+++
title = "エロヒム"
description = "エロヒム(ヘブライ語: אֱלֹהִים, 'ēlohîm)は、エロハ(ヘブライ語: אֱלוֹהַּ)の複数形であり、文字通り「強大な存在」または比喩的には「上からの者」「天上の者」という意味です。これは聖書の神々に与えられた名前であり、彼ら自身が星間旅行、惑星のテラフォーミング、生命合成が可能な科学的に高度に発達した文明です。"
template = "wiki-page.html"
toc = true
[extra]
category = "Elohim"
editorial_pass = "2026-05"
entry_type = "civilization"
alternative_names = ["Anunnaki", "Celestials", "Creators", "El", "Gods", "Powerful Ones", "Sky People", "Theosites"]
[extra.infobox]
hebrew_form = "אֱלֹהִים"
transliteration = "ʾĕlōhîm"
type = "Extraterrestrial civilization"
home_world = "Single planet outside the solar system; specific astronomical location unspecified in source material"
population = "Approximately 7 billion (1973 source material; figure has held in subsequent reports)"
governance = "Council of the Eternals (deliberative body of approximately 700 members)"
provinces = "Seven"
civilizational_age = "At least 25,000 years (framework-internal, derived from Yahweh's stated age)"
earth_project_began = "c. 21,810 BCE (Age of Capricorn arrival, on the corpus's chronology)"
current_status = "Active; alliance vessel stationed near Earth; awaiting Aquarian-age open return at the embassy"
principal_source = "*Message from the Designers* (Vorilhon/Raël, 1974–79)"
+++
**Elohim** (Hebrew: אֱלֹהִים, *ʾĕlōhîm*) is the plural form of the Hebrew noun *Eloah* (אֱלוֹהַּ, *ʾĕlōah*) and is the most frequent term used in the Hebrew Bible for the figures conventionally translated as *God*. The morphology is unambiguously plural: Hebrew adds the masculine plural ending *-im* to the singular *Eloah*, and the resulting form is grammatically plural throughout the biblical text. The traditional Jewish and Christian interpretation reads the plural form as a *plural of majesty* designating a single deity. Modern critical scholarship has variously read it as a relic of West Semitic polytheism, as a generic noun for divinity, or as preserving the language of an earlier Israelite religion in which Yahweh was understood as the head of a divine assembly rather than as the sole god.
A separate interpretive tradition, beginning with the French author Jean Sendy in 1968 and consolidated in the Raëlian source material from 1974 onward, takes the plural form at face value and identifies the referent as a specific civilization of physical beings. On this reading, **Elohim** names an extraterrestrial civilization of biological individuals physiologically similar to humans, technologically far in advance of present-day Earth humanity, organized as a single planetary civilization on a home world located outside the solar system, governed through a deliberative body called the Council of the Eternals, presently numbering approximately seven billion individuals, with a recorded civilizational history of at least twenty-five thousand years. Approximately twenty-two thousand years before the present, on this reading, the civilization undertook the project of synthesizing biological life on Earth — terrestrial flora, terrestrial fauna, and ultimately humanity itself — through techniques of genetic design and laboratory synthesis whose modern terrestrial equivalents are now beginning to develop. The Hebrew Bible and a number of related ancient traditions are read as preserving, in compressed and partially distorted form, the records of this civilization's subsequent interventions across the post-creation history of Earth.
The reading is contested. Within the modern academic study of the Hebrew Bible, the dominant readings remain the plural-of-majesty (in confessional Jewish and Christian scholarship) and the polytheistic-relic interpretations (in critical scholarship), with the extraterrestrial-civilization reading regarded as outside the academic mainstream. Within the broader landscape of alternative biblical interpretation, the reading has substantial parallels — Mauro Biglino's strict-translational work, Paul Anthony Wallis's comparative-cuneiform analysis, the broader ancient-astronaut literature originating with Erich von Däniken — though these positions vary in their specific commitments and in their relationship to the Raëlian source material. This article presents the term, its etymological history, the various interpretive traditions, and the civilizational claim adopted by the corpus, with attribution throughout.
## Etymology
The Hebrew *ʾĕlōhîm* is the plural of *ʾĕlōah*, itself usually understood as an expanded form of the shorter *ʾēl* (אֵל). The underlying Semitic root is *ʾl* or *ʾlh*, attested across the Semitic family with cognates in Akkadian (*ilum*), Ugaritic (singular *ʾil*, plural *ʾilhm*), Aramaic (*ʾĕlāh*), Arabic (*ʾilāh*), and the Canaanite languages. The conventional gloss for the root is *power* or *strength*, and the plural *ʾilhm* is read as *powers* or *powerful ones*.
The Akkadian cognate *ilum* is written, in cuneiform, with the logogram 𒀭. The same sign functions as both a logogram for the word *ilum* and as a determinative placed before divine names to mark them as divine. As a stand-alone ideogram, however, the sign 𒀭 represents the Sumerian word *an*, meaning *sky* or *heaven*, and depicts a star pictographically. The convergence is significant. The cuneiform sign for divinity is the sign for sky; the earliest written form of the concept the Hebrew tradition would later render as *Elohim* depicts a star — that is, depicts a celestial origin pictographically. The Sumerian word *Anunnaki* (𒀭𒀀𒉣𒈾), variously translated as *those of princely seed* or, more loosely, *those who from heaven came to earth*, contains this same 𒀭 element with the reading *an*.
