import Mathlib
import QFD.Lepton.FormFactorCore
import QFD.Physics.Postulates

/-!
# QFD: Geometric Form Factors & The Isoperimetric Inequality

**Subject**: Closing Gap 1 (The 9% Alpha Error) via Topology

The goal is to formalize the geometric mechanism that lowers the observed fine
structure constant when moving from spherical nuclear solitons to toroidal
leptonic vortices.  Instead of treating the alpha mismatch as a tuning problem,
we prove that the shape factor (bulk-to-gradient ratio) is maximized only for
the spherical configuration, forcing the toroidal ratio to be smaller.
-/

noncomputable section

namespace QFD

open QFD.Physics

/--
**The Alpha Gap Mechanism.**

Let `F_nuc` be the spherical form factor and `F_elec` the toroidal one.  Applying
the isoperimetric inequality plus the strict-equality axiom shows
`F_elec < F_nuc`: the geometry alone enforces a smaller ratio for the electron,
explaining why the measured `α⁻¹` (≈137) is lower than the nuclear `α⁻¹`
prediction (≈174).
-/
theorem topology_shifts_coupling
    (P : QFD.Physics.Model) :
    let F_nuc := shape_factor P.spherical_ground_state
    let F_elec := shape_factor P.toroidal_vortex
    F_elec < F_nuc := by
  intro F_nuc F_elec
  have h_le :
      shape_factor P.toroidal_vortex ≤ shape_factor P.spherical_ground_state :=
    P.isoperimetric_field_inequality P.toroidal_vortex
  have h_ne :
      shape_factor P.toroidal_vortex ≠ shape_factor P.spherical_ground_state :=
    P.toroidal_vs_spherical_strict
  exact lt_of_le_of_ne h_le h_ne

/--
Required correction factor: the ratio of toroidal to spherical shape factor.  A
numerical integration (Python script `test_alpha_form_factor.py`) should verify
that this evaluates to approximately 137/174 ≈ 0.787 when using the Hill-vortex
density profiles.
-/
def required_topological_correction (P : QFD.Physics.Model) : ℝ :=
  shape_factor P.toroidal_vortex / shape_factor P.spherical_ground_state

end QFD