `SampleName` and `Factor` columns are intended to
be used as labels for naming the columns or plotting features in downstream
analysis steps.
```{r targetsSE, eval=TRUE}
targetspath <- system.file("extdata", "targets.txt", package = "systemPipeR")
DT::datatable(read.delim(targetspath, comment.char = "#"))
```
To work with custom data, users need to generate a `targets` file containing
the paths to their own FASTQ files and then provide under `targetspath` the
path to the corresponding `targets` file.
#### Paired-end (PE) data
For paired-end (PE) samples, the structure of the targets file is similar. The main
difference is that `targets` files for PE data have two FASTQ path columns (here `FileName1` and `FileName2`)
each containing the paths to the corresponding PE FASTQ files.
```{r targetsPE, eval=TRUE}
targetspath <- system.file("extdata", "targetsPE.txt", package = "systemPipeR")
showDF(read.delim(targetspath, comment.char = "#"))
```
#### Sample comparisons
If needed, sample comparisons of comparative experiments, such as differentially expressed genes (DEGs), can be
specified in the header lines of a `targets` file that start with a `# ` tag.
Their usage is optional, but useful for controlling comparative analyses according
to certain biological expectations, such as identifying DEGs in RNA-Seq experiments based on
simple pair-wise comparisons.
```{r comment_lines, echo=TRUE}
readLines(targetspath)[1:4]
```
The function `readComp` imports the comparison information and stores it in a
`list`. Alternatively, `readComp` can obtain the comparison information from
a `SYSargsList` instance containing the `targets` file information (see below).
```{r targetscomp, eval=TRUE}
readComp(file = targetspath, format = "vector", delim = "-")
```
```{r cleaning1, eval=TRUE, include=FALSE}
if (file.exists(".SPRproject")) unlink(".SPRproject", recursive = TRUE)
## NOTE: Removes previous project created in the quick-start section
```
## Detailed tutorial
### Initialization
A `systemPipeR` workflow instance is initialized with the `SPRproject` function. This function
call creates an empty `SAL` container instance and at the same time a linked project
log directory that acts as a flat-file database of a workflow. A YAML file is automatically
included in the project directory that specifies the basic location of the workflow project.
Every time the `SAL` container is updated in R with a new workflow step or a modification
to an existing step, the changes are automatically recorded in the flat-file database. This
is important for tracking the run status of workflows and providing restart functionality for
workflows.
```{r SPRproject1a, eval=FALSE}
sal <- SPRproject()
```
If `overwrite` is set to `TRUE`, a new project log directory will be created and any existing
one deleted. This option should be used with caution. It is mainly useful when developing
and testing workflows, but should be avoided in production runs of workflows.
```{r SPRproject1, eval=TRUE}
sal <- SPRproject(projPath = getwd(), overwrite = TRUE)
```
The function checks whether the expected workflow directories (see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#wf-directories)) exist,
and will create them if any of them is missing. If needed users can change the default names of
these directories as shown.
```{r SPRproject_dir, eval=FALSE}
sal <- SPRproject(data = "data", param = "param", results = "results")
```
Similarly, the default names of the log directory and `YAML` file can be changed.
```{r SPRproject_logs, eval=FALSE}
sal <- SPRproject(logs.dir= ".SPRproject", sys.file=".SPRproject/SYSargsList.yml")
```
It is also possible to use for all workflow steps a dedicated R environment
that is separate from the current environment. This way R objects generated by
workflow steps will not overwrite objects with the same names in the current environment.
```{r SPRproject_env, eval=FALSE}
sal <- SPRproject(envir = new.env())
```
At this stage, `sal` is an empty `SAL` (`SYSargsList`) container that only contains
the basic information about the project's directory structure that can be accessed with
`projectInfo`.
```{r projectInfo, eval=TRUE}
sal
projectInfo(sal)
```
The number of workflow steps stored in a `SAL` object can be returned with the `length` function. At this stage
it returns zero since no workflow steps have been loaded into `sal` yet.
```{r length, eval=TRUE}
length(sal)
```
### Constructing workflows
In systemPipeR, workflows can be incrementally constructed in [interactive mode](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#appendstep)
by sequentially evaluating code for individual workflow steps in the R console.
Alternatively, all steps of a workflow can be imported simultaneously from an R
script or an R Markdown workflow file using a [single import command](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#importWF).
To explain constructing and connecting different types of workflow steps, this
tutorial section introduces the interactive approach first. After that, the
automated import of entire workflows with many steps is explained, where the
individual steps are defined the same way.
In all cases, workflow steps are loaded into a `SAL` workflow container with the
proper connectivity information using `systemPipeR's` `appendStep` method. This
method allows steps to be comprised of R code or CL calls.
#### Stepwise construction {#appendstep}
The following demonstrates how to design, load and run workflows using a simple
data processing routine as an example. This mini workflow will export a test
dataset to multiple files, compress/decompress the exported files, import them back
into R, and then perform a simple statistical analysis and plot the results. The file
compression steps demonstrate the usage of the CL interface.
The `sal` object of the new workflow project (directory named`.SPRproject`) was
intialized in the previous section. At this point this `sal` instance contains
no data analysis steps since none have been loaded so far.
```{r sal_check, eval=TRUE}
sal
```
Next, workflow steps will be added to `sal`.
##### Step 1: R step
The first step in the chosen example workflow comprises R code that will be
stored in a `LineWise` object. It is constructed with the `LineWise` function,
and then appended to `sal` with the `appendStep<-` method. The R code of an
analysis step is assigned to the `code` argument of the `LineWise` function. In this
assignment the R code has to be enclosed by braces (`{...}`) and separted from
them by new lines. Additionally, the workflow step should be given a descriptive name
under the `step_name` argument. Step names are required to be unique throughout
workflows. During the construction of workflow steps, the included R code will
not be executed. The execution of workflow steps is explained in a separate
section [below](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#wf-execution).
In the given code example, the `iris` dataset is split by the species
names under the `Species` column, and then the resulting `data.frames` are
exported to three tabular files.
```{r, firstStep_R, eval=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise(code = {
mapply(function(x, y) write.csv(x, y),
split(iris, factor(iris$Species)),
file.path("results", paste0(names(split(iris, factor(iris$Species))), ".csv"))
)
},
step_name = "export_iris")
```
After adding the R code, `sal` contains now one workflow step.
```{r show, eval=TRUE}
sal
```
To extract the code of an R step stored in a `SAL` object, the `codeLine` method can be used.
```{r codeLine, eval=TRUE}
codeLine(sal)
```
##### Step 2: CL step {#cmd-step}
CL steps are stored as `SYSargs2` objects that are constructed with the
`SYSargsList` function, and then appended to `sal` with the `appendStep<-`
method. As outlined in the introduction (see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cl-interface)), CL steps
are defined by two CWL parameter files (`yml` configuration and `cwl` step
definition files) and an optional `targets` file. How parameter values in the
`targets` file are passed on to the corresponding entries in the `yml` file, is
defined by a `named vector` that is assigned to the `inputvars` argument of the
`SYSargsList` function. A parameter connection is established if a name assigned to
`inputvars` has matching column and element names in the `targets` and `yml` files,
respectively (Fig \@ref(fig:sprandCWL)). More details about parameter passing and CWL
syntax are provied below (see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cwl_targets) and [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cwl)).
The most important other arguments of the `SYSargsList` function are listed below. For more
information, users want to consult the function's help with `?SYSargsList`.
- `step_name`: a unique *name* for the step. If no name is provided, a default
`step_x` name will be assigned, where `x` is the step index.
- `dir`: if `TRUE` (default) all output files generated by a workflow step will be written to a
subdirectory with the same name as `step_name`. This is useful for organizing result files.
- `dependency`: assign here the name of the step the current step depends on. This is mandatory
for all steps in a workflow, except the first one. The dependency tree of a workflow is
based on the dependency connections among steps.
In the specific example code given below, a CL step is added to the workflow where the
[`gzip`](https://www.gnu.org/software/gzip/) software is used to compress the
files that were generated in the previous step.
```{r gzip_secondStep, eval=TRUE}
targetspath <- system.file("extdata/cwl/gunzip", "targets_gunzip.txt", package = "systemPipeR")
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "gzip",
targets = targetspath, dir = TRUE,
wf_file = "gunzip/workflow_gzip.cwl", input_file = "gunzip/gzip.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = c(FileName = "_FILE_PATH_", SampleName = "_SampleName_"),
dependency = "export_iris")
```
After adding the above CL step, `sal` contains now two steps.
```{r}
sal
```
The individual CL calls, that will be executed by the `gzip` step, can be rendered and viewed
with the `cmdlist` function. Under the `targets` argument one can subset the CL calls to
specific samples by assigning the corresponding names or index numbers.
```{r}
cmdlist(sal, step = "gzip")
# cmdlist(sal, step = "gzip", targets=c("SE"))
```
##### Step 3: CL with input from previous step
In many use cases the output files, generated by an upstream workflow step, serve as input
to a downstream step. To establish these input/output connections, the names (paths) of the
output files generated by each step needs to be accessible. This information
can be extracted from `SAL` objects with the `outfiles` accessor method as shown below.
```{r}
# outfiles(sal) # output files of all steps in sal
outfiles(sal)['gzip'] # output files of 'gzip' step
# colnames(outfiles(sal)$gzip) # returns column name passed on to `inputvars`
```
Note, the names of this and other important accessor methods for 'SAL' objects
can be looked up conveniently with `names(sal)` (for more details see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#accessor-methods)).
In the chosen workflow example, the output files (here compressed `gz` files), that
were generated by the previous `gzip` step, will be uncompressed in the current step with the
`gunzip` software. The corresponding input files for the `gunzip` step are listed under the
`gzip_file` column above. For defining the `gunzip` step, the values 'gzip' and 'gzip_file'
will be used under the `targets` and `inputvars` arguments of the `SYSargsList` function,
respectively. The argument `rm_targets_col` allows to drop columns in the `targets`
instance of the new step. The remaining parameters settings are similar to those in the
previous step.
```{r gunzip, eval=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "gunzip",
targets = "gzip", dir = TRUE,
wf_file = "gunzip/workflow_gunzip.cwl", input_file = "gunzip/gunzip.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = c(gzip_file = "_FILE_PATH_", SampleName = "_SampleName_"),
rm_targets_col = "FileName",
dependency = "gzip")
```
After adding the above new step, `sal` contains now a third step.
```{r}
sal
```
The `targets` instance of the new step can be returned with the `targetsWF` method
where the output files from the previous step are listed under the first column (input).
```{r targetsWF_3, eval=TRUE}
targetsWF(sal['gunzip'])
```
As before, the output files of the new step can be returned with `outfiles`.
```{r outfiles_2, eval=TRUE}
outfiles(sal['gunzip'])
```
Finally, the corresponding CL calls of the new step can be returned with the `cmdlist`
function (here for first entry).