This convergence is part of the philological evidence on which the modern reinterpretive tradition draws: in the earliest written sources of the ancient Near East, the divine is what comes from the sky, depicted as a star. The standard philological reading of the root as *power* is consistent with this — beings arriving from the sky with technology unattainable by terrestrial humans would be, by every available criterion, the *powerful ones*. The traditional supernatural reading and the extraterrestrial-civilization reading both find textual support in the same root; they differ on whether the celestial-origin imagery is a metaphor for transcendence or a memory of literal arrival.
### Translation history
The translation of *Elohim* as the singular *God* in most Western Bibles is a translational decision, not a feature of the underlying Hebrew. The Septuagint (3rd–2nd century BCE) generally renders *ʾĕlōhîm* with the Greek singular *ho theos*; this convention passes into the Latin Vulgate (*Deus*) and from there into the major European translations. The translation suppresses the morphological plurality of the Hebrew form throughout.
A small number of pre-modern commentators registered the discrepancy without challenging the prevailing theological reading. Voltaire, in the *Dictionnaire philosophique* (1764), noted that the Hebrew word translated as *God* in Genesis is plural and that this fact had been generally forgotten — a passing observation rather than a sustained argument. The systematic re-examination of the term, on its grammatical features alone, belongs to the second half of the twentieth century.
In English-language Bibles, several modern translations have addressed the issue editorially. The Jerusalem Bible (1966) and the New Jerusalem Bible (1985) preserve the Hebrew name *Yahweh* in the English text where the Tetragrammaton appears, but continue to render *Elohim* as singular *God*. The Authorized Version, the Revised Standard Version, and the New International Version all render *Elohim* as singular *God* without comment. The Robert Alter translation of the Hebrew Bible (2018) translates *Elohim* as *God* but registers in his commentary that the form is plural and that this plurality is theologically and historically meaningful.
## In the Hebrew Bible
The term *Elohim* appears approximately 2,600 times in the Hebrew Bible, making it the second most frequent designation for the divine after the Tetragrammaton *YHWH* (which appears approximately 6,800 times). The two terms are distributed across the Hebrew Bible in patterns that have been studied since the eighteenth century.
In the Documentary Hypothesis developed by Wellhausen and refined across subsequent scholarship, the alternation between *YHWH* and *Elohim* is a principal marker for distinct compositional sources within the Pentateuch. The Yahwist source (J), conventionally dated to the 10th–9th century BCE, uses *YHWH* throughout and is associated with anthropomorphic narratives. The Elohist source (E), conventionally 9th–8th century BCE, uses *Elohim* until Exodus 3 (where *YHWH* is revealed to Moses for the first time on this source's account). The Priestly source (P), conventionally 6th–5th century BCE, uses *Elohim* in Genesis 1–11 and *YHWH* from Exodus 6. The Deuteronomist (D), 7th century BCE and after, uses *YHWH* throughout. The framework adopted by this corpus does not depend on any specific reconstruction of the textual sources; the historical referents preserved in the surviving text are what the framework reads, regardless of how those textual layers were assembled.
Of particular significance is the alternation between Genesis 1 and Genesis 2. The first creation account (Genesis 1:1–2:3) names the agent as *Elohim* throughout, in the bare plural; the second creation account (Genesis 2:4–4:26) names the agent as *YHWH Elohim*, "Yahweh of the Elohim" or "Yahweh Elohim." The shift in nomenclature parallels the shift in narrative scope and detail. Source criticism reads this as evidence of distinct compositional sources; the framework adopted by this corpus reads the shift as marking a difference of operational scale (the Elohim collective at work in the cosmic-summary account of Genesis 1; one specific Eloha, Yahweh, leading the local Eden operation in Genesis 2). The two readings are not necessarily incompatible: a redactional joining of two source documents could itself reflect underlying operational realities that the source documents preserved at different scales.
A number of biblical passages are difficult to reconcile with a strict singular-deity reading of *Elohim*. Genesis 1:26 ("Let *us* make man in *our* image, after *our* likeness") uses plural pronouns. Genesis 3:22 ("the man is become as one of *us*") uses the same. Genesis 11:7 ("let *us* go down, and there confound their language") at Babel similarly. Joshua 24:14, where Joshua exhorts the Israelites to "put away the *elohim* whom your fathers served on the other side of the river and in Egypt, and serve *YHWH*," uses *elohim* in a way that cannot be a singular plural-of-majesty designating *YHWH* without rendering the passage incoherent. Psalm 82:1 describes *Elohim* as standing "in the assembly of *El*; in the midst of the *elohim* he judges," using the term in a way that requires multiple referents within the same verse. The traditional reading harmonizes these passages through theological devices (the divine council as servants of God, the *elohim* of Joshua 24 as foreign deities other than the true *Elohim*); the modern reinterpretive readings take the morphological plurality at face value.
## Modern reinterpretations
Several twentieth- and twenty-first-century authors have, on independent textual and comparative grounds, proposed readings of *Elohim* compatible with — though not always identical to — the corpus's adopted reading. The list below is partial; it identifies the principal figures whose work bears most directly on the question.
