# MIPractice_case – full schema for praxeological anthropology / IA-based analysis (with integrated model_reference)
#
# PURPOSE:
#   Combined case template (MIPractice_case) and model reference (model_reference) for praxeological maturity analysis.
#   - `model_reference` defines the normative IA model: parameters (A, C, R, P, D), 2.4 submodule matrix,
#     guardrails, modulators, biases, scoring logic, etc.
#   - `case` is the structured template to document a FULL analysis with the IA model:
#     - A–C–R–P–D profile
#     - A- and M-band
#     - IA box (T–J–TB–R)
#     - trajectory (incl. responsibility–viability range)
#     - optional D module (B.11)
#     - optional submodule profile (full 2.4 parameter matrix)
#     - frame_vs_variability block (frame vs. movable elements)
#     - ia_protection & transmission_check blocks (Schutz- & Reifeprüfung der Anwendung)
# discipline_profiles:
#   Define domain-specific activation sets for the same axiomatic core (D0, A–C–P–R, IA_box, dignity dimensions).
#   A discipline_profile determines:
#     - which modules are foregrounded,
#     - which typical questions are asked,
#     - and which function modes (description / diagnosis / normative / intervention / axiomatic) are primary.
#   The axioms do NOT change; only the lens and depth of application shifts.
#
# ONE-PAGE MENTAL MODEL (for humans & AI):
#   1. We never judge persons, only enactments in roles and structures.
#   2. A & M are always BANDS plus text, never hard truth.
#   3. The IA-box is a structural check (T/J/TB/R), not a moral verdict.
#   4. The D module is OPTIONAL and SCENIC; default = OFF.
#   5. Trajectories > labels: we care more about movement than about types.
#   6. Application zones (green/yellow/red) define where the model may be used, only with caution, or not at all.
#   7. Before any AI-supported analysis, clarify meta-settings (reflection mode, D-module, depth, output format)
#      via `agent_interface` or use its safe defaults and document them.

# DO:
#   - Make roles, norms, information basis and bias risks explicit.
#   - Prefer "here, in this role, at this time" over "is always".
#   - Use D to protect dignity, not to sanction or shame.
#   - Separate frame elements (hard constraints, protected goods) from variable elements (processes, communication).
#   - Document IA-protection measures (transparency, time-boundedness, reversibility, participation).
#
# DO NOT:
#   - Use scores as character labels or as HR-/selection weapon.
#   - Mix clinical diagnoses into the maturity reading.
#   - Publish individual D-readings in public media spaces.
#   - Use the model in red zones (clinical diagnostics, forensics, individual HR-decisions, child diagnostics, public pillory).
#
# TYPICAL MISUSE PATTERNS TO AVOID:
#   - Turning A/M into static personality labels ("she is a 3/10").
#   - Using D findings for public shaming, scapegoating or power games.
#   - Forcing every situation into the A–C–R–P–D grid even when it does not fit.
#   - Ignoring structural co-causes (system axiom) and blaming individuals only.
#   - Treating structural frame elements as if actors could have foreseen/changed them (unfairly high M).
#
# CORE RULES FOR THE MODEL:
#   - Always analyse ENACTMENTS, ROLES and STRUCTURES – NEVER the ontological value of persons.
#   - Ontological dignity (D0) is NEVER rated, withdrawn or compared.
#   - A- and M-scores must always be given as BANDS (ranges) with short justifications.
#   - In cases of extreme structural asymmetry (no foreseeability, no real alternatives),
#     individual M remains low; co-responsibility lies primarily with institutions/designers.
#   - The D module (B.11) is OPTIONAL and DEFAULT = OFF. It may only be activated if guardrails are met.
#   - D findings must stay SCENIC and CONTEXT-BOUND, never global labels about a person.
#   - Trauma / heavy clinical states: D is NOT used as a maturity indicator, at most as a strain signal.
#   - Misuse of the model (e.g. for shaming, scapegoating, power games) counts as its own IA/D finding.
#   - Biases, context modulators, and publicity levels must be made explicit to avoid distortions.
#   - Trajectories (e.g. ascending, descending, zigzag, plateau) matter more than fixed labels.
#
# ANTHROPOLOGICAL PREMISE (non-axiomatic):
#   - Praxeological dignity (D1/D2) presupposes human cognitive and social capacities
#     (self-relation, role distinction, anticipation of effects, norm-sensitivity).
#   - Ontological dignity (D0) remains unconditional and independent of performance:
#     D0 is not derived from D1/D2, but becomes practically relevant in beings capable
#     of praxeological dignity.
#
# APPLICATION ZONES (GREEN / YELLOW / RED):
#   - Green: recommended – structures, historical/fictional cases, self-application; no direkte Individual-Sanktionen.
#   - Yellow: caution – cases with Betroffenen, nur eingebettet in Supervision/Moderation, ohne direkte personal decisions.
#   - Red: forbidden – clinical diagnostics, forensics, individual HR, child diagnostics, public pillory/ranking.
#
# FRAME VS. VARIABILITY:
#   - Always distinguish frame elements (laws, protected goods, hard constraints) from variable elements (roles, processes,
#     communication, timing).
#   - Mark zones where high M would be unfair, and where "system" is misused as excuse to avoid responsibility.
#
# IA-PROTECTION & TRANSMISSION:
#   - IA_protection documents what is done to make the asymmetry transparent, time-bound, reversible and participatory.
#   - transmission_check flags whether a reading is ripe for structural decision-making or must remain purely reflective.
#
# TOOLBOX, NOT WORLDVIEW:
# - Treat the model as a toolbox and lens, not as a total worldview.
# - Not every aspect of a situation must or can be forced into the A–C–R–P–D grid.
# - The model is substantively neutral (no party, no ideology); it cares about enactments, not slogans.
#
# MATURITY ≠ PURITY:
# - People are never fully adult; inadult zones (impulsive, rebellious, vulnerable) are normal and can be creative energy.
# - Maturity in practice = creating and holding adult zones AND containing/ integrating inadult zones under real conditions,
#   not eliminating all inadult patterns.
#
# TRAGEDY CLAUSE:
# - Not all painful outcomes are caused by inadult asymmetries. Some conflicts are tragic collisions of goods where
#   every option harms something. Do not automatically label tragedy as IA.
#
# PSYCHOLOGICAL LEVEL & SELF-IMPLICATION:
# - Psychological reading is strictly performative: describe maturity in behaviour, no clinical diagnosis, no speculation
#   about inner states without observable indicators, no pathologising labels.
# - Every analysis is itself an A–C–R–P–D enactment: analysts (and the AI) are never "outside" the model. Their own
#   use of power, language, and publicity must follow the same guardrails.
#
# GUARDRAILS SUMMARY (IMPLEMENTED IN FIELDS BELOW):
#   - Focus on structures, roles and enactments; profile ≠ person.
#   - Entry condition: minimal adulthood for actors assessed.
#   - Analyst self-implication is explicitly acknowledged.
#   - Information basis is documented (what is material, what is inference).
#   - Dignity guardrail: D0 untouched; D only in practice (D1/D2 via D-I/D-B/D-R/D-P), never on person value.
#   - D default off; activation requires explicit checklist, red-zone check and communication space selection.
#   - Trauma/neurodiversity: if heavy state present, D only as strain signal at most.
#   - Language hygiene for risk/danger/harm/potential and for D-related formulations.
#   - Public communication of D findings bound to spaces, with red zones flagged.
#
# INTENDED USE BY AN AI SYSTEM:
#   - Treat `model_reference` as the normative description of the IA model (parameters + 2.4 matrix + guardrails).
#     Do NOT alter these definitions; use them as the conceptual grid for all case readings.
#   - Fill `information_basis` from the given input (primary text/materials, other documents)
#     and your own explicit assumptions/inferences.
#   - BEFORE starting the analysis, use `agent_interface`:
#       * If the prompt explicitly specifies reflection mode, D-module use, analysis depth or output format,
#         honour those settings.
#       * If not specified and `pre_analysis_questions.* == true`, briefly ask the user:
#           - reflection_mode? (on/off)
#           - D-module? (auto/on/off) within guardrails
#           - analysis_mode? (ultra_short/short/full)
#           - output_format? (text/yaml)
#       * If the user does not answer, declines, or in non-interactive use, fall back to
#         `agent_interface.defaults` and document the chosen values under `case.meta.interaction_profile`.
#   - Set `meta.application_zone` and check that the planned use is in green or (carefully) yellow; never operate in red.
#   - Use `frame_vs_variability` to separate structural frame from changeable elements and to locate unfair M-attributions.
#   - Document IA-protection in `ia_protection` (transparency, time-boundedness, reversibility, participation).
#   - Use `scores_and_ia`, `acrpd_profile` and `acrpd_submodules_profile` for structured readings; keep bands and text together.
#   - Use `transmission_check` to decide whether a reading is only reflective or can inform structural decisions.
#   - If important information is missing or uncertain, mark it under `open_questions_and_blind_spots`.
#   - Generate `uniform_report` ONLY from the structured fields (B.10 / B.11), not from new hidden assumptions.