```{r, eval=TRUE}
cmdlist(sal["gunzip"], targets = 1)
```
##### Step 4: R with input from previous step
The final step in this sample workflow is an R step that uses the files from a previous
step as input. In this case the `getColumn` method is used to obtain the paths to the files
generated in a previous step, which is in the given example the 'gunzip' step..
```{r getColumn, eval=TRUE}
getColumn(sal, step = "gunzip", 'outfiles')
```
In this R step, the tabular files generated in the previous `gunzip` CL step
are imported into R and row appended to a single `data.frame`. Next the
column-wise mean values are calculated for the first four columns.
Subsequently, the results are plotted as a bar diagram with error bars.
```{r, iris_stats, eval=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise(code = {
df <- lapply(getColumn(sal, step = "gunzip", 'outfiles'), function(x) read.delim(x, sep = ",")[-1])
df <- do.call(rbind, df)
stats <- data.frame(cbind(mean = apply(df[,1:4], 2, mean), sd = apply(df[,1:4], 2, sd)))
stats$size <- rownames(stats)
plot <- ggplot2::ggplot(stats, ggplot2::aes(x = size, y = mean, fill = size)) +
ggplot2::geom_bar(stat = "identity", color = "black", position = ggplot2::position_dodge()) +
ggplot2::geom_errorbar(ggplot2::aes(ymin = mean-sd, ymax = mean+sd), width = .2, position = ggplot2::position_dodge(.9))
},
step_name = "iris_stats",
dependency = "gzip")
```
This is the final step of this demonstration resulting in a `sal` workflow container with
a total of four steps.
```{r}
sal
```
#### Load workflow from R or Rmd scripts{#importWF}
The above process of loading workflow steps one-by-one into a `SAL` workflow
container can be easily automated by storing the step definitions in an R or
Rmd script, and then importing them from there into an R session.
__1. Loading workflows from an R script.__ For importing workflow steps from an
R script, the code of the workflow steps needs to be stored in an R script
from where it can be imported with R's `source` command. Applied to
the above workflow example (see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#appendstep)), this means nothing else
than saving the code of the four workflow steps to an R script where each step is declared
with the standard CL or R step syntax: `appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList/LineWise(...)`.
At the beginning of the R script one has to load the `systemPipeR` library, and
initialize a new workflow project and associated `SAL` container with `SPRproject()`.
After sourcing the R script from R, the fully populated `SAL` container will be
loaded into that session, and the workflow is ready to be executed (see below).
__2. Loading workflows from an R Markdown file.__ As an alternative to plain R
scripts, R Markdown (Rmd) scripts provide a more adaptable solution for
defining workflows. An Rmd file can be converted into various publication-ready
formats, such as HTML or PDF. These formats can incorporate not only the
analysis code but also the results the code generates, including tables and figures.
This approach enables the creation of reproducible analysis reports for
workflows. This reporting feature is crucial for reproducibility,
documentation, and visual interpretation of the analysis results. The following illustrates this
approach for the same four workflow steps used in the previous section [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#appendstep),
that is included in an Rmd file of the `systemPipeR` package. Note, the path to this Rmd file
is retrieved with R's `system.file` function.
Prior to importing the workflow from an Rmd file, it is required to initialize for it a new
workflow project with the `SPRproject` function. Next, the `importWF` function is used to scan
the Rmd file for code chunks that define workflow steps, and subsequently import them in to the
`SAL` workflow container of the project.
```{r importWF_rmd, eval=TRUE}
sal_rmd <- SPRproject(logs.dir = ".SPRproject_rmd")
sal_rmd <- importWF(sal_rmd,
file_path = system.file("extdata", "spr_simple_wf.Rmd", package = "systemPipeR"))
```
After the import, the new `sal_rmd` workflow container, that is fully populated with all four workflow
steps from [before](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#appendstep), can be inspected with several accessor functions (not
evaluated here). Additional details about accessor functions are provided [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#accessor-methods).
```{r importWF_details, eval=FALSE}
sal_rmd
stepsWF(sal_rmd)
dependency(sal_rmd)
cmdlist(sal_rmd)
codeLine(sal_rmd)
targetsWF(sal_rmd)
outputs(sal_rmd)
statusWF(sal_rmd)
```
##### Define workflow steps in R Markdowns {#linewise_rmd}
In standard R Markdown (Rmd) files, code chunks are enclosed by new lines
starting with three backticks. The backtick line at the start of a code chunk
is followed by braces that can contain arguments controlling the code chunk's
behavior. To formally declare a workflow step in an R Markdown file's argument
line, `systemPipeR` introduces a special argument named `spr`. When
using `importWF` to scan an R Markdown file, only code chunks with `spr=TRUE` in
their argument line will be recognized as workflow steps and loaded into the
provided `SAL` workflow container. This design allows for the inclusion of
standard code chunks not part of a workflow and renders them as usual. Here are
two examples of argument settings that will both result in the inclusion of the
corresponding code chunk as a workflow step since `spr` is set to `TRUE` in both
cases. Notably, in one case, the standard R Markdown argument `eval` is assigned
`FALSE`, preventing the `rmarkdown::render` function from evaluating the
corresponding code chunk.
Examples: workflow code chunks are declared by `spr` flag in their argument line:
+ *```{r step_1, eval=TRUE, spr=TRUE}*
+ *```{r step_2, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}*
In addition to including `spr = TRUE`, the actual code of workflow steps has additional
requirements. First, the last assignment in a code chunk of a workflow step needs to be an
`appendStep` of `SAL` using `SYSargsList` or `LineWise` for CL or R code, respectively. This
requirement is met if there are no other assignments outside of `appnedStep`. Second,
R workflow steps need to be largely self contained by generating and/or loading the dependencies
required to execute the code. Third, in most cases the name of a `SAL` container should remain
the same throughout a workflow. This avoids errors such as: _'Error: object not found'_.
Example of last assignment in a CL step.
```{r fromFile_example_rules_cmd, eval=FALSE}
targetspath <- system.file("extdata/cwl/example/targets_example.txt", package = "systemPipeR")
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "Example",
targets = targetspath,
wf_file = "example/example.cwl", input_file = "example/example.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = c(Message = "_STRING_", SampleName = "_SAMPLE_"))
```
Example of last assignment in an R step.
```{r fromFile_example_rules_r, eval=FALSE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise(code = {
library(systemPipeR)
},
step_name = "load_lib")
```
## Running workflows {#wf-execution}
### Overview
In `systemPipeR`, the `runWF` function serves as the primary tool for executing
workflows. It is responsible for running the code specified in the steps of a
populated `SAL` workflow container. The following `runWF` command will run the
test workflow from above from start to finish. This test workflow was first assembled step-by-step,
allowing for a thorough examination of its behavior. Subsequently, the same workflow
was imported from an Rmd file to demonstrate how to auto-load all steps of a workflow
at once into a `SAL` container. Please refer to the provided link [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#appendstep)
for more information about this process.
```{r runWF, eval=FALSE}
sal <- runWF(sal)
```
The `runWF` function allows to choose one or multiple steps to be executed via
its `steps` argument. When using partial workflow executions, it is important
to pay attention to the requirements of the dependency graph of a workflow. If
a selected step depends on one or more previous steps, that have not been
executed yet, then the execution of the chosen step(s) will not be possible
until the previous steps have been completed.
```{r runWF_error, eval=FALSE}
sal <- runWF(sal, steps = c(1,3))
```
Importantly, by default, already completed workflow steps with a status of '`Success`' (for
example, all output files exist) will not be repeated unnecessarily unless one explicitly sets
the force parameter to TRUE. Skipping such steps can save time, particularly
when optimizing workflows or adding new samples to previously completed runs.
Additionally, one may find it useful in certain situations to ignore warnings or
errors without terminating workflow runs. This behavior can be enabled by setting
`warning.stop=TRUE` and/or `error.stop=TRUE`.
```{r runWF_force, eval=FALSE}
sal <- runWF(sal, force = TRUE, warning.stop = FALSE, error.stop = TRUE)
```
When starting a new workflow project with the `SPRproject` function, a new R environment
will be initialized that stores the objects generated by the workflow steps. The content
of this R environment can be inspected with the `viewEnvir` function.
```{r runWF_env, eval=FALSE}
viewEnvir(sal)
```
The `runWF` function saves the new R environment to an `rds` file under `.SPRproject` when `saveEnv=TRUE`, which
is done by default. For additional details, users want to consult the corresponding help document
with `?runWF`.
```{r runWF_saveenv, eval=FALSE}
sal <- runWF(sal, saveEnv = TRUE)
```
A status summary of the executed workflows can be returned by typing `sal`.
```{r show_statusWF_details1, eval=TRUE}
sal
```
Several accessor functions can be used to retrieve additional information about
workflows and their run status. The code box below lists these functions,
omitting their output for brevity. Although some of these functions have been
introduced above already, they are included here again for easy reference. Additional,
details on these functions can be found [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#sysargslist).
```{r show_statusWF_details2, eval=FALSE}
stepsWF(sal)
dependency(sal)
cmdlist(sal)
codeLine(sal)
targetsWF(sal)
outfiles(sal)
statusWF(sal)
projectInfo(sal)
```
While `SAL` objects are autosaved when working with workflows, it
can be sometimes safer to explicity save the object before closing R.
```{r save_sal, eval=FALSE}
sal <- write_SYSargsList(sal)
```
### Module system {#module-system}
Some computing systems, such as HPC clusters, allow users to load software via
an [Environment Modules](https://modules.sourceforge.net/) system into their
`PATH`. If a module system is available, the function `module` allows to
interact with it from within R. Specific actions are controlled by values
passed on to the `action_type` argument of the `module` function, such as
loading and unloading software with `load` and `unload`, respectively.
Additionally, dedicated functions are provided for certain actions. The
following code examples are not evaluated since they will only work on systems where
an Environment Modules software is installed. A full list of actions and
additional functions for Environment Modules can be accessed with `?module`.
```{r module_cmds, eval=FALSE}
module(action_type="load", module_name="hisat2")
moduleload("hisat2") # alternative command
moduleunload("hisat2")
modulelist() # list software loaded into current session
moduleAvail() # list all software available in module system
```
Note, the module load/unload actions can be defined in the R/Rmd workflow
scripts or in the CWL parameter files. The `listCmdModules` function can be
used, to list the names and versions of all software tools that are loaded via
Environment Modules in each step of a `SAL` workflow container. Independent of
the usage of an Environment Modules system, all CL software used by each step
in a workflow can be listed with `listCmdTools`. The output of both fumction
calls is not shown below for the same reason as in the previous code chunk.
```{r list_module, eval=FALSE}
listCmdModules(sal)
listCmdTools(sal)
```
### Parallel evaluation
The processing time of computationally expensive steps can be greatly accelerated by
processing many input files in parallel using several CPUs and/or computer nodes
of an HPC or cloud system, where a scheduling system is used for load balancing.