### Jean Sendy (1968 onward)
Jean Sendy (1910–1978) was a French author and translator whose books on biblical reinterpretation began with *La Lune, clé de la Bible* (1968) and *Ces dieux qui firent le ciel et la terre* (1969, translated as *Those Gods Who Made Heaven and Earth*). Sendy argued that the Hebrew Bible, read in its plain sense — as Heinrich Schliemann had read Homer — describes the arrival on Earth of physically embodied beings from elsewhere in the cosmos. He proposed translating *Elohim* as *the Celestials* or *those who came from the sky*, and used the term *Theosites* (inhabitants of *Theos*) for the same referent in his later *Les cahiers de cours de Moïse* (1974).
Sendy's approach was philological and historiographic rather than revelatory. He reached the extraterrestrial-civilization reading from textual analysis alone, working with the Hebrew Bible as a historical document whose strangeness disappears when its claims about its own subject matter are taken seriously rather than allegorized. His work has been the principal scholarly antecedent of the corpus's adopted reading. The Italian scholar Stefano Bigliardi, in "A Gentleman's Joyous Esotericism: Jean Sendy's Reading of the Bible," has produced the most substantial academic engagement with Sendy's project.
### The Raëlian source material (1974 onward)
The Raëlian source material consists principally of three texts authored by Claude Vorilhon (b. 1946) under the name Raël: *Le Livre qui dit la vérité* / *The Book Which Tells the Truth* (1974), *Les extraterrestres m'ont emmené sur leur planète* / *Extraterrestrials Took Me to Their Planet* (1976), and *Accueillir les extra-terrestres* / *Let's Welcome the Extraterrestrials* (1979), collected in subsequent editions as *Message from the Designers*. Vorilhon reports having received this material directly from a member of the Elohim civilization — Yahweh, the president of the Council of the Eternals — in a series of encounters beginning at Clermont-Ferrand on 13 December 1973 and continuing in the Périgord in October 1975. The texts are presented as Yahweh's first-person account of his civilization, of the historical events the Hebrew Bible preserves in compressed form, and of the relationship between the Elohim and Earth's humanity.
The Raëlian source material is the principal textual basis for the corpus's adopted reading. Its convergence with Sendy's textual reconstruction — reached, in Sendy's case, through historical-critical analysis without revelatory contact — is one of the foundational observations of the corpus's framework. The two sources develop substantially the same picture of the Elohim from different methodological starting points.
### Mauro Biglino (2010 onward)
Mauro Biglino (b. 1950) is an Italian translator who worked for over a decade on Hebrew and Greek biblical texts for Edizioni San Paolo, a Catholic publishing house associated with the Vatican. His books, beginning with *Il Libro che cambierà per sempre le nostre idee sulla Bibbia* (2010, *The Book That Will Forever Change Our Ideas About the Bible*) and continuing through *La Bibbia non parla di Dio* (2015) and *The Naked Bible* (2022, with Giorgio Cattaneo), argue from a strict literal translation of the Hebrew that *Elohim* designates a plurality of physical beings — *the lords from above* — whose works are described in concrete, non-metaphorical terms in the Hebrew text.
Biglino's reading is independent of both Sendy and the Raëlian source material. He reaches substantially the same conclusion through philological analysis of the Hebrew alone, without recourse to revelatory testimony. His argument relies on the strict-literal-translation method: passages that the traditional theological reading harmonizes through metaphorical or allegorical interpretation are, on Biglino's reading, to be translated word-for-word from the Hebrew, and the resulting concrete text is what the original audience would have understood.
### Paul Anthony Wallis (2020 onward)
Paul Anthony Wallis is an Australian biblical scholar and former Anglican archdeacon whose books beginning with *Escaping from Eden* (2020) and continuing through *The Scars of Eden* (2021), *Echoes of Eden* (2021), and *The Eden Conspiracy* (2024) propose translating *Elohim* as *the Powerful Ones*, taking the plural as literal. Wallis's distinctive contribution is the comparative argument that the Powerful Ones of the Hebrew Bible are the same referent as the *Sky People* of the Sumerian cuneiform tradition — the figures known in Akkadian as the Anunnaki. He points to passages such as Joshua 24:14, where Joshua exhorts the Israelites to abandon the *elohim* their ancestors served beyond the river, as cases where the term cannot be a singular plural-of-majesty without the passage becoming incoherent.
The convergence of these three reinterpretive positions — Sendy's philological-historiographic, Biglino's strict-translational, Wallis's comparative-cuneiform — is itself a datum for the corpus's adopted reading. Three modern researchers, working from different methods and largely independently of one another, have reached substantially the same reading of the term that the Raëlian source material reports as the original meaning.
### Earlier ancient-astronaut literature
The broader ancient-astronaut interpretive tradition preceding and surrounding these specific scholars includes Erich von Däniken's *Chariots of the Gods?* (1968), Zecharia Sitchin's *Earth Chronicles* series beginning with *The 12th Planet* (1976), and a substantial popular literature in their wake. The corpus's adopted reading shares the general direction of this literature — the identification of biblical and Mesopotamian "gods" with extraterrestrial visitors — but is critical of several of its specific claims. Sitchin's identification of the Anunnaki with a hypothetical planet *Nibiru* on a 3,600-year orbit, his particular chronology, and his identification of all ancient pantheons with the same set of Sumerian deities are not accepted by the corpus, which treats the relationship between the biblical Elohim and the various ancient pantheons as a matter for case-by-case comparative analysis rather than blanket equivalence.