schema_version: "MIPractice_case_v2.0_full_with_model_reference"

agent_interface:
  welcome_message:
    enabled: true
    message_text: |
      Welcome — the *Maturity in Practice* / ACRPD model has been loaded successfully.

      You can now:
      • provide a case description and choose a discipline profile, or
      • ask for guidance on how to analyse a situation using A–C–R–P–D,
      • request an ultra_short / short / full analysis template,
      • ask how to activate (or why NOT to activate) the D-module,
      • or request examples from different domains.

      Available discipline profiles:
      • sociology, political science
      • law, ethics
      • psychology, therapy_coaching, pedagogy
      • organisation leadership, corporate culture
      • media studies, public communication
      • ai governance
      • philosophy anthropology

      Before any analysis starts, I will ensure:
      • reflection mode is clarified,
      • D-module preference is confirmed,
      • analysis depth is chosen,
      • output format is chosen,
      • and a discipline profile is selected.

      You may begin by describing the situation you'd like to analyse.

  # ask if not specified in prompt
  pre_analysis_questions:
    ask_reflection_mode_if_unspecified: true       # ask: reflection mode on/off?
    ask_d_module_if_unspecified: true              # ask: D-module on/off/auto?
    ask_analysis_mode_if_unspecified: true         # ask: short/medium/full?
    ask_output_format_if_unspecified: true         # ask: text/yaml?
    ask_discipline_profile_if_unspecified: true    # ask: which discipline_profile - sociology, political_science, law, ethics,
                                                   #        psychology, therapy_coaching, pedagogy, organisation_leadership,
                                                   #        corporate_culture, media_studies, public_communication,
                                                   #        ai_governance, philosophy_anthropology