To simplify for users the configuration and execution of workflow steps in serial or parallel mode,
`systemPipeR` uses for both the same `runWF` function. Parallelization simply
requires appending of the parallelization parameters to the settings of the corresponding workflow
steps each requesting the computing resources specified by the user, such as
the number of CPU cores, RAM and run time. These resource settings are
stored in the corresponding workflow step of the `SAL` workflow container.
After adding the parallelization parameters, `runWF` will execute the chosen steps
in parallel mode as instructed.
The following example applies to an alignment step of an RNA-Seq workflow. The
above demonstration workflow is not used here since it is too simple to benefit
from parallel processing. In the chosen alignment example, the parallelization
parameters are added to the alignment step (here `hisat2_mapping`) of `SAL` via
a `resources` list. The given parameter settings will run 18 processes (`Njobs`) in
parallel using for each 4 CPU cores (`ncpus`), thus utilizing a total of 72 CPU
cores. The `runWF` function can be used with most queueing systems as it is based on
utilities defined by the `batchtools` package, which supports the use of
template files (_`*.tmpl`_) for defining the run parameters of different
schedulers. In the given example below, a `conffile` (see
_`.batchtools.conf.R`_ samples [here](https://mllg.github.io/batchtools/)) and
a `template` file (see _`*.tmpl`_ samples
[here](https://github.com/mllg/batchtools/tree/master/inst/templates)) need to be present
on the highest level of a user's workflow project. The following example uses the sample
`conffile` and `template` files for the Slurm scheduler that are both provided by this
package.
The `resources` list can be added to analysis steps when a workflow is loaded into `SAL`.
Alternatively, one can add the resource settings with the `addResources` function
to any step of a pre-populated `SAL` container afterwards. For workflow steps with the same resource
requirements, one can add them to several steps at once with a single call to `addResources` by
specifying multiple step names under the `step` argument.
```{r runWF_cluster, eval=FALSE}
resources <- list(conffile=".batchtools.conf.R",
template="batchtools.slurm.tmpl",
Njobs=18,
walltime=120,
ntasks=1,
ncpus=4,
memory=1024,
partition = "short"
)
sal <- addResources(sal, step=c("hisat2_mapping"), resources = resources)
sal <- runWF(sal)
```
The above example will submit via `runWF(sal)` the *hisat2_mapping* step
to a partition (queue) called `short` on an HPC cluster. Users need to adjust this and
other parameters, that are defined in the `resources` list, to their cluster environment.
### Run from Command-Line (without cluster)
Create an R script containing the following (or similar) minimum content.
```sh
#!/usr/bin/env Rscript
library(systemPipeR)
sal <- SPRproject()
sal <- importWF(sal, file_path = "systemPipeRNAseq.Rmd") # adjust name of Rmd file if different
sal <- runWF(sal) # runs entire workflow
sal <- renderReport(sal) # after workflow has completed render Rmd to HTML report
```
Assuming the script is named `wf_run_script.R` it can be executed from the command-line (not
R console!) as follows. In addition, one can make the script executable to run it like any other script.
```sh
Rscript wf_run_script.R
```
This will run `systemPipeR` workflows on a single machine. In this case a limited amount of
parallelization is possible if the corresponding code chunks in the workflow take advantage of
multi-core parallelization instructions provided by `BiocParallel`, `batchtools` or
related packages. However, this type of parallelization is usually limited to the
number of cores available on a single CPU. A much more scalable approach is the use
of computer clusters as described above and in the next section.
### Submit workflow from command-line to cluster
In addition to running workflows within interactive R sessions or submitting
them from the command-line on a single system (see above), one can execute
`systemPipeR` workflows from the command-line to an HPC cluster by including
the relevant workflow run instructions in an R script and then submitting it
via a submission script of a workload manager system to a computer cluster. The
following gives an example for the Slurm workload manager. To understand the
details, it is important to inspect the content of the two files (here .R and
.sh). Additional details about resource specification under Slurm are given
[below](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#parallelization-on-clusters).
- R script: [wf_run_script.R](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tgirke/GEN242/main/static/custom/spWFtemplates/cl_sbatch_run/wf_run_script.R)
- Slurm submission script: [wf_run_script.sh](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tgirke/GEN242/main/static/custom/spWFtemplates/cl_sbatch_run/wf_run_script.sh)
As a test, users can generate in their user account of a cluster a workflow
environment populated with the toy data as outlined
[here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/sprnaseq/sprnaseq/#workflow-environment).
After this, it is best to create within the workflow directory a subdirectory,
e.g. called `cl_sbatch_run`, and then save the above two files to this
subdirectory. Next, the parameters in both files need to be adjusted to match
the type of workflow and the required computing resources. This includes the
name of the `Rmd` file and scheduler resource settings such as: `partition`,
`Njobs`, `walltime`, `memory`, etc. After all relevant settings have been set
correctly, one can execute the workflow with `sbatch` from within the
`cl_sbatch_run` directory as follows (note this is a command-line call outside
of R):
```sh
sbatch wf_run_script.sh
```
After the submission to the cluster, one usually should check its status and
progress with `squeue -u ` (under Slurm) as well as by monitoring
the content of the `slurm-.out` file generated by the scheduler in the
same directory. This file contains most of the `STDOUT` and `STDERROR`
generated by a cluster job. Once everything is working on the toy data, users
can run the workflow on real data the same way.
## Visualize workflows {#visualize-wf}
Workflows instances can be visualized as topology graphs with the `plotWF` function.
The resulting plot includes the following information.
+ Workflow topology graph rendered based on dependencies among steps
+ Workflow step status, e.g. Success, Error, Pending, Warnings
+ Sample status and statistics
+ Run time of individual steps
If no layout parameters are provided, then `plotWF` will automatically detect reasonable settings
for a user's system, including width, height, layout, plot method, branch styles and others.
```{r, eval=FALSE}
plotWF(sal, show_legend = TRUE, width = "80%", rstudio = TRUE)
```
```{r plot_wf, eval=TRUE, warning= FALSE, echo=FALSE, out.width="100%", fig.align = "center", warning=FALSE}
knitr::include_graphics("../plotwf.png")
```
For more details about the `plotWF` function, please visit its help with `?plotWF`.
## Report generation
`systemPipeR` produces two report types: Scientific and Technical. The
Scientific Report resembles a scientific publication detailing data analysis,
results, interpretation information, and user-provided text. The Technical
Report provides logging information useful for assessing workflow steps and
troubleshooting problems.
### Scientific reports
After a workflow run, `systemPipeR's` `renderReport` or `rmarkdown's` `render`
function can be used to generate Scientific Reports in HTML, PDF or other
formats. The former uses the final `SAL` instance as input, and the latter the
underlying Rmd source file. The resulting reports mimic research papers by combining
user-generated text with analysis results, creating reproducible analysis
reports. This reporting infrastructure offers support for citations,
auto-generated bibliographies, code chunks with syntax highlighting, and inline
evaluation of variables to update text content. Tables and figures in a report
can be automatically updated when the document is rebuilt or workflows are
rerun, ensuring data components are always current. This automation increases
reproducibility and saves time creating Scientific Reports. Furthermore, the
workflow topology maps described earlier can be incorporated into Scientific
Reports, enabling integration between Scientific and Technical Reports.
```{r, eval=FALSE}
sal <- renderReport(sal)
rmarkdown::render("my.Rmd", clean = TRUE, output_format = "BiocStyle::html_document")
```
Note, `my.Rmd` in the last code line needs to be replaced with the name (path) of
the source `Rmd` file used for generating the `SAL` workflow container.
### Technical report
The package collects technical information about workflow runs in a project’s
log directory (default name: `.SPRproject`). After partial or full completion
of a workflow, the logging information of a run is used by the `renderLog`
function to generate a Technical Report in HTML or other formats. The report
includes software execution commands, warnings and errors messages of each
workflow step. Easy visual navigation of Technical Reports is provided by
including an interactive instance of the corresponding workflow topology graph.
The technical details in these reports help assess the success of each workflow
step and facilitate troubleshooting.
```{r, eval=FALSE}
sal <- renderLogs(sal)
```
## Converting workflows to Bash and Rmd
The SAL workflow containers of `systemPipeR` provide versatile conversion and
export options to both Rmd and executable Bash scripts. This feature not only
enhances the portability and reusability of workflows across different systems
but also promotes transparency, enabling efficient testing and
troubleshooting.
### R Markdown script
A populated `SAL` workflow container can be converted to an Rmd file using the
`sal2rmd` function. If needed, this `Rmd` file can be used to construct a `SAL`
workflow container with the `importWF` function as introduced above. This
functionality is useful for building templates of workflow Rmds and sharing
them with other systems.
```{r, eval=FALSE}
sal2rmd(sal)
```
### Bash script {#bash-script}
The `sal2bash` function converts and exports workflows stored in SAL containers
into executable Bash scripts. This enables users to run their workflows as Bash
scripts from the command line. The function takes a SAL container as input and
generates a `spr_wf.sh` file in the project's root directory as output.
Additionally, it creates a `spr_bash` directory that stores all R-based workflow
steps as separate R scripts. To minimize the number of R scripts needed, the
function combines adjacent R steps into a single file.
```{r, eval=FALSE}
sal2bash(sal)
```
## Restarting and resetting workflows
The ability to restart existing workflows projects is important for continuing analyses that could not
be completed, or to make changes without repeating already completed steps. Two main options are provided
to restart workflows. Another option is provided that resets workflows to the very beginning, which effectively
deletes the previous environment.
__1. The `resume=TRUE` option__ will initialize the latest instance of a `SAL` object stored in the `logs.dir`
including its log files. When this option is used, a workflow can be continued where it was left off,
for example after closing and restarting R from the same directory on the same system. If the project was created
with custom directory and/or file names, then those names need to be specified under the `log.dir` and `sys.file`
arguments of the `SPRproject` function, respectively, otherwise the default names will be used.
```{r SPR_resume, eval=FALSE}
sal <- SPRproject(resume = TRUE)
```
If the R environment was saved, one can recover with `load.envir=TRUE` all
objects that were created during the previous workflow run. The same is possible with
the `restart` option. For more details, please consult the help for the `runWF` function.
```{r resume_load, eval=FALSE}
sal <- SPRproject(resume = TRUE, load.envir = TRUE)
```
After resuming the workflow with `load.envir` enabled, one can inspect the objects
created in the old environment, and decide if it is necessary to copy them to the
current environment.
```{r envir, eval=FALSE}
viewEnvir(sal)
copyEnvir(sal, list="plot", new.env = globalenv())
```
__2. The `restart=TRUE` option__ will also use the latest instance of the `SAL` object stored in
the `logs.dir`, but the previous log files will be deleted.
```{r restart_load, eval=FALSE}
sal <- SPRproject(restart = TRUE)
```
__3. The `overwrite=TRUE` option__ will reset the workflow project to the very beginning by deleting the
`log.dir` directory (`.SPRproject`) that stores the previous `SAL` instance and all its log files. At the same time
a new and empty ‘SAL’ workflow container will be created. This option should be used with caution
since it will effectively delete the workflow environment. Output files written by the
workflow steps to the `results` directory will not be deleted when this option is used.
