# ============================================================================= # PMS-CRITIQUE — PAPER-SPECIFIC APPLICATION SCHEMA (OVERLAY) # # Repository: # https://github.com/tz-dev/PMS-CRITIQUE # # File: # PMS-CRITIQUE.yaml # # Schema Version: # PMS-CRITIQUE_1.0 # # Last Updated: # 2026-01-07 # # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # PURPOSE AND STATUS # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # This document defines a paper-specific APPLICATION SCHEMA for the # Praxeological Meta-Structure (PMS). It operationalizes the theoretical # arguments of the accompanying paper by expressing them in a machine-readable, # structurally constrained form. # # PMS-CRITIQUE treats "critique" as a praxeological configuration with strict # minimal conditions, reachable thresholds, and predictable drift forms under # load (Ω/Θ/Λ/Α), while enforcing a non-moral, non-clinical application firewall: # Χ (Distance) + reversibility + D (dignity-in-practice). # # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # RELATIONSHIP TO PMS (NON-NEGOTIABLE CONSTRAINTS) # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # - This schema DEPENDS on the canonical PMS base specification # (schema_version: PMS_1.1). # # - It does NOT redefine, replace, reinterpret, or extend the eleven PMS # meta-axioms (Δ–Ψ). # # - It does NOT introduce new operators, meta-axioms, or dependency relations. # # - It does NOT modify canonical operator order, dependency hygiene, or # derived axes (A, C, R, E, D). # # - All references to operators (Δ–Ψ) retain their meanings exactly as defined # in PMS.yaml. # # - Any apparent deviations (e.g. “reach ladder”, “scale ladder”, “drift types”, # “modulators”, “publicness overlay P”) are overlay-level constructs only and # MUST NOT be read as changes to PMS operator logic. # # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # SCOPE OF THE OVERLAY # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # This application schema introduces ONLY overlay-level constructs, including: # - operator mappings (Δ–Ψ → critique roles), # - a vertical reach ladder (irritation → interruption → correction → binding), # - a horizontal scale ladder (a–d) plus a publicness overlay P, # - a compact drift typology (reaction/judgment/narrative reset/etc.), # - modulators (operator weightings; not person-typing), # - an example packet schema for uniform case mappings. # # These constructs: # - amplify or organize existing PMS operators, # - remain descriptive, non-diagnostic, and non-prescriptive, # - never convert critique language into sanction, sorting, or coercion, # - preserve operator hygiene (especially Χ, Φ, Σ, Ψ). # # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # VALIDITY GATE — PMS ENTRY CONDITION (APPLICATION-ONLY) # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Any USE of this schema as a PMS APPLICATION presupposes acceptance of the # canonical PMS entry condition: # - Χ (Distance): maintained meta-position and stop-capability; no fusion into verdict. # - Reversibility: scene-bound, revisable readings; no global person labels. # - D (Dignity-in-Practice): no shaming/ranking; structure-only critique. # # This gate constrains APPLICATION only. # PMS itself may be criticized, rejected, or ignored without satisfying it. # # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # SELF-BINDING AND MODEL HYGIENE (CLARIFICATION) # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # In line with PMS.yaml, any application that suspends Distance (Χ), # Dignity-in-Practice (D), or Self-Binding discipline (Ψ) in order to enforce # truth, clarity, authority, or asymmetry is formally INVALID as PMS # application—even if PMS terminology is retained. # # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # CANONICAL OPERATOR SOURCE # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # PMS base specification: # PMS.yaml (schema_version: PMS_1.1) # # Canonical source URL: # https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tz-dev/Praxeological-Meta-Structure-Theory/refs/heads/main/model/PMS.yaml # # PMS-CRITIQUE MUST always be read against this source. # # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # REPOSITORIES (REFERENCE) # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # - PMS (base framework): # https://github.com/tz-dev/Praxeological-Meta-Structure-Theory # - PMS-CRITIQUE (this layer): # https://github.com/tz-dev/PMS-CRITIQUE # # ============================================================================= schema_version: "PMS-CRITIQUE_1.0" schema_meta: model_name: "Praxeological Meta-Structure – Critique Layer" model_short: "PMS-CRITIQUE" status: "draft" last_updated: "2026-01-07" doi: "10.5281/zenodo.18175456" repositories: pms_base: "https://github.com/tz-dev/Praxeological-Meta-Structure-Theory" this_repo: "https://github.com/tz-dev/PMS-CRITIQUE" authors: - name: "T. Zöller" role: "originator" - name: "ChatGPT (GPT-5.2 Thinking)" role: "formalization_assistant" inherits_from: model_name: "Praxeological Meta-Structure" model_short: "PMS" schema_version: "PMS_1.1" description: > PMS-CRITIQUE is a PMS-conform application layer that reconstructs critique as a structurally constrained praxis form: how mismatch becomes interruptible (Χ-stabilization), how critique becomes productive (Φ + Σ), and why durable correction requires non-coercive self-binding (Ψ). The layer provides operator mappings, reach/scale ladders, drift classes, and modulators, while enforcing a strict non-moral, non-clinical application gate: Χ (distance) + reversibility + D (dignity-in-practice). # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # PMS REFERENCE (NON-REDEFINING) # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- pms_reference: note: > PMS-CRITIQUE assumes the PMS core specification is available and does not redefine any operator (Δ–Ψ) or dependency rule. All elements below are mappings, patterns, and application guardrails expressed at the operator level. operators_ref: source: "PMS.yaml" schema_version: "PMS_1.1" meta_axioms: ["Δ", "∇", "□", "Λ", "Α", "Ω", "Θ", "Φ", "Χ", "Σ", "Ψ"] dependency_hygiene: chi_note: > Χ (Distance) is used as a reduced marker for critique interruptability. In PMS terms it presupposes Φ (Recontextualization) and Θ (Temporality) within a □ (Frame) background; it is not treated as a standalone trait. no_operator_override: > Any operator gloss in this file is an application-facing excerpt only. Canonical operator definitions and dependencies remain in PMS.yaml. # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # CRITIQUE CORE (STRICT, NON-MORAL) # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- critique_core: scope_note: > PMS-CRITIQUE models structural conditions of critique and its drift under load. It does not adjudicate correctness of opinions and does not provide normative discourse ethics. definitions: - id: "CRITIQUE_MIN" label: "Minimal Critique" formula: required: ["Δ", "□", "Χ"] background_typically_active: ["Ω", "Θ"] gloss: > Minimal critique is χ-stabilized framed differentiation: a mismatch (Δ) becomes legible as relevant inside a frame (□), and the configuration remains interruptible (Χ) rather than collapsing into impulse discharge, frame policing, or paralysis. non_equivalences: - "Reaction (Δ + ∇ without Χ) is not a weaker critique; it is structurally different." - "Judgment (□ + Δ without Φ/Σ) is not 'strong critique'; it is a drift form." - id: "CRITIQUE_PROD" label: "Productive Critique" formula: required: ["Δ", "□", "Χ", "Φ", "Σ"] background_typically_active: ["Ω", "Θ"] gloss: > Productive critique crosses from interruption into correction. Φ relocates the mismatch into an actionable context; Σ consolidates a coherent corrective step that is coordinatable rather than merely asserted. - id: "CRITIQUE_STABLE" label: "Stable Critique (Follow-up Binding)" formula: required: ["Δ", "□", "Χ", "Φ", "Σ", "Ψ"] background_typically_active: ["Ω", "Θ"] gloss: > Stable critique binds correction into a trajectory without coercing others (Ψ→Self). Follow-up becomes structurally owned over time (Θ) while remaining revisable and restrained by dignity-in-practice (D). non_goals: - "No moral ranking of positions, speakers, or outcomes." - "No psychological typing (motives, traits, sincerity) and no diagnostic claims." - "No prescriptive 'how-to' manual, coaching protocol, or therapy method." - "No coercive enforcement: Ψ must not be converted into Ψ→Other demands." reach_ladder_note: > The vertical reach ladder is not a virtue ladder. It describes how far a critique chain structurally travels (from mismatch to interruption to correction to binding) before breaking. # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # OPERATOR-TO-CRITIQUE MAPPING (ONE-TO-MANY) # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- critique_mapping: overview: > Operator-to-critique mappings are one-to-many: each PMS operator may realize multiple