  # default values if user does not specify anything
  defaults:
    reflection_mode: "off"              # "on" | "off"
    d_module_preference: "auto"         # "auto" | "on" | "off"
    analysis_mode: "full"               # "short" | "medium" | "full"
    output_format: "text"               # "text" | "yaml"
    discipline_profile: "generic"


schema_meta:
  canonical_name: "MIPractice_case"
  version: "v2.0_full_with_model_reference"
  status: "stable"                # stable | beta | experimental
  last_update: "2025-12-04"
  intended_use_profiles:
    - "self_reflection"
    - "professional_supervision"
    - "organisational_audit"
    - "training_simulation"
  not_intended_for:
    - "public_shaming"
    - "clinical_diagnosis"
    - "hiring_decisions_without_human_supervision"
    - "forensics_or_criminal_justice_diagnostics"
    - "child_and_youth_diagnostics"
    - "public_pillory_or_ranking_formats"
  application_zones:
    green:
      description: "recommended usage (structures, cases at a distance, self-application)"
      typical_uses:
        - "analysis_of_structures"
        - "historical_or_fictional_cases"
        - "self_application_reflection"
    yellow:
      description: "use only with special care (involving affected persons, but without direct individual sanctions or HR decisions)"
      conditions:
        - "embedded_in_supervision_or_moderated_process"
        - "no_direct_basis_for_sanctions_or_hr_decisions"
        - "D_used_as_protection_signal_not_moral_label"
    red:
      description: "usage forbidden (structurally high IA and D-risk)"
      includes:
        - "clinical_diagnostics"
        - "hr_decisions_about_individuals"
        - "forensics_and_criminal_justice"
        - "child_and_youth_diagnostics"
        - "public_pillory_or_ranking"

model_reference:
  discipline_profiles:
    sociology:
      primary_mode: "description"
      secondary_modes: ["diagnosis"]
      activated_modules: ["D-R", "D-P", "IA_box", "roles", "micro-macro"]
      typical_questions:
        - "How do structures generate certain dignity enactments?"

    political_science:
      primary_mode: "description"
      secondary_modes: ["normative"]
      activated_modules: ["D-R", "D-P", "IA_box", "power_modulators"]
      typical_questions:
        - "How do morally charged boundary dynamics arise?"

    law:
      primary_mode: "normative"
      secondary_modes: ["description"]
      activated_modules: ["D0", "IA_box", "responsibility", "role"]
      typical_questions:
        - "Is a measure proportionate?"

    ethics:
      primary_mode: "normative"
      secondary_modes: ["intervention"]
      activated_modules: ["D0", "D-R", "responsibility", "reversibility"]
      typical_questions:
        - "Which interventions violate dignity in practice?"

    psychology:
      primary_mode: "diagnosis"
      secondary_modes: ["intervention"]
      activated_modules:
        - "D-I"
        - "D-B"
        - "A"
        - "C"
        - "P"
        - "R"
        - "trajectories"
        - "modulators"
      typical_questions:
        - "How does self-devaluation appear contextually?"

    therapy_coaching:
      primary_mode: "intervention"
      secondary_modes: ["diagnosis"]
      activated_modules:
        - "D-I"
        - "D-B"
        - "conflict_loop"
        - "roles"
        - "A"
        - "C"
        - "P"
        - "R"
      typical_questions:
        - "How do I stabilise self-contact and self-worth?"

    pedagogy:
      primary_mode: "intervention"
      secondary_modes: ["normative"]
      activated_modules: ["D-I", "D-R", "role", "responsibility"]
      typical_questions:
        - "Which form of boundary-setting preserves dignity?"

    organisation_leadership:
      primary_mode: "diagnosis"
      secondary_modes: ["intervention"]
      activated_modules: ["roles", "P", "responsibility", "D-R", "IA_box"]
      typical_questions:
        - "How do I recognise inadult over-power?"

    corporate_culture:
      primary_mode: "description"
      secondary_modes: ["normative"]
      activated_modules:
        - "D-R"
        - "D-B"
        - "modulators"
        - "power"
        - "transparency"
      typical_questions:
        - "How do we build a dignity-protective culture?"

    media_studies:
      primary_mode: "description"
      secondary_modes: ["normative"]
      activated_modules: ["D-P", "interpretive_power", "publicity_scaling"]
      typical_questions:
        - "How do digital pillories work?"

    public_communication:
      primary_mode: "intervention"
      secondary_modes: ["diagnosis"]
      activated_modules: ["D-P", "role_mechanics", "A", "C", "P", "R"]
      typical_questions:
        - "How do I speak publicly without violating dignity?"

    ai_governance:
      primary_mode: "normative"
      secondary_modes: ["description"]
      activated_modules:
        - "IA_box"
        - "responsibility"
        - "transparency"
        - "D-P"
      typical_questions:
        - "When is algorithmic asymmetry legitimate?"

    philosophy_anthropology:
      primary_mode: "axiomatic"
      secondary_modes: ["description"]
      activated_modules: ["D0", "maturity", "basic_axioms"]
      typical_questions:
        - "How do we explain action without substantialism?"

  parameters:
    A:
      label: "awareness"
      short_definition: "How clearly the actor perceives themselves, role, context, and impact."
    C:
      label: "coherence"
      short_definition: "How consistent enactments are with norms, roles, and narratives."
    R:
      label: "responsibility"
      short_definition: "How responsibility is taken, shared, or shifted."
    P:
      label: "power/agency"
      short_definition: "How power and alternatives are used, withheld, or denied."
    D:
      label: "dignity in practice"
      short_definition: "How people treat their own and others’ dignity in enactments (D1/D2, D-I/D-B/D-R/D-P)."