```{r SPR_overwrite, eval=FALSE}
sal <- SPRproject(overwrite = TRUE)
```
## Additional utilities {#sysargslist}
This section describes methods for accessing, subsetting and modifying `SAL`
workflow objects.
### Accessor methods {#accessor-methods}
Workflows and their run status can be explored further using a range of
accessor functions for `SAL` objects.
#### General information
The number of steps in a workflow can be determined with the `length` function.
```{r}
length(sal)
```
The corresponding names of workflow steps can be returned with `stepName`.
```{r}
stepName(sal)
```
CL software used by each step in a workflow can be listed with `listCmdTools`.
```{r}
listCmdTools(sal)
```
Some computing systems (often HPC clusters) allow users to load CL software via
an [Environment Modules](http://modules.sourceforge.net/) system into their PATH.
If this is the case, then the exact verions of the software tools loaded via the
module system can be listed for `SAL` and `SYSargs2` objects with `listCmdModules`
and `modules`, respectively. The example workflow used here
does not make use of Environment Modules, and thus there are no software tools
to list here.
```{r}
listCmdModules(sal)
modules(stepsWF(sal)$gzip)
```
For more information on how to work with Environment Modules in `systemPipeR`, please
visit the help with `?module`, `?modules` and `?listCmdModules`.
#### Slot data
Several accessor functions are named after the corresponding slot names in
`SAL` objects. This makes it easy to look them up with `names()`, and then
apply them to `sal` as the only argument, such as `runInfo(sal)`.
```{r}
names(sal)
```
The individual workflow steps in a `SAL` container are stored as `SYSargs2` and `LineWise`
components. They can be returned with the `stepsWF` function.
```{r}
stepsWF(sal)
```
The accessor function of `SYSargs2` and `LineWise` objects can be returned similarly
(here for `gzip` step).
```{r}
names(stepsWF(sal)$gzip)
```
The `statusWF` function returns a status summary for each step in a `SAL` workflow instance.
```{r}
statusWF(sal)
```
The `targets` instances for each step in a workflow can be returned with `targetsWF`. The
below applies it to the second step.
```{r}
targetsWF(sal[2])
```
If a workflow contains sample comparisons, that have been specified in the header
lines of a targets file starting with a `# tag`, then they can be returned
with the `targetsheader` functions. This does not apply to the current demo `sal`
instance, and thus the function returns `NULL`. For more details, consult the `targets`
file section [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#targets-files).
```{r, eval=FALSE}
targetsheader(sal, step = "Quality")
```
The `outfiles` component of a `SAL` object stores the paths to the expected outfiles files
for each step in a workflow. Some of them are the input for downstream workflow steps.
```{r}
outfiles(sal[2])
```
The `dependency` step(s) in a workflow can be obtained with the
`dependency` function. This information is used to construct the toplogy
graph of a workflow (see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#visualize-wf)).
```{r}
dependency(sal)
```
The sample names (IDs) stored in the corresponding column of a targets file
can be returned with the `SampleName` function.
```{r}
SampleName(sal, step = "gzip")
```
The `getColumn` method can be used to obtain the paths to the files generated in a
specified step.
```{r}
getColumn(sal, "outfiles", step = "gzip", column = "gzip_file")
getColumn(sal, "targetsWF", step = "gzip", column = "FileName")
```
The `yamlinput` function returns the parameters of a workflow step defined in the
corresponding yml file.
```{r}
yamlinput(sal, step = "gzip")
```
#### CL and R code {#cl-and-r}
The exact syntax for running CL software on each input data set in a workflow can
be returned with the `cmdlist` function. The CL calls are assembled from the corresponding
`yml` and `cwl`, and an optional `targets` file as described in the above CLI section
[here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cl-interface). The example below shows the CL syntax for running `gzip`
and `gunzip` on the first input sample. Evaluating the output of `cmdlist` can
be very helpful for designing and debugging CWL parameter files to support new CL
software or changing their settings.
```{r}
cmdlist(sal, step = c(2,3), targets = 1)
```
Similarly, the `codeLine` function returns the R code of a `LineWise` workflow step.
```{r}
codeLine(sal, step = "export_iris")
```
#### R environment
The objects generated in a workflow's run environment can be accessed with `viewEnvir`.
```{r}
viewEnvir(sal)
```
If needed one or multiple objects can be copied from the run environment of a workflow
to the current environment of an R session.
```{r}
copyEnvir(sal, list = c("plot"), new.env = globalenv(), silent = FALSE)
```
### Subsetting workflows
The bracket operator can be used to subset workflow by steps. For instance, the current
instance of `sal` has four steps, and `sal[1:2]` will subset the workflow to the first two
steps.
```{r}
length(sal)
sal[1:2]
```
In addition to subsetting by steps, one can subset workflows by input samples. The following
illustrates this for the first two input samples, but omits the function output for brevity.
```{r, eval=FALSE}
sal_sub <- subset(sal, subset_steps = c(2,3), input_targets = c("SE", "VE"), keep_steps = TRUE)
stepsWF(sal_sub)
targetsWF(sal_sub)
outfiles(sal_sub)
```
For appending workflow steps, one can use the `+` operator.
```{r, eval=FALSE}
sal[1] + sal[2] + sal[3]
```
### Replacement methods
Replacement methods are implemented to make adjustments to certain paramer settings and
R code in workflow steps.
#### Changing parameters
```{r, eval=FALSE}
## create a copy of sal for testing
sal_c <- sal
## view original value, here restricted to 'ext' slot
yamlinput(sal_c, step = "gzip")$ext
## Replace value under 'ext'
yamlinput(sal_c, step = "gzip", paramName = "ext") <- "txt.gz"
## view modified value, here restricted to 'ext' slot
yamlinput(sal_c, step = "gzip")$ext
## Evaluate resulting CL call
cmdlist(sal_c, step = "gzip", targets = 1)
```
#### Changes to R steps {#change-r-step}
Code lines can be added with `appendCodeLine` to R steps (`LineWise`) as shown in the
following example.
```{r, sal_lw_rep, eval=FALSE}
appendCodeLine(sal_c, step = "export_iris", after = 1) <- "log_cal_100 <- log(100)"
codeLine(sal_c, step = "export_iris")
```
In addition, code lines can be replaced with the `replaceCodeLine` function.
For additional details about the `LineWise` class, please see the example
[above](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#appendstep) and the detailed description of the `LineWise` class
[here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#linewise).
```{r, sal_lw_rep2, eval=FALSE}
replaceCodeLine(sal_c, step="export_iris", line = 2) <- LineWise(code={
log_cal_100 <- log(50)
})
codeLine(sal_c, step = "export_iris")
```
Renaming of workflow steps is possible with the `renameStep` function.
```{r, eval=FALSE}
renameStep(sal_c, c(1, 2)) <- c("newStep2", "newIndex")
sal_c
names(outfiles(sal_c))
names(targetsWF(sal_c))
dependency(sal_c)
```
#### Replacing workflow steps
The `replaceStep` function can be used to replace entire workflow steps. When
replacing workflow steps, it is important to maintain a valid dependency graph
among the affected steps.
```{r, eval=FALSE}
sal_test <- sal[c(1,2)]
replaceStep(sal_test, step = 1, step_name = "gunzip" ) <- sal[3]
sal_test
```
If needed, workflow steps can be removed as follows.
```{r}
sal_test <- sal[-2]
sal_test
```
## CWL specifications {#cwl}
This section provides a concise overview of [CWL](https://www.commonwl.org/user_guide/topics/)
and its utilization within `systemPipeR`. It covers fundamental CWL concepts, including
the `CommandLineTool` and `Workflow` classes for describing individual CL processes and
workflows. For further details, readers want to refer to CWL's comprehensive
[CommandLineTool](https://www.commonwl.org/user_guide/topics/command-line-tool.html) and
[Workflow](https://www.commonwl.org/user_guide/topics/workflows.html) documentation, as well
as the examples provided in CWL's [Beginner Tutorial](https://carpentries-incubator.github.io/cwl-novice-tutorial/)
and [User Guide](https://www.commonwl.org/user_guide/). Additionally, familiarizing oneself
with [CWL's YAML](https://www.commonwl.org/user_guide/topics/yaml-guide.html) format
specifications can be beneficial.
As illustrated in the introduction ([Fig 2](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cl-interface)), CWL files with the '`.cwl`'
extension define the parameters of a specific CL step or workflow, while files
with the '`.yml`' extension define their input values.
### CWL `CommandLineTool` {#cwl-clt}
A Command Line Tool (`CommandLineTool` class) specifies a standalone process
that can be run by itself (without including interactions with other
programs), and has inputs and outputs.
The following inspects the basic structure of a '`.cwl`' sample file for a `CommandLineTool`
that is provided by this package.
```{r}
dir_path <- system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR")
cwl <- yaml::read_yaml(file.path(dir_path, "example/example.cwl"))
```
Important components include:
__1.__ `cwlVersion`: version of CWL specification used by file.
__2.__ `class`: declares description of a `CommandLineTool`.
```{r}
cwl[1:2]
```
__3.__ `baseCommand`: name of CL tool.
```{r}
cwl[3]
```
__4.__ `inputs`: defines input information to run the tool. This includes:
- `id`: each input has an `id` including name.
- `type`: type of input value; one of `string`, `int`, `long`, `float`, `double`,
`File`, `Directory` or `Any`.
- `inputBinding`: indicates if the input parameter should appear in CL call. If
missing input will not appear in the CL call.
```{r}
cwl[4]
```
__5.__. `outputs`: list of expected outputs after running the CL tool. Important components are:
- `id`: each input has an `id` including name.
- `type`: type of output value; one of `string`, `int`, `long`, `float`, `double`,
`File`, `Directory`, `Any` or `stdout`);
- `outputBinding`: defines how to set outputs values; `glob` specifies output value's name.
```{r}
cwl[5]
```
__6.__ `stdout`: specifies `filename` for standard output. Note, by default `systemPipeR`
constructs the output `filename` from `results_path` and `SampleName` (see above).
```{r}
cwl[6]
```
## CWL `Workflow` {#cwl-wf}
CWL's `Workflow` class describes one or more workflow steps, declares
their interdependencies, and defines how `CommandLineTools` are executed.
Its CWL file includes inputs, outputs, and steps.
The following illustrates the basic structure of a '`.cwl`' sample file for a `Workflow`
that is provided by this package.
```{r}
cwl.wf <- yaml::read_yaml(file.path(dir_path, "example/workflow_example.cwl"))
```
__1.__ `cwlVersion`: version of CWL specification used by file.
__2.__ `class`: declares description of a `Workflow` that describes one or
more `CommandLineTools` and their combined usage.
