--- name: harvest-competitive description: Competitive intelligence - extract features, pricing, tech stack from competitor sites allowed-tools: [Bash, Read, Write, WebFetch, WebSearch] keywords: [competitive, analysis, competitor, pricing, features, comparison, intelligence, benchmark] --- # Harvest Competitive Automated competitive intelligence gathering. Extract and compare features, pricing, technology stacks, and market positioning from competitor websites. ## Usage ```bash # Analyze a single competitor /harvest-competitive https://competitor.com # Compare multiple competitors /harvest-competitive https://a.com https://b.com https://c.com --compare # Focus on specific aspect /harvest-competitive https://competitor.com --focus pricing /harvest-competitive https://competitor.com --focus features /harvest-competitive https://competitor.com --focus tech-stack ``` ## Output ```markdown # Competitive Analysis: [Company] > Source: [URLs] > Date: [timestamp] ## Product Overview [What they do, target market, positioning] ## Features | Feature | Status | Notes | |---------|--------|-------| | Feature A | Yes | [details] | | Feature B | No | - | ## Pricing | Plan | Price | Key Limits | |------|-------|-----------| | Free | $0 | [limits] | | Pro | $X/mo | [limits] | ## Technology Stack (detected) - Frontend: [framework] - Backend: [inferred from headers/scripts] - CDN: [provider] - Analytics: [tools] ## Strengths & Weaknesses ### Strengths - [strength 1] ### Weaknesses - [weakness 1] ## Comparison Matrix (multi-competitor) | Aspect | Us | Competitor A | Competitor B | |--------|-----|-------------|-------------| | Feature X | Yes | Yes | No | | Price | $X | $Y | $Z | ``` ## Integration - **growth**: Market positioning, feature gaps - **designer**: UI/UX patterns from competitors - **architect**: Technical approach comparison - **business-analyst**: Feature gap analysis ## Rules - Only use publicly available information - No login-wall bypassing - Respect robots.txt - Date-stamp all data (competitive info ages fast) - Flag uncertainty: "detected" vs "confirmed"