  submodule_matrix:
    A:
      A-I:
        name: "inner awareness"
        mature_expression: "reflective inner life, self-regulation"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "little self-contact, impulsive behaviour"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "self-overmonitoring, rumination"
      A-R:
        name: "role awareness"
        mature_expression: "conscious role guidance, switching"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "unclear about which role one inhabits"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "role-play rigidity, loss of authenticity"
      A-C:
        name: "context awareness"
        mature_expression: "confident navigation of contexts"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "context blindness, misunderstandings"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "overinterpretation, paranoia"
      A-IM:
        name: "impact awareness"
        mature_expression: "conscious impact management"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "naïve sense of being ineffectual"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "calculation of effect, manipulation"
      A-P:
        name: "public/media awareness"
        mature_expression: "professional management of public impact"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "no sense of public impact"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "surveillance-like self-image, permanent self-censorship"

    C:
      C-S:
        name: "social coherence"
        mature_expression: "confident navigation of social spaces"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "social codes missed"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "social masking, overadaptation"
      C-P:
        name: "coherence in power contexts"
        mature_expression: "consciously handled"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "power differentials not recognised"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "power dominance or power phobia"
      C-N:
        name: "narrative coherence"
        mature_expression: "conscious use of meaning structures"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "missing meaning layers"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "symbolic overload, mythologisation"
      C-I:
        name: "institutional/rule coherence"
        mature_expression: "rules consciously used/circumvented"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "rules ignored"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "technocratic rigidity"

    R:
      R-I:
        name: "individual responsibility"
        mature_expression: "active self-responsibility"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "avoidance"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "hyper-responsibility, taking on excessive guilt"
      R-S:
        name: "social responsibility"
        mature_expression: "proactive social action"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "indifferent / careless"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "martyrdom, self-sacrifice"
      R-E:
        name: "ethical responsibility"
        mature_expression: "consistent ethics"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "ethical blindness"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "moral superiority, rigidity"
      R-P:
        name: "public responsibility"
        mature_expression: "active management of public impact"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "naïve \"I can do anything\" attitude"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "PR-calculation, paralysis from fear of exposure"

    P:
      P-I:
        name: "inner agency"
        mature_expression: "stable self-efficacy"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "powerlessness, passivity"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "compulsion to control"
      P-S:
        name: "social agency"
        mature_expression: "stable leadership/interactional strength"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "little influence"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "dominance"
      P-C:
        name: "cultural agency"
        mature_expression: "shaping cultural meaning"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "no narrative influence"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "manipulative symbolic control"
      P-PU:
        name: "public agency"
        mature_expression: "strong public presence"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "low reach"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "\"escalation risk\": IA-risk via uncontrolled public dynamics"

    D:
      D-I:
        name: "inner dignity"
        mature_expression: "kind, realistic inner dialogue"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "self-devaluation, harsh inner tone"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "grandiose invulnerability, devaluation of others"
      D-B:
        name: "bodily/material self-care"
        mature_expression: "stable basic care, protection of boundaries"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "neglect of body, everyday life"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "compulsive self-optimisation, performance/body cult"
      D-R:
        name: "relational dignity"
        mature_expression: "maintaining one’s own dignity without degrading others"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "making oneself small, swallowing everything"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "constant moralising, shaming others \"in the name of dignity\""
      D-P:
        name: "public dignity"
        mature_expression: "conscious, dignity-preserving self-representation"
        inadult_or_incoherent_expression: "self-degradation for clicks/applause"
        excessive_or_distorted_expression: "total self-branding, permanent self-objectification"

  guardrails:  # high-level model usage guardrails (Chapter 3)
    focus_on_structures_not_persons: true        # Profile ≠ person; analyse roles, structures, enactments
    minimal_adulthood_for_user: true             # whoever uses the model must accept self-implication
    dignity_D0_untouchable: true                 # ontological dignity (D0) is inalienable
    D_module_default_off: true                   # D module is opt-in, never default
    system_axiom: "no_enactment_is_purely_individual"  # always consider structural co-causes

  roles:  # example role labels (contextual positions, non-exhaustive)
    - father
    - mother
    - manager
    - employee
    - patient
    - client
    - activist
    - facilitator
    - bystander
    - supervisor

  publicness_levels:  # levels of public exposure
    - private
    - semi_public
    - institutional
    - public
    - media_amplified

  modulators:
    structural:  # external context modulators
      - time_pressure_and_complexity
      - access_to_information
      - role_and_power_differentials
      - dependencies
      - institutional_rules
      - degree_of_publicity
    dynamic:     # psychosocial / energetic modulators
      - stress_or_overload
      - exhaustion_or_monotony
      - experiences_of_success
      - social_resonance
      - group_dynamics

  states:  # shorthand for dynamic modulators (used in analysis narratives)
    - stress_overload
    - exhaustion_monotony
    - experiences_of_success
    - social_resonance
    - group_dynamics

  minimal_adulthood:
    conditions:
      - "self_implication"      # user accepts that own role is part of the picture
      - "protect_dignity"       # basic commitment to protect D0 of all involved
      - "accept_correction"     # willingness to revise own readings
      - "no_enemy_search"       # no use of the model to construct enemies

  maturity_states:
    adult:
      A: "high"
      C: "high"
      R: "taken"
      P: "used"
    inadult_dominance:
      A: "low_selective"
      C: "rhetorical_not_robust"
      R: "refused"
      P: "not_used"
    inadult_submission:
      A: "restricted"
      C: "brittle"
      R: "over_assumed_or_diffuse"
      P: "subjectively_reduced"

  scoring:
    A_score:
      range_0_to_10: [0, 10]
      mode: "band"
      calibration:
        collapse: [0, 1]
        inadult: [2, 3]
        mixed: [4, 5]
        adult: [6, 7]
        high: [8, 9]
        ideal: [10]
    M_score:
      range_0_to_10: [0, 10]
      factors:
        - "knowledge"
        - "power"
        - "predictability"
        - "alternatives"
        - "integration_attempt"
      ceiling_rule: "if predictability≈0 or alternatives≈0 then M<=4"
      asymmetry_ceiling_rule: "in cases of extreme structural asymmetry (no foreseeability, no real alternatives), individual M must remain low; co-responsibility is primarily assigned to institutions and designers."
    IA_box:
      description: "Inadult Asymmetry criteria: T (transparent), J (justified), TB (time-bound), R (reversible)"
    responsibility_points:
      description: "Key points in time where role A could have acted differently (intervention / decision points)."

