--- name: npm-package-comparator description: Compare two or more npm packages side by side using live data — downloads, bundle size, GitHub stars, last update, known vulnerabilities, and community sentiment. Use this skill when a user asks "zustand vs jotai vs redux", "compare react-query and swr", "which state management library should I use", "what's the difference between X and Y", "is X better than Y for my use case", "help me choose between these packages", or any request to compare npm packages or decide between JavaScript libraries. --- # npm Package Comparator Compare any set of npm packages side by side using live data from npm, GitHub, Bundlephobia, and Snyk — then give a clear recommendation based on what you actually need. ## Pre-flight Check (REQUIRED) Before making any TinyFish call, always run BOTH checks: **1. CLI installed?** ```bash which tinyfish && tinyfish --version || echo "TINYFISH_CLI_NOT_INSTALLED" ``` If not installed, stop and tell the user: > Install the TinyFish CLI: `npm install -g @tiny-fish/cli` **2. Authenticated?** ```bash tinyfish auth status ``` If not authenticated, stop and tell the user: > You need a TinyFish API key. Get one at: https://agent.tinyfish.ai/api-keys > > Then authenticate: > ``` > tinyfish auth login > ``` Do NOT proceed until both checks pass. --- ## Step 1 — Gather inputs You need: - **Package names** — 2 to 4 packages to compare (e.g. `zustand`, `jotai`, `redux`) - **Use case** (optional but improves recommendation) — e.g. "small React app", "large enterprise codebase", "need SSR support" If the user hasn't specified a use case, ask: > "What are you building with it? (e.g. small side project, large team codebase, performance-critical app)" If they don't know, proceed without it and give a general recommendation. --- ## Step 2 — Parallel data fetch For each package, fire agents across npm, GitHub, Bundlephobia, and Snyk simultaneously. Run ALL agents for ALL packages in parallel — one agent per package per source. ```bash # ── For each PACKAGE, run all 4 agents in parallel ─────────── # npm stats tinyfish agent run \ --url "https://www.npmjs.com/package/{PACKAGE}" \ "You are on the npm page for the package {PACKAGE}. Extract: - current version - weekly downloads (exact number shown) - total downloads if shown - last publish date - license - number of dependencies - TypeScript support (yes/no — check if types are listed) - maintainers count - repository URL STRICT RULES: - Do NOT click any links - Read only what is visible on this page - If a field is not shown, return null Return JSON: {package, version, weekly_downloads, last_published, license, dependency_count, typescript_support, maintainer_count, repo_url}" \ --sync > /tmp/npm_{PACKAGE_SAFE}.json & # GitHub stats tinyfish agent run \ --url "https://github.com/{OWNER}/{REPO}" \ "You are on the GitHub repository page for {PACKAGE}. Extract: - star count - fork count - open issues count - last commit date - number of contributors (from sidebar or Insights) - latest release tag and date - whether the repo is actively maintained (check: last commit within 6 months) STRICT RULES: - Do NOT click any tabs or links - Read only what is visible on the main repo page Return JSON: {package, stars, forks, open_issues, last_commit, contributors, latest_release, latest_release_date, is_active}" \ --sync > /tmp/gh_{PACKAGE_SAFE}.json & # Bundle size tinyfish agent run \ --url "https://bundlephobia.com/package/{PACKAGE}" \ "You are on the Bundlephobia page for {PACKAGE}. Extract: - minified size (in KB) - minified + gzipped size (in KB) - download time on slow 3G (if shown) - tree-shakeable (yes/no) - side-effect free (yes/no) STRICT RULES: - Do NOT click any links - Read only what is visible on this page - If the page hasn't loaded sizes yet, note it Return JSON: {package, minified_kb, gzipped_kb, tree_shakeable, side_effect_free}" \ --sync > /tmp/bp_{PACKAGE_SAFE}.json & # Known vulnerabilities tinyfish agent run \ --url "https://security.snyk.io/package/npm/{PACKAGE}" \ "You are on the Snyk security page for the npm package {PACKAGE}. Extract: - total number of known vulnerabilities - number by severity: critical, high, medium, low - most recent vulnerability title and date (if shown) STRICT RULES: - Do NOT click any vulnerability links - Read only the summary visible on this page - If the page shows 'no vulnerabilities', return {total: 0} Return JSON: {package, total_vulns, critical, high, medium, low, latest_vuln_title, latest_vuln_date}" \ --sync > /tmp/snyk_{PACKAGE_SAFE}.json & # Repeat the above 4 agents for each additional package # All backgrounded with & — fire everything at once then: wait # Collect all results for p in {PACKAGE_LIST}; do echo "=== $p ===" cat /tmp/npm_${p}.json cat /tmp/gh_${p}.json cat /tmp/bp_${p}.json cat /tmp/snyk_${p}.json done ``` **Before running**, replace: - `{PACKAGE}` — exact npm package name e.g. `zustand` - `{PACKAGE_SAFE}` — safe filename version e.g. `zustand` - `{OWNER}/{REPO}` — GitHub repo e.g. `pmndrs/zustand` - `{PACKAGE_LIST}` — space-separated list of all packages Use your knowledge to find the correct GitHub repo for well-known packages. For unknown packages, check the `repository` field on their npm page first. --- ## Step 3 — Synthesize comparison Combine all data into a side-by-side comparison. ``` ## Package Comparison: {PACKAGE_1} vs {PACKAGE_2} vs ... *Data fetched live — {date}* --- ### 📊 At a Glance | | {pkg1} | {pkg2} | {pkg3} | |---|---|---|---| | **Version** | {v} | {v} | {v} | | **Weekly Downloads** | {n} | {n} | {n} | | **GitHub Stars** | {n} | {n} | {n} | | **Bundle (gzipped)** | {n}kb | {n}kb | {n}kb | | **Tree-shakeable** | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | **TypeScript** | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | ✅/❌ | | **Last Published** | {date} | {date} | {date} | | **Known Vulns** | {n} | {n} | {n} | | **License** | {l} | {l} | {l} | --- ### 📈 Popularity & Health {2-3 sentences comparing download trends, GitHub activity, and community size} --- ### 📦 Bundle Size {Comparison of bundle impact — important for frontend packages} {Flag if any package is significantly larger than alternatives} --- ### 🔒 Security {Note any packages with known vulnerabilities} {If all clean: "No known vulnerabilities found for any of these packages."} --- ### ⚙️ Maintenance {Compare last commit dates, contributor counts, release cadence} {Flag any package that looks abandoned (no commits in 12+ months)} --- ### 🎯 Recommendation {Use case}: {user's stated use case or "general use"} **Best pick: {PACKAGE}** {2-3 sentences explaining why this package wins for this use case, and what trade-offs you're making} **When to pick {PACKAGE_2} instead:** {1-2 sentences on when the runner-up is the better choice} **Avoid {PACKAGE_3} if:** {Any specific reasons to avoid a package in certain contexts} ``` --- ## Edge Cases - **Package not on npm** — check if it's a GitHub-only package and scrape the repo directly - **Bundlephobia doesn't have it** — note "bundle size unavailable" and skip that row - **GitHub repo not found from npm page** — search `https://github.com/search?q={PACKAGE}&type=repositories` to find the canonical repo - **One of the packages is deprecated** — flag it clearly at the top of the comparison: "⚠️ {package} is deprecated — the maintainers recommend {replacement}" - **Comparing more than 4 packages** — ask the user to narrow to their top 3, as more becomes hard to compare meaningfully - **Packages serve slightly different purposes** — note the distinction upfront before comparing (e.g. "react-query handles server state, zustand handles client state — you may actually need both")