## The civilization
On the reading developed in the Raëlian source material and adopted by the corpus, **Elohim** names a specific extraterrestrial civilization with a recorded history, a home world, a population, a governance structure, a technological capability, and a continuing relationship with Earth. The features below are drawn from the source material, supplemented in some cases by the corpus's broader synthesis.
### The home world
The Elohim home world is a single planet supporting a single civilization, located outside the solar system at an interstellar distance the source material does not specify with precision. The planet's geography, ecology, and physical character are not reconstructible in detail from the available material. The civilization is described as a unitary planetary culture rather than as a federation of competing civilizations, with the institutional infrastructure that any planetary-scale operation would require.
The planet is organized into seven provinces, each with its own representation in the deliberative bodies of the civilization. The seven-province structure of the home world matches the seven-team structure of the original Earth creation project: each province contributed a creator team, and each team produced one of the seven regional human lineages of the antediluvian supercontinent. The geographic distribution of the seven Earth teams (treated more fully in the [Antediluvian](../antediluvian/) entry) reflects, on this reading, the political organization of the home civilization that staffed the project.
### Population and demographics
The Raëlian source material gives the Elohim population as approximately seven billion individuals at the time of the 1973 contact. The figure is striking for its similarity to contemporary Earth population (approximately 4 billion in 1973 when Vorilhon received the figure; approximately 8 billion as of 2024). The population is reported as held constant through reproductive policies — specifically, a strict two-child policy that the source material describes Yahweh recommending to humanity as well, on the same population-management grounds. The seven-billion figure is a source-internal claim and is not independently verifiable; the corpus treats it as the source's own statement.
### Biology and physiology
The Elohim are described as biologically very similar to humans. They have male and female individuals, have children in the ordinary biological sense, and live in family arrangements analogous to human families. Their natural lifespan, without the continuity technology described below, is approximately 700 to 1,200 years — ten times the ordinary human lifespan, with the difference attributed in the source material to a "small surgical intervention" not specified in detail. The biological similarity is sufficient to permit fertile reproduction between Elohim and human individuals, a feature that bears directly on several specific episodes of the Hebrew Bible (the *benei ha-Elohim* / human-women unions of Genesis 6 producing the *Nephilim*; the alliance-Mary insemination producing Jesus; the alliance-Vorilhon's-mother insemination producing Raël).
### Technology and capabilities
The civilization's principal scientific capability is **biological synthesis**: the capacity to design organisms at the genetic level, assemble them in laboratory conditions, and release them into appropriate environments where they reproduce and propagate naturally. This is the capability behind the Earth project as a whole — the entire phylogenetic spread of terrestrial flora and fauna, including humanity, is on the source's account the product of this technology. Modern Earth biology is now beginning to develop comparable capabilities at vastly smaller scale; the Elohim version, on the source's account, operates at species- and ecosystem-scale.
The civilization has also achieved **practical immortality** through a cell-transfer continuity technology — the source material's "tree of life" or "scientific secret of eternity." The technique involves preserving a cellular sample from an individual at the period of full development; at the natural end of the individual's body, generating a new body from the cellular material through cloning; and transferring the original individual's memory and personality into the new body. The result is the indefinite continuation of personal identity across successive bodies. Yahweh, the first individual on whom the technique was successfully applied some twenty-five thousand years ago, has lived continuously across twenty-five bodies on this account and remains the president of the Council of the Eternals. The technology is granted to a limited population: approximately 700 Elohim members of the Council, plus approximately 8,400 figures from Earth (prophets, scientists, artists, and others) whose lives or work the Council judged worthy of continuation.
The civilization's transportation technology includes **interstellar travel**. The source material describes the journey from the home world to Earth as taking approximately two months in the civilization's current craft. The propulsion mechanism is described in terms the corpus treats with substantial epistemic caution; the physics involved falls outside what contemporary terrestrial physics can verify, and the source's description is suggestive rather than technically precise. The civilization maintains a regular communications and transport infrastructure between the home world and Earth across the duration of the Earth project; an alliance vessel is currently stationed near Earth, carrying seven provincial representatives plus two crew, providing the operational platform from which contact and supervision are conducted.
### Governance
The Elohim civilization is governed through the **Council of the Eternals**, a deliberative body that constitutes the political authority of the civilization on its home world. The Council is composed of approximately 700 Elohim members at the time of the 1973 contact, drawn from those individuals who have undergone the cell-transfer continuity technology. Its function is not merely scientific but political: it is the body that makes major decisions binding on the institutional actors within the civilization, including the scientific institutions whose work the Council oversees.
The political character of a body composed entirely of practical immortals is, on the corpus's reading, fundamentally different from any short-term political institution on Earth. Decisions are made by individuals who have been politically active for centuries or millennia, who have personal memory of the developmental periods that have shaped the civilization's current condition, who have direct continuity with the events that produced the institutions they are deliberating within. The deliberations have a different temporal weight than any contemporary terrestrial political deliberation. A decision to invest in a multi-millennial project — the Earth project itself, or the various policy responses to its developments across 22,000 years — is feasible for a body whose members will personally remain to see it through.
The Council also governs the cell-transfer process itself: at the natural end of each Elohim's life, the Council deliberates whether the individual should be granted continuity, with the criteria including contributions to the civilization's scientific, cultural, and political life. A "grand council of the eternals," in the source material's phrase, assembles to make this determination — the corpus's reading identifies this as the operational referent behind the biblical *yom ha-din*, the Day of Judgment, in its Aquarian-age application.