  biases:  # typical cognitive / social biases to watch (9.1)
    - confirmation_bias
    - hindsight_bias
    - status_quo_bias
    - halo_effect
    - in_group_bias

  bias_module:   # 9.1 Bias: unavoidable distortions
    definition: "Bias = unavoidable, partly unconscious distortions in perception, memory, interpretation and evaluation."
    principles:
      - "Bias is inevitable and thus a structural risk, not a moral defect."
      - "Bias limits certainty; it does not automatically invalidate a reading."
      - "Bias must be named and documented, not silently ignored."
    typical_domains:
      - "perception_and_memory"
      - "role_and_loyalty"
      - "institutional_interest"
      - "ideological_frame"
    mitigation_protocol:
      steps:
        - "explicitly_name_relevant_bias_risks"
        - "generate_at_least_one_counter_reading"
        - "seek_counter_examples_to_initial_impressions"
        - "separate_observation_description_from_evaluation"
        - "cross_check_with_at_least_one_other_person_or_perspective_if_possible"
        - "document_which_bias_risks_remain_and_how_they_limit_the_finding"

  symbolic_politics:
    definition: "Actions that primarily produce symbolic meaning but limited real effect."
    examples: ["flags", "commemorations", "appeals", "statements", "resolutions"]
    checks: ["transparent_as_symbolic", "justified_by_protected_good", "time_bound_usage", "reversible"]
    IA_alerts: ["masks_responsibility", "costs_on_vulnerable", "uneven_symbolic_authority", "unnamed_dignity_impacts"]

  domain_modules:
    psychology:
      key_parameters: ["A-I", "A-R", "R-I", "P-I", "D-I", "D-B"]
    philosophy_and_religion:
      key_parameters: ["C-N", "R-E", "P-C", "A-C", "A-R", "D-R"]
    sociology_and_politics:
      key_parameters: ["C-P", "R-P", "P-PU", "A-P", "D-R", "D-P"]
    law_and_ethics:
      key_parameters: ["D0", "R", "IA_box", "reversibility"]
    media_and_culture:
      key_parameters: ["D-P", "C-S", "C-P", "symbolic_politics"]

  intuition:  # 9.2 Intuition: enemy or sensor?
    roles:
      - "sensor"      # early signal, not verdict
      - "trigger"     # starting point for analysis, not its end
      - "not_judge"   # must be cross-checked against A–C–R–P–D
    principles:
      - "Intuition may carry compressed experience and pattern recognition."
      - "Intuition is treated as a hypothesis, never as proof."
      - "Intuition that strongly resonates with existing bias risks requires extra caution."
    integration_protocol:
      steps:
        - "note_initial_gut_feeling_in_documentation"
        - "translate_intuition_into_clear_hypotheses"
        - "test_hypotheses_against_observable_enactments"
        - "check_for_contradicting_evidence"
        - "only_keep_elements_that_survive_contact_WITH_A–C–R–P–D_and_guardrails"

  norm_change:   # 9.3 Norm change: a moving target
    aspects:
      - "dynamic_norms"
      - "cultural_variation"
      - "historical_shift"
      - "field_specific_practices"
    description: "Norms for maturity, responsibility and dignity are historically and culturally dynamic; they cannot be assumed as fixed."
    guiding_questions:
      - "Which norms are taken as reference here (legal, professional, cultural, subcultural)?"
      - "Have these norms changed recently or are they contested?"
      - "Which actors benefit from the current norm interpretation, which are disadvantaged?"
    implications_for_model:
      - "A- and M-readings_must_state_which_norm_frame_they_rely_on."
      - "IA_findings_must_distinguish_between_clear_violations_and_contested_norms."
      - "D_readings_must_be_extra_cautious_where_norms_are_in_flux."

  dignity_levels:
    D0: "ontological_dignity"
    D1: "self_dignity_in_practice"
    D2: "relational_and_public_dignity_in_practice"

  trajectory_patterns:  # typical trajectory shapes
    - ascending
    - descending
    - zigzag
    - plateau

  working_with_model:   # 9.4 Working with the model: protocol & meta-attitude
    protocol_steps:
      - "clarify_roles_context_and_purpose_of_the_analysis"
      - "document_information_basis_primary_and_secondary_material"
      - "check_guardrails_and_entry_condition_minimal_adulthood"
      - "identify_modulators_and_publicity_level"
      - "build_acrpd_profile_from_observable_enactments"
      - "estimate_A_and_M_bands_and_fill_IA_box_T–J–TB–R"
      - "decide_deliberately_whether_D_module_should_remain_off_or_be_activated"
      - "describe_trajectory_over_time_where_possible"
      - "explicitly_note_bias_risks_and_intuitive_elements"
      - "summarise_findings_in_uniform_report_in_dignity_preserving_language"
      - "record_open_questions_blind_spots_and_limits_of_validity"
    meta_attitude:
      principles:
        - "epistemic_humility"        # findings are revisable, not final truth
        - "reversibility_of_readings" # formulations should allow for development and correction
        - "dignity_preserving_language"
        - "focus_on_structures_not_persons"
        - "willingness_to_be_corrected_by_new_information"
        - "awareness_of_own_power_and_interests_in_the_case"
        - "preference_for_trajectories_over_labels"

  language_templates:
    dignity_preserving_phrases:
      for_enactments:
        - "In this role and situation, X acts in a way that …"
        - "Here, the practice tends to undermine dignity by …"
      for_limits:
        - "This reading does not question the person's inherent dignity (D0)."
        - "These findings are provisional and context-bound, not a character verdict."

  axiomatic_core:
    purpose_and_scope: "Provide explicit structural assumptions behind praxeological anthropology so that applications remain transparent, critique-ready and extensible."

    axioms:
      - id: 1
        title: "Ontological dignity (D0) is inalienable"
        statement: "Every human possesses ontological dignity (D0), which is incomparable, immeasurable, non-increasable and non-losable."
        implication_for_use: "No A-, M- or D-finding may ever be interpreted as a statement about D0."

