--- name: research-digest description: "Generate structured research briefs from RSS feeds and web sources on any topic. Synthesizes multiple sources into actionable analysis with key findings, data points, expert perspectives, and content angles." license: MIT origin: custom author: Rebecca Rae Barton author_url: https://github.com/thatrebeccarae metadata: version: 1.0.0 category: strategy domain: research updated: 2026-03-13 tested: 2026-03-17 tested_with: "Claude Code v2.1" --- # Research Digest Generate structured research briefs from RSS feeds, web sources, and industry publications. ## Install ```bash git clone https://github.com/thatrebeccarae/claude-marketing.git && cp -r claude-marketing/skills/research-digest ~/.claude/skills/ ``` ## Core Capabilities - Pull from RSS feeds, web search, and curated sources - Assess source credibility and recency - Cross-reference findings across multiple sources - Extract trends, data points, and expert opinions - Identify counter-arguments and nuance - Produce actionable research briefs ## Workflow ### 1. Source Collection Gather raw material from: - **RSS feeds** — industry blogs, news sites, newsletters (via any RSS reader/API) - **Web search** — targeted queries for recent coverage - **Industry reports** — analyst reports, whitepapers, earnings calls - **Social/community** — Reddit, Twitter/X, LinkedIn discussions ### 2. Source Assessment Evaluate each source on: | Criterion | Weight | Scale | |-----------|--------|-------| | Credibility | 30% | Original research > analysis > aggregation > opinion | | Recency | 25% | Last 7 days > 30 days > 90 days > older | | Relevance | 25% | Directly on topic > adjacent > tangential | | Uniqueness | 20% | Novel data > unique angle > common knowledge | ### 3. Synthesis - Identify convergent themes (3+ sources saying the same thing) - Flag divergent views (contradictions between sources) - Extract specific data points with citations - Note the "so what" — why this matters for the target audience ### 4. Brief Generation Produce a structured markdown brief. ## Brief Structure ```markdown # Research Brief: [Topic] **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD **Depth:** Quick scan / Standard / Deep dive **Sources reviewed:** [count] ## Executive Summary - [Key finding 1] - [Key finding 2] - [Key finding 3] ## Key Findings ### Finding 1: [Headline] [2-3 paragraph analysis with source citations] ### Finding 2: [Headline] [2-3 paragraph analysis with source citations] ## Data Points | Metric | Value | Source | Date | |--------|-------|--------|------| ## Expert Perspectives - "[Quote]" — [Name, Title, Source] ## Counter-Arguments & Nuance - [Opposing view with source] ## Content Angles - [Angle 1: how to use this research in content] - [Angle 2] ## Sources 1. [Source name] — [URL] — [Credibility: High/Medium/Low] ``` ## Options | Option | Values | Default | |--------|--------|---------| | Time range | 24h, 7d, 30d, 90d | 7d | | Depth | quick, standard, deep | standard | | Focus | topic keyword or category | required | | Output | brief, report, raw-notes | brief | ## Quality Standards 1. **Minimum 3 independent sources** per key finding 2. **Recency bias** toward last 30 days unless historical context is needed 3. **Always include counter-arguments** — at least one contrarian or skeptical view 4. **Separate facts from opinions** — clearly label which is which 5. **Link to original sources** — never cite without attribution 6. **No speculation** — if data is missing, say so rather than guessing For source credibility framework and synthesis methodology, see [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md).