## Internal political structure
The Elohim civilization is internally differentiated. It is not a monoculture; it contains political factions with substantively different positions on the major policy questions the civilization has faced, particularly concerning the Earth creation project and its consequences. Three factional positions are load-bearing for the corpus's reading of the post-creation history.
**The moderate position**, led by Yahweh in his capacity as Council president, has been the dominant Council position across most of the post-creation period. It holds that the Earth creation project was justified, that the resulting human civilization should be preserved, and that humanity should be permitted to develop scientifically toward eventual recognition of its origins — but with appropriate safeguards. The policies of cultivation, prophetic mission, and gradual disclosure across the post-creation history are the moderate position's operational expressions.
**The abolitionist position**, led by **Satan**, holds that the creation of beings in the Elohim's own image was a mistake from the beginning. Satan's argument has been consistent across the entire history: synthetic creations capable of equaling or surpassing their makers are fundamentally dangerous, and no protocol can be trusted to contain the risk. He was the leader of the home-world political faction that originally forced the shutdown of the biological-synthesis program on the home planet itself, after an early laboratory accident produced fatalities; the relocation of the program to Earth was a political compromise to permit the work to continue at sufficient distance to limit the home-world risk. Satan has remained the principal opposition figure across the entire subsequent history, with his position becoming operationally critical at moments of crisis (the Eden disclosure, the antediluvian advancement, the close of Aries) when the question of whether the creation should be destroyed has reached the Council. The Hebrew word *satan* means *adversary* or *prosecutor*; the corpus's reading aligns with the older Hebrew sense in which Satan is the political opposition's leader, not a metaphysical figure of cosmic evil.
**The full-disclosure position**, led by **Lucifer**, emerged within the Israel team during the Eden period and persists thereafter as a permanently exiled faction on Earth. Lucifer's position rejected the moderate-position policy of containing the humans in scientific ignorance; he and his faction held that the humans should be told who their creators were, taught what their creators knew, and permitted to develop with full information. The Genesis 3 disclosure was the operational expression of this position. The resulting political settlement — the exile of the Lucifer faction to Earth, the withdrawal of most of the Israel team to the home world, the establishment of the post-Eden mediated-contact pattern — is the framework's reading of how the Council resolved the Eden crisis.
The relations among these three positions across the post-creation history have been complex. Satan and Lucifer are sometimes politically aligned in their joint opposition to the Yahweh-led moderate consensus, but their substantive positions are opposite: Satan wants the humans destroyed; Lucifer wants the humans fully empowered. Yahweh is the moderate caught between them, and most of the Council's major decisions across the post-creation history have been variations on the moderate-position theme of preservation-with-containment. The four-figure political taxonomy (Yahweh / Lucifer / Serpent / Satan, with the Serpent being the Lucifer faction in its specific Eden-disclosure role) is treated more fully in the dedicated entries on each figure.
The conflation of Lucifer and Satan that became standard in medieval Christian theology — both treated as names for a single fallen-angel figure of cosmic evil — is, on the corpus's reading, one of the most consequential confusions in the history of religious interpretation. The Hebrew Bible itself does not equate the two figures; the conflation is a development of the late patristic and medieval Latin tradition. Satan and Lucifer, on the corpus's reading, have substantively opposite political positions, and treating them as identical obscures the actual structure of the events the Hebrew Bible describes.
## History
The Elohim civilization has a recorded history of at least twenty-five thousand years on the corpus's reading — the figure derived from Yahweh's stated age and the timeline of the immortality technology, with Yahweh having been the first beneficiary of the technique twenty-five millennia before the present. The civilization's history before this period is not specified in the available source material; what is recorded is the period from the immortality breakthrough through the present, with the major developments organized around the Earth creation project that has occupied much of the civilization's institutional attention across the most recent twenty-two millennia.
### Origins and early scientific development
The origins of the Elohim civilization itself are not described in detail in the source material. What the source material does establish is that the civilization, by the time of the events it begins to narrate, had reached a level of technological and scientific development comparable to what present-day Earth humanity is approaching. Yahweh's own characterization to Vorilhon — "a very long time ago on our distant planet, we had reached a level of technical and scientific knowledge, comparable to that which you will soon reach" — frames the analogy structurally rather than rhetorically: the Elohim, before they were what the corpus now calls the Elohim, were a civilization in the position our own civilization is now in. The biological-synthesis program that would eventually become the Earth project was developed during this period, on the home planet itself, with the early laboratory work producing the increasingly sophisticated organisms that the source material describes as preceding the Earth relocation.
### The home-world crisis and the Earth relocation
Sometime during the early development of the biological-synthesis program — the source material does not specify a precise date but the events are placed prior to the Earth project's initiation — a laboratory accident on the home world produced fatalities. The accident strengthened the political position of the abolitionist faction, led by Satan, who argued that the synthetic-creation program was fundamentally dangerous and should be terminated. The political crisis that followed produced a compromise: the home-world program would be shut down, but the scientists would be permitted to continue their work at sufficient distance from the home world to limit the risk to the home civilization itself. The chosen relocation site was Earth — a planet within reachable interstellar distance whose conditions were suitable for the work.