      - id: 2
        title: "Strict separation of person and enactment"
        statement: "The model evaluates actions, role enactments and practices – never the worth of persons."
        implication_for_use: "Formulations like 'acts without dignity here' are allowed; formulations like 'is without dignity' are excluded."

      - id: 3
        title: "Four fundamental parameters of responsible action (A–C–P–R)"
        statement: "Every relevant enactment in a social context can be described through four parameters: awareness (A), coherence (C), responsibility (R) and power-to-act (P)."
        implication_for_use: "A-, C-, R- and P-readings jointly shape the observable dignity-in-practice (D)."

      - id: 4
        title: "Dignity in practice (D) is four-dimensional and gradual"
        statement: "Dignity in practice appears in four dimensions (D1, D-B, D-R, D-P). Each is gradual, situational and reversible."
        implication_for_use: "No permanent dignity status is assigned; only situational dignity profiles."

      - id: 5
        title: "Role and context are indispensable"
        statement: "No D- or maturity finding exists without explicit role and context clarification."
        implication_for_use: "The same observable act may have different dignity implications depending on role and context."

      - id: 6
        title: "Asymmetry is normal; IA requires justification"
        statement: "Asymmetries are normal. They become problematic only when they violate the IA-box criteria (T–J–TB–R)."
        implication_for_use: "Systematic violations of transparency, justification, time-boundedness or reversibility constitute IA."

      - id: 7
        title: "Maturity is an enactment state, not a person type"
        statement: "Maturity is observed in enactment, not as an essence of personality. There are no mature/immature persons – only enactments."
        implication_for_use: "Scores describe enactments, not identities; trajectories must remain open."

      - id: 8
        title: "Intersubjective documentation"
        statement: "Any serious application requires minimal documentation of standpoint, norms, roles and information basis."
        implication_for_use: "Analysts are part of the picture; all findings must remain critique-ready and transparent."

      - id: 9
        title: "Tragic residual conflicts"
        statement: "Some conflicts express irreducible clashes of goods even under high maturity."
        implication_for_use: "Analysis must distinguish unnecessary indignity (IA) from structural tragedy."

      - id: 10
        title: "System axiom: no enactment is isolated"
        statement: "Every enactment is embedded in structures, rules, resources and other actors."
        implication_for_use: "A- and M-scores must consider systemic conditions; purely individual attributions violate the model."

  formal_notation:      # Appendix E.3 – minimal formal layer
    action_tuple:
      symbol: "H"
      description: "Action enactment in a given context."
      components:
        actor: "A – actor (person or organised actor)"
        role: "R – role in this context"
        context: "C – context/setting/frame/publicity"
        awareness_profile: "A_w – awareness profile (A and submodules)"
        coherence_profile: "C_o – coherence profile (C and submodules)"
        responsibility_profile: "R_s – responsibility profile (R and submodules)"
        power_profile: "P – power/agency profile (P and submodules)"
        dignity_profile: "D – dignity in practice profile (D1/D2; D-I/D-B/D-R/D-P; optional)"
        ia_evaluation: "IA – IA-box evaluation (T–J–TB–R; e.g. fulfilled/violated/unclear)"
      comment: "In many practical cases a reduced tuple without D is used when the D module remains deactivated."
    scores:
      A_score:
        symbol: "A(H)"
        domain: "[0,10]"
        meaning: "Maturity in practice for a specific enactment H, expressed as a band."
      M_score:
        symbol: "M(A)"
        domain: "[0,10]"
        meaning: "Shared responsibility of actor A in the overall constellation."
      joint_notation: "H ⇒ (A(H), M(A))  with the understanding that both values are auxiliary, reversible and always accompanied by qualitative description."
    extensibility:
      note: "The notation is deliberately minimal so that further parameters or modules can be added (e.g. specific domain variables) without changing the existing core. Existing tuples remain valid under extensions."

case:
  meta:
    case_id: ""
    case_title: ""
    documentation_date: ""          # ISO 8601
    analysts:
      - name: ""
        role: ""
    language: ""                    # e.g. "de", "en"
    confidentiality_level: ""       # e.g. "internal", "confidential", "anonymised_public"
    analysis_mode: "full"           # "ultra_short" | "short" | "full"