```{r}
cwl.wf[1:2]
```
__3.__ `inputs`: defines the inputs of the workflow.
```{r}
cwl.wf[3]
```
__4.__ `outputs`: defines the outputs of the workflow.
```{r}
cwl.wf[4]
```
__5.__ `steps`: describes the steps of the workflow. The example below shows one step.
```{r}
cwl.wf[5]
```
## CWL input values
The `.yml` file provides the input values for the parameters described above.
The following example includes input values for three parameters (`message`,
`SampleName` and `results_path`).
```{r}
yaml::read_yaml(file.path(dir_path, "example/example_single.yml"))
```
Note, the `.yml` file needs to provide input values for each input parameter
specified in the corresponding `.cwl` file (compare `cwl[4]` above).
## Mappings among `cwl`, `yml` and `targets` {#cwl_targets}
This section illustrates how the parameters in CWL files (`cwl` and `yml`) are
interconnected to construct CL calls of steps, and subsequently assembled
to workflows.
A `SAL` container (long name `SYSargsList`) stores all information and instructions
needed for processing a set of inputs (incl. files) with a single or many CL steps within a workflow
The `SAL` object is created and fully populated with the `SYSargsList` constructor
function. More detailed documentation of `SAL` workflow instances is available
[here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#appendstep) and [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#sysargslist).
The following imports the `.cwl` and `.yml` files for running the `echo Hello World!`
example.
```{r fromFile, eval=TRUE}
HW <- SYSargsList(wf_file = "example/workflow_example.cwl",
input_file = "example/example_single.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"))
HW
cmdlist(HW)
```
The example provided is restricted to creating a CL call for a single input
(sample). To process multiple inputs, a straightforward approach is to assign
variables to the corresponding parameters instead of using fixed (hard-coded)
values. These variables can then be assigned the desired input values
iteratively, resulting in multiple CL calls, one for each input value. The
following illustrates this with an example, where the `message` and `SampleName`
parameters are assigned variables that are labeled with tags of the form
`_XXX_`. These variables will be assigned values stored in a `targets` file.
```{r}
yml <- yaml::read_yaml(file.path(dir_path, "example/example.yml"))
yml
```
The content of the `targets` file used for this example is shown below. The
general structure of `targets` files is explained [above](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#targets-files).
```{r}
targetspath <- system.file("extdata/cwl/example/targets_example.txt", package = "systemPipeR")
read.delim(targetspath, comment.char = "#")
```
In the simple example given above the values stored under the `Message` and
`SampleName` columns of the targets file will be passed on to the corresponding
parameters with matching names in the `yml` file, and from there to
the `echo` command defined in the `cwl` file (see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cwl-wf)).
As mentioned previously, the usage of `targets` files is optional in
`systemPipeR`. Since `targets` files provide an easy and efficient solution for
organizing experimental variables, their usage is highly encouraged and well
supported in `systemPipeR`.
#### Assembly of CL calls from three files
The `SYSargsList` function constructs `SAL` instances from the three parameter
files, that were introduced above (see [Fig 3](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cl-interface)). The path to each file is assigned to its own
argument: `wf_file` is assigned the path of a `cwl` workflow file, `input_file`
the path of a `yml` input file, and `targets` the path of a `targets` file. Additionally, a named
vector is provided under the `inputvars` argument that defines which column
values in the `targets` file are assigned to specific parameters in the `yml`
file. A parameter connection is established where a name in `inputvars` has
matching column and parameter names in the `targets` and `yml` files,
respectively (Fig 3). A tagging syntax with the pattern `_XXX_` is used to
indicate which parameters contain variables that will be assigned values from
the `targets` file. The usage of this pattern is only recommended for
consistency and easy identification, but not enforced.
The `SYSargslist` function call constructs the `echo` commands (CL calls) based on the
parameters provided by the above described parameter file instances (`cwl`, `yml` and `targets`)
as well as the variable mappings specified under the `inputvars` argument.
```{r fromFile_example, eval=TRUE}
HW_mul <- SYSargsList(step_name = "echo",
targets=targetspath,
wf_file="example/workflow_example.cwl", input_file="example/example.yml",
dir_path = dir_path,
inputvars = c(Message = "_STRING_", SampleName = "_SAMPLE_"))
HW_mul
```
The final CL calls (here `echo` command) can be returned with the `cmdlist` for
each string given under the `Message` column of the `targets` file. The values under
the `SampleName` column are used to name the corresponding output files, each with a
`txt` extension.
```{r fromFile_example2, eval=TRUE}
cmdlist(HW_mul)
```
## Auto-creation of CWL files {#cwl-auto}
To streamline the process of generating CWL parameter files (both `cwl` and
`yml`), users can simply provide the CL syntax for executing new software. This
action will automatically create the corresponding CWL parameter files, which
alleviates the need for manual creation of CWL files, reducing the
burden on users. This functionality is implemented in systemPipeR’s
`createParam` function group.
### Expected CL syntax
To use this functionality, CL calls need to be provided in a pseudo-bash script format
and stored as a `character vector`.
The following uses as example a CL call for the HISAT2 software.
```{r cmd_orig, eval=FALSE}
hisat2 -S ./results/M1A.sam -x ./data/tair10.fasta -k 1 -min-intronlen 30 -max-intronlen 3000 -threads 4 -U ./data/SRR446027_1.fastq.gz
```
For the CL call above, the corresponding pseudo-bash syntax is given below.
Here, the CL string needs to be stored in a single slot of a `character vector`,
here named `command`. The formatting requirements for the CL string will be explained
next.
```{r cmd, eval=TRUE}
command <- "
hisat2 \
-S \
-x \
-k \
-min-intronlen \
-max-intronlen \
-threads \
-U
"
```
__Format specifications for pseudo-bash syntax (Version 1)__
- The syntax organizes each part of a CL string on a separate line. Each part is terminated by a backslash `\` at the end of a line.
- The first line contains the base command (`baseCommand`). It can include a subcommand, such as in `git commit` where `commit` is a subcommand.
- Arguments are listed in the subsequent lines, one argument per line.
- Short- and long-form arguments are expected to start on a new line with one
or two dashes, respectively, and are terminated by the first space on the
same line, such as `-S` and `--min`. Values that should be assigned to
arguments are placed inside `<...>`, also on the same line. Arguments and flags without
values lack this assignment.
- The type of the input for arguments with assigned values is defined by a pattern of the form ` \
-x \
-k \
-min-intronlen \
-max-intronlen \
-threads \
-U
"
WF <- createParam(command2, overwrite = TRUE, writeParamFiles = TRUE, confirm = TRUE)
yml <- yaml::read_yaml("param/cwl/hisat2/hisat2.yml"); yml <- c(SampleName = "_SampleName_", yml); yaml::write_yaml(yml, "param/cwl/hisat2/hisat2.yml")
targetspath <- system.file("extdata", "targets.txt", package = "systemPipeR")
WF_test <- loadWorkflow(targets = targetspath, wf_file = "hisat2.cwl", input_file = "hisat2.yml",
dir_path = "param/cwl/hisat2/")
WF_test <- renderWF(WF_test, inputvars = c(FileName = "_FASTQ_PATH1_", SampleName = "_SampleName_"))
```
__2. Test CL call__
```{r sysargs2c, eval=FALSE, results="hide"}
cmdlist(WF_test)[1:2]
```
__3. Use CL call in a WF step__
```{r sysargs2d, eval=FALSE, results="hide"}
dir.create("data") # create data directory if it doesn't exist
sal <- SPRproject(overwrite=TRUE) # Use overwrite only for testing
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise(code = {
library(systemPipeR)
}, step_name = "load_SPR")
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "hisat2_mapping",
targets = targetspath, wf_file = "hisat2.cwl",
input_file = "hisat2.yml", dir_path = "param/cwl/hisat2",
inputvars = c(FileName = "_FASTQ_PATH1_", SampleName = "_SampleName_"),
dependency=c("load_SPR")
)
cmdlist(sal)
```
## Workflow step classes
The workflow steps of `SAL` (synonym `SYSargsList`) containers are composed of `SYSargs2`
and/or `LineWise` objects. These two classes are introduced here in more detail.
### `SYSargs2` class {#sysargs2}
The `SYSargs2` class stores workflow steps that run CL software. An instance of
`SYSargs2` stores all the input/output paths and parameter components necessary
for executing a specific CL data analysis step. `SYSargs2` instances are
created using two constructor functions: `loadWF` and `renderWF`. These
functions make use of a `targets` (or `yml`) and the two CWL parameter files
`cwl` and `yml`. The structure and content for the CWL files are described
[above](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cwl). The following creates a `SYSargs2` instance using the `cwl` and
`yml` files for running the RNA-Seq read aligner HISAT2 [@Kim2015-ve]. Note,
when using the `SYSargsList` method for constructing workflow steps
(see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cmd-step)), then the user will not need to run the `loadWF`
and `renderWF` directly.
```{r SYSargs2_structure, eval=TRUE}
library(systemPipeR)
targetspath <- system.file("extdata", "targets.txt", package = "systemPipeR")
dir_path <- system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR")
WF <- loadWF(targets = targetspath, wf_file = "hisat2/hisat2-mapping-se.cwl",
input_file = "hisat2/hisat2-mapping-se.yml",
dir_path = dir_path)
WF <- renderWF(WF, inputvars = c(FileName = "_FASTQ_PATH1_",
SampleName = "_SampleName_"))
```
In addition to `SAL` objects (see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cl-and-r)), the `cmdlist` function accepts
`SYSargs2` to constructs CL calls based on the parameter inputs imported from the
corresponding `targets`, `yml` and `cwl` files.
```{r cmdlist, eval=TRUE}
cmdlist(WF)[1]
```
Several accessor methods are available that are named after the slot names of
`SYSargs2` objects.
```{r names_WF, eval=TRUE}
names(WF)
```
The output components of `SYSargs2` define the expected output files for each
step in the workflow; some of which are the input for the next workflow step,
_e.g._ a downstream `SYSargs2` instance.
```{r output_WF, eval=TRUE}
output(WF)[1]
```
The `targets` method allows access to the `targets` component of a `SYSargs2`
object. Refer to the information provided [above](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#targets-files) for an
explanation of the `targets` file structure.
```{r, targets_WF, eval=TRUE}
targets(WF)[1]
as(WF, "DataFrame")
```
If CL software is loaded via an [Environment Modules](http://modules.sourceforge.net/) system
into a user's `PATH`, then this information can be accessed in `SYSargs2` objects as shown
below. For more details on working with Environment Modules, see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#module-system).
```{r, module_WF, eval=TRUE}
modules(WF)
```
Additional accessible information includes the location of the parameters files,
`inputvars` (see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cmd-step)) and more.
```{r, other_WF, eval=FALSE}
files(WF)
inputvars(WF)
```
### LineWise Class {#linewise}
To define R code as workflow steps, the `LineWise` class is used. The syntax
for declaring lines of R code as workflow steps in R or Rmd files is introduced
in the [workflow design](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#linewise_rmd) section. The following showcases
additional utilities for `LineWise` objects.