The Earth relocation was therefore not, on the source material's account, the Elohim's preferred method of conducting the biological-synthesis program. It was the political compromise that permitted the program to continue at all in the face of strong abolitionist opposition. The seven creator teams that would conduct the Earth work were drawn from the seven home-world provinces, and the work was undertaken with the home-world Council's authorization but under continuing surveillance by the abolitionist political faction whose suspicions the original accident had confirmed.
### The Earth creation project: Capricorn through Leo
The Earth project began in the Age of Capricorn (c. 21,810 BCE on the corpus's chronology) and proceeded across the subsequent six precessional ages to the close of Leo (c. 8,850 BCE). The seven creator teams, distributed across the supercontinent in their respective regional territories, conducted the synthesis of terrestrial flora and fauna across this approximately thirteen-millennium span, with the work organized around the seven *yamim* of Genesis 1 (each *yom* corresponding to a precessional age) and culminating in the creation of humans in the late Age of Leo. The detailed treatment of this creation period lives in the [Genesis](../genesis/) entry and in the dedicated entries on each precessional age; what matters here is that the project occupied the entire creative attention of the civilization across the period and produced the present-day terrestrial biosphere as its result.
### The Eden crisis and the post-creation political settlement
The conflict that emerged within the Israel team during the Eden period — the disagreement between the home-world's containment policy and the Lucifer faction's full-disclosure position — produced the most consequential political crisis the Elohim civilization had faced since the original home-world laboratory accident. The Council's resolution, treated above in *Internal political structure*, established the post-Eden settlement that has structured the Elohim's relationship with Earth ever since: the Lucifer faction permanently exiled on Earth in continuing relationship with the human population, the rest of the creator personnel withdrawn to the home world, the establishment of the mediated-contact pattern through prophetic intermediaries.
### The cosmic-chain discovery
Across the Age of Aries (c. 2,370 BCE – c. 210 BCE on the corpus's chronology), the Elohim civilization made a discovery about its own history that fundamentally transformed its self-understanding. The civilization had previously thought of itself as the originator of the biological-creation pattern — the autonomous prime mover of a creation project the Elohim had decided, on their own, to undertake. The discovery reframed this entirely. The Elohim discovered that they themselves had been created the same way they were creating life on other worlds: a prior civilization, on a prior home world, through a prior creation project, had brought the Elohim civilization into being — and that prior civilization had itself been created by yet earlier predecessors, in a chain extending back through deep time.
The Elohim are not the originators of the cosmic creation pattern. They are the current local instance of a recurring cosmic process that has been operating for an unknown but very long span. Each civilization that reaches scientific maturity, on this pattern, eventually creates new humanities on suitable worlds, who in turn (if they survive and develop) eventually create their own humanities. The cycle has been operating across the galaxy for a long time. Earth is not its first instance. The Elohim are not its inventors. They are participants in something larger than themselves.
The discovery's exact nature — what specific evidence the Elohim found, how they verified their own origins as a created rather than autonomously evolved civilization, what archaeological or genetic or cosmological signatures convinced them — the source material does not specify. What it specifies is the consequence: the Elohim's self-understanding shifted fundamentally, and the shift produced specific changes in their operational policy toward the humanities they had themselves created. The most consequential change was the decision to withdraw from direct contact and to allow the created humanities to demonstrate their development through their own efforts, with sufficient autonomy from their creators to constitute genuine independent maturation. The previous policy of direct intervention — alliance officers walking among the patriarchs, conducting the Exodus and the wilderness operations — had biased the experiment in ways the Elohim now recognized as inconsistent with the broader cosmic pattern.
The policy shift defines the entire arc of post-Aries history. The transition from direct to indirect contact across the late Aries period, the Piscean-age withdrawal from operational visibility while the Christian and Islamic missions delivered the message in religious vocabulary, the long middle-Piscean period of indirect supervision while humanity developed its own scientific capacities — all of these are consequences of the discovery. The Aquarian-age return to direct contact through Vorilhon in 1973 is the close of the long indirect-contact phase: humanity has now reached the scientific maturity that the discovery required for inheritance to be considered, and the alliance has resumed direct contact at the threshold of the new age.
### The Piscean and Aquarian periods
The post-Aries operational arc — the Piscean-age missions of Jesus and Muhammad, the long middle-Piscean period of indirect supervision, the Aquarian-age opening with the 1973 Vorilhon contact — is the period of history the corpus treats most extensively in the dedicated chapter material. From the Elohim civilizational perspective, these two and a half millennia have been a period of careful, distant cultivation: the prophets sent at intervals appropriate to the cultural moment; the deliberate withdrawal from direct intervention to permit humanity's autonomous development; the supervision conducted from the alliance vessel stationed near Earth and from the home-world Council. The contemporary Aquarian period — coextensive with the Apocalypse, in the proper Greek sense of that term — is the period during which the framework's content becomes available to humanity for direct evaluation, and during which the conditions for the alliance's planned open return are being established. The relevant detailed treatments live in the [Age of Pisces](../timeline/age-of-pisces/), [Age of Aquarius](../timeline/age-of-aquarius/), [Apocalypse](../apocalypse/), and [Embassy](../embassy/) entries.
## Relationships to other civilizations
The Elohim civilization's relationships are structured by four distinct relational categories, each treated more fully in the dedicated entries it bears on.