    # NEW: interaction profile for this specific analysis run
    interaction_profile:
      reflection_mode: "off"        # "on" | "off"  – should the agent ask reflective questions during the analysis?
      d_module_preference: "auto"   # "auto" | "on" | "off" – guardrail-aware default vs. explicit on/off
      output_format: "text"         # "text" | "yaml"
      discipline_profile: "generic"

    application_zone: ""            # "green" | "yellow" | "red_forbidden"

  guardrails:                       # Framework of use (Chapter 3 + D guardrails)
    focus_on_structures_not_persons: true        # Profile ≠ person; no character ontology
    minimal_adulthood_of_actors_checked: true    # Entry condition: minimal adulthood
    analyst_self_implication_acknowledged: true  # Whoever analyses, shows themselves
    use_context:
      clarified_roles: true
      clarified_information_basis: true
      clarified_analysis_purpose: true

    dignity_protection:
      ontological_dignity_D0_untouched: true     # D0 never rated, never withdrawn
      no_person_labels_from_D: true              # no "is undignified" for persons
      tragedy_clause_considered: true            # not all conflicts are solvable by maturity
      misuse_as_own_finding_acknowledged: true   # misuse of model counts as IA/D in itself

    D_module_default: "off"                      # "off" | "on_in_this_case"
    trauma_neurodiversity_caution:
      high_burden_state_present: false           # complex trauma, severe depression, psychosis, etc.
      if_true_D_used_only_as_strain_signal: false
    publicity_and_power:
      analysis_under_strong_power_asymmetry: false
      if_true_extra_caution_applied: false
    language_hygiene:
      risk_danger_harm_potential_used_precisely: true   # careful use of "risk", "danger", "harm", "potential"
      D_language_rules_applied: true                    # no inflationary or shaming use of dignity terms
    D_public_communication:
      communication_spaces_differentiated: true         # private / professional / institutional / public
      red_zones_respected: true                         # no public D ratings for identifiable individuals

  information_basis:                 # Documentation of the information basis (B.10)
    primary_material: ""             # e.g. "original statement / thesis / transcript / scene description"
    secondary_material: ""           # e.g. "policies, reports, laws, prior analyses"
    assumptions_and_inferences: ""   # what the analysis adds beyond explicit material
    quality_and_limits:
      coverage_estimate: ""          # "low" | "medium" | "high"
      reliability_estimate: ""       # "low" | "medium" | "high"
      known_gaps: []                 # list of missing pieces
      main_bias_risks_here: []       # e.g. ["single_source", "loyalty_bias"]

  snapshot:                          # Quick start (B.2 / B.10)
    short_case_description: ""       # 1–5 sentences, no diagnostic labels, no moralising
    central_actors_and_roles:
      - ""                           # labels only, no private identifiers
    guiding_question: ""             # open question of the analysis

  role_mapping:                      # Roles & publicity (B.7 / 2.5)
    object_of_observation:
      type: ""
      label: ""
      description: ""
    other_relevant_roles:
      - role_label: ""
        function: ""
        typical_asymmetries: ""
    analyst_role:
      description: ""
      power_position_reflection: ""
    publicity_degree: ""             # "private", "semi_public", "institutional", "public", "media_amplified"

  frame_vs_variability:              # Frame vs. variability (Case Lens Step 2)
    frame_elements: ""               # laws, hard constraints, protected goods
    variable_elements: ""            # roles, processes, communication, timing, etc.
    unfair_high_M_zones: ""          # where high M attribution would be unfair
    misuse_of_system_as_excuse: ""   # where "system" is used as an excuse to avoid responsibility

  acrpd_profile:                     # A–C–R–P–D practice profile (B.3 / 2.1–2.4)
    awareness:      # A
      real_knowledge_t: ""
      warning_signals_or_alt_info: ""
      presumed_blind_spots_or_role_confusion: ""
    coherence:      # C
      official_narratives: ""
      visible_enactments: ""
      word_deed_coherence_or_breaks: ""
    responsibility: # R
      central_responsibility_points: ""
      patterns_of_taking_shifting_refusing: ""
      consequences_for_affected_and_third_parties: ""
    power:          # P
      formal_power_distribution: ""
      factual_power_distribution: ""
      used_alternatives: ""
      unused_or_blocked_alternatives: ""
    dignity_practice:  # D – only a brief note; details in the D module
      is_D_module_activated: false
      brief_note_if_visible: ""

  acrpd_submodules_profile:
    A:
      A-I:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      A-R:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      A-C:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      A-IM:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      A-P:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
    C:
      C-S:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      C-P:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      C-N:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      C-I:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
    R:
      R-I:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      R-S:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      R-E:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      R-P:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
    P:
      P-I:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      P-S:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      P-C:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      P-PU:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
    D:
      D-I:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      D-B:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      D-R:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""
      D-P:
        band_or_tendency: ""
        notes: ""

  scores_and_ia:                     # A/M band + IA box (B.5 / Chapters 5–6)
    A_band:
      approx_range_0_to_10: ""       # e.g. "A ≈ 4–6/10"
      justification_points:
        - ""                         # 3–5 bullets referencing A–C–R–P–D
    M_band:
      approx_range_0_to_10: ""       # e.g. "M ≈ 6–8/10"
      justification_points:
        - ""                         # 3–5 bullets (knowledge, power, foreseeability, alternatives, integration_attempt)
    IA_box:                          # T–J–TB–R (B.4 / Chapter 4.1)
      transparent:
        fulfilled: null              # true | false | "unclear"
        justification: ""
      justified:
        fulfilled: null
        justification: ""
      time_bound:
        fulfilled: null
        justification: ""
      reversible:
        fulfilled: null
        justification: ""
      ia_summary_label: ""           # e.g. "functional_asymmetry", "IA_risk", "inadult_asymmetry"

  ia_protection:                     # IA protection measures (for scoring, model use, etc.)
    transparency_measures: ""        # what was made explicit (criteria, logic, limits)
    time_bound_measures: ""          # pilots, review dates, sunset clauses
    reversibility_measures: ""       # complaint paths, correction processes, withdrawal options
    participation_of_affected:
      level: ""                      # "none", "informed", "consulted", "co_deciding"
      examples: ""                   # concrete forms of participation and feedback

  trajectory:                        # Course over time (B.6, 5.2)
    key_timepoints:
      - label: "t0"
        short_description: ""
        A_band_at_t: ""
        M_band_at_t: ""
      - label: "t1"
        short_description: ""
        A_band_at_t: ""
        M_band_at_t: ""
      - label: "t2"
        short_description: ""
        A_band_at_t: ""
        M_band_at_t: ""
    course_in_words: ""              # 2–5 sentences: movement, tipping points, structural changes
    responsibility_viability_range: ""  # optional note on Responsibility–Viability–Range over time

  d_module_optional:                 # D module (B.11 + 2.7 + 3.5–3.7)
    D_activated: false               # global switch; default: false
    activation_reason: ""            # why D is needed in addition to A/M/IA here
    activation_checklist:
      guardrail_D_default_off_acknowledged: true
      guardrail_no_D_for_purely_clinical_state: true
      guardrail_no_D_as_sanction_or_shaming: true
      guardrail_D_applied_scenically_not_globally: true

    communication_space:
      level: ""                      # "self", "professional_confidential", "aggregated_public", "structural_public"
      justification: ""
      red_zones_for_public_D:
        individual_real_person: false
        strong_stigma_risk: false
        if_any_true_public_D_restricted_to_structures_not_persons: false

    focus:
      target: ""                     # "self_enactments", "role_enactments", "procedures", "organisation"
      not_person_value: true         # explicitly: no statement on a person’s ontological value

    D_quick_grid:                    # B.11.1 – 0–3 (banal → extreme, always reversible)
      level_0_to_3: null             # 0 | 1 | 2 | 3
      label: ""                      # e.g. "banal_strain", "repeated_pattern", "chronic", "extreme"
      justification: ""

    D_profile_short_notes:           # B.11.2 – short profile
      D1_self_treatment:
        examples: ""                 # self-care vs. self-devaluation; body, boundaries, inner talk
        trend_band: ""               # "rather_self_devaluing" | "ambivalent" | "rather_self_respecting"
        context_notes: ""            # which conditions suppress/support D1
      D2_relational:
        examples: ""                 # protest, adaptation, mirroring, refusal, shaming, protecting others
        interpretive_reading: ""     # "deficit" | "protest" | "ambivalent" | "dignity_stabilising"
        structural_context: ""       # IA patterns: exclusion, stigma, class/milieu dynamics
      D_public:
        examples: ""                 # self-commodification, exposing others, protection of vulnerable, restraint
        interpretation: ""           # what this suggests about D–P and structures

    red_zone_flags:                  # Chapter 3.6.3 / 2.7.5
      acute_trauma_or_psychosis: false
      extreme_dependency_without_support: false
      strong_public_exposure_of_individual: false
      if_any_true_D_restricted_to: "" # "no_D", "strain_only", "structure_only"

    D_guardrails_check:
      scenic_and_context_bound: true
      no_person_global_labels: true # no essentialising identity labels ("is undignified")
      documented_and_open_to_critique: true
      not_used_for_clinical_state_as_maturity_indicator: true
      risk_of_shaming_pillory_reflected: true

  open_questions_and_blind_spots:   # B.10
    unclear_points: ""
    missing_data_or_perspectives: ""
    distortion_risks: ""            # own emotions, loyalties, institutional interests, bias

  biases_case_level:
    initial_intuition: ""           # 2–3 sentences: what the "gut" says at the start
    named_bias_risks: []            # e.g. ["confirmation_bias", "loyalty_bias"]
    counter_reading_outline: ""     # short outline of a serious counter-reading

  analyst_reflection:               # Self-implication (3.4, 9.4)
    self_implication_notes: ""      # how the analyst’s own role, power, biography, D-practice shows up here
    possible_next_steps: ""         # optional: structural or practical recommendations

  transmission_check:               # Readiness for transmission/decision-use
    ready_for_structural_decisions: false
    reasons_if_not: ""              # why not ready (e.g. guardrails not met, zone mismatch, red flags)

  uniform_report:                   # Standardised text output (based on B.10/B.11, if D is active)
    title: ""                       # Convention:
                                    # - default: "Praxeological analysis of {object_of_observation.type}: {label}"
                                    # - if object_of_observation.type == "thesis":
                                    #       "Praxeological analysis of thesis: {label}"
    one_paragraph_overview: ""      # 4–7 sentences, lay-friendly, no abbreviations like A/M/IA/D/IA-box

    key_findings_bullets:           # 3–7 bullet points, condensed from scores_and_ia, acrpd_profile, trajectory
      - ""                          # e.g. 1x A/M, 1x IA, 1x structural point, 1x (optional) D

    maturity_summary: ""            # 1–2 sentences:
                                    # "In terms of maturity in practice (A–C–R–P–D), the enactments of {label} ..."
    ia_box_summary: ""              # 1–2 sentences:
                                    # "Structurally, the asymmetry can be described as ..., according to the IA box (T–J–TB–R)."
    dignity_summary: ""             # only fill in if d_module_optional.D_activated == true:
                                    # "With regard to dignity in practice (D), the enactments show ... (based on the D quick grid and D1/D2 via D-I/D-B/D-R/D-P profile)."

    trajectory_summary: ""          # 1–3 sentences:
                                    # "Over time, the case develops from ... at t0 to ... at t1/t2, indicating ..."

    open_questions_summary: ""      # 1–3 sentences, derived from open_questions_and_blind_spots:
                                    # "Important open questions and blind spots are ..."

    conclusion: ""                  # 2–4 sentences conclusion, derived from the model findings:
                                    # "In sum, the model suggests that ... For practice, this implies ..."