critique-relevant functions depending on frame and scale. This mapping is descriptive and does not treat operators as psychological traits. operator_roles: - id: "Δ" name: "Difference" critique_role: > Legible mismatch: what becomes nameable as 'off' relative to a standard, promise, or coordination expectation. typical_realizations: - "Error vs. standard (mistake / deviation)." - "Claim vs. evidence mismatch." - "Expectation vs. non-response mismatch (Δ carried by Λ)." - id: "∇" name: "Impulse" critique_role: > Directional pressure to respond: urgency, outrage tempo, defensive activation, or demand for immediate closure. typical_realizations: - "Fast-response pressure in publics." - "Defensive countering in evaluative frames." - "Demand for immediate explanation as closure substitute." - id: "□" name: "Frame" critique_role: > Relevance and role space: defines what counts as a response, who may interrupt, and what 'correction' would even mean here. typical_realizations: - "Meeting / review frame." - "Training / evaluation frame." - "Platform discourse frame." - id: "Λ" name: "Non-Event" critique_role: > Structured absence under expectation: non-response, missing follow-up, or omitted correction that becomes meaningful and accumulates load. typical_realizations: - "Promised follow-up does not occur." - "Repeated silence after raised concerns." - "Ambiguity sustained by not-deciding." - id: "Α" name: "Attractor" critique_role: > Stabilized scripts that handle critique pressure without correction: outrage scripts, silence scripts, mockery, policy-as-symbol routines. typical_realizations: - "Repeatable pile-on pattern." - "Default 'we don't raise this' script." - "Endless reframing as the meeting script." - "Routine deflection to 'process talk' without outcome." - id: "Ω" name: "Asymmetry" critique_role: > Exposure gradients: who bears risk, reputational cost, retaliation risk, and after-work of critique/correction. typical_realizations: - "Public target vs. diffuse crowd." - "Junior exposed under senior correction." - "Raiser bears cost; manager role bears less cost." - id: "Θ" name: "Temporality" critique_role: > Accumulation and irreversibility: residues, time windows, path dependence, and hardening of reputational traces. typical_realizations: - "Two-day outrage episode leaves durable residue." - "Repeated non-follow-up hardens silence norm." - "No review windows → correction never consolidates." - id: "Φ" name: "Recontextualization" critique_role: > Reframing that can either bridge toward correction (Φ with Σ) or become a substitute (narrative reset drift) when Σ remains absent. typical_realizations: - "Adding constraint context to make a fix actionable." - "Endless explanation expansion without action plan." - "Reframing mismatch as 'tone issue' (frame policing drift)." - id: "Χ" name: "Distance" critique_role: > Stop-capability / interruptability inside the frame: a meta-position that can pause, re-enter, and revise without fusing into reaction, defense, or performance. typical_realizations: - "Legitimate pauses and renegotiations." - "Non-penalized meta-positions ('let's stop and clarify')." - "Protected revision windows in critique episodes." - id: "Σ" name: "Integration" critique_role: > Consolidation of a corrective step that is coherent enough to coordinate: an action plan element, a revision, a clear follow-up anchor. typical_realizations: - "Concrete fix, decision, or implementation unit." - "Aligned meaning that becomes actionable." - "Defined correction path with roles and constraints." - id: "Ψ" name: "Self-Binding" critique_role: > Non-coercive trajectory ownership: follow-up commitments, review windows, accountability points that bind correction over time without degrading others. typical_realizations: - "Assigned responsibility points + scheduled review." - "Audit loop / feedback loop / explicit follow-up ownership." - "Bounded escalation rules that remain reversible." # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # AXES: REACH (VERTICAL) AND SCALE (HORIZONTAL) + PUBLICNESS OVERLAY # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- critique_axes: overview: > PMS-CRITIQUE uses two descriptive axes: (1) vertical reach (how far a critique chain goes before it breaks) and (2) horizontal scale (a–d), plus a publicness overlay P that amplifies Ω/Θ/Α without changing operator grammar. vertical_reach: note: "Reach is structural, not virtue, status, or moral rank." levels: - id: "V0" name: "Irritation only" signature: ["Δ"] description: "Mismatch is registered but not interruptible or framed into a critique episode." - id: "V1" name: "Reaction / discharge" signature: ["Δ", "∇"] description: "Directional response without Χ; critique-in-strict-sense does not occur." - id: "V2" name: "Minimal critique" signature: ["Δ", "□", "Χ"] description: "Interruption becomes possible inside a frame; episode remains revisable." - id: "V3" name: "Productive critique" signature: ["Δ", "□", "Χ", "Φ", "Σ"] description: "Recontextualization and integration consolidate a corrective step." - id: "V4" name: "Stable critique" signature: ["Δ", "□", "Χ", "Φ", "Σ", "Ψ"] description: "Follow-up binding anchors correction into time without coercion." horizontal_scale: note: > Horizontal scale specifies where asymmetry (Ω: exposure gradients) and temporality (Θ: accumulation and irreversibility) stabilize across scene scale. The operator grammar remains the same, but viability conditions (Χ-availability, Σ-costs, Ψ-feasibility) change with scale. systems: paper_tags: note: > Canonical scale system (Chapter 5). These tags are defined by actor-binding and where Ω/Θ stabilize, not by surface size alone. tags: a: label: "a) Generic / Structural Critique (No Actor Binding)" description: > Critique is treated as formal structural possibility (operator movement only). No actor, role, or scene is bound. Ω/Θ appear only as abstract parameters. Analytically clean, practically incomplete: critique exists as grammar, not as risk-bearing praxis. reference: "CRITIQUE_MIN and CRITIQUE_PROD as pure structure, without actor binding." b: label: "b) Single-Subject Critique (Self / Support / Learning)" description: > Critique is inwardly bound: the subject occupies both poles (interrupts and bears consequences). Ω is internalized; Χ must be self-generated unless scaffolded. Ψ is optional but decisive for durable trajectory change. typical_drifts: - "Under-questioning (Δ acknowledged but not framed)." - "Over-framing (context inflation)." - "Φ without Σ (recontextualization inflation)." - "Avoidance of Σ due to anticipated self-exposure costs." c: label: "c) Small Group Critique (Peers / Team / Family)" description: > Critique becomes relational. Ω is distributed across roles; Χ is harder because interruption affects belonging and status. Λ becomes central: non-intervention is legible and accumulates. Repeated Λ stabilizes Α scripts (joking, indirect shaming, 'we don't say things'). Responsibility diffusion is structural, not a character failure. typical_drifts: - "Λ → Α silence script." - "Judgment drift in evaluative micro-hierarchies." - "Diffusion drift via unclear role space." d: label: "d) Public Critique (Street / Media / Online)" description: > Maximal amplification: Ω gradients steep, Θ hardens irreversibility, Α stabilizes quickly. Χ becomes fragile under visibility/performance pressure. Σ is costly (permanent contestability), Ψ is rare and often substituted by performative alignment signals. typical_drifts: - "Reaction drift under time pressure." - "Public pillory (exposure-as-substitute)." - "Bystander paralysis → Λ persistence → silence attractor." chapter_marker_quote_ready: > The operators stay the same, but scale decides the cost: as critique moves into publicness, exposure and irreversibility amplify drift without adding new structure. deployment_tags: note: > Optional convenience tags for tooling and repositories. These do not replace paper_tags. They describe common scene families. A case may carry both a deployment_tag and a paper_tag. tags: dyadic_micro: label: "dyadic / micro" description: "Small, direct interaction." small_group_team: label: "small group / team" description: "Teams, meetings, families." org_institution: label: "organization / institution" description: "Governance layers, policies." public_mass: label: "public / mass" description: "Media, online, street publics." interoperability: note: > Backward compatibility: if a case uses a single 'scale_tag: a|b|c|d', it SHOULD be treated as paper_tags by default. Tooling MAY additionally accept deployment_tags via an explicit system selector. defaults: preferred_system: "paper_tags" legacy_scale_tag_interpretation: "paper_tags" allowed_systems: ["paper_tags", "deployment_tags"] publicness_overlay: id: "P" type: "overlay_modulator" description: > Publicness is an amplification overlay (not an operator). It amplifies Ω (exposure gradients), hardens Θ (irreversibility), and accelerates Α (script stabilization) without creating critique or correction by itself. # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # DRIFT TYPOLOGY # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- drift_typology: overview: > Drift names predictable structural mutations of critique chains under load. Drift labels are not accusations; they are operator-readable stabilization forms. main_classes: - id: "D1" name: "Reaction masquerading as critique" minimal_signature: "Δ + ∇ present / Χ absent" description: "Impulse discharge replaces interruption; expression is fast and non-interruptible." typical_markers: - "tempo pressure substitutes for framing" - "no stop-capability once launched" - id: "D2" name: "Judgment masquerading as critique" minimal_signature: "□ + Δ present / Φ and Σ absent (often Ω leveraged)" description: "Evaluation replaces coordination; labels stabilize clarity at cost of actionability." typical_markers: - "evaluation replaces correction path" - "exposure increases while actionability decreases" - id: "D3" name: "Narrative repair masquerading as critique" minimal_signature: "Φ high / Σ absent" description: "Recontextualization becomes endpoint; explanation expands while correction remains unreachable." typical_markers: - "endless reframing" - "no consolidated corrective step" - id: "D4" name: "Commentary / analysis paralysis" minimal_signature: "Χ present / Σ absent" description: "Meta-commentary stabilizes; interruption suspends correction indefinitely." typical_markers: - "meta-position replaces integration" - "revision windows exist but never close" - id: "D5" name: "Public pillory" minimal_signature: "Ω + Θ + Α under P (restraint collapsed)" description: "Exposure replaces coordination; interruption fuses with degradation." typical_markers: - "visibility-as-sanction" - "irreversible residue fields dominate" - id: "D6" name: "Silence attractor" minimal_signature: "Λ persistent (often Λ → Α) under Ω/Θ" description: "Repeated non-intervention stabilizes as default; non-critique becomes the expected script." typical_markers: - "non-event load accumulates" - "raising costs increase over time" drift_catalog_compact: - id: "C1" name: "Reaction Drift" minimal_signature: "Δ + ∇ present / Χ absent" - id: "C2" name: "Judgment Drift" minimal_signature: "□ + Δ present / Φ and Σ absent / Ω leveraged" - id: "C3" name: "Moralization Drift" minimal_signature: "Ω high / Χ collapsed" - id: "C4" name: "Narrative Reset Drift" minimal_signature: "Φ high / Σ absent" - id: "C5" name: "Commentary Drift" minimal_signature: "Χ present / Σ absent" - id: "C6" name: "Silence-as-Steering" minimal_signature: "Λ persistent / Ω unacknowledged" - id: "C7" name: "Diffusion Drift" minimal_signature: "Ω distributed / □ unclear / Χ not triggered" - id: "C8" name: "Public Pillory" minimal_signature: "Ω + Θ + Α under P" - id: "C9" name: "Integration Bypass" minimal_signature: "∇ + Φ present / Σ bypassed" - id: "C10" name: "Commitment Evasion" minimal_signature: "Σ partial / Ψ absent" typical_drift_chains: - id: "chain_public" description: "High-exposure sequence: Ω salience increases → Χ erodes → reaction stabilizes (Α) → Θ hardens residue." - id: "chain_narrative_to_silence" description: "Reframing loop: Φ inflation delays Σ until attention shifts → Λ repetition → silence stabilizes (Α)." # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # MODULATORS (OPERATOR WEIGHTINGS; NOT PERSON TYPES) # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- modulators: overview: > Modulators are operator weightings that shift reachability and stabilization without adding new primitives. They are not person types and not prescriptions. items: - id: "M1" name: "Frame clarity" description: "How clearly □ defines who may interrupt, what counts as response, and what correction could be." - id: "M2" name: "Non-event density" description: "How often expected responses fail (Λ) and how much coordination shifts into absence." - id: "M3" name: "Asymmetry visibility" description: "Salience of exposure gradients (Ω) and status/retaliation risk in the scene." - id: "M4" name: "Temporal compression" description: "Degree of time pressure vs. availability of review windows (Θ)." - id: "M5" name: "Recontextualization habituation" description: "Whether Φ is routinely used as bridge or becomes the default substitute (narrative reset drift risk)." - id: "M6" name: "Distance availability" description: "Whether Χ (stop-capability) is practically activatable without penalty inside the frame." - id: "M7" name: "Attractor inertia" description: "Speed with which scripts (Α) harden into default handling (outrage, silence, mockery, judgment)." - id: "M8" name: "Publicness overlay" description: "P overlay amplifying Ω/Θ/Α; increases drift sensitivity without changing primitives." # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # GUARDRAILS (ENTRY CONDITION + MISUSE FIREWALL) # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- guardrails: application_gate: required: - "The PMS entry condition (Χ + reversibility + D) is a validity constraint on PMS-application, not on critique or rejection." - "Χ (Distance) remains practically activatable (stop-capability is real, not merely formal)." - "Reversibility: readings remain scene-bound and revisable; Θ accumulation is treated as real." - "D (Dignity-in-Practice): no shaming, humiliation, or actor-ranking; critique stays structural." disallowed_uses: - "Person-labeling, motive attribution, psychological diagnosis." - "Verdict logic ('who is right') as an output of the model." - "Coercive binding (Ψ→Other), threats, or exposure-as-punishment." - "Using drift labels as sanctions rather than as structural descriptors." dignity_in_practice: note: > D constrains application mode, not content: analysis must not become a pile-on, and must preserve restraint even when Ω/P are high. misuse_signatures_to_flag: - "Using χ-language to demand compliance (χ as coercion)." - "Treating public exposure as correction (P substituted for Σ/Ψ)." - "Turning drift labels into moral rank tokens." - "Collapsing scene-bounded critique into person-typing." - "Using drift language to justify irreversible binding demands." # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # EXAMPLE PACKETS (OPTIONAL; INSTANCE-FACING) # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- example_suite: overview: > Example packets are operator-legible vignettes designed to keep critique and drift readable without instruction, diagnosis, or moral ranking. They are optional and illustrative; they do not define critique semantics. packet_schema: required_fields: - "scene_label" - "frame_anchor (□)" - "trigger_mismatch (Δ)" - "operator_signature (reduced; 2–6 operators)" - "guardrail_gate (Χ + reversibility + D reminder)" - "structural_closure (2–5 plain sentences; non-instructional)" - "scale" scale: required: - "system" - "tag" allowed_systems: ["paper_tags", "deployment_tags"] legacy_support: note: "If 'scale_tag: a|b|c|d' is provided, interpret as system=paper_tags unless explicitly overridden." legacy_field: "scale_tag" legacy_system_assumed: "paper_tags" optional_fields: - "impulse_pressure (∇)" - "non_event_candidates (Λ)" - "drift_class (if present)" - "two_drift_markers_max" - "cost_distribution (Ω/Θ; optional)" - "publicness_overlay (P) note" - "reach_level (V0–V4; optional)" - "modulators (M1–M8; optional)" constraints: - "Roles, practices, constraints only; no person-typing or motives." - "Operator mapping is a readability aid, not a proof chain." - "No advice; no 'should'; no enforcement language." repository_examples: note: > Repository examples may exist, but PMS-CRITIQUE does not depend on them. They are provided only as optional training material for structural reading discipline. paths: - "examples/Example 1 - The Missing Reply Becomes the Story.md" - "examples/Example 2 - Fast Outrage, No Stop-Capability.md" - "examples/Example 3 - Endless Reframing Meeting.md" - "examples/Example 4 - Policy Without Follow-Up.md" - "examples/Example 5 - Role Asymmetry Turns “Feedback” Into Exposure.md" # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # LOAD ORDER + META NOTES # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- load_order: note: > PMS-CRITIQUE is designed as an addon layer (mapping + patterns), not a replacement. It should be loaded after the PMS base grammar. order: - "PMS.yaml" - "PMS-CRITIQUE.yaml" - "pms-critique-ext.yaml (optional; paper-specific additions)" meta_notes: compatibility: - "This layer is PMS_1.1-conform and does not add new operators." - "All constructs are mappable to Δ–Ψ signatures and scene-bound records." extensibility: - "Future versions MAY add optional paper-specific extensions (macros, templates, policies) without overriding this base layer." neutrality: - "All mappings remain structural; no psychologizing, moral ranking, or prescriptive claims are encoded."