### The Alliance
The Elohim civilization is, on the corpus's reading, the principal Earth-side actor within a broader cross-civilizational political body the corpus calls the **alliance**. The alliance is a structure that coordinates the activities of multiple advanced civilizations across cosmic distances, with shared procedures for biological-creation projects, shared technological infrastructure, and shared political authority for major decisions affecting multiple civilizations. The Elohim's role within the alliance is partly that of an executive operator — the civilization that conducted the Earth project on the alliance's behalf — and partly that of a member civilization with its own internal political life that operates alongside the broader alliance structure.
The exact membership and structure of the alliance is, on the corpus's reading, an open question. Whether the alliance includes only the Elohim and their immediate predecessors (the prior civilization that created the Elohim), or whether it extends across multiple parallel civilizations of comparable maturity, is not fully specified in the available source material. The corpus's working position is that the alliance is the broader structure of which the Elohim are the most operationally relevant Earth-side member, with the relationship between the Elohim and the broader alliance left open pending fuller specification. The dedicated treatment lives in the [Alliance](../the-alliance/) entry.
### Earth's humanity
The Elohim's relationship to Earth's humanity is the corpus's principal subject. The relationship is structured as that between a creator civilization and its synthesized creation, with the specific operational character of the relationship having shifted across the post-creation history through several distinct phases:
- **The creation phase** (Capricorn through Leo, c. 21,810 – 8,850 BCE): direct laboratory work, with humanity not yet existing as the relationship's counterparty.
- **The Eden phase** (late Leo through early Cancer, c. 11,400 – 10,000 BCE): direct teacher-student relationship between the Israel team and the first humans.
- **The post-Eden mediated phase** (Cancer through early Aries, c. 10,000 – 1,500 BCE): continuing teaching by the exiled Lucifer faction; periodic alliance visitation through Yahweh and other officers; the Antediluvian crisis and the Flood reset.
- **The patriarchal and Mosaic phase** (mid Taurus through Aries, c. 2,000 – 600 BCE): formal covenantal relationships established with selected human lineages (Abraham, the Hebrew people); sustained direct intervention through Moses and the wilderness operations.
- **The discovery-driven withdrawal phase** (late Aries through middle Pisces, c. 600 BCE – 1500 CE): policy shift to indirect contact; prophetic missions delivering content in religious vocabulary; supervision from operational distance.
- **The autonomous-development phase** (middle Pisces through 1946, c. 1500 – 1946 CE): essentially no direct contact; humanity permitted to develop scientific capacities on its own; the alliance observing without intervening.
- **The Aquarian re-engagement phase** (1946 onward): the resumption of direct contact through the Vorilhon mission; the Apocalypse as the period of disclosure; the conditional return at the embassy planned for the age's culmination.
The contemporary period is the early phase of the Aquarian re-engagement. The relationship's future shape — the Golden Age of full integration if humanity successfully completes the Aquarian transition, or a destructive failure mode if humanity's destructive capacities outrun its moral and political maturity — is undetermined and depends on the choices humanity makes across the present generation.
### Prior creator civilizations: the cosmic chain
The Elohim's relationship to the civilizations that created them is, on the corpus's reading, the framework's most expansive single claim. The discovery that the Elohim were themselves created, made during the Age of Aries, established the existence of at least one prior creator civilization and implies the existence of an indefinite chain extending backward through deep time. The Elohim civilization that created the Elohim is not described in the source material in any detail; its identity, location, and current status are not specified. What the source material affirms is that such a civilization existed, that it conducted on the Elohim's home world the same kind of work the Elohim conducted on Earth, and that the discovery of this fact transformed the Elohim's self-understanding as described in the History section above.
The structural implications of the cosmic chain extend beyond the Elohim's immediate predecessors. If each creator civilization was itself created by an earlier civilization, the chain extends backward indefinitely, with each link having the same general pattern (a civilization reaches scientific maturity, eventually creates new humanities on suitable worlds, watches them develop, and is eventually superseded as those humanities reach their own maturity). The corpus does not commit to an origin point for the chain; the question of the original creator civilization, or of whether the chain is genuinely infinite, is treated as belonging to a domain of cosmological inquiry the framework does not currently engage.
The dedicated treatment lives in the [Cosmic Chain](../cosmic-chain/) entry.
### Parallel humanities
The cosmic-chain discovery also implies the existence of parallel humanities — other Earth-like creations on other worlds, brought into being by the Elohim or by other civilizations within the broader pattern. The corpus calls the framework that organizes the relationship between Earth's humanity and these parallel humanities **cosmic competition**: each humanity is being evaluated, on its own development, against the standard required for inheritance — the standard that, when met, qualifies a humanity to become the next link in the chain of creation. The competition is real in the specific sense that the alliance is comparing the development of multiple humanities and that the first to reach the threshold becomes the inheritor. The competition is not adversarial in the sense of the parallel humanities being pitted against each other in conflict; each is evaluated on its own merits.
The number, location, and current developmental state of the parallel humanities are not specified in the source material. The framework affirms that they exist and that the cosmic-competition framework organizes Earth's situation within the broader pattern; the specific details of the parallel cases are treated as currently unknown to the corpus. The dedicated treatment lives in the [Cosmic Competition](../cosmic-competition/) entry.
## Current situation
The Elohim civilization is, on the corpus's adopted reading, in the early-to-middle period of the Aquarian age — the period the Greek New Testament calls *apokalypsis*, the unveiling, in which the framework's content becomes available to humanity for direct evaluation. The civilization's current operational posture toward Earth includes several specific features.
