--- name: idea-validation description: | 研究假說驗證與可行性評估框架。 LOAD THIS SKILL WHEN: hypothesis、假說、PICO、feasibility、可行性、testable、可驗證、研究計畫評估、check feasibility CAPABILITIES: 純指令技能,不需要專屬 MCP tool。利用 LLM 推理能力 + 現有 tools (list_saved_references, search_local_references) 完成分析。 --- # 研究假說驗證與可行性評估技能 純指令技能。LLM 醫學知識 + `compare_with_literature`, `list_saved_references`, `search_local_references`, `validate_concept`。 觸發:hypothesis、假說、PICO、feasibility、可行性、testable、研究計畫評估 --- ## Framework 1: Hypothesis Validation ### Step 1: PICO 分析 | Component | 偵測重點 | | ---------------- | --------------------------------------------- | | **P**opulation | patients, subjects, ICU, surgical... | | **I**ntervention | treatment, therapy, drug, procedure... | | **C**omparison | versus, vs, placebo, standard, control... | | **O**utcome | mortality, survival, recovery, score, rate... | ### Step 2: Testability 1. **Directional** — higher/lower/better/worse/reduce? ✅ vs 只有描述性 ❌ 2. **Comparison** — significantly/compared/than? ✅ vs 缺基準 ❌ 3. **Type** — Null (no difference) vs Alternative (有方向) 4. **Specificity** — <10 words 太模糊, 10-50 適當, >50 過複雜 ### Step 3: Study Type Recommendation | 假說特徵 | 建議設計 | | ------------------------- | ---------------------- | | effect/efficacy/treatment | RCT or Cohort | | risk factor/association | Cohort or Case-Control | | prevalence/frequency | Cross-Sectional | --- ## Framework 2: Feasibility Assessment ### Sample Size Quick Check | 類型 | 注意 | | ---------- | ------------------ | | N ≤ 10 | Case report/series | | N < 30 RCT | Pilot or crossover | | N ≥ 100 | 大多設計合理 | ### Timeline by Study Type | 類型 | IRB | 主要工作 | 分析寫作 | | ------------- | --------------- | ------------- | -------- | | RCT | 2 mo | 招募+收案 ÷3 | ÷4 | | Retrospective | 1 mo | 資料萃取 2 mo | ÷2 | | SR | 1 mo (protocol) | 搜尋+篩選 ÷3 | ÷3 | ### Feasibility Checklist (17 items, 5 categories) | Category | Critical Items | High Items | | ------------- | -------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | | Data & Sample | 資料可及、樣本可達 | 納排標準 | | Ethics | IRB plan、informed consent | privacy | | Resources | — | funding, timeline, team, equipment | | Methodology | primary outcome | stat plan, validated tools, confounders | | Publication | — | target journal, reporting guideline, novelty | **All Critical items must be ✅ before proceeding.** --- ## 使用原則 1. PICO 分析用語意理解,非關鍵字匹配 2. 可行性評估寧可保守 3. 文獻比較用 `compare_with_literature` MCP tool