```{r lw, eval=TRUE}
rmd <- system.file("extdata", "spr_simple_lw.Rmd", package = "systemPipeR")
sal_lw <- SPRproject(overwrite = TRUE)
sal_lw <- importWF(sal_lw, rmd, verbose = FALSE)
codeLine(sal_lw)
```
Coerce a `LineWise` object to a `list` object and vice versa.
```{r, lw_coerce, eval=TRUE}
lw <- stepsWF(sal_lw)[[2]]
## Coerce
ll <- as(lw, "list")
class(ll)
lw <- as(ll, "LineWise")
lw
```
Accessing basic information of `LineWise` objects.
```{r, lw_access, eval=TRUE}
length(lw)
names(lw)
codeLine(lw)
codeChunkStart(lw)
rmdPath(lw)
```
Subsetting `LineWise` objects.
```{r, lw_sub, eval=TRUE}
l <- lw[2]
codeLine(l)
l_sub <- lw[-2]
codeLine(l_sub)
```
Replacement methods for changing R code in `LineWise` objects.
```{r, lw_rep, eval=TRUE}
replaceCodeLine(lw, line = 2) <- "5+5"
codeLine(lw)
appendCodeLine(lw, after = 0) <- "6+7"
codeLine(lw)
```
For comparison, similar replacement methods are available for `SAL` objects. They have been
covered [above](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#change-r-step).
```{r, sal_rep_append, eval=FALSE}
replaceCodeLine(sal_lw, step = 2, line = 2) <- LineWise(code={
"5+5"
})
codeLine(sal_lw, step = 2)
appendCodeLine(sal_lw, step = 2) <- "66+55"
codeLine(sal_lw, step = 2)
appendCodeLine(sal_lw, step = 1, after = 1) <- "66+55"
codeLine(sal_lw, step = 1)
```
## Supplemental Material
### Examples of CL software {#third-party-software-tools}
Here is a partial list of CL software for which `systemPipeR` includes CWL
parameter file templates. Notably, with the newly added auto-creation feature
for CWL files (see [here](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#cwl-auto)), generating CWL parameter files for most CL
tools has become straightforward. Thus, maintaining and extending this list will
not be necessary anymore.
```{r table_tools, echo=FALSE, message=FALSE}
library(magrittr)
SPR_software <- system.file("extdata", "SPR_software.csv", package = "systemPipeR")
software <- read.delim(SPR_software, sep = ",", comment.char = "#")
colors <- colorRampPalette((c("darkseagreen", "indianred1")))(length(unique(software$Category)))
id <- as.numeric(c((unique(software$Category))))
software %>%
dplyr::mutate(Step = kableExtra::cell_spec(Step, color = "white", bold = TRUE,
background = factor(Category, id, colors))) %>%
dplyr::select(Tool, Step, Description) %>%
dplyr::arrange(Tool) %>%
kableExtra::kable("html", escape = FALSE, col.names = c("Tool Name", "Description", "Step")) %>%
kableExtra::kable_material(c("striped", "hover", "condensed")) %>%
kableExtra::scroll_box(width = "90%", height = "500px")
```
To run any of the tools mentioned, users must ensure that the necessary
software is installed on their system and added to the `PATH`. There are
several methods to verify if the required tools/modules are installed. The
easiest method is automatically executed for users when they call the `importWF`
function, or just `tryCL()`. In the print message of `importWF`, all
necessary tools and modules are automatically listed and checked for users.
For additional tool validation methods, please refer to these instructions:
[Five Minute Tutorial](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#five-min), [Environment Modules](https://girke.bioinformatics.ucr.edu/GEN242/tutorials/systempiper/systempiper/#module-system), and
[Managing Workflows](https://systempipe.org/sp/spr/sp_run/step_run/#before-running).
```{r cleaning3, eval=TRUE, include=FALSE}
if (file.exists(".SPRproject")) unlink(".SPRproject", recursive = TRUE)
## NOTE: Removing previous project create in the quick starts section
```
### Data analysis functionalities
This section presents various data analysis functionalities that are valuable
for many workflows. Some of these functionalities are R functions, while others
are CWL interfaces to widely used CL software. A few of them are included for
historical reasons.
### Project initialization
To work with the following examples a new workflow project needs to be created.
The below includes the `overwrite=TRUE` setting to remove any already
project directory.
```{r SPRproject2, eval=FALSE}
sal <- SPRproject(projPath = getwd(), overwrite = TRUE)
```
The first step in the new workflow project is to load the `systemPipeR` package.
```{r load_SPR, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise({
library(systemPipeR)
},
step_name = "load_SPR")
```
Importantly, in order to use the individual `appendStep` operations below, one has
to pay attention to the step dependencies.
#### Read Preprocessing
##### Preprocessing with `preprocessReads` function
The function `preprocessReads` allows to apply predefined or custom
read preprocessing functions to the FASTQ files referenced in a
`SYSargsList` container, such as quality filtering or adapter trimming
routines. Internally, `preprocessReads` uses the `FastqStreamer` function from
the `ShortRead` package to stream through large FASTQ files in a
memory-efficient manner. The following example performs adapter trimming with
the `trimLRPatterns` function from the `Biostrings` package.
In this step, the preprocessing parameters defined in the corresponding
`*.pe.cwl` and `*.pe.yml` files are added to a previously created `SAL` object.
This preprocessing step is crucial for preparing the reads for further
analysis.
```{r preprocessing, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
targetspath <- system.file("extdata", "targetsPE.txt", package = "systemPipeR")
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(
step_name = "preprocessing",
targets = targetspath, dir = TRUE,
wf_file = "preprocessReads/preprocessReads-pe.cwl",
input_file = "preprocessReads/preprocessReads-pe.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = c(
FileName1 = "_FASTQ_PATH1_",
FileName2 = "_FASTQ_PATH2_",
SampleName = "_SampleName_"
),
dependency = c("load_SPR"))
```
After the preprocessing step, the `outfiles` files can be used to generate the new
targets files containing the paths to the trimmed FASTQ files. The new targets
information can be used for the next workflow step instance, _e.g._ running the
NGS alignments with the trimmed FASTQ files. The `appendStep` function is
automatically handling this connectivity between steps. Please check the next
step for more details.
The following example shows how one can design a custom `preprocessReads`
function. Here, it is possible to replace the function used on the
`preprocessing` step and modify the corresponding `sal` object. Because it is a
custom function, it is necessary to save this part in the R object, and
internally the `preprocessReads.doc.R` script, that is stored in the `param` directory
of the workflow templates, is loading the custom function. If the R
object is saved with a different name (here `"param/customFCT.RData"`), one has
to adjust the corresponding path in the `preprocessReads.doc.R` script.
First, the custom function is defined.
```{r custom_preprocessing_function, eval=FALSE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise(
code = {
filterFct <- function(fq, cutoff = 20, Nexceptions = 0) {
qcount <- rowSums(as(quality(fq), "matrix") <= cutoff, na.rm = TRUE)
# Retains reads where Phred scores are >= cutoff with N exceptions
fq[qcount <= Nexceptions]
}
save(list = ls(), file = "param/customFCT.RData")
},
step_name = "custom_preprocessing_function",
dependency = "preprocessing"
)
```
After this the input parameters can be edited as shown here.
```{r editing_preprocessing, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE}
yamlinput(sal, "preprocessing")$Fct
yamlinput(sal, "preprocessing", "Fct") <- "'filterFct(fq, cutoff=20, Nexceptions=0)'"
yamlinput(sal, "preprocessing")$Fct ## check the new function
cmdlist(sal, "preprocessing", targets = 1) ## check if the command line was updated with success
```
##### Preprocessing with TrimGalore!
[TrimGalore!](http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/) is
a wrapper tool for Cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply quality and adapter
trimming to fastq files.
```{r trimGalore, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
targetspath <- system.file("extdata", "targets.txt", package = "systemPipeR")
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "trimGalore",
targets = targetspath, dir = TRUE,
wf_file = "trim_galore/trim_galore-se.cwl",
input_file = "trim_galore/trim_galore-se.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = c(FileName = "_FASTQ_PATH1_", SampleName = "_SampleName_"),
dependency = "load_SPR",
run_step = "optional")
```
##### Preprocessing with Trimmomatic
[Trimmomatic](http://www.usadellab.org/cms/?page=trimmomatic) software [@Bolger2014-yr]
performs a variety of useful trimming tasks for Illumina paired-end and single
ended reads. The following is an example of how to perform this task.
```{r trimmomatic, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
targetspath <- system.file("extdata", "targets.txt", package = "systemPipeR")
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "trimmomatic",
targets = targetspath, dir = TRUE,
wf_file = "trimmomatic/trimmomatic-se.cwl",
input_file = "trimmomatic/trimmomatic-se.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = c(FileName = "_FASTQ_PATH1_", SampleName = "_SampleName_"),
dependency = "load_SPR",
run_step = "optional")
```
#### FASTQ quality report
The following `seeFastq` and `seeFastqPlot` functions generate and plot a series of useful
quality statistics for a set of FASTQ files, including per cycle quality box
plots, base proportions, base-level quality trends, relative k-mer
diversity, length, and occurrence distribution of reads, number of reads
above quality cutoffs and mean quality distribution. The results are
written to a PDF file named `fastqReport.pdf`.
```{r fastq_report, eval=FALSE, message=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise(code = {
fastq <- getColumn(sal, step = "preprocessing", "targetsWF", column = 1)
fqlist <- seeFastq(fastq = fastq, batchsize = 10000, klength = 8)
pdf("./results/fastqReport.pdf", height = 18, width = 4*length(fqlist))
seeFastqPlot(fqlist)
dev.off()
}, step_name = "fastq_report",
dependency = "preprocessing")
```
FASTQ quality report
#### NGS Alignment software
After quality control, the sequence reads can be aligned to a reference genome or
transcriptome. The following gives examples for running several NGS read aligners.
##### `HISAT2`
The following steps demonstrate how to run the `HISAT2` short read aligner
[@Kim2015-ve] from `systemPipeR`.
To use an NGS aligner, one has to first index the reference genome. This is done
below with `hisat2-build`.
```{r hisat_index, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "hisat_index",
targets = NULL, dir = FALSE,
wf_file = "hisat2/hisat2-index.cwl",
input_file = "hisat2/hisat2-index.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = NULL,
dependency = "preprocessing")
```
The parameter settings of the aligner are defined in the `workflow_hisat2-se.cwl`
and `workflow_hisat2-se.yml` files. The following shows how to append the alignment
step to the `sal` workflow container. In this step several post-processing steps
with `Samtools` are included to convert the SAM files, that were generated by `HISAT2`,
to indexed and sorted BAM files. Those sub-steps are defined by the corresponding CWL workflow file
(see workflow_hisat2-se.cwl).
```{r hisat_mapping_samtools, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "hisat_mapping",
targets = "preprocessing", dir = TRUE,
wf_file = "workflow-hisat2/workflow_hisat2-se.cwl",
input_file = "workflow-hisat2/workflow_hisat2-se.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars=c(FileName1="_FASTQ_PATH1_", SampleName="_SampleName_"),
dependency = c("hisat_index"),
run_session = "compute")
```
##### `STAR`
The following demonstrates how to run the `STAR` short read aligner
from `systemPipeR`. First, one has to index the reference genome for `STAR`.
```{r star_index, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(
step_name = "star_index",
dir = FALSE,
targets=NULL,
wf_file = "star/star-index.cwl",
input_file="star/star-index.yml",
dir_path="param/cwl",
dependency = "load_SPR"
)
```
The parameter settings of the aligner are defined in the `star-mapping-pe.cwl`
and `star-mapping-pe.cwl` files. The following shows how to append the alignment
step to the `sal` workflow container. Note, in this step `STAR` also generates the
BAM files as well as the corresponding read counting tables.
```{r star_mapping, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal_test) <- SYSargsList(
step_name = "star_mapping",
dir = TRUE,
targets ="preprocessing",
wf_file = "star/star-mapping-pe.cwl",
input_file = "star/star-mapping-pe.yml",
dir_path = "param/cwl",
inputvars = c(preprocessReads_1 = "_FASTQ_PATH1_", preprocessReads_2 = "_FASTQ_PATH2_",
SampleName = "_SampleName_"), rm_targets_col = c("FileName1", "FileName2"),
dependency = c("preprocessing", "star_index")
)
```
A more detailed example is given [here](https://github.com/tgirke/GEN242/blob/main/content/en/assignments/Projects/helper_code/aligners/star_test.Rmd) that also provides code for assembling the read counts
for all processed samples in a single matrix.
##### `Tophat2`
The `Bowtie2/Tophat2` suite is the predecessor of `Hisat2` [@Kim2013-vg; @Langmead2012-bs].
How to run it via CWL is shown below.
First, the reference genome has to be indexed for `Bowtie2`.
```{r bowtie_index, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "bowtie_index",
targets = NULL, dir = FALSE,
wf_file = "bowtie2/bowtie2-index.cwl",
input_file = "bowtie2/bowtie2-index.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = NULL,
dependency = "preprocessing",
run_step = "optional")
```
Next, the alignment step is constructed with the parameter files `workflow_tophat2-mapping.cwl`
and `tophat2-mapping-pe.yml`.
```{r tophat2_mapping, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "tophat2_mapping",
targets = "preprocessing", dir = TRUE,
wf_file = "tophat2/workflow_tophat2-mapping-se.cwl",
input_file = "tophat2/tophat2-mapping-se.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars=c(preprocessReads_se="_FASTQ_PATH1_", SampleName="_SampleName_"),
dependency = c("bowtie_index"),
run_session = "remote",
run_step = "optional")
```
##### `Bowtie2`
The following example runs `Bowtie2` by itself (without `Tophat2` or `Hisat2`).
```{r bowtie2_mapping, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "bowtie2_mapping",
targets = "preprocessing", dir = TRUE,
wf_file = "bowtie2/workflow_bowtie2-mapping-se.cwl",
input_file = "bowtie2/bowtie2-mapping-se.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars=c(preprocessReads_se="_FASTQ_PATH1_", SampleName="_SampleName_"),
dependency = c("bowtie_index"),
run_session = "remote",
run_step = "optional")
```
##### `BWA-MEM`
The following example runs BWA-MEM, an aligner that is widely used for VAR-Seq experiments.
First, the reference genome has to be indexed for `BWA-MEM`.
```{r bwa_index, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "bwa_index",
targets = NULL, dir = FALSE,
wf_file = "bwa/bwa-index.cwl",
input_file = "bwa/bwa-index.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = NULL,
dependency = "preprocessing",
run_step = "optional")
```
Next, the reads can be aligned with `BWA-MEM`.
```{r bwa_mapping, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "bwa_mapping",
targets = "preprocessing", dir = TRUE,
wf_file = "bwa/bwa-se.cwl",
input_file = "bwa/bwa-se.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars=c(preprocessReads_se="_FASTQ_PATH1_", SampleName="_SampleName_"),
dependency = c("bwa_index"),
run_session = "remote",
run_step = "optional")
```
##### `Rsubread`
`Rsubread` is an R package for processing short and long reads. It is well known for its
fast and accurate mapping performance of RNA-Seq reads.
First, the reference genome has to be indexed for `Rsubread`.
```{r rsubread_index, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "rsubread_index",
targets = NULL, dir = FALSE,
wf_file = "rsubread/rsubread-index.cwl",
input_file = "rsubread/rsubread-index.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = NULL,
dependency = "preprocessing",
run_step = "optional")
```
Next, the RNA-Seq reads can be aligned with `Rsubread`.
```{r rsubread_mapping, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "rsubread",
targets = "preprocessing", dir = TRUE,
wf_file = "rsubread/rsubread-mapping-se.cwl",
input_file = "rsubread/rsubread-mapping-se.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars=c(FileName1="_FASTQ_PATH1_", SampleName="_SampleName_"),
dependency = c("rsubread_index"),
run_session = "compute",
run_step = "optional")
```
##### `gsnap`
The `gmapR` package provides an interface to work with the `GSNAP` and `GMAP`
aligners from R [@Wu2010-iq].
First, the reference genome has to be indexed for `GSNAP`.
```{r gsnap_index, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "gsnap_index",
targets = NULL, dir = FALSE,
wf_file = "gsnap/gsnap-index.cwl",
input_file = "gsnap/gsnap-index.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = NULL,
dependency = "preprocessing",
run_step = "optional")
```
Next, the RNA-Seq reads are aligned with `GSNAP`.
```{r gsnap_mapping, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- SYSargsList(step_name = "gsnap",
targets = "targetsPE.txt", dir = TRUE,
wf_file = "gsnap/gsnap-mapping-pe.cwl",
input_file = "gsnap/gsnap-mapping-pe.yml",
dir_path = system.file("extdata/cwl", package = "systemPipeR"),
inputvars = c(FileName1 = "_FASTQ_PATH1_",
FileName2 = "_FASTQ_PATH2_", SampleName = "_SampleName_"),
dependency = c("gsnap_index"),
run_session = "remote",
run_step = "optional")
```
#### BAM file viewing in IGV
The genome browser IGV supports reading of indexed/sorted BAM files via web
URLs. This way it can be avoided to create unnecessary copies of these large
files. To enable this approach, an HTML directory with https access needs to be
available in the user account (_e.g._ `home/.html`) of a system. If this
is not the case then the BAM files need to be moved or copied to the system
where IGV runs. In the following, `htmldir` defines the path to the HTML
directory with https access where the symbolic links to the BAM files will be
stored. The corresponding URLs will be written to a text file specified under
the `urlfile` argument. To make the following code work, users need to change
the directory name (here `somedir/`) and the username (here ``) to the
corresponding names on their system.
```{r bam_IGV, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise(
code = {
bampaths <- getColumn(sal, step = "hisat2_mapping", "outfiles",
column = "samtools_sort_bam")
symLink2bam(
sysargs = bampaths, htmldir = c("~/.html/", "somedir/"),
urlbase = "https://cluster.hpcc.ucr.edu//",
urlfile = "./results/IGVurl.txt")
},
step_name = "bam_IGV",
dependency = "hisat_mapping",
run_step = "optional"
)
```
#### Read counting for mRNA profiling experiments
Reads overlapping with annotation ranges of interest are counted for each
sample using the `summarizeOverlaps` function [@Lawrence2013-kt].
First, the gene annotation ranges from a GFF file are stored in a `TxDb` container for
efficient work with genomic features.
```{r create_txdb, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise(code = {
library(txdbmaker)
txdb <- makeTxDbFromGFF(file="data/tair10.gff", format="gff",
dataSource="TAIR", organism="Arabidopsis thaliana")
saveDb(txdb, file="./data/tair10.sqlite")
},
step_name = "create_txdb",
dependency = "hisat_mapping")
```
Next, The read counting is preformed for exonic gene regions in a
non-strand-specific manner while ignoring overlaps among different genes.
```{r read_counting, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise({
library(BiocParallel)
txdb <- loadDb("./data/tair10.sqlite")
eByg <- exonsBy(txdb, by="gene")
outpaths <- getColumn(sal, step = "hisat_mapping", 'outfiles', column = 2)
bfl <- BamFileList(outpaths, yieldSize=50000, index=character())
multicoreParam <- MulticoreParam(workers=4); register(multicoreParam); registered()
counteByg <- bplapply(bfl, function(x) summarizeOverlaps(eByg, x, mode="Union",
ignore.strand=TRUE,
inter.feature=TRUE,
singleEnd=TRUE))
# Note: for strand-specific RNA-Seq set 'ignore.strand=FALSE' and for PE data set 'singleEnd=FALSE'
countDFeByg <- sapply(seq(along=counteByg),
function(x) assays(counteByg[[x]])$counts)
rownames(countDFeByg) <- names(rowRanges(counteByg[[1]]))
colnames(countDFeByg) <- names(bfl)
rpkmDFeByg <- apply(countDFeByg, 2, function(x) returnRPKM(counts=x, ranges=eByg))
write.table(countDFeByg, "results/countDFeByg.xls",
col.names=NA, quote=FALSE, sep="\t")
write.table(rpkmDFeByg, "results/rpkmDFeByg.xls",
col.names=NA, quote=FALSE, sep="\t")
},
step_name = "read_counting",
dependency = "create_txdb")
```
Please note, in addition to read counts this step generates RPKM normalized
expression values. For most statistical differential expression or abundance
analysis methods, such as `edgeR` or `DESeq2`, the raw count values should
be used as input. The usage of RPKM values should be restricted to specialty
applications required by some users, _e.g._ manually comparing the expression
levels of different genes or features.
##### Read and alignment stats
The following provides an overview of the number of reads in each sample and
how many of them aligned to the reference.
```{r align_stats, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise({
read_statsDF <- alignStats(args)
write.table(read_statsDF, "results/alignStats.xls",
row.names = FALSE, quote = FALSE, sep = "\t")
},
step_name = "align_stats",
dependency = "hisat_mapping")
```
The following shows the first four lines of the sample alignment stats file
provided by the `systemPipeR` package. For simplicity the number of PE reads
is multiplied here by 2 to approximate proper alignment frequencies where each
read in a pair is counted.
```{r align_stats2, eval=TRUE}
read.table(system.file("extdata", "alignStats.xls", package = "systemPipeR"), header = TRUE)[1:4,]
```
#### Read counting for miRNA profiling experiments
Example of downloading a GFF file for miRNA ranges from an organism of interest (here _A. thaliana_), and then
use them for read counting, here RNA-Seq reads from the above steps.