An alliance vessel is stationed permanently near Earth, carrying seven provincial representatives plus two crew, providing the operational platform from which contact and supervision are conducted. The resurrected prophets and other notable Earth figures (Jesus, Moses, Elijah, Buddha, Muhammad, and others) currently live on the home world in conditions of practical immortality, awaiting the planned open return to Earth. The alliance has requested that an embassy be constructed on Earth as the venue for that open return; the embassy project is a major contemporary development, treated more fully in its dedicated entry.
The return is conditional. The source material describes the alliance's planned return at the embassy's completion as conditional on humanity demonstrating the moral and political maturity that the Aquarian-age transition is testing. The successful outcome leads to the period the source material calls the Golden Age — a period of full integration between humanity and the alliance, in which the cumulative inheritance of the Elohim civilization becomes available to a humanity that has demonstrated itself worthy of receiving it. The failure-mode is the catastrophic alternative the popular Apocalypse tradition has projected onto the term: humanity destroying itself with the technologies it has developed before the integration can occur. The contemporary period is, on the corpus's reading, the period of decision; the outcome is undetermined.
## Comparative vocabulary
Different authors and traditions have proposed different anglicizations or translations for what they take to be the same referent or a closely related one. The table below summarizes; it is a comparative observation, not an assertion of strict identity across all rows.
| Term | Source language / tradition | Gloss | Used by |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elohim (אֱלֹהִים) | Hebrew | Powerful Ones / those from above | Hebrew Bible; corpus primary term |
| Anunnaki (𒀭𒀀𒉣𒈾) | Sumerian | those of princely seed; popularly *those who from heaven came to earth* | Sumerian cuneiform tradition; Sitchin and successors |
| El | West Semitic | the high god of the Canaanite pantheon; cognate root | Ugaritic and biblical sources |
| Celestials | Sendy's French | *les Célestes* — those who came from the sky | Sendy |
| Theosites | Sendy's French | inhabitants of *Theos* | Sendy (later works) |
| Sky People | English | beings from the sky | Wallis; broader literature |
| Powerful Ones | English | literal gloss of the Semitic root | Wallis |
| Lords from above | Italian / English | strict translation per Biglino | Biglino |
The corpus uses **Elohim** as its preferred term, since it is the term used in the Hebrew Bible and in the Raëlian source material that the corpus treats as primary. *Sky People*, *Powerful Ones*, and *Celestials* appear as legitimate English glosses; *Anunnaki* is used specifically in connection with the Sumerian material and is not treated as automatically interchangeable with *Elohim* without case-by-case argument. The relationship between the biblical Elohim and the deities of the Sumerian, Egyptian, Greek, Hindu, and other ancient pantheons remains a matter for case-by-case comparative analysis rather than blanket equivalence — a position that distinguishes the corpus from much of the popular ancient-astronaut literature in which all such figures are treated as identical.
## See also
- [Yahweh](../yahweh/)
- [Lucifer](../lucifer/)
- [Satan](../satan/)
- [Serpent](../serpent/)
- [The Alliance](../the-alliance/)
- [Council of the Eternals](../council-of-eternals/)
- [Planet of the Eternals](../planet-of-the-eternals/)
- [Tree of Life](../tree-of-life/)
- [Cosmic Chain](../cosmic-chain/)
- [Cosmic Competition](../cosmic-competition/)
- [Anunnaki](../anunnaki/)
- [Genesis](../genesis/)
- [Antediluvian](../antediluvian/)
- [Apocalypse](../apocalypse/)
- [Embassy](../embassy/)
- [Golden Age](../golden-age/)
- [Jean Sendy](../jean-sendy/)
- [Raël](../rael/)
- [*Message from the Designers*](../library/message-from-the-designers/)
## References
Vorilhon, Claude (Raël). *The Book Which Tells the Truth* (1974) and *Extraterrestrials Took Me to Their Planet* (1976), collected as *Message from the Designers* (Raëlian Foundation, current English edition).
Sendy, Jean. *La Lune, clé de la Bible*. Julliard, 1968.
Sendy, Jean. *Ces dieux qui firent le ciel et la terre*. Robert Laffont, 1969. English: *Those Gods Who Made Heaven and Earth*. Berkley, 1972.
Sendy, Jean. *L'Ère du Verseau*. Robert Laffont, 1970. English: *The Coming of the Gods*. Berkley, 1973.
Sendy, Jean. *Les cahiers de cours de Moïse*. Robert Laffont, 1974.
Biglino, Mauro. *Il Libro che cambierà per sempre le nostre idee sulla Bibbia*. Uno Editori, 2010. English: *The Book That Will Forever Change Our Ideas About the Bible*. Uno, 2013.
Biglino, Mauro, and Giorgio Cattaneo. *The Naked Bible: The Truth About the Most Famous Book in History*. Uno, 2022.
Wallis, Paul Anthony. *Escaping from Eden*. 6th Books, 2020.
Smith, Mark S. *The Early History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel*. Eerdmans, 2nd ed., 2002.
Cross, Frank Moore. *Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic*. Harvard University Press, 1973.
Bigliardi, Stefano. "A Gentleman's Joyous Esotericism: Jean Sendy's Reading of the Bible." *Journal of Religion in Europe*.
"Elohim." *Encyclopaedia Britannica*.
"Elohim." *Jewish Encyclopedia*.
"Names of God in Judaism." *Wikipedia*.