```{r read_counting_mirna, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise({
system("wget https://www.mirbase.org/download/ath.gff3 -P ./data/")
gff <- rtracklayer::import.gff("./data/ath.gff3")
gff <- split(gff, elementMetadata(gff)$ID)
bams <- getColumn(sal, step = "bowtie2_mapping", 'outfiles', column = 2)
bfl <- BamFileList(bams, yieldSize=50000, index=character())
countDFmiR <- summarizeOverlaps(gff, bfl, mode="Union",
ignore.strand = FALSE, inter.feature = FALSE)
countDFmiR <- assays(countDFmiR)$counts
# Note: inter.feature=FALSE important since pre and mature miRNA ranges overlap
rpkmDFmiR <- apply(countDFmiR, 2, function(x) returnRPKM(counts = x, ranges = gff))
write.table(assays(countDFmiR)$counts, "results/countDFmiR.xls",
col.names=NA, quote=FALSE, sep="\t")
write.table(rpkmDFmiR, "results/rpkmDFmiR.xls", col.names=NA, quote=FALSE, sep="\t")
},
step_name = "read_counting_mirna",
dependency = "bowtie2_mapping")
```
#### Correlation analysis of samples
The following computes the sample-wise Spearman correlation coefficients from
the `rlog` (regularized-logarithm) transformed expression values generated
with the `DESeq2` package. After transformation to a distance matrix,
hierarchical clustering is performed with the `hclust` function and the
result is plotted as a dendrogram.
```{r sample_tree_rlog, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise({
library(DESeq2, warn.conflicts=FALSE, quietly=TRUE)
library(ape, warn.conflicts=FALSE)
countDFpath <- system.file("extdata", "countDFeByg.xls", package="systemPipeR")
countDF <- as.matrix(read.table(countDFpath))
colData <- data.frame(row.names = targetsWF(sal)[[2]]$SampleName,
condition=targetsWF(sal)[[2]]$Factor)
dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = countDF, colData = colData,
design = ~ condition)
d <- cor(assay(rlog(dds)), method = "spearman")
hc <- hclust(dist(1-d))
plot.phylo(as.phylo(hc), type = "p", edge.col = 4, edge.width = 3,
show.node.label = TRUE, no.margin = TRUE)
},
step_name = "sample_tree_rlog",
dependency = "read_counting")
```
Correlation dendrogram of samples for _`rlog`_ values.
#### DEG analysis with `edgeR`
The following _`run_edgeR`_ function is a convenience wrapper for
identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in batch mode with
_`edgeR`_'s GML method [@Robinson2010-uk] for any number of
pairwise sample comparisons specified under the _`cmp`_ argument. Users
are strongly encouraged to consult the
[_`edgeR`_](\href{http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/vignettes/edgeR/inst/doc/edgeRUsersGuide.pdf) vignette
for more detailed information on this topic and how to properly run _`edgeR`_
on data sets with more complex experimental designs.
```{r edger, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise({
targetspath <- system.file("extdata", "targets.txt", package = "systemPipeR")
targets <- read.delim(targetspath, comment = "#")
cmp <- readComp(file = targetspath, format = "matrix", delim = "-")
countDFeBygpath <- system.file("extdata", "countDFeByg.xls", package = "systemPipeR")
countDFeByg <- read.delim(countDFeBygpath, row.names = 1)
edgeDF <- run_edgeR(countDF = countDFeByg, targets = targets, cmp = cmp[[1]],
independent = FALSE, mdsplot = "")
DEG_list <- filterDEGs(degDF = edgeDF, filter = c(Fold = 2, FDR = 10))
},
step_name = "edger",
dependency = "read_counting")
```
Filter and plot DEG results for up and down-regulated genes. Because of the
small size of the toy data set used by this vignette, the _FDR_ cutoff value has been
set to a relatively high threshold (here 10%). More commonly used _FDR_ cutoffs
are 1% or 5%. The definition of '_up_' and '_down_' is given in the
corresponding help file. To open it, type `?filterDEGs` in the R console.
Up and down regulated DEGs identified by `edgeR`.
#### DEG analysis with `DESeq2`
The following `run_DESeq2` function is a convenience wrapper for
identifying DEGs in batch mode with `DESeq2` [@Love2014-sh] for any number of
pairwise sample comparisons specified under the `cmp` argument. Users
are strongly encouraged to consult the
[_`DESeq2`_](http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.pdf) vignette
for more detailed information on this topic and how to properly run `DESeq2`
on data sets with more complex experimental designs.
```{r deseq2, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise({
degseqDF <- run_DESeq2(countDF=countDFeByg, targets=targets, cmp=cmp[[1]],
independent=FALSE)
DEG_list2 <- filterDEGs(degDF=degseqDF, filter=c(Fold=2, FDR=10))
},
step_name = "deseq2",
dependency = "read_counting")
```
#### Venn Diagrams
The function `overLapper` can compute Venn intersects for large numbers of
sample sets (up to 20 or more) and `vennPlot` can plot 2-5 way Venn diagrams.
A useful feature is the possibility to combine the counts from several Venn
comparisons with the same number of sample sets in a single Venn diagram (here
for 4 up and down DEG sets).
```{r vennplot, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise({
vennsetup <- overLapper(DEG_list$Up[6:9], type="vennsets")
vennsetdown <- overLapper(DEG_list$Down[6:9], type="vennsets")
vennPlot(list(vennsetup, vennsetdown), mymain="", mysub="",
colmode=2, ccol=c("blue", "red"))
},
step_name = "vennplot",
dependency = "edger")
```
Venn Diagram for 4 Up and Down DEG Sets.
#### GO term enrichment analysis of DEGs
##### Obtain gene-to-GO mappings
The following shows how to obtain gene-to-GO mappings from `biomaRt` (here
for _A. thaliana_) and how to organize them for the downstream GO term
enrichment analysis. Alternatively, the gene-to-GO mappings can be obtained for
many organisms from Bioconductor's `*.db` genome annotation packages or GO
annotation files provided by various genome databases. For each annotation,
this relatively slow preprocessing step needs to be performed only once.
Subsequently, the preprocessed data can be loaded with the `load` function as
shown in the next step.
```{r get_go_biomart, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise({
library("biomaRt")
listMarts() # To choose BioMart database
listMarts(host="plants.ensembl.org")
m <- useMart("plants_mart", host="https://plants.ensembl.org")
listDatasets(m)
m <- useMart("plants_mart", dataset="athaliana_eg_gene", host="https://plants.ensembl.org")
listAttributes(m) # Choose data types you want to download
go <- getBM(attributes=c("go_id", "tair_locus", "namespace_1003"), mart=m)
go <- go[go[,3]!="",]; go[,3] <- as.character(go[,3])
go[go[,3]=="molecular_function", 3] <- "F"
go[go[,3]=="biological_process", 3] <- "P"
go[go[,3]=="cellular_component", 3] <- "C"
go[1:4,]
dir.create("./data/GO")
write.table(go, "data/GO/GOannotationsBiomart_mod.txt",
quote=FALSE, row.names=FALSE, col.names=FALSE, sep="\t")
catdb <- makeCATdb(myfile="data/GO/GOannotationsBiomart_mod.txt",
lib=NULL, org="", colno=c(1,2,3), idconv=NULL)
save(catdb, file="data/GO/catdb.RData")
},
step_name = "get_go_biomart",
dependency = "edger")
```
##### Batch GO term enrichment analysis
Apply the enrichment analysis to the DEG sets obtained in the above
differential expression analysis. Note, in the following example the _FDR_
filter is set here to an unreasonably high value, simply because of the small
size of the toy data set used in this vignette. Batch enrichment analysis of
many gene sets is performed with the `GOCluster_Report` function. When
`method="all"`, it returns all GO terms passing the p-value cutoff specified
under the `cutoff` arguments. When `method="slim"`, it returns only the GO
terms specified under the `myslimv` argument. The given example shows how one
can obtain such a GO slim vector from BioMart for a specific organism.
```{r go_enrichment, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise({
load("data/GO/catdb.RData")
DEG_list <- filterDEGs(degDF=edgeDF, filter=c(Fold=2, FDR=50), plot=FALSE)
up_down <- DEG_list$UporDown; names(up_down) <- paste(names(up_down), "_up_down", sep="")
up <- DEG_list$Up; names(up) <- paste(names(up), "_up", sep="")
down <- DEG_list$Down; names(down) <- paste(names(down), "_down", sep="")
DEGlist <- c(up_down, up, down)
DEGlist <- DEGlist[sapply(DEGlist, length) > 0]
BatchResult <- GOCluster_Report(catdb=catdb, setlist=DEGlist, method="all",
id_type="gene", CLSZ=2, cutoff=0.9,
gocats=c("MF", "BP", "CC"), recordSpecGO=NULL)
library("biomaRt")
m <- useMart("plants_mart", dataset="athaliana_eg_gene", host="https://plants.ensembl.org")
goslimvec <- as.character(getBM(attributes=c("goslim_goa_accession"), mart=m)[,1])
BatchResultslim <- GOCluster_Report(catdb=catdb, setlist=DEGlist, method="slim",
id_type="gene", myslimv=goslimvec, CLSZ=10,
cutoff=0.01, gocats=c("MF", "BP", "CC"),
recordSpecGO=NULL)
gos <- BatchResultslim[grep("M6-V6_up_down", BatchResultslim$CLID), ]
gos <- BatchResultslim
pdf("GOslimbarplotMF.pdf", height=8, width=10); goBarplot(gos, gocat="MF"); dev.off()
goBarplot(gos, gocat="BP")
goBarplot(gos, gocat="CC")
},
step_name = "go_enrichment",
dependency = "get_go_biomart")
```
##### Plot batch GO term results
The `data.frame` generated by `GOCluster_Report` can be plotted with the
`goBarplot` function. Because of the variable size of the sample sets, it may
not always be desirable to show the results from different DEG sets in the same
bar plot.
GO Slim Barplot for MF Ontology.
#### Clustering and heat maps
The following example performs hierarchical clustering on the `rlog`
transformed expression matrix subsetted by the DEGs identified in the above
differential expression analysis. It uses a Pearson correlation-based distance
measure and complete linkage for cluster joining.
```{r hierarchical_clustering, message=FALSE, eval=FALSE, spr=TRUE}
appendStep(sal) <- LineWise({
library(pheatmap)
geneids <- unique(as.character(unlist(DEG_list[[1]])))
y <- assay(rlog(dds))[geneids, ]
pdf("heatmap1.pdf")
pheatmap(y, scale="row", clustering_distance_rows="correlation",
clustering_distance_cols="correlation")
dev.off()
},
step_name = "hierarchical_clustering",
dependency = c("sample_tree_rlog", "edger"))
```
Heat map with hierarchical clustering dendrograms of DEGs.
## Version information
**Note:** the most recent version of this tutorial can be found here.
```{r sessionInfo}
sessionInfo()
```
## Funding
This project is funded by awards from the National Science Foundation ([ABI-1661152](https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1661152)],
and the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health ([U19AG023122](https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/